Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Chemours Company, FC, LLC 22828 Highway 87W Fayetteville, NC 28306
Sources Tested: VES Carbon Bed
Inlet/Outlet Test Date: May 19, 2021
AST Project No. 2021‐1361O
Prepared By
Alliance Source Testing, LLC 7600 Morgan Road Liverpool, NY 13090
Source Test Report
Source Test Report
Test Program Summary
2021-1361O Chemours – Fayetteville, NC Page i
Regulatory Information Permit No. Title V Air Permit No. 03735T48 Source Information
Source Name Target Parameter VES Carbon Bed Inlet/Outlet HFPO-DA
Contact Information
Test Location Test Company The Chemours Company, FC, LLC
22828 Highway 87W Fayetteville, NC 28306
Facility Contact
Christel E. Compton [email protected]
Alliance Source Testing, LLC 7600 Morgan Road
Liverpool, NY 13090
Project Manager/ Field Team Leader
Patrick Grady [email protected]
(716) 713-9238
QA/QC Manager Heather Morgan
[email protected] (256) 260-3972
Report Coordinator
Jarrett Vickers [email protected]
(256) 351-0121
2 of 49
Source Test Report
Certification Statement
2021-1361O Chemours – Fayetteville, NC Page ii
Alliance Source Testing, LLC (AST) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and AST is not responsible for use of less than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the relevant sections on the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of AST has signed in the space provided below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
Patrick Grady, QSTI Project Manager
Alliance Source Testing, LLC
Date
7/16/2021
3 of 49
Source Test Report
Table of Contents
2021-1361O Chemours – Fayetteville, NC Page iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1-1
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions ................................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Project Team ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1
2.0 Summary of Results ..................................................................................................................................... 2-1
3.0 Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 3-1
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate ..... 3-1
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content ......................................................................... 3-1
3.3 U.S. EPA Other Test Method 45 – Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid ....................................... 3-1
3.4 HFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation ............................................................................. 3-2
3.5 HFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery .......................................................................................................... 3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1 Project Team ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1
Table 2-1 Summary of Results ............................................................................................................................. 2-1
Table 3-1 Source Testing Methodology ............................................................................................................... 3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix D Process Operating/Control System Data
4 of 49
Introduction
5 of 49
Source Test Report
Introduction
2021-1361O Chemours – Fayetteville, NC Page 1-1
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Source Testing, LLC (AST) was retained by The Chemours Company (Chemours) to conduct compliance
testing at the Fayetteville Works facility in Fayetteville, North Carolina. The facility operates under Title V Air
Permit No. 03735T48. Testing was conducted to determine the emission rate of hexafluoro-propylene oxide-dimer
acid (HFPO-DA) at the inlet and outlet of a carbon bed serving Vinyl Ethers South (VES).
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions
VES is part of the fluoromonomer area at the Fayetteville facility. This area produces fluorocarbon compounds used
to produce Chemours products, such as IXM, Krytox® and Viton®. Indoor air fugitive emissions from VES are
vented to a carbon bed which is then vented to atmosphere through a process stack (NEP-Hdr2).
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-1 Project Team
Chemours Personnel Kevin Smith
AST Personnel
Patrick Grady
Eric Alongi
Antonio Anderson
Brian Goodhile
Jeffrey Sheldon
6 of 49
Summary of Results
7 of 49
Source Test Report
Summary of Results
2021-1361O Chemours – Fayetteville, NC Page 2-1
2.0 Summary of Results
AST conducted compliance testing at the Fayetteville Works facility in Fayetteville, North Carolina on May 19,
2021. Testing consisted of determining the emission rates of HFPO-DA at the inlet and outlet of a carbon bed
serving VES.
Table 2-1 provides a summary of the emission testing results. Any difference between the summary results listed in
the following tables and the detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1
Summary of Results
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 5/19/21 5/19/21 5/19/21 --
HFPO-DA Data
Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr 4.6E-05 7.0E-05 1.0E-04 7.2E-05
Inlet Emission Rate, lb/hr 4.0E-04 2.3E-04 1.6E-04 2.6E-04
Reduction Efficiency, % 89 70 36 65
8 of 49
Testing Methodology
9 of 49
Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
2021-1361O Chemours – Fayetteville, NC Page 3-1
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix C.
Table 3-1
Source Testing Methodology
Parameter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Volumetric Flow Rate 1 & 2 Full Velocity Traverses
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid OTM-45 Isokinetic Sampling
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-1 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 1.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a known
quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on the
same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.3 U.S. EPA Other Test Method 45 – Hexafluoro-Propylene Oxide-Dimer Acid
HFPO-DA emissions were evaluated in accordance with Other Test Method (OTM) 45. The sample train consisted
of a borosilicate glass nozzle attached directly to a heated borosilicate glass-lined probe. The probe was connected
directly to a heated borosilicate glass filter holder containing a solvent-extracted glass fiber filter. In order to
minimize possible thermal degradation of the HFPO-DA, the probe and particulate filter were heated to just above
stack temperature to minimize water vapor condensation before the filter. The filter holder exit was connected to a
water-cooled coil condenser followed by a water-cooled sorbent module containing approximately 40 grams of
XAD-2 resin. The XAD-2 inlet temperature was monitored to ensure that the module is maintained at a temperature
below 20oC.
10 of 49
Source Test Report
Testing Methodology
2021-1361O Chemours – Fayetteville, NC Page 3-2
The XAD-2 resin trap was followed by a condensate knockout impinger and a series of two impingers each
containing 100-ml of high purity deionized water. The water impingers were followed by another condensate
knockout impinger equipped with a second XAD-2 resin trap to account for any sample breakthrough. The final
impinger contained approximately 250 grams of dry pre-weighed silica gel. The water impingers and condensate
impingers were submerged in an ice bath through the duration of the testing. The water in the ice bath was also used
to circulate around the coil condenser and the XAD-2 resin traps.
Exhaust gases were extracted from the sample locations isokinetically using a metering console equipped with a
vacuum pump, a calibrated orifice, oil manometer and probe/filter heat controllers.
3.4 HFPO-DA Sample Train and Equipment Preparation
Prior to conducting the field work the following procedures were conducted to prepare the field sampling glassware
and sample recovery tools.
1. Wash all glassware, brushes, and ancillary tools with low residue soap and hot water.
2. Rinse all glassware, brushes, and ancillary tools three (3) times with D.I. H20.
3. Bake glassware (with the exception of probe liners) at 450˚C for approximately 2 hours, (XAD-2 resin tube
glassware is cleaned by Eurofins/TestAmerica by this same procedure).
4. Solvent rinse three (3) times all glassware, brushes, and ancillary tools with the following sequence of solvents:
acetone, methylene chloride, hexane, and methanol.
5. Clean glassware and tools will be sealed in plastic bags or aluminum foil for transport to the sampling site.
6. Squirt bottles will be new dedicated bottles of known history and dedicated to the D.I. Water and
methanol/ammonium hydroxide (MeOH/ 5% NH4OH) solvent contents. Squirt bottles will be labelled with the
solvent content it contains.
3.5 HFPO-DA Sample Train Recovery
Following completion of each test run, the sample probe, nozzle and front-half of the filter holder were brushed and
rinsed three times each with the MeOH/ 5% NH4OH solution (Container #1). The glass fiber filter was removed
from its housing and transferred to a polyethylene bottle (Container #2). Any particulate matter and filter fibers
which adhered to the filter holder and gasket were also placed in Container #2. The XAD-2 resin trap was sealed,
labelled and placed in an iced sample cooler. The back-half of the filter holder, coil condenser condensate trap and
connecting glassware were rinsed with the same MeOH/ 5% NH4OH solution and placed in Container #3.
The volume of water collected in the second and third impingers was measured for moisture determinations and then
placed in Container #4. Impingers #2 and #3 were then rinsed with the MeOH/ 5% NH4OH solution and placed in
Container #5. The second (breakthrough) XAD-2 resin trap was sealed, labelled and placed in an iced sample cooler.
The second condensate trap was rinsed with the MeOH/ 5% NH4OH solution and placed in Container #5. The
contents of the fifth impinger were placed in its original container and weighed for moisture determinations.
Containers were sealed and labeled with the appropriate sample information. Samples remained chilled until
analysis. HFPO-DA analysis was conducted using liquid chromatography/dual mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS).
11 of 49
Appendix A
12 of 49
Appendix AExample Calculations
Location:Source:
Project No.:Run No.:
Parameter:
Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg
where,Pb 30.35 = barometric pressure, in. Hg
ΔH 1.556 = pressure differential of orifice, in H2O
Pm 30.46 = in. Hg
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg
where,Pb 30.35 = barometric pressure, in. Hg
Pg 1.50 = static pressure, in. H2O
Ps 30.46 = in. Hg
Standard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf
where,Y 0.994 = meter correction factor
Vm 65.986 = meter volume, cfPm 30.46 = absolute meter pressure, in. HgTm 546.0 = absolute meter temperature, oR
Vmstd 64.539 = dscf
Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf
where,
Vlc 30.6 = volume of H2O collected, ml
Vwstd 1.443 = scf
Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimensionless (theoretical at saturated conditions)
where,Ts 74.3 = stack temperature, °FPs 30.46 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
BWSsat 0.028 = dimensionless
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless (measured)
where,Vwstd 1.443 = standard wet volume, scfVmstd 64.539 = standard meter volume, dscf
BWS 0.022 = dimensionless
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NCVES Carbon Bed Outlet2021-1361O1HFPO-DA
Pm Pb ΔH13.6
Ps Pb Pg13.6
17.636 Y Vm Pm
Vwstd 0.04716 Vlc
BWSsat 10 . ,
Ps
BWS Vwstd
Vwstd Vmstd
13 of 49
Appendix AExample Calculations
Location:Source:
Project No.:Run No.:
Parameter:
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NCVES Carbon Bed Outlet2021-1361O1HFPO-DA
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless
where,BWSsat 0.028 = moisture fraction (theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd 0.022 = moisture fraction (measured)BWS 0.022
Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lb/lb-mole
where,CO2 0.1 = carbon dioxide concentration, %
O2 20.9 = oxygen concentration, %
Md 28.85 = lb/lb mol
Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/lb-mole
where,Md 28.85 = molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
BWS 0.022 = moisture fraction, dimensionlessMs 28.61 = lb/lb mol
Average Velocity (Vs), ft/sec
where,Cp 0.840 = pitot tube coefficient
Δ P1/2 0.550 = velocity head of stack gas, (in. H2O)1/2
Ts 533.9 = absolute stack temperature, °RPs 30.46 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Ms 28.61 = molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb molVs 30.9 = ft/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm
where,Vs 30.9 = stack gas velocity, ft/secAs 7.07 = cross-sectional area of stack, ft2
Qa 13,114 = acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm
where,Qa 13,114 = average stack gas flow at stack conditions, acfm
BWS 0.022 = moisture fraction, dimensionlessPs 30.46 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. HgTs 533.9 = absolute stack temperature, °RQs 12,906 = dscfm
Md 0.44 %CO 0.32 %O2 0.28 100 %CO %O2
Ms Md 1 BWS 18.015 BWS
Qa 60 Vs As
Qs 17.636 Qa 1 BWS PsTs
Vs 85.49 Cp ΔP / avg Ts
PsxMs
BWS BWSmsdunlessBWSsat BWSmsd
14 of 49
Appendix AExample Calculations
Location:Source:
Project No.:Run No.:
Parameter:
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NCVES Carbon Bed Outlet2021-1361O1HFPO-DA
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check (Yqa), dimensionless
where,Y 0.994 = meter correction factor, dimensionlessΘ 96 = run time, min.
Vm 65.986 = total meter volume, dcfTm 546.0 = absolute meter temperature, °R
ΔH@ 1.8 = orifice meter calibration coefficient, in. H2O
Pb 30.35 = barometric pressure, in. Hg
ΔH avg 1.556 = average pressure differential of orifice, in H2O
Md 28.85 = molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol(Δ H)1/2
1.243 = average squareroot pressure differential of orifice, (in. H2O)1/2
Yqa -2.8 = dimensionless
Volume of Nozzle (Vn), ft3
where,Ts 533.9 = absolute stack temperature, °RPs 30.46 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Vlc 30.6 = volume of H2O collected, ml
Vm 65.986 = meter volume, cfPm 30.46 = absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
Y 0.994 = meter correction factor, unitlessTm 546.0 = absolute meter temperature, oRVn 65.576 = volume of nozzle, ft3
Isokinetic Sampling Rate (I), %
where,Vn 65.576 = nozzle volume, ft3θ 96.0 = run time, minutes
An 0.00037 = area of nozzle, ft2
Vs 30.9 = average velocity, ft/secI 98.3 = %
Yqa
Y ΘVm
0.0319 Tm 29
Δ @ Pb ΔHavg.13.6
ΔHavg.
100
Vn 0.002669Vm
15 of 49
Appendix AExample Calculations
Location:Source:
Project No.:Run No.:
Parameter:
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NCVES Carbon Bed Outlet2021-1361O1HFPO-DA
where,M(HFPODA) 1,727.4 = HFPO-DA mass, ng
Vmstd 64.539 = standard meter volume, dscf
CHFPODA 9.5E+02 = ng/dscm
HFPO-DA Emission Rate (ERHFPODA), lb/hr
where,CHFPODA 9.5E+02 = HFPO-DA concentration, ng/dscm
Qs 12,906 = average stack gas flow at standard conditions, dscfm
ERHFPODA 4.6E-05 = lb/hr
HFPO-DA Concentration (CHFPODA), ng/dscm
C Qs 60
4.5E 11
35.313
16 of 49
Appendix B
17 of 49
Emission Calculations
LocationSource
Project No.Parameter
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 5/19/21 5/19/21 5/19/21 --
Start Time 9:23 11:55 14:15 --
Stop Time 11:27 13:48 16:08 --
Run Time, min (θ) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb) 30.35 30.35 30.35 30.35
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 0.994 0.994 0.994 0.994
Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @) 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800
Meter Volume, ft3 (Vm) 65.986 64.181 65.966 65.378
Meter Temperature, °F (Tm) 86.4 79.4 83.0 82.9
Meter Temperature, °R (Tm) 546.0 539.0 542.7 542.6
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (ΔH) 1.556 1.466 1.552 1.525Volume H2O Collected, mL (Vlc) 30.6 28.0 27.8 28.8
Nozzle Diameter, in (Dn) 0.262 0.262 0.262 0.262
Area of Nozzle, ft2 (An) 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004FH HFPO-DA Mass, ng M(HFPODA) 1,300.0 2,020.0 1,780.0 1,700.0
BH HFPO-DA Mass, ng M(HFPODA) 393.0 613.0 2,070.0 1,025.3
Imp HFPO-DA Mass, ng M(HFPODA) 32.5 19.1 0.0 17.2
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass, ng M(HFPODA) 1.9 1.5 2.1 1.8
Total HFPO-DA Mass, ng M(HFPODA) 1,727.4 2,653.6 3,852.1 2,744.3
Standard Meter Volume, ft3 (Vmstd) 64.539 63.572 64.912 64.341
Standard Water Volume, ft3 (Vwstd) 1.443 1.320 1.311 1.358
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.022 0.020 0.020 0.021
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.028 0.029 0.032 0.029
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.022 0.020 0.020 0.021
Meter Pressure, in Hg (Pm) 30.46 30.46 30.46 30.46
Volume at Nozzle, ft3 (Vn) 65.576 64.692 66.381 65.55
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, (%) (I) 98.3 98.6 98.7 98.5DGM Calibration Check Value, (+/- 5%) (Yqa) -2.8 -1.9 -2.2 -2.3
HFPO-DA Concentration, ng/dscm C(HFPODA) 9.5E+02 1.5E+03 2.1E+03 1.5E+03HFPO-DA Emission Rate, lb/hr ER(HFPODA) 4.6E-05 7.0E-05 1.0E-04 7.2E-05
Inlet HFPO-DA Emission Rate, lb/hr ER(HFPODA) 4.0E-04 2.3E-04 1.6E-04 2.6E-04HFPO-DA Reduction Efficiency, % ER(HFPODA) 88.6 69.7 35.7 64.7
REDUCTION CALCULATIONS
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NCVES Carbon Bed Outlet2021-1361O
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
ISOKINETIC DATA
INPUT DATA
HFPO-DA
18 of 49
Volumetric Flow Rate Data
LocationSource
Project No.Parameter
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 AverageDate 5/19/21 5/19/21 5/19/21 --Start Time 9:23 11:55 14:15 --Stop Time 11:27 13:48 16:08 --Run Time, min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
Point 1 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.24Point 2 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.24Point 3 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.26Point 4 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.27Point 5 0.29 0.29 0.32 0.30Point 6 0.32 0.31 0.32 0.32Point 7 0.34 0.32 0.34 0.33Point 8 0.35 0.32 0.35 0.34Point 9 0.36 0.34 0.37 0.36Point 10 0.36 0.34 0.37 0.36Point 11 0.38 0.37 0.38 0.38Point 12 0.39 0.38 0.36 0.38Point 13 0.22 0.19 0.19 0.20Point 14 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21Point 15 0.25 0.23 0.22 0.23Point 16 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.26Point 17 0.28 0.26 0.30 0.28Point 18 0.32 0.27 0.33 0.31Point 19 0.30 0.30 0.34 0.31Point 20 0.32 0.32 0.35 0.33Point 21 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.35Point 22 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.35Point 23 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.35Point 24 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
Square Root of ΔP, (in. WC)1/2 (ΔP) 0.550 0.541 0.553 0.548Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb) 30.35 30.35 30.35 30.35Static Pressure, in. WC (Pg) 1.50 1.20 1.15 1.28Stack Pressure, in. Hg (Ps) 30.46 30.44 30.43 30.44Stack Cross-sectional Area, ft2 (As) 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07Temperature, °F (Ts) 74.3 75.5 78.4 76.0Temperature, °R (Ts) 533.9 535.2 538.0 535.712Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.022 0.020 0.020 0.021Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.028 0.029 0.032 0.029Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.022 0.020 0.020 0.021O2 Concentration, % (O2) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9CO2 Concentration, % (CO2) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet) (Ms) 28.61 28.63 28.64 28.63Velocity, ft/sec (Vs) 30.9 30.4 31.2 30.8
At Stack Conditions, acfm (Qa) 13,114 12,903 13,230 13,082At Standard Conditions, dscfm (Qs) 12,906 12,680 12,936 12,841
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NCVES Carbon Bed Outlet2021-1361O
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
CALCULATED DATA
VELOCITY HEAD, in. WC
HFPO-DA
19 of 49
Method 1 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date:
Horizontal
Circular
51.00 in
15.00 in
36.00 in
7.07 ft2
2
12.5 ft
4.2 (must be > 0.5)
31.0 ft
10.3 (must be > 2)
24
24
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 14.6 -- 6.7 -- 4.4 -- 3.2 -- 2.6 -- 2.1 1 2.1 1.00 16.00
2 85.4 -- 25.0 -- 14.6 -- 10.5 -- 8.2 -- 6.7 2 6.7 2.41 17.41
3 -- -- 75.0 -- 29.6 -- 19.4 -- 14.6 -- 11.8 3 11.8 4.25 19.25
4 -- -- 93.3 -- 70.4 -- 32.3 -- 22.6 -- 17.7 4 17.7 6.37 21.37
5 -- -- -- -- 85.4 -- 67.7 -- 34.2 -- 25.0 5 25.0 9.00 24.00
6 -- -- -- -- 95.6 -- 80.6 -- 65.8 -- 35.6 6 35.6 12.82 27.82
7 -- -- -- -- -- -- 89.5 -- 77.4 -- 64.4 7 64.4 23.18 38.18
8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 96.8 -- 85.4 -- 75.0 8 75.0 27.00 42.00
9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 91.8 -- 82.3 9 82.3 29.63 44.63
10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.4 -- 88.2 10 88.2 31.75 46.75
11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 93.3 11 93.3 33.59 48.59
12 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.9 12 97.9 35.00 50.00
*Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point.
A = 12.5 ft.
B = 31 ft.
Depth of Duct = 36 in.
Duct Orientation:
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC
VES Carbon Bed Outlet
2021-1361O
05/19/21
Stack Parameters
Duct Design:
Nipple Length:
Depth of Duct:
Cross Sectional Area of Duct:
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port:
No. of Test Ports:
Number of Readings per Point:
Distance A:
Distance A Duct Diameters:
Distance B:
Distance B Duct Diameters:
Minimum Number of Traverse Points:
Actual Number of Traverse Points:
CIRCULAR DUCT
Number of traverse points on a diameter
Stack Diagram
Cross Sectional Area
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTSTraverse
Point% of
Diameter
Distance from inside
wall
Distance from
outside of port
Upstream Disturbance
Downstream Disturbance
B
A
20 of 49
Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Project No. 2021-1361O
Date 05/19/21
Sample Point Angle (ΔP=0)
1 12
2 10
3 10
4 15
5 15
6 15
7 12
8 12
9 10
10 8
11 8
12 8
13 15
14 15
15 18
16 18
17 15
18 15
19 15
20 12
21 12
22 10
23 12
24 10
Average 13
21 of 49
Method 4 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
Analysis
Run 1 Date: 5/19/21
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass, g 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 745.8 1045.8
Final Mass, g 0.0 2.0 102.0 102.0 100.0 0.0 770.4 1076.4
Gain 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 24.6 30.6
Run 2 Date: 5/19/21
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass, g 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 804.6 1104.6
Final Mass, g 0.0 2.0 102.0 104.0 100.0 0.0 824.6 1132.6
Gain 0.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 28.0
Run 3 Date: 5/19/21
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass, g 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 826.4 1126.4
Final Mass, g 0.0 2.0 104.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 848.2 1154.2
Gain 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.8 27.8
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC
VES Carbon Bed Outlet
2021-1361O
HFPO-DA
Gravimetric
22 of 49
Isokinetic Field DataLocation: Start Time: Source:
Date: VALID End Time: Project No.: 2021-1361O HFPO-DA
Moisture: 1.5 % est. Est. Tm: 85 °F Pb: 30.35 in. Hg
Barometric: 30.35 in. Hg Est. Ts: 70 °F Pg: 1.50 in. WC
Static Press: 1.20 in. WC Est. ΔP: 0.31 in. WC O2: 20.9 %
Stack Press: 30.44 in. Hg Est. Dn: 0.269 in. CO2: 0.1 %
CO2: 0.0 % Target Rate: 0.75 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O2: 20.9 % LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf) 4.615 4.893 0.278
N2/CO: 79.1 % 0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm): 0.009 0.006 0.007 -- 0.005 Mid 2 (cf) --
Md: 28.84 lb/lb-mole G-1 glass Vacuum (in Hg): 12 10 10 -- 10 Mid 3 (cf) --
Ms: 28.67 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube: Pass -- -- -- Pass 0.278
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux
Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb.
Begin End Ideal Actual -
1 0.00 4.00 0.25 72 1.25 1.25 2 79 78 52 39 101.8 28.02
2 4.00 8.00 0.25 72 1.26 1.30 2 80 81 48 38 97.8 28.02
3 8.00 12.00 0.26 74 1.32 1.30 2 82 83 48 37 100.3 28.63
4 12.00 16.00 0.27 75 1.37 1.40 2 83 84 48 40 95.0 29.21
5 16.00 20.00 0.29 75 1.48 1.50 2 80 82 48 41 96.9 30.27
6 20.00 24.00 0.32 74 1.64 1.60 3 79 81 47 38 99.4 31.77
7 24.00 28.00 0.34 74 1.74 1.70 3 80 81 47 37 100.8 32.74
8 28.00 32.00 0.35 74 1.79 1.80 3 79 82 47 38 96.1 33.22
9 32.00 36.00 0.36 74 1.85 1.90 3 80 82 47 38 98.0 33.69
10 36.00 40.00 0.36 74 1.85 1.90 3 80 82 47 40 98.8 33.69
11 40.00 44.00 0.38 74 1.95 2.00 3 80 81 47 38 101.7 34.62
12 44.00 48.00 0.39 75 1.99 2.00 3 81 82 47 37 92.9 35.10
1 48.00 52.00 0.22 75 1.11 1.10 2 83 84 64 43 104.1 26.36
2 52.00 56.00 0.21 75 1.06 1.10 2 84 80 50 35 94.8 25.76
3 56.00 60.00 0.25 74 1.26 1.30 2 81 80 44 38 103.0 28.08
4 60.00 64.00 0.25 74 1.25 1.30 2 81 79 43 37 102.0 28.08
5 64.00 68.00 0.28 74 1.40 1.40 2 80 80 42 35 94.6 29.71
6 68.00 72.00 0.32 74 1.60 1.60 2 78 77 41 36 96.3 31.77
7 72.00 76.00 0.30 74 1.50 1.50 2 77 76 41 38 94.4 30.76
8 76.00 80.00 0.32 75 1.60 1.60 2 79 79 41 38 100.4 31.80
9 80.00 84.00 0.34 75 1.70 1.70 3 79 80 41 39 96.1 32.77
10 84.00 88.00 0.34 75 1.67 1.70 3 80 82 40 38 97.6 32.53
11 88.00 92.00 0.35 75 1.75 1.80 3 81 82 40 38 100.4 33.25
12 92.00 96.00 0.32 75 1.60 1.60 3 82 83 40 39 94.7 31.80
Final DGM:
MaxVac
%ISO BWS
96.0 min 65.986 ft3 0.30 in. WC 86.4 °F 74.3 °F 3 1.556 in. WC 98.3 0.022
Gas Temperatures (°F)
641.933
637.099
652.440
631.611
82
Sam
ple
P
t.
Gas Temperatures (°F)
DGM Average
Amb.
Sample Time(minutes)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
(ft3)
84
95
95
95
625.292
76
84
87
603.002
600.444
616.255
619.300
605.495
634.615
608.110 90
95
Pitot TubeΔP
(in WC)
VES Carbon Bed Outlet
STACK DATA (EST)
7
Run 1
9:23
11:27Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC
STACK DATA (EST) EQUIPMENT MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
30.6
K-FACTOR
STACK DATA (FINAL)FILTER NO.
OTM-45
5/19/21
0.994
1.800
Meter Box ID:
Y:
Parameter:
-2.8
YqaΔHTs
RE
SU
LT
S
666.708
Vm ΔP TmRun Time
81
81
81
84639.310
647.061
644.521
81664.00181
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
Nozzle ID:
Nozzle Dn (in.):
82
649.822
Liner Material:
P4-3
Pitot Cp/Type:
610.648 93
94613.344
94
622.244
82
84
658.143
660.999
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):0.262
Pitot ID:
94
628.364
655.311
81
% ISO
5.077
Vs(fps)
PumpVac
(in. Hg)
Orifice Press.ΔH
(in. WC)
glass
P4-3
23 of 49
Isokinetic Field DataLocation: Start Time: Source:
Date: VALID End Time: Project No.: 2021-1361O HFPO-DA
Moisture: 1.5 % est. Est. Tm: 86 °F Pb: 30.35 in. Hg
Barometric: 30.35 in. Hg Est. Ts: 74 °F Pg: 1.20 in. WC
Static Press: 1.20 in. WC Est. ΔP: 0.30 in. WC O2: 20.9 %
Stack Press: 30.44 in. Hg Est. Dn: 0.271 in. CO2: 0.1 %
CO2: 0.0 % Target Rate: 0.75 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O2: 20.9 % LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf) 9.611 9.858 0.247
N2/CO: 79.1 % 0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm): 0.005 0.007 0.009 -- 0.008 Mid 2 (cf) --
Md: 28.84 lb/lb-mole G-1 glass Vacuum (in Hg): 12 10 12 -- 10 Mid 3 (cf) --
Ms: 28.67 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube: Pass -- -- -- Pass 0.247
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux
Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb.
Begin End -- Ideal Actual -- -- -- --
1 0.00 4.00 0.24 75 1.19 1.20 2 80 81 64 52 106.8 27.54
2 4.00 8.00 0.24 75 1.19 1.20 2 81 82 58 47 101.4 27.54
3 8.00 12.00 0.25 75 1.24 1.30 2 83 82 58 46 100.3 28.10
4 12.00 16.00 0.27 75 1.34 1.30 2 79 83 54 47 94.6 29.21
5 16.00 20.00 0.29 75 1.44 1.40 2 78 82 52 48 100.6 30.27
6 20.00 24.00 0.31 75 1.54 1.50 3 79 83 50 48 97.4 31.29
7 24.00 28.00 0.32 75 1.60 1.60 3 81 83 50 48 101.7 31.80
8 28.00 32.00 0.32 75 1.60 1.60 3 82 84 51 47 97.6 31.80
9 32.00 36.00 0.34 75 1.69 1.70 3 78 81 50 46 94.7 32.77
10 36.00 40.00 0.34 75 1.69 1.70 3 79 81 49 44 92.2 32.77
11 40.00 44.00 0.37 75 1.84 1.80 4 80 82 52 46 95.5 34.19
12 44.00 48.00 0.38 75 1.89 1.90 4 80 82 50 46 96.4 34.65
1 48.00 52.00 0.19 76 0.94 0.94 2 80 83 64 52 103.9 24.52
2 52.00 56.00 0.21 76 1.04 1.00 2 82 84 58 46 101.8 25.78
3 56.00 60.00 0.23 76 1.15 1.20 2 83 84 58 42 101.7 26.98
4 60.00 64.00 0.26 76 1.29 1.30 2 81 83 54 42 101.0 28.69
5 64.00 68.00 0.26 76 1.29 1.30 2 82 84 49 42 97.3 28.69
6 68.00 72.00 0.27 76 1.34 1.35 2 83 84 48 42 99.2 29.23
7 72.00 76.00 0.30 76 1.49 1.50 2 83 84 48 42 97.8 30.81
8 76.00 80.00 0.32 76 1.59 1.60 2 82 84 45 42 98.2 31.83
9 80.00 84.00 0.35 76 1.74 1.75 3 82 83 45 42 93.7 33.28
10 84.00 88.00 0.35 76 1.74 1.75 3 82 83 45 43 97.1 33.28
11 88.00 92.00 0.34 76 1.69 1.70 3 83 84 45 43 98.3 32.80
12 92.00 96.00 0.32 76 1.60 1.60 3 82 83 45 44 100.7 31.83
Final DGM:
MaxVac
%ISO BWS
96.0 min 64.181 ft3 0.29 in. WC 79.4 °F 75.5 °F 4 1.466 in. WC 98.6 0.020
690.991
696.621
699.611
701.889
693.698
709.298
704.240
706.700
711.800
714.400
717.100
Orifice Press.ΔH
(in. WC)DGM Average
Amb.
--
79
77
79
81
81
78
79
80
80
80
81
80
80
666.942
682.521
677.061
679.790
669.566
674.583
672.061
719.900
725.600
722.700
ΔP
731.370
728.494
79
79
78
688.211
685.425
81
79
11:55
K-FACTOR
OTM-45
STACK DATA (EST)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
(ft3)
EQUIPMENT
VES Carbon Bed Outlet
Vs(fps)
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC5/19/21
STACK DATA (EST)
7
Sample Time(minutes)
Nozzle Dn (in.):
% ISO
Nozzle ID:
13:48
STACK DATA (FINAL)
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):
Run 2 Parameter:
Meter Box ID:
Sam
ple
P
t.R
ES
UL
TS
Run Time
-1.9
Vm ΔH Yqa
PumpVac
(in. Hg)
Gas Temperatures (°F)
80
79
76
80
TsTm
79
80
Y:
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
Liner Material:
Gas Temperatures (°F)
5.05
Pitot ID:
Pitot Cp/Type:
0.262
P4-3
Pitot TubeΔP
(in WC)
0.994
1.800
P4-3
glass
MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
28.0
FILTER NO.
24 of 49
Isokinetic Field DataLocation: Start Time: Source:
Date: VALID End Time: Project No.: 2021-1361O HFPO-DA
Moisture: 1.5 % est. Est. Tm: 79 °F Pb: 30.35 in. Hg
Barometric: 30.35 in. Hg Est. Ts: 76 °F Pg: 1.15 in. WC
Static Press: 1.20 in. WC Est. ΔP: 0.29 in. WC O2: 20.9 %
Stack Press: 30.44 in. Hg Est. Dn: 0.276 in. CO2: 0.1 %
CO2: 0.0 % Target Rate: 0.75 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O2: 20.9 % LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf) 5.767 6.012 0.245
N2/CO: 79.1 % 0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm): 0.012 0.014 0.015 -- 0.014 Mid 2 (cf) --
Md: 28.84 lb/lb-mole G-1 glass Vacuum (in Hg): 10 12 10 -- 10 Mid 3 (cf) --
Ms: 28.67 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube: Pass -- -- -- Pass 0.245
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux
Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb.
Begin End -- Ideal Actual -- -- -- --
1 0.00 4.00 0.24 78 1.19 1.20 2 83 83 64 50 102.9 27.61
2 4.00 8.00 0.24 78 1.19 1.20 2 83 85 54 44 94.3 27.61
3 8.00 12.00 0.26 78 1.29 1.30 2 80 83 52 43 97.6 28.74
4 12.00 16.00 0.28 78 1.39 1.40 2 81 84 50 42 101.1 29.83
5 16.00 20.00 0.32 78 1.59 1.60 2 84 85 48 40 95.2 31.88
6 20.00 24.00 0.32 78 1.59 1.60 2 85 83 48 41 98.9 31.88
7 24.00 28.00 0.34 77 1.70 1.70 3 84 83 49 42 96.7 32.84
8 28.00 32.00 0.35 76 1.75 1.80 3 85 84 49 42 99.8 33.28
9 32.00 36.00 0.37 77 1.85 1.90 3 86 85 49 41 97.9 34.25
10 36.00 40.00 0.37 77 1.85 1.90 3 87 86 49 42 101.4 34.25
11 40.00 44.00 0.38 78 1.90 1.90 3 86 87 49 41 94.7 34.75
12 44.00 48.00 0.36 78 1.79 1.80 3 87 86 49 42 98.5 33.82
1 48.00 52.00 0.19 79 0.94 0.94 2 88 87 62 46 103.1 24.59
2 52.00 56.00 0.21 79 1.04 1.00 2 87 86 50 43 101.5 25.85
3 56.00 60.00 0.22 79 1.09 1.10 2 88 86 48 42 102.1 26.46
4 60.00 64.00 0.26 80 1.29 1.30 2 87 88 47 42 100.3 28.79
5 64.00 68.00 0.30 80 1.49 1.50 2 88 87 46 41 97.5 30.93
6 68.00 72.00 0.33 79 1.65 1.60 3 87 87 44 40 103.0 32.41
7 72.00 76.00 0.34 79 1.69 1.70 3 88 89 43 40 95.7 32.90
8 76.00 80.00 0.35 79 1.75 1.80 3 87 88 43 41 92.8 33.38
9 80.00 84.00 0.35 79 1.75 1.80 3 88 89 42 40 93.1 33.38
10 84.00 88.00 0.35 79 1.75 1.80 3 87 88 41 40 104.1 33.38
11 88.00 92.00 0.35 79 1.75 1.80 3 88 87 42 41 100.3 33.38
12 92.00 96.00 0.32 79 1.60 1.60 3 86 88 43 40 97.4 31.91
Final DGM:
MaxVac
%ISO BWS
96.0 min 65.966 ft3 0.31 in. WC 83.0 °F 78.4 °F 3 1.552 in. WC 98.7 0.020
83
83
775.388
778.091
770.379
781.087
756.694
768.034
772.799
765.767
762.779
759.822 84
783.911
786.696
734.744
82
82
82
83
PumpVac
(in. Hg)
STACK DATA (FINAL)
4.973
FILTER NO.
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):
81
% ISO
81
Vs(fps)
Orifice Press.ΔH
(in. WC)
Gas Temperatures (°F)
81
Gas Temperatures (°F)
P4-3
1.800
glass
P4-3
84
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC5/19/21 Run 3
STACK DATA (EST)
7
Nozzle ID:
Nozzle Dn (in.):
Sam
ple
P
t.
Sample Time(minutes)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
(ft3)--
0.262
EQUIPMENT
Meter Box ID:
Y:
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
Liner Material:
Pitot ID:
Pitot Cp/Type:
0.994
16:08
K-FACTOR
MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
27.8
VES Carbon Bed Outlet
OTM-45
STACK DATA (EST)
Parameter:
14:15
795.621
DGM Average
Amb.
Pitot TubeΔP
(in WC)
79
83
81
732.210
750.689
747.833
742.288
745.008
739.584
753.679
737.074
789.488
792.612
85
85
86
-2.2
ΔHVm YqaΔP Tm Ts
82
84
85
85
RE
SU
LT
S
Run Time
84
84
84
798.421
25 of 49
Emission Calculations
LocationSource
Project No.Parameter
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 5/19/21 5/19/21 5/19/21 --
Start Time 9:23 11:55 14:15 --
Stop Time 11:27 13:48 16:08 --
Run Time, min (θ) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb) 30.35 30.35 30.35 30.35
Meter Correction Factor (Y) 1.002 1.002 1.002 1.002
Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @) 1.600 1.600 1.600 1.600
Meter Volume, ft3 (Vm) 77.844 78.745 82.762 79.784
Meter Temperature, °F (Tm) 85.5 89.0 90.1 88.2
Meter Temperature, °R (Tm) 545.2 548.6 549.8 547.9
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (ΔH) 1.829 1.845 2.060 1.912Volume H2O Collected, mL (Vlc) -2.1 -2.1 -2.1 -2.1
Nozzle Diameter, in (Dn) 0.235 0.235 0.235 0.235
Area of Nozzle, ft2 (An) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003FH HFPO-DA Mass, ng M(HFPODA) 7,380.0 2,940.0 3,270.0 4,530.0
BH HFPO-DA Mass, ng M(HFPODA) 5,130.0 4,280.0 1,660.0 3,690.0
Imp HFPO-DA Mass, ng M(HFPODA) 46.1 66.5 15.6 42.7
Breakthrough HFPO-DA Mass, ng M(HFPODA) 6.8 14.7 4.4 8.6
Total HFPO-DA Mass, ng M(HFPODA) 12,562.9 7,301.2 4,950.0 8,271.4
Standard Meter Volume, ft3 (Vmstd) 76.920 77.323 81.143 78.462
Standard Water Volume, ft3 (Vwstd) 1.236 1.132 1.009 1.125
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.014
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.027 0.032 0.036 0.032
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.014
Meter Pressure, in Hg (Pm) 30.48 30.49 30.50 30.49
Volume at Nozzle, ft3 (Vn) 76.931 78.035 82.453 79.14
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, (%) (I) 100.0 100.5 100.0 100.2DGM Calibration Check Value, (+/- 5%) (Yqa) 1.3 1.8 1.3 1.5
HFPO-DA Concentration, ng/dscm C(HFPODA) 5.8E+03 3.3E+03 2.2E+03 3.8E+03HFPO-DA Emission Rate, lb/hr ER(HFPODA) 4.0E-04 2.3E-04 1.6E-04 2.6E-04
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NCVES Carbon Bed Inlet2021-1361O
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
ISOKINETIC DATA
INPUT DATA
HFPO-DA
26 of 49
Volumetric Flow Rate Data
LocationSource
Project No.Parameter
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 AverageDate 5/19/21 5/19/21 5/19/21 --Start Time 9:23 11:55 14:15 --Stop Time 11:27 13:48 16:08 --Run Time, min 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
Point 1 0.54 0.96 0.70 0.73Point 2 0.56 0.96 0.68 0.73Point 3 0.55 0.95 0.68 0.73Point 4 0.58 0.95 0.74 0.76Point 5 0.58 0.96 0.77 0.77Point 6 0.63 0.88 0.75 0.75Point 7 0.64 0.66 0.71 0.67Point 8 0.63 0.64 0.66 0.64Point 9 0.58 0.53 0.62 0.58Point 10 0.55 0.37 0.61 0.51Point 11 0.55 0.36 0.61 0.51Point 12 0.55 0.36 0.60 0.50Point 13 0.93 0.60 1.10 0.88Point 14 0.93 0.59 1.10 0.87Point 15 0.92 0.66 1.05 0.88Point 16 0.93 0.64 1.05 0.87Point 17 0.90 0.60 1.00 0.83Point 18 0.90 0.58 0.96 0.81Point 19 0.65 0.54 0.60 0.60Point 20 0.55 0.53 0.57 0.55Point 21 0.39 0.50 0.54 0.48Point 22 0.39 0.51 0.37 0.42Point 23 0.38 0.51 0.38 0.42Point 24 0.36 0.51 0.38 0.42
Square Root of ΔP, (in. WC)1/2 (ΔP) 0.787 0.791 0.838 0.805Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb) 30.35 30.35 30.35 30.35Static Pressure, in. WC (Pg) -2.00 -2.00 -2.00 -2.00Stack Pressure, in. Hg (Ps) 30.20 30.20 30.20 30.20Stack Cross-sectional Area, ft2 (As) 7.07 7.07 7.07 7.07Temperature, °F (Ts) 73.8 78.6 82.3 78.2Temperature, °R (Ts) 533.4 538.3 541.9 537.864Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.014Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.027 0.032 0.036 0.032Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.014O2 Concentration, % (O2) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9CO2 Concentration, % (CO2) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry) (Md) 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet) (Ms) 28.68 28.70 28.72 28.70Velocity, ft/sec (Vs) 44.3 44.8 47.5 45.5
At Stack Conditions, acfm (Qa) 18,806 18,980 20,163 19,316At Standard Conditions, dscfm (Qs) 18,482 18,512 19,575 18,856
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NCVES Carbon Bed Inlet2021-1361O
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
CALCULATED DATA
VELOCITY HEAD, in. WC
HFPO-DA
27 of 49
Method 1 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date:
Vertical
Circular
51.00 in
15.00 in
36.00 in
7.07 ft2
2
2.9 ft
1.0 (must be > 0.5)
3.4 ft
1.1 (must be > 2)
24
24
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 14.6 -- 6.7 -- 4.4 -- 3.2 -- 2.6 -- 2.1 1 2.1 1.00 16.00
2 85.4 -- 25.0 -- 14.6 -- 10.5 -- 8.2 -- 6.7 2 6.7 2.41 17.41
3 -- -- 75.0 -- 29.6 -- 19.4 -- 14.6 -- 11.8 3 11.8 4.25 19.25
4 -- -- 93.3 -- 70.4 -- 32.3 -- 22.6 -- 17.7 4 17.7 6.37 21.37
5 -- -- -- -- 85.4 -- 67.7 -- 34.2 -- 25.0 5 25.0 9.00 24.00
6 -- -- -- -- 95.6 -- 80.6 -- 65.8 -- 35.6 6 35.6 12.82 27.82
7 -- -- -- -- -- -- 89.5 -- 77.4 -- 64.4 7 64.4 23.18 38.18
8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 96.8 -- 85.4 -- 75.0 8 75.0 27.00 42.00
9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 91.8 -- 82.3 9 82.3 29.63 44.63
10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.4 -- 88.2 10 88.2 31.75 46.75
11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 93.3 11 93.3 33.59 48.59
12 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.9 12 97.9 35.00 50.00
*Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point.
A = 2.91666666666667 ft.
B = 3.41666666666667 ft.
Depth of Duct = 36 in.
Number of traverse points on a diameter
Stack Diagram
Cross Sectional Area
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTSTraverse
Point% of
Diameter
Distance from inside
wall
Distance from
outside of port
No. of Test Ports:
Number of Readings per Point:
Distance A:
Distance A Duct Diameters:
Distance B:
Distance B Duct Diameters:
Minimum Number of Traverse Points:
Actual Number of Traverse Points:
CIRCULAR DUCT
Duct Design:
Nipple Length:
Depth of Duct:
Cross Sectional Area of Duct:
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port:
Duct Orientation:
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC
VES Carbon Bed Inlet
2021-1361O
05/19/21
Stack Parameters
Upstream Disturbance
Downstream Disturbance
B
A
28 of 49
Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC
Source VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Project No. 2021-1361O
Date 05/19/21
Sample Point Angle (ΔP=0)
1 12
2 15
3 15
4 15
5 12
6 15
7 18
8 18
9 15
10 12
11 12
12 12
13 15
14 18
15 18
16 20
17 18
18 15
19 15
20 12
21 12
22 10
23 10
24 10
Average 14
29 of 49
Method 4 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
Analysis
Run 1 Date: 5/19/21
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass, g 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 923.4 1223.4
Final Mass, g 0.0 2.0 104.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 943.6 1249.6
Gain 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.2 26.2
Run 2 Date: 5/19/21
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass, g 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 877.6 1177.6
Final Mass, g 0.0 2.0 104.0 100.0 102.0 0.0 893.6 1201.6
Gain 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 16.0 24.0
Run 3 Date: 5/19/21
Impinger No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O H2O XAD Trap Silica --
Initial Mass, g 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 865.4 1165.4
Final Mass, g 0.0 2.0 100.0 100.0 102.0 0.0 882.8 1186.8
Gain 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 17.4 21.4
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC
VES Carbon Bed Inlet
2021-1361O
HFPO-DA
Gravimetric
30 of 49
Isokinetic Field DataLocation: Start Time: Source:
Date: VALID End Time: Project No.: 2021-1361O HFPO-DA
Moisture: 1.5 % est. Est. Tm: 80 °F Pb: 30.35 in. Hg
Barometric: 30.35 in. Hg Est. Ts: 69 °F Pg: -2.00 in. WC
Static Press: -2.10 in. WC Est. ΔP: 0.67 in. WC O2: 20.9 %
Stack Press: 30.20 in. Hg Est. Dn: 0.224 in. CO2: 0.1 %
CO2: 0.0 % Target Rate: 0.75 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O2: 20.9 % LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf) --
N2/CO: 79.1 % 0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm): 0.001 -- -- -- 0.001 Mid 2 (cf) --
Md: 28.84 lb/lb-mole G-3 glass Vacuum (in Hg): 8 -- -- -- 10 Mid 3 (cf) --
Ms: 28.67 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube: Pass -- -- -- Pass --
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux
Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb.
Begin End Ideal Actual -
A-1 0.00 4.00 0.54 71 1.54 1.55 6 86 82 60 45 101.7 41.31
2 4.00 8.00 0.56 72 1.61 1.60 6 84 80 52 44 101.1 42.11
3 8.00 12.00 0.55 72 1.58 1.60 6 83 80 49 42 103.1 41.73
4 12.00 16.00 0.58 72 1.67 1.70 6 81 80 47 44 100.5 42.86
5 16.00 20.00 0.58 72 1.67 1.70 6 81 81 46 43 100.7 42.86
6 20.00 24.00 0.63 73 1.81 1.80 6 80 81 45 44 99.2 44.71
7 24.00 28.00 0.64 73 1.84 1.85 7 80 82 47 44 100.3 45.06
8 28.00 32.00 0.63 73 1.81 1.80 7 80 81 47 44 98.7 44.71
9 32.00 36.00 0.58 73 1.67 1.70 6 81 80 46 43 97.7 42.90
10 36.00 40.00 0.55 73 1.58 1.60 6 82 80 47 45 107.3 41.77
11 40.00 44.00 0.55 73 1.59 1.60 6 81 81 47 47 107.4 41.77
12 44.00 48.00 0.55 73 1.59 1.60 6 82 80 48 45 103.1 41.77
B-1 48.00 52.00 0.93 75 2.66 2.65 9 80 82 60 53 98.1 54.42
2 52.00 56.00 0.93 75 2.67 2.65 9 78 82 56 51 98.7 54.42
3 56.00 60.00 0.92 75 2.65 2.65 9 78 83 56 52 98.8 54.13
4 60.00 64.00 0.93 75 2.67 2.70 9 77 83 53 52 100.3 54.42
5 64.00 68.00 0.90 75 2.59 2.60 9 77 83 55 53 99.4 53.54
6 68.00 72.00 0.90 75 2.59 2.60 9 78 84 55 49 101.2 53.54
7 72.00 76.00 0.65 75 1.88 1.90 7 78 84 52 43 102.3 45.50
8 76.00 80.00 0.55 75 1.59 1.60 7 79 84 48 41 104.5 41.85
9 80.00 84.00 0.39 75 1.13 1.15 5 85 85 48 41 107.3 35.24
10 84.00 88.00 0.39 75 1.13 1.15 5 85 84 49 42 106.9 35.24
11 88.00 92.00 0.38 75 1.10 1.10 5 85 84 46 40 104.9 34.79
12 92.00 96.00 0.36 75 1.04 1.05 5 85 84 46 40 105.2 33.86
Final DGM:
MaxVac
%ISO BWS
96.0 min 77.844 ft3 0.63 in. WC 85.5 °F 73.8 °F 9 1.829 in. WC 100.0 0.016
638.820
641.550
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):0.235
Pitot ID:
84
600.070
636.080
89
% ISO
2.878
Vs(fps)
PumpVac
(in. Hg)
Orifice Press.ΔH
(in. WC)
glass
P4-2
90644.19590
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
Nozzle ID:
Nozzle Dn (in.):
88
629.560
Liner Material:
P4-2
Pitot Cp/Type:
581.150 83
83584.250
83
593.840
88
86
87614.070
625.660
621.830
89
90
90
RE
SU
LT
S
646.776
Vm ΔP TmRun Time
1.3
YqaΔHTs
VES Carbon Bed Inlet
STACK DATA (EST)
3
Run 1
9:23
11:27Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC
STACK DATA (EST) EQUIPMENT MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
-2.1
K-FACTOR
STACK DATA (FINAL)FILTER NO.
OTM-45
5/19/21
1.002
1.600
Meter Box ID:
Y:
Parameter:
Sam
ple
P
t.
Gas Temperatures (°F)
DGM Average
Amb.
Sample Time(minutes)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
(ft3)
85
84
85
85
596.850
78
81
81
571.930
568.932
587.430
590.670
574.980
606.400
578.060 82
84
Pitot TubeΔP
(in WC)
Gas Temperatures (°F)
617.910
610.220
632.920
603.300
87
31 of 49
Isokinetic Field DataLocation: Start Time: Source:
Date: VALID End Time: Project No.: 2021-1361O HFPO-DA
Moisture: 1.5 % est. Est. Tm: 86 °F Pb: 30.35 in. Hg
Barometric: 30.35 in. Hg Est. Ts: 74 °F Pg: -2.00 in. WC
Static Press: -2.10 in. WC Est. ΔP: 0.63 in. WC O2: 20.9 %
Stack Press: 30.20 in. Hg Est. Dn: 0.227 in. CO2: 0.1 %
CO2: 0.0 % Target Rate: 0.75 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O2: 20.9 % LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf) --
N2/CO: 79.1 % 0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm): 0.003 -- -- -- 0.003 Mid 2 (cf) --
Md: 28.84 lb/lb-mole G-3 glass Vacuum (in Hg): 8 -- -- -- 11 Mid 3 (cf) --
Ms: 28.67 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube: Pass -- -- -- Pass --
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux
Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb.
Begin End -- Ideal Actual -- -- -- --
A-1 0.00 4.00 0.96 77 2.73 2.75 9 85 83 60 56 98.3 55.40
2 4.00 8.00 0.96 77 2.75 2.75 9 87 84 57 56 99.7 55.40
3 8.00 12.00 0.95 77 2.73 2.75 9 90 91 56 54 99.5 55.11
4 12.00 16.00 0.95 77 2.73 2.74 9 90 91 53 54 98.3 55.11
5 16.00 20.00 0.96 77 2.75 2.74 9 90 91 52 54 101.3 55.40
6 20.00 24.00 0.88 78 2.52 2.55 8 90 92 53 53 100.8 53.09
7 24.00 28.00 0.66 78 1.89 1.90 7 88 92 54 54 103.2 45.97
8 28.00 32.00 0.64 78 1.84 1.85 7 89 92 55 54 103.8 45.27
9 32.00 36.00 0.53 78 1.53 1.50 6 89 92 54 54 101.3 41.20
10 36.00 40.00 0.37 78 1.07 1.05 5 90 92 54 52 107.0 34.42
11 40.00 44.00 0.36 78 1.04 1.05 5 90 91 54 53 101.9 33.95
12 44.00 48.00 0.36 78 1.04 1.05 5 91 91 54 54 105.0 33.95
B-1 48.00 52.00 0.60 79 1.72 1.70 6 93 90 56 53 101.9 43.88
2 52.00 56.00 0.59 79 1.69 1.70 6 92 91 56 54 105.0 43.51
3 56.00 60.00 0.66 79 1.89 1.90 6 91 91 54 54 97.3 46.02
4 60.00 64.00 0.64 79 1.84 1.85 6 91 91 52 54 102.8 45.31
5 64.00 68.00 0.60 79 1.72 1.75 6 93 91 51 50 102.4 43.88
6 68.00 72.00 0.58 80 1.66 1.65 6 89 89 50 48 104.5 43.18
7 72.00 76.00 0.54 80 1.55 1.55 6 87 88 49 45 104.5 41.66
8 76.00 80.00 0.53 80 1.52 1.55 6 90 87 50 43 102.5 41.27
9 80.00 84.00 0.50 80 1.44 1.45 6 90 86 50 41 107.9 40.09
10 84.00 88.00 0.51 80 1.47 1.50 6 90 86 50 43 102.9 40.49
11 88.00 92.00 0.51 80 1.47 1.50 6 90 87 50 45 103.9 40.49
12 92.00 96.00 0.51 80 1.47 1.50 6 90 87 50 45 103.3 40.49
Final DGM:
MaxVac
%ISO BWS
96.0 min 78.745 ft3 0.64 in. WC 89.0 °F 78.6 °F 9 1.845 in. WC 100.5 0.014
Y:
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
Liner Material:
Gas Temperatures (°F)
2.88
Pitot ID:
Pitot Cp/Type:
0.235
P4-2
Pitot TubeΔP
(in WC)
1.002
1.600
P4-2
glass
MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
-2.1
FILTER NO.
RE
SU
LT
S
Run Time
1.8
Vm ΔH Yqa
PumpVac
(in. Hg)
Gas Temperatures (°F)
88
88
84
88
TsTm
89
89
11:55
K-FACTOR
OTM-45
STACK DATA (EST)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
(ft3)
EQUIPMENT
VES Carbon Bed Inlet
Vs(fps)
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC5/19/21
STACK DATA (EST)
3
Sample Time(minutes)
Nozzle Dn (in.):
% ISO
Nozzle ID:
13:48
STACK DATA (FINAL)
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):
Run 2 Parameter:
Meter Box ID:
Sam
ple
P
t.
ΔP
725.610
722.600
88
88
88
677.120
673.750
92
89
646.865
670.350
662.500
666.520
650.740
658.620
654.690
713.460
719.570
716.570
Orifice Press.ΔH
(in. WC)DGM Average
Amb.
--
89
87
89
92
91
87
88
89
89
89
92
91
91
680.120
685.260
687.825
691.020
682.770
700.840
694.290
697.500
704.060
707.290
710.420
32 of 49
Isokinetic Field DataLocation: Start Time: Source:
Date: VALID End Time: Project No.: 2021-1361O HFPO-DA
Moisture: 1.5 % est. Est. Tm: 89 °F Pb: 30.35 in. Hg
Barometric: 30.35 in. Hg Est. Ts: 79 °F Pg: -2.00 in. WC
Static Press: -2.10 in. WC Est. ΔP: 0.64 in. WC O2: 20.9 %
Stack Press: 30.20 in. Hg Est. Dn: 0.226 in. CO2: 0.1 %
CO2: 0.0 % Target Rate: 0.75 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O2: 20.9 % LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf) --
N2/CO: 79.1 % 0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm): 0.003 -- -- -- 0.003 Mid 2 (cf) --
Md: 28.84 lb/lb-mole G-3 glass Vacuum (in Hg): 11 -- -- -- 11 Mid 3 (cf) --
Ms: 28.67 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube: Pass -- -- -- Pass --
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux
Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb.
Begin End -- Ideal Actual -- -- -- --
A-1 0.00 4.00 0.70 81 2.00 2.03 4 92 92 66 55 97.8 47.48
2 4.00 8.00 0.68 81 1.95 1.96 5 93 93 48 50 98.6 46.80
3 8.00 12.00 0.68 81 1.95 1.96 6 94 93 44 48 99.0 46.80
4 12.00 16.00 0.74 81 2.12 2.10 7 93 93 46 40 98.4 48.82
5 16.00 20.00 0.77 81 2.21 2.20 8 91 93 47 39 100.4 49.80
6 20.00 24.00 0.75 81 2.15 2.15 8 90 94 46 41 100.6 49.15
7 24.00 28.00 0.71 81 2.04 2.05 8 88 93 46 41 102.2 47.82
8 28.00 32.00 0.66 82 1.89 1.90 7 86 93 46 41 102.4 46.14
9 32.00 36.00 0.62 82 1.78 1.80 7 86 93 46 41 103.1 44.72
10 36.00 40.00 0.61 82 1.75 1.75 7 85 91 46 43 102.7 44.36
11 40.00 44.00 0.61 82 1.75 1.75 7 85 90 46 42 102.4 44.36
12 44.00 48.00 0.60 82 1.72 1.70 7 84 89 48 43 102.2 44.00
B-1 48.00 52.00 1.10 82 3.14 3.15 10 83 84 55 46 97.0 59.57
2 52.00 56.00 1.10 82 3.14 3.15 10 84 84 46 44 98.9 59.57
3 56.00 60.00 1.05 82 2.99 3.00 10 84 83 50 43 100.1 58.20
4 60.00 64.00 1.05 82 2.99 3.00 10 85 83 51 43 100.3 58.20
5 64.00 68.00 1.00 83 2.84 2.90 10 85 83 52 43 101.4 56.85
6 68.00 72.00 0.96 83 2.73 2.75 10 85 83 54 47 102.2 55.70
7 72.00 76.00 0.60 83 1.71 1.70 7 85 83 54 47 104.0 44.04
8 76.00 80.00 0.57 84 1.62 1.65 7 85 84 55 47 103.5 42.96
9 80.00 84.00 0.54 84 1.54 1.55 7 85 84 55 46 105.0 41.82
10 84.00 88.00 0.37 84 1.05 1.05 5 85 85 56 46 108.8 34.61
11 88.00 92.00 0.38 84 1.08 1.10 5 85 85 56 44 107.8 35.08
12 92.00 96.00 0.38 84 1.08 1.10 5 86 85 56 45 108.1 35.08
Final DGM:
MaxVac
%ISO BWS
96.0 min 82.762 ft3 0.72 in. WC 90.1 °F 82.3 °F 10 2.060 in. WC 100.0 0.012
RE
SU
LT
S
Run Time
89
89
89
808.497
90
89
89
89
1.3
ΔHVm YqaΔP Tm Ts
89
89
89805.800
DGM Average
Amb.
Pitot TubeΔP
(in WC)
89
91
91
725.735
749.730
746.230
739.110
742.690
735.670
753.110
732.350
800.430
803.110
16:08
K-FACTOR
MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
-2.1
VES Carbon Bed Inlet
OTM-45
STACK DATA (EST)
Parameter:
14:15Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC5/19/21 Run 3
STACK DATA (EST)
3
Nozzle ID:
Nozzle Dn (in.):
Sam
ple
P
t.
Sample Time(minutes)
Dry Gas Meter Reading
(ft3)--
0.235
EQUIPMENT
Meter Box ID:
Y:
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
Liner Material:
Pitot ID:
Pitot Cp/Type:
1.002
PumpVac
(in. Hg)
STACK DATA (FINAL)
2.874
FILTER NO.
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):
91
% ISO
91
Vs(fps)
Orifice Press.ΔH
(in. WC)
Gas Temperatures (°F)
90
Gas Temperatures (°F)
P4-2
1.600
glass
P4-2
91
729.050
91
91
91
91
91
91
782.760
786.850
774.460
790.890
756.410
770.260
778.610
766.139
762.920
759.670 91
794.150
797.310
33 of 49
Appendix C
34 of 49
QA/QC Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
#1 #2 #3 Dn (Average) Difference
5/19/21 G-1 0.262 0.262 0.262 0.262 0.000 glass
5/19/21 P4-3 no no no
5/19/21 7
Material
Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check
Pass
≤ 0.004 in.
Date Pitot IDEvidence of
damage?Evidence of
mis-alignment?Calibration or
Repair required?
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC
VES Carbon Bed Outlet
2021-1361O
Nozzle Diameter (in.)Date Nozzle ID Criteria
HFPO-DA
35 of 49
QA/QC Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
#1 #2 #3 Dn (Average) Difference
5/19/21 G-3 0.235 0.235 0.235 0.235 0.000 glass
5/19/21 P4-2 no no no
5/19/21 3
Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works Facility, NC
VES Carbon Bed Inlet
2021-1361O
Nozzle Diameter (in.)Date Nozzle ID Criteria
HFPO-DA
Material
Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check
Pass
≤ 0.004 in.
Date Pitot IDEvidence of
damage?Evidence of
mis-alignment?Calibration or
Repair required?
36 of 49
ME
TH
OD
5 D
RY
GA
S M
ETER
CA
LIB
RA
TIO
N U
SIN
G C
RIT
ICA
L O
RIF
ICES
1)
Sel
ect
thre
e cr
itic
al o
rifice
s to
cal
ibra
te t
he
dry
gas
met
er w
hic
h b
rack
et t
he
expec
ted o
per
atin
g r
ange.
2)
Rec
ord b
arom
etri
c pre
ssure
bef
ore
and a
fter
cal
ibra
tion
pro
cedure
.
3)
Run a
t te
sted
vac
uum
(fr
om O
rifice
Cal
ibra
tion
Rep
ort)
, fo
r a
per
iod o
f tim
e
nec
essa
ry t
o ac
hie
ve a
min
imum
tot
al v
olum
e of
5 c
ubic
fee
t.
4)
Rec
ord d
ata
and info
rmat
ion in t
he
GR
EEN
cel
ls,
YELL
OW
cel
ls a
re c
alcu
late
d.
INIT
IAL
FIN
AL
AV
G (
Pb
ar)
DA
TE:
2/
10
/2
02
1M
ETER
SE
RIA
L #
:M
B3
BA
RO
ME
TR
IC P
RES
SU
RE (
in H
g):
30
.38
30
.38
30
.38
ME
TER
PA
RT #
:C
RIT
ICA
L O
RIF
ICE
SET S
ER
IAL #
:1
39
3
K'
TE
STED
TE
MP
ER
ATU
RE
S °
FE
LA
PS
ED
Y %
Dif
fY
% D
iff
FA
CTO
RV
AC
UU
MD
GM
REA
DIN
GS
(FT
3)
AM
BIE
NT
DG
M I
NLET
DG
M O
UTLET
DG
MTIM
E (
MIN
)D
GM
DH
(1)
(2)
(3)
tow
ith
oth
er
OR
IFIC
E #
RU
N #
(AV
G)
(in
Hg
)IN
ITIA
LFIN
AL
NE
T (
Vm
)IN
ITIA
LFIN
AL
INIT
IAL
FIN
AL
AV
Gq
(in
H2O
)V
m (
STD
)V
cr (
STD
)Y
Avera
ge Y
ori
fice
sD
H@
10
.30
62
48
89
.29
08
95
.16
25
.87
25
76
06
16
06
06
0.2
51
5.0
00
.44
6.0
58
76
.13
46
1.0
13
1.5
3
20
.30
6
30
.30
6
AV
G =
1
.01
31
.06
1.3
5
10
.42
68
22
.58
95
.16
29
00
.69
35
.53
15
86
16
26
06
16
11
0.0
00
.86
5.7
04
55
.69
87
0.9
99
1.5
4
20
.42
68
30
.42
68
AV
G =
0
.99
9-0
.29
-0.2
0
10
.49
61
21
.59
00
.69
39
07
.11
36
.42
05
86
26
36
16
16
1.7
51
0.0
01
.26
.61
72
6.6
24
01
.00
11
.59
20
.49
61
30
.49
61
AV
G =
1
.00
1-0
.09
0.4
7
10
.71
31
19
90
7.1
13
91
6.3
71
9.2
58
58
63
65
61
62
62
.75
10
.00
2.6
9.5
56
39
.52
15
0.9
96
1.6
7
20
.71
31
30
.71
31
AV
G =
0
.99
6-0
.56
-0.4
3
10
.83
58
17
.59
16
.37
19
27
.18
01
0.8
09
58
65
67
62
63
64
.25
10
.00
3.6
11
.15
21
11
.15
98
1.0
01
1.6
8
20
.83
58
30
.83
58
AV
G =
1
.00
1-0
.12
0.4
4
AV
ER
AG
E D
RY
GA
S M
ETER
CA
LIB
RA
TIO
N F
AC
TO
R,
Y =
1
.00
2
AV
ER
AG
E D
H@ =
1
.60
(1)
=N
et v
olum
e of
gas
sam
ple
pas
sed t
hro
ugh D
GM
, co
rrec
ted t
o st
andar
d c
onditio
ns
K1 =
17.6
4 o R
/in.
Hg (
Englis
h),
0.3
858 o K
/mm
Hg (
Met
ric)
Tm =
Abso
lute
DG
M a
vg.
tem
per
ature
(o R
- E
nglis
h, o
K -
Met
ric)
DH
@ =
0
.75
qD
H
V
m(s
td)
Vcr
(std
)
V
m
(2)
=Vol
um
e of
gas
sam
ple
pas
sed t
hro
ugh t
he
critic
al o
rifice
, co
rrec
ted t
o st
andar
d c
onditio
ns
Tam
b =
Abso
lute
am
bie
nt
tem
per
ature
(o R
- E
nglis
h, o
K -
Met
ric)
K' =
Ave
rage
K' fa
ctor
fro
m C
ritica
l O
rifice
Cal
ibra
tion
(3)
=D
GM
cal
ibra
tion
fac
tor
11
26
31
16
18
EN
VIR
ON
ME
NT
AL
SU
PP
LY
CO
MP
AN
Y
USI
NG
TH
E C
RIT
ICA
L O
RIF
ICES
AS
CA
LIB
RA
TIO
N S
TAN
DA
RD
S:Th
e fo
llow
ing
equa
tions
are
use
d to
cal
cula
te th
e st
anda
rd v
olum
es o
f air
pass
ed th
roug
h th
e D
GM
, Vm
(std
), an
d th
e cr
itica
l orif
ice,
V c
r(s
td),
and
the
DG
M c
alib
ratio
n fa
ctor
, Y. T
hese
equ
atio
ns a
re a
utom
atic
ally
cal
cula
ted
in th
e sp
read
shee
t abo
ve.
()2
()
V:\
Offic
e-O
ps\E
NV\D
iv01\S
our
ce T
estin
g\Eq
uipm
ent
Cal
ibra
tion
Dat
a\In
itial
Cal
ibra
tions
\Dry
Gas
Met
ers\
2021\M
B 3
\MB 3
Ini
tial C
al 0
2102021.x
ls
37 of 49
ME
TH
OD
5 D
RY
GA
S M
ETER
CA
LIB
RA
TIO
N U
SIN
G C
RIT
ICA
L O
RIF
ICES
1)
Sel
ect
thre
e cr
itic
al o
rifice
s to
cal
ibra
te t
he
dry
gas
met
er w
hic
h b
rack
et t
he
expec
ted o
per
atin
g r
ange.
2)
Rec
ord b
arom
etri
c pre
ssure
bef
ore
and a
fter
cal
ibra
tion
pro
cedure
.
3)
Run a
t te
sted
vac
uum
(fr
om O
rifice
Cal
ibra
tion
Rep
ort)
, fo
r a
per
iod o
f tim
e
nec
essa
ry t
o ac
hie
ve a
min
imum
tot
al v
olum
e of
5 c
ubic
fee
t.
4)
Rec
ord d
ata
and info
rmat
ion in t
he
GR
EEN
cel
ls,
YELL
OW
cel
ls a
re c
alcu
late
d.
INIT
IAL
FIN
AL
AV
G (
Pb
ar)
DA
TE:
1/
11
/2
02
1M
ETER
SE
RIA
L #
:M
B 5
BA
RO
ME
TR
IC P
RES
SU
RE (
in H
g):
29
.92
29
.92
29
.92
ME
TER
PA
RT #
:C
RIT
ICA
L O
RIF
ICE
SET S
ER
IAL #
:1
39
3
K'
TE
STED
TE
MP
ER
ATU
RE
S °
FE
LA
PS
ED
Y %
Dif
fY
% D
iff
FA
CTO
RV
AC
UU
MD
GM
REA
DIN
GS
(FT
3)
AM
BIE
NT
DG
M I
NLET
DG
M O
UTLET
DG
MTIM
E (
MIN
)D
GM
DH
(1)
(2)
(3)
tow
ith
oth
er
OR
IFIC
E #
RU
N #
(AV
G)
(in
Hg
)IN
ITIA
LFIN
AL
NE
T (
Vm
)IN
ITIA
LFIN
AL
INIT
IAL
FIN
AL
AV
Gq
(in
H2O
)V
m (
STD
)V
cr (
STD
)Y
Avera
ge Y
ori
fice
sD
H@
10
.30
62
3.5
60
6.2
87
61
4.2
84
7.9
97
64
65
66
67
66
66
20
.00
0.5
18
.03
90
8.0
01
60
.99
51
.80
20
.30
6
30
.30
6
AV
G =
0
.99
50
.43
0.8
2
10
.42
68
22
61
4.2
97
61
9.9
08
5.6
11
65
66
67
66
66
66
.25
10
.00
1.0
55
.64
53
5.5
74
90
.98
81
.91
20
.42
68
30
.42
68
AV
G =
0
.98
8-0
.36
0.0
2
10
.49
61
21
61
9.9
23
62
6.4
41
6.5
18
66
67
68
66
66
66
.75
10
.00
1.4
6.5
57
26
.47
39
0.9
87
1.8
9
20
.49
61
30
.49
61
AV
G =
0
.98
7-0
.38
-0.0
2
10
.71
31
19
62
6.4
47
63
5.7
94
9.3
47
66
68
72
67
67
68
.51
0.0
02
.99
.40
65
9.3
05
70
.98
91
.90
20
.71
31
30
.71
31
AV
G =
0
.98
9-0
.18
0.2
0
10
.83
58
17
.56
35
.81
36
46
.69
51
0.8
82
67
71
74
68
69
70
.51
0.0
04
10
.93
92
10
.89
65
0.9
96
1.9
0
20
.83
58
30
.83
58
AV
G =
0
.99
60
.50
0.8
9
AV
ER
AG
E D
RY
GA
S M
ETER
CA
LIB
RA
TIO
N F
AC
TO
R,
Y =
0
.99
1
AV
ER
AG
E D
H@ =
1
.88
(1)
=N
et v
olum
e of
gas
sam
ple
pas
sed t
hro
ugh D
GM
, co
rrec
ted t
o st
andar
d c
onditio
ns
K1 =
17.6
4 o R
/in.
Hg (
Englis
h),
0.3
858 o K
/mm
Hg (
Met
ric)
Tm =
Abso
lute
DG
M a
vg.
tem
per
ature
(o R
- E
nglis
h, o
K -
Met
ric)
DH
@ =
0
.75
qD
H
V
m(s
td)
Vcr
(std
)
V
m
(2)
=Vol
um
e of
gas
sam
ple
pas
sed t
hro
ugh t
he
critic
al o
rifice
, co
rrec
ted t
o st
andar
d c
onditio
ns
Tam
b =
Abso
lute
am
bie
nt
tem
per
ature
(o R
- E
nglis
h, o
K -
Met
ric)
K' =
Ave
rage
K' fa
ctor
fro
m C
ritica
l O
rifice
Cal
ibra
tion
(3)
=D
GM
cal
ibra
tion
fac
tor
11
26
31
16
18
EN
VIR
ON
ME
NT
AL
SU
PP
LY
CO
MP
AN
Y
USI
NG
TH
E C
RIT
ICA
L O
RIF
ICES
AS
CA
LIB
RA
TIO
N S
TAN
DA
RD
S:Th
e fo
llow
ing
equa
tions
are
use
d to
cal
cula
te th
e st
anda
rd v
olum
es o
f air
pass
ed th
roug
h th
e D
GM
, Vm
(std
), an
d th
e cr
itica
l orif
ice,
V c
r(s
td),
and
the
DG
M c
alib
ratio
n fa
ctor
, Y. T
hese
equ
atio
ns a
re a
utom
atic
ally
cal
cula
ted
in th
e sp
read
shee
t abo
ve.
()2
()
V:\
Offic
e-O
ps\E
NV\D
iv01\S
our
ce T
estin
g\Eq
uipm
ent
Cal
ibra
tion
Dat
a\In
itial
Cal
ibra
tions
\Dry
Gas
Met
ers\
2021\M
B 5
\MB 5
Ini
tial C
al 0
1112021.x
ls
38 of 49
Init
ial
Oven
Box T
herm
oco
up
le C
ali
bra
tion
Ref
eren
ceTher
moc
ouple
Ref
eren
ceTher
moc
ouple
Ref
eren
ceTher
moc
ouple
Tem
per
ature
(o R
)Tem
per
ature
(o R
)Tem
per
ature
(o R
)Tem
per
ature
(o R
)Tem
per
ature
(o R
)Tem
per
ature
(o R
)
OB-1
491.6
7492.6
70.2
%524.6
7523.6
7-0
.2%
671.6
7673.6
70.3
%SM
ilo02/2
2/2
1O
B-2
491.6
7492
0.1
%530.6
7531
0.1
%671.6
7672
0.0
%SRW
03/0
2/2
1O
B-3
491.6
7493
0.3
%530.6
7530
-0.1
%671.6
7671
-0.1
%SRW
03/0
2/2
1O
B-4
491.6
7493.6
70.4
%524.6
7524.6
70.0
%671.6
7670.6
7-0
.1%
SM
ilo02/2
2/2
1O
B-A
491.6
7493
0.3
%530.6
7529
-0.3
%671.6
7673
0.2
%SRW
03/0
2/2
1O
B-B
491.6
7492
0.1
%530.6
7530
-0.1
%671.6
7672
0.0
%SRW
03/0
2/2
1O
B-5
491.6
7492
0.1
%530.6
7530
-0.1
%671.6
7670
-0.2
%SRW
03/0
2/2
1O
B-C
491.6
7492
0.1
%530.6
7529
-0.3
%671.6
7674
0.3
%SRW
03/0
3/2
1O
B-6
491.6
7493.6
70.4
%524.6
7525
0.1
%671.6
7669.6
7-0
.3%
SM
ilo02/2
2/2
1O
B-7
491.6
7494.6
70.6
%524.6
7525
0.1
%671.6
7669.6
7-0
.3%
SM
ilo02/2
2/2
1O
B-E
491.6
7492
0.1
%530.6
7529
-0.3
%671.6
7671.6
70.0
%SRW
03/0
3/2
1O
B-1
0491.6
7492
0.1
%530.6
7531
0.1
%671.6
7670
-0.2
%SRW
03/0
3/2
1O
B-1
1491.6
7495
0.7
%530.6
7532
0.3
%671.6
7672
0.0
%SRW
03/0
3/2
1O
B-1
2491.6
7493
0.3
%530.6
7531
0.1
%671.6
7671
-0.1
%SRW
03/0
3/2
1
Ref
eren
ce T
her
moc
ouple
: Fl
uke
S/N
: 83450033 o
r S/N
90460057 t
race
able
to
the
Untied
Sta
tes
Nat
ional
Inst
itute
of
Sta
ndar
ds
and T
echnol
ogy
*Acc
epta
ble
Dev
iation
: 1.5
%
ID N
um
ber
Ice
Bat
hAm
bie
nt
Hot
Wat
er B
ath
Dev
iation
*D
evia
tion
*D
evia
tion
*Tec
hnic
ian
Dat
e Per
form
ed
V:\
Offic
e-O
ps\
EN
V\D
iv01\S
ourc
e T
est
ing\E
quip
ment
Calib
ration
Data
\Initia
l Calib
ration
s\O
ven B
oxes\
2021\C
opy o
f In
it O
B C
al 03032021.x
ls\2
020
39 of 49
DOCU
MEN
T TITLE
Init
ial
Imp
ing
er O
utl
et T
her
mo
cou
ple
Cal
ibra
tio
n
Ref
eren
ceTh
erm
ocou
ple
Ref
eren
ceTh
erm
ocou
ple
Ref
eren
ceTh
erm
ocou
ple
Tem
pera
ture
(o R
k)Te
mpe
ratu
re
(o Rk)
Tem
pera
ture
(o R
k)Te
mpe
ratu
re
(o Rk)
Tem
pera
ture
(o R
k)Te
mpe
ratu
re
(o Rk)
IO-1
494.
1749
3.87
-0.1
%52
4.37
523.
17-0
.2%
672.
1767
2.67
0.1%
SM
03/1
6/21
IO-2
493.
6749
3.87
0.0%
524.
5752
3.17
-0.3
%67
1.77
672.
670.
1%SM
03/1
6/21
IO-3
493.
5749
3.87
0.1%
521.
3752
3.17
0.3%
671.
7767
2.67
0.1%
SM
03/1
6/21
IO-4
493.
9749
3.87
0.0%
524.
3752
3.17
-0.2
%67
1.17
672.
670.
2%SM
03/1
6/21
IO-5
493.
7749
3.87
0.0%
524.
0752
3.17
-0.2
%67
2.37
672.
670.
0%SM
03/1
6/21
IO-6
493.
9749
3.87
0.0%
522.
9752
3.17
0.0%
670.
7767
2.67
0.3%
SM
03/1
6/21
IO-7
493.
1749
3.87
0.1%
524.
3752
3.17
-0.2
%67
1.37
672.
670.
2%SM
03/1
6/21
IO-8
494.
3749
3.87
-0.1
%52
3.67
523.
17-0
.1%
670.
3767
2.67
0.3%
SM
03/1
6/21
IO-9
IO-1
049
3.77
493.
870.
0%52
4.27
523.
17-0
.2%
671.
2767
2.67
0.2%
SM
03/1
6/21
IO-1
149
4.37
493.
87-0
.1%
524.
3752
3.17
-0.2
%67
2.27
672.
670.
1%SM
03/1
6/21
IO-1
249
3.77
493.
870.
0%52
2.17
523.
170.
2%67
1.47
672.
670.
2%SM
03/1
6/21
IO-1
3SM
03/1
6/21
IO-1
449
3.87
493.
870.
0%52
4.37
523.
17-0
.2%
670.
8767
2.67
0.3%
SM
03/1
6/21
IO-1
549
4.17
493.
87-0
.1%
524.
3752
3.17
-0.2
%67
1.47
672.
670.
2%SM
03/1
6/21
IO-1
649
4.37
493.
87-0
.1%
524.
3752
3.17
-0.2
%67
1.07
672.
670.
2%SM
03/1
6/21
IO-1
749
3.37
493.
870.
1%52
2.17
670.
97IO
-18
494.
1749
3.87
-0.1
%52
4.37
523.
17-0
.2%
671.
2767
2.67
0.2%
SM
03/1
6/21
IO-1
949
3.97
493.
870.
0%52
4.77
523.
17-0
.3%
672.
9767
2.67
0.0%
SM
03/1
6/21
Ref
eren
ce T
herm
ocou
ple:
Flu
ke S
/N:
8345
0033
or
S/N
904
6005
7 tr
acea
ble
to t
he U
ntie
d Sta
tes
Nat
iona
l Ins
titut
e of
Sta
ndar
ds a
nd T
echn
olog
y*A
ccep
tabl
e D
evia
tion:
1.5
%
Tech
nici
anD
ate
Perf
orm
edID
Num
ber
Ice
Bat
hAm
bien
tH
ot W
ater
Bat
h
Dev
iatio
n*D
evia
tion*
Dev
iatio
n*
V:\
Off
ice-
Ops
\EN
V\D
iv01
\Sou
rce
Test
ing\
Equi
pmen
t C
alib
ration
Dat
a\In
itia
l Cal
ibra
tion
s\Im
ping
er O
utle
ts\2
021\
2021
Ini
t I.
O.
Cal
.xls
x\20
19
40 of 49
DOCUMENT TITLEInitial Sample Probe Calibration Form
Probe ID Date Technician
Is the Pitot Level and Perpindicular? Yes
Is There any Obstruction? No
Is the Pitot Damaged No
a1 (-10o = a1 = + 10o) 1
a2 (-10o = a2 = + 10o) 0
ß1 (-5o = ß1 = + 5o) 1
ß2 (-5o = ß2 = + 5o) 1
g 1
Q 0
z = A Tan g (< 0.125") 0.011
W = A Tan Q (< 0.03125") 0.0000
Dt (3/16 = Dt = 3/8") 0.252
A 0.655
A/2Dt (1.05 = PA/Dt = 1.5) 1.300
Source: Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement
Systems: Volume III, Stationary Source-Specific Methods.
EPA/600/R-94/038c, September 30, 1994
Verification of "S" Type Pitot, Thermocouple and Nozzle Placement
Does X Exceed 0.75 inches? Yes
Does Y Exceed 3 inches? NA
Thermocouple Calibration
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3Reference Temp 492 492 492 526 526 526 672 672 672
Thermocouple Temp 492 492 492 525 525 525 672 672 672
Difference (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Temperature values must be within 1.5% of reference temperature
I certify that the probe ID meets or exceeds all specifications, criteria and/or applicable design features and is herby assigned a pitot tube calibration factor CP of 0.84.
Certified By: Date:S. Waters 01/28/21
Ambient OR Boiling Water OR
S. Waters
P4-1/TC-7C
"S" Type Pitot Calibration
P4-1/TC-7C 01/28/21
Ice Bath OR
V:\Office-Ops\ENV\Div01\Source Testing\Equipment Calibration Data\Initial Calibrations\Probes and Pitots\2021 Initial Cals\4'\2021 Initial Probe Cal P4-1.xlsx\Initial
41 of 49
DOCUMENT TITLEInitial Sample Probe Calibration Form
Probe ID Date Technician
Is the Pitot Level and Perpindicular? Yes
Is There any Obstruction? No
Is the Pitot Damaged No
a1 (-10o = a1 = + 10o) 2
a2 (-10o = a2 = + 10o) 1
ß1 (-5o = ß1 = + 5o) 1
ß2 (-5o = ß2 = + 5o) 1
g 1
Q 0
z = A Tan g (< 0.125") 0.011
W = A Tan Q (< 0.03125") 0.0000
Dt (3/16 = Dt = 3/8") 0.251
A 0.650
A/2Dt (1.05 = PA/Dt = 1.5) 1.295
Source: Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution MeasurementSystems: Volume III, Stationary Source-Specific Methods.EPA/600/R-94/038c, September 30, 1994
Verification of "S" Type Pitot, Thermocouple and Nozzle Placement
Does X Exceed 0.75 inches? Yes
Does Y Exceed 3 inches? NA
Thermocouple Calibration
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3Reference Temp 493 493 493 525 525 525 672 672 672
Thermocouple Temp 491 491 491 524 524 524 671 671 671
Difference (%) -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1
Temperature values must be within 1.5% of reference temperature
I certify that the probe ID meets or exceeds all specifications, criteria and/or applicable design features and is herby assigned a pitot tube calibration factor CP of 0.84.
Certified By: Date:SRW 01/28/21
Ambient OR Boiling Water OR
SRW
P4-2/TC-5D
"S" Type Pitot Calibration
P4-2/TC-5D 01/28/21
Ice Bath OR
D:\Equipment Calibration Data\Initial Calibrations\Probes and Pitots\2021 Initial Cals\4'\2021 Initial Probe Cal P4-2.xlsx\Initial
42 of 49
DO
CUM
ENT
TITL
E
PO
ST T
ES
T D
RY
GA
S M
ETE
R C
ALIB
RA
TIO
N
INIT
IAL
FIN
AL
AV
G (
Pb
ar)
DA
TE
:0
5/2
6/2
1M
ETE
R B
OX
#:
3B
AR
OM
ETR
IC P
RE
SS
UR
E (
in H
g):
29
.75
29
.75
29
.75
TE
CH
NIC
IAN
:S
. M
ilo
CR
ITIC
AL O
RIF
ICE
SE
T S
ER
IAL #
:1
39
3
K'
TE
ST
ED
TE
MP
ER
AT
UR
ES
°F
ELA
PS
ED
Y %
Dif
f
FA
CT
OR
VA
CU
UM
DG
M R
EA
DIN
GS
(FT
3)
AM
BIE
NT
DG
M I
NLE
TD
GM
OU
TLE
TD
GM
TIM
E (
MIN
)D
GM
DH
(1)
(2)
(3)
to
OR
IFIC
E #
RU
N #
(AV
G)
(in
Hg
)IN
ITIA
LFIN
AL
NE
T (
Vm
)IN
ITIA
LFIN
AL
INIT
IAL
FIN
AL
AV
Gq
(in
H2O
)V
m (
ST
D)
Vcr
(S
TD
)Y
Avera
ge Y
DH
@
1 2 3
AV
G =
10
.49
61
22
81
0.2
45
81
6.6
94
6.4
49
71
73
73
73
73
73
10
.00
1.2
6.3
72
26
.40
67
1.0
05
-0.0
61
.62
18
20
.49
61
22
81
6.6
94
82
3.1
27
6.4
33
72
73
73
73
73
73
10
.00
1.2
6.3
56
46
.40
07
1.0
07
0.1
01
.63
30
.49
61
22
82
3.1
27
82
9.5
75
6.4
48
72
73
74
73
74
73
.51
0.0
01
.26
.36
52
6.4
00
71
.00
6-0
.04
1.6
3
AV
G =
1
.00
6
1 2 3
AV
G =
AV
ER
AG
E D
RY
GA
S M
ET
ER
CA
LIB
RA
TIO
N F
AC
TO
R,
Y =
PR
E-D
ETE
RM
INE
D D
RY
GA
S M
ETE
R C
ALIB
RA
TIO
N F
AC
TO
R,
Y =
PE
RC
EN
T D
IFFE
RE
NC
E =
1.0
06
1.0
02
0.4
C:\
Use
rs\p
atrick
.gra
dy\
AppD
ata\
Loca
l\M
icro
soft
\Win
dow
s\IN
etCac
he\
Con
tent.
Outloo
k\7PT
FWU
0P\
MB 3
Pos
t Cal
05262021.x
lsx\
Shee
t1
43 of 49
DO
CUM
ENT
TITL
E
PO
ST T
ES
T D
RY
GA
S M
ETE
R C
ALIB
RA
TIO
N
INIT
IAL
FIN
AL
AV
G (
Pb
ar)
DA
TE
:0
5/2
6/2
1M
ETE
R B
OX
#:
5B
AR
OM
ETR
IC P
RE
SS
UR
E (
in H
g):
29
.88
29
.88
29
.88
TE
CH
NIC
IAN
:S
. M
ilo
CR
ITIC
AL O
RIF
ICE
SE
T S
ER
IAL #
:1
39
3
K'
TE
ST
ED
TE
MP
ER
AT
UR
ES
°F
ELA
PS
ED
Y %
Dif
f
FA
CT
OR
VA
CU
UM
DG
M R
EA
DIN
GS
(FT
3)
AM
BIE
NT
DG
M I
NLE
TD
GM
OU
TLE
TD
GM
TIM
E (
MIN
)D
GM
DH
(1)
(2)
(3)
to
OR
IFIC
E #
RU
N #
(AV
G)
(in
Hg
)IN
ITIA
LFIN
AL
NE
T (
Vm
)IN
ITIA
LFIN
AL
INIT
IAL
FIN
AL
AV
Gq
(in
H2O
)V
m (
ST
D)
Vcr
(S
TD
)Y
Avera
ge Y
DH
@
1 2 3
AV
G =
10
.49
61
21
.58
2.5
44
89
.09
06
.54
67
57
37
57
27
37
3.2
51
0.0
01
.46
.49
64
6.4
10
60
.98
70
.12
1.9
0
18
20
.49
61
21
.58
9.0
90
95
.66
96
.57
97
77
57
77
37
57
51
0.0
01
.46
.50
77
6.3
98
60
.98
3-0
.24
1.9
0
30
.49
61
21
.59
5.6
69
10
4.2
06
8.5
37
78
76
79
75
76
76
.51
3.0
01
.48
.42
09
8.3
10
50
.98
70
.13
1.9
0
AV
G =
0
.98
6
1 2 3
AV
G =
AV
ER
AG
E D
RY
GA
S M
ET
ER
CA
LIB
RA
TIO
N F
AC
TO
R,
Y =
PR
E-D
ETE
RM
INE
D D
RY
GA
S M
ETE
R C
ALIB
RA
TIO
N F
AC
TO
R,
Y =
PE
RC
EN
T D
IFFE
RE
NC
E =
0.9
86
0.9
91
-0.5
C:\
Use
rs\p
atrick
.gra
dy\
AppD
ata\
Loca
l\M
icro
soft
\Win
dow
s\IN
etCac
he\
Con
tent.
Outloo
k\7PT
FWU
0P\
MB 5
Pos
t Cal
05262021.x
lsx\
Shee
t1
44 of 49
DOCUMENT TITLE
Post-Test Sample Probe Calibration Form
Probe ID
Visual Inspection
Do pitot tips appear to be damaged? NO
Do thermocouple wires appear broken or shorted? NO
Do all components appear to be in good condition? YES
Post-Test Thermocouple Calibration
Difference OF
65.7 67 1.3
Reference Thermocouple: Fluke S/N: 83450033 traceable to the Untied States National Institute of Standards and Technology
Accepatable Deviation +/- 2 OF
X Acceptable
Unacceptable
Date Technician S. Milo
P4-1
05/26/21
Thermocouple Temperature OFReference Temperature OF
D:\Equipment Calibration Data\2021\4'\Probe Post Cal P4C 01152021.xlsx\Initial
45 of 49
DOCUMENT TITLE
Post-Test Sample Probe Calibration Form
Probe ID
Visual Inspection
Do pitot tips appear to be damaged? NO
Do thermocouple wires appear broken or shorted? NO
Do all components appear to be in good condition? YES
Post-Test Thermocouple Calibration
Difference OF
65.7 66.5 0.8
Reference Thermocouple: Fluke S/N: 83450033 traceable to the Untied States National Institute of Standards and Technology
Accepatable Deviation +/- 2 OF
X Acceptable
Unacceptable
Date Technician S. Milo
P4-2
05/26/21
Thermocouple Temperature OFReference Temperature OF
D:\Equipment Calibration Data\2021\4'\Probe Post Cal P4C 01152021.xlsx\Initial
46 of 49
Appendix D
47 of 49
Viny Ethers South Operations Data
Date
05/19/21
Time
Stack Testing
Run 1: 9:23‐11:27
Run 2: 11:55‐13:48
Run 3: 14:15‐16:08
VES Product
VES Precursor
VES Conden
sation (HFPO)
VES ABR (East)
VES ABR (West)
100 kg/hr
135 kg/hr125 kg/hr
VES Refining
1400
1500
1600
PM/PE
48 kg/hr
48 kg/hr
48 kg/hr
48 kg/hr
48 kg/hr
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
130 kg/hr
135 kg/hr
68 kg/hr
88 kg/hr
88 kg/hr
88 kg/hr
88 kg/hr
88 kg/hr
135 kg/hr
Burnout
48 of 49
Last Page of Report
49 of 49