Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program
The SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program is funded principally through a grant from the SPE Foundation.
The society gratefully acknowledges the companies that support this program by allowing their professionals to participate as lecturers.
Special thanks to the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers (AIME) for its contribution to the program.
Society of Petroleum Engineers Distinguished Lecturer Programwww.spe.org/dl
Improving Drilling Performance By Applying
Advanced Dynamics Models
Mark W. Dykstra, Ph.D.Shell Exploration and Production
Society of Petroleum Engineers Distinguished Lecturer Programwww.spe.org/dl
The Message• Drilling system vibration affects drilling efficiency• Uncontrolled vibrations can lead to poor hole quality
– Image logs difficult to interpret – Completions difficult to run– Formation damage
• Advanced dynamics models are helping us understand and mitigate vibrations
Reference: Santos, et al.“Consequences and Relevance of Drillstring Vibration on Wellbore Stability,” SPE/IADC 52820
Considering Engineering Simulation ?
Reference: ASME Journal
Types of Dynamics Models• Engineering Models • Research Models
Improved computational horsepower has made use of “research” models more practical
– Everyday use• BHA design
– Linear Finite Element Analysis• Beam elements• Simplified contact geometry• Idealized vibration inputs
– Estimates for planning and post-analysis
• Buckling load• Static and dynamic loads and
stresses• Natural frequencies and mode
shapes (critical speeds)
– More detailed analyses• Bit designs (PDC, RC)• BHA design• Bit/BHA system performance
– Nonlinear FEA• Beam elements• Complex contact geometry• Complex vibration inputs
– Refined load and stress estimates
• Transient dynamic loads and stresses
• Post-buckling analyses
Research Model Applications• PDC Bit Dynamic Stability
– Evaluated via laboratory testing• Constant speed (often 120 RPM)• Increment weight on bit (ROP)• Identify transition from “unstable” to “stable”
– Time consuming and costly– Needed a predictive model
Unstable 8.500-in. M434
Stable 8.750-in. M123
Bit Dynamics Model• Stability Prediction• Dynamic Load Evaluation
– 120 RPM, 3 ft/hr– Force vectors shown in yellow
and green
Unstable 8.500-in. M434
Reference: Hanson, Hansen“Dynamics Modeling of PDC Bits,” SPE/IADC 29401
If PDC Cutters Could Talk …
Verification of Stability Predictions• Laboratory Tests
– 27 designs, 5.875 to 17.500-in., various IADC classes
7.875-in. M4343 ft/hr, 120 RPM
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Predicted Stable ROP Step
Mea
sure
d St
able
RO
P St
ep
Improving PDC Bit Stability• Laboratory Tests
– Hard limestone (co=15 kpsi), 120 RPM
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
0 3 6 9 12 18 24 36 48
Rate of Penetration (ft/hr)
Prob
abili
ty o
f Sta
bilit
y (%
)
Previous Generation (>50 bits)
Latest Generation (>25 bits)
Diamond Table Loss
Dynamic Load PredictionsCutter Power vs. Cutter Damage
7.875-in. M123
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.000%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cutter Scaled Radial Position
Pow
er (B
TU/h
r)
Dia
mon
d Ta
ble
Loss
Smooth Rotation PowerAvg. Dynamic Power
Max. Dynamic Power
Bit Center Bit Gauge
Load Predictions Through Beds• Formation changes affect
load distribution
Soft→Hard(nose)
Hard→Soft(cone, shoulder)
HardSoft
HardSoft
HardSoft
Segmented core usedfor laboratory tests
Research Model Applications ...• Roller Cone Bit Design
– Elimination of off-center running tendencies
UnevenGauge Wear
ConeWear
Research Model Applications ...• BHA Dynamic Stability
– Unbalanced components feed whirl
• Mass imbalance in collars
• Eccentric rotor rotation
Whirl caused by mass imbalance
Eccentric rotor rotation
– Frictional interaction with wellbore triggers BHA whirl
• High average accelerations • Extreme impacts
– Needed a predictive model
490 ft 88 ft
Drillstring Dynamics Model• 8.500-in. Horizontal Hole
– Instrumented motor– MWD tool– LWD tool
• Operating Conditions– WOB = 22.4 klb– TOB = 4.6 klb-ft– ρM = 11.7 ppg
Reference: Heisig, Neubert“Lateral Drillstring Vibrations In Extended-Reach Wells,” IADC/SPE 59235
Laboratory Verification
Reference: Aldred, W.D. and Sheppard, M.C“Drillstring Vibrations: A New Generation Mechanism and Control Strategies,” SPE 24582
Verification of Bending Predictions
• Controlled Field Tests– 12.250-in. hole, RC-STB-MWD-STB-DC– Limestone drilling
3000
1500
0
-1500
-3000330 332 334 336 338 340
Dow
nhol
e B
endi
ng(lb
-ft)
50 52 54 56 58 60Time (s)
Sim
ulat
ed B
endi
ng(lb
-ft)
3000
1500
0
-1500
-3000
Research Model Applications ...• Bit-Drillstring System
Performance– Effect of BHA vibration
on bit loading
Research Model Applications ...• Bit-Drillstring System Performance
– The effect of BHA vibration on bit loading– Operating parameters for sub-optimal BHAs
Cutter Force Distribution7.875-in. IADC 627
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Aver
age
Forc
e (lb
)45 RPM, Lab Rig45 RPM, Slick BHA90 RPM, Slick BHA
Financial Impact: Improved Bits• UK North Sea Application
– Hard and abrasive zones• Poor PDC life in offsets
– Needed to improve in 12.250-in. section
9443 Tor
10667 Flounder
12133 Herring
12629 Plenus/Hidra
12902 Cromer Knoll
13262 Kimmeridge
13591 Brae 113755 Brae 2&3
Fm. Tops Lithology Series
408609
Bit Type Depth Out(ft)
Drilled(ft)
Hr. Avg. ROP(ft/hr)
Cost/ft(US$/ft)
Standard 1.1 13,535 49 11.7 4.1 2,274
New 609 13,930 395 30.1 13.2 467
New 408 14,437 507 42.2 12.0 476
New 608 14,820 383 38.3 10.0 686
Standard 1.2 15,013 193 32.1 6.0 897
Standard 2.1 15,128 115 14.3 8.0 1,049
0
100
200
300
400
HP2 HP1
Drilling Hours
12.250-in. Section Performance• Focus Well
– New designsdrilled furtherand faster
• Versus Offset– Section drilled in half the time
• Savings– US $663 per foot– US $816,282 for section
Financial Impact: BHA Refinement• Norwegian North Sea Application
– 6,000-10,000 ft horizontals in reservoir– Geosteering to stay above O/W contact – Soft sands, some calcite cemented zones– Could not steer PDC bits on motors– RS systems potentially offered step change
• Early Challenges– Bit performance– RS system durability
• Multidisciplinary Focused Study– Advanced models used for both bit
and RS system refinement
Reference: Fiksdal, Rayton, Djerfi“Application of Rotary Steerable System/PDC Bits … ,” SPE/IADC 29401
Premature Fatigue Cracks
9.500-in. Hole Section Performance
• Improved Drilling Efficiency– Improved bit performance– Improved RS BHAs– Savings approach US$1MM per well based on drilling time
Description Before Study After Study
Average interval length 8,856 ft 8,856 ftCalcite stringers 7% 7%Number of runs 8.5 5Run length 1,273 ft 2,102 ftBit runs 10.4
(6.7 RC, 3.7 PDC)4.6
(0.9 RC, 3.7 PDC)ROP 35.1 ft/hr 67.2 ft/hrBHA component failures 3.5 1.9
Failure Distribution< 25 circulating hours 25% 14%25 - 75 hr 18% 14%> 75 hr 57% 72%
Summary• Advanced dynamics models are useful for planning
– Bit design optimization– BHA design optimization
• Advanced dynamics models are useful while drilling– Lessons learned provide insights into improved operating
parameters• Advanced dynamics models are useful for post-analysis
– Evaluation of downhole vibration measurements– Failure analysis of drilling system components
• Advanced dynamics models improve performance– PDC bit efficiency and durability– RC bit efficiency and durability– LWD tool durability– Hole quality
The Next Challenge
Reference: Dupriest and Koederitz“Maximizing Drill Rates with Real-Time Surveillance of Mechanical Specific Energy,” SPE/IADC 92194
Potential Performance
Performance is enhancedby redesigning to extendthe founder point
Region II: Efficient Drilling
Region I: Inadequate Depth of Cut
Weight On Bit
Rat
e of
Pen
etra
tion
(Or T
orqu
e)
Region III: Founder• Bit Balling• Bottom Hole Balling• Vibrations
Questions?
Society of Petroleum Engineers Distinguished Lecturer Programwww.spe.org/dl