sp13_module1_intro1b

7/29/2019 sp13_module1_intro1b

1/34

CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller

architectural analysis

module 1

BIG, Hafjell Mountain Hotel


2/34


part b - spatial systems

Leif Estrada, Arch.Analysis 2010


3/34


Yuliya Grebyonkina / Karly Stephens, Arch.Analysis 2012

K.STEPHENS

Y. GREBYONKINA

SERVICE VOIDS

VOIDS

Solid mat is the generic form rather then a simple typology definition. The mat is cut into two independent building by the street, which also

shapes the outlines of added retail space on ground floor. Retail spaces form an open surface for an adittional 4 units to g row above. Retail space

serves as a wrapper that buffers the hidden interrior of the units from the street and gen eral flow. Extruded vertical autonomies shift up

and expose unit cores/ towers for private and public circulation, which afterwards forces structural system to wrap around each core to distinguish the

barrior between inside (private) and outside

(public). Standard matte base moves up to provide full enclosure and intimacy for bedroom area. Structural element again

wraps around the program to provide very rough and insisting privacy .

Vertical programatic development opens up to the top for very refined, open and light spaces.

On a top level the back wall folds ou t and separates units.

Architect

City / Location

Year Designed

Oma/ Rem Koolhaas

FUKUOKA / JAPAN

1991

MODULE 1 B

BUFFER

TIERS

Morphology - Levels of privacy and enclosure / exposure

Units align along the horizontail grid and form three rows of tiers. Each tier is formed of two different unit types;

as retail element is added the unit above it deforms and forms a new tier as well. Tiers have a level of porosity defined

by service void from the back and the cut outs formed by unit voids.


4/34



K.STEPHENS

Y. GREBYONKINA

A A`

B B`

A``

B``

Bar geometry is split into two parts by the street and

then extruded with the front retail program

3 : 4 Grid divides formed mat into vertical units

of 2 generic typologies

Mat is pierced through by series of voids added into each one of the units

r i

i i

r i

There are two generic unit types (A and B) that populate the perimeter by mirroring along the vertical grid (A and B),

Left building symmetrically mirrors onto the left building. Units above the retail are deformated to match the street outline.

Units vary in sizes (2,3 and 4 bedroom ) as well as void configuration.

A A`

B B`

A``

B``

K.STEPHENS

Y. GREBYONKINA

Architect

City/ Location

YearDesigned

Architect NameHere

FUKUOKA /JAPAN

1991

MODULE 1 D


5/34


I I

I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I.

i

i i

i

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

I I I I

I I

I I I I I I I I I I I

I I .

i

i i

i

SECONDFLOOR PLAN

.

. I

THIRDFLOOR PLAN

. I

.

SHAREDCIRCULATION

UNIT/PRIVATECIRCULATION

T HI I A A I HI H L I H TI H E E T HE H A E A I A TE U I T C I C UL AT I I

T HE TH I F L .


ENTRANCE

CIRCULATION

VOID

BATHROOMS

BEDROOM

ROOF TERRACE

KITCHEN

OPEN LIVING SPACE

ENTRANCE ENTRANCE

ENTRANCE

Program component layout on different levels. Void is consistent throughout each floor and becomes a generic

modifier for circualtion and program.

EPHENS

EBYONKINA

UNIT - VOID relationship

Unit typology is defined by the void boundaries. Void becomes a solid part of the units that activates public spaces,

forms outdoor occupiable surfaces and serves as a buffer for private typologies.

Architect

City / Location

Year Designed

Architect Name Here

FUKUOKA / JAPAN

1991

MODULE 1 D

THISDIAGRAM IS SHOWINGPRIVATEUNITCIRCULATIONINA TYPICAL UNIT. WHERETHECIRCULATION

OVERLAPSWITHTHEVOID, THE MOSTPRIVATEPROGRAM ISCONNECTED.

Y. GREBYONKINA

K.STEPHENS

THECIRCULATIONSHOWS ISSPLIT INTOTHREE LEVELS. THEBOTTOM FLOOR ISTHE CONNECTEDIS SEMI-CONNECTEDTOTHE VOID,

MIDDLEFLOOR ISCONNECTED, ANDTHETOP FLOOR ISSEMICONNECTED.

Architect

City/ Location

YearDesigned

OMA/REM KOOLHOUSE

FUKUOKA /JAPAN

1991

MODULE 1 B


6/34


Morphosis, Madrid Housing

Pranay Mowji, Madrid Social Housing (Morphosis)

typology


7/34


The BEAM + LOT 13residential block

Alexia Gaviola

Flori Kryethi

.

.

A block typology is streched into a bar where it is split to divide the

volume programatically.

BLOCK

BAR

split BEAM

public void

Marieca Tie, Cameron Eng, Arch.Analysis 2011Alexia Gaviola, Flori Kryethi, Arch.Analysis 2011


8/34


Bar

Courtyard

Bar+Courtyard

Taylor Fulton

Jaime Bernal

TheFukuoka Housinghas a system oftakingspaces out to createvoids foropen space,sunlight,and privacy.Thesevoided spaces createa series ofvertical bars,and a courtyard in between the bars.

EXTRACTION FROMFORM CREATES VOIDSPACES,

ALLOWING ACCESS TO NATURALLIGHT AND AIR.

Typology Diagram 1

Architect

City/ Location

Year Designed/ Built

Area, # Floors, # Units

Steven Holl

Fukuoka, Japan

1989,Fukuoka Housing

4,243m, 5 Floors, 28 Units

BAR TYPOLOGY

BEND

COMPRESSED

TWIST

TWIST OCCURS TO ACCOMMODATEITSELF

INTO THESITEAS WELLAS ADJACENT BUILDINGS

Taylor Fulton

Jaime Bernal

A lot o fS un l igh t N o t a lot o fS un l igh t

Morphology Diagram 1

Architect

City/ Location

Year Designed/ Built

Area, # Floors, # Units

Steven Holl

Fukuoka, Japan

1989,Fukuoka Housing

4,243m, 5 Floors, 28 Units

Thevoids createa spacefor privacy,and to let sunlight into theunits.Someofthe facades ofthebuildingget morelight becauseof how openthey are.

Jaime Bernal / Taylor Fulton, Arch.Analysis 2012

typology vs. morphology

typology diagramsmorphology diagrams

CC h j i ll


9/34


I

I I I I DOUBLE DECKER

This bar typology takes the idea of street-accessed singlefamily housing and stacks one bar over another due to theneed for density. This creates an elevated street condition

(direct street access) for both upper and lower units.

POSITIVE EXTENSIONThe lot is under the residential zoning of 3-storey buildings.But in order to maximize the experiential qualities of each

lot (double aspects), a third of the lot is allotted for a publicpark as a tradeoto grow one storey higher.

SHARED COURTYARDThough this housing scheme is predominantly a bar ty-

pology, it can also be interpreted as a courtyard typology.Given its location, sandwiched between two buildings, andthe subtraction to provide public park, the schemes court-yard becomes shared with the adjacent building.

.

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

11

11

11

1

1 1

1

11

1 1

1 1

11

1 11

1 1

1

1

1 1

1

1111

1 1

1 1 -1

11

11

1

1

11

1

1

111

1

1 1

1 1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1 1

1 11 11 11

1 11 1

11

1

1 1

111

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1 1

1 1

1

1

11

11

11

11

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

111

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1111

1111

1111

1111

11

1 11

1 11 1

11

11

1 1

1 11 1

11111111

11111111

11111111

11 1

1

1

1 11 1

1 11 1

11

1

1 1

1111

1111

1111 1

1111

1111 1

1 1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1 11

1

l i ii ili i

ill i ill l

CIRCULATIONThe circulation through this housing scheme ismostly horizontal with the exception of a few

vertical movements for when there is a levelchange. It is a continuous system that glidesthrough the housing units, public park, andunderground parking space.

HOUSING OUTDOOR SPACE CIRCULATION

B. Leong, A. Iwan

TYPICAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING BLOCKl l

l

ll

I I Il l l

l ll l l ll l

l

l l ll l

ll

.

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

11

11

11

1

1 1

1

11

1 1

1 1

11

1 11

1 1

1

1

1 1

1

1111

1 1

1 1 -1

11

11

1

1

11

1

1

111

1

1 1

1 1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1 1

1 11 11 11

1 11 1

11

1

1 1

111

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1 1

1 1

1

1

11

11

11

11

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

111

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1111

1111

1111

1111

11

1 11

1 11 1

11

11

1 1

1 11 1

11111111

11111111

11111111

11 1

1

1

1 11 1

1 11 1

11

1

1 1

1111

1111

1111 1

1111

1111 1

1 1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1 11

1

Anesta Iwan, Bobby Leung, Arch.Analysis 2011

morphology

CCA hit t l l i tj t i ll


10/34


Alan Hayes / Jean Tse, Arch.Analysis 2012

aggregation

MAX PERIMETERfor experiential gain

BAR STYLE

MINIMIZING INTERIOR CIRCULATION

housing complex

ROOMS ARE SYNCEDto one another for dynamicspacial results

ROOFTOP GARDENrecreational circulatory space

completes the envelope of circulation

WRAPPING PROGRAM

and leads to future modularopportunities on communityscale

MASSING STRATEGY

l ll

SHIFYT REFLECT

ROTATE THE ROOM DANCE

The modularity of the units allows for as well as demands astrategy to create as much variety without much variation.

CCA hit t l l i antje steinmuller


11/34


Leona Hu / Ivonne Gomez, Arch.Analysis 2012

aggregation



12/34


Leif Estrada, Alfonso Reyes 58 (Dellekamp)

aggregation + circulation



13/34


Leah Zaldumbide / Ana Gonzales, Arch.Analysis 2012

circulation



14/34



circulation



15/34



circulation



16/34





17/34

CCA architectural analysis j

Francis Silagon, David Gastaneta, Arch.Analysis 2011

drawing sets



18/34

y j




19/34

y j




20/34Francis Silagon, David Gastaneta, Arch.Analysis 2011



21/34




22/34




23/34

Jason Vereschak, Rania Odeh, Arch.Analysis 2011



24/34




25/34




26/34




27/34




28/34




29/34

Amanda Cross, Claudine Chiongbian, Arch.Analysis 2011



30/34




31/34




32/34

Hugh Vanho, Vincent Nieto, Arch.Analysis 2011

i

, ,, ,

A mster ,

il

hypothesis


+

.


33/34

Vanho

Relationship between the units and the Corridor

Corridor Position

Hugh Vanho, Vincent Nieto, Arch.Analysis 2011

hypothesis



34/34

Documents

sp13_module1_intro1b