21
SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 [email protected] M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 [email protected] Ann H. Smith (919) 424-8610 [email protected] SPEAKERS: Patrick H. Flanagan (704) 940-3419 pfl[email protected] Norwood P. Blanchard (910) 332-0944 [email protected] Ryan D. Bolick (704) 940-3416 [email protected]

SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 [email protected] M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 [email protected] Ann H. Smith

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

SPEAKERS:

Patricia L. Holland(919) [email protected]

M. Robin Davis(919) [email protected]

Ann H. Smith(919) [email protected]

SPEAKERS:

Patrick H. Flanagan(704) [email protected]

Norwood P. Blanchard(910) [email protected]

Ryan D. Bolick(704) [email protected]

Page 2: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

RETALIATORY EMPLOYMENT

DISCRIMINATION ACT (REDA)

Page 3: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

RETALIATORY EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION ACT (REDA)

Enacted in 1992

N.C. Gen. Stat. § § 95-240 to 249

Enforced by Employment Discrimination Bureau of NC DOL

Page 4: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

ELEMENTS OF A REDA CLAIM

In order to establish a claim against an employer under REDA, the employee must show:

1. He/She exercised a right to engage in a protected activity;

2. He/She suffered an adverse employment action; and

Page 5: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

ELEMENTS OF A REDA CLAIM

3. A causal connection exists between the exercise of the protected activity and the alleged retaliatory action. (Close temporal proximity.)

(Smith v. Computer Task Groups, Inc., 568 F.Supp. 2B 603, M.D.N.C. 2008)

Page 6: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

WHAT IS A PROTECTED ACTIVITY?

REDA provides that no person shall discriminate or take retaliatory action against an employee who in good faith takes action or threatens to:

File a complaint

Initiate any inquiry, investigation, inspection, proceeding, or other action, or

Testify or provide information to any person regarding the following matters:

Page 7: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

WHAT IS A PROTECTED ACTIVITY?

Workers’ Compensation Act

Wage and Hour Act

Occupational Safety and Health Act

Mine Safety and Health Act

Sickle Cell or Hemoglobin C trait

Genetic Testing or Genetic Information

National Guard Service

Domestic Violence Proceedings

Juvenile Justice Proceedings

Page 8: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

WHAT IS AN ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION?

Discharge

Suspension

Demotion

Retaliatory relocation

Other adverse employment action in the terms, conditions, privileges and benefits of employment

Page 9: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

Constructive Discharge?

Prior to July 2005, NC DOL position was yes

NC common law does not recognize a constructive discharge as a tort claim.

Whitt v. Harris Teeter, Inc., 359 N.C. 625, 614 S.E.2d 531 (July 1, 2005).

WHAT IS AN ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION?

Page 10: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

WHAT IS A “CLOSE TEMPORAL PROXIMITY”?

One Day – Lilly v. Mastec N. Amer., Inc., 302 F.Supp. 2d 471, 482 (M.D.N.C. 2004).

Page 11: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

WHAT IS A “CLOSE TEMPORAL PROXIMITY”?

Less than one month – Martin v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company No. 1: 99CV00956, 2001 W.L. 604192 8-9 2001U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9038 24-25 (M.D.N.C. April 20, 2001)

Page 12: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

WHAT IS A “CLOSE TEMPORAL PROXIMITY”?

Six years – Tarrent v. Freeway Foods of Greensboro, Inc., 163 N.C.App. 504, 511, 593 S.E.2d 808, 813 (2004)

Avoid:

Asking questions like: Will you behave? You’re not going to fall again are you?

Telling employee that her workers’ compensation claims cost a lot of money.

Page 13: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

WHAT IS THE ABSENCE OF A “CLOSE TEMPORAL PROXIMITY”?

2 ½ months – Salter v. E & J Healthcare, 155 N.C.App. 685, 575 S.E.2d 46 (2003)

81 days – Brown v. Sears Automotive Center, 222 F.Supp. 2nd 757 (N.D.N.C. 2002).

3 months – Shaffner v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 101 N.C.App. 213, 216 398 S.E.2d 657, 659 (1990)

Page 14: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

PRACTICAL TIPS AND DEFENSES

The Good Faith Requirement

Statute of Limitations DOL Charge cannot be filed more than 180 days after last alleged discriminatory or retaliatory act.

Right to Sue Employee must file lawsuit within ninety (90) days of receipt of a Right to Sue letter from the Department of Labor.

Page 15: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

PRACTICAL TIPS AND DEFENSES

N.C.G.S. § 95-241 provides a complete defense to any REDA claim.

It states: It shall not be a violation of this Article for a person to discharge or take any other unfavorable action with respect to an employee who has engaged in protected activity as set forth under this Article if the person proves by the greater weight of the evidence that it would have taken the same unfavorable action in the absence of the protected activity of the employee.

Page 16: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

If the decision maker did not know that the employee engaged in a protected activity, this fact if proven provides a complete defense Brown v. Sears Automotive Center, 222 F.Supp. 2d 757 (2002).

PRACTICAL TIPS AND DEFENSES

Page 17: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

PRACTICAL TIPS AND DEFENSES

In order to file a civil action against an employer, an employee must exhaust administrative remedies.

Page 18: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

PRACTICAL TIPS AND DEFENSES

Employee must file a Charge with the Department of Labor.

The Department of Labor has the power to investigate the allegations including obtaining documents from the employer as well as subpoenaing witness.

The Department of Labor may then file suit on behalf of the employee or issue a Right to Sue letter to the employee.

Employer has an opportunity to present a position statement in defense of the employee’s allegations.

Page 19: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

WHAT REMEDIES ARE AVAILABLE UNDER REDA? Injunction to stop the continuing violation of REDA. Reinstatement of the employee to the same position held

before the retaliatory action/discrimination or to an equivalent position. Reinstatement of full fringe benefits and seniority rights.

Compensation for lost wages, lost benefits, and other economic losses that were proximately caused by the retaliatory action /discrimination.

If the court finds there was a willful violation of REDA, the court can triple the amount awarded from compensation.

Assess the respondent costs and expenses including attorneys fees for bringing the action.

Page 20: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

Questions?

Page 21: SPEAKERS: Patricia L. Holland (919) 424-8608 Patricia.holland@jacksonlewis.com M. Robin Davis (919) 424-8609 Robin.davis@jacksonlewis.com Ann H. Smith

SPEAKERS:

Patrick H. Flanagan(704) [email protected]

Norwood P. Blanchard(910) [email protected]

Ryan D. Bolick(704) [email protected]

SPEAKERS:

Patricia L. Holland(919) [email protected]

M. Robin Davis(919) [email protected]

Ann H. Smith(919) [email protected]