Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SprSpr
Michael Me
Nov. 6, 200
rinkler Irrigation &rinkler Irrigation & Soil Moisture
Uniformity
D. Dukes, Ph.D., P.E., C.I.D.lissa Haley, Stephen Hanks6, IA Int’l Irrig. Show, San Antonio, TX
Backgg• Population served by p
– 5.4 million 1970– 17 million 2004– 20 million 2020
+ 1 000 l /d• + ~1,000 people/day• 11% U.S. new home co
FL th t• FL uses the most groun• Most new homes in FL
60% h h ld t• ~60% household water• High quality landscape
capacity
Slide 2 6-Nov-06
capacity
groundgpublic supply
onstruction in FLd t i th U Sndwater in the U.S.
include irrigationf i i tir use for irrigation
es and low water holding
Florida’s Water CrisisCrisis
Water Resource Caution Areas: placesCaution Areas: places where water is either scarce or
t i t dcontaminated as defined by Florida’s Water Management
Slide 3 6-Nov-06
gDistricts
Adopted from: Purdum, EManual from Florida’s Wa
E.D. 2002. Florida Waters: A Water Resource ater Management Districts. Brooksville, Fl.
Sensor Base
Slide 4 6-Nov-06Evapotranspiration (ET) bas
ed IrrigationgSoil moisture sensors (SMS)
sed controllers
Current Turf/LandReseRese
1. SMS plots, Gaines2 Rain Sensor evalu2. Rain Sensor evalu3. SMS plots & ET c
(Turfgrass Resear(Turfgrass Resear4. SMS on cooperatin5. SMS development
Pasco Co.6. ET controller plot
Hillsborough Co.
Slide 5 6-Nov-06
dscape Irrigation earchearchsvilleation Gainesvilleation, Gainesvilleontrollers, Citra
rch Unit)rch Unit)ng homes, Pinellas Co.t scale, Lake Jovita,
s, GCREC
Potential Unifo
RRR
Soil BeSoil BeSoil Be
Non-uniformity(100% uniformityNon-uniformity(100% uniformityNon-uniformity(100% uniformitynot practical)Adequate irrigation not practical)Adequate irrigation not practical)Adequate irrigation
Over irrigationOver irrigation
Slide 6 6-Nov-06
ormity Impacty p
Root ZoneRoot ZoneRoot Zone
elow Root Zoneelow Root Zoneelow Root Zone
Under irrigatedUnder irrigatedUnder irrigated
Improper Cp p
Slide 7 6-Nov-06
Coverageg
Narrow
Slide 8 6-Nov-06
w Areas
Catch Ca
Slide 9 6-Nov-06
n Testingg
Literature• Analytical yield &
l ti hirelationship• Yield reduction du
not well document• Redistribution of i• Redistribution of i
within canopy (ag.• Minimal informati
uniformity
Slide 10 6-Nov-06
uniformity
e Review uniformity
ue to non-uniformity yted in the fieldirrigation waterirrigation water . crops)ion on turf quality &
Turf Quality & Ny
Slide 11 6-Nov-06
Non-uniformityy
Method• Plots
– 4.6 m X 4.6 m (15 ft X– 15Q Spray heads– 25 catch cans
• Tests at 3 pressureTests at 3 pressure– 414 kPa (60 psi)
138 kPa (20 psi)– 138 kPa (20 psi)– 69 kPa (10 psi)
Slide 12 6-Nov-06
dologygy
X 15 ft)
eses
Experimep
Slide 13 6-Nov-06
ental Site
Method• Arredondo FS
– Field capacity 7-10% (no runoff)
– Permanent wilting point 2-3%I fil i 179– Infiltration rate 179 mm/hr (7 in/hr)
lowlq V
VDU %25=
Slide 14 6-Nov-06
avglq V
dologygy
Testing Cg• Soil moisture conte
– Gravimetric 10 cm (4dia.
– TDR 20 cm (8 in) lon• Soil sample & TDRp
90 deg.• Soil sample locatio• Soil sample locatio• Low wind (< 2.5 m
Slide 15 6-Nov-06
onditionsent4 in) long X 5.7 cm (2.2 in)
ng rodsR collection rotated
ons repackedons repackedm/s; 5 mph)p
Uniformity Day
Slide 16 6-Nov-06
ata Collection
0.80
0.90
1.00PRE
0.50
0.60
0.70
DU
lq
R2 =
0 10
0.20
0.30
0.40
1.00
60 i0.00
0.10
29-Dec 17-Feb 8-Apr 28-May 17-Jul 5-Sep 25-Oct
Date0 60
0.70
0.80
0.9060 psi 20 psi
GRAV-DU TDR-DU CC-DU
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60D
U lq
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
Slide 17 6-Nov-06
29-
IrrigationIrrigation Effect on DUlq
0.341
POST
t 14-Dec
R2 = 0.2709
R2 = 0.0747POST
R2 = 0 341
R 0.2709
R 0.341
60 psi 20 psi 10 psi
-Dec 17-Feb 8-Apr 28-May 17-Jul 5-Sep 25-Oct 14-Dec
Date
GRAV-DU TDR-DU CC-DU
Statistica• Interaction betwee
& pressure level on– GravimetricGravimetric – TDR
C t h C– Catch Can
Slide 18 6-Nov-06
al Resultsen measurement type n DUlq
Pressure Effect UnifoUnifo
Pres. TDR Pre-Irr
Grav. Pre-IrrPre-Irr. Pre-Irr.
(psi) -----------------------
60 0.77 a 0.83 a
20 0.81 a 0.86 a
10 0.78 a 0.81 a
Slide 19 6-Nov-06
Different letters indicate a significant diffe
on Distribution ormityormity
TDR Post-Irr
Grav. Post-Irr
Catch CanPost-Irr. Post-Irr. Can
------DUlq---------------------------
0.74 a 0.83 a 0.63 a
0.79 a 0.83 a 0.55 b
0.75 a 0.69 b 0.39 c
erence within columns
Pressure Effect on SPres. TDR
Pre-IrrGrav. Pre-IrrPre-Irr. Pre-Irr.
(psi) -------------------(m
60 0.07 a 0.07 a
20 0.07 a 0.09 a
10 0.06 a 0.08 a
Slide 20 6-Nov-06
Different letters indicate a significant diffe
Soil Moisture ContentTDR Post-Irr
Grav. Post-Irr
Catch CanPost-Irr. Post-Irr. Can
m3/m3)------------------- (in)
0.15 a 0.20 a 0.72 a
0.11 b 0.17 b 0.47 b
0.09 b 0.15 c 0.39 c
erence within columns
Effect of Irrigationg
y = 0.000R2
0.14
0.16m
3 /m3 )
R2 =
0.10
0.12
re C
onte
nt (m
0.06
0.08
Soi
l Moi
stur
0 00
0.02
0.04
Cha
nge
in S
0.000 100 200
Irriga
C
Slide 21 6-Nov-06
G
n on Soil Moisture03x + 0.0162
0 7111= 0.7111
y = 0.0003x - 0.0264R2 = 0.5855
300 400 500
ation Vol (mL)
GRAV TDR
0.20
0.25PRE
0.15
(m3 /m
3 )
R2 = 0 76380.05
0.10
TDR Θ
0.25
R = 0.7638
0.000.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
0.20
Gravimetric Θ (m3/m3)
0.10
0.15DR
Θ (m
3 /m3 )
0.05
TD
Slide 22 6-Nov-06
0.000
TDR SMC vs. Gravimetric
SMCSMC
0.25
POST
R2 = 0.6101
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
Gravimetric Θ (m3/m3)
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.5
0.6
0.7
oist
ure
DUlq
0.2
0.3
0.4
Soil
Mo
0.90
1.00
TDR
0.0
0.1
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Catch Can DUlq 0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
re D
Ulq
lq
Residential Rotor Spray CC DUlh
0.30
0.40
0.50
Soil
Moi
stur
0.00
0.10
0.20
0 00
)*614.0(386.0 lqlh DUDU +=
Slide 23 6-Nov-06
Plot Testing0.00
Residential Testingg
Grav = 0.535 CC-DUlq + 0.5004R2 0 745
0.9 1.0
R2 = 0.745
Grav = 0.8713 CC-DUlh + 0.1641R2 = 0.745
0 0 10 0 20 0 30 0 40 0 50 0 60 0 70 0 80 0 90 1 000 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
Catch Can DUlq
Gravimetric TDR CC DUlh-Grav CC DUlh-TDR
Conclu• SMC uniformity r
to irrigation uniforhere (CC DUl 0.39here (CC DUlq 0.39
• CC DUlh approxim• CC DUlh may be a
of irrigation systemof irrigation system
Slide 24 6-Nov-06
usionselatively insensitive rmity levels tested 9-0.63)9 0.63)
mates SMC DUlq
reasonable indicator m performancem performance
Microirrigation Ug
Slide 25 6-Nov-06
niformity Testingy g
Microirrigation Unifog
Slide 26 6-Nov-06
ormity Testing cont’dy g
Microirrigation TDg
Slide 27 6-Nov-06
DR DUlq vs CC DUlqlq lq
QuestQuest
Thank
Acclima, Inc., Lawn Logic, RETW t WETWater, We
SWFWMD Hillsborough CoSWFWMD, Hillsborough CoUtili
Danny Burch, Numerous unde
if
Slide 28 6-Nov-06
www.ifasirrigation.if
tions?tions?
k you!
Rain Bird, Toro, Hydropoint, th tieathermatic
o Water Dept Pinellas Coo. Water Dept., Pinellas Co. ities
ergrad and graduate students
fl ds.ufl.edufas.ufl.edu