Upload
iplbc-bc
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 1/60
SONIC THEORY
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 2/60
Sonic energy is generated and detected by devices called
transducers. By definition, a transducer is a “device thatis actuated by power from one system to supply power
in any other form to a second system” ; i.e. , a
transducer converts energy from one form to another. In
sonic logging, the conversion is electrical to acousticenergy (transmitters) or acoustic to electrical energy (
receivers).
Two types of transducers are typically used for logging: 1.
2.
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 3/60
CREST
TROUGH
SINUSOIDAL WAVE TRAIN
A
B
C A M
P L I T U D
E
TIMEE
F
G
HD
T
T
T
T=PERIOD OF THE WAVE
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 4/60
THE WAVELENGTH
A
B
C A M
P L I T U D
E
DISPLACEMENT (POSITION)E
F
G
HD
SINUSOIDAL WAVE TRAIN
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 5/60
PROPERTIES OF WAVES
•
••
attenuation
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 6/60
ACOUSTIC WAVES
•
•
•
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 7/60
SONIC MONOPOLE THEORY
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 8/60
COMPRESSIONAL WAVE
DIRECTION OFPROPAGATION
DIRECTION OF
PARTICLE
DISPLACEMENT
RAREFACTION
COMPRESSION
COMPRESSION
RAREFACTION
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 9/60
SHEAR WAVE
DIRECTION OF
PROPAGATION
DIRECTION OF
PARTICLE
DISPLACEMENT
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 10/60
THE COMPRESSIONAL AND SHEARVELOCITIES
vK
v
K BULK MODULUS
SHEAR MODULUS
BULK DENSITY
p
s
( / )4 31/ 2
1/ 2
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 11/60
A
F Modulus
Angleor Volume Length
Strain
Parameter Parameter inChangeStrain
Area
ForceStress
Strain
Stress Modulus
,,
ELASTIC MODULI
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 12/60
FORCE =F
FORCE FORCE
VOLUMETRIC DEFORMATION
V A
FV MODULUS BULK K
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 13/60
FORCE = F
FORCE = F
l
l
SHEARING DEFORMATION
l A
Fl
ll
AF
Tan
AF MODULUSSHEAR
/
/ /
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 14/60
Rock/
Fluid
Mineral Density
(gm/cc)
Young’s
Modulus
Bulk
Modulus
Shear
Modulus
Poisson’s
Ratio
Sandstone Quartz 2.65 0.92 (Mbars) 0.370 (Mbars) 0.424 (Mbars) 0.09
Limestone Calcite 2.71 0.89 0.732 0.342 0.30
Dolomite CaMg
(CO3)2
2.87 1.66 0.820 0.500 0.25
Oil n( CH2) 0.85 - 0.014 0.0 -
Water H2O 1.00 - 0.023 0.0 -Gas - 0.001 - 1.5x10
-60.0 -
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF
DIFFERENT MATERIALS
SHEAR WAVE
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 15/60
SHEAR WAVE
PROPAGATION
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 16/60
CYLINDRICAL DEFORMATION
and POISSON’S RATIO
FORCE
l
r
l
FORCE
r
strainallongitudin
strainlateral
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 17/60
SONIC VELOCITIES AND
POISSON’S RATIO
RatiosPoisson
t
t
v
v
p
s
s
p
'
)2 / 1(
12 / 1
Velocity Ratio
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 18/60
SNELL’S LAW ANALYSIS
normal
angle of
incident
angle ofrefraction
r
i
BOREHOLE
FORMATIONi
v
vr
f
bsinsin
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 19/60
SNELL’S LAW REPRESENTATION OF
SONIC WAVE PROPAGATION
M1 M2
C
r s
is
r s
M1 M2
A
r Pi
M1 M2
B
r pr s
ip
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 20/60
SNELL’S LAW ANALYSIS
For wave propagation down the
borehole wall, =90 degress ( sin =1)
so that we now obtain:
sini
v
vcritical
f
b
angle ofincidenti
BOREHOLE
FORMATION
angle of
refraction
SONIC WAVE PROPAGATION
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 21/60
SONIC WAVE PROPAGATION
T
R1
R2
ipis
st pt
S wave
P wave
ip =CRITICAL
COMPRESSIONAL
ANGLE
Is=CRITICAL
SHEAR
ANGLE
CRITICALLY
REFRACTED
COMPRESSIONAL
AND SHEAR
WAVES
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 22/60
QUESTION:
CAN Vf BE GREATER
THAN Vb ?
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 23/60
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 24/60
SONIC DIPOLE THEORY
HALLIBURTON
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 25/60
12 in
12 in
MONO TRANS
DIPOLE TRANS
MONO
RECVSDIPOLE
RECVS
12 in
LFDT
ISOLATOR
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 26/60
FLEXURAL WAVE
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 27/60
DISPERSION PLOT IN A
SLOW SANDSTONE
0 5 10 15291
265
241
222
I n v e r s e d
p h a s e d v
e l o c i t y
s/ft
Frequency (khz)
tflexuralvs frequency
tshear
ts
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 28/60
p
f pV V criticali )(sin
For critically refracted
compressional waves:
SONIC WAVE PROPAGATIONAL
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 29/60
SONIC WAVE PROPAGATIONAL
PATHS
T
R1
R2
TOOL BODY
BOREHOLE
FLUID
ALTERED
(DAMAGED ZONE)
UNALTERED
(UNDAMAGED)
ZONE
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 30/60
GUIDED WAVES
•
•
•
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 31/60
THE LEAKY AND NORMAL MODES
Both the Leaky and Normal
modes are produced by
constructive interferencebetween reflected waves at
the borehole wall and body
waves traveling down the
formation
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 32/60
Stoneley waves are generatedalong the borehole wall, essentially
by flexing of the wall caused byinteraction of the formation and theborehole fluid
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 33/60
STONELEY
WAVE
PROPAGATION
PORE FLUID COMPRESSED
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 34/60
BOREHOLE
MUDCAKE
STONELEY WAVE PROPAGATIONPORE FLUID COMPRESSED
WHICH CAUSES MOVEMENT
INTO FORMATION
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 35/60
b
smud mud tubestoneley
t t t t
t OF TERMS IN
22
STONELEY WAVE VELOCITY
AT LOW FREQUENCY
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 36/60
TOTAL ACOUSTIC WAVEFORM
P wave
Leaky mode
S wave Stoneley
wave
Normal Mode
time
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 37/60
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 38/60
Time(microseconds)
A
B
C
CENTRALIZED TOOL WITH NO WASHOUT
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 39/60
T
R1
R2
tR1
tR2
A
B
C
D
E
tR2= A+B+D+E
tR1
=A+B+C
A,B,C,D,E,=TRAVEL TIMES
tR2 - tR1 = A+B+D+E -(A+B+C)
tR2 - tR1 = D+(E-C)
ASSUME
E=C
tR2 - tR1 = D
t 2
D
s acin
t t Δt
R1 R2
TIME TRANSIT
CENTRALIZED TOOL WITH NO WASHOUT
SLOWNESS
INVERSE
PHASE
VELOCITY
ACOUTIC SIGNAL AT TWO RECEIVERS
pacing
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 40/60
ACOUTIC SIGNAL AT TWO RECEIVERS
THE ZERO CROSSING THRESHOLD TECHNIQUE
pacing
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 41/60
TR
R1
R2
B
A
CD
E
A
B
CD
E
REASONS FOR
BOREHOLE
COMPENSATIONS
CAVED HOLE
(WASHOUT)
TOOL TILT
BOREHOLE COMPENSATION SONIC
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 42/60
BOREHOLE COMPENSATION SONIC
(BCDT)
TR
R2
TR
R1
3 FT
2 FT
3 FT
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 43/60
t3
TR
R2
TR
R1
t1
t4
t2
BOREHOLE
COMPENSATION
CAVED HOLE
)2
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 44/60
BOREHOLE
COMPENSATION
TOOL TILT
t1
t3
t2
t4
ft
t t t t
t c 2
)(
2 / 1
2143
TR
DEPTH DERIVED BOREHOLE
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 45/60
Z=1 ft
10 ft
TR
R1
R2
t4
B
TR
R1
R2
t1
t2
C
DEPTH DERIVED BOREHOLE
COMPENSATION
DTRCVR = (t2-t1)/z
TR
R1
R2
t3
A
TR
R1
R2DTXMIT = (t4-t3 )/z
DT(BHC) = (DTXMIT+DTRCVR)/2
TR
DEPTH DERIVED BOREHOLE
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 46/60
Z=1 ft
10 ft
TR
R1
R2
t1
t2
C
DEPTH DERIVED BOREHOLE
COMPENSATION
TR
R1
R2
A,B
TR
R1
R2
t3
t4
TR
DEPTH DERIVED BOREHOLE
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 47/60
TR
R1
R2
t1
t2
C
DEPTH DERIVED BOREHOLE
COMPENSATION
TR
R1
R2
t3
A,B
TR
R1
R2
t4
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 48/60
TR
R2
TR
R1
BOREHOLE
COMPENSATION
CAVED HOLE
THE WYLLIE TIME -AVERAGE
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 49/60
THE WYLLIE TIME -AVERAGE
EQUATION
1- f f
1MATRIX FLUID
THE WYLLIE TIME-AVERAGE
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 50/60
THE WYLLIE TIME-AVERAGE
EQUATION
t t t
s o lv in g fo r p o r o sity
t t
t t
f m a
sm a
f m a
lo g
lo g
( )
f f
f f
1
The fluid in the zone of interest is
typically mud filtrate
is usually considered 189 u sec/ft f t
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 51/60
The presence of gas in the pore space of a
rock will increase the sonic transit time over
its value in the same liquid-saturated rock.Because of the increase in tlog (cycle
skipping may also add to this effect), the
sonic porosity is optimistic if gas is present inthe flushed zone (using the Wyllie equation,
the input value for tf will be too low).
CYCLE SKIPPING
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 52/60
THRESHOLD LEVEL
E4
E1
E2
E3
E3
E1
E2 E4
E1
E2
CYCLE SKIPPING
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 53/60
GAS EFFECT ON SONIC TOOL RESPONSE
As has already been stated,the presence of gas in the pore spaceof a rock will increase the sonic transit time over its value in the
same liquid-saturated rock. Gas is very compressible; when it
replaces pore liquid, it lower the rock rigidity more than its
density and decreases Sonic velocity.
The decrease in velocity is almost negligible in deeper low-
porosity formations where pore volume is low and compaction
pressure is high, which means that pore fluid contributes little
to rock rigidity. However, it can be as high as 40 % in shallow,
high -porosity formations where pore volume is large and
compaction pressure is minimum-in which case pore fluid has a
much larger contribution to formation rigidity.
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 54/60
COMPACTION CORRECTION
p
s
C
1
tt
tt
mafluid
malog
f
100
Shale p t C
EFFECTIVE POROSITY
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 55/60
EFFECTIVE POROSITY
When shale is present in the formation,
the effective porosity can be calculated
from
ma fl
mashsh
shma fl
maeff
t t
t t V t t t
t t 100logf
Here t sh is from the adjacent (nearby)shale
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 56/60
Lithology
Sandstone 55.6
Limestone 47.5Dolomites 43.5
) / ( ft st ma
TYPICAL DELTA-t MATRIX VALUES
f
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 57/60
Primary
porositySecondary
porosity(Vugs,or
fractures)
PRIMARY and
SECONDARY POROSITY
D
f
f
sec
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 58/60
OFFSET 8 FEET = LONG SPACED TOOL
Potential for deeper investigation
LONG SPACED VS SHORT SPACED TOOLS
OFFSET < 8 FEET = SHORT SPACED TOOL
TRANS
REC
OFFSET
Can make measurements in larg
LARGE BOREHOLE EFFECT
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 59/60
LARGE BOREHOLE EFFECT
TR
R1
A
B
A
B
TR
R1
TR
R1
TR
R1
TR
R1
TR
R1
A
B
A
B
7/31/2019 Sonic -2000
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sonic-2000 60/60