Upload
chester-harrington
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SOUTH AFRICAN DEEP-SEA TRAWLING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1005/2008—the Catch Certification Scheme for Fishery Products Imported from Third Countries.
A Private Sector View from South Africa
Introductory
• The issues at stake are serious for private sector operators depending on the European Trade for survival.
• The private sector understands the inevitability the Regulation
• commends and supports its objectives and will do anything to help to ensure that the smooth working of the certification system.
• Business needs legitimate trade to continue unchanged and undisturbed come January2010 --- at no significant increase in cost to exporters.
• Business also wants a Regulation positively disposed to the development of trade with Europe
• Business does not want to be considered overcritical of EC1005/2008
CAUTIONARY• the astounding diversity of commercial fisheries in ACP countries makes it
extraordinarily difficult to arrive at a definitive private sector view
• The background of present opinion
• Capital intensive
• medium to high tech
• heavily reliant on European trade
• sophisticated fisheries laws
• good fisheries management
• rigorous enforcement and compliance.
• Appropriate prescription for small scale, and quasi-subsistence fisheries differ from industrial fisheries
• The Regulation could also have been better crafted to meet the needs of artisanal sectors
SCOPE OF CONCERN
• Concerns focus on mechanics and legal issues
• fishery products shall only be imported with a catch certificate validated by a competent authority related to (the responsible) fishing vessel(s) catching in accordance with applicable laws and containing all the information in Annex II.
• Article 12 together with the definition of illegal fishing poses a danger of enterprises being unable to comply with procedure or otherwise prejudiced
• Other concerns have been tabled hopefully if the certification scheme is sorted they should all resolve in good time.
THE DIFFICULTY WITH TRACKING
• The mechanisms for 3rd Countries were largely inspired by RFMOs thus the Certification Scheme is well crafted to deal with iconic, high seas, IUU operations
• RFMOs are not the norm - they account for a small part of trade in fishery products – the rest of the fishing world tends to rely on a diversity of much more complex business models
• Advanced trading practice usually implies aggregation and disaggregation processes along the way from landing to exportation perfect traceability inevitably unravels
• The Ship, the Trip and the Skipper mostly get lost in the wash but secure tracking still remains possible
THE DIFFICULTY WITH LAW
• It is acknowledged a great strength of the Regulation that it lets the laws and policies of trading partners apply to certification procedure.
• When the definition of illegality in EC1005/2008 interacts with a rigorous local enforcement tradition strength may turn weakness.
• Local law may or may not prevent a distinction being drawn between “illegal fishing” and “non-compliant fishing” whereas local practice will probably always do so
• Failure of other legal systems to distinguish between grand and petty illegality leads to perverse outcomes under the best management regimes
• The role of the vessel and the skipper should be downgraded, radically so for the skipper, possibly by finding a way to reformulate Annex II
• Tracing needs to be appropriate to the wider circumstances of fisheries - the “critical control point” approach of the existing European food safety system may prove a useful guideline
• Competent Authorities administering quality fisheries management systems need discretion in issuing certificates for domestic enterprise
• the concept of properly regulated fishing needs to be given more weight in the implementation of the Regulation
CAN ANYTHING BE DONE?
CONCLUSIONS
• A certification scheme remains the best vehicle to ensure that fishery products traded into the EC are lawful.
• The Regulation cannot be amended within any meaningful period - individual Government and EC Authorities will have to work rapidly, flexibly and creatively with the tools at hand.
• The tools seem limited to Subordinate Regulations, Interpretation and Exemptions - hopefully Annex II will benefit from betterment processes.
• The probability of bilateral negotiation within the framework of EC 1005/2008 means that ACP countries will have opportunity to cooperate with the European Commission in shifting the Certification Scheme in the desired direction.
SOUTH AFRICAN DEEP-SEA TRAWLING INDUSTRY
ASSOCIATION
THANK YOU
Aggregation etc - a Practical Example• Italian consumers love sleeved hake loins retailed in cartons of 400 grams
• This cut is derived from a process of filleting, skinning and portioning the fish into six other cuts destined for different markets
• 35% of the landing is consigned to other product lines, the rest is geared for cutting – only fish over 600 grams go into cutting
• 2% of the landing is recoverable in loin form
• This fleet achieves 7 landings per week consisting of 40 tons average raw material per landing.
• it will require approx 900 tons of landed fish to fill an 18 ton container consigned to a single customer
• 900 tons approximates to 23 landings put into storage vessel by vessel over nearly a month
• 23 catch certificates are required for that one container let alone all the other containers holding the other parts of the same fish
• It is observed that from the time of being caught until the day it arrives in Italy all the fish has belonged to and been in the custody of one person