1

Spacetime MetamaterialsChristophe Caloz, Fellow, IEEE, and Zoé-Lise Deck-Léger, Student, IEEE

CONTENTS

I Introduction 1

II Medium Generalization 3II-A Non-metamaterial Spacetime Systems . 3II-B Spacetime Metamaterial Illustration and

Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3II-C Spacetime Invariant – Nondispersive

Bianisotropic Media . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3II-D Metamaterial Unification and Extension 4

III Fundamental Phenomena in Spacetime Systems 5III-A Spacetime Frequency Transitions . . . . . 5III-B Nonreciprocity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5III-C Moving and Modulated System Peculiar-

ities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5III-D Superluminality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

IV Relativity Perspective 7IV-A Spacetime Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . 7IV-B Lorentz Transformations . . . . . . . . . . 7IV-C Resolution Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9IV-D Canonical Spacetime “Metamaterials” . . 10

V Pure-Space and Pure-Time Phenomenology andElectromagnetic Boundary Conditions 10

VI Scattering Coefficients 11VI-A Pure-Space Medium . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11VI-B Pure-Time Medium . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12VI-C Spacetime Medium . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

VII Frequency Transitions 14VII-A Pure-Space Medium . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14VII-B Pure-Time Medium . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14VII-C Spacetime Medium . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

VIII Spacetime Reversal and Compansion 15

IX New Physics 16IX-A Mirror and Cavity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16IX-B Inverse Prim and Chromatic Birefringence 17IX-C Crystals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

X Applications 20X-A Frequency Multiplication and Mixing . . 20X-B Matching and Filtering . . . . . . . . . . . 21X-C Nonreciprocity and Absorption . . . . . . 21X-D Electromagnetic Cloaking . . . . . . . . . 22X-E Electromagnetic Processing . . . . . . . . 22X-F Radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

The authors are with Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Canada.Manuscript received April, 2019; revised Month Day, 2019.

XI Conclusions 23

Appendix A: Derivation of the Spacetime VariableLorentz Transforms 24

Appendix B: Derivation of the Electromagnetic FieldLorentz Transformations 25

References 25

Abstract—This paper presents the authors’ vision of theemerging field of spacetime metamaterials in a cohesive andpedagogical perspective. For this purpose, it systematicallybuilds up the physics, modeling and applications of thesemedia upon the foundation of their pure-space and pure-timecounterparts. First, it introduces spacetime metamaterials as ageneralization of (bianisotropic) metamaterials, presented in theholistic perspective of direct and inverse spacetime scattering,where spacetime variance and dispersion offer unprecedentedmedium diversity despite some limitations related to the un-certainty principle. Then, it describes the fundamental physicalphenomena occurring in spacetime systems, such as frequencytransitions, nonreciprocity, Fizeau dragging, bianisotropy trans-formation, and superluminality, allowed when the mediummoves perpendicularly to the direction of the wave. Next, it ex-tends some principles and tools of relativity physics, particularlya medium-extended version of the spacetime (or Minkowski)diagrams, elaborates a general strategy to compute the fieldsscattered by spacetime media, and presents a gallery of possiblespacetime media, including the spacetime step discontinuity,which constitutes the building brick of any spacetime meta-material. From this point, it describes the phenomenology ofsuch a spacetime interface, deduces from it the related electro-magnetic boundary conditions, and derives the correspondingscattering (Fresnel-like) coefficients and frequency transitions,culminating with a section that generalizes time reversal tospacetime compansion (compression and expansion). Then, asection illustrates the new physics of spacetime metamaterialswith the examples of spacetime mirrors and cavities, the inverseprism and chromatic birefringence, and spacetime crystals.Finally, the paper discusses various applications – categorizedas frequency multiplication and mixing, matching and filter-ing, nonreciprocity and absorption, cloaking, electromagneticprocessing, and radiation. Ultimately, the conclusion sectionprovides a 23-item list that concisely summarizes the key resultsand teachings of the overall document.

I. INTRODUCTION

A metamaterial is an artificial structure consisting of asubwavelength lattice of scattering particles – or metaparti-cles – engineered to provide desired medium propertiesthat are generally beyond (Greek prefix µετα) those avail-able in other materials. Their constituent metaparticles arenaturally themselves composed of molecules, atoms andsubatomic particles, but it is rather the larger-scale geom-etry, orientation and arrangement of these metaparticlesthat determine the essential macroscopic properties of the

arX

iv:1

905.

0056

0v2

[ph

ysic

s.op

tics]

5 M

ay 2

019

metamaterial. While they most often refer to homogeniz-able structures, i.e., subwavelengh-lattice structures thatcan be described by media parameters, their subwavelengthregime is always restricted in terms of frequency range,and a metamaterial is hence really a metamaterial onlyin a small fraction of the electromagnetic spectrum. Forthis reason, we envisage a somewhat broader definition ofmetamaterials, which encompasses their response beyondtheir actual medium range.

Although the term ‘metamaterial’ is hardly 20 yearsold [1], metamaterials have a long history, which maybe roughly divided in the four consecutive generationsrepresented in Fig. 1. This history goes back to ancienttimes, with various composite materials, such as Lycurguscup’s dichroic glass – made of gold and silver nanoparti-cles [2], Damascus steel – recently discovered to includenanowires and carbon nanotubes [3], and medieval stainedglass – made of soda-lime-silica or potash-lime-silica com-pounds [4]. However, these early metamaterials followedempirical fabrication rules and involved little engineeringprinciples. We may call these composites 1st-generationmetamaterials (Fig. 1). Metamaterial engineering, based onMaxwell’s electromagnetics theory and subsequent earlymicrowave-optical technologies, really emerged only nearthe end of the XIXth century and during the followingdecades, with developments such as Bose’s tinfoil-paperpolarizers [5], Lindman’s chiral structures [6], Kock andCohn’s light lenses [7], [8], and Rotman’s wire plasmas [9].These “artificial dielectrics” were of great practical interest,but possessed well-known physical properties. We may referto them as 2nd-generation metamaterials (Fig. 1). At the turnof the XXth century, metamaterials brought up new physicsinto the picture, initially with negative refraction [10], [11],and later with other effects such as cloaking [12], [13],magnetless magnetism [14]–[16], and early metasurfaces(two-dimensional metamaterials with new phase, magni-tude and polarization transformation capabilities) [17]–[19].We shall refer here to these metamaterials - that havealready generated over 300 books to date! (e.g. [20]–[25])– as 3rd-generation metamaterials (Fig. 1).

Recent advances in metasurfaces and bianisotropicmetastructures have dramatically extended the range ofmodern-metamaterial properties. These advances havemost notably ushered the field of dynamic metamaterials,which may be regarded as 4th-generation metamaterials(Fig. 1), and which are currently in high-speed expan-sion. Dynamic metamaterials are materials whose prop-erties are partly due to the time-variation of some oftheir physical parameters, induced by an external sourceof energy. They naturally include reconfigurable metama-terials, whose response may be changed over time, butthey are much more general and more fundamental insofaras their properties at any time directly depend on thetime variation, which allows a universal manipulation ofthe temporal and spatial spectra of electromagnetic waves,beyond the mere variation of static properties over time.We shall therefore refer to these metamaterials as spacetimemetamaterials. While such metamaterials were still un-thinkable a few decades ago, the recent spectacular devel-

Fig. 1. Metamaterial evolution in four consecutive generations, wherethe recently started 4th generation is largely represented by spacetimemetamaterials.

opments in micro/nano/quanto/bio/chemico-technologies,and even artificial intelligence, presage a brilliant futureto this emerging generation of metamaterials. This paperpresents the authors’ vision of this area in a cohesive andpedagogical perspective.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section IIintroduces spacetime metamaterials as a generalization ofexisting time-invariant metamaterials. Section III describesthe fundamental physical phenomena occurring in gen-eral (not only metamaterial) spacetime systems. Section IVpresents a relativistic perspective of spacetime systemsand metamaterials, including the Minkowski diagram rep-resentation, the Fourier-direct and Fourier-inverse Lorentztransformations, and the overall approach that we next useto solve spacetime metamaterial problems. Upon this basis,Sec. V recalls the phenomenology of pure-space and pure-time interfaces and derives the electromagnetic spacetimeboundary conditions for the subluminal and superluminalregimes from their respective purely spatial and purelytemporal limit cases. Using these boundary conditions,Secs. VI and VII derive the fundamental relations for thescattering coefficients and frequency transitions, respec-tively, at a spacetime interface, and unravel the unusualrelated physics. Section VIII shows that spacetime reversalnaturally emerges from our spacetime framework as ageneralization of the concept of time reversal. Spacetimemetamaterials may support a myriad of new physical ef-fects, most of which are still to be discovered. Section IXillustrates this new physics with a selection of three exam-ples: the spacetime mirror and cavity, the inverse prism andchromatic birefringence, and spacetime crystals. A num-ber of potential applications – classified in the categoriesA) frequency multiplication and mixing, B) matching andfiltering, C) nonreciprocity and absorption, D) cloaking,E) electromagnetic processing, and F) radiation –, are thendiscussed in Sec. IX. Finally, conclusions are given in Sec. XI.

Page 2

II. MEDIUM GENERALIZATION

A. Non-metamaterial Spacetime Systems

There is an infinity of spacetime systems that would notqualify as spacetime metamaterials, but that are definitelyrelevant to consider in the context of spacetime metama-terials. This is of course the case for the entire world asexperienced by us, humans, where everything, like the fallof an apple from a tree or the emission light by a star, variesin both space and time, according to Newton laws, relativity,and other laws of physics. A particularly insightful familiarspacetime phenomenon is the Doppler effect [26], producedby moving objects, such as cars or planes, emitting soundsor reflecting radar waves [27]. At the micro/nano-scale,the emerging field of optomechanics, which explores theclassical and quantum interactions between electromag-netic radiation and moving mirrors mediated by radiation-pressure forces, represents another example of moving-media spacetime physics [28].

In the above examples, the spacetime variation occurs viathe motion of matter (moving molecule blocks), as apples,stars, cars and mirrors. However, there are other spacetimesystems whose variation is produced by a wave modulation(dynamic ‘biasing’ wave), without any transfer of matter.This is for instance the case of acousto-optic or electro-optic structures, where an external acoustic wave or lightwave modulates the refractive index of the medium [29]. Arelated spacetime device is the WWII traveling-wave tube,where a beam of electron amplifies a radio signal sloweddown for synchronization by helical wires or coupled cavi-ties [30]; in this case, the structure may in fact be seen eitheras a wave-modulated or moving-matter spacetime systemdepending on whether one considers the wave nature orparticle nature of the electrons.

B. Spacetime Metamaterial Illustration and Implementation

We are here specifically interested in spacetime metama-terials. How would such a metamaterial look like and whatwould it offer? A preliminary answer to this question maybe formulated with the help of the illustration in Fig. 2.Figure 2(a) represents a stationary or static metamaterial,which scatters, from its periodic lattice, a few diffractionorders1. Adding a temporal variation to the spatial variation,so as to obtain a combined space and time – or space-time – variation, as suggested in Fig. 2(b), produces someunique effects. For instance, the diffraction orders may besuppressed and new exotic temporal and spatial frequenciesmay be created.

As was the case for photonic crystals, negative materialsand cloaking structures, the initial experimental space-time metamaterials will be demonstrated at microwaves,using distributed varactors or transistors modulated by a

1Typically, a phase-gradient metamaterial or metasurface “refracts” anincident wave in a specified direction together with spurious diffractionorders associated to the supercell corresponding to one phase cycle ofthe structure. Indeed, even if the unit cell feature is much smaller thanthe wavelength of the incoming wave, the actual supercell period iscomparable to this wavelength. This effect, which becomes severe atlarge angles from the normal, may be remedied by introducing properbianisotropy [31].

(a) (b)

χ(r) χ(r, t )

stationaryor static

metaparticle

movingor modulatedmetaparticle

Fig. 2. Generic representation of a spacetime metamaterial, using theexample of a 3D periodic array of spheroidal metallic, dielectric or plas-monic metaparticles. (a) Stationary or static (only space-varying) structure,here excited by the double-monochromatic wave (ωi,ki) and producingthe three diffraction orders [(ωi,k0), (ωi,k−1), (ωi,k+1)]. (b) Moving ormodulated structure, here with the same excitation as in (a) and producingthe scattered waves [(ωa ,ka ), (ωb ,kb ), (ωc ,kc )].

processor, and ultimately involving artificial intelligencefor adapting to the environment and realizing complextasks. However, optical implementations, using for instanceacousto-optic and electro-optic modulation, may also beenvisioned in a near-future horizon.

C. Spacetime Invariant – Nondispersive Bianisotropic Media

The behavior of an electromagnetic medium can gener-ally be expressed by the relations

D = ε0E+Pe, (1a)

B =µ0H+Pm, (1b)

where ε0 = 8.854 · 10−12 As/Vm and µ0 = 4π · 10−7 Vs/Amare the free-space permittivity and permeability, E (V/m)and H (A/m) are the electric field and magnetic field –considered here as the medium excitations –, D (As/m2) andB (Vs/m2) are the electric flux density (or displacement)field and the magnetic flux density (or induction) field –considered here as the medium responses –, and Pe (As/m2)and Pm = µ0M (Vs/m2) (M: magnetization) are the electricand magnetic polarization densities corresponding to theresponse of the particles forming the medium while ε0Eand µ0H represent the electric and magnetic responses ofthe free space between them.

Pe may be induced not only by E but also by H, whilePm may be induced not only by H but also by E. Therefore,Pe and Pm generally decompose as

Pe = Pee +Pem, (2a)

Pm = Pme +Pmm, (2b)

where Pee, Pem, Pme and Pmm are the electric-to-electric,magnetic-to-electric, electric-to-magnetic and magnetic-to-magnetic polarization densities induced in the medium,which we may generically refer to as Pab , with ab = ee, em,me and mm. Such a medium is called biisotropic if the re-sponses are parallel to the excitations, i.e., (Pee,Pme)‖E and(Pem,Pmm)‖H [32], [33], and bianisotropic otherwise [33],[34].

A linear, spacetime invariant and spacetime nondisper-sive bianisotropic medium, where the exact definition ofspacetime in/variance and non/dispersion will be given

Page 3

shortly, can be modeled in terms of the susceptibility dyadic3×3 tensor χab corresponding to Pab as [33](

Pe

Pm

)=

(ε0χee

pε0µ0χemp

ε0µ0χme µ0χmm

)·(

EH

)=χ ·

(EH

), (3a)

where χ represents the dyadic 6×6 tensor combining χee,χem, χme and χmm, and where we have used matrix nota-tion for compactness and better visualization. Alternatively,inserting (3) into (1) yields(

DB

)=

(ε ξ

ζ µ

)·(

EH

), with

(ε ξ

ζ µ

)=

ε0

(I +χee

) pε0µ0χem

pε0µ0χme µ0

(I +χmm

) ,

(3b)

where I = xx+ yy+ zz is the unit dyadic tensor, and ε, ξ, ζand µ are respectively the permittivity, magnetic-to-electric,electric-to-magnetic and permability tensors. Spacetime in-variance means that χab in (3) depends neither on space,i.e., χab 6= χab(r), nor on time, i.e., χab 6= χab(t ), whilespacetime nondispersion means that χab depends neitheron the wavenumber, i.e., χab 6= χab(k), nor on the (usual)frequency, χab 6= χab(ω), so that a spacetime invariant andnondispersive bianisotropic medium is one where χab 6=χab(r, t ,k,ω). Despite this restriction, bianisotropy bringsabout great medium diversity, given its up to 4×(3×3) = 36distinct parameters, often interrelated from fundamentalphysical properties [35].

D. Metamaterial Unification and Extension

The spacetime invariant and nondispersive restrictioncan be lifted for even more diversity, as suggested bythe spacetime variance and dispersion Venn-diagram clas-sification presented in Fig. 3, where we holistically referto r, t , k and ω as direct space or simply space, directtime or simply time, inverse space or spatial frequency andinverse time or temporal frequency, respectively, with theterms ‘direct’ and ‘inverse’ referring to the usual Fouriertransform-pair independent variables. A general and globalmetamaterial control of the spacetime variant-dispersiveproperties would unify and extend current medium scienceand technology, and bring about a cornucopia of novelphysical effects and industrial devices. The recent spec-tacular developments in micro/nano/quanto/bio/chemico-technologies suggest that such a grand perspective willbecome a pervasive reality in the forthcoming decades.

The classification of Fig. 3 must be considered with someprecaution: the relations (3), upon which it is based, donot strictly apply to all spacetime variance-dispersion cases.This may be best understood with the help of an example.Consider the case χ(t ,ω), simplified to the purely electricscalar response χee(t ,ω). This may represent for instancethe Drude time-dispersive [36], [37] and time-variant [38],[39] dielectric medium χee(t ,ω) =−ω2

p,ee(t )/(ω2 − jνp,eeω),whose plasma frequency, ωp,ee, varies in time, and whereνp,ee denotes the damping factor.

If the time variation of ωp,ee(t ) is a drift that occurs ona much greater time scale, ∆τ, than the (largest Fourier)time period, T = 2π/ω, of the signal exciting the medium,

χ(r) χ(t )

χ(k) χ(ω)

χ(r, t )

χ(k, t )χ(r,ω)

χ(k,ω)χ(r,k) χ(t ,ω)

χ(r,k,ω) χ(t ,k,ω)

χ(r, t ,ω) χ(r, t ,k)

χ(r, t ,k,ω)

χ

D-SPACE D-TIME

I-SPACE I-TIME

FOURIERDIRECT

(D)

FOURIERINVERSE

(I)

SPACE TIME

Fig. 3. Unified and extended representation and classification of bian-isotropic spacetime metamaterials in terms of their spacetime varianceand dispersion, with χ representing the global dyadic tensor defined in (3),and r, t , k and ω being referred to as direct space or space, direct timeor time, inverse space or spatial frequency and inverse time or temporalfrequency, respectively. Among the 24 = 16 spacetime variance-dispersioncases in this diagram, 8 cases are absolutely meaningful, while the 7 casesmarked by a cross are meaningful only in situations involving very differentspacetime parameter scales.

i.e., ∆τ À T , the time dependence may be safely con-sidered as decoupled from the frequency dependence,and the expression χee(t ,ω) makes sense. It may then beconsidered as the “transfer function” of the linear quasitime-invariant system [40] characterized by the spectralrelation D(ω) = ε0χee(t ,ω) · E(ω) with the “input function”E(ω) and “output function” D(ω) or, in the temporaldomain, as the “impulse response”2 χee(t , t ′) associatedwith the relation D(t ′) = ε0χee(t , t ′)∗E(t ′), which reads3

χee(t , t ′) =pπ/2ω2

p,ee(t )t ′ sgn(t ′) in the case of negligibleloss (νp,eeω¿ω2).

In contrast, if the variation of ωp,ee(t ) occurs on a timescale that is comparable to – or smaller than – that ofthe exciting wave, or ∆τ. T , the expression χee(t ,ω) losesits meaning. Indeed, in this case the variation scale of“dispersion” [χee(ω) or χee(t , t ′)] is comparable to – orsmaller than – the variation scale of the exciting wave [E(t )],and the actual dispersion is then undetermined because thewave, whose meaningfulness requires at least one cycle (T ),“does not have time to probe the memory of the medium”

2It is important to distinguish the regular time variable t (here drifttime variance) from the impulse time t ′, which represents a physicallymeaningful time quantity only in the theoretical case where E(t ′) = E0δ(t ′),for which D(t ′) = ε0E0χee(t ′) (impulse response).

3This function is in fact acausal, and hence unphysical, since it has aninfinite time support. The Drude model is indeed only an approximationof the Lorentz model, which is, in contrast, perfectly causal [34], but whose(time-limited) impulse response is substantially more complex.

Page 4

via D(t ′) = ε0χee(t , t ′)∗E(t ′) = ε0´ t ′=t ′0+∆τ

t0χee(t ,τ−t ′)E(τ)dτ,

where t0 is the start time of the impulse response, “toexperience a specific dispersion from it.”

A similar argument would naturally apply to a fast-varying medium with moderate to strong dispersion, χ(t ,ω),to the spatial counterpart of χ(t ,ω), χ(r,k), and, con-sequently, to susceptibilities with more complex depen-dencies. Overall, among the 24 = 16 spacetime variance-dispersion cases in Fig. 3, the 8 cases in the periphery ofthe diagram are absolutely meaningful, whereas the 7 casestowards the center indicated by crosses are meaningful onlyin the case of very different spacetime parameter scales.

These limitations are simply expressions of the uncer-tainty principle [41] applied to Fourier theory, which statesthat one can determine the spectrogram (t ,ω response) of asystem only within the precision constraint ∆t ·∆ω>π [42].In such a case, the susceptibility concept must be to the up-stream differential equation resulting from the applicationof the Newton equation of motion to the relevant particleof the medium [36], i.e.,

∂2Pab

∂t 2 +γab∂Pab

∂t+ω2

0,ab Pab =ω2p,abΨb , (4)

where Ψe = E and Ψm = H, which may be solved consis-tently with Maxwell equations and Eqs. (1) [43].

III. FUNDAMENTAL PHENOMENA IN SPACETIME SYSTEMS

A. Spacetime Frequency Transitions

Spacetime systems generally alter both the temporal andspatial spectra of the electromagnetic waves with whichthey interact.

The simplest form of temporal-spectrum (ω) transforma-tion induced by spacetime variation is the already men-tioned (Sec. II-A) Doppler effect, where the wave emittedor reflected by a moving object undergoes an upward ordownward temporal-frequency shift (∆ω) in the directionof or in the direction opposite to the motion [26]. Thiseffect, whose study has been extended since Doppler toarbitrary source-observer angles [44] and to the relativisticregime [45], takes a more general form and represents morediverse embodiments in penetrable spacetime entities, andeven more in spactime metamaterials, as will be shown inthe sequel of the paper.

The first observed form of spatial-spectrum (k) trans-formation induced by spacetime variation might be theaberration of light, which causes stars to appear displaced(∆k) towards the direction of motion of the Earth. Thisphenomenon was explained by Bradely in 1727 [46], andEinstein extended its description to the relativistic regimein his 1905 foundational paper on the special theory ofrelativity [45], [47]. As temporal-spectrum transformations,spatial-spectrum transformations become much richer inpenetrable spacetime entities and spactime metamaterials,as will also be shown in the sequel of the paper.

Recently, the term frequency transition was introduced inan analogy between photon modes in a photonic crystalwith a temporally-spatially varying permittivity and op-tical transitions between electronic states in metals and

semiconductors [48], where the transitions in the pho-tonic/energy bandgap structure could be either vertical, asdirect energy transitions (e.g. in GaAs and InAs) or oblique,as indirect energy transitions (e.g. in Si, Ge and AlSb).We adopt here this terminology, and we will distinguishspace (horizontal), time (vertical) and spacetime (oblique)frequency transitions (see Sec. VII).

B. Nonreciprocity

Another fundamental phenomenon that is common tomost spacetime varying media is nonreciprocity [49]. In-deed, spacetime motion or modulation generally breakstime reversal symmetry, due to the directional bias of theperturbation4. Such spacetime nonreciprocity recently gen-erated intense interest towards the realization of magnetlessnonreciprocal devices [16].

C. Moving and Modulated System Peculiarities

As pointed out in Sec. II-A, the spacetime variation ina spacetime system may occur either via the motion ofmatter, such as for instance a moving dielectric object,or via the modulation by a wave, such as for instancean acoustic wave in a piezoelectric crystal. The latter(wave modulation) is certainly easier than the former (wavemodulation) to realize and implement in devices, as itis easier to generate a propagating modulation than anactual motion of matter, particularly if very high velocitiesare required! Beyond this practical difference, there arealso fundamental differences between these two types ofspacetime systems. In particular, there are two phenomenathat can occur only in the moving-medium case: the Fizeaudrag and bianisotropy transformation.

The Fizeau drag is the effect according to which thevelocity of a wave propagating in a moving medium –specifically, light in flowing water in the 1851 experimentof Fizeau – is increased or decreased from its velocityin the stationary medium [50]. Specifically, Fizeau foundthat the velocity of a light wave in a medium of refrac-tive index n moving at the velocity vm is v± = v0 ±∆v ,where the signs + and − correspond to wave-medium co-directional propagation and contra-directional propagation,respectively, v0 = c/n is the velocity of the wave in thestationary medium (vm = 0), and ∆v = vm(1−1/n2) is the ve-locity increment or decrement due to motion5. This effect,which, together with Bradley aberration, instrumentally ledEinstein to establish his theory of special relativity [45],does not exist in the case of spacetime wave modulation,since such modulation does not involve any transfer ofmatter and hence does not provide “dragging molecules”for altering the velocity of the wave to process.

4In the particular case where the propagation direction of the pertur-bation is purely orthogonal to the propagation direction of the wave, thesystem remains reciprocal, since the same time-varying medium is thenseen from both ends of the system by the wave. However, this correspondsto a pure-time system, and not to a spacetime system, as will become clearin Sec. III-D.

5The Sagnac effect is a rotative version of the Fizeau experiment [51],[52], which is commonly used in modern gyroscopes.

Page 5

The first form of bianisotropy transformation was dis-covered in 1888 by Röntgen, who found that a dielectricmaterial moving through an electric field would becomemagnetized [53], which corresponds to the electric-to-

magnetic bianisotropic parameter ζ, or χme, in (3b). Thiseffect may be easily understood by inspecting the Lorentzforce exerted on the particles or metaparticles that formthe medium6, F = qE+ qvm × (µ0H), where q and vm arethe charge and velocity of a particle, and (E,H) is the(free-space) electromagnetic field [as in Eqs. (1) to (4)] thatexcites the medium.

If vm = 0 (no matter motion), F reduces to qE, whichtypically induces an electric dipole moment parallel to E,corresponding to a scalar permittivity ε = ε0(1 + χee). Ifvm 6= 0 and vm‖vwave, we have the additional force contribu-tion qvm×(µ0H) inducing an electric dipole moment againparallel to E, i.e., a scalar (biisotropic) magnetodielectriccoupling ξ = p

ε0µ0χem in (3b)7, and if vm ⊥ vwave, wehave an electric dipole moment induced perpendicularlyto E, leading to the tensorial (bianisotropic) coupling

ξ = pε0µ0χem in (3b). And so on. Complete bianisotropy

transformation formulas are today available [34]. This effect,which generally changes the bianisotropy of a medium (e.g.from isotropic to bianisotropic), also does not exist in thecase of spacetime wave modulation, since the Lorentz forceis associated with moving particles. More precisely, thisis true in the stationary frame with respect to which themodulation is moving, whereas the opposite is true in themoving frame since that frame would see the static-frameenvironment moving.

D. Superluminality

It has been known from over 130 years of experimenta-tion, and it is the second postulate of the theory of specialrelativity [45], that nothing can move faster than light in freespace, c = 299,792,458 m/s. However, this does not meanthat superluminal effects are not possible. Perturbationsuperluminality, associated with transfer of energy withouttransfer of information, is indeed perfectly possible; it maybe simply achieved by injecting the perturbation into thesystem at a non-zero angle with respect to the direction ofwave propagation.

To understand this, consider the macabre but insightfulexample of the guillotine, an apparatus used to behead

6We assume here, for simplicity, a relatively low-density medium, wherethe constitutive particles or metaparticles do not interact with each other.

7In the case of a simple nonmagnetic dielectric medium, the secondforce term is significant only in the relativistic regime (|vm|/c = β . 1),and negligible (|ξ| ¿ |ε|) at lower velocities (β¿ 1). Indeed, according tothe Maxwell-Faraday equation, (nω/c)k×E =ωµ0H (n: refractive index), wehave then (µ0H) ∼ nE/c, so that |vm×(µ0H)| < |vm|·|µ0H| ∼ n(|vm|/c)·|E| =nβ|E|, with practically n < 10. The situation is naturally different if themoving medium or modulation is a metamaterial, since in this case theshape of the particle can induce strong magnetoelectric coupling, as forinstance helix particles in the case of biisotropic media [54]. In such acase, motion is not even required for magnetoelectric coupling, since thesecond Lorentz force term is provided by the current, I , induced in themetaparticles (e.g. a helices in biisotropic media [54]), as better seen uponrewriting it as

´[(I d`)× (µ0H)] with I d` being an elementary current.

royalists during the French revolution8, which is depictedin Fig. 4. A short inspection of this device reveals thatthe point P at the intersection between the blade andthe board moves along the z direction at an unlimitedvelocity, vz , which can perfectly be superluminal, i.e. vz > c,and even reach infinity when the blade is perfectly flat(θ = 0). This effect does not violate the second postulateof relativity: the molecules of the blade exclusively movealong the x direction, at a velocity vx that is definitelysmaller than c. The reason why P can be superluminal isthe fact that it does not move in the direction of mattermotion, but perpendicularly to it, and that the blade is“present” everywhere over the board along the z directionfrom the outset (no information transfer) so that it doesnot need to travel along z. This motion corresponds thusto a “perturbation” motion. However, such perturbationdefinitely carries energy, as the ghost of guillotined QueenMarie Antoinette would certainly testify!

θ

θ

mg

vz = vx /tanθ = g t/tanθθ→0→ ∞

x

z

P

Fig. 4. Demonstration of superluminality with the example of the (sim-plified) guillotine, an apparatus with a blade falling under gravity througha slit operated on a base board and ipso facto cutting off in two partsthe “object” placed on the board. The point P , corresponding to theintersection of the blade and the board, moves along the z direction ata velocity that is unlimited. This velocity, vz , is superluminal if the angleof the blade, θ, is such that θ < tan−1(g t/c), where g = 9.81 m/s2 is thegravity acceleration constant of the Earth and t is the time when theblade is dropped, and it becomes infinite as θ→ 0: vz (θ = 0) =∞ (puretime perturbation or variation).

In physics and engineering, spacetime superluminalitycan be realized essentially in the same manner as themechanical system of Fig. 4, by applying the – matter ormodulation – perturbation perpendicularly to the directionof wave propagation and with an injection angle or gradientcorresponding to the desired velocity. For instance, one maymodulate the refractive index of a semiconductor slab byan oblique laser pulse9, where the front of the pulse wouldplay the role of the edge of the blade in the figure with theslab being at the position of the board. However, this canalso be practically achieved with many other modulationtechniques, involving for instance oblique ferroelectric orferromagnetic slabs in waveguides [56], arrays of varac-tor diodes in microwave transmission-line structures, andpiezoelectric or electrooptic materials in optical structures.

8The guillotine was in fact not invented by Joseph-Ignace Guillotin, whowas against the death penalty, but proposed by him for capital punishment,in order to “simply to end life rather than to inflict pain” [55]. This devicewas indeed arguably preferable to the breaking wheel, which was commonbefore!

9The laser obliquely illuminates the board under the angle θ with respectto the x axis and the width of its oblique beam front corresponds to theoblique edge of the blade.

Page 6

Note that if the modulation angle (θ in Fig. 4) is zero, theresulting “infinite superluminality” may be considered asa purely temporal or pure-time perturbation [38], whichrepresents the dual of a purely spatial perturbation, as willbe seen later in the paper.

IV. RELATIVITY PERSPECTIVE

A. Spacetime Extension

Shortly after the publication of Einstein’s theory of specialrelativity, Minkowski formulated the concept of spacetimeas a fusion of the three dimensions of space and the one di-mension of time into a single four-dimensional continuum,and developed the eponymic diagram, also simply referredto as the spacetime diagram [57]. This concept and diagramquickly became essential aspects of relativity [45], [58], andwe shall see in this paper that they also represent powerfultools for handling spacetime metamaterials.

Figure 5(a) shows the conventional spacetime diagram,which represents the three dimensions of space, r = (x, y, z),as a horizontal plane, called the hyperspace, and the onedimension of (space-normalized) time, ct , as the directionperpendicular to that plane. In this diagram, each physicalevent is localized by a unique spacetime point, P = (r,ct ),while the evolution of an event is represented by a contin-uous curve, called a trajectory or world line, which extendsfrom its past to its future through its present (origin). Theslope of the trajectory is s = |∇r(ct )| = c|∇rt | = c/v , and ishence inversely proportional to the velocity (v) of the event.Thus, a vertical curve (s = ∞) represents a stationary orstatic event, a straight line with s > 1 (or v < c) represents a(subluminally) uniformly moving object, a curved line (withsubluminal s > 1 everywhere) represents a nonuniformlymoving (accelerated/deccelerated) object, and the Dirac-like cone, with s = 1 (or v = c), represents light propagationin free space10.

Relativity essentially deals with the motion of celestialbodies (e.g. stars, spacecrafts) and the propagation of elec-tromagnetic and gravitational waves in free space. A space-time metamaterial may be considered as the extension ofthe spacetime concept, where a spacetime medium is addedto the conventional spacetime structure, as illustrated inFig. 5(b). The spacetime metamaterial is to be understoodas a 3D penetrable propagating perturbation with arbitrarilycomplex spacetime structure11. A possibly helpful illustra-tion at this point could be that of a plasma cloud (hostmedium) with regions of higher density and complexity(metaparticles) passing across the observer. Such a pertur-bation can support continuua of subluminal and superlu-minal discontinuity features, and this superluminal aspect,demystified in Sec. III-D, brings about a great diversity of

10This cone explicitly represents the propagation of a circular light pulsein a 2D-spatial structure (e.g. a thin slab), with the origin of the conecorresponding to the pulse source and each horizontal circular section ofthe cone corresponding to the “position” of the pulse at a given time (seealso Sec. IX-A). In the case of 3D-spatial light propagation, the light pulse“position” is a spherical shell, and the spacetime diagram, drawn on a 2Dsurface, is only a symbolic (hyperspace) representation of its propagation.

11A cosmological version of such a “spacetime metamaterial” would bethe universe, whose spacetime varying curvature caused by gravitationalwaves would act as the spacetime medium across which light propagates.

hyperspace

(a) (b)

ct ct

x, y, z

v > c

v = c

v < c

hostmedium

metaparticle

unif.accel.

Pc/v

1

metamaterial

Fig. 5. Spacetime diagrams. (a) Conventional case, with a uniformtrajectory (red), an accelerated trajectory (green) and the light cone (blue).(b) Metamaterial extension, including a host medium (brown) and afew metaparticles (magenta) with subluminal (v < c), luminal (v = c)and superluminal (v > c) discontinuity features, here with a subluminalnonuniform (inhomogeneous host medium) wave strongly scattered byone of the spacetime metaparticles.

unexplored physical phenomena and bears potential formany novel electromagnetic device opportunities.

The space r, t , represented in Fig. 5, involves the direct-Fourier spacetime independent variables r and t . We there-fore refer to it as the direct spacetime, consistently with theterminology introduced in Fig. 3. This diagram is repeatedin Fig. 6(a) with a pair of waves, a subluminal one, withinthe light cone, and a superluminal one, outside of the lightcone. As we see here again, the direct spacetime allowsto describe wave trajectories and scattering directions, andthis will be used to determine the spacetime scatteringcoefficients in Sec. VI. However, it does not include anyspacetime spectral information, which will be needed todetermine the spacetime frequency transitions in Sec. VII.That information is contained in the space of the inverse-Fourier space and time independent variables k and ω,which is represented in Fig. 6(b) and which shall logicallyrefer to as the inverse spacetime. As illustrated in Fig. 6(b),the inverse spacetime hosts the dispersion curves of themedium, and provides a perspective that is obviously com-plementary to that of the direct spacetime.

B. Lorentz Transformations

The Lorentz transformations are mathematical transfor-mations that relate quantities measured in different space-time inertial coordinate frames [59], [60], i.e., coordinateframes that move rectilinearly at constant velocity (or zeroacceleration) and hence experience no force, according toNewton second law [61].

Figure 7 shows a pair of such frames in direct spacetime,with spacetime coordinates (r,ct ) = (x, y, z,ct ) and (r′,ct ′) =(x ′, y ′, z ′,ct ′) and origins O and O′, where the latter movesat the (constant) velocity v (v = |v| < c) relatively to theformer. We shall next consider, for simplicity and withoutloss of generality, the specific configuration shown in thisfigure, where the two frames have been oriented in such amanner that z = z′ = v = v z, and where the wave of interest

Page 7

hyperspace hyperspace

(a) (b)

r k

ct ω/c

x, y, z kx ,ky ,kz

F

ωsub

ωsup

ωsub

ωsup

ct = r(light)

ω/c = k0(free space)

∇r[ct (r)] = cv/v ∇k[ω(k)/c] = vg /c

Fig. 6. Fourier spacetime pair. (a) Direct spacetime, (r,ct ) (host mediumin brown in Fig. 5(b) implicit, not shown here), with the trajectoriesof two harmonic plane waves propagating in the dispersive mediumrepresented in (b) at ωsub, where vsub < c (subluminal), and at ωsup,where vsup > c (superluminal). (b) Inverse spacetime, (k,ω/c), with thedispersion curve of the dispersive (isotropic) medium (yellow) and spectralpoints corresponding to the two waves in (a).

(light pulse in the figure) propagates in the same direction.

c

x

y

zO

x ′

y ′z ′O′

v

t t ′

(r, t ) (r′, t ′)

z ′z

Fig. 7. Pair of rectilinear inertial spacetime frames, with spacetimecoordinates (r,ct ) = (x, y, z,ct ) and (r′,ct ′) = (x′, y ′, z′,ct ′), where the lattermoves at the (constant) velocity v (v = |v| < c) relatively to the former. Here,the two frames have been oriented in such a manner that z = z′ = v = v z.The position of a light pulse propagating along the v direction (withspeed c) is measured as z and z′ in the unprimed and primed frames,respectively.

The Lorentz transformations of the direct spacetimevariables, (z, t ) and (z, t ′), follow from the second postulateof the theory of special relativity, which states that the speedof light is the same (c = 299,792 km/s) for all observersregardless of the source [45], and read (see Appendix A)

z ′ = γz −γβ(ct )ct ′ =−γβz +γ(ct )

or

(z ′

ct ′

)= γ

(1 −v/c

−v/c 1

)(z

ct

), (5a)

z = γz ′+γβ(ct ′)

ct = γβz ′+γ(ct ′)

or

(z

ct

)= γ

(1 v/c

v/c 1

)(z ′

ct ′

), (5b)

where

γ= 1√1−β2

, with β= v/c (6)

is the Lorentz factor. Note that, consistently with the sym-metry of the problem, the transformation relations (5) aresymmetric to each other, with opposite transformations

differing only in the sign associated with v . The general-ization of these relations to arbitrarily-directed motions aretensorial relations that are available for instance in [37].

The spacetime Lorentz transformations of the inversespacetime variables, (kz ,ω) and (k ′

z ,ω′), may be foundby enforcing the invariance of the phase, φ, for a time-harmonic wave, which expresses the fact that the unprimedand primed observers would agree on whether an eventcorresponds to a wave crest or a wave through [62], i.e.,

φ=φ′, or kz z −ωt = kz z ′−ωt ′. (7)

Substituting (5b) in the latter equation, grouping the co-efficients of z ′ and t ′, and considering the fact that theresulting relation must hold for any values of the twovariables leads to the sought after inverse formulas,

k ′z = γkz −γβ

(ωc

)ω′

c=−γβkz +γ

(ωc

) or

(k ′

zω′/c

)= γ

(1 −v/c

−v/c 1

)(kz

ω/c

),

(8a)kz = γk ′

z +γβ(ω′

c

)ω

c= γβk ′

z +γ(ω′

c

) or

(kz

ω/c

)= γ

(1 v/c

v/c 1

)(k ′

zω′/c

), (8b)

which involve exactly the same transformation matrices astheir direct counterparts [Eq. (5)].

The direct and inverse spacetime unprimed and primedframes are plotted in Fig. 8, along with representativewave trajectories in Fig. 8(a) and corresponding spectra inFig. 8(b). The direct spacetime primed frame axes z ′ and ct ′

are obtained by setting ct ′ = 0 and z ′ = 0 in (5a), yieldingct = (v/c)z and ct = (c/v)z, respectively, while the inversespacetime primed frame axes k ′

z and ω′/c are obtained bysetting ω′/c = 0 and k ′

z = 0 in (8a), yielding ω/c = (v/c)kz

and ω/c = (c/v)kz , respectively.

(a) (b)

c/vpulse

z

ct

z ′

ct ′

kz

ω/c

k ′z

ω′/c

O,O′O,O′

c/vc/v

v/c v/c

PQ

∆z

∆t

∆kz

∆ω

z0

ct0

z ′0

ct ′0

kz0

ω0/c

k ′z0

ω′0/c

Fig. 8. Lorentz unprimed and primed spacetime frames with a wave pulse.(a) Direct spacetime [Eq. (5)] (Figs. 6(a) and 7), with P representing anevent of coordinates [(z0,ct0), (z′0,ct ′0)], and the graded strip representinga pulse wave of space length ∆z and time duration ∆t . (b) Inversespacetime [Eq. (8)] (Fig. 6(b)), with Q representing a harmonic planewave of spacetime frequencies [(kz0,ω/c), (k ′

z0,ω′/c)], and the graded spotrepresenting the spacetime spectrum with spatial bandwidth ∆kz andtemporal bandwidth ∆ω.

The graded strip in Fig. 8(a) represents the trajectory ofa pulse wave of spacetime extent (∆z,∆t ) while the gradedspot in Fig. 8(b) represents its spectrum with spacetimeextent (∆k,∆ω). The trajectory of a point (∆z,∆t ) → 0 would

Page 8

correspond to a constant-phase point (e.g. a crest) of a har-monic plane wave, whose direct spacetime representation[Fig. 8(a)] would strictly involve a periodic set of paral-lel trajectory lines with horizontal and vertical distancescorresponding to the wavelength (λ = 2π/k) and period(T = 2π/ω), respectively. On the other hand, the inverse-spacetime point (∆k,∆ω) → 0 [Fig. 8(b)] would exactlyrepresent a harmonic plane wave.

The Lorentz transformations of the electromagnetic fieldsfollow from the first postulate of the theory of specialrelativity, which states that the laws of physics are the samein all inertial systems [45], and read (see Appendix B)

E ′x (z ′) = γ(

Ex (z)− vBy (z))

, (9a)

cB ′y (z ′) = γ

(cBy (z)− v

cEx (z)

), (9b)

H ′y (z ′) = γ(

Hy (z)− vDx (z))

, (9c)

cD ′x (z ′) = γ

(cDx (z)− v

cHy (z)

), (9d)

and, inverting the primed and unprimed quantities andsubstituting v →−v ,

Ex (z) = γ(E ′

x (z ′)+ vB ′y (z ′)

), (10a)

cBy (z) = γ(cB ′

y (z ′)+ v

cE ′

x (z ′))

, (10b)

Hy (z) = γ(H ′

y (z ′)+ vD ′x (z ′)

), (10c)

cDx (z) = γ(cD ′

x (z ′)+ v

cH ′

y (z ′))

. (10d)

Again, the generalizations of these relations to arbitrarily-directed motions are tensorial relations that are availablefor instance in [37]. Moreover, the spectral counterparts ofthese relations are straightforwardly obtainable by space-time Fourier transformation.

C. Resolution Strategy

The conventional strategy for determining the scatteringresponse of a medium moving with uniform velocity vm

with respect to a given laboratory frame – the unprimedframe in Figs. 7 and 8 – consists in the following twosteps [34], [36], [62]. First, we solve the problem in the frameco-moving with the medium – the primed frame in Figs. 7and 8 –, where the medium is stationary or static, andhence the problem is much simpler. Second, we convertthe result to the original laboratory frame, using the Lorentztransformations (10) for an electromagnetic problem.

This strategy encounters two issues in the study ofspacetime metamaterials: 1) the inapplicability, in the caseof superluminal systems, of the Lorentz spacetime variabletransformations (5) and (8) with the conventional definitionof the Lorentz factor in (6); 2) the inappropriateness, inthe case of modulated spacetime systems, to express theconstitutive relations in the primed expressions of theelectromagnetic fields associated with the Lorentz transfor-mations (9) and (10).

The first issue arises, as mentioned, when the spacetimeperturbation is superluminal, i.e., vm > c (e.g. θ < tan(g t/c)in Fig. 4). In this case, the Lorentz factor in (6), withv = vf = vm, is imaginary, since β2 = (vm/c)2 > 1, which leads

to absurd imaginary direct and indirect spacetime variablesaccording to (5) and (8). Can we still use Lorentz transformswhile avoiding this problem? The fact that the limit case of asuperluminal medium, vm →∞, is a pure-time medium asthe limit case of a subluminal medium, vm = 0, is a purelyspatial, or pure space, medium suggests that the issue maybe resolved by setting the primed frame as one where themedium is purely temporal instead of purely spatial. Thisindeed resolves the issue, as first reported in [63].

To show this, let us consider the problem of a spacetime-modulated interface between two semi-infinite media of re-spective refractive indices n1 and n2, which is addressed inFig. 912. This problem is fundamental because an interfacebetween two media represents the building brick of anymetamaterial, which is essentially nothing but a successionof such discontinuities. Figure 9(a) shows the case of a sub-luminal interface. In this case, following the conventionalapproach, we set the time axis of the primed frame parallelto the interface, so that the interface appears static (v ′

m = 0),or pure-space, at z ′ = z ′

0 in that frame. Equating the twoslopes, c/vf = c/vm, leads then to vf = vm: the frame isco-moving with the interface. In contrast, in the case of asuperluminal interface, shown in Fig. 9(b), we set the spaceaxis of the primed frame parallel to the interface, so that theinterface appears instantaneous (v ′

m →∞), or pure-time, atct ′ = ct ′0 in that frame. Equating the two slopes, vf/c = c/vm,leads this time to vf = c2/vm: the frame is ‘co-standing’ withthe interface. Now |β| = |vf|/c = c/vm < 0, so that γ is real,and the Lorentz transformations in Sec. IV-B can be safelyused.

(a) (b)

00zz

ctct

z ′z ′

ct ′ct ′

c

vf= c

vm

vf

c= c

vmz ′

0

ct ′0

n1

n1

n2

n2

c

vm

c

vf

c

vf

vf

c

vf

c

v ′m =0 v ′

m →∞c

vm

Fig. 9. Choice of a proper primed Lorentz frame, moving at the velocity vfwith respect to the unprimed frame (Fig. 8) for an interface moving at thevelocity vm (here vm < 0) between two semi-infinite media of respectiverefractive indices n1 and n2. (a) Subluminal (conventional) case: vf = vm.(b) Superluminal (see Sec. III-D) case: vf = c2/vm.

Let us now turn to the second issue, which, as mentioned,is related to the field Lorentz transformations (9) and (10),and which concerns modulated (as opposed to moving)media. When the primed fields have been obtained, from

12An analogy to help understanding such an interface would be thatof “a chain of standing domino tiles, sufficiently closely spaced to toppletheir neighbors upon falling, so that a chain reaction can be launchedby knocking down the first tile. In such a reaction, one clearly sees the“interface” between the fallen and standing parts of the chain propagatingalong the structure at a specific velocity, with the domino tiles standing upor lying down on either side of the interface not moving in the directionof propagation (no transfer of energy).” (text borrowed from [39]).

Page 9

applying the spacetime boundary conditions (see Sec. V)to (9) in the primed frame, as in the conventional approach,it is recommended not to decompose D′ and B′ in terms ofthe E′ and H′ via the primed version of the constitutiverelations (3b). Indeed, since a modulation involves notransfer of matter in the laboratory frame or, equivalently,the material molecules involved in the modulation arestationary in the laboratory (unprimed) frame, they arenecessarily moving, in the direction opposite to the mod-ulation, in the primed frame, and therefore, correspond tobianisotropy-transformed parameters in that frame, accord-ing to Sec. III-C. For instance, if the initially modulatedmedium is monoisotropic in the unprimed frame, it isbianisotropic, and hence more complex, in the primedframe. To avoid this complication, it is better to apply theconstitutive-relation decomposition only after expressingthe primed fields in terms of their unprimed counterpartwith (9).

Once the fields scattered by the interface have beendetermined, with the precautions just described, we cansolve the problem of spacetime metamaterials, as theaforementioned succession of spacetime interfaces, us-ing in the case of a mono-directional spatial-variationa spacetime-extended version of the well-known transfermatrix method [64], either isolated for computing the scat-tering from a finite number of spacetime layers [39], orcombined with the Floquet-Bloch theorem for computingthe dispersion diagram [39], [65]. The problems involv-ing spacetime corner discontinuities or higher spacetime-variation dimensions require more sophisticated analyticalor computational techniques.

D. Canonical Spacetime “Metamaterials”

Figure 10 presents a number of canonical spacetimemedia. The first row shows, from left to right, a pure-space discontinuity, a pure-time discontinuity and a space-time discontinuity (moving in the positive z direction,contrarily to those in Fig. 9), which, as mentioned above,represents the building bricks of spacetime metamateri-als, and which will therefore be analyzed in the nextsections. Such discontinuities may be considered as thesuccession of two media, but they may alternatively beconsidered as a single medium involving a discontinuity;for instance, the spacetime discontinuity may be expressedas a medium with the spacetime-varying refractive indexn(z,ct ) = n1+(n2−n1)U (z−vmt ), where U (·) is the Heavisidestep function. Each of these media may be of dimensions(1+1)D, (2+1)D or (3+1)D, where the first and second num-bers respectively represent the spatial dimension and thetemporal dimension.

The second row in Fig. 10 shows, from left to right, apure-space crystal, a pure-time crystal and a spacetimecrystal, which are obtained by cascading the correspondingdiscontinuities of the first row, and which will be specificallydescribed in Sec. IX-C. The third row shows more complexspacetime media, namely an accelerated discontinuity13, a

13The Lorentz transforms (Sec. IV-B) do not apply to such a medium,since they are restricted to inertial systems.

zzz

zzz

zzz

ctctct

ctctct

ctctct

SPACE TIME SPACETIME

singlediscont.

periodicmedium

complexspacetimestructures

space step time step spacetime step

space crystal time crystal spacetime crystal

acceleratedspacetime

step

spacetimecheckerboard

spacetimemetamaterial

Fig. 10. Canonical space, time and spacetime media. The white andbrown areas represent different homogenous isotropic media, for instancecharacterized by respective refractive indices n1 and n2. The axis zmay generally represent the hyperspace r = (x, y, z) (Fig. 5), so that thespacetime dimension may be (1+1)D, (2+1)D or (3+1)D.

spacetime checkerboard [66], [67], and a general spacetimemetamaterial, corresponding to Fig. 5.

While the media shown in Fig. 10 involve step discon-tinuities, they may as well involve graded discontinuities,characterized by a progressive variation of the mediumparameter, as for instance in the core of graded-indexoptical fibers or in the Luneburg, Eaton and Maxwell fish-eye lenses.

V. PURE-SPACE AND PURE-TIME PHENOMENOLOGY AND

ELECTROMAGNETIC BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

The problem of scattering by a spacetime discontinuity,as that shown in the top right panel of Fig. 10, can besolved from the solutions of the pure-space discontinuityand pure-time discontinuity problems in the top left andtop center panels of Fig. 10 combined with the Lorentztransforms provided in Sec. IV-B. We shall therefore startwith these two problems, whose scattering phenomenologyis illustrated in Fig. 11. Note that the pure-space discontinu-ity is the limit case vm = 0 of the subluminal discontinuityin Fig. 9)(a), while the pure-space discontinuity is the limitcase vm →∞ of the superluminal discontinuity in Fig. 9)(b).

The scattering of a wave by a pure-space discontinuity,whose spacetime-diagram is shown in Fig. 11(a), is a high-school textbook problem: the incident (pulse or harmonic)wave (i) splits into a wave reflected with reflection co-efficient γ and a wave transmitted (or refracted) withtransmission coefficient τ at the discontinuity position, z0.The scattering of a wave by a pure-time discontinuity isthe dual problem, whose spacetime-diagram is shown inFig. 11(b) [38]. Here, the incident wave is called the earlierwave. At the discontinuity time, ct0, this wave splits into alater-backward wave with coefficient ζ and a later-forward

Page 10

(a) (b)

zz

ctct

z0

ct0ǫ1,µ1

ǫ1,µ1

ǫ2,µ2

ǫ2,µ2

ii

γ τξζ

n1n1

n1n2n2n2

Fig. 11. Scattering phenomenology in the most fundamental disconti-nuities between two electromagnetic media of permittivities and perme-abilities (ε1,µ1) and (ε2,µ2). (a) Pure-space step discontinuity [limit casevm = 0 of the subluminal discontinuity in Fig. 9)(a)], with incident (i),reflected (γ) and transmitted (τ) waves. (b) Pure-time step discontinuity[limit case vm →∞ of the superluminal discontinuity in Fig. 9)(a)], withincident (i) or earlier, later-backward (ζ) and later-forward (ξ) waves.

wave with coefficient ξ. It is important to realize that, induality with the pure-space problem where a harmonicwave scatters at the position z0 at all times (ct axis), sucha harmonic wave in the pure-time problem scatters at theinstant ct0 at all positions (z axis).

The boundary conditions follow from the fundamentalphysical constraint that all physical quantities must remainbounded everywhere and at every time. Specifically, theyare found from inspecting the space and time derivativesin Maxwell equations,

∇×E =−∂B

∂tand ∇×H = ∂D

∂t, (11)

which are here assumed to concern a sourceless region(J = 0) for simplicity.

In the case of the pure-space discontinuity, representedin Fig. 11(a), one must naturally focus on the spatial deriva-tive along the same direction, i.e., ∂/∂z, which correspondsto the tangential (x, y) part of (11),

z× ∂Et

∂z=−∂Bt

∂tand z× ∂Ht

∂z= ∂Dt

∂t, (12)

where the t subscript denotes tangential field components.If Et or Ht were discontinuous at z0, then the fields Bt or Dt

would be singular, i.e., unbounded, at that position, whichis physically not allowed. Therefore, as well-known fromelectromagnetics textbooks, Et and Ht, must be continuousat a space discontinuity.

An analogous argument applies to pure-time discontinu-ity in Fig. 11(b). However, the critical derivative for ensuingbounded fields is now the temporal derivative in (11). If B orD were discontinuous at ct0, then the fields E or D would besingular, i.e., unbounded, at that instant, which is physicallynot allowed. Therefore, B or D must be continuous at a timediscontinuity.

As a result, the boundary conditions at a pure-spacediscontinuity, perpendicular to the direction z, are

z× (E2 −E1)|z ′=z ′0= 0 and z× (H2 −E1)|z ′=z ′0

= 0, (13a)

while they are at a pure-time discontinuity

(B2 −B1)|ct ′=ct ′0= 0 and (D2 −D1)|ct ′=ct ′0

= 0, (13b)

where the subscripts 1 and 2 correspond to the media 1and 2, respectively (Fig. 11).

These boundary conditions will next allow us to deter-mine the scattering coefficients and transition frequenciesfor spacetime interfaces. For simplicity, we will restrict hereour attention to the case of (1+1)D problems, whose waveequation may be written as

∂2

∂z2 − ∂2

∂2[v(z,ct )t ]

ψ(z,ct ) = 0, (14a)

withv(z,ct ) = c

n(z,ct ), (14b)

where ψ represents the continuous field component, andn(z,ct ) is the spacetime-varying refractive index of the‘medium’ formed by the discontinuity.

VI. SCATTERING COEFFICIENTS

A. Pure-Space Medium

The determination of the electromagnetic reflection andtransmission coefficients – or Fresnel coefficients – for thepure-space discontinuity depicted in Fig. 11(a) is a basictextbook problem, but we shall still address it here, both toestablish a foundation for the forthcoming spacetime inter-face problem and to provide deep insight into the dualityof this problem with the pure-time interface problem. Thespatial-discontinuity continuous fields are here, accordingto (13a), Et and Ht. We therefore set in (14) ψ= E , H (e.g.with E‖x → E = Ex and H‖y → H = Hy ). The wave equationmay then be rewritten in each of the two media as[

1

n21,2

∂2

∂z2 − ∂2

∂(ct )2

]E1,2(z,ct )H1,2(z,ct )

= 0. (15)

The solutions of these equations may be found usingthe method of separation of variables and proper wavepropagation directions14 as

E1 = e− j n1ωic z e jωit +γe j n1

ωγc z e jωγt , (16a)

E2 = τe− j n2ωτc z e jωτt , (16b)

H1 =(e− j n1

ωic z e jωit −γe j n1

ωγc z e jωγt

)/η1, (16c)

H2 = τe− j n2ωτc z e jωτt /η2, (16d)

where the subscripts i, γ and τ correspond to the incident,reflected and transmitted waves, respectively [Fig. 11(a)],and η1,2 = √

µ1,2/ε1,2 is the intrinsic impedance of themedium. The unknown reflection and transmission coeffi-cients, γ and τ, are then found by inserting these relationsinto the boundary conditions [Eqs. (13a)]

E1|z=z0 = E2|z=z0 and H1|z=z0 = H2|z=z0 , (17)

which yields the well-known pure-space scattering coeffi-cients

γ= η2 −η1

η1 +η2and τ= 2η2

η1 +η2. (18)

14We use here the time-harmonic complex dependence e+ jωt , corre-sponding to the spatial expressions e− j kz and e+ j kz for the forward andbackward waves, respectively.

Page 11

The problem of scattering by a pure-space slab is thenconventionally solved by applying boundary conditions ofthe type (17) at each of the two interfaces of the slabwith the proper field expressions involving the scatter-ing coefficients (18) (e.g. [37]). The corresponding directspacetime representation is shown in Fig. 12(a). It involvesan infinity of scattering events, and therefore an infinitenumber of trajectory contributions to the global reflectionand transmission coefficients, Γ and T .

(a) (b)

zz

ctct

T

Γ Z Ξ

Fig. 12. Direct spacetime representation scattering in (step) slabs. (a) Pure-space slab, involving an infinity of multiple-scattering trajectories, con-tributing to the total reflection coefficient Γ and transmission coefficient T .(b) Pure-time slab, involving only four final scattering trajectories, con-tributing to the total later-backward scattering coefficient Z and later-forward scattering coefficient Ξ.

B. Pure-Time Medium

The determination of the electromagnetic later-forwardand later-backward coefficients for the pure-time discon-tinuity depicted in Fig. 11(b) is less known, although it isnow also a textbook topic [38]. The temporal-discontinuitycontinuous fields are, according to (13b), D and B. Wetherefore set in (14) ψ= D,B (e.g. with D‖x → D = Dx andB‖y → B = By ). The wave equation may then be rewrittenin each of the two media as[

∂2

∂z2 −n21,2

∂2

∂(ct )2

]D1,2(z,ct )B1,2(z,ct )

= 0. (19)

The solutions of these equations may be found using againthe method of separation of variables and proper wavepropagation directions15, as

D1 = e− j kz,iz ej

kz,in1

ct, (20a)

D2 = ζD e− j kz,ζz e− j

kz,ζn1

ct +ξD e− j kz,ξz ej

kz,ξn1

ct, (20b)

B1 = e− j kz,iz ej

kz,in1

ct/η1, (20c)

B2 =(−ζD e− j kz,ζz e

− jkz,ζn1

ct +ξD e− j kz,ξz ej

kz,ξn1

ct)

/η2, (20d)

where the subscripts i, ζ and ξ correspond to the earlier(incident), later-backward and later-forward waves, respec-tively [Fig. 11(b)]. The unknown later-backward and later-forward coefficients, ζD and ξD , are then found by insertingthese relations into the boundary conditions [Eqs. (13b)]

D1|ct=ct0 = D2|ct=ct0 and B1|ct=ct0 = B2|ct=ct0 , (21)

15We use here the space-harmonic, or plane wave, complex dependencee− j kz z , corresponding to the temporal expressions e jωt and e− jωt for theforward and backward waves, respectively.

which yields the less known pure-time D-related scatteringcoefficients

ζD = η2 −η1

2η1and ξD = η1 +η2

2η1. (22)

The asymmetry between these relations and the pure-space scattering coefficients (18) is due to the asymmetrybetween the space and time scattering phenomenology,which is apparent in Fig. 11 and which is itself due tocausality: since scattering back to the past is impossible,the mathematically correct trajectory pointing towards thebottom-right direction in both Fig. 11(a) and Fig. 11(b) isphysically unacceptable (which is why it is not drawn). Asresult, given the π/2 angle difference between pure-spaceand pure-time discontinuities, the former case involvesone scattered wave in medium 1 (the reflected wave) andone scattered waves in medium 2 (the transmitted wave),whereas the latter case has the two scattered waves (later-forward and later-backward) in medium 2.

The E-related form of the pure-time scattering param-eters (22), more appropriate for combination with thepure-space scattering parameters (18), are simply found bysubstituting D1,2 = ε1,2E1,2 and B1,2 =µ1,2B1,2 in (19) to (21),which yields [68]

ζ= n1

n2

η2 −η1

2η1and ξ= n1

n2

η1 +η2

2η1, (23)

where n1,2 =pε1,2µ1,2.

The problem of scattering by a pure-time slab is thensolved by applying boundary conditions of the type (21)at each of the two interfaces of the slab with the properfield expressions involving the scattering coefficients (22)or (23) [63]. The corresponding direct spacetime repre-sentation is shown in Fig. 12(b). This representation isfundamentally different from its pure-space counterpart inFig. 12(a): it involves a finite number of scattering events,and only 4 trajectory contributions in the global later-backward and later-forward coefficients, Z and Ξ.

C. Spacetime Medium

We have now the required tools to solve the mostfundamental spacetime problem associated with spacetimemetamaterials: the scattering of waves by a spacetime dis-continuity, represented in Fig. 13. The fact that, as pointedout in Sec. V, the pure-space interface is the vm = 0 limit ofa subluminal interface while the pure-time interface is thevm →∞ limit of a superluminal interface suggests that thereare fundamental similarities between a subluminal space-time interface and a pure-space interface and between asuperluminal spacetime interface and a pure-time interface.Indeed, comparing Figs. 9 and 11 reveals that the formerboth support reflected and transmitted (or refracted) waves,as shown in Fig. 13(a), while the latter both support later-backward and later-forward waves, as shown in Fig. 13(b)16.We therefore sometimes refer to a subluminal discontinuity

16In fact, there is an intermediate regime between the subluminal andsuperluminal regimes, specifically in the velocity interval c/n2 < vm < c/n1,assuming n2 > n1, called the interluminal regime. Here, we do not considerthis regime, whose phenomenology is described in [69], [70].

Page 12

as space-like and to a superluminal discontinuity as time-like, and we will be able to solve each problem from itslimit counterpart.

(a) (b)

zz

ctct

z ′z ′

ct ′ct ′

z ′0

ct ′0

ǫ1,µ1

ǫ1,µ1ǫ2,µ2

ǫ2,µ2

ii

γ τξζ

n1

n1

n1

n2n2n2

Fig. 13. Scattering in spacetime discontinuities between two electromag-netic media of permittivities and permeabilities (ε1,µ1) and (ε2,µ2). Herevm > 0 (in contrast to the case of Fig. 9); the wave and the interface are co-directional. (a) Subluminal (space-like) spacetime step discontinuity, withincident (iW), reflected (γ) and transmitted (τ) waves. (b) Superluminal(time-like) spacetime step discontinuity, with incident (i) or earlier, later-backward (ζ) and later-forward (ξ) waves.

Let us start with the subluminal interface [Fig. 13(a)].Here, the interface is static, or pure-space, at z ′ = z ′

0, in theprimed frame [see Fig. 9(a)], and we can therefore apply thepure-space boundary conditions (13a) in that frame, i.e.,

E ′1

∣∣z ′=z ′0

= E ′2

∣∣z ′=z ′0

and H ′1

∣∣z ′=z ′0

= H ′2

∣∣z ′=z ′0

. (24)

Following the prescriptions in Sec. IV-C, we next substitutethe primed fields in these relations by their unprimedcounterparts, provided by (9). This leads, upon settingv = vf = vm, canceling the Lorentz factor appearing on bothsides, and setting D1,2 = ε1,2E1,2 and B1,2 = µ1,2H1,2 for amodulated17 interface, to

E1 − vm(µ1H1)∣∣

z ′=z ′0= E2 − vm(µ2H2)

∣∣z ′=z ′0

, (25)

H1 − vm(ε1E1)|z ′=z ′0= H2 − vm(ε2E2)|z ′=z ′0

. (26)

Substituting in these relations the fields E1,2 and H1,2 bytheir pure-space expressions (16) finally provides the sub-luminal interface reflection and transmission coefficients

γ= η2 −η1

η1 +η2

(1−n1vm/c

1+n1vm/c

)and τ= 2η2

η1 +η2

(1−n1vm/c

1−n2vm/c

),

(27)with v1,2 = c/n1,2, which properly reduce to (18) at vm = 0.The first of these equations indicates that increasing vm de-creases γ, which makes intuitive sense since as the interfacemoves faster co-directionally with the wave, the scatteringgets weaker, as in the collision of two co-directionaly versuscontra-directionally driving cars. The dependence of τ onvm is less pronounced and more subtle.

The subluminal scattering coefficients (27) correspondto the co-directional problem where the incident wave(v1,i > 0) and the medium (vm > 0) propagate in the samedirection. The contra-directional problem, corresponding tothe situation in Fig. 9(a) with the medium moving in thedirection opposite to the wave (vm < 0), is quite differ-ent, due to the breaking of spacetime symmetry. Noting

17In the case of a moving interface, the constitutive relations wouldtypically be expressed in the primed frame, where matter is not moving,and where the medium is hence most often monoisotropic.

the co-directional coefficients (27) γ+ and τ+, the contra-directional coefficients γ− and τ− are obtained from themby simply exchanging n1 and n2 and reversing the sign ofvm [39].

Let us now consider the superluminal interface[Fig. 13(b)]. Here, the interface is instantaneous, or pure-time, at ct ′ = ct ′0, in the primed frame [see Fig. 9(b)], andwe therefore apply the pure-time boundary conditions 13bin that frame, i.e.,

D ′1

∣∣ct ′=ct ′0

= D ′2

∣∣ct ′=ct ′0

and B ′1

∣∣ct ′=ct ′0

= B ′2

∣∣ct ′=ct z ′0

. (28)

Following the prescriptions in Sec. IV-C, we next substitutethe primed fields in these relations by their unprimedcounterparts, provided by (9). This leads, upon settingv = vf = c2/vm, canceling the Lorentz factor appearing onboth sides, and setting E1,2 = D1,2/ε1,2 and H1,2 = B1,2/µ1,2

for (again) a modulated interface, to

D1 − (vm/c2)B1/µ1∣∣ct ′=ct ′0

= D2 − (vm/c2)B2/H2∣∣ct ′=ct ′0

,

(29)

B1 − (vm/c2)D1/ε1∣∣ct ′=ct ′0

= B2 − (vm/c2)D2/ε2∣∣ct ′=ct ′0

. (30)

Substituting in these relations the fields D1,2 and B1,2 bytheir pure-time expressions (20) finally provides the (E-related) superluminal interface later-backward and later-forward scattering coefficients

ζ= η1 −η2

2η1

(1−n1vm/c

1+n2vm/c

)and ξ= η1 +η2

2η1

(1−n1vm/c

1−n2vm/c

),

(31)which properly reduce to (22) at vm →∞. The first of theseequations indicates that increasing vm decreases ζ, whichmakes intuitive sense for the same reason as given above forγ decreasing with increasing vm, since ζ also correspondsto some kind of reflection, with the wave being sent backtowards the source due to the time discontinuity.

The contra-directional superluminal scattering coeffi-cients, ζ− and ξ−, are obtained from their co-directionalcounterparts, ζ+ and ξ+, by only reversing the sign ofvm [39], assuming that the early medium is still medium 1.

In this section, we have considered only straight, orlinear, spacetime interface trajectories, (ct ) = (c/vm)z withvm = constant [Figs. 9 and 13], i.e., interfaces with constant(or uniform) velocity. However, spacetime interfaces may becurved, as shown in the left-most bottom panel of Fig. 10,which corresponds to a variable velocity, vm = vm(z, t ),and hence to an accelerated interface, ∂vm/∂t = a(z, t ) 6= 0,where a(z, t ) is the acceleration. For instance, a uniformlyaccelerated interface, i.e., and interface with accelerationa(t ) = a0 (constant) or velocity vm(t ) = a0t (assumingvm(0) = 0), would correspond to the curved trajectory(ct ) =±(c/

pa0)

pz [71], [72]. In such a case, the scattering

coefficients (27) and (31), become naturally spacetime-dependent, i.e., (γ,τ,ζ,ξ) = (γ,τ,ζ,ξ)(z, t ), and the Lorentztransformations (Sec. IV-B), which are restricted to uniform-velocity systems, i.e. special relativity [45], are not applica-ble here anymore. One may then either solve the problemclassically using Maxwell equation or, more efficiently andore elegantly, by using the tools of general relativity [58](differential geometry).

Page 13

VII. FREQUENCY TRANSITIONS

A. Pure-Space Medium

The determination of the electromagnetic frequency tran-sitions for a pure-space discontinuity are usually not ex-plicitly mentioned in textbooks, where they are generallytaken for granted, and not even being called by a specificname. Since the wavelength gets compressed in the densermedium, the scattered wavenumber, kz , obviously increasesin that medium, while the scattered frequency, ω, can onlybe conserved, given the absence of nonlinearity. Let usnevertheless address here this problem from a rigorouspoint of view, again for completeness and insight.

Such a treatment was already initiated in the pure-space fields given by (16), where, avoiding any a prioriassumption, we have admitted the possibility of havingdifferent temporal frequencies, ωγ and ωτ, in media 1 and 2.It is the fact that the boundary conditions (17) must hold forall times that implies ωτ =ωi, or ∆ω=ωτ−ωi = 0. Indeed,a purely spatial discontinuity cannot induce any temporalfrequency transformation. At the same time, these bound-ary conditions lead to spatial frequency transformations,corresponding to the traditional phase matching condition.Specifically, we find from solving (17)

ωγ =ωτ =ωi (∆ω= 0), (32a)

kz,γ =−kz,i and kz,τ =n2

n1kzi, (32b)

where the reflected spatial frequency, kz,γ, is equal to theincident spatial frequency, kzi, since reflection occurs inthe same medium, while the transmitted spatial frequency,kz,τ, gets compressed or expanded depending on whetherthe second medium is denser or rarer.

In terms of the frequency transitions discussed inSec. III-A, the pure-space discontinuity relations (32) trans-late into the dispersion-diagram horizontal transitions rep-resented in Fig. 14(a). Such transitions correspond to con-served temporal frequency (∆ω= 0), and involve the trans-formation from the incident wave at kz,i to the reflectedwaves at kz,γ and to the transmitted wave at kz,τ.

(a) (b)

kzkz

ω/cω/c

iiγ τ

kz,i kz,τkz,γ

ωi/c

ωi/cωξ/c

−ωζ/c

kz,i

ζ

ξ

∆ω= 0 ∆kz = 01/n1

1/n2

−1/n1

−1/n2

Fig. 14. Pure spacetime frequency transitions between two electromagneticmedia, corresponding to Fig. 11. The gray and brown lines correspondto the dispersion relations of media 1 and 2, respectively. (a) Horizontaltransition in the pure-space step discontinuity, corresponding to Fig. 11(a).(b) Vertical transition in the pure-time step discontinuity, correspondingto Fig. 11(b).

B. Pure-Time Medium

The determination of the electromagnetic frequency tran-sitions for a pure-time discontinuity may be rigorouslycomputed from the pure-time fields given by (20), where,avoiding again any a priori assumption, we have admittedthe possibility of having different spatial frequencies, kz,i

and kz,ζ, kz,ξ, in media 1 and 2. This time, the boundaryconditions, given by (21), must hold for all positions, whichimplies that kz,ζ = kz,ξ = kz,i, or ∆kz = kz,ζ − kz,i = kz,ξ −kz,i = 0. Indeed, a purely temporal discontinuity cannotinduce any spatial frequency transformation. At the sametime, these boundary conditions lead to temporal frequencytransformations. Specifically, we find form solving (21) [68]

kz,ζ = kz,ξ = kz,i (∆kz = 0) (33a)

ωζ =−n1

n2ωi and ωξ =

n1

n2ωi, (33b)

where both the later-backward and the later-forward tem-poral frequencies are different from the incident one, sincethe both propagate in the second medium, and bothundergo the same frequency expansion or compressiondepending on whether the second medium is denser orrarer.

In terms of the frequency transitions discussed inSec. III-A, the pure-time discontinuity relations (33) trans-late into the dispersion-diagram vertical transitions rep-resented in Fig. 14(b). Such transitions correspond toconserved spatial frequency (∆kz = 0), and involve thetransformation from the incident frequency at ωi/c to thelater-forward positive frequency at ωξ/c and later-backwardfrequency at ωζ/c.

Note that the generation of the new temporal frequen-cies in a time discontinuity occurs without resorting tononlinearity. The new frequencies are indeed produced bythe product of the time-varying constitutive parametersand the time-varying excitation fields in the time-varyingversion of (3b), rather than from field intensity-dependentconstitutive parameters. The physical process that inducesthe modulation is typically nonlinear, but the assumedsmall-signal regime, where the wave fields are much weakerthan the modulation pump, ensures linearity, with thefundamental benefit of the response being independentfrom the incident wave intensity, as long as it is sufficientlysmaller than that of the pump. Note also that, in contrastto horizontal transitions, vertical transitions are energy non-conservative operations18, where energy is injected into ortaken away from the wave by the external source of themodulation. A time-varying system can therefore involveinstability and produce gain or attenuation, as will be seenin Sec. X.

C. Spacetime Medium

As the spacetime scattering coefficients, the spacetimefrequency transitions can be obtained from their pure-space

18This is fundamentally incarnated in the de Broglie relation (∆E =ħ∆ω,E : energy), which states that a difference in frequency corresponds to atransfer of energy.

Page 14

counterparts in the subluminal case and from their pure-time counterparts in the superluminal case.

In the subluminal case, the interface is static, or pure-space, in the primed frame, where it can therefore betreated exactly as in Sec. VII-A, i.e., from (32a),

ω′γ =ω′

τ =ω′i (∆ω′ = 0). (34)

We then simply substitute the second relation of (8a) in thisequation to find the temporal-frequency result

ωγ =1−n1vm/c

1+n1vm/cωi and ωτ =

1−n1vm/c

1−n2vm/cωi, (35)

from which the spatial-frequency results is obtained, bysubstituting ω= ckz /n for each wave, as

kz,γ =1−n1vm/c

1+n1vm/ckz,i and kz,τ =

n2

n1

1−n1vm/c

1−n2vm/cωz,i, (36)

and the contra-directional result is obtained again by ex-changing n1 and n2 and by reversing the sign of vm.

This result may also be found geometrically and inter-preted graphically with the inverse spacetime scattering ofFig. 15(a), which now displays oblique space-like transitions.In the co-directional situation corresponding to this figure,the reflected temporal frequency (ωγ) is lower than theincident temporal frequency (ωi), in agreement with (35)and with the Doppler effect for a receding moving reflector,while the figure reveals that the transmitted temporal fre-quency (ωτ) is higher than the incident temporal frequency.It may be easily understood from the graph, that thetransmitted frequency is up-shifted if the second mediumis denser (as here) and down-shifted if it is rarer (mediumdispersion curve between the vertical and medium 1 dis-persion curve).

(a) (b)

kzkz

ω/cω/c

k ′zk ′

z

ω′/cω′/c

ii

γ

τ

k ′z,i

k ′zγ

k ′zτ

ω′i/c

ωi/cωi/c

ωγ/c

ωτ/c

ωξ/c

ωζ/c k ′z,i

ζ

ξ

∆ω′ = 0 ∆k ′z = 0

Fig. 15. Spacetime frequency transitions between two electromagneticmedia, corresponding to the co-directional situation of Fig. 13. (a) Sub-luminal step discontinuity, corresponding to Fig. 13(a). (b) Superluminalstep discontinuity, corresponding to Fig. 13(b).

In the superluminal case, the interface is dually instan-taneous, or pure time, in the primed frame, where it cantherefore be treated exactly as in Sec. VII-B, i.e., from (33a),

k ′z,ζ = k ′

z,τ = k ′z,i (∆k ′

z = 0). (37)

We then simply substitute the first relation of (8a) in thisequation to find the spatial-frequency result

kz,ζ =1− c/(n1vm)

1+ c/(n2vm)kz,i and kz,ξ =

1− c/(n1vm)

1− c/(n2vm)kz,i, (38)

from which the temporal-frequency result is obtained, bysubstituting kz = nω/c for each wave, as

ωζ =−1− (n1vm)/c

1+ (n2vm)/cωi and ωξ =

1− (n1vm)/c

1− (n2vm)/cωi, (39)

where the contra-directional results are obtained again bysimply reversing the sign of vm.

As for the subluminal case, this result may also be foundgeometrically and interpreted graphically, this time with theinverse spacetime scattering of Fig. 15(b), which displaysoblique time-like transitions. In the co-directional situa-tion, corresponding to this figure, the lower later-backwardtemporal frequency (ωζ) and a lower later-forward tem-poral frequency (ωξ) are both lower than the incident orearlier frequency (ωi) due to the higher density of thelater medium, whereas a lower-density later medium wouldproduce larger scattered frequencies.

In the case of an accelerated interface, mentioned in thelast paragraph of Sec. VI-C in connection with the scatteringcoefficients, the frequency transitions can generally not bededuced from the uniform-interface frequency transitions[Eqs. (35), (36), (38) and (39)], due to the fundamentalindeterminacy associated with the uncertainty principle,∆t ·∆ω > π and ∆kz ·∆z > π (Sec. II-D). However, this canstill be approximately done in the particular case wherethe variation spacetime scale of the medium variation ismuch smaller than the smallest spacetime frequency of thewave, in which case the variation of the scattered frequencyis called a chirp, whose instantaneous frequency can besimply obtained by substituting vm = constant by vm(t )in (35), (36), (38) and (39),

VIII. SPACETIME REVERSAL AND COMPANSION

The oldest reference to spacetime reversal might be theLoschmidt paradox [73]. In 1876, Loschmidt argued that ifthe velocities of all the particles of a system evolving intime were reversed, all of these particles would naturallyreturn to their previous positions, as a movie played backreturns to previous scenes [74]. Such reversibility is gener-ally forbidden by the second law of thermodynamics, whereinelastic collisions, due to random thermal fluctuations, in-duce irreversible heat dissipation19 [75]. However, the basiclaws of physics are time-reversal symmetric [Ψ(−t ) =Ψ(t ),with Ψ(t ) being the operator describing the time evolutionof the physical system], in the absence of external forces; forinstance, Maxwell equations [Eqs. (11)] are invariant undertime-reversal [36], and it is only the constitutive-relation[Eq. (3b)] decomposition of D and B in terms of E and Hthat possibly induces irreversibility, via loss or bias presentin the constitutive parameters [49]. If dissipation is moder-ate, time reversal is practically realizable, and it has beenabundantly applied for wave focusing in ultrasonics andelectromagnetics, using arrays of transducers (engineers’“Loschmidt demons”) properly distributed on a Hugyenssurface around the source [76], [77].

19Dissipation loss could only be compensated by gain, but this wouldrequire an external source of energy, which, by definition, is not presentin a closed system.

Page 15

Time reversal is a particular incarnation of the moregeneral concept of phase conjugation [78]. What producesfocusing is the inversion of the phase, φ= k · r−ωt , whichdoes not only include a time part [−ωt = (∂φ/∂t )t ], but alsoa space part [k · r = (∇rφ) · r], so reversal effects may occurnot only via time but also via space and, more generally, viaboth space and time, or spacetime, and spacetime systemsinvolve a diversity of extra phenomena, that may generallybe referred to as compansion, a portemanteau representing– positive or negative20 – compression or expansion [79],particularly useful in real-time wave processing [29], [80].

Figure 16 presents a general perspective of spacetime re-versal and compansion of a pulse wave at a spacetime (step)interface in the direct spacetime21. In such a problem, thespacetime-diagram graphical tool is particularly efficient,as it provides a visual perspective of the overall physics.This section restricts to (1+1)D pulse compansion, whilespacetime focusing for a (2+1)D system will be addressedin Sec. IX-A. We shall also quantify compansion, beyond thequalitative geometrical results of the figure, in terms of thevariation of the spacetime spectra induced by the disconti-nuity, in reference to the results of Sec. VII. Fundamentally,increasing (resp. decreasing) the inverse spacetime variables(kz and ω) by a given factor increases (resp. decreases)the spacetime spectra (∆kz and ∆ω) and hence decreases(resp. increases) the corresponding spacetime support (∆zand ∆t ) by the same factor, that we shall refer to here asthe compansion factor, αχ, with χ = γ,τ,ζ,ξ, with valuesrespectively given by Eqs. (32), (33), (35)-(36) and (38)-(39) for the pure-space, pure-time, subluminal spacetimeand superluminal spacetime cases. To avoid overcrowding,Fig. 16 explicitly gives the expressions of these factors onlyfor the pure-space and pure-time problems, those for thesubluminal and superluminal spacetime problems beingaccessible in (35)-(36) and (38)-(39).

Let us now describe the different cases of Fig. 16. Inthe pure-space interface problem, shown in Fig. 16(a), theincident pulse is space-reversed upon reflection and space-compressed (resp. space-expanded) upon transmission forincidence to a denser (resp. rarer) medium; in contrast,the temporal waveform undergoes neither reversal norcompansion, due to the absence of time discontinuity. Inthe pure-time interface problem, shown in Fig. 16(b), theincident pulse is time-expanded (resp. time-compressed) bythe same factor for the later-backward and later-forwardwaves for incidence to a denser (resp. rarer) medium,with the later-backward wave being also time-reversed,while the spatial waveform undergoes neither reversal norcompansion due to the absence of space discontinuity.

Spacetime compansion is more complex than pure-spaceand pure-time compansion because it involves both spa-tial and temporal reversal and compansion. In the sub-luminal spacetime interface problem, shown in Fig. 16(c),

20Negative compansion is equivalent to compansion and (space, timeor spacetime) reversal.

21The inverse spacetime representation counterpart of Fig. 16, corre-sponding to Fig. 8(b) versus Fig. 8(a), can be obtained by the Fourier-transformed version of (9) and (10), and would naturally provide acomplementary spacetime frequency perspective.

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

z

z

z

z

ctct

ct ct

n1 n2

ψ(z)ψ(z)

ψ(z)

ψ(αγz) ψ(ατz)

αγ =−1 ατ = n2/n1

ψ(ct )

ψ(ct )

ψ(ct )

ψ(αζ)ψ(αξ)

αζ =−n1/n2 αξ = n1/n2

αγ,kz

αγ,ω

ατ,kz ατ,ωψ(ct )

ψ(ct )

(n2 > n1)

∆z

∆(ct )

αζ,ω

αξ,kz

αζ,kz

αξ,ω

Fig. 16. Spacetime reversal and pulse compansion (reflection or expan-sion) at an interface between two electromagnetic media of refractiveindices n1 and n2, here with n2 > n1 and co-directionality [sgn(vm) =sgn(vwave)] in the spacetime cases. The variable αχ (χ = γ,τ,ζ,ξ) isthe compansion factor, whose negativeness corresponds to reversal. Thespacetime evolution of the pulse is easily understood by following thetrajectory of specific points of the pulse. (a) Pure-space interface. (b) Pure-time interface. (c) Subluminal spacetime interface. (d) Superluminal space-time interface.

the reflected wave is space-reversed and space-expanded(resp. space-compressed) and time-expanded (resp. time-compressed) for incidence to a co-directional (resp. contra-directional) medium; on the other hand, the transmit-ted wave is space-compressed (resp. space-expanded) andtime-compressed (resp. time-expanded) for incidence to adenser (resp. rarer) medium. The problem of the superlu-minal spacetime interface, shown in Fig. 16(d), is left as anexercise to the reader.

IX. NEW PHYSICS

A. Mirror and Cavity

In the previous three sections (Secs. VI, VII and VIII), wehave restricted our attention to the problem of scatteringby spacetime interfaces between two semi-infinite media,as the building bricks of any spacetime metamaterial. Weshall now address the problem of scattering, and morespecifically, of reflection – meant here to encompass bothsubluminal reflected waves (space reflection) and super-luminal later-backward waves (“time reflection”) – from aspacetime slab in free space (or in a simple host medium),and explore related exotic physical effects. We will mostlyconsider the transformation of the angular spectrum, with

Page 16

applications such as real-time imaging or radiotherapy inmind.

Specifically, we shall consider a slab that is thin interms of its spacetime length-duration dimensions, (`,d),i.e., (`,d) ¿ (λ,T ), where λ and T are respectively thesmallest wavelength and the smallest period of the spatialand temporal spectra of the incident-early wave. Given itsdeeply subwavelength and subperiod feature, the slab doesnot support any Fabry-Perot resonance, and the transmit-ted or later-forward – or, globally, ‘transmitted’ – fractionof the energy therefore propagates as if no slab existed.The whole physical interest resides thus in the reflectionphenomenology. Consequently, the reflection coefficients,γ [first relations in (18) or (27)] and ζ [first relations in (23)or (31)], should be maximized to avoid functional loss;this is achieved by using the most abrupt possible slabinterfaces, namely the step interfaces considered in theprevious sections. In the following, the slab is assumedto move at the velocity vm in the negative z direction(vm =−|vm|z).

Let us first consider an incident-early plane wave prop-agating in the direction k0, i.e. a wave with the trivialspatial spectrum δ(k − k0), corresponding to the angleθ = sin−1(kx /k0) with respect to the normal of the slab. Thelimit case of a stationary or static slab (vm = 0) reducesto the problem of conventional specular reflection, alreadydescribed by Euclides 300 BC. The problem of a subluminalslab (vm < c) essentially corresponds to the Bradely-Einsteinaberration phenomenon (Sec. III-A), where the specularlyreflected wave deflects towards the normal of a contra-directional slab as its velocity increases towards c (|vm|→ c).We recently extended this problem to a superluminal slabin [63]. In this case, the “reflected” wave is slower than thecontra-directional slab; therefore, it passes across it, andthe later-backward wave propagates backward, towards thesource, at the other side of the slab. We found that as theslab velocity increases beyond the speed of light towardsinfinity (c < |vm| → ∞), the later-backward wave (at theother side of the slab) eventually returns exactly backwardto the source, as expected, in the limit (vm) of a pure-timeslab.

We are now prepared to address the more involvedproblem of scattering of a circular (or spherical) wave froma spacetime slab, which is depicted in Fig. 17. Let us start,as usual, with the subluminal case, represented here inFig. 17(a). The trajectory of a circular wave correspondsto the free-space cone of the spacetime diagram [seeFig. 5)(a)]. On the other hand, the thin slab, essentiallycorresponds plane rotated about the x axis and with aslope of c/|vm|, with c/|vm| > 1, in the (ct , z) plane [seeFig. 9(a)]. Therefore, the scattering events coincide withthe intersection of the incident-wave cone and of the slabplane, which, according to the analytic-geometry theory ofconic section [81], forms a hyperbola, with the origin of thecone, and hence the wave source, coinciding with one ofthe foci of the hyperbola. The subluminal slab is thereforea hyperbolic mirror, which diffracts the incident wave, asshown in the figure, with the virtual source of the reflectedwave placed at the other focus of the hyperbola.

r

(a) (b)

(c)

x

x

x

x

z

z

z

z

ctct

z ′

ct ′

slabslab

vm

t

ct0

γct0

focus

1 2 3 4 5 6

Fig. 17. Reflection of a circular (or spherical) wave by a thin (deeplysubwavelength and subperiod) penetrable spacetime slab [63]. (a) Sublu-minal slab: hyperbolic-mirror diffraction. (b) Superluminal slab: elliptic-cavity shifted focusing. (c) Full-wave simulated shifted focusing by thesuperluminal slab of (b), represented by the vertical white line, at thefollowing instants, from left to right: 1) before scattering, 2) when the slabreaches the source origin (t0), 3) when the slab has almost crossed theentire pulse, 4) after crossing, 5) at the focus time, 6) after focusing.

Figure 17 represents the case of a superluminal slab.The intersection with the circular-wave cone and the planeof the slab, with slope c/|vm|, is now, according to thetheory of conical sections [81], an ellipse, with the originof the cone or wave source coinciding with one of thefoci of the ellipse. The superluminal slab is therefore anelliptic cavity, which reflects, or focuses, the incident wave,as shown in the figure, at the other focus of the ellipse.Such shifted focusing may be considered as a spacetimegeneralization of the pure-time time-reversal focusing [77].Snapshots of the shifted focusing are shown in Fig. 17(c),where, as in the case of the plane wave, the “reflected”wave (or the later-backward wave) has passed to the otherside of the slab. Note that the focal point is shifted withrespect to the source origin by the amount γct0 in thedirection of the slab propagation, where t0 is the time whenthe slab passes across the source origin. Formulas for thetemporal frequency transformations of the reflected waveare available in [63].

B. Inverse Prim and Chromatic Birefringence

The spacetime mirror and cavity presented in Sec. IX-Aare based on spacetime reflection and later-backward prop-agation, or global reflection. We shall now present another

Page 17

new physical phenomenon, that is based on spacetimetransmission and later-forward propagation, or global trans-mission: the inverse prism. The principle of this device,which was introduced in [82], is described in Fig. 18, where‘inverse’ is meant here in reference – or duality – withthe Newton prism effect. Given its transmissive nature, thisphenomenon would require, for minimal functional loss, tomaximize the transmission coefficients τ [second relationsin (18) or (27)] and ξ [second relations in (23) or (31)], whichcan be perfectly achieved (up to zero reflection) by using asufficiently tapered spacetime transition22.

(a)(a) (b)

(c) (d)

z

x

airglass

Newtonprism

Inverseprism

SYMMETRY

BREAKING

space:n(r)

time:n(t )

FREQUENCY

DISPERSION

time:n(ω)

space:n(k)

DECOM-POSITION

time→space:k(ω) :ω→ k

space→time:ω(k) : k →ω

Fig. 18. Concept of the inverse prism [82]. (a) Conventional Newton prism.(b) Duality between the Newton prism and the inverse prism. (c) Circularwave propagation, with single temporal frequency, ω = ω0, representedhere by the green color, before the time discontinuity. (d) Transformation ofthe wave in (c) after temporal transition to a spatially dispersive medium,with decomposition of the spatial frequencies into temporal frequencies,ω=ω(k), distinguished here by the different colors.

The conventional prism, represented in Fig. 18(a), is atransparent device that decomposes incident white lightinto its constituent colors by refracting them into differentdirections. This effect was explained by Newton in hisbook Opticks [84] to be caused by the frequency dispersivenature of the glass medium forming the prism, whereby therefractive index is a function of frequency. From a generalspacetime viewpoint, the Newton prism is, as mentioned inthe first column of the table in Fig. 18(b), a device whoseoperation results from a combination of spatial-symmetrybreaking (n(r), corresponding to the air-glass interface) andtemporal-frequency dispersion (n(ω), frequency dispersionof the glass pointed out by Newton), which decomposesthe temporal frequencies of the incident temporal-spectrumbroadband wave into spatial frequencies (k(ω) :ω→ k).

In [82], we addressed the following fundamental ques-tion: can spacetime be manipulated so as to provide

22The concept of spacetime tapering is a fundamental generalization ofthe well-known concept of space tapering, which is abundantly used inelectromagnetics engineering for matching [83].

the inverse properties of the Newton prism? The devicerealizing such a feat would exhibit the dual propertieslisted in the second column of the table in Fig. 18(b): itsoperation would result from a combination of temporal-symmetry breaking [n(t )] and spatial-frequency dispersion[n(k)], and would decompose the spatial frequencies ofthe earlier spatial-spectrum broadband wave into temporalfrequencies (ω(k) : k →ω). We showed that such a device isindeed possible [82], as we shall next explain how.

Temporal-symmetry breaking is precisely what happensat a pure-time interface (Secs. VI-B and VII-B), which isrealized by switching between an earlier medium and alater different medium, for instance by ionizing a plasma,exciting a nonlinearity, producing a shock wave or modu-lating an array of vacactors. Since the sought after effect ishere transmissive, this switching should ideally be a smoothtapered time transition, as mentioned above, rather thanan abrupt time step. This is an advantageous feature ofthe inverse prism since slow time variations are practicallyeasier to produce than fast ones.

On the other hand, spatial-frequency dispersion may beachieved by a uniaxial medium (e.g. a 2D-lattice wire-likemedium), of tensorial refractive index n = diagnt ,nt ,nz ,where nt and nz are the refractive indices of the (assumednonmagnetic) medium along the transverse (x, y) and longi-tudinal (z) directions of the medium, respectively. In such amedium (see coordinate system in Fig. 18), an s-wave (E‖z)sees only the refractive index nt , and hence undergoes thesimple isotropic Doppler shift ωs

2 = c√

(kx /nt )2 + (kz /nt )2 =(n1/nt )ω1, where ω1 is the frequency of the earlier wave.In contrast, a p-wave (E‖(x, y)-plane) sees a combina-tion of the refractive indices nt and nz , leading to theanisotropic frequency shift ω

p2 = c

√(kx /nt )2 + (kz /nz )2 =√

(ωx /nt )2 + (ωz /nz )2. The overall phenomenon is illus-trated in Figs. 18(c) and 18(d), which represent circularpropagation of a monochromatic wave before and afterthe time transition from an earlier isotropic medium to alater spatially dispersive medium, for the p-polarization.This effect might find a diversity of applications in optics.Given the fact that only one of the polarizations under-goes frequency decomposition into temporal frequencies,it may be referred to as chromatic birefringence23. Thiseffect also bears some spacetime duality with the Snell law,whereby spatial transformations are replaced by temporaltransformations. Although we have discussed here a pure-time transition, a spacetime transition would be interestingto study, and would surely lead to even more exotic effects.

C. Crystals

Section IX-A, on the spacetime mirror and cavity, dealtwith a spacetime reflective slab, while Sec. IX-B, on theinverse prism, dealt with a spacetime transmissive interface.Arguably, neither of these two systems corresponds to afull-fledged metamaterial. In contrast, this section describesspacetime periodic structures or crystals [39], [65], [85], [86],

23An interesting effect associated to this chromatic birefringence isthe fact the polarization of the a mixed s, p-wave follows a Lissajouspolarization trajectory [82].

Page 18

which may be considered as real spacetime metamaterialsystems, with much greater complexity and richer physics.Such crystals, which are generically represented in theright-most middle panel of Fig. 10, may be considered asgeneralizations of the pure-space periodic structures andphotonic crystals [87], [88] and of the pure-time periodicstructures and systems [56], [89].

Spacetime crystals may be (1+1)D, (2+1)D or (3+1)D,where the dimension refers here to the periodicity ratherthan the structure itself; for instance, (1+1)D refers to acrystal with monodimensional spatial and temporal pe-riodicity whose structure can extend in the three (vol-ume) dimensions of space and support tridimensionalwave propagation. We shall restrict here our attentionto unbounded crystals, the truncation of spacetime crys-tals being a relatively complex matter, which is treatedelsewhere [39]. Our study of these unbounded spacetimecrystals will be largely based on the dispersion diagramsthat are plotted in Fig. 19 using a spacetime extensionof the transmission matrix technique combined with theFloquet-Bloch theorem [39], [65]. We also restrict here ourattention to spacetime-modulated crystals, without cover-ing their spacetime-moving (Secs. II-A) counterparts [90],which would be probably less amenable to electromagnetictechnology (Sec. III-C).

Conventional photonic crystals are pure-space periodicstructures, whose periodicity may be 1D, 2D or 3D [88], cor-responding to 1, 5 and 14 possible distinct (Bravais) latticestructures, respectively [91]. They have been used in a greatdiversity of applications, including low-loss waveguides andcavities [88], diffraction gratings [29], spatial filters [92], andmultifunctional metasurfaces [17]–[19]. Since they do notinvolve any time variation, they are energy conservative(∆E ∝ ∆ω = 0) and only alter the spatial spectrum, ormomentum, of waves (∆k 6= 0). They exhibit a horizontalω−k bandgap structure, whose stopband complex-numbertemporal frequencies corresponds to reflection-type atten-uation.

A subluminal spacetime crystal, whose (1+1)D diagramis shown in Fig. 19(a), is a generalization of a pure-spacecrystal [39], [85], [93]. Such a crystal exhibits the samespatial-lattice diversity as a pure-space crystal along withthe additional time periodicity. In contrast to its pure-spacecounterpart, it exhibits an oblique bandgap structure (dis-persion curves, gaps and Brillouin zone), and is energy non-conservative, due temporal variation. Given the breaking ofspacetime symmetry, it is fundamentally nonreciprocal [49],[93], and may therefore be used to realize magnetlessnonreciprocal devices [16]. The slopes of the forward andbackward spacetime harmonics in a spacetime crystal aredifferent from each other because of the different averagetimes spent by the wave in the different media composing

(a)

(b)

ω

c

ω

c

k

k

ω′

c

ω′

c

k ′

k ′

vm/c

vm/c

c/(n1n2vm)

c

n1n2vm

ω= v+avk

ω= v+avk

ω= v−avk

ω= v−avk

kB

ωB

c

space-likegap

time-likegap

spac

etim

epe

riod

spacetime period

Fig. 19. Dispersion diagrams of a (1+1)-D bilayer spacetime-modulatedcrystals of equal-electrical-length layers (to avoid extra complexity) withrefractive index ratio n2/n1 = 1.5. The green dashed lines represent theaverage dispersion structure [39]. The black skewed diamond-like structurerepresents the real spacetime frequencies and the blue half ellipsesrepresent the complex spacetime frequencies. (a) Subluminal case, withvm = c/3 (kB = 2π/`B , where `B is the spatial period of the crystal).(b) Superluminal case, with vm = 3c (ωB = 2π/TB , where TB is the temporalperiod of the crystal).

the crystal24. Some periodic acousto-optic and electro-opticsystems are in fact (1+1)D spacetime crystals, although theyhave possibly never been described from such a generalperspective to date. It should be noted that a subluminalcrystal can amplify reflected waves but only attenuatetransmitted waves. This may be shown analytically [39], butalso intuitively understood from the analogy of a surfer whocan be carried by a wave only if it not slower than him.

A superluminal spacetime crystal, whose (1+1)D diagram

24For instance, in a bilayer (1+1)D crystal (case of Fig. 19), in the extremecase where the wave velocity, vwave, is equal to the crystal velocity, vm,and the velocity of one of the media, e.g. v1 = c/n1, i.e., vwave = v1 = vm, apulse wave from medium 1 would always remain in medium 1 in the co-directional regime, leading an an average index of n1, whereas it wouldperiodically cross the two media in the contra-directional regime, andhence experience in this regime an average refractive index depending onthe two media [39].

Page 19

is shown in Fig. 19(b), shares most of the features of itssubluminal counterpart. The most striking difference is thatits gaps are more vertical, which results in a stronger ratioof complex ω versus complex k, as seen by comparing thehalf-ellipses in Figs. 19(b) and 19(a). Moreover, superlu-minal crystals can amplify not only the reflected (contra-directional) wave, but also the transmitted (co-directional)wave [39], which is the effect used in some distributedparametric amplifiers, the circuital counterparts of actual(medium) superluminal spacetime crystals. Finally, whereassubluminal crystals are essentially diffractive, as subluminalslabs (see mirroring in Sec. IX-A), superluminal crystalmight support interesting focusing effects, as superluminalslabs (see focusing in Sec. IX-A), akin to some spacetimegeneralization of Anderson-like localization in photoniccrystals [94]. The pure-time limit case of a superluminalcrystal, which recently even attracted attention as a newpotential state of matter in theoretical physics [95], [96],also prosaically corresponds to the circuital form to alumped parametric amplifier, using a synchronized modu-lation (pump) with frequency at twice the signal frequency.

X. APPLICATIONS

Given their fundamental nature and immense diver-sity, spacetime metamaterials have a potential for virtuallyunlimited applications across the entire electromagneticspectrum, from radio to optics through terahertz, andbeyond electromagnetic waves, with mechanical (acoustic,fluid and seismic) waves, quantum mechanical waves, andgravitational waves. This section lists a number of theseapplications, some of which have been recently reportedand others of which are still only conceptual at this point25.

A. Frequency Multiplication and Mixing

Most modern electromagnetic devices are time-invariant,and their time-invariant nature imposes fundamentalbounds on their properties. This is for instance the caseof frequency multipliers, which are used in terahertz oroptical wave sources [29], [83]. Frequency multipliers maybe categorized as reactive multipliers (based on varactoror step-recovery diodes), resistive multipliers (based onSchottky diodes and other nonlinear I-V elements), ortransistor (FET or BJT) multipliers [83].

Reactive multipliers feature small loss and can theoret-ically reach an efficiency of 100%. However, their poweris distributed among the different harmonics accordingto the time-invariance-based Manley-Row relation [98]∑∞

m=0∑∞

n=−∞mPmn

mω1+nω2= 0, which shows that transferring

100% of the fundamental (m = 0) frequency energy ontothe mth harmonic frequency, i.e., reaching

ηreactive =Pm0

P10→ 1, (40)

implies terminating (shorting or opening, typically withstubs) all the other harmonics, which is a formidable task

25We do not specifically cover the application of amplification because1) it has already been abundantly demonstrated in distributed parametricamplifiers [97] and 2) because it is implicitly inherent to all spacetimesystems.

when m À 1. Moreover, such multipliers suffer from poorbandwidth. Resistive multipliers offer larger bandwidth(with lower efficiency), but their harmonic generation isbound by the time-invariance-based Pantell relation [99]∑∞

m=0∑∞

n=−∞ m2Pmn ≥ 0, which shows that the conversionefficiency of the mth harmonic frequency is restricted as

ηresistive =Pm0

P10≤ 1

m2 , (41)

which is an obvious issue for large values of m. Transistormultipliers can reach efficiencies surpassing 100% whileconsuming smaller DC power, but they have their own time-invariance-related bounds. For instance, for a FET withdrain current waveform iD(t ) = cos(πt/τ)Π(t/τ), where Π(·)is the rectangular pulse function and τ the duration of thedrain current pulse, the conversion efficiency is found fromFourier-series decomposition to scale with m as

Pm0

P10=

[4τ

πT

cos(mπτ/T )

1− (2mτ/T )2

]2

∝ 1

m4 , (42)

where T = 2π/ω1 where ω1 is the fundamental, whichis even worse than the efficiency of resistive multipliers[Eq. (41)] while requiring the same harmonic terminationeffort as reactive multipliers.

Time-variant systems, and hence spacetimemetamaterial-based devices, are not subjected to anyof the aforementioned bounds. Therefore, they intrinsicallybear potential for more efficient and agile multipliers. Inthe (modulated) pulse regime, frequency multiplicationcan be achieved by a simple time discontinuity (seeSecs. VI-B and VII-B), and not only without any spuriousharmonics and unrestricted efficiency, but also witharbitrary anharmonic conversion ratios, α = n1/n2

[Eq. (33b)], depending only on the electromagneticdensities of the two involved media [100]. Alternatively,multiplication can be accomplished by a spacetimemedium (e.g. a spacetime-modulated waveguide structure)with conversion ratio α = 1−(n1vm)/c

1±(n2vm)/c [Eq. (39)] that canbe tuned via vm. In the harmonic regime, frequencymultiplication would require a continuous spacetimeperturbation, and could be realized with a spacetimecrystal structure (Sec. IX-C) [43].

Conventional, time-invariant frequency mixers are re-stricted by similar bounds as frequency multipliers in boththe microwave and optical frequency ranges [29], [83]. Asa result, they produce intermodulation frequencies thatare difficult to suppress when a simple mixing product isrequired, from two (or three) input frequencies to a third(or fourth) one, as for instance in up/down-converters inradio systems and four-wave mixers in nonlinear optics.

Spacetime metamaterial structures can overcome theselimitations in various ways. A first possibility is to use aspacetime periodic waveguide structure with a dispersivebackground medium, i.e., with a refractive index of the form

n(z, t ) = n0(ω)[1+M cos(ωmt −βmz)

], (43)

where βm and ωm are the spatial and temporal modulationfrequencies, respectively, M is the modulation index, andn0(ω) is the background-medium dispersion. In this system,

Page 20

the dispersion curves are engineered in such a way asto support an oblique transition (see Sec. VII-C) to thedesired mixing frequency while avoiding a cascade effectthat would induce spurious intermodulation products [43].Another possibility, in the same vein, is the avoid the har-monic cascade effect with a nonuniform spatial waveguidestructure [101], corresponding to a refractive index of theform

n(z, t ) = n0(z)[1+M cos(ωmt −βmz)

]. (44)

B. Matching and Filtering

Another fundamental bound in electromagnetic devicesis the matching-bandwidth limit, which was introduced byBode [102] and generalized by Fano [103] for passive, linearand time-invariant networks. The Bode-Fano limit may besummarized by the sum-rule [104]ˆ ∞

0f (ω) ln

[1

|Γ(ω)|

]dω<Ωlim, (45)

where |Γ(ω)| is the frequency-dependent magnitude of thereflection coefficient at any port of the network, f (ω) is afrequency function characterizing the network and Ωlim isthe corresponding limit. For instance, in the case of a simpleRC parallel load, we have f (ω) = 1 and Ωlim = π/(RC ), sothat Eq. (45) reduces to

´∞0 ln[1/|Γ(ω)|]dω < π/(RC ). Such

a relation essentially indicates that increasing the band-width (

´∞0 dω) of a network implies decreasing the inverse

of its reflection magnitude (specifically, ln[1/|Γ(ω)]), andhence increasing the reflection level (|Γ(ω)|), i.e., sacrificingmatching. This is the so-called matching-bandwidth limit.This limit explains why a quarter-wave length transformerachieves perfect matching only at one frequency and whyarbitrarily sophisticated matching networks are subjected toa trade-off between the matching flatness and the matchinglevel (and loss, of course), which mathematically corre-spond to tuning f (ω) in (45).

Revoking any of the conditions at the origin of the Bode-Fano limit, and particularly, in our current interest, thecondition of time invariance, naturally removes the limit,and potentially – although without guarantee! – allows toachieve broader bandwidth matching. A heuristic time-variant approach to beat the Bode-Fano limit in the pulseregime would be, using for instance an array of varactors, toswitch the characteristic impedance of the transmission lineto the impedance of the mismatched load before the pulsereaches it, since this would suppress the reflection from thespatial discontinuity on the load. However, the switching in-duces then a temporal discontinuity (see Sec. VI-B), whose‘reflected’ wave [the later-backward wave, corresponding toζ in (23)] might cause even more mismatch than the initialspatial discontinuity. Fortunately, as was shown in [105],the matching efficiency can be optimized in terms ofsource, load and modulation powers, to indeed beat theBode-Fano limit, even when conservatively accounting forthe modulation power in the definition of the efficiency.The result in [105] could be most likely further improvedby replacing the step impedance jump by an optimizedtapered time discontinuity. Note that this approach works

only in the pulse regime, and that, again, a periodic (crystal-type) approach (Sec. IX-C) would be required for the contin-uous wave regime. In this regime, a transmission line withinductance varying as the tangent function so as to emulatea receding load for matching was theoretically presentedin [106].

A matching-network related device that is conventionallylimited by time-invariance is the filter, and particularlymicrowave filters, which have a history of over 100 years ofdevelopment [107], [108]. The quasi-totality of microwavefilters are reflective, i.e., the energy that is prohibitedfrom propagating in the stopbands is reflected towards thesource. In some applications this may cause detuning, spu-rious modulation and even component destruction, hencenecessitating the addition of an isolator in front of the filter,which naturally increases the insertion loss of the overallcircuit.

An alternative approach would be to elaborate absorp-tive filters. Such filters arise as a natural application ofsubluminal codirectional spacetime crystals (see Sec. IX-C),where the stopband energy is taken away from the wave bythe modulator26, and hence dissipated from the viewpointof the filter, instead of being reflected to the source. Theperiodic implementation would only be a starting point. Asin pure-space filters, where spatial periodicity is a very non-optimal way to design filters and aperiodic configurations,such as those obtained with insertion loss method, arepractically largely preferable [83], spacetime periodicity willnot be the optimal way to design such absorptive spacetimefilters. This is an open field of research.

C. Nonreciprocity and Absorption

As pointed out in Sec. III-B, spacetime systems are in-herently nonreciprocal, and space time nonreciprocity rep-resents thus an obvious route to magnetless nonreciproc-ity [16]. Spacetime-based nonreciprocity was first suggestedover 50 years ago, in the context of microwave parametricamplifiers (e.g. [109], [110]). It was recently revived inoptics, along with the elegant analogy with semiconductortransitions mentioned in Sec. III-A in [48], and led to noveltypes of magnetless isolators and circulators (e.g. [111]–[116]). Most interestingly, recently papers reported multidi-mensional nonreciprocal operations, such as nonreciprocalspecular reflection or/and transmission [117], [118] andspatial nonreciprocal circulation [119].

The spacetime approach to nonreciprocity is typicallyless practical than that provided by transistor-loaded meta-materials at microwaves [14], [15], [120], [121] because itrequires a modulation source that is dynamic and difficultto inject into the structure, while transistor-based mag-netless nonreciprocal metamaterials use a much simpler

26An analogy to understand this intuitively would be the tennis racket,representing the (periodic) medium. If the racket moves towards the in-coming ball, representing the wave, the ball gets bounced back (‘reflected’)with a higher speed and energy than it had before hitting the racket; insuch a contra-directional scenario, the reflected wave is thus amplified. Incontrast, if the racked is properly moved backwards, the incoming ball iscushioned, and hence not bounced back; in this co-directional scenario,the energy of the wave is thus absorbed by the system (here the tennisplayer).

Page 21

and more economical DC source, and have already beenexperimentally largely demonstrated in real metamaterialstructures [15]. However, the implementation of transistor-based magnetless nonreciprocal devices still awaits theavailability of optical transistors [122], [123].

Nonreciprocity is one of the most fundamental ways torealize absorption, since a wave that is not returned to thesource is seen as absorbed from its viewpoint. We recentlydiscovered that it can offer angle-independent absorption,amplification and phase-shifting (gyrotor-type operation)in properly designed crossanisotropic [χee = χmm = 0 andχem,χme 6= 0 in (3b)] metasurface configurations [124],whether using spacetime or other types of nonreciprocity.The implementation of such functionalities, still to beexperimentally demonstrated, would be quite revolutionaryin electromagnetics engineering.

D. Electromagnetic Cloaking

Pure-space electromagnetic cloaking, and related ma-nipulations based on coordinate transformation designs,represent particularly spectacular electromagnetic opera-tions [12], [125]. This concept has been recently theo-retically extended to spacetime [126]. Unfortunately, suchcloaking structures are overly complex to realize, due totheir three-dimensional anisotropic and nonuniform char-acteristics. Poor-man versions of them, such as for in-stance metasurface penetrable cloaking [127], seem prac-tically more realistic and still extremely useful. We recentlydemonstrated a space-time camouflaging version of it,where the wave incident from the interrogator undergoestemporal frequency spectrum spreading, from a phase-modulated mirror constituted by grounded patches withdiode loading, so as to render the scattered wave unde-tectable by an interrogator not possessing the spreadingkey [128].

E. Electromagnetic Processing

Spacetime metamaterials represent a most natural oppor-tunity for processing signal waves in an ultrafast and flexiblemanner. They could, for instance, dramatically extend therange of pure-space real-time processing electromagneticand metamaterial systems [80], [129]–[131]. This will beparticularly true when they will, soon, be driven by proces-sors and involve artificial intelligence. Until this becomes areality, simpler but again still very useful versions of themcan be realized. We shall here only describe two examples ofspacetime processing systems that we recently developed.

The first example is the spacetime compander (Sec. VIII)reported in [79]. Compansion, i.e., pulse compression orexpansion, is widely used in photonic technologies, forinstance in high-resolution spectroscopy, high-power pulsegeneration, and ultrafast signal processing [29]. Conven-tional compansion is based on nonlinear phase chirpingfollowed by group velocity dispersion with the oppositeor identical chirp slope for compression or expansion,respectively. However, this technique suffers from signal dis-torsion and superposition incapability, due to its nonlinearnature. The system in [79] is based on a new, spacetime,

mechanism that is immune to these issues. It uses an an-tisymmetric (monocycle-shaped for a Gaussian-like pulse)spacetime-modulated medium that co-propagates with thepulse, typically in a modulated waveguide structure, andcompands it by continuously modifying the velocity of therising and trailing sections of the pulse.

Such a compander is a nonuniform-velocity medium,whose acceleration profile is a monocycle with an accelera-tion part and a deceleration part alternating at the centroidof the pulse. More elaborated forms of such a mediumcould lead to other interesting applications, such as forinstance quantum noise squeezing [132], which increasesthe precision of interferometers by reshaping the waveformso as to trade magnitude accuracy for phase accuracy, atthe limit of the uncertainty principle, for the detection ofsignals with extremely low signal-to-noise ratios, such asgravitational waves [133].

The second example is the spacetime-spectra transform-ing metasurface, reported in [134]. This device resultsfrom the recent development of metasurface synthesistechniques, and particularly the General Sheet TransitionConditions (GSTCs) technique coupled with bianisotropicsusceptibilities [19], [135]. The GSTCs are a generalizationof the conventional boundary conditions [36] for disconti-nuities supporting surface polarization currents. They take,in the time domain, the general form [136]

n×∆H = J+ ∂Ps,e,t

∂t− n×∇Ps,m,n , (46a)

n×∆E =−K− ∂Ps,m,t

∂t− n×∇Ps,m,n , (46b)

where n is a unit vector perpendicular to the metasurface,the subscripts n and t respectively denote the componentsthat are normal and tangential to the metasurface, thesuperscripts ± denote the positions infinitesimally justbefore and beyond the metasurface (e.g. z = 0± if n = z andthe metasurface is positioned at z = 0), Ps,e (As/m) andPs,m (Vs/m) are the surface polarization densities relatedto the volume polarization densities in (1) via Ps,e = Peδ(z)and Ps,m = Pmδ(z) (δ(z) (1/m): Dirac delta distribtion),having the surface version (surface instead of volume sus-ceptibility) constitutive relations of the volume constitutiverelations (3), and where

∆H = [H+(ρ, t )−H−(ρ, t )

], (47a)

∆E = [E+(ρ, t )−E−(ρ, t )

]. (47b)

Time-integrating (46) with (47) and the surface versionof (3), and solving the result for the surface susceptibil-ities yields the spacetime surface susceptibility functions,χs,ab(ρ, t ) (ab = ee, mm, em, me), required to theoreti-cally transform an arbitary incident wave into an arbitraryscattered wave in terms of both temporal spectrum (ω)and spatial spectrum (k) [134]. The paper [134] shows theexample of a normally incident modulated pulse wave beingrefracted to two different directions of space, with the time-reversed version of the incident waveform in one directionand the time-derivative version of the incident waveformin the other direction. This method is universal. Such

Page 22

spacetime metasurfaces are still challenging to fabricate atthe present time, but some promising simpler versions ofthem have already been experimentally demonstrated [128],[137].

F. Radiation

The forthcoming decade will witness the development ofa flurry of spacetime antennas, reflectors, polarizers andmetasurface radomes with very diverse functionalities. Atthe time of this writing, this is still an emerging area withvery little reports. We shall only mention here, again, twoexamples of related systems that we recently developed.

The first example is that of a spacetime leaky-wave struc-ture that accomplishes the function of a full radio front-end system [138]. The system is a two-port periodicallyspacetime modulated structure, with one port used fortransmitting and the other for receiving. In the uplink,the base-band signal is injected into the transmit port,converted to the RF band by oblique transition into theradiation cone, and hence radiated to the desired directionof space, without leaking any significant energy towards thereceive port due to exponential leakage decay along thestructure. In the downlink, the incoming signal is pickedup by the leaky-wave antenna structure, unidirectionallyrouted to the receive port – as if passing through a circulator– due to the inherent nonreciprocity of the spacetime mod-ulation, and downconverted to base-band when reachingthe receive port.

The second example is in fact accomplishing two or threevery distinct and powerful operations with the combinationof a single antenna (rather than an array) and a metasur-face [139], [140]. The metasurface in these applications isa structure whose elements (or rows for 2D-plane insteadof 3D processing) are individually addressed by spacetimemodulating waves. The first metasurface-antenna systemperforms Direction-of-Arrival (DoA) detection: the elementsof the metasurface are time-modulated by different or-thogonal codes, and DoA is accomplished by measuringthe delay between the different waveforms obtained bymultiplication of the received mixed signal with the differ-ent codes [139]. The second metasurface-antenna systemperforms spatial multiplexing for wireless communicationusing a same modulated mirror as in [128]: different wire-less signal waves, carrying different orthogonal codes, arereceived by the metasurface that is modulated by the samesequences so as to radiate the different data stream towardsthe intended receivers placed at different positions of space.This concept may in fact also be applied to dynamicallydeflect incoming waves to different directions of spaceas a general approach of tunable generalized reflection-refraction with gradient bianisotropic metasurfaces [31].

XI. CONCLUSIONS

We have presented our vision of the emerging field ofspacetime metamaterials in a cohesive and – hopefully!– pedagogical perspective, systematically building up thephysics, modeling and applications of these media from

their pure-space and pure-time counterparts. The mainconclusions and results may be summarized as follows:

1) A spacetime metamaterial is a metamaterial (see def-inition in Sec. I) whose structure vary in both spaceand time.

2) According to 1), spacetime metamaterials represent ageneralization of conventional metamaterials, whichmost often vary only in space (1D, 2D or 3D array ofmetaparticles) or, sometimes, only in time, within thespatial extent of interest.

3) There is an infinity of natural spacetime systems in ouruniverse that may be considered as trivial particularcases of spacetime metamaterials, since everything(known to human science) evolves in space and time.

4) There is also a number of engineering systems, suchas opto-mechanical and acousto/electro-optic devices,that may be considered as particular cases of space-time metamaterials.

5) The spacetime variation in spacetime metamaterialsmay occur via two fundamentally distinct mechanisms:matter motion (moving blocks of molecules, as in op-tomechanics) and wave modulation (dynamic ‘biasing’waves, as in acouto/electro-optics).

6) While spatial variation transforms only the spatialspectrum (k) of waves, temporal variation transformsonly their temporal spectrum (ω). The combinationof the two variations opens up new opportunities tosimultaneously manipulate the spatial and temporalspectra, or the spacetime spectrum (k,ω), of waves (seeexample in Fig. 2).

7) Conventional pure-space electromagnetic metamateri-als already offer unprecedented opportunities for con-trolling waves from their general 36 bianisotropic pa-rameters. The addition of time variation in spacetimemetamaterials brings about an extra level of diversityand a fundamental generalization of pure-space bian-isotropic metamaterials through the transformation ofthe complete spacetime spectrum of waves mentionedin 6).

8) The generalization mentioned in 7) prompts fora unified representation of metamaterials, whosebianisotropic parameters generally depend on directspace (r), direct time (t ), inverse space (k) and inversetime (ω) (see Fig. 3).

9) The spacetime dependences in 8) may be logicallyreferred to as spacetime variance for the directspace (r, t ) and spacetime dispersion for the inversespace (k,ω).

10) The principle of uncertainty imposes some funda-mental restrictions on the possible types of spacetimevariance and dispersion in 9); among the 16 existingcombinations (see Fig. 3), 7 are determined only inthe case where the spacetime scales involved are verydifferent from each other.

11) Spacetime metamaterials are inherently nonreciprocal,except in the direction perpendicular to their motionor modulation.

12) The phenomena of Fizeau drag and bianisotropy trans-formation occur in moving-matter spacetime media,

Page 23

but not in modulated-wave media, due to the absenceof transfer of matter in them (see 5) above).

13) Spacetime systems can be superluminal, in the sense ofenergy (but not information) transfer, without violatingany law of physics. This can occur in directions thatare not parallel to the direction of motion of thesystem (e.g. guillotine). Such superluminality opens upnew horizons for wave manipulations with spacetimemetamaterials.

14) Spacetime diagrams constitute a powerful tool forthe description of spacetime metamaterials, wherethe metamaterial, of arbitrary spacetime complexity,is added onto the conventional ‘empty’ spacetime ofcosmology, which restrictively deals with the motion ofcelestial bodies and the propagation (electromagneticand gravitational) waves in free space. The direct andinverse spacetime diagrams offer a complementaryperspective of spacetime medium phenomenology.

15) A subluminal discontinuity involves the same scat-tered waves as a pure-space discontinuity (space-like),namely incident, reflected and transmitted waves; asuperluminal discontiniuty involves the same scatteredwaves as a pure-time discontinuity (time-like), namelyearlier, later-backward and later-forward waves. In boththe subluminal and superluminal cases, the scatteringcoefficients and frequency transitions (or transforma-tions) are drastically different in the co-directional andcontra-directional cases (wave and medium moving insame or opposite directions).

16) The computation of electromagnetic scattering inspacetime media involve two difficulties that do notexist in conventional relativity: a) in the superluminalregime, the moving frame must be taken as instanta-neous instead of stationary ; b) in a wave-modulatedspacetime medium, the constitutive relations shouldnot be applied in the moving frame, where they involvebianisotorpy complication, but in the laboratory frame.

17) As pure-space transitions between different media,spacetime transitions between different media may beabrupt (step-type) or progressive (graded-type). Someapplications, such as spacetime reversal focusing, arebased on reflection, and require therefore abruptspacetime transitions, whereas others, such as theinverse prism, are based on transmission, and requiretherefore tapered (matching) spacetime transitions.

18) In electromagnetics, while the continuous fields at aspatial discontinuities are the tangential E and H fields,the continuous field at a temporal discontinuity arethe total D and B fields. The boundary conditionsfor subluminal and superluminal media respectivelyderive from the pure-space and pure-time boundaryconditions as a distinct combination of all the fields.

19) While scattering from a pure-space slab involves aninfinite number of spacetime wave contributions, apure-time slab involves exactly four spacetime wavecontributions. The space and time phenomenologiesare thus fundamentally different, which is due tothe unidirectionality of the time arrow (or causality).Subluminal and superluminal media follow their pure-

space and pure-time limit cases, with extra complexityand diversity, as for instance the nonreciprocity men-tioned in Sec. 11.

20) Time reversal naturally generalizes to spacetime rever-sal and, further, to spacetime compansion (compres-sion or expansion), with negative space and time com-pansion respectively corresponding to space reversaland time reversal, and the type and amount of space-time compansion depending on the electromagneticdensity of the media involved in the discontinuity.

21) Spacetime metamaterials host a cornucopia of un-explored physical phenomena. Examples of recentlydiscovered physics include spacetime mirroring andfocusing, inverse prism transformation and chromaticbirefringence, and generalized spacetime crystallogra-phy.

22) As a consequence of 21), spacetime metamaterialsharbor a myriad of potential applications, many ofwhich result from the revocation of the constraint oftime invariance that dominates current technology. Wehave briefly described a number of such applications,both recently reported and still embryonic, classified inthe categories of frequency multiplication and mixing,matching and filtering, nonreciprocity and absorption,cloaking, electromagnetic processing and radiation.

23) From the research point of view, the field of spacemetamaterials is bursting with new theoretical, com-putational and technological problems and challenges,whose resolution might take decades of effort butprove most rewarding.

It may be safely predicted that spacetime metamateri-als, given their fundamental nature and virtually unlim-ited diversity, along with recent spectacular advances inmicro/nano/quanto/bio/chemico-technologies, will repre-sent a most vibrant field of research and development inthe forthcoming decades. We hope that this paper willcontribute to this exciting adventure!

APPENDIX ADERIVATION OF THE SPACETIME VARIABLE

LORENTZ TRANSFORMS

Given the assumed homogeneity of space and time, thespace and time intervals in the unprimed and primedframes (Fig. 7) are proportional to each other, i.e.,(∆z ′,∆t ′) ∝ (∆z,∆t ), and the relations between the spaceand time variables are therefore linear, i.e.,

z ′ = Az +B t , (48a)

t ′ =C z +Dt , (48b)

where A, B , C and D are unknown constants, whosedetermination requires four independent relations.

By definition, O′ corresponds to the point z ′ = 0 inthat primed frame, and hence to the point z = v t in theunprimed frame. Substituting these values into (48a) yieldsa first relation:

B =−Av. (49)

According the second postulate of relativity (constancy ofspeed velocity of light for all observers regardless of the

Page 24

source) [45], we have that c = z/t and c = z ′/t ′, assumingcoinciding space and time origins in each frame. Substi-tuting (48) into the latter relation, replacing in the result zby ct following from the former relation, and simplifyingyields, as a second relation,

B = c2C − c(D − A). (50)

As we shall see, enforcing the condition that a transfor-mation from the unprimed system to the primed systemfollowed by a transformation from the primed systemback to the unprimed system must be equivalent to notransformation provides the missing two relations. The firsttransformation is given by (48). The second transformationmay be related to the first one by substituting (A,D) →(A,D) and (B ,C ) →−(B ,C ), following from the fact that zand z ′ change sign whereas t and t ′ do not change signbetween the two transformations. We may then write, usingfor convenience matrix notation,(

A −B−C D

)(z ′

t ′

)=

(A −B−C D

)(A BC D

)(zt

)=

(1 00 1

)(zt

), (51)

which yields(A2 −BC AB −BD

−C A+DC −C B +D2

)=

(1 00 1

), (52)

that reduce to the two announced independent relations

A2 −BC = 1, (53)

A = D. (54)

Solving the system of equations (49), (50), (53) and (54) pro-vides the sought after constants as A = D = γ, B =−γv andC =−γv/c2, where γ= 1/

√1− (v/c)2. Inserting these results

into (48) finally provides the Lorentz transformations (5).

APPENDIX BDERIVATION OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD

LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS

According to the first postulate of relativity (identicalityof the laws of physics in all inertial systems) [45], Maxwellequations have the same form in the primed and unprimedframes, i.e.,

∇×E(r, t ) =−∂B(r, t )

∂t, ∇×H(r, t ) = ∂D(r, t )

∂t+ J(r, t ), (55a)

∇′×E′(r′, t ′) =−∂B′(r′, t ′)∂t ′

, ∇′×H′(r′, t ′) = ∂D′(r′, t ′)∂t ′

+J′(r′, t ′),

(55b)where it is to be noted that the primed and unprimedvariables generally have different values27. Assuming an x-polarized plane wave propagating in the z direction (asthe light pulse in Fig. 7) and no variation in the x y-plane(∂/∂x = ∂/∂y = 0), Eqs. (55) reduce to

∂Ex (z)

∂z=−∂By (z)

∂t, −∂Hy (z)

∂z= ∂Dx (z)

∂t+ Jx (z), (56a)

27Consider for instance a distribution of charges that is stationary in theprimed frame, and hence moving at the velocity v in the unprimed frame.Such a charge distribution, of density ρ, produces in the unprimed framethe current J = ρv, but v′ = 0 implies J′ = ρ′v′ = 0 in the primed frame. So,J′(r′, t ′) 6= J(r, t ).

∂E ′x (z ′)∂z ′ =−

∂B ′y (z ′)

∂t ′, −

∂H ′y (z ′)

∂z ′ = ∂D ′x (z ′)∂t ′

+ J ′x (z ′). (56b)

=To find the relations between the fields in the unprimed

and primed frames, or the electromagnetic field transfor-mation formulas, we have to establish some comparisonbetween Eqs. (56a) and (56b). This may be done by express-ing the unprimed derivation operators in (56a) in terms ofthe primed derivation operators in (56b). For this purpose,we successively use the chain rule and apply (5a) as

∂

∂z= ∂

∂z ′∂z ′

∂z+ ∂

∂t ′∂t ′

∂z= γ ∂

∂z ′ −γv

c2

∂

∂t ′, (57a)

∂

∂t= ∂

∂z ′∂z ′

∂t+ ∂

∂t ′∂t ′

∂t=−γv

∂

∂z ′ +γ∂

∂t ′. (57b)

Substituting the last equalities of these relationsinto (56a) and grouping the terms with the same operatorsyields

∂

∂z ′[γ

(Ex (z)− vBy (z)

)]=− ∂

∂t ′[γ

(By (z)− v

c2 Ex (z))]

, (58a)

− ∂

∂z ′[γ

(Hy (z)− vDx (z)

)]= ∂

∂t ′[γ

(Dx (z)+ v

c2 Hy (z))]

.

(58b)Comparing these relations with those in (56b) finally pro-vides the electromagnetic field transformations (9).

REFERENCES

[1] R. M. Walser, “Electromagnetic metamaterials,” in Complex MediumsII: Beyond Linear Isotropic Dielectrics, vol. 4467, Jul. 2001, pp. 1–16.

[2] U. Leonhardt, “Optical metamaterials: Invisibility cup,” Nat. Photon-ics, vol. 1, no. 4, p. 207, Apr. 2007.

[3] M. Reibold, P. Paufler, A. A. Levin, W. Kochmann, N. Pätzke, andD. C. Meyer, “Materials: Carbon nanotubes in an ancient Damascussaber,” Nature, vol. 444, no. 7117, p. 286, Nov. 2006.

[4] G. Shvets, “Photonics: Metamaterials add an extra dimension,” Nat.Mater., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 7, Jan. 2008.

[5] J. C. Bose, “On the rotation of plane of polarization of electric wavesby twisted structure,” Proc. Royal Soc., vol. 63, pp. 146–152, Jan. 1898.

[6] K. F. Lindman, “Rotation of the plane of polarisation of electromag-netic waves,” Ann. Phys., vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 621–644, 1920.

[7] W. E. Kock, “Metallic delay lenses,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 27, no. 1,pp. 58–82, Jan. 1948.

[8] S. B. Cohn, “The electric and magnetic constants of metallic delaymedia containing obstacles of arbitrary shape and thickness,” J.Appl. Phys., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 628–634, May 1951.

[9] W. Rotman, “Plasma simulation by artificial dielectrics and parallel-plate media,” IRE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 82–95,Jan. 1962.

[10] R. A. Shelby, D. R. Smith, and S. Schultz, “Experimental verificationof a negative index of refraction,” Science, vol. 292, no. 5514, pp.77–79, Apr. 2001.

[11] J. B. Pendry, “Negative refraction makes a perfect lens,” Phys. Rev.Lett., vol. 85, no. 18, pp. 3966–3969, Oct. 2000.

[12] D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, B. J. Justice, S. A. Cummer, J. B. Pendry,A. F. Starr, and D. R. Smith, “Metamaterial electromagnetic cloakat microwave frequencies,” Science, vol. 314, no. 5801, pp. 977–980,Nov. 2006.

[13] U. Leonhardt, “Optical conformal mapping,” Science, vol. 312, no. 4,p. 5781, Jun. 2006.

[14] T. Kodera, D. L. Sounas, and C. Caloz, “Artificial Faraday rotationusing a ring metamaterial structure without static magnetic field,”Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 031 114:1–3, Jul. 2011.

[15] T. Kodera and C. Caloz, “Unidirectional Loop Metamaterial (ULMs)as as magnetless ferrimagnetic materials: principles and applica-tions,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1943–1947, Nov. 2018.

[16] C. Caloz and A. Alù, “Guest editorial: special cluster on magnetlessnonreciprocity in electromagnetics,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag.Lett., vol. 17, no. 11, p. 1931âAS1937, Nov. 2018.

Page 25

[17] C. L. Holloway, E. F. Kuester, J. A. Gordon, J. O’Hara, J. Booth,and D. R. Smith, “An overview of the theory and applications ofmetasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials,”IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 10–35, Apr. 2012.

[18] S. B. Glybovski, S. A. Tretyakov, P. A. Belov, Y. S. Kivshar, and C. R.Simovski, “Metasurfaces: From microwaves to visible,” Phys. Rep.,vol. 634, pp. 1–72, May 2016.

[19] K. Achouri and C. Caloz, “Design, concepts, and applications ofelectromagnetic metasurfaces,” Nanophotonics, vol. 7, no. 6, pp.1095–1116, Jun. 2018.

[20] C. Caloz and T. Itoh, Electromagnetic Metamaterials: TransmissionLine Theory and Microwave Applications. Wiley and IEEE Press,2005.

[21] N. Engheta and R. W. Ziolkowsi, Eds., Metamaterials: Physics andEngineering Explorations. John Wiley and Sons, 2006.

[22] F. Capolino, Ed., Metamaterials Handbook. CRC Press, 2009.[23] W. Cai and V. Shalaev, Optical Metamaterials: Fundamentals and

Applications. Springer, 2009.[24] R. Marqués, F. Martín, and M. Sorolla, Metamaterials with Negative

Parameters: Theory, Design, and Microwave Applications. Wiley-Interscience, 2013.

[25] D. H. Werner and D. H. Kwon, Transformation Electromagnetics andMetamaterials. Springer, 2015.

[26] A. Eden, The search for Christian Doppler, T. Martin, Ed. Springer-Verlag, 1992, contains a facsimile with an English translation ofDoppler’s 1842 treatise “Über das farbige Licht der Doppelsterneund einiger anderer Gestirne des Himmels”.

[27] V. C. Chen, The Micro-Doppler Effect in Radar, 2nd ed. ArtechHouse, 1990.

[28] M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, “Cavity optome-chanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1391–, Dec. 2014.

[29] B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, 2nd ed.Wiley-Interscience, 2007.

[30] W. C. Hahn and G. F. Metcalf, “Velocity-modulated tubes,” Proc. IRE,vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 106–116, Apr. 1939.

[31] G. Lavigne, K. Achouri, V. S. Asadchy, S. A. Tretyakov, and C. Caloz,“Susceptibility derivation and experimental demonstration of re-fracting metasurfaces without spurious diffraction,” IEEE Trans.Antennas. Propag., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1321–1330, Mar. 2018.

[32] I. V. Lindell, A. H. Sihvola, S. A. Tretyakov, and A. J. Viitanen,Electromagnetic Waves in Chiral and Bi-Isotropic Media. Artech,1994.

[33] C. Caloz and A. Sihvola, “Electromagnetic chirality,”arXiv:1903.09087, pp. 1–27, Apr. 2019.

[34] J. A. Kong, Electromagnetic Wave Theory. EMW Publishing, 2008.[35] ——, “Theorems of bianisotropic media,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 60, no. 9,

pp. 1036–1046, Sep. 1972.[36] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. Wiley, 1998.[37] E. J. Rothwell and M. J. Cloud, Electromagnetics, 2nd ed. CRC Press,

2008.[38] D. K. Kalluri, Electromagnetics of time varying complex media:

frequency and polarization transformer. CRC Press, 2010.[39] Z.-L. Deck-Léger, N. Chamanara, M. Skorobogatiy, M. G. Sil-

veirinha, and C. Caloz, “Uniform-velocity spacetime crystals,”arXiv:1808.02863, Aug. 2018.

[40] B. P. Lathi and R. Green, Linear Systems and Signals, 3rd ed. OxfordUniversity Press, 2017.

[41] W. Heisenberg, “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantenthe-oretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,” Zeit. für Phys., vol. 43, pp.172–198, 1927.

[42] L. Cohen, “Time-frequency distributions – A review,” Proc. IEEE,vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 941–981, Jul. 1989.

[43] N. Chamanara, Z.-L. Deck-Léger, and C. Caloz, “Unusual electro-magnetic modes in space-time-modulated dispersion-engineeredmedia,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 97, no. 6, p. 063829, Jun. 2018.

[44] T. P. Gill, “The Doppler effect: the theory and applications,” 1965.[45] A. Einstein, “Zur elektrodynamik bewegter Körper,” Ann. Physik, vol.

322, no. 10, pp. 891–921, Jun. 1905.[46] J. Bradley, “IV. A letter from the Reverend Mr. James Bradley Savilian

Professor of Astronomy at Oxford, and FRS to Dr. Edmond HalleyAstronom. Reg. &c. giving an account of a new discovered motion ofthe fix’d stars,” Philos. Trans. Royal Soc., vol. 35, no. 406, pp. 637–661,1729.

[47] J. D. Norton, “Einstein’s investigations of Galilean covariant electro-dynamics prior to 1905,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences, vol. 59,no. 1, pp. 45–405, Nov. 1972.

[48] J. N. Winn, S. Fan, Joannopoulos, D. John, and E. P. Ippen, “Interbandtransitions in photonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 59, no. 31, pp.1551–1554, Jan. 2008.

[49] C. Caloz, A. Alù, S. Tretyakov, D. Sounas, K. Achouri, and Z.-L. Deck-Léger, “Electromagnetic nonreciprocity,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 10,no. 4, pp. 047 001:1–26, Oct. 2018.

[50] H. Fizeau, “Sur les hypothèses relatives à l’éther lumineux, et surune expérience qui parait démontrer que le mouvement des corpschange la vitesse avec laquelle la lumière se propage dans leurintérieur,” C.R. Acad. Sci., vol. 33, pp. 349–355, 1851.

[51] G. Sagnac, “L’éther lumineux démontré par l’effet du vent relatifd’éther dans un interféromètre en rotation uniforme,” CR Acad. Sci.,vol. 157, pp. 708–710, 1913.

[52] ——, “Sur la preuve de la réalité de l’éther lumineux par l’expériencede l’interférographe tournant,” CR Acad. Sci., vol. 157, pp. 1410–1413,1913.

[53] W. C. Röntgen, “Ueber die durch Bewegung eines im homogenenelectrischen Felde befindlichen Dielectricums hervorgerufene elec-trodynamische Kraft,” Ann. Phys., vol. 271, no. 10, pp. 264–270, 1888.

[54] C. Caloz and A. Sihvola, “Electromagnetic chirality,”arXiv:1903.09087, Mar. 2019.

[55] L. D. Bois, Recherches Historiques et Physiologiques sur la Guillotine:et Détails sur Sanson. France, 1843.

[56] D. Holberg and K. Kunz, “Parametric properties of fields in a slabof time-varying permittivity,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 14,no. 2, pp. 183–194, Apr. 1966.

[57] H. Minkowski, “Raum und Zeit,” Jahresbericht der DeutschenMathematiker-Vereinigung, vol. 18, pp. 75–88, Oct. 1909.

[58] A. Einstein, “The foundation of the general theory of relativity,” Ann.Physik, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 769–822, May 1916.

[59] H. A. Lorentz, “Electromagnetic phenomena in a system movingwith any velocity smaller than that of light,” Proc. Royal NetherlandsAcademy of Arts and Sciences, vol. 6, pp. 809–831, 1904.

[60] M. H. Poincaré, “Sur la dynamique de l’électron,” Rendiconti delCircolo Matematico di Palermo, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 129–175, Dec.1905.

[61] I. Newton, The Principia. Snowball Publishing, 2011, originallywritten circa 1687.

[62] W. Pauli, Theory of Relativity. Pergaman Press, 1958, originallypublished in German in 1921.

[63] Z.-L. Deck-Léger, A. Akbarzadeh, and C. Caloz, “Wave deflectionand shifted refocusing in a medium modulated by a superluminalrectangular pulse,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 97, no. 10, pp. 104 305–1:7, Mar.2018.

[64] F. Abelès, “La théorie générale des couches minces,” J. Ph. Radium,vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 307–309, Jul. 1950.

[65] F. Biancalana, A. Amann, A. V. Uskov, and E. O’Reilly, “Dynamics oflight propagation in spatiotemporal dielectric structures,” Phys. Rev.E, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 046 607:1–12, Apr. 2007.

[66] K. Lurie and S. Weekes, “Wave propagation and energy exchange ina spatio-temporal material composite with rectangular microstruc-ture,” J. Math. Anal. Appl., vol. 314, no. 1, pp. 286–310, Feb. 2006.

[67] G. Milton and O. Mattei, “Field patterns: a new mathematicalobject,” Proc. R. Soc. A, vol. 18, pp. 20 160 819:1–26, Feb. 473.

[68] F. R. Morgenthaler, “Velocity modulation of electromagnetic waves,”IRE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 167–172, Apr. 1958.

[69] L. A.Ostrovskiı, “Some “moving boundaries paradoxes” in electrody-namics,” Sov. Phys. Usp., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 452–458, Jun. 1975.

[70] Z.-L. Deck-Léger and C. Caloz, “Scattering at interluminal interface,”arXiv, May 2019.

[71] K. Tanaka, “Reflection and transmission of electromagnetic wavesby a linearly accelerated dielectric slab,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 25, no. 1,pp. 385–390, Jan. 1982.

[72] J. V. Meter, S. Carlip, and F. Hartemann, “Reflection of plane wavesfrom a uniformly accelerating mirror,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 69, no. 7,pp. 783–787, Jul. 2001.

[73] F. Weinert, “Loschmidt’s demon: Reversibility and irreversibility,” inThe Demons of Science. Springer, Dec. 2016, pp. 127–130.

[74] J. Loschmidt, “Ueber den Zustand des Wärmegleichgewichteseines System von Körpern,” Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien.Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Sitzungsberichte,vol. 73, pp. 128–135, 1876.

[75] H. B. G. Casimir, “Reciprocity theorems and irreversible processes,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1570–1573, Nov. 1963.

[76] M. Fink, C. Prada, F. Wu, and D. Cassereau, “Self focusing ininhomogeneous media with time reversal acoustic mirrors,” in IEEEInt. Ultrason. Symp., Oct. 1989, pp. 681–686.

Page 26

[77] V. Bacot, M. Labousse, A. Eddi, M. Fink, and E. Fort, “Time reversaland holography with spacetime transformations,” Nat. Phys., vol. 12,no. 10, p. 972, Oct. 2016.

[78] A. Ishimaru, Electromagnetic Wave Propagation, Radiation, andScattering: From Fundamentals to Applications, 2nd ed. Wiley -IEEE Press, 2017.

[79] N. Chamanara and C. Caloz, “Linear pulse compansion using co-propagating space-time modulation,” arXiv:1810.04129, Oct. 2018.

[80] C. Caloz, S. Gupta, Q. Zhang, and B. Nikfal, “Analog signal pro-cessing: A possible alternative or complement to dominantly digitalradio schemes,” IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 14, no. 46, pp. 87–103, Sep.2013.

[81] D. Pedoe, Geometry: A Comprehensive Course. Courier Corporation,2013.

[82] A. Akbarzadeh, N. Chamanara, and C. Caloz, “Inverse prism basedon temporal discontinuity and spatial dispersion,” Opt. Lett., vol. 43,no. 14, pp. 3297–3300, Jul. 2018.

[83] D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 4th ed. Wiley, 2011.[84] I. Newton, Opticks: Or, a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions,

Inflections and Colours of Light. Snowball Publishing, 1721, williamand John Innys.

[85] E. S. Cassedy and A. A. Oliner, “Dispersion relations in time-spaceperiodic media: Part I–Stable interactions,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 51,no. 19, pp. 1342–1359, Oct. 1963.

[86] T. Li, Z.-X. Gong, Z.-Q. Yin, H. Quan, X. Yin, P. Zhang, L.-M. Duan,and X. Zhang, “Space-time crystals of trapped ions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.,vol. 109, no. 16, pp. 163 001:1–5, Oct. 2012.

[87] R. E. Collin, Field Theory of Guided Waves, 2nd ed. Wiley-IEEEPress, 1990, chap. 9: “Periodic Structures”.

[88] J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade,Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light, 2nd ed. PrincetonUniversity Press, 2008.

[89] J. R. Zurita-Sánchez, P. Halevi, and J. C. Cervantes-González, “Re-flection and transmission of a wave incident on a slab with a time-periodicdielectric function ε(t ),” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 79, no. 5, pp.053 821:1–13, May 2009.

[90] M. Skorobogatiy and J. Joannopoulos, “Rigid vibrations of a photoniccrystal and induced interband transitions,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 61,no. 8, pp. 5293:1–10, Feb. 2008.

[91] C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed. Wiley, 2004.[92] B. A. Munk, Frequency selective surfaces: theory and design. John

Wiley & Sons, 2005.[93] Z. Yu and S. Fan, “Complete optical isolation created by indirect

interband photonic transitions,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 91–94, Feb. 2009.

[94] S. John, “Strong localization of photons in certain disordered dielec-tric superlattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 58, no. 23, pp. 2486–2489, Jun.1987.

[95] F. Wilczek, “Quantum time crytals,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 109, no. 16,pp. 160 401:1–5, Oct. 2012.

[96] A. Shapere and F. Wilczek, “Classical time crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett.,vol. 109, pp. 160 402:1–4, Oct. 2012.

[97] R. E. Collin, Foundation for Microwave Engineering. John Wiley &Sons, 2007.

[98] J. M. Manley and H. E. Rowe, “Some general properties of nonlinearelements – part I. General energy relations,” Proc. IRE, vol. 44, no. 7,pp. 904–913, Jul. 2006.

[99] R. H. Pantell, “General power relationships for positive and negativenonlinear resistive elements,” Proc. IRE, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1910–1913, Dec. 1958.

[100] D. K. Kalluri and R. K. Lade, “Frequency and polarization trans-former (10 Ghz to 1000 Ghz): Interaction of a Whistler wave with acollapsing plasma in a cavity,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Science, vol. 40,no. 11, pp. 3070–3078, Nov. 2012.

[101] S. Taravati, “Aperiodic space-time modulation for pure frequencymixing,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 115 131:1–9, Mar. 2018.

[102] H. W. Bode, Network analysis and feedback amplifier designs. vanNostrand, 1945.

[103] R. M. Fano, “Theoretical limitations on the broadband matchingof arbitrary impedances,” J. Franklin Institute, vol. 249, no. 1, pp.57–83, Jan. 2018.

[104] J. Schwinger, L. L. DeRaad, K. A. Milton, and W.-Y. Tsai, ClassicalElectrodynamics. Perseus Books, 1998.

[105] A. Shlivinski and Y. Hadad, “Beyond the Bode-Fano bound: Wide-band impedance matching for short pulses using temporal switchingof transmission-line parameters,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 121, no. 20,pp. 204 301:1–6, Nov. 2018.

[106] M. S. Mirmoosa, G. A. Ptitcy, V. S. Asadchy, and S. Tretyakov, “Time-varying reactive elements for extreme accumulation of electromag-netic energy,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 014 024:1–10, Jan.2019.

[107] G. Matthaei, E. M. T. Jones, and L. Young, Microwave Filters,Impedance-Matching Networks, and Coupling Structures. ArtechHouse, 1980.

[108] R. J. Cameron, C. M. Kudsia, and R. R. Mansour, Microwave Filters forCommunication Systems: Fundamentals, Design, and Applications,2nd ed. Wiley, 2018.

[109] A. Kamal, “A parametric device as a nonreciprocal element,” Proc.IRE, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1424–1430, Aug. 1960.

[110] L. Baldwin, “Nonreciprocal parametric amplifier circuits,” Proc. IRE,vol. 49, no. 6, p. 1075, Jan. 1961.

[111] Z. Yu and S. Fan, “Optical isolation based on nonreciprocal phaseshift induced by interband photonic transitions,” Appl. Phys. Lett.,vol. 94, no. 17, p. 171116:3, Apr. 2009.

[112] ——, “Optical isolation: a non-magnetic approach,” Nature Photon.,vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 517–519, Sep. 2011.

[113] N. A. Estep, D. L. Sounas, J. Soric, and A. Alù, “Magnetic-freenon-reciprocity and isolation based on parametrically modulatedcoupled-resonator loops,” Nature Phys., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 923–927,Dec. 2014.

[114] S. Taravati, N. Chamanara, and C. Caloz, “Nonreciprocal electromag-netic scattering from a periodically space-time modulated slab andapplication to a quasisonic isolator,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 96, no. 16,pp. 165 144:1–11, Oct. 2017.

[115] N. Chamanara, S. Taravati, Z.-L. Deck-Léger, and C. Caloz, “Opticalisolation based on space-time engineered asymmetric photonicband gaps,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 96, no. 15, pp. 155 409:1–12, Oct. 2017.

[116] D. L. Sounas, J. Soric, and A. Alù, “Broadband passive isolators basedon coupled nonlinear resonances,” Nat. Electron., vol. 1, no. 2, pp.113–119, Feb. 2018.

[117] A. Shaltout, A. Kildishev, and V. Shalaev, “Time-varying metasurfacesand lorentz non-reciprocity,” Opt. Mat. Expr., vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 2459–2467, Nov. 2015.

[118] Y. Hadad, D. L. Sounas, and A. Alù, “Space-time gradient metasur-faces,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 100 304:1–6, Sep. 2015.

[119] Y. Shi, S. Han, and S. Fan, “Optical circulation and isolation basedon indirect photonic transitions of guided resonance modes,” ACSPhotonics, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 1639–1645, Jul. 2017.

[120] D. L. Sounas, T. Kodera, and C. Caloz, “Electromagnetic modeling ofa magnet-less non-reciprocal gyrotropic metasurface,” IEEE Trans.Antennas Propag., vol. 61, no. 1, p. 221âAS231, Jan. 2013.

[121] S. Taravati, B. S. Khan, S. Gupta, K. Achouri, and C. Caloz, “Nonrecip-rocal nongyrotropic magnetless metasurface,” IEEE Trans. AntennasPropag., vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 3589–3597, Jun. 2017.

[122] L. Neumeier, M. M. Leib, and M. J. Hartmann, “Single-photontransistor in circuit quantum electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol.111, no. 6, pp. 063 601:1–5, Aug. 2013.

[123] W. Chen, K. M. Beck, R. Bücker, M. Gullans, M. D. Lukin, H. Tanji-Suzuki, and V. Vuletic, “All-optical switch and transistor gated byone stored photon,” Science, vol. 341, no. 6147, pp. 768–770, Aug.2013.

[124] G. Lavigne and C. Caloz, “Angle-independent nongyrotropic meta-surfaces,” arXiv:1903.11956, Mar. 2019.

[125] U. Leonhardt and T. Tyc, “Broadband invisibility by non-Euclideancloaking,” Science, vol. 323, no. 5910, pp. 110–112, Jan. 2009.

[126] M. McCall, A. Favaro, P. Kinsler, and A. Boardman, “A spacetimecloak, or a history editor,” J. Optics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 024 003:1–945–405, Nov. 2010.

[127] M. Dehmollaian, N. Chamanara, and C. Caloz, “Wave scattering by acylindrical metasurface cavity of arbitrary cross-section:Theory andapplications,” arXiv:1808.09530, Aug. 2018.

[128] X. Wang and C. Caloz, “Spread-sspectrum camouflaging based ontime-modulated metasurface,” in IEEE AP-S Int. Antennas Propag.(APS), Atlanta, USA, Jul. 2019, to be published.

[129] C. Caloz, “Metamaterial dispersion engineering concepts and appli-cations,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 1711–1719, Oct. 2011.

[130] A. Silva, F. Monticone, G. Castaldi, V. Galdi, A. Alù, and N. Engheta,“Performing mathematical operations with metamaterials,” Science,vol. 343, no. 6167, pp. 160–163, Jan. 2014.

[131] N. Estakhri, B. Edwards, and N. Engheta, “Inverse-designed metas-tructures that solve equations,” Science, vol. 363, no. 6433, pp. 1333–1338, Mar. 2019.

[132] M. C. Teich and B. E. A. Saleh, “Squeezed state of light,” QuantumOptics: J. European Optical Society, Part B, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 153–191,Dec. 1989.

Page 27

[133] D. Castelvecchi and A. Witze, “Einstein’s gravitational waves foundat last,” Nature news, 2016.

[134] N. Chamanara, Y. Vahabzadeh, and C. Caloz, “Simultaneous controlof the spatial and temporal spectra of light with space-time varyingmetasurfaces,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 2430–2441, Apr. 2019.

[135] K. Achouri, M. A. Salem, and C. Caloz, “General metasurface synthe-sis based on susceptibility tensors,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.,vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 2977–2991, Jul. 2015.

[136] M. Idemen and A. H. Serbest, “Boundary conditions of the elec-tromagnetic field,” Electron. Lett., vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 704–705, Jun.1987.

[137] L. Zhang, X. Q. Chen, S. Liu, Q. Zhang, J. Zhao, J. Y. Dai, G. D.Bai, X. Wan, Q. Cheng, G. Castaldi, V. Galdi, and T. J. Cui, “Space-time-coding digital metasurfaces,” Nat. Commun., vol. 9, no. 1, pp.4334:1–11, Feb. 2018.

[138] S. Taravati and C. Caloz, “Mixer-duplexer-antenna leaky-wave sys-tem based on periodic space-time modulation,” IEEE Trans. Anten-nas Propag., vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 442–452, Feb. 2017.

[139] X. Wang and C. Caloz, “Direction-of-Arrival (DOA) estimation basedon spacetime-modulated metasurface,” in IEEE AP-S Int. AntennasPropag. (APS), Atlanta, USA, Jul. 2019, to be published.

[140] ——, “Spacetime-modulated metasurface for spatial multiplexingcommunication,” in Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symp.(PIERS), Rome, Italy, Jun. 2019, to be published.

Page 28