Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Spencer-Van Etten Central School District
2017-18 Budget Statement
Includes:
Proposed Budget in Three Components
Proposed Revenues
Property Tax Report Card
School Academic Report Card
District’s Fiscal Accountability Summary
Administrative Compensation Information
Exemption Impact Reports
Page 1
3-Part Budget Report
Spencer VanEtten Central School
Fiscal Year: 2018
10:42:19 am
April 26, 2017
2017-2018
Proposed
BudgetDescriptionState Function
Administration
1010 Board Of Education 13,213.00
1040 District Clerk 4,172.00
1060 District Meeting 1,476.00
1240 Chief School Administrator 214,894.00
1310 Business Administration 446,098.00
1320 Auditing 20,300.00
1325 Treasurer -
1330 Tax Collector 8,155.00
1380 Fiscal Agent Fee 3,500.00
1420 Legal 5,000.00
1430 Personnel 61,053.00
1480 Public Information and Services 56,495.00
1670 Central Printing & Mailing 6,000.00
1910 Unallocated Insurance 84,000.00
1920 School Association Dues 9,861.00
1981 BOCES Administrative Costs 242,726.00
1983 BOCES Capital Expenses 90,608.00
2010 Curriculum Devel and Suprvsn 51,007.00
2020 Supervision-Regular School 507,474.00
2060 Research, Planning & Evaluation 10,075.00
2070 Inservice Training-Instruction -
2110 Teaching-Regular School -
9000 Employee Benefits -
9010 State Retirement 63,792.00
9020 Teachers' Retirement 53,977.00
9030 Social Security 73,356.00
9040 Workers' Compensation 17,308.00
9050 Unemployment Insurance 1,617.00
9055 Disability Insurance 980.00
9060 Hospital, Medical, Dental Insurance 253,425.00
9089 Other (specify) 9,480.00
2,310,042.00Total Administration
Capital
1620 Operation of Plant 949,564.00
1621 Maintenance of Plant 326,438.00
1930 Judgments and Claims -
1964 Refund on Real Property Taxes -
9010 State Retirement 100,955.00
9030 Social Security 49,249.00
9040 Workers' Compensation 11,620.00
9050 Unemployment Insurance 1,086.00
9055 Disability Insurance 2,300.00
9060 Hospital, Medical, Dental Insurance 230,209.00
9089 Other (specify) 720.00
9710 Serial Bonds-Other (specify) -
9711 Serial Bonds-School Construction 3,232,484.00
9712 Serial Bonds-Bus Purchases 56,238.00
9720 Statutory Bonds-Other (specify) -
9730 Bond Antic Notes-Other (specify) -
9731 Bond Antic Notes-School Construction -
9770 Revenue Anticipation Notes -
9785 Install Purch Debt-State Aided Hardware -
9789 Other Debt (specify) 153,278.00
9950 Transfer to Capital Fund -
5,114,141.00Total Capital
Program
1420 Legal 25,000.00
2010 Curriculum Devel and Suprvsn 80,102.00
2070 Inservice Training-Instruction 88,320.00
2110 Teaching-Regular School 4,698,335.00
2250 Prg For Sdnts w/Disabil-Med Elgble 2,314,477.00
2280 Occupational Education(Grades 9-12) 452,500.00
WinCap Ver. 17.04.25.2093
Page 2
3-Part Budget Report
Spencer VanEtten Central School
Fiscal Year: 2018
10:42:19 am
April 26, 2017
2017-2018
Proposed
BudgetDescriptionState Function
2330 Teaching-Special Schools 300.00
2610 School Library & AV 143,222.00
2630 Computer Assisted Instruction 726,535.00
2810 Guidance-Regular School 228,862.00
2815 Health Srvcs-Regular School 119,562.00
2820 Psychological Srvcs-Reg Schl 76,919.00
2825 Social Work Srvcs-Regular School 108,574.00
2850 Co-Curricular Activ-Reg Schl 100,877.00
2855 Interscholastic Athletics-Reg Schl 260,354.00
5510 District Transport Srvcs-Med Elgble 794,322.00
5530 Garage Building 24,749.00
5540 Contract Transportation-Med Elgble -
7140 Recreation -
8070 Census -
9000 Employee Benefits -
9010 State Retirement 147,450.00
9020 Teachers' Retirement 620,039.00
9030 Social Security 557,624.00
9040 Workers' Compensation 131,073.00
9050 Unemployment Insurance 12,297.00
9055 Disability Insurance 2,620.00
9060 Hospital, Medical, Dental Insurance 3,318,408.00
9089 Other (specify) 720.00
9901 Transfer to Other Funds -
9901 Transfer to School Food Service Fund 60,000.00
9901 Transfer to Special Aid Fund 35,000.00
15,128,241.00Total Program
22,552,424.00Report Totals
Selection Criteria
Report Title: 3-Part Budget Report
Column 1 Value: Proposed Amount
Column 2 Value: None
Column 3 Value: None
Column 4 Value: None
Column 5 Value: None
Column 6 Value: None
From Column Value: Current Year Initial
To Column Value: Proposed Amount
Sort by: Budget Category / State Function Code
Printed by Jane St. Amour-Bradley
WinCap Ver. 17.04.25.2093
Page 1
Fund: A GENERAL FUND
2017-18 BOE Approved Revenue
Spencer VanEtten Central School
Fiscal Year: 2018
April 26, 2017
10:45:54 am
2017-2018
Proposed
RevenueRevenue Account Description
1001.000 Real Property Taxes 5,644,446.00
1081.000 Other Pmts in Lieu of Taxes 96,000.00
1085.000 STAR Reimbursement 1,000,000.00
1090.000 Int. & Penal. on Real Prop.Tax 25,000.00
1410.000 Admissions (from Individuals) 3,500.00
2401.000 Interest and Earnings 2,000.00
2410.000 Rental of Real Property,Indiv. 3,500.00
2413.000 Rental of Real Property, BOCES 3,000.00
2701.000 Refund PY Exp-BOCES Aided Srvc 150,000.00
2703.000 Refund PY Exp-Other-Not Trans 30,000.00
2770.000 Other Unclassified Rev.(Spec) 80,000.00
3101.000 Basic Formula Aid-Gen Aids (Ex 11,974,967.00
3101.001 Basic Formula- Comm Schools 76,108.00
3101.100 Basic Formula Aid-Excess Cost 71,229.00
3102.000 Lottery Aid 1,000,000.00
3102.100 Lottery Aid - VLT Grant 600,000.00
3103.000 BOCES Aid (Sect 3609a Ed Law) 1,132,612.00
3260.000 Textbook Aid (Incl Txtbk/Lott) 51,785.00
3262.000 Computer Sftwre, Hrdwre Aid 32,065.00
3263.000 Library A/V Loan Program Aid 5,575.00
5997.000 Appropriated Reserves 327,197.00
5999.000 Appropriated Fund Balance 243,440.00
Total GENERAL FUND 22,552,424.00
Selection Criteria
Criteria Name: Last Run
Fund: A
Report Title: 2017-18 BOE Approved Revenue
Suppress revenue accounts with zero amount
Column 1 Value: Proposed Revenue
Column 2 Value: None
Column 3 Value: None
Column 4 Value: None
Column 5 Value: None
Column 6 Value: None
Column 7 Value: None
Column 8 Value: None
Column 9 Value: None
From Column Value: Current Year Initial Estimate
To Column Value: Proposed Revenue
Sort by: Fund
Printed by Jane St. Amour-Bradley
WinCap Ver. 17.04.25.2093
SPENCER-VAN ETTEN CSD - SCHOOL REPORT CARD DATA [2015 - 16]
SPENCER-VAN ETTEN CSD ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)K-12 ENROLLMENT 856
ENROLLMENT BY GENDERMALE
453 53%
FEMALE
403 47%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITYGROUP
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
TOTAL
4
17
14
9
808
4
PERCENT
0%
2%
2%
1%
94%
0%
OTHER GROUPSENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
— —
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
124 14%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
487 57%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADEGROUP
PRE-K (FULL DAY)
K (FULL DAY)
1ST GRADE
2ND GRADE
3RD GRADE
4TH GRADE
5TH GRADE
6TH GRADE
UNGRADED ELEMENTARY
7TH GRADE
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
UNGRADED SECONDARY
TOTAL
36
63
55
71
53
75
63
72
5
71
65
71
74
61
50
7
PERCENT
4%
7%
6%
8%
6%
9%
7%
8%
1%
8%
8%
8%
9%
7%
6%
1%
1 of 45
AVERAGE CLASS SIZE (2015 - 16)
ATTENDANCE (2014 - 15)
STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2014 - 15)
TEACHER TURNOVER RATE (2014-15 TO 2015-16)
GROUP
COMMON BRANCH
GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS
GRADE 8 SCIENCE
GRADE 10 ENGLISH
GRADE 10 MATHEMATICS
CLASS SIZE
22
20
22
15
17
FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH (2015 - 16)ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
356 42%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
104 12%
ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE94%
23 3%
2 of 45
STAFF COUNTS (2015 - 16)
TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS (2015 - 16)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
3
0
7
33
TOTAL TEACHERS 85
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE 4%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE 5%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 11%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE 8%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES 220
PERCENT NOT TAUGHT BY HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS IN THIS DISTRICT 220
TOTAL NUMBER OF CLASSES 334
PERCENT TAUGHT BY TEACHERS WITHOUT APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATION 8%
3 of 45
HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETERS (2015 - 16)GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
48
41
7
GRADUATES (REGENTS + LOCAL DIPLOMAS)
46
41
5
REGENTS DIPLOMA
44 96%
41 100%
3 60%
GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
17 37%
17 41%
0 0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
4 9%
3 7%
1 20%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
2 4%
0 0%
2 40%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
2 4%
0 0%
2 29%
4 of 45
HIGH SCHOOL NON-COMPLETERS (2015 - 16)GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
DROPPED OUT
_ _
_ _
_ _
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION
PROGRAM
_ _
_ _
_ _
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_ _
_ _
_ _
5 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 3-40.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.0
24%
34%40%
2%
42%
27%31%
35%
7%
42%
GRADE 3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 306
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
50
42
8
2
1
47
50
19
31
50
34
16
50
TOTAL TESTED
42%
48%
13%
_%
_%
_%
42%
47%
39%
42%
35%
56%
42%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
12 24%
6 14%
6 75%
_ _
_ _
_ _
12 24%
3 16%
9 29%
12 24%
10 29%
2 13%
12 24%
LEVEL 2
17 34%
16 38%
1 13%
_ _
_ _
_ _
17 34%
7 37%
10 32%
17 34%
12 35%
5 31%
17 34%
LEVEL 3
20 40%
19 45%
1 13%
_ _
_ _
_ _
20 40%
9 47%
11 35%
20 40%
11 32%
9 56%
20 40%
LEVEL 4
1 2%
1 2%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
1 2%
0 0%
1 3%
1 2%
1 3%
0 0%
1 2%
7 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 3-40.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.0
26%
38%
25%
11%
35%
24%
35%
26%
15%
41%
GRADE 4 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 302
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
65
54
11
2
2
1
60
5
30
35
65
40
25
65
TOTAL TESTED
35%
41%
9%
_%
_%
_%
33%
60%
53%
20%
35%
28%
48%
35%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
17 26%
8 15%
9 82%
_ _
_ _
_ _
17 28%
0 0%
4 13%
13 37%
17 26%
11 28%
6 24%
17 26%
LEVEL 2
25 38%
24 44%
1 9%
_ _
_ _
_ _
23 38%
2 40%
10 33%
15 43%
25 38%
18 45%
7 28%
25 38%
LEVEL 3
16 25%
15 28%
1 9%
_ _
_ _
_ _
14 23%
2 40%
10 33%
6 17%
16 25%
8 20%
8 32%
16 25%
LEVEL 4
7 11%
7 13%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
6 10%
1 20%
6 20%
1 3%
7 11%
3 8%
4 16%
7 11%
8 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 3-40.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.043%
34%
14%9%
22%
36%30%
23%
10%
33%
GRADE 5 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 286
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
58
53
5
1
2
54
1
58
27
31
58
33
25
58
TOTAL TESTED
22%
25%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
22%
22%
23%
22%
12%
36%
22%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
25 43%
20 38%
5 100%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
25 43%
12 44%
13 42%
25 43%
19 58%
6 24%
25 43%
LEVEL 2
20 34%
20 38%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
20 34%
9 33%
11 35%
20 34%
10 30%
10 40%
20 34%
LEVEL 3
8 14%
8 15%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
8 14%
3 11%
5 16%
8 14%
3 9%
5 20%
8 14%
LEVEL 4
5 9%
5 9%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
5 9%
3 11%
2 6%
5 9%
1 3%
4 16%
5 9%
9 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 3-40.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.0
27%
42%
18%12%
30%27%
38%
20%14%
34%
GRADE 6 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 298
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
66
58
8
1
2
1
61
1
5
27
39
66
38
28
66
TOTAL TESTED
30%
34%
0%
_%
_%
_%
31%
_%
20%
37%
26%
30%
18%
46%
30%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
18 27%
11 19%
7 88%
_ _
_ _
_ _
17 28%
_ _
1 20%
4 15%
14 36%
18 27%
16 42%
2 7%
18 27%
LEVEL 2
28 42%
27 47%
1 13%
_ _
_ _
_ _
25 41%
_ _
3 60%
13 48%
15 38%
28 42%
15 39%
13 46%
28 42%
LEVEL 3
12 18%
12 21%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
12 20%
_ _
0 0%
7 26%
5 13%
12 18%
6 16%
6 21%
12 18%
LEVEL 4
8 12%
8 14%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
7 11%
_ _
1 20%
3 11%
5 13%
8 12%
1 3%
7 25%
8 12%
10 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
31%
46%
18% 5%23%
28%36%
24%
11%
35%
GRADE 7 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 297
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
65
57
8
1
1
63
65
30
35
65
38
27
65
TOTAL TESTED
23%
26%
0%
_%
_%
_%
23%
30%
17%
23%
16%
33%
23%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
20 31%
14 25%
6 75%
_ _
_ _
_ _
20 31%
5 17%
15 43%
20 31%
15 39%
5 19%
20 31%
LEVEL 2
30 46%
28 49%
2 25%
_ _
_ _
_ _
30 46%
16 53%
14 40%
30 46%
17 45%
13 48%
30 46%
LEVEL 3
12 18%
12 21%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
12 18%
7 23%
5 14%
12 18%
6 16%
6 22%
12 18%
LEVEL 4
3 5%
3 5%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
3 5%
2 7%
1 3%
3 5%
0 0%
3 11%
3 5%
11 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
21%
49%
22%
9%
31%24%
35%27%
14%
41%
GRADE 8 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 300
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
68
58
10
1
1
66
68
39
29
68
39
29
68
TOTAL TESTED
31%
34%
10%
_%
_%
_%
31%
41%
17%
31%
21%
45%
31%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
14 21%
7 12%
7 70%
_ _
_ _
_ _
14 21%
5 13%
9 31%
14 21%
6 15%
8 28%
14 21%
LEVEL 2
33 49%
31 53%
2 20%
_ _
_ _
_ _
33 49%
18 46%
15 52%
33 49%
25 64%
8 28%
33 49%
LEVEL 3
15 22%
14 24%
1 10%
_ _
_ _
_ _
15 22%
10 26%
5 17%
15 22%
6 15%
9 31%
15 22%
LEVEL 4
6 9%
6 10%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
6 9%
6 15%
0 0%
6 9%
2 5%
4 14%
6 9%
12 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
8%
41% 39%
12%
51%
25%31%
22% 22%
44%
GRADE 3 MATHEMATICSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 314
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
51
43
8
2
1
48
51
20
31
51
35
16
51
TOTAL TESTED
51%
56%
25%
_%
_%
_%
51%
60%
45%
51%
43%
69%
51%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
4 8%
3 7%
1 13%
_ _
_ _
_ _
4 8%
1 5%
3 10%
4 8%
4 11%
0 0%
4 8%
LEVEL 2
21 41%
16 37%
5 63%
_ _
_ _
_ _
21 41%
7 35%
14 45%
21 41%
16 46%
5 31%
21 41%
LEVEL 3
20 39%
18 42%
2 25%
_ _
_ _
_ _
20 39%
10 50%
10 32%
20 39%
12 34%
8 50%
20 39%
LEVEL 4
6 12%
6 14%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
6 12%
2 10%
4 13%
6 12%
3 9%
3 19%
6 12%
13 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
26%
41%
20%14%
33%28% 28%
23% 21%
45%
GRADE 4 MATHEMATICSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 300
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
66
54
12
1
2
2
1
60
6
29
37
66
40
26
66
TOTAL TESTED
33%
39%
8%
_%
_%
_%
_%
33%
33%
45%
24%
33%
25%
46%
33%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
17 26%
10 19%
7 58%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
16 27%
1 17%
5 17%
12 32%
17 26%
12 30%
5 19%
17 26%
LEVEL 2
27 41%
23 43%
4 33%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
24 40%
3 50%
11 38%
16 43%
27 41%
18 45%
9 35%
27 41%
LEVEL 3
13 20%
13 24%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
11 18%
2 33%
8 28%
5 14%
13 20%
5 13%
8 31%
13 20%
LEVEL 4
9 14%
8 15%
1 8%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
9 15%
0 0%
5 17%
4 11%
9 14%
5 13%
4 15%
9 14%
14 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 3-40
10
20
30
40
29%33%
24%
15%
38%
32%28%
24%
16%
40%
GRADE 5 MATHEMATICSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 307
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
55
51
4
1
2
51
1
55
24
31
55
30
25
55
TOTAL TESTED
38%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
38%
33%
42%
38%
20%
60%
38%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
16 29%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
16 29%
7 29%
9 29%
16 29%
14 47%
2 8%
16 29%
LEVEL 2
18 33%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
18 33%
9 38%
9 29%
18 33%
10 33%
8 32%
18 33%
LEVEL 3
13 24%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
13 24%
6 25%
7 23%
13 24%
4 13%
9 36%
13 24%
LEVEL 4
8 15%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
8 15%
2 8%
6 19%
8 15%
2 7%
6 24%
8 15%
15 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
10%
34%
22%
33%
55%
26%34%
18%22%
40%
GRADE 6 MATHEMATICSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 320
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
67
59
8
1
2
1
1
61
1
6
29
38
67
37
30
67
TOTAL TESTED
55%
63%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
57%
_%
33%
59%
53%
55%
41%
73%
55%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
7 10%
1 2%
6 75%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
6 10%
_ _
1 17%
2 7%
5 13%
7 10%
7 19%
0 0%
7 10%
LEVEL 2
23 34%
21 36%
2 25%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
20 33%
_ _
3 50%
10 34%
13 34%
23 34%
15 41%
8 27%
23 34%
LEVEL 3
15 22%
15 25%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
14 23%
_ _
1 17%
9 31%
6 16%
15 22%
8 22%
7 23%
15 22%
LEVEL 4
22 33%
22 37%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
21 34%
_ _
1 17%
8 28%
14 37%
22 33%
7 19%
15 50%
22 33%
16 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 & above 3 & above0
15
30
45
60
19%
30% 28%23%
52%
34%30%
22%14%
36%
GRADE 7 MATHEMATICSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics.
For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu
of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 320
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
64
56
8
1
1
62
64
30
34
64
37
27
64
TOTAL TESTED
52%
59%
0%
_%
_%
_%
52%
53%
50%
52%
41%
67%
52%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
12 19%
4 7%
8 100%
_ _
_ _
_ _
12 19%
2 7%
10 29%
12 19%
10 27%
2 7%
12 19%
LEVEL 2
19 30%
19 34%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
19 30%
12 40%
7 21%
19 30%
12 32%
7 26%
19 30%
LEVEL 3
18 28%
18 32%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
18 28%
7 23%
11 32%
18 28%
9 24%
9 33%
18 28%
LEVEL 4
15 23%
15 27%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
15 23%
9 30%
6 18%
15 23%
6 16%
9 33%
15 23%
17 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 & above 3 & above0.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.0
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
29% 27%
17%
27%
44%
GRADE 8 MATHEMATICSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics.
For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu
of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 307
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
58
51
7
1
1
56
58
34
24
58
35
23
58
TOTAL TESTED
31%
35%
0%
_%
_%
_%
31%
26%
38%
31%
20%
48%
31%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
9 16%
5 10%
4 57%
_ _
_ _
_ _
9 16%
3 9%
6 25%
9 16%
6 17%
3 13%
9 16%
LEVEL 2
31 53%
28 55%
3 43%
_ _
_ _
_ _
31 53%
22 65%
9 38%
31 53%
22 63%
9 39%
31 53%
LEVEL 3
13 22%
13 25%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
13 22%
6 18%
7 29%
13 22%
7 20%
6 26%
13 22%
LEVEL 4
5 9%
5 10%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
5 9%
3 9%
2 8%
5 9%
0 0%
5 22%
5 9%
GRADE 8 STUDENTS TAKING A REGENTS MATH TEST
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
ALL STUDENTS
GROUP
2
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
_ _
LEVEL 2
_ _
LEVEL 3
_ _
4 & ABOVE
_ _
3 & ABOVE
_ _
18 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
4%10%
40% 46%
86%
3% 8% 36%
52%
89%
GRADE 4 SCIENCEDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 79
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
70
57
13
1
2
2
1
64
6
32
38
70
43
27
70
TOTAL TESTED
86%
93%
54%
_%
_%
_%
_%
84%
100%
97%
76%
86%
84%
89%
86%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
3 4%
1 2%
2 15%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
3 5%
0 0%
0 0%
3 8%
3 4%
2 5%
1 4%
3 4%
LEVEL 2
7 10%
3 5%
4 31%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
7 11%
0 0%
1 3%
6 16%
7 10%
5 12%
2 7%
7 10%
LEVEL 3
28 40%
23 40%
5 38%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
25 39%
3 50%
16 50%
12 32%
28 40%
21 49%
7 26%
28 40%
LEVEL 4
32 46%
30 53%
2 15%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
29 45%
3 50%
15 47%
17 45%
32 46%
15 35%
17 63%
32 46%
19 of 45
District:2016
Statewide:2016
1 2 3 4 3-40
20
40
60
80
10%19%
58%
13%
71%
10%21%
40%29%
69%
GRADE 8 SCIENCEDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 69
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
56
49
7
1
1
54
56
31
25
56
35
21
56
TOTAL TESTED
73%
78%
43%
_%
_%
_%
73%
68%
80%
73%
66%
86%
73%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
4 7%
2 4%
2 29%
_ _
_ _
_ _
4 7%
3 10%
1 4%
4 7%
4 11%
0 0%
4 7%
LEVEL 2
11 20%
9 18%
2 29%
_ _
_ _
_ _
11 20%
7 23%
4 16%
11 20%
8 23%
3 14%
11 20%
LEVEL 3
35 63%
32 65%
3 43%
_ _
_ _
_ _
35 63%
17 55%
18 72%
35 63%
21 60%
14 67%
35 63%
LEVEL 4
6 11%
6 12%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
6 11%
4 13%
2 8%
6 11%
2 6%
4 19%
6 11%
GRADE 8 STUDENTS TAKING A REGENTS SCIENCE TEST
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
ALL STUDENTS
GROUP
6
TOTAL TESTED
50%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
2 33%
LEVEL 2
1 17%
LEVEL 3
1 17%
LEVEL 4
2 33%
20 of 45
READING
MATHEMATICS
READING
MATHEMATICS
STATEWIDE RESULTS ON THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS: NAEP (2014 - 15)
GRADE: 4
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER…
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
GROUP
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
BASIC
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
PROFICIENT
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
ADVANCED
98
88
PARTICIPATION RATE
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER…
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
GROUP
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BELOW BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
BASIC
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
PROFICIENT
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
ADVANCED
98
91
PARTICIPATION RATE
GRADE: 8
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER…
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
GROUP
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BELOW BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
BASIC
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
PROFICIENT
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
ADVANCED
98
89
PARTICIPATION RATE
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
GROUP
31%
*%
BELOW BASIC
38%
*%
BASIC
24%
*%
PROFICIENT
7%
*%
ADVANCED PARTICIPATION RATE
21 of 45
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER…
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
99
94
22 of 45
District:2012Cohort
Statewide:2012Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
2% 0%
42% 47%
89%
3% 3%37%
47%
85%
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGEARTS AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
57
48
9
1
56
57
29
28
57
21
36
57
TOTAL TESTED
89%
96%
56%
_%
_%
89%
93%
86%
89%
95%
86%
89%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
1 2%
0 0%
1 11%
_ _
_ _
1 2%
0 0%
1 4%
1 2%
0 0%
1 3%
1 2%
LEVEL 2
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
LEVEL 3
24 42%
19 40%
5 56%
_ _
_ _
24 42%
11 38%
13 46%
24 42%
9 43%
15 42%
24 42%
LEVEL 4
27 47%
27 56%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
27 47%
16 55%
11 39%
27 47%
11 52%
16 44%
27 47%
23 of 45
District:2012Cohort
Statewide:2012Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
4% 9%
67%
19%
86%
3% 5%
59%
27%
86%
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS AFTERFOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
57
48
9
1
56
57
29
28
57
21
36
57
TOTAL TESTED
86%
98%
22%
_%
_%
86%
90%
82%
86%
90%
83%
86%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
2 4%
0 0%
2 22%
_ _
_ _
2 4%
0 0%
2 7%
2 4%
0 0%
2 6%
2 4%
LEVEL 2
5 9%
1 2%
4 44%
_ _
_ _
5 9%
2 7%
3 11%
5 9%
2 10%
3 8%
5 9%
LEVEL 3
38 67%
36 75%
2 22%
_ _
_ _
38 67%
20 69%
18 64%
38 67%
15 71%
23 64%
38 67%
LEVEL 4
11 19%
11 23%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
11 19%
6 21%
5 18%
11 19%
4 19%
7 19%
11 19%
24 of 45
District:2012Cohort
Statewide:2012Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
7% 2%
60%
26%
86%
6% 6%
44%34%
78%
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL GLOBAL HISTORY ANDGEOGRAPHY AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
57
48
9
1
56
57
29
28
57
21
36
57
TOTAL TESTED
86%
96%
33%
_%
_%
86%
90%
82%
86%
90%
83%
86%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
4 7%
1 2%
3 33%
_ _
_ _
4 7%
1 3%
3 11%
4 7%
1 5%
3 8%
4 7%
LEVEL 2
1 2%
0 0%
1 11%
_ _
_ _
1 2%
1 3%
0 0%
1 2%
1 5%
0 0%
1 2%
LEVEL 3
34 60%
31 65%
3 33%
_ _
_ _
34 60%
18 62%
16 57%
34 60%
14 67%
20 56%
34 60%
LEVEL 4
15 26%
15 31%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
15 26%
8 28%
7 25%
15 26%
5 24%
10 28%
15 26%
25 of 45
District:2012Cohort
Statewide:2012Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
2% 0%
40%49%
89%
3% 4%33%
48%
81%
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL U.S. HISTORY ANDGOVERNMENT AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
57
48
9
1
56
57
29
28
57
21
36
57
TOTAL TESTED
89%
96%
56%
_%
_%
89%
93%
86%
89%
95%
86%
89%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
1 2%
0 0%
1 11%
_ _
_ _
1 2%
0 0%
1 4%
1 2%
0 0%
1 3%
1 2%
LEVEL 2
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
LEVEL 3
23 40%
18 38%
5 56%
_ _
_ _
23 40%
12 41%
11 39%
23 40%
12 57%
11 31%
23 40%
LEVEL 4
28 49%
28 58%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
28 49%
15 52%
13 46%
28 49%
8 38%
20 56%
28 49%
26 of 45
District:2012Cohort
Statewide:2012Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
4% 0%
51%39%
89%
3% 5%
45%38%
84%
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL SCIENCE AFTER FOURYEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
57
48
9
1
56
57
29
28
57
21
36
57
TOTAL TESTED
89%
96%
56%
_%
_%
89%
93%
86%
89%
95%
86%
89%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
2 4%
0 0%
2 22%
_ _
_ _
2 4%
1 3%
1 4%
2 4%
0 0%
2 6%
2 4%
LEVEL 2
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
LEVEL 3
29 51%
25 52%
4 44%
_ _
_ _
29 51%
17 59%
12 43%
29 51%
14 67%
15 42%
29 51%
LEVEL 4
22 39%
21 44%
1 11%
_ _
_ _
22 39%
10 34%
12 43%
22 39%
6 29%
16 44%
22 39%
27 of 45
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE)
REGENTS GEOMETRY
Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE)
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
69
57
12
1
2
66
69
29
40
69
29
40
69
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
5 7%
1 2%
4 33%
_ _
_ _
_ _
5 7%
0 0%
5 13%
5 7%
2 7%
3 8%
5 7%
LEVEL 2
3 4%
2 4%
1 8%
_ _
_ _
_ _
3 4%
1 3%
2 5%
3 4%
3 10%
0 0%
3 4%
LEVEL 3
22 32%
15 26%
7 58%
_ _
_ _
_ _
22 32%
9 31%
13 33%
22 32%
16 55%
6 15%
22 32%
LEVEL 4
11 16%
11 19%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
11 16%
5 17%
6 15%
11 16%
2 7%
9 23%
11 16%
LEVEL 5
28 41%
28 49%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
28 41%
14 48%
14 35%
28 41%
6 21%
22 55%
28 41%
GEOMETRY
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
15
14
1
1
14
15
5
10
15
7
8
15
TOTAL TESTED 55
12 80%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
12 80%
5 100%
7 70%
12 80%
5 71%
7 88%
12 80%
65
10 67%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
10 67%
5 100%
5 50%
10 67%
4 57%
6 75%
10 67%
85
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
28 of 45
REGENTS ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY
ALGEBRA I (COMMON CORE)
ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
55
55
1
2
1
51
55
30
25
55
17
38
55
TOTAL TESTED 55
38 69%
38 69%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
38 69%
20 67%
18 72%
38 69%
12 71%
26 68%
38 69%
65
25 45%
25 45%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
25 45%
13 43%
12 48%
25 45%
8 47%
17 45%
25 45%
85
5 9%
5 9%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
5 9%
2 7%
3 12%
5 9%
0 0%
5 13%
5 9%
ALGEBRA I (COMMON CORE)
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
87
76
11
3
1
83
87
46
41
86
1
31
56
87
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
3 3%
0 0%
3 27%
_ _
_ _
_ _
3 3%
1 2%
2 5%
_ _
_ _
2 6%
1 2%
3 3%
LEVEL 2
8 9%
3 4%
5 45%
_ _
_ _
_ _
8 9%
2 4%
6 15%
_ _
_ _
4 13%
4 7%
8 9%
LEVEL 3
49 56%
46 61%
3 27%
_ _
_ _
_ _
49 56%
25 54%
24 59%
_ _
_ _
21 68%
28 50%
49 56%
LEVEL 4
15 17%
15 20%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
15 17%
9 20%
6 15%
_ _
_ _
3 10%
12 21%
15 17%
LEVEL 5
12 14%
12 16%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
12 14%
9 20%
3 7%
_ _
_ _
1 3%
11 20%
12 14%
29 of 45
GEOMETRY (COMMON CORE)
ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE)
GEOMETRY (COMMON CORE)
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
61
59
2
3
58
61
35
26
61
28
33
61
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
8 13%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
8 13%
2 6%
6 23%
8 13%
4 14%
4 12%
8 13%
LEVEL 2
14 23%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
14 23%
7 20%
7 27%
14 23%
6 21%
8 24%
14 23%
LEVEL 3
34 56%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
34 56%
24 69%
10 38%
34 56%
18 64%
16 48%
34 56%
LEVEL 4
2 3%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
2 3%
1 3%
1 4%
2 3%
0 0%
2 6%
2 3%
LEVEL 5
3 5%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
3 5%
1 3%
2 8%
3 5%
0 0%
3 9%
3 5%
ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE)
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
40
40
2
38
40
21
19
40
13
27
40
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
8 20%
8 20%
_ _
_ _
8 20%
5 24%
3 16%
8 20%
5 38%
3 11%
8 20%
LEVEL 2
5 13%
5 13%
_ _
_ _
5 13%
4 19%
1 5%
5 13%
1 8%
4 15%
5 13%
LEVEL 3
19 48%
19 48%
_ _
_ _
19 48%
9 43%
10 53%
19 48%
5 38%
14 52%
19 48%
LEVEL 4
7 18%
7 18%
_ _
_ _
7 18%
3 14%
4 21%
7 18%
2 15%
5 19%
7 18%
LEVEL 5
1 3%
1 3%
_ _
_ _
1 3%
0 0%
1 5%
1 3%
0 0%
1 4%
1 3%
30 of 45
REGENTS GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY
REGENTS U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT
GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
103
88
15
2
2
1
98
5
51
52
103
46
57
103
TOTAL TESTED 55
88 85%
82 93%
6 40%
_ _
_ _
_ _
84 86%
4 80%
47 92%
41 79%
88 85%
37 80%
51 89%
88 85%
65
72 70%
70 80%
2 13%
_ _
_ _
_ _
68 69%
4 80%
35 69%
37 71%
72 70%
30 65%
42 74%
72 70%
85
23 22%
22 25%
1 7%
_ _
_ _
_ _
21 21%
2 40%
11 22%
12 23%
23 22%
7 15%
16 28%
23 22%
U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
68
57
11
1
2
65
68
29
39
68
27
41
68
TOTAL TESTED 55
65 96%
56 98%
9 82%
_ _
_ _
_ _
65 96%
29 100%
36 92%
65 96%
26 96%
39 95%
65 96%
65
61 90%
54 95%
7 64%
_ _
_ _
_ _
61 90%
27 93%
34 87%
61 90%
22 81%
39 95%
61 90%
85
35 51%
34 60%
1 9%
_ _
_ _
_ _
35 51%
18 62%
17 44%
35 51%
8 30%
27 66%
35 51%
31 of 45
REGENTS LIVING ENVIRONMENT
REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE
LIVING ENVIRONMENT
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
82
63
19
3
2
77
5
38
44
81
1
39
43
82
TOTAL TESTED 55
75 91%
63 100%
12 63%
_ _
_ _
71 92%
4 80%
36 95%
39 89%
_ _
_ _
33 85%
42 98%
75 91%
65
68 83%
60 95%
8 42%
_ _
_ _
65 84%
3 60%
33 87%
35 80%
_ _
_ _
28 72%
40 93%
68 83%
85
27 33%
26 41%
1 5%
_ _
_ _
25 32%
2 40%
15 39%
12 27%
_ _
_ _
9 23%
18 42%
27 33%
PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
33
32
1
1
32
33
21
12
33
10
23
33
TOTAL TESTED 55
29 88%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
29 88%
17 81%
12 100%
29 88%
8 80%
21 91%
29 88%
65
22 67%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
22 67%
12 57%
10 83%
22 67%
3 30%
19 83%
22 67%
85
5 15%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
5 15%
2 10%
3 25%
5 15%
0 0%
5 22%
5 15%
32 of 45
REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY
REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS
PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
49
49
2
1
46
49
29
20
49
15
34
49
TOTAL TESTED 55
48 98%
48 98%
_ _
_ _
_ _
48 98%
29 100%
19 95%
48 98%
14 93%
34 100%
48 98%
65
43 88%
43 88%
_ _
_ _
_ _
43 88%
24 83%
19 95%
43 88%
12 80%
31 91%
43 88%
85
19 39%
19 39%
_ _
_ _
_ _
19 39%
9 31%
10 50%
19 39%
3 20%
16 47%
19 39%
PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
15
15
1
14
15
8
7
15
5
10
15
TOTAL TESTED 55
15 100%
15 100%
_ _
_ _
15 100%
8 100%
7 100%
15 100%
5 100%
10 100%
15 100%
65
12 80%
12 80%
_ _
_ _
12 80%
5 63%
7 100%
12 80%
4 80%
8 80%
12 80%
85
2 13%
2 13%
_ _
_ _
2 13%
1 13%
1 14%
2 13%
0 0%
2 20%
2 13%
33 of 45
NEW YORK STATE ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT (NYSAA) RESULTS (2015 - 16)
GRADE 3 ELA
GRADE 3 MATH
GRADE 4 ELA
GRADE 4 MATH
GRADE 4 SCIENCE
GRADE 5 ELA
GRADE 5 MATH
GRADE 6 ELA
GRADE 6 MATH
GRADE 7 ELA
GRADE 7 MATH
GROUP
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TOTAL TESTED
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
PROFICIENT
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
34 of 45
NEW YORK STATE ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE ACHIEVEMENT TEST (NYSESLAT) RESULTS (2015 - 16)
GRADE 9
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
GROUP
1
1
TOTAL TESTED
_
_
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
35 of 45
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
TESTED 95%
824*
3
10
6
5
775*
3
130*
0
477*
STUDENTS
ENROLLED DURING
THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION
PERIOD
92%*
―
―
―
―
92%*
―
85%*
―
92%*
PERCENT OF
ENROLLED
STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
PI >= EAMO OR SAFE
HARBOR TARGET
366
2
8
5
5
344
2
56✝
0
218
TESTED STUDENTS
ENROLLED ON BEDS
DAY
102
―
―
―
―
100
―
38✝
―
86
PI
98
―
―
―
―
113
―
60
―
85
EAMO
92
―
―
―
―
92
―
47
―
79
SAFE HARBOR
TARGET
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
818*
809*
812*
814*
27
818*
694*
824*
347*
438*
386*
0
824*
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION PERIOD
92%*
92%*
92%*
92%*
―
92%*
93%*
92%*
92%*
93%*
91%*
―
92%*
PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
364
358
361
361
22
364
312
366
148
198
168
0
366
TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY
101
101
101
101
―
102
113
102
124
87
118
―
102
PI
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district withanother opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
36 of 45
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
TESTED 95%
823*
3
10
6
5
774*
3
130*
0
476*
STUDENTS
ENROLLED DURING
THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION
PERIOD
90%*
―
―
―
―
90%*
―
83%*
―
89%*
PERCENT OF
ENROLLED
STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
PI >= EAMO OR SAFE
HARBOR TARGET
358
3
9
5
5
334
2
52✝
0
211
TESTED STUDENTS
ENROLLED ON BEDS
DAY
127
―
―
―
―
127
―
56✝
―
108
PI
95
―
―
―
―
109
―
61
―
83
EAMO
95
―
―
―
―
109
―
49
―
83
SAFE HARBOR
TARGET
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
817*
808*
811*
813*
27
817*
693*
823*
347*
438*
385*
0
823*
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION PERIOD
90%*
90%*
90%*
90%*
―
90%*
91%*
90%*
91%*
90%*
89%*
―
90%*
PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
355
349
353
353
24
356
308
358
147
194
164
0
358
TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY
126
128
126
126
―
127
138
127
154
120
135
―
127
PI
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district withanother opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
37 of 45
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL SCIENCE RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
TESTED 80%
148
1
3
2
2
140
0
25
0
87
STUDENTS
ENROLLED DURING
THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION
PERIOD
90%
―
―
―
―
89%
―
―
―
93%
PERCENT OF
ENROLLED
STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
PI >= EAMO OR
PROGRESS TARGET
128
1
3
2
2
120
0
21
0
78
TESTED STUDENTS
ENROLLED ON BEDS
DAY
166
―
―
―
―
166
―
―
―
160
PI
178
―
―
―
―
185
―
―
―
169
EAMO
170
―
―
―
―
170
―
―
―
153
PROGRESS TARGET
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
147
145
146
146
8
148
123
148
61
73
75
0
148
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION PERIOD
90%
90%
90%
90%
―
90%
91%
90%
85%
88%
92%
―
90%
PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
127
125
126
126
8
128
107
128
50
64
64
0
128
TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY
166
166
167
166
―
166
173
166
176
170
163
―
166
PI
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
38 of 45
SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
TESTED 95%
46
0
0
1
0
45
0
5
0
21
12TH GRADERS
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PERCENT OF 12TH
GRADERS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO OR SAFE
HARBOR TARGET
47
0
0
1
0
46
0
7
0
20
2012
ACCOUNTABILITY
COHORT MEMBERS
155
―
―
―
―
154
―
―
―
―
PI
160
―
―
―
―
169
―
―
―
―
EAMO
155
―
―
―
―
154
―
―
―
―
SAFE HARBOR
TARGET
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
46
46
45
46
1
46
41
46
25
23
23
0
46
12TH GRADERS
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERS WITH VALID
TEST SCORES
47
47
46
47
1
47
40
47
27
25
22
0
47
2012 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS
155
155
154
155
―
155
165
155
―
―
―
―
155
PI
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and SafeHarbor Target data are suppressed.
39 of 45
SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
TESTED 95%
46
0
0
1
0
45
0
5
0
21
12TH GRADERS
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PERCENT OF 12TH
GRADERS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO OR SAFE
HARBOR TARGET
47
0
0
1
0
46
0
7
0
20
2012
ACCOUNTABILITY
COHORT MEMBERS
140
―
―
―
―
139
―
―
―
―
PI
145
―
―
―
―
156
―
―
―
―
EAMO
135
―
―
―
―
135
―
―
―
―
SAFE HARBOR
TARGET
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
46
46
45
46
1
46
41
46
25
23
23
0
46
12TH GRADERS
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERS WITH VALID
TEST SCORES
47
47
46
47
1
47
40
47
27
25
22
0
47
2012 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS
140
140
139
140
―
140
153
140
―
―
―
―
140
PI
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and SafeHarbor Target data are suppressed.
40 of 45
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED ELA AND MATH PIS
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
102
―
―
―
―
100
―
38
―
86
ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL ELA PI
127
―
―
―
―
127
―
56
―
108
ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL MATH PI
155
―
―
―
―
154
―
―
―
―
SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA PI
140
―
―
―
―
139
―
―
―
―
SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH PI
131
0
0
0
0
130
0
47
0
97
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
OVERALL GRADUATION RATE FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
MADE AYP
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
41 of 45
FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:
72
0
1
2
0
69
0
9
0
23
2011 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL
COHORT
90%
―
―
―
―
90%
―
―
―
―
GRADUATION RATE
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
STATE STANDARD
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
PROGRESS TARGET
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
42 of 45
FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:
88
0
1
1
0
86
0
19
0
36
2010 FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL
COHORT
91%
―
―
―
―
91%
―
―
―
92%
GRADUATION RATE
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
STATE STANDARD
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
PROGRESS TARGET
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
43 of 45
GRADUATION RATES FOR NON-AYP GROUPS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT
72
71
70
72
3
72
63
72
49
39
33
0
72
2011 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATETOTAL COHORT
90%
90%
90%
90%
―
90%
94%
90%
92%
92%
88%
―
90%
GRADUATION RATE
FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT
88
87
87
88
2
88
69
88
52
48
40
0
88
2010 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATETOTAL COHORT
91%
91%
91%
91%
―
91%
96%
91%
90%
88%
95%
―
91%
GRADUATION RATE
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
44 of 45
© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: APRIL 26, 2017, 10:58 AM EST
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2011 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2015 with:
REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (THIS DISTRICT) 39%
REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (STATEWIDE) 32%
PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE YES
REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (THIS DISTRICT) 17%
REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (STATEWIDE) 5%
PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE YES
45 of 45
FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY SUMMARY (2015 - 16)
INFORMATION ABOUT EXPENDITURE RATIOS (2014 - 15)(Data are lagged a year.)
Commissioner's Regulations require that certain expenditure ratios for general-education and special-education students be reported and compared with ratios for similar districts
and all public schools. The required ratios for this district are reported below.
The numbers used to compute the statistics on this page were collected on the State Aid Form A, the State Aid Form F, the School District Annual Financial Report (ST-3), and from the
Student Information Repository System (SIRS).
THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
GENERAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$8,818,402
PUPILS
861
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$10,242
SPECIAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$3,475,152
PUPILS
135
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$25,742
SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUPHIGH NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY RURAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$1,561,573,974
PUPILS
149,618
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$10,437
SPECIAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$641,246,480
PUPILS
23,680
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$27,080
1 of 3
ALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$31,780,970,752
PUPILS
2,659,777
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$11,949
SPECIAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$13,848,179,596
PUPILS
451,571
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$30,667
Instructional Expenditures for General Education are K-12 expenditures for classroom instruction (excluding Special Education) plus a proration of building level administrative and
instructional support expenditures. These expenditures include amounts for instruction of students with disabilities in a general-education setting. District expenditures, such as
transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.
The pupil count for General Education is K-12 average daily membership plus K-12 pupils for whom the district pays tuition to another school district. This number represents all
pupils, including those classi ed as having disabilities and those not classi ed, excluding only students with disabilities placed out of district. Pupils resident in the district but
attending a charter school are included. For districts in which a county jail is located, this number includes incarcerated youth to whom the district must provide an education
program.
Instructional Expenditures for Special Education are K-12 expenditures for students with disabilities (including summer special education expenditures) plus a proration of building-
level administrative and instructional support expenditures. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.
The pupil count for Special Education is a count of K-12 students with disabilities for the school year plus students for whom the district receives tuition from another district plus
students for whom the district pays tuition to another district. Students attending the State schools at Rome and Batavia, private placements and out-of-state placements are included.
Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. The total cost of instruction for students with disabilities may include both
general- and special-education expenditures. Special-education services provided in the general-education classroom may bene t students not classi ed as having disabilities.
TOTAL EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
$22,811
SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP
$22,078
NY STATE
$22,556
Total Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Total Expenditures to Pupils. Total Expenditures include district expenditures for classroom instruction, as well as
expenditures for transportation, debt service, community service and district-wide administration that are not included in the Instructional Expenditure values for General Education
and Special Education. As such, the sum of General Education and Special Education Instructional Expenditures does not equal the Total Expenditures.
2 of 3
© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: APRIL 26, 2017, 10:51 AM EST
INFORMATION ABOUT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (2015 - 16)Commissioner's Regulations require reporting students with disabilities by the percent of time they are in general education classrooms and the classi cation rate of students with
disabilities. These data are to be compared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. The required percentages for this district are reported below.
STUDENT PLACEMENT (PERCENT OF TIME INSIDE REGULARCLASSROOM)
THIS SCHOOLDISTRICT
80% OR MORE
84 67.7%
40% - 79%
19 15.3%
LESS THAN 40%
20 16.1%
SEPARATE SETTINGS
0 0.0%
OTHER SETTINGS
1 0.8%
SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUPHIGH NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY RURAL
80% OR MORE
57.1%
40% - 79%
19.6%
LESS THAN 40%
20.6%
SEPARATE SETTINGS
2.1%
OTHER SETTINGS
0.6%
NY STATE
80% OR MORE
58.2%
40% - 79%
11.7%
LESS THAN 40%
19.9%
SEPARATE SETTINGS
5.3%
OTHER SETTINGS
5.1%
The source data for the statistics in this table were reported through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and veri ed in Veri cation Report 5. The counts are numbers of
students reported in the least restrictive environment categories for school-age programs (ages 6-21) on BEDS Day, which is the rst Wednesday of the reporting year. The percentages
represent the amount of time students with disabilities are in general-education classrooms, regardless of the amount and cost of special-education services they receive. Rounding of
percentage values may cause them to sum to a number slightly different from 100%.
SCHOOL-AGE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES CLASSIFICATION RATE
THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
13.1%
SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP
15.0%
NY STATE
14.7%
This rate is a ratio of the count of school-age students with disabilities (ages 4-21) to the total enrollment of all school-age students in the school district, including students who are
parentally placed in nonpublic schools located in the school district. The numerator includes all school-age students for whom a district has Committee on Special Education (CSE)
responsibility to ensure the provision of special-education services. The denominator includes all school-age students who reside in the district. In the case of parentally placed
students in nonpublic schools, it includes the number of students who attend the nonpublic schools located in the school district. Source data are drawn from the SIRS and from the
Basic Education Data System (BEDS).
Similar District Groups are identi ed according to the Need-to-Resource-Capacity Index. More information is available on our NRC capacity categories page.
3 of 3