Spring Hill Community Planning Team meeting notes · Web viewCPT members participated in a brief introductory activity, chatting in pairs, sharing their backgrounds and discussing

The Gap Neighbourhood Plan Community Planning Team Meeting notes Meeting 1 - 15 September 2016

1

Notes from The Gap Neighbourhood Plan Community Planning Team Meeting 1

Meeting detailsDate: Thursday 15 September 2016

Time: 6pm

Location: Walkabout Creek Function Centre

Attendees

Community planning team members:Alexie, Ann, Beatrice, Brandon, Bruce, Christopher, Craig, Deborah, Denise, Geoff, Geoffrey, James, John, Kate, Lisa, Marion, Mark, Monika, Nathan, Nicholas, Nick, Peter, Sharon, Simon and Tim.

Council officers:Jan Logan (meeting MC, Community Engagement Centre of Excellence), Matt Rolley (Acting Neighbourhood Planning and Urban Renewal Manager), Mark Leary (Project Manager and Senior Urban Planner), Laurelle Muir (Community Engagement Manager), Alex Hodgson, Anna McKinven, Daniel Pirie, Georgia Pilkington, Sonia Kirby, Jess Crane, Tim Sergiacomi (table facilitators and scribes), Jennifer Einam (note taker).

Elected Representatives and other Observers:Councillor Steve Toomey, Councillor for the Ward of The Gap; Gemma Long, Policy Advisor to Councillor Simmonds; Lucy Smith, The Gap Ward Office.

Apologies:Councillor Julian Simmonds, Chair of City Planning.

Agenda1. Registration and refreshments

2. Welcome and introductions

3. Activity #1 – Getting to know each other

4. Working together as a Community Planning Team

5. Presentation intent

6. Facts, figures and information sharing

BREAK

7. Activity #2 – Let’s hear from you: challenges and opportunities

8. Introducing the vision, and homework

9. Next steps

10. Thank you and close

2

Neighbourhood Planning Brisbane| City Planning & Economic DevelopmentCity Planning & Sustainability | BRISBANE CITY COUNCIL

Welcome and introductionsJan Logan acknowledged the traditional owners of the meeting place and the project area, and welcomed everybody to the first Community Planning Team (CPT) meeting for The Gap Neighbourhood Plan (TGNP).

In thanking everyone for giving up their time to contribute, Jan introduced Councillor Steve Toomey, Councillor for The Gap. She then introduced the Council team who will manage the planning process and assist to guide the meeting. Mark Leary is a Senior Urban Planner in the Neighbourhood Planning Brisbane team and will be Project Manager for TGNP.

Jan advised that this was the first of four CPT meetings to be convened over the next three months, with each meeting adopting a particular theme or focus for discussions, while also allowing community members to offer input on all aspects of the neighbourhood planning process for The Gap.

Before introducing the evening’s first activity, Jan provided an overview of the meeting agenda and encouraged all CPT members to have their say.

Activity #1: Getting to know each otherCPT members participated in a brief introductory activity, chatting in pairs, sharing their backgrounds and discussing their personal interests in and connection to The Gap. Members also compared ideas about ‘one thing’ that they love about the local area (for detail please see the end of these notes). Members then introduced their ‘partners’ to the larger group.

This activity affirmed the diversity of the CPT members, who have varying backgrounds and different interests in The Gap.

Working together as a CPTJan introduced Laurelle Muir, Community Engagement Manager, who explained the role of CPT members and the Council through the process, including the intent to conduct CPT meetings in a collaborative, respectful and open manner, encouraging contributions from all participants. In answer to a question about the Terms of Reference, Laurelle explained that, apart from material noted as ‘confidential’, that Council wanted to get as much local knowledge from the CPT and their networks as possible.

In order for everyone to be able to express their point of view in a safe and supportive environment, members were invited to nominate a set of overarching principles or ‘rules of engagement’ to guide discussions and deliberations. In summary, these were:

One person speaking at a time Respecting each others’ point of view Allowing a set time for each person to speak to ensure that all people have an equal

amount of time to express their view There are no ‘bad’ ideas; all ideas are welcome No duplication, if it has already been said, move on Keep to the point (no ‘waffle’) Focus on useful or positive emotions (not too angry) Be considerate of the manner in which others may express their passion and connection

with the area.

Notes from all CPT meetings will be distributed to members and published on Council’s website so that all CPT members and the wider community can keep abreast of the matters being discussed across the plan area. CPT members are encouraged to put forward any suggestions (by phone or email) for improving the way in which meetings are conducted.

3


The Planning ContextMark then took members through a description of the way in which planning is managed, with the South East Queensland Regional Plan 2009-2031 (SEQ Regional Plan) growth targets set to 2031, citywide outcomes driven by Brisbane City Plan 2014 (City Plan), and the future shape of local areas influenced by the neighbourhood planning process. The SEQ Regional Plan is currently under review and a draft is expected to be available in late 2016. For more information please refer to the Queensland Government’s website http://www.dilgp.qld.gov.au/planning/regional-planning/review-of-the-south-east-queensland-regional-plan.html

The neighbourhood plan is the instrument through which Council facilitates place-based planning, with many different sectors and agencies contributing to those outcomes. Queensland Government has advised their interests for the area relating to housing diversity, environment retention and bushfire risk assessment. Mark also highlighted the function and evolution of The Gap as a Suburban Living Area in the whole-of-city planning process through the Strategic Framework of City Plan.

Project background timelineMark Leary took members through a timeline of significant planning milestones and events over recent years regarding The Gap. He noted that a petition was submitted to Council, requesting a neighbourhood plan for The Gap. This request was considered by Council in early 2016, and a decision made to prepare a neighbourhood plan for The Gap, including amendments to the Brisbane City Plan 2014.

A comment from a member pointed out that the petition wasn’t about growth; Mark agreed and advised that the next part of the presentation would provide context for The Gap’s neighbourhood plan.

In answer to a question from a member, Mark advised that the Powerpoint presentation would be included as part of the minutes and be available on Council’s website.

Neighbourhood Planning Brisbane – getting to know usNext, Mark explained the Neighbourhood Planning Brisbane (NPB) team is charged with carrying out planning at a local level, within the constraints and opportunities of the Brisbane City Plan 2014 and the greater planning framework. In so doing, NPB carries out three major functions – planning, enabling and delivering outcomes on the ground in the local area.

Mark then noted that City Plan sets out where growth in Brisbane should occur, with The Gap to play a minimal role in accommodating some of the 156,000 new dwellings (138,000 inner-city infill houses and 18,000 new suburban or greenfield houses) expected to be created over the life of the SEQ Regional Plan. Residents, businesses and landowners previously advised Council of a strong preference for growth in Brisbane to occur in a network of strategic nodes and along major transport spines and key corridors, resulting in the development of Brisbane’s ‘CityShape’.

Mark explained that the first step in the process was to prepare a Neighbourhood Plan Strategy. It is a non-statutory planning document that sets the directions for the area, including a vision and strategies. The draft Strategy responds to the community’s input and technical reports and informs the development of the statutory neighbourhood plan. It is a “reader-friendly” document which is designed to get broad community review and comment as the CPT is one stakeholder among many others. Copies of the Newstead North Renewal Strategy were available at the meeting as an example.

Mark then explained that neighbourhood plans are statutory documents that form part of City Plan and are aimed at facilitating economic prosperity, protecting character, identifying development areas and providing for open space, to name a few. The content of a neighbourhood plan complements and expands on the details in City Plan through locally specific planning provisions.

4

http://www.dilgp.qld.gov.au/planning/regional-planning/review-of-the-south-east-queensland-regional-plan.html

http://www.dilgp.qld.gov.au/planning/regional-planning/review-of-the-south-east-queensland-regional-plan.html


Mark then spoke about the limits of what a neighbourhood plan can influence and directly impact on, and also pointed out the areas which a neighbourhood plan cannot affect, summarised as below.

A neighbourhood plan can: plan where growth will go set out what type of development is permitted (including appropriate land uses, building

heights and lot sizes) set standards for new development retain and protect character coordinate infrastructure improvements.

A neighbourhood plan cannot:

make development happen prohibit development force existing development to change or move control Queensland or Australian Government development stop people or appropriate industries moving to the area.

Mark pointed out that, in the context of citywide planning, each neighbourhood planning project is a unique and distinct exercise in ensuring that the local community’s views are taken into account. He also noted that development provides locally based infrastructure whereas Council provided trunk infrastructure, for example Waterworks Road.

He then provided an overview of the timeframe to produce and consult on a neighbourhood planning strategy and ultimately a neighbourhood plan, noting that the project is currently in the background research phase, and adoption and gazettal of the final neighbourhood plan was scheduled for mid-2018.

The Gap – what we know so farContinuing, Mark provided an introduction to TGNP area, confirming the plan boundary and then the zoning of the area, highlighting the significant land uses across The Gap. He also outlined some general statistics about The Gap, notably that the area has:

17,220 residents (as at July 2015), with expected growth of 773 new residents by 2036 1,163 additional people aged 65+ anticipated by 2036, about a 40% increase in people

aged 65+ as compared to the present day 5,851 private residential dwellings 5 schools

A question from a member as to whether Council had a dwelling target or limit for The Gap. Mark advised that Council prepared population forecasts for area based on the existing land zoning and demographic trends. The Gap is not included in the growth nodes or corridors in the City Plan – it is in a Suburban Living Area.

Mark explained that, in developing the TGNP, Council holds no pre-determined outcomes for The Gap other than recognising the need to accommodate appropriate growth in a way that retains and enhances the local community. The need for age-appropriate housing and the need to maintain the viability of the centres are issues for consideration when planning in Suburban Living Areas.

In answer to a question from a member, Mark advised that the neighbourhood plan boundary was set by land that wasn’t already covered by a neighbourhood plan, excluding land owned by utilities, such as Enoggera Reservoir.

Online community surveyMark described the online survey and its purpose, to assist Council to understand the views and aspirations of the local community. He advised that at its close on 14 August 2016, 915 responses

5


had been received, predominantly from residents living in stand alone houses in The Gap, with the top five issues identified by respondents being:

Improve traffic congestion. No high density development. Separate bike lanes on Waterworks Road / add other bike lanes. Improve public transport. Have pull-in bays for buses on Waterworks Road.

A summary of the survey will be published on Council’s website. Everyone who has registered for email updates will be advised when this is available.

Council also carried out targeted consultation to engage with people who appeared to be less well represented in survey responses, specifically people over the age of 65 or under the age of 18. These activities worked through Council’s Community Engagement Team and Youth Development Team to engage with students at The Gap State High School, The Gap Probus Club and The Gap Uniting Church Seniors.

These combined activities have given Council’s survey a broad coverage of the community of The Gap.

For TGNP, the input of the community, including the input of the Community Planning Team, will be vital to test new ideas or concepts. The survey provides one mechanism through which Council can identify those issues. It was noted that a neighbourhood plan generally foreshadows development outcomes across a 10-year planning horizon.

Current planning activity in The GapMark then noted that there is currently some planning and development activity occurring in The Gap, and he highlighted the focus on the following development applications, issues and activities:

Nova Gardens. Illowra Street / Waterworks Road. 234 Payne Road. 28 Mt Nebo Road. 17 Glen Affric Street. Average lot sizes. Walton Bridge Reserve.

A member suggested that the proposed Ashgrove Golf Course development be added to this list, noting that it hadn’t yet been lodged with Council but information had been distributed to the local community.

Members then paused for a brief break before commencing the evening’s second activity.

Activity #2: Neighbourhood Check – challenges and opportunitiesDuring the main part of the activity, CPT members took part in facilitated table discussions to describe and detail the challenges and opportunities in The Gap. Members provided their input via

Two tables were devoted to discussing challenges while two tables discussed opportunities. Members spent fifteen minutes at each subject table before moving to the other subject.

At the end of the activity, each table facilitator highlighted the significant points to emerge from their discussions, and these are summarised as follows (detailed summaries of input provided at the end of these notes).

Table 1 – Challenges:

Traffic management is an issue with cars and trucks travelling through the area from other suburbs.

6


Natural hazards of fire and flooding is part of the area so escape routes need to be provided and well known by the community.

The transition to new technologies can be a challenge, for example, autonomous cars.

Table 2 – Opportunities:

Enhance the walking opportunities and connections along the creeks. Opportunities for local signage for gateways, catchments and creeks. Creating a bypass tunnel under the Enoggera Army Barracks would help get the traffic off

Settlement Road.

Table 3 – Challenges:

Social and recreational places are underutilitsed. Commuting to the CBD takes a long time. The natural environment and open spaces could be better integrated.

Table 4 – Opportunities:

More local shops throughout the area will promote walkability. There could be better access to Mt Coot-tha and Enoggera Reservoir from this area. Open space and sports and recreational facilities could provide opportunities for

rehabilitation not just recreation.

Jan noted that the key challenges identified in the online survey were:

Improve traffic congestion/ flow No high density development Separate bike lanes on Waterworks Road / add other bike lanes/ improve connectivity Improve public transport Pull-in bays for buses on Waterworks Road Improve local retail / dining / community facilities Improve footpaths and pedestrian links Protect environment and wildlife Parking issues (e.g. Ashgrove, Park ‘n’ Ride, other) Improve infrastructure before further development Appropriate development and shopping centre / Waterworks Road Suitable single-storey development for older residents Ensure greenspace with new developments

Introducing the visionJan indicated that the project will be guided by an overarching Vision statement, and the CPT’s input is critical to developing an appropriate vision statement that captures the community’s aspirations for The Gap.

Question from a member about the value of a vision other than just words. Discussion followed with Mark Leary, Matt Rolley and other CPT members identifying that the process of creating a vision required involvement and agreement from all CPT members who represent a range of views. The vision is the highest order statement in the neighbourhood plan and is used by planners to help make decisions.

The Vision, a non-technical statement, will describe what the area will look and feel like in 20 years’ time, summarising the desired future for The Gap. The Vision will provide the building blocks for the drafting of policy settings in the Neighbourhood Plan Strategy.

Examples of Vision statements adopted in Dutton Park-Fairfield and Moggill-Bellbowrie were provided to CPT members.

7


Members were requested to take some time between now and the next CPT meeting in October to consider their desired future for The Gap, and email to the project team ([email protected]) by 30 September, three dot points to describe what they believe should be the essence of The Gap in the future.

Next steps and meeting conclusionJan explained there will be a further three CPT meetings to guide the process, as follows.

CPT Meeting 2 (13 October 2016) CPT Meeting 3 (10 November 2016) CPT Meeting 4 (8 December 2016)

Mark pointed out that it is anticipated that the draft Ferny Grove – Upper Kedron Neighbourhood Plan Strategy will be released for public comment in October 2016, and all are encouraged to provide input. In answer to a member, copies of the strategy will be brought to the next CPT meeting. Further information is available on Council’s website https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/planning-building/planning-guidelines-tools/neighbourhood-planning/neighbourhood-plans-other-local-planning-projects/ferny-grove-upper-kedron-neighbourhood-plan

Further background research and investigations will continue, and results of some of that work are expected to be available when the CPT reconvenes in October 2016. This will enable a more detailed look at issues of importance to the local area.

To further assist CPT members, an opportunity will be provided for one-on-one discussions with Council’s planners for 45 minutes prior to the next CPT meeting. CPT members are invited to use those discussions to clarify any issues or to seek additional detailed information.

Members were reminded of the confidentiality requirements as detailed in the Terms of Reference for the project, including:

Information available for public release will be identified at the meetings and CPT members are encouraged to share this with their networks;

CPT meeting working materials are for review and comment and do not represent Council policy or decisions. CPT members will be advised of any confidential items.

Jan thanked all present for their enthusiasm and commitment to the night’s activities, and advised that all information provided during the meeting will now be collated and used as valuable input as the next stages are progressed.

Matt closed the meeting by thanking all for contributing in a truly collaborative manner.

The meeting closed at 8.33pm.

Further contactPhone: 3403 8888

Email: [email protected]

Web: www.brisbane.qld.gov.au and search for ‘The Gap’

Minutes checked/approved

Checked: Initials – ML

Approved: Initials – MR

8

https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/planning-building/planning-guidelines-tools/neighbourhood-planning/neighbourhood-plans-other-local-planning-projects/ferny-grove-upper-kedron-neighbourhood-plan



mailto:[email protected]


9


APPENDIX ADuring the Introductions, CPT members identified one thing they loved about The Gap:

Trees and birds Sacred sites – Bora ring Turrbal Leafy aspects Views of hills Bushwalks Quieter Less traffic Village Close community Village feel Mountains World apart from the city No-through suburb Peace and quiet Ring of trees Settlement Road Village feel Live and work in the suburb All roads lead back to The Gap Yoorala Street community garden Reconciliation Village feel Community Churches Netball Kookaburras, whip birds, wallabies Character of The Gap Don’t squeeze too much in Certainty Townhouses don’t fit in Protect ridgelines and vistas

10


Appendix BCPT workshop activity feedback: Opportunities and challenges for The Gap

Opportunities – Table 1 (Mark and Tim) Session 1:

Small local centres within walking distance that have their own feel.

Housing alternatives for the ageing population in the suburb to maintain the leafy and green feel of the suburb.

Improving the cycling experience for residents that commute along Waterworks Road.

Opportunities to preserve nature and vegetation that exists along creek corridors and ridgelines.

Opportunities also exist to preserve existing views of ridgelines.

Rail spur line from Keperra to The Gap.

Session 2:

Limit height and size of the development.

Opportunity for a new skate park that is activated, integrated and well lit within the Walton Bridge Reserve.

Active transport circuits could be developed by improving the existing cycle and pedestrian network in The Gap.

Improve the access to the existing Mount Coot-tha track.

An Olympic sized (25 m) public swimming pool developed in Wittonga Park.

Introducing contraflow traffic management solution along Waterworks Road to assist with traffic.

Create cycle and pedestrian links to Enoggera Reservoir.

Consider opportunities for improved retail precincts to accommodate improved dining and cafes.

Upgrade of the access and connections to the shopping centres so that they are Disability Discrimination Act compliant.

New community centre and library resourced with a Community Coordinator on the corner of Payne and Waterworks Roads.

Use some open space areas for organised activities and events.

Challenges – Table 2 (Alex and Georgia) Session 1:

Increasing traffic in the road network, particularly at the northern end of Settlement Road (over the hill), intersection at 7-Eleven on Settlement Road, and bus pull in bays located along Waterworks Road.

Improving the operation of bus lanes cannot be improved without addressing the design of the T2 transit-lane on Waterworks Road.

Traffic is only an issue at peak hour in the afternoon, particularly on Waterworks Road between Cooinda Street and the intersection of Settlement Road.

11


Limited access to the city for residents of the suburb using different modes of transport (car, bus and bikes).

Layout of the shopping centre creates traffic at the intersection on Waterworks Road

Young people in The Gap have nothing for them to do, with only an old and run down skate facility (1980s design) and underutilised sports and pony clubs.

Ashgrove Golf Club is counted as part of the sports ground and not accessible to the general public.

Integrated open space is required in The Gap.

Accessibility for disabled people is limited at some bus stops that have inappropriate gradients.

Preserving environmental character and trees through development controls.

Session 2:

Building on the Corner of Payne and Waterworks Roads is underutilised and an opportunity may exist to create an indoor space for kids and young people.

Need for aged care facility that caters for elderly people with high care requirements, which is unlikely to be met in the proposed development at Ashgrove Golf Course.

Distrust in the community about the development process.

Influence of proposed developments outside of the Neighbourhood Planning Area.

Suitability of the development in the area with the type, design, density and height eroding that character of the area.

Height of proposed development could create visual and amenity impacts by blocking views of the green hills.

Design of proposed developments need to integrate with the surrounding environment by blending with the hills to maintain the character of the suburb.

Inefficient public transport routes do not cater for commuters that travel to the city (approximately 45 minutes).

Limited provision of social places (e.g. restaurants and cinemas), however, development of ‘strip shops’ potentially changing the character of the area. Development of smaller-scale shops integrated throughout the area is needed to maintain the character of the area.

Social and recreational spaces and facilities are underutilised in the area.

Opportunities – Table 3 (Sonia and Dan)Session 1:

Maintain and enhance the existing green and public open space areas.

Gateway to the Enoggera Reservoir that could provide tourism, outdoor and business development opportunities for The Gap.

Mountain biking on Gap Creek Road provides outdoor recreation opportunities for residents and visitors.

Surrounding hills provide view sheds across the area that need to be protected.

Fish, Enoggera, and Wattle Creeks provide environmental values and connections (i.e. cycle ways and pathways) for the area.

12


Tributary of Wattle Creek, south of Payne Road, remains unnamed providing an opportunity for the local community to participate in this process.

Continuing to improve the environmental values of the creek corridors through existing community and environmental groups, particularly an overgrown part of Fish Creek that is adjacent to The Gap State High School.

Proposed upgrade of the Walter Bridge Reserve will enhance public open spaces offering in The Gap.

Providing a sense of arrival to the suburb through signage on gateways, including Waterworks and Settlement Roads.

Naming and signage of the catchments and major creeks in The Gap.

Increasing connections to Walkabout Creek Wildlife Centre and the shopping centre through public and active transport linkages.

Planned upgrade of the Walkabout Creek Wildlife Centre and walking tracks will increase the amenity and connections to Enoggera Reservoir.

Increasing opportunities for active transport (e.g. walking and biking) by improving linkages between gaps in the existing network, however, development of Nova Gardens has reduced some of these opportunities.

Connections could also be increased by pathways developed across the golf course.

Retail offering is piecemeal with opportunities to provide a more integrated and holistic centre for The Gap.

Enhancing connections to the shopping centre with adjoining land uses including the Walter Bridge Reserve and The Gap Farmers Markets.

Improving accessibility of car park and intersections to allow people to walk from the Walter Bridge Reserve and The Gap Farmers Markets, and the centre.

Upgrade the centre so that it is more like a village.

New alignment of the Settlement Road through the Enoggera Barracks.

Priority infrastructure upgrade for Settlement Road.

Suburb is well serviced by community facilities and spaces, but some are underutilised. Improved use and sharing could be supported by a community facilities audit.

Session 2

Naming of important Aboriginal places for the Turrbal people that exist in The Gap informed by engagement with elders in the community, which will break down some of the barriers that may exist in the community.

Provide displays in the native nursery for bush tucker and other native flora species.

Celebrate other local stories in the suburb through interpretive displays and signage, including the bunya tree that is close to the Enoggera Reservoir.

Neighbourhood Plan is an opportunity to manage the impacts of development on the character of the suburb, and enhance the connections with the other suburbs in the area.

A vacant commercial building exists in Payne Road – up for lease –that could an opportunity to consolidate with other local retailers.

Increasing allied health services to enable existing residents to age in place, including physiotherapy, dieticians and others.

13


Extending the trail way along the Enoggerra Creek to provide connections with the Walkabout Creek Wildlife Centre and Enoggera Reservoir.

Development of child care facilities provides social and economic opportunities for The Gap.

Upgrading the playgrounds for young families in The Gap that currently travel to other suburbs, which could support local economic development outcomes.

Increasing connections with Enoggera Reservoir.

Upgrade of the Walkabout Creek Wildlife Centre and walking tracks will be an asset for the Gap.

A beach and car park has been constructed at Enoggera Reservoir that has created an attraction for residents and visitors.

Upgrade of the shopping centre will increase the retail opportunities for residents that currently drive to other suburbs.

Enhancing the shopping centre to make it a destination to support local jobs and networks.

Increasing small businesses provided to expand the retail offering in the shopping centre, including coffee shops, food and others.

Cottage Care, subdivision of larger blocks to provide separate dwellings for age care, provides an opportunity for residents to age in place in the Gap.

Challenges – Table 4 (Anna and Jess)Session 1:

Traffic management is an issue with a lot of people travelling through the area from other suburbs.

Waterworks Road is the main arterial road for commuters travelling to the city, and buses stopping on waterworks road impact the T2 transit-lanes worsening traffic.

Settlement Road is another route providing access to the suburb that is impacted by traffic.

Transition to automated and driverless cars could impact traffic in The Gap.

Pollution and road safety are health issues that relate to the traffic issues experienced in The Gap.

Extreme weather events like storms, flooding and bush fires are challenges to the community in The Gap, which may change with the effects of climate change.

Close proximity to Brisbane Forest Park creates a bush fire hazard to properties in The Gap.

Gateway to the Enoggera Reservoir that could provide tourism, outdoor and business development opportunities for The Gap.

Aesthetics of developments in the area challenge the existing character, with a need to focus on requirements for green space, site cover and lot sizes in the plan.

Demography is a challenge for the area with an ageing population, but also a large number of young families.

The Gap State High School is attractive for parents from outside the Neighbourhood Plan Area as it is a high performing school; driving people into The Gap.

14


Diversity and choice of housing in the area are a challenge.

Lack of respect for cultural and Aboriginal heritage in the area.

Preserving greenspace and vegetation in the area, including bunya trees of Aboriginal importance.

Heavy vehicle routes through The Gap impact the amenity of the area, despite being a no through suburb.

Lack of services and facilities provided for all the community, especially young people.

Session 2:

Efficiency of local buses (381 and 380 services) provides challenges for commuters travelling to the city; only running on an hourly basis.

Rat running on local streets (e.g. Romeo Street) to avoid traffic is a challenge in the area.

Limited bike routes that connect directly to the city.

Park and Ride facility fill up quickly by 6:30am.

Bikes, buses and cars sharing on Waterworks Road, especially near the quarry on Glen Road.

Illowra Street, Payne Road, Dillon Road and Gap Creek Road experience traffic issues at peak hour, which are routes for tradesmen.

Limited commercial zoning in the area reducing the opportunities for local shops in walking distance like Friendly Grocer on Payne Road.

Limited bushfire escape routes are an issue that could be provided in Keys and Payne Roads.

Lot sizes and density of housing developed in the area are inappropriate for their location.

Trucks travelling on Settlement Road are a specific issue because of their noise impacts.

Emerging Community Zoning in the City Plan does not provide clear expectations about development form.

Low density zoning enables growth in unsuitable areas, specifically lots that are larger than 3,000 m2.

15


Opportunities table 1 maps

16


Opportunities table 2 map

Challenges table 3 map

17


Challenges table 4 map

18

Documents

Spring Hill Community Planning Team meeting notes · Web viewCPT members participated in a brief introductory activity, chatting in pairs, sharing their backgrounds and discussing