SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONmcdonline.gov.in › departmentdocs › Stg.Comttee meeting dt.19... · 2013-07-09 · SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION List of Business to be transacted

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

List of Business

to be transacted at the Meeting of the

Standing Committee

to be held on

Tuesday, the 19 March, 2013

at 2:15 p.m. at Hansraj Gupta Sabhagar, 1ST Floor, A-Wing,

Dr. S.P.Mukherjee Civic Centre,

New Delhi.

Item No. Subject _____________________________________________________________________________

PART ‘A’

POSTPONED CASES

7 Final Report of Third Municipal Valuation Committee. (i) Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/A&C/SDMC/06/C&C dated 31-5-2012. (ii) Constitution of Sub-Committee in the meeting dated 3-7-2012. 60 Revision of parking charges in the jurisdiction of South Delhi Municipal Corporation as per directions of Hon’ble L.G., Delhi as also recommended by STF constituted on the of the Delhi High Court on traffic issues in Delhi under Chairmanship of Chief Secy., Delhi.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/R.P.Cell/SDMC/682/C&C dated 5-3-2013.

NEW CASES

61 Handing Over Sr. Citizen Recreation Centre at NDSE-II to Sr. Citizen’s Forum South Ex-II.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/CSD/SDMC/657/C&C dated 26-2-2013. 62 Regarding enhancement of rent of Ay. Dispensary, Malikpur.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Health/SDMC/666/C&C dated 27-2-2013.

PLACED ON TABLE

63 Grant of Recognition without aid to Mahashya Dharampal Vidya Mandir at Village Dhansa, New Delhi_110073 (Najafgarh Zone)

(i) Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Edu./SDMC/413/C&C dated 17-12-2012. (ii) Resolution No.12 of the Education Committee dated 13-2-2013. 64 Corrigendum to Item No. 48 – Agenda for Meeting of the Standing Committee

held on 05-03-2013 regarding implementation of policy of conversion of commercial properties transferred from GOI (L&DOE) to erstwhile MCD.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/L&E/SDMC/712/C&C dated 18-03-2013.

65 Municipal Corporations of Delhi employees health scheme (MCDEHS) applicable to the regular employees of all the three corporation i.e. SDMC, EDMC &NDMC.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Health/SDMC/714/C&C dated 19-03-2013.

PART ‘B’

POSTPONED CASE

164 Retirement of five members of the Standing Committee. Municipal Secretary’s Note No. D-701/M.S.(S)/2013 dated 25-2-2013.

NEW CASES

167 Re-construction of Community Hall at Tagore Garden in Ward No.105 in West Zone.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Engg./SDMC/534/C&C dated 20-2-2013. 168 Delivering of Audit Report for the year 2010-2011.

Chief Auditor’s letter No. MCA/RS/Misc. 19/1367 dated 1-3-2013.

169 Construction of boundary wall of land acquired for setting up a Hot Mix Plant for MCD at Village Ferozpur Kalan, Faridabad, Haryana.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Engg./SDMC/531/C&C dated 20-2-2013. 170 Restoration of cut made by BSES Rajdhani for lying of 11 KV Cable from Matiyala Grid to Mochiwala Sub Section Mohan Garden. Sub-Head:--Najafgarh Road to C-Block,Dwarka via Mansa Ram Park- Matiyala Road in C-136/NGZ.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Engg./SDMC/655/C&C dated 22-2-2013. 171 C/o 100 bedded Hospital at Kalkaji Ward No.194, Central Zone. Sub-Head:--P/o fire fighting.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Engg./SDMC/656/C&C dated 25-2-2013.

172 Construction of 10 classrooms in M.C. Pry. School, Katwaria Sarai in Ward No.161 in South Zone.


173 Improvement/ Strengthening of roads by dense carpeting. (a) In Sector-5, R.K. Puram in Ward No.167, South Zone. (b) In Sector-12, R.K. Puram in Ward No.167, South Zone. (c) In Sector-7,8, R.K. Puram & South Moti Bagh in Ward NO.167, South Zone. (d) In Sector-2, 3, 4, R.K. Puram Ward No.166, South Zone.


174 Improvement of link road by RMC from Dhansa Village to Sarangpur, Surehra to Ghumanhera Road & Ujwa to Dariyapur in NGZ.


175 Imp.of link road by RMC from approach road to Jaffarpur Village, Jaffarpur to Khaira Village, Malikpur to Jhulijhuli , Rawta Road to Shyam Baba mandir in NGZ.


176 Const. of Outfall Nallah from Shanti Telecom to Aaditya Communication on approach road from J.J.Colony, Sector-15 to Dwarka in C-135/NGZ.

(i) Dy. Commissioner’s letter No.EE (M)-III/NGZ/2012-13/2105 dated 1-3-2013. (ii) Resolution No.115 of the Ward Committee (Rural Najafgarh) dated 1-3-2013.

PLACED ON TABLE

177 Construction of cunit of Nalla by pdg. B/W from CNG Pump towards DJB Pump House in RK Puram Sector-3 in Munirka in Ward No. 166/S.Z.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Engg./SDMC/697/C&C dated 14-3-2013. 178 I/S of approach road by dense carpeting from Najafgarh Bijwasan Road to

Bharthal Phirni, approach road to village Bharthal paraller to railway line, Sahi road, H Block Pushpanjali road and Indian Oil Road in Bijawasan, NGZ.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Engg./SDMC/709/C&C dated 18-3-2013. 179 Construction of SW drain along Shani road, H block Pushpanjali road and Indian

Oil Road in Bijwasan Constituency. Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Engg./SDMC/695/C&C dated 14-3-2013.

180 Development of Unauthorized colony at Sr No.398/1639 in C-139 NGZ

SH:-Const of road by Pdg M/P and O/S/D from Gali No.01 to Gali No.12 in all Lanes in Jai Vihar, B-Block Ph-II, Nangloi Road in C-139 NGZ. Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Engg./SDMC/715/C&C dated 19-3-2013.

181 Development of Unauthorized colony at Sr No.398/1639 in C-139 NGZ SH:-Const of road by Pdg M/P and O/S/D from Main Nangloi Road to Dinesh house in Jai Vihar, Phase-II, B- Block on Nangloi Road in C-139 NGZ. Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Engg./SDMC/716/C&C dated 19-3-2013.

182 P/L RMC and Drain from MCD Pry. School to Old Gurgaon Road and Internal Roads in Samalkha Village in C-143 NGZ. Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Engg./SDMC/717/C&C dated 19-3-2013.

183 P/L RMC and Drain from Jai Narayan to Khati Wali Gali and Joginder house to

Khati Wali Gali in Kapashera Village in C-143 NGZ. Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/Engg./SDMC/718/C&C dated 19-3-2013.

PART ‘C’ 11 Modification in the Layout Plan of Sector-VI, Pushp Vihar (amalgamation of Plot No.15 and 22) M.B. Road, New Delhi.

Commissioner’s letter No.F.33/CTP/SDMC/683/C&C dated 5-03-2013.

PART ‘A’

POSTPONED CASES

Item No. 60 :— Revision of parking charges in the jurisdiction of South Delhi MunicipalCorporation as per directions of Hon’ble L.G., Delhi as also recommendedby STF constituted on the orders of the Delhi High Court on traffic issuesin Delhi under Chairmanship of Chief Secy., Delhi.

Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/RP Cell/SDMC/682/C&C dated 5-3-2013.

The RP Cell of SDMC presently operates 73 authorised parking lots in its jurisdiction and is inthe process of issue of fresh NIT for auction of more than 50 parking site in South Delhi as per theprevalent rates of parking charges which have been in force since 2007. No revision of parking chargeswas made by the erstwhile Corporation during the last 6 years. The following rate structure is presentlyprevalent in the jurisdiction of South Delhi Municipal Corporation :———————————————————————————————————————————Type of vehicles Rates——————————————————————————————————————————

Car Rs. 10/- for upto 10 hoursRs. 20/- Beyond 10 hours and upto 24 hoursRs. 350/- PM (Day passes)Rs. 500/- PM (Day and night passes)

Scooter/Motor Cycle Rs. 7/- upto 10 hoursRs. 15/- Beyond 10 hours and upto 24 hoursRs. 200/- PM (Day passes)Rs. 250/- PM (Day and night passes)

Tempo (Allowed only in Rs. 25/- upto 12 hourspark under flyover or Rs. 50/- upto 24 hoursparking set for the tempos) Rs. 1,250/- PM

Bus/Other equivalent Rs. 30/- upto 12 hoursRs. 60/- upto 24 hoursRs. 1,500/- PM

——————————————————————————————————————————

Further the revised guidelines for registration of parking contractors in RP Cell of SDMC hasalso been approved by the Standing Commitee on 19th February, 2013 wherein the same old rates ofparkig were incorporated. A draft proposal for enhancement of parking rates proposed by STF was alsoprepared. However, the Corporation vide Resolution No. 221 dated 1-2-2013 discarded any suchincrement in parking charges in the jurisdiction of SDMC. Copy of Resolution is Annexed at ‘A’.

Recently, during the meeting of Special Task Force constituted on the orders of the Delhi HighCourt dated 10-2-2010 on traffic issues and convened by the Chief Secretary on 18-10-2012 and on1-3-2013, a number of important issues were discussed on traffic management in Delhi. It was

[ 2 (S) ]

recommended by Chief Secretary that increase in parking charges would be more suitable policyintervention to discourage the use of private vehicles which results in parking problem in Delhi. TheHon’ble L.G., Delhi has also approved and directions have been issued to all civic agencies includingDDA, NDMC, DMRC, SDMC and EDMC to implement new parking rate structure throughout the DelhiArea. Copy of the dicision regarding enhancement of parking charges in the NCT of Delhi issued by Tpt.Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi vide No. F. 3(9/2)/Proj/Tpt/2010/66 dated 21-2-2013 is annexed as‘B’. The following enhancement in parking charges was proposed by STF for four wheelers duringnon-peak hours :—

(vi) Upto 30 minutes — Rs. 10/-

(vii) Upto 1 hour — Rs. 20/-

(viii) Upto 3 hours — Rs. 50/-

(ix) Every additional hour or part thereof beyond 3 hours — Rs. 20/-

(x) For residents of the area (only one car to be allowed — Rs. 1,500/- p.m.per family/shop)

It was also decided that for the parking during peak hours, the charges would be additional50% of above charges. In case of the two wheelers, the parking charges were proposed to be levied atrates 50% of those proposed for four wheelers with the condition that parking charges would not exceedRs. 50/- for upto 9 hours. It was further recommended that the enhancement of parking charges should besimultaneously accompanied by stricter enforcement of rules of the parking contrators i.e. by way ofproper demarcation/marking of the boundaries of the existing parking lots, installation of appropriatesignage’s displaying the parking rates, and issue of computerized receipt by the parking contractors,showing the amount of parking charges collected as well as time of entry and exit of vehicle.

In view of the directions of Hon’ble L.G., Delhi and recommendations of STF under theChairmanship of Chief Secretary, Delhi, the revised parking charges are required to be implemented bySDMC as per table given below :—

PROPOSED REVISED PARKING CHARGES——————————————————————————————————————————

For four wheelers For four wheelers——————————————————————————————————————————

Up to 30 Minutes Rs. 10/- Up to 30 Minutes Rs. 05/-

Up to 1 hour Rs. 20/- Up to 1 hour Rs. 10/-

Up to 3 hours Rs. 50/- Up to 3 hours Rs. 25/-

Every additional hour or part Rs. 20/- Every additional hour or part Rs. 10/-thereof beyond 3 hours after 3 hours thereof

For residents of the area Rs. 1,500/- p.m. (Parking charges for(only one car to be allowed two wheelers would notper family/shop) exceed Rs. 50/- for nine hours)

For residents of the area Rs. 750/- p.m.(only one two wheeler to beAllowed per family/shop)

——————————————————————————————————————————

[ 3 (S) ]

Therefore, in view of the directions of Hon’ble L.G., Delhi based on the recommendations ofSTF, the revised rates of parking charges is proposed for implementation. The charges, once approvedwould be incorporated in forthcoming NIT of RP Cell.

The parking rates of Tempo and Bus etc have not been considered for revision by STF, hencethe existing parking charges for them would continue.

Accordingly, in view of the above deliberations and recommendations about the increase ofparking charges in Delhi, it is proposed that revision of the parking charges be also implemented in SDMCand the same incorporated in the new NITs to be issued shortly for allotment of parking sites by RP Cell.

The matter may be placed before the Corporation through Standing Committee for formalapproval and implementation thereof.

ANNEXURE ‘B’

GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHITRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, 5/9, UNDER HILL ROAD, DELHI 54

No. F. 3(9/2)/Proj./Tpt/2010/66 Dated : 21-2-2013

To

1. Vice Chairman, DDA, Vikas Minar, New Delhi-110002

2. Chairperson, New Delhi Municipal Council, New Delhi

3. Commissioner, NDMC, Civic Centre, New Delhi-110002

4. Commissioner, SDMC, Civic Centre, New Delhi-110002

5. Commissioner, EDMC, Patparganj Indl. Area, Delhi

6. Managing Director, DMRC, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi

7. Director (Local Bodies), Urban Development Department, GNCTD

Subject :— Decision reg. enhancement of Parking Charges in the NCT of Delhi.

Sir,

A Special Task Force (STF) on traffic issues in Delhi was constituted by the GNCTD underthe Chairmanship of Chief Secretary in pursuance of the order dated 10-2-2010 of Hon’ble Delhi HighCourt. The Task Force had inter-alia recommended enhancement of the quantum of the parking charges inits meeting dated 25th June, 2012. The recommendation made in this regard has been considered by theGovernment of Delhi and Hon’ble Lt. Governor, Delhi has approved the decision to levy the followingparking charges :—

Parking charges for four wheelers during non-peak hours :

(i) Up to 30 minutes .... .... .... Rs. 10/-

(ii) Up to 1 hour .... .... .... Rs. 20/-

(iii) Up to 3 hours .... .... .... Rs. 50/-

(iv) Every additional hour or part thereof beyond 3 hours .... Rs. 20/-

[ 4 (S) ]

Further, for the parking during peak hours, the charges would be additional 50% of abovecharges. Incase of the Two Wheelers, the parking charges are to be livied at 50% rates of those proposedfor four wheelers with the condition that parking charges would not exceed Rs. 50/- for up to 9 hours.

In view of the above, it is requested to take necessary action for implementation of the abovedecision. An early response on action taken in the matter would be highly appreciated.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-

(GAMLI PADU)Special Commissioner (Transport)

Copy for Kind Information to :—

1. OSD to Hon’ble Lt. Governor, Delhi.

2. Principal Secretary to Hon’ble Chief Minister, Delhi.

3. Secretary to Hon’ble Minister of Transport, Delhi.

4. PS to Chief Seeretaty, Delhi.

5. Pr. Secty.-cum-Commr. (UD), GNCTD.

6. Secretary-cum-Commissioner (Transport).

ANNEXURE ‘A’

fnukad 1&2&2013 dks gqÃ nf{k.kh fnYyh uxj fuxe lfefr dh LFkfxr fo’ks”k ctV lHkk dsçLrko la[;k 221 dh çfrfyfi

çLrko la[;k 60 %

loZJh djrkj flag ,oa iou flag jkBh }kjk çLrqr fuEufyf[kr çLrko dk Jh jkts”k xgyksr usvuqeksnu fd;k %&

izLrko la[;k 221 pwafd nf{k.kh fnYyh uxj fuxe fnYyh dh turk ij dksbZ u;k dj yxk mu ijvfrfjDr Hkkj ugha Mkyus ds fy, d rladYi gSA

pwafd ctV ds izko/kkuksa esa fnYyh dh turk ls ikfdZax pktsZl dks c<+kdj olwyusdk izLrko gS blfy, ge bl c<+ksrjh dks udkjrs gSaA

vr% nf{k.kh fnYyh uxj fuxe dh ;s lHkk ladYi djrh gS fd fnYyh dh turk lsikfdZax pktsZl ds :i esa dksbZ o f) u dh tk,A

çLrko loZlEefr lss ikfjr gks x;kA

[ 5 (S) ]

NEW CASES

Item No. 61 :— Handing Over Sr. Citizen Recreation Centre at NDSE-II to Sr. Citizen’sForum South Ex-II.

Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/CSD/SDMC/657/C&C dated 26-2-2013.

Sh. Farhad Suri, Leader of the Opposition, South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Sh. AjayMakan, Hon’ble Minister of Youth Affairs & Sports, Govt. of India have forwarded the request of SeniorCitizen’s Forum South Ex-II, M-17, NDSE-II, New Delhi-110049 to allot the Senior Citizen RecreationCentre at South Extension-II to the Forum.

There was an old building in the premises of Community Hall, NDSE, Part-II. In the premises,a new building has been constructed for the Community Hall purpose and the old building, after necessaryrenovations works, has been converted into a Senior Citizen Recreation Centre which is being used by theSr. Citizens of the area.

The Senior Citizen Forum South Ex-II (registered under Society Registration Act of XXI of1860 with registration No. S/435/Distt.South/2011 dated 4-4-2011) has requested to hand over/allot theabove mentioned Sr. Citizen Recreation Centre to their Forum. In their request letter, they have agreed tomake arrangement of proper facilities at their own cost and also undertake to pay regularly all water andelectricity charges consume by them. Further agreed that they will also make necessary arrangement ofthe Security of the Recreation Centre.

In this regard, it is submitted that :—

1. At present there is no policy for allotment of Sr. Citizen Recreation Centre/CommunityHall to any NGO/Association.

2. A fresh policy needs to be passed by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation.

3. Under the jurisdiction of SDMC, there are 19 Senior Citizen Recreation Centres. Thedepartment is facing so many difficulties to operate/manage these Centres due to shortageof staff. It will be appropriate to give the Sr. Citizen Recreation Centre, NDSE-II to theSenior Citizen’s Forum South Ex-II for operation & management.

4. If agreed, the proposal for allotment of Sr. Citizen Recreation Centre, NDSE-II to theSenior Citizen Forum South Ex-II (Regd.), M-17, NDSE-II, New Delhi-110049 isproposed on the basis of Agreement and terms & conditions annexed as Annexure ‘A’.

The matter may be placed before the South Delhi Municipal Corporation routed throughStanding Committee for approval please.

[ 6 (S) ]

ANNEXURE ‘A’

AGREEMENT

This agreement is made on this________ day of_______ between the South Delhi MunicipalCorporation (SDMC) through Director, Community Services Department, at Delhi (first party)

And

Senior Citizen’s Forum For South Extn.-II, New Delhi-110049 located at M-17, N.D.S.E.-II,New Delhi registered under Societies Registrartion Act 1860, vide Registration No. S/435/Distt. South/2011.

Whereas the South Delhi Municipal Corporation is owner and in possession of the saidproperty Senior Citizen Recreation Centre at NDSE-II, New Delhi.

1. Whereas the Senior Citizen’s Forum (called as Forum) has represented to the SDMC thatthe Forum is willing to manage & Operate the Senior Citizen Centre (called as Centre)through a separate Committee hereinafter called (Managing Committee).

2. Whereas the SDMC is willing to allow the said Forum through its elected GeneralSecretary by virtue of his official position to manage and operate the Centre for exclusiveuse by the Senior Residents of the area and adjoining colonies for a period of five yearsinitially subject to the terms and conditions specified herein after.

3. The SDMC agree to allow the use of the said Centre on a licence fee of Rs. 101/- permonth on the following terms and conditions. Now therefore, it is mutually agreed :—

That the SDMC authorizes, the Forum’s present General Secretary to use thesaid Centre and around as detailed here above subject to the conditions, hereinafterappearing, for a period of five years commencing from the date of MOU, and the samecan be extended at the discretion of the SDMC on the recommendation of the area Mpl.Councillor.

The said Forum shall not use the building and open ground of the Community Hall,NDSE-II for any purpose and shall keep and maintain the centre and the land around it ina clean, proper hygienic and decent conditions, well equipped and shall not suffer theCentre and Community Hall to be in a bad state of affairs during the currency of theperiod of licence and shall not in any manner destroy or damage the Centre and theCommunity Hall site and not cause any kind of obstruction, to the user of the CommunityHall in any manner whatsoever and shall not violate any rules, Bye Laws relating thereto.

4. That the said Forum shall abide by fire safety rules and all other rules and regulations asstipulated in the relevant statutory, codes and orders as the case may be.

5. That the activities, which the licensee would be, required to perform for the benefit of theSenior Citizens are a mix of the foIIowing :—

• Reading Room

• T.V.

• Entry will be regulated so as to prevent mischief and unlawful Activities. The decisionon whom to allow the facilities of this centre shall be taken by Committee of theCentre.

[ 7 (S) ]

6. That the provision of these facilities would be binding on the Forum and permission to usethe Centre would be liable to cancellation if the facilities were not opened to theSr. Citizens, within period of one month from the grant of the permission/allotment.

7. That other activities which are permitted in the Centre are as followings :—

Yoga Activities.

Social and Cultural Activities.

Meetings of Sr. Citizens.

Sports Activities of Sr. Citizens.

8. That activities not permitted in the Centre or open spaces are as followings :—

• Diwali Mela.

• Exhibition-cum-sale by whatever name called.

• Religious discourses.

• Political Meetings/Party/Functions.

• Chit Fund/Lottery/Gambling etc. activities.

• Commercial Activities.

9. That the Centre would be allowed to restrict entry to the premises to the bonafidemembers of the community.

10. That entry would also be allowed to Senior Citizens of the neighboring community.

11. That the Sr. Citizens of the area would be entitled entry to the premises of the centre andto use the facilities therein free.

12. That the journals and the newspapers to be subscribed for the centre would be decided bythe Managing Committee of the Centre in keeping with the choice of the members andbills thereof will be paid by the Forum.

13. Those publications which are obscene or offensive to public taste may not be subscribed.

14. That members would be bound to observe the rules and regulations of the Centre.

15. That the rules and regulations of the Centre would be framed by the Managing Committeeof the Centre.

16. The Centre’s Managing Committee shall include three representatives of the SDMC, oneof whom would be from the Engineering Wing and one would be from General or FinanceWing and the third the Director, Community Services Department, SDMC. There wouldbe three or more representatives of the Forum. The decision of the Managing Committeewould be on the basis of consensus.

17. Where a consensus is not reached, the Managing Committee of the Centre would referthe matter through the Director, Community Services Department of SDMC to theCommissioner, SDMC, whose decision would be final and binding. Commissioner, SDMCmay decide the issue himself or direct one of the officers of SDMC to arrive at adecision. The Forum would be bound to follow the procedure and decision of theCommissioner, SDMC.

[ 8 (S) ]

18. If there are accumulated losses, and the permission to use the premises is not renewed orterminated, the members would be required to make good the accumulated losses inproportion to their members. No liability shall pass on to SDMC as to the Centre and itsassets.

19. The Forum shall not be entitled to sublet the premises or part with the possession there inany manner whatsoever.

20. That the Forum shall maintain the Centre in clean and hygienic conditions and shallconform to the rules, regulations or bye-laws made in this regard by the concernedMunicipal Authority and any other statutory requirements as applicable from time to time.

21. The staff engaged by the Forum for running its community activities shall be in exclusiveemployment of the said Forum and they shall be responsible for compliance of all labourlegislation. SDMC shall not be responsible for any such violation or staff so engaged areneither under contract of employment nor employment with SDMC.

22. The Forum shall place and continue to keep in the Centre all necessary equipments/articles provided by SDMC and shall not remove any item from the site of the Centrethereof without prior approval of the SDMC/Director (Community Services Department).

23. That the Forum shall not display or exhibit pictures posters, statues or other articles orplay music or exhibit any movies or advertisements which are repugnant to the morals orof indecent immoral or other improper character. It is expressly agreed that the decisionof the SDMC in this behalf shall be conclusive and binding on the Forum and shall not bea subject matter or dispute.

24. That the Forum shall not display or exhibit any advertisements or put-up any hoarding orplay and music or exhibit any movies or advertisements in any party in any part of theinterior or exterior other than those in keeping with the objectives of the Centre as a publicplace.

25. That the Forum shall have neither right, title, interest in the Centre allowed for use, norshall Forum be deemed to have exclusive possession threreof, except the permission touse the said site for the specific purpose of operating the centre and maintaining the site.The Centre and Land adjacent shall remain in actual and constructive, ownership andpossession of SDMC.

26. That the Forum shall not be entitled to allow any other person to use or run the Centre inits stead or to use or run any part of the site. Transfer of the Centre and site is prohibited.In the event of the Forum, becoming insolvent or the association being wound up prior tothe expiry of the period fixed hereinafter, the agreement shall stand terminated auto-matically and the successors and permitted assigns of the Forum shall not be entitled touse the said land and the successors and permitted assigns may be permitted afterdischarging any liability that the licensee may have incurred, to remove the goods andother equipments that may be found at the Centre, but in case the goods are not claimedby the successors and permitted assigns within four weeks of the dissolution of the Forum,the SDMC may be public auction dispose of the same.

27. That the Centre shall pay the cost of light, power and water consumed by them as per thedemand of the authorities concerned.

28. That if the Forum desires to close down the Centre within the period of agreement, it willhave to serve a notice of two months in advance from the date it proposes to close down.

[ 9 (S) ]

29. That the Forum shall abide by rules, regulations, orders and instructions that the SDMCmay from time to time make or adopt or issue for the care, protection and administrationof the Centre.

30. That the SDMC shall not be responsible for the safety of the employees, visitors to theCentre or any other material or articles belonging to the Forum and shall not be liable forany damage or injury to the property of the Forum lying at any time, on, upon or aroundthe Centre from any cause whatsoever.

31. That the overall control of the Centre shall remain vested with the SDMC, whose officersor authorized representatives shall have access to all reasonable hours to the said Centresite or any part thereof.

32. That the SDMC shall have the right to revoke the agreement in the event of breach ofany of the terms and conditions specified herein or any terms and conditions or in publicinterest with prior notice of 30 days.

33. That in the event of cancellation, revocation or termination of agreement, the Centre shallstand resumed by the SDMC regardless of the ‘expenditure incurred by the Forum ortemporary structures allowed to be constructed by the Forum. The Forum shall howevercontinue and remain responsible for clearing all the liabilities of the third persons.

34. That on expiry of the period of the agreement or on determination or revocation ofagreement under the terms and conditions hereof, any belonging of the Forum found in theCentre shall be liable to be claimed by the SDMC and may be sold through public auctionunless claimed within a month of the expiry of the said period of determinationor revocation of the agreement as the case may be. The SDMC shall be entitled toappropriate out of the proceeds of such sale, the amounts due to the SDMC from theForum and also after deducting cost of administration and auction of those belongings, andthe balance if any shall be paid over to the Forum or successors and permitted assigns, asthe case may be.

35. That the SDMC shall have the right to terminate the agreement after giving one month’snotice without assigning any reason thereof.

36. That in case, the Centre is destroyed or damaged by any natural calamity or riot or civildisturbance so as to make it unfit for use, the agreement shall stand determinntionautomatically.

37. That in case of any dispute arising between the SDMC and the Forum in respect of theinterpretation or performance of any terms or conditions of this agreement, the same shallbe referred to the sole arbitration of the Commissioner, SDMC whose decision thereonshall be final and binding on both the parties. The Forum shall not object to the Commis-sioner, SDMC acting as sole arbitrator on the ground that he had dealt with the case orhas at some stage expressed opinion in any matter coill1ected therewith.

38. That nothing herein contained shall be constructed as conferring upon the Forum any right,title or interest in respect of over, in or upon the Senior Citizen Centre and the said land ofthe SDMC. The SDMC accepts and reserves upto himself all mines, minerals, coal, goldwashing, earth, oils stores, gravel and quarries, in or under the said site or any part thereof and full right and power at all times to enter on the said land and to do all acts andthings which may be necessary or expedient for the purpose of searching for, workingobtaining, removing and enjoying the same without providing or having any vertical supportof the surface of the said land or for any building for the time being standing thereon,subject however, that the licensor shall make reasonable compensation to the Forum forall damages directly occasioned by the exercise of the rights hereby reserved or any ofthem the amount of such compensation being determined by the SDMC or any officeappointed by the SDMC for the purpose whose decision thereto shall be final and bindingon the Forum.

[ 10 (S) ]

39. That if the Forum allows any credit facility to its members it will do so as its own risk andthe SDMC will take no obligation whatsoever in this regard and no request or claim formthe Forum be entertained on this account.

40. That the Forum shall not resist in any manner if the representatives and the authorizedstaff of the SDMC enter upon the premises/site in order to inspect and execute anystructural repairs/additions or alternations at the site, check water and sanitary conditionsto do renovations, which may be found necessary from time to time by the SDMC and forthe purposes connected therewith and for the compliance of terms and conditions of anyworks relating to repairs/additions/alternations or other damages that may be causedduring the course of installation of any fitting, fixtures etc. or owing to the inspection ofthe premises.

41. That the Forum shall be responsible for all damages or loss of property due to the reasonsfor which Forum or its staff are directly responsible and shall be liable to make good anyloss or damage that may be sustained by the SDMC except those due to normal wear andtear or such as are caused by storm, earthquake or any other natural calamity beyond hiscontrol. The decision of the SDMC in regard to the extent and quantum of compensationif any to be paid the Forum.

42. That the Centre site shall not be used for residential purpose, banqueting, tehbazari, retailshopping, sale-cum-exhibition or for a purpose other than that for which it is allowed.

43. That the Forum shall not keep any animal or conveyance inside the Centre without thespecific written permission of the SDMC.

44. That in case any amount becomes due against the Forum in respect of any matter underthis agreement, the same shall on the failure of the Forum to pay within the timeprescribed, be recovered as arrears of land revenue.

45. That all or any of the powers vested in the SDMC under these presents in respect of thegrant, determination, revocation, cancellation or restoration of this agreement or recoveryof any dues in respect thereof or connected therewith shall also be exercised byCommissioner, SDMC and the Forum shall have no objection whatsoever in this respect.

46. In witness whereof the parties to the agreement have signed this agreement on the dayfirst above-mentioned a true copy thereof signed by both the parties has been retained bythe Forum

For South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Senior Citizen’s Forum South Ex.-II

Witness :—

1. ...............................................................

2. ...............................................................

[ 11 (S) ]

Item No. 62 :— Regarding enhancement of rent of Ay. Dispensary, Malikpur.

Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Health/SDMC/666/C&C dated 27-2-2013.

S.D.M.C. is running an Ayurvedic Dispensary in village Malikpur of Najafgarh Zone in arented building of Late Sh. Ram Mehar since 1984. The said building was initially on a monthly rent ofRs. 665.50 which was subsequently the same was enhanced to Rs. 732/- vide Corporation ResolutionNo. 684 dated 26-2-2001.

It is submitted that the owner Sh. Ram Mehar expired & Sh. Amit Dagar succeeded the saidproperty & the rent at present is being received by said Sh. Amit Dagar, the successor of abovesaidproperty.

Under the provisions of DRC Act., 10% enhancement is permissible. Therefore earlier therent was increased from Rs. 732/- to 805.20 p.m., which was again increased to Rs. 886/- p.m. videResolution No. 201 dated 21-9-2007 & now as per the request of the owner of the said building theincrease in the rent has become due w.e.f. 1st November 2012.

The matter has been examined and the increase of the rent is due w.e.f. 1-11-2012 fromRs. 975/- to 1,073/- p.m. i.e. the 10% enhancement as per DRC Act.

Finance has seen & concurred in the proposal.

In view of above the matter may be placed before Corporation routed through the StandingCommittee for allowing the enhancement of rent of the building of Ay. Dispensary in Malikpur fromRs. 975/- to 1,073/- w.e.f. 1-11-2012.

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION EDUCATION DEPARTMENT: HQ

23RD FLOOR, DR. SPM CIVIC CENTRE MINTO ROAD, NEW DELHI-110002

No.:…………………………… Dated:………………….

From:

The Commissioner,

South Delhi Municipal Corporation,

Dr. S.P.M. Civic Centre,

New Delhi-110 002

To: The Municipal Secretary,

South Delhi Municipal Corporation,

Dr. S.P.M. Civic Centre,

New Delhi-110 002

Sub: Grant of Recognition without aid to Mahashya Dharampal Vidya

Mandir at Village Dhansa, New Delhi-110073(Najafgarh Zone)

On receipt of an application Dated 11.07. 2008 from the Management of

said School for grant of recognition without aid, the above cited School was

inspected initially by Asstt. Education officer (Najafgarh Zone) on 14.02.2011.

The School was found fit for recognition. The area councillor has recommended this

School for recognition. The Final Inspection was carried out on 24.08.2011 by team

of officers from Head Quarters comprising Addl. Director (Pry. Edn.-II), Member of

Education Committee, AEO (phy.) and DDE Najafgarh Zone. They have also

recommended the case for recognition. As per facts noticed and records furnished by

the Management, the position is as under:-

1. Society : The School is being run by The Samarth Shiksha Samiti,

registered on 12.11.1959 under Societies Registration Act, XXI of 1860 (Regn.

No. S-1556 of 1959-60) and Society has started the School w.e.f. 01.04.1983.

2. Financial position: Financial position of the Society is satisfactory. The

society having two accounts, one in the name of Society and the other in the name

of School having the balance Rs. 252,274/- with Axis Bank, Karol Bagh, New

Delhi and Rs. 21,417/- with Allahabad Bank, Dhansa, New Delhi. The source of

income is fees collected from the students & donation from the society. The society

has given an undertaking to deposit three months salary of the staff in reserve fund

with a bank in the joint name of Director (Edn.) and Manager of the school

3. Staff & Salaries: Five teachers with the following details are working in the

School. All of them possess the requisite qualification and age. They are being paid

in the pay-scale prescribed for MCD Schools. The previous school staff has been

resigned due to better opportunities time to time.

S.No. Name of

Teacher

Post Qualification D.O.B. D.O.A. Pay Scale

1. Mr.

Samunder

Singh

Prin. M.Sc., M.Ed. 10.08.69 01.04.1998 9300-34800

(4600)

2. Mrs. Sulbha

Devi

Tr. B.A., B.Ed. 01.07.56 01.04.1995 9300-34800

(4200)

3. Ms. Deepa Tr. B.Sc., B.Ed. 10.06.54 01.04.1990 ----do----

4. Ms. Savita Tr. M.A., B.Ed. 17.10.63 01.04.1998 ----do----

5. Ms. Sharda Tr. M.A., B.Ed. 05.01.53 01.04.1990 ----do----

4. Enrolment of Students and attendance on the day of inspection was

as under:-

First Inspection on 14-2-11

I-A I-B II-A II-B III IV V Total

19/25 19/25 14/25 10/25 24/26 ----- ----- 86/126

Second Inspection on 24-8-11

I-A I-B II-A II-B III IV V Total

21/25 21/26 16/25 17/26 24/26 ----- ----- 99/128

5. School Building: The school is running in a societies plot measuring 2016

Sq. Yards. An open space measuring 1000 Sq. Yards is available in the school

premises for prayer and physical activities/games. No part of the premises of the

school is being used for any purpose other than teaching.

The Size of the rooms are as under:-

21’.4”x19’.0” – 2 rooms 16’.0”x10’.0” – 1 room

20’.0”x20’.0” – 5 rooms 16’.0”x11’.0” – 1 room

Executive Engineer Najafgarh Zone has certified that the School building is

in satisfactory condition to hold the classes.

6. Teaching aids have been provided in the school.

7. Medium of instruction is English.

8. Public Conveniences: Dy. Health officer Najafgarh Zone has given no

objection from the health point of view for running a school.

9. Text Books: Teaching is done as per prescribed syllabus through NCERT

Books/Delhi Bureau of Text Books.

10. Fees & other funds: Tuition fees @ Rs. 225/- for class I to IIIrd is charged

from the students per month by the Management. Besides this annual charges

of Rs. 500/- are charged by the Management.

11. Maintenance of record is proper.

12. PTA has been constituted in the school.

13. Managing committee has also been constituted.

14. Library: There are 1665 books is the Library for the use of the children and

teachers.

15. Admission to the School is open to all without any discrimination of the

children and teachers.

16. Science Equipment has been provided as per requirement.

17. Scheme of Management has been furnished.

18. Students are Encouraged to participate in Co-curricular activities.

19. Provision has been made for indoor and outdoor games.

20. Fire safety & Water: Delhi Fire Service, Govt. NCT of Delhi has given NOC

from fire safety point and tested water has been provided, electricity exist

with proper arrangement of fans and light.

Since the report of Fire department, Health department & water department

are more than 2 years old, it is recommended that recognition may be granted

subject to procurement of the reports from these departments within 3 months

failing which the recognition to granted may be withdrawn.

21. Grant of recognition to this school will not adversely affect other schools

functioning in the vicinity.

22. The manager has certified that the School is not being run for personal benefit

of any individual or a group.

In view of the above, this school fulfils all the conditions for grant of

recognition without aid. It is, therefore proposed that recognition without aid may be

granted to Mahashya Dharampal Saraswati Vidya Mandir at Village- Dhansa,

New Delhi-110073 w.e.f. the date of resolution subject to the following

conditions:-

1. Order/instructions issued by the Education Department and provisions of

Education Act, 1973 shall have to be followed strictly and the

documents/returns as per rule 180 thereof submitted regularly.

2. School shall have to admit children belonging to EWS & disadvantage group to

the extent of at least 25% under free ship quota at entry level as per

notification No. 15/(172)/DE/Act/2010/69 dt. 07.01.2011.

3. An amount equal to three months salary of the staff shall have to be

deposited as reserve fund in the joint name of manager and Dir. (PE), SDMC.

As per orders of the worthy commissioner/Municipal secretary of unified

erstwhile Municipal Corporation the proposal may be placed before the South Delhi

Municipal Corporation routed through the Education Committee to Standing

Committee for approval.

Addl. Commissioner (Edn.)

For Commissioner


From: Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation, Civic Centre, New Delhi. To: Municipal Secretary, South Delhi Municipal Corporation, Civic Centre, New Delhi.

Sub: Corrigendum to Item No.48 – Agenda for Meeting of the Standing Committee held on 05-03-2013 regarding implementation of policy of conversion of commercial properties transferred from GOI (L&DO/DOE) to erstwhile MCD.

______________________________________________________ Aforesaid proposal was placed before the Standing Committee vide Commissioner’s letter No. F-33/L&E/SDMC/524/CYC dated 15-02-2013 and was duly approved in the meeting dated 05-02-2013. Due to some clerical oversight, examples shown on Pages 19(S) and 20(S) and Brochure – Page 58(S) and Annexure ‘B’ under the heading “Conversion fee applicable..” at Page 54(S) may be read as under: As regards examples at Pages 19(S) and 20(S):

For example, if the shop situated in R.K. Puram Market measures 10 sq. m., the applicable land rate is, say Rs. 6,13,800/- per sq. m. and the cost of superstructure works out to say Rs.50,000 (after applicable depreciation), then the Capitalized Value shall be:

(a) where the shop/unit is part of a single storeyed structure:

Area of the Shop : 10 sq.m. Locality : R.K. Puram Category (as per Circle Rates) : B Circle Rate applicable : Rs.204600/- per sq.m. (res.)

– for Commercial, the rate chargeable is three times the base rate i.e. 204600x 3 = Rs. 613800/- per sq.m.

Factor : 1. Land Rate Chargeable : Rs. 613800/- per sq.m. Premium of Land : Rs. 61,38,000/-

Cost of superstructure : Rs. 50,000/- Capitalized Value Payable : Rs. 61,88,000/-

(b) Where the shop/unit is part of a two -storeyed structure i.e. ground floor – shop whereas the upper floor comprises of residential flats: Area of the Shop : 10 sq. m. Locality : R.K. Puram Category (as per Circle Rates) : B Circle Rate applicable : Rs.2,04,600/- per sq.m. (res.)


Factor : 2/3– Commercial ; 1/3 Residential. Land Rate Chargeable : 2/3 x 613800/- per sq.m. i.e. 4,09,200/- Premium of Land : Rs. 40,92,000/-


(c) Where the shop/unit is part of a two -storeyed structure i.e. ground floor – shop whereas the upper floor comprises of commercial flats: Area of the Shop : 10 sq. m. Locality : R.K. Puram. Category (as per Circle Rates) : B Circle Rate applicable : Rs.2,04,600/- per sq.m. (res.)

– for Commercial, the rate chargeable is 3 times the base rate i.e. 204600x 3= Rs. 613800/- per sq.m.

Factor : ½– Commercial ; 1/2 Residential. Land Rate Chargeable : ½ x 613800/- per sq. m. i.e.306900/- Premium of Land : Rs. 30,69,000/-


(d) Where the shop/unit is part of a four -storeyed structure i.e. ground floor consists of shops whereas the first floor comprises of commercial flats and the upper floors consist of govt. general pool accommodation (residential) : Area of the Shop : 10 sq. m. Locality : R.K. Puram. Category (as per Circle Rates) : B Circle Rate applicable : Rs.2,04,600/- per sq.m. (res.)


Factor : ¼ – Commercial Land Rate Chargeable : ¼ x 613800/- per sq. m. i.e.153450/- Premium of Land : Rs. 15,34,500/-


The above illustrations are purely indicative in nature and the Circle/Land Rates

prevailing as on date of conversion, shall be applicable. As regards land rates at Pages 54(S) – Annexure ‘B” of Brochure:

Conversion fee applicable for built up Commercial Shops of L&DO will be as per the notified Circle Rates (indicative). The prescribed conversion charges are applicable as per Circle Rates notified by the GNCTD on 04-12-2012 (effective/applicable from 05-12-2012) (or circle rates prevailing on the date of conversion whichever is later)

SL. No. Category Conversion fee per Sq.mtr. Commercial Shops/stalls/show

windows/commercial flats/fuel depots 1 A 19,35,000 (645000 x 3) 2 B 6,13,800 (204600 x 3) 3 C 3,99,600 (133200 x 3) 4 D

3,19,200 (106400 x 3)

5 E 1,75,200 (58400 x 3) 6 F 1,41,600 (47200 x 3) 7 G 1,15,500 (38500 x 3) 8 H 58,200 (19400 x 3)

As regards examples in Brochure at Page 58(S):

For example, if the shop situated in R.K. Puram Market measures 10 sq. m., the applicable land rate is, say Rs. 6,13,800/- per sq. m. and the cost of superstructure works out to say Rs.50,000 (after applicable depreciation), then the Capitalized Value shall be:

(a) where the shop/unit is part of a single storeyed structure: Area of the Shop : 10 sq.m. Locality : R.K. Puram Category (as per Circle Rates) : B Circle Rate applicable : Rs.204600/- per sq.m. (res.)


Factor : 1. Land Rate Chargeable : Rs. 613800/- per sq.m. Premium of Land : Rs. 61,38,000/-


(b) Where the shop/unit is part of a two -storeyed structure i.e. ground floor – shop whereas the upper floor comprises of residential flats: Area of the Shop : 10 sq. m. Locality : R.K. Puram Category (as per Circle Rates) : B Circle Rate applicable : Rs.2,04,600/- per sq.m. (res.)


Factor : 2/3– Commercial ; 1/3 Residential. Land Rate Chargeable : 2/3 x 613800/- per sq.m. i.e. 4,09,200/- Premium of Land : Rs. 40,92,000/-


(c) Where the shop/unit is part of a two -storeyed structure i.e. ground floor – shop whereas the upper floor comprises of commercial flats: Area of the Shop : 10 sq. m. Locality : R.K. Puram. Category (as per Circle Rates) : B Circle Rate applicable : Rs.2,04,600/- per sq.m. (res.)


Factor : ½– Commercial ; 1/2 Residential. Land Rate Chargeable : ½ x 613800/- per sq. m. i.e.306900/- Premium of Land : Rs. 30,69,000/-


(d) Where the shop/unit is part of a four -storeyed structure i.e. ground floor consists of shops whereas the first floor comprises of commercial flats and the upper floors consist of govt. general pool accommodation (residential) : Area of the Shop : 10 sq. m. Locality : R.K. Puram. Category (as per Circle Rates) : B Circle Rate applicable : Rs.2,04,600/- per sq.m. (res.)


Factor : ¼ – Commercial Land Rate Chargeable : ¼ x 613800/- per sq. m. i.e.153450/- Premium of Land : Rs. 15,34,500/-


The above illustrations are purely indicative in nature and the Circle/Land Rates

prevailing as on date of conversion, shall be applicable.

Other things remain unchanged and the same may be placed before the Standing Committee as a necessary Corrigendum to Commissioner’s letter No. F-33/L&E/SDMC/524/ CYC dated 15-02-2013 which was duly approved in the meeting held on 05-03-2013.

ADDL. COMMISSIONER (I) For Commissioner

From

The Commissioner South Delhi Municipal Corporation

To The Municipal Secretary South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Subject: Municipal Corporations of Delhi employees health scheme (MCDEHS) applicable to the regular employees of all the three Corporations i.e. SDMC, EDMC & NDMC.

1. The medical reimbursement facilities available to the employees of the Municipal Corporations of

Delhi are governed by Circular No Addl. MHO (M)/2007/1352 dated 14th August 2007. This order entitles

regular employees for reimbursement of the expenditures, incurred on treatment of self and dependents.

In the case of those Category C and Category D employees who have opted to receive a monthly medical

allowance (at the rates as applicable from time to time), medical reimbursement is restricted to 34

specified diseases. These reimbursements are allowed for treatments in government hospitals/recognized

private hospitals/ diagnostic centers/dental clinics. In cases of real emergencies, accidents and other

deserving cases, medical reimbursement is also permitted if treatment is taken from private unrecognized

hospitals, subject to approval by competent authority.

2. With the rapid advancements in medical technologies including therapies/diagnostics and with

attendant cost escalations, the present system of medical reimbursements, though working satisfactorily

in the past be inefficacious in meeting the employee’s requirements and expectations. Need of the hour is

to ensure that good quality medical treatment becomes available to the employees without having to

undergo protracted procedural requirements. There has been a growing demand for providing cashless

facility to serving municipal employees also which has been introduced by the MCD for its pensioners.

Such a cashless facility, which entitles the pensioners for on-spot hospitalization, has not so far been

extended to the serving employees. The matter has been engaging the consideration of the Municipal

Corporations of Delhi for quite some time. After careful consideration of the deficiencies in the existing

system of medical reimbursements, the persistent demand of the employees for introduction of cashless

facility and taken into account the financial implications, it has been decided to launch a unified new

scheme for employees of all the three corporations namely NDMC, SDMC & EDMC, having the following

salient features:-

(i) This scheme will be known as the Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme in

short ‘MCDEHS’.

(ii) For smooth functioning of the scheme, South DMC will be treated as lead Corporation.

(iii) The MCDEHS will come into operation with effect from the date of its notification &

accordingly, shall apply only to the claims arising thereafter.

(iv) MCDEHS shall compulsory be applicable to all regular employees of all the three Corporations

of Delhi namely East Delhi Municipal Corporation, South Delhi Municipal Corporation and

North Delhi Municipal Corporation. Benefits of the MCDEHS will mutatis mutandis apply to

the members and dependents as defined under the Central Services (Medical Attendance) Rules

1944.

(v) The facilities under MCDEHS will be available within the territory of Delhi and the NCR.

(vi) The monthly subscription, which will be as per prevailing CGHS rates, shall be deducted from

the salary bill of the employees. The present rates of contribution are as under :

Sl. No. Grade Pay (as per 6th CPC) Contribution ( Rupees per month)

1. Upto 1650/- per month 50/- 2 Rs.1800/-, Rs.1900/-, Rs.2000/-,

Rs.2400/-, & Rs.2800/- per month 125/-

3 Rs.4200/- per month 225/- 4 Rs.4600/-, Rs.4800/-, Rs.5400/-, &

Rs.6600/- per moth 325/-

5 Rs.7600/- and above 500/-

On the recommendations of MCDEHS Cell, contribution rates can be revised by the committee

of Commissioners (SDMC,EDMC & NDMC) from time to time considering the overall inflow &

outflow, with the objective of balancing the inflow & outflow of the funds.

(vii) For establishing identity of self or dependent members of the employees, the department shall

issue identity cards under the scheme.

(viii) Medical services are made available as per their entitlements in all health units of Municipal

Corporations of Delhi without payment of any charges. Medical reimbursement of all

expenditure incurred in government hospitals will be made as per Central Services (Medical

Attendance) Rules 1944.

(ix) In case of hospitalization/procedures in private recognized hospitals, employees and their

dependents will be extended cashless treatment facility subject to conditions detailed in

MCDEHS. This means the payment will be made by the Municipal Corporations of Delhi

directly to the hospital concerned and employees have to make no payments. All existing

private recognized hospitals and the private hospitals recognized under CGHS Delhi/Delhi Govt.

Employees Health Scheme will be offered empanelment under proposed MCDEHS. Newer

hospitals/diagnostic centers/dental clinics etc. that are empanelled under CGHS Delhi /DGEHS

will also be offered empanelment under proposed MCDEHS with the recommendations of In-

charge MCDEHS Cell and approval of the Commissioners. The list of such hospitals/diagnostic

centers/ dental clinics that enters into an agreement and the facilities for which the hospital is

empanelled with Municipal Corporations of Delhi will be circulated separately and updated

from time to time.

(x) Cashless facility will not apply to OPD treatments or diagnostic services. The reimbursement in

such cases will be made as per prevailing CGHS Delhi rates. Claims will have to be submitted in

the modified Medical Claim Form along with Check List.

(xi) Referrals, for cashless facility, in cases of planned treatment requiring hospitalization, will be

made only by Medical Officers/ Specialists of Municipal Corporations of Delhi specifically

authorized. The referral slip so issued will be in prescribed Performa.

(xii) For OPD treatment and diagnostic services, the beneficiaries will be referred by Medical

Officers/Specialists of Municipal/Government Dispensary/Hospital on OPD Card.

(xiii) Emergency treatment from recognized hospitals: In the case of emergency medical conditions,

beneficiaries may avail treatment from any recognized hospital directly i.e. without prior

referral. In such cases, cashless facility will be extended only if a referral slip has been obtained

from the medical officers / specialists of Municipal Corporations of Delhi specifically authorized

within two working days of admission.

(xiv) Emergency treatment from unrecognized private hospitals: In cases of real emergencies,

accidents and other deserving cases, beneficiaries can avail treatment from nearest available

hospital. But in such cases, the member will not be entitled to cashless facility and the medical

reimbursement will be restricted to prevailing CGHS Delhi rates as per merits of the case.

(xv) All residual matters not specifically mentioned in the MCDEHS will be dealt with as per

provisions contained in the CS (MA) Rules 1944 / CGHS Delhi & amendments from time to

time.

The detailed MCDEHS, which also includes the draft agreement to be executed with the private hospitals,

is enclosed as Appendix 1.

3. In the case of Municipal Pensioners to whom such cashless facility has been offered, settlements

of claims made by the recognized hospitals are being cleared within two months. Under the new MCDEHS

also, this time schedule will be adhered to.

For this to happen and successful implementation of MCDEHS, a full-fledged Cell will have to be

established in the Department. Based on the studies carried out, the proposed MCDEHS Cell will consist

of Medical Officers, Accounts Officer (ACA), Accountants, and other ministerial staff for which certain

posts will have to be created. It will also be necessary to computerize all relevant data in respect of

employees and also to develop appropriate application software for the purpose. Besides above,

MCDEHS Cell shall undertake the matters relating to payment of hospital bills on priority basis.

4. Financial implications: Medical reimbursement facilities for serving employees are borne from

salary head and there is no separate head exclusively for this purpose. This will have to be done. Although

it may be presumed this head could be funded through re-appropriation from the salary head, there is a

chance of additional expenditure because of introduction of cashless facility. But once the scheme is

introduced, no municipal employee will draw monthly medical allowance as is being paid now. Total

saving from medical allowance will be approximately Rs. 190 lakh per month and will grow

proportionately as the same is linked with enhancement in Dearness Allowance. Additionally, by way of

monthly contribution, it is estimated that another Rs 230 lakh per month will accrue to the Municipal

Corporations of Delhi coffers. The total annual accretion to the MCDEHS Fund (savings due to stoppage

of medical allowance, monthly subscription of members and savings due to stoppage of current system of

medical reimbursement) works out to Rs 61.2 crores per annum. Apart from payment of the medical

charges, the scheme will entail additional expenditure (Rs 1.2 crores per annum) by way of salaries to the

new posts to be created in the MCDEHS Cell and other over heads. With the introduction of Cash less

medical facility to Municipal Corporations of Delhi employees, it is expected that large number of medical

claims will be received, to be processed meticulously in a timely manner. Hence, a separate cell dedicated

for dealing such cases and allied matters need to be created. Proposed details of the cell are as under:

S.No Post Number of posts Approx. Salary per annum (Rs. In Lakh)

1. Chief Medical Officer 1 14.00 2 Medical Officers 4 30.00 3 Asst Chief Accountant 1 7.00 4 Accountant 1 6.00 5 UDC 4 13.00 6 LDC 6 17.00 7 Date Entry Operator 2 2.50 8 Category D 2 5.50 Total 21 95.00

However O&M Deptt has assessed the demand and agreed for following posts:-

Sr.No. Post No.of Post 1. Chief Medical Officer 1 2. Medical Officers 4 3. Asstt.Chief Accountant 1 4. Accountant 1 5. UDC 4 6. LDC 4 7. Data Entry Operator - 8. Category D 2

Total 17 The finance (erstwhile MCD) had concurred the scheme vide endorsement number

12/5/CA/F&G/2012/5873/21 dated 3/5/2012 subject to the condition that “budget provision be made in

the respective salary head to meet the expenditure. Keeping in view of trifurcation of MCD, perhaps

there will be a requirement of three separate dedicated cell for implementation of the scheme. Hence,

department may first get the OM study done”. Further, after O&M study, finance deptt. of North

DMC vide endorsement no.7-10-12/CA/F&G/NDMC/1665-372 dated 26/10/2012 has observed that “The

proposal of the department may be considered as concurred in subject to necessary provision of budget

under relevant head of account to meet the expenditure on account to creation of posts”, subject to the

condition the services of group D may be outsourced against the sanctioned posts from the approved

agency of the corporations.

The matter was discussed at length by the duly constituted committee consisting of Addl.DHAs

(M&TB) & DCAs of the three Corporations. Since large number of medical claims are expected to be

received, the same are supposed to be processed meticulously in a timely manner and as exact quantum

of work load on the proposed cell cannot be assessed, it was unanimously agreed that:-

a) The size of MCDEHS Cell as proposed above is justified and the posts detailed therein may be got

created, subject to the condition that the services of group D may be outsourced against the sanctioned

posts from the approved agencies of the corporations.

b) Size of cell may be reviewed after three years.

c) MCDEHS Cell may be headed by a SAG level Medical Officer.

d) In cases of exigencies, on the request of In-charge MCDEHS Cell, provision of mobilization of

additional staff from all the three corporations (NDMC, SDMC & EDMC) may be permitted.

e) The establishment of MCDEHS including annual confidential reports, leave record and service

record etc. in respect of staff deployed in medical cell will be maintained by lead corporation i.e. South

DMC.

f) Establishment expenditure of MCDEHS Cell will be charged from the respective Corporations in respect

of the proposed health scheme on the basis of number of employees in each corporation as on first day of financial

year.

g) A separate head of account will be created for payment of cashless claims of private recognized hospitals,

establishment / contingency expenditures etc. of MCD EHS Cell.

h) A separate Bank Account shall be opened by In-charge, MCD EHS Cell.

i) To create the corpus fund in the said bank account, the concerned corporation shall deposit the advance

cheque on half yearly basis relating to C & D category employees working under their jurisdiction, equal to an

amount which is being paid to its employees as medical allowance for ensuing six months.

In addition, the respective corporation shall deposit “subscription amount” deducted from the salary of

individual employee while passing their salary bills.

All transactions/accounts of the MCDEHS will be audited and balance sheet will be prepared on yearly

basis.

j) Flow chart: On receipt of bills from the private recognized hospitals for payment, the MCD EHS

Cell shall process the claims. Admissibility of the claim shall be worked out and the same will be

sanctioned by designated competent authority under the proposed scheme. The medical cell shall pass

the bills under respective head of account allotted for the purpose and claim the amount from concerned

corporation by way of demand to the respective Accounts Officer (HQ). Meanwhile, the medical cell shall

make the payment to concerned hospital from corpus fund as detailed above.

Since, as per terms of agreement, the payment to the concerned hospital are to be made within

60 days of submission of the claims, on receipt of demand from medical cell, respective Accounts Officer

(HQ) shall release the payment to medical cell on priority basis and book the expenditure in the

concerned corporation.

The medical cell shall keep a watch on the demand sent and payment made so that the payment to

the concerned hospital is not delayed at any cost.

k) Sanction of Cashless claims: - In-Charge, MCDEHS Cell will be delegated administrative approval

and expenditure sanction powers up to Rs.5.00 Lacs. The claims over & above Rs.5.00 Lacs will be

forwarded to respective Corporation for financial concurrence, administrative approval and expenditure

sanction by concerned competent authorities.

l) Besides settlement of claims pertaining to private hospitals, the MCDEHS Cell so established

shall also be responsible among other functions for :-

i) Giving adequate publicity of the proposed scheme.

ii) Recommending empanelment of newer private health facilities as per prevailing

guidelines.

iii) Recommending de-empanelment of erring private health facilities if situation so

warrants.

iv) Random checking/inspection of such institutions where municipal beneficiaries are

undergoing frequent admissions/prolonged indoor treatment/irrational billing etc.

v) Scrutiny for admissibility of such claims wherein municipal beneficiaries have undergone

treatment at un-recognized hospitals or treatments without referral through the duly

constituted Expert Medical Committee, consisting of In-charge MCDEHS Cell

(Chairperson), CMO- MCDEHS Cell(Member Secretary), One Specialist/GDMO with PG

qualification each in the field of Medicine, Gynecology & Obstetrics and Surgery. If

required, Specialist /GDMO with PG qualification in particular specialty can be co-opted.

vi) The Cell shall also be responsible for processing such cases pertaining to provision of

CPAP, BIPAP, Oxygen Concentrator, Cochlear Implants, other Medical Appliances,

recommending for treatment outside Delhi or abroad etc. as per provisions of CS (MA)

Rules 1944.

5. Legal issues: - All legal issues arising out of facilities provided under proposed scheme will be

processed by the MCDEHS Cell in consultation with Law Department of concerned Corporation and will

be forwarded to the respective Corporation for contesting the same in the Court of law.

6. Finance Department has seen and concurred in the MCEDHS as detailed above in Para 4.

7. It is requested that the proposal may please be placed before the Corporation, through the

Standing Committee, for its consideration and approval.

Additional Commissioner (Health)

South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Appendix-1

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS OF DELHI EMPLOYEES HEALTH SCHEME

1. This scheme will be known as the Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme

(MCDEHS).

2. It will come into operation from the date of notification and will apply to only those claims arising

after this date.

3. All regular employees of the three Corporations viz NDMC, SDMC & EDMC (who are not covered

under any other medical scheme of central/state governments or PSUs) shall compulsorily become

members of the MCDEHS with effect from the date of its notification. In the case of Officers/Officials on

deputation to MCD, applicability of the MCDEHS will be determined as per the terms and conditions

governing the deputation.

4. No employee of the Corporations will be entitled to payment of medical allowance with effect

from the date of introduction of the MCDEHS.

5. Every member shall be required to make a monthly subscription at CGHS rates as may be fixed

/revised from time to time deductible from his/her monthly salary.

6. Benefits of the Scheme :The MCDEHS entitles a member to avail the following medical facilities

in respect of self or dependent family:

(i) Reimbursement of admissible expenditure incurred on treatment from any government

hospital;

(ii) Reimbursement of admissible expenditure (as per prevailing CGHS Delhi rates) on OPD

treatment and diagnostic procedures from recognized private hospitals, diagnostic

centers and dental clinics in Delhi and NCR with prior referral from

government/municipal hospitals and dispensaries;

(iii) Credit (cashless) facility for treatments availed as inpatient in any private recognized

hospital but will not extend to OPD diagnostic procedures and/or OPD treatments;

(iv) Reimbursement of admissible expenditure (as per prevailing CGHS Delhi rates) in cases

of treatment undertaken in any hospital in real emergencies (as may be determined by a

duly constituted Expert Medical Committee);

(v) Reimbursement of admissible expenditure incurred on medical treatment outside Delhi

and abroad in cases where such facilities are not available in Delhi or within the country

(strictly in accordance with CS(MA) Rules and CGHS guidelines);

(vi) Reimbursement of admissible expenditure towards cost of artificial appliances, implants,

hearing aids etc. strictly in accordance with CS (MA) Rules and CGHS guidelines.

7. Private recognized hospitals are those hospitals (other than government hospitals) located in

Delhi and NCR and which have entered into agreement (as given in Annexure-1) with the Corporations

for providing medical facilities as envisaged in the MCDEHS. The relevant clarifications/guidelines as per

CGHS Delhi are annexed as Annexure -2 which are liable to be revised by CGHS from time to time and

will apply mutatis mutandis to MCDEHS.

8. For availing the benefits of the MCDEHS listed in Para 6 above, the following conditions are to be

fulfilled :-

(i) It shall be mandatory for the member (or the beneficiary as the case may be) to produce

such document or card as may be prescribed by the Corporations from time to time for

establishing his /her identity;

(ii) For OPD treatment in private recognized hospitals, prior referral from any Medical

Officer/Specialist of Municipal/Government Hospital/Dispensary is mandatory.

However, no referral is essential for availing OPD treatment facility from any

Government health facility.

(iii) Although, no credit facility will be provided for OPD treatment & diagnostic services, the

member/beneficiaries may apply for reimbursement of expenditure incurred from their

respective department through DDO concerned in the prescribed Claim Form and Check

List as per Annexure 3 & 4).

(iv) For treatment in any private recognized hospital, referral by the following medical

officers of Municipal Corporations of Delhi viz. the Additional Directors Hospital

Administration (Medical & TB), Chief Administrative Medical Officers (CAMOs) of the

zones, Medical Superintendents (MSs)/Addl. MSs of major hospitals, Resident Medical

Superintendent/Medical Officer in charges of designated Allopathic Medical Centers

under Municipal Pensioners’ Health Scheme. The referral will be issued in the prescribed

format, along with signature, name and seal of the referring authority (the format is

annexed as Annexure-5).

(v) In cases of emergencies (list of such conditions is detailed in Annexure-6), private

recognized hospitals shall extend inpatient treatment without a referral. In such cases,

the referral slip has to be obtained from the Authorized Medical Officer as mentioned in

sub Para (iv) above and submitted to the hospital within two working days of such

admission, failing which the claims of such treatments are liable to be not entertained by

the Corporation under the cashless facility. However, all charges reimbursed / or

claimed through credit facility shall be strictly as per prevailing CGHS/Delhi rates.

9. Processing of claims

(i) In respect of those preferred by the private recognized hospitals under cash less facility

to employees /pensioners of Municipal Corporations of Delhi will be carried out by a Cell called

the MCDEHS Cell consisting of Medical Officers, Accounts Officer (ACA), Accountants, and other

support staff;

(ii) in respect of OPD treatment/diagnostic/ treatment taken from Govt. Hospitals and treatment

taken from unrecognized hospitals in emergency will be carried out through the respective Chief

Administrative Medical Officers (CAMOs), as per the CGHS rates for which a Check List and

Claim Form –III as detailed in Annexure-3 & 4 respectively will have to be submitted; and

(iii) in respect of those claims of reimbursement to members under relaxed provisions of the

CS(MA) Rules, as applicable, will be carried out by a Committee headed by In Charge MCDEHS

Cell and one Physician, Gynecologist, Surgeon each as members and CMO, MCDEHS as Member

Secretary called the Expert Medical Committee (EMC), which shall recommend such cases to the

Competent Authority for disposal. The EMC will co-opt specialists from other disciplines and will

meet as often as required.

10. The Commissioners may delegate such financial powers to officer/s by special or general order as

deemed necessary to implement the provisions of the MCDEHS. The Commissioners may also designate

the officers, who will be competent to relax any of the provision/s of the CS (MA) Rules on the express

recommendations of concerned Director Hospital Administration / Chief Administrative Medical Officer.

11. The MCDEHS being scheme for benefit of municipal employees, it is incumbent upon all the

members to observe and practice highest standards of integrity while availing the benefits for self and

dependents. Any attempt to derive undue benefit shall be construed as a serious misconduct within the

ambit of Conduct Rules and will make him/herself liable for appropriate disciplinary action without

prejudice to any other legal action arising there from.

12. All residual matters not specifically mentioned in the MCDEHS will be dealt with as per

provisions contained in the CS (MA) Rules, 1944 and Central Government Health Scheme Delhi and

amendments from time to time.

(In non-judicial Stamp Paper of Rs.100/-)

Annexure-1

AGREEMENT

This agreement for empanelment of hospital (hereinafter referred to as the

“Agreement”) is made at __________________ and entered into on this

_______________ day of ____________, 20….

BETWEEN

Municipal Corporations of Delhi viz South Delhi Municipal Corporation

(SDMC) , North Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) & East Delhi Municipal

Corporation (EDMC), are statutory bodies constituted and governed by the Delhi Municipal

Corporation Act, 1957, having offices at Dr. S.P.M Civic Centre, New Delhi-110002 ( SDMC &

NDMC) and Plot No.419, Udyog Sadan, Patparganj Industrial Area, Delhi-110092 (EDMC)

respectively, acting through Dr. _____________________________________, In-

charge Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme Cell ( MCDEHS) , Dr. S.P.M.

Civic Center, J.L. Nehru Marg, New Delhi-110 002 (hereinafter referred to as the “MCDs”,

which expression, unless repugnant to the context or excluded shall include its successors-in-

office, legal representatives, administrators and assigns) of the First Part;

Dr.__________________________________ In-charge Municipal Corporations of Delhi

Employees Health Scheme Cell ( on behalf of all the above detailed three Corporations).

AND

M/s / ____________________________________, a [company] / [society] / [trust],

incorporated and registered under the Companies Act, 1956 / registered under Indian Societies

Act, 1860, having its registered office at _______________________ represented by its

Managing Director / Director / Partner / Proprietor / Secretary / President / Representative

____________________________, duly authorized to enter into this Agreement vide

Company / Society / Trust Resolution No.________ dated ______ and the duly authenticated

copy is annexed herewith to this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Hospital”, which

expression unless repugnant to the context or excluded shall include its legal representatives,

successors, administrators and permitted assigns) of the Second Part.

The MCDs and the Hospital shall hereinafter be individually referred to as the “Party” and

collectively referred to as the “Parties”.

WHEREAS:

A. MCDs have been providing medical facilities to their employees, pensioners and their

dependents respectively through their hospitals (“MCDS’ hospitals”).

B. MCDs have also been providing medical care facilities to their pensioners and their

dependents in a cashless manner by having cooperation with the recognized non-MCDS’

hospitals under the scheme titled “MEDICAL FACILITIES TO MUNICIPAL

PENSIONERS/FAMILY PENSIONERS” (“Pensioners Scheme”) which is attached

herewith as Annexure I. The said facility has been provided by MCDs for those pensioners

which are the members of the Pensioners’ Scheme.

C. MCDs have introduced the cashless facility to their existing employees and their dependents

under the scheme titled ‘MCDs Employees Health Scheme’ (“Employees Scheme”) and

the same is attached herewith as Annexure II. The said facility has been introduced for the

employees without having them to undergo protracted procedural requirements with respect

to claim of medical expenditure for those employees who are covered under above scheme.

D. MCDs have agreed to take the services of the identified hospitals to implement the

Pensioners’ Scheme and the Employees Scheme under this Agreement to benefit the

pensioners and their dependents and employees and their dependents (hereinafter

collectively referred to as the “Beneficiaries”).

E. Above referred is the Non-Govt. hospital which has provisionally been recognized by MCDs

for the treatment_____________________________________(name of specialties

approved.)

F. In view of the aforesaid, the Parties have agreed to enter into this Agreement on the terms

and conditions as set out herein below.

NOW THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH AS FOLLOWS:-

1. INTERPRETATION

a) a reference to "the Agreement" or "this Agreement" includes all schedules, exhibits and annexes to the Agreement;

b) a reference to singular includes the plural and vice-versa;

c) a reference to any legislation or legislative provision includes any statutory modification or re-enactment of, or legislative provision substituted for, and any subordinated legislation issued under, that legislation or legislative provision;

d) headings do not affect the interpretation of this Agreement;

e) a reference to any Party includes that Party's executors, administrators, substitutes, successors and permitted assigns;

f) a reference to a day, month or year is relevant to a day, month or year in accordance with the Gregorian calendar; unless otherwise specified in this Agreement;

g) a reference to an agreement, deed, instrument or other document include the same as amended, novated, supplemented, varied or replaced from time to time;

h) the expressions "including", "includes" and "include" have the meaning as if followed by "without limitation";

i) The expression "writing" or "written" shall include communications by telex, telegram, facsimile (FAX), electronic mail (E-mail) and by post; and

2. RECOGNITION OF THE HOSPITAL

(a) The Hospital is recognized and empanelled for treatment of the Beneficiaries subject to

the conditions hereinafter mentioned.

(b) MCDs reserve the right to de-recognize or de-empanel the Hospital in accordance with

the terms of this Agreement.

3. TERM

This Agreement is valid for a period of 2 (two) years with effect from date of entering into

agreement unless modified or revoked. (“Effective Date”).

4. SCOPE OF SERVICES

(a) The scope of medical treatment the Beneficiaries may avail at the Hospital shall include

consultation with various consultants in Out Patient Department (“OPD”), necessary

diagnostic tests, in patient treatment and follow up care/ consultation. For the purpose

of OPD treatment and diagnostic services, the Beneficiaries shall be referred on OPD

Card of the concerned dispensary / hospital or any other scope as agreed by the parties.

(b) Based on its category mentioned below, the Hospital shall deposit an interest free cash

security with the MCDs as per rates indicated below immediately before execution of this

Agreement:-

Category Type of hospital Amount of Security

Money Category – A Corporate hospital/super – specialty hospital Rs. 1,00,000.00 (Rs.

One Lac Only)

Category - B Trust / Partnership / Single Owner / General

Purpose Hospital / Diagnostic Center Rs.50,000.00 (Rs. Fifty

thousand only)

5. MECHANISM FOR CASHLESS FACILITY

a) That in routine cases, the Hospital shall provide treatment to the Beneficiaries on

production of a Medical Identity Card issued by MCDs and a referral slip from the

concerned authorized officers of the MCDs by the Beneficiaries.

b) That in case of emergencies, the Beneficiaries have the option to go directly to the

Hospital and the Hospital shall not ask for the referral slip from MCDS’ dispensary /

hospital or the concerned authorized officer of the MCDs. The Hospital shall not refuse

admission or demand an advance payment from the Beneficiary or his family member

and shall provide cashless facilities to the Beneficiaries on production of a valid Medical

Identity Card. Further, in such cases, the Hospital shall inform the Municipal

Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme Cell and shall obtain the referral slip

within 2 (two) working days of the admission of the Beneficiary in the Hospital from the

concerned authorized officers of the MCDs by the Beneficiaries.

c) The Hospital shall submit/forward the bill for reimbursement complete in all respects as

per prevailing Central Government Health Scheme as applicable to Delhi (“CGHS”)

approved rates to the In-charge Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health

Scheme Cell ( MCDEHS) , Dr. S.P.M. Civic Center, J.L. Nehru Marg, New Delhi-

110 002 and MCDs will make every reasonable effort for reimbursement to the Hospital

within 60 (sixty) days from the date of submission of a bill.

d) For the purpose of this Agreement, the conditions of emergency are as detailed in

MCDEHS, shall apply.

e) For reasons of clarity, it is hereby clarified that the mechanism for cashless facility shall

not be available in cases of OPD services and Diagnostic Centers.

6. BASIS OF CHARGE

(a) The Hospital agrees and undertakes that the inpatient accommodation would be

provided to the Beneficiaries as per their entitlement in accordance with the provisions

of the CSMA Rules and CGHS Delhi as amended and notified from time to time with

respect to the treatment of the Beneficiaries as undertaken by the Hospital.

(b) The Hospital shall charge for the treatment of the Beneficiaries within the ceiling limits

as described and contained in the schedule of prevailing approved charges for CGHS

Delhi.

(c) The maximum rates applicable and admissible shall be the CGHS Delhi approved rates,

wherever available. In the event, the rates for various procedures in the Hospital are

lower than those fixed by the CGHS Delhi, then the Hospital shall charge the actual rates

prevalent in the Hospital and not the CGHS Delhi rates.

(d) In case an item, essential for the treatment of a Beneficiary, is not covered in the

package, as contained in CGHS guidelines, the same will be reimbursed separately by the

MCDs to the beneficially.

(e) That the Hospital shall not charge any amount agreed in the package as prescribed under

CGHS Delhi from the Beneficiary.

7. OBLIGATIONS OF THE HOSPITAL

(a) The Hospital shall prominently display that the Hospital is empanelled under MCDs,

along with the purposes for which it is empanelled so as to enable the services to the

Beneficiaries, namely, employees and pensioners and their dependents alike to avail

medical facilities easily and as per requirements.

(b) It shall be the duty and responsibility of the Hospital, at all times, maintain and sustain

high quality and standard of its services and healthcare and to have all statutory /

mandatory licenses, permits or approvals of the concerned authorities under or as per

the existing laws. The Hospital shall adopt reasonable standard of care in providing

treatment to the Beneficiaries.

(c) That during In-Patient Department (IPD) treatment of the Beneficiary, the Hospital shall

not ask the Beneficiaries to purchase medicine/s from outside, but bear the cost on its

own since the “package rate” fixed by the CGHS Delhi includes the cost of drugs, surgical

consumables, other medicines, etc.

(d) The Parties shall not discriminate in the provision of facility and treatment, in any

manner whatsoever, against the Beneficiaries receiving treatment in the Hospital, as

compared to the other patients of equal/similar status coming for treatment in the

Hospital.

(e) The Hospital shall not refuse treatment/admission to any Beneficiary reporting to the

Hospital in OPD or Emergency if the condition of the Beneficiary so warrants. In the

event of the refusal by the Hospital, if the Beneficiary is required to undergo treatment

from any non-panel hospital then the difference in cost of such treatment between the

CGHS Delhi rates and the rates of such non-panel hospital shall be borne by the Hospital

where the Beneficiary had reported first. Such amount shall be payable to the MCDs

within 60 days from the receipt of such claim notice.

(a) The Hospital shall send across the originals of such invoices, bills etc. to the

MCDs. The Hospital shall start providing complete details of the billing and

invoices by uploading the same on the website in a format as prescribed by the

MCDs as and when asked for. The MCDs, for this purpose, shall provide an access

key to the Hospital for the same.

(b) The administrative cost of the Hospital & all other expenses required by the

Hospital for the purpose of this Agreement shall be borne by the Hospital.

(c) The Hospital shall be responsible with respect to the complete statutory, labour,

fire and municipal compliances and/or approvals and all direct and incidental

expenses related thereto with respect to the maintenance of a Hospital/diagnostic

centre as applicable.

(d) The Hospital shall be solely responsible and liable for the statutory compliances

related to the employees and /or consultants of the Hospital employed in any

capacity and MCDs shall under no circumstances be responsible for such

compliances. The Hospital shall not raise any claim against the MCDs on account

of the Hospital’s employees including doctors and paramedics undertaking the

obligations as contained under this Agreement.

(e) The Hospital shall ensure that the treatment provided to the Beneficiary by the

Hospital shall be appropriate as per the condition of the Beneficiary and most

economical.

(f) The Hospital shall also provide reports in the prescribed format to the In-charge

Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme Cell ( MCDEHS) , in

respect of the Beneficiaries treated in the Hospital on a monthly basis by the 10th

day of the succeeding calendar month.

(g) Any liability arising due to any default or negligence in providing treatment or

performance of the medical services shall be borne exclusively by the

Hospital/diagnostic center that shall alone be responsible and liable for the

defects in rendering such services or the default or negligence so committed by

the Hospital / diagnostic center. The MCDs shall not be liable for the same in any

manner whatsoever.

(h) The Hospital shall notify/inform the MCDs of any material change in their status

and their shareholdings or that of any Guarantor of the Hospital in particular

where such change would have an impact on the performance of the obligations

of the Hospital under this Agreement.

8. INSPECTION AND AUDIT BY MCD

(a) The MCDs shall have right to send medical and financial teams to the Hospital without

any notice to the Hospital:

i) To inspect and scrutinize the Hospital in terms of actual medical facilities provided

by the Hospital to the Beneficiaries;

ii) To scrutinize the requirement of the treatment being provided to the Beneficiaries;

iii) To scrutinize any difference between the invoices raised and the actual treatment

provided to the Beneficiaries; and

iv) For any other purpose whatsoever to further the objects of this Agreement.

(b) The Hospital shall provide access to its financial and medical records for the assessment

and review by medical and financial auditors of the MCDs, as and when required and the

decision of the MCDs on such essentiality or requirement shall be final and the Hospital

shall not raise any objection whatsoever in this regard.

9. DE-EMPANELMENT AND DE-RECOGNITION

(a) The In-charge Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme Cell (

MCDEHS) , is authorized and empowered to de-panel/derecognize any or all

empanelled Hospital(s) / diagnostic center(s) without assigning any reason whatsoever

and none of the Hospital(s) or diagnostic center(s) shall raise any objection whatsoever

in this regard.

(b) In case of any complaint of overcharging the Beneficiaries, the In-charge Municipal

Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme Cell ( MCDEHS ) may derecognize the

Hospital, after giving due notice, and his/ her decision shall be final. This shall be

without prejudice to any other action that MCDs may take as per the terms herein

contained including but not limited to the recovery of overcharged amount from the

Hospital.

(c) In case of any malpractice by the Hospital or collusion between the Hospital and the

Beneficiary or any other interested party is detected / proved, In-charge Municipal

Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme Cell ( MCDEHS ) in capacity of

registering authority will consider the cancellation of the registration / de-recognition /

de-empanelment of the Hospital along with initiation of appropriate criminal

proceedings against the Hospital by the concerned Head of the Department.

(d) In the event of any bribes, commission, gifts or advantages being given, promised or

offered by or on behalf of the Hospital or any of or its officers or staff including

proprietor, partner, director, etc. or its agent or servant or anyone else on its behalf to

any officer, servant, employee or representative of the MCDs or any member of the

family of any officer, servant, employee or representative of the In-charge Municipal

Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme Cell ( MCDEHS ) in relation to

execution of this Agreement or any other agreement with the MCDs, then the MCDs shall

without prejudice to the other rights and remedies which it is entitled and

notwithstanding any criminal liability which the Hospital may incur, cancel this

Agreement and/or any other agreement entered into between the Hospital and MCDs.

Further, MCDs shall be entitled to recover from the Hospital, any loss or damages

resulting from any such cancellation. Any question or dispute as to the commission of

any offence under this clause shall be decided by the In-charge Municipal Corporations

of Delhi Employees Health Scheme Cell ( MCDEHS ) in such a manner and in such

evidence or information as he / she shall think fit and sufficient and his / her decision

shall be final and conclusive.

10. TERMINATION

(a) It is agreed between the Parties that the Agreement may be terminated at any time by the

In-charge Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme Cell ( MCDEHS )

after giving a prior written notice of 1 (one) calendar month to the Hospital.

(b) It is further agreed between the Parties that the MCDs shall be at liberty at any time to

terminate this Agreement by giving a prior 7 (seven) days notice in writing to the

Hospital in the event the Hospital fails to fulfill any of its obligations under this

Agreement or commits a breach of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement

and the decision of the In-charge Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health

Scheme Cell (MCDEHS) in this regard shall be final.

(c) The In-charge Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme Cell

(MCDEHS) shall refund the cash security deposit or such portion thereof as may be due

and payable to the Hospital after making requisite deductions by the MCDs on the

termination of this Agreement. It is agreed between the Parties that no interest shall be

paid on the amount of the cash security deposit.

(d) In the event of winding up or dissolution of the company / partnership firm running the

Hospital, the In-charge Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme Cell

(MCDEHS) shall have the right to terminate this Agreement. However termination of the

Agreement shall not absolve the Hospital or its legal representative(s), nominee(s),

assignee(s), etc. from the civil/ criminal liability in respect of the medical services

provided by the Hospital during the currency of the term of this Agreement.

11. NOTICE

(a) All notices and correspondences under this Agreement may be given or taken by:

In case of MCDs: the In-charge Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health

Scheme Cell (MCDEHS) or any officer for the time being entrusted with the functions

and powers.

In case of the Hospital: __________________________________

(b) All notices and reference hereunder shall be deemed to have been duly served and given

to the Hospital if delivered to the Hospital or any of its authorized agents or sent by

registered post / speed post to the address stated hereinbefore. Any notice shall be

deemed to be duly served to the MCDs, if delivered to the In-charge Municipal

Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme Cell ( MCDEHS ) or sent by registered

post or left at the office of In-charge Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health

Scheme Cell ( MCDEHS ) during regular office hours on any working day.

12. MISCELLANEOUS

(a) Original Copy. The original copy of this Agreement shall be kept at the office of In-

charge Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme Cell (MCDEHS) and

a true copy thereof shall be retained in the office of the Hospital.

(b) Indemnification. The Hospital agrees to indemnify and hold MCDs harmless for any

cost, charges, damage, expenses, losses, penalty and/or liability or claims incurred by or

made against MCDs in the event if any of the representations or warranties under this

Agreement given by the Hospital to MCDs are found to be contrary or false or due to any

breach, non-observance, failure or any other act or omission on part of the Hospital in

the performance of its obligations under this Agreement.

In the event any legal proceeding arising out of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or

medical negligence / criminal negligence committed by the Hospital, if proved by the

Court of law, compensation payable or any liability in respect thereof shall be entirely the

responsibility of the Hospital and MCDs shall be totally absolved of any such proceeding

of any manner whatsoever.

(c) Non Assignment. The Hospital shall not assign its obligations under this Agreement in

part or whole, directly or indirectly to any third party without prior consent of MCDs in

writing.

(d) Right of Set-Off. The MCDs shall have a lien and also reserve the right to retain and set

off against any sum which may, from time to time become due and payable to the

Hospital hereunder, any claim which the MCDs may have against the Hospital under this

Agreement or any other agreement between the Parties hereto.

(e) Principal-to-Principal relationship. It is understood by the Parties that this

agreement is strictly on a Principal-to-Principal basis and the Hospital shall not be

construed as an agent of MCDs. Neither Party by virtue of this Agreement shall have any

right, power of authority to act or create any obligation, express or implied, on behalf of

the other Party.

(f) Supersession. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the

Parties and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings pertaining to the

subject matter hereof including the agreements executed with respect to the provision of

the cashless facility under the Pensioners’ Scheme from the Effective Date. However, the

Pensioners’ Scheme and the Employees Scheme shall be considered to be a part of this

Agreement and shall be read harmoniously with the provisions of this Agreement.

(g) Amendment. The Agreement may be amended at any time by mutual agreement of the

Parties in writing. No amendment, variation or modification of this Agreement shall be

valid unless made in writing and signed by each Party.

(h) Waiver. The non-exercise of or delay in exercising any power or right by either Party

shall not operate as a waiver of that power or right. A waiver by a Party shall be valid

only if such waiver of power or right is in writing and is signed by a duly authorized

officer of such Party.

(i) Expenses. The Hospital shall pay all the expenses incidental to the preparation,

registration and stamping of this Agreement.

(j) Applicable Law and Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be construed, interpreted,

and enforced pursuant to the laws of India and all disputes arising out this Agreement

shall be subject to sole and exclusive jurisdiction of the Courts of Delhi only.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have hereunto set their respective hands on this

Agreement on the day and year first above written, in the presence of the following witnesses

For and on behalf of Commissioners, MCDs For and behalf of M/s__________

_______________Hospital/ Doctor

(Name_________________________)

Authorized signatory

In-charge Municipal Corporations of Delhi

Employees Health Scheme Cell ( MCDEHS ) (Rubber Seal)

(Authorized signatory

Witnesses Witnesses

1._______________________ 1._______________________

_______________________ ______________________

_______________________ ______________________

2._______________________ 2.______________________

_______________________ ______________________

________________________ _______________________

Annexure-2

Clarifications/Guidelines in respect of Private recognized Hospitals etc.

Relevant clarifications regarding private recognized hospitals / diagnostic centers are as under: -

1 (a) “Package Rate” shall mean and include lump sum cost of inpatient treatment / day care /

diagnostic procedure for which a Municipal beneficiary has been permitted by the competent authority or

for treatment under emergency from the time of admission to the time of discharge including (but not

limited to) – (i) Registration charges, (ii) Admission charges, (iii) Accommodation charges including

patient’s diet, (iv) Operation charges, (v) Injection charges, (vi) Dressing charges, (vii) Doctor /

consultant visit charges, (viii) ICU / ICCU charges, (ix) Monitoring charges, (x) Transfusion charges, (xi)

Anesthesia charges, (xii) Operation theatre charges, (xiii) Procedural charges / surgeon’s fee, (xiv) Cost of

surgical disposables and all sundries used during hospitalization, (xv) Cost of medicines, (xvi) Related

routine and essential investigations, (xvii) Physiotherapy charges etc. (xviii) Nursing care and charges for

its services.

(b) Cost of Implants / stents / grafts is reimbursable in addition to package rates as per CGHS ceiling

rates for implants / stents / grafts or as per actual, in case there is no CGHS prescribed ceiling rates.

(c) Treatment charges for newborn baby are separately reimbursable in addition to delivery charges for

mother.

(d) Hospitals / diagnostic centers empanelled under MCDEHS shall not charge more than the

prevailing CGHS Delhi package rates/ rates.

2. a). Package rates envisage duration of indoor treatment as follows:

Upto 12 days: for Specialized (Super Specialties) treatment

Upto 7 days: for other Major Surgeries

Upto 3 days: for Laparoscopic surgeries/ normal Deliveries

day: for day care / Minor (OPD) surgeries.

b). However, if the beneficiary has to stay in the hospital for his/her recovery for a period more than the

period covered in package rate, in exceptional cases supported by relevant medical records and certified

as such by hospital, the additional reimbursement shall be limited to accommodation charges as per

entitlement, investigations charges at approved rates, and doctors visit charges ( not more than 2 visits

per day per visit by specialists/ consultants) and cost of medicines for additional stay).

c). No additional charge on account of extended period of stay shall be allowed if the extension is due to

infection on the consequences of surgical procedure or due to any improper procedure and is not justified.

3. a). Beneficiaries of MCDEHS are entitled to facilities of private, semi private or general ward

depending on their basic pay. The entitlement is as follows:

Sl. No. Basic Pay ( without the inclusion of grade pay) Entitlement

1. Upto Rs.13,950/- General Ward.

2 Between Rs.13,951/- and Rs.19,530/- Semi- Private Ward

3 Rs.19540/- and above Private Ward.

b). The package rate for semi-private ward.

c). The beneficiaries of MCDEHS taking treatment in the empanelled hospitals will be entitled for

reimbursement / treatment on credit as per the package rate/rates. The package rates are for semi-

private ward, if the beneficiary is entitled for general ward there will be a decrease of 10% in the rates; for

private ward entitlement there will be an increase of 15%. However, the rates shall be same for

investigation irrespective of entitlement, whether the patient is admitted or not and the test per se does

not require admission to hospital.

d). A hospital empanelled under MCDEHS whose normal rates for treatment procedure / test are

lower than the CGHS prescribed rates shall charge as per the rates charged by them for that procedure /

treatment from a non-Municipal beneficiary and will furnish a certificate to the effect that the rates

charged from Municipal beneficiaries are not more than the rates charged by them from non MCD

beneficiaries.

e). Private ward is defined as a hospital room where single patient is accommodated and which has an

attached toilet (lavatory and bath). The room should have furnishings like wardrobe, dressing table, bed-

side table, sofa set, carpet, etc. as well as a bed for attendant. The room has to be air-conditioned.

f). Semi Private Ward is defined as a hospital room where two to three patients are accommodated and

which has attached toilet facilities and necessary furnishings.

g). General ward is defined as halls that accommodate four to ten patients.

h). There are certain procedures where there is no prescribed package rate under CGHS, similarly there

are medical emergencies where the treatment is mainly conservative, the admissible amount in such cases

is calculated item wise, room rent, procedures, investigations,

i) The maximum room rent for different categories would be:

General ward Rs.1000/- per day

Semi-Private ward Rs.2000/- per day

Private ward Rs.3000/- per day

4). Normally treatment in higher category of accommodation than the entitled category is not

permissible. However, in case of an emergency when the entitled category accommodation is not

available, admission in the immediate higher category may be allowed till the entitled category

accommodation becomes available. However, if a particular hospital does not have the ward as per

entitlement of beneficiary, then the hospital can only bill as per entitlement of the beneficiary even though

the treatment was given in higher type of ward.

5). In case of non-emergencies, the beneficiary shall have the option of availing specific treatment /

investigation from any of the empanelled hospitals of his/her choice (provided the hospital is empanelled

for that treatment procedure / test) after the same has been advised by specialists / medical officers

Municipal / other Government hospital / Dispensary and in case of indoor cashless facility prior referral is

obtained from the competent authority.

6). The empanelled hospitals shall honor referral letter for cashless facility issued by competent authority

and provide treatment facility as specified in referral letter.

7). The private hospitals will furnish their claims under credit (cashless) scheme in the office of MCDEHS

Cell.

8). During the In-patient treatment of the Municipal beneficiary, the Hospital will not ask the beneficiary

or his attendant to purchase separately the medicines / sundries / equipment or accessories from outside

and will provide the treatment within the package rate, fixed by the CGHS which includes the cost of all

the items.

9). In case of treatment taken in emergency in any un-empanelled private hospitals, reimbursement shall

be considered by competent authority at CGHS prescribed Packages/ rates only.

10). If one or more minor procedures form part of a Major treatment procedure, then package charges

would be permissible for Major procedure and only 50% of charges for minor procedure.

11). Any legal liability arising out of such services, responsibility solely rests on the hospital and shall be

dealt with by the concerned empanelled hospital themselves.

Annexure-3 South Delhi Municipal Corporation

MEDICAL FORM FOR REIMBURESEMENT OF MEDICAL CLAIMS

(To be filled by the claimant)

1. Medical Card No. :

2. Validity of Medical Card & entitlement :

Pvt./Semi Pvt./General.(Strike out whichever is applicable)

3. Full name of the card holder (Block letters) :

Biometric I.D.No. :

Full Address :

4. Telephone No. : (O)………………( R) ……………(M)………

5. e-mail Address, if any :

6. Name of the Bank :

( Branch ………………………SB A/c …………………..MICR Code ……………………Tel. ………)

7. Name of the patient & relationship With the card holder

8. Basic Pay

9. Name of the Hospital with Address:

(a) OPD treatment and investigations.

(b) Indoor Treatment

10. Date of admission……..……….. Date of Discharge ……………….(In case of Indoor Treatment only).

11. Total amount claimed :

(a) OPD Treatment

(b) Indoor Treatment

12. Detail of Permission

13. Details of Medical advance, if any.

I hereby declare that the statements made in the application are true to the best of my knowledge and

belief and the person for whom medical expenses were incurred is wholly dependent on me. I am a MCD

beneficiary and the Medical Card was valid at the time of treatment. I agree for the reimbursement as is

admissible under the rules.

Signature of Card Holder (with date).

Note: Obtain Break up of investigations from the hospital (details and rates of individual tests and the

exact number of Sugar tests, X-Ray films, etc. (as the reimbursable amount is calculated as per approved

rates only).

I , Dr…………………………have gone through this Medical Reimbursement Claim pertaining to

Mr./Ms………………………S/o, D/o, W/o Sh……………………….. and hereby certify that the treatment

obtained was essential . The claimed expenditure is verified for reimbursement.

Signature of treating Doctor

(With Name and Seal)

Annexure-4

South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Check List for Reimbursement of Medical Claims

1. Medical Card No. :

2. Validity of Card (For Family Pensioners) : From…………….to……………

3. Entitlement Pvt./Semi Pvt./General

4. Full Name of Card Holder(Block Letters) :

5. Status (Please tick mark item applicable) : Employee/Pensioner/Family Pensioner

6. Documents submitted (Please tick mark)

(a) Medical Claim Form : Yes/No

(b) Photocopy of Card : Yes/No

(c) Bills (in Original), indicate number of bills : Yes/No…………

If “No” (i) Photocopies of claim papers : Yes/No

(ii) Affidavit on Stamp Paper : Yes/No

(d) Copy of OPD Card/ Discharge summary : Yes/No

(e) Copy of referral : Yes/No

(f) Break up for investigations : Yes/No

(g) If Card Holder is not alive, whether following documents are submitted:-

(i) Affidavit on Stamp Paper by claimant : Yes/No

(ii) NOC from all legal heirs on Stamp Papers : Yes/No

(iii) Copy of Death Certificate : Yes/No

Dated:____________ Signature of Card Holder

Tel. No.(O)

(R)

(M)

e-mail address

Name of Bank ……………………..Branch……………………. SB A/c No……………………..

Branch MICR Code………………Tel. No. of Bank( Branch)……………………………………

Annexure-5

In triplicate

(Hospital copy/Employee’s copy/Office Copy)

MUNICIPAL CORPIRATIONS OF DELHI (Health Department)

S.No. Dated:___________

REFERRAL SLIP (For beneficiaries under Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme and their dependents for cashless transaction/Credit facility in private recognized hospitals.) I,Dr._______________________________________________________, Designation____________, am fully authorized to refer the patients to private recognized hospitals under Municipal Corporations of Delhi Employees Health Scheme and their Dependents for cashless transaction (Credit facility). I am referring Mr./Mrs._______________________________________________________ Age__________________sex_______________ to ________________________________ Hospital for necessary treatment as detailed below :-

1. Name of Employee______________________________________________________ 2. a .Medical Card No._______________b.Biometric I.D.No.________________________ 3. Name of the Corporation _________________________________________________ 4. Relation of Patient with Card Holder_________________________________________ 5. Brief History and provisional diagnosis_______________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6. Referred for (Purpose)__________________________________________________

The above patient may be extended cashless facility/credit facility as per our agreement. All charges should be as per prevailing CGHS Delhi Rates. Bills raised are to be submitted with the MCDEHS Cell at Dr.S.P.M Civic Centre , JLN Marg, New Delhi-110002

Signature with Seal

Annexure-6

List of Emergency conditions.

In case of emergencies as detailed below, a beneficiary can avail treatment from any

private recognized hospital without prior referral:

(a) Acute Coronary Syndromes (Coronary Artery By-pass Graft/ Percutaneous Transluminal

Coronary Angioplasty) including Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina, Ventricular

Arrhythmias, Paroxysmal Supra Ventricular Tachycardia, Myocarditis, Cardiac Tamponade,

Acute Left ventricular Failure/Severe Congestive Cardiac Failure, Accelerated

Hypertension, Hypertensive emergencies, Complete Heart Block and Strokes Adam attack,

Acute Aortic dissection.

(b) Acute Limb Ischemia, Rupture of Aneurysm, Medical and Surgical shock and peripheral

circulatory failure.

(c) Cerebrovascular Attack-Strokes, Sudden Unconsciousness, Head injury, Respiratory failure

decompensated lung disease, Cerebro Meningeal Infections, Convulsions, Acute Paralysis,

Acute Visual loss.

(d) Respiratory failure, decompensated lung disease, Pneumothorax, Hemothorax.

(e) Acute Abdomen: - Hepatitis, Amoebic liver abscess, obstructive jaundice, Biliary colic,

Acute cholecystitis/choledochocystitis, Acute pancreatitis, Pancreatic abscess, Acute

apenditicitis, Acute intestinal colitis, Acute gastritis, Peptic ulcer, Perforative peritonitis,

Renal Calculus, PUJ Obstruction, Pyonephrosis, Pyelonephritis, Ureteric calculus, Acute or

Subacute intestinal obstruction, Obstructed Hernia, Enteritis, Tubercular Abdomen,

Mesenteric lymphadenitis, Diverticulitis and any other miscellaneous acute conditions.

(f) Road traffic Accidents, Head injuries, with injuries including fall, other injuries,

electrocution, drowning, fractures etc.

(g) Dengue Fever (complicated), Chickengunia.

(h) Acute poisoning, snakebite.

(i) Acute Renal Failure.

(j) Acute abdomen in female including acute Obstetrical and Gynecological emergencies.

(k) Heat Stroke / exhaustion.

(l) Any other life threatening emergent condition which is not covered above.

PART ‘B’

POSTPONED CASE

Item No. 164 :— Retirement of five members of the Standing Committee.

Municipal Secretary’s Note No. D-701/M.S.(S)/2013 dated 25-2-2013.

Section 45 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act deals with the constitution of the StandingCommittee Sub-Section (3) of this Section provides as under :—

“One-half of the members referred to in Clause (i) of Sub-section (1) and one-half of themembers referred to in Clause (ii) of that Sub-section shall retire on the expiration of oneyear from the date of constitution of the Standing Committee after the commencement ofthe Delhi Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1993, and for that purpose they shallbe selected by lot from amongst their respective categories before the said expiration insuch manner as the Chairman of the Standing Committee may determine.”

The present Standing Committee was constituted as under :—

(i) The following six members were elected by the Councillors from among themselves at the1st meeting of the Corporation held on 2-5-2012 :—

1. Ms. Tilotma Chaudhary, Ward No. 129

2. Sh. Rajesh Gehlot, Ward No. 136

3. Ms. Simmi Jain, Ward No. 153

4. Sh. Farhad Suri, Ward No. 154

5. Sh. Anil Kumar Sharma, Ward No. 168

6. Sh. M. Nagrajan, Ward No. 184

(ii) The following four members were elected by the Wards Committees in their meetingsheld on 11-5-2012 (one member each elected by the members of each WardsCommittee) :—

1. Dr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Ward No. 121 (West)

2. Sh. Parveen Rajpoot, Ward No. 131 (Rural Najafgarh)

3. Sh. Satender Prakash, Ward No. 181 (South)

4. Ms. Timsi Kasana, Ward No. 204 (Central)

As per the provisions of Sub-section (3) of Section 45 quoted above, three members out of6 members mentioned in (i) above and the 2 members out of 4 members mentioned at (ii) above are toretire on the expiration of one year from the date of the constitution of the Committee.

Attention is also invited towards Sub-Section (1) of Section 47 (reproduced below) accordingto which it is mandatory for the Standing Committee to elect its Chairman and Deputy Chairman in its firstmeeting each year. As per Sub-Section 67 of Section 2 ‘year’ means a year commencing on the 1st day ofApril.

[ 2 (S) ]

47. Chairman & Dy. Chairman of the Standing Committee(1 ) The Standing Committee shall at its first meeting in each year elect one of its member

(who is a councillor) to be the Chairman and another member, to be the DeputyChairman.

Keeping in view the provision mentioned above and to ensure that the election of Chairmanand Dy. Chairman of the Standing Committee should be held in its first meeting of the year 2013-14 it isalso pertinent to mention that the process of selection of 5 retiring members by the Standing Committee,including the confirmation of its minutes should also be completed on or before 31st March, 2013 so thatfurther process of election of 3 members in place of 3 retiring members from the Corporation could takeplace in the first meeting of the Corporation in April, 2013 along with the election of Mayor andDy. Mayor.

Accordingly, the matter is placed before the Standing Committee for selection of 5 membersto retire as above.

NEW CASES

Item No. 167 :— Re-construction of Community Hall at Tagore Garden in Ward No. 105 in West Zone.

Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Engg./SDMC/534/C&C dated 20-2-2013.

The Administrative Approval and Expenditure Sanction in anticipation of approval of theCorporation, alongwith permission for calling tenders was obtained by the department. Vide CorporationResolution No. 129 dated 12-12-2012 Administrative Approval & Expenditure Sanction has been grantedfor the above noted scheme amounting to Rs. 559.09 lacs.

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 4,27,13,500/- based on DSR’ 2007 &approved rates of M.C.D. for Part-A & demolishing of existing structure amounting to Rs. 1,36,629/- forPart-B was prepared and technical sanction accorded by the Competent Authority. Draft NIT amountingto Rs. 3,76,70,754/- for Part-A & Item Rate for demolishing of existing structure as Part-B for the abovework was also approved by the competent authority.

The tender for the work amounting to Rs. 3,76,70,754/- for Part-A & Part-B Item Rate fordismantling of old existing structure were invited vide NIT No. E.E.(Project-II)WZ/TC/2012-13/15 dated12-10-2012 due on 5-11-2012 with due publicity in the following newspapers :—

S. No. Name of Newspaper Language Date of Publicity1. The Hindu Hindi 15-10-20122. Dainik Jagran (All Edition) Hindi 15-10-20123. IE + JS + F. Exp (Delhi) English, Hindi 15-10-20124. Daily Milap Urdu 15-10-2012

Eighteen tenders were sold out of which eight tenders were received. The comparativestatement of the rates received is as under :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––S. No. Name of Contractor Rate received G-8 No. Date

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––1. M/s. S.N. Malhotra & Sons @ (–) 12.55% below G-8 No. 034357

No condition & for dated 5-11-2012Part B : Rs. 1,00,000/- for Rs. 9,42,000/-

2. M/s. R.P. Singh & Co. Pvt. Ltd. @ (–) 12.15% belowNo condition & forPart B : Rs. 1,60,000/-

[ 3 (S) ]

3. M/s. Amar Const. Co. @ (–) 7.42% belowNo condition & forPart B : Rs. 1,00,000/-

4. M/s. Puja Const. Co. @ (–) 6.67% belowNo condition & forPart B : Rs. 20,000/-

5. M/s. R.P. Singhal & Co. @ (–) 6.39% belowNo condition & forPart B : Rs. 10,000/-

6. M/s. J.S. Const. Co. @ (–) 4.00% belowNo condition & forPart B : Rs. 90,000/-

7. M/s. Sushil Const. Co. @ (–) 3.96% belowNo condition & forPart B : Rs. 20,000/-

8. M/s. Vijay & Co. @ (–) 2.5% belowNo condition & forPart B : Rs. 10,000/-

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Justification of rates comes to 10.95% above. M/s. S.N. Malhotra & Sons quoted his rates@ (–) 12.55% below which are well within the justification of rates for Part-A and for Part-B fordismantling of old existing structure Rs. 1,00,000/- which is lower than the fixed reserve price i.e.Rs. 1,36,629/-. Hence, the quoted rates of the contractor @ (–) 12.55% below for Part-A and for Part-Bfor dismantling of old existing structure @ Rs. 1,36,629/- are recommended for acceptance.

M/s. S.N. Malhotra & Sons is a registered contractor with M.C.D. under Class-I and iseligible to tender for this work. The financial as well as technical capability of the firm is reported to besatisfactory. The firm has not been blacklisted/debarred as on date of tendering. The contractual cost ofthe work comes to Rs. 3,29,43,074/-. The year-wise likely expenditure is as under :—

2012-13 Rs. 20.00 lacs

2013-14 Rs. 309.43 lacs———————

Total Rs. 329.43 lacs———————

Finance has seen and concurred in the proposal.

The time of completion of the work is sixteen months which is to be reckoned from the 10thday of issue of work order. The rates are valid upto 4-4-2013. The expenditure of this work will becharged under Head of Account : XL-VIII-M.

The case may be placed before the Standing Committee, SDMC for approval of rates andagency in favour of M/s. S.N. Malhotra & Sons at his quoted rates @ (–) 12.55% below the tenderedamount for the contractual cost of Rs. 3,29,43,074/- for Part-A & Part-B for @ Rs. 1,36,629/- fordemolishing of old existing structure, which will be deposited by the contractor in Municipal Treasurybefore execution of work, under Head of Account : XL-VIII-M as per NIT conditions and to authorize theCommissioner to enter into the contract with lowest tenderer as required under D.M.C. Act, as amendedin 2011.

[ 4 (S) ]

Item No. 168 :— Delivering of Audit Report for the year 2010-2011.

Chief Auditer’s letter No. MCA/RS/Misc. 19/1367 dated 1-3-2013.

In terms of Section 206(3) of The Delhi Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 2011, theAudit Report for the year 2010-2011 (Fifteen copies) in respect of erstwhile Municipal Corporation ofDelhi, (Part relating to SDMC) is forwarded for placement before the Standing Committee, South DelhiMunicipal Corporation.

Item No. 169 :— Construction of boundary wall of land acquired for setting up a Hot Mix Plant forMCD at Village Ferozpur Kalan, Faridabad, Haryana.


As per information received from Division, HMP, South Delhi Municipal Corporation a landmeasuring 75 Canal 14 Marla was acquired by LAC cum DRO at Ferozpur Kalan, Faridabad for settingup of Hot Mix Plant for use by erstwhile MCD. As reported, land compensation has also been paid to theland owners.

Subsequent to various discussions held at HQ and field, a site inspection was also carried outby the officers from the Project Wing, Central Zone and the concerned Hot Mix Plan Division. HMPDivision, SDMC is in the process of demarcation of land Revenue Department/Tehsildar, Faridabad.

As per the Khasra Map available, the estimate for the proposed boundary wall by providingstone random rubble masonry in a length of 865 mtr. was prepared based on DSR 2007 and applicableMCD rates and the same got checked by the Planning Department for an amount of Rs. 89,53,700/-. Theexpenditure is proposed to be charged under Heads of A/c 66/1077. Administrative Approval &Expenditure Sanction amounting to Rs. 89,53,700/- for the aforesaid work has been accorded by WardsCommittee, Central Zone, SDMC vide Resolution No. 9 dated 21-9-12 (Annexure-A).

Detailed estimate based on DSR 2007 and approved MCD rates amounting to Rs. 89,53,700/-was technically sanctioned by the competent authority & Draft NIT amounting to Rs. 55,83.425/- was alsoapproved by the competent authority.

With the approval of Competent Authority, tenders for the work mentioned above were invitedvide NIT No. D/EE (Pr.-I)/CNZ/TC/2012-13/14 dated 14-9-2012 Item No. 01 due on 1-10-12 with webpublicity on the website www.mcdetenders.com. However, no response to the said NIT was received.

The tenders were re-called vide NIT No. D/EE(Pr.-I)/CNZ/TC/2012-13/18 dated 8-10-12Item No. 01 due on 1-11-12 with web publicity on the website www.mcdetenders.com (Due to half dayafter 2-00 p.m. on 1-11-12 on account of ‘Phool Walon-ki-Sair’; the tenders for the work aforesaid wereopened upto 2-11-12 at 3-00 p.m.) with press publicity in the following Newspapers :—

S. No. Name of Newspaper Language Date of Publication

1. The Hindu (All Editions) English 15-10-2012

2. The Statesman English 15-10-2012

3. Punjab Kesri Hindi 15-10-2012

4. Dainik Bhaskar (All Editions) Hindi 15-10-2012

5. Roznama Rashtriya Sahara Urdu 15-10-2012

[ 5 (S) ]

One tender was sold/downloaded from website and the same has been received. M/s. TheMacadam Makers was found to be the lone tenderer as per comparative statement given below :———————————————————————————————————————————

S. No. Name Agency Quoted Rates Earnest Money (Rs.)——————————————————————————————————————————

1. M/s. The Macadam Makers 99.99% above Rs. 1,79,100/- G-8 No. BB-049982dated 5-11-2012.

——————————————————————————————————————————

Justification of rates worked out by department and checked by the Planning Departmentcomes to @ 72.78% above. In accordance with the extant policy circular, the aforesaid work is subjectedto 3rd party checking and the 3rd party testing charges are to be borne by the contractor.

From the forgoing it may be seen that the rates quoted by the lone tenderer M/s. TheMacadam Makers @ 99.99% above are on higher side in comparison to the rates justification worked outby the department and checked by the Planning Department at 72.78% above. With the approval ofcompetent authority, negotiation with the lone tenderer M/s. The Macadam Makers was conducted on18-12-2012. During negotiation the contractors reduced his offer rates to 72.72% above.

The reduced rates of M/s. The Macadam Makers @ 72.72 % above are lower in comparisonto justification of rates worked out by the department 72.78% above, hence, are recommended foracceptance.

As per the justified rates, cost of work comes to Rs. 96,47,042/- (Tender AmountRs. 55,83,425/-) whereas as per the reduced rates of the contractor, the contractual amount of the workcomes to Rs. 96,43,692/- chargeable under Head of Account 66/1077.

The year expenditure is proposed to be made as under :—

Year Expenditure

2012-13 20.00 lacs

2013-14 76.43 lacs

M/s. The Macadam Makers is MCD registered contractor in Class-I and is eligible to tenderfor the work. His financial & technical capability is reported to be satisfactory. The firm is not blacklisted/debarred as on date.

Budget provision exists and the same has been booked with Zonal Finance. The time ofcompletion is six months. The earnest money and Tender Cost has been deposited in Mpl. TreasuryCentral Zone, SDMC. The rates are valid up to 17-5-2013.


The proposal may be placed before the Standing Committee, SDMC for approval of rate andagency in favour of M/s. The Macadam Makers at the reduced rates @ 72.72% above amounting toRs. 96,43,692/- under Head of Account 66/1077 against the departmental justification @ 72.78% above forthe work of Construction of boundary wall of land acquired for setting up a Hot Mix Plant for MCD atVillage Ferozpur Kalan, Faridabad, Haryana’ and to authorize the Commissioner to enter into theagreement with lowest tenderer as required under Section 202(C) of the DMC Act, 1957 (Amended todate). The proposal may be accordingly forwarded to the Corporation for accord of revised AdministrativeApproval & Expenditure Sanction amounting to Rs. 96,43,692/-.

[ 6 (S) ]

ANNEXURE ‘A’

Copy of the Resolution No. 9 of the meeting of Wards Committee (Central) held on 21-9-2012

No. D/EE(Pr.)-I(CNZ)12-13/499 Dated : 20-9-2012

Item No. 9 :

Subject :— Construction of boundary wall of land acquired for setting up a Hot Mix Plant forMCD at Ferozpur Kalan, Faridabad.

As per the information received from Division HMP, SDMC a land measuring 75 canal,14 Marla was acquired by LAC cum DRO at Ferozpur Kalan, Faridabad for setting up of Hot Mix Plantfor use by MCD. As reported, land compensation has also been paid to the land owners.

Subsequent to various discussions held at HQ and field, a site inspection was also carried outby the officers from the Project Wing, Central Zone and the concerned Hot Mix Plant Division. It hasbeen confirmed by the HMP Division that demarcation of land shall be done by office RevenueDepartment/Tehsildar Faridabad which has been communicated to them.

As per the Khasra Map available, the estimate for the proposed boundary wall by providingstone random rubble masonry in a length of 865 mtr. was prepared based on DSR-2007 andapplicable MCD rates and the same has been checked by the Planning Department for an amount ofRs. 89,53,.700/-.

The work is proposed to be charged Head of Account 66/1077. The work shall be included inthe action plan for the year 2012-13. The year wise expenditure is proposed to be made as under :—

Year Expenditure

2012-13 20.00 lacs

2013-14 69.537 lacs

The requisite budget has been booked with Zonal Finance.


The case may be placed before the Wards Committee, Central Zone for accord of AdminstrativeApproval and Expenditure Sanction amounting to Rs. 89,53,700/- under H/A 66/1077 for the worK of‘construction of Boundary wall of land acquired for setting up a Hot Mix Plant for MCD at FerozpurKalan, Faridabad’.

Sd/-

DY. COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL ZONEFOR COMMISSIONER, SDMC

en la[;k 9 %& fQjkstiqj dyka] Qjhnkckn esa fn-u-fu- ds fy, g‚V feDl IykUV LFkkfir djus gsrq vf/kxzg.kdh Hkwfe dh pkjnhokjh dk fuekZ.k djukA

izLrko la[;k 9 ladYi fd;k x;k gS fd tSlkfd mik;qDr ¼e/; {ks=½ ds i= Øekad D/EE(Pr.)-I(CNZ)12-13/499 fnukad 20&9&2012 esa izLrkfor gS fd fQjkstiqj dyka] Qjhnkckn esa fn-u-fu- ds fy, g‚V feDl IykUV LFkkfir djus gsrq vf/kxzg.k dh Hkwfe dh pkjnhokjh dkfuekZ.k djus gsrq 89]53]700@& #i;s dh vuqekfur jkf”k dh iz”kklfud Lohd r ,oa O;;eatwjh iznku dh tk,A

[ 7 (S) ]

Item No. 170 :— Restoration of cut made by BSES Rajdhani for lying of 11 KV Cable from MatiyalaGrid to Mochiwala Sub Station Mohan Garden.

Sub-Head :— Najafgarh Road to C-Block, Dwarka via, Mansa Ram Park-Matiyala Road inC-136/NGZ.


A cut was made by the BSES Rajdhani Power Limited for lying of 11 KV cable fromMatiyala Grid to Mochiwala Sub Station. SH :— Najafgarh Road to C-Block, Dwarka via Mansa RamPark-Matiyala Road in C-136/NGZ for which permission was granted for this cut by this office vide letterNo. 272/EE-M-IV/NGZ/2012 dated 14-5-2012 and the condition of the road was become deteriorated/dilapidated which was required immediate attention to provide better road surface to the residents in thearea.

Accordingly, an estimate amounting to Rs. 42,53,601/- has been sanctioned by the WardCommittee vide Resolution No. 27 dated 30-8-2012 for the above cited work chargeable under Head ofA/c 66-1076 and the tender amounting to Rs. 28,41,146/- were invited vide NIT No. EE-M-IV/NGZ/TC/No.12/11 Item No. 1 due on 29-9-2012 after sending the copies of NIT to the various offices of MCD andContractor’s Associations ete.

Press publicity was also made in the folJowing Newspapers :—

S. No. Name of the Newspapers Date of advertisement in the Newspapers

1. The Hindu 8-9-2012

2. Amar Ujala (All Editions) 8-9-2012

3. Dainik Jagran 8-9-2012

4. Daily Milap 8-9-2012

5 Tender was/were sold, 5 received at the time of opening.––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Vide G-8 No. & Date––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Ishwar Singh Dagar @ 60.00% above 041105/8-10-2012

2. M/s. Ram Kr. Solanki @ 61.00% above

3. M/s. Puja Const. Co. @ 62.45% above

4. M/s. A.R. & Co. @ 70.77% above

5. M/s. Rajinder Kr. Kaushik @ 75.75% above––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

The justification of rates has been worked out to Rs. 56.79% above based on DSR-2007 andapproved items. The rates offered by the lowest tenderer M/s. Ishwar Singh Dagar, Mpl. Contractorquoted @ 60.00% above. Accordingly, a negotiation was called on 23-10-2012 wherein M/s. Ishwar SinghDagar has agreed to reduce his rate from @ 60.00% above to @ 55.50% above and as per order ofEngineer-in-Chief/SDMC dated 18-1-2013 at Page 28/N, a re-negotiation was called on 23-1-2013 whereinM/s. Ishwar Singh Dagar has agreed to reduce his rate @ 55.00% above which well within thejustification and privilege rates. The validity of rates hold good up to 22-6-2013.

[ 8 (S) ]

The firm of M/s. Ishwar Singh Dagar is registered-IV Class firm and has not exceeded theannual tendering limits.

The case is submitted for awarding the work to M/s. Ishwar Singh Dagar for amounting toRs. 44,03,776/- chargeable under Head of A/c 66-1076. The contractual amount shall be restricted toRs. 42,53,601/- as sanctioned by the Ward Committee as the estimate was sent to Finance before sendingit to Ward Committee for checking of the estimate and as per report at page 1/N, it was confirmed by theAAO (Engg.) that an amounting to Rs. 42,53,601/- is available against the booking No. 10153 afterdeducting departmental charges and service charges.

The Finance has seen and concurred in the proposal.

The case may be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rate and agency infavour of M/s. Ishwar Singh Dagar @ 55.00% above against the departmental justification @ 56.79%above proposed to be charged under head of Ale 66-1076 having contractual amount of Rs. 44,03,776/-(Cont. amount shall be rest. to Rs. 42,53,601/-) and to authorize the Commissioner, SDMC to enter into theagreement with the lowest tenderer as per NIT condition as required under Section 202 (C) of DMC Act,1957 amended to date.

Item No. 171 :— C/o 100 bedded Hospital at Kalkaii in Ward No 194, Central Zone.

Sub-Head :— P/o fire fighting.


A scheme for const. of 100 bedded hospital at Kalkaji was sanctioned by Corporationvide Resolution No. 131 dated 18-5-2005. There is a provision of Rs. 6,73,98,753/- for Electrical, Airconditioning and misc services including consultant fee, QC and contingency charges. Accordingly, anestimate amounting to Rs. 1,01,22,564/- was framed and technically sanctioned by the competent authority.

The Draft NIT was approved for Rs. 98,12,306/-. Item rate tender were invited on dual bidsystem vide NIT No. 34/EEE-IV/11-12 Item No. 3 dated 27-2-12 due on 22-3-12. In response threetenders have been received and out of them only two firms have qualified for opening of financial bids asper detail given below :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. No. Name of Agency Total Amount Offered Amount of EM Deposit––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Fire Cool Engineers Rs. 1,26,25,375/- Rs. 1,96,250/- vide G-8 No. 049335dated 22-3-12.

2. M/s. Royale Meridian (India) Rs. 1,53,96,750/- Refunded.Pvt. Ltd.

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Item-wise JOR worked out by the department has been checked for a total amount ofRs. 1,32,07,792/- only by the JOR cell/Planning Division.

Lowest quoted offer of M/s. Fire Cool Engineers for some items was considered on higherside as compared to the item-wise J.O.R. Negotiation was held with the lowest tenderer vide letterNo. 321/EEE-IV/2012-13 dated 29-11-12 on 10-12-12.

The firm has negotiated only in some of the rates and is not ready to reduce the rates further.However, in compliance to directions of Worthy E-in-C, a second negotiation was held with the firm on

[ 9 (S) ]

7-1-13 vide letter No. D-378/EEE-IV/2012-13 dated 3-1-13. Still the rates of the lowest firm are on higherside in some of the items, however the rates of the firm is on lower side on overall basis. If the tenderswere re-invited, there is a possibility of receiving higher rates. Also the work of construction of building isat full swing and hence the work is urgently required. Hence the negotiated rates for Rs. 1,25,67,122/- iswithin the J.O.R for Rs. 1,32,07,792/- checked by the planning division. However, the rates of items whichare still higher than the JOR of the respective items will be dealt as per the provisions of contract/manual.

Rates quoted for each item vis-a-vis the justified negotiated rates are as under :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Sr. Qty. Justified Rates Rates of L1 Rate of L1 Rate of L1 AmountNo./ —————————— before after first after secondItem Rate Amount negotiation negotiation negotiationNo. Rate Rate Rate

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––1.1 2 468055 936110 450000 450000 450000 900000

1.2 1 711820 711820 750000 745000 745000 745000

1.3 1 103569 103569 115000 112000 112000 112000

1.4 7 2393 16751 2200 2200 2200 15400

1.5 2 35831 71662 36000 35831 35830 71660

1.6 1 9923 9923 10000 9923 9920 9920

2.1 1 352968 352968 400000 396000 396000 396000

2.2 1 17289 17289 18000 18000 18000 18000

2.3.1 100 750 75000 715 715 715 71500

2.3.2 200 600 120000 585 585 585 117000

2.3.3 200 210 42000 200 200 200 40000

2.4 250 155 38750 170 165 154 38500

2.5.1 8 381 3048 700 600 380 3040

2.5.2 16 328 5248 500 450 326 5216

2.5.3 16 151 2416 200 175 150 2400

2.6 3 4094 12282 5500 5000 4090 12270

2.7 3 3691 1107 550 500 365 1095

2.8 80 124 9920 150 140 140 11200

2.9.1 20 1214 24280 350 350 350 7000

2.9.2 30 2256 67680 l750 750 750 22500

3.1.1 500 2401 1200500 2200 2200 2200 1100000

3.1.2 100 1796 179600 1500 1500 1500 150000

3.1.3 50 1259 62950 1460 1460 1460 73000

[ 10 (S) ]

3.2.1 20 3750 75000 3500 3500 3500 70000

3.2.2 20 3100 62000 2800 2800 2800 56000

3.3.1 885 1950 1725750 1750 1750 1750 1548750

3.3.2 460 1400 644000 1250 1250 1250 575000

3.3.3 150 1050 157500 900 900 900 135000

3.3.4 250 875 218750 750 750 750 187500

3.3.5 540 678 366120 600 600 600 324000

3.3.6 90 531 47790 500 500 500 45000

3.3.7 415 475 197125 400 400 400 166000

3.3.8 5750 350 2012500 325 325 325 1868750

3.4 52 6500 338000 5500 5500 5500 286000

3.5 52 803 41756 800 800 800 41600

3.6 104 4784 497536 5200 5150 5150 535600

3.7 52 2000 104000 1900 1900 1900 98800

3.8 2 4228 8456 4500 4500 4500 9000

3.9 40 10209 408360 9500 9500 9500 380000

3.10 15 7397 110955 15000 14500 14500 217500

3.11a 2 31654 63308 35000 34500 34500 69000

3.11b 3 22257 66771 25000 24500 24500 73500

3.11c 25 12822 320550 14000 13900 1390 347500

3.11d 1 8752 8752 10000 9800 8750 8750

3.11e 2 6628 13256 7500 7300 6625 13250

3.11f 1 5641 5641 6500 6400 5640 5640

3.12 17 2145 36465 3000 2900 2900 49300

3.13 4 12500 50000 10000 10000 10000 40000

3.14 1 6615 6615 4500 4500 4500 4500

3.15 1 11366 11366 16000 15500 15500 15500

3.16 4 2083 8332 5000 4800 4800 19200

3.17 100 900 90000 800 800 800 80000

3.18a 1 23555 23555 20000 20000 20000 20000

3.18b 4 9500 38000 7000 7000 7000 28000

3.18c 3 4914 14742 4000 4000 4000 12000

[ 11 (S) ]

3.19 8 6863 54904 15000 14800 14800 118400

4.1 7 963 6741 900 900 900 6300

4.2.1 1026 295 302670 225 225 225 230850

4.2.2 152 381 57912 275 275 275 41800

4.2.3 20 874 17480 800 800 800 16000

4.2.4 23 637 14651 550 550 550 12650

4.2.5 2 560 1120 450 450 450 900

4.3 13 4520 58760 4200 4200 4200 54600

4.4 2 39097 78194 40000 40000 40000 80000

5.1 2 15045 30090 16000 16000 16000 32000

5.2 6.5 7549 49068.50 7500 7500 7500 48750

5.3 8.5 1668 14178 1750 1725 1666 14161

5.4 35 2573 90055 2600 2575 2572 90020

6.1 8 2344 18752 2200 2200 2200 17600

6.2 32 6374 203968 5500 5500 5500 176000

6.3 90 3315 298350 3500 3475 3475 312750

6.4 10 5543 55430 4500 4500 4500 45000

6.5 1 17645 17645 16000 16000 16000 16000

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––13207792 12567122

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Lowest quoted offer of M/s. Fire Cool Engineers for a total amount of Rs. 1,25,67,122/- iswithin the JOR checked by the planning division for Rs. 1,32,07,792/- and hence is recommended foracceptance.

M/s. Fire Cool Engineers is eligible to tender for this work as per per-qualification criteriaapproved by the NIT approving authority. This financial as well as technical capability is satisfactory. Thecontractual cost of the work comes to Rs. 1,25,67,122/- against the JOR of Rs. 1,32,07,792/-.

Expenditure is chargeable to Head of A/c XL-IX-Med. The validity of rates exist upto28-2-13. Time of completion of work is 1 year to be reckoned from the 10th day of issue of work order.The firm is neither black listed nor debarred as on date.


The case may be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rates and agency ofthe firm M/s. Fire Cool Engineers for a total contractual amount of Rs 1,25,67,122/- against departmentalJOR of Rs. 1,32,07,792/- and also authorize the Commissioner to enter into agreement with the lowesttenderer.

[ 12 (S) ]

Item No. 172 :— Construction of 10 classrooms in M.C. Pry. School, Katwaria Sarai in Ward No. 161in South Zone.


South Delhi Municipal Corporation vide Resolution No. 85 dated 10-10-2012 accordedadministrative approval/expenditure sanction amounting to Rs. 2,41,78,000/- for Construction of 10 class-rooms in M.C. Pry. School, Katwaria Sarai in Ward No. 161 in South Zone and also the approval fordisposing of existing old structure at a bid amount equal or higher than reserve price of Rs. 1,75,180/-.

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 1,75,55,200/- was prepared on DSR-2012and got technically sanctioned from the competent authority. A composite draft NIT was also got approvedfor Rs. 1,66,62,157/- for Part-A and Part-B Rs. 1,75,180/- as reserve price to be recovered from theagency for demolition of old structure. Tenders were called vide NIT No. EE(Pr.)SZ-I/TC/12-13/18 ItemNo. 1 dated 7-11-2012 due on 29-11-2012. Due publicity was given through website and in the followingleading daily Newspapers :—

S. No. Name of papers Language Date Place

1. The Pioneer English 11-11-2012 New Delhi

2. Indian Express English 11-11-2012 New Delhi

3. Financial Express English 11-11-2012 New Delhi

4. Jansatha Delhi Hindi 11-11-2012 New Delhi

5. Dainik Jagran Hindi 11-11-2012 New Delhi

6. Jathendar Puniabi 11-11-2012 New Delhi

2 Tenders were sold, and 2 tenderers quoted their rates as per the comparative statementgiven below :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. Name of contractor Rates quoted E.M. of Rs. 3,52,000/-No. (G-8 No. & Date)

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––1. M/s. K. Construction Company Part-A 05.98% below 049786 dated 30-11-2012

Part-B Rs. 1 ,90,000/-

2. M/s. Surender Kishan Gupta Part-A 04.89% labovePart-B Rs. 1,75,500/-

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

M/s. K. Construction Company is the lowest tenderer with quoted rates of 05.98% below forPart-A & Rs. 1,90,000/- for Part-B.

Justification of rates worked out by the Planning Department comes to @ 11.31% abovewhereas the lowest tenderer M/s. K. Construction Company has quoted their rates @ 05.98% below. Asthe rates quoted by the contractor are less than the justified rates worked out by the Planning Departmentthe same are justified and recommended for acceptance. The quoted amount for Part-B i.e. fordismantling of existing structure is Rs. 1,90,000/- against the reserve price of Rs. 1,75,180/-, which ishigher than the reserve price fixed by the department. The amount will be recovered from the 1st runningbill of the contractor.

[ 13 (S) ]

The likely year-wise expenditure shall be as under :—2012-13 Rs. 20.00 lacs2013-14 Rs. 136.66 lacsM/s. K. Construction Company is registered Municipal contractor under Class-I category in

MCD and eligible to tender for this work. Their financial as well as technical capability is reportedlysatisfactory. The contractual amount of the work comes to Rs. 1,56,65,760/- which is less than sanctionedamount of Rs. 2,41,78,000/- of the scheme. The expenditure of the work will be charged under Head ofA/c XL-VII- Education. The time of completion of the work is 12 months reckoned from the 10th day ofissue of work order. The work shall be carried out as per BIS specification for seismic and earthquakeconsiderations.

The validity of rates hold good up to 28-04-2013Finance has seen and concurred in the proposal.The case may please be placed before Standing Committee for approval of rates and agency

in favour of the lowest tenderer M/s. K. Construction Company at their quoted rates @ 05.98%below against Departmental Justification of rates i.e. @11.31% above for a contractual amount ofRs. 1,56,65,760/- for Part-A and Rs. 1,90,000/- for demolition of old structure as Part-B, which is higherthan the reserve price of Rs. 1,75,180/- and to authorize the Commissioner, SDMC to enter into agreementwith the lowest tenderer as required under Section 202 (C) DMC Act amended to date.

Item No. 173 :— Improvement/strengthening of roads by dense carpeting.(a) In Sector-5, R.K. Puram in Ward No. 167, South Zone.(b) In Sector-12, R.K. Puram in Ward No. 167, South Zone.(c) In Sector-7, 8, R.K. Puram & South Moti Bagh in Ward No. 167, South Zone.(d) In Sector-2, 3, 4, R.K. Puram in Ward No. 166, South Zone.

Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Engg./SDMC/662/C&C dated 26-2-2012.Hon’ble MLA Smt. Barkha Singh of AC-44 visited the area of R.K. Puram with senior

officers & area residents. During the inspection she desired the improvement of some roads of this areaby providing dense carpeting under her discretionary funds. Special Secretary (Admin.) vide his letterNo. F. 18B(44)UD/Plg./MLA/4VS/2008-09/Vol.-Part-II/241-254 dated 8-8-2012 informed the release offunds of Rs. 79.68 lacs for following four works as detailed below :———————————————————————————————————————————

S. No. Name of work Amount in lacs——————————————————————————————————————————

1. Improvement/strengthening of roads by dense carpeting in Rs. 19.87Sector-5, R.K. Puram in Ward No. 167, South Zone.

2. Improvement/strengthening of roads by dense carpeting in Rs. 19.99Sector-12, R.K. Puram in Ward No. 167, South Zone.

3. Improvement/strengthening of roads by dense carpeting in Rs. 20.05Sector-7, 8, R.K. Puram & South Moti Bagh inWard No. 167, South Zone.

4. Improvement/strengthening of roads by dense carpeting in Rs. 19.77Sector-2, 3, 4, R.K. Puram in Ward No. 166, South Zone.

———— Total : Rs. 79.68

————

[ 14 (S) ]

Accordingly, the estimates was prepared on DSR-2007 prevailing at that time with 25%enhancement & 1% contingency as per recommendation of UD Department, GNCTD and got checkedwith SW South Zone.

Administrative approval/expenditure sanction was accorded by the competent authority. Beingthe similar type of works under same Head of Account i.e. XL-VIII-S a combined draft NIT wasprepared and got approved from competent authority. Tenders were called vide NIT No. EE(Pr.)SZ-I/TC/12-13/18 item No. 2 dated 7-11-2012 due on 29-11-2012. Due publicity was given through website and inthe following leading daily Newspapers :—

S. No. Name of Papers Language Date Place1. The Pioneer English 11-11-2012 New Delhi2. Indian Express English 11-11-2012 New Delhi3. Financial Express English 11-11-2012 New Delhi4. Jansatta Delhi Hindi 11-11-2012 New Delhi5. Dainik Jagran Hindi 11-11-2012 New Delhi6. Jathedar Punjabi 11-11-2012 New Delhi

4 tenders were sold, and 4 tenderers quoted their rates. Due to submission of bank draft oflesser amount against earnest money the bid of M/s. C. Prakashan & Company & the M/s. MacadamMakers were rejected. Out of 4 tenders only 2 tenders were opened as per the comparative statementgiven below :———————————————————————————————————————————

S. No. Name of contractor Rates quoted E.M. G-8 No. & date——————————————————————————————————————————

1. M/s. Radhey Shyam 26.19% above Rs. 1,60,300/-049787 dated 30-11-2012

2. M/s. R.K. Goyal Abhay Kumar Jain 26.49% above——————————————————————————————————————————

M/s. Radhey Shyam is the lowest tenderer with quoted rates of 26.19% above.Justification of rates worked out by the Planning Department comes to @ 60.63% above

whereas the lowest tenderer M/s. Radhey Shyam has quoted their rates @ 26.19% above. The ratesquoted by the lowest tenderer are well within the departmental justification of rates and as suchrecommended for acceptance.

The likely year-wise expenditure shall be as under :—2012-13 — Rs. 79.648 lacsM/s. Radhey Shyam is registered Municipal contractor under Class-I category in MCD and

eligible to tender for this work. Their financial as well as technical capability is reportedly satisfactory. Thecontractual amount of the instant proposal works out to be Rs. 79,64,741/-. The time of completion of thework is 3 months to be reckoned from the 10th day of issue of work order.

The validity of rates hold good up to 28-4-2013.Finance has seen and concurred in the proposal.The case may please be placed before Standing Committee for approval of rates and agency

in favour of the lowest tenderer M/s. Radhey Shyam at his quoted rates @ 26.19% above againstdepartmental justification of rates i.e. @ 60.63% above for a contractual amount of Rs. 79,64,741/- underHead of Account XL-VIII-S and to authorize the Commissioner, SDMC to enter into agreement with thelowest tenderer as required under Section 202 (C) DMC Act amended to date.

[ 15 (S) ]

Item No. 174 :— Improvement of link road by RMC from Dhansa village to Sarangpur, Surehra toGhumanhera Road & Ujwa to Dariyapur in NGZ.


During the inspection of the area, it was found that the certain roads are badly damaged & indeteriorated condition, thereby causing great inconvenience to public and traffic and required to improvedby providing RMC. Accordingly, it was decided to provide RMC from Dhansa Village to Sarangpur,Surehra to Ghumanhera Road & Ujwa to Dariyapur in NGZ. Administrative approval of above notedscheme amounting to Rs. 331.41 lacs has been approved by the Delhi Rural Development Board in itsmeeting held on 2-2-2011 at S. No. 136 circulated vide file No. 2(341)PD(RD)/10-11/14058-73 dated13-12-2011 checked by Planning Department amounting to Rs. 3,19,16,800/-. Administrative approval ofthe same has been accorded by the Corporation vide Corporation Resolution No. 90 dated 10-10-2012(Annexure ‘A’).

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 3,19,16,800/- has been got technicallysanctioned from the Competent Authority and a draft NIT was also got approved for Rs. 2,47,89,714/-from the competent authority.

Tenders for the abovesaid work amounting to Rs. 2,47,89,714/- was called vide NIT No.EE(Pr.)/NGZ/Plan/TC/2012-13/16/1 dated 3-12-2012, due on 26-12-2012 after giving due publicity in thefollowing Newspapers :—

S. No. Name of Newspaper Language Date Place

1. The Hindu English 7-12-2012 Delhi

2. The statesman English 7-12-2012 Delhi

3. Dainik Jagran Hindi 7-12-2012 Delhi

4. Punjab Kesari Hindi 7-12-2012 Delhi

5. Daily Tej Urdu 7-12-2012 Delhi

Sale, downloading of documents & opening of the tenders was online.

Twenty one tenders were sold & received online as per comparative statement givenbelow :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. No. Name of Contractor Rate Quoted E/M & G-8 No. (Rs. 5,00,000/-)––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Chinar Promoters Pvt. Ltd. 3.31% below 039545 dated 26-12-2012

2. M/s. Sushil Const. Co. 0.99% below E.M. Refuded

3. M/s. Tejpal Singh 1.51% above E.M. Refuded

4. M/s. Kautillya Const. Co. 3.31% above E.M. Refuded

5. M/s. Aggarwal Const. Co. 5.55% above E.M. Refuded

6. M/s. Naresh Kr. Bansal 7.79% above E.M. Refuded

7. M/s. Satpaul 9.92% above E.M. Refuded

8. M/s. Naresh Kumar 11.38% above E.M. Refuded

[ 16 (S) ]

9. M/s. S.N.Malhotra & Sons 11.77% above E.M. Refuded

10. M/s. Renu Const. Co. 12.80% above E.M. Refuded

11. M/s. Naresh Kr. Aggarwal 18.1 % above E.M. Refuded

12. M/s. Narender Const. Co. 23.35% above E.M. Refuded

13. M/s. Js Const. Co. 28% above E.M. Refuded

14. M/s. Essco Traders 29.99% above E.M. Refuded

15. M/s. Ram Karan Goel 33% above E.M. Refuded

16. M/s. Dabas Const. Co. 33.33% above E.M. Refuded

17. M/s. Naresh Rai 45% above E.M. Refuded

18. M/s. Surender & Co. 50% above E.M. Refuded

19. M/s. Tewatia Const. Co. 54.54% above E.M. Refuded

20. M/s. Puja Const. Co. 54.55% above E.M. Refuded

21. M/s. Pawan Kr. Gupta 68% above E.M. Refuded––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Justification of rates worked out by the Planning Department comes to 52.85% above. Thelowest tenderer M/s. Chinar Promoters Pvt. Ltd. have quoted their rates @ 3.31% below. The quotedrates of the lowest tenderer are abnormally low. Hence recommended for acceptance. The condition of100% test check by AE & 50% test check by EE shall be followed.

M/s. Chinar Promoters Pvt. Ltd. are registered in Class-I with MCD and are eligible to tenderfor this work. Their financial as well as technical capability is satisfactory. The firm is not blacklisted/debarred. The contractual amount of the work comes to Rs. 2,39,69,175/- which is well within thesanctioned amount. The expenditure will be charged under Head of Account XL-VIII-Z-f. The time ofcompletion of the work is 9 months reckoned from the 10th day of issue of work order.

The validity of rates holds good upto 25-5-2013.

The case may please be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rates &agency in favour of M/s. Chinar Promoters Pvt. Ltd. @ 3.31% below, against the departmental justifica-tion @ 52.85% above, with a contractual amount of Rs. 2,39,69,175/- under Head of Account XL-III-D-IV, as per NIT conditions and to authorise the Commissioner to enter into agreement with lowest tenderer,as required under the latest amended DMC Act, 2011. The condition of 100% test check by AE & 50%test check by EE shall be followed.

ANNEXURE ‘A’

Copy of Resolution No. 90 of the Ordinary & Adj. October (2012) Meeting of the Corporationheld on 10-10-2012

Item No. 16 :— Improvement of link road by RMC from Dhansa Village to Sarangpur, Surehra toGhumanhera Road & Ujwa to Dariyapur in NGZ.

(i) Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Engg./SDMC/65/C&C dated 31-7-2012.

During inspection of the area MLA, it was observed that certain roads are badly damaged &in deteriorated condition, thereby causing great inconvenience to public and traffic. Accordingly, it was

[ 17 (S) ]

desired to provide RMC from Dhansa village to Sarangpur, Surehra to Ghumanhera Road & Ujwa toDariyapur in NGZ. Administrative approval of above noted scheme amounting to Rs. 331.41 lacs has beenapproved by the Delhi Rural Development Board in its meeting held on 2-2-2011 at S. No. 136 circulatedvide file No.2(341)PD(RD)/10-11/14058-73 dated 13-12-2011 checked by Planning Department amountingto Rs. 319.17 lacs.

The expenditure is proposed to be charged under H/A XL-VIII-Z-f & Likely year-wiseexpenditure shall be as under :—

Year Expenditure

2011-12 NIL

2012-13 Rs. 319.17 lacs———————

Total Rs. 319.17 lacs———————

Finance has seen & concurred in the proposal. The para-wise reply to the observations, onpre-page, of Finance Department is as under :—

1. (i) Normal tender procedure be followed. Normal tender procedure shall be followed.

(ii) Required entire budget allocation be obtained Required entire budget allocation has alreadyby the division before processing the case. been obtained by the division before processing

the case.

(iii) Adequate measure has been taken to account It will be complied with.for accrued liabilities in the next financiallyyear as the expenditure is spilling over to thenext financial year.

(iv) The proposal is based on traffic density. The proposal is based on traffic density.

(v) The existing work, if any, has outlived its life The existing work, if any, has outlived itsand is not covered under any warranty clause. life and is not covered under any warranty

clause.

(vi) Due precaution has been taken by the All codal formalities shall be observed prior todepartment while preparing the estimates to incurring of financial expenditure.ensure that assets created will last its codallife without any major expenditure.

(vii) Proposal has been included in Annual Action The proposal has been included in AAPPlan 2011-12. 2012-13.

(viii) The proposed work has not been taken under The proposed work has not been taken underany other head of account or under any other any other Head of Account or under any otherscheme. scheme.

(ix) All circulars/instructions/guidelines issued All circulars/instructions/guidelines issuedregarding construction/remodeling/covering regarding construction/remodeling/coveringof drain has been followed with respect to of drain will be followed.instant propoal.

(x) The instant proposal is in consonance with The instant proposal is in consonance withU/a colony board guidelines. U/a colony board guidelines.

[ 18 (S) ]

(xi) The instant proposal is not in violation of The instant proposal is not in violation ofModel Code of conduct and shall be routed Model Code of conduct and shall be routedthrough Addl. Cm. (Engg.). routed through Addl. Cm. (Engg.).

(xii) All issued raised by Planning department (6/c) All issued rated by Planning department areare resolved. resolved.

2. Following may be placed on record.

(i) Reasons for deterioration of the existing Existing work has outlived its life span withwork, if any and measures taken for passage of time.minimizing the cause of deterioration.

(ii) Reasons for not processing the case under Due to urgent nature of work, case is notEDIS. processed on EDIS.

(iii) Year of C/o existing work as per record. The existing work was constructed about 10years back.

(iv) Life span of existing work as per CPWD About 5 years.Manual.

3. Planning Department checked the estimate for Planning department checked the estimateRs. 3,19,16,800/- but department is proposing amounting to Rs. 319.17 lacs and it itfor Rs. 331.41 lacs. Please clarify. clericle misprint.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––————––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

The case may please be placed before the Corporation routed through Works Committee foraccord of administrative approval & expenditure sanction to the estimate amounting to Rs. 319.17 lacsunder Head of Account XL-VIII-Z-f, as required under the latest amended DMC Act, 2011.

(ii) Resolution No. 13 of the Works Committee dated 9-8-2012.

Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that approval to the proposal ascontained in Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Engg./SDMC/65/C&C dated 31-7-2012, be accorded.

Resolution No. 90 Resolved that as proposed by the Commissioner in his letter No. F. 33/Engg./SDMC/65/C&C dated 31-7-2012 and recommendations made by the WorksCommittee vide its Resolution No. 13 dated 9-8-2012, expenditure sanction to theestimate amounting to Rs. 319.17 lacs for improvement of Link Road by RMC fromDhansa Village to Sarangpur, Surehera to Ghumanhera Road & Ujwa to Dariyapur inNajafgarh Zone as detailed in the letter aforesaid, be accorded.

Item No. 175 :— Imp. of link road by RMC from approach road to Jaffarpur Village, Jaffarpur toKhaira Village, Malikpur to Jhuljhuli, Rawta Road to Shyam Baba Mandir in NGZ.


During the inspection of the area, it was found that the certain roads are badly damaged & isin deteriorated condition, thereby causing great inconvenience to public and traffic. Accordingly, it wasdecided to improve the link road by RMC from approach road to Jaffarpur Village, Jaffarpur to KhairaVillage, Malikpur to Jhuljhuli, Rawta Road to Shyam Baba Mandir in NGZ. Administrative approval ofabove noted scheme amounting to Rs. 269.80 lacs has been approved by the Delhi Rural DevelopmentBoard in its meeting held on 2-2-2011 at S. No. 262 circulated vide File No. 2(342)PD(RD)/10-11/13975

[ 19 (S) ]

dated 8-12-2011 which was checked by Planning Department amounting to Rs. 269.206 lacs. Preamblefor accord of administrative approval & expenditure sanction of the same has been sent to Mpl. Secretaryfor placing it before the Corporation vide Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Engg./SDMC/121/C&C dated17-8-2012. Permission for call of tenders in anticipation of administrative approval & expenditure sanctionfrom the Corporation has been sought from E-in-C, SDMC, however A/A & E/S has been accorded bythe Corporation vide Resolution No. 128 dated 12-12-2012 (Annexure ‘A’).

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 2,69,20,600/- has been got technicallysanctioned from the Competent Authority and a draft NIT was also got approved for Rs. 2,09,09,233/-from the competent authority.

Tenders for the abovesaid work amounting to Rs. 2,09,09,233/- were called vide NITNo. EE(Pr.)/NGZ/Plan/TC/2012-13/16/4 dated 3-12-2012, due on 26-12-2012 after giving due publicity inthe following Newspapers :—

S. No. Name of Newspaper Language Date Place

1. The Hindu English 7-12-2012 Delhi

2. The Statesman English 7-12-2012 Delhi

3. Dainik Jagran Hindi 7-12-2012 Delhi

4. Punjab Kesari Hindi 7-12-2012 Delhi

5. Daily Tej Urdu 7-12-2012 Delhi

Sale, downloading of documents & opening of the tenders was online.

Nineteen tenders were sold & received online as per comparative statement given below :—––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

S. No. Name of Contractor Rate Quoted E/M & G-8 No. (Rs. 4,18,200/-)––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Tejpal Singh 1.51% above 039548 dated 26-12-2012

2. M/s. Kautillya Const. Co. 3.31% above E.M. Refuded

3. M/s. Naresh Kr. Bansal 4.03% above E.M. Refuded

4. M/s. Sushil Const. Co. 4.86% above E.M. Refuded

5. M/s. Aggarwal Const. Co. 5.55% above E.M. Refuded

6. M/s. Satpaul 12.92% above E.M. Refuded

7. M/s. S.N. Malhotra & Sons 14.14% above E.M. Refuded

8. M/s. Naresh Kumar 14.38% above E.M. Refuded

9. M/s. Renu Const. Co. 14.60% above E.M. Refuded

10. M/s. Naresh Kr. Aggarwal 18.3% above E.M. Refuded

11. M/s. Narendra Const. Co. 25.20% above E.M. Refuded

12. M/s. Essco Traders 29.99% above E.M. Refuded

13. M/s. Js Const. Co. 32% above E.M. Refuded

14. M/s. Dabas Const. Co. 33.33% above E.M. Refuded

[ 20 (S) ]

15. M/s. Naresh Rai 45% above E.M. Refuded

16. M/s. Gupta Bros. 45.46% above E.M. Refuded

17. M/s. Puja Const. Co. 54.55% above E.M. Refuded

18. M/s. Tewatia Const. Co. 54.89% above E.M. Refuded

19. M/s. Pawan Kr. Gupta 68% above E.M. Refuded––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Justification of rates worked out by the Planning Department Comes to 52.72% above. Thelowest tenderer M/s. Tejpal Singh have quoted their rates @1.51 % above. The quoted rates of the lowesttenderer are abnormally low. Hence recommended for acceptance. The condition of 100% test check byAE & 50% test check by EE shall be followed.

M/s. Tejpal Singh are registered in Class-II with MCD and are eligible to tender for this work.Their financial as well as technical capability is satisfactory. The firm is not blacklisted/debarred. Thecontractual amount of the work comes to Rs. 2,12,24,964/- which is well within the sanctioned amount.The expenditure will be charged under Head of Account XL-VIII-Z-f. The time of completion of the workis 9 months reckoned from the 10th day of issue of work order.

The validity of rates holds good upto 25-5-2013.

Finance has seen & concurred in the proposal.

The case may please be placed before the Standing Committee for approval’ of rates &agency in favour of M/s. Tejpal Singh @ 1.51% above, against the departmental justification @ 52.72%above, with a contractual amount of Rs. 2,12,24,964/- under Head of Account XL-VIII-Z-f, as per NITconditions and to authorise the Commissioner to enter into agreement with lowest tenderer, as requiredunder the latest amended DMC Act 2011. The condition of 100% test check by AE & 50% test check byEE shall be followed.

ANNEXURE ‘A’

Copy of Resolution No. 128 of the Ordinary December (2012) Meeting of the Corporationheld on 12-12-2012

Item No. 4 :— Improvement of link road by RMC from app. Road of Jafferpur Village, Jafferpur toKhaira Village, Malikpur to Jhuljhuli, Rawta Road to Shyam Baba Mandir in NGZ.

(i) Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Engg./SDMC/121/C&C dated 17-8-2012.

During inspection of the area MLA, it was observed that certain roads are badly damaged &in deteriorated condition, thereby causing great inconvenience to public and traffic. Accordingly, it wasdesired to provide RMC from app. Road of Jafferpur Village, Jafferpur to Khaira Village, Malikpur toJhuljhuli, Rawta Road to Shyam Baba Mandir in NGZ. Administrative approval of above noted schemeamounting to Rs. 269.80 lacs has been approved by the Delhi Rural Development Board in its meetingheld on 2-2-2011 at S. No. 262 circulated vide file No. 2(342)PD(RD)10-11/13975 dated 8-12-2011checked by Planning Department amounting to Rs. 269.206 lacs.

[ 21 (S) ]

The expenditure is proposed to be charged under H/A XL-VIII-Z-f & Likely year-wiseexpenditure shall be as under :—

Year Expenditure

2011-12 NIL

2012-13 Rs. 269.21 lacs——————

Total Rs. 269.21 lacs——————

Finance has seen & concurred in the proposal. The para-wise reply to the observations, onpre-page, of Finance Department is as under :———————————————————————————————————————————S. No. Observations Reply——————————————————————————————————————————1. (i) Normal Tender Procedure be followed. Normal tender procedure shall be followed.

(ii) Required entire budget allocation be Required entire budget allocation has already beenobtained by the division before processing obtained by the division before processing thethe case. case.

(iii) Adequate measure has been taken to It will be complied with.account for accrued liabilities in the nextfinancially year as the expenditure isspilling over to the next financial year.

(iv) The proposal is based on traffic density. The proposal is based on traffic density.

(v) The existing work, if any, has outlived The existing work, if any, has outlived its life andits life and is not covered under any is not covered under any warranty clause.warranty clause.

(vi) Due precaution has been taken by the All codal formalities shall be observed priordepartment while preparing the estimates to incurring of financial expenditure.to ensure that assets created will last itscodal life without any major expenditure.

(vii) Proposal has been included in Annual The proposal has been included in AAP 2011-12Action Plan 2011-12. and 2012-13.

(viii) The proposed work has not been taken The proposed work has not been taken underunder any other head of account or under any other head of account or under any otherany other scheme. scheme.

(ix) All circulars/instructions/guidelines issued All circulars/instructions/guidelines issuedregarding construction/remodeling/covering regarding construction/remodeling/covering ofof drain has been followed with respect to drain will be followed.instant proposal.

(x) The instant proposal is in consonance The instant proposal is in consonance with thewith the EIA study. EIA study.

(xi) The proposed asset needs to be support by Proposed asset needs is supported by approvedapproved norms/yardsticks and parameters. norms/yardsticks and parameters.

[ 22 (S) ]

(xii) The instant proposal is not in violation of The instant proposal is not in violation of ModelModel Code of conduct and shall be routed Code of conduct and shall be routed through Addl.through Addl. Cm. (Engg.). Cm. (Engg.).

(xiii) All issued rated by Planning Department are All issued rated by Planning Department areresolved. resolved.

2. Following may be placed on record :

(i) Reasons for deterioration of the existing — Existing work has outlived its life span hencework, if any and measures taken for deteriorated.minimizing the cause of deterioration.

(ii) Reasons for not processing the case under Due to urgent nature of work. case is notEDIS. processed on EDIS.

(iii) Year of C/o existing work as per record. The existing work was constructed 10 years back.

(iv) Life span of existing work as per CPWD About 5 years.Manual.

3. Planning Department checked the estimate for Planning Department checked the estimateRs. 2,69,20,600/- but department is proposing for amounting to Rs. 269.21 lacs and it is clericleRs. 269.80 lacs. Please clarify. misprint.

——————————————————————————————————————————

The case may please be placed before the Corporation routed through Works Committee foraccord of administrative approval & expenditure sanction to the estimate amounting to Rs. 269.21 lacsunder Head of Account XL-VIII-Z-f, as required under the latest amended DMC Act, 2011.

(ii) Resolution No. 14 of the Works Committee dated 27-9-2012.

Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that approval to the proposal ascontained in Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/Engg./SDMC/121/C&C dated 17-8-2012, be accorded.

Resolution No. 128 Resolved that as recommended by the Works Committee vide its ResolutionNo. 14 dated 27-09-2012, the proposal of the Commissioner as contained in his letterNo. F. 33/Engg./SDMC/121/C&C dated 17-08-2012, be approved.

Item No. 176 :— Const. of Outfall Nallah from Shanti Telecom to Aaditya Communication on approachroad from J.J. Colony, Sector-15 to Dwarka in C-138/NGZ.

(i) Dy. Commissioner’s letter No. EE(M)-III/NGZ/2012-13/2105 dated 1-3-2013.

While inspecting the area of J.J. Colony, Sector-15 to Dwarka in C-135/NGZ by the areaCouncillor with Chairman, Standing Committee along with senior officers of MCD and the residents of thearea, it was desired by the residents of area and the Chairman, Standing Committee and Councillor that toprovide addl. Facility in J.J. Colony, a outfall nallah is to be constructed to provide smooth flow of water inthe area in the public interest.

Accordingly, an estimate amounting to Rs. 24,92,800/- has been sanctioned by the competentauthority for the above cited work chargeable under Head of A/c XL-I-B-V and the tender amounting toRs. 15,93,320/- were invited vide NIT No. EE-M-IV/NGZ/TC/2010/12 Item No.16 due on 17-10-2012after sending the copies of NIT to the various offices of MCD and Contractor’s Associations etc.

[ 23 (S) ]

05 Tender was/were sold, 05 received at the time of opening.––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Vide G-8 No.& Date––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1. M/s. Jai Dada Budha Const. Co. @ 66.60% above 041118/2-12-12

2. M/s. Shree Shyam Ji Enterprises @ 68.68% above

3. M/s. Versha @ 75.00% above

4. M/s. Ved Const. Co. @ 78.00% above

5. M/s. Sanjay Const. Co. @ 80.00% above––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

The justification of rates has been worked out to Rs. 68.63% above based on DSR-2007 andapproved items. The rates offered by the lowest tenderer M/s. Jai Dada Budha Const. Co., Mpl.Contractor quoted @ 66.60% above which is well within the justification and privilege rates. The validityof rates hold good up to 16-3-2012.

The firm of M/s. Jai Dada Budha Const. Co is registered-IV class firm and has not exceededthe annual tendering limits.

The case is submitted for awarding the work to M/s. Jai Dada Budha Canst. Co. foramounting to Rs. 26,54,471/- chargeable under Head of A/c XL-I-B-V.

It is worthwhile to mention here that the estimated amount of this work is 24,92,800/- whileafter calling tender for this work, the contractual amount has been increased to Rs. 26,54,471/- for whichrevised A/A & E/S is required from the Ward Committee and later on after final concurrence by theFinance Department, the case shall be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rate andagency in favour of M/s Jai Dada Budha Const. Co.

The Finance has seen and concurred in the proposal.

1. This is certified that the rates of the instant proposal are not higher than that of similarworks undertaken in zone/division in recent past.

2. Draft NIT has been sealed under proper certificate.

3. Site map has been signed by the Divisional Officer.

4. Date of uploading of NIT on website is 27-9-2012.

5. Year of C/o existing work is 6-7 years back.

6. Life span of existing work as per CPWD Manual is 5 years.

7. Due to non-depositing of earnest money, the bid of the deliquent contractors have notbeen opened and the same has been rejected. However, action in this regard shall betaken separatley.

8. ZAO booking has been made.

9. FTC sheet has been properly filled up.

The case may be placed before the Ward Committee for revised A/A & E/S for amounting toRs. 26,54,471/- before placing it to Standing Committee for approval of rate and agency in favour ofM/s. Jai Dada Budha Const. Co. @ 66.60% above against the justification worked by the Planning Deptt.

[ 24 (S) ]

@ 68.63% above having contractual amount of Rs. 26,54,471/- proposed to be charged under Head ofA/c XL-I-B-V and to authorize the Commissioner/SDMC to enter into the agreement with the lowesttenderer as per NIT condition as required under Section 202 (C) of DMC Act, 1957 amended to date.

(ii) Resolution No. 115 of the Ward Committee (Rural Najafgarh) dated 1-3-2013.

Resolved that as proposed by the Dy. Commissioner (NGZ) vide his letter No. EE(M)-III/NGZ/2012-13/2105 dated 1-3-2013 revised administrative approval and expenditure sanction to theestimate amounting to Rs. 26,54,471/- for construction of Nallah from Shanti Telecom to AadityaCommunication on approach Road from J.J. Colony, Sector-15 to Dwarka in C-135/NG Zone, beaccorded.

Also resolved that as per above letter of D.C. (NGZ) case may be placed before the StandingCommittee for approval of rate and agency in favour of M/s. Jai Dada Budha Const. Co. at their rate@ 66.60% above and to authorize the Commissioner/SDMC to enter into the agreement with the lowesttenderer.

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT)

No............................ Dated :.................... From : The Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation, Civic Centre, New Delhi. To : The Municipal Secretary, South Delhi Municipal Corporation, Civic Centre, New Delhi.

Subject : Construction of cunit of Nalla by pdg. B/W from CNG Pump towards DJB

Pump House in RK Puram Sector-3 in Munirka in Ward No. 166/S.Z.

CNG Pump Nalla is an open nallah between the reach from CNG Pump towards Delhi Jal

Board Pump House in Sector-3 RK Puram. This nalla caters to storm water discharge of

Munirka Village, Ring Road and Sector-3 RK Puram. During the inspection of higher officers of

SDMC (erstwhile MCD) it was decided to beautify this nallah and to provide cunit for

channelising the flow of water.

Accordingly, an estimate amounting to Rs. 89.35 lac was prepared which has been

accorded Administrative Approval & Expenditure Sanction by Wards Committee, South Zone

vide Resolution No.13 dt. 23.12.11. Detailed estimate was prepared and Technical Sanction &

Draft NIT was approved by the competent authority.

Tenders for this case were invited vide No. NIT No. 19/1 dt. 16.12.11 through e-

tendering system after giving due publicity in the following newspapers: -

S. No

Name of Newspaper Date of Publication

Language of Publication

Place of Publication

1 IE+ JS +F. Exp 25.12.11 English Delhi 2 Dainik Bhaskar 25.12.11 Hindi Delhi 3 Hari Bhoomi 25.12.11 Hindi Delhi 4 Jathedar 25.12.11 Punjabi Delhi

Four tenders were received in this case as per following comparative statement:

S. No.

Name of Contractor/ Agency

Quoted rates Just. rates Contractual cost

Remarks

1 M/s Smart Engg. &

Contractors @ 32.32% above

@ 66.93% above

Rs 75,57,205/-

EM deposited vide G8 No. 1067164 Dt. 17.1.12

2 M/s R.S. Sirsiya Const. Co.

@33.17% above

Rs. 7605752/-

3 M/s Sharma Constructions

@ 39.99% above

Rs. 7995263/-

4 M/s Surinder Kishan Gupta

@ 43.10% above

Rs. 8172885/-

The rates quoted by the lowest bidder M/s Smart Engineers & Contractors @ 32.32%

above against departmental justification worked out by Planning Department @ 66.93% above

are competitive and reasonable. These rates are considerably lower than the departmental

justification and thus considered competitive. M/s Smart Engineers & Contractors is registered

under Class-II in SDMC (erstwhile MCD). The past performance of the agency is satisfactory.

The firm was neither blacklisted nor debarred at the time of tendering. The contractual amount

of this work comes to Rs. 75,57,205/- (Rs. Seventy five lac fifty seven thousand two hundred

five only). Expenditure shall be charged to Head of Account XL-III-D-IV. Likely expenditure

during current financial year 2012-13 is 10.00 lac only and the balance will be met out of next

Financial Year allocation. The time of completion of the work shall be 8 Months starting from

the 10th day of issue of work order. Rates are valid upto 31.05.2013.

The expenditure is proposed to be charged under Head of account XL-III-D-IV. The

finance has seen and concurred in the proposal.

The case may be placed before Standing Committee as required under DMC Act 1957

(amended to date) for approval of rate and agency in favour of M/s Smart Engineers &

Contractors. @ 32.32% above for a contractual cost of Rs. 75,57,205/- (Rs. Seventy five lac fifty

seven thousand two hundred five only) under H/A XL-III-D-IV and to authorize Commissioner,

MCD to enter into the contract with lowest bidder as per conditions of the NIT.

E-in-C

For Commissioner, SDMC


No............................ Dated :.................... From : The Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, Delhi To : The Municipal Secretary, South Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, Delhi Subject : I/S of approach road by dense carpeting from Najafgarh Bijwasan road

to Bharthal phirni, approach road to village Bharthal paraller to railway line, Sahi road, H block Pushpanjali road and Indiaon Oil Road in Bijwasan, NGZ.

During the inspection of the area, it was found that the bituminous road was in

deteriorated condition & broken at several places and the surface has not been dense carpeted

during the last 5 years. These roads require improvement for smooth movement of traffic.

Accordingly, it was decided to provide dense carpet from Najafgarh Bijwasan road to Bharthal

phirni, approach road to village Bharthal Paraller to railway line, Sahi road, H block Pushpanjali

road and Indian Oil Road in Bijwasan, NGZ. Administrative approval of above noted scheme

amounting to Rs. 186.80 lacs has been approved by the Delhi Rural Development Board in its

meeting held on 2.2.2011 at S.No. 173 circulated vide file no. 2 (136)PD(RD)/10-11/380-393

dated 11.5.2012 which was checked by Planning Department amounting to Rs. 2,59,93,900/-.

Preamble for accord of administrative approval & expenditure sanction of the same has been

sent to Mpl. Secretary for placing it before the Corporation vide Commissioner’s letter no. F-

33/Engg./SDMC/370/C&C dated 22.11.2012. Permission for call of tender in anticipation of

administrative approval & expenditure sanction from the Corporation has been sought from E-

in-C, SDMC vide dated 22.11.2012. Anticipation approval has been sought from Hon’ble Mayor

in anticipation of accord of A/A & E/S by the Corporation (Annexure A).

Accordingly, a detailed estimate amounting to Rs. 2,59,93,850/- has been got technically

sanctioned from the competent Authority and a draft NIT was also got approved for

Item rate from the competent authority.

Tenders for the above said work for item rate were called vide NIT No

EE(Pr.)NGZ/Plan/TC/2012-13/16/3 dated 3.12.2012, due on 26.12.2012 after giving due

publicity in the following newspapers :

S.No. Name of

newspaper Language Date Place

1 The Hindu English 7.12.2012 Delhi

2 The statesman English 7.12.2012 Delhi

3 Dainik Jagran Hindi 7.12.2012 Delhi

4 Punjab Kesari Hindi 7.12.2012 Delhi

5 Daily Tej Urdu 7.12.2012 Delhi

Sale, downloading of documents & opening of the tenders was on line.

Eight tenders were sold & received online as per comparative statement given below :

S.No. Name of contractor

Rate Quoted E/M & G-8 No. (Rs.350000/-)

Tack coat 80/100

66750sqm

BM

60/70

1835.62cum

AC

60/70

1335 cum

1 M/s. Radhey Shyam

12.89 5189/- 7789/- 039547 dt. 26.12.12

2 M/s. Competent Const. Co.

11.99 5699/- 7299/- E.M.Refuded

3 M/s. R.P.Singhal & Co.

14.49 5490/- 8190/- E.M.Refuded

4 M/s. Ram Karan Goel

16.3 6004/- 8011/- E.M.Refuded

5 M/s. R.K.Goela Abhey Kumar jain

13.89 5899/- 8399/- E.M.Refuded

6 M/s. The Macadam Makers

17.17 6565/- 8787/- E.M.Refuded

7 M/s. C.Parkashan & Co.

15/- 6811/- 8911/- E.M.Refuded

8 M/s. Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd.

17/- 6900/- 8900/- E.M.Refuded

Justification of rates worked out by the Planning Department comes to

Rs. 18.15/sqm for tack coat, Rs. 7953.35/cum for BM &Rs. 10623.10/cum for AC. The lowest

tenderer M/s. Radhey Shyam have quoted their rates @ Rs. 12.89/sqm for tack coat,

Rs. 5189/cum for BM & Rs. 7789/cum for AC. The quoted rates of the lowest tenderer are

abnormally low. Hence recommended for acceptance. The condition of 100% test check by AE

& 50% test check by EE shall be followed.

M/s. Radhey Shyam are registered in Class-I with MCD and are eligible to tender for

this work. Their financial as well as technical capability is satisfactory. The firm is not black

listed/debarred. The contractual amount of the work comes to Rs. 2,07,83,754/- which has

exceeded the sanctioned amount of Rs. 186.80 lacs. The case for accord & revised A/A from

RDB has been processed separately. The expenditure will be charged under head of account

XL-VIII-Z-f. The time of completion of the work is 6 months reckoned from the 10th day of

issue of work order.

The validity of rates holds good upto 25.5.2013.

The case may please be placed before the Standing Committee for approval of rates &

agency in favour M/s. Radhey Shyam @ Rs. 12.89/sqm for tack coat, Rs. 5189/cum

for BM & Rs. 7789/cum for AC, against the departmental justification @ Rs.

18.15/sqm for tack coat, Rs. 7953.35/cum for BM &Rs. 10623.10/cum for AC, with a

contractual amount of Rs. 2,07,83,754/- subject to expenditure upto the sanctioned

amount of Rs. 186.80 lacs till the revised sanction is obtained from RDB, under

head of account XL-VIII-Z-F, as required under the latest amended DMC Act 2011. The

condition of 100% test check by AE & 50% test check by EE shall be followed

(Ravi Dass)

Engineer-in-Chief, SDMC for Commissioner, SDMC

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

No............................ Dated :.................... From : The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Town Hall, Delhi. To : The Municipal Secretary, Municipal Corporation of Delhi,

Town Hall, Delhi

Subject : Construction of SW drain along Shani road, H block Pushpanjali road and Indian Oil Road in Bijwasan constituency.

During the inspection of the area, it was found that the there was no drain on the above

roads, which causes the water logging & deteriorated the road surface. Accordingly, it was

decided to construct SW drain along Shani road, H block Pushpanjali road and Indian Oil Road

in Bijwasan constituency. Administrative approval of above noted scheme amounting to Rs.

263.39 lacs has been approved by the Delhi Rural Development Board in its meeting held on

2.2.2011 at S.No. 174 circulated vide file no.2(136)PD(RD)/10-11/380-393 dated 11.5.2012

which was checked by Planning Department amounting to Rs. 362.02 lacs. Preamble for accord

of administrative approval & expenditure sanction of the same has been sent to Mpl. Secretary

for placing it before the Corporation vide Commissioner’s letter no. F-33/Engg./SDMC/343/C&C

dated 6.11.2012. Permission for call of tenders in anticipation of administrative approval &

expenditure sanction from the Corporation has been sought from E-in-C, SDMC vide dated

22.11.2012, however administrative approval & expenditure sanction has been accorded by the

Corporation vide Corp. Resolution No. 146 dt. 10.1.2013 (Annexure A.)



Rs. 2,35,88,794/- from the competent authority.

Tenders for the above said work amounting to Rs. 2,35,88,794/- were called vide NIT

No EE(Pr.)NGZ/Plan/TC/2012-13/16/2 dated 3.12.2012, due on 26.12.2012 after giving due


S.No. Name of








Seventeen tenders were sold & received online as per comparative statement given

below :

S.No. Name of contractor Rate Quoted E/M & G-8 No. (Rs.47500/-)

1 M/s. Naresh Kumar 17.38% above 039546 dt. 26.12.2012

2 M/s. JS Const. Co. 18.28% above E.M.Refuded

3 M/s. Suresh Bros. 24.34% above E.M.Refuded

4 M/s. Aggarwal Const. Co. 25.25% above E.M.Refuded

5 M/s. Surender & Co. 27.98% above E.M.Refuded

6 M/s. Narender Const. Co. 33.21% above E.M.Refuded

7 M/s. Dabas Const. Co. 33.33% above E.M.Refuded

8 M/s. Sushil Const. Co. 35.86% above E.M.Refuded

9 M/s. National Builders 44% above E.M.Refuded

10 M/s. Essco Traders 44.44% above E.M.Refuded

11 M/s. Naresh Rai 45% above E.M.Refuded

12 M/s. S.N.Malhotra & Sons 45.45% above E.M.Refuded

13 M/s. Naresh Kr. Aggarwal 54.4% above E.M.Refuded

14 M/s. B.P.Dabas & Bros. 66.66% above E.M.Refuded

15 M/s. Pawan Kr. Gupta 68% above E.M.Refuded

16 M/s. Tewatia Const. Co. 68.09% above E.M.Refuded

17 M/s. Puja Const. Co. 68.15% above E.M.Refuded


67.12% above. The lowest tenderer M/s. Naresh Kumar have quoted their rates @17.38%

above. The quoted rates of the lowest tenderer are abnormally low. Hence recommended for

acceptance. The condition of 100% test check by AE & 50% test check by EE shall be followed.

M/s. Naresh Kumar are registered in Class-II with MCD and are eligible to tender for


listed/debarred. The contractual amount of the work comes to Rs. 2,76,88,529/- which is

within 10% excess of the sanctioned amount. The expenditure will be charged under head of

account XL-VIII-Z-f. The time of completion of the work is 12 months reckoned from the 10th

day of issue of work order.



agency in favour M/s. Naresh Kumar @ 17.68% above, against the departmental

justification @67.12% above, with a contractual amount of Rs. 2,76,88,529/- subject to

expenditure upto the sanctioned amount of Rs. 263.39 lacs till the Revised administrative

approval is obtained from RDB, under head of account XL-VIII-Z-F, as required under the

latest amended DMC Act 2011. The condition of 100% test check by AE & 50% test check by

EE shall be followed

(Ravi Dass) Engineer-in-Chief, SDMC

for Commissioner, SDMC

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

No............................ Dated :.................... From : The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Town Hall, Delhi. To : The Municipal Secretary, Municipal Corporation of Delhi,

Town Hall, Delhi

Subject : Construction of SW drain along Shani road, H block Pushpanjali road and Indian Oil Road in Bijwasan constituency.

During the inspection of the area, it was found that the there was no drain on the above

roads, which causes the water logging & deteriorated the road surface. Accordingly, it was

decided to construct SW drain along Shani road, H block Pushpanjali road and Indian Oil Road

in Bijwasan constituency. Administrative approval of above noted scheme amounting to Rs.

263.39 lacs has been approved by the Delhi Rural Development Board in its meeting held on

2.2.2011 at S.No. 174 circulated vide file no.2(136)PD(RD)/10-11/380-393 dated 11.5.2012

which was checked by Planning Department amounting to Rs. 362.02 lacs. Preamble for accord

of administrative approval & expenditure sanction of the same has been sent to Mpl. Secretary

for placing it before the Corporation vide Commissioner’s letter no. F-33/Engg./SDMC/343/C&C

dated 6.11.2012. Permission for call of tenders in anticipation of administrative approval &

expenditure sanction from the Corporation has been sought from E-in-C, SDMC vide dated

22.11.2012, however administrative approval & expenditure sanction has been accorded by the

Corporation vide Corp. Resolution No. 146 dt. 10.1.2013 (Annexure A.)



Rs. 2,35,88,794/- from the competent authority.

Tenders for the above said work amounting to Rs. 2,35,88,794/- were called vide NIT

No EE(Pr.)NGZ/Plan/TC/2012-13/16/2 dated 3.12.2012, due on 26.12.2012 after giving due


S.No. Name of








Seventeen tenders were sold & received online as per comparative statement given

below :

S.No. Name of contractor Rate Quoted E/M & G-8 No. (Rs.47500/-)

1 M/s. Naresh Kumar 17.38% above 039546 dt. 26.12.2012

2 M/s. JS Const. Co. 18.28% above E.M.Refuded

3 M/s. Suresh Bros. 24.34% above E.M.Refuded

4 M/s. Aggarwal Const. Co. 25.25% above E.M.Refuded

5 M/s. Surender & Co. 27.98% above E.M.Refuded

6 M/s. Narender Const. Co. 33.21% above E.M.Refuded

7 M/s. Dabas Const. Co. 33.33% above E.M.Refuded

8 M/s. Sushil Const. Co. 35.86% above E.M.Refuded

9 M/s. National Builders 44% above E.M.Refuded

10 M/s. Essco Traders 44.44% above E.M.Refuded

11 M/s. Naresh Rai 45% above E.M.Refuded

12 M/s. S.N.Malhotra & Sons 45.45% above E.M.Refuded

13 M/s. Naresh Kr. Aggarwal 54.4% above E.M.Refuded

14 M/s. B.P.Dabas & Bros. 66.66% above E.M.Refuded

15 M/s. Pawan Kr. Gupta 68% above E.M.Refuded

16 M/s. Tewatia Const. Co. 68.09% above E.M.Refuded

17 M/s. Puja Const. Co. 68.15% above E.M.Refuded


67.12% above. The lowest tenderer M/s. Naresh Kumar have quoted their rates @17.38%

above. The quoted rates of the lowest tenderer are abnormally low. Hence recommended for

acceptance. The condition of 100% test check by AE & 50% test check by EE shall be followed.

M/s. Naresh Kumar are registered in Class-II with MCD and are eligible to tender for


listed/debarred. The contractual amount of the work comes to Rs. 2,76,88,529/- which is

within 10% excess of the sanctioned amount. The expenditure will be charged under head of

account XL-VIII-Z-f. The time of completion of the work is 12 months reckoned from the 10th

day of issue of work order.



agency in favour M/s. Naresh Kumar @ 17.68% above, against the departmental

justification @67.12% above, with a contractual amount of Rs. 2,76,88,529/- subject to

expenditure upto the sanctioned amount of Rs. 263.39 lacs till the Revised administrative

approval is obtained from RDB, under head of account XL-VIII-Z-F, as required under the

latest amended DMC Act 2011. The condition of 100% test check by AE & 50% test check by

EE shall be followed

(Ravi Dass) Engineer-in-Chief, SDMC

for Commissioner, SDMC

South Delhi Municipal Corporation (Engineering Deptt.)

From The Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, New Delhi - 110002 To The Secretary, South Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, New Delhi - 110002 Subject:- Development of unauthorized colony at Sr No 398/1639 in C-139 NGZ

SH: Const of road by Pdg M/P and O/S/D from Gali No. 01 to Gali No. 12 in all lanes in Jai Vihar, B-Block Ph-II, Nangloi Road in C-139 NGZ.

The above said case has been administratively approved amounting to Rs.74,26,300/- by the U.D. Deptt. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and conveyed to the MCD vide their letter No. 500/UC/UD/1639/2010/1050-1059 dt 31.01.11. Accordingly, an estimate for the above said work based on DSR-2007 and approved rates of MCD amounting to Rs.74,26,300/- was prepared and got technically approved by competent authority. This estimate was administratively approved by Ward Committee Najafgarh Zone vide resolution No. 28 dt. 28.09.2012. A draft NIT for Rs. 47,46,737/- was also approved by the competent authority. Revised A/A & E/S for Rs. 88,52,190/- have been obtained from Ward Committee vide resolution No. 84 dated 8.02.2013.

Tenders were called vide NIT No.EE/NG/TC/2012-13/ 11/3 Due on 29.10.2012 as well as through e-tendering on the web site of MCD on internet vide tender No. 171297 It was also circulated in different MCD offices and due publicity of the NIT was also made in the leading newspaper of different languages. Details is as under:- S No Names of newspaper Language Detailed of Publicity 1 The Indian Express English 12.10.2012 2 The Pioneer Delhi English 12.10.2012 3 The Financial Express English 12.10.2012 4 Amar Ujala Hindi 12.10.2012 5 Jansatta Delhi Hindi 12.10.2012 6 Daily Pratap Urdu 12.10.2012

Thirty two tender were sold & three were received as per comparative statement given below. S.No Name of Contractor Rates Quoted EM Rs. 95,000/-

G-8 No. & Date 1. M/s Puja Const Co. @ 86.49 % above 039947 dt. 05.11.2012 2. M/s Ashok Kumar Gupta @ 87.11 % above Return Back 3. M/s Pawan Kumar Gupta @ 87.17 % above Return Back

Justification of rates worked out by the planning department comes @_88.23%above.

The lowest tenderer M/s Puja Const Co. have quoted their rates @_86.49% above. The quoted rates of M/s Puja Const Co. found on lower side which are well within the departmental justification and hence, recommended for acceptance.

M/s Puja Const Co. are registered in Class III with MCD and eligible to tender for this

work. Their financial and technical capability is satisfactory & they are not black listed / debarred. The contractual amount of the work comes to Rs.88,52,190/-. The expenditure will be charged under head of A/C XL-VIII-Y the validity of rates hold good up to 28.06.2013.

Finance has seen & concurred the proposal.

In view of the above the case may be placed before Standing Committee through Ward Committee NGZ (SDMC) as required under DMC Act amended upto 2011 for Revised Administrative Approval and Expenditure Sanction to the estimate amounting Rs.88,52,190/- under head of A/c XL-VIII-Y and approval of rate & agency in favour of M/s Puja Const Co. The contractual amount Rs.88,52,190/- and to authorize the Commissioner to enter into agreement with the lowest tenderer as per condition of NIT.

Engineer-in-Chief For Commissioner


From The Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, New Delhi - 110002 To The Secretary, South Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, New Delhi - 110002 Subject:- Development of unauthorized colony at Sr No 398/1639 in C-139NGZ

SH: Const of road by Pdg M/P and O/S/D from Main Nangloi road to Dinesh house in Jai Vihar, Phase-II, B-Block on Nangloi Road in C-139 NGZ.

The above said case has been administratively approved amounting to Rs.49,46,200/- by the U.D. Deptt. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and conveyed to the MCD vide their letter No. 500/UC/UD/1639/2010/1050-1059 dt 31.01.11. Accordingly, an estimate for the above said work based on DSR-2007 and approved rates of MCD amounting to Rs.49,46,200/- was prepared and got technically approved by competent authority. This estimate was administratively approved by Ward Committee Najafgarh Zone vide resolution No. 30 dt. 28.09.2012. A draft NIT for Rs. 31,48,730/- was also approved by the competent authority. Revised A/A & E/S for Rs. 58,72,067/- have been obtained from Ward Committee vide resolution No. 83 dated 8.02.2013.

Tenders were called vide NIT No.EE/NG/TC/2012-13/ 11/1 Due on 29.10.2012 as well as through e-tendering on the web site of MCD on internet vide tender No. 171295 It was also circulated in different MCD offices and due publicity of the NIT was also made in the leading newspaper of different languages. Details is as under:- S No Names of newspaper Language Detailed of Publicity 1 The Indian Express English 12.10.2012 2 The Pioneer Delhi English 12.10.2012 3 The Financial Express English 12.10.2012 4 Amar Ujala Hindi 12.10.2012 5 Jansatta Delhi Hindi 12.10.2012 6 Daily Pratap Urdu 12.10.2012

Seventy one tender were sold & five were received as per comparative statement given below. S.No Name of Contractor Rates Quoted EM Rs. 63,000/-

G-8 No. & Date 1. M/s Manish Nayyar @ 86.49 % above 039949 dt. 05.11.2012 2. M/s Gupta Const Co. @ 88.99 % above Return Back 3. M/s Gupta Engineers &

Contractors @ 89.50 % above Return Back

4. M/s Suresh Kumar Gupta @ 90.00 % above Return Back 5. M/s Shyam Lal Gupta @ 95.07 % above Return Back

Justification of rates worked out by the planning department comes @_88.60%above.

The lowest tenderer M/s Manish Nayyar have quoted their rates @_86.49% above. The quoted rates of M/s Manish Nayyar found on lower side which are well within the departmental justification and hence, recommended for acceptance.

M/s Manish Nayyar are registered in Class III with MCD and eligible to tender for this

work. Their financial and technical capability is satisfactory & they are not black listed / debarred. The contractual amount of the work comes to Rs.58,72,067/-. The expenditure will be charged under head of A/C XL-VIII-Y the validity of rates hold good up to 28.06.2013.

Finance has seen & concurred the proposal.

In view of the above the case may be placed before Standing Committee through Ward Committee NGZ (SDMC) as required under DMC Act amended upto 2011 for Revised Administrative Approval and Expenditure Sanction to the estimate amounting Rs.58,72,067/- under head of A/c XL-VIII-Y and approval of rate & agency in favour of M/s Manish Nayyar The contractual amount Rs.58,72,067/- and to authorize the Commissioner to enter into agreement with the lowest tenderer as per condition of NIT.

Engineer-in-Chief

For Commissioner


From The Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, New Delhi - 110002 To The Secretary, South Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, New Delhi - 110002 Subject:- P/L RMC and Drain from MCD Pry. School to Old Gurgaon Road and Internal Roads in Samalkha Village in C-143 NGZ.

The above said case amounting to Rs. 79,16,561/- was administratively approved /

expenditure sanctioned by Ward Committee Najafgarh Zone vide Resolution No. 34 dated 12.10.2012. Accordingly, an estimate for the above said work based on DSR-2007 and approved rates of MCD amounting to Rs.79,16,561/- was prepared and got technically approved by competent authority. A draft NIT for Rs. 58,07,299/- was also approved by the competent authority. Inanticipation approval of revised A/A & E/S from Chairman Ward Committee has been obtained amounting to Rs. 91,08,748/-.

Tenders were called vide NIT No.EE/NG/TC/2012-13/ 12/1 Due on 09.11.2012 as well as through e-tendering on the web site of MCD on internet vide tender No. 172644 It was also circulated in different MCD offices and due publicity of the NIT was also made in the leading newspaper of different languages. Details is as under:- S No Names of newspaper Language Detailed of Publicity 1 The Hindu English 27.10.2012 2 The Statesman English 27.10.2012 3 Dainik Bhaskar Hindi 27.10.2012 4 Amar Ujala Hindi 27.10.2012 5 Daily Milap Urdu 27.10.2012

Sixty three tender were sold & five were received as per comparative statement given below. S.No Name of Contractor Rates Quoted EM Rs. 1,17,000/-

G-8 No. & Date 1. M/s Nand Kishore @ 62.00 % above 039951 dt. 15.11.2012 2. M/s Harish Kumar @ 62.00 % above Return Back 3. M/s Rajender Kumar Gupta @ 65.00 % above Return Back 4. M/s Paradise Enterprises @ 65.00 % above Return Back 5. M/s J K Const Co. @ 69.00 % above Return Back

Justification of rates worked out by the planning department comes to @58.43% above.

The instant case was tied as the lowest rates @ 62.00 % above were quoted by the two tenderes i.e. M/s Nand Kishore and M/s Harish Kumar due to this the revised bids were called vide orders of CE/NGZ dt. 24.12.12. The revised bids were received on 26.12.12 in the office of EE(M-I)-NGZ. During the revised bids submission M/s Nand Kishore has reduced the rates @56.85 % above and M/s Harish Kumar has refused to reduced his rates further. The rates of M/s Nand Kishore @ 56.85 % above were found reasonable and are well within the Deptt. Justification @ 58.43 % above, and hence are recommended for acceptance.

M/s Nand Kishore are registered in Class III with MCD and eligible to tender for this work. Their financial and technical capability is satisfactory & they are not black listed / debarred. The contractual amount of the work to Rs.91,08,748/-. The expenditure will be charged under head of A/C XL-VIII-ZF the validity of rates hold good up to 08.07.2013.

Finance has seen & concurred the proposal. Instant proposal is booked with booking amount Rs. 76.22 lacs. As advised by finance balance budget of Rs. 14,86,748/- will be obtained and booked in the next financial year 2013-14.

In view of above, case may be sent to Standing Committee as required under DMC Act

amended upto 2011 for accepting the rate & agency in favor of M/s Nand Kishore @56.85% above against the Deptt. justification @58.43% above with the contractual amount to Rs.91,08,748/- chargeable under head of A/c XL-VIII-ZF and to authorize the Commissioner to enter into agreement with the lowest tenderer as per condition of NIT.

Engineer-in-Chief

For Commissioner


From The Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, New Delhi - 110002 To The Secretary, South Delhi Municipal Corporation Civic Centre, New Delhi - 110002 Subject:- P/L RMC and Drain from Jai Narayan house to Khati Wali Gali and Joginder house to Khati Wali Gali in Kapashera Village in C-143 NGZ.

The above said case amounting to Rs. 78,62,000/- was administratively approved /

expenditure sanctioned by Ward Committee, Najafgarh Zone vide Resolution No. 33 dated 12.10.2012. Accordingly, an estimate for the above said work based on DSR-2007 and approved rates of MCD amounting to Rs.78,62,000/- was prepared and got technically approved by competent authority. A draft NIT for Rs. 59,90,168/- was also approved by the competent authority. Inanticipation approval of revised A/A & E/S from Chairman Ward Committee has been obtained amounting to Rs. 94,86,030/-.

Tenders were called vide NIT No.EE/NG/TC/2012-13/ 12/2 Due on 09.11.2012 as well as through e-tendering on the web site of MCD on internet vide tender No. 172645 It was also circulated in different MCD offices and due publicity of the NIT was also made in the leading newspaper of different languages. Details is as under:- S No Names of newspaper Language Detailed of Publicity 1 The Hindu English 27.10.2012 2 The Statesman English 27.10.2012 3 Dainik Bhaskar Hindi 27.10.2012 4 Amar Ujala Hindi 27.10.2012 5 Daily Milap Urdu 27.10.2012

Sixty six tender were sold & five were received as per comparative statement given below. S.No Name of Contractor Rates Quoted EM Rs. 1,20,300/-

G-8 No. & Date 1. M/s Sushil Bansal @ 66.00 % above 039954 dt. 15.11.2012 2. M/s J K Const Co. @ 69.00 % above Return Back 3. M/s Rajesh Const Co. @ 70.00 % above Return Back 4. M/s Bansal Enterprises @ 71.00 % above Return Back 5. M/s Gulati Const Co. @ 75.00 % above Return Back

Justification of rates worked out by the planning department comes to @59.91% above.

The lowest tenderer M/s Sushil Bansal have quoted their rates @66.00% above which were higher then the Deptt. Justification worked out by the Planning Deptt. Due to this the negotiation was held on 31.12.2012 in the Chamber of SE/NG in the presence of DCA/NG, SE/NG, EE/NG and Divisional Accountant Najafgarh. During the negotiation the contractor has agreed to reduce his rates @58.36% above which were found reasonable and are well within the Deptt. Justification @ 59.91 % above, and hence are recommended for acceptance.

M/s Sushil Bansal are registered in Class III with MCD and eligible to tender for this work. Their financial and technical capability is satisfactory & they are not black listed / debarred. The contractual amount of the work to Rs.94,86,030/-. The expenditure will be charged under head of A/C XL-VIII-ZF the validity of rates hold good up to 08.07.2013.

Finance has seen & concurred the proposal. Instant proposal is booked with booking amount Rs. 78.62 lacs. As advised by finance, the balance budget of Rs. 16,24,030/- will be obtained and booked in the next financial year 2013-14.

In view of above, case may be sent to Standing Committee as required under DMC Act amended upto 2011 for accepting the rate & agency in favor of M/s Sushil Bansal @58.36% above against the Deptt. justification @59.91% above with the contractual amount Rs.94,86,030/- chargeable under head of A/c XL-VIII-ZF and to authorize the Commissioner to enter into agreement with the lowest tenderer as per condition of NIT.

Engineer-in-Chief For Commissioner

PART ‘C’

Item No. 11 :— Modification in the Layout Plan of Sector-VI, Pushp Vihar (amalgamation of PlotNo. 15 and 22) M.B. Road, New Delhi.

Commissioner’s letter No. F. 33/CTP/SDMC/683/C&C dated 5-3-2013.

Proposal of amalgamation of Plot No.15 & 22, Sector-VI, Pushp Vihar Institutional area,M.B. Road, New Delhi, has been submitted by Dr. M. Thambi Durai (M.P.), Tamilnadu for approval ofMCD u/s 313 of DMC Act.

1. Earlier Approval/Background :

The layout plan titled as Redevelopment Plan of Sector-VI, Pushp Vihar, M.B. Road, NewDelhi for plotted development was approved by the Standing Committee vide Resolution No. 215 dated21.07.04 subject to certain conditions.

Also, the Standing Committee of MCD has approved the amalgamation of Plot Nos. 10 & 11,13 & 14, 18 & 19, 23 & 24, 35 & 36 and 49 & 52 vide Resolution No. 375 dated 15-10-2009 and of PlotNos. 16 & 17 vide Resolution No. 362 dated 21-9-2011 respectively.

2. Area and Location :

The total area of the two plots (each admeasuring 504 sqm.) under proposal is 1008 sqm. andthe site is bounded as under :—

North : Plot No. 16 and 21

South : Plot No. 13 -14 and 23-24

East : Road 18 m wide

West : Road 12 m wide

Access to the plot in question has been drawn from 18 m and 12 In wide road.

3. Land Use :

As per the notification of Ministry of Urban Development & Poverty Alleviation dated19-2-04 the land use of the area measuring 112060.678 sqm. (complete sector VI) was changed from“Residential to Public and Semi Public”. Hence the land use of the site under reference is public and semipublic and thus conforming.

4. Ownership :

As per the documents submitted by the applicant, the site under reference i.e. Plot No. 15 and22 (total area measuring 1008 sqm.) at Pushp Vihar Sec.-VI, M. B. Road has been leased by Dy. Landand Development Officer, MOUD, GOI to the General Secretary, All India Anna Dravida MunnetraKazhgam, AVVAI Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai by L&DO through one Memorandum ofAgreement dated 21-02-2012 with a few conditions.

[2 (S)]

Applicant has also submitted the copy of the NOC/Extension of time of construction ofbuilding up to 13-9-15 on Plot No. 15 & 22 Sector-VI, Pushp Vihar Institutional Area, M.B. Road, NewDelhi allotted to All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhgam (AIADMK) issued by Dy. L&DO vide letterNo. L7DO/L-II-B-I(l814)/115dated 3-4-12.

5. Present Proposal :

The present proposal envisages modification in the Layout Plan of Sector-VI, Pushp Viharincorporating Plot No. 15 and 22 as one building site.

6. LOSC Considerations :

The proposal has been considered by LOSC vide item No. 14/12 dated 12-12-12 and decisiontaken is reproduced as under :

“The proposal as received on behalf of Government of Tamilnadu foramalgamation of Plot Nos. 15 & 22, Sector- VI, Pushp Vihar was considered in viewof the fact that both the plots have been allotted to Govt. of Tamilnadu under oneinstrument to enable the state government to get building plan sanctioned on theamalgamated area of both the plots. In the past also, the Standing Committee hasalso approved such amalgamation area Plot Nos. 16 & 17 by way of themodification in the layout plan vide Resolution No. 362 dated 21-9-11. It was,therefore, decided that the present proposal of amalgamation of two plots as allottedby L&DO under one instrument of allotment be taken to Standing Committee forapproval”.

7. Recommendations :

In view of the above and as required U/S 313 of DMC Act (amended to date) the modi-fication in the Layout Plan of Sector-VI, Pushp Vihar (amalgamation of Plot No. 15 & 22) M.B. Road,New Delhi is placed before the Standing Committee for approval subject to the following conditions :—

1. The applicant shall get the bldg. plans sanctioned from the Building Department of MCDas per the approved layout plan and bldg. bye-laws and provisions of MPD-2021. Thedevelopment control norms for a plot size of 1008 sqm. as stipulated under MPD-2021shall be applicable on the said plot.

2. Tree, if any, affected in the proposal shall not be felled without the prior approval of theCompetent Authority.

3. The applicant shall get the services plans approved before sanction of Bldg. Plans fromthe competent authority and shall comply with all the conditions of approval of servicesplans.

4. The applicant shall indemnify MCD through an Indemnity Bond keeping it harmless incase of any dispute if arises at any stage with respect to the shape, size, extent,title/ownership of land.

5. Previous conditions of approval of the layout plan shall remain applicable, whereverapplicable.

6. As per circular dated 17-2-09 the applicant shall file an undertaking stating that no equityshall be claimed by them if ultimately it is found that MPD-2021 suffers from infirmity anddemolition of unauthorized and or impermissible construction is to be made, the same shallbe carried out and the MCD shall not be responsible for any loss/damage as a result ofgranting the aforesaid sanction.


Minutes of the Meeting of the Standing Committee (South Delhi) held on Tuesday, the 19th March, 2013 at 2.15 P.M. at Hansraj Gupta Sabhagaar, 1st Floor, A-Wing, Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Centre, New Delhi.

PRESENT

1. Shri Rajesh Gehlot Chairman 2. Sh. M. Nagrajan Dy. Chairman

3. Shri Anil Kumar Sharma 4. Shri Farhad Suri 5. Sh. Pankaj Kumar Singh 6. Shri Parveen Rajput 7. Sh. Satender Prakash 8. Ms. Simmi Jain 9. Ms. Tilotama Chaudhary

Shri Manish Gupta, Commissioner and Shri O.P. Taneja, Municipal Secretary.

CONFIRMATION AND SIGNING OF MINUTES: Minutes of the meeting dated 05.03.2013 were confirmed and signed.

lHkk ds vkjEHk esa Jh lrsUnz pkS/kjh us dgk fd o”kZ 2011 esa ,-,l-vkbZ- ds inksa dks Hkjus gsrq

lsfuVs’ku fMIyksek/kkjh lQkbZ deZpkfj;ksa ls vkosnu ekaxs x, Fks ftlesa U;wure ‘kSf{kd ;ksX;rk 10oha d{kk

ikl gksus ds lkFk lsfuVs’ku fMIyksek j[kk x;k FkkA bl ifji= ds izR;qRrj esa izkIr vkosnuksa esa ls 261

vkosndksa dh ,d lwph rS;kj dh xbZA bl lwph esa 10oha o 12oha o lsfUkVjh bLiSDVj fMIyksek /kkjh nksuksa gh

izdkj ds vkosnd ‘kkfey Fks ysfdu vc dgk tk jgk gS fd dsoy 12oha o lsfuVjh bLiSDVj fMIyksek/kkjh

dks gh ,-,l-vkbZ- cuk;k tk,xkA mUgksaus tkuuk pkgk fd ,slk D;ksa \ mUgksaus vuqjks/k fd;k fd ,-,l-vkbZ-

in ds fy, lsfUkVjh bLiSDVj ds fMIyksek ds lkFk 12oha d{kk ikl gksus dh ‘krZ u j[kh tk,A

Jh lrsUnz pkS/kjh dh ckr dk leFkZu djrs gq, Jh vfuy ‘kekZ us Hkh ,-,l-vkbZ- in ds fy,

U;wure ‘kSf{kd ;ksX;rk lsfUkVjh fMIyksek ds lkFk 10oha ikl j[kk tk,A

vk;qDr us crk;k fd NBs osru vk;ksx dh fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj ,-,l-vkbZ- ds in ds fy, HkrhZ fu;eksa

esa dqN ifjorZu fd, x, Fks] mlds vuqlkj ;ksX;rk 12oha ikl vfuok;Z dh x;h gSA mUgksaus vkxs crk;k fd

,-,l-vkbZ- inksa dh HkrhZ ds fy, 10oha ikl fMIyksek/kkjh yksxksa ds fy, ,d ckj ;ksX;rk esa NwV dh ekax ds

fy, mi&jkT;iky dks Qkby Hksth xbZ gS rkfd nf{k.kh fnYyh uxj fuxe esa vf/kd ls vf/kd ,-,l-vkbZ-

ds fjDr inksa dks Hkjk tk ldsA

v/;{k us dgk fd tc ,-,l-vkbZ- in ds fy, fMIyksek 10oha d{kk ds ckn gksrk gS rks d{kk 12oha

dh ‘krZ D;ksa j[kh x;h gSA Jh Qjgkn lwjh us Hkh v/;{k dk leFkZu fd;kA

rRi’pkr~ Jh lrsUnz pkS/kjh us blh fo”k; ij ,d izLrko izLrqr fd;k ftldk Jh vfuy ‘kekZ us

vuqeksnu fd;kA

iz-la- 260 % ladYi fd;k x;k fd fuxe ls flQkfj’k dh tk, fd Jh lrsUnz pkS/kjh }kjk izLrqr o

Jh vfuy ‘kekZ }kjk vuqeksfnr fuEu izLrko dks Lohdfr iznku dh tk, %&

pwafd 2011 esa ,dhd`r fnYyh uxj fuxe esa foHkkxh; Lrj ij ,-,l-vkbZ- ds inksa ij HkrhZ gsrq

lSfuVsjh bLiSDVj fMIyksek/kkjh o 10oha d{kk ikl lQkbZ deZpkfj;ksa ls vkosnu ekaxs x;s Fks] blh fu;e ds

vUrxZr yxHkx 261 deZpkfj;ksa dh lwph cukbZ xbZ Fkh ftlesa 10oha ,oa 12oha d{kk ikl nksuksa 'kSf{kd

;ksX;rk izkIr vkosnd 'kkfey Fksa] ijUrq vc dgk tk jgk gS fd dsoy 12oha ikl o lSfuVsjh bLiSDVj

fMIyksek/kkfj;ksa dks gh ,-,l-vkbZ cuk;k tk,xkA

&2&

pwafd vc NBs osru vk;ksx dh flQkfj’kksa ds ifjizs{; esa ,-,l-vkbZ- ds HkrhZ fu;eksa esa lSfuVsjh

bLiSDVj fMIyksek ds lkFk 12oha d{kk ikl gksus dh vfuok;Z ;ksX;rk fu/kkZfjr dh xbZ gS] tks fd U;k;laxr

ugha gSA

pwafd lSfuVsjh bLiSDVj fMIyksek djus ds fy, 10oha d{kk ikl dh vfuok;Zrk gS vkSj ,sls esa ,-,l-

vkbZ ds inksa ij fu;qfDr gsrq U;wure 'kSf{kd ;ksX;rk lSfuVsjh bLiSDVj fMIyksek ds lkFk 12oha d{kk ikl

djus dh vfuok;Zrk U;k;laxr izrhr ugha gksrh gS blfy, ,-,l-vkbZ- dh fu;qfDr ds fy, U;wure 'kSf{kd

;ksX;rk iwoZ dh Hkkafr lSfuVsjh bLiSDVj fMIyksek ds lkFk 10oha d{kk ikl gksus dh vfuok;Zrk j[kh tk,A

vr% nf{k.kh fnYyh uxj fuxe dh LFkk;h lfefr dh cSBd ;g ladYi dj fuxe ls flQkfj’k

djrh gS fd ,-,l-vkbZ- dh HkrhZ ds fy, U;wure 'kSf{kd ;ksX;rk lSfuVsjh bLiSDVj fMIyksek ds lkFk 12oha

d{kk ds LFkku ij lSfuVsjh bLiSDVj fMIyksek ds lkFk 10oha d{kk ikl gh j[kus dh Lohd`fr nh tk,A

Jh Qjgkn lwjh us dgk fd fnukad 31-01-2008 dks rSewj uxj dk ,d ys&vkmV Iyku ikl fd;k

x;k Fkk ftlesa dkQh f’kdk;rsa vk;h FkhA ftlesa ;g Hkh dgk x;k Fkk fd ;g ljdkjh Hkwfe gS rFkk QkbZy

ds uksfVl ls ;g Kkr gqvk fd ;g izLrko xyr ikl gqvk gS ftldh tkap ds fy, lrdZrk foHkkx dks

fjiksVZ fd;k x;k FkkA lrdZrk foHkkx }kjk nks o”kksZa ds Ik’pkr~ vHkh rd dksbZ fjiksVZ ugha nh x;h gSA

bl ij v/;{k us vk;qDr dks funsZ’k fn;k fd vkxkeh cSBd ls iwoZ lEcfU/kr nks”kh vf/kdkfj;ksa ij

dk;Zokgh dj fjiksVZ izLrqr djsaA

lqJh fryksrek pkS/kjh us dgk fd muds {ks= dh vukf/kd`r dkWyksfu;ksa ds yksxksa dks o”kZ 2003&04

ls izkWiVhZ VSDl ds uksfVl fn, tk jgs gSa tcfd ml le; bu dkWyksfu;ksa esa izkWiVhZ VSDl ugha yxrk FkkA

bl leL;k dk ‘kh?kz lek/kku fd;k tk,A

v/;{k us dgk fd vukf/kd`r dkWyksfu;ksa esa vHkh rd dksbZ Hkh uksfVl ugha fn, x, gSaA mUgksaus

vkns’k fn;k fd vukf/kdr dkWyksfu;ksa ds fjgk;’kh {ks=ksa esa uksfVl u fn, tk,aA

Jh vfuy dqekj ‘kekZ us dgk fd lQkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dk lk{kkRdkj ‘kq: gks x;k gSa ysfdu fdlh

vH;kFkhZ dk ysVj nsj ls ;k vU; dkj.kksa ls ml vkosnd dks le; ds ckn feyrk gS rks mUgsaa ,d ckj vkSj

ekSdk fn;k tk,A v/;{k us bldk leFkZu fd;kA mUgksaus vkxs dgk fd Mhchlh deZpkfj;ksa dh HkrhZ izfdz;k

‘kh?kz ‘kq: dh tkuh pkfg, rFkk iqjkus ykxksa ds lkFk&lkFk u;s yksxksa dks Hkh ekSdk fn;k tk;s A

bl ij fuxe LokLF; vf/kdkjh us crk;k fd fu;ekuqlkj igys iqjkus Mh-ch-lh- deZpkfj;ksa dks

ekSdk fn;k tk;sxk ;fn in fjDr gksaxs rks u;s yksxksa dks ekSdk fn;k tk;sxk A

lQkbZ deZpkfj;ksa dh HkrhZ ds ckjs esa lEcfU/kr mik;qDr us dgk fd ftUgsa nsjh ls ysVj feys gSa

mUgsa ,d vkSj ekSdk fn;k tk,xkA

Jh ijohu jktiwr us dgk fd gkmlVSDl foHkkx ls ,d fyLV ekaxh x;h Fkh ftlesa ikl gq, uD’ks

,oa mudh Mh-Mh- dk C;kSjk fn;k tkuk FkkA D;ksafd ,slk Kkr gqvk ,d gh Mh-Mh- ls dbZ&dbZ uD’ks ikl

fd, tk jgs gSaA

bl ij lEcfU/kr vf/kdkjh us crk;k fd eSaus vius foHkkx esa lHkh lwfp;ksa dh tkap djok;h gS

mlesa ,d Hkh MhMh ,slh ugha gS ftldks ,d ls vf/kd lEifr esa iz;ksx fd;k gks A ;fn dgha ,aslk dqN

gqvk gS rks mldh izfr foHkkx dks nh tk;s rkfd mldh tkap dh tk lds A

en la[;k 60 ij ppkZ djrs gq, v/;{k us tkuuk pkgk fd D;k fuxe mi&jkT;iky dk vkns’k

ekuus ds fy, ck/; gSA vk;qDr ds vkns’k ij eq[; fof/k vf/kdkjh us crk;k fd fn-u-fu- vf/kfu;e dh

/kkjk 487 ds vUrxZr fuxe mi&jkT;iky ds vkns’k ekuus ds fy, ck/; gSA v/;{k us dgk fd lnu

loksZifj gS blfy, ge lnu ds ek/;e ls bls okfil djrs gSaA

&3&

PART-A POSTPONED CASES

Item No.7 Final Report of Third Municipal Valuation Committee.

Consideration postponed.

Item No. 60 Revision of parking charges in the jurisdiction of South Delhi Municipal Corporation as per directions of Hon’ble L.G., Delhi as also recommended by STF constituted on the of the Delhi High Court on traffic issues in Delhi under Chairmanship of Chief Secy., Delhi.

Reso. No. 261 Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation the

case be referred back to the Commissioner.

NEW CASES

Item No. 61 Handing Over Sr. Citizen Recreation Centre at NDSE-II to Sr. Citizen’s Forum South Ex-II.

Consideration postponed. Item No. 62 Regarding enhancement of rent of Ay. Dispensary, Malikpur. Reso No. 262 Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that the

proposal of the Commissioner as contained in his letter No. F.33/Health/SDMC/666/C&C dated 27-2-2013 regarding enhancement of rent of Ay. Dispensary, Malikpur as detailed in the aforesaid letter, be approved.

PLACED ON TABLE

Item No. 63 Grant of Recognition without aid to Mahashya Dharampal Vidya

Mandir at Village Dhansa, New Delhi_110073 (Najafgarh Zone)

Reso. No. 263 Having considered the proposal of the commissioner as

contained in his letter no F.33/Edu./SDMC/413/C&C dated 17-12-2012 and recommendations made by Education committee vide its resolution No. 12 dated 13.2.2013 resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that proposal of the Commissioner as contained in aforesaid letter, be approved.

Item No. 64 Corrigendum to Item No. 48 – Agenda for Meeting of the Standing

Committee held on 05-03-2013 regarding implementation of policy of conversion of commercial properties transferred from GOI (L&DOE) to erstwhile MCD.

Reso. No. 264 Having considered the proposal of the Commissioner as

contained in his letter no F.33/L&E/SDMC/712/C&C dated 18-03-2013 resolved that it be recommended to Corporation that the illustrations mentioned in the Commissioner’s letter No. F33/ L&E/SDMC/524/C&C dated 15-02-2013 be rectified as per Commissioner’s letter No. F.33/L&E/SDMC/712/C&C dated 18-03-2013 and other things will remain unchanged.

&4&

Item No. 65 Municipal Corporations of Delhi employees health scheme (MCDEHS) applicable to the regular employees of all the three corporation i.e. SDMC, EDMC &NDMC.

Reso No. 265 Resolved that it be recommended to the Corporation that the

proposal of the Commissioner as contained in his letter No. F.33/Health/SDMC/714/C&C dated 19-03-2013 regarding Municipal Corporations of Delhi employees health scheme (MCDEHS) applicable to the regular employees of all the three corporation i.e. SDMC, EDMC &NDMC as detailed in the aforesaid letter, be approved.

PART ‘B’ POSTPONED CASE

Item No. 164 Retirement of five members of the Standing Committee.

Consideration postponed.

NEW CASES

Item No. 167 Re-construction of Community Hall at Tagore Garden in Ward No.105 in West Zone.

Reso. No. 266 Resolved that the proposal of the Commissioner as

contained in his letter No. F.33/Engg./SDMC/534/C&C dated 20-2-2013, be approved.

Item No. 168 Delivering of Audit Report for the year 2010-2011. Reso. No. Resolved that the Audit Report for the year 2010-2011 267 on the Accounts of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (Part relating to South Delhi Municipal Corporation as received from the Municipal Chief Auditor vide his letter No. MCA/RS/Misc. 19/1367 dated 1-3-2013, be forwarded to the Commissioner for printing of Audit Report & furnishing para-wise comments within three months.

Item No. 169 Construction of boundary wall of land acquired for setting up a Hot

Mix Plant for MCD at Village Ferozpur Kalan, Faridabad, Haryana.



Item No. 170 Restoration of cut made by BSES Rajdhani for lying of 11 KV Cable from Matiyala Grid to Mochiwala Sub Section Mohan Garden. Sub-Head:- Najafgarh Road to C-Block,Dwarka via Mansa Ram Park-Matiyala Road in C-136/NGZ.



&5&

Item No. 171 C/o 100 bedded Hospital at Kalkaji Ward No.194, Central Zone. Sub-Head:- P/o fire fighting.



Item No. 172 Construction of 10 classrooms in M.C. Pry. School, Katwaria Sarai in Ward No.161 in South Zone.



Item No. 173 Improvement/ Strengthening of roads by dense carpeting. (a) In Sector-5, R.K. Puram in Ward No.167, South Zone. (b) In Sector-12, R.K. Puram in Ward No.167, South Zone.

(c) In Sector-7,8, R.K. Puram & South Moti Bagh in Ward NO.167, South Zone.

(d) In Sector-2, 3, 4, R.K. Puram Ward No.166, South Zone.



Item No. 174 Improvement of link road by RMC from Dhansa Village to

Sarangpur, Surehra to Ghumanhera Road & Ujwa to Dariyapur in NGZ.



Item No. 175 Imp. of link road by RMC from approach road to Jaffarpur Village,

Jaffarpur to Khaira Village, Malikpur to Jhulijhuli , Rawta Road to Shyam Baba mandir in NGZ.



Item No. 176 Const. of Outfall Nallah from Shanti Telecom to Aaditya

Communication on approach road from J.J.Colony, Sector-15 to Dwarka in C-135/NGZ.

Reso. No. 275 Resolved that as recommended by the ward committee (Rural Najafgarh) vide its Resolution No. 115 dated 01-03-2013 the proposal of the Dy. Commissioner, Najafgarh Zone as contained in his letter No. EE (M)-III/NGZ/2012-13/2105 dated 1-3-2013 regarding approval of rate and agency as detailed in the aforesaid letter, be approved.

&6&

PLACED ON TABLE Item No. 177 Construction of cunit of Nalla by pdg. B/W from CNG Pump towards

DJB Pump House in RK Puram Sector-3 in Munirka in Ward No. 166/S.Z.



Item No. 178 I/S of approach road by dense carpeting from Najafgarh Bijwasan

Road to Bharthal Phirni, approach road to village Bharthal paraller to railway line, Sahi road, H Block Pushpanjali road and Indian Oil Road in Bijwasan, NGZ.



Item No. 179 Construction of SW drain along Shani road, H block Pushpanjali

road and Indian Oil Road in Bijwasan Constituency. Reso. No. 278 Resolved that the proposal of the Commissioner as


Item No. 180 Development of Unauthorized colony at Sr No.398/1639 in

C-139 NGZ.

SH:- Const of road by Pdg M/P and O/S/D from Gali No.01 to Gali No.12 in all Lanes in Jai Vihar, B-Block Ph-II, Nangloi Road in C-139 NGZ.

Reso. No. 279 Resolved that the matter be referred to the Wards

Committee (Rural Najafgarh) for according revised Administrative approval and Expenditure Sanction amounting to Rs. 88,52,190/- under head of A/c XL-VIII-Y as proposed by Commissioner in his letter No. F.33/Engg./SDMC/715/C&C dated 19-3-2013.

Resolved further that the proposal of the Commissioner as

contained in his letter No. F.33/Engg./SDMC/715/C&C dated 19-3-2013 regarding rate and agency as detailed in the aforesaid latter, be approved.

&7&

Item No. 181 Development of Unauthorized colony at Sr No.398/1639 in

C-139 NGZ.

SH:- Const of road by Pdg M/P and O/S/D from Main Nangloi Road to Dinesh house in Jai Vihar, Phase-II, B- Block on Nangloi Road in C-139 NGZ.

Reso. No. 280 Resolved that the matter be referred to the Wards

Committee (Rural Najafgarh) for according revised Administrative approval and Expenditure Sanction amounting to Rs. 58,72,067/- under head of A/c XL-VIII-Y as proposed by Commissioner in his letter No. F.33/Engg./SDMC/716/C&C dated 19-3-2013.

Resolved further that the proposal of the Commissioner as

contained in his letter No. F.33/Engg./SDMC/716/C&C dated 19-3-2013 regarding rate and agency as detailed in the aforesaid latter, be approved.

Item No. 182 P/L RMC and Drain from MCD Pry. School to Old Gurgaon Road

and Internal Roads in Samalkha Village in C-143 NGZ. Reso. No. 281 Resolved that the proposal of the Commissioner as


Item No. 183 P/L RMC and Drain from Jai Narayan to Khati Wali Gali and

Joginder house to Khati Wali Gali in Kapashera Village in C-143 NGZ.



PART ‘C’

Item No. 11 Modification in the Layout Plan of Sector-VI, Pushp Vihar

(amalgamation of Plot No.15 and 22) M.B. Road, New Delhi.


contained in his letter No. F.33/CTP/SDMC/683/C&C dated 5-03-2013, be approved.

Reso. No. 284 Resolved that the minutes of the Standing Committee be deemed

as confirmed and the Chairman be authorised to sign the minutes later on.

Sd/- Sd/- Municipal Secretary Chairman Standing Committee (South Delhi)