13
Speed Racer PowerPoint Irene Olivera Mrs. Falk

Speed Racer PowerPoint

  • Upload
    benard

  • View
    31

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Speed Racer PowerPoint. Irene Olivera Mrs. Falk. Objective. Build fan-powered car and use mathematical methods and physics to understand its motion and acceleration Learn how to present graphs from calculators on computers and explain their meaning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Speed Racer PowerPoint

Speed Racer PowerPoint

Irene OliveraMrs. Falk

Page 2: Speed Racer PowerPoint

Objective Build fan-powered car and use

mathematical methods and physics to understand its motion and acceleration

Learn how to present graphs from calculators on computers and explain their meaning

Learn appropriate kinematics vocab to describe the findings effectively

Page 3: Speed Racer PowerPoint

Problem We needed to study functions we

normally see on a calculator in real life. We wanted to examine how acceleration

increases in drag race cars. To do this, we had to build miniature cars and use motion detectors that would reveal various information about how the cars moved, such as their velocity, and whether it was constant or changing.

Also, we had to find a way to convert the numeric values given to us by the calculator into terms and figures that would make sense when read.

Page 4: Speed Racer PowerPoint

Design & Use of Tools Our design was to build wooden, fan-powered cars (I

made no modifications). We would then hook up a graphing calculator with the

necessary software to a motion detector and run the car positioned in front of it in a straight line to gather lists of acceleration data.

We then put the lists into scatter plots so we had a visual representation of what happened when it ran.

We were able to see linear and quadratic representations of the acceleration, i.e.:

The slope in the VT graph revealed acceleration, as did the AT graph’s average acceleration #.

Page 5: Speed Racer PowerPoint

Design!

The fabulous motorized vehicle!

And the other equipment…

Page 6: Speed Racer PowerPoint

Distance-Time

Acceleration: .794 x 2 = 1.588m/s/sOr 3.557 mi/hr/s

R² value = .998719077 – great Model: D(F) = .794T² - 1.478T + 1.151

Source of error ¾ way through the graph

Page 7: Speed Racer PowerPoint

Velocity-Time

Acceleration: 1.48m/s/sOr 2.930 mi/hr/s

R value: .9808115775 – somewhat weaker Model: V (T) = 1.482T – 1.308

Source of error in last 5 points– too far

Page 8: Speed Racer PowerPoint

Average Acceleration-Time

Acceleration: 1.274m/s/sOr 2.854 mi/hr/s

No model (1 list), number of points used: 25

Source of error: last 7 points

Page 9: Speed Racer PowerPoint

Points of Error In the distance graph, the only

questionable points were enclosed in the graph and could have been a natural spike at that point where the acceleration increased more, causing a greater curve.

In the velocity and average acceleration graphs, the outlying points were at the end of the graph, probably when the car had gone too far from the detector.

There were even more to begin with, I deleted some but clearly did not get them all.

Page 10: Speed Racer PowerPoint

What is the acceleration?

How do the 3 accelerations compare?All very close, esp. AT and VT graphs

What is it really? I averaged them because it seemed

most fitting: 1.353m/s/s

What is it in mi/hr?3.031 mi/hr

Is it fast?Reasonably, perhaps not relatively

Page 11: Speed Racer PowerPoint

1 minute math: How far would the car travel in a minute?If the car goes 3.031mi/hr, then it would

travel 0.051mi/min.In more tangible terms, this equals

266.728ft/min

How fast is it going at the end of the minute?

181.594 mi/hr by the end of the minute

Page 12: Speed Racer PowerPoint

Conclusions My conclusions clearly reflected the problem

I needed to solve regarding how quickly cars accelerate. They were basically what I expected…but a whole lot faster.

The math I did supports the physics in that when we did it on a larger scale with a regular truck, we found that proportionately, my car’s acceleration made a lot of sense (seconds, minutes, and hours used for reference).

Every method I used to calculate acceleration resulted in very close numbers (doubling for the quadratic, using the slope for the VT, and reading the average from the single acceleration list).

Page 13: Speed Racer PowerPoint

Self-Assessment Overall, I am very pleased with my work

and there’s hardly anything I would change. I could have done little things like made sure my car went a little straighter, and I would have tried to work out a better way to solve and represent the minute math questions because my method involved a lot of confusing conversions.

My accelerations alol made sense and turned out accurate. I was able to easily get the data and transform it int something workable and understandable.

If I had to make one goal to improve something, it would simply be to make more modifications to my car and see how it changed things!