45
ACHP Affordability Discussion Specific Cost Savings Strategies December 17, 2014

Specific Cost Savings Strategies - ACHP

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

ACHP Affordability

Discussion Specific Cost Savings Strategies

December 17, 2014

ACHP News and Upcoming Events

2

Recent Affordability Profiles: • Asthma Home Visiting and Case

Management program (UCare) • Behavioral Health Case

Management (CDPHP) • Low-Risk Chest Pain Protocol

(HealthPartners) • Reduced Blood Utilization (Select

Health) • Heart Failure Clinic (Security

Health Plan) • Care Partners for Frail Elders

(Independent Health) • Use of Clinical Pharmacists (GHC-

SCW) • Shared Decision-Making (Group

Health) • Improved PAC and SNF

Performance (Geisinger Health Plan)

Specific Cost Savings Strategies

Payment Reform Models: • Stephen Perkins, M.D., Vice President, Medical Affairs UPMC Health Plan

Improved Clinical Efficiency:

• Gretchen Leiterman, Vice President, Operations and Hospital Specialty Services, HealthPartners

• William Nelson, M.D., Ph.D., Department Head, HealthPartners Cardiology and Medical Director, Regions Hospital Heart Center

3

Value Based Payment Initiatives Knee and Hip Replacement Bundled Payment Model ACHP Webinar 12/17/2014

Bundled Payments Episode Consist of many moving parts

Payment negotiation, allocation, billing, claims adjudication, reconciliation

Episode Of Care

Trigger Rules Standard Care Pathway Inclusions/Exclusions Duration

1 month Pre-op Surgery Date Readmission/Reoperation

1 month Post-Op

3 month Post-Op

Diagnostic Triggering Event Follow-up Care

PCP

Ort

hopo

d Im

agin

g - M

RI

Car

diol

ogis

t

Facility

Pre-

op L

ab

Orthopod PC

P C

ardi

olog

ist

Phar

mac

y

Take

-hom

e Su

pplie

s

PT

Facility

Phar

mac

y

Ort

hopo

d PC

P

PT Ort

hopo

d Ph

arm

acy

Car

diol

ogis

t

PCP

Phar

mac

y

5

Alternative Payment Methodologies

6

• Objective - Incentivize physicians to deliver quality care across the entire episode of care in a cost-efficient manner

• Four examples of potential payment models: 1. Shared Savings (Retrospective Reconciliation) 2. Retrospective Bundled Payment 3. Prospective Bundled Payment 4. Global Capitation

• All payment methodologies are subject to quality and clinical pathway-adherence standards in order to receive any incentive payments

• Considerations when determining the appropriate payment model – Definition of continuum of care / pathway – Participation / buy-in from providers – Quality benchmarks / standards – Utilization benchmarks / standards

• Program Objective: • Incentivize physicians to increase quality of care by:

1. Adhering to an evidence-based pathway, and 2. Choosing the most cost effective implantable devices and supplies

• Program Criteria:

• Pilot period effective from July 2013 to July 2014 • UPMC Health Plan is the patient’s primary insurer • Patient is a Commercial Fully Insured/ASO or Medicare member • Patient is receiving a total hip/knee replacement (MS DRG 469 & 470) • Acuity Level 1 and 2 only as determined by APR DRG • Patient is discharged to home

Hip and Knees Shared Savings Initiative: Program Overview

7

Professional & Ancillary Services

Operating Room Supply

Costs

Physician CLAIMS Savings

Physician COST

Savings

Quality

Threshold (80 points)

Physician Shared Savings

Payment

Professional & Ancillary Services

• Savings shared between Health Plan and physician

• Based on evidence-based clinical pathway

• Includes 30 days pre and 90 days post-surgery All costs of episode of care, except DRG

• Bundled Payments only apply to elective procedures acuities 1&2

Operating Room Supply Costs

• Savings reduce Health Plan payment to hospital

• Savings shared between hospital and physician

• Based on best practice

Quality Criteria

8

Hip and Knees Shared Savings Initiative: Physician Scorecard – Quality (7/1/2013 – 10/31/2013)

9

Total Surgeries By Physician: 3

ScoreGoal

(Threshold)Maximum

Potential Points Meets Goals?100.0% > 60.0% 25 Yes

0.0% < 10.0% 5 Yes0.0% < 1.0% 10 Yes0.0% < 1.0% 10 Incomplete0.0% = 0.% 5 Yes

100.0% >= 75% 10 IncompleteEligible

SurgeriesSurveys

Returned

Pre-Surgical 3 2

Post-Surgical 3 0

Pre-Surgical 3 3

Post-Surgical 3 225

105 Pt

Improvement

Incomplete

31

Quality of Life (SF12)

Functional Assessment (Physical Therapy evaluation)

N/A, no post-surgical follow-up

Patients do not show overall improvement

Patient Satisfaction

Eligible Surgeries

3033

Hips and Knees Shared Savings InitiativePhysician Scorecard - Quality

SAMPLEPeriod: 7/1/2013 - 10/31/2013

Adherence to Pathway: Order SetsBlood UtilizationSurgical Site Infections90-Day Readmission*Pulmonary Embolism

Any Improvement

Incomplete

Measure

The quality scores must be at or above 80/100 by year end reconciliation in order for physicians to be eligible to receive savings.

Hips and Knees Shared Savings Initiative: Key Metrics

10

Avg. # of

Tests

Avg. $ per Case

Avg. # of

Tests

Avg. $ per Case

CBC with Platelets

PT-INR

BMP

UA and C&S

MRSA Culture

All Other

Total

Hip Unilateral 1 View

EKG

All Other

Total

Chest, 2 Views, Frontal & Lateral

Hips Bilateral 2 Views Anteropost Pelvis

Hip Unilateral Complete Minimum 2 Views

Pre-Surgical TestingLab

Radiology

Hip Replacements Commercial Medicare

Surgeries

Selected Key impactable areas

Avg. # of

Consults

Avg. $ per Case

Avg. # of

Consults

Avg. $ per Case

PCP Consult

Initial Follow Up

Pain Service

Initial Follow Up

Cardiology

Initial Follow Up

Total

Avg. # of

Visits

Avg. $ per Case

Avg. # of

Visits

Avg. $ per Case

Home Health (Nurse)

Home PT

Outpatient PT

Total

Inpatient StaySpecialty Consults

Post-Surgical Rehab*

Physical Therapy

Hip Replacements Commercial Medicare

Surgeries

Selected Key impactable areas

OR Costs

Labs

Radiology

Nursing Staff

Anesthesia

Room and Board

Recovery

PA’s

OR and Equipment

Usage OR Supplies*

Pharmacy

Blood Products

Physical Therapy

Hips Target Costs: Implant Blade Catheter Drain Dressing Pharmacy Blood

Knees Target Costs: Implant Additional Implant Components Blade Catheter Cement Pharmacy Blood

Target OR Supplies, Pharmacy, and Blood Cost

*OR Supply costs are based on FY2012 supply items charged to patients. They do not include low-cost items such as sutures, drapes, gloves and reusable instruments. They also do not include any supplies used but not documented in Surginet.

OR cost distributions provided for example/reference purposes only

Claims Cost per Episode and OR Supply Costs

12

Maximum

75th Percentile

Average

Median

25th Percentile

Minimum

Hip and Knee Shared Savings Pilot Update

13

UPMC Value Based Payment Timeline

14

Hip/Knee Shared Savings • Time Frame • July 2013 – July 2014 • July 2014 – July 2015

• Model • Retrospective Reconciliation of Claims • Acuities 1 and 2 only

Spine Shared Savings • Time Frame • January 2015 – 2016

• Model • Retrospective Reconciliation of Claims • Separate bundles for lumbar and cervical fusion

Hip/Knee & Low Risk Delivery Prospective Bundled Payments • Time Frame • July 2015 – July 2016

• Model • Single bundled payment for entire continuum of care

July 2013

January 2015

July 2015

1. Further implementation of AVER Bundled Payment Software

2. Contracting with external providers

3. Other potential bundles 1. COPD 2. Hysterectomy 3. CHF 4. CAD 5. AMI

Questions?

Stephen Perkins MD Vice President, Medical Affairs Tom Aubel Director of Medical Payment Strategy & Policy

15

ACHP AFFORDABILITY WEBINAR LOW RISK CARDIAC PROTOCOLS: REDUCING COST & IMPROVING CARE December 17, 2014

Gretchen Leiterman Vice President, Operations & Hospital Specialty Services

William Nelson, MD, PhD Department Head – HealthPartners CV Service Line

Medical Director, Regions Hospital Heart Center

Presenters have nothing to disclose

Affordability Profile: Improving low risk cardiac care

• Organizational Overview • Triple Aim Results • Low Risk Chest Pain Protocol • Next Steps

– Low Risk Congestive Heart Failure Protocol – Low Risk Atrial Fibrillation Protocol

HealthPartners • Not-for-profit, consumer-governed • Integrated care and financing system

– A team of 21,000 people – Health plan

• 1.4 million health and dental members in Minnesota and surrounding states – Medical Clinics

• 1 million patients • 1,700 physicians

– Park Nicollet Health Services – HealthPartners Medical Group – Stillwater Medical Group

• 55 medical and surgical specialties • 45 primary care clinics • Multi-payer

– Dental Clinics • 60 dentists, 21 locations

– Seven hospitals • Regions: 454-bed level 1 trauma and tertiary center • Methodist: 426-bed acute care hospital, featuring the Jane Brattain Breast Center • Lakeview: 97-bed acute care hospital, national leader in orthopedic care • Hudson: 25-bed critical access hospital, award-winning healing arts program • Westfields: 25-bed critical access hospital, regional cancer care location • St. Francis: 86-bed community hospital (partial owner) • Amery: 25-bed critical access hospital, joining HealthPartners January 1, 2014

Electronic Medical Records •Named “Most Wired” by Hospital and Health Networks magazine four years in a row

Community benefit •2013 Anti-Stigma Award from Minnesota National Alliance on Mental Illness •Recognized as a ‘Leader in LGBT Healthcare Equality’ by the Human Rights Campaign

Top Hospital •Leapfrog Top Hospital, the most competitive hospital quality award in the country. •Only urban hospital in Minnesota to earn this recognition •Awarded “Grade A” in The Leapfrog Group Hospital Safety Score.

Minnesota Hospital Association •Safe from Falls, Safe Skin, Safe Site, Safe Count, Safe Account •Recognized by MHA and the March of Dimes for reducing early elective deliveries •Recipient of 2013 Good Catch Award for patient safety

Joint Commission • One of the top performing hospitals in the nation for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia and surgical care •First hospital in Minnesota to be named a Certified Comprehensive Stroke Center

Critical Care •In 2013, the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (ACCN) honored Regions SICU with its Beacon Award for Excellence •Regions inpatient heart and vascular unit received the same award in 2010 and 2012

Environmental excellence •Received award from Practice Greenhealth for achieving benchmarks in energy conservation, mercury reduction pollution prevention and recycling

Distinguished Hospital for Clinical Excellence • Among HealthGrades top 5 percent of hospitals in the nation for high-quality outcomes •Among “America’s 100 Best Hospitals” for pulmonary care, stroke care and critical care

Regions Hospital & HealthPartners – Collaborating to improve quality, experience & cost

Results: Leapfrog Group - Quality and Resource Use Regions Hospital

Results: HealthPartners – Heart Attack (AMI) Regions Hospital

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

0.84

AMI Core Measure Bundle Includes* • Aspirin at Arrival and Discharge • ACE1 or ARB for LVSD • Smoking Cessation Counseling

DECREASE Total Cost Index (compared to statewide average). Less than 1 is better than network average

INCREASE percentage of patients who “Would Recommend” Regions Hospital

94%

Core Measure Outcomes

81%

Patient Satisfaction

Total Cost of Care

96%

100%

Low Risk Chest Pain

Low Risk Chest Pain Protocol - Background

• Implemented in September 2011 • Collaboration between Cardiology, Emergency

Medicine and Hospital Medicine • Aim: Standardize care for Low Risk Chest Pain

patients to improve the patient experience, ensure safety (using evidence to guide treatment), and reduce costs to the system

• Three years of consistent performance and positive outcomes

Innovation: HealthPartners Low Risk Chest Pain Program Flow @ Regions Hospital

Typical US Patient Experience: ER evaluation hospital observation admit 1-2 day stay (often

includes noninvasive imaging) home HealthPartners Low Risk Chest Pain Protocol: Rapid ER evaluation

• TIMI Risk score – 0,1 • Negative troponin at 0 and 6 hours

Low risk group (most) home stress test next day

(echo/nuclear, 7d/wk)

$2600 savings per patient

Chest Pain - Volume Trend (2007-2014) Regions Hospital Growth

409 475 474 387205 115 49 86

456

593762 921

1,028

826843

868

126 658 690 662

865

1,068

1,2361,308 1,359

1,599 1,582 1,616

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 YTDAnnualized

Inpatient Observation LRCP

2008-2010, Medicare

2008 2010

PCI ICD Implant

16%

21%

27%

36%

Length of Stay for Common CV Cases Condition/ Procedure 1-Day LOS 1 or 2-Day

LOS

AMI 17% 34%

Chest Pain 40% 67%

Arrhythmia2 25% 49%

Carotid Stent 61% 75%

CEA3 56% 74%

Heart Failure 9% 27%

Hypertension 32% 60%

ICD Implant4 31% 41%

PCI 30% 54%

PVI5 20% 34%

Percent of Cases Performed Outpatient1

Innovation: HealthPartners Low Risk Chest Pain Outcomes @ Regions Hospital

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

ED Low risk chest pain patients

OP Scheduled Eve & Weekends

No Show

Positive Stress-Cath

ED Pt stress Mon - Fri 8 am - 5 pm

Monthly Totals

OP Scheduled Eve & Weekends No Show Positive Stress-Cath

ED Pt stress Mon - Fri 8 am - 5 pm

Totals 2025 481 29 121

Chest Pain – Readmissions Decline Regions Hospital

24

18

13

7

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2010 2011 2012 2013

Readmissions

Low Risk Chest Pain Protocol - Success • More than 2000 patients have benefited at

Regions Hospital alone • Safely avoided unnecessary care and

benefited organization by $4 million dollars in rate alone

• HealthPartners shares these protocol with other participating providers to spread the benefits across the network

• Success of this program led to exploration of other low risk cardiac pathways

Low Risk Congestive Heart Failure

Low Risk CHF Protocol - Background

• AIM: create protocol to safely avoid hospitalizations/readmissions for low risk CHF patients through team approach involving ED, hospital medicine, and cardiology

• Hospital readmissions for CHF have historically been approximately 20% – Affordable care act institutes penalties for CHF

readmissions

Innovation: HealthPartners Low Risk Heart Failure Program Flow @ Regions Hospital

ED Presentation Home

Observation

Meets low risk criteria

IV Diuretics

ED Observation

No

Yes Next day CHF Clinic follow-up 1 week CHF Clinic Follow-up

Innovation: HealthPartners Low Risk Heart Failure Protocol Regions Emergency Department

Innovation: HealthPartners Low Risk Heart Failure Outcomes @ Regions Hospital

Protocol initiated in June 2012 and has led to change in ED care patterns

• ED trends from 2010 onward demonstrates a trend in higher utilization of observation and discharges to home after this protocol was initiated

In 7 month period, 13 total 30-day inpatient admissions were saved

• 4 total 30-day inpatient admissions were saved by placing patients in observation • 9 total 30-day inpatient admissions were saved by discharging patients to home

Overall, this is a low risk population • Only 7 of 59 patients were readmitted within 30 days

Heart Failure Volumes: Shift from Inpatient to Observation & Low-Risk Treatment

474 451 460515

62

123

119

16

100%

88%79% 79%

21% 18%

20.25% 20.62% 18.70% 18.65%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Case

s

Inpatient Observation Low Risk Heart Failure% Inpatient % Observation % Low Risk Heart Failure% Readmissions

2011 2012 2013 2014 YTD Annualized

2%

12%

Low Risk Atrial Fibrillation

Low Risk Afib Protocol - Background

• 2.6 million people in US 2010 • Prevalence projected to double 2020 • Afib accounts for 1% of all ED visits in US 65% result in hospital admission 20% 30 day adverse outcome • ED management varies greatly – proclivity for

cardioversion in patient with recent onset afib • Spontaneous conversion to NSR in 70% patients

with recent onset afib.

Innovation: HealthPartners Low Risk Afib Program Flow @ Regions Hospital

After Visit Summary

• Echo will be done next day at 10am • Cardiology visit at 11:20am • NPO after 7am except meds • You may need a ride home

Atrial Fibrillation Volumes: Shift from inpatient to observation

213 207 196 180

43 53 78

52

16

83% 80% 72% 73%

17% 20% 28%

21%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

C a s e s

Inpatient Observation Low Risk Afibrillation % Inpatient % Outpatient % Low Risk Afibrillation

2011 2012 2013 2014 YTD Annualized

6%

Affordability Profile: Improving low risk cardiac care Summary of Success

• Reduced the number and rate of readmissions for chest pain & congestive heart failure patients

• Improved the experience of care for low risk cardiac patients

• Reduced the costs to patients and the system overall

• Shared learnings and benefits across all HealthPartners Networks

Questions & Discussion

Discussion • What type of cost-reduction information from ACHP

would be of the greatest value to you in 2015?

• What are new, ongoing or particularly innovative cost-reduction initiatives taking place at your plan?

• How are cost reduction strategies different for plan-employed versus network physicians?

• How do your approaches either differ or align with those of UPMC and HealthPartners?

44

[email protected] Phone: 202-785-2247 www.achp.org

1825 Eye Street, NW Suite 401 Washington, DC 20006