46
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES SOVEREIGN DEBT PORTFOLIOS, BOND RISKS, AND THE CREDIBILITY OF MONETARY POLICY Wenxin Du Carolin E. Pflueger Jesse Schreger Working Paper 22592 http://www.nber.org/papers/w22592 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 September 2016 We are grateful to Mark Aguiar, Daniel Andrei, Adrien Auclert (discussant), John Campbell, Lorenzo Garlappi, Joshua Gottlieb, Juan Carlos Hatchondo (discussant), Tarek Hassan, Oleg Itskhoki, Thomas Mertens, Vincenzo Quadrini (discussant), Julio Rotemberg, Rosen Valchev (discussant), Adrien Verdelhan, Jenny Tang, Pierre Yared, and seminar participants at AEA 2016, UCLA Anderson, Columbia University, Stanford GSB, MIT Sloan, the 8th Macro-Society Meeting, NBER Summer Institute, UC Santa Barbara, the San Francisco Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Bank for International Settlements, and the University of British Columbia for helpful comments. Jiri Knesl, Sandra Ramirez, George Vojta, and Nanyu Chen provided excellent research assistance. Pflueger thanks MIT Sloan and Stanford GSB for their hospitality and UBC for research funding while working on this research. Schreger thanks the Princeton Economics Department for their hospitality during the research process and the Harvard Business School Division of Research for financial support. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. At least one co-author has disclosed a financial relationship of potential relevance for this research. Further information is available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w22592.ack NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2016 by Wenxin Du, Carolin E. Pflueger, and Jesse Schreger. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source.

Sovereign Debt Portfolios, Bond Risks, and the Credibility of … · 2019. 8. 21. · Sovereign Debt Portfolios, Bond Risks, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy Wenxin Du, Carolin

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES

    SOVEREIGN DEBT PORTFOLIOS, BOND RISKS, AND THE CREDIBILITY OFMONETARY POLICY

    Wenxin DuCarolin E. Pflueger

    Jesse Schreger

    Working Paper 22592http://www.nber.org/papers/w22592

    NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH1050 Massachusetts Avenue

    Cambridge, MA 02138September 2016

    We are grateful to Mark Aguiar, Daniel Andrei, Adrien Auclert (discussant), John Campbell, LorenzoGarlappi, Joshua Gottlieb, Juan Carlos Hatchondo (discussant), Tarek Hassan, Oleg Itskhoki, ThomasMertens, Vincenzo Quadrini (discussant), Julio Rotemberg, Rosen Valchev (discussant), Adrien Verdelhan,Jenny Tang, Pierre Yared, and seminar participants at AEA 2016, UCLA Anderson, Columbia University,Stanford GSB, MIT Sloan, the 8th Macro-Society Meeting, NBER Summer Institute, UC Santa Barbara,the San Francisco Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Bank for InternationalSettlements, and the University of British Columbia for helpful comments. Jiri Knesl, Sandra Ramirez,George Vojta, and Nanyu Chen provided excellent research assistance. Pflueger thanks MIT Sloanand Stanford GSB for their hospitality and UBC for research funding while working on this research.Schreger thanks the Princeton Economics Department for their hospitality during the research processand the Harvard Business School Division of Research for financial support. The views expressedherein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of EconomicResearch.

    At least one co-author has disclosed a financial relationship of potential relevance for this research.Further information is available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w22592.ack

    NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies officialNBER publications.

    © 2016 by Wenxin Du, Carolin E. Pflueger, and Jesse Schreger. All rights reserved. Short sectionsof text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that fullcredit, including © notice, is given to the source.

  • Sovereign Debt Portfolios, Bond Risks, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy Wenxin Du, Carolin E. Pflueger, and Jesse SchregerNBER Working Paper No. 22592September 2016, Revised August 2019JEL No. E4,F3,G12,G15

    ABSTRACT

    We document that governments whose local currency debt provides them with greater hedging benefitsactually borrow more in foreign currency. We introduce two features into a government's debt portfoliochoice problem to explain this finding: risk-averse lenders and lack of monetary policy commitment.A government without commitment chooses excessively counter-cyclical inflation ex post, whichleads risk-averse lenders to require a risk premium ex ante. This makes local currency debt too expensivefrom the government's perspective and thereby discourages the government from borrowing in itsown currency.

    Wenxin DuBooth School of BusinessUniversity of Chicago5807 S. Woodlawn AvenueChicago, IL 60637and [email protected]

    Carolin E. PfluegerUniversity of ChicagoHarris School of Public Policy1307 E 60th StChicago, IL 60637and [email protected]

    Jesse SchregerColumbia Business School3022 BroadwayUris Hall 821New York, NY 10027and [email protected]

    A online appendix is available at http://www.nber.org/data-appendix/w22592

  • 0 20 40 60 80 100

    International Risk Aversion *

    -0.2

    -0.15

    -0.1

    -0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    LC

    Bo

    nd-S

    tock

    Be

    ta

    EM (no commitment)DM (commitment)

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    International Risk Aversion *

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    Opt

    ima

    l LC

    Deb

    t S

    hare

    s

    EM (no commitment)DM (commitment)