84
Aexcel ® Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network Methodology Guide

Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Aexcel®

Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network

Methodology Guide

Page 2: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 2

Aexcel 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Background on Aexcel Performance Networks......................................................................................... 3 Clinical Performance Evaluation Process ................................................................................................. 8

General Statements on the Clinical Performance Measures.............................................................. 9 Individual Clinical Measure Descriptions.......................................................................................... 13 Adverse Event Rate (Measure ID 30100) ........................................................................................ 13 30-Day Hospital Readmission Rate (Measure ID 30200) ................................................................16 Breast Cancer Screening (Measure ID 30600) ................................................................................ 18 Cervical Cancer Screening (Measure ID 30700).............................................................................. 20 Testing for HIV during Pregnancy (Measure ID 30800) ................................................................... 22 Lipid-Lowering Drug for Prevention of Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) (Measure ID 30300)............. 24 Beta-Blocker Treatment after AMI (Measure ID 30400)................................................................... 26 ACE/ARB Use in Members with Chronic Heart Failure (Measure ID 30500) ................................... 29

Efficiency Evaluation Process ................................................................................................................. 32 General Statements on the Physician Efficiency Measure............................................................... 32 Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology............................................................................................... 32 Symmetry ETGs as a Measure of Physician Group Efficiency......................................................... 32 Aetna’s Provider Attribution for Symmetry Episodes of Care........................................................... 33 Provider Attribution for Aexcel Specialties ....................................................................................... 33 Provider Minimum Episode Volume ................................................................................................. 33 Symmetry Clean Period ................................................................................................................... 33 Claims Lag....................................................................................................................................... 33 Episode Risk Groups ....................................................................................................................... 33 Aetna Case-Mix Adjustment............................................................................................................. 34 Aetna Outlier Logic .......................................................................................................................... 35 Administrative Specification ............................................................................................................. 35 Provider Grouping............................................................................................................................ 36 Provider Scoring .............................................................................................................................. 36 Statistical Significance of Efficiency Index ....................................................................................... 36

Aexcel Designation Model Process......................................................................................................... 37 Designation Process ........................................................................................................................ 37

Appendix A: Aexcel Specialties and Sub Categories ..............................................................................39 Appendix B: Specialty ETG Groupings ................................................................................................... 40 Appendix C – 2009 Aexcel Markets ........................................................................................................ 47

Page 3: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 3

Overview Background on Aexcel Performance Networks As one of the oldest and largest insurers in America, Aetna has an obligation and an opportunity to transform health care. We believe a better health care system is more transparent and consumer friendly and also recognizes physicians for their efficient and effective use of health care resources. Our Aexcel physician performance program is a component of our overall transparency efforts. Aexcel is a designation for specialists who:

are part of the broader Aetna network of participating providers

have met certain clinical performance and efficiency standards

Aexcel originated from discussions with large employer groups who were challenged by rising health care costs. Patients, in turn, were becoming increasingly engaged as consumers of health care. As such, they wanted access to information about physicians to help them make informed health care decisions before seeking care from a physician. As Aexcel is implemented throughout the country, we make sure that affected physicians are aware of its introduction to their area beforehand. We also review the program with specialty societies and other groups within organized medicine. Our goal is to work collaboratively with physicians, employers and consumers to transform health care in a way that works for all constituents. We chose to address physician specialty care in developing this program for several reasons:

1. Specialty care is more episodic than primary care

2. Specialty care drives most of the advances in treatment, procedures, pharmaceuticals and diagnostic imaging, as well as the cost increases that accompany these advances

3. The following specialty categories chosen as part of Aexcel represent approximately 70 percent of specialty costs and control approximately 50 percent of our plan sponsors’ total medical costs

Aexcel physician specialty categories Cardiology Neurology Otolaryngology/ENT Cardiothoracic surgery Neurosurgery Plastic surgery Gastroenterology Obstetrics and Gynecology Urology General surgery Orthopedics Vascular surgery

Page 4: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 4

How We Evaluate Physicians Case Volume

We begin by identifying specialists/groups currently participating in Aetna’s network who have managed at least 20 episodes of care for Aetna members over the past 3 years. Only physicians with this baseline of episodes are considered for Aexcel designation. The next steps are to review a physician’s:

clinical performance efficiency

Clinical Performance

Clinical performance means how well physicians meet certain recognized measures of clinical care. We use clinical guidelines established by leading medical associations and considered part of standard clinical practice. These medical associations are well regarded by physicians and include the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission, National Committee for Quality Assurance and Ambulatory Care Quality Alliance. Using claims information, we evaluate whether the physician met the clinical performance standards established by respected professional organizations. Some clinical performance measures pertain to all Aexcel specialties. Other measures are specialty specific. All measures are case-mix adjusted. All are associated with improved patient care. Metrics for all specialty categories include:

• A rate of unanticipated hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge. • A rate of unexpected adverse health events experienced by a specialist’s hospitalized patients.

Metrics for cardiologists only: • A rate of use of cholesterol-lowering medication in patients with coronary artery disease. • A rate of use of beta blocker in members identified with ischemic heart disease that has had a heart

attack. • A rate of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker in members with chronic heart failure.

Metrics for obstetricians/gynecologists only: • A rate of cervical cancer screening (Pap smear or similar test). • A rate of breast cancer screening (mammography). • A rate of HIV testing in pregnant women.

To be evaluated for a clinical measure, physicians must have a minimum threshold of 10 cases per measure. The results of each measure are combined. Only those results that are statistically 95 percent confident or better are used in the Aexcel designation process. The clinical performance standards we use have already been adopted by many physicians as part of their standard clinical practice. For that reason, 96 percent of physicians evaluated for Aexcel pass these clinical performance measures.

Page 5: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 5

Efficiency For physicians who meet the clinical performance standards, a measure of the efficiency of their care is developed and compared to their peers. We use the Symmetry Episode Treatment Groups® methodology to measure a physician’s efficiency. Efficiency is a combination of physician treatment patterns, health care resource utilization and cost. When evaluating the costs physicians incur for treating Aetna members, all costs are taken into account, not just office visits. We review inpatient, outpatient, diagnostic, laboratory and pharmacy costs for patients of these specialists. Statistical Validity For statistical validity, physicians must have a minimum of 20 episodes of care over 3 years. An index rating is created based on actual cost for the episode compared with the expected cost of the peer group. Episodes are then attributed to physicians. Surgical episodes are attributed to the surgeon with the highest allowed charges. If the episode is non-surgical, the physician with the highest number of visits receives the attribution of the case. Risk Adjustment Some physicians may care for more patients with chronic or complex conditions in a given time period than their peers; therefore, we evaluate physicians by comparing their services for patients with similar conditions. We apply risk-adjustment factors to account for differences in the use of health care resources among individuals. Use of health care resources can differ among patients because of age, gender, chronic disease risk and insurance product type. Comparison to Peers In addition, we compare all the resources used to treat a physician’s patients to those of other physicians in the same specialty and geographic location. If a physician is a part of a group practice, we evaluate the entire group. In this case, performance measurement results of other physicians in the group practice will have an impact on each individual physician’s evaluation. Episodes of Care This methodology is based on episodes of care, which is the current industry standard for measuring efficiency. Episodes of care methodology focuses on all of the costs (inpatient, outpatient, professional, office, lab, pharmacy and ancillary) required to care for a patient’s underlying medical condition. Volume Threshold We chose 20 as a minimum threshold based on a comparison of results using random samples of various thresholds, including 20, 30 and 100. We found there was a reasonably similar result for groups with at least 20 episodes as there were at the higher thresholds. Furthermore, using 20 episodes as a minimum allows us to be more inclusive in our program. Application of Confidence Interval A physician whose efficiency score is greater than or equal to the mean efficiency score for his or her market and specialty is considered efficient. Physicians who are efficient, and statistically so, using a 90 percent confidence interval, are designated for Aexcel participation. In our experience, efficient physicians tend to recommend appropriate testing and treatment for their patients. What’s more, these physicians may use some of the most advanced and costly procedures, pharmaceuticals, diagnostic imaging and technology but in a skilled and thoughtful manner. This results in high-quality outcomes for even the most complex cases, avoids complications and efficiently manages total medical costs.

Page 6: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 6

Network Adequacy Once the selections are complete, we may need to supplement the network with additional physicians to ensure members have satisfactory access to enough specialists. However, only physicians who have met the clinical performance standards are eligible for consideration to supplement the network. Periodic Physician Re-Evaluation for Aexcel Designation We re-evaluate a physician’s performance at least every two years. As a result, a physician’s Aexcel designation status could change. Physicians who previously did not receive Aexcel designation may now meet the criteria. Similarly, physicians who are currently designated may lose their designation because they did not meet the volume, clinical performance or efficiency standards. This could be due to a physician’s individual performance or because the overall performance of the physician’s peers in his or her market, whom the physician is measured against, has improved. Regardless of whether a physician receives Aexcel designation, he or she remains a participating physician in Aetna’s broader network. We realize that physicians, members and employers alike are impacted by changes to the composition of Aetna networks. We do our best to consider member and physician disruption during the Aexcel evaluation process.

Data Variability As Aexcel continues to evolve we look for opportunities to further enhance our methodology and evaluation process based on new clinical evidence, feedback from members, providers and employers, as well as evolving industry trends.

While we are committed to using the best available information, there are certain data limitations: • The clinical quality and efficiency information is based on Aetna member data only. Combined claim data from

multiple payors (e.g. insurance companies, self-insured and government plans) may provide a more complete picture of physician performance but is not yet available. We support industry-wide data collection initiatives and when this credible combined data becomes available, we will consider using it in our evaluations.

• The claim data used to evaluate physicians does not include all procedures, lab or pharmacy data - only those for which Aetna has claim data. Doctors may perform health care services for which they do not provide us with information. Also because of the way claims are submitted by doctors and/or processed by Aetna, health care service details may not always be available in the claim data we use. Therefore, we strongly encourage physicians to reach out to us with additional data they might have in medical charts that is not available to us through claims data.

Aexcel as a Guide Aexcel information is intended to be only a guide for when a member chooses a specialist within the Aexcel specialist categories. There are many ways to evaluate doctor practices and members should consult with their existing doctor before making a decision. All ratings have a risk of error and, therefore, should not be the sole basis for selecting a doctor.

We recommend members consider the following when selecting a doctor:

• Consult with their doctor regarding their health care decisions • View specialist clinical quality and cost efficiency information as one factor in their health care decision • Aexcel designation is not a guarantee as to the quality of the service a member receives or the outcome of

any treatment by that specialist • If a specialist is currently not designated for Aexcel:

Page 7: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 7

o this does not mean the doctor does not provide quality services o we might not have sufficient data to evaluate this doctor; and/or o this doctor might be in the process of appealing their designation status

Page 8: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 8

Clinical Performance Evaluation Process The Aexcel designation process includes four key criteria: Volume — Clinical performance — Efficiency and Network adequacy The following steps describe the clinical performance evaluation process. Step 1 All Aetna participating physicians in a geographic market1 who practice in the selected specialty (for example, all cardiologists in the Aetna network in Atlanta) are reviewed. Physicians are rank-ordered according to an overall index score. Index measures are based on established evidence-based measures of clinical performance. Each measure is case-mix adjusted and a physician or physician group must have at least 10 cases in any given measure, for claims-based clinical performance measures evaluation. Clinical volume is based on a denominator of at least 10 in each measure used. The denominator can represent unique members or events, depending on the measure. In some measures, such as breast cancer screening, the denominator is members. In some measures, such as adverse event rate, the denominator is each event, and a member can have multiple events. Only scored measures are included in the index score; measures are weighted according to the number of eligible cases. Step 2 We identify physicians with the lowest index scores. Physicians whose measured outcomes fall below the 5th percentile of the peer group are reviewed further (Steps 3-6) and may be excluded from consideration for Aexcel designation, unless other clinical criteria are met. Step 3 We apply a statistical significance formula (95 percent confidence limits) to the lowest group, removing any cases with insufficient statistical significance and reducing the group that may be excluded from Aexcel designation. Step 4 An Aetna medical director reviews measure detail reports of physicians remaining in the lowest group using available clinical data, including administrative claims data. Some cases have logical clinical explanations and are eliminated from the index score, allowing additional physicians to be considered for Aexcel designation. Step 5 Prior to any final decision about designation and publication of results, detailed clinical performance data for each measure is shared with the physicians remaining in the lowest group through Aexcel’s formal reconsideration process. An Aetna medical director is available to discuss this data. Pursuant to the physician reconsideration process, every physician has the opportunity to provide additional information for reconsideration prior to the final clinical performance designation decisions. Step 6 Physicians who meet the clinical performance standards are evaluated on the efficiency of their care. On average, 96 percent of specialists evaluated pass these clinical performance measures. 1 In 2009, Aexcel is in 36 markets, including Arizona; Atlanta; Austin; Central Valley CA; Chicago, IL; Cincinnati; Cleveland; Colorado; Columbus; Connecticut; Dallas/Fort Worth; Delaware; Detroit; Houston; Indianapolis; Kansas City, KS and MO; Los Angeles; Louisville; Maine; Metropolitan DC (including Maryland, DC and Northern Virginia); Metropolitan New York; North Florida; Northern CA; Northern New Jersey; Oklahoma City; Orlando; Pittsburgh; Richmond; San Antonio, TX; San Diego; Seattle/W.Washington; South FL (Dade and Broward Counties); Tampa; and Tulsa.

Page 9: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 9

General Statements on the Clinical Performance Measures 1. Current Procedure Terminology All references are to Current Procedure Terminology © 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. 2. Provider Attribution Attribution logic is addressed for each specific measure. The Enterprise Provider Database (EPDB) is a database that houses provider and network data. EPDB houses two types of provider data: community and network participation data.

Community data is information that is generally known about a Provider. Examples are name, Social Security number, tax identification number, service location(s), billing address(es), education.

Provider network participation data (PNP) is information specific to a provider's contract or participation with Aetna. Examples are fees, fee codes, risk groups, effective and expiration network participation dates, network specialties, directory information. Only participating providers are considered for Aexcel.

Twelve specialties (cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, gastroenterology, general surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, orthopedics, otolaryngology, neurology, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, urology and vascular surgery) are included within the Aexcel network, and the appropriate specialty is addressed within the measurement specifications. For a complete list of sub-specialties refer to Appendix A.

Visit logic: The Aetna Data Warehouse Procedure Group contains the historic and current evaluation and management (physician visit) codes as well as CPTII codes that give assessment information on a member gathered during a physician visit, and HCPC codes that indicate physician visits for specific care. These procedure codes represent contact with the member where a physical assessment was completed by a physician provider. We have not limited the scope of the evaluation and management codes included (assessments in the outpatient, ER or inpatient settings), but rather have limited the attribution of the visit based on the place of service on the claim or encounter. Each measure defines the specialty that is included for attribution. Within EPDB, each provider/provider group is assigned a provider type and a specialty. We have grouped the codes that represent the specific specialties to define provider attribution. 3. Lab Data Integrity We have found that a data integrity issue exists for certain areas of the country due to capitation arrangements with labs, where we are not receiving all the encounters for the labs that are done. For HMO-based membership, a logical method is applied at the provider level to determine laboratory utilization. If a provider qualifies for data integrity condition, which is low utilization, all attributed members for that provider are excluded at the individual ID level. (Traditional plan data is not subject to the same problem since we receive the claims for those tests.) 4. Claims Lag Four months of medical claim lag is required. We add four months on to the end of the measurement timeframe before we extract the data from our warehouse. This ensures the majority of medical claims have been submitted to be included in our data. Pharmacy claims are current due to electronic filing, so they are retrieved according to

Page 10: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 10

the timeframe in the measure for the pharmacy claims. Pharmacy claims can be extracted as soon as the end of month data is loaded into the warehouse or later if the end date is used to limit the timeframe. 5. Case Mix Adjustment Case mix classifies data characteristics into groups that are homogenous to allow for a basis of comparison. A case-mix adjustment is applied to each clinical performance measure, as appropriate, such as the ob/gyn and cardiology clinical performance measures, for which there is strong evidence in the literature of the value of certain services and medications for all members meeting the criteria of each measure. For this reason, it was not necessary to adjust provider results to account for differences in the age, gender and severity level of their patient population. However, because the measurement for each provider includes all of his/her Aetna members regardless of the type of medical product (HMO-based or traditional-based), we did case-mix adjust the results by the types of medical products of the Aetna members in the provider’s panel. We were concerned that incomplete capture of capitated services (encounters) for HMO-based plan members could negatively impact providers who had a greater proportion of Aetna HMO-based plan members in their patient population compared to providers with a greater proportion of Aetna traditional-based members in their patient population. For consistency in programming, the medical product adjustment was applied for all of these measures, although we did not expect capitation to affect pharmacy data. We also adjusted rates of breast cancer screening by “plan market” (a geographic variable) because of reports of prolonged scheduling delays at mammography centers in certain markets within Aetna regions. Such delays could affect providers differently when compared to a regional or national average. The expected value for all measures, except adverse event, is calculated based on the results of indirect standardization using case-mix adjustment. The expected value for adverse event is calculated using regression analysis. 6. Medical Case Aetna Medical Case Logic summarizes clinical events by linking or associating all of the claims submitted for a member during the same treatment episode. All Aetna Data Warehouse claims and encounter details are run through medical case logic. All specialist and ancillary claims that are within the starting and ending dates of service for these cases are attached to the case. For inpatient cases, a room and board bill is required based on the revenue code or benefit code. A bill from a different facility would trigger a new case. An example would be a transfer or being moved from a medical bed to a skilled nursing or rehab bed. Once a case is defined, a series of clinical attributes are defined for the case. For example, each medical case is assigned a Diagnostic Related Group (DRG) to aid in the analysis. A DRG is assigned to each case using DRG Grouper software. The array of codes fed to the Grouper is arranged based on a clinical algorithm and service date basis, thus delivering the most clinically appropriate DRG for the case. Aetna has defined algorithms that identify a managing provider for each case.

Page 11: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 11

7. Inpatient Performance Measurement System The Aetna Inpatient Performance Measurement System (IPMS) is a case-mix and severity-adjusted inpatient care performance measurement tool that Aetna uses in a number of ways, one of which is Aexcel. IPMS obtains its original data from medical, pharmacy and lab claims, as well as from member and provider data. Factors that are not under the control of the hospital have an impact on length of stay and the likelihood of having an adverse event. Examples of patient-specific factors that impact outcomes include age, gender, admission type (elective, emergency, transfer from another facility, etc.), and comorbidities (clinical conditions present at the time of hospital admission). IPMS applies a regression-based methodology to the inpatient data to account and adjust for these patient-specific factors. With this approach, adjusted expected rates can be calculated. Expected rates can then be compared with observed rates. This comparison of observed to expected provides a valid measure of performance specific to the population of interest. And, since the calculated data has been adjusted for clinical and demographic factors, an equitable comparison can be made across hospitals, providers or geography. 8. Health Profile Database The Aetna Health Profile Database (HPD) is a foundation database used to identify Aetna members with any of 81 chronic diseases or medical conditions. The identification algorithms are comprised of medical, pharmacy and clinical laboratory data from physician claims and encounters, specialist claims, pharmacy, facilities, laboratories and others. The HPD is refreshed monthly. The HPD consists of two major components: Disease Identification and Prevalence The chronic diseases and medical conditions included in HPD are selected based on the following considerations: 1.) the disease is chronic in nature, 2.) the disease represents a significant burden of illness, and 3.) the disease generates significant medical costs. In addition, diseases were chosen where improved processes of care might lead to better outcomes. Clinical selection criteria have been established for each disease in HPD. The Aetna Clinical Groups is used in the generation of these criteria. These groups are a hierarchical grouping of diagnosis and procedure codes used for classifying all International Classification of Diseases 9th revision (ICD-9) and Current Procedure Terminology 4th revision (CPT-4) codes. Complex inclusion and exclusion logic has been developed to reduce the occurrence of a false positive rate on specific indicators. Members are selected for inclusion in one or more HPD disease categories using “one hit” criteria or one occurrence of any of the specific diagnosis criteria, including ICD-9, CPT, pharmacy and laboratory codes. This selection process is designed to loosely identify members for the calculation of prevalence of chronic diseases and clinical conditions in a population and to identify a pool of members for more rigorous identification and ad hoc reporting. Disease Indicator Flag A more stringent identification criterion for members with chronic diseases and clinical conditions is beneficial for targeted interventions, case management and member education through disease management programs. The use of a multiple selection criteria improves the sensitivity of the identification process. DM=Y – Members flagged with a disease identification indicator of “Y” have fully met the disease-specific identification criteria defined as “hits” in two of five databases OR a total of three “hits” in any of the databases, except where exclusion logic applies. One date of service must fall within the prior 18 months. The 18-month timeframe is calculated from the file effective date.

Page 12: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 12

DM=N – Members flagged with a disease identification indicator of “N” have not fully met the identification criteria. This category may potentially be useful for early identification of chronic diseases. DM=H – Members flagged with a disease identification indicator of “H” were at one time identified but have either termed or no longer meet the criteria for identification, for example, no date of service in the last 18 months. Use of HPD in Clinical Measures: For members to be included in a specific measure, the DM=Y or H is used to ensure that the member is being treated for the specific disease or condition. For measures that require member exclusion based on knowledge of another disease or condition, the existence of that disease code in the HPD, which is equivalent to a single claim for that condition, is considered evidence of the excluded value. 9. Clinical Group Definitions UPG, or Aetna Procedure Groups, represent the grouping of similar CPT–4 and ICD–9 procedure codes that refer to specific procedures performed for similar pathophysiologic processes for the same organ system. Currently, there are over 26,000 procedure codes, which map into 191 internally defined procedure groups or UPGs. Each procedure group is categorized as to whether it is major procedure (for example, heart surgery), a minor procedure (for example, colonoscopy), a diagnosis or other. UDG, or Aetna Diagnosis Groups, represent a grouping of similar ICD–9 diagnosis codes that refer to the same pathophysiologic process affecting the same organ system. Currently, there are over 16,000 diagnosis codes, which map into 198 diagnosis groups, or UDGs. CSG, Clinical Service Group, is an Aetna grouping that reflects the most significant clinical reason for a medical case; it can be a procedure or a diagnosis. Which one is assigned to the CSG is dependent on the place of service, procedures and diagnoses submitted on the claims that linked to that case. IPMS Diagnostic Related Group (IDRG) is an aggregate of HCFA DRGs that represent the outputs of reasonably distinct clinical processes. The IDRG logic is used in IPMS adverse-event and length-of-stay modeling to group the DRGs into similar subsets based on the member’s critical path (clinical reason for hospitalization) and then into the IDRG specialty for modeling.

Page 13: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 13

Individual Clinical Measure Descriptions Adverse Event Rate (Measure ID 30100)

Measure Endorsed by: AHRQ/RAND

Description

A case-mix adjusted rate of unexpected adverse health events experienced by a specialist’s hospitalized patients.

The adverse event data for the Aexcel measure is extracted from the Inpatient Performance Measurement System (IPMS).

Understanding Adverse Events An adverse event is a negative, unanticipated consequence of care. Examples include a wound infection within an elective surgery case, hospital-acquired pneumonia or deep vein thrombosis after hip replacement surgery. All cases are included in the modeling for adverse events; however, not all of these are included in the Aexcel specialist measurement. Only those deemed clinically appropriate are used in Aexcel.

A subset of adverse events related to anesthesia and drug-induced complications have been excluded from this measure because these are complications that are not likely controlled by care directed by the managing provider of the medical case.

IPMS logic assigns an adverse event to a case if there is a secondary diagnosis that has all of the following characteristics:

The diagnosis is unlikely to have been present on admission.

The diagnosis is unlikely to be a coexisting condition.

The diagnosis is unlikely to reflect the normal progression of the principal diagnosis.

The diagnosis is logically consistent with the occurrence of an adverse event.

Modeling Adverse Events Cases are grouped by DRG to align with provider practice specialties, such as cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, gastroenterology and general surgery. Each group of DRG cases is modeled based on the specialty definition.

Each case is then interrogated for secondary diagnosis codes that Aetna has targeted as representing a possible adverse event. The case is checked to see if it is an elective admission or an emergency admission. Due to the known instability of members admitted for urgent care, some adverse event ICD-9 codes are only considered for elective admissions.

Some complications are anticipated, such as the member who has cardiac surgery but goes on to have a post-operative heart attack. This ICD-9 diagnosis code would not be counted as an adverse event. The exclusion logic, organized by specialty model, excludes the count for adverse event diagnosis codes present in an admission, based on the IDRG of the case, to avoid the inappropriate counting of complications that are unfortunate but anticipated.

Page 14: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 14

Eligible Population

Clinical Subset

The CSG is an Aetna-derived grouping that reflects the most significant clinical reason for a medical case. The CSG subset is used to identify the most appropriate inpatient cases to be evaluated based on the provider’s specialty using the diagnosis and procedure codes that the specialist is expected to manage.

Continuous Enrollment

Eligibility based on an inpatient stay

Measurement Period

24 months

Benefit Medical

Provider Specialty

There are currently 14 IPMS specialties that are modeled along the adverse event metric, and they are: cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, gastroenterology, general medicine, general surgery, gynecology, hematology/oncology, neurology, neurosurgery, obstetrics, orthopedics, otolaryngology, pulmonary medicine and urology. General medicine is split into adults and pediatrics.

Administrative Specification

Denominator The acute inpatient cases identified through the IPMS process with an inpatient stay. When we use the adverse event measure in Aexcel, we only use the events that have a managing specialist in one of the following specialty categories: cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, gastroenterology, general surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, orthopedics, otolaryngology, neurology, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, urology and vascular surgery.

Numerator The numerator is an adverse event as described above.

Expected

Separate data files are created for each specialty, clinical logic is applied and logistic regression models are run to obtain parameter estimates for the adverse event measure. An adjusted average rate is generated and is expressed as the expected adverse event rate on every medical case. The expected value is calculated based on the results of case-mix regression modeling that take into account many clinical and demographic variables that include, but are not limited to age, gender, region, product, admission type, discharge status, co-existing condition and the DRG group. A p value is generated and applied if statistically significant.

Page 15: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 15

Exclusion

The exclusion logic excludes the count for adverse event diagnosis codes present in an admission, based on the IDRG of the case, to avoid the inappropriate counting of complications that are unfortunate but anticipated.

Provider Attribution

Assigning the Managing Provider

In assigning a managing provider of a medical case, or the physician who managed the clinical and diagnostic events of the case, all medical, surgical or Ob/Gyn physicians from the claims that feed into the case are considered. The managing provider audit code indicates how the managing provider for that case was determined. Possible values, in priority order of selection, are:

1 = The provider is a medical, surgical or Ob/Gyn physician that performed a major procedure (if applicable). 2 = The provider is a medical, surgical or Ob/Gyn physician that performed a minor procedure (if applicable). 3 = The provider is a medical, surgical or Ob/Gyn physician that has the highest number of visits.

If the managing provider’s specialty category falls into one of the following, then that provider’s record is used to produce the clinical adverse event measure used in Aexcel: cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, gastroenterology, general surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, orthopedics, otolaryngology, neurology, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, urology and vascular surgery.

Observations

A minimum of 10 eligible inpatient events, per provider/provider group, as defined by the denominator, is needed for a provider to be scored on this measure.

Case Mix Adjustment An adjusted average rate is generated and is expressed as the expected adverse event rate. Every case generates this expected or predicted probability. The expected value is calculated based on the results of case-mix regression modeling that takes into account many clinical and demographic variables that include, but are not limited to, age, gender, region, product, admission type, discharge status, co-existing condition and the DRG group. A p value is generated and applied if statistically significant.

Page 16: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 16

30-Day Hospital Readmission Rate (Measure ID 30200)

Measure Endorsed by: AHRQ/RAND

Description A case-mix adjusted rate of unanticipated hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge. This measures the readmission for a specialist or specialty group. Readmission is defined as the proportion of hospitalizations managed by the specialist or specialty group that are followed by a subsequent hospitalization related to the same condition or a recognized complication of the condition within 2 to 30 days of the discharge date of the first hospitalization. This measure excludes readmissions that would have been expected based on the clinical nature of the case. The actual readmission rate is compared with the adjusted average readmission rate for the specialist or specialty group. The average level of performance is adjusted for the age and gender of the member, as well as for the reason care was provided (defined by the diagnosis or procedure that best describes the reason for the admission).

Eligible Population

Product lines All products (commercial, Medicare and Medicaid).

Ages All

Clinical Subset

The CSG is an Aetna derived grouping that reflects the most significant clinical reason for a medical case. The CSG subset is used to identify the most appropriate inpatient cases to be evaluated based on the provider’s specialty using the diagnosis and procedure codes that the specialist is expected to manage

Continuous Enrollment

During the month of the inpatient admission through the month after discharge

Benefit Medical

Visit Attribution is done according to managing provider logic for Aetna medical case grouper. The definition is according to greatest number of visits, unless surgical, in which case it is the surgeon.

Provider Specialty

Any of the 12 Aexcel specialties that have an acute inpatient admit that fit the categories for this measure.

Page 17: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 17

Administrative Specification

Denominator All acute inpatient cases occurring within the first 23 months of the 2-year measurement period using discharge date, managed by a specialty provider with an Aexcel specialty to CSG mapping defined above.

Numerator If an inpatient hospitalization occurred within 2 to 30 days of an inpatient discharge (denominator), it is considered a readmission.

Exclusion Calculate the 99th percentile based on Specialty and length of stay of the cases selected for the denominators. If the case is in the 99th percentile the case will be excluded from the expected calculation, and a record will be produced for this case without an expected value.

Provider Attribution Managing provider, according to medical case logic, on the initial admission.

Observations

A minimum of 10 eligible inpatient events per provider/provider group, as defined by the denominator, is needed for a provider to be scored on this measure.

Case Mix Adjustment

This measure is case-mix adjusted by age, product and CSG logic with specialty included.

Page 18: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 18

Breast Cancer Screening (Measure ID 30600) Measure Endorsed by: NQF, AQA, AMA,/CMS/HEDIS/NCQA

Description

The percentage of women 52–69 years of age who had a visit to an Ob/Gyn during the most recent 12-month measurement time period and who had a mammogram to screen for breast cancer.

Eligible Population

Product lines All products (commercial, Medicare and Medicaid).

Ages Women 52–69 years as of the end of the measurement period.

Continuous enrollment

Twelve months prior to the measurement end date.

Measurement Period

Twenty-four-month measurement time period to identify the numerator.

Benefit Medical.

Visit Ob/Gyn provider during the measurement period, as defined by specialty category code (OG).

Provider Specialty One visit to an Ob/Gyn provider during the measurement time period

Administrative Specification

Denominator The eligible population.

Numerator One mammogram during the 24-month measurement time period. A woman had a mammogram if a submitted claim/encounter contains any one of the codes in the following table.

Table Measure ID 30600-A: Codes to Identify Breast Cancer Screening CPT HCPCS ICD-9-CM Diagnosis ICD-9-CM Procedure UB Revenue

76090-76092 G0202, G0204 or G0206

V76.11, V76.12 87.36, 87.37 401 or 403

Page 19: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 19

Exclusion

If the member had unilateral mastectomies on two separate dates of service or a bilateral mastectomy. All date frames available in the Aetna Data Warehouse are reviewed (three full years of history plus the current year). Refer to the following table for codes to identify exclusions.

Table Measure ID 30600-B: Codes to Identify Exclusions Description CPT ICD-9-CM Procedure

Bilateral mastectomy 19216, 19245, 19183 19185, 19187, 19205, 19212 or 19181

85.42,85.44, 85.46, 85.48, 85.35 or 85.36

Unilateral mastectomy (members must have 2 separate occurrences at least 14 days

apart)

19180, 19200, 19220, 19240, 19250, 19254, 19215, 19182, 19162 or 19160

85.23, 85.31, 85.33, 85.34,85.4, 85.41, 85.43,85.45

or 85.47

Provider Attribution

Each Ob/Gyn provider the member has visited, at least once, in the current measurement time period is included in the measure. The member may or may not have had the numerator service with a qualifying denominator provider. The measure evaluates each qualifying denominator provider whom the member visited.

Only one provider per group, per member is attributed. The visit date selected is the most recent.

Duplications of the same provider and member combination are eliminated.

Observations

A minimum of 10 eligible members per provider/provider group, as defined by the denominator, is needed for a provider to be scored on this measure.

Case-Mix Adjustment Case-mix adjustment is applied to each clinical performance measure, as appropriate, and classifies data characteristics into groups that are homogenous to allow for a basis of comparison.

Page 20: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 20

Cervical Cancer Screening (Measure ID 30700)

Measure Endorsed by: NQF, AQA, HEDIS, NCQA

Description

The percentage of women 21–64 years of age who had a visit to an Ob/Gyn during the most recent 12-month measurement time period and received a Pap test to screen for cervical cancer.

Eligible Population

Product lines All products (commercial, Medicare and Medicaid).

Ages Women 21–64 years as of the end date of the measurement time period.

Continuous enrollment

Measurement Period

Twelve months prior to the measurement end date.

Thirty-six-month measurement time period to identify the numerator.

Benefit Medical.

Visit One visit to an Ob/Gyn provider during the measurement time period

Provider Specialty

Ob/Gyn provider during the measurement period, as defined by specialty category code (OG).

Administrative Specification

Denominator The eligible population.

Numerator One or more Pap tests during the measurement year or the two years prior to the measurement year. A woman had a Pap test if a submitted claim/encounter contains any one of the codes in the following table.

Table Measure ID 30700-A: Codes to Identify Cervical Cancer Screening

CPT HCPCS ICD-9-CM Diagnosis

ICD-9-CM Procedure

88141, 88142, 88143, 88144, 88145, 88147, 88148, 88150, 88152, 88153, 88154, 88155, 88156, 88158, 88164, 88165, 88166, 88167, 88174 or 88175

G0214, G0123, G0141, G0143, G0144, G0145, G0147 or G0148

v76.2, v72.3 or v76.47

91.46

Page 21: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 21

Exclusion

Exclude women who had a hysterectomy at any time, based on claims or encounters where the procedure code indicates a hysterectomy was performed. Refer to the following table to identify exclusions.

Table Measure ID 30700-B: Codes to Identify Exclusions Description Health Profile Database

Hysterectomy Excluded is procedure group number of 39 (hysterectomy)

Provider Attribution

Each Ob/Gyn provider the member has visited at least once in the current measurement time period is included in the measure. The member may or may not have had the numerator service with a qualifying denominator provider. Each qualifying denominator provider the member has visited will be evaluated.

Only one provider per group, per member is attributed. The visit date selected is the most recent. Duplications of the same provider and member combination are eliminated.

Observations

A minimum of 10 eligible members per provider/provider group, as defined by the denominator, is needed for a provider to be scored on this measure.

Case-Mix Adjustment Case-mix adjustment is applied to each clinical performance measure, as appropriate, and classifies data characteristics into groups that are homogenous to allow for a basis of comparison.

Lab Data Integrity

Lab data integrity applies.

Page 22: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 22

Testing for HIV during Pregnancy (Measure ID 30800) Measure Endorsed by: NQF, AQA, ACOG

Description

The percentage of women greater than 10 years of age, who delivered a baby, had an HIV test performed, and a claim was received from an obstetrician who billed an ante partum visit or total obstetrical care during the measurement time period.

Eligible Population

Product lines All products (commercial, Medicare and Medicaid).

Ages Women over 10 years of age as of the end date of the measurement period.

Delivery Women who had a delivery during the measurement period, based on medical case delivery logic that defines a vaginal or Cesarean delivery. This value is determined based on procedure codes or diagnosis codes within the medical case that indicate a confinement for a delivery.

Continuous enrollment

The month of the delivery plus the nine months prior.

Measurement Period

The month of the delivery plus the nine months prior.

Benefit Medical.

Administrative Specification

Denominator The eligible population.

Numerator HIV testing within the 10-month measurement period. A woman had an HIV test if a submitted claim/encounter contains any one of the codes in the following table

Table Measure ID 30800-A: Codes to Identify HIV Testing CPT

86701-86703, 86689, 87390, 87391, 87449-87450,87901

Page 23: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 23

Exclusion Exclude from the denominator women who did not have a qualifying test performed and identified with AIDs

Table Measure ID 30800-B: Codes to Identify Exclusions Description Health Profile Database

AIDS Excluded are members with a disease code of AID.

Provider Attribution

Each Ob/Gyn provider who billed the total obstetric care or ante-partum care in the current measurement time period is included in the measure. The member may or may not have had the numerator service with a qualifying denominator provider. Each qualifying denominator provider who billed the total obstetric care or ante-partum care will be evaluated. Table Measure ID 30800-C: Codes to Identify Total OB Care

CPT 59400, 59425-59426,

59510, 59610 or 59618

Only one provider per group, per member is attributed. If there are multiple deliveries for one member within a time period, each delivery is evaluated.

Observations

A minimum of 10 eligible members per provider/provider group, as defined by the denominator, is needed for a provider to be scored on this measure.

Case-Mix Adjustment Case-mix adjustment is applied to each clinical performance measure, as appropriate, and classifies data characteristics into groups that are homogenous to allow for a basis of comparison.

Lab Data Integrity

Lab data integrity applies.

Page 24: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 24

Lipid-Lowering Drug for Prevention of Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) (Measure ID 30300)

Measure Endorsed by: NQF, AQA, PCPI, ACC

Description

Measures the use of cholesterol-lowering medication in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). This measure includes only members with an Aetna pharmacy plan and evidence of use.

Eligible Population

Product lines All products (commercial, Medicare and Medicaid).

Ages Members 22 years and older at the end of the measurement time period.

Diagnosis Evidence of IHD on or before the visit to the cardiologist. Table Measure ID 30300-A contains codes.

Table Measure ID 30300-A: Codes or Descriptive to Identify IHD and AMI

Description Health Profile Database Ischemic Heart Disease Members with a disease code of IHD

(DM = Y or H)

Continuous Enrollment

Based on the data source of the membership file, if the visit to the cardiologist is within the first 15 days of the month, then continuous enrollment starts the month prior to the cardiology visit and subsequent 4 months. If the visit to the cardiologist is after the 16th of the month, then continuous enrollment starts the month of the cardiology visit and subsequent 4 months.

Measurement Period

Twenty-four months

Benefit Medical and pharmacy. The pharmacy benefit must be demonstrated through an Aetna benefits indication during the month of the cardiology visit AND the 4 months following the cardiology visit. In addition, a pharmacy claim must have been received at any time during the 24-month reporting period or 4-month post-reporting period.

Visit A minimum of one visit to a cardiologist during the measurement time period

Provider Specialty

Cardiologist provider during the measurement period, as defined by specialty category code (C)

Page 25: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 25

Administrative Specification

Denominator The eligible population.

Numerator Member in the denominator with a pharmacy claim for a drug with one of the following descriptions.

Table Measure ID 30400-B: Lipid Lowering Medications Description

AntihyperlipidemicsNiacin

Exclusion

No exclusions.

Provider Attribution

Each cardiologist the member has visited, at least once, in the current measurement time period is included in the measure. The member may or may not have had the numerator service with a qualifying denominator provider. Each qualifying denominator provider the member has visited will be evaluated.

Only one provider per group, per member is attributed.

Observations

A minimum of 10 eligible members per provider/provider group, as defined by the denominator, is needed for a provider to be scored on this measure.

Case-Mix Adjustment Case-mix adjustment is applied to each clinical performance measure, as appropriate, and classifies data characteristics into groups that are homogenous to allow for a basis of comparison.

Page 26: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 26

Beta-Blocker Treatment after AMI (Measure ID 30400)

Measure Endorsed by: AQA, HEDIS/NCQA

Description

Measures the use of beta blocker in members identified with ischemic heart disease who have had a heart attack. This measure includes only members with an Aetna pharmacy plan and evidence of use.

Eligible Population

Product lines All products (commercial, Medicare and Medicaid).

Ages Members 22 years and older at the end of the measurement time period.

Diagnosis Evidence of AMI on or before the visit to the cardiologist. Table Measure ID 30400-A contains codes.

Table Measure ID 30400-A: Codes or Descriptive to Identify IHD and AMI

Description Health Profile Database Ischemic Heart Disease Members with a disease code of IHD

(DM = Y or H) Acute Myocardial Infarction Members with AMI indicator of yes

Continuous Enrollment

Based on the data source of the membership file, if the visit to the cardiologist is within the first 15 days of the month, then continuous enrollment starts the month prior to the cardiology visit and subsequent 4 months. If the visit to the cardiologist is after the 16th of the month, then continuous enrollment starts the month of the cardiology visit and subsequent 4 months.

Benefit Medical and pharmacy. The pharmacy benefit must be demonstrated through an Aetna benefits indication during the month of the cardiology visit AND the 4 months following the cardiology visit. In addition, a pharmacy claim must have been received at any time during the 24-month reporting period or 4-month post-reporting period.

Page 27: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 27

Administrative Specification

Denominator The eligible population.

Numerator Member who has a pharmacy claim for a drug with one of the following descriptions.

Table Measure ID 30400-B: Medications Description

Beta blockers non selective Beta blockers cardio selective Alpha-beta blockers (Coreg/Carvedilol only)

Exclusion

Exclude from the denominator members with any of the disease or ICD-9 codes in Table Measure 30400-C found within the timeframes available within Aetna’s data warehouse. Members with a diagnosis of asthma, COPD or chronic renal failure are excluded.

Table Measure ID 30400-C: Exclusion Codes ICD- Description ICD 9

Codes Atrioventricular Block, Complete 426 Atrioventricular Block, Other And Unspecified

426.1

Mobitz (type) Ii Atrioventricular Block 426.12 Other Second Degree Atrioventricular Block 426.13 Other Heart Block 426.6 Sinoatrial Node Dysfunction 427.81

Table Measure ID 30400-D: Exclusion by Disease

Description Health Profile Database Asthma Members with a disease code of AST COPD Members with a disease code of COP Chronic Renal Failure

Members with a disease code of CRF

Provider Attribution

Each cardiologist the member has visited, at least once, in the current measurement time period is included in the measure. The member may or may not have had the numerator service with a qualifying denominator provider. Each qualifying denominator provider the member has visited will be evaluated.

Only one provider per group per member is attributed.

Page 28: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 28

Observations

A minimum of 10 eligible members per provider/provider group, as defined by the denominator, is needed for a provider to be scored on this measure.

Case Mix Adjustment Case mix adjustment is applied to each clinical performance measure, as appropriate, and classifies data characteristics into groups that are homogenous to allow for a basis of comparison.

Page 29: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 29

ACE/ARB Use in Members with Chronic Heart Failure (Measure ID 30500)

Measure Endorsed by: NQF, AQA, PCPI, CMS/JCAHO

Description

Measures the rate of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in members with chronic heart failure. This measure includes only members with an Aetna pharmacy plan and evidence of use.

Eligible Population

Product lines All products (commercial, Medicare and Medicaid).

Ages Members 20 years and older as of the end of the measurement time period.

Diagnosis Evidence of CHF on or before the visit to the cardiologist. Table Measure ID 30500-A contains codes.

Table Measure ID 30500-A: Codes to Identify CHF Description Health Profile Database

Congestive Heart Failure Members with a disease code of CHF (DM = Y or H)

Continuous Enrollment

Based on the data source of the membership file, if the visit to the cardiologist is within the first 15 days of the month, then continuous enrollment starts the month prior to the cardiology visit and subsequent 4 months. If the visit to the cardiologist is after the 16th of the month, then continuous enrollment starts the month of the cardiology visit and subsequent 4 months.

Benefit Medical and pharmacy. The pharmacy benefit must be demonstrated through an Aetna benefits indication during the month of the cardiology visit AND the 4 months following the cardiology visit. In addition, a pharmacy claim must have been received at any time during the 24-month reporting period or 4-month post-reporting period.

Visit A minimum of one visit to a cardiologist during the measurement time period

Provider Specialty

Cardiologist during the measurement period, as defined by provider specialty category code (C)

Page 30: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 30

Administrative Specification

Denominator The eligible population.

Numerator Member who has a pharmacy claim for a drug with one of the following descriptions.

Table Measure ID 30500–B: Medications Description of Medications

Carvedilol Bisoprolol fumarate Metoprolol Ace Inhibitors Angiotensin II receptor antagonists ACE Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers ACE Inhibitors and thiazides Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and thiazides OR Hydralazine and Nitrates OR Vasodilators/Thiazide and Nitrates

Exclusion

Exclude from the denominator members with any of the individual ICD-9 codes in Table Measure 30500-C or evidence of an ICD-9 diagnosis code within any of the listed diagnosis groups.

Table Measure ID 30500-C: Codes to Identify Exclusions

Description ICD-9 Codes Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy 425.1 Hyperkinetic Heart Disease 429.82

Table Measure ID 30500-D: Codes to Identify Exclusions

Description Diagnosis Group NumberCongenital Heart disease 7 Acute Renal Failure 66 Chronic Renal Failure 67

Provider Attribution

Each cardiologist the member has visited, at least once, in the current measurement time period is included in the measure. The member may or may not have had the numerator service with a qualifying denominator provider. Each qualifying denominator provider the member has visited will be evaluated.

Only one provider per group, per member is attributed.

Observations

A minimum of10 eligible members, per provider/provider group, as defined by the denominator, is needed for a provider to be scored on this measure.

Page 31: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 31

Case Mix Adjustment Case mix adjustment is applied to each clinical performance measure, as appropriate, and classifies data characteristics into groups that are homogenous to allow for a basis of comparison.

Page 32: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 32

Efficiency Evaluation Process

General Statements on the Physician Efficiency Measure

Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology

“Episode of care” is a methodology to assist in understanding medical cost and utilization drivers. An "episode of care" for a member represents treatment and service utilization across time for an identified health condition. The doctor, hospital, pharmacy and ancillary testing, as well as other costs and utilization relating to an episode of illness, are rolled up into a single entity based on a specific condition. An episode of care spans from the onset of symptoms until treatment is complete. Aetna uses Symmetry Health Data Systems’ software and its Episode Treatment Groups® (ETGs®) version 6.5 illness classification system to build episodes of care data in the Aetna Data Warehouse. The ETG technology is distributed in the form of "grouper" software. The software accepts health care claims (service line detail) and returns the ETG value, along with other patient information. The grouper software rolls up all doctor, hospital, pharmacy and ancillary testing claims data together to create episodes of illness or surgery that are clinically defined and identified by ETG codes for analysis purposes. Symmetry ETGs as a Measure of Physician Group Efficiency

Symmetry’s ETGs offer the ability to identify, quantify and compare the total medical costs of a clinically based episode of care spanning hospitalizations, ambulatory visits and all ancillary services, including the use of pharmaceuticals. Medical claims and pharmacy claims are fed into the grouper software, and medical episodes are created from these claims. Symmetry creates ETGs that categorize the episodes into different medical groupings. ETGs are assigned to a physician who is involved in a patient’s care as demonstrated by that provider’s claims detail within that episode. The physician who is assigned the episode is referred to as the “responsible provider.” Aetna has developed the “responsible provider logic” that is used to assign an episode of care to a physician. There are many variables that can affect the use of health care resources for a condition. There can be variation in resource use to treat a condition that is a direct result of the population differences or level of illness. To adjust for the variation in resource use, a case-mix-adjusted “expected allowed amount” is created for each ETG that is assigned to a physician group. That case-mix-adjusted expected allowed amount is then compared to the “actual allowed amount” for that episode of care. The efficiency measure created for Aexcel provides the ability to evaluate medical cost and utilization patterns among physicians treating similar, severity-adjusted illnesses. Providers are ranked in terms of resource efficiency after adjusting for differences in patient demographics and case mix, and then are compared to their peers. The peer group is defined as physicians of the same specialty in the same Aexcel market. There can be variation in efficiency indexes over time period analysis. Variation has been noted in physician groups whose episode counts over the given time period are low. To evaluate physicians and determine potential for variation, the statistical significance of a provider group’s efficiency score is evaluated using a 90 percent confidence interval.

Page 33: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 33

Aetna’s Provider Attribution for Symmetry Episodes of Care

Aetna assigns one responsible provider for each episode of care. For non-surgical ETGs, an episode is assigned to the physician with the most visits with the patient during that episode of care. For surgical ETGs, an episode is assigned to the surgeon with the most allowed amounts for that episode. Only one physician is assigned to an episode with Symmetry.

Provider Attribution for Aexcel Specialties

Aexcel uses the responsible provider of the episode for attribution but limits the ETGs used for evaluation of efficiency in the Aexcel network selection process. Each specialty has a specialty specific list of ETGs that are used in the evaluation process, and they are limited to the ETGs that are most frequently assigned to that particular specialty (see Appendix B). Upon request, Aetna will discuss with physicians more detailed information regarding the ETGs that were managed by the physicians. Provider Minimum Episode Volume

We identify those physicians who have managed at least 20 episodes of care within their specialty specific ETGs for Aetna members over the past three years. A reasonable volume of Aetna members is necessary to credibly measure performance. Symmetry Clean Period

Each ETG has its own clean period. It is defined as the absence of treatment for a specified period of time. For example, ETG 204 (Conjunctivitis) has a 60-day clean period, which means that any claims related to that diagnosis that fall within a 60-day period will be considered a recurrence of the same condition. After 60 days, a new episode would be triggered. Only full-year or complete episodes are used for Aexcel. Complete episodes are those that met the clean periods before and after the measure, or episodes lasting 365 days. Aetna limits episodes to a maximum of 365 days. Claims Lag

There is a claims lag of three months used in the episodes of care measurement. When episodes of care are used for Aexcel, we also apply a lag to allow for as many episodes to become complete or full-year episodes as possible for the measurement period. Episode Risk Groups

Symmetry's Episode Risk Groups® (ERGs®) version 6.5 is a software analysis tool that allows the use of enrollment information (demographics), medical claims, pharmacy claims and episodes of care in developing a risk-stratification score for individuals and groups. That score represents health care risk or burden of illness and can be applied to populations, such as a provider’s patient base, to determine differences between the health burden of that provider versus his/her peers. ERGs can be retrospective, using historical claims to determine current risk, or prospective, to predict risk going forward. In Aexcel, we use retrospective ERG scores to determine the risk and burden of illness for each provider's Aetna practice eligible for Aexcel. That risk/burden of illness is then used during the development of normative values for case-mix adjustment to ensure that health risk and burden are accounted for in efficiency measurement when the provider is compared to his/her peers.

Page 34: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 34

Aetna Case-Mix Adjustment

The case-mix adjustment includes the following default variables for each individual ETG used:

Variable within each ETG Values Aexcel Market See Appendix C Product All medical products Year of Episode Calendar years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, based on episode start date Episode Risk Group (ERG) Risk group ranges from 1 to 4 where:

• Risk group 1: 0 to <0.7 • Risk group 2: 0.7 to <2.4 • Risk group 3: 2.4 to < 7.0 • Risk group 4: 7.0 and greater

Specialty Category of the Provider

See Appendix A

Pharmacy Coverage

Yes or No

Age Group Age group ranges: • Member ages 0 to 20 • Member ages 21 to 50 • Member ages 51 to 64 (Episodes with members age 65 and greater are excluded from the efficiency measurement.)

Gender Male or Female

All variables are evaluated yearly. The items are then used in indirect standardization to create a grid of averages broken out by all of the above variables. If the cell is too small (less than 20), then the regional average allowed amount is used instead. The regional average allowed amount uses all the same variables with the exception of Region, which is substituted for Aexcel market and Specialty category of the provider group. For example, the following seven members would each fall into a separate case mix category and produce a different peer average for the case mix: ETG Provider

Specialty Aexcel Market Age/Age

Group Gender Pharmacy

Benefit Product Year of

Episode ERG Average

Allowed Amount*

268 Cardiology Atlanta 18 (0 to 20) Male Yes PPO 2006 3 $2,271 268 Cardiology Atlanta 25 (21-50) Male Yes PPO 2006 3 $2.308 268 Cardiology Atlanta 60 (51-64) Male Yes PPO 2006 3 $2,700 268 Cardiology Atlanta 18 (0 to 20) Female Yes PPO 2006 3 $2,100 268 Cardiology Atlanta 25 (21-50) Female Yes PPO 2006 3 $2,232 268 Cardiology Atlanta 60 (51-64) Female Yes PPO 2006 3 $2,552 268 Cardiology Atlanta 18 (0 to 20) Male Yes HMO 2006 3 $1,800 *Average allowed amounts in this chart are for illustration purposes only. They do not represent actual average allowed amounts. In the table above, the difference between the first three case-mix categories is age. The fourth case-mix category yields a difference in age between case-mix categories two and three and a difference in gender from case-mix category one. Each of these groups would be considered a different case-mix category and would yield a different expected value. That goes for every variable combination that is encountered. Each combination of the case-mix variables produces its own expected value. This allows for a provider to be assessed while adjusting for the case-mix of the members he/she is treating, thus allowing for a more even

Page 35: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 35

playing field to be used when comparing one provider to another and to the specialty/market average for each ETG. Aetna Outlier Logic

Outlier logic is applied at the case-mix category level as described above. When case-mix categories are created, the highest and lowest five percent of episodes within each case-mix category, based on the total cost, are considered outliers and, therefore, excluded. There is additional clinical logic applied to identify outliers that are based on the length of an episode. For example, an episode for an acute myocardial infarction that is only one day in length would be considered an outlier as it most likely represents a coding error and not an actual episode of acute myocardial infarction. Eligible Population

Administrative Specification

Measurement Timeframe Three full years of episodes where the episode start begins within the three-year timeframe

Denominator Denominator is the sum of the expected allowed amounts for the episodes being attributed to the group. The expected allowed amount is the case-mix-adjusted average for each ETG created within each market/specialty combination

Number of Episodes The volume threshold for a provider/provider group to be considered for Aexcel is a minimum of 20 episodes.

Total Allowed $ Episodes must be greater than $0

Numerator Numerator is the sum of the actual allowed amounts for the same episodes in the denominator being attributed to the group.

Exclusion (1) All members age 65 and older (2) All transplants

Product Lines All medical products

Ages Members less than 65

Continuous Enrollment

Complete and full-year episodes are included, which means the episode began and came to an end according to the rules of clean periods or were 12-month episodes. Episodes longer than 12 months for chronic conditions are not created by Aetna’s warehouse to enable comparisons. For example, if a chronic episode for one person is only 12 months long, it would not be comparable to an episode for another person with the same condition that is 3 years long.

Benefit Medical (pharmacy if available)

Provider Specialty Category

Cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, gastroenterology, neurology, neurosurgery, vascular surgery, plastic surgery, general surgery, Ob/Gyn, orthopedic, urology, otolaryngology

Page 36: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 36

Provider Grouping Provider data is sent to each region in the “Aexcel Designation Model” (see following section) for provider group selection. Provider groups can be either an individual or a group, based on how individual markets conduct business.

Provider Scoring Scoring is done at the provider group level for volume. A provider group can include from one to many individual providers. Each provider group has the potential to be scored for efficiency, but it must meet the measure threshold of 20 or more episodes. Each group meeting the 20 or more threshold is considered for designation as long as it passes at least one of the clinical performance measures. Each group will receive an observed (actual rate) to expected (case-mix-adjusted) ratio score. The expected value for this score is the case-mix-adjusted average allowed amount for each episode attributed to that group Statistical Significance of Efficiency Index Statistical significance is determined using a weighted Student’s t-test in which we compare each provider group’s episodes index to the mean episode index to test for statistical significance using a 90 percent confidence interval. Physician groups can be placed into four categories of statistical significance of efficiency:

ESS - Efficient and statistically so ENSS - Efficient but not statistically so INSS – Did not meet efficiency standards but not statistically so ISS – Did not meet efficiency standards and statistically so NA - not enough volume to determine efficiency and statistical significance

Page 37: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 37

Aexcel Designation Model Process The Aexcel designation process includes four key criteria:

− Case volume

− Clinical performance

− Efficiency

− Network adequacy

For specialists who meet the case volume and clinical performance standards for Aexcel network designation, a measure of the efficiency of their care is developed and compared to that of their peers.

Designation Process (performed by specialty in each market’s designation model)

1. As described above, provider groups are assigned an efficiency/statistical significance type: a. ESS b. ENSS c. INSS d. ISS e. NA

2. The provider group’s overall efficiency/statistical significance is percentiled within the market/specialty and stated as an “add-back priority order” to indicate relative performance within efficiency/statistical significance types

3. Provider groups are non-designated for Aexcel, regardless of efficiency/statistical significance type, if:

a. They do not pass one of the clinical measures b. They are under investigation by the Special Investigations Unit

4. Provider groups are moved from a non-designated to a designated status, regardless of

efficiency/statistical significance type, if they weren’t in a non-designated status in the preceding step, and if: a. They have contractual language requiring them to be included in all networks b. They represent a rare sub-specialty or perform unique services within the market c. They are a multi-specialty group, and all of their specialties as a whole are deemed to meet the

efficiency and general access standards

5. After designation/non-designation, the eligible network for each market and specialty category is built by automatically excluding all ISS and NA providers: however, additional providers can be added back, in “add-back priority order,” until the network size is sufficient to meet general access and penetration requirements (see note below regarding network adequacy).

6. A GeoAccess analysis is then conducted to determine if there are gaps in each market’s geographic

coverage using up to a 75-mile threshold. If gaps are identified, providers are added to the network, in add-back priority order, to address the geographic gaps.

Page 38: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 38

Note: Aexcel Network Adequacy The Aexcel designation model produces a baseline Aexcel network based on the evaluation of volume, clinical performance, fraud flags and efficiency. Some physicians or physician groups also have Aexcel designation based on contractual obligations. Once these selections are complete, we may need to supplement the performance network with additional physicians to ensure members have satisfactory access to enough specialists. However, only physicians who have passed the clinical performance evaluation are eligible for consideration to supplement the network.

Page 39: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 39

Appendix A: Aexcel Specialties and Sub Categories

Specialty

Sub Category

Cardiology

Cardiology Cardiovascular Disease Interventional Cardiology

Cardiothoracic Surgery Surgery, Thoracic Cardiovascular Thoracic Surgery

Gastroenterology Gastroenterology

Neurology Neurology

Neurosurgery Surgery, Neurological

Obstetrics-Gynecology

Obstetrics & Gynecology Gynecology Surgery, Obstetrics & Gynecology Obstetrics & Gynecology - CA PCP

Orthopedics

Surgery, Hand/Orthopedic Surgery, Knee Surgery, Orthopedic

Otolaryngology

Otolaryngology Otology Otology/Neurotology Otorhinolaryngology Surgery, Head & Neck

Plastic Surgery

Surgery, Plastic Surgery, Hand/Plastic Surgery, Oro-Facial Plastic Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Otorhinolaryngology & Oro-Facial Plastic Surgery Otorhinolaryngology/Plastic Surgery

Surgery

Surgery Proctology Surgery, Colon & Rectal Surgery, Hand

Urology

Urology Surgery, Urological

Vascular Surgery Surgery, General Vascular

Page 40: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 40

Appendix B: Specialty ETG Groupings

CARDIOLOGY CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY ETG Code ETG Description

ETG Code ETG Description

265 IHD, except CHF, w/o AMI 260 CAD, w/o AMI, w CABG 311 Cardiovascular signs/symptoms 251 CAD, w AMI, w CABG 277 Minor conduction disorder 400 Malig pulmonary neopl, w surg 281 Benign hypertension, w/o cc 900 Signs/symptoms non-specific 274 Valvular disorder, w/o cc 261 CAD/valve dis, w/o AMI w valve 280 Benign hypertension, w cc 290 Minor arterial inflam w/o surg 283 Cardiac congenital w/o surg 410 Pulmonary signs & symptoms 264 CAD w/o AMI, with cardiac cath 295 Atherosclerosis, w/o surgery 047 Hyperlipidemia 270 Aortic aneurysm, w/o surgery 279 Malignant hypertension, w/o cc 810 Late effect/late complication 262 CAD, w/o AMI, with angioplasty 401 Malig pulmonary neopl w/o surg 410 Pulmonary signs & symptoms 282 Cardiac congenital w surg 276 Maj conduction w/o pacer/defib 263 CAD w/o AMI w arrythmia and pacer 900 Signs/symptoms non-specific 373 Bacterial lung infection, w cc 268 Congestive Heart Failure w/o c 265 IHD, except CHF, w/o AMI 253 CAD, w AMI, w angioplasty 794 Routine exam 797 Conditional exam 399 Oth inflam lung dis w/o surg 794 Routine exam 292 Artery embolism/thromb w/o sur 278 Malignant hypertension, w cc 269 Aortic aneurysm, with surgery 267 Congestive Heart Failure, w cc 403 Benign pulmonary neopl w/o sur 029 Non-insulin diabetes w cc 159 CVA, non-hemorrhagic w surgery 160 CVA, non-hemorrhagic, w/o surg 310 Other diseases of the veins 022 Hypo-function thyroid gland 678 Minor inflam skin/subcu tissue 048 Obesity, mild 305 Phlebitis/thrombophleb vein 290 Minor arterial inflam w/o surg 302 Vein inflammation, w surgery 255 CAD, w AMI, w cardiac cath 271 Cardiac infection, w surgery 287 Other cardiac diseases 797 Conditional exam 295 Atherosclerosis, w/o surgery 677 Major inflam skin/subcu tissue 272 Cardiac infection, w/o surgery 288 Arterial inflammation w surg 259 CAD w AMI inferior wall w/o cc 374 Bacterial lung infect w/o cc 263 CAD w/o AMI w arrythmia and pacer 294 Atherosclerosis, with surgery 027 Insulin depend diabetes w cc 402 Benign pulmonary neopl w surg 266 Pulmonary heart disease w/oAMI 252 CAD w AMI/aqua defect, w valve 257 CAD w AMI anterior wall w/o cc 258 CAD, w AMI inferior wall, w cc 270 Aortic aneurysm, w/o surgery 030 Non-insulin diabetes w/o cc 273 Valvular disorder, w cc 303 Embolism/thrombosis veins 305 Phlebitis/thrombophleb vein 256 CAD, w AMI anterior wall, w cc 275 Major conduction w pacer/defib 028 Insulin depend diabetes w/o cc 254 CAD w AMI, w arrythmia w pacer

Page 41: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 41

GASTROENTEROLOGY NEUROLOGY

ETG ETG

Code ETG Description Code ETG Description 433 Inflam esophagus, w/o surgery 168 Migraine headache, common 449 Diverticulitis, w/o surgery 900 Signs/symptoms non-specific 486 Gastroenterology signs&symptom 185 Neurological signs & symptoms 464 Irritable bowel syndrome 722 Joint degen localized, w/o sur 455 Benign neo intest/abdom w surg 177 Inflam non-cran nerves w/o sur 474 Hemorrhoids, simple 169 Migraine headache, complicated 794 Routine exam 171 Congenital/other CNS w/o surg 435 Gastritis/duodenitis, simple 160 CVA, non-hemorrhagic, w/o surg 456 Benign neo intest/abd w/o surg 152 Epilepsy, w/o surgery 452 Inflam intestine/abd w/o sur 175 Carpal tunnel syndrome w/o sur 485 Oth dis rectum/anus w/o surg 167 Hereditary/degener CNS w/o sur 479 Benign neo rectum/anus, w surg 150 Inflammation CNS w/o surg 438 Ulcer, simple 173 Inflam cranial nerves w/o surg 076 Non-neopl blood disease, minor 101 Attention deficit disorder 473 Hemorrhoids, comp, w/o surgery 184 Congenital peripheral nerve 900 Signs/symptoms non-specific 749 Oth minor orthopedic disorder 533 Hepatology signs & symptoms 353 Other ENT disorder w/o surgery 431 Infect stomach/esophag w/o cc 106 Other neuropsych/behavior dis 469 Oth diseases intestine/abdomen 746 Minor orthopedic trauma 468 Hiatal hernia, w/o surgery 102 Development disorder 514 Infect hepatitis L sev w/o cc 163 Minor brain trauma 484 Oth disorder rectum/anus w sur 752 Ortho/rheumatoid signs&symptom 442 Benign neo stoma/esoph w/o sur 092 Autism and child psychoses 450 Oth infect intestines/abdomen 091 Organic drug/metabolic dis 480 Benign neo rectum/anus w/o sur 206 Inflam eye disease w/o surgery 518 Cirrhosis, w/o surgery 156 Benign neoplasm CNS w/o surg 437 Ulcer, complicated w/o surgery 183 Trauma non-cran nerve w/o surg 521 Cholelithiasis, complicated 751 Ortho cong/acquir deform w/o s 445 Anom stomach/esophagus w/o sur 165 Spinal trauma, w/o surgery 463 Bowel obstruction, w/o surgery 158 CVA, hemorrhagic, w/o surgery 519 Acute pancreatitis 154 Malig neoplasm CNS w/o surg 516 Non-infect hepatitis, w/o cc 140 Viral meningitis 523 Cholelithiasis simple w/o surg 162 Major brain trauma, w/o surg 520 Chronic pancreatitis 179 Peripheral nerve neo w/o surg 512 Infect hepatitis H sev w/o cc 143 Nonviral encephalitis 513 Infect hepatitis, low sev w cc 141 Bacterial/fungal meningitis

142 Viral encephalitis 181 Trauma cranial nerves w/o surg 145 Toxic encephalitis

Page 42: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 42

NEUROSURGERY OB/GYN ETG ETG Code ETG Description Code ETG Description

722 Joint degen localized, w/o sur 794 Routine exam 721 Joint degen localized, w surg 649 Cond asso w menstruation w/o s 156 Benign neoplasm CNS w/o surg 640 Infect vagina except monilial 171 Congenital/other CNS w/o surg 647 Benign neo female genit w/o s 749 Oth minor orthopedic disorder 661 Gynecological signs & symptoms 751 Ortho cong/acquir deform w/o s 574 Infect low GU not STD 153 Malignant neoplasm CNS w surg 658 Benign neo breast, w/o surgery 746 Minor orthopedic trauma 639 Monilial infect vagina (yeast) 177 Inflam non-cran nerves w/o sur 653 Oth female genital cond w/o s 160 CVA, non-hemorrhagic, w/o surg 643 Inflam female genital w/o surg 162 Major brain trauma, w/o surg 796 Contraceptive manage, w/o surg 161 Major brain trauma, w surgery 623 Induced abortion 165 Spinal trauma, w/o surgery 646 Benign neo female genital w s 810 Late effect/late complication 622 Spontaneous abortion 167 Hereditary/degener CNS w/o sur 637 Infection cervix, w/o surgery 034 Benign neoplasm pituitary 572 Sexually trans disease primary 166 Hereditary/degener CNS w surg 786 Oth maj neonatal, perinatal 175 Carpal tunnel syndrome w/o sur 780 Uncomp neonatal management 173 Inflam cranial nerves w/o surg 797 Conditional exam 174 Carpal tunnel syndrome w surg 592 Urinary incontinence w/o surg 163 Minor brain trauma 720 Osteoporosis 158 CVA, hemorrhagic, w/o surgery 651 Cond asso w infertility w/o s 155 Benign neoplasm CNS w surg 648 Cond asso w menstruation w sur 185 Neurological signs & symptoms 790 Exposure to infectious disease 154 Malig neoplasm CNS w/o surg 645 Malig female genital w/o surg 170 Congenital/other CNS w surgery 596 Urologic signs & symptoms 164 Spinal trauma, with surgery 801 Other preventative/adm service 159 CVA, non-hemorrhagic w surgery 795 Contraceptive manage, w surg

632 Infect ovary/tube w/o s w/o cc 642 Endometriosis, w/o surgery 580 Inflam genitourinary w/o surg 787 Oth minor neonatal, perinatal 652 Oth female genital cond w surg 595 Oth genitourinary sys w/o surg 650 Cond asso w infertility w surg 784 Mechanical disorder antenatal 638 Vaginal infection, w surgery 641 Inflam female genital, w surg 621 Ectopic pregnancy, w/o surgery 630 Infect ovary/fallop tube w sur 591 Urinary incontinence w surgery 620 Ectopic pregnancy, w surgery 644 Malig female genital w surg 635 Infect uterus w/o surg w/o cc 588 Benign neo GU w/o surg 573 Sexually trans disease dissem 785 Other disorders, antenatal 631 Infect ovary/tube w/o sur w cc 633 Infection uterus, with surgery 634 Infection uterus w/o surg w cc

Page 43: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 43

ORTHOPEDICS OTOLARYNGOLOGY ETG ETG Code ETG Description Code ETG Description 722 Joint degen localized, w/o sur 329 Otitis media, w/o surgery 746 Minor orthopedic trauma 335 Chronic sinusitis, w/o surgery 748 Bursitis/tendinitis, w/o surg 331 Tonsill/adenoid/pharyn w/o sur 743 Joint derangement, w/o surgery 341 Minor ENT inflam cond w/o surg 731 Cl frac/dis up extrem w/o surg 337 Oth ENT infection w/o surgery 751 Ortho cong/acquir deform w/o s 349 Hearing disorders, w/o surgery 749 Oth minor orthopedic disorder 330 Tonsill/adenoid/pharyn w surg 752 Ortho/rheumatoid signs&symptom 354 Otolaryngology signs/symptoms 742 Joint derangement, w surgery 328 Otitis media, w minor surgery 734 Cl frac/dis low extrem w/o sur 339 Major ENT inflam cond w/o surg 721 Joint degen localized, w surg 353 Other ENT disorder w/o surgery 690 Minor skin trauma 900 Signs/symptoms non-specific 719 Major joint inflam, w/o surg 333 Acute sinusitis 175 Carpal tunnel syndrome w/o sur 347 ENT congenital/anomal w/o sur 733 Cl frac/dis low extrem w surg 332 Allergic rhinitis 745 Maj orth trauma except frac/dis w/o s 351 ENT trauma, w/o surgery 177 Inflam non-cran nerves w/o sur 433 Inflam esophagus, w/o surgery 730 Cl frac/dis up extrem w surg 334 Chronic sinusitis with surgery 174 Carpal tunnel syndrome w surg 345 Benign ENT neoplasm, w/o surg 747 Bursitis/tendinitis, w surg 185 Neurological signs & symptoms 741 Benign bone/conn ex head/neck 322 Inflam oral cavity w/o surgery

737 Cl fracture/dis trunk w/o surg 486 Gastroenterology signs&symptom

744 Maj ortho trauma ex frac/dis w s 682 Benign neoplasm of the skin 729 Op frac/dis of upper extremity 678 Minor inflam skin/subcu tissue 728 Cl frac/dis w/o s thi/hip/pelv 327 Otitis media, w major surgery 750 Ortho cong/acquir deform w sur 320 Infection of the oral cavity 727 Cl frac/dis w s thigh/hip/pelv 343 Malignant ENT neoplasm w/o sur 732 Op frac/dis lower extremity 346 ENT congenital/anomalies w sur 718 Major joint inflam w surg 338 Major ENT inflam cond w surg 736 Cl fracture/dis trunk w surg 671 Maj bact infection skin, w/o s

350 ENT trauma, with surgery

344 Benign ENT neoplasm, w surgery

672 Minor bacterial infection skin 336 Oth ENT infection with surgery 340 Minor ENT inflam cond w surg 679 Malig skin, major, w surgery 675 Fungal skin infection, w/o sur 342 Malignant ENT neoplasm w surg 352 Other ENT disorders, w surgery 348 Hearing disorders with surgery

Page 44: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 44

PLASTIC SURGERY

ETG Code ETG Description 682 Benign neoplasm of the skin 678 Minor inflam skin/subcu tissue 658 Benign neo breast, w/o surgery 679 Malig skin, major, w surgery 685 Major skin trauma ex burns w s 688 Open wound, with surgery 657 Benign neo breast, w surgery 689 Open wound, w/o surgery 900 Signs/symptoms non-specific 749 Oth minor orthopedic disorder 686 Maj skin trauma ex burns w/o s 655 Malig breast w surgery ex BMT 743 Joint derangement, w/o surgery 672 Minor bacterial infection skin 810 Late effect/late complication 175 Carpal tunnel syndrome w/o sur 741 Benign bone/conn ex head/neck 731 Cl frac/dis up extrem w/o surg 680 Malig skin, major, w/o surgery 722 Joint degen localized, w/o sur 347 ENT congenital/anomal w/o sur 677 Major inflam skin/subcu tissue 174 Carpal tunnel syndrome w surg 748 Bursitis/tendinitis, w/o surg 690 Minor skin trauma 660 Oth disorders breast, w/o surg 751 Ortho cong/acquir deform w/o s 752 Ortho/rheumatoid signs&symptom 351 ENT trauma, w/o surgery 746 Minor orthopedic trauma 466 Hernias except hiatal w/o surg 687 Minor burns 346 ENT congenital/anomalies w sur 209 Malig neoplasm eye external 218 Trauma of the eye, w surgery 740 Benign bone/connect head/neck 798 Major specific procedure NOS 691 Other skin disorders 354 Otolaryngology signs/symptoms 345 Benign ENT neoplasm, w/o surg 341 Minor ENT inflam cond w/o surg 306 Varicose veins lower extremity 343 Malignant ENT neoplasm w/o sur 349 Hearing disorders, w/o surgery

Page 45: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 45

SURGERY ETG Code ETG Description

ETG Code ETG Description

658 Benign neo breast, w/o surgery 523 Cholelithiasis simple w/o surg 465 Hernias, except hiatal, w surg 689 Open wound, w/o surgery 678 Minor inflam skin/subcu tissue 677 Major inflam skin/subcu tissue 473 Hemorrhoids, comp, w/o surgery 749 Oth minor orthopedic disorder 466 Hernias except hiatal w/o surg 479 Benign neo rectum/anus, w surg 682 Benign neoplasm of the skin 690 Minor skin trauma 657 Benign neo breast, w surgery 446 Appendicitis, with rupture 661 Gynecological signs & symptoms 452 Inflam intestine/abd w/o sur 521 Cholelithiasis, complicated 477 Malig rectum/anus, w surgery 486 Gastroenterology signs&symptom 451 Inflam intestine/abdomen w sur 900 Signs/symptoms non-specific 463 Bowel obstruction, w/o surgery 794 Routine exam 470 Infection rectum/anus, w surg 672 Minor bacterial infection skin 679 Malig skin, major, w surgery 449 Diverticulitis, w/o surgery 302 Vein inflammation, w surgery 522 Cholelithiasis, simple, w surg 049 Obesity, morbid with surgery 447 Appendicitis, w/o rupture 462 Bowel obstruction with surgery 474 Hemorrhoids, simple 456 Benign neo intest/abd w/o surg 655 Malig breast w surgery ex BMT 484 Oth disorder rectum/anus w sur 476 Inflam rectum/anus w/o surgery 448 Diverticulitis, with surgery 306 Varicose veins lower extremity 433 Inflam esophagus, w/o surgery 050 Obesity, morbid w/o surgery 453 Malig intestine/abdomen w surg 455 Benign neo intest/abdom w surg 020 Disease-thyroid gland w surg 656 Malignancy breast, w/o surgery 475 Inflam rectum/anus, w surgery 472 Hemorrhoids, comp, w surg 480 Benign neo rectum/anus w/o sur 485 Oth dis rectum/anus w/o surg 159 CVA, non-hemorrhagic w surgery 660 Oth disorders breast, w/o surg 478 Malig rectum/anus, w/o surgery 290 Minor arterial inflam w/o surg 454 Malig intestine/abd w/o surg 741 Benign bone/conn ex head/neck 685 Major skin trauma ex burns w s 810 Late effect/late complication 461 Vascular disease intest/abdom 295 Atherosclerosis, w/o surgery

Page 46: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 46

UROLOGY VASCULAR SURGERY ETG Code ETG Description

ETG Code ETG Description

574 Infect low GU, not STD 465 Hernias, except hiatal, w surg 580 Inflam genitourinary w/o surg 305 Phlebitis/thrombophleb vein 596 Urologic signs & symptoms 658 Benign neo breast, w/o surgery 584 Benign neo prostate, w/o surg 302 Vein inflammation, w surgery 578 Kidney stone w/o surg & comorb 682 Benign neoplasm of the skin 592 Urinary incontinence w/o surg 752 Ortho/rheumatoid signs&symptom 582 Malignancy prostate, w/o surg 159 CVA, non-hemorrhagic w surgery 595 Oth genitourinary sys w/o surg 678 Minor inflam skin/subcu tissue 576 Kidney stone w surg w/o comorb 466 Hernias except hiatal w/o surg 795 Contraceptive manage, w surg 553 Chronic renal failure, w ESRD 044 Male sex gland disorders 294 Atherosclerosis, with surgery 586 Malig genitourinary w/o surg 292 Artery embolism/thromb w/o sur 794 Routine exam 521 Cholelithiasis, complicated 307 Oth minor inflam disease veins 677 Major inflam skin/subcu tissue 593 Male Infertility 672 Minor bacterial infection skin 588 Benign neo GU w/o surg 900 Signs/symptoms non-specific 673 Viral skin infection 303 Embolism/thrombosis veins 585 Malignancy genitourinary w sur 269 Aortic aneurysm, with surgery 579 Inflam genitourinary w surgery 657 Benign neo breast, w surgery 583 Benign neo prostate, w surgery 297 Art aneurysm ex aorta w/o surg 581 Malignancy prostate, w surgery 304 Disorder of lymphatic channels 594 Oth genitourinary with surgery 050 Obesity, morbid w/o surgery 653 Oth female genital cond w/o s 486 Gastroenterology signs&symptom 591 Urinary incontinence w surgery 722 Joint degen localized, w/o sur 571 Infect upper GU w/o s 810 Late effect/late complication 577 Kidney stone w/o sur w comorb 522 Cholelithiasis, simple, w surg 575 Kidney stone w surg, w comorb 177 Inflam non-cran nerves w/o sur

291 Maj non-inflam artery dis w s 447 Appendicitis, w/o rupture 749 Oth minor orthopedic disorder 029 Non-insulin diabetes w cc 554 Chronic renal failure w/o ESRD 288 Arterial inflammation w surg 296 Artery aneurysm ex aorta w sur

Page 47: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Copyright © 2001-2008 Aetna Inc. 47

Appendix C – 2009 Aexcel Markets

Arizona Atlanta, GA Austin, TX Central Valley, CA Chicago, IL Cincinnati, OH Cleveland, OH Colorado Columbus, OH Connecticut Dallas/Fort Worth, TX Delaware Detroit, MI Houston, TX Indianapolis, IN Kansas City (KS and MO) Los Angeles, CA Louisville, KY Maine Metropolitan DC (including MD, DC and N. VA)Metropolitan New York North Florida Northern CA Northern New Jersey Oklahoma City, OK Orlando, FL Pittsburgh, PA Richmond, VA San Antonio, TX San Diego, CA Seattle/W. Washington South FL (Dade and Broward Counties) Tampa, FL Tulsa, OK

Page 48: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

A CONDITION CLASSIFICATION AND EPISODE BUILDING SYSTEM

Introduction A condition classification system which identifies discretely occurring episodes of care has long been at the center of analytical demand for those health care professionals responsible for the funding, analysis and direct provision of health care services. In simple terms, unless one can consistently and meaningfully quantify those services offered by health care providers, attempts to manage supply and demand or otherwise to effect change is elusive at best. This desire, then, for a meaningful unit of analysis lies at the heart of Symmetry's efforts with respect to its Episode Treatment Groups® (ETGs).

Previously, work in this area relied solely on the identification of discrete patient groups in an inpatient setting (1) or the simple "bucketing" of diagnosis codes (2). Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) provided an easily understood classification system which organized inpatient stays into one of approximately 500 groups. The DRG methodology was developed in the late 1970's at Yale University and subsequently adopted by Medicare as a prospective payment methodology. In short, this classification scheme provided a means to identify and measure inpatient confinements, and further, formed the basis from which to identify and compare resource consumption in terms of dollars.

DRGs as a unit of analysis have been widely used in the private sector by both purchasers and providers of health care services to quantify both demand and relative financial performance. Its wide acceptance as a tool to define an inpatient population is due principally to the methodology underlying DRGs. This classification scheme proved a reliable case mix adjustment method because it controlled for patient severity by establishing a manageable number of clinically homogeneous groups. This characteristic coupled with the statistical stability of its groups has made DRGs the most widely used patient classification methodology. Unfortunately, DRGs do not address ambulatory data, nor do they create a unit of analysis based on a complete episode of care spanning both inpatient and outpatient settings.

Diagnosis Clusters, originally developed by Schneeweiss and his colleagues at the University of Washington for use in the ambulatory setting, essentially groups diagnosis codes together into similar "clusters". Diagnosis Clusters were not developed as a methodology to adjust for case mix, to account for resource use or to establish a treatment episode. Other classification methods have been developed as a basis for reimbursement (3), financing (4), or as a means to control for case mix but without benefit of creating a clinically homogenous unit or an episode of care (5).

ETGs The ETG methodology is similar to that of the DRGs but with several important differences. Perhaps the most obvious is that ETGs identify and classify an entire episode of care regardless of whether the patient has received medical treatment as an outpatient, inpatient, or both. Specifically, the characteristics of the ETG methodology are:

Case mix adjustment ETGs have been developed to account for differences in patient severity. Differences in patient age, complicating conditions, comorbidities and major surgeries have been factored into the definition of the ETGs.

Clinical Homogeneity Each ETG is clinically homogeneous with respect to the underlying condition, and hence treatment requirements.

Page 49: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Episode Building ETGs build a complete treatment episode which incorporates both inpatient and ambulatory care, including pharmaceutical services. Once treatment for an episode has begun, the ETG software continues to collect all clinically relevant information until an absence of treatment or 'clean-period' is detected. This insures that all appropriate procedural and cost information has been collected and correctly assigned to one complete treatment episode.

Concurrent and Recurrent Episodes Using the service unit of an individual claim or encounter form as input, ETGs identify and track the treatment of different conditions which can occur even during the same patient encounter. As a result, ETGs separate and identify concurrently occurring conditions and assigns each health care service to the clinically appropriate episode. In addition, should a patient be successfully treated but suffer a recurrence of the same condition, the ETG software identifies recurrent episodes.

Shifting Episodes ETGs account for changes in a patient's condition during the course of treatment. Once a change in condition has been identified, the patient's entire episode shifts from the initially defined ETG to the ETG which includes the change in condition. In this way, the progression of a condition is identified.

Manageable Number of Groups The ETG episode-building condition classification system is comprised of 574 clinically homogeneous and statistically stable groups. A complete list of the ETGs, their English descriptions and corresponding Major Practice Categories (MPCs) can be found here.

General Philosophy ETGs are designed to provide a consistent and reliable measurement tool to measure the provision and financing of health care services. Specifically, the ETGs can serve as:

• An analytical unit in which to measure and compare the utilization and financial performance of health care providers (provider profiling)

• A clinically useful unit from which to measure health care demand • A basis to establish disease management strategies, especially with the inclusion of

pharmaceutical claims

As a point of reference, ETGs were not primarily designed to:

• Detect inappropriate diagnosis/procedure code combinations for the purposes of clinical or payment review or denial

• Identify potentially inappropriate health care services • Provide the basis for a population rating mechanism • Be used as an encounter-based reimbursement methodology

Case Mix Adjustment and Clinical Homogeneity At the core of the ETG methodology are two concepts which are interrelated: case mix adjustment and clinical homogeneity. In short, case mix adjustment is a term used to describe the goal of a classification scheme which endeavors to explain, among other things, resource consumption. Although other terms like "resource intensity" or "severity" are used, both are proxy measures for the type and amount of resources which classification methods hope to explain. This is usually accomplished by identifying discrete units of patients or conditions which differ from one another with respect to resource consumption. Once these discrete groups of patients are identified, any subsequent analysis based upon these discrete units can be said to be "case mix adjusted". Of course the ability to use these discrete units varies widely with the method used to define them. In general, the wider the definition of each group, the greater the variability of resource consumption among the members of the group. And the greater the variability, the weaker the method's ability to distinguish real differences between and among populations. Towards the other end of the spectrum, as the definition of each group narrows, the explanation of resource consumption increases. At its most extreme, each patient or each patient's condition becomes its own group. The result is a perfect explanation of resource consumption but since each unit is absolutely unique with respect to the others, comparisons become impossible.

A balance exists between a manageable number of uniquely defined groups and the explanation of resource consumption.

Page 50: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Clinical homogeneity is a term used to describe the extent to which those patients or patient's conditions are similar from a clinical perspective. Patients or conditions which are clinically similar provide a natural basis (especially among clinicians) from which to identify differences among populations. A clinically homogeneous group of asthma cases, for example, provides a more intuitive unit of analysis than a group of patients with dis-similar diagnostic characteristics.

Additionally, while there is a natural tendency to simply place all patients with the same diagnosis in a single group, there are often other characteristics which may further differentiate those patients with respect to their severity. Asthma patients, for example, generally differ in their level of illness depending upon their age and whether there exists a specific comorbid condition. Hence, adjusting for the patient's age and comorbidity improves clinical homogeneity.

ETGs adjust for case mix, initially, by grouping together clinically similar conditions; for example, the several diagnosis codes which together are referred to as chronic bronchitis. Further differentiation of patient episodes may occur based on clinical complications, the existence of complicating comorbidities, patient age, the chronicity or severity of the condition, the significant use of surgery as treatment, and the level of management. Each is described below.

Complications Complications which develop during the evolution of an episode can influence the amount of resources used to treat the condition. In chronic bronchitis for example, a patient who develops pneumonia will incur higher cost than a patient without pneumonia. Therefore, the ETG grouper software makes a distinction between these two types of chronic bronchitis, i.e., chronic bronchitis with complication and Chronic Bronchitis without complication. Complications are ETG specific: a complication of pneumonia for chronic bronchitis does not automatically affect another concurrent ETG episode with a complication distinction. Comorbidities In some cases, a patient's prior medical history may impact the type and volume of resources required to treat a condition episode. Again for chronic bronchitis, a patient with a history of asthma will generally require additional resources than a patient without asthma. Hence, the ETG methodology specifically identifies chronic bronchitis with complication with comorbidity from chronic bronchitis with complication without comorbidity. Rare and Chronic Conditions Rare conditions generally are included in a broader illness category to avoid the problem of having too few members in a group. However certain conditions such as blood clotting disorders require such intensive and expensive management that they occupy their own unique group. Chronic conditions such as insulin dependent diabetes must be considered differently from conditions that are expected to have an onset and a completion of care. These conditions occupy unique groups, and can be managed in yearly units as opposed to using an episode as the unit of analysis. Age In other cases, the age of a patient can affect the extent of resource utilization for the treatment of a particular condition. Therefore, some ETGs are differentiated based on the age of an individual at the onset of an episode, hence: Acute bronchitis with comorbidity age less than 5. Defining Surgeries In those instances in which a particular surgery is indicative of a 'sicker' patient, ETGs account for the distinct differences in resource consumption between those patients with the surgical procedure from those without. The classification of a patient's condition into the with surgery ETG does not occur unless a specific surgical procedure(s), called a defining surgery, has been provided. As a general rule, defining surgeries have the following characteristic:

• Defining surgeries do not include purely diagnostic procedures or biopsies since they do not necessarily identify a 'sicker' patient. For example, Diagnostic Esophagoscopy (CPT-4: 43200) is not a defining surgery for Inflammation of the esophagus, with surgery. However, Esophagoscopy with the removal of tumor(s), polyp(s) or other lesion(s) (CPT-4: 43216) is a defining surgery.

Page 51: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

• These defining surgeries are specific to an ETG: While a hip replacement procedure is a defining

surgery for the treatment of a patient's Hip Fracture, the surgery has no effect on any other currently occurring episodes for the patient, e.g., Acute Bronchitis.

Non-Active Management vs. Active Management

Cancer is a condition where treatment decisions are based upon myriad clinical and patient choice issues. Treatments vary from watchful waiting to aggressive management to post-treatment observation. A decision to manage a cancer aggressively results in a significant increase in expected resource consumption. Therefore cancers are divided into those episodes which are being actively managed by radiation and/or chemotherapy, and those which are not.

Page 52: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Structure of Episode Treatment Groups Similar to the structure of DRGs, whereby each DRG belongs to one Major Diagnostic Category defined by body system, each ETG belongs to a specific Major Practice Category (MPC). Each MPC represents a body system and/or a particular physician specialty. In the flowchart example in Figure 1, a small portion of the Gastroenterology MPC is displayed. Note that ETGs 430 and 431 correspond to gastroesophageal infection, with and without comorbidity, respectively. Inflammation of the gastroesophageal tract is further identified by site; esophagus and stomach/duodenum. Inflammation of the esophagus is further sub-defined by defining surgery. Each of the 22 MPCs are similarly arranged.

Figure 1 Gastroesophageal Section of MPC 11: Gastroenterology

Clinical Logic and ETG Shifting The basis of the clinical logic for the ETG methodology are a series of Diagnosis and Procedure code "eligibility" tables. Each and every ICD-9 (diagnosis), CPT-4 (procedure), NDC (drug) and HCPCS (procedure) code has been laboriously mapped to each of the ETGs. As each claim record is considered by the ETG grouper, the procedure and diagnosis codes are evaluated with respect to each other and in turn to each of the eligibility tables. Those "matches" are then considered with respect to the ETGs. Diagnosis Codes Every diagnosis code is accounted for by the ETG methodology, with the exception of the 'E' codes. With respect to the diagnosis code eligibility table, each ICD-9 code is principally assigned to one and only one ETG. This mapping forms the basis for initial ETG assignment; Initial, since subsequent diagnosis codes may affect final ETG assignment in a process called shifting. The way in which a diagnosis code shifts the assignment of an episode depends on the class of ICD-9 code with respect to the ETGs. A brief description of each class of diagnosis code follows.

Primary diagnosis codes are the principal means of establishing initial ETG assignment. Each diagnosis code is mapped as primary to one and only one ETG.

Incidental diagnoses are those codes which represent an illness or condition that is present during the treatment of another related, but usually more serious illness or condition. Incidental diagnoses do not shift an ETG assignment.

Page 53: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

For example, if during the course of treatment for acute bronchitis a patient is treated for "throat pain", the throat pain diagnosis is considered incidental to acute bronchitis. Rather than begin a new episode with throat pain, this claim record and the information it contains will be considered part of the acute bronchitis episode. From a chronological perspective, if a throat pain claim was considered first, it would still group to the acute bronchitis episode.

Comorbid diagnoses represent an on-going chronic condition which affects a patient's treatment for a given condition episode. Diagnosis codes in this class will shift an ETG assignment regardless of its chronological relationship to the episode. Only certain comorbid diagnoses will cause the ETG to shift if it is identified prior to, concurrent with, or subsequent to the treatment of the episode.

For example, a patient receiving care for arthritis would be considered to be more difficult and expensive to treat if the patient also had osteoporosis, a comorbid condition. Although the patient may not be concurrently receiving treatment for osteoporosis per se, the patient would generally require a more intensive treatment regimen for the arthritis than if this cormorbid condition did not exist. Hence, the patient shifts into a more complicated episode of arthritis with comorbidity. In addition, the ETG software keeps track of each patient's comorbid conditions in a reference table. Therefore, a patient identified with certain comorbid conditions need not display a recent claim for, in this case, osteoporosis to shift into a more complicated ETG. Comorbidities are ETG specific. For example, osteoporosis would not be considered a comorbid diagnosis for an otolaryngology ETG.

Complicating diagnoses indicate that the patient treated for a current condition episode has developed a complication requiring a more intensive treatment protocol. Diagnosis codes in this class will shift an ETG assignment only when the complication is identified subsequent to the start of the episode.

For example, should a patient receiving treatment for bronchitis develop pneumonia, a known complication of bronchitis and more severe condition, the entire condition episode is defined as an episode of bronchitis with complication. As with comorbidities, complications are ETG specific.

Procedure Codes The procedure code eligibility table helps to identify the ETGs in which a particular claim record can be assigned. Only those CPT-4 defined services which, from a clinical perspective, could conceivably group to a particular ETG will do so. For example, if both a chest x-ray and blood glucose test were provided to a patient during the same encounter and further, if the patient had active episodes of both chronic bronchitis and diabetes; the chest x-ray will be assigned to the chronic bronchitis episode while the blood glucose test is assigned to the diabetes episode. In other words, the blood glucose test is not eligible for assignment to the chronic bronchitis ETG. Defining Surgeries Similar to those comorbid and complicating diagnoses codes which affect the final assignment (shift) of an episode, there are specific surgeries which also affect an episode's final ETG assignment. These are referred to as defining surgeries. As with the comorbid and complicating diagnoses, defining surgeries are ETG specific and whose use is indicative of conditions with higher severity.

For example, a patient receiving care for eye trauma requiring surgery to repair a detached retina is considered more severe and requires more intensive (and expensive) treatment than a patient who did not require detached retina repair.

Pharmaceutical Claims As pharmaceutical claims typically do not contain diagnosis codes, the ETG methodology includes the ability to identify the disease state for which a particular drug has been prescribed and assign pharmaceutical claims data to the most clinically appropriate episode.

Page 54: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

National Drug Code National Drug Code (NDC) is an eleven digit code usually available on pharmaceutical claims, particularly when a Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) plays some role in the management or adjudication of prescription drug claims. The NDC code contains highly specific information regarding each drug, its manufacturer and dosage. Using a sophisticated hierarchical approach, the ETG methodology evaluates each prescription drug claim against each of the concurrently occurring episodes for which the patient is treated. A clinical logic base identifies for which of the concurrently occurring episodes a particular drug can be prescribed and then assigns the drug claim to the most clinically appropriate episode. Episode Creation Along with the clinical aspects, the method of episode creation is a crucial feature of the ETG methodology. The approach taken for the identification of a complete episode relies on a flexible, rather than a fixed length of time. In other words, there are no presumed definitions of an episode's chronological length. The ETG methodology will continue to identify and track all clinical activity for an episode for as long as a condition is actively treated.

ETGs accomplish this by the identification of discrete 'clean periods'. A clean period is defined as the absence of treatment for a specified period of time. Each ETG has its own clean period.

For example, the clean period for Acute bronchitis with comorbidity, age less than 5 is 60 days. Once an episode has begun for this ETG, all clinically consistent claims activity for acute bronchitis will group to this episode until such time as 60 days passes without any corresponding clinically consistent treatment. For Chronic Bronchitis, with comorbidity on the other hand, the clean period is 180 days, consistent with an illness of greater and more chronic severity. In some obvious instances, e.g. benign hypertension, there is no clean period. The condition is basically lifelong and all clinically consistent treatment will group to an episode of benign hypertension for as long as data are available. This presents the analyst with some interesting challenges which will be discussed later in the section titled Complete and Incomplete Episodes.

ETG Assignment Thus far, the clinical and episode building characteristics of Episode Treatment Groups have been explained. The discussion which follows explains actual ETG assignment and the methods employed by the methodology to build an episode. Expense Line Grouping A medical claim coming from a provider typically has two parts: a claim 'header', which contains patient and provider information as well as ICD-9 diagnoses; and the billing detail which contains service date information as well as billing procedure codes (usually CPT) and billing amounts. Upon data entry into a typical claims/encounter system, each claim will spawn as many 'expense line' records as there are billable procedures. Each expense line will contain all of the information from the 'header' and therefore, all diagnoses (maximum of four) appear on each expense line record. An example follows:

Table 1 HEADER FILE

Patient ICD-9 ICD-9 ICD-9 ICD-9

John Doe 490

Bronchitis 250.1

Diabetes Blank Blank

Table 2

BILLING DETAIL

Service Date From

Service Date To CPT-4 AMOUNT DESCRIPTION

07/17/96 07/17/96 99201 $X Office Visit

07/17/96 07/17/96 71010 $Y Chest x-ray

07/17/96 07/17/96 82948 $Z Blood Glucose

Page 55: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Table 3

EXPENSE LINES

Patient ICD-9 ICD-9 ICD-9 ICD-9 Service

Date From

Service Date To CPT-4 AMOUNT DESCRIPTION

John Doe 490

Bronchitis 250.1

Diabetes Blank Blank 07/17/96 07/17/96 99201 $X Office Visit

John Doe 490

Bronchitis 250.1

Diabetes Blank Blank 07/17/96 07/17/96 71010 $Y Chest x-ray

John Doe 490

Bronchitis 250.1

Diabetes Blank Blank 07/17/96 07/17/96 82948 $Z Blood Glucose

The ETG grouping software evaluates each expense line record independently and determines which procedure code 'links' to which diagnosis code. Each diagnosis code on every expense line is evaluated with respect to the billed procedure code to determine ETG eligibility. During this evaluation, one assumption is made: the first diagnosis code is considered primary. In the example above, both the bronchitis and diabetes diagnosis codes are evaluated with respect to each of the three procedure codes to determine 'matches' with respect to the ETGs. When a match occurs, the expense line becomes a part of an episode corresponding to a particular ETG.

As with our example, the first expense line considered shows the two diagnoses (bronchitis and diabetes) and the billing procedure (office visit). While the office visit is considered valid for every ETG, bronchitis is in the first diagnosis position and therefore this record will group to one of the four acute bronchitis ETGs. (The specific bronchitis ETG will be determined by a combination of the patient's age and the whether or not the patient has a comorbidity, i.e., asthma).

The second expense line again shows the two diagnoses but the billing procedure is for a chest x-ray. In this case, the chest x-ray matches a diagnosis of bronchitis but does not match with the diagnosis of diabetes and therefore links to the bronchitis episode.

The third expense line, of course, has both diagnoses but the blood glucose exam as the billing procedure. Since the blood glucose exam is inconsistent with a diagnosis of bronchitis but is consistent with diagnosis of diabetes, this expense line will link itself to a diabetes episode.

Shown below is our three expense line example, following the clinical matching of each CPT procedure code to the appropriate diagnosis code.

Table 4 EXPENSE LINES FOLLOWING CLINICAL MATCHING

Patient ICD-9 ICD-9 ICD-9 ICD-9 CPT-4 AMOUNT DESCRIPTION EPISODE

John Doe 490

Bronchitis 250.1

Diabetes Blank Blank 99201 $X Office Visit Bronchitis

John Doe 490

Bronchitis 250.1

Diabetes Blank Blank 71010 $Y Chest x-ray Bronchitis

John Doe 490

Bronchitis 250.1

Diabetes Blank Blank 82948 $Z Blood Glucose Diabetes

Reviewing this example, this one health care encounter has 'spawned' three separate billable expense lines which have been evaluated individually by the ETG grouper software. Following its clinical matching algorithms, two concurrently occurring episodes have been identified. The next step in the building of an episode requires the 'clustering' of expense lines with identical ETG assignment. Clusters are the essential building blocks of an episode. This will be discussed in the next section.

Page 56: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

Building the ETG-Based Episode Building an episode requires more than clinical information alone. It requires an understanding of how, by whom, and in what venue health care services are provided. Towards that end, each expense line is evaluated, in addition to the clinical information, with respect to the type of health care provider responsible for the service. This information is crucial in developing clusters - the building blocks of an episode. Identifying Clusters: Anchor and Ancillary Records Other than the individual expense lines, the cluster is the smallest unit of analysis in the ETG methodology. Each cluster is comprised of one anchor record and zero, one or more ancillary records. Further, each treatment episode consists of one or more clusters.

• Anchor records represent a service by a clinician engaging in the direct evaluation, management or treatment of a patient, such as office visits, surgery or certain therapies.

The identification of an anchor record is a significant event because it represents that a clinician has evaluated a patient, and has decided on the types of services required to further identify and treat the patient's condition. Anchor records are identified by a combination of the billing provider and the procedure code billed. There are two types of anchor records. Management records for the most part consist of the evaluation and management CPT-4 codes; surgery records are the procedural CPT-4 codes. (These surgery records should not be confused with defining surgeries. Only a special subset of the surgery records are considered defining surgeries and can therefore shift an episode.) From a methodological perspective, only anchor records can identify the beginning of an episode, or for that matter, continue an episode with respect to the clean periods. Only a clinician can generate an anchor record. There is one notable exception to this rule: in certain instances a facility record can behave as an anchor record and begin an episode.

• Ancillary records represent services that are incidental to the direct evaluation, management and treatment of a patient. Examples of ancillary records are x-rays, pharmaceuticals and laboratory tests.

Ancillary records are only identified by the procedure code billed. Therefore, ancillary records can be produced by both clinicians and non-clinicians. There are three types of ancillary records: facility records, which include the facility component of ambulatory surgery centers, and inpatient room and board services, pharmaceutical records, and ancillary records, which consist primarily of laboratory tests and x-rays. Each ancillary record links to one and only one anchor record, which by inference assigns the responsibility of that ancillary service to the clinician on the anchor record.

The identification of anchor [management and surgery] and ancillary [facility, pharmaceutical and ancillary (x-ray and lab tests)] are added to the expense lines, designated by M, S, F, P, or A. This is shown in our example in Table 5 in the column labeled RECord Type.

Note that our example has been slightly modified to display the provider type, record type and cluster number. In addition, the episode column has been modified to show episode number. The office visit (an evaluation and management CPT-4 code) has been designated "M", a type of anchor record, while the x-ray and laboratory services have been designated "A" for ancillary records.

Table 5 EXPENSE LINES SHOWING RECORD TYPE AND CLUSTER

Provider ICD-9 ICD-9 ICD-9 ICD-9 CPT-4 AMT DESC EPISODE ETG REC CLUS

MD 490

Bronchitis 250.1

Diabetes Blank Blank 99201 $X

Office Visit

000000001 Bronchitis M 001

MD 490

Bronchitis 250.1

Diabetes Blank Blank 71010 $Y

Chest x-ray

000000001 Bronchitis A 001

MD 490

Bronchitis 250.1

Diabetes Blank Blank 82948 $Z

Blood Glucose

A

Page 57: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

The first two records share the same cluster designation, 001, and belong to the same episode, 000000001. Subsequent records which belong to this episode will have sequential cluster numbers, i.e., 002, 003 etc., but still share the same episode number 000000001. The third expense line with the Blood Glucose billed procedure will group to a different episode.

Ungroupable Expense Lines

Orphan Records Despite all efforts to assign every expense line to an ETG-based episode, there will be instances in which grouping of an ancillary record is not possible. The first instance involves ancillary records which do not have associated anchor records. These "ungroupable" ancillary records are known as Orphan records. Orphan records for ancillary services such as lab and x-ray are assigned to ETG 999, orphan ancillary record. Orphan pharmaceutical records are assigned to ETG 991, orphan drug record. Mismatched Records A second instance of an ungroupable ancillary record is where the billed procedure is inconsistent with any of the diagnoses. An example would be a billing procedure for the setting of a broken bone with a single diagnosis of acute respiratory infection. Mis-matched records are assigned to ETG 998, Inappropriate Dx-CPT4 matched record.

Complete and Incomplete Episodes

Identifying discretely occurring, clinically homogeneous episodes of care is one challenge that the ETG methodology has successfully addressed. The identification for subsequent analysis of complete episodes is the other. The notion of a complete episode, while intuitively simple to envision, is a bit more complex in the reality of claims data. For example, available claims data for ETG grouping will have a chronological beginning date, say incurred claims as of January 1, 1993. Does an episode for acute bronchitis with its first anchor record on January 3rd begin with this claim or have we 'joined the episode in progress'? In other words, the episode of acute bronchitis might have begun sometime earlier (prior to January 1, 1993) and the data to identify the exact beginning date are not available.

Of course, the opposite is also true. With data available from January 1, 1993 through December 31, 1994, how can we know if a claim record incurred on December 21st for an existing episode of acute bronchitis is the end of the episode? The answer to both questions is that under certain circumstances we cannot know whether a claim record is actually the 'true' beginning or the 'true' end of an episode. A distinction must be made then, between episodes which are to be considered complete from those whose completeness cannot be determined.

Clean and Unknown Episode Starts A clean start is defined as a situation where the "true" beginning date for an episode is known. The ETG methodology identifies a clean start by comparing the incurred date of the first anchor record of an episode with beginning date of the database (or a member's beginning eligibility date, if known), with the episode's ETG clean period. Consider the following example in Figure 2 for ETG 381 (Acute Bronchitis, with comorbidity, Age less than 5) which has a clean period of 60 days.

Figure 2

Clean and Unknown Episode Starts and Finishes

Page 58: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

If the first anchor record for an episode in this ETG is determined to be at date A which is less than 60 days beyond the database start date of January 1, 1993, we cannot discern whether we have a clean start or whether we have joined the episode in progress, hence an unknown start. However, if the service date of the first anchor record is anywhere beyond 60 days after the database start date (dates B, C or D), the episode is considered to have a clean start.

Clean and Unknown Episode Finishes A clean finish is defined as situation where the true finish date for an episode is known. Analogous to the clean start which uses each ETG's clean period to determine a known beginning, a clean finish uses the same clean period to determine a known finish. Consider the previous example in Figure 2. If the service date of the last anchor record is at least 60 days before the database end date, (dates A, B, or C) then we consider the episode to have a clean finish. On the other hand, if the service date of the last anchor record is somewhere between the database end date and 60 days before it, (date D) then we determined the episode to be an unknown finish. The finish is considered unknown because we cannot say with certainty whether the episode is truly finished or whether additional services will be provided and the data has yet to be submitted. Full Year Episodes and Analysis It is fairly easy to identify and analyze acute condition episodes. Acute bronchitis, for example, can be diagnosed and treated within a fairly short period of time and subsequent analysis is straightforward. But how do we analyze more chronic illnesses when, by their very nature, a treatment episode can last a very long time, sometimes for the patient's entire lifetime? Here, the concept of clean and unknown episode starts and finishes is key to the understanding of what is referred to as full year episodes and how to analyze them. Consider the example in the figure below of an episode in ETG 390 (Chronic bronchitis, with complication, with comorbidity) which has a clean period of 180 days. In this example, anchor records for this episode occur at dates A, B, C, D and E. Note that the treatment for this episode spans well over one year.

Figure 3

Full Year Episodes

Assume that the timeframe from each anchor record to the next is less than 180 days. So,

• The anchor record at date A is an unknown start; • The anchor records at dates B and C (if either were the first anchor records in this episode)

represent a clean start; • The anchor records at dates D and E (if either were the last anchor records in this episode)

represent an unknown finish.

To restate the question: How do we analyze this episode which spans over a year and which has both an unknown start and an unknown finish? We can also expand on this question since it becomes clear that for many conditions, especially chronic ones, it may become difficult to rely solely on episodes with both clean starts and finishes for subsequent analysis. In fact, in the case of lifelong illnesses such as diabetes or hypertension, one could argue that both clean starts and finishes should rarely be observed in the data. The question then becomes: For what duration of time should we limit our analysis of those episodes which can essentially last 'forever'?

Page 59: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

From the perspective of certain clinically defined analyses, one might not want to prescribe a limited length for an episode. Yet from the perspective of comparing one episode to another, such as for provider profiling for example, it is important to do so since exogenous factors often exist that may lead to erroneous conclusions.

Consider the case of two cardiologists treating hypertensive patients: Dr. Smith with 80 percent of her patients 'in-plan' for two years and Dr. Jones with 80 percent of his patients 'in-plan' for only one year. From an episode perspective, Dr. Smith, on average, will probably have episodes of longer duration and greater expense than Dr. Jones, despite the fact that she may be treating her patients more efficiently. Having already adjusted for case mix by ETGs, we further allow proper episode by episode comparison by limiting the length of each episode to one year. Such episodes which extend beyond one year and are subsequently limited to one year for analytical purposes are referred to as full year episodes. Using our previous example, consider the following types of episodes which could be used in a provider profile (or other) analysis:

• Complete episode with both a clean start and a clean finish, where the service date of the first anchor record is at date B and the last anchor record is at date C;

• A full year episode with a clean start but unknown finish. This situation occurs when the service date of the first anchor record is at date B and the last anchor record is at date E. The full year episode is then comprised of all claim information from date B to 365 days after date B;

• A full year episode with an unknown start but a clean finish. This situation occurs when the service date of the first anchor record is at date A and the last anchor record is found at date C. The full year episode is then comprised of all claim information from date A to 365 days after date A.

• A full year episode with both an unknown start and unknown finish. This situation occurs when the service date of the first anchor record is at date A and the last anchor record is at date E. The full year episode is then comprised of all claim information from date A to 365 days after date A.

Outlier Status

The determination of outlier status is another important feature of the ETG methodology. An episode is considered a low outlier if it is below its ETG-specific low outlier charge trim point. Similarly, there exists a high outlier cost trim point for each ETG beyond which an episode is flagged as a high outlier. An episode could be an outlier due to one of several reasons:

• Inaccurate processing of, or coding on, the claim records. The coding problem could exist in the cost field, diagnoses, CPT codes, dates of service, etc.

• Inappropriate treatment which includes under- or overutilization. • The episode is treated appropriately but is truly dissimilar from other episodes in the ETG.

Presumably if there were more variables available to define the ETGs, such as lab test results, and there were enough such episodes, a separate ETG would be defined.

• If the member's plan enrollment date is not available, the patient is presumed to be enrolled in the plan from the database start date. However, the patient may have enrolled in the plan after the database start date and a treatment episode may have started prior to the patient's enrollment. Thus, the episode may become a low outlier due to incomplete claims availability when it really should be an episode with an unknown start date.

NON-EPISODIC ETG CATEGORIES The smallest unit of an episode of care is a cluster, and a cluster requires an anchor record. However there are many cases where drug and ancillary data are present for a member but no physician claims exist to create the anchors. Sometimes a matching physician claim doesn’t exist because of a call-in prescription where the provider chooses not to submit a claim. Sometimes the number of refills of a prescription are so large that a given prescription claim may fall well beyond a reasonable period to match it to the ordering physician in the claims data. In addition, managed care is now replete with prevention activities which do not fall neatly into the concept of an episode of care. Such services however are extremely

Page 60: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

important for the overall health of the member and cost containment for the health plan. The ETG methodology is able to classify most of these data into clinically homogenous, non-episodic ETGs. One set of non-episodic ETGs are the screenings and immunizations which are incidental to other services. There are 9 such ETGs, and they exist in their own major practice category. They range from glaucoma screenings to cholesterol tests. The other non-episodic ETG category is the many groupings of pharmacy data with no provider intervention data. For those drugs (such as insulin) were the clinical category is obvious, they are bucketed into clinically homogenous groups. Most major practice categories have at least one such grouping of pharmacy data. Endocrinology has the most unique categories at 10. These non-episodic ETGs are not assigned a unique episode number. The user can analyze these data separately from the episodic data. They serve both to illustrate the way medicine is practiced today as well as provide an opportunity to question if more physician monitoring and intervention may be appropriate.

EXAMPLE APPLICATION: PROFILING REPORT CARD

PROVIDER PROFILING Provider ID: 638143 Michael Ashton, M.D. 24000 West University Blvd., Suite 8b Ann Arbor, MN 48107

Casemix Index: 0.82 Performance Index: 1.17

ETG Number Episodes

Average Cost

Expected Cost

Difference Total Difference

English Description

794 280 64 67 (3) (840) Routine Exam 337 245 31 39 (8) 1,960 Other ENT Infection, w/o surgery 328 221 898 713 185 49,855 Otitis media, with minor surgery 384 82 29 47 (17) (1,394) Acute bronchitis, w/o comorbidity, age 5+ 678 54 37 49 (11) (594) Minor inflammation of skin & subcutaneous

tissue 388 52 66 60 7 364 Asthma w/o comorbidity, age < 18 329 50 33 45 (12) (600) Otitis media, w/o surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total 1,525 131 113 18 $27,450

This provider "report card" displays an overview of a Dr. Ashton's case mix adjusted performance, and in addition, offers specific ETG feedback regarding his actual case mix. The Case mix Index is a measure of the morbidity underlying his case mix while the Performance Index measures overall financial performance (after adjusting for case mix). The higher the Case mix Index, the greater the patient severity; the higher the Performance Index, the greater the cost inefficiency.

In this example, after adjusting for his relatively easy case mix (0.82), Dr. Ashton costs 17% more to treat his patients than other providers treating an identical case mix. This relative inefficiency is due primarily to one ETG: Otitis Media, with minor surgery. Subsequent drill-down analysis can uncover the source of this cost inefficiency.

Page 61: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

EXAMPLE APPLICATION:

PHARMACEUTICAL-BASED DISEASE MANAGEMENT

Analyzing an ETG-defined episode for component prescription drug costs can be illuminating. A good example is the study of prescribing patterns in the treatment of depression episodes (ETG 88, subETG 2; Mood disorder, depressed, without psychosis). An analysis of completed episodes using the Symmetry multi-tiered drug classification system yields the expected results. Virtually all prescriptions within these episodes (99.85%) were for Central Nervous System Agents (classification at the TCC level). About half of those (49.17%) were SSRI Antidepressants (classification at the PCC level). Figure 4 illustrates the breakdown of these SSRI medications (classification at the DCC level).

Figure 4 Distribution of SSRI Drug Costs for Depression Episodes

The cost effectiveness of pharmaceutical interventions can be easily determined by stratifying episode cost by drug. In the example below, note that the pharmaceutical cost for Drug Z is the most costly but results in the most inexpensive episode. Why? Because other costs associated with the episode are reduced. What does this mean? Perhaps Drug Z should make its way to your plan's drug formulary. Result: work smarter instead of harder.

Figure 5

Relative Difference in Episode Cost, by Type, for ETG 329: Otitis Media, w/o Surgery

Page 62: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

There are innumerable other reporting possibilities with the ETG methodology including, but not limited to: Demand Analysis, Disease Management/Outcome Studies (by comparing the length and cost of episodes after controlling for drug or other interventions), Best Practice Guideline Management and Predictive Modeling.

Summary

The ETG methodology represents a case mix adjustment and episode building system which uses individual claim expense lines as input. The resulting 574 defined episodes are clinically homogenous groups which adjust for the presence of complicating conditions, comorbidities and other characteristics of a patient's condition which effect resource utilization. ETGs identify both complete and incomplete episodes in addition to those episodes which, from a cost perspective, are both low and high outliers. Finally, since the user controls the amount and format of the claims data as input, subsequent analysis is essentially unlimited.

Footnotes 1. Fetter R., Youngsoo, S., Freeman J. et.al., Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups.

Medical Care, 1980;18:2 (suppl) 2. Schneeweiss, R., Cherkin, D., Hart, L., et.al., Diagnosis Clusters adapted for ICD-9-CM and

ICHPPC-2, Journal of Family Practice, 1986;22(1): 69-72 3. Fetter R., Averill, et.al., Ambulatory Visit Groups: A framework for measuring productivity in

ambulatory care. Health Services Research, 1984 19:415-437 4. Weiner, J.P., Starfield, B.H., et.al., Development and application of a population-oriented

measure of ambulatory care case-mix, Medical Care, 1991 29(5): 452-472 5. Boyer, N., Software solutions for health care challenges, Journal of Health Care Benefits,

May/June 1993, 33-37

Copyright © Ingenix, Inc. 2006.

Page 63: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 1 of 22

List of MPCs in Symmetry ETG 6.5 MPC Description

1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2 ENDOCRINOLOGY 3 HEMATOLOGY 4 PSYCHIATRY 5 CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY 6 NEUROLOGY 7 OPHTHALMOLOGY 8 CARDIOLOGY 9 OTOLARYNGOLOGY

10 PULMONOLOGY 11 GASTROENTEROLOGY 12 HEPATOLOGY 13 NEPHROLOGY 14 UROLOGY 15 OBSTETRICS 16 GYNECOLOGY 17 DERMATOLOGY 18 ORTHOPEDICS & RHEUMATOLOGY 19 NEONATOLOGY 20 PREVENTIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE 21 LATE EFFECTS, ENVIRONMENTAL TRAUMA AND POISONINGS 22 ISOLATED SIGNS & SYMPTOMS

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

1 1 AIDS 1 2 HIV sero-positive, w/o AIDS 1 3 Major infectious diseases, except HIV, with comorbidity 1 4 Septicemia, w/o comorbidity 1 5 Major infectious diseases, except HIV & septicemia, w/o comorbidity 1 6 Minor infectious diseases 1 7 Infectious diseases signs & symptoms 2 20 Diseases of thyroid gland, with surgery 2 21 Hyper-functioning thyroid gland 2 22 Hypo-functioning thyroid gland 2 23 Non-toxic goiter 2 24 Malignant neoplasm of thyroid gland 2 24 1 Malignant neoplasm of thyroid gland, with surgery, with active mgmt 2 24 2 Malignant neoplasm of thyroid gland, with surgery, w/o active mgmt

Page 64: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 2 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

2 24 3 Malignant neoplasm of thyroid gland, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 2 24 4 Malignant neoplasm of thyroid gland, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 2 25 Benign neoplasm of thyroid gland 2 26 Other diseases of thyroid gland 2 27 Type I diabetes, with comorbidity 2 28 Type I diabetes, w/o comorbidity 2 29 Type II diabetes, with comorbidity 2 30 Type II diabetes, w/o comorbidity 2 31 Malignant neoplasm of pancreatic gland 2 31 1 Malignant neoplasm of pancreatic gland, with surgery, with active mgmt 2 31 2 Malignant neoplasm of pancreatic gland, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 2 31 3 Malignant neoplasm of pancreatic gland, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 2 31 4 Malignant neoplasm of pancreatic gland, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 2 32 Benign endocrine disorders of pancreas 2 33 Malignant neoplasm of pituitary gland 2 33 1 Malignant neoplasm of pituitary gland, with surgery, with active mgmt 2 33 2 Malignant neoplasm of pituitary gland, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 2 33 3 Malignant neoplasm of pituitary gland, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 2 33 4 Malignant neoplasm of pituitary gland, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 2 34 Benign neoplasm of pituitary gland 2 35 Hyper-functioning adrenal gland 2 36 Hypo-functioning adrenal gland 2 37 Malignant neoplasm of adrenal gland 2 37 1 Malignant neoplasm of adrenal gland, with surgery, with active mgmt 2 37 2 Malignant neoplasm of adrenal gland, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 2 37 3 Malignant neoplasm of adrenal gland, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 2 37 4 Malignant neoplasm of adrenal gland, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 2 38 Benign neoplasm of adrenal gland 2 39 Hyper-functioning parathyroid gland 2 40 Hypo-functioning parathyroid gland 2 41 Malignant neoplasm of parathyroid gland 2 41 1 Malignant neoplasm of parathyroid gland, with surgery, with active mgmt 2 41 2 Malignant neoplasm of parathyroid gland, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 2 41 3 Malignant neoplasm of parathyroid gland, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 2 41 4 Malignant neoplasm of parathyroid gland, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 2 42 Benign neoplasm of parathyroid gland 2 43 Female sex gland disorders 2 44 Male sex gland disorders 2 45 Nutritional deficiency 2 46 Gout 2 47 Hyperlipidemia 2 47 1 Hyperlipidemia, other 2 47 2 Lipidoses (Gauchers disease, Fabry disease, Mucolipidosis I-III) 2 48 Obesity, mild 2 49 Obesity, morbid with surgery

Page 65: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 3 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

2 50 Obesity, morbid w/o surgery 2 51 Other metabolic disorders 2 51 1 Other metabolic disorders, except cystic fibrosis 2 51 2 Cystic fibrosis 2 52 Other diseases of endocrine glands or metabolic disorders, with surgery 2 53 Other diseases of endocrine glands or metabolic disorders, w/o surgery 2 54 Endocrine & metabolic disorders signs & symptoms 3 70 Leukemia with bone marrow transplant 3 71 Leukemia with splenectomy 3 71 1 Leukemia with splenectomy, with active mgmt 3 71 2 Leukemia with splenectomy, w/o active mgmt 3 72 Leukemia w/o splenectomy 3 72 3 Leukemia w/o splenectomy, with active mgmt 3 72 4 Leukemia w/o splenectomy, w/o active mgmt 3 73 Neoplastic diseases of blood & lymphatic system, except leukemia 3 73 1 Neoplastic diseases of blood & lymphatic system, except leukemia, with active mgmt 3 73 2 Neoplastic diseases of blood & lymphatic system, except leukemia, w/o active mgmt 3 74 Non-neoplastic diseases of blood, with splenectomy 3 75 Non-neoplastic diseases of blood, major 3 75 1 Non-neoplastic diseases of blood, major, other 3 75 2 Sickle cell anemia 3 75 3 Hemophilia 3 76 Non-neoplastic diseases of blood, minor 3 77 Hematology diseases signs & symptoms 4 88 Mood disorders, depressed 4 88 1 Mood disorders, depressed, with psychosis 4 88 2 Mood disorders, depressed, w/o psychosis 4 89 Mood disorders, bipolar 4 89 1 Mood disorders, bipolar, with psychosis 4 89 2 Mood disorders, bipolar, w/o psychosis 4 90 Dementia 4 91 Organic drug or metabolic disorders 4 92 Autism & child psychoses 4 93 Psychotic & schizophrenic disorders 4 94 Personality disorders 4 97 Anxiety disorders or phobias, major 4 98 Anxiety disorders or phobias, minor 4 99 Eating disorders 4 100 Psychosexual disorders 4 101 Attention deficit disorders 4 102 Development disorders 4 103 Somatoform disorders 4 104 Mental retardation, mild 4 105 Mental retardation, moderate to profound 4 106 Other neuropsychological or behavioral disorders

Page 66: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 4 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

4 107 Psychiatric diseases signs & symptoms 5 110 Cocaine or amphetamine dependence, with complication 5 111 Cocaine or amphetamine dependence, w/o complication 5 112 Acute alcohol intoxication 5 113 Alcohol dependence, with complication 5 114 Alcohol dependence, w/o complication 5 115 Opioid or barbiturate dependence 5 116 Other drug dependence 6 140 Viral meningitis 6 141 Bacterial & fungal meningitis 6 142 Viral encephalitis 6 143 Non-viral encephalitis 6 144 Parasitic encephalitis 6 145 Toxic encephalitis 6 146 Brain abscess, with surgery 6 147 Brain abscess, w/o surgery 6 148 Spinal abscess 6 149 Inflammation of central nervous system, with surgery 6 150 Inflammation of central nervous system, w/o surgery 6 150 1 Inflammation of central nervous system, w/o surgery, other 6 150 2 Multiple sclerosis 6 151 Epilepsy, with surgery 6 152 Epilepsy, w/o surgery 6 153 Malignant neoplasm of central nervous system, with surgery 6 153 1 Malignant neoplasm of central nervous system, with surgery, with active mgmt 6 153 2 Malignant neoplasm of central nervous system, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 6 154 Malignant neoplasm of central nervous system, w/o surgery 6 154 3 Malignant neoplasm of central nervous system, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 6 154 4 Malignant neoplasm of central nervous system, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 6 155 Benign neoplasm of central nervous system, with surgery 6 156 Benign neoplasm of central nervous system, w/o surgery 6 157 Cerebral vascular accident, hemorrhagic, with surgery 6 158 Cerebral vascular accident, hemorrhagic, w/o surgery 6 159 Cerebral vascular accident, non-hemorrhagic, with surgery 6 160 Cerebral vascular accident, non-hemorrhagic, w/o surgery 6 161 Major brain trauma, with surgery 6 162 Major brain trauma, w/o surgery 6 163 Minor brain trauma 6 164 Spinal trauma, with surgery 6 165 Spinal trauma, w/o surgery 6 166 Hereditary & degenerative diseases of central nervous system, with surgery 6 167 Hereditary & degenerative diseases of central nervous system, w/o surgery 6 167 1 Hereditary & degenerative diseases of central nervous system, w/o surgery, other 6 167 2 Alzheimer’s disease 6 167 3 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Page 67: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 5 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

6 167 4 Parkinson’s disease 6 168 Migraine headache, common 6 169 Migraine headache, complicated 6 170 Congenital & other disorders of central nervous system, with surgery 6 171 Congenital & other disorders of central nervous system, w/o surgery 6 172 Inflammation of cranial nerves, with surgery 6 173 Inflammation of cranial nerves, w/o surgery 6 174 Carpal tunnel syndrome, with surgery 6 175 Carpal tunnel syndrome, w/o surgery 6 176 Inflammation of non-cranial nerves, except carpal tunnel, with surgery 6 177 Inflammation of non-cranial nerves, except carpal tunnel, w/o surgery 6 178 Neoplasm of peripheral nerves, with surgery 6 179 Neoplasm of peripheral nerves, w/o surgery 6 180 Traumatic disorders of cranial nerves, with surgery 6 181 Traumatic disorders of cranial nerves, w/o surgery 6 182 Traumatic disorders of non-cranial nerves, with surgery 6 183 Traumatic disorders of non-cranial nerves, w/o surgery 6 184 Congenital disorders of peripheral nerves 6 185 Neurological diseases signs & symptoms 7 200 Internal infections of eye, with surgery 7 201 Internal infections of eye, w/o surgery 7 202 External infections of eye, with surgery 7 203 External infections of eye, except conjunctivitis, w/o surgery 7 204 Conjunctivitis 7 205 Inflammatory diseases of eye, with surgery 7 206 Inflammatory diseases of eye, w/o surgery 7 207 Malignant neoplasm of eye, internal, with surgery 7 207 1 Malignant neoplasm of eye, internal, with surgery, with active mgmt 7 207 2 Malignant neoplasm of eye, internal, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 7 208 Malignant neoplasm of eye, internal, w/o surgery 7 208 3 Malignant neoplasm of eye, internal, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 7 208 4 Malignant neoplasm of eye, internal, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 7 209 Malignant neoplasm of eye, external 7 210 Benign neoplasm of eye, internal 7 211 Benign neoplasm of eye, external 7 212 Glaucoma, closed angle, with surgery 7 213 Glaucoma, closed angle, w/o surgery 7 214 Glaucoma, open angle, with surgery 7 215 Glaucoma, open angle, w/o surgery 7 216 Cataract, with surgery 7 217 Cataract, w/o surgery 7 218 Trauma to eye, with surgery 7 219 Trauma to eye, w/o surgery 7 220 Congenital anomaly of eye, with surgery 7 221 Congenital anomaly of eye, w/o surgery

Page 68: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 6 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

7 222 Diabetic retinopathy, with surgery 7 223 Diabetic retinopathy, w/o surgery, with comorbidity 7 224 Diabetic retinopathy, w/o surgery, w/o comorbidity 7 225 Non-diabetic vascular retinopathy, with surgery 7 226 Non-diabetic vascular retinopathy, w/o surgery 7 227 Other vascular disorders of eye, except retinopathies, with surgery 7 228 Other vascular disorders of eye, except retinopathies, w/o surgery 7 229 Macular degeneration, with surgery 7 230 Macular degeneration, w/o surgery 7 231 Non-macular degeneration, with surgery 7 232 Non-macular degeneration, w/o surgery 7 233 Major visual disturbances, with surgery 7 234 Major visual disturbances, w/o surgery 7 235 Minor visual disturbances, with surgery 7 236 Minor visual disturbances, w/o surgery 7 237 Other & unspecified diseases & disorders of eye & adnexa 8 250 Heart transplant 8 251 Coronary artery disease, with AMI, with coronary artery bypass graft 8 252 Coronary artery disease, with AMI or acquired defect, with valvular procedure 8 253 Coronary artery disease, with AMI, with angioplasty 8 254 Coronary artery disease, with AMI, with arrhythmia, with pacemaker implant 8 255 Coronary artery disease, with AMI, with cardiac catheterization 8 256 Coronary artery disease, with AMI, anterior wall, with complication 8 257 Coronary artery disease, with AMI, anterior wall, w/o complication 8 258 Coronary artery disease, with AMI, inferior wall, with complication 8 259 Coronary artery disease, with AMI, inferior wall, w/o complication 8 260 Coronary artery disease, w/o AMI, with coronary artery bypass graft 8 261 Coronary artery disease or valvular disorder, w/o AMI, with valvular procedure 8 262 Coronary artery disease, w/o AMI, with angioplasty 8 263 Coronary artery disease, w/o AMI, with arrhythmia, with pacemaker implant 8 264 Coronary artery disease, w/o AMI, with cardiac catheterization 8 265 Ischemic heart disease, except CHF, w/o AMI 8 266 Pulmonary heart disease, w/o AMI 8 267 Congestive heart failure, with comorbidity 8 268 Congestive heart failure, w/o comorbidity 8 269 Aortic aneurysm, with surgery 8 270 Aortic aneurysm, w/o surgery 8 271 Cardiac infections, with surgery 8 272 Cardiac infections, w/o surgery 8 273 Valvular disorders, with complication 8 274 Valvular disorders, w/o complication 8 275 Major conduction disorders, with pacemaker/defibrillator implant 8 276 Major conduction disorders, w/o pacemaker/defibrillator implant 8 277 Minor conduction disorders 8 278 Malignant hypertension, with comorbidity

Page 69: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 7 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

8 279 Malignant hypertension, w/o comorbidity 8 280 Benign hypertension, with comorbidity 8 281 Benign hypertension, w/o comorbidity 8 282 Cardiac congenital disorders, with surgery 8 283 Cardiac congenital disorders, w/o surgery 8 284 Major cardiac trauma, with surgery 8 285 Major cardiac trauma, w/o surgery 8 286 Minor cardiac trauma 8 287 Other cardiac diseases 8 288 Arterial inflammation, with surgery 8 289 Major arterial inflammation, w/o surgery 8 290 Minor arterial inflammation, w/o surgery 8 291 Major non-inflammatory arterial disease, with surgery 8 292 Arterial embolism/thrombosis, w/o surgery 8 293 Major non-inflammatory arterial disease, except embolism/thrombosis, w/o surgery 8 294 Atherosclerosis, with surgery 8 295 Atherosclerosis, w/o surgery 8 296 Arterial aneurysm, except aorta, with surgery 8 297 Arterial aneurysm, except aorta, w/o surgery 8 298 Other minor non-inflammatory arterial diseases, with surgery 8 299 Other minor non-inflammatory arterial diseases, w/o surgery 8 300 Arterial trauma, with surgery 8 301 Arterial trauma, w/o surgery 8 302 Vein inflammation, with surgery 8 303 Embolism & thrombosis of veins 8 304 Disorders of lymphatic channels 8 305 Phlebitis & thrombophlebitis of veins 8 306 Varicose veins of lower extremity 8 307 Other minor inflammatory diseases of veins 8 308 Venous trauma, with surgery 8 309 Venous trauma, w/o surgery 8 310 Other diseases of veins 8 311 Cardiovascular diseases signs & symptoms 9 320 Infections of oral cavity 9 321 Inflammation of oral cavity, with surgery 9 322 Inflammation of oral cavity, w/o surgery 9 323 Trauma to oral cavity, with surgery 9 324 Trauma to oral cavity, w/o surgery 9 325 Other diseases of oral cavity, with surgery 9 326 Other diseases of oral cavity, w/o surgery 9 327 Otitis media, with major surgery 9 328 Otitis media, with minor surgery 9 329 Otitis media, w/o surgery 9 330 Tonsillitis, adenoiditis or pharyngitis, with surgery 9 331 Tonsillitis, adenoiditis or pharyngitis, w/o surgery

Page 70: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 8 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

9 332 Allergic rhinitis 9 333 Acute sinusitis 9 334 Chronic sinusitis, with surgery 9 335 Chronic sinusitis, w/o surgery 9 336 Other infections of ear/nose/throat, with surgery 9 337 Other infections of ear/nose/throat, w/o surgery 9 338 Major inflammatory conditions of ear/nose/throat, with surgery 9 339 Major inflammatory conditions of ear/nose/throat, w/o surgery 9 340 Minor inflammatory conditions of ear/nose/throat, with surgery 9 341 Minor inflammatory conditions of ear/nose/throat, w/o surgery 9 342 Malignant neoplasm of ear/nose/throat, with surgery 9 342 1 Malignant neoplasm of ear/nose/throat, with surgery, with active mgmt 9 342 2 Malignant neoplasm of ear/nose/throat, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 9 343 Malignant neoplasm of ear/nose/throat, w/o surgery 9 343 3 Malignant neoplasm of ear/nose/throat, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 9 343 4 Malignant neoplasm of ear/nose/throat, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 9 344 Benign neoplasm of ear/nose/throat, with surgery 9 345 Benign neoplasm of ear/nose/throat, w/o surgery 9 346 Congenital & acquired anomalies of ear/nose/throat, with surgery 9 347 Congenital & acquired anomalies of ear/nose/throat, w/o surgery 9 348 Hearing disorders, with surgery 9 349 Hearing disorders, w/o surgery 9 350 Trauma to ear/nose/throat, with surgery 9 351 Trauma to ear/nose/throat, w/o surgery 9 352 Other disorders of ear/nose/throat, with surgery 9 353 Other disorders of ear/nose/throat, w/o surgery 9 354 Otolaryngology diseases signs & symptoms

10 370 Lung transplant 10 371 Viral pneumonia, with comorbidity 10 372 Viral pneumonia, w/o comorbidity 10 373 Bacterial lung infections, with comorbidity 10 374 Bacterial lung infections, w/o comorbidity 10 375 Fungal & other lung infections, with comorbidity 10 376 Fungal & other lung infections, w/o comorbidity 10 377 Pulmonary tuberculosis, with comorbidity 10 378 Pulmonary tuberculosis, w/o comorbidity 10 379 Disseminated tuberculosis, with comorbidity 10 380 Disseminated tuberculosis, w/o comorbidity 10 381 Acute bronchitis, with comorbidity, age less than 5 10 382 Acute bronchitis, with comorbidity, age 5 & older 10 383 Acute bronchitis, w/o comorbidity, age less than 5 10 384 Acute bronchitis, w/o comorbidity, age 5 & older 10 385 Minor infectious pulmonary disease, other than acute bronchitis 10 386 Asthma, with comorbidity, age less than 18 10 387 Asthma, with comorbidity, age 18 & older

Page 71: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 9 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

10 388 Asthma, w/o comorbidity, age less than 18 10 389 Asthma, w/o comorbidity, age 18 & older 10 390 Chronic bronchitis, with complication, with comorbidity 10 391 Chronic bronchitis, with complication, w/o comorbidity 10 392 Chronic bronchitis, w/o complication, with comorbidity 10 393 Chronic bronchitis, w/o complication, w/o comorbidity 10 394 Emphysema, with chronic bronchitis 10 395 Emphysema, w/o chronic bronchitis 10 396 Occupational & environmental pulmonary diseases, with comorbidity 10 397 Occupational & environmental pulmonary diseases, w/o comorbidity 10 398 Other inflammatory lung diseases, with surgery 10 399 Other inflammatory lung diseases, w/o surgery 10 400 Malignant neoplasm of pulmonary system, with surgery 10 400 1 Malignant neoplasm of pulmonary system, with surgery, with active mgmt 10 400 2 Malignant neoplasm of pulmonary system, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 10 401 Malignant neoplasm of pulmonary system, w/o surgery 10 401 3 Malignant neoplasm of pulmonary system, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 10 401 4 Malignant neoplasm of pulmonary system, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 10 402 Benign neoplasm of pulmonary system, with surgery 10 403 Benign neoplasm of pulmonary system, w/o surgery 10 404 Chest trauma, open 10 405 Chest trauma, closed, with surgery 10 406 Chest trauma, closed, w/o surgery 10 407 Pulmonary congenital anomalies, with surgery 10 408 Pulmonary congenital anomalies, w/o surgery 10 409 Other pulmonary disorders 10 410 Pulmonology diseases signs & symptoms 11 430 Infections of stomach & esophagus, with comorbidity 11 431 Infections of stomach & esophagus, w/o comorbidity 11 432 Inflammation of esophagus, with surgery 11 433 Inflammation of esophagus, w/o surgery 11 434 Gastritis and/or duodenitis, complicated 11 435 Gastritis and/or duodenitis, simple 11 436 Ulcer, complicated with surgery 11 437 Ulcer, complicated w/o surgery 11 438 Ulcer, simple 11 439 Malignant neoplasm of stomach & esophagus, with surgery 11 439 1 Malignant neoplasm of stomach & esophagus, with surgery, with active mgmt 11 439 2 Malignant neoplasm of stomach & esophagus, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 11 440 Malignant neoplasm of stomach & esophagus, w/o surgery 11 440 3 Malignant neoplasm of stomach & esophagus, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 11 440 4 Malignant neoplasm of stomach & esophagus, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 11 441 Benign neoplasm of stomach & esophagus, with surgery 11 442 Benign neoplasm of stomach & esophagus, w/o surgery 11 443 Trauma or anomaly of stomach or esophagus, with surgery

Page 72: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 10 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

11 444 Trauma to stomach or esophagus, w/o surgery 11 445 Anomaly of stomach or esophagus, w/o surgery 11 446 Appendicitis, with rupture 11 447 Appendicitis, w/o rupture 11 448 Diverticulitis, with surgery 11 449 Diverticulitis, w/o surgery 11 450 Other infectious diseases of intestines & abdomen 11 451 Inflammation of intestines & abdomen, with surgery 11 452 Inflammation of intestines & abdomen, w/o surgery 11 453 Malignant neoplasm of intestines & abdomen, with surgery 11 453 1 Malignant neoplasm of intestines & abdomen, with surgery, with active mgmt 11 453 2 Malignant neoplasm of intestines & abdomen, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 11 454 Malignant neoplasm of intestines & abdomen, w/o surgery 11 454 3 Malignant neoplasm of intestines & abdomen, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 11 454 4 Malignant neoplasm of intestines & abdomen, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 11 455 Benign neoplasm of intestines & abdomen, with surgery 11 456 Benign neoplasm of intestines & abdomen, w/o surgery 11 457 Trauma to intestines & abdomen, with surgery 11 458 Trauma to intestines & abdomen, w/o surgery 11 459 Congenital anomalies of intestines & abdomen, with surgery 11 460 Congenital anomalies of intestines & abdomen, w/o surgery 11 461 Vascular diseases of intestines & abdomen 11 462 Bowel obstruction, with surgery 11 463 Bowel obstruction, w/o surgery 11 464 Irritable bowel syndrome 11 465 Hernias, except hiatal, with surgery 11 466 Hernias, except hiatal, w/o surgery 11 467 Hiatal hernia, with surgery 11 468 Hiatal hernia, w/o surgery 11 469 Other diseases of intestines & abdomen 11 470 Infections of rectum or anus, with surgery 11 471 Infections of rectum or anus, w/o surgery 11 472 Hemorrhoids, complicated, with surgery 11 473 Hemorrhoids, complicated, w/o surgery 11 474 Hemorrhoids, simple 11 475 Inflammation of rectum or anus, with surgery 11 476 Inflammation of rectum or anus, w/o surgery 11 477 Malignant neoplasm of rectum or anus, with surgery 11 477 1 Malignant neoplasm of rectum or anus, with surgery, with active mgmt 11 477 2 Malignant neoplasm of rectum or anus, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 11 478 Malignant neoplasm of rectum or anus, w/o surgery 11 478 3 Malignant neoplasm of rectum or anus, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 11 478 4 Malignant neoplasm of rectum or anus, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 11 479 Benign neoplasm of rectum or anus, with surgery 11 480 Benign neoplasm of rectum or anus, w/o surgery

Page 73: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 11 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

11 481 Trauma to rectum or anus, open, with surgery 11 482 Trauma to rectum or anus, open, w/o surgery 11 483 Trauma to rectum or anus, closed 11 484 Other diseases & disorders of rectum & anus, with surgery 11 485 Other diseases & disorders of rectum & anus, w/o surgery 11 486 Gastroenterology diseases signs & symptoms 12 510 Liver transplant 12 511 Infectious hepatitis, high severity, with comorbidity 12 512 Infectious hepatitis, high severity, w/o comorbidity 12 513 Infectious hepatitis, low severity, with comorbidity 12 514 Infectious hepatitis, low severity, w/o comorbidity 12 515 Non-infectious hepatitis, with complication 12 516 Non-infectious hepatitis, w/o complication 12 517 Cirrhosis, with surgery 12 518 Cirrhosis, w/o surgery 12 519 Acute pancreatitis 12 520 Chronic pancreatitis 12 521 Cholelithiasis, complicated 12 522 Cholelithiasis, simple, with surgery 12 523 Cholelithiasis, simple, w/o surgery 12 524 Malignant neoplasm of hepatobiliary system, with surgery 12 524 1 Malignant neoplasm of hepatobiliary system, with surgery, with active mgmt 12 524 2 Malignant neoplasm of hepatobiliary system, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 12 525 Malignant neoplasm of hepatobiliary system, w/o surgery 12 525 3 Malignant neoplasm of hepatobiliary system, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 12 525 4 Malignant neoplasm of hepatobiliary system, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 12 526 Benign neoplasm of hepatobiliary system, with surgery 12 527 Benign neoplasm of hepatobiliary system, w/o surgery 12 528 Trauma to hepatobiliary system, complicated, with surgery 12 529 Trauma to hepatobiliary system, complicated, w/o surgery 12 530 Trauma to hepatobiliary system, simple 12 531 Other diseases of hepatobiliary system, with surgery 12 532 Other diseases of hepatobiliary system, w/o surgery 12 533 Hepatology diseases signs & symptoms 13 550 Kidney transplant 13 551 Acute renal failure, with comorbidity 13 552 Acute renal failure, w/o comorbidity 13 553 Chronic renal failure, with ESRD 13 554 Chronic renal failure, w/o ESRD 13 555 Acute renal inflammation, with comorbidity 13 556 Acute renal inflammation, w/o comorbidity 13 557 Chronic renal inflammation, with surgery 13 558 Chronic renal inflammation, w/o surgery 13 559 Nephrotic syndrome, with minimal change 13 560 Nephrotic syndrome, w/o minimal change

Page 74: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 12 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

13 561 Other renal conditions 13 562 Nephrology diseases signs & symptoms 14 570 Infections of upper genitourinary system, with surgery 14 571 Infections of upper genitourinary system, w/o surgery 14 572 Sexually transmitted diseases, primary 14 573 Sexually transmitted diseases, disseminated 14 574 Infections of lower genitourinary system, not sexually transmitted 14 575 Kidney stones, with surgery, with comorbidity 14 576 Kidney stones, with surgery, w/o comorbidity 14 577 Kidney stones, w/o surgery, with comorbidity 14 578 Kidney stones, w/o surgery, w/o comorbidity 14 579 Inflammation of genitourinary system, except kidney stones, with surgery 14 580 Inflammation of genitourinary system, except kidney stones, w/o surgery 14 581 Malignant neoplasm of prostate, with surgery 14 581 1 Malignant neoplasm of prostate, with surgery, with active mgmt 14 581 2 Malignant neoplasm of prostate, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 14 582 Malignant neoplasm of prostate, w/o surgery 14 582 3 Malignant neoplasm of prostate, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 14 582 4 Malignant neoplasm of prostate, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 14 583 Benign neoplasm of prostate, with surgery 14 584 Benign neoplasm of prostate, w/o surgery 14 585 Malignant neoplasm of genitourinary system, except prostate, with surgery 14 585 1 Malignant neoplasm of genitourinary except prostate, with surgery, with active mgmt 14 585 2 Malignant neoplasm of genitourinary, except prostate, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 14 586 Malignant neoplasm of genitourinary system, except prostate, w/o surgery 14 586 3 Malignant neoplasm of genitourinary, except prostate, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 14 586 4 Malignant neoplasm of genitourinary, except prostate, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 14 587 Benign neoplasm of genitourinary system, except prostate, with surgery 14 588 Benign neoplasm of genitourinary system, except prostate, w/o surgery 14 589 Trauma to genitourinary system, with surgery 14 590 Trauma to genitourinary system, w/o surgery 14 591 Urinary incontinence, with surgery 14 592 Urinary incontinence, w/o surgery 14 593 Male infertility 14 594 Other diseases of genitourinary system, with surgery 14 595 Other diseases of genitourinary system, w/o surgery 14 596 Urological diseases signs & symptoms 15 610 Normal pregnancy, delivery with C-section 15 611 Normal pregnancy, delivery w/o C-section 15 612 Complicated pregnancy, delivery with C-section 15 613 Complicated pregnancy, delivery w/o C-section 15 614 Hemorrhage during pregnancy, delivery with C-section 15 615 Hemorrhage during pregnancy, delivery w/o C-section 15 616 Other conditions during pregnancy, delivery with C-section 15 617 Other conditions during pregnancy, delivery w/o C-section

Page 75: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 13 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

15 618 Fetal problems during pregnancy, delivery with C-section 15 619 Fetal problems during pregnancy, delivery w/o C-section 15 620 Ectopic pregnancy, with surgery 15 621 Ectopic pregnancy, w/o surgery 15 622 Spontaneous abortion 15 623 Induced abortion 15 624 Pregnancy, not yet delivered 15 624 1 Normal pregnancy, not yet delivered 15 624 2 Complicated pregnancy, not yet delivered 15 624 3 Hemorrhage during pregnancy, not yet delivered 15 624 4 Other conditions during pregnancy, not yet delivered 15 624 5 Fetal problems during pregnancy, not yet delivered 15 625 Obstetrics signs & symptoms 16 630 Infections of ovary and/or fallopian tube, with surgery 16 631 Infections of ovary and/or fallopian tube, w/o surgery, with comorbidity 16 632 Infections of ovary and/or fallopian tube, w/o surgery, w/o comorbidity 16 633 Infections of uterus, with surgery 16 634 Infections of uterus, w/o surgery, with comorbidity 16 635 Infections of uterus, w/o surgery, w/o comorbidity 16 636 Infections of cervix, with surgery 16 637 Infections of cervix, w/o surgery 16 638 Vaginal infections, with surgery 16 639 Monilial infections of vagina (yeast) 16 640 Infections of vagina, except monilial 16 641 Inflammation of female genital system, with surgery 16 642 Endometriosis, w/o surgery 16 643 Inflammatory conditions of female genital tract, except endometriosis, w/o surgery 16 644 Malignant neoplasm of female genital tract, with surgery 16 644 1 Malignant neoplasm of female genital tract, with surgery, with active mgmt 16 644 2 Malignant neoplasm of female genital tract, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 16 645 Malignant neoplasm of female genital tract, w/o surgery 16 645 3 Malignant neoplasm of female genital tract, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 16 645 4 Malignant neoplasm of female genital tract, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 16 646 Benign neoplasm of female genital tract, with surgery 16 647 Benign neoplasm of female genital tract, w/o surgery 16 648 Conditions associated with menstruation, with surgery 16 649 Conditions associated with menstruation, w/o surgery 16 650 Conditions associated with infertility, with surgery 16 651 Conditions associated with infertility, w/o surgery 16 652 Other diseases of female genital tract, with surgery 16 653 Other diseases of female genital tract, w/o surgery 16 654 Malignant neoplasm of breast, with bone marrow transplant 16 655 Malignant neoplasm of breast, with surgery, other than BMT 16 655 1 Malignant neoplasm of breast, with surgery, with active mgmt 16 655 2 Malignant neoplasm of breast, with surgery, w/o active mgmt

Page 76: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 14 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

16 656 Malignant neoplasm of breast, w/o surgery 16 656 3 Malignant neoplasm of breast, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 16 656 4 Malignant neoplasm of breast, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 16 657 Benign neoplasm of breast, with surgery 16 658 Benign neoplasm of breast, w/o surgery 16 659 Other disorders of breast, with surgery 16 660 Other disorders of breast, w/o surgery 16 661 Gynecological signs & symptoms 17 670 Major bacterial infections of skin, with surgery 17 671 Major bacterial infections of skin, w/o surgery 17 672 Minor bacterial infections of skin 17 673 Viral skin infections 17 674 Fungal skin infections, with surgery 17 675 Fungal skin infections, w/o surgery 17 676 Parasitic skin infections 17 677 Major inflammation of skin & subcutaneous tissue 17 678 Minor inflammation of skin & subcutaneous tissue 17 679 Malignant neoplasm of skin, major, with surgery 17 679 1 Malignant neoplasm of skin, major, with surgery, with active mgmt 17 679 2 Malignant neoplasm of skin, major, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 17 680 Malignant neoplasm of skin, major, w/o surgery 17 680 3 Malignant neoplasm of skin, major, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 17 680 4 Malignant neoplasm of skin, major, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 17 681 Malignant neoplasm of skin, minor 17 682 Benign neoplasm of skin 17 683 Major burns, with surgery 17 684 Major burns, w/o surgery 17 685 Major skin trauma, except burns, with surgery 17 685 1 Major skin trauma, except burns, with surgery - foot & ankle 17 685 2 Major skin trauma, except burns, with surgery - lower leg 17 685 3 Major skin trauma, except burns, with surgery - hip & thigh 17 685 4 Major skin trauma, except burns, with surgery - hand & forearm 17 685 5 Major skin trauma, except burns, with surgery - elbow & upper arm 17 685 6 Major skin trauma, except burns, with surgery - shoulder 17 685 7 Major skin trauma, except burns, with surgery - head 17 685 9 Major skin trauma, except burns, with surgery - trunk 17 685 10 Major skin trauma, except burns, with surgery - other 17 685 11 Major skin trauma, except burns, with surgery - unspecified 17 686 Major skin trauma, except burns, w/o surgery 17 686 1 Major skin trauma, except burns, w/o surgery - foot & ankle 17 686 2 Major skin trauma, except burns, w/o surgery - lower leg 17 686 3 Major skin trauma, except burns, w/o surgery - hip & thigh 17 686 4 Major skin trauma, except burns, w/o surgery - hand & forearm 17 686 5 Major skin trauma, except burns, w/o surgery - elbow & upper arm 17 686 6 Major skin trauma, except burns, w/o surgery - shoulder

Page 77: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 15 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

17 686 7 Major skin trauma, except burns, w/o surgery - head 17 686 9 Major skin trauma, except burns, w/o surgery - trunk 17 686 10 Major skin trauma, except burns, w/o surgery - other 17 686 11 Major skin trauma, except burns, w/o surgery - unspecified 17 687 Minor burns 17 688 Open wound, with surgery 17 688 1 Open wound, with surgery - foot & ankle 17 688 2 Open wound, with surgery - lower leg 17 688 3 Open wound, with surgery - hip & thigh 17 688 4 Open wound, with surgery - hand & forearm 17 688 5 Open wound, with surgery - elbow & upper arm 17 688 6 Open wound, with surgery - shoulder 17 688 7 Open wound, with surgery - head & face 17 688 9 Open wound, with surgery - trunk 17 688 11 Open wound, with surgery - unspecified 17 689 Open wound, w/o surgery 17 689 1 Open wound, w/o surgery - foot & ankle 17 689 2 Open wound, w/o surgery - lower leg 17 689 3 Open wound, w/o surgery - hip & thigh 17 689 4 Open wound, w/o surgery - hand & forearm 17 689 5 Open wound, w/o surgery - elbow & upper arm 17 689 6 Open wound, w/o surgery - shoulder 17 689 7 Open wound, w/o surgery - head & face 17 689 9 Open wound, w/o surgery - trunk 17 689 11 Open wound, w/o surgery - unspecified 17 690 Minor skin trauma, except burn & open wound 17 690 1 Minor skin trauma, except burn & open wound - foot & ankle 17 690 2 Minor skin trauma, except burn & open wound - lower leg 17 690 3 Minor skin trauma, except burn & open wound - hip & thigh 17 690 4 Minor skin trauma, except burn & open wound - hand & forearm 17 690 5 Minor skin trauma, except burn & open wound - elbow & upper arm 17 690 6 Minor skin trauma, except burn & open wound - shoulder 17 690 7 Minor skin trauma, except burn & open wound - head & face 17 690 9 Minor skin trauma, except burn & open wound - trunk 17 690 10 Minor skin trauma, except burn & open wound - other 17 690 11 Minor skin trauma, except burn & open wound - unspecified 17 691 Other skin disorders 17 692 Dermatological signs & symptoms 18 710 Infections of bone & joint, with surgery 18 710 1 Infections of bone & joint, with surgery - foot & ankle 18 710 2 Infections of bone & joint, with surgery - knee & lower leg 18 710 3 Infections of bone & joint, with surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 710 4 Infections of bone & joint, with surgery - hand, wrist & forearm 18 710 5 Infections of bone & joint, with surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 710 6 Infections of bone & joint, with surgery - shoulder

Page 78: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 16 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

18 710 11 Infections of bone & joint, with surgery - unspecified 18 711 Infections of bone & joint, w/o surgery 18 711 1 Infections of bone & joint, w/o surgery - foot & ankle 18 711 2 Infections of bone & joint, w/o surgery - knee & lower leg 18 711 3 Infections of bone & joint, w/o surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 711 4 Infections of bone & joint, w/o surgery - hand, wrist & forearm 18 711 5 Infections of bone & joint, w/o surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 711 6 Infections of bone & joint, w/o surgery - shoulder 18 711 11 Infections of bone & joint, w/o surgery - unspecified 18 712 Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis 18 713 Adult rheumatoid arthritis, with comorbidity 18 714 Adult rheumatoid arthritis, w/o comorbidity 18 715 Lupus, with complication 18 716 Lupus, w/o complication 18 717 Autoimmune rheumatologic diseases, except lupus 18 718 Major joint inflammation, other than rheumatoid arthritis, with surgery 18 718 1 Major joint inflammation, with surgery - foot & ankle 18 718 2 Major joint inflammation, with surgery - knee & lower leg 18 718 3 Major joint inflammation, with surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 718 4 Major joint inflammation, with surgery - hand, wrist & forearm 18 718 5 Major joint inflammation, with surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 718 6 Major joint inflammation, with surgery - shoulder 18 718 8 Major joint inflammation, with surgery - neck & back 18 718 10 Major joint inflammation, with surgery - other 18 718 11 Major joint inflammation, with surgery - unspecified 18 719 Major joint inflammation, other than rheumatoid arthritis, w/o surgery 18 719 1 Major joint inflammation, w/o surgery - foot & ankle 18 719 2 Major joint inflammation, w/o surgery - knee & lower leg 18 719 3 Major joint inflammation, w/o surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 719 4 Major joint inflammation, w/o surgery - hand, wrist & forearm 18 719 5 Major joint inflammation, w/o surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 719 6 Major joint inflammation, w/o surgery - shoulder 18 719 8 Major joint inflammation, w/o surgery - neck & back 18 719 10 Major joint inflammation, w/o surgery - other 18 719 11 Major joint inflammation, w/o surgery - unspecified 18 720 Osteoporosis 18 721 Joint degeneration, localized, with surgery 18 721 1 Joint degeneration, localized, with surgery - foot & ankle 18 721 2 Joint degeneration, localized, with surgery - knee & lower leg 18 721 3 Joint degeneration, localized, with surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 721 4 Joint degeneration, localized, with surgery - hand, wrist & forearm 18 721 5 Joint degeneration, localized, with surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 721 6 Joint degeneration, localized, with surgery - shoulder 18 721 8 Joint degeneration, localized, with surgery - neck & back 18 721 11 Joint degeneration, localized, with surgery - unspecified

Page 79: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 17 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

18 722 Joint degeneration, localized, w/o surgery 18 722 1 Joint degeneration, localized, w/o surgery - foot & ankle 18 722 2 Joint degeneration, localized, w/o surgery - knee & lower leg 18 722 3 Joint degeneration, localized, w/o surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 722 4 Joint degeneration, localized, w/o surgery - hand, wrist & forearm 18 722 5 Joint degeneration, localized, w/o surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 722 6 Joint degeneration, localized, w/o surgery - shoulder 18 722 8 Joint degeneration, localized, w/o surgery - neck & back 18 722 11 Joint degeneration, localized, w/o surgery - unspecified 18 723 Open fracture or dislocation - head & face 18 724 Closed fracture or dislocation, with surgery - head & face 18 725 Closed fracture or dislocation, w/o surgery - head & face 18 726 Open fracture or dislocation - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 727 Closed fracture or dislocation, with surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 728 Closed fracture or dislocation, w/o surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 729 Open fracture or dislocation of upper extremity 18 729 4 Open fracture or dislocation of upper extremity - hand, wrist & forearm 18 729 5 Open fracture or dislocation of upper extremity - elbow & upper arm 18 729 6 Open fracture or dislocation of upper extremity - shoulder 18 730 Closed fracture or dislocation, upper extremity, with surgery 18 730 4 Closed fracture or dislocation, upper extremity, with surgery -hand, wrist, forearm 18 730 5 Closed fracture or dislocation, upper extremity, with surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 730 6 Closed fracture or dislocation, upper extremity, with surgery - shoulder 18 731 Closed fracture or dislocation, upper extremity, w/o surgery 18 731 4 Closed fracture or dislocation, upper extremity, w/o surgery - hand, wrist, forearm 18 731 5 Closed fracture or dislocation, upper extremity, w/o surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 731 6 Closed fracture or dislocation, upper extremity, w/o surgery - shoulder 18 732 Open fracture or dislocation of lower extremity 18 732 1 Open fracture or dislocation of lower extremity - foot & ankle 18 732 2 Open fracture or dislocation of lower extremity - knee & lower leg 18 733 Closed fracture or dislocation, lower extremity, with surgery 18 733 1 Closed fracture or dislocation, lower extremity, with surgery - foot & ankle 18 733 2 Closed fracture or dislocation, lower extremity, with surgery - knee & lower leg 18 734 Closed fracture or dislocation, lower extremity, w/o surgery 18 734 1 Closed fracture or dislocation, lower extremity, w/o surgery - foot & ankle 18 734 2 Closed fracture or dislocation, lower extremity, w/o surgery - knee & lower leg 18 735 Open fracture or dislocation of trunk 18 736 Closed fracture or dislocation, trunk, with surgery 18 737 Closed fracture or dislocation, trunk, w/o surgery 18 738 Malignant neoplasm of bone & connective tissue, head & neck 18 738 1 Malignant neoplasm of bone, head & neck, with surgery, with active mgmt 18 738 2 Malignant neoplasm of bone, head & neck, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 18 738 3 Malignant neoplasm of bone, head & neck, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 18 738 4 Malignant neoplasm of bone, head & neck, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 18 739 Malignant neoplasm of bone & connective tissue, other than head & neck

Page 80: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 18 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

18 739 1 Malignant neoplasm of bone, not head or neck, with surgery, with active mgmt 18 739 2 Malignant neoplasm of bone, not head or neck, with surgery, w/o active mgmt 18 739 3 Malignant neoplasm of bone, not head or neck, w/o surgery, with active mgmt 18 739 4 Malignant neoplasm of bone, not head or neck, w/o surgery, w/o active mgmt 18 740 Benign neoplasm of bone & connective tissue, head & neck 18 741 Benign neoplasm of bone & connective tissue, other than head & neck 18 742 Joint derangement, with surgery 18 742 1 Joint derangement, with surgery - foot & ankle 18 742 2 Joint derangement, with surgery - knee & lower leg 18 742 3 Joint derangement, with surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 742 4 Joint derangement, with surgery - hand, wrist & forearm 18 742 5 Joint derangement, with surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 742 6 Joint derangement, with surgery - shoulder 18 742 11 Joint derangement, with surgery - unspecified 18 743 Joint derangement, w/o surgery 18 743 1 Joint derangement, w/o surgery - foot & ankle 18 743 2 Joint derangement, w/o surgery - knee & lower leg 18 743 3 Joint derangement, w/o surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 743 4 Joint derangement, w/o surgery - hand, wrist & forearm 18 743 5 Joint derangement, w/o surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 743 6 Joint derangement, w/o surgery - shoulder 18 743 11 Joint derangement, w/o surgery - unspecified 18 744 Major orthopedic trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, with surgery 18 744 1 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/surgery - foot & ankle 18 744 2 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/surgery - knee & lower leg 18 744 3 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 744 4 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/surgery - hand, wrist & forearm 18 744 5 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 744 6 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/surgery - shoulder 18 744 9 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/surgery - trunk 18 744 11 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/surgery - unspecified 18 745 Major orthopedic trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/o surgery 18 745 1 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/o surgery - foot & ankle 18 745 2 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/o surgery - knee & lower leg 18 745 3 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/o surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 745 4 Major trauma other than fracture or dislocation, w/o surgery - hand, wrist, forearm 18 745 5 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/o surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 745 6 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/o surgery - shoulder 18 745 9 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/o surgery - trunk 18 745 11 Major trauma, other than fracture or dislocation, w/o surgery - unspecified 18 746 Minor orthopedic trauma 18 746 1 Minor orthopedic trauma - foot & ankle 18 746 2 Minor orthopedic trauma - knee & lower leg 18 746 3 Minor orthopedic trauma - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 746 4 Minor orthopedic trauma - hand, wrist & forearm

Page 81: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 19 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

18 746 5 Minor orthopedic trauma - elbow & upper arm 18 746 6 Minor orthopedic trauma - shoulder 18 746 7 Minor orthopedic trauma - head & face 18 746 8 Minor orthopedic trauma - neck & back 18 746 9 Minor orthopedic trauma - trunk 18 746 11 Minor orthopedic trauma - unspecified 18 747 Bursitis & tendinitis, with surgery 18 747 1 Bursitis & tendinitis, with surgery - foot & ankle 18 747 2 Bursitis & tendinitis, with surgery - knee & lower leg 18 747 3 Bursitis & tendinitis, with surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 747 4 Bursitis & tendinitis, with surgery - hand, wrist & forearm 18 747 5 Bursitis & tendinitis, with surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 747 6 Bursitis & tendinitis, with surgery - shoulder 18 747 11 Bursitis & tendinitis, with surgery - unspecified 18 748 Bursitis & tendinitis, w/o surgery 18 748 1 Bursitis & tendinitis, w/o surgery - foot & ankle 18 748 2 Bursitis & tendinitis, w/o surgery - knee & lower leg 18 748 3 Bursitis & tendinitis, w/o surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 748 4 Bursitis & tendinitis, w/o surgery - hand, wrist & forearm 18 748 5 Bursitis & tendinitis, w/o surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 748 6 Bursitis & tendinitis, w/o surgery - shoulder 18 748 11 Bursitis & tendinitis, w/o surgery - unspecified 18 749 Other minor orthopedic disorders 18 749 1 Other minor orthopedic disorders - foot & ankle 18 749 2 Other minor orthopedic disorders - knee & lower leg 18 749 3 Other minor orthopedic disorders - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 749 4 Other minor orthopedic disorders - hand, wrist & forearm 18 749 5 Other minor orthopedic disorders - elbow & upper arm 18 749 6 Other minor orthopedic disorders - shoulder 18 749 8 Other minor orthopedic disorders - neck & back 18 749 11 Other minor orthopedic disorders - unspecified 18 750 Orthopedic congenital or acquired deformity, with surgery 18 750 1 Orthopedic deformity, with surgery - foot & ankle 18 750 2 Orthopedic deformity, with surgery - knee & lower leg 18 750 3 Orthopedic deformity, with surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 750 4 Orthopedic deformity, with surgery - hand, wrist & forearm 18 750 5 Orthopedic deformity, with surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 750 6 Orthopedic deformity, with surgery - shoulder 18 750 7 Orthopedic deformity, with surgery - head & face 18 750 8 Orthopedic deformity, with surgery - neck & back 18 750 9 Orthopedic deformity, with surgery - trunk 18 750 11 Orthopedic deformity, with surgery - unspecified 18 751 Orthopedic congenital or acquired deformity, w/o surgery 18 751 1 Orthopedic deformity, w/o surgery - foot & ankle 18 751 2 Orthopedic deformity, w/o surgery - knee & lower leg

Page 82: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 20 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

18 751 3 Orthopedic deformity, w/o surgery - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 751 4 Orthopedic deformity, w/o surgery - hand, wrist & forearm 18 751 5 Orthopedic deformity, w/o surgery - elbow & upper arm 18 751 6 Orthopedic deformity, w/o surgery - shoulder 18 751 7 Orthopedic deformity, w/o surgery - head & face 18 751 8 Orthopedic deformity, w/o surgery - neck & back 18 751 9 Orthopedic deformity, w/o surgery - trunk 18 751 11 Orthopedic deformity, w/o surgery - unspecified 18 752 Orthopedic & rheumatological signs & symptoms 18 752 1 Orthopedic signs & symptoms - foot & ankle 18 752 2 Orthopedic signs & symptoms - knee & lower leg 18 752 3 Orthopedic signs & symptoms - thigh, hip & pelvis 18 752 4 Orthopedic signs & symptoms - hand, wrist & forearm 18 752 5 Orthopedic signs & symptoms - elbow & upper arm 18 752 6 Orthopedic signs & symptoms - shoulder 18 752 8 Orthopedic signs & symptoms - neck & back 18 752 11 Orthopedic signs & symptoms - unspecified 19 780 Uncomplicated neonatal management 19 781 Chromosomal anomalies 19 782 Metabolic related disorders, antenatal origin 19 783 Chemical dependency related disorders, antenatal origin 19 784 Mechanical related disorders, antenatal origin 19 785 Other disorders, antenatal origin 19 786 Other major neonatal disorders, perinatal origin 19 787 Other minor neonatal disorders, perinatal origin 19 788 Neonatal diseases signs & symptoms 20 790 Exposure to infectious diseases 20 791 Routine inoculation 20 792 Non-routine inoculation 20 793 Prophylactic procedures, other than inoculation & exposure to infectious diseases 20 794 Routine exam 20 795 Contraceptive management, with surgery 20 796 Contraceptive management, w/o surgery 20 797 Conditional exam 20 798 Major specific procedures not classified elsewhere 20 799 Minor specific procedures not classified elsewhere 20 800 Administrative services 20 801 Other preventative & administrative services 21 810 Late effects & late complications 21 811 Environmental trauma 21 812 Poisonings & toxic effects of drugs 22 900 Isolated signs, symptoms & non-specific diagnoses or conditions 22 901 Screenings & immunizations incidental to other services 22 901 1 Screenings & immunizations incidental to other services - Glaucoma 22 901 2 Screenings & immunizations incidental to other services - PAP test

Page 83: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 21 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

22 901 3 Screenings & immunizations incidental to other services - Mammogram 22 901 4 Screenings & immunizations incidental to other services - Prostate 22 901 5 Screenings & immunizations incidental to other services - Sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy 22 901 6 Screenings & immunizations incidental to other services - Cholesterol 22 901 7 Screenings & immunizations incidental to other services - Immunizations 22 901 8 Screenings & immunizations incidental to other services - Sickle cell anemia 22 901 9 Screenings & immunizations incidental to other services - Sexually transmit disease 1 902 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Infectious Diseases 1 902 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Non-HIV Antiviral Tx 1 902 2 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - HIV/AIDS Antiviral Tx 1 902 3 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Leprosy Tx 2 903 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Endocrinology 2 903 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Diabetes Mellitus Tx 2 903 2 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Hyperuricemia/Gout Tx 2 903 3 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Impotence Tx 2 903 4 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Antihyperlipidemic Tx 2 903 5 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Nutritional Tx 2 903 6 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Tx 2 903 7 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Respiratory Enzyme Deficiency Tx 2 903 8 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Thyroid Hormone Replacement Tx 2 903 9 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Testosterone Replacement Tx 2 903 10 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Weight Reduction Tx 3 904 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Hematology 3 904 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Colony Stimulating Tx 4 905 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Psychiatry 4 905 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Anxiety/Panic Disorder Tx 4 905 2 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Depression Tx 4 905 3 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Mania/Affective Disorder Tx 4 905 4 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Psychosis/Schizophrenia Tx 6 906 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Neurology 6 906 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Anticonvulsant Tx 6 906 2 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Alzheimer's Disease Tx 6 906 3 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Migraine Tx 6 906 4 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Multiple Sclerosis/ALS Tx 6 906 5 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Parkinson's Syndrome Tx 7 907 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Ophthalmology 7 907 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Glaucoma Tx 8 908 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Cardiology 8 908 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Anticoagulant Tx 8 908 2 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Antiplatelet Tx 8 908 3 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Antiarrhythmic Tx 8 908 4 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Hypertension/Heart Disease Tx 9 909 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Otolaryngology 9 909 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Fluoride Tx 9 909 2 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Sinusitis/Rhinitis Tx

Page 84: Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network ...€¦ · Episode of Care (EOC) Methodology ... Research and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission,

����������� ��������������� ��

Copyright 2008. Ingenix, Inc. All rights reserved Page 22 of 22

List of ETGs in Symmetry ETG 6.5

MPC ETG Sub ETG Description

10 910 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Pulmonology 10 910 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Asthma Tx 10 910 2 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Bronchodilator Tx 10 910 3 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Emphysema/COPD Tx 11 911 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Gastroenterology 11 911 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Inflammatory Bowel Disease Tx 11 911 2 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Irritable Bowel Disease Tx 11 911 3 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Acid Peptic Disease Tx 14 912 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Urology 14 912 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy Tx 14 912 2 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Incontinence Tx 16 913 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Gynecology 16 913 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Vaginal Antifungal Tx 17 914 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Dermatology 17 914 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Acne Tx 17 914 2 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Antifungal/Skin Tx 17 914 3 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Topical Retinoid Tx 18 915 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Orthopedics & Rheumatology 18 915 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Arthritis/Anti-Inflammatory Tx 18 915 2 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Osteoporosis/Bone Disease Tx 18 915 3 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Skeletal Muscle Spasm Tx 20 916 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Preventative & Administrative 20 916 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Contraceptive Tx 20 916 2 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Hormonal Replacement Tx 22 917 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Isolated Signs & Symptoms 22 917 1 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Insomnia Tx 22 917 2 Ongoing Rx Tx w/o Prov intervention - Pain Tx 0 970 Hold for future grouping 0 989 Record requires a diagnosis code for the procedure code 0 990 Drug record, no drug module 0 991 Orphan drug record 0 992 Non-pharmaceutical NDC code 0 993 OTC or otherwise invalid NDC code 0 994 Invalid provider type, e.g., dentist 0 995 Record outside date range 0 996 Invalid procedure code 0 997 Invalid diagnosis code 0 998 Inconsistent diagnosis/procedure matched record 0 999 Orphan record