Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.energy.gov/EM 1
Spring 2015 EM SSAB Chairs MeetingConnie Flohr
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Program Planning and Budget
April 2015
Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
www.energy.gov/EM 2
Dec. 16: FY 2015 Omnibus
(P.L. # 113-235). EM funded at
$5.861M, $239M above request.
Oct. 1st - FY 2015 starts under a
Continuing Resolution
Feb. 2: President releases
FY 2016 budget request
Congressional Hearings begin
for EM’s FY 2016 Budget
Request
Budget Timeline: FY 2015 Events and FY 2016 Outlook
Sep. 30th - Deadline for Congress to
pass an appropriation for FY 2016
Potential exists for FY 2016 caps
lower than the Budget proposesLawmakers in both chambers
release FY 2016 budget resolutions
Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. July – Sep. Oct.
Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
www.energy.gov/EM 3
FY 2016 Budget Focus
EM’s FY 2016 budget supports clear, discrete progress in the cleanup of
the environmental legacy of the Cold War.
In particular, the budget will allow EM to:
� Continue recovery of transuranic waste disposal operations at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
� Continue construction of the Low Activity, Lab, and Balance of Facilities at Waste Treatment and
Immobilization Facility and design of the Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System at Hanford.
� Continue Defense Waste Processing Facility liquid waste processing and supports construction and
commissioning of Salt Waste Processing Facility at Savannah River Site.
� Complete major facility cleanout and demolition projects.
� Address key infrastructure needs across the complex.
WIPP Recovery (NM) Salt Waste Processing Facility (SC)
Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
www.energy.gov/EM 4
Radioactive Liquid Tank Waste
$ 2,297M / 39%
Facility D&D
$ 835M / 14%
Special Nuclear Materials
and Used Nuclear Fuel*
$ 967M / 17%
Transuranic &
Solid Waste
$ 779M / 13%
Soil and Groundwater
$ 527M / 9%
Site Services**
$ 413M / 7%
**Includes Program Direction, Program Support, Technology Development & Deployment,
Post Closure Administration, Community and Regulatory Support.
*Includes Safeguards and Security
Where Does Each Dollar of Funding Go?
Funding by EM Mission Area in FY 2016
EM’s FY 2016 Budget Request - $5.818 Billion Total
Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
www.energy.gov/EM 5
Sites Remaining in 2012
CA$12M
ID$375M
KY$244M
NV$65M
NM
$455M
NY$61M
OH$265M
SC$1.383B
TN$380M
UT
WA$2.4B
$38M
EM FY 2016 Budget Request Funding by State
Note: State funding values include program
direction costs for each field site.
Total Request: $5.818B
Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
www.energy.gov/EM 6
$332M
TN $427M
EM FY 2014 - FY 2016 Budget Request
Funding by Field Site
(Dollars in the Millions)
Site
FY 2014
Current
($M)
FY 2015
Request
($M)
FY 2015
Enacted
($M)
FY 2016
Request
($M)
Carlsbad 221 220 324 248
Idaho 394 372 405 367
Los Alamos National Laboratory 225 225 190 189
Moab 36 36 36 38
Nevada 62 65 65 62
Oak Ridge 429 385 431 366
Paducah 325 270 270 232
Portsmouth 199 222 276 227
Richland 1,013 914 1,007 914
River Protection 1,210 1,235 1,212 1,414
Savannah River 1,255 1,282 1,260 1,337
West Valley Demonstration Project 66 60 60 61
Program Direction 300 281 281 282
Mission Support 35 28 39 62
Other Sites 61 26 26 19
D&D Fund Deposit 0 463 463 472
Subtotal, Environmental Management 5,832 6,085 6,345 6,290
UED&D Contribution 0 -463 -463 -472
Offset -2 0 -21 0
Total, Environmental Management5,830 5,622 5,861 5,818
Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
www.energy.gov/EM 7
-93
-76
-65
-49
-38
-38
-8
-2
-1
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
2
9
23
77
202
-125 -75 -25 25 75 125 175 225
Richland
Carlsbad
Oak Ridge
Portsmouth
Idaho
Paducah
Closure Sites
Nevada
Los Alamos
Sandia
Lawrence Livermore
Mission Support
TDD
West Valley
Program Direction
ETEC
Moab
UED&D Fund
Uranium/Thorium
Savannah River
River Protection
-35
-23
-23
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
10
33
46
54
93
104
-45 -5 35 75 115
Los Alamos
River Protection
Savannah River
Moab
Closure Sites
ETEC
Lawrence Livermore
Mission Support
Nevada
Paducah
Program Direction
Sandia
UED&D Fund
West Valley
TDD
Uranium/Thorium
Idaho
Oak Ridge
Portsmouth
Richland
Carlsbad
Changes to Funding by Site (dollars in millions)
FY 15 Request: $5.622B
FY 15 Enacted: $5.861B
Increase of: +$ 239M
FY 2015 Request versus FY 2015 Omnibus FY 2015 Omnibus versus FY 2016 Request
FY 15 Enacted: $5.861B
FY 16 Request: $5.818B
Decrease of: -$ 43M
Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
www.energy.gov/EM 8
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013
� Provided sequester relief
temporarily over two years in
FY 2014 and FY 2015.
FY 2016 Budget Outlook
� President’s Request is $74.4B
over caps (+$37.9B for defense
and +$36.5B for non-defense).
� House and Senate Resolutions
claim to adhere to the spending
caps for FY 2016 in both defense
and non-defense accounts.
Budgetary Outlook for FY 2016
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2011
� Imposed spending caps on discretionary programs set to reduce funding by more than $1T
over ten years from FY 2012 – FY 2021.
House /
Senate
Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
www.energy.gov/EM 9
Formulation Timeline: FY 2017
Meetings held with
EM SSAB & other
stakeholders
per memo from
Mark Whitney
dated
Feb. 6, 2015
EM issues budget
guidance to sites
on 3/31/15
EM SSAB & other stakeholders submit
advice to sites
**EM BUDGET
REQUEST BECOMES
EMBARGOED UPON
RECEIPT OF SITE
IPLs**
February to May 2015
EM budget deliberations
between the sites,
DOE leadership, and CFO
June to Sept. 2015 February 2016
1st Monday in
February President
rolls-out budget to
Congress
Oct. 2015 to Jan. 2016
EM identifies request for
programmatic
requirements including all
environmental compliance
requirements in official
OMB budget justification
document (OMBJ)
OMB funding decision
expected in late
November
(Passback)
EM submits final
budget to CFO in
accordance with CFO
schedule (usually by
mid-January)
DOE submits appeals
to OMB Passback and
engages with
OMB/CFO to reach
settlement