64
1 HDR Inc. August 8, 2012 Holland Board of Public Works Sustainable Return on Investment (SROI) Analysis Results Power for the 21 st Century

SROI Results

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SROI Results

1  

HDR Inc. August 8, 2012

Holland Board of Public Works

Sustainable Return on Investment (SROI) Analysis Results

Power for the 21st Century

Page 2: SROI Results

2  

Agenda

•  Introduction

•  Electric Generation Resource Options & Scenario Overview

•  SROI Overview

•  SROI Results

Page 3: SROI Results

3  

Holland Board of Public Works

Electric Generation Resource Options & Scenario Overview

James R. Connell P.E. Sr. Vice President Director of Power, HDR Engineering, Inc.

Power for the 21st Century

Page 4: SROI Results

4  

• New  Genera.on  Op.ons  Analysis a.   Conceptual  designs  of  electric  genera.on  op.ons b.   Calcula.on  of  thermodynamic  and  emissions  performance c.   Es.mated  Capital  and  Fixed  &  Variable  O&M  costs  d.   Inputs  to  Ventyx  Strategist  Model  e.   Defined  Electric  Resource  Scenarios  (CEP+)  

• Ventyx  Integrated  Resource  Planning  &  Produc.on  Cost  model    a.  HBPW  Electric  Load  Forecast    b.  Ventyx  Reference  Case  for  25  year  Energy  Cost  Forecasts      c.  Electric  Resource  Scenario  Strategist  Runs    d.  Sensi.vity  Runs  –  High/Low  Natural  Gas  Cost  Forecasts  

• HDR  Decision  Economics  Analysis a. Financial  Return  On  Investment  (FROI)    b.  Sustainable  Return  On  Investment  (SROI)

Work  Flow:  

Page 5: SROI Results

5  

James De Young Station

• Unit 3 Retired in all cases • Snowmelt system currently fed by U3/U4 •  46 MW Combined Capacity U4+U5 • No Capital Investment – Retire U4 &U5 by 2016 per the CEP • Invest $28M Air Pollution Control Equipment , U4 Retires 2027, U5 Retires 2033 (Base Case)

Page 6: SROI Results

6  

Renewable Generation Options

20MW Wind Farm 8MW Solar Photovoltaic

22MW Biomass Conversion JDY - U5

4MW Digester Gas CHP

Page 7: SROI Results

7  

New Solid Fueled Unit 10 at JDY

70 MW Capacity • 50% Petroleum Coke • 30% Biomass • 20% PRB Coal

Page 8: SROI Results

8  

Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle

2x1 LM2500 - 78MW 2x1 LM6000 – 114MW

Page 9: SROI Results

9  

Natural Gas Fired Combined Heat and Power (CHP)

LM2500 CHP – 30.5MW

Page 10: SROI Results

10  

Page 11: SROI Results

11  

Page 12: SROI Results

12  

Page 13: SROI Results

13  

Page 14: SROI Results

14  

Page 15: SROI Results

15  

Page 16: SROI Results

16  

Page 17: SROI Results

17  

Page 18: SROI Results

18  

Ventyx

Page 19: SROI Results

19  

Ventyx Dispatch Model •  HBPW engaged Ventyx to conduct operational modeling •  Ventyx’s model considers the available resources in

each scenario and forecasts how the resources would be dispatched based on economic variables internal and external to HBPW

•  The Ventyx forecasts feed directly into the SROI model

SROI Process for P21 Decision

Page 20: SROI Results

20  

Ventyx Dispatch Model •  Ventyx also provides forecasts of external energy

market conditions •  Some of these forecasts were also used directly in the

SROI model

SROI Process for P21 Decision

Page 21: SROI Results

21  

Questions?

Page 22: SROI Results

22  

SROI Overview

Dennis Bruce & Andrew Luison HDR Engineering Inc.

Page 23: SROI Results

23  

Traditional Business Case Analysis

SROI Overview

Life-­‐Cycle  Cost  Analysis  involves  the  analysis  of  the  costs  of  a  system  or  a  component  over  its  en6re  life  span  

Financial  Analysis  involves  evalua6on  of  cash  flow  impacts  to  determine  investment  suitability  

Tradi6onal  models  o>en  fall  short:  

  Only  consider  cash  impacts  

  Do  not  account  for  uncertainty    Lack  transparency  

Page 24: SROI Results

24  

What is SROI? Triple  Boaom  Line  Decision  Making  Framework  

It’s  best  prac6ce  in  Cost-­‐Benefit  Analysis  and  Financial  Analysis  over  a  project’s  en6re  life-­‐cycle,  augmented  by:  

 Accoun.ng  for  uncertainty  using  state-­‐of-­‐the-­‐art  risk  analysis  techniques   Engaging  stakeholders  directly  to  generate  consensus  and  transparency  

Page 25: SROI Results

25  

The Triple-Bottom Line Framework

SROI Overview

SROI  adds  to  tradi6onal  financial  analysis  the  mone6zed  value  of  non-­‐cash  benefits  and  externali6es  

Page 26: SROI Results

26  

SROI Methodology

SROI Overview

A  Four-­‐Step  Process  

“SROI reveals the hidden value in projects.” David Lewis, PhD

Former Principal Economist at the US Congressional Budget Office Author “Policy and Planning as a Public Choice: Mass Transit in the United States”

Page 27: SROI Results

27  

Today: End of Step 4

SROI Overview

Run  the  Model  and  Produce  Results  

Page 28: SROI Results

28  

S-Curve Diagram

SROI Overview

Page 29: SROI Results

29  

SROI Outcomes ($NPV): Changing Decision Making Processes

SROI Overview

Technology  X  Technology  Y  (Tech  X  plus  Renewable)  

Tradi.onal  (FROI)   $188   $126  

Environmental  and  Community  Impacts  

$234   $337  

Total  Impact  (SROI)   $422   $463  

•  “X” would be selected from a fiscal perspective •  “Y” is the best option on a balanced SROI basis

–  $62M investment, yields >$100 in environmental benefits

Page 30: SROI Results

30  

SROI Process for P21 Decision

Page 31: SROI Results

31  

SROI Process for P21 •  2 RAP sessions with stakeholders from HBPW, the

Holland community, and HDR – Potential project costs and benefits identified – Preliminary and refined values discussed

•  Additional research and interviews to refine assumptions and inputs

•  Several refinements of technology options and costing inputs

•  Development of SROI model •  Development of metrics and output reports •  Discussion of results (today) •  Impacts are incremental:

–  relative to the “base case” SROI Process for P21 Decision

Page 32: SROI Results

32  

Benefit & Cost Categories

Page 33: SROI Results

33  

Benefit and Cost Impacts •  A range of impacts were identified by stakeholder

group or “account”

•  Key stakeholder accounts: –  Holland BPW –  Electricity User –  Environmental –  Economy –  Community

•  Some impacts are transfers –  Quantified by account –  But cancel out in NPV calculation

SROI Process for P21 Decision

Page 34: SROI Results

34  Benefits & Cost Categories

Holland BPW Account

•  Capital, EPC, O&M, Fuel, and Fixed Costs

•  Retail Electricity Sales •  Interchange Purchases & Sales •  District Heating Costs &

Recovery •  Snowmelt Costs & Recovery •  Retired JDY Value •  Reduced Biosolids Treatment

Cost •  Capacity Purchases & Sales •  Renewable Energy Credit

Purchases & Sales •  Site Remediation Cost

Page 35: SROI Results

35  Benefits & Cost Categories

Electricity User Account

•  Savings Due to District Heating

•  Electricity Service Cost

Page 36: SROI Results

36  Benefits & Cost Categories

Environmental Account

•  Criteria Air Contaminant Emissions

•  Greenhouse Gas Emissions

•  Additional Emission Savings Due to District Heating

Page 37: SROI Results

37  Benefits & Cost Categories

Economic Activity Account

•  Business Relocation Benefit

•  Reduced Biomass Shipping Costs

Page 38: SROI Results

38  Benefits & Cost Categories

Community Account

•  General Fund Transfer from HBPW

•  Loss of Commercial Harbor Status

•  Social Value of Parkland

•  Landfilling of Tires

•  Retired James De Young Land Value

•  Snowmelt Service Cost

Page 39: SROI Results

39  

Results & Outcomes

Page 40: SROI Results

40  

High-Level Outcomes:

Results & Conclusions

•  All but one scenario provides a positive SROI relative to the base case

•  Impacts span all stakeholder accounts •  Two individual impacts dominate the overall results:

–  Value of electricity service cost reduction –  Value of emissions reductions

•  The 3 scenarios with natural gas (e.g., A, B, G) provide the highest SROI –  The largest benefit is reduced emissions –  Electricity cost reductions significant too (>$100M)

Page 41: SROI Results

41  

High-Level Outcomes (cont’d):

Results & Conclusions

•  The scenario providing the greatest incremental value (at the mean) from both an FROI and SROI perspective relative to the base case is Scenario G –  FROI ~$250M –  SROI ~$575M

•  Range from about $300M to $800M •  Range includes low, medium and high gas price

•  Scenario G: –  reduces both electricity costs and emissions –  Increases Holland’s competiveness –  Provides district heating and snowmelt benefits

Page 42: SROI Results

42  

Financial Return on Investment ($M)

Results & Conclusions

Page 43: SROI Results

43  

Non-Financial Return on Investment ($M)

Results & Conclusions

Page 44: SROI Results

44  

Sustainable Return on Investment ($M)

Results & Conclusions

Page 45: SROI Results

45  

Sustainable Return on Investment ($M)

Results & Conclusions

Page 46: SROI Results

46  

Contributions to NPV by Scenario

Results & Conclusions

Page 47: SROI Results

47  

Sustainable Return on Investment (SROI)

Results & Conclusions

Page 48: SROI Results

48  

Levelized Cost of Electricity

Results & Conclusions

Page 49: SROI Results

49  

Scenario Summaries

Page 50: SROI Results

50  

♦ JDY Units 4 and 5 continue to operate, each with a new bag house with DSI (for SO2 mitigation) and an SNCR system (for NOx mitigation)

♦ Circulating fluidized bed boiler and steam turbine facility beginning operation in 2017 and located at the existing JDY site

BASE CASE

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 51: SROI Results

51  

♦ All existing JDY units offline by 2016

♦ Gas turbine (LM2500) combined heat and power plant beginning operation in 2015 and located at or near the Industrial Park

♦ Gas turbine (LM2500) combined cycle facility beginning operation in 2015 and located at the existing JDY site

SCENARIO A

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 52: SROI Results

52  

SCENARIO A

Emission Savings

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions) Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Page 53: SROI Results

53  

♦ All existing JDY units offline by 2016 ♦ Gas turbine (LM2500) combined heat and power plant beginning operation in 2015 and located at or near the Industrial Park ♦ Gas turbine (LM2500) combined cycle facility beginning operation in 2015 and located at the existing JDY site ♦ JDY Unit 5 retrofitted to burn woody biomass in 2018 ♦ 8 MW of solar capacity beginning operation in 2030 ♦ 20 MW of wind capacity beginning operation in 2016 ♦ Digester gas combined heat and power plant beginning operation in 2014, and located at the existing JDY site or the wastewater treatment facility

SCENARIO B

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 54: SROI Results

54  

SCENARIO B

Emission Savings

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions) Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Page 55: SROI Results

55  

♦ All existing JDY units offline by 2016 ♦ Circulating fluidized bed boiler and steam turbine facility beginning operation in 2017 and located at the existing JDY site ♦ Gas turbine (LM2500) combined heat and power plant beginning operation in 2015 and located at or near the Industrial Park ♦ 8 MW of solar capacity beginning operation in 2030 ♦ 20 MW of wind capacity beginning operation in 2016

♦ Digester gas combined heat and power plant beginning operation in 2014, and located at the existing JDY site or the wastewater treatment facility in 2014

SCENARIO C

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 56: SROI Results

56  

SCENARIO C

Emission Savings

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions) Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Page 57: SROI Results

57  

♦ All existing JDY units offline by 2016

♦ Circulating fluidized bed boiler and steam turbine facility beginning operation in 2017 and located at the existing JDY site

♦ Gas turbine (LM2500) combined heat and power plant beginning operation in 2015 and located at or near the Industrial Park

SCENARIO D

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 58: SROI Results

58  

SCENARIO D

Emission Savings

Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions)

Page 59: SROI Results

59  

♦ JDY Units 4 and 5 continue to operate, each with a new bag house with DSI (for SO2 mitigation) and an SNCR system (for NOx mitigation) Y Units 4 and 5 continue to operate with new bag house, DSI system, and SNCR system

♦ Increased electricity demand satisfied by market purchases

SCENARIO E

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 60: SROI Results

60  

SCENARIO E

Emission Savings

Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions)

Page 61: SROI Results

61  

♦ All existing JDY units offline by 2016

♦ Increased electricity demand satisfied by market purchases

SCENARIO F

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 62: SROI Results

62  

SCENARIO F

Emission Savings

Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions)

Page 63: SROI Results

63  

♦ All existing JDY units offline by 2016

♦ Gas turbine (LM6000) combined cycle facility beginning operation in 2015 and located adjacent to the existing JDY site

SCENARIO G

Scenario Net Present Value

Firm Capacity Cost of Electricity

Page 64: SROI Results

64  

SCENARIO G

Emission Savings

Account SROI Net Present Value

Major Public Benefits

Emission Savings (% of Base Emissions)