Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Specimen preparationfor high-resolution cryo-EM
Christopher J Russo
Copyright C. J. Russo, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, 2016
All rights reserved.
The enclosed slides are provided for non-commercial, educational use only under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, and may contain reference to other material subject to copyright restrictions.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
The specimen is the limiting factor
Passmore & Russo MiE 2016
Protein Preparation
Negative stain
Diagnostic cryo-EM
Initial cryo-EM data collection
•Composition•Purity, homogeneity•Stability (buffer composition)
•Biochemical activity
•Discrete particles•Stability•Particle size and shape
•Stability•Particle size and shape•Particle distribution vs. concentration
•High resolution 2D classes•Initial 3D model•Orientation distribution•Particle yield
High res cryo-EM data collection
180°
90°
0°
-180° 0 180°
High res cryo-EM data collection
Example data Evaluation criteria3
2
1
0
Abs.
(AU)
30 Volume (mL)
66–
31–
6.5–
45–
14–
M.W
. (kD
a)
Step
•Tilt-pairs / validation•Motion statistics•Angular accuracy•Local / overall resolution•Conformational states
Entry levelEntry levelM
id-rangeM
id-rangeHigh End
High End
TEM1
2
3
4
5
metal grid bar
amorphous carbon membrane
ice embedded protein particles
electron microscope grid80 μm
1 μm
Standard cryo-EM specimen
Passmore & Russo MiE 2016
Protein Preparation
Negative stain
Diagnostic cryo-EM
Initial cryo-EM data collection
•Composition•Purity, homogeneity•Stability (buffer composition)
•Biochemical activity
•Discrete particles•Stability•Particle size and shape
•Stability•Particle size and shape•Particle distribution vs. concentration
•High resolution 2D classes•Initial 3D model•Orientation distribution•Particle yield
High res cryo-EM data collection
180°
90°
0°
-180° 0 180°
High res cryo-EM data collection
Example data Evaluation criteria3
2
1
0
Abs.
(AU)
30 Volume (mL)
66–
31–
6.5–
45–
14–
M.W
. (kD
a)
Step
•Tilt-pairs / validation•Motion statistics•Angular accuracy•Local / overall resolution•Conformational states
Entry levelEntry levelM
id-rangeM
id-rangeHigh End
High End
TEM1
2
3
4
5
Protein Preparation
Negative stain
Diagnostic cryo-EM
Initial cryo-EM data collection
•Composition•Purity, homogeneity•Stability (buffer composition)
•Biochemical activity
•Discrete particles•Stability•Particle size and shape
•Stability•Particle size and shape•Particle distribution vs. concentration
•High resolution 2D classes•Initial 3D model•Orientation distribution•Particle yield
High res cryo-EM data collection
180°
90°
0°
-180° 0 180°
Example data Evaluation criteria3
2
1
0Ab
s. (A
U)30 Volume (mL)
66–
31–
6.5–
45–
14–
M.W
. (kD
a)Step
•Tilt-pairs / validation•Motion statistics•Angular accuracy•Local / overall resolution•Conformational states
Entry levelEntry levelM
id-rangeM
id-rangeHigh End
High End
TEM1
2
3
4
5
Passmore & Russo MiE 2016
Homogeneity• Looks homogeneous on SDS-PAGE and native PAGE• Biochemically active
A. Easter
SEC-MALS Superose 6
SEC MALS(Size exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle light scattering)
DLS(Dynamic light scattering)
Size exclusion chromatography
Homogeneity
*Optimise buffer conditions (salt, pH,
detergent, etc)
Quantity2 – 4 µl / grid50 nM – 5 µM concentration– Make sure your complex is stable at these
concentrations (e.g. consecutive SEC runs)
Vinothkumar & Henderson 2016
Protein Preparation
Negative stain
Diagnostic cryo-EM
Initial cryo-EM data collection
•Composition•Purity, homogeneity•Stability (buffer composition)
•Biochemical activity
•Discrete particles•Stability•Particle size and shape
•Stability•Particle size and shape•Particle distribution vs. concentration
•High resolution 2D classes•Initial 3D model•Orientation distribution•Particle yield
High res cryo-EM data collection
180°
90°
0°
-180° 0 180°
Example data Evaluation criteria3
2
1
0
Abs.
(AU)
30 Volume (mL)
66–
31–
6.5–
45–
14–
M.W
. (kD
a)Step
•Tilt-pairs / validation•Motion statistics•Angular accuracy•Local / overall resolution•Conformational states
Entry levelEntry levelM
id-rangeM
id-rangeHigh End
High End
TEM1
2
3
4
5
Passmore & Russo MiE 2016
Negative stain• Sample is embedded in a layer of heavy metal salts (e.g.
uranium, molybdenum, tungsten) which surrounds the protein like a shell
• Reveals the solvent-excluded surface and shape of the molecule
Carbon support
Electron beam
Negative Stain
Protein
Crowther et al. (1970) Nature 226, 421
Tomato bushy stunt virus
Schreiber et al (2011) NatureDa Fonseca et al (2011) Nature
Negative stain• Advantages– Quick to screen lots of conditions (10-20 in a day)• Evaluate homogeneity and size, presence of binding partners
– Very high contrast – small molecules– Mildly radiation sensitive– Relatively straightforward
• Disadvantages– Limited resolution (~20 Å)– Protein damage or distortion (high salt, low pH, dehydrated)
– often proteins are flattened– Uneven staining leads to difficulties with processing/
classification
Protein Preparation
Negative stain
Diagnostic cryo-EM
Initial cryo-EM data collection
•Composition•Purity, homogeneity•Stability (buffer composition)
•Biochemical activity
•Discrete particles•Stability•Particle size and shape
•Stability•Particle size and shape•Particle distribution vs. concentration
•High resolution 2D classes•Initial 3D model•Orientation distribution•Particle yield
High res cryo-EM data collection
180°
90°
0°
-180° 0 180°
Example data Evaluation criteria3
2
1
0
Abs.
(AU)
30 Volume (mL)
66–
31–
6.5–
45–
14–
M.W
. (kD
a)
Step
•Tilt-pairs / validation•Motion statistics•Angular accuracy•Local / overall resolution•Conformational states
Entry levelEntry levelM
id-rangeM
id-rangeHigh End
High End
TEM1
2
3
4
5
Passmore & Russo MiE 2016
Jacques Dubochet
Vitreous = glass, amorphousNOT crystalline
1 μm
200 Å
80 μm
grid bar
grid bar
3 mm
Copper!"#$%&
'"()*"+,
-"&"#.*
Gold/+01
2.&345%*+,
6&+,"*+,
'+*78(%*
Grid materials Film materials
Amorphous carbon9:);1%*%
9:);1%*%<.="5%
'"-"
grid
support/substrate
foil foilice embedded protein particles
continuous film
grid bar
Amorphous carbonGold
Foil materials
-"!
-"/
'"-"
-">?
1
1
Types of specimen supports
Russo & Passmore Current Op. 2016
1 μm
200 Å
80 μm
grid bar
grid bar
3 mm
Copper!"#$%&
'"()*"+,
-"&"#.*
Gold/+01
2.&345%*+,
6&+,"*+,
'+*78(%*
Grid materials Film materials
Amorphous carbon9:);1%*%
9:);1%*%<.="5%
'"-"
grid
support/substrate
foil foilice embedded protein particles
continuous film
grid bar
Amorphous carbonGold
Foil materials
-"!
-"/
'"-"
-">?
1
1
Lacey carbon
Holeycarbon
Types of specimen supports
Russo & Passmore Current Op. 2016
1 μm
200 Å
80 μm
grid bar
grid bar
3 mm
Copper!"#$%&
'"()*"+,
-"&"#.*
Gold/+01
2.&345%*+,
6&+,"*+,
'+*78(%*
Grid materials Film materials
Amorphous carbon9:);1%*%
9:);1%*%<.="5%
'"-"
grid
support/substrate
foil foilice embedded protein particles
continuous film
grid bar
Amorphous carbonGold
Foil materials
-"!
-"/
'"-"
-">?
1
1
Types of specimen supports
Russo & Passmore Current Op. 2016
gold grid bar
gold membrane
ice embedded protein particles
electron microscope grid80 μm
1 μm
250
200
150
100
50
0Verti
cal d
isplac
emen
t (Å)
6050403020100Fluence e/Å2
Grid vertical movement
Quantifoil
16 e/Å2/s30° tilt real time Russo & Passmore Science 2014
250
200
150
100
50
0Verti
cal d
isplac
emen
t (Å)
6050403020100Fluence e/Å2
Gold
Grid vertical movement
16 e/Å2/s30° tilt real time Russo & Passmore Science 2014
Quantifoil250
200
150
100
50
0Verti
cal d
isplac
emen
t (Å)
6050403020100Fluence e/Å2
250
200
150
100
50
0Verti
cal d
isplac
emen
t (Å)
6050403020100Fluence e/Å2
Gold
Grid vertical movement
16 e/Å2/s30° tilt real time Russo & Passmore Science 2014
Without ice
Carbon
Gold
No ice
228 Å vs. 3.8 Å
With ice
With ice
76 Å vs. 1.9 Å
Russo & Passmore Science 2014
4k particles on new gold grids 8.0 Å gold-std FSC
4k particles on carbon grids ~25 Å gold-std FSC
Apo ferritin Russo & Passmore Science 2014
Russo & Passmore Science 2014
Grid handling
100 µm scale bar1 mm scale bar
A B
C D
Handling of supports• Always check in
optical microscope before use– Discard any grids with
defects• Clean tweezers,
glass slides and storage dishes
1 mm 100 µm
Passmore & Russo MiE 2016
Storing grids
BA
glass dishplastic dish
glovedhand
no glove
wrist grounding strap
Passmore & Russo MiE 2016
Store in glass dish in desiccator cabinet ideally in dry nitrogen
Plasma treatment
• Plasma created by ionisation of a low pressure gas– E.g. in air (glow discharge), oxygen, argon, hydrogen
• Ions interact with surface to remove organic contamination and render it hydrophillic
• Other molecules can be introduced to alter the surface, e.g. Amylamine
Ted Pella easyGlow (c. 2015) Edwards S150B (c. 1995) Edwards 12E6 (c. 1962)
Passmore & Russo MiE 2016
Passmore & Russo MiE 2016
As made after 20 second 9:1 Ar:O2 plasma
Cryo-EM grid preparationPlunge freezing1. Apply sample to grid2. Blot away excess buffer (control humidity/temperature)3. Plunge grid into liquid ethane
For water to vitrify, the temperature has to drop faster than 105-106 K/s (Dubochet et al 1988) - Liquid nitrogen boils on contact - poor cooling
capacity- Water is a poor thermal conductor so sample
must be thin < 3 µm- Plunge at > 1 m/s
Cryo-EM grid preparation
Evaluate:1. Ice thickness and uniformity2. Phase of the ice3. Protein concentration and stability
1. Ice pathology
• Vitreous• Free of
contamination
Devitrification occurs in 5 min at -120 °C
Dubochet et al (1988)
1. Ice thickness and uniformity
Ribosomes, Chris Russo Vinothkumar
Optimise plasma exposure time and blot force.
1. Ice thickness and uniformity
Dobro et al (2010)
Incomplete wetting
Vinothkumar & Henderson 2016
Expected particle distribution on grids Given the concentration of the molecule of interest in mg/ml and the molecular weight (MW), how many particles should you see in the image if the frozen specimen has the
same concentration of molecules that you expect in free solution?
What if I don’t see the expected number of particles?
If it is stable in solution, the following parameters can be optimised:• Buffer optimisation (pH, salt), crosslink– change charge on protein
• Addition of small amounts of detergents, lipids– Protect protein from air-water interface
• Blotting and plasma conditions – Is the ice too thick? Too thin?
• Use of a thin film of carbon or graphene – Provides another surface for proteins to adsorb to
1 μm
200 Å
80 μm
grid bar
grid bar
3 mm
Copper!"#$%&
'"()*"+,
-"&"#.*
Gold/+01
2.&345%*+,
6&+,"*+,
'+*78(%*
Grid materials Film materials
Amorphous carbon9:);1%*%
9:);1%*%<.="5%
'"-"
grid
support/substrate
foil foilice embedded protein particles
continuous film
grid bar
Amorphous carbonGold
Foil materials
-"!
-"/
'"-"
-">?
1
1
Types of specimen supports
Continuous carbon films
metal grid bar
amorphous carbon membrane
ice embedded protein particles
electron microscope grid80 μm
1 μm
continuous am. carbon film
Depositing thin carbon onto grids
siphon
thin amorphous carbon
stainless steel ring
glass crystallization
dish
supports stainless steel mesh
filter paper
flow
A B
Passmore & Russo MiE 2016
10 Å
Graphene to control protein adsorption
gold grid bar
amorphous carbon membrane
ice embedded protein particles
electron microscope grid80 μm
1 μm
graphene
Pantelic, Stahlberg, Plitzko, BaumeisterRosenthal
Partial Hydrogenation: Russo & Passmore 2014 Nat MethodsPassmore & Russo 2016 Methods in Enzymology
Graphene oxide: Pantelic et al 2010https://figshare.com/articles/Graphene_Oxide_Grid_Preparation/3178669
no graphene graphene +20 s hydrogen
graphene +40 s hydrogen
Controlled adsorption of proteins to graphene
Human 20S proteasome
on graphene no graphene
Passmore & Russo MiE 2016
Protein Preparation
Negative stain
Diagnostic cryo-EM
Initial cryo-EM data collection
•Composition•Purity, homogeneity•Stability (buffer composition)
•Biochemical activity
•Discrete particles•Stability•Particle size and shape
•Stability•Particle size and shape•Particle distribution vs. concentration
•High resolution 2D classes•Initial 3D model•Orientation distribution•Particle yield
High res cryo-EM data collection
180°
90°
0°
-180° 0 180°
High res cryo-EM data collection
Example data Evaluation criteria3
2
1
0
Abs.
(AU)
30 Volume (mL)
66–
31–
6.5–
45–
14–
M.W
. (kD
a)
Step
•Tilt-pairs / validation•Motion statistics•Angular accuracy•Local / overall resolution•Conformational states
Entry levelEntry levelM
id-rangeM
id-rangeHigh End
High End
TEM1
2
3
4
5
Reference free class averages
no imposed symmetryRusso & Passmore Science 2014
30°
60°
90°
120°
150°
0°-90°-180° 90° 180°
30°
60°
90°
120°
150°70S amC70S graphene
80S amC80S graphene80S unsuppored ice
Russo & Passmore Nature methods 2014
Passmore & Russo MiE 2016
Protein Preparation
Negative stain
Diagnostic cryo-EM
Initial cryo-EM data collection
•Composition•Purity, homogeneity•Stability (buffer composition)
•Biochemical activity
•Discrete particles•Stability•Particle size and shape
•Stability•Particle size and shape•Particle distribution vs. concentration
•High resolution 2D classes•Initial 3D model•Orientation distribution•Particle yield
High res cryo-EM data collection
180°
90°
0°
-180° 0 180°
High res cryo-EM data collection
Example data Evaluation criteria3
2
1
0
Abs.
(AU)
30 Volume (mL)
66–
31–
6.5–
45–
14–
M.W
. (kD
a)
Step
•Tilt-pairs / validation•Motion statistics•Angular accuracy•Local / overall resolution•Conformational states
Entry levelEntry levelM
id-rangeM
id-rangeHigh End
High End
TEM1
2
3
4
5
Preparing for a trip to Diamond• Prepare a large batch of grids (same conditions) • Screen some from each batch in house
• Grid storage
Doryen A Bubeck
Shipping samples
• Dry cryo shipper• Shipping label
NOT RESTRICTED AS PER IATA SPECIAL PROVISION A152
Protein samples for researchnon-toxic, non-hazardous
Plan a data collection strategyTable 4 Currently Recommended Data Collection Settings at the MRC LMB
Mode SourceMicroscopetype Energy (keV) Detector
Pixel size(Å/px)
Flux(e2/Å2/s)
Exp.Time (s)
Fluence(e2/Å2)
Negative stain W-thermal Entry level 80–120 a CCD 3.3 9 2 18
Diagnostic cryo W-thermal Entry level 80–120 a CCD 3.3 9 2 18
Diagnostic cryo FEG Mid-range 200 Falcon 2 2.1 10 2 20
Medium-resolution cryo (!3.5 A) FEG Mid-range/high-end
300 Falcon 2 1.7 17 3 51
High-resolution ("3.5 A) !400 kDa FEG High-end 300 Falcon 2 1.3 28 2 56
High-resolution ("3.5 A) <400 kDa FEG High-end 300 (#5 eV) K2 1.8 1.5 40 60
Very high-resolution (<2.8 A) FEG High-end 300 (#5 eV) K2 0.90 6.2 10 62
Cryo-tomography cellular (>30 A) FEG High-end 300 (#5 eV) K2 3.5 b 0.65 1.25 pertilt angle
100
Cryo-tomography high-resolutionsubtomogram avg. (<15 A)
FEG High-end 300 (#5 eV) K2 2.2 b 1.5 1 per tiltangle
60
aDQE is maximum for a phosphor coupled CCD at approximately 80 keV but the effects of specimen charging and mean free path are lower at 120 keV.bPixel size is limited by flux instead of spatial resolution.
ARTICLE
INPRESS
Passmore & Russo MiE 2016
McMullan et al. 2013
Back-thinned direct electron detectors
The quality of your data is at least directly proportional
to the quality of your specimen.
-D.B. Williams
Israel Fernandez Venki Ramakrishnan
Tanmay BharatGreg McMullan Shaoxia Chen Christos SavvaTony Crowther
LMB workshops Steve Scotcher
LMB computationToby Darling
Jake Grimmett
Thanks!Lori Passmore
Richard Henderson