10
5/1/2018 1 Sports Turf Research Focusing on Athlete Performance & Safety John Sorochan, Ph.D. January 18, 2018 OVERVIEW OF THE UT CENTER FOR ATHLETIC FIELD SAFETY J.C. SOROCHAN University of Tennessee Center for Athletic Field Safety CAFS Facts 25 current sports turf research projects 5+ acres of athletic turf research Cool- and warm-season turf and synthetic surfaces Importance Youth injuries (<14) cost the US public $49,192,781,832 in 1997 Emergency room visits (2004) 116,000 – baseball 186,000 – football AAP, US CPSC, & National Youth Sports Safety Foundation Importance 5.7% of high school football injuries were definitely related to field conditions, 15.2% were possibly related to field conditions (Harper et al., 1984) 10% of lawsuits related to sports injuries claim that the athletic field was inadequately maintained (Dougherty, 1988) Importance 38 million children & adolescents (NIH, 2009) 3.5 million children under 14 receive medical treatment for sports injuries (Safe Kids, 2007) 50% of these injuries are preventable (Brenner, 2007; Safe Kids, 2007)

Sports Turf Research OVERVIEW OF THE UT CENTER FOR

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Sports Turf Research OVERVIEW OF THE UT CENTER FOR

5/1/2018

1

Sports Turf Research –Focusing on Athlete Performance & Safety

John Sorochan, Ph.D.

January 18, 2018

O VERVI EW O F TH E UT C EN TER FO R ATH LETI C FI ELD SA FETY

J . C . SO RO C H A N

University of Tennessee Center for Athletic Field Safety

CAFS Facts• 25 current sports turf research projects• 5+ acres of athletic turf research • Cool- and warm-season turf and synthetic surfaces

Importance

• Youth injuries (<14) cost the US public $49,192,781,832 in 1997

• Emergency room visits (2004)• 116,000 – baseball

• 186,000 – football

AAP, US CPSC, & National Youth Sports Safety Foundation

Importance

• 5.7% of high school football injuries were definitely related to field conditions, 15.2% were possibly related to field conditions 

(Harper et al., 1984)

• 10% of lawsuits related to sports injuries claim that the athletic field 

was inadequately maintained 

(Dougherty, 1988)

Importance

• 38 million children & adolescents(NIH, 2009)

• 3.5 million children under 14 receive medical treatment for sports injuries 

(Safe Kids, 2007)

• 50% of these injuries are preventable

(Brenner, 2007; Safe Kids, 2007) 

Page 2: Sports Turf Research OVERVIEW OF THE UT CENTER FOR

5/1/2018

2

CAFS Traffic Simulator CAFS Traffic Simulator

FIFA Soccer Cleat

World Rugby Cleat

CAFS Traffic Simulator

Spring SpecificationType: die springMaterial: steelInner diameter: 0.5 inOuter diameter: 1 inLength: 3 inRating: 10.3 lb per 0.10 in

Testing Evaluations Testing Evaluations

Page 3: Sports Turf Research OVERVIEW OF THE UT CENTER FOR

5/1/2018

3

Testing Methods for Surface Hardness

ASTM F‐355A ASTM F1702

Clegg Surface Hardness Comparisons

2.25 kg (5 lb) missile45 cm (18”) drop height

(ASTM F1702) 

ASTM F355A Synthetic Turf Standard

9.1 kg (20 lbs) flat missile61 cm (24”) drop heightFlat surface on projectile

Used to measure high level body impacts

(ASTM 1936)

Clegg Surface Hardness Comparisons

2.25 kg (5 lb) missile45 cm (18”) drop height

(ASTM F1702) 

F355 Comparisons  

Synthetic Turf = Bermudagrass > Kentucky bluegrass

9.1 kg missile61 cm drop height

F355 Comparisons  

• Synthetic Turf vs. Bermudagrass Not different • Synthetic Turf ‐108 GMAX  and Bermudagrass ‐110.5 GMAX

• Synthetic Turf vs. KBG  ***Different • Synthetic Turf ‐108 GMAX and KBG ‐90 GMAX

Page 4: Sports Turf Research OVERVIEW OF THE UT CENTER FOR

5/1/2018

4

Clegg Surface Hardness Comparisons  

Bermudagrass > Synthetic Turf > Kentucky bluegrass

2.25 kg missile45 cm drop height

Clegg Surface Hardness Comparisons  

• Synthetic Turf vs. Bermudagrass ***Different • Synthetic Turf ‐76 GMAX and Bermudagrass ‐90 GMAX

• Synthetic Turf vs. KBG ***Different • Synthetic Turf ‐76 GMAX and KBG ‐57 GMAX

Clegg versus F355 F355 to Clegg Relationship 2013F355 after 30 Sim

ulated Traffic Events

Clegg Impact Soil Tester after 30 Simulated Events

Tennessee Athletic Field Tester (TAFT)Tennessee Athletic Field Tester

•Athlete weight• 35 lbs – 330 lbs

•Running• 1 m/s

•Contact distance• 230 mm

Page 5: Sports Turf Research OVERVIEW OF THE UT CENTER FOR

5/1/2018

5

TAFT TAFT Vertical Force Comparisons  Synthetic Turf > Bermudagrass > Kentucky bluegrass

TAFT Vertical Force Comparisons210 lb Athlete

• Synthetic Turf vs. Bermudagrass ***Different • Synthetic Turf 340 lbs. of vertical force and Bermudagrass 324 lbs. of vertical force

• Synthetic vs. Kentucky Bluegrass ***Different • Synthetic Turf 340 lbs. of vertical force and KBG 302 lbs. of vertical force 

Rotational Resistance  Comparisons  

Synthetic Turf = Bermudagrass = Kentucky bluegrass

TAFT Horizontal Comparisons  Synthetic Turf > Bermudagrass > Kentucky bluegrass

TAFT Horizontal Force Comparisons210 lb Athlete

• Synthetic Turf vs. Bermudagrass ***Different • Synthetic Turf 254 lbs. of horizontal force and Bermudagrass 234 lbs. horizontal force

• Synthetic Turf vs. KBG ***Different • Synthetic Turf 254 lbs. of horizontal force and KBG 194 lbs. of horizontal force 

Page 6: Sports Turf Research OVERVIEW OF THE UT CENTER FOR

5/1/2018

6

Head Injury Criterion (HIC)

•When HIC = 1000, 18% of people will suffer traumatic brain injuries 

•When HIC = 250, concussions have occurred in most athletes  

(Viano, 2005)

Playground Head Drop Device Curved projectile mimics head shape

Standard - ASTM F1292ASTM F355E

• 4.6 kg (10 lbs.) curved missile

• World Rugby Standard for synthetic turf 1.3 m (51”) drop height

• HIC must be less than 1000

Conclusions 2016 HIC for Root Zone & Turf Species

Game 0 Game 20

ASTM

Native

Determining HIC on Trafficked Bermudagrass

ASTM F1292 1.3 m drop on synthetic turf

Clegg: ~71 avg. F355A: ~119 avg.HIC: ~1,225 avg.  (1.3 m)

Clegg: ~88 avg.F355A: ~111 avg.HIC: ~370 avg. (1.3 m)

Measuring Critical Fall Height to achieve 1,000 HIC

USGA Spec: Bermudagrass = 2.5 m

ASTM Spec:Bermudagrass = 2.4 m

Page 7: Sports Turf Research OVERVIEW OF THE UT CENTER FOR

5/1/2018

7

Head Injury Criterium (HIC) changes on bermudagrass w/ soil type and traffic 

Game 0 Game 20

ASTM

Native

ASTM F1292

Conclusions 2016 HIC for Root Zone & Turf SpeciesMeasuring HIC for Soil Type & Turf Species

Determining Critical Fall Height (1,000 HIC) based on Species, Soil Moisture, & Soil Type

World Rugby 1.3 m limit

Athlete to Surface Interactions

Athlete to Surface Interaction StudiesAthletic injury mechanisms and risk factors

• Movement coordination variability

• Computer simulation of human movement

Page 8: Sports Turf Research OVERVIEW OF THE UT CENTER FOR

5/1/2018

8

Athlete to Surface Interactions

Deceleration and Cutting Movements

Outdoor Human Performance Testing Outdoor Human Performance Testing

Outdoor Human Performance Testing

Soccer ball to Playing Surface Interactions

Page 9: Sports Turf Research OVERVIEW OF THE UT CENTER FOR

5/1/2018

9

Professional soccer players are emotional 

• Playing surfaces are crucial for the best play.

• It’s never their fault for a Bad Bounce.

All types of surfaces…

(Google 2017)

UN I VERSI TY FI ELD D AYSREG ULA RLY ED UC A TE A T

University of Tennessee Research Field Day August 30, 2018

Page 10: Sports Turf Research OVERVIEW OF THE UT CENTER FOR

5/1/2018

10

John Sorochan, Ph.D. [email protected] @Sorochan

Adam Thoms, M.S. [email protected] @UT_CAFS