4
Speed to Market maddockdouglas.com ® Maddock Douglas • Helping you anticipate, navigate and overcome the challenges of innovation. Time and Innovation By Doug Stone, Senior Vice President Strategy and Lauren Schwartz, Innovation Strategy Manager A new client who had been put in charge of his company’s innovation project sat across the table. He was looking tentatively at the project plan we had developed together. “We have to go faster,” he declared. “Can we somehow shave a couple of months off of this?” Our response was not what our client expected to hear: “Are there any consumer trends influencing your desire to go faster that you’re feeling pressured to capitalize on? Is doing so worth the risk of making it all the way to market before realizing that your assumptions about these trends might be wrong?” Clients who are new to design strategy always ask us the speed question, and it reminds us that consumers (in this case our client) find it difficult to articulate their own needs. The lesson typically learned as executives participate in our professional design services (aka innovation management, design thinking, new product development, etc.) is that speed is less important than an organization’s ability to moderate it effectively. In fact, it becomes a barrier when considered as a throttle-to-the-floor necessity. That’s not to say that being first to market doesn’t have its advantages. After all, SPAM ® owns the compressed-meat-in-a-can category and the Snuggie ® is unlikely to see any meaningful competition. However, the problem is when speed to market is prioritized over speed to learning, speed to quality and speed to designs that consumers want to pay for. To illustrate this, think about the iPhone that many Americans now rely on to manage their daily lives. Yet, Apple was not the first smartphone to market. In fact, the iPhone lagged behind Microsoft and Research in Motion (RIM), owing much of its success to the iPod (which, by the way, was not the first MP3 player to market either). Rather than speed, both the iPod and iPhone owe a good portion of their success to intelligent supplier contracts and intuitive user interfaces, resulting from Apple’s ability to leverage ecosystem trends and new technology to help consumers in new ways. The choice to focus on correctly timing a product’s development rather than making it first to market has the power to transform an organization. Since profitably meeting consumer needs is like hitting a moving target, organizations practicing design strategy can moderate speed in two ways: 1) through the use of consumer research to inform design decisions, and 2) through the use of ecosystem and technology trends to time the best launch strategy. By using research and trendcasting to moderate speed, organizations can manufacture serendipity by identifying the moments when demand, advocacy and technology are best aligned to optimize market adoption.

Speed to Market Article_FEI Conference

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Speed to Market Article_FEI Conference

Maddock Douglas Innovation Briefs • Helping you anticipate, navigate and overcome the challenges of innovation.

Speed to Market

maddockdouglas.com

® ®

Maddock Douglas • Helping you anticipate, navigate and overcome the challenges of innovation.

Time and InnovationBy Doug Stone, Senior Vice President Strategy and Lauren Schwartz, Innovation Strategy Manager

A new client who had been put in charge of his company’s innovation project sat across the

table. He was looking tentatively at the project plan we had developed together. “We have

to go faster,” he declared. “Can we somehow shave a couple of months off of this?”

Our response was not what our client expected to hear: “Are there any consumer trends

infl uencing your desire to go faster that you’re feeling pressured to capitalize on? Is doing

so worth the risk of making it all the way to market before realizing that your assumptions

about these trends might be wrong?”

Clients who are new to design strategy always ask us the speed question, and it reminds us

that consumers (in this case our client) fi nd it diffi cult to articulate their own needs.

The lesson typically learned as executives participate in our professional design services

(aka innovation management, design thinking, new product development, etc.) is that

speed is less important than an organization’s ability to moderate it effectively. In fact, it

becomes a barrier when considered as a throttle-to-the-fl oor necessity.

That’s not to say that being fi rst to market doesn’t have its advantages. After all, SPAM®

owns the compressed-meat-in-a-can category and the Snuggie® is unlikely to see any

meaningful competition. However, the problem is when speed to market is prioritized over

speed to learning, speed to quality and speed to designs that consumers want to pay for.

To illustrate this, think about the iPhone that many Americans now rely on to manage their

daily lives. Yet, Apple was not the fi rst smartphone to market. In fact, the iPhone lagged

behind Microsoft and Research in Motion (RIM), owing much of its success to the iPod

(which, by the way, was not the fi rst MP3 player to market either). Rather than speed, both

the iPod and iPhone owe a good portion of their success to intelligent supplier contracts

and intuitive user interfaces, resulting from Apple’s ability to leverage ecosystem trends

and new technology to help consumers in new ways.

The choice to focus on correctly timing a product’s development rather than making it fi rst to market has the power to transform an organization.Since profi tably meeting consumer needs is like hitting a moving target, organizations

practicing design strategy can moderate speed in two ways: 1) through the use of consumer

research to inform design decisions, and 2) through the use of ecosystem and technology

trends to time the best launch strategy. By using research and trendcasting to moderate

speed, organizations can manufacture serendipity by identifying the moments when

demand, advocacy and technology are best aligned to optimize market adoption.

Page 2: Speed to Market Article_FEI Conference

Speed to Market

Let’s turn back to the iPhone as an example. In order to time the fi rst 2007 iPhone

introduction, Apple started by identifying an unmet consumer need they were positioned

to address using their core capabilities: the need to make internet content, particularly

video streaming, more shareable. Apple knew they could leverage their expertise in

hardware/software integration to meet this need in new ways, so they began consumer

research, prototyping and testing to explore how technology might enable more

meaningful sharing. Rather than speed to market, Apple’s goal was speed to learning.

However, equally important was their ability to track ecosystem and technology trends.

For example, Apple timed their product launch to coincide with a trend in eroding profi t

margins among cellphone carriers, increasing the odds that designing for mass market

appeal would unshackle them from carrier demands. They were the fi rst hardware

manufacturer with complete control over the base software installation.

They also leveraged steadily increasing cellular bandwidth availability to revolutionize the

ways in which content could be shared. While business strategy projections predicted that

the iPhone could capture 1 percent of the global market in 2008, their properly executed

design strategy actually sold over 3.4 million iPhones — or about 28 percent of the market.

The design strategy behind the iPhone involved the use of speed as a tool, not an

objective or outcome. At Maddock Douglas, we work with our clients to develop a corporate

competency in design strategy by increasing speed to learning and leveraging external

trends, resulting in more profi table and scalable product launches that help consumers in

revolutionary new ways.

This expertise is not formulaic and cannot be simply observed, installed and repeated. It

does, however, include some basic tenets that innovation leaders can use to reframe how

they think about speed. These practices increase the likelihood of making it to market with

a product consumers want to pay for and decrease the likelihood of experiencing a large

and costly product launch failure:

1. Conduct consumer research to instill consumer empathy in the organization

Ever wonder why luxury brands seldom falter or go out business? One explanation is

that the executives are attitudinally and behaviorally aligned with the core consumer

and are living the consumer experience on a daily basis. This tight personal integration

(e.g., status-driven executives making decisions for status-driven customers) is not

fool proof, but it does offer an often invisible advantage in the speed at which market

changes are felt and responded to.

Design strategy requires that the organization engage with consumer research so that

the most often debated (and sometimes misaligned) consumer assumptions are tested

and validated before informing design and development.

This is why the goal is speed to learning rather than speed to market, since reaching

market more effi ciently and effectively means testing hypotheses with consumers as

early and often as possible.

Despite advances in data collection and analysis (e.g., smartphone, chat groups, social

media data mining), the real speed benefi t comes from equipping an organization to

better consume research fi ndings. The challenge is working inside the organization to

integrate research into decision-making processes.

Page 3: Speed to Market Article_FEI Conference

Speed to Market

One broadly effective method is co-creation workshops that involve cross-functional

teams. In the span of two days, employees will have an understanding of, access to and

functional experience with research that typically could take months to work its way

through an organization.

2. Active new product/service/capability management

The management of initiatives meant to develop new products, services or capabilities

for a company is a relatively new competency. Many clients will attempt to manage

innovation using their existing core business strategies, such as existing funding

metrics or management processes. However, it quickly becomes obvious that relying

on what’s worked in the past to meet familiar needs in familiar ways will not work

to meet unfamiliar needs in unfamiliar ways in the future. At best, only evolutionary

innovation will be supported in a typical project prioritization process.

The best way to infl uence organizational growth is to inform idea management and

funding decisions based on where ideas map across a well-balanced innovation

portfolio. This results in four separate sets of projects, each requiring different time

horizons and implementation methods to reach success.

When mapping an idea to the innovation portfolio, select the appropriate quadrant

based on: 1) how diffi cult it will be for your organization to develop the idea, and

2) how predictable consumer demand is for the value you intend to deliver.

Market Maturity Certainty

Market Maturity

Uncertainty

Business Certainty

Business Uncertainty

Evolutionary

Uncertainty

Differentiation Revolutionary

Fast Fail

Market Maturity Certainty

Market Maturity

Uncertainty

Business Certainty

Business Uncertainty

60%

15% 5%

20%

Each innovation quadrant should move at a different pace. And by having projects running in all quadrants simultaneously, a company can continue to launch new products, services and capabilities to drive growth and demand.

Equally important is the recognition that each of the quadrants should be evaluated on

a quarterly basis to assess whether the external factors they depend on have changed.

Page 4: Speed to Market Article_FEI Conference

Speed to Market

3. Cyclically scan interrelated trends and technologies using maturation forecasting

Organizations naturally try to form relationships with suppliers and channel partners,

often contracting for services so that projections can be made. Companies that use

speed as a tool also will look beyond the immediate ecosystem that their current

business relies upon so that they can gauge the introduction (or sometimes sunsetting)

of products, services and capabilities.

Our most successful clients utilize all three of these methods to manage the process

of change that is necessary to survive in an increasingly global, volatile and consumer-

dictated marketplace.

More about Maddock DouglasMaddock Douglas, Inc., established in 1991, is an internationally recognized innovation

consulting fi rm that helps companies design, brand and launch new products, services,

experiences and business models. Maddock Douglas’ client list includes 25 percent of the

top 100 global brands and 10 out of the Fortune 50 companies.

If you have any questions about the material in this article, or Maddock Douglas in general,

please contact us at 630.279.3939 or visit maddockdouglas.com

Doug Stone | Senior Vice President Strategy

Doug is a strategist, a futurist, an innovation Idea Monkey, a speaker and a writer. He is responsible for bringing innovation strategies to life across a diverse portfolio of companies and categories. Doug’s entrepreneurial spirit has served him well in previous leadership roles in product development, digital strategy and application design. He is also a professor for the two-year Master’s program in Business Innovation at the CEDIM design school in Monterrey, Mexico, and attended Indiana University and McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University.

[email protected]

Lauren Schwartz | Innovation Strategy Manager

Lauren lays the strategic groundwork for innovation by designing consumer research that supports new product and service development. In particular, her future-focused approach helps clients uncover consumer insights they are uniquely positioned to address. Using her expertise in complex problem solving, trend casting and consumer psychology, she helps clients identify opportunities for innovation that will result in the greatest return on investment. Lauren has led innovation initiatives for Fortune 500 companies across a variety of industries, including insurance, education, data science, retail and consumer-packaged goods. Prior to Maddock Douglas, Lauren graduated with a B.S. in Marketing from Indiana University’s Kelley School of Business.

[email protected]

Maddock Douglas, Inc. | © 2016 All Rights Reserved | Confi dential And Proprietary | Do Not Distribute