Southeast Maricopa / Northern Pinal County Transportation Study

Southeast Maricopa / Northern Pinal County Transportation Study

Public MeetingMarch 17, 2003

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea

Transportation Transportation StudyStudy

Regional Context

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Study Area Boundaries

Model Area

Focus Area

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Study Focus Area

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Population & Employment Growth

2000 Draft 2 2020

% Increase

Draft 2 2030

% Increase

POPULATION

Maricopa 361,816 790,372 118 834,113 6

Pinal 150,807 295,894 96 518,171 75

EMPLOYMENT

Maricopa 120,821 385,050 218 441,026 15

Pinal 57,728 100,880 75 185,080 83

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


2002 Network: Number of LanesS.E. Maricopa

N. Pinal CountyTransportation

Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 22002 Network

Number of Lanes

2

4

6

8

10

HOV

Lanes

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN

BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITIONBROWN

MCKELLIPS

PRICE

DOBS

ON

ALMA

SCHOO

L

ARIZONA

MCQ

UEEN

COOPER

GILBERT

LINDSAY

VAL VISTA

GREEN

FIELD

HIGLE

Y

RECKE

R

POWE

R

SOSS

AMAN

HAW

ES

ELLSWO

RTH

CRISMON

SIGNAL BUTTE

MERIDIAN

VINEYARD

8

10

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


2000 Link V/CS.E. Maricopa


Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 32000 Link V/C

A

B

C

D

E-F

(0 - .6)

(.61 - .7)

(.71 - .8)

(.81 - .9)

(.9 or higher)

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN

BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITION

BROWN

MCK ELLIPS

PRICE

DOBSON

ALMA SC

HOO

L

ARIZON

A

MC

QUE

EN

COO

PER

GILBERT

LINDSA

Y

VAL VIS

TA

GREENFIELD

HIG

LEY

RECKER

POW

ER

SOSSAM

AN

HA

WES

ELLSW

ORTH

CRISM

ON

SIGNAL

BUTTE

MERIDIA

N

VINEYAR

D

8

10

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


2000 Intersection LOSS.E. Maricopa


Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 42000 Intersection LOS

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


BROWN

MCKELLIPS

PRICE

DOBSON

ALMA

SCHO

OL

ARIZONA

MCQ

UEEN

COOPER

GILBERT

LINDSAY

VAL VISTA

GREENFIELD

HIGLEY

RECKER

POWER

SOSS

AMAN

HAW

ES

ELLSWO

RTH

CRISMON

SIGNAL B

UTTE

MERIDIAN

VINEYARD

8

10

-

A

B

C

D

E F

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


2002 Network Summary

MEASURE FREEWAY/ EXPRESSWAY HOV ARTERIAL

Centerline Miles 36 0 425

Lane Miles 195 0 1491

Congested Intersections/Interchanges 6 NA 22

Maricopa County

Pinal County





Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


S.E. MaricopaN. Pinal CountyTransportation

Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 5Future Base

Added Roadways

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

Coun ty

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


MCKELLIPS

PRICE

DOBSON

ALM

A SCHOOL

ARIZONA

MCQ

UEEN

COOPER

GILBERT

LINDSAY

VAL VISTA

GREENFIELD

HIGLEY

RECKER

POWER

SOSSAMAN

HA

WES

ELLSW

ORTH

CRISMON

SIGNAL BUTTE

MERIDIAN

VINEYARD

8

10

Future Base: Added Roadways

• 385 miles of new arterial

• 22 miles of new freeway

• Cost = $1,155 million

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Future Base: Widened RoadwaysS.E. Maricopa


Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 6Future Base

Widened Roadways

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


MCKELLIPS

PRICE

DOBSON

ALMA SCHO

OL

ARIZONA

MCQ

UEEN

COOPER

GILBERT

LINDSAY

VAL VISTA

GREENFIELD

HIGLEY

RECKER

POWER

SOSSAMAN

HAW

ES

ELLSWO

RTH

CRISMON

SIGNAL BUTTE

MERIDIAN

VINEYARD

8

10

• 586 miles of widened arterials


Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Base/2030 Intersection LOSS.E. Maricopa


Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 7Base/2030 Intersection

LOS

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUPE

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


MCKELLIPS

PRIC

E

DO

BSON

ALMA SCHO

OL

ARIZ

ONA

MCQ

UEEN

COO

PER

GILB

ERT

LIND

SAY

VAL V

ISTA

GREENFIELD

HIGLEY

RECKER

POW

ER

SOSSAM

AN

HAW

ES

ELLSWO

RTH

CRISM

ON

SIGNAL BUTTE

MERIDIA

N

VINE

YARD

8

10

-

A

B

C

D

E F

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Future Base Network: Number of LanesS.E. Maricopa


Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 8Future Base Network

Number of Lanes

2

4

6

8

10

HOV

Lanes

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOTILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUPE

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


MCKELLIPS

PRICE

DOBSO

N

ALM

A SCHOOL

ARIZO

NA

MC

QUE

EN

COO

PER

GILBERT

LINDSAY

VAL

VISTA

GREENFIELD

HIG

LEY

RECKER

POW

ER

SOSSAM

AN

HAW

ES

ELLSWO

RTH

CRISM

ON

SIG

NAL B

UTTE

MERID

IAN

VINEYARD

8

10

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Future Base Network Summary





Cost (millions) $880 $0 $2,208

Maricopa County

Pinal County





Cost (millions) $0 $0 $1,590

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Arterial Improvement Program Example Arterials

Arizona Ave Ironwood Rd Gilbert Rd Elliot Rd Higley Rd Queen Creek Rd Power Rd Riggs Rd Ellsworth Rd

Features to Consider Widening Express Bus Service Variable Message Signs Bus Priority Signal Coordination HOV Lanes Major Intersection

Improvement

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Widened State HighwaysS.E. Maricopa


Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 17Widened State

Highways

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUPE

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


BROWN

MCK ELLIPS

PRICE

DOBSON

ALMA SCHO

OL

ARIZONA

MCQ

UEEN

COOPER

GILBERT

LINDSAY

VAL VISTA

GREENFIELD

HIGLEY

RECKER

POWER

SOSSAMAN

HAW

ES

ELLSWO

RTH

CRISMON

SIGNAL BUTTE

MERIDIAN

VINEYARD

8

10

HOV Facility

New or Improved Interchange

Wi dento 4 Lanes

Wi dento 6 Lanes

Wi dento 8 Lanes andHOV

• 35 miles of highway widening

• Cost = $123 million

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea



Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 16Widened Freeways

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


MCKELLIPS

PRIC

E

DO

BSON

ALM

A SCHO

OL

ARIZ

ONA

MCQ

UEEN

COO

PER

GILB

ERT

LIND

SAY

VAL

VISTA

GREENFIE

LD

HIGLEY

RECKER

POW

ER

SOSSAMA

N

HAW

ES

ELLSWO

RTH

CRISM

ON

SIGNAL B

UTTE

MERIDIAN

VINE

YARD

8

10

HOV Facility

New or Improved Interchange

Wi dento 4 Lanes

Wi dento 6 Lanes

Wi dento 8 Lanes andHOV

Widened Freeways

• 42 miles of freeway widening, cost = $336 million

• 38 miles of HOV cost = $228 million

• 8 New/Modified Interchanges

• cost = $74 million

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Enhanced 2030 Intersection LOSS.E.Maricopa

N.PinalCountyTransportation

Study

Februaury2003

Enhanced/2030 Intersection LOS

A

B

C

D

E-F

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOTILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUPE

BASELINE

SOUTHERN

BROADWAYAPACHESUPERSTITION

BROWN

MCKELLIPS

PRICE

DOBSON

ALMA SCHO

OL

ARIZONA

MCQ

UEEN

COOPER

GILBERTLINDSAY

VAL VISTA

GREENFIELD

HIGLEY

RECKER

POWER

SOSSAMAN

HAW

ES

ELLSWO

RTH

CRISMON

SIGNAL BUTTE

MERIDIAN

VINEYARD

8

10

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Enhanced Network Summary



Lane Miles 504 116 2,827


Cost (millions) $330 $198 $0

Maricopa County

Pinal County



Lane Miles 88 10 1,962


Cost (millions) $112 $30 $0

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea



Study

Februaury 2003

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


BROWN

MCK ELLIPS

PRICE

DOBSO

N

ALMA SC

HOOL

ARIZONA

MC

QUEEN

COO

PER

GILBERT

LINDSAY

VAL VIS

TA

GREENFIELD

HIG

LEY

RECKER

POW

ER

SOSSAM

AN

HA

WES

ELLSW

ORTH

CRISM

ON

SIGNAL

BUTTE

MERIDIA

N

VINEYA

RD

8

10

Figure 10Williams Gateway Freeway Concept

Williams Gateway Freeway Concept

Projected Daily Volumes

• Loop 202 to N/S Corridor = 60,000 to 100,000

• N/S Corridor to US 60 = 5,000


Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea



Study

Februaury 2003

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


BROWN

MCKELLIPS

PRICE

DOBSON

ALMA SCHO

OL

ARIZONA

MC

QUEEN

COOPER

GILBERT

LINDSAY

VAL VISTA

GREENFIELD

HIGLEY

RECKER

POWER

SOSSAMAN

HA

WES

ELLSW

ORTH

CRISMON

SIGNAL BUTTE

MERIDIAN

VINEYARD

8

10

Figure 11Price Freeway

Extension Concept

Price Freeway Extension Concept

• Projected Daily Volume = 96,000 to 140,000


Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea



Study

Februaury 2003

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


BROWN

MCKELLIPS

PRICE

DOBS

ON

ALMA

SCH

OO

L

ARIZONA

MC

QUEEN

COOPER

GILBERT

LINDSAY

VAL VISTA

GREENFIE

LD

HIG

LEY

RECK

ER

POWER

SOSS

AMAN

HA

WES

ELLSW

ORT

H

CRISMON

SIGNAL B

UTT

E

MERIDIAN

VINEYARD

8

10

Figure 12US 60 Freeway

Extension Concept

US 60 Freeway Extension Concept

• Projected Daily Volume = 35,000 to 65,000


Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea



Study

Februaury 2003

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


BROWN

MCKELLIPS

PRICE

DOBSON

ALMA SCHO

OL

ARIZONA

MC

QUEEN

COOPER

GILBERT

LINDSAY

VAL VISTA

GREENFIELD

HIGLEY

RECKER

POWER

SOSSAMAN

HA

WES

ELLSW

ORTH

CRISMON

SIGNAL BUTTE

MERIDIAN

VINEYARD

8

10

Figure 13East Valley Corridor

Concept

East Valley Corridor Concept


• I-10 to Higley = 84,000 to 110,000

• Higley to N/S Corridor = 63,000 to 84,000

• N/S Corridor to US 60 = 14,000 to 21,000


Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea



Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 14Apache Junction-Casa

Grande Corridor Concept

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


MCKELLIPS

PRICE

DOBSON

ALMA SCH

OOL

ARIZONA

MC

QUEEN

COOPER

GILBERT

LINDSAY

VAL VISTA

GREENFIELD

HIGLEY

RECKER

POWER

SOSSAM

AN

HA

WES

ELLSW

ORT

H

CRISMON

SIGNAL BUTT

E

MERIDIAN

VINEYARD

8

10

Apache Junction – Coolidge Corridor Concept


• US 60 to E/W Corridor = 60,000 to 88,000

• E/W Corridor to SR 287 = 55,000 to 110,000

• SR 287 to I-10 = 26,000 to 45,000


Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Summary of New Corridor ConceptsS.E. Maricopa


Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 15Summary of New

Corridor Concepts

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


BROWN

MCK ELLIPS

PRICE

DOBS

ON

ALMA

SCHOO

L

ARIZONA

MC

QUEEN

COOPER

GILBERT

LINDSAY

VAL VISTA

GREENFIELD

HIGLEY

RECKER

POWER

SOSSAMAN

HA

WES

ELLSW

ORTH

CRISMON

SIGNAL BUTTE

MERIDIAN

VINEYARD

8

10


Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


New 2030 Intersection LOSS.E.Maricopa

N.PinalCountyTransportation

Study

Februaury2003

New/2030 Intersection LOS

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOTILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUPE

BASELINE

SOUTHERN

BROADWAYAPACHESUPERSTITIONBROWN

MCKELLIPS

PRICEDOBSONALMA SCHOOLARIZONAMCQUEENCOOPERGILBERTLINDSAYVAL VISTAGREENFIELDHIGLEYRECKERPOWERSOSSAMANHAWESELLSWORTHCRISMONSIGNAL BUTTEMERIDIANVINEYARD

8

10

A

B

C

D

E-F

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


New Facilities Network Summary



Lane Miles 819 116 2,779


Cost (millions) $1,590 NA $0

Maricopa County

Pinal County



Lane Miles 827 10 1,977


Cost (millions) $2,620 NA $0

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


2030 Operational Comparisons

MEASURE 2000 NETWORK

FUTURE BASE ENHANCED NEW

CORRIDORS

VMT (million) 10.0 22.9 22.7 24.1

Lane Miles– % Congested 9 6 4 3

% Congested Intersections 26 45 38 32

Cost (millions) NA $3,088 $530 $1,550

Maricopa County

Pinal County

MEASURE 2000 NETWORK

FUTURE BASE ENHANCED NEW

CORRIDORS

VMT (million) 1.9 7.6 6.6 6.6

Lane Miles– % Congested 1 3 1 0

% Congested Intersections 0 5 4 0

Cost (millions) NA $1,590 $233 $2,737

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea

Transportation Transportation StudyStudyLocal Network &

Rural Transit AccessS.E. Maricopa


Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 19Local Network &

Rural Transit Access

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Proposed Regional ConnectionsS.E. Maricopa


Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 18Regional Connections

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Transit Service-Maricopa Expanded Fixed Route Service Regional Service

Main St Chandler Blvd. Southern Ave Germann Rd. US 60 Power Rd. Loop 101 Gilbert Rd. Country Club Dr/Arizona Ave

5 New Park and Ride 2 New Transit Centers

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Transit Service-Pinal Expanded Fixed Route Service

Extend Maricopa County Service to Apache Junction

Intra-county Service Within Individual cities

Express/Commuter Inter-city Service

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Draft NetworkS.E. Maricopa


Study

Februaury 2003

Figure 20Draft Network

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


High Capacity Corridor Cost UP Mainline Chandler

LRT - $461 million BRT - $226 million

Chandler Boulevard LRT - $684 million BRT - $306 million

Power Road LRT - $465 million BRT - $237 million

Main Street LRT - $374 million BRT - $185 million

UP Southeast Commuter rail - $567 million

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Non-Motorized System GapsS.E. Maricopa


Study

January 2003

Figure 10Gaps in the Non-

Motorized System

System Gaps

Existing Routes347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOTILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUPE

BASELINE

SOUTHERN


MCKELLIPS

PRICE

DOBSON

ALMA SCHO

OL

ARIZONA

MCQ

UEEN

COOPER

GILBERTLINDSAY

VAL VISTA

GREENFIELD

HIGLEY

RECKER

POWER

SOSSAMAN

HAW

ES

ELLSWO

RTH

CRISMON

SIGNAL BUTTE

MERIDIAN

VINEYARD

8

10

347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOTILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUPE

BASELINE

SOUTHERN


MCKELLIPS

PRICE

DOBSON

ALMA SCHO

OL

ARIZONA

MCQ

UEEN

COOPER

GILBERTLINDSAY

VAL VISTA

GREENFIELD

HIGLEY

RECKER

POWER

SOSSAMAN

HAW

ES

ELLSWO

RTH

CRISMON

SIGNAL BUTTE

MERIDIAN

VINEYARD

8

10

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Non-motorized System

Eliminate Existing Gaps Expand Trail System Provide On-street Bike Lanes with Arterial

Construction/Widening

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Arterial & Highway Priorities New

Independent of Other Components Constructed with New Development

Widening Occurs as Segments Approach LOS D/E Bottleneck, Continuity, Safety Considerations

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Freeway Priorities Widening

Higher Priority than New Corridors Phased Based on Demand Benefit of HOV Lane

New Incorporate in Local Plans Preserve Right of Way Williams Gateway Freeway US 60 Freeway Extension Price Freeway Extension Apache Junction/Coolidge Corridor East Valley Corridor

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Transit Priorities Fixed Route

Increase Service to Satisfy Growth Expand with New Development to Meet Density

Thresholds Regional Service

Compliment Fixed Route Service Serve Medium Distance Trips

High Capacity Facilities Connect Activity Centers Serve Long Distance Trips

Documents

Southeast Maricopa / Northern Pinal County Transportation Study