36
Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Square packing:Not most space efficient

Hexagonal packing:Most space efficient

Page 2: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Unit Cells: the simplest repeating motif

Can be different shapes and sizes

TheRhomb Is the Unit cellShapeOfHexagonallattices

Page 3: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Packing: layers build up 3D solid

Page 4: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Packing: layers build up 3D solid

Page 5: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

ABABABAB . . . . Packed up towards you

Packing direction

Page 6: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Packing direction

A B A B A B A

hcp Hexagonal Closest Packing:A B A B …

Packing direction

Page 7: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient
Page 8: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Packing direction

A C B A C B A

ccp CubicClosestPacking:A B C A B C …

Packing direction

Page 9: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Unit Cells: • a conceptual way to build up structure• sometimes resemble macroscopic crystalline solid• assigned symmetry types, like P21/c or P4mm called space groups• used in X-ray crystallography( see quartzpage)

Packing layers • a more realistic view of how to build up structure• sometimes not at all related to unit cell

Page 10: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

CCP viewed as extended unit cell

CCP viewed as packing layers

Page 12: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

More on Metals

Cubic closest packing makes metals malleable: easily bendable Cu and Ag

Work- hardening: creation of defects, loss of ccp lattice

Work hardening, strain hardening, or cold work is the strengthening of a material by increasing the material's dislocation density. Wikipedia

AlloysSterling Silver = Ag (92.5%) + Cu (7.5%), a

substitutional alloy

Brass = Cu + Zn, a new structure, an intermetallic alloy

Steel = Fe + C (~1%), carbide steel, an interstitial alloy

Chrome = steel + Cr = Fe + C(~1%) + Cr(10%) Stainless steel = chrome steel, both

interstitial and substitutional alloy“18/10” stainless is 18% Cr and 10% Ni

Galvanized Steel = steel with Zn layerMolybdenum steel = Fe + C(<1%) + Cr(14%) +

Ni(<2%) + Mo(1 %),“martensitic” steel: very

strong and hard

Page 13: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient
Page 14: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Defectsin metal structure

Page 15: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient
Page 16: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Now consider red and blue balls the larger metal atoms;Where are the interstitial sites?

Small alloy atoms, e.g. C,

Other metal atoms, e.g. Cr or W,replace metal atomsSmall alloy atoms fit into

Td sites and Oh sites

Page 17: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Effect of addedatoms andgrainson metal structure.

Smaller atom like C in iron

Larger atom like P in iron

Second crystal phasesprecipitated

Defects and grain boundaries “pin” structure. All these inhibit sliding planes and harden the metal.

Page 18: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Ionic Solids as “Ideal structures”

Build up Ionic Solids conceptually like this:

• assume Anions are larger than Cations, r- > r+

• pack the Anions into a lattice: ccp, hcp or bcc

• add Cations to the interstitial spaces

2 x r-

2 x r-

r- + r+

Page 19: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Consider red and blue balls the larger anions of A B packed layers;Where do the cations go?

largeranions

Smaller cations, r+/r- < 0.41

Larger cations, r+/r- > 0.41

Page 20: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Td cation holes are smaller than Oh holes2x as many Td holes as Oh holes

Page 21: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Wurzite = Hexagonal ZnShcp S2- dianions (A B A packed) with Zn2+ cations in 1/2 Td holes. Build it! See it! (as Chem3D)

Page 22: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Sphalerite or Zinc Blende = Cubic ZnSccp S2- dianions (A B C packed) with Zn2+ cations in 1/2 Td holes. Build it! See it! (as Chem3D movie)

Page 23: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Fluorite = Cubic CaF2

ccp Ca2+ cations (A B C packed) with F2- anions in all Td holes. Build it! See it! (as Chem3D movie)

Page 24: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Halite = NaCl ccp Cl anions (A B C packed) with Na cations in all Oh holes. Build it! See it in 3D!

Page 25: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

These are the prototype structures:

NaCl (Halite) - ccp anions & Oh cations; a 1:1 ionic solid

CaF2 (Fluorite) - ccp cations & Td anions; a 1:2 ionic solidCubic ZnS (sphalerite) - ccp anions & 1/2 Td cations; a 1:1 ionic solidHexagonal ZnS (wurzite) - hcp anions & 1/2 Td cations; a 1:1 ionic solid

Page 26: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Prototype Lattices

1:1 Ionic Solids

NaCl (halite) packing type: ccp packing, all Oh sites filledcubic ion sites: both anion and cation six coordinate, Oh

ZnS (sphalerite) packing type: ccp packing, half Td sites filledcubic ion sites: both anion and cation four coordinate, Td

ZnS (wurzite) packing type: hcp packing, half Td sites filledhexagonal ion sites: both anion and cation four coordinate, Td

CsCl packing type: bcc packingcubic ion sites: both anion and cation eoght coordinate, Oh

2:1 Ionic Solids CaF2 (fluorite) packing type: ccp packing, all Td sites filledcubic ion sites: anion four coordinate, Td

and cation eight coordinate, Oh

Page 27: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient
Page 28: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient
Page 29: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient
Page 30: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient
Page 31: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Other Structures are Described Based on Prototypes

Example 1. Galena - PbS “has the NaCl lattice”. Note crystal morphology

Example 2. pyrite - Fe(S2) “has the NaCl lattice”, where (S22-)

occupies Cl- siteNote crystal morphology

With more deviations:Example 3. tenorite- CuO: pseudo cubic where (O2-) occupies ABC sites and

Cu2+ occupies 3/4 ‘squashed’ Td sites.

Example 4. CdI2: Layered Structure: I- forms hcp (ABA) layers and

Cd2+ occupies all Oh sites between alternate hcp (A B) layers

Example 5. MoS2 : Layered Structure: S22- forms (AA BB)

layers and Mo4+ occupies all D3h sites between AA layers

Note similarity to graphite.Used as lubricant.

Page 32: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

One Prototype Layered Structure:Cadmium Iodide

Layers of hcp w/ Cd in Oh sites

AB

AB

AB

AB

I-

Cd2+

Page 33: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

The funny thing about corundum is, when you have it in a clean single crystal, you get something much different.

Sapphire is Gem-quality corundum

with Ti(4+) & Fe(2+) replacing Al(3+)

Page 34: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Ruby

Gem-quality corundum

with ~3% Cr(3+) replacing Al(3+)

Page 35: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

Al2O3

Corundum

Al(3+): CN=6, OhO(2-): CN=4, Td

Nothing recognizable here..

Page 36: Square packing: Not most space efficient Hexagonal packing: Most space efficient

The same reaction occurs in the commercial drain cleaner Drano. This consists of sodium hydroxide, blue dye, and aluminum turnings. When placed in water, the lye removes the oxide coating from the aluminum pieces,causing them to fizz as they displace hydrogen from water. This makes it sound like the Drano is really working effectively, even though it's the lye that actually cleans out the drain clog.