Upload
votram
View
250
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Spoof Plasmon Hybridization
Jingjing Zhang2,
*, Zhen Liao1,
*, Yu Luo2,
*, #
, Xiaopeng Shen1, Stefan A. Maier
3, #, Tie Jun Cui
1, #
1 State Key Laboratory of Millimetre Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
2 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Nanyang
Avenue 639798, Singapore
3 The Blackett Laboratory, Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
# To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Abstract
Plasmon hybridization between closely spaced nanoparticles yields new hybrid modes not found in
individual constituents, allowing for the engineering of resonance properties and field enhancement
capabilities of metallic nanostructure. Experimental verifications of plasmon hybridization have been
thus far mostly limited to optical frequencies, as metals cannot support surface plasmons at longer
wavelengths. Here, we introduce the concept of ‘spoof plasmon hybridization’ in highly conductive
metal structures and investigate experimentally the interaction of localized surface plasmon
resonances (LSPR) in adjacent metal disks corrugated with subwavelength spiral patterns. We show
that the hybridization results in the splitting of spoof plasmon modes into bonding and antibonding
resonances analogous to molecular orbital rule and plasmonic hybridization in optical spectrum.
These hybrid modes can be manipulated to produce enormous field enhancements (>5000) by tuning
the separation between disks or alternatively, the disk size, which effectively changes the relative gap
size. The impact of the radiation loss is considered to find out the optimum disk size that maximizes
field enhancement capabilities. Our investigation not only extends the range of applicability of the
hybridization model, but also provides insightful guidance to exporting the exciting applications
associated with plasmon hybridization to lower spectral range.
1. Introduction
Metallic nanoparticles support surface plasmons at optical frequencies and have the ability to
concentrate electromagnetic radiation into nanoscale dimensions, giving rise to a strong enhancement
of electromagnetic fields in the near-field region. In complex plasmonic systems consisting of
multiple closely spaced nanoparticles, the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) modes of
each individual nanoparticle can interact and form hybridized bonding and antibonding plasmon
modes. Such coupling effect allows for largely increased field enhancement at LSPR compared to
isolated constituents, making it attractive for a large variety of applications, including molecular
sensing [1], surface-enhanced spectroscopy [2], photovoltaics [3], and nonlinear process [4]. As the
geometrical features of the nanoparticles are pushed to sub-nanometer regime, nonlocal and quantum
effects arising from the dispersion of charges at the metal boundaries play increasingly important
role, setting an ultimate limit for the maximum field enhancement [5-10]. At lower frequencies
(terahertz regions or microwave frequencies) where the effects of metal smearing are negligible,
however, metals feature poor confinement of electromagnetic waves and cannot support surface
plasmons. Recently, by patterning the metal surface with subwavelength periodic features, spoof
surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) have been developed from microwave to far-infrared frequencies
to control the surface electromagnetic modes with properties resembling those of conventional
metallo-dielectric plasmonic structures at optical frequencies [11-15]. This metamaterial approach
offers possibilities of bringing most of the advantages associated with optical SPPs to lower
frequencies, such as high confinement of electromagnetic field [13]. In particular, in the terahertz
and microwave spectra where the metal is highly conductive, even higher field enhancements may be
achieved with particles supporting spoof SPPs, as compared to their optical counterparts. Moreover,
the behaviour of spoof SPPs depends primarily on the geometry of the corrugations instead of the
optical properties of the metal. This gives us extended flexibility in controlling the surface plasmons,
either as propagating SPPs in the waveguide configurations [14-19] or as localized surface plasmons
(LSPs) in structures with closed surfaces [20-25]. While various theoretical and experimental studies
have been performed on the spoof SPPs in individual devices or structures, the investigation on the
hybridization of spoof LSP modes in coupling systems have not yet been reported.
A thorough understanding of the coupling between individual structures can facilitate the design
of highly sophisticated plasmonic systems with desired optical properties. An electromagnetic
analogue of the molecular orbital theory, the plasmon hybridization model has been proposed as a
simple and intuitive tool to describe and interpret the plasmon response of complex nanostructures or
interacting nanoparticle systems. In this work, we present a hybridization scheme of spoof SPPs,
showing that the spoof LSP resonance properties of the complex structures depends on the
geometries and spectra of the building blocks. In analogy to the rule of molecular orbitals or
plasmonic hybridization, the collective modes supported by such spoof plasmonic system can be
categorized into bonding and antibonding resonances [26]. In particular, we investigate
experimentally the coupling between adjacent metal disks with spiral subwavelength textures which
support spoof LSP at microwave frequencies. We show that the hybrid spoof LSPs can be
manipulated to produce enormous field enhancement by tuning the separation in the dimer or
alternatively, the radius of the disk, which effectively changes the relative gap size. The interplay
between the radiative loss and the plasmonic focusing is investigated in details, and the optimum size
parameter is found for which the field enhancement is maximized. Our investigation not only
extends the range of applicability of the hybridization model, but also provides insightful guidance to
exporting the exciting applications associated with plasmon hybridization to lower spectral range.
2. Hybridization Model for Spoof Plasmons
A core-shell nanostructure represents a simple prototypical model system for the study of
plasmon hybridization, where the geometry-dependent plasmon response can be taken as an
interaction between the plasmon resonances of a nanosphere and a nanocavity [26], resulting in the
splitting of the plasmon resonances into a lower energy symmetric (bonding) mode and a higher
energy antisymmetric (antibonding) mode. Here, we consider a two-dimensional (2D) perfect
electric conductor (PEC) composite structure comprising a cavity with spiral corrugations (with inner
radius r2, outer radius R2, and spiral intersection angle 2 ) and a spiral core (with inner radius r1,
outer radius R1, and spiral intersection angle 1 ) as illustrated in Fig. 1 (a). For the cases where the
ratio of the spacing between the spiral arms to the period of the spiral is fixed as a
d, the surface-
charge density can be expressed as cylindrical harmonics of order n, and the resonances modes can
be derived as (Details given in the supporting information)
0 1 1 0 2 22
2
1 0 1 1 0 2 2
cos cos1 1
cos cos1 1
n
g g
g g
k aR k ar
nn d nn dr
R k aR k ar
nn d nn d
(1)
where ng is the dielectric constant of the surrounding medium, k0 is the free space wave vector;
and are defined as
0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
0 1 1 0
1 1 1 1
cos cos cos cos
cos cos cos cos
g g g g
g g g g
n k r n k R n k R n k rJ Y J Y
n k R n k r n k r n k RJ Y J Y
,
and
0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2
1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2
0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2
0 1 1 0
2 2 2 2
cos cos cos cos
cos cos cos cos
g g g g
g g g g
n k r n k R n k R n k rJ Y J Y
n k r n k R n k R n k rJ Y J Y
.
Note that this expression for eigenmodes is similar to the case of metallic or dielectric core-shell
nanostructure where the resonance condition is expressed as [26, 27]
2
1 22
1 1 2
1 1
1 1
n
r
R
(2)
where 1 and 2 are the permittivity of the shell and the core, respectively. Equation (1) indicates that
the charge density on the inner surface of the cavity and outer surface of the core can be constructed
from linear combinations of the surface charge densities of its two primitive components. Analogous
to molecular orbital theory, the interaction of the spoof surface plasmons gives rise to a bonding
mode with lower energy level corresponding the symmetric coupling and an antibonding mode with
higher energy level corresponding to the asymmetric coupling, as shown in Fig. 1(a). In contrast to
metal nanoshells in optical frequencies where surface charges exist in both metal and dielectric, the
interaction of spoof SPPs in the PEC core and shell can only occur within the dielectric gap in
between. Therefore, spoof plasmon modes of PEC structures can be tuned over a smaller range of
kinetic energies than plasmon modes in metallic nanostructures. Fig. 1(b) displays the spectral
positions of eigenmodes (i. e. magnetic dipolar mode, electric dipolar mode, and quadrupole mode)
in terms of the gap size between the cavity and the core. Here, the radius of spiral core is kept as
R1=10mm, and the depth of the corrugations on the inner surface of the cavity is fixed as
2 2 6.42R r mm . We find that as the gap size increases, the splitting between the bonding and
antibonding modes decreases, due to the decrease of coupling between the charges on the surfaces of
the core and the cavity. As the gap size approaches infinity, the eigenmodes will approach those of
the individual primitive structures.
3. Experimental Verification
The spoof SPP hybridization picture illustrated with the example of spiral core-shell structures
can also be used to understand the plasmon resonance of more complex spoof SPP structures such as
dimers. The dimer structure has been considered as an important prototypical system that exhibits
large electromagnetic field enhancement at plasmon resonances. Therefore, in what follows we
experimentally study the hybridization of spoof SPPs and the underlying physics in the dimer
structure in microwave frequencies. The schematic of the dimer structure is shown in Fig. 2(a),
which consists of two identical metallic spiral structures separated by gap g=0.1 mm. Each spiral
structure is composed of a small disk of radius r=1mm surrounded by six spiral arms with radius
R=10mm. The arms have a width 0.5mm, and the spacing between neighbouring arms is 1.5mm,
giving the period of the spiral d=2mm (as measured at the end of the arm). These two 0.035mm
ultrathin metallic spiral disks are printed on a 0.5 mm-thick dielectric substrate with the relative
permittivity 2.65 and loss tangent 0.002. Fig. 2(b) shows the photograph of the metallic spiral disks
fabricated with a standard printed circuit board manufacturing process. To investigate the coupling
between two closely spaced spiral disks and demonstrate how the plasmon modes of individual spiral
disks interact and form new hybridized modes, we perform both numerical and experimental studies
under dipole illuminations at the centre of the gap polarising horizontally and perpendicularly, as
shown in Fig. 2(b). Finite-element simulations are carried out using a commercial software, CST
Microwave Studio, where the metal is treated using the PEC approximation at microwave
frequencies. In the measurement, a monopole probe is placed 1.5mm above the structure, and
connected with the vector network analyzer (Agilent N5230C), which measures the reflection from
the structure.
3.1. Hybridization of Spoof LSP Modes
The simulated and measured S11 spectra for the spiral dimer under two different polarized
excitations are shown in Fig. 3, with the nearfield Ez field distribution given in the right column. The
dipolar modes of each spiral are hybridized to form plasmon orbitals, leading to new net dipole
moments which govern the far-field optical properties [28, 29]. Here we focus our attention on the
lowest momentums, i. e. dipolar modes and magnetic modes; higher-order multipolar modes are not
discussed. As shown in Fig. 3(a), as the monopole probe is oriented perpendicular to the dimer, the
dipolar modes of each spiral are excited, orienting perpendicularly to the dimer. Interesting, due to
the non-mirror-symmetric geometry of the dimer, a degenerated mode with dipole oriented parallel
to the dimer is formed (mode I), with a binding plasmon orbital at lowest energy (around 2.03 GHz).
A standard bonding mode is formed at a higher frequency (2.2 GHz) with the dipoles in the two
spirals in phase, oriented in the same direction as the external excitation (mode II). As demonstrated
in previous work [22, 24], a magnetic dipolar mode can be excited on individual metallic spiral
structures, where the circulating Ez field varies between negative and positive to generate a closed
current loop and a magnetic momentum. In Fig. 3(b), we can see that the magnetic plasmon modes
on two spirals are anti-symmetrically coupled (antibonding) at 3.45 GHz (mode III). The phase is
uniform in the azimuthal direction of each spiral and the plasmons on two spirals are oscillating out-
of-phase. When the external dipolar excitation is parallel to the dimer, similarly, a degenerated mode
with out-of-phase dipole moments on two spirals perpendicular to the dimer is observed at 2.15 GHz
(mode IV), as shown in Fig. 3(c). The destructive interference of the two spiral plasmons forms an
antibonding mode at around 2.25 GHz (mode V). At higher frequencies, the magnetic modes on
individual spirals are both anti-symmetrically coupled (antibonding mode VI) and symmetrically
coupled (bonding mode VII) with out-of-phase and in-phase oscillations on the two spirals. The
simulation results agree well with the experiment in predicting the spectral positions of the resonance
modes, while deviations are visible in both the magnitude and linewidth of the resonances, due to the
difference between the monopole probe in the simulation and the measurement.
3.2. Extremely Large Field Enhancements
Similar to the core-shell system as discussed above, the interaction of spoof SPPs in the dimer
structure can be engineered by the separation between the constitutive components. To study the
splitting of bonding and antibonding dimer plasmons in terms of the separation and demonstrate how
the spoof dipole resonance of two interacting spiral disks can be used to enhance the electric field in
the centre of the gap, we change the mutual separation between the spirals and explore the variation
of the resonance spectrum and the field enhancement at the gap, as shown in Fig. 4. When the gap
size is gradually reduced from 0.9mm to 0.1mm, the the splitting of bonding and antibonding modes
increases as the mutual coupling increases, and this interaction induces a red shift in the lowest mode
of plasmon resonance (mode I), as confirmed by the simulation and measurement. Numerical
simulations reveal the expected behaviour of strongly localized fields in the gap, which increases as
the gap size decreases (insets of Fig. 4(a)). As given in Fig. 4(b), the plasmon resonance for mode I
shifts predictably towards the red, and the field enhancement grows as the gap dimension decreases
steadily, reaching up to 5500 at the gap size 0.1mm.
3.3. Radiative Effects
To achieve even larger enhancements of field, we may wish to further decrease the gap size,
which is ultimately limited by the fabrication technique. An alternative approach is to increase the
size of the spiral disks while keeping the separation unchanged, a way to reduce the relative gap size.
However, as the size of the spiral structure grows, the radiative damping plays an increasingly
important part, leading to the reduction of field enhancements. Therefore, it is vital to take into
account the trade-off between the interaction and the radiative reaction, and find the dimension
parameters which give the optimum performance in light harvesting. Here, we investigate this
problem with numerical simulations by comparing the extinction cross sections for spiral dimers
with different disk radii from 9mm to 13mm while the gap size remains 0.1mm. Three resonance
peaks can be observed at R=9mm in Fig. 5(a). The increase of the disk dimension not only leads to
the distinct red shift of all the resonance peaks as expected, but also results in the change of the
resonance modes and the enhancement of electromagnetic field at the gap. As displayed in Fig. 5(b),
at the first resonance peak (i.e. the lowest resonance frequency), the field enhancement grows with
the increase of the disk dimension and reach the maximum at R=11mm. As we further increase the
disk size, the contribution of the radiation loss will surpass that from the reduction of relative gap
dimension, leading to the decrease of the field enhancement. The gap field enhancement at the
second resonance peak corresponding to a quadruple mode is monotonically increasing with the disk
size from 9 mm to 11 mm. At the third resonance peak, the field enhancement slightly decreases as
the radius change from 9 mm to 10 mm, and then steadily increases with R. Notably, as the disk
radius reaches 13mm, the field enhancements of higher-order modes (the second and third resonance
peaks) exceed those of the dipolar resonance. This phenomenon is quite different from that observed
for nanoparticle dimer at optical frequencies, where the maximum field enhancements generally
occur at the lowest resonance peak [10, 30, 31].
3.4. Spatial Nonlocality
Besides very small gaps, fabricating very small corrugations (or very large corrugation number)
is also challenging in experiments of spiral dimers supporting spoof SPPs. Here, we consider the
effect of spatial nonlocality resulting from the finite size of the surface textures and find how the
spatial nonlocality affects the maximum field enhancement. As shown in Fig. 6, the resonance
frequencies of the dipolar modes and corresponding field enhancement are calculated in terms of the
number of corrugations in each spiral disk. The resonance shows a red shift as the number of spiral
arms increases, as denoted by the black curve. The field enhancement grows as the spatial
nonlocality is reduced, and will gradually converge for arm number larger than 16.
4. Conclusion
We have shown that an intuitive hybridization picture analogous to what has been previously
established for plasmonic nanostructures can be applied for describing and understanding the spoof
SPP modes in composite metal structures at low frequencies (from microwave to terahertz spectra).
The spoof plasmon hybridization scheme is theoretically demonstrated using the example of a 2D
textured PEC core-shell structure, representing the simplest coupling system, and further investigated
experimentally in a more complex metal dimer structure which support spoof SPPs at microwave
frequencies. We have shown that the interaction of the spoof SPPs gives rise to bonding modes and
antibonding modes. The spectral positions of collective modes and coupling strength depend on the
geometries and spectra of the primitive structures, allowing for the manipulation of hybridization to
produce enormous field enhancement. Practical issues, including spatial nonlocality arising from the
finite size of the surface textures and the radiation loss particularly in large structures, have been
considered to find the optimized geometrical parameters for which the field enhancement is
maximized.
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to thank Professor John Pendry for fruitful discussions. This work was supported in
part by Nanyang Technological University Start-up Grants, Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE)
under Grant No RG72/15 and Grant No. MOE2015-T2-1-145, and in part by the National Science
Foundation of China (61571117, 61171024, 61171026, 61138001), 111 Project (111-2-05), National
Instrumentation Program (2013YQ200647), Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of
Southeast University (YBJJ1436), and Program for Postgraduate Research Innovation in University
of Jiangsu Province (3204004910). S.A.M. acknowledges the EPSRC (EP/L 204926/1), the Royal
Society, and the Lee-Lucas Chair in Physics.
References
[1] J.N. Anker, W.P. Hall, O. Lyandres, N.C. Shah, J. Zhao, R.P. Van Duyne, Biosensing with
plasmonic nanosensors, Nat. Mater., 7 (2008) 442-453.
[2] K.A. Willets, R.P. Van Duyne, Localized surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and sensing,
Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 58 (2007) 267-297.
[3] H.A. Atwater, A. Polman, Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices, Nat. Mater., 9 (2010)
205-213.
[4] M. Kauranen, A.V. Zayats, Nonlinear plasmonics, Nat Photonics, 6 (2012) 737-748.
[5] C. Ciraci, R.T. Hill, J.J. Mock, Y. Urzhumov, A.I. Fernandez-Dominguez, S.A. Maier, J.B.
Pendry, A. Chilkoti, D.R. Smith, Probing the Ultimate Limits of Plasmonic Enhancement, Science,
337 (2012) 1072-1074.
[6] K.J. Savage, M.M. Hawkeye, R. Esteban, A.G. Borisov, J. Aizpurua, J.J. Baumberg, Revealing
the quantum regime in tunnelling plasmonics, Nature, 491 (2012) 574-577.
[7] J. Zuloaga, E. Prodan, P. Nordlander, Quantum Description of the Plasmon Resonances of a
Nanoparticle Dimer, Nano Lett., 9 (2009) 887-891.
[8] R. Esteban, A.G. Borisov, P. Nordlander, J. Aizpurua, Bridging Quantum and Classical
Plasmonics with a Quantum-Corrected Model, Nature Commun., 3 (2012) 825.
[9] Y. Luo, A.I. Fernandez-Dominguez, A. Wiener, S.A. Maier, J.B. Pendry, Surface plasmons and
nonlocality: A simple model, Physical Review Letters, 111 (2013) 093901.
[10] Y. Luo, R.K. Zhao, J.B. Pendry, van der Waals interactions at the nanoscale: The effects of
nonlocality, P Natl Acad Sci USA, 111 (2014) 18422-18427.
[11] J.B. Pendry, L. Martin-Moreno, F.J. Garcia-Vidal, Mimicking Surface Plasmons with Structured
Surfaces, Science, 305 (2004) 847-848.
[12] A.P. Hibbins, B.R. Evans, J.R. Sambles, Experimental verification of designer surface plasmons,
Science, 308 (2005) 670-672.
[13] S.A. Maier, S.R. Andrews, L. Martin-Moreno, F.J. Garcia-Vidal, Terahertz surface plasmon-
polariton propagation and focusing on periodically corrugated metal wires, Phys. Rev. Lett., 97
(2006) 176805.
[14] C.R. Williams, S.R. Andrews, S.A. Maier, A.I. Fernandez-Dominguez, L. Martin-Moreno, F.J.
Garcia-Vidal, Highly confined guiding of terahertz surface plasmon polaritons on structured metal
surfaces, Nat. Photonics, 2 (2008) 175-179.
[15] A.I. Fernandez-Dominguez, E. Moreno, L. Martin-Moreno, F.J. Garcia-Vidal, Terahertz wedge
plasmon polaritons, Optics Letters, 34 (2009) 2063-2065.
[16] N.F. Yu, Q.J. Wang, M.A. Kats, J.A. Fan, S.P. Khanna, L.H. Li, A.G. Davies, E.H. Linfield, F.
Capasso, Designer spoof surface plasmon structures collimate terahertz laser beams, Nature
Materials, 9 (2010) 730-735.
[17] X.P. Shen, T.J. Cui, D. Martin-Cano, F.J. Garcia-Vidal, Conformal surface plasmons
propagating on ultrathin and flexible films, P Natl Acad Sci USA, 110 (2013) 40-45.
[18] Z. Liao, X.P. Shen, B.C. Pan, J. Zhao, Y. Luo, T.J. Cui, Combined System for Efficient
Excitation and Capture of LSP Resonances and Flexible Control of SPP Transmissions, Acs
Photonics, 2 (2015) 738-743.
[19] Y.H. Yang, H.S. Chen, S.S. Xiao, N.A. Mortensen, J.J. Zhang, Ultrathin 90-degree sharp bends
for spoof surface plasmon polaritons, Optics Express, 23 (2015) 19074-19081.
[20] A. Pors, E. Moreno, L. Martin-Moreno, J.B. Pendry, F.J. Garcia-Vidal, Localized Spoof
Plasmons Arise while Texturing Closed Surfaces, Physical Review Letters, 108 (2012).
[21] X.P. Shen, T.J. Cui, Ultrathin plasmonic metamaterial for spoof localized surface plasmons,
Laser Photonics Rev, 8 (2014) 137-145.
[22] P.A. Huidobro, X.P. Shen, J. Cuerda, E. Moreno, L. Martin-Moreno, F.J. Garcia-Vidal, T.J. Cui,
J.B. Pendry, Magnetic Localized Surface Plasmons, Phys Rev X, 4 (2014) 021003.
[23] Z. Li, L.L. Liu, C.Q. Gu, P.P. Ning, B.Z. Xu, Z.Y. Niu, Y.J. Zhao, Multi-band localized spoof
plasmons with texturing closed surfaces, Appl Phys Lett, 104 (2014).
[24] Z. Gao, F. Gao, Y.M. Zhang, X.H. Shi, Z.J. Yang, B.L. Zhang, Experimental demonstration of
high-order magnetic localized spoof surface plasmons, Appl Phys Lett, 107 (2015).
[25] Z. Liao, Y. Luo, A.I. Fernandez-Dominguez, X.P. Shen, S.A. Maier, T.J. Cui, High-order
localized spoof surface plasmon resonances and experimental verifications, Scientific reports, 5
(2015).
[26] E. Prodan, C. Radloff, N.J. Halas, P. Nordlander, A Hybridization Model for the Plasmon
Response of Complex Nanostructures, Science, 302 (2003) 419-422.
[27] T.C. Preston, R. Signorell, Vibron and phonon hybridization in dielectric nanostructures, P Natl
Acad Sci USA, 108 (2011) 5532-5536.
[28] P. Nordlander, C. Oubre, E. Prodan, C. Li, M.I. Stockman, Plasmon Hybridization in
Nanoparticle Dimers, Nano Lett., 4 (2004) 899-903.
[29] V. Myroshnychenko, J. Rodriguez-Fernandez, I. Pastoriza-Santos, A.M. Funston, C. Novo, P.
Mulvaney, L.M. Liz-Marzan, F.J.G. de Abajo, Modelling the optical response of gold nanoparticles,
Chem Soc Rev, 37 (2008) 1792-1805.
[30] A. Aubry, D.Y. Lei, S.A. Maier, J.B. Pendry, Interaction between Plasmonic Nanoparticles
Revisited with Transformation Optics, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105 (2010) 233901.
[31] J.B. Pendry, A.I. Fernández-Domínguez, Y. Luo, R. Zhao, Capturing photons with
transformation optics, Nat. Phys., 9 (2013) 518-522.
Figure 1. (a) An energy-level diagram describing the spoof plasmon hybridization in PEC structures
comprising a PEC cavity with spiral corrugations and a spiral PEC core. The interaction between the
cavity and core spoof-plasmons results in an antibonding and a bonding spoof plasmon mode. (b)
Spectral positions of eigenmodes in terms of the gap size between the cavity and the core. The
electric field distributions of each modes at the gap size 5mm are plotted in the insets.
Figure 2: (a) Schematic of the closely spaced spiral structures. (b) Photograph of adjacent spiral
structures under horizontal (left) and perpendicular (right) dipole excitations at the gap between the
spirals. The gap between two spirals is g=0.1 mm. Each spiral structure is composed of a small disk
of radius r=1mm surrounded by six spiral arms with radius R=10mm. The period of the spiral arms is
d=2mm, and the spacing between neighbouring arms is a=1.5mm. These two 0.035mm ultrathin
metallic spiral disks are printed on a 0.5 mm-thick dielectric substrate with the relative permittivity
2.65 and loss tangent 0.002.
Figure 3. Simulated and measured reflection spectra under (a,b) horizontal and (c,d) perpendicular
dipole excitations (left column), and the corresponding simulated and measured near field
distributions for different resonance modes (right column).
Figure 4. (a) Simulation and measurement of reflection spectra for adjacent spiral structures with
varying gap size from 0.9mm to 0.1mm. The insets show the corresponding electric field
enhancements at the center of the gap. (b) The resonance frequency of mode I (black) and the
maximum field enhancement (blue) as a function of the gap size. Here the solid curves correspond to
the simulation results and the dots denote the measurement result.
Figure 5. (a) Simulated extinction cross section for spiral dimers with different disk radii varying
from R=9mm to R=13mm and the same gap size g=0.1mm. The insets in the right column show the
corresponding field distributions for different resonance peaks. (b) The maximum field enhancement
at different resonance peaks as a function of the spiral disk radius.
Figure 6 Simulated dipolar resonance frequency (black) and the field enhancement at the gap (blue)
as a function of the number of spiral arms.
Supporting Information
Enormous Field Enhancement in Hybrid Spoof Plasmonic System
Jingjing Zhang, Zhen Liao, Yu Luo *, Xiaopeng Shen, Stefan A. Maier *, and Tie Jun Cui *
* To whom correspondence should be addressed;
E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
We consider the corrugated structures with spiral grooves. The intersection angle between each spiral
and the radial direction is defined as . The effective permittivity and permeability of the
corresponding metamaterial cover can be written as
1
2
1 cos 2 sin 2
sin 2 1 cos 22 g
a
n d
, 1
z
d
a . (S1)
The magnetic field in each region can be written as
20 0 tan ln
0 0 2 2
2 2
1
0 0 2 1
0 0 tan
0 0
1 1
, cos cos
,
cos cos
g g in
n n
n
in
z n n n n
n
g g in
n n
n k n kf J g Y e R r
H a J k b H k e r R
n k n kc J d Y e
1 ln
1 1, n
R r
(S2)
The electric fields can be simply obtained by /E i H . Then, by applying the boundary
conditions we have the following equations:
21 0 2 0 2tan
0 2 0 2 2 0 0
2 2cos cos
g gin
n n n n n n
n k r n k ra J k r b H k r r f J g Y
(S3)
21 0 2 0 2tan2
0 2 0 2 2 1 1
2 2
cos
cos cos
g gin
n n n n n n
g
n k r n k raa J k r b H k r r f J g Y
n d
(S4)
0 2 0 2
1 1
2 2
0cos cos
g g
n n
n k R n k Rf J g Y
(S5)
11 0 1 0 1tan
0 1 0 1 1 0 0
1 1cos cos
g gin
n n n n n n
n k R n k Ra J k R b H k R R c J d Y
(S6)
11 0 1 0 1tan1
0 1 0 1 1 1 1
1 1
cos
cos cos
g gin
n n n n n n
g
n k R n k Raa J k R b H k R R c J d Y
n d
(S7)
0 1 0 1
1 1
1 1
0cos cos
g g
n n
n k r n k rc J d Y
. (S8)
Eliminating nc , nd , nf , and ng in the equations above yields
1
0 2 0 2 2
1
0 2 0 2
cosn n n n
gn n n n
a J k r b H k r a
n da J k r b H k r
, (S9)
1
0 1 0 1 1
1
0 1 0 1
cosn n n n
gn n n n
a J k R b H k R a
n da J k R b H k R
, (S10)
where we have defined two coefficients
1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1
/ cos / cos / cos / cos
/ cos / cos / cos / cos
g g g g
g g g g
J n k r Y n k R J n k R Y n k r
J n k R Y n k r J n k r Y n k R
, (S11)
1 0 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 2
0 0 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 2 0 0 2 2
/ cos / cos / cos / cos
/ cos / cos / cos / cos
g g g g
g g g g
J n k r Y n k R J n k R Y n k r
J n k r Y n k R J n k R Y n k r
. (S12)
Further simplifying Equation (S9) and (S10) leads to the resonance condition
1 20 1 0 1 0 2 0 2
1 1 1 11 20 1 0 1 0 2 0 2
cos cos
cos cos
n n n n
g g
n n n n
g g
a aJ k R J k R J k r J k r
n d n d
a aH k R H k R H k r H k r
n d n d
. (S13)
Since we are interested in subwavelength particles where 0 2 0 1 1k a k b , Equation (S13) can be
rewritten as
0 1 1 0 2 22
2
1 0 1 1 0 2 2
cos cos1 1
cos cos1 1
n
g g
g g
k aR k ar
nn d nn dr
R k aR k ar
nn d nn d
. (S14)
Defining
0 1 11
cos
g
k aR
nn d
and 0 2 2
2
cos
g
k ar
nn d
, (S15)
Eq. (S14) reduces to
2
1 22
1 1 2
1 1
1 1
n
r
R
, (S16)
which is the resonance condition of a core-shell structure.