5

webftp.gazi.edu.trwebftp.gazi.edu.tr/gudisdergi/yayinlar/2002/cilt19/sayi1/35.pdfThe specimens of each restorative material were evaluated against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: webftp.gazi.edu.trwebftp.gazi.edu.tr/gudisdergi/yayinlar/2002/cilt19/sayi1/35.pdfThe specimens of each restorative material were evaluated against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus
Page 2: webftp.gazi.edu.trwebftp.gazi.edu.tr/gudisdergi/yayinlar/2002/cilt19/sayi1/35.pdfThe specimens of each restorative material were evaluated against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus
Page 3: webftp.gazi.edu.trwebftp.gazi.edu.tr/gudisdergi/yayinlar/2002/cilt19/sayi1/35.pdfThe specimens of each restorative material were evaluated against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus
Page 4: webftp.gazi.edu.trwebftp.gazi.edu.tr/gudisdergi/yayinlar/2002/cilt19/sayi1/35.pdfThe specimens of each restorative material were evaluated against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus
Page 5: webftp.gazi.edu.trwebftp.gazi.edu.tr/gudisdergi/yayinlar/2002/cilt19/sayi1/35.pdfThe specimens of each restorative material were evaluated against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus