18
South China Sea: Conflict Solution Yale IPC 2018 Jaymi-Lyn Souza, Nicholas Clark, Noah Aurelio, Timothy Jarvis Worcester State University

South China Sea: Conflict Solution

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

South China Sea:Conflict Solution

Yale IPC 2018

Jaymi-Lyn Souza, Nicholas Clark,Noah Aurelio, Timothy JarvisWorcester State University

Page 2: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

Historical Context

➢ Ambiguous territorial claims in regions of the South China Sea have allowed contentious situations to develop between nations in the region.

2

➢ There has never been an agreed upon claim over the region

➢ As a result, disputes in the area has been characterized by rising and falling periods of conflict

Page 3: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

1.THE PROBLEM

What makes this issue significant?

Page 4: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

““China will never move an inch on its core

interests of sovereignty and territorial integrity

and will always stand up for that at any cost.” - Li Hongmei, The People’s Daily, 2011

4

Page 5: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

The Issues

➢ Sovereignty, everyone lays claim to the region.➢ Economics, the region is in a strategic trade

location and has various important resources.➢ Military, everyone has military pressure in the

region. ➢ U.S occupies the international waters in the SCS.

5

Page 6: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

THE SOLUTION

How can we placate China and the U.S. while ensuring the economic prosperity of the entire region?

6

2.

Page 7: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

1. Negotiationsa) Bring the nations to the

negotiating tablei) Precedent in the 2002

Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea

b) The involved nations then agree upon and sign a treaty.

The Policy: First Steps

2. Treaty takes effect a) South China Sea Treaty Regulatory

Council is established under UN’s Economic and Social Commision of Asia and Pacific.

b) South China Sea Investment Bank is Established.

c) Demilitarization and investment in trade infrastructure in South China Sea

7

Page 8: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

Elements of the South China Sea Trade Treaty

Signed by: U.S., China, Myanmar/Burma,Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Brunei, Philippians

Takes effect immediately

China supports North Korea denuclearisation

Demilitarisation and economic prosperity for South China Sea by 2025

Council Created as Subcommittee of ESCAP in UN. SCSTRC consists of 1 delegate from each member state and hold annual meetings to monitor adherence to treaty.

Council creates investment bank for SCS region to stimulate trade infrastructure (China contributes initial sum) Distributed proportionately.

If council finds member does not uphold treaty duties, or displays military intimidation near the SCS, nation given 1 year to address and solve issue.

If member nation does not resolve issue after 1 year, tready is nullified, thus threatening remilitarization to keep nations faithful to treaty.

8

Page 9: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

How Do We Define the South China Sea?

9

China’s Nine-Dash Line International Law Zone

Page 10: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

The PolicyImpact

10

3.

Page 11: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

Impacts

Short TermTenstion deescilates

Investments begin in SCSTRC Investment bank

U.S. and China begin demilitarisation and work together on North Korea’s denuclearisation

Mid TermInvestments allocated to member nations proportionate to need (by GDP)

Efficient use of resources by capable nations

Long Term 2025- Demilitarisation in South China Sea

Trade infrastructure and prosperity grown in South China Sea Region

11

Page 12: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

4.Identifying and

Combating Potential Problems

What can go wrong, and how do we combat that?

Page 13: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

Specific Allocations to Involved Parties

United States1. Nuclear

disarmament in North Korea

2. Eventual demilitarization in the SCS Zone

3. U.S. gets a transit pass for commercial vessels in the region

China1. U.S. leaving the

Chinese sphere of Influence

2. Mediate control over the region of the SCS

3. Energy security through access to oil

ASEAN1. The economic

growth they desire without military conflict through trade investment

2. Use of the SCS zone

3. Fair prices on oil proportionate to their GDP

13

Page 14: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

Other issues...

Issue: The US and ASEAN fear China gaining too much power- Counter: The U.N. regulatory subcommittee established for the

region (SCSTRC) will check Chinese power- If there is a violation that cannot be solved within one year the

treaty becomes null and void.Issue: The proposal is too radical

- Counter: This is conflict resolution, which varies from the norm.- China is the strongest power in the region, the other nations

haven’t been able to band together, other countries get benefits and we avoid military conflict

14

Page 15: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

5.Conclusion

Page 16: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

Concluding Thoughts

We believe that this is the most realistic way to spur rapid advancement while also preventing conflict in the region.No policy is guaranteed to work, but we must look to precedent and the social climate in the various nations involved and try to find the best solution possible.

16

Page 17: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

Questions?

17

Page 18: South China Sea: Conflict Solution

Sources"Introduction." About AIIB Overview - AIIB. Accessed October 13, 2018.

Brødsgaard, Kjeld Erik, and Koen Rutten. "The Era of Xi Jinping (2012–2016)." In From Accelerated Accumulation to Socialist Market Economy in China: Economic Discourse and Development from 1953 to the Present, 154-64. LEIDEN; BOSTON: Brill, 2017.

Fabrizi, Rebecca. "METAL 金: BELT TIGHTENING." In Pollution, edited by Davies Gloria, Goldkorn Jeremy, and Tomba Luigi, 215-40. Australia: ANU Press, 2016.

Golley, Jane, and Adam Ingle. "THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE: HOW TO WIN FRIENDS AND INFLUENCE PEOPLE." In Prosperity, edited by Golley Jane and Jaivin Linda, 42-60. Acton ACT, Australia: ANU Press, 2018.

Grossman, Derek. "Can Vietnam's Military Stand Up to China in the South China Sea?" Asia Policy 13.1 (2018): 113-34. ProQuest. Web. 13 Oct. 2018.

Martin, Brian. "THE NINETEENTH PARTY CONGRESS: HERE COMES THE FUTURE." In Prosperity, edited by Golley Jane and Jaivin Linda, 14-28. Acton ACT, Australia: ANU Press, 2018.

McDevitt, Michael. “The South China Sea: Assessing U.S. Policy.” American Foreign Policy Interests 37, no. 1 (January 2015): 23–30.

Mirski, Sean. "The South China Sea Dispute: A Brief History." Lawfare. June 10, 2015. Accessed October 13, 2018.

18

Murphy, David. "ONE BELT ONE ROAD: INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS." In

Pollution, edited by Davies Gloria, Goldkorn Jeremy, and Tomba Luigi, 245-52. Australia: ANU Press, 2016.

Penny, Benjamin. "CLASSIC XI JINPING: ON ACQUIRING MORAL CHARACTER." In Shared Destiny, edited by Barmé Geremie R, Jaivin

Linda, and Goldkorn Jeremy, 4-13. ANU Press, 2015.

Scott, David. "Conflict Irresolution in the South China Sea." Asian Survey 52, no. 6 (2012): 1019-042.

Severino, Rodolfo C. "ASEAN and the South China Sea." Security Challenges 6, no. 2 (2010): 37-47.

Steffens, Aaron W. "Scramble in the South China Sea: Regional Conflict and US Strategy." Strategic Studies Quarterly 7, no. 3 (2013): 88-107.

Teh, Louise S., et al. "What is at Stake? Status and Threats to South China Sea Marine Fisheries." Ambio 46.1 (2017): 57-72. ProQuest. Web. 13 Oct.

2018.

Womack, Brantly. "The Spratlys: from dangerous ground to apple of discord." Contemporary Southeast Asia 33, no. 3 (2011): 370+. Global

Issues in Context (accessed October 13, 2018).

Yang, Jian. "Navigating volatile South China Sea: Jian Yang explains the dispute over the Spratly Islands and calls for more meaningful negotiations

between the interested parties." New Zealand International Review, September-October 2011, 2+. Academic OneFile (accessed October 13,

2018).