Upload
pleasance-roche
View
14
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Lead Officers’ Meeting 2010. SP-Bench. National Benchmarking. 48 Local Authorities 8 non-SPOCC LAs 10 added so far this year Entire East of England region 9200+ Services CLG interest SP-Bench for Providers Anonymised data Requirement to share assessment evidence. Summer 2009. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
National Benchmarking• 48 Local Authorities
• 8 non-SPOCC LAs• 10 added so far this year• Entire East of England region
• 9200+ Services
• CLG interest• SP-Bench for Providers
• Anonymised data• Requirement to share assessment evidence
Summer 2009• Outcomes
• Achievements & Failures
• Data verification• New filters
• Household Units Available & Number of Staff• Support provision• Nearest neighbours (demographically)
• Item Counts• LA Contact List
Autumn 2009• Default to only current data
• Improved PI calculations
• Save and share custom reports
Coming up• Better Service ID sorting
• Improved upload process
• Automatic PI calculation choice
• Latest Outcomes file format
• and...
Value for Money• Mentioned over 40 times in 2009 Audit
Commission report
“Value for money is a key achievement of the SP programme”
• Underpinned by frameworks and returns
How do you assess VfM?“A VfM assessment is a judgement about
the price of a service in the light of the perceived value of that service.”
•Cost Effectiveness Analysis
•Cost Benefits Analysis
Audit Commission Requirements• Clear, tailored understanding of cost,
quality and outcome issues
• Encourage diversity, emphasise outcomes
• Do not focus only on costs
• Benchmark at a national, regional & local level
• Innovative approaches to benchmarking
• Evidence improvements
How can SP-Bench help?• Cost Effectiveness Analysis
• Cost Benefits Analysis
• Studied VfM processes from several LAs
• Found common themes
VfM in SP-Bench• Assess each area individually
• Cost• Performance• Quality• Outcomes
• Compare against percentiles & mean
• Review achievements in concert