14
Split Options for 5G Radio Access Networks Paul Arnold, Nico Bayer, Jakob Belschner, Gerd Zimmermann Technology Innovation Deutsche Telekom AG

Split Options for 5G Radio Access Networks · Split Options for 5G Radio Access Networks Paul Arnold, Nico Bayer, Jakob Belschner, Gerd Zimmermann Technology Innovation Deutsche Telekom

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Split Options for 5G Radio Access Networks

Paul Arnold, Nico Bayer, Jakob Belschner, Gerd Zimmermann

Technology InnovationDeutsche Telekom AG

IntroductionTwo splits envisioned in the 5G RAN

Control-Plane / User-Plane Split

“CU/DU”-Split (Central and Distributed Units)

Central and Distributed Units

Central and Distributed Units

› Centralization of parts of the processing in a central unit

› Motivation: Simplified implementation of interference coordination, multi-connectivity, traffic-steering, …

› Several options to split the protocol stack, each with different demand on the underlying interface (xHaul)

› Flexibility to implement centralization in different deployments

Split Options in the Protocol Stack

Examples for data rate requirements on the xHaul interface

0,0

2,0

4,0

6,0

8,0

10,0

12,0

8 7-1 7-3 6

xHau

l dat

a ra

te in

Gb

it/s

3GPP Split Option

2 antenna ports / 2 layers

4 antenna ports / 4 layers

8 antenna ports / 8 layers

0,1

1,0

10,0

100,0

1000,0

10000,0

8 7-1 7-3 6

xHau

l dat

a ra

te in

Gb

it/s

3GPP Split Option

LTE 20 MHz

5G AIV (< 6 GHz /100 MHz)5G AIV (> 6 GHz /400 MHz)

LTE Potential 5G Air Interfaces

Control-Plane / User-Plane Split

Control-Plane / User-Plane Split

› Categorize network functions into Control-Plane (CP) and User-Plane (UP) functions

› Define standardized interfaces for interaction between CP and UP

› Consistent control over network elements from different vendors

› Avoid replacement of UP in case CP is modified

› More flexible network

Pros

› Tight coupling of CP / UP Full separation might be complex

› Standardization for all interfaces is required

› Additional effort in terms of testing

Cons

Interactions between CP and UP

1: DL Buffer Status

2: Payload Selection

3: Payload Selection, DL Resource Assignment, UL Grants

4: Retransmission Control

5: Broadcast Channel Information

6: Coding Scheme

7: Antenna Mapping, Precoder, Modulation Scheme

8: Reference Symbols, Synchronization Channels

9: Antenna Weights

10: Channel State Information (from UL Sounding)

11: Channel State Information (CQI Reporting),

UL Scheduling Request

12: HARQ Status

Radio Unit (RU)

1

PD

CP

RLC

(asyn

ch.)

RLC

(syn

ch.)

MA

C H

igh (

MU

X)

MA

C L

ow

(H

AR

Q)

FE

C C

odin

g

Scra

mblin

g

Modula

tion

Laye

r M

appin

g

Dig

ital B

eam

form

ing Resource Element

Mapping & IFFT

Resource Element

Mapping & IFFT

D/A

Conversion

D/A

Conversion

Antenna

#1

Antenna

#N

2 3 4 6 7

RLC

(asyn

ch.)

RLC

(syn

ch.)

MA

C H

igh (

DeM

UX

)

MA

C L

ow

(H

AR

Q)

FE

C D

ecodin

g

Descra

mblin

g

Laye

r D

em

appin

g

Dem

odula

tion

Equaliz

ation

Resource Element

Demapping & FFT

Resource Element

Demapping & FFT

A/D

Conversion

A/D

Conversion

S1-U*

S1-U*

Downlink User

Plane

Uplink User

Plane

Control PlaneICIC

S1-C*

8

Cell

Config

5

10

Analo

gB

eam

form

ing

(RF

Pre

codin

g)

Antenna

#1

Antenna

#M

Analo

g

RF

Com

bin

ing

Short-Term Scheduler 9

1112

RRC

RU

Config

PD

CP

X2-C*

3GPP Split

Option

3 87-3654 7-12

Overall Network Architecture

Proposed Overall Network Architecture› Forwarding of data in the

transport network through based on SDN– Implements CP/UP split

› Central Access Controller (CAC) is the centralized network element in Radio Access Network– Separated into CP and UP part

› xHaul-Interface to the radio sites– Flexible adaptation depending

on the network deployment

Use Case: Multi-Connectivity

1

PD

CP

(incl. F

ast

Sw

itch o

r

Packet

Duplic

ation)

PHY

2

S1-U*

Downlink User Plane

Low

er

CP

AIV

1

S1-C*

8

Cell

Config

5

1012

RUMACRLC

PHY RUMACRLC

PHY RUMACRLC

PHY RUMACRLC

QoS

/ S

lice

Enfo

rcem

ent

AIV 2

AIV 1

AIV 1

AIV 2

Uplink User Plane

S1-U*

76

Short-Term Scheduler

11

43

QoS

/ S

lice

Contr

ol

RR

C

PD

CP

(incl. F

ast

Sw

itch o

r

Packet

Duplic

ation)

Multi-C

ell/

-AIV

Resourc

e

Mappin

g

Com

mon H

igher

CP L

ow

er

CP

AIV

2

Central Unit (CU) Distributed Unit (DU)

… … ………………………

› Multi-Connectivity is important in 5G, especially for:– mmWave Radio

– Ultra-Reliable Communication

› Figure shows potential implementation based on CU / DU split option 2

› Additional CP functions for:– Traffic Steering (Multi-Cell / Multi-

AIV Resource Mapping)

– Quality of Service

– Network Slicing

2

Summary and Conclusions

Summary and Conclusions

› Two split options under discussion for 5G– Central and distributed unit (“CU/DU split”)– Control-Plane / User-Plane split

› CU/DU split– Important for multi-connectivity, interference coordination, traffic-steering– Split at lower layers can lead to extremely high data rates on the interface

› Control-Plane / User-Plane split– Important for flexible future networks and consistent control functions– Tight coupling in the RAN make full separation complex

Thank Youhttps://metis-ii.5g-ppp.eu/