F. No. J·II 0 llIl 0512016-IA.ll(I) Government of India

Ministry of Environment. Forest and Climate Change (LA. Division)

Indira Paryavaran Bhawan Jor Bagh Road, Aliganj,

New Delhi· 111}{10J E·mail: satish.garkoti@nic.in

Tel: 011.24695316

To / V MIs. Mukand Ltd.

Dated: 19'" May, 2016

Village· Kanakapur, Taluka & District· Koppal , Kamataka·583231.

SUbje<.:t: Pro(lOsed lotcgrntcd Steel Plnot of 0.7 MTPA capacity by 1'tV~. Muk.nd Ltd. at Village· l(ana"-pur, Taluka & Ilistrkt- Koppal, Karnataka- prescribing of ToRs regarding ..

Sir,

This has reference to your online application No. IAIKAIINDl5142712016 dated 1011

March, 2016 along withlhe application in prescribed fonnat (Fonn.I), copy of pre·feasibility report and proposed TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study as per the EIA Notification, 21}{16 for the project mentioned above and Subsequent letter No. Nil dated 17" Mareh, 2016. The proposed project activity is listed at S.No. 3(a), under category 'A" of the Schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and appmised at the Cenlrallevel.

2,0 Mis. Mukand Ltd. has proposed to set up an Integrated Steel Plant capacity of 0.7 MTI'A (DRI, BF, met coke ovens, EOF, ladle furnace, vacuum degassing, billet! bloom ca,ter. wire rod milll bar mill, sinter plant. oxygen plant. captive power plant) at Village Kanakapur, '!"aluka & Di,trict Koppal, Kamataka . It is proposed that in the Integrated Steel Pla nt Billets and Hlooms in size, of 160 X 160 mm to 280 X 320 mm shall he prrnluced. Cast Billets will he mll~d into Wire Rods and BaN. It is also proposed to roll heavy section bars from Blooms.

3.0 The total land area ,..,quired for the proposed project is approximately 300 acre, out of whieh 39 acre is for plant, 77 ac,.., is for storagt', 31 acre is lor utility including WTP and STI', 2 aere lor administrative building, 117 acres for green belt. 5 acre for parking and 29 acre for colony and open area. Tungabhadra dam is reponed to be located at a distance of 5 km. (aerial distance - sq. t\'o National Park, Wildlife Sanctuary, Ec20 Sensitive Areas reported within 10 Ian of the project.

4.0 Total project cost is approx Rs . 2892 em,..,. The total manpower required for the proposed project will be around 730 permanent executives during operation of the Plant. Employment generation duc to the project is direct & indirect.

5,0 Total water ,..,quirement for the proposed project will be 18 MLD. Source of Water is from downstream ofTungabhadm Reservoir. Total Waste water genemtion will be 583 KLD, Domestic & Trade emuI'm, shall be treated in Sewage Treatment Plant & Effluent Treatmenl Plant respectively. T,..,ated water will be reused for process, dust supp,..,,,i,,n and gardening purposes , Power requirement for the pmposed project will be 60 MW, out of which 30 MW will be "'Ufeed from the proposed Captive Power Plant and 30 MW from State Utility Grid (KPTCUGESCOM). ~

,

6.0 The major raw materials required for the proj~ct are iron ore, limestone and coke. The iron on: mines in Bdlll!y • Hospe1 area an: the main 5Oun;e for iron ore, wli;";h shall be lransported by road to the plant. Limestone wi lt be brougbt from Bagal kol, Kamatah (Approx. 200 km) by road. Coke w il primari ly be imported and transported ffom tIie nearest pot! by road. OIher requ ired !""~w materials will be obtained locally and transported by road to the plant.

7.0 The abo~e proposal was considered by tile Expert Appraisal Comminec (Induwy) during its 4"' m~eting held on 30· - ) I· March, 2016 for prescribing TORs fOt undertaking detailed ElNEMP study.

&.0 Bailed OIl the information furni shed and pn:sentation made by the prnjcct proponent. the Committee recommended prescribing following specifi~ TORs for undertaking dCllliloxl ElA and EMP study in add ition to the ge neri~ TOR endo~d at Angno., I Tn ll wilb ad!lUin" a l TORs ill An"eW n;=2 n d An"u u!,(; J .

1. Publ;"; hearing for the proje.:t should be coRduCled by Kamataka Pollution Control -Board.

11. The issues raised during public hearing and CQrnmiunent of th~ projoct proponent 0!1

thc same alO!1g with time bouRd action plan 10 implcJmnt the commiunent and financial aliocatiOflthe~o s.hou ld be clearly provided~

III . The projeCt propootent should carry oul social impact assessment ohhe proj«t as per the Office Memoraooum No. J.l I0lJI2512014·lA .1 dated 11.08.201 4 issued by the Ministry regarding gu idel ines on Environment SU5Iainability and CSR related issues. The social impact assessment srudy so carried out sho uld fonn part of ElA and EMP "l"'rt

I~. The proj«t proponent shall generate fresh baseline data for preparalion of ElA and EMP Report.

v. The project prnponent will subm il a plan for encrgy s:lI"ing in the propo.~d stee l plant.

9 .0 The u~dcrsigned is directoo to in form that the Mini5lry nf Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) after accepting the recommcndatiOfl of Inc EAe (Industry). hereby decided to accord ToRs for the above projoct.

10.0 II is requestcd that the draft EIA Repon may be prepared in accnrdancc with the above mentioned specific TORs and enc losed ge~eric TORs and addit ional TORs and thereafter further rMXessary action including conduct of publ;"; consullation may be taken (if required) for obtaining En~i ronment Clea!llJ1ce in accordance with the procedun: pre§cribed uno:lcrthe EIA NQtificatiOfl, 2006 as amended.

11.0 Thc TORs are val id for a period of threc years from today i.e 19.05.20 16 and wi ll expire on 18.05.2019. Howevcr, this period could be funher extended by a maxi mum period of one year provided an application is made by the project proponent at least three months befon: the expiry of lhe validity period. together with updated r onn-I, based on proper

justificaliOfl. ~JL;'l \016

(Or. Satis~i) Scientist 'F'

I. The Secretary, Dcpanment of Environment, Government of Kamataka.

,

2. The Additional Pr incipal Chid CooKrvalor of Forests (C), Ministry of Environm~nl, Forest and Climate Change, Regional Office (SZ). Kendrlya Sadan, 4· Floor, E&F Willgs, 17'" Main Road. Koramangala II Block, Bangalore -560034.

,

(Dr. SM lish C. Garkuti) Scientist 'F'

ANt-XXURE - I

GENERIC nR-'1S O F REfERENCE croRl lN RESPECT OF ,@vSTRY St:CTQR

I . Executive Summary 2. InltodllCtion

i. Details of the EIA Consuilant including NABET OlCc!"l:ditation \\. Information about tile project proponent i i i. ImportanI'C and benelits of the project

3. Project Des.cription I. Cost of project and time of completion. ll. Products with capacities for the pmposW pmjcct. iii. If expalL'lion projecL dcllliis of existing products with capacities lond whether

ade<fuate land is available fore~pansion. reference ofearlicr EC if any. IV. List of raw materials requited and their 5OU= along ... ·ith mode: of

traIl5pOrtation. v. Other chemicals and materials req uited with quantities and storage capacities vi. Details of Emission, cmuents, lIazardous was~ gencl1ltion and their

management. vii. Requirement of water, power, with source of supply, status ofnpPfOval. W3~r

balan"" diagram, man-power requirement (regular and contract) viii. Process description along with major equipOlents and machineries, process

flow Sheel (quantative) from raw material to products 10 be pmvided IX. H:v,.ard identification and details of proposed safety systems. x. bpansionlmodcmilalion proposals:

a. Copy of I!.!Lthe Environmental Ckarancc(s) including Amcndm\!1lts thereto obtairlCd fOf the pmject from MOEFfSElAA shall I1e anached as an Annc~un: . A cert ified copy oflhe lateS! Monitoring Report of thc Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment und Forests 8$ per ein:ular dated 30" M~y. 2012 on the status of compl iance ofeond ilions stipu'ated in III the existing environmental clearances including Amendments shall be pro~id~. In addition, status of compl iance of Consent to Operllte fOf the ongoing lexi~ting OflCration of the project from SPCD shall be atlached with the EIA-EMY repon.

b. In case the existing project ha~ not obtained environmental clearance, reasons for not tak ing EC unde r the provisions of the EIA Notification 1994 andlor EIA Notification 2006 shall be provided. Copies of Consent to EstablishfNo Objection Cenificate and Consent 10 Opo;:rate (in ,ase of units operllting prior to EIA Notification 2006, CTE and CTO of FY 2005-2006) oblai""d from the SPCS sllall be submitted. " urther. compliance report 10 the conditions of consents from the SPCS sha ll be submitted.

4. Site Details

••

".

Ill.

".

Location of the project site covering village, T alukafrehsil. Di.trict and State, Justification for selecting the site, whether other sites .... ere considered. A toposheet of the study arc~ of radius of 10km and site location on 1:50,00011 :25,000 sca le on an 1\31 A2 shoot. (including all ceo-sens itive areas and environmentally scn~ itivc places) Co-ord inates (Jat-Iong) of all four comers of the ~ite. ~ol Google map-Earth downloaded of the project site. r[l-'

•

v. Layout map5 indicating existing unit as well as proposed unit indicating stOfRge area, plant area. greenbelt area, uti lities etc, If loca!ed within an Ind ustri al llreaiEstatelComplcx, layou! of Industrial Area ind icating location of unit within the Industr ial arcaiE5Iate.

vi. Photograptu of tile proposed and existing (if appliuble) plant site. If existing, show photographs of plantation/greenbelt, in particul ar.

viI. Landusc brl:ak-up of IOtaI land of the project site (identi rlCd alld acquired), government/private - agricultura l, forest, wa~teland. wa ter bod i "~. settlements, etc shall be inc luded. (001 requi red for induSlria l area)

viii. A liSl of major indu>l ries with name and type within study area (IOkm radius) Shal l be incorporated. Lund use detai l~ of the study area

IX. Grological features and Gco-hydrologic.al status of the study area shall be included.

x. Deta ils of Drainage of tile project UplO 5km radius of study area. If the site is with in ' km rad illS of any major rivcr. peak: ~nd lean season river discharge as well as flood occurrence frequency based on peak rainfall data of the p.a.!1 30 years. DcUli h of 1'l00d Level of the pI'Oject site and maximum r lood 1..c\"C1 of the river shall also be provided, (mega green field projects)

xi. Status of acquisition of land. If acquisition is nOl compkte. >lage of Ihe acquisition process and expe<;ted time ofcomplele possession of the land.

xii. R&R d<:ta il s in respect of land in line with state Govcmment pol icy

5. Enr" t Hn d wild li re rn&ttd i~.uts (if anoliublel:

I . Permis:5ion and approval for the usc of forest laoo (Forestry clearance), if any, and recommendations of the State Forest Dcpanmenl. (if app l icabl~)

II . Laoousc map based OIl Hijj.h resolution .wellite imagery (GPS) of the proposed sife delineating the forest land (in cme 0/ proj~clS j1fW)/vjng /Or-rSI /Glld fM,t Ihan 40 ha)

iii. StalllS of Application submitted for obLaining the sta~ I Foresti}' clearance along with latest statu s shall be ~ubmit! ed.

IV , T1le projects 10 be located wilhin 10 k:m of Ihe National Park:s, Sanctuaries. Biosphere Reserves, Migratory Corridors of Wild Animal., the project proponent shall su bmi t the map duly auth~nticated by Chief Wildlifc War<:k:n showing these featu= vis-a-vis the project location and the recommendat ions or comments of the Chief Wi ldUfe Warden·thereon

.... Wildl ife Conservation Plan duly authcmicated by the Chief Wild life Warden of the State Government for consel"\' ation of Schedule I fauna. if any exists in the study area

VL. Copy of application submined for clearance under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972,10 the Standing Committee ofthl: Nationa l Board for Wi ldlife

6. ER\'iroamental S tatlli 1. Determination of atmospheric in version level at the project site and site·

specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relati\'c humid ity. hourly wind sped and direction and rainfal l.

ii . AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 locations for PMI G, PMl.5, S02. NOX, CO and other parnme!crs rl:levam to the pI'Oject shall he col lected. The monitoring stati ons shall be based C PCB guidelines and tak:e into account the pre­dominant wind direclion. population lOne and sensitive n:<.;eptorS including reserve4 Forests.

iii. Raw data of all AAQ measurement for 12 wccb of all statjon~ as per rnoquency given in the NAQQ:-.1 Noti fICation of No .... 2009 along .... ith - min .•

,

max .. average and 98% values for each of the AAQ parameters from data of all AAQ stations should be provided as an annexure to the ElA Report.

iv. Surface water quality of nearby River (6Om upstream and downstream) and other surface drains at e ight location, as per CPCBIMoEF&CC guidelines.

v. Whcther the site falls near to polluted stretch of river identilicd by the CPCBIMoEF&CC.

VI. Ground water monitoring at minimum at 8 locations shall be included. vn . Noise level., rnonitoring at 8 locations within the study area. viii. Soil Characteristic as per CPCB guidelines. lX. Traffic study of the area, type of veh icle,. frequency of vehicles for

transportation of materials, additional traffic due to proposed project, park ing alTangernent etc. Detailed de<;<;ripti(}n of nora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) existing in the study area shall be given with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species. If Schedule-I fanna arc found within the study area, a Wildlife Conservation Plan shall be prepared and furnished.

XI. Soci(}-economic status of the study area.

7. Impact Assessment and Environment Management Plan

,.

ii.

Ill.

iv.

, vi.

" ..

VIII.

Assessment of ground le"eI concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological features . In case the project is located on a hilly terrain, the AQIP Modell ing ,hall be done using inputs of the specific terrain characteristics for determining the potential impacts of the project on the AAQ. Cumulative impact of all o;ourc~s of emissions (including transportation) on the AAQ of the area shall be well ~.';('i:.ed. rxtail~ of the model used and the input data used for modeling shall also be provided. The air quality contours shall be plotted on a location map showing thc location of project site, babitation nearby, sensitive re""ptms, if any. Water Quality modelling - in case, if the effluent i, proposed to be discharged in to thc local drain, then Water Qua lity Modelling ,1udy sh(}uld be conducted for the drain water taking into consideration the upstr~am and downstream quali!y of water of the dra in. tmpact of tilt. transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding environment shall be assessed and provided. In this regard , options for transport of raw materia ls and finished products and wastes (large quantities) by rail or rail-cum road transport '" conveyor-<:um-rail transport shall be examined. A note on treatment of wastewater frorn different plant operations, extent recyeled and reused for different purposes shall be included. Complete scheme of effiuent treatment. Characteristics of untreated and treated effluent to meet the prescribed standards of discharge under E(P) Rule,. Details of Slack emission and act ion plan f", control of emissions to meet standards. Measures for fugitive emission control Details of hazardous waste generation and their storage, utilization and di<po<al. Copie, of MOU regard ing utilization of solid and hazardous waste shall alo;o be included. EMP shall include the concept of waste-minimization, re<:yc le!reu",/rec""er techniques, Energy conservation, and natural resource conservation. Proper utilizat ion offl~' ash shall be ensured as per Fly Ash Notification, 2009. A detailed plan of action ,hall be pro,·ided.

,

i~. Action plan for the green bel! development plan in 33 % area Le. land with not k ss than I,SOO trees per ha. Givinll details af spec ies, width of plantati on, plann ing schedule etc. s.hali be included. The \ll"«n belt sha ll be around the project boundary and a scheme for \ll"«ning of the roads used for the project shall al !;O be inCOl"pOratcd.

x. Act ion plan for ra inwater harvcstinll measures at plant site shall be submitted to harvest rainwater from the rooftops and stann wBter drai ns to =harge tbe ground ,",'Iuer and a[!;O to usc for the vaoo"" activities at the project site to conSCfVe fresh waler and ~uce the water re<ju;remCnl from other 5OUroCS.

Xl. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental po ll ution coo troJ m~""ures s.haLi be included.

xn. Action plan for post1""Ojccl environmental monitoring slull l be submitted. Xlll. Onsile and Offsitc Disaster (natund and Man-made) Preparodncss and

Emergency Management Plan inclucling Risk Assessm~nt and damage COntrol. Disaster mana¥emenl plan should be linked with District Disaster Management I'lan.

8. Occupational health

i. Details of ex isting Occupational & Safety l launh. What an: the exposull' levels of above mentioned hazards and whether they an: within Permissible Exposure level (PEL) . If these are not with in PEL, what measures the company has ai.loptcd to keep them ""ilhin PEL so that health of the workers can be preserved,

ii, Details of exposure specific health status evaluation of worker. If the workers' health is b!:ing (valuato:d by pre designed formal, chest x ra~>. Audiometry. Spirometry, Vision tesling (Far & Near vision. coloor vision aoo any other ocular defect) ECG, during ~ placement and periodical examinations give Ihe detai ls of the same. Details regarding last mont h ana lyzed dala of abo vementiOned paramel~rs as ]JIlr age, sex, duration of expo. ure and dcpanment ... i.e .

iii. Annual repon of heath status of workers with spec ial Il'ference to

Occupationa l Health and Safety. iv . Plan and fund allocation to ensure the occupational hea lth & safety of all

contrllC t and casual wori<:ers.

9. Corpornt~ e nvironme nt Pol icy

i, Does the company have a we ll laid down Environment Policy appro,"Cd by its Board ofDin:c~ If5O. ;t may be dctaikd in the EIA repon.

ii. Docs the Envirooment Policy pn:scribe for standard operating process I procedures to bring into focus any infringement I de viat ion I vio lat ion of the environmental or forest nonns I eoooitions? If so, it lI1lIy be detailed in the lOlA.

iii. What is the hieran:hical system or Admi ni,1rative order of the compan), \0 dea l wilh the enviro nmental iss ues and for ensuring compliance with the enYiron~ntat dearancc conditions? Oe\.ails of th is system may be given ,

iY. Does the company have system of reponing of non compliaoces / vioiations of envi ronmental norms to the Board of Dir~ctors of the company and I or ,hareholders or stak~ho l ders at large? This reponing mechanism shall be do:\.llilctl in tbe EIA n:por1 .t.

,

10. Dclails regarding in fraslrllClUre facililles such as sanitarion, fuel, n:Slroom etc. to be provided 10 lIle labour for« during CQnSIruCrion as well as 10 r~ casual ""OrKcrs including !ruCk drivc~ during opcT1uion phase:.

II. Any liligation pending against the projecl and/or any di~ionlorder passed by any Court of Law against the project. if so, details thereof shall al so be included. Has the unit received any notice under the Scelion 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, \986 or re levant Sections of Air and Water AcU? If so, detai ls thereof and cO mpliance/ATR to the notice(s) and prescnt ~tntus of the casco

12. 'A tabular chart with index for poin t wi.e compliance of above TORs.

13. The TORs prescribed shall be valid for a period ofthn:c ~ for submission of lhc: ElA-EMP rep<lI1S along wilh Public Hearing Proceedings (wherever stipuLaled).

The folLowing general ooinlS ,hall b!: noted;

1. All documenls shall be properly indexed, JXlge numbered. Ii. Period/date of data co llection shalL be clearly indicaled. iii. Authenticated English lrans l ~ t ion of all material in Regional languages shall be

provided. IV. The letter/application for environmental clearance sha ll quote the MOEI' file No. anc.1

8150 al1ach a copy of the letter. -V. The copy of the lettcr re«ived from the Ministry ~al1 be al so attached as an annexure

to the final EIA-EMP Report. vi. The index of the final EIA-EM!' report must indicate the !fJecifl(; eMpler and page 00.

of the EIA-E\fP Report vii. While preparing Ihe F.JA report, Ihe iflSlnlclions for lhe proponents and irutructioos

for the consuhanlS issued by MOEF vide a.M. No. J-l IOI3/4112006-IA.l1 (I) daled 4'" August. 2009, whicb are available on the website of this Ministry shall also be followed.

viii. The consuliants involved in the prL-paration of EIA-EMP report after accrcditatioo with Quality Couneil of India (OCI) "'atiooal Accreditation Hoard of Education and Training (NABED would need to include a certificate in this regard in thc EIA-EMf' reports prepared by them and data provided by other organi7.ationfLaboratories including their status ()f approva ls etc. Name of the Consuli ant and the Accredital;oo details shall be posted on tli e EIA·EMP Report as well as on the cover of the Hard Copy of the Presentation material for EC presentation.

ix. TORs' prescribed by the EXIXrt Appraisal Committee (Industry) shall be considered for preparation of ElA-EM!' report for Ihc projecl in addition to all the relevant information as per the 'Generic Struclure of EIA' given in ApIXndix III and iliA in 1M EIA Nolificalion, 2006. Where the documents provided are in a language other !han Eoglish, an English translation shall be provided. The draft EIA-£MJ' n:pon shall be submined 10 the Slate Pollutioo Control Board of lIle concerned Stale for condUCI of Public Hearing. The SPCIl shall conduct 1M Public lIearingipublic toruIultatioo, district·wise, as per tbe provisions of EIA noIification, 2006. The Public Hcaring shall be chai red by an Office r not below the rank of Additional Ilistricl Magistrate . The i.sues rai scd in the Public Hearing and during the consultation proxess and 1m, commi tments made by the project proponent on the same ~al l be included ""parmely in EIA·EMP Report Tn a ",paratc chapter and summari sed in a tabular chart with financial budget (cap ita l and rev~nue) along with time·schedule of

~ •

implementation for complying with the commitments made. The tinal EJA report shall be submitted to the Min istry for obtaining envi ronment~1 clearance .

.... uu

,

AN!'5EXVRE-2

AI)I)ITIONAL TORS FOR INTEGRATED ~"TEEL PLAl\,

I. Iron oreleoal linkage documents along with the status of environmental clearana of iron 0"' and coal mines

2. Quantum of production of coal and iron Ore from coal & iron ore mines and thc projects they catcr to. Mode of transportation to the plant and its impact

3. For Large ISP" a 3-D vicw i.c. OEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in 10 km radius from the proposal site. MRL details of projed sitc and RL of nearby sources of water shall be indicated.

4. Reccnt land-use map based on satellite imagery. High-rewlution satellite image data having lm-5m spatia l re<;()iution like qui ckbird. Ikonos, IRS P-6 pan sharpened cte. for the to Km radius area from proposed site. The same shall be used for land used/land­cover mapping of me area.

5. PM(PMw and Pll) P",SCnt in the am bient air must be analysed for source analy,is ­natural dustlRSPM generated from plant operations (Irace elements) of PM IO 10 be carried over.

6. All slock piles will have to be On lap ofa stable liner 10 avoid leaching of male rials to ground waler.

7. Plan for the implementalion of the ",commendations made for the steel plants in the eREP guidelines. "

8. Plan for slag utilization 9. Plan for utilization "fenergy in offgascs (coke oven, blast lumace) 10. System of coke quenching adopted with justilication. II . Trace metals Mercury, a"enic and fluoride emissions in the row material. ~.

12. Trace metals in waste malerial especially slag. IU--13. Trace metals in water

ANNEXURr..)

I' I. D! POUu!aD! Q~ I\l clhod u$Cd lu Number or B. dge E$11 •• lrd IUnil , ge lleralc Conl rol/a Dd UD;U , POSI ConI",!

d lpecincatkm$lauac pinned & Qfy of b ~paratc Shed 10 Capacity Poll.tant fur nis h Det.il.

Per p" Unit Day

,

.

"

· 'o rmal for [uculivc Summary

Executive summary of the repon in about g.IO pages irn.:Of1Xlrating the followin g:

j. Projecl name and location {Vi llage, Dif>!, Siale. lndustrial Estale (i f applicable) Ii. ?roducl$ Bnd capacitiu. If expansion proposallhcn existing products with capacities

I\rId .. ference to earlier Be. iii. Rcquirernent of land. raw materia l. ,.,ater. power, fuel wilh source of supply

(Quantitative) iv. Process d~sc ription in brief, specifLcally indicating the gaseous emission, liquid

emuent and §Olid and hazardous wanes.

'.

•• ~i,.

ix.

• xi.

>Iii. Aiii . xi • . ...

Me ....... n:s for miligating the impact on the environment I\rId mode of discharge or displ»3l. Capita l cost of the project, estimated time of completion Site s.el~\cd for t),., projecl - Naturo: of land - Agricu ltural (sing le/double crop). barren. Oovtlpri''ate land. stalus of is acquisition, nearby (in 2·3 km.) waler body, population. with in l ()l;m OIher industries, forest . cco.sc:nsitive zones, accessibility. (note - in case of industrial estate this information may not be necessary) Bas.elioe environmental data - ai r Guality, surface and ground water quali!)" §oil characteriSlic.l1ora and fauna, lIOCio-economic condition of the nearby population Identification of hazards in handling. processing and storage of hazardous material and safety system provided 10 mitiga te the risk . Likely im pact ofthc project on air, water, land, tlora·fiUJna and nearby population Emel"gCncy pn:paKdness plan in casc of nalUrlll or in plant emergencies Issues raised dllring public hearinll (i f applicable) and ~sponsc given IJ. CSR plan with proposed expenditure. !l!--Occupational l l~altb Measures PoS! project monitoring plan