Upload
upayin-arapacana
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/11/2019 Srinivas, Many Heads, Arms and Eyes. Origin,
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srinivas-many-heads-arms-and-eyes-origin 1/10
DO
RIS METH
SRINIV
S N
M
AN
Y
HE
AD
S
A
RM
S
A
ND
Y
S
Origin Meaning
Form
of Mul t
iplicity
in Ind
i
n
rt
RILL
8/11/2019 Srinivas, Many Heads, Arms and Eyes. Origin,
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srinivas-many-heads-arms-and-eyes-origin 2/10
• F
Publication of this book has
been
aided
by
a grant from the Millard Meiss Publication Fund of the
College Art Association
CoY<:r illustration: Parel (Bombay-Mabarashtra} Siva Sadasivamurti, 6th century. Deccan trap
(Plaster of
Paris
copy}, Bombay, Prince of Wales Museum,
90.
Courtesy of the American lnstilllte
of Indian Stuclies.
This
book
is
printed
on
acid-free
paper
.
Lllwvy olCoav- C a ~ P a h U . - i o a
ata
Srini•Jasan
Dori
s
Many head<,
anm, and <) CS
: origin, meaning·,
and
fonn
of
multiplicity in
Indian art
I
by Doris Meth
Srinivasan
.
p. cm. - (Studies in A<ian an and IU Char.ology. JSSN 138().782X ;
Y,
20)
ln
c:ludcs bibliographical n:fem>ces and index.
ISBN 9004107S84 (cloth :
a1k.
paper)
I. Arts,
lndi
c-
Thcme<, motive
.
2.
Cods, Hindu, in an.
S.
Cods,
Hindu,
in
lit
.erature.
I.
Tide.
11.
Series
.
~ 3
77
vol. 20
[NX576.AI)
700
.9M-DCc21 97-
11187
CIP
Sriaiw. ..
D..U Meclu
Many bead.,
and
eyes : origin, meaning and fonn of mulri.plicity
in
IDdian
an I by Doru Mcth
Srinivasan.
- Lciden ; New
Yor
k ; KOln : Brill, 1997
(St
udios;, Aaian aot
and
archaoeolol)
;
Vol. 20)
ISBN
9G-04-107)8-4
Ocwcbc
JSSN 1380·782X
ISBN 90 04 I
0758
4
~ 199
7
bJ K..UoklijU
Brill,
Uidnt,
Tilt X<IM/mJJ
Alln .1ts
rnmxJ.
JV•
fJMI
f{ itis
pwblialtiM
"" ' IJ< rffJ<cdMud,
trfliiSiakd, stortr/ in
a rdrialal
)'S""'-
'
trlliUJitiJk.d
U. tufJf . ' bJ "' 1 ... ell<tr..U..
- altW/, rtumli"'l
or
ollttru:ist, u.11N>ul
pri"'
wriltm
j>mlti<•iMt fotm t
/lfJ Iulttr
.
A u ~ . J I«JJ/1.l
ilmu.for
-'/
1<
J>m-l
..,. is
r.rllllkd
'
8riiJ ,,,. .
;JtrJ
1 JJJJ
t
j t t J
illii dirtd J 14 17ot
C. Jng/11
a--·""""· 22 R.s ...t Drit•, tilt
910
Dtvt11trs
MA 01923,
USA
.
F«S.,.,
svbj«<
w
l lliNTF.D OIF.
NF.
I tif.RI.ANUS
Matena1
pro g do por derechos de at..tr
8/11/2019 Srinivas, Many Heads, Arms and Eyes. Origin,
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srinivas-many-heads-arms-and-eyes-origin 3/10
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments
IX
Abbreviations
X I
PART I:
Mtmi w Textual Studks
Se,crion A lntmdncrion
Chapt
er One:
Th
eory ... ............................................................................... ....... .... 3
Sr-ction B. Basic Prlinjrions in the SawhiW
Chapter Two: The
Rig
Ve
da
Defines the Multiplicity Convention .................. 24
Chapter
Three:
Th
e AthaiVa Veda Su'tains and Expand the Definiri
olliS
...... 33
Chapter
Four. So Does the Yajur Vcda ............... ............................................... 41
Chapter Five: Theo ry Con' t: Vedic Rudra-Siva .................................................. 47
Section C Transference of the
Punap
Ideal into rbr
n m a ~ ~ a
Chapter
Six:
From
Puru$ 1 to Praj pati ...... . .. ................. .. ... .. ..... ...... ............. 60
Chapter
Seven: Rudra and
Vimu arc
Linked to Puru.a-
Pra
j lpati ....... ............ 76
Section
D
Multiplicity in the Upanif d s
Cha
ter
F i t: The Fullness of Brahman .................................................•.......... 83
Chapter
Nine: Body
of God in
the veWva ara Upanisa<f .... ................. .......... 96
Chapter
Ten: Munis
and
the MallanaraY3 )a Upanisad ............................ ........ 2
Section
E.
Multiplicity
in
the Epics
and
Beyond
Chapter Eleven: The Bridge from Words to Forms: Mul tiplicity in the
Epics and Selected Devotional Texts ................................................................ 29
Chapt
er Twelve:
Th
e Language
of
Numbers ......................... .............................
62
PART l l:
Form
lcunogr@ ludUs
Socrion F The Prehistoric Period
Chapter
Thirteen: Does the Multiplicity Convention Begin in the Indus
Civilization? .. . .. .. . 9
Chapter
Fourtecn: Ritual
as
Icon ...... .. ....... ........... . .... . ............ ...... .. . ............ 1
85
octjoa G The Pre-Ku53 )a Period
Chapter F"tftecn: Maba Yakp:
Image of
an Apparition ..................... ................
197
Chapter Sixteen:
In Praise
of
He
roes (Vnl}i Vlras) ...........................................
211
Chapter
Seventeen: Religious Netw
orlcs
and
Incipient
Saiva
Forms ..................
221
Se.:rion H
The
K n ~ Q a
Period
Cha ter
F i
htcen: Multi lici and the Me er Towards Vai avism .............. 240
aiva Multiplicity:
Th
e Germ ination of God .............. ......... 260
M r
al
pro
1do
por d
10S
d
ll
8/11/2019 Srinivas, Many Heads, Arms and Eyes. Origin,
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srinivas-many-heads-arms-and-eyes-origin 4/10
CHAYfER FifTEEN
MAHA
Y AKl>A:
IMAGE OF AN APPARITION
The
cosmic form$ constinl c the
vairui Ja,
the manifold appearance
of
the deity. £acb
of
thcrn in its strict definition is an apparition, a yakrha
merely name and fo
iTrl
without real subsmnce.
V.S. Agrawala "VisvakaiTOa"
A
·n1cre
is
something
of
a
Y
a in the two earliest
vai/lraoo
sculptures showing cosmic
fonn.s of the deity. The first, a four-sided upright poruaying the u a i l r m ~ a catuTfl) iiha notion
depicts twO
of
the emanations, or, I )ID w in anthropomorphic forms (Pis. 15.1 2). T hey
arc t.all, pot-bellied males
and on
tha.t account they recall the earliest Malta
~
(
i.
e.
the colossal yak4a forms). These affinities influenced their initial identification. N .P. Joshi
idcnl ified the upright from Bhfta as a fourfold Y a image of c. the second century
B.C.' The
four-armed
vai,rrtaua
image from Malhar, Madhya Pradesh (PI. 14.
1),
reminds
of
a
~
for a different reason. It calls attention to a connection between Vrra and
Y ~ . With his sword suspended from the left hip all the way down nearly to the
a
nk
les
(PI. 15.3),
he conveys
m a l e n e s s ~ ,
especially
an
heroic male" (vf
ra
).
The Malhar
image
is big (c
.
5' 2 ) and
is
readily comparable with a Sunga over-life
size
torso having
a similar sword
also
on the left hip (PI.
16 10
11
).
This torso, which would have been
originally part of a large male figure, comes from the village of Biriivai (Skt. vrra); its
name
indicates that
at
one time that locality in Rajasthan paid
honor
to a hero-god.
Four miles from the Brravai image, in Noh, Rajastban, a statue still under worship as
'jakkba (Skt. Ya4a) B11b3 was discovered.' Again, it is a massive Swiga Y ~ a found
on
the bank of a tank
(PI.
15.4). On the basis
of
girth alone, which at the shoulden [mclu
sive of
both
arms) is seven feet across, the Noh Yak4a stands as a large (or mahii a ~
Maha could well be applied also 10 the Bir11vai
and
M
alhar
statues,
but pe
rhaps in
their cases, maha Vrra would
be
more suitable. Actually, the name
Maha vtra
was given
10 th
e foremost
of
~ a s . Possibly both the Brravai torso and the Malhar figure repre
sent a Vrra, a great
or
foremost Yak '3, the laucr figure incorporating these qualities
within some
so
rt of
vai$11ava
context. The special connection believed to
exist
in ancient
times between Vrras and Y
is
evident still in modem times. V.S. Agrawala observed
' N.P. joohi, "Some Unnoticed ~ i n h of Iconographic lnten:st",
East
aMI
at
(Rome), Vol. 22, N
os.
1- 2,
1972,
41
- 43.
' R.C. 8r•wal•, Y.q.
Tol'liO
fi"m Bharaq>ur Region", J.,ma/ o/ tlot Orinti41 111Jtillill, Vol. 17 , 1967,
64-65
.
' Cf. V.S.
Agrawala, lllrMrt /Niiolo Folk Odu,
Var.masi, 1970,
p.
186.
Mater
al
p
oteg1do
por d r chos d a to
8/11/2019 Srinivas, Many Heads, Arms and Eyes. Origin,
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srinivas-many-heads-arms-and-eyes-origin 5/10
198
that
on
his campus at Banaras Hindu University there are "to-day four Yaksha shrines
under t11e
name
of 'Brr'
[i.e.
VTr) receiving religious homage even now".' His many
ot11er fmthand acco
unu leave
little doubt
as
to t11e prevalence
of
Y worship in modem
times under the name of B
im
and Bamhm (i.e. Bmhmli} worship.• Names of some of
the Brr-Barnhm godlings show that epithets indicative of ~ u r u o r and "senior"
are
prefixed
to
Yalcl a nam
es, and it should have been the same in ancient times. n fuct, V.S. Agrawala
surmises that when the
Jain
Savior, Vardhamlina, became famous, he received the hon
orific "Mah lvfra" (i.e. senior VTra, that
is,
f o r e ~ n o s t Yak(l<l).
6
It seems equally
po
ssible
that the four-armed Malhl r figure commemorates a famous or senior Vtra. Combining
vaiP,IIWO attributes ith VTra and ~ features, the Malhar figure could be a va# taiiQ
Maha
Vim.
'The Noh
~
along \\ith several other early Yalqas, assumes a particular shape
which tells a lot about the nature of
Y ~
a matter of prime imponance
i
we are
ultimately to understand what their features may mean
when
incorporated into the car·
licst v a ~ O I I Q multiplicity imagery. The overall impression
of
the Noh
a k ~
is one
of
massiveness. Tllis impression is achieved by height (the visible height is c. 5'} and an
unrelenting series of
O'Pansive
forms.
The
entire Y
is
composed
of
rounded volumes.
11te head
is
large and round. Viewed from the back, the neck
is
as broad as t11e bead
(PI. 15.5). Tite shoulders and the remttining parts of th e arms and legs appear like in·
Aated tubes. Foremost of all the swollen forms
is
the middle, further accentuated
by rwo piece. of cloth. One is a looped sash which circles the upper part of the ~
belly; the other i.s a sash holding up the dhoti and emphasizing the lowermost part of the
convex hulk.
There is
no need to indicate all the details of this oR described Yak.,a
.
Suffice it to note that all such details are subordinated to the s
heer
vo.lumc of the image.
The Nob ~ is of course very similar to an even more well-known image, the Parkham
~ which has been aruibuted to c. the first ceotury B.C.
{PI. 15.6)
.'
Tills
is a
figure
over 8' in height coming from the village of Parkham, which
is
situated ne
ar
to Mathurll,
as
is
also Nob.
When
found, the figure received worship under the name ':Jakhaiya"
(ultimately derived from Skt.
"yalcl a"
).
1
The word ~
is
not mentioned in the in
scription around the feet
of
the image.
Th
e inscription does state that the image
of
the
Holy
One
was caused
to
be made by the members
of
the M
lnibhada
(i.e.
M ~ b h a d r t
co
ngregation.
On
that account, it
is
surmised that the image represents Yaqa Miil;libhadra,
whose connection with ''vfra" worship (In present Bengal) may have
bc:gtm
in antiquity.'
Two otJ1er Y ~ are associat.
ed
\\id1 Mfil;libbadra; one is from the region of
Kauiambr
and one is from Pawaya (ancient Padmiivau1. These figures confirm the impression con·
' Folk OdU, p.
1
85
.
' See V.$ .
Agrawala, Folk
Cldts, pp. 185-191;
C£ M. Clundra,
Some Aspec:ts of Vaqa
Cult in
AJ>c
lcm
India
,
l+iou
q
W.Ju &Jkho,
No. 3, 1954,
6Hi2
.
• FoiJ;
c
its
PP· 166; 1aa.
'
Sec
Gritli
v. Mitt<JWO Incr, "Yak$as of MothurA"
in
Maflrotrl: Th C.ltUTa/ Hmlllf.<, gen. cd
. D.M.
Sriniv:uan, New Delhi, 1989 ,
Jl >· 368 t
O.C. Sircar,
IKt l ~ t ~ t r i { l i < l r u
I,
p.
93.
1
Sec
V.S. Agntwala, F.lk Cldts, p. 167.
• See V.S. Agmwal•'s fmdings p"'oented in R.N. Misra,
Ya.tsita c.JJ
IWi l t ' 'f J'J/rJ, New
Delhi
1981,
p. 85.
llllatenal protog1do por d rccro > do
8/11/2019 Srinivas, Many Heads, Arms and Eyes. Origin,
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srinivas-many-heads-arms-and-eyes-origin 6/10
MAltA VAJ<V.: IMAOE OF AN APPARITION 199
veycd by the partial figure
of
the Noh Ya4a, namely that a huge body and swelling
forms, in particular
an
expanded middle, are the primary traits
of
early free-standing
Y a s . The entire torso
of
the Parkham Ya4a expands as a un.it. The surface is taut.
Volumes defining the neck, shoulders
and
chest sweU
and
lock into each
other
abruptly.
The neck is so wide that it articulates more as a passageway than a pan
of
a body. The
face whose features are now defaced, does not seem to have had a fierce expression.
The
belly
is
again set
off
by a looped sash
on
top
and
a right sash
on
the bottom. Conspicu
ous, it dominates the body's contours.
It
is easy to see why a
Y ~ l
with
t hi.s
feature
should be Jabeled a
kumbhodara
yalqa (i.e. a
y ~ l
whose beUy is like a water pot). Four
miles from Parkham comes a fragment ofa male, worshipped under the name of
:J
alcheya",
who surpasses in size the Parkham Ya4a. This is the upper pan of the Y ~ from
Baro<la in Mathurii District.'
0
When complete the image should have reached over twelve
feet in height. It shows the same fullness of forms as the Parkham and Noh Y ~ it has
the unusually br
oad
neck, inflated chest
and
shoulders
and
the looped sash marking the
upper
part of the large abdomen. Mention of these few early free-standing ~ will
suffice since the aint is neither to rcitermc surveys
of
the various types (which would need
to include the demonic fonm, the caryatids, seated as well as standing types, plus the
female counterparts), nor to present an historical sequence (which would need
to
concen
trate on stylistic considerations, in the main). inquiry into Mahii Y ~ s essential fea
tures
and
what they disclose about the nature
of
this Ya4a is the aim here. ·nte size of
the figures and the absence of the flywhisk indicate that these large Y are
not
aucnd
ant figures, but major cult images.
Ind
e
ed
on the
Y ~ a
from Dcoriya {about one
km.
from Bhita) attributes are present which bespeak of high status.
1
t The Dcoriya colossus
is adorned with a turban and a large protective umbrella, both insignia of the highest
cultic status. All these colossi (plus the Palwal
Y ~
the two Pama Y ~ the Haigunda
Yak$a, the Vidisa, Pratapgarh
and
Sopara Ya4as
to
mention the o ther impor tant free
standing colossi) express an astowtding sense
of
physical energy, in spite
of
the archaic
stilfucss
of
the limbs
and
their abrupt articulation. A sense
of
energy
is
due
lO
the pal
pab
le fullness that inform.s every bodily •cavity, especially the beUy. An essential feature
of
these
ear
ly free-standing Yak,as the locked-in sense of fullness, a characteristic which
continues even in later ages. An cxccUent example
of
a Kumbhodara Ya4a dating to the
si
.xth/scventh century A.D. comes from Nort11 India, probably Bih.ar (Pl 15.7).'' The
rotund, seated Y ~ 1 holds a knotted mace (gat/4), in both his hands which are placed
on
his knees.
He
spreads his legs far apart to
make
room for a
bcUy of
truly globular pro
portions. Its girth is circled by a thick sash whose ends are tied into a bow. Below the
V.S. Agrawola, «Pn:-Kushll(la
n
or Matlwr.l ,
J .U.
.H .
S. Vol.
6, 193
3,
see
95 and Fig. 9.
F
or
n:cmt
worb
providing a bibliography
on
these
matten
,
tee
N.P
.
Jwhi
,
Unnoticed
Find• , 42,
ap
.
fn.
2; v. Minen..-allner, 'Yak:ps .
A.
K.
Coomanuwamy, The Origin
or the
Buddha Image ,
Art
Holklin
Vol
. 9, 1927;
Hs 47
.
l t is
reproduced in ll<iimt
Arrhtli Jiogy
1973
74
A
1/aMrc,
Plate X:XXU; tbc
other
yaJqas
arc
fr<qucndy
published, - for ' plc tbc publication J11Cllliooed in rn. l0.
R.C. Agrnwoln , More Sculptures Tom
the
National MuJeum, New O.:lbi ,
&.rt
Wut (Rome
),
N.S.
Vol. 20, No. 3, 1970, 351ft
v1
n prot gtdo por d c ~ o a
JLJIOI
8/11/2019 Srinivas, Many Heads, Arms and Eyes. Origin,
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srinivas-many-heads-arms-and-eyes-origin 7/10
200 CllAPTER PIITEI N
navel it
is
possible
to
catch a gfunpse
of
the lower sash straining to get
arou
nd the
bottom
of the
be
ay.
Depictions of painted Kumbhodara
~ ~ a s and
the "male" vessels already described
reveal that th.e belly is not merely inspired by the shape
of
a
vessel.
t
is
meant to
represent a
vessel
kumhha, gluJ a etc.), or vice VCJlll. ln
the
aforementioned "male" vessels
from Sonkh PI. 14.9), Bhflll PI. 14. 10), Taxila PI. 14.
11
), Purana Qila (PI. 14.12) and
Mathurll (Pis. I4.I3 14), the vessel equates with the body which is effectively reduced
to the belly. Two painted Kumbhodara
~
also have bodies which assume t11e fea
tures of vessels.
The
Y have been found painted
on
rocks in the region of central
India. They arc oontcmporaneous with the "male" anthropomorphic pots and the major
ity of the stone colossi just reviewed. The first Kumbhodara Y ~ a comes from t11e
Bhonr.twali hill (Cave Jl A- 5) in the Bhinlbetka region
(Raisen
Dist., Madhya Pradesh).
Dr. Mathpal, who has studied Biumbetka rock paintings in detail, assigns the figure to
the Early Historic Period and states in his communication that it is some 2200 years
before the present. That means that a Mauryan dating has been given to the
figure
whose head
is
formed by a rectangle outlined with a double line (see PI. 15.8 which
represents a drawing
of
the figure
in
the Cave).
Th
e head rests directly on the mouth
of
the vessel, whose rim turns outward. The vessel is the 'body of the Y ~ At its widest
part, a ribbon cuts across, reminding of the
sash
that circles the upper part of the belly
on the sculptured and larger counterparts. In the painted versions,
tl1e
1ibbon extends
beyond the body in a manner indicative of outstretched arms. Two dissimilar
stallS
are
held
in
each
of me hands.
The ~ legs are splayed open
and
are rendered in a
series of short, unc01wected brush strokes.
The
Bhinlbetka Y ~ bas a benign expres
sion on
his
face,
and
is in a field witl1 auspicious symbols such as a bird, the svastika, the
railing, the moon
or
mountain symbol
and
a hollow cross. t therefore
is
likely that this
~
too is an auspicious representation. Nearly identical to this ~ is another
Kumbbodara ~ from Binaikli near Bharkhera (M.P.). K.D. Bajpai places the fJgure,
painted in red ochre, between
t11e
second century B.C.
and
the second century A.D.
PI.
15.9; sketch is on PI. 15.10).
16
This ~ (ht. 6"), has both a fiercer expression and hair
which grows upward
like
two pliant stalks. Again the head rests on the mouth
of
the
open vessel; it
is
almost as if the
vessel
is brimming with vegetation which is converted
into hair. Here too the girth of the
Y ~ s
body is punctuated with a ribbon. These
paintings which show the body/vessel marked with the ribbon are just a step away,
visually, from the
clotl1,
draped and kuoued, over the Pfll' la gha a ( filled container")
as depicted in t:.vly lndian art
PI. 15
. I 1). Such decorated vessels probably n:Rect the
appearance of ritual vessels in certain worshipful contexts. Al-George and R ~ u connect
" Penonal communication from Or. Yashodhar Matbpal, dated
April
4,
t989. Dating
of
this
''Yalqa"
f t g ~ t r e is
on the buis
.
of
auperimrJO<Iition•
of painted la>"" •• Bbimbctlta •nd dtc scientific analyses of the
c:omponenu
of
each
l&)'tr; personal c:omrnunication
from Or.
Mathpal dated June
6, 1989. I
am chankfulco
Or. Mathpal for his ~
a n a t i o n s
of
tl1e
work
ao Rbimbctlca
.
Sec also
Robcrt R.R. Rroolc.o and
Vi hn
u S.
Wakanlou,
SIJJR
Age Pamlifw in lndin, New Hava1
and
London, 1
97
·6,
p.
57
and p-
98.
11
Jnfonnarlon in a p c r O I I I ~
communication,
dated
July
16,
197
9. Prof. Bajp:u kindly
s
uppliod mr. ,.;,h
this photograph and
ske
tch.
M at roal pro
gKlo
por d cchos
o
Jior
8/11/2019 Srinivas, Many Heads, Arms and Eyes. Origin,
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srinivas-many-heads-arms-and-eyes-origin 8/10
MAHA A i q ~ A : IMAGE OF
AN APPARrriON
201
such images of the draped purrr
glraJa
10 riJUals wherein the vessels "en tant que support
du ctivin ou des reliques du mort'' are addressed." They also point out that the vessel's
sash is imbued with precise symbolism pertaining to both the cosmic and the theological
level . For example, the vessel in the Agnicayana, the uldJII, is presented with a girdle
ramii
) that represents, according to the Satapatha BriihmaQa passage accompanying the
gesture, the celestial regions (SB Vl.5.2.11), as
well
as the girdle of Adiri (SB Vl.5.2.13).
Since Aditi is
th
e embodiment
of
motherhood and generation in the
S31]1tilltlls,
11
the
girdle which highlights her loins must be equally charged with procreative energy or
gencrntivc powen. The
uJdJ
itself also correspond to cosmic,
celestial
and ritualistic entities.
The three parts of the
uidJII
(pl
us
the wholc),'
0
in SB
Vl.5.2.3-6, correspond to four
different sets of gods, parts of the universe and Vedic meters. The uidJII in the Apastamba
SrautasOtr.t (
c.
500 B.C.), receives not only a girdle, whicb seems to be an elevated strip
of clay, fashioned during
its
preparation, it
also
sho
uld
have two, four, six or ciglht breasts/
udders (i.e. elevations; swna-
XVI.5.2).
The Baudhayana SrautasOtra
(X.5;
T aittirfya
Recension) also specifies that an upper girdle and breasts/udders Jtana-) should. be carved
on the ukltli
to
be used in tJ1c Agnicayana.
21
In tJ1e Pravargya rite, tJ1e Mahlivfra
pot
is
also fitted with an upper girdle rlisn
li}
during the course of its preparation,zz and it is
given "elevations" uddhi-).
n
It is clear tbat the Ukha and the Mahavfrn vessels a.re out
fitted, mainly during the
pr
epararional stages, with a girdle and female decorations
having cosmic and procreative import." In addition, a conceptual connection may have
been. eventually forged between "the vessel" and "the place of birth". A word such as
yoni develops tJ1e
speciali7.ed
secondary me.aning of "womb-chamber", from the p1imary
meaning "place of issue, receptacle, abode or place" (especially on or before the ritual
a l t a r ~ Several Upani$lld ' usage ofyoni reflects the secondary meaning; yoni as "source"
in
tJ>
c Svet.Uvatara
U p a n i ~ a d
(1.9), implies "a pregnant cavity"; in the Brbadarat)yaka
(1.4
.1
1)
and MahanariiyaQa (vs.
535)
U p a n ~ d stipulates the Brnhman-Womb, birth
place
of
creation. The result
is
that a symbolic connection between "vessel" and "place
of
birth" can
be
made for the time
of
the
sOtr.lll.
The
po
ssi
bility
is
strong
that
ritual
vessels mentioned in the siltras were understood as life-symbols, having possible
cos
mic
" S. AI-George et A ROJu, "l'lln)a Gha a et Le S)'mbolisme du V:w: dans L' lnde
" ,
Lll ll
Tome
IV ,
1 957
, 243ft:; 251.
" In tloc
Rig
Veda, Aditi
is
allied
with
Vilk, Sacred Speech, another
female
crelltive principle. Aditi/Viik
i incorporaled into
OO<onOf O
nic tpeeulations
which posit
her as a cream . principle. Sec eopccially RV
10
.
72
.
31t
where she is called Uttil.napad (She whose legs .are
spread [m
parturition]).
•• On the addi ti
on
of " I" Jignifying "the whole" to
1h
e sum of the p:uu, sec Ch•ptcr 6,
1 1'-
71- 72.
10
C .G. Kashikar, " l'onuy
in
the Vedic Literature", lntlUlnJ1111n141 of/Ju History of imt<, Vol 4, 1969, 21.
' '
Knshikar
uP
ot
c
c:ry , Hr20
"' Ka.ltikur, "l'ouery",
J (H7
, using the llaudbi
ya
na $rautuutm (IX 1 ).
" .J
.A.B
. van
Duiten
cn,
Tlu
l rllfNlllla, Poona, 19f.S, p .
10
.
" lo
•bould
be
noted
tbat
except for
deoails
on the
preparation
of
tlt...
two
vessels,
we
h:.
ve
very
little
additional
infonnation in U\ C Vcdic texm on
the
preparotion or
Vedic
pottery; Kuhilw, " Pot·tery", 2•
1.
" See
L Renou,
p r i o o
premiere du mot sanskrit y6ni",
BSL
4 1:1, 1940, pp. 18, 20.
The
idea hat
• rea:p1ade ;., a womb-<:hamber promotes the
Mahlbhllr.u
a binh-story of ~ i Aga1tya
who
is born imide a
poL This """""' bim to
be
called Kumbhajannw.t, Kumbhayoni, Kumbhas311tbhava, Gha odbhava etc.; see
17oe
MaMM6raJJJ
trarul.
and
cd. by J .A.B. van
e n e n
Boob 2 and 3, ChiCAgo, p. 187. In the KaUfRW
Bmhrn:tlJll
(VI.I -9),
R
udra
is born from a golden bowl.
tJ.atertal p otegtdo por derechos de aL.tor
8/11/2019 Srinivas, Many Heads, Arms and Eyes. Origin,
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srinivas-many-heads-arms-and-eyes-origin 9/10
202 CHAPTF.R FIPTF.I?.N
implications. (l'he Mahavira, for example, represents
the
sun in the ritual whose inten
tion is to reinforce the power of the sun.)
26
The symbolism attributed to the ritual vcsseb
should
be
likewise attributed to the
fiiirpa
glrn/n
which is always encircled
by
a girdle in
the ar tY By extension, the correspondence between a fiilled vessel and a filled womb is
retained when the hypostatic
parrta
g raJa is fitted wtto the body of the Y as his
swollen belly. Like the craftmen when they fashioned a
Y a ~
swollen
be
lly , the ancient
ritualists did not shy away from ascribing female procreative attributes to the male. The
Mahavtra vessel makes this point implicit. H ere is a vessel called the large man or the
gTCat hero , therefore obviously a male' ' vessel, which :is adorned with elevations and
a girdle , symbols of fecundity taken from the female realm. The Pravargya is an iconic
ritual
and
it may
have, on that account, helped prepare for the acceptance
of an
i
co
nog
raphy which associates the male's pot-belly with the female's pregnant womb.
There arc numer•ous examples which demonstrate
that
the belly of a god, godling or
goddess, is id
eo
logically connected to the fliirrta
glra a
and represents the filled womb
chamber. Depicted on railing pillars and
on
temple doors
are
small
Y ~
from whose
bellies forms of life proceed. A lower fragme
nt
of a Bharbut r.tilpost now in
th
e Allahabad
Mu
seum de
pi
cts a small, seat
ed
YaJcsa
on either s
id
e.
On
one side vegetal forms, includ
ing a lotus still intact, stream from his distended navel (PI .
15.12). On
the
other
side
similar
foJTnS stream from his mouth (PI. 15.13). Be it navel or mouth, plant life
can
arise
from tl1e Ynk a because his body, mainly composed of his belly
=
vcssel
=
womb) is
fecund. For the same reason, squatting, full-bellied Yalqas on either side of a railing
pillar from Siiiichr Stiipa II unfurl from their navels flowers, buds and leaves over the
upper
portion of a pillar .. A sev
en
hundred ye
ar
interim has neither affected the basic
iconography
nor au
spiciousness of tlt
c
plant-bearing Yalqa found, in a la ter example, on
a doorframe from the temple at
Bhumara
(M.P.) of the fifth century A.D.
(PI.
15.14}.
With all these examples, as with the painted Kwnbhodara Y ~ the limbs
are
not as
important as the middle of the body which emphasizes the fruitful womb.
Y ~
on
th
e lowest arcltitrave of the so
uth torana
of
Sanchi
Stiipa I exhibits a splendid variation
(Pl. 15.15; sketch from A.K. Goomara swamy, Ya/rfas on
PI.
15.16). Walking on infantile
legs, the bloated belly of the
~
sprours plant forms both from the navel and r.he
moutlt. Two Bharrbut railing medallions, while also recognizing the symbolic inte.rchange
ahility of these two orifices, confirm that in all these cases the image is that of the par
turient Y ~ .
In
the first medallion the foliage issues from the navel (Pl. 15.1 7}; in the
second
it
comes from the mouth (Pl.
15.18). ln
both medallions the Y body
is
clodt
ed
and poised in a similar, and telling, manne r. Nude
but
for a
co
vering over the
genitals, the Yah,a sirs on the bottom of the medallion; his thighs and knees
are
stretched
wide open and his feet a.re tensed on the lower
rim
of
the
medallion.
Th
e posture is the
mmc as that of the Birth-Giving Goddess (PI.
15
.
19
),
co
nfirming that
tl1es
e
ar
c birth·
, . van
Bui
tenen, 7Ttt
~ ~ D r ~ I f U J >
p. 31.
A.K. Cooonaraswamy,
r..q.
Part D, Reprint, New Delhi, 197 1, pp. 61 - 64.
, . A.K. Coomararwamy, r.q.
Part
0 , Reprint, New Delhi, 1971, PI. 14,
No . I
M at
rral
pro grao por d cchos oc Jior
8/11/2019 Srinivas, Many Heads, Arms and Eyes. Origin,
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/srinivas-many-heads-arms-and-eyes-origin 10/10
M H Y A K ~ IMAGE
OF
AN
APPAJUTION
203
giving Yalqas
who
bring forth vegetation.
The ea
rliest images
of
the Birth-Giving God
dess a.re minimally anthropomorphic, there being
no
head, no arms and
no
breasts.
29
TI1e emphasis is always on a recumbent female having tensely splayed legs
and
a middle
in the shape of a pot.
30
What is more, me pot
is
provided wim a girdle that
is
not unlike
the decorated band adorning the pur(Ul gha(4 seen in contemporary art
(cf.
me Amaravati
relief of a Pil.rQaghata, PI.
XVIll,
in Barrctt
31
and the recumbent figure from Kondapur,
No. 8 in
C.
Bolon,
Cauri).
This
is
n
ot
an
isolated case; there
are
many examples
of
a cloth around the shoulders of the pilrrra g/la/4 and around the girth
of
the body
of
the
pot-like Mother Goddess.
A curious set of sexual reversals musl be quickly registered. The Birth-Giving Goddess,
being without a swoll
en middle, shows no indication
of
pregnancy. She appears to be a
metaphor for creativity.
The
counterpart to the Yalqa, namely the
~
is almost never
portrayed
as
pregnant in the early
an.n
The Yalqa
is. Be
he represented as a colossus
or
a small ancillary godling, the male form expresses fullness; especially his belly symbol
izes the fruitful womb. There can be little
doubt
that the male Y re
pr
esents, on the
most general level, a being 6lled with an animating energy.
That
energy can
be
thought
of
as
a creative force
and
result in the depictions
of
the plant-sprouting
~
That
energy can be visualized as strength of body and mind
and
result
in
depictions
of
Viras.
In each case, the wellspring, conceptually and plastically, is the Large
~ the
colossus
whose entire body, but especially the middle, seems to be filled with animating energy.
Here is
a case where the Male
is
the Plenum and the Female is not. Why? Is it because
these Y a k ~ a s are sti
ll
under the influence of antiquity's important and impressive Male
Projenitor,
P u r u ~ a - P r a j a p a t i ?
B
In singling
out
the influence of
P u r u ~ - P r a j a p a t i
during a considerable p
arl
of
the first
millenium B.C., I am abandoning
an
approach lhat establisbcs importance
by
counting
the number of hymns to a god, or, the frequency
of
textual references to a god's wor
ship.
or
yet, another method lhat looks backward from the position of Hinduism
to
make
Carol Ra<k:liffe Bolon, Forms o/ U..
Godtlm
L< iio
Gaari
NIUm Art,
Universi1y
Park, 1992, p. 13.
10
Sec
Fill'·
1-17 in
Bolon,
L1j4 Ga.ui.
Douglas
B a m : t ~
SrollhJrts frOift
Amonwali iJ tl e
iJis4
MIIS- London,
1954.
.Bolon, 14je Caori, p. ~
'
t
is of
course
imJlO 'lhhe tO pn>vi<k
a
oompreberui\<e
list
of
'' 1' YalcJT in early Indian
art
A good
sampling
of
the genre is
KCD
in Coomaraswamy,
r. q.
and Misra,
Yakslul
Odl. Be they beauteous maidens,
seducti females, divine Mothers,
or
rcpresenlations
of
AbundJtooe,
tbe
Y qn
are
either
potent:ially mother>
or reali
•ed
mother>. But they are
not
shown being pregnant. At the ACSAA '94 Sympoo;ium where I
presented the paper 'The
Pregn.:utt
Male ,
Sara
I.. w t o and Stq>han Hylcr spoke of isolated examples
of pregnant fcnala , but did not mentioned data Amy Poster
knew
of a Maury.m tcrroootta pregnant
female. I have not yet xen their exampleo.
M On the bomologizing between Purup
an
d Ptajjpati which is assumed and sustained throughout the
b r t l h m ~ trndition, see Chapter 6; pp. 6 1- 62.