Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Sovereign Wealth Funds:
New challenges for the Caspian countries
Summary
ThisbookconsidersfinancialmanagementandtransparencyaspectsofSovereignWealthFunds(SWF).Italsodiscussestheimpactoftheglobalfinancialmeltdown(2008-2009),commoditypricefluctuationsandtheriseoftherisksintheemergingworldonSWFsfinancialperformanceandtheirinvestmentactivities.ThebookparticularlyconcentratesonCaspianBasincountries(Azerbaijan,Russia,andKazakhstan)plusNorwayasexplanatorycasestudies.
Baku–2011
KhazaruniversityAddress:11Mehsetistr.,BakuAZ1096,Azerbaijan
www.khazar.org
PublicFinanceMonitoringCenterAddress:CaspianPlaza3;44,J.Jabbarlystr.,
9thfloorBakuAZ1065,Azerbaijan
Tel/Fax:(+99412)4978967,4970467E-mail:[email protected]
www.pfmc.az
Acronyms
EITI ExtractiveIndustriesTransparencyInitiative
GAPP GenerallyAcceptedPrinciplesandPractices
GDP GrossDomesticProduct
IFI InternationalFinancialInstitutions
IMF InternationalMonetaryFund
NASDAQ NationalAssociationofSecuritiesDealersAutomatedQuotations
NGOs Non-governmentalOrganizations
NGPF NorwegianGovernmentPensionFund
OECD TheOrganizationforEconomicCooperationandDevelopment
SOFAZ StateOilFundofAzerbaijanRepublic
SWF SovereignWealthFunds
USD UnitedStatesDollar
US/G7 UnitedStatesGroupSeven
3
Content
Foreword...........................................................................................................4
SovereignWealthFundsastheemergingplayersintheglobalfinancialarena:characteristics,risksandgovernance................................................................6
Governance,transparencyandaccountabilityinSovereignWealthFunds:remarksontheassessment,rankingsandbenchmarkstodate......................47
StateOilFundofAzerbaijanRepublic:Past,presentandfuture...................................................................................73
TheNationalFundoftheRepublicofKazakhstan(NFRK):Fromstress-testtoglobalfuture.....................................................................100
RussianSovereignWealthFunds.................................................................130 Aboutauthors................................................................................................159
130
Russian Sovereign Wealth Funds
Sergey DrobyshevskyHeadofMacroeconomicsandFinanceDivisionoftheGaidarInstituteforEconomicPolicy
(Moscow,Russia)
Russia hasa relatively longbut rather peculiar history of sovereign fundsdevelopment.Havingstartedin2004withonefund-theStabilizationFundoftheRussianFederation-thecountryhadtwofairlylargefunds,includingtheNationalWelfareFund,in2008onthevergeofthecrisis.However,attheendofthecrisisinthemediumterm,bothfundsmayceasefunctioning,havingmetonlyapartoftheirobjectives.
Short History, Mission and Type
Creation of the firstRussian sovereign fund, theStabilizationFund of theRussianFederation,wasrelated to the ideaof institutionalizing federalbudgetsurplusgeneratedintheformofbalancesonthebudgetaccountswiththeCentralBank of Russia since 2000. Understanding the situational nature of budgetrevenuesinthebackgroundofrisingoilpricesintheworldmarket,andwishingtoavoidaproportionalgrowthofthebudgetexpenditurecommitments,theRFgovernment in 2003 proposed establishment of the Stabilization Fund, whichwouldbeformedfromtheexcessiverevenuesfromoilproductionandexports(ascomparedwiththeestimatedlong-termoilprice,cut-offpriceorbaselineprice).
FederalLaw«OnAmendmentstotheBudgetCodeoftheRussianFederationregardingtheestablishmentoftheStabilizationFundoftheRussianFederation”No.184-FZ,onthebasisofwhichtheStabilizationFundoftheRussianFederationwascreatedin2004,wasadoptedDecember23,2003.
Thepurposeof theStabilizationFundofRussiawastoensurethefederalbudget balanceduringadecrease in oil pricesbelow thebaseline.Accordingto theRFMinistryofFinance, “theFundcontributes tostabilityandeconomicdevelopment;itisoneofthemaininstrumentsofbindingtheexcessiveliquidity,which is reducing inflationary pressures and the dependence of nationaleconomy from adverse fluctuations of revenue from commodity exports.”Thus,at the initialstageofestablishment, theFund isaclassicversionof thecommodityfund,designedtosuppressfluctuationsofthemarketrevenueofthefederalgovernment.TheFundassetscouldbeusedtocoverthefederalbudgetdeficitonlyinthecaseofoilpricesdroppingbelowthebaseline.However,iftheaccumulatedamountoftheFundexceeded500billionrubles,theexcesscouldbeusedforotherpurposes.
FromJanuary1,2004 thebasepricewassetat$20perbarrel forUrals,andonJanuary1,2006,thecut-offpricewasraisedto$27.Despitecontinuedgrowthinoilprices,therewasnofurtherincreaseinthe«cut-offprice»becauseoftheriskofrisinginflationandincreasingbudgetdependenceontheexternal
131
economicsituation.Since in 2005 the Fund exceeded the level of 500 billion rubles (RUR
1,387.8bln),apartoftheassetswasaddressedtootherpurposes,namelyforthepaymentofexternal debtof theRussianFederation (RUR643.1bln)andreplenishmentofthedeficitofthePensionFundoftheRussianFederation(30billionrubles,seeTable1).
Table 1. RF Stabilization Fund Assets: Dynamics in 2004-2007 (RUR bln)
Year
Proceeds Utilization
BalanceasoftheendoftheyearTo
tal
Exportduty
Royalty(oil)
Balances ofFed-
eralBudget
Externaldebt
reco
very
Development
Institutions
financing
RFPension
Funddeficit
replenishm
ent
2004 522.3 240.8 175.5 106.0 – – – 522.32005 1387.8 663.4 507.3 217.1 643.1 – 30.0 1237.02006 1708.6 991.2 646.7 47.8 604.7 – – 2346.92007 1895.9 918.9 674.7 156.7 33.7 300.0 – 3849.1Total 5514.6 2814.8 2004.1 527.6 1281.5 300.0 30.0
Source: RF Federal Treasury
In2005,attheexpenseoftheStabilizationFund,repaymentofexternaldebtofRussiawasmadeintheamountof643.1bln,including:
• 93.5 billion rubles (equivalent to USD 3.3 billion) - the debt to theInternationalMonetaryFund;
• 430.1billionrubles(equivalenttoUSD15billion)-thedebttothemembercountriesoftheParisClub;
• 123.8 billion rubles (equivalent to USD 4.3 billion) - the debt toVnesheconombankundercreditgrantedbytheMinistryofFinanceoftheRussianFederationin1998-1999fortherepaymentandservicingofexternalgovernmentdebtoftheRussianFederation.
In2006,604.7billionrublesandin2007,33.7billionrubleswerespentforexternaldebtredemption.In2005,30.0billionrubles(equivalentto1.04billionU.S.dollars)wereallocatedtocoverthedeficitoftheRFPensionFund,andin2007–300.0billion rubles to financedevelopment institutions (Rusnano - 30billionrubles,VEB-180billionrubles,InvestmentFund-90billionrubles).
BythetimetheFundsplitin2008,theassets’totalvolumewas3,851.8billionrubles(157.38billionU.S.dollars),reachingapproximately11.6%ofannualGDPofRussia(Fig. 1).
132
Figure 1. The total volume of the RF Stabilization Fund
Source: RF Ministry of Finance
StartinginFebruary1,2008theStabilizationFundofRussiawasdividedintotwoparts:theReserveFund(withaninitialvolumeofRUR3069.0bln)andtheNationalWelfareFund(initiallyRUR782.8billion),hereinafterreferredtoasFNB.
TheReserveFund,liketheearlierStabilizationFund,isapartofthefederalbudget.TheFundisintendedtoassistthegovernmenttoupholdbudgetspendingcommitmentsintheeventoflowoilandgasrevenues.ThenormativevalueoftheReserveFundisestablishedatalevelequalto10%ofGDP.IncontrasttotheStabilizationFundof theRussianFederation, inaddition to federalbudgetrevenuesfromoilproductionandexport,thesourcesformingtheReserveFundalsoincludefederalbudgetrevenuesfromgasproductionandgasexport.
Figure 2. Reserve Fund Total Assets Volume
Source: RF Ministry of Finance
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
3 000
3 500
4 000
4 500
01.0
8.20
06
01.0
9.20
06
01.1
0.20
06
01.1
1.20
06
01.1
2.20
06
01.0
1.20
07
01.0
2.20
07
01.0
3.20
07
01.0
4.20
07
01.0
5.20
07
01.0
6.20
07
01.0
7.20
07
01.0
8.20
07
01.0
9.20
07
01.1
0.20
07
01.1
1.20
07
01.1
2.20
07
01.0
1.20
08
30.0
1.20
08
billi
on ru
bles
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
billi
on d
olla
rs
in billion rubles in billion dollars
0
1 000
2 000
3 000
4 000
5 000
6 000
01.0
2.20
0801
.03.
2008
01.0
4.20
0801
.05.
2008
01.0
6.20
0801
.07.
2008
01.0
8.20
08
01.0
9.20
0801
.10.
2008
01.1
1.20
0801
.12.
2008
01.0
1.20
09
01.0
2.20
0901
.03.
2009
01.0
4.20
0901
.05.
2009
01.0
6.20
0901
.07.
2009
01.0
8.20
0901
.09.
2009
01.1
0.20
09
01.1
1.20
0901
.12.
2009
01.0
1.20
1001
.02.
2010
01.0
3.20
10
01.0
4.20
1001
.05.
2010
billi
on ru
bles
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
billi
on d
olla
rs
in billion rubles in billion dollars
133
TheNationalWelfareFundisapartofthefederalbudgetsubjecttoseparateaccounting and management to ensure co-financing of voluntary retirementsavingsof theRussiancitizens,aswellas tocover thedeficitof thePensionFundbudget.
Figure 3. National Welfare Fund Total Assets Volume
Source: RF Ministry of Finance
TheReserveFundactuallybecameafunctionalsuccessoroftheStabilizationFundasapartofthefederalbudgetwithseparateaccountingandmanagementfor thepurposeofoilandgas transfers in theeventof insufficientoilandgasrevenuesforthefinancialsupportofthistransfer.Thereservefundisfinancedbyexcessoilrevenuesofthefederalbudgetinthescopeauthorizedforthefinancialyearintheamountofoilandgastransfers,providedthattheaccumulatedamountof the Reserve Fund does not exceed its established value, as well as fromrevenuesderivedfromthemanagementoftheReserveFund.Inotherwords,itisaclassiccommodityfund.
Inturn,theFNBisclosetothesovereignfundsorfuturegenerationsfundsinnature,andisaccumulatedfromoilandgasrevenuesofthefederalbudgetexceedingtheamountofoilandgastransfersapprovedforthefinancialyear,inthecasethattheaccumulatedamountoftheReserveFundreaches(exceeds)itsestablishedvalue,aswellasrevenuesderivedfromFNBmanagement.
AsofJune1,2010theReserveFundofRussiahasbeenreducedtoRUR1,197.66billion(USD39.27billion).ThevolumeoftheNationalWelfareFundisRUR2,616.54billion(USD85.8billion).
Legal basis, accountability and reporting
Asmentionedabove,in2003theFederalLaw“OnAmendmentstotheBudgetCodeoftheRussianFederationregardingtheestablishmentoftheStabilizationFund of theRussian Federation” of 23.12.2003No. 184-FZwas adopted, onthebasisofwhichin2004theStabilizationFundoftheRussianFederationwasestablished.The lawhas introducedChapter 13.1 in theBudgetCode,which
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
3 000
3 500
01.
02.2
008
01.0
3.20
08
01.0
4.20
08
01.0
5.20
08
01.0
6.20
08
01.0
7.20
08
01.0
8.20
08
01.0
9.20
08
01.1
0.20
08
01.1
1.20
08
01.1
2.20
08
01.0
1.20
09
01.0
2.20
09
01.0
3.20
09
01.0
4.20
09
01.0
5.20
09
01.0
6.20
09
01.0
7.20
09
01.0
8.20
09
01.0
9.20
09
01.1
0.20
09
01.1
1.20
09
01.1
2.20
09
01.0
1.20
10
01.0
2.20
10
01.0
3.20
10
01.0
4.20
10
01.0
5.20
10
billi
on ru
bles
0102030405060708090100
billi
on d
olla
rs
in billion rubles in billion dollars
134
stipulatedfundamentalsoftheStabilizationFundanditsmanagementprocedure.According to the law, theStabilizationFund isapartof the federalbudget
assets,formedfromtheexcessofoilpricesoverthebaselineprice,subjecttoseparateaccounting,managementanduseinordertobalancethefederalbudgetincaseofadecreaseinoilpricesbelowthebaseline.
ThesourcesoftheinitialformationoftheStabilizationFundwere:• federalbudgetsurplusrevenues,whichareassessedasanexcessoil
pricesoverthebaselineprice;• balancesof the federalbudgetassetsat thebeginningof the relevant
fiscalyear,includingtheproceedsfromtheStabilizationFundassetsallocation.AdditionalfederalbudgetrevenuestobecreditedtotheStabilizationFundin
thecurrentmonthwereassessedasthesumof: • actual revenue to the federalbudget from theexportcustomsdutyon
crudeoilobtainedinthecurrentmonth,multipliedbytheratioofthedifferencebetweentherateofexportdutyoncrudeoileffectiveinthecurrentmonthandtheestimatedrateofthatdutywiththebaselinepriceforoiltotherateofexportcustomsdutyoncrudeoileffectiveinthecurrentmonth;
• actualrevenueofthefederalbudgetfromseverancetax(oil)obtainedinthecurrentmonthmultipliedbytheratioofthedifferencebetweentheseverancetaxrateeffectiveinthecurrentmonthforoilextractionandtheestimatedrateofthistaxwiththebaselinepriceoilextractiontaxrateeffectiveinthecurrentmonthonextractionofminerals(oil).
Onlyone targetwas foreseen in theRFBudgetCode for theStabilizationFund,namely-financingofthefederalbudgetdeficit“inthecaseofadecreaseinoilpricesbelowthebaseline,aswellasforotherpurposes,iftheaccumulatedvolumeoftheStabilizationFundexceeds500millionrubles.”
AccordingtoArt.96.4BCRF,theMinistryofFinanceofRussiawasauthorizedtomanagetheStabilizationFund,butsomerelevantfunctionscouldbeperformedbytheCentralBankoftheRussianFederation.ThelistoffunctionsperformedbytheCBRwasnotspecifiedintheBudgetCode.
AsaneffectofChapter13.1oftheRFBudgetCode,amendmentsweremademainlyinregardtothebaselineforoilprices,butnotaffectingthemanagementoftheFundortheirtargetuse.Attheexecutivelevel,themanagementprocedureof the Stabilization Fund was governed by a number of legal acts, themostimportantofwhichare:
• TheRFGovernmentRegulationsNo.508of30.09.2004andNo.229from 21.04.2006 “On the Procedure of the Stabilization Fund of the RussianFederationManagement”
• TheRFGovernmentRegulationNo.31of23.01.2004“OnApprovaloftheRulesoftransfertotheStabilizationFundoftheRussianFederationoftheadditional federal budget revenues, balances of the federal budget as of thebeginningofthefiscalyear,andrevenuesfromtheallocationoftheStabilizationFundoftheRussianFederation”
• OrderoftheRFMinistryofFinanceNo.20of28.01.2004“OnApprovalofRules of assessment and transfer to theStabilizationFund of theRussianFederation of the federal budget surplus revenues and fund balances of thefederalbudgetbythebeginningofthefiscalyear,”and
• OrderoftheRFMinistryofFinanceNo.158of22.05.2006“Onapproval
135
of theminimumandmaximumtimelines for repaymentof thedebt liabilitiesofforeign countries, in which the Stabilization Fund of the Russian Federationassetscanbeinvested.”
Of particular interest are the RF Government Regulation No. 508 of30.09.2004, “On theorderof theStabilizationFundof theRussianFederationassets management,” and No. 229 from 21.04.2006 “On the order of themanagementoffundsoftheStabilizationFundoftheRussianFederation.”Oneof the key tasks in the first stagewas to set conditions for investment of theRFStabilizationFundbytheCentralBankabroadandtoprovideatleastsomesafeguards toprotect them fromclaimsof foreigncreditors.As investments inforeignfinancial instruments,federalfundslosethestatusofpublicfundsand,accordingly,anystatejurisdictionalimmunity.
The Regulation No. 508 of 30.09.2004 stipulated the following allocationof investments. The Fund assets were legally separated from the assets ofthe Central Bank1 and were legally considered “commercial” investments oftheRussianFederationasa legalentity.Thiscreatedcertain risks for foreigninvestmentsoftheStabilizationFund,sincetherewasnojurisdictionalimmunityof theRussian Federation in regard to those funds.As a result, therewas apossibilityofforeclosureontheStabilizationFundfromforeigncreditors.
The government feared the risk of foreclosure on these funds2, and theadoptionof“ontheprocedureformanagingtheStabilizationFundoftheRussianFederation”No.229from21.04.2006triedtogivethemthestatusoffundsusedfor “governmental and non-commercial” purposes3, which are protected withjurisdictionalimmunity.Tothisend,theassetsplacedabroadweretransferredtothestatusoffundsbelongingtotheCentralBankofRussia.
TheRegulationprovidedthefollowingprocedureforinvestingtheStabilizationFundassets:theypassedtotheFederalTreasury,andtheTreasurythenplacedtheminaspecialaccountwiththeRFCentralBank,notonthebasisoftheassetsmanagementcontractasitwasbefore,butonthebasisofacontractforabankaccount. Since the funds deposited in an account with the bank are formallytransferredtoitsownership,itallowedtheCentralBanktoinvestthemabroadasitsownfundsusedfor“publicnon-commercialpurposes.”Herewith,theMinistryofFinancehasretainedthekeyresponsibilityformanagementoftheinvestmentprocessforallocationoftheStabilizationFundassets4.
Inparticular,theMinistryofFinancewasauthorizedtodefine:• thestandardcurrencystructureoftheStabilizationFund,theprocedure
ofpursuingthestandardcurrencystructure;• standardsofminimumandmaximummaturityofdebtsecurities,
1Theassetsweretransferredunderthemanagementcontract,concludedbetweentheRussianFinanceMinistryandCentralBank,anddidnotlegallybecomethepropertyofRFCentralBank.
2See,forinstance,UnitedNationConferenceonTradeandDevelopment.WorldInvestmentReport:TransnationalCorporations,ExtractiveIndustriesandDevelopment.newYorkandGeneva,2007.P.XVII.;McKnightA.TheLawofInternationalFinance.OxfordUniversityPress,2008.P.368,369.
3 Immunity to this category of funds is provided under theUnitedNationsConvention “OnJurisdictionalImmunityoftheStatesandtheirProperty”from02.12.2004.
4ThisDecreestipulates“managementoftheStabilizationFundbytheMinistryofFinanceoftheRussianFederation”.
136
• theprocedureforaccountingandcreditinginterestaccruedonbalancesoftheStabilizationFundaccounts,aswellasotherconditionsofthebankaccountcontract;and
• the procedure of interactionwith the FederalTreasury in carrying outtransactionswiththeaccountsoftheStabilizationFund.
Monitoring of theRussianFinanceMinistry control functions over the useoftheStabilizationFundwaslimitedtothedutiesofprovidingquarterlyannualreportstotheGovernmentofRussiaonthestatusofthefollowingindicators:
• the amount of authorized foreign currency purchased and foreigncurrencyplacedontheaccountsoftheStabilizationFund;
• estimatedinterestratesfortheallocationoftheStabilizationFundassetsintheaccounts;
• estimated income for theallocationof theStabilizationFundassets intheaccounts;
• names and basic characteristics of foreign countries’ debt liabilitiesacquiredwiththeStabilizationFundassets;
• incomederivedfromtheplacementoftheStabilizationFundassetsintobondsofforeigncountriesbytypeofdebtliabilitiesofforeigncountries;
• informationonbalancesof theaccountsof theStabilizationFund(peryear);and
• detailsofinterestpaidoverthepastyearfortheuseofStabilizationFundassetsplacedintheaccounts(peryear).
In2007,theprocedurefortheformationoffunds,accumulatingoilandgasrevenuesof the federalbudget,and theprocedure tomanage the fundswereradically amended. Relevant amendments were made with the Federal LawNo.63-FZof26.04.2007“OnAmendmentstotheBudgetCodeoftheRussianFederation in terms of regulating the budgetary process and bringing certainlegislativeactsof theRussianFederation in linewith thebudget legislationoftheRussianFederation.”UnderthisAct,theStabilizationFundwassplitintotwoparts,andthefollowingwereestablished:
1.aReserveFundinordertominimizetherisksoftheRussianeconomyinthecaseofasharpdropinenergysources’pricesintheworldmarkets(Art.96.9oftheRFBudgetCode)
2. a National Welfare Fund, in order to ensure co-financing voluntaryretirementsavingsoftheRussianFederationcitizens,aswellastoensurethebalance (cover the deficit) of the budget of thePension Fund of theRussianFederation(Art.96.10BCCode).
Inaddition,startingfrom2007,apartoftheoilandgasrevenuewasusedasapartofthefederalbudgettoimplementinparticularlarge-scalesocialprogramsandreplenishmentofthefederalbudgetdeficitthroughtheso-called“oilandgastransfers”(Article96.8oftheRFBudgetCode).
Reserve FundThe reserve fund is formed from the oil revenues of the federal budget
exceedingthelevelofoilandgastransfersauthorizedfortherelevantfinancialyear,providedthatthecumulativeReserveFunddoesnotexceeditsestablishedvalue,aswellasfromrevenuesfromthemanagementofthereservefund.
137
Item 2 of art. 96.9 of the RF Budget Code established a procedure forestimationof thenormativevaluesof theReserveFund.Under this item, it isassigned an absolute amount, assessed on the basis of 10 percent of GDPplannedfortherelevantfiscalyear.
However,alargepartoftheprovisionsofArt.96.9oftheRFBudgetCodewerenot set tobeput intoeffectuntil 2013.The relevantdecisionwas takenaspartoftheanti-crisismeasuresandapprovedbytheFederalLawNo.314-FZof17.12.2009 “OnAmendments toCertainLegislativeActsof theRussianFederation”inconnectionwiththeFederalLaw“Onthefederalbudgetfor2010andtheplannedperiodof2011and2012.”
Before2013,while the revenue from theReserveFundmanagementwasallocated to financing the budget expenditures, the procedure for the fundassessment,stipulatedbyItem2ofArticle96.9,couldbeignored.Also,before2013, the RF Government could, without amending the federal law on thefederalbudget,makedecisionsontheuseof theStabilizationFundandotherbalances of the federal budget for the implementation of payments, reducingdebtliabilities,borrowing,andtobalancethefederalbudgetexecution(includingfinancial support of oil and gas transfers), including the excess of the totalfederalbudgetexpenditureswithinincreasedbudgetaryallocationsofthefederalbudgettoprovideintergovernmentaltransfersinordertobalancethebudgetsofstateextra-budgetary fundsof theRussianFederation,with thecorrespondingamendmentstothebudgetregistry5.
National Welfare FundAccordingtoArt.96.10oftheRFBudgetCode,theNationalWelfareFund
is formed fromoil revenuesof the federalbudgetexceeding theamountofoilandgastransfersapprovedforthefinancialyear,iftheaccumulatedamountoftheReserveFundreaches(exceeds)itsestablishedvalue,aswellasfromtheincomederivedfromtheNationalWelfareFundmanagement.Thelatter,aswellas income from theReserveFundmanagement from2009 through2013,areallocatedtothefinancingofthebudgetexpenditures6.
Art.96.11oftheRFBudgetCodeestablishestheprocedureformanagingtheFunds’assets,aswellassettinguprequirementsfortheassetsoftheFundsthatcanbeusedforinvestments.Theserequirementsarespecifiedindetailonthesub-lawlevel.Accordingtothisarticle,theReserveFundandNationalWelfareFundaremanagedbytheMinistryofFinanceoftheRussianFederationinthemanner established by theGovernment of theRussian Federation.Herewith,some responsibility formanaging theReserveFundcanbeperformedby theCentral Bank of theRussian Federation, and some of those in regard to theNationalWelfareFund-bytheCentralBankoftheRussianFederationandbyspecialfinancialinstitutions,inaccordancewithagreementswiththeMinistryofFinanceoftheRussianFederationinthemannerprescribedbytheGovernmentoftheRussianFederation.
5SeeFederalLaw№58-FZof09.04.2009“OnamendmentstotheBudgetCodeoftheRussianFederationandsomelegislativeactsoftheRussianFederation”
6SeeFederalLaw№58-FZof09.04.2009“OnamendmentstotheBudgetCodeoftheRussianFederationandsomelegislativeactsoftheRussianFederation”
138
Currently,theprocedureforthemanagementoftheFundsisgovernedby:• TheRFGovernmentRegulationNo.892of17.12.2007“Ontheestimates
andtransferoffundsinconnectionwiththeformationandusageofoilandgasrevenuesofthefederalbudget,oilandgastransfersandtheassetsofReserveFundandNationalWealth;”
• TheRFGovernmentRegulationNo.955of29.12.2007“OntheprocedureoftheReserveFundmanagement;”
• TheRFGovernmentRegulationNo.18of19.01.2008“OntheprocedureoftheNationalWelfareFundassetsmanagement;”
• The Order of the RF Ministry of Finance No. 3 of 16.01.2008 “Onapprovalof theauthorizedshares inthetotalvolumeoffinancialassetsof theReserveFundandtheprocedureforassessmentoftheactualauthorizedshareof financial assets in the total assets of theReserveFund to bring them intoconformitywiththeestablishedrates;”
• The Order of the RF Ministry of Finance No. 26 of 24.01.2008 “Onapprovalof theauthorizedshares inthetotalvolumeoffinancialassetsof theNationalWelfareFundandtheprocedureforassessmentoftheactualauthorizedshareoffinancialassetsinthetotalvolumeoftheNationalWelfareFundtobringthemintoconformitywiththeestablishedrates;”
• TheOrderoftheMinistryofFinanceN517of21.10.2008“OnamendmentstotheOrderoftheMinistryofFinanceoftheRussianFederationN26onJanuary24,2008;”
• The Order of the RF Ministry of Finance No. 24 of 24.01.2008 “Onapproval of the established foreign currency structure of theNationalWelfareFund and the Procedure to bring the actual foreign currency structure of theNationalWelfareFundintocompliancewiththeestablishedrates;”and
• The Order of the RF Ministry of Finance No. 5 of 16.01.2008, “OnapprovalofthelistofforeigngovernmentagenciesinwhichthedebtliabilitiesoftheReserveFundcanbeallocated.”
Ingeneral,themanagementprocedureoftheFunds,establishedonthebasisoftheStabilizationFund,isgovernedbythelogiclaiddownbythegovernmentintheRegulationNo.229issuedin2006.Accordingtothe“new”OrderNo.892of 17.12.2007, the key functions associated with management decisions areperformedbytheMinistryofFinance,whiletheCentralBankcarriesouttechnicalworkrelatedtoensuringtheir implementation.RelationsamongtheMinistryofFinance,TreasuryandCentralBankarebasedonthebankaccountagreement.TheAgreement, as before, is reachedbetween theRFCentralBankand theTreasury.
• AccordingtotheMinistryofFinanceOrderNo.25Hof14.02.2008,theoilandgasrevenuesofthefederalbudget,theReserveFundandNationalWelfareFund are registered in special accounts of the federal budget opened for theFederalTreasurywith theCentralBank of theRussianFederation. For thesepurposes,inaccordancewiththeBankAccountAgreemententeredintobytheFederalTreasuryandtheCentralBankoftheRussianFederation,onthebalanceofaccountNo.40105“Thefederalbudget,”separateaccountsareopened:
• toaccountforoilandgasrevenuesofthefederalbudget;• toaccountfortheReserveFundassetsinthenationalcurrencyofthe
RussianFederationinthespecialaccountoftheReserveFund;
139
• toaccountfortheNationalWelfareFundassetsintheRussiannationalcurrencyandaccountfortherecordingoftheNationalWelfareFundassets.
Transferoftheoilandgasrevenuesofthefederalbudget,theReserveFundandNationalWelfareFund in thenationalcurrencyof theRussianFederationis performed by the Federal Treasury upon instructions from the Ministry ofFinanceoftheRussianFederationtoconducttransactionsontheaccountsfortheaccountingofoilandgasrevenues,theReserveFundandNationalWelfareFund,aswellaspaymentdocuments.
All the above-mentioned laws provide for the minimum requirements inrelationtothecontrolprocessoverinvestingtheReserveFundandtheNationalWelfareFundassets.
ControlarisesfromthefactthattheFinanceMinistryprovidesquarterlyandannualreportsonthemanagementoftheFundsassetstothegovernmentoftheRussianFederation.ThereportsprovidedtotheGovernmentcomprise:
• informationonthebalancesoftheFunds;• informationonthevolumeoftheboughtandsoldassets;• informationontheestimated interest rates for theusageassetsof the
Fundallocatedtotheaccounts;• informationontheestimatedamountsofincomederivedfromtheuseof
thefundsallocatedtotheaccountsoftheFunds;• the names and basic characteristics of financial assets, in which the
Funds’assetswereplaced;• detailsofincomereceivedfromtheplacementoffunds.Inaddition,nolaterthanonthe20thofeachmonth,theMinistryofFinance
compiles and publishes in its website monthly summary reports available forpublic use. Published reports provide an overview of the total assets of theNationalWelfareFundasof thebeginningof the reportingmonth, aswell asinformationon theassetscredited to the fund, theirplacementanduse in thereportingmonth.
Theserequirementsonthecontroloverinvestmentofoilandgasrevenuesare limited.Speakingof controlling theuseof the funds,oneshouldalsopayattentiontothefactthattherepresentativebodiesofthestatepowerarevirtuallynotinvolvedinthecontrolofthefunds’investments,anddonotmakemanagementdecisionsontheseissues.
Moreover,asnotedabove,from2009to2013thedecisionsontheuseoftheReserveFundweremadebytheRFGovernmentwithnochangestothelawonthefederalbudget;thatis,thefundnotonlyinvests,butalsopartlyspendstheFundassetswithouttheapprovaloftheParliament.Therefore,themanagementoftheFundsisvirtuallybeyondtheParliament’scontrol.
OnMay6,2010theRFGovernmentRegulationNo.267of21.04.2010“OnthesuspensionoftheactsoftheRFGovernmentontheformationanduseofoil and gas revenues of the federal budget, income frommanagement of theReserve Fund andNationalWelfare Fund” came into effect, underwhich thefollowingrequirementsfortheMinistryofFinancearecancelled:
• publishing of information on the Russian Ministry of Finance websiteaboutthecollectionanduseofoilandgasrevenuesofthefederalbudget,theirenrollmentintheReserveFundandNationalWealthFund,andtheadmissionofincomefrommanagementoftheReserveFundandNationalWealthFundtothe
140
Fund(beforeFebruary1,2012);• submissionofreportstotheGovernmentofRussiaontheformationof
theReserveFundandNationalWelfareFundandontherevenuefromtheuseofoilandgasrevenuesofthefederalbudget(beforeJanuary1,2013).
Inaddition,issuesoftheformationandusageoftheoilandgasrevenuefrombefore January 1, 2013 are excluded from the review for the formulation andapprovalofthefederalbudgetforthenextfiscalyearandtheplannedthree-yearterm.
Thus,thisRegulationestablishesadeparturefromtheconceptofseparationofthebudgetbyoilandgasandnon-oiland-gascomponentsandofoilandgastransfer as a source of funding the non-oil budget deficit, andmakes theRFMinistryofFinanceandtheGovernmentofRussiavirtuallyunaccountabletotheStateDumaintermsofbothFunds’assetsmanagement.
However, it should be noted that theRFMinistry of Finance continued topublishinformationonthestatusoftheFundsonitswebsiteasofJune1,2010.
Institutional base and institutional quality
CreationoftheRFStabilizationFundin2004,althoughitgoesbeyondthechronologicalframework,shouldbeconsideredinthecontextoftheoveralllogicofeconomic reformsofV.V.Putin’s first term inoffice (2000-2003),of theso-called “Gref Program”7 or “Strategy-2010.” In the framework of this program,radical tax reformwas carried out, the foundationwas laid for the new fiscalpolicy (transition to three-year budget planning), and the contours of majorinstitutionalreformswereoutlined(administrativereform,judicialreform,reformofnaturalmonopolies),although the latterones,unfortunately,have remainedlargelyunimplemented.Inaddition,whenmakingeconomicpolicydecisions,thethen-recenteventsof thecrisis thathappened inAugust1998weretaken intoaccount,leadingtothenationalcurrencydevaluation,theenlargeddebtburdenonthebudgetandthefearofuncontrolledgovernmentdeficit.Inparticular,thedynamics of oil prices in the worldmarkets, even in the short term, seemedextremelyvolatile,astherewasahighprobabilityofanewdeclinethereoftothelevelof$9-10perbarrel,aswasobservedin1998-1999.
Inthiscontext,theauthorsoftheconceptoftheStabilizationFundfacedthetaskofdevelopingareliable,sustainablemechanismfortheprotectionofexportrevenuestothebudgetfromtheirusageforthecurrentbudgetcommitmentsandemergingnewbudgetarycommitments in thecaseofashort-term increase inoilprices,aswellasminimizationofthenegativeimpactoftheinflowofexportrevenueson theeconomy ingeneral (namely, preventing theaccumulationofliquidityintheeconomy,thesituationofadeficitofinvestmentprojects,andthewillingnessofbusinessesandbankstoinvestintherealsector).
Thus,asstatedabove,ininstitutionalterms,theRFStabilizationFundwasapartofthefederalbudgetassets,subjecttoseparateaccounting,managementandutilization.Inotherwords,theFundassetswereaccountedforandplacedinaspecialaccountoftheRFMinistryofFinancewiththeRFCentralBankofRussia.Theplanned revenue to theFund for the relevant fiscal yearand the
7 NamedaftertheMinisterofEconomicDevelopmentG.O.Gref.
141
amountoftheFundasoftheendofeachfinancialyearwereapprovedbytheFederalAssembly(Parliament)ofRussiabythelawonthefederalbudgetforthenextfiscalyearandtheplannedthree-yearterm.
Managementof theFundwasexecutedby theRFCentralBankunderanagreementwiththeRFMinistryofFinance.Herewith,theBankofRussia,infact,actedasthemanagementcompany,andtheRFGovernmentandtheRussianMinistryofFinancedefinedthestrategyforthemanagementoftheFundandascopeofpermissibleassets.
TheRFReserveFundofRussiaandtheNationalWelfareFundalsomakeupapartofthefederalbudgetsubjecttoseparateaccountingandmanagement.Atthesametime,theyare(atleastuntilthebeginningofMay2010)subjecttothesameinstitutionalconstraintsandconditionsastheStabilizationFundofRussia.
AssessingtheoverallqualityoftheinstitutionalenvironmentoftheRussiansovereignfunds,onecandistinguishthefollowingadvantagesanddisadvantages.
Advantages• Strong legal status of the Funds through the addition of individual
ChapterstotheBudgetCode,whichbeforethecrisiscreatedareliablesystemforprotectingtheFunds’assetsfrompoliticalandsituationaltemptationsonthepartofboththeRFGovernmentandrepresentativesofthepowerauthorities.
• FormationofthefundsinspecialaccountsoftheRFGovernmentintheBank of Russia, whichminimized the effect of additional situational revenuesfromoilexportsnotonlytothebudgetsystem,butalsoonmonetary-creditandexchangeratepolicies.
• AnadequatelinkingofthesourcesoftheFunds’formationwiththemarketrevenuesfromoilexports.Calculationsshowthatin2005-2008,whenthelevelofoilpricesintheworldmarketwasabove$35-40perbarrelversusthenationalmarket,upto95%ofthesurplusincomefromoilexportswereaddressedtotheStabilizationFundintheformofexportdutiesandmineralextractiontax.
• Splittingof theStabilizationFund into theReserveFundandNationalWelfareFundin2008.EvenduringtheworstcrisissituationinRussia,in2008-2009, and the high budget deficit in the subsequent years, the institutionalconditionsallowedtheNationalWelfareFundtobesavedasasovereignfundforfuturegenerations,usingitforfinancingthefederalbudgetdeficit.Obviously,if onlyoneof theStabilizationFundshadbeenmaintainedduring thisperiod,its fundswouldhavebeen fullyspent for thesolutionof thecurrentbudgetaryproblems.
Shortages• TheconservativemanagementschemeoftheFunds.Managementofall
Fundassetsremainsinthehandsoftheagencies,forwhichthisissueisoutsidetheir main objective (RF Central Bank and the Russian Ministry of Finance).Involvementofprivateprofessionalmanagementcompanies(Russianorforeign)inthemanagementoftheFundsremainspoliticallyunacceptable.
• The lackofa legal framework for targetedparametersof theNationalWelfareFund.DespitethefactthattheobjectiveoftheNationalWelfareFundwasdeclaredthe“co-financingofvoluntaryretirementsavingsofRussiancitizens,”
142
aswellas“recoveringofthe(deficit)budgetofthePensionFund,”therequiredparameters are not in place to link to the pension fund reform. Under thesecircumstances,theNationalWelfareFundcouldexclusivelybecomeasourceoffundingforthecurrentdeficitofthePensionFund,andnotatoolforsolvinglong-termproblemsofthepensionsystemintheRussianFederation.
• The lack of institutional capacity to develop individual strategies formanagingtheassetsofthetwoexistingFunds,notonlybasedonprinciplesofriskmanagement,butalsotoensuremaximumyieldatagivenlevelofrisk.
Investment Portfolio and Asset Management
Intheperiodfrom2004to2006,thefollowingrequirementswereappliedtoassetsthatcanbeinvestedintheStabilizationFund:
a)theissuerofthedebtliabilitiesshouldhavealong-termcreditratingofnotlower thanthe level“AAA”bytheclassificationofFitchRatingsorStandard&Poor’s,ornotbelowthelevelof“AAA”undertheratingagencyMoody’sInvestorsService;
b)maturityofdebtsecurities isfixed; thetermsof issueandcirculationdonotprovidetheissuertherighttoaffecttheirearlyredemption(maturity)ortherightoftheownertosubmitthemforredemption(maturity)bytheissuerofdebtinstrumentsaheadofschedule;
c)thecurrentmaturitydateofissuedoesnotexceedoneyearfordiscountliabilitiesor10yearsforcouponbonds;
d)couponratepaidoncouponbondsisfixede)thebondvalueisdenominatedinoneoftheauthorizedforeigncurrencies
and payments toward the debt liabilities are made in the currency of itsdenomination;
f)thevolumeofthedebtliabilitiesissuedincirculationisnotlessthanUS$1billionforthedebtliabilitiesdenominatedinU.S.dollars,Euro1billionfordebtliabilitiesdenominated inEuro,orGBP1billion for thebondsdenominated inpoundssterling.
From2006to2007therequirementsunderwentminimalchangeswherebythevolumeofdebt liabilities incirculationanddenominated inpoundssterlingwasreducedfromGBP1billionto0.5billion.
Also in theResolutionNo. 229 of 21.04.2006 there appeared a clarifyingrequirementthattheissuanceofdebtliabilitiesinwhichinvestmentsaremadeshouldnotbeissuesintendedforprivate(non-public)placement.Inaddition,itwasstatedintheRegulationthatthestandardsoftheminimumandmaximumtermtomaturityofthebondissuesareestablishedbytheMinistryofFinance.
Thedistributionofsharesamongthevarioustypesofinvestmentinstrumentsused for placement of the Fund assets was established by the Order of RFMinistry of FinanceNo. 157 of 22.05.2006, providing for the following foreigncurrencystructureoftheStabilizationFund:
• U.S.Dollar-45%;• Euro-45%;• PoundSterling-10%.The limits of permissible deviations of actual monetary structure of the
143
StabilizationFundfromtheestimatedforeigncurrencystructurewere: • fortheStabilizationFundinU.S.dollars-+/-5percentagepoints;• fortheStabilizationFundinEuro-+/-5percentagepoints• fortheStabilizationFundinBritishpoundssterling-+/-2percentage
points.In2007,theFinanceMinistryalsoclarifiedtherequirementsfortheminimum
andmaximummaturityofdebtbytheOrderoftheRFMinistryofFinanceNo.737of05.12.2007“OnapprovalofstandardsfortheminimumandmaximummaturitytermofbondissuesofforeigncountriesinwhichtheassetsoftheStabilizationFund of the Russian Federation may be located.” For the debt instrumentsdenominatedinU.S.dollarsandEuro,theminimumtermtomaturityhasbeensetat2months,andthemaximum-15months.FortheliabilitiesdenominatedinBritishpoundssterlingtheminimumtermtomaturitywassetat3monthsandthemaximumterm-36months.
During thefunctioningperiodof theStabilizationFundtheprocedureof itsinvestment policy had been developed only in general and was insufficientlydetailed8.TherewerenorulesgoverningtheformationoftheinvestmentpolicyoftheRussianMinistryofFinance.Inparticular,therewasnoclearregulationoftheorderofinformationinteractionbetweentheMinistryofFinanceandTreasury,althoughtheneedforsuchaprocedurewasmentionedintheregulationsoftheGovernment.
Once theStabilizationFundwassplit into theReserveFundandNationalWelfare Fund, the regulation of matters related to investment of their assetswas detailed9. In particular, the order of the RFMinistry of Finance No. 25Hfrom14.02.2008regulatedtheissuesoftheinformationexchangewiththeRFTreasury.
AccordingtoResolutionsNo.955andNo.18,theRussianMinistryofFinanceestablished:
a)astandardforeigncurrencystructureofassetsofbothfunds,theprocedureforbringingtheactualforeigncurrencystructureoftheFundsintoalignmentwiththeestablishedstandards;
b) the share of financial assets authorized for allocation in the total Fundassetswithin the prescribed requirements and procedure for estimates of theactualshareoffinancialassetsauthorizedforallocationinthetotalFundassets(bringingthemintoconformitywiththenormativeshares);
c)standardminimumandmaximummaturitytermsofdebtliabilitiesofforeigncountries,foreigngovernmentagenciesandcentralbanks,andofinternationalfinancialorganizations,includingthoseinsecurities;
d)alistofforeigngovernmentagenciesintothedebtinstrumentsofwhichtheFundassetscanbeplaced;
e)standardminimumandmaximumtermsofplacing the fundsondepositwithforeignbanksandcreditinstitutions;
f)proceduresforestimatesofcreditsandinterestearnedonfundsdepositedintheFundaccountsandotherprovisionsofthebankaccountcontracts;
8 Thesewereprovided in theRFgovernmentRegulationNo.508of30.09.2004and in theAnnextotheRFgovernmentRegulationNo.229of21.04.2006.
9Listofnormativeactsregulatingthemanagementofinvestmentfundspolicyisgivenabove.
144
g) procedures of interaction with the Federal Treasury in carrying outtransactionswiththeFundaccountsinthemanagementoftheReserveFund;
h)proceduresofinteractionwithFederalTreasuryindeterminingthetermsofthecontractwithbankaccountsinthemanagementoftheFundsassets.
In addition, the twoRegulations (in the annexes) have approved detailedrequirementsforfinancialassetsinwhichtheNationalWelfareFundandReserveFundassetsmaybeplaced.
Thus, the regulation of issues related to the process of the Funds’managementhasbecomemoredetailedingeneral.However,theproceduresarestillinsufficienttoregulatehowindividualauthoritiesmanagetheFunds’assetsbymeansofspecializedfinancialinstitutions,aswellastheirinvolvementintheimplementationofthosepowers10.
There is a lack of clarity in the issues related to the implementation ofinvestmenttransactionsbytheCentralBankthatcarriesouttheactualallocationofthefunds.Currently,therearenointernalCentralBankregulationsgoverningsuchfunctionsinthisarea.
Thus, in 2004 and 2005 there were no investment transactions of theStabilization Fund assets. During the period from July 24, 2006 (the startingdateof investmentof theStabilizationFund) throughDecember15,2007, thetotal income from the investmentsamounted to174.8billion rubles. (Over theyearfromDecember15,2006toDecember15,2007therevenuereached151.9billionrubles).Therefore,thereturnsfrominvestmentsinU.S.dollarsfortheyearamountedto10.94%perannumandinrubles-about5%.Giventheannualrateofinflation(respectively11.7%and10.9%),wecanseeanegativereturnontheFund.
Table 2. Stabilization Fund Growth Rate in RUR1) and in USD2), %
01.09.2006
01.10.2006
01.11.2006
01.12.2006
01.01.2007
01.02.2007
01.03.2007
01.04.2007
01.05.2007
01.06.2007
01.07.2007
01.08.2007
01.09.2007
01.10.2007
01.11.2007
01.12.2007
01.01.2008
1 -21.6 9.4 8.2 6.8 7.2 12.8 2.3 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.8 3.9 4.5 3.2 3.7 -3.6 9.42 -21.2 9.3 8.3 8.6 7.1 11.9 3.8 4.4 5.2 2.8 4.1 4.8 4.3 6.1 4.6 -2.1 8.6
Source: RF Ministry of Finance
10TheneedforsuchregulationisexpresslyprovidedbytheResolution№18,whichobligedtheMinistryofFinancejointlywithotheragencies(MinistryofEconomicDevelopment,FederalFinancialMarketsService,theMinistryofJusticeandCentralBank)to“developandsubmittotheGovernmentoftheRussianFederationthedraftRegulationintheestablishedprocedure.”
145
Requirements for placing assets of the Reserve Fund
Ingeneral,therequirementsfortheFundassetsarestipulatedinArt.69.11oftheRFBudgetCode,andalsogivenindetailatthesub-lawlevel11.TheArticlepresentsvariousrequirementsfortheinvestmentofthetwoFunds.
OptionsforallocationoftheReserveFundassetsaremuchmorelimitedthanthosefortheplacementoftheFundofNationalWelfareassets.ReserveFundassetsmaybeplacedinforeigncurrencyandinthefollowingtypesoffinancialinstrumentsdenominatedinforeigncurrency:
• debtliabilitiesofforeigncountries;• debtliabilitiesofforeigngovernmentagenciesandcentralbanks12;• debt liabilities of international financial organizations, including
securities13;• depositsandbalances inbankaccountswith foreignbanksandcredit
organizations;• deposits and account balances with the Central Bank of Russian
Federation.RFGovernmentRegulationNo. 955 of 29.12.2007 «On themanagement
procedureofadministrationoftheReserveFund»clarifiestheserequirements,settingminimumandmaximumsharesoftheallocatedassets,aswellasmoredetailedrequirementsforthem.
Thus, the share of foreign countries’ debts should be from 50 to 100%.Herewith,suchassetscanbeinvestedexclusivelyindebtinstrumentsin:Austria,Belgium, Britain, Germany, Denmark, Ireland, Spain, Canada, Luxembourg,Netherlands,USA,Finland,FranceandSweden.
TheRegulationcontainsanopenlist14ofrecommendedinternationalfinancialinstitutionswhosedebt liabilities canbeused for investment.Theyare:AsianDevelopmentBank,ADB;CouncilofEuropeDevelopmentBank,CEB;EuropeanBankforReconstructionandDevelopment,EBRD;EuropeanInvestmentBank,EIB;Inter-AmericanDevelopmentBank,IADB;InternationalFinanceCorporation,IFC; International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, IBRD; NordicInvestmentBank,NIB;andInternationalMonetaryFund,IMF.
The right to define the currency structure of both Funds, as before, wasprovidedtotheMinistryofFinance.AccordingtotheSub-ItemA,Item4oftheRegulation No. 955, «On management of the Reserve Fund, the Ministry ofFinance approves ... normative currency structure of theReserve Fund» and
11SeetheRFGovernmentDecree№955of29.12.2007“OnthemanagementprocedureoftheReserveFund”andtheRFGovernmentDecree№18of19.01.2008“OnthemanagementprocedureoftheFundofNationalWelfare”.
12 The share of foreign government agencies and central banks assets should not exceed30%.SeetheRFGovernmentDecree№955of29.12.2007“OnthemanagementprocedureoftheReserveFund”.
13 The shareof theseassets should be15%.See theRFGovernmentDecree№955 of29.12.2007“OnthemanagementprocedureoftheReserveFund”
14 The regulation uses the following wording: “the debt liabilities of international financialorganizations,inwhichtheFundsassetscanbeinvestedincludethedebtliabilities,securitiesamongthem,ofthefollowingfinancial institutions....”Thatis,otherinstrumentsbesidesthoseamongthelisted“includingthesecurities”arelikelytobeused.
146
theprocedureforbringingtheactualcurrencystructureoftheReserveFundintoaccordancewiththeestablishedstandard.
Currently the currency structure of the Reserve Fund is governed by theOrderoftheRFMinistryofFinanceNo.3of16.01.2008.TheOrderestablishedthefollowingauthorizedsharesinthetotalamountoftheReserveFund:
• debtliabilitiesofforeigncountries-95%;• debtliabilitiesofforeigngovernmentagenciesandcentralbanks-0%;• debtliabilitiesofinternationalfinancialorganizations,includingsecurities
-5%;• depositsinforeignbanksandcreditinstitutions-0%.Thislimitsthepermissibledeviationsofactualsharesofthefinancialassets
inthetotalamountofallocatedfundsfromtheReserveFundfromtheestablishedsharesasfollows:
• forthedebtliabilitiesofforeigncountries-+/-5percentagepoints;• for the debt liabilities of international financial organizations, including
securities,-+/-5percentagepoints. Inaddition,theMinistryofFinancehasapprovedtheformulaforassessment
oftheactualshareoffinancialassetsoftheReserveFundanddeviationsoftheactualshareoffinancialassetsfromtheestablishedshareoffinancialassets.
TheRegulationNo.955of29.12.2007imposesthefollowingrequirementsforthedebtinstrumentsfortheinvestmentoftheReserveFund:
• theissuerofthedebtinstrumentsshouldhavealong-termcreditratingnotlowerthan«AA-accordingtotheclassificationofFitch-RatingsortheStandard&Poor'sratingagenciesornotbelowthe«GaAs»byclassificationofMoody'sInvestorsServiceratingagency.Iftheissuerofdebtliabilitiesisassigneddifferentlong-termcreditratingsbythoseagencies,thelowestassignedlong-termcreditrating is selected.Comparedwith the requirements to the selection criteria inrelationtoassetsusedtoinvesttheStabilizationFundassets,therequirementscontainedintheRFGovernmentRegulationNo.955of29.12.2007werereduced.Asmentionedabove,previousrequirementstotheassetswere«AAA»15levelor«AAA»16ratings;
• Maturitytermsofthedebtliabilitiesarefixed;theconditionsofissueandcirculationdonotprovidetheissuertherighttocarryouttheirearlyredemption(maturity)andtherightsoftheownerofthedebttosubmitthemforredemption(maturity)bytheissueraheadofschedule;
• standards of theminimumandmaximummaturity terms for the bondissues, established by theMinistry of Financeof theRussianFederation, aremandatory;
• couponyieldrateoncouponbonds,andthenominalvalueofthedebtliabilities,arefixed;
• denomination of debt is expressed in U.S. dollars, Euro and PoundsSterling, and payments under debt liabilities are made in the currency ofdenomination;
• thevolumeofdebtliabilitiesissuedincirculationisnotlessthanUS$1billionfordebtliabilitiesdenominatedinU.S.dollars,notlessthanEUR1billion
15AccordingtoclassificationsofFitch-RatingsorStandard&Poor’sratingagencies.16AccordingtoclassificationsofMoody’sInvestorsServiceratingagency.
147
forthedebtliabilitiesdenominatedinEuro,andatleastBSP0.5billionfordebtliabilitiesdenominatedinpoundssterling;
• debtliabilityissuanceisnotintendedforprivate(non-public)placement;• thenominalamountofdebtliabilitiespurchasedfromoneissueshould
notexceed15percentofthenominalamountoftheissue;• the total volume of the Reserve Fund invested on deposit in foreign
banksorcreditinstitutionsshallnotexceed25percentofthetotalReserveFund.
Requirements for placing assets of the National Welfare Fund
AccordingtoArt.96.11oftheRFBudgetCode,theNationalWelfareFundmay also be allocated in all of the above instruments, except for deposits inforeignbanks.However,theFundassetsmayadditionallybeinvestedin:
• depositsandbankaccountbalanceswithbanksandcreditorganizations,aswellasintheStateCorporation«BankforDevelopmentandForeignEconomicAffairs(Vnesheconombank);»
• debtsecuritiesandstocksoflegalentities;• shares(stakes)ofinvestmentfunds.Inaddition,theNationalWelfareFundassetscanbetransferredtothetrust
managementofspecializedfinancialinstitutions.17ProvisionsoftheBudgetCodearedetailedintheRFGovernmentRegulation
No.18of19.01.2008«OntheprocedureofmanagementoftheFundofNationalWelfare.”Toalargeextent,theyrepeattherequirementsforassetsusedfortheplacementoftheReserveFund.Thus,theResolutionNo.18hasstipulated:
• asimilarlistofcountrieswhosedebtliabilities(aswellastheliabilitiesoftheiragenciesandcentralbanks)maybeusedforallocationofassets;
• asimilarlistofinternationalfinancialorganizations,• similarrequirementsforlong-termcreditratingofforeignissuersofdebt
liabilities.However, since the listofassetsused to invest theNationalWealthFund
assetsisbroader,theRFGovernmentRegulationNo.18of19.01.2008mentionsanumberofspecificrequirements.Thus:
-amongotherthings,theRegulationincludesthefollowingrequirementstothedebt liabilitiesoftheRussiancompanies.Russianissuersofdebt liabilitiesshould have a long-term credit rating not lower than the “BBB-” level by theclassificationofFitchRatingsorStandard&Poor's,ornotlowerthanthelevelof“Baa3”bytheclassificationofMoody'sInvestorsServiceratingagency.IftheRussianissuerisassigneddifferentlong-termcreditratings,thelowestassignedisselectedasthelong-termcreditrating.
Thus, the requirements for the debt liability rating of foreign issuers18 are higherthantherequirementsfortheRussianones.
17ThefounderoftheoftheNationalWelfareFundtrustmanagementistheRussianFederation.TheMinistryofFinanceoftheRussianFederationisinchargeoflegalrelationsinconnectionwiththeestablishmentoftheNationalWelfareFundtrustmanagementonbehalfoftheRussianFederation.
18 Asmentioned above, their rating has to be at least level “AA-” under the classificationofFitch-RatingsorStandard&Poor’s, or at least level “АаЗ” under the classificationofMoody’sInvestorsService.
148
-inrelationtosharesandstocks(sharesofparticipation)ofinvestmentfunds,thefollowingrequirementsareestablished19:
• sharesoflegalentitiesshouldbeincludedinthequotationlistofatleastonestockexchange;
• sharesofforeignissuersshouldbeincludedinthelistsofsecuritiesusedtoestimatethestockindicesofMSCIWorldIndexandFTSEAll-WorldIndex;
• sharesofRussiancompaniesshouldbeincludedinthelistsofsecuritiesusedtoestimatethestockindicesofRTSorMICEX;
• the structure of the assets of investment funds,whose issued shares(stakes)shouldincludeonlytheauthorizedfinancialassets.
-inrelationtodepositsandaccountswiththebanksandcreditinstitutions,thefollowingrequirementsareestablished.Thebankorcreditorganizationshouldhavealong-termcreditratingnotlowerthan“AA-”accordingtotheclassificationof Fitch-Ratings or Standard & Poor's rating agencies or not below the levelof “Aa3” by the classification ofMoody's InvestorsService rating agency. If abankorcreditorganizationisassignedadifferentoflong-termratingbyofthoseagencies,thelowestratingisassignedasalong-termcreditrating;
-inrelationtodepositsoftheStateCorporation«BankforDevelopmentandForeignEconomicAffairs (Vnesheconombank), the following requirementsareestablished:
• thefundscanbeplacedondepositinRussianrubles,U.S.dollars,EuroandPoundsSterling;
• themaximumtotalamounttobeplacedondeposits inRussianrublesis655billionrubles.Atthesametime,upto175billionrublescanbeplacedondeposit,theamount,termandotheressentialprovisionsofwhicharedeterminedbytheMinistryofFinance.
WithregardtotheNationalWelfareFund,theMinistryofFinance20hasalsoestablished the authorized standard shares of the total assets of the Fund inforeigncurrencytobeinvestedinfinancialinstruments,denominatedinforeigncurrency:
• debtinstrumentsofforeigncountries-80%;• debtliabilitiesofforeigngovernmentagenciesandcentralbanks-15%;• debtliabilitiesofinternationalfinancialinstitutions,includingsecurities-
5%;• deposits and balances in the accounts with foreign banks and credit
institutions-0%;• stocksandshares(stakes)offoreignlegalentities-0%;• debtliabilitysecuritiesofforeignlegalentities-0%.• theOrderoftheRFMinistryofFinanceNo.24of24.01.2008approves
thefollowingnormativecurrencystructureoftheNationalWelfareFund:• U.S.Dollar-45%+/-5percentagepoints,• Euro-45%,+/-5percentagepoints;
19Ifacquiredsharesoflegalentitiesorstocks(sharesofparticipation)ofinvestmentfundsdonotmatchanyoftheaboverequirements,suchsharesorstocks(sharesofparticipation)ofinvestmentfundsaretobesoldwithin3monthsfromthedateofinconsistencyarising.
20SeetheOrderoftheMinistryofFinanceNo.517from21.10.2008“OnAmendingtheOrderoftheMinistryofFinanceoftheRussianFederationNo.26ofJanuary24,2008”.
149
• PoundSterling-10%,+/-2percentagepoints.Thus,thecurrencystructureoftheNationalWelfareFundisnodifferentfrom
thecurrencystructureoftheStabilizationFund.DuringthefirstyearaftertheReserveFundandtheNationalWelfareFund
formation(fromFebruary1,2008toFebruary1,2009),theirmanagementhadnegativeUS$ returns,whichamounted to -2.47%.Given thosedynamics, theRussianMinistryofFinancehasproposedanewindex--theso-calledaggregateprofitability--whichdoesnottakeintoaccountthefluctuationsoftheEuro,PoundSterlingandUSdollar.Theaggregatedindexofreturninthecurrencybasketfortheyearamountedto5.41%(see Table. 3).
Table 3. Annual Revenue from the Reserve Fund and National Welfare Fund management (over the year from 02.2008 to 02.2009),%
Currency Account currency In USD In RURUSD 3.9 3.9 35.14Euro 5.94 –4.99 23.67GBP 9.58 –19.8 4.57Total 5.41 –2.47 26.92
Source: RF Ministry of Finance
WhenconvertedintoEuro,thetotalgainwouldamountto9.3%perannum,and into rubles -more than26%perannum.Themain reason for the lossoffunds indollar termswastheU.S.dollar’sstrengtheningagainst theEuroandBritishpoundsterling in2008.Settingatight limitoncurrenciespreventedthecompensationforthenegativeimpactofweakeningcurrencies,inwhich55%ofbothfundsweredenominated.
Macroeconomic and fiscal linkages; highlights of political economy
Intermsofmacroeconomiceffectsandimplicationsofthesovereignwealthfunds’formationinRussia,therearethreenoteworthyaspects:
1.Intertemporalstabilizationofthefederalbudget.2.Support to theRFCentralBank’santi-inflationarypolicyandpoliciesof
limitedRURappreciation.3.Fundingofanti-crisismeasuresin2008-2009.
Budget PolicyAs mentioned above, the main objective of the RF Stabilization Fund
establishment was institutionalized accumulation of surpluses of the federalbudget under the circumstances of the external environment due to the highoil revenues. Oil and gas revenues include proceeds from taxes on mineralextractionofhydrocarbons,exportdutiesoncrudeoil,naturalgas,andgoods
150
producedfromcrudeoil.Some oil and gas revenues are addressed toward financing current
expendituresof the federalbudget (oilandgas transfer),and thebalancecanbesaved.Toassesstheshort-termrisksintermsofstabilityofpublicfinances,thenon-oildeficitindicatorisimportant,representingthedifferencebetweenthenon-oilrevenueandthetotalbudgetexpenditures(seeTable.4).Accordingly,theamountofthefundisincreasing(see Figs. 4).
Table 4. Revenues and Expenditures of the Federal Budget in 2000-2009. (% of GDP)
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Expenditures(1)
14.2 14.8 18.9 17.8 15.8 16.3 15.9 18.1 18.2 24.7
Revenues(2) 15.5 17.8 20.3 19.5 20.1 23.7 23.3 23.6 22.3 18.8Includingnon-oilrevenue(2.1)
11.7 13.1 15.1 14.1 13.5 13.6 12.7 14.6 11.8 11.2
Oilrevenue(2.2)
3.8 4.7 5.2 5.4 6.6 10.1 10.9 9.0 10.6 7.6
RFfederalbudgetsur-plus(3)=(2)–(1)
1.4 3 1.4 1.7 4.3 7.4 7.5 5.5 4.1 –5.9
Non-oildeficit(4)=(2.1)–(1)
2.5 1.7 3.8 3.7 2.3 2.7 3.4 3.5 6.4 13.5
Note: when assessing the non-oil deficit in 2009, income from the man-agement of the Reserve Fund and National Welfare Fund, which amounted to
respectively 0.8% of GDP, were taken into account.
Source: Federal Treasury of Russia
151
Figure 4. Stabilization Fund, Reserve Fund, the National Welfare Fund in 2004-2009, % of GDP
Note: The Stabilization Fund is a hypothetical fund equal to the amount of the Reserve Fund and National Welfare Fund
Thus,duringtheperiodofafavorableexternalmarketsituation,thepresenceof theStabilizationFundwasaserious institutionalconstraint to thegrowthofbudgetaryexpenditures.Atthesametime,evensuchaconstrainthadalimitedeffect,andin2007-2008,duringinthepeakinoilprices,amarkedincreaseinthefederalbudgetexpenditureswasobservedinrealterms.
Inturn,in2009-2010,theReserveFundbecamethemainsourceoffinancingthe federalbudgetdeficit, formeddue toreductionof thebudget revenues,aswell as due to adoption of thepackageof anti-crisismeasures.However, thescopeofthebudgetdeficit intheRF(likeinmanycountriesaroundtheworld)clearlyexceedsexpectations.Forexample, if the initiallyestimatedscope theStabilizationFund,andthentheReserveFund,wasassessedbasedontheneedtofinancethedeficitof3%ofGDPforthetermnotexceedingthreeyears,whenin2009thedeficitofthefederalbudgetamountedto5.9%,in2010itisexpectedtoamountto6-7%ofGDP,whichmeansacompleteexhaustionoftheReserveFundalreadyinthecurrentyear.BecauseinthefuturethegovernmentofRussiaexpectsthefederalbudgetdeficittobesustained(withagradualdecreaseto2%ofGDPin2013withanaverageoilpriceofnotbelow70dollarsperbarrel),thereisariskofneedingtheinvolvementoftheNationalWelfareFundforthebudgetdeficitfinancingaswell.
Monetary and Exchange Rate PolicyTheavailabilityofbudgetarysovereignfunds,aswellastheirallocationinthe
internationalreservesoftheBankofRussia,hasimportantimplicationsforthe
0,0%
2,0%
4,0%
6,0%
8,0%
10,0%
12,0%
14,0%
16,0%
18,0%
20,0%I II III I I II III I I II III I I II III I I II III I I II III I
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
% G
DP
Stabilisationfund Reservefund
Fundofnationalwell-being Stabilisationfund'
152
monetaryandexchangeratepolicyinRussia.Thus,thetotalvolumeofmonetarysupply,withdrawnfromtheeconomyand
allocatedtotheaccountswiththeRFCentralBankasofJanuary1,2009,wasapproximately120%ofthemonetarybase(high-poweredmoney)at thattime.Savingthisvolumeofmonetarysupply in theeconomyover2004-2008wouldincrease the rate of the monetary supply growth by about 15-20 percentagepointsperyear.Theinflationaryconsequenceofthiscouldbetheincreaseoftheaverageannualinflationratefrom11.35%perannum(whichisoneofthehighestratesintheworld)to13.5-14%perannum.
Atthesametime,thetotalamountoffundsplacedintheforeigncurrencyisabout35-40%ofthetotalsurplusoftheRussianbalanceofpaymentsfrom2006through thefirst sixmonthsof2008.Accordingly,ademandwas formed fromtheRussianMinistryofFinanceforsuchinflowofthecurrencytothedomesticmarket,whichhashelpedtheBankofRussiatokeeptherublerateatalevelnohigherthan23.5-24.0rublesperdollar.Modelingasituationwherein2006-2008therewasnoneed toallocate the funds in foreigncurrencyshows that in thiscase,thenominalrubleexchangeratecouldrisetothelevelof13-15rublesperdollarbyAugust2008.Accordingly,therealeffectiverubleratebythebeginningofthecrisisinautumn2008wouldhaveamountednotto116.5%ascomparedwithJuly1998(themaximumvalueof therealexchangeratebeforethe1998crisis),butto180-200%,whichwouldmeanacompletelossofcompetitivenessofdomesticproducersandasharpslowdownineconomicgrowth,evenagainstthebackgroundofhighpricesforoilandotherRussianexportgoodsin2007.
Anti-crisis measures funding in 2008-2009Financingoflarge-scalemeasuresforthesupportofthenationaleconomy
withouttheinvolvementofexternalborrowingin2008-2009waspossiblethanksto the reservesaccumulatedduring theeconomicgrowth. In fact, oil andgasrevenuesbecamethemainsourcestosupportthebalanceofthefederalbudgetin2009. Inparticular, tofinance thebudgetaryexpenditures fromtheReserveFund,aboutRUR2.964trillionwasallocated.Thisfactallowsustoconcludethattheideaofforminganoilandgasfundwasfullyjustified,andcanberegardedasanadvantageinthenationalfiscalpolicy.
Table 5. Dynamics of Formation and Use of Oil and Gas Assets in 2009(RUR bln)
FundBalanceasoflate2008*
Revenueover2009:
Expenditureover2009:
Balanceasoflate2009*Oiland
gasrev-enue
Revenuefromassetsmanage-ment
Supportofthefederalbalancesolvency
Supportofoil
andgastransfer
ReserveFund
4027.6(9.8%of
GDP)488.5 205.0 2964.8 179.4
1830.5(4.7%ofGDP)
153
NationalWelfareFund
2584.5(6.3%of
GDP)– 92.5 – –
2769.0(7.1%ofGDP)
Total6612.1
(16.0%ofGDP)
488.5 297.5 2964.8 179.44599.5
(11.8%ofGDP)
* Balances are estimated at the exchange rates of January 1, 2009 and January 1 of 2010, accordingly.
Source: Federal Treasury
Formally,theassetsoftheNationalWelfareFundwerenotusedtofinancethe federal budget deficit and the financing of anti-crisismeasures.However,starting fromOctober 13, 2008, theRFPresidentDmitryMedvedev signed apackageof lawspreviously enactedby theStateDumaandapprovedby theFederalCouncilonthestabilizationof thefinancialsystemduringthefinancialcrisis: inparticular, legislativeamendmentsallowedplacementof theNationalWelfareFundassetswith theVnesheconombankdepositsuntilDecember31,2019,totalingnomorethan450billionrublesattherateof7%perannum.
Thus,therewasonlyachangeintheportfoliooffixedassetsfortheallocationof the NationalWelfare Fund; it was replenished with the ruble-denominateddepositsoftheRFVnesheconombank.Inthefuture,theuseofthoseresourcesfor the implementation of anti-crisis measures was already implemented bytheRFVnesheconombank. Inparticular,404billion rublesweregranted to14Russiancommercialbanksintheformofsubordinatedloansand30billionrublesweretransferredtothe“RussianDevelopmentBank”forcreditingSME.
Ingeneral,analyzingtheroleoftheReserveFundasasourceoffinancingofthefederalbudgetdeficitinRussiaover2009-2010,oneshouldtakeintoaccountthreeissuesrelatedtotheproperunderstandingofthe“reserve”natureofthesefunds:
1. On the one hand, the use of the Reserve Fund assets to cover thebudget deficit is a commonmonetary emissionof theCentralBank, since inpracticesuchanoperationmeanstheflowoffundsintheRFCentralBankfromthespecialaccountsoftheRFGovernmenttothemonetarybase(throughthecurrentaccountoftheGovernment).Thenon-emissionnatureofthisoperationcouldtakeplaceiftheBankofRussiaatthesametimewouldsellforeigncurrency(whichisformallyacounterpartoftheReserveFund),butafteradownfalltoitslowest level inJanuary2009, the international reservesof theBankofRussiahaveconsiderablygrown.Thus, intermsofmonetarypolicy, theFundisnotareserve,butisaseparatechannelforthemoneyinflowintheeconomy.
2. Ontheotherhand,thedescribedeffectofmonetaryemissionfromthebudget account is observed every timewhen the government spendsmoneyon the basis of the existingRF systemof theTreasury,which has budgetaryaccountswiththeBankofRussia,i.e.thosewithdrawnfromthemonetarysupply.
154
Irregular fluctuations are observed within the year (e.g., the sharp growth ofmonetaryassetsinDecember,whenthebudgetexpensesareperformedwhenthemoneybaseisreducedeachmonthinthelastdaysofthemonth,whentaxesarepaid),butbyvirtueofthebudgetreportingterm,namelythefiscalyear,asarule,onlythefinalimpactofthebudgetexecutiononthemoneysupplyistakenintoaccount.If,however,weextendtheperiodofconsiderationfromoneto,forexample,5years,thentheuseoftheReserveFundshallceasetobeamereemission,sincethemoneyaccumulatedinitwithinsuchatermmayberegardedastemporarilywithdrawnandreturnedtotheeconomyassets.
3. Fromanotherperspective,intermsoffiscalanddebtpolicy,theReserveFundassetscertainlycanberegardedasareserveoftheRFGovernment,astheymakeitpossibletoreplenishthebudgetdeficitwithoutborrowinginthedebtmarketandavoidingtheincreaseofthegovernmentdebt.Atthesametime,astheexperienceofEUcountries,USA,Japan,UKandothersshows,thegrowthofpublicdebttofinancetheanti-crisismeasurespackagehasbecomeoneofthekeychallengesfortheeconomicpolicyatthestageofrecoveryfromthecrisis.Inthisregard,theexistenceoftheReserveFundinRussiacanberegardedasapotentialallowingthecountrytoavoidthegrowthofdebtburdenandtoshiftcurrentbudgetexpensesforthefuturegenerations.
The impact on poverty eradication, social policy and labor marketFromthepointofviewofthecurrentsocialeffectsandsupportoftheliving
standardsofthepopulationofRussia,thesovereignwealthfundsprovidelimitedand,forthemostpart, indirecteffects.It isextremelydifficulttodistinguishtheimpactofeachoftheexistingfunds.
Fromourpointofview, themost important impacton thepopulation livingstandards is the provision of an anti-inflationary effect of theRFStabilizationFund(seeabove).Weestimatethetotalincreaseinincomeinrealtermsduetolowerinflationintheperiodof2004-2008atabout20percentagepoints.
AnotherimportantconsequenceoftheReserveFund’sexistenceisfundingofthefederalbudgetdeficitin2009.Thesocialprojectsinparticular,whichallowedagrowthinrealincomesby2.3%inthesituationofaseverecrisis(declineinrealGDPin2009by7.9%),reducedthenegativeimpactoflowerdomesticdemandandensuredthegrowthofhouseholdsavings.Herewith,asnotedabove,thoseexpenditureshavebeenfinancedwithoutincreasingthenationalborrowingand,consequently,thegrowthoftheborrowingputsaburdenonthefuturegenerations.
TheroleoftheNationalWelfareFundinsolvingthesocialproblemsatthemomentisextremelysmall.Moreover,theNationalWelfareFundobviouslydoesnotplaytherole imposedon it--butnotensured in institutionaland legislativeterms-- as an instrument for the long-term solutions of thepension system inRussia.WewillconsiderthetentativeoptionsoftheNationalWelfareFundinthisareainthefinalsectionofthismemo.
Compliance with Santiago PrinciplesTable 6showsourexpertassessmentofcomplianceoftheRFReserveFund
andNationalWelfareFundwiththeGenerallyAcceptedPrinciplesandPractices(GAPP),orSantiagoPrinciples.Compliancewith theseprinciples ispresented
155
for each fund separately, although, as shown above, the legal provisions oftheiroperation,managementsystemandtherequirementtoinvestmentsofthefundsarepractically identical.Nevertheless,basedonthedifferentnatureandpurposesofeachofthefunds’formations,theextentoftheircompliancewiththeSantiagoPrinciplesvaries.
Table 6. Santiago Principles and Implementation thereof for the Rus-sian Sovereign Wealth Funds
Principles RF Reserve fund RF National Welfare FundGAPP1GAPP1.1GAPP1.2
+++
+++
GAPP2 + –GAPP3 + +/–GAPP4GAPP4.1GAPP4.2
+++
+++/–
GAPP5 +(?) +(?)GAPP6 +/– –GAPP7 +/– –GAPP8 +/– –GAPP9 – –GAPP10 +/– +/–GAPP11 + +GAPP12 – –GAPP13 – –GAPP14 – –GAPP15 + +GAPP16 +/– +/–GAPP17 + +/–GAPP18GAPP18.1GAPP18.2GAPP18.3
+/–+/–++/–
––+/–+/–
GAPP19GAPP19.1GAPP19.2
+/–++/–
–+/––
GAPP20 + +GAPP21 – –
156
GAPP22GAPP22.1GAPP22.2
––+/–
––+/–
GAPP23 +/–(?) +/–(?)GAPP24 – –
Therefore, as seen from the above estimates for the RF Reserve Fund,compliancewith theSantiagoPrinciples isobserved inninepositions (andsixsub-positions),andpartialcomplianceineightpositions(foursub-positions).Insevenpositions(andonesub-position)thereisnocompliance.
FortheNationalWelfareFund,thesituationlooksevenworse:• compliance-in6positions(3sub-positions)• partialcompliance–in5positions(5sub-positions)• inconsistency–in13positions(3sub-positions).Itshouldbenotedthat forbothFundsfullcompliancebyonepositionand
partialcompliancewiththeotherpositionsareinquestionbecauseoftheabove-mentioned decision of theRFGovernment,which has refused to provide theinformationontheFunds’statusforpublicdisclosuresinceMay2010.
Perspectives and Predictability after the Global Economic CrisisAsstatedabove,thesituationwiththedynamicsofbothRussiansovereign
funds during the recent crisis is ambiguous.At the beginning of the crisis intheRussianFederation inautumn2008 (October1,2008), thevolumeof theStabilizationFundofRussiaamountedtoabout141billionUSdollars,andtheNationalWelfareFund–48.7billionUSdollars.AllassetswereplacedinhighlyreliablesecuritiesdenominatedinUSdollars,Euro,poundssterlingandJapaneseyen.Thus,fromthebeginningofthecrisisdespitethedevaluationoftheruble,aswellaslowerinterestratesintheleadingglobaleconomiesfortheruble,assetsbegantogrow.Incontrasttotheassetsofothersovereignfunds,intheRussianfundstherewerenoassetsincorporatesecurities(stocks),sothedownfallinthestockmarketdidnothaveseriousconsequencesonthem.
At the same time, the growth of the federal budget deficit and the RFGovernment'sneedforadditionalfinancialresourceshaveresultedinattractingthefundstomeetcurrentfinancialdemands.Fallingoilpricesintheworldmarketsandthereducedinflowofexportearningstothecountryledtothedisappearanceoftheincomepartofbothfunds.ByearlyJune2010,thebalanceintheReserveFundshouldnotexceed40billionUSdollars,andallthemoneyfromthefundshouldbeallocated to finance the federal budget deficit in 2010.However, inourview,theutilizationofthefundin2009-2010cannotberegardedasalossbecausetheassetswereusedfortheimplementationofthefund’smainobjective-torecoverabudgetdeficitthataroseinconsequenceofshort-termandcyclicalswingsinrevenues.Inaddition,availabilityofthissourcetofinancethebudgetdeficitallowsRussiatoavoidthetrapintowhichothereconomiesoftheworldfall,namelytherapidaccumulationofpublicdebt.TherenewalofrevenueinflowtotheReserveFundofRussiaisexpectednotearlierthanin2012-2013(inthecaseofthemoderatelyoptimisticscenario,revivingtheglobaleconomyandthe
157
preservationoftheglobaloilpricesatnotlessthan70USdollarsperbarrel).NationalWelfareFundassetswerenotdirectlyusedtofinancethefederal
budget deficit, and the assets spent in the context of an anti-crisismeasurespackage for operations in the stockmarket of Russia and the support of thebankingsysteminRussiawereprovidedastheconversionoffundsfromforeigncurrency intorublesandtheirallocation inrubleassets(approximately20%oftheNationalWelfareFund).ThoseRURinvestmentsarepotentiallylost,butduetotheirlong-termnaturetheywillbereflectedinanexplicitformlater.Thus,withregardtotheeffectoftherubledevaluationandthefactthatbuyingtheRussiancompanies’shareswascarriedoutatclosetoaminimumprice,specifically intimesof crisis, theFundhasnot suffered losses in ruble terms. Losseswererecordedin2010,asthenominalexchangerate,andconsequently,rubleratingswerereduced,affectingthefundassets.Similarlosseswereobservedinthepre-crisisperiod,when the rublewasalso rapidlystrengtheningagainst themajorworldcurrencies.
However, in the absence of fiscal consolidation in 2011-2013, the RFgovernmentwillbecompelledtofinancethefederalbudgetdeficitattheexpenseoftheNationalWelfareFund,downtoitsfullexhaustion(exceptfortheamountofthelong-termruble-denominatedinvestmentsmadeintheframeworkofAnti-CrisisMeasures).Accordingly,onecanmentionthefollowingmainrecommendationstoimprovethefunctioningoftheRussiansovereignfunds:
1.Withrespecttothe Reserve Fund of Russia–thesoonestreturntotheaccumulationoftheassetsatthehighprofitabilityinthelongtermperiod.
2.WithrespecttotheNational Welfare Fund–theRFGovernmentshouldclearlydefinethestrategicobjectivesoftheFund.CurrentlytheFund,inessence,isaseparatefundoftheRFGovernment,protectedfromspendingtocoverthebudgetdeficitfinancing(sofar!),whichhasnoclearpurpose.Forthepurposesof the Fund, one can propose its transformation into a savings pension fund(for example, like theGovernmentPension Fund ofNorway), i.e., it could beaddressedtoresolvetheshortageinthepensionsystemovertheprospectofatleast15-20years.ItisthereforenecessarytoreverttotheaccumulationofassetsintheNationalWelfareFund.
CurrentvolumeoftheFund(lessthan10%ofGDP)isclearlyinsufficienttosolveanyseriousproblem.Inadditiontotheshort-termrevenuesfromexportsofrawmaterials,themostobvioussourceforthereplenishmentoftheFundmaybetheproceedsofprivatizationofthestateassetsandrealassetsownedbythestate.Asof2007(priortothecrisiseventsintheglobaleconomy),assessmentofsuchassetsandpropertyisnotlessthan57%oftheRussianGDP.InthecaseoftransferofthesefundstotheNationalWelfareFund,witharealreturnontheinvestmentsoftheFundatthelevelof4.5%peryear,theamountoftheFundbytheendof2015shouldamountto70.6%ofGDPandbytheendof2025–80.5%,whichisenoughtokeepthereplacementrateofretirementpensionat30%until2025.
3. With respect to both funds-principlesandapproachestomanagingthefunds’assetsshouldbedifferentiated. Inparticular, theNationalWelfareFundshould bemanaged essentially on different terms than theReserve Fund. Inother words, an authorized structure of assets and management mechanismshouldberevised.
158
First,theNationalWelfareFundhasalongerprospectusforinvestmentthantheReserveFund,andtheNationalWelfareFundassetscanbeinvestedinmorevolatileandprofitablefinancialinstruments.
Secondly,theNationalWelfareFundshort-termliquidityhasalowervalue,andconsequently,itispermissibletoinvestitinnon-marketableassets.
Third,internationalexperienceshowsthattoimproveefficiencyofmanagementandprofitabilityofsuchasovereignfund,itisreasonabletotransfermanagementofsuchasovereignfundtoprivateprofessionalmanagementcompanies,ratherthantotheCentralBankoraspecializedstateagency.
Therefore,achangeintheinstitutionalandlegalbasesofbothfunds’functionsisrequiredtoimprovetheircompliancewiththeSantiagoPrinciples.