Upload
mryan1776
View
868
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Practical application of Six Sigma in solving real business problems.
Citation preview
The Uni ersit of AkronThe University of AkronCollege of Business Administration
Six Sigma: Solving Problems Practical Application of DMAIC
Guest Lecture6500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis
Akron, OHNovember 10, 2009
This document is confidential and is intended solely for the use and information of the client to whom it is addressed
Michael [email protected] // li k di /i /i l bl
use and information of the client to whom it is addressed.
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION - MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT PERMISSION
http://www.linkedin.com/in/isolveproblems
What is Six Sigma?
A Statistical Measure
66 1Mi ll d d i ll lib
SigmaSigma Spelling ErrorsSpelling Errors Time Keeping ErrorsTime Keeping Errors
3 4
DPMODPMO
99 9997
Yield (%)Yield (%)
6 S d t
Process & Method for Continuous Improvement
66σσ 1 Misspelled word in a small library 3.4 99.99976 Seconds per century
Process & Method for Continuous ImprovementInspecting and Fixing products Fixing processes
Enabler for Culture ChangeF th C t
Ali P l P d S t A d M t i
•Focus on the Customer
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 1
Align People, Process and Systems on Agreed Metrics
What’s In It For Me?
Where it Started:• Focus on cost and• Focus on cost andInternal productivity
To Where it’s Evolved…To Where it s Evolved• Delighting Customers
S l i P bl t C t Wi Wi S i
and Driving Revenue
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 2
Solving Problems to Create a Win‐Win Scenario
It’s All About the Customer
When it’s too anything(hot/cold, light/dark, small/big, etc…)is theit’s not acceptable to the customer
is theENEMY
of the customerQUALITY
C t F l th V i N t th M
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 3
Customers Feel the Variance, Not the Mean
The Recipe For Six Sigma
Define: What is the Problem Your Trying to Solve?
Measure: If it Can’t Be Measured, It Can’t be Fixed
Analyze: How & Why do Defects Occur?
Improve: Reduce Process Variation
Control: Maintain The Gain & Keep it Fixed!
S l i P bl t C t Wi Wi S i
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 4
Solving Problems to Create a Win‐Win Scenario
Three Keys To A Successful Project
What’s The Problem You’re Trying to Solve
Is it a Process? Can it Be Measured?You re Trying to Solve Measured?
Th K C iti l t P j t S
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 5
Three Keys are Critical to Project Success
What is The Problem You’re Solving?
Understanding Customer NeedsUnderstanding Customer Needs• Customers Can’t Always Tell You
Translate Emotion to Data• Customers Can’t Always Tell Youy
Customer: “Your Service Stinks”
Real Problem: “Of the 23 shipments we received from you last year, 2 were received on the requested date, but 14 were at least 2 days late.”
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 6
Translate the Voice of the Customer Into “Language Data”
What is a Process?Beginning Middle EndInput Transformation OutputStart And Then Some Magic Happens Finishg pp
Definable: Can draw a picture of it…f p f
Predictable: Know what result will be…
Repeatable: Outcome is assured & repeated…
M t B D fi bl P di t bl d R t bl
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 7
Must Be: Definable, Predictable and Repeatable
Customer Needs Must Be Measurable
Critical to Satisfaction (CTS)• “I want a good cup of coffee”
Critical to Quality (CTQ)• Identify measurable characteristics
The Challenge: • Qualitative to Quantitative
How Does the Customer Measure Your Process?*
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 8
How Does the Customer Measure Your Process?*Customer Has to Like It, Value It and Be Willing to Pay for It!
Practical Application of Six SigmaExternal Customer: Process Variation Impacting Delivery
Measurable Impact on Customer Satisfaction
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 9
Six Sigma In Reviewh h ( )Know What Is Important to The Customer (CTQ)
What is the customer willing to pay for?
Reduce Defects (DPMO)
Identify when & why defects occur 01234 01234
Center Around Target (Mean)
Build quality into the processXbar
Target
Reduce Variation (Standard Deviation)
Improve process capability to maintain the gainUSLLSL
A St t t D i Ch & D li R lt
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 10
A Strategy to Drive Change & Deliver Results
“What’s the problem you’re trying to solve?”
Ryanisms / Guiding Thoughts
What s the problem you re trying to solve? and it's corollary…
"What's the question you're trying to answer?”q y y g
…Some favorites:
“If it can’t be measured, it can’t be fixed”If it can t be measured, it can t be fixed“A Process is: Definable, Predictable and Repeatable”“What’s the business case ($) to fix this problem?”($) p"You don't know if you don't ask”
And remember:And remember:
“The measure of success is not whether you have a tough problem to deal with, but whether it’s the same
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 11
problem you had last year.”
APPENDIXAPPENDIX
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 12
It’s All About the Customer!C t V l C i t d Q litCustomers Value Consistency and Quality• Expect performance, reliability, competitive prices, and on‐time delivery.• When expectations are not met, it creates the opportunity for someone else.
33σσ 1 5 Misspelled words per page in a book
SigmaSigma Spelling ErrorsSpelling Errors
3 5 Months per century
Time Keeping ErrorsTime Keeping Errors
66 800
DPMODPMO
93 32
Yield (%)Yield (%)
33σσ 1.5 Misspelled words per page in a book
44σσ 1 Misspelled words per 30 pages in a book 2.5 Days per century
3.5 Months per century
6,200
66,800
99.379
93.32
55σσ 1 Misspelled word in set of encyclopedias
66σσ 1 Misspelled word in a small library
30 Minutes per century
6 Seconds per century
233
3.4
99.9767
99.9997
The Secret of Success is to Do Common Things Uncommonly Well.
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 13
The Secret of Success is to Do Common Things Uncommonly Well.‐ John Rockefeller
A Process of Continuous ImprovementDMAIC: It’s All About ProcessDMAIC: It’s All About ProcessSix Sigma is a highly disciplined process that helps us focus on developing and delivering near‐perfect products and services.
DDefineefine Customer expectations of the process?A. Identify Project CTQ’sB. Develop Team CharterC. Define Process Map
1. Select CTQ Characteristics
MMeasureeasure What is the frequency of defects?1. Select CTQ Characteristics2. Define Performance Standards3. Measurement System Analysis on Y
AAnalyzenalyze Why, when, and where do defects occur?4. Establish Process Capability5. Define Performance Objectivesyy6. Identify Variation Sources
IImprovemprove How can we fix the process?7. Screen Potential Causes8. Discover Variable Relationships9. Establish Operating Tolerances
Si Si B “Th W Y W k”
CControlontrol How can we make the process stay fixed?10. Define & Validate Measurement System11. Determine Process Capability12. Implement Process Control
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 14
Six Sigma Becomes “The Way You Work”
Variation is the Enemy of QualityFundamental Objective of Six SigmaFundamental Objective of Six SigmaReduce variation and eliminate defects
Accurate PreciseAccurate AND PreciseAccurate,Not Precise
Precise,Not Accurate
01234 01234
01234 01234 01234 01234
01234 01234
XbarTargetXbar
TargetXbar
Target
C t F l th V i N t th MUSLLSLUSLLSL USLLSL
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 15
Customers Feel the Variance, Not the Mean
l k l j ll i b & li
Practical Application of Six Sigma
Black Belt Projects: Full Time Job to Focus & Deliver
Black Belt Projects Lead (7)Fi F i t j t i l diFinance: Four process improvement projects, including:
Removed 1 day from monthly closing cycle for largest business unitGE Superabrasives
Lapping Process EDM Process
EDM Cut Wire DiesGE Superabrasives
Lapping Process EDM Process
EDM Cut Wire DiesClosing Process TimelineClosing Process Timeline
Place parts on lapper
Quick FinishLap (<12 hrs)
Lapper removesMaterial
49 Ho rs
Cut to NearNet Shape
Add Diamond640 g/gal
@ 14 ml/min/
Finished Part Place parts on EDM Finished PartPlace parts on lapper
Quick FinishLap (<12 hrs)
Lapper removesMaterial
49 Ho rs
Cut to NearNet Shape
Add Diamond640 g/gal
@ 14 ml/min/
Finished Part Place parts on EDM Finished Part
2006 - 20071997 - 2005
19961995
Historical Target: Between 1997 and 2005 the Closing Transmission Target = 12pm +6WD
Process Evolution: In 2006, the Closing Transmission Target was moved up to = 12pm +5WD
Days to Close
2006 - 20071997 - 2005
19961995
Historical Target: Between 1997 and 2005 the Closing Transmission Target = 12pm +6WD
Process Evolution: In 2006, the Closing Transmission Target was moved up to = 12pm +5WD
Days to Close
MCR / March 8, 2002Wire Cut Summary.ppt
Eliminated 75% of Lap Feed to Finish 5211/08 Wire DiesGenerated Annual Savings of $96m
Process Issues•Consumes a great deal of lap feed•$2.28 per hour, per piece to lap•Average of $111.72 in lap feed for 5208•On average 49 hours needed to lap 5208
Project Resolution • EDM cutting produces near-net shape• Leaves 0.050” on each side for clean up• Reduces lapping to <12 hrs
49 Hours
Slide 1/2
709.6 ct/hr
MCR / March 8, 2002Wire Cut Summary.ppt
Eliminated 75% of Lap Feed to Finish 5211/08 Wire DiesGenerated Annual Savings of $96m
Process Issues•Consumes a great deal of lap feed•$2.28 per hour, per piece to lap•Average of $111.72 in lap feed for 5208•On average 49 hours needed to lap 5208
Project Resolution • EDM cutting produces near-net shape• Leaves 0.050” on each side for clean up• Reduces lapping to <12 hrs
49 Hours
Slide 1/2
709.6 ct/hr
4CIS Monthly Financial Close Process ImprovementGlobal Finance Quality & Process Improvement
5 Day Close Project is First Major Effort Since 1997
+3 WDNoon
50.5 hrs elapsed
+4 WDNoon
74.5 hrs elapsed
+6 WDNoon
122.5 hrs elapsed
+5 WDNoon
98.5 hrs elapsed
+2 WDNoon
26.5 hrs elapsed
+1 WD9:30 am
0 hrs
+8 WDNoon
170.5 hrs elapsed
+10 WDNoon
218.5 hrs elapsed
4CIS Monthly Financial Close Process ImprovementGlobal Finance Quality & Process Improvement
5 Day Close Project is First Major Effort Since 1997
+3 WDNoon
50.5 hrs elapsed
+4 WDNoon
74.5 hrs elapsed
+6 WDNoon
122.5 hrs elapsed
+5 WDNoon
98.5 hrs elapsed
+2 WDNoon
26.5 hrs elapsed
+1 WD9:30 am
0 hrs
+8 WDNoon
170.5 hrs elapsed
+10 WDNoon
218.5 hrs elapsed
Manufacturing Productivity: Three projects, $430k in productivity including:Wire die scrap reduction, control of sonic velocity, and near‐net shape finishing
L 6 A th B i t D i R lt
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 16
Leverage 6σ Across the Business to Drive Results
Practical Application of Six SigmaInternal Customer: Digitization (Process Automation) Project
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 17
l j il l
Practical Application of Six Sigma
Green Belt Projects: Integrate Into Daily Role aka “Divide & Conquer”
Green Belt Projects Mentored (20)Green Belt Projects Mentored (20)Finance: 13 reporting, digitization, and process improvement projects, including:
Monthly Closing, Monthly AR, Material Handling, and P&E Status
Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS): One project focused on Reduced non‐occupational lost‐time days 24%, saving $334k in first full year
Commercial Opportunity: One project focused on excess inventory utilizationCommercial Opportunity: One project focused on excess inventory utilizationIdentified market to sell excess inventory, generating $400k sales1
Manufacturing Productivity: Five projects delivering $459k including:N d lifi ti 2 t ti d ti i t tili tiNew vendor qualification2, setup time reduction, inventory utilization
G B lt 6 B A F M lti li
1. Won 1Q 2002 GE Superabrasives Award for Six Sigma Productivity for inventory reduction program2. Won 3Q 2001 GE Superabrasives Award for Six Sigma Leadership for new vendor qualification
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 18
Green Belts: 6σ Becomes A Force Multiplier
Sample Financial Benefit of 6σ : EHS ProjectInternal Customer(s): Hourly Associates & Business Leadership
Reactive Case Management (96 cases @ avg. 70.1 days/case)
6725 Days Lost in ’01
Pro-Active Intervention (64 cases @ avg. 54.5 days/case)
3491 Days Lost in ‘02Employee Informs Disability Center Disability Center InformsGESW Shoulders
B d i L t
Reactive Case Management (96 cases @ avg. 70.1 days/case)
6725 Days Lost in ’01
Pro-Active Intervention (64 cases @ avg. 54.5 days/case)
3491 Days Lost in ‘02Employee Informs Disability Center Disability Center InformsGESW Shoulders
B d i L ty
of Injury/Illnessy
Onsite Care Nurse Regularly of New Cases
Frequency and
Burden in LostTime Days
yof Injury/Illness
yOnsite Care Nurse
Regularly of New Cases
Frequency and
Burden in LostTime Days
Disability Center Informs
Duration of Injury / Illness reduced
Identify OpportunitiesFor early
Return to WorkDisability Center Informs
Duration of Injury / Illness reduced
Identify OpportunitiesFor early
Return to Work
Reactive Case Management•Employee set expectation of return to work date•Onsite Care Nurse notified after the fact
Pro-Active Intervention • Onsite Care Nurse Works with Disability Center and Operations Management team• Each Monday, all open cases are reviewed
yOnsite Care Nurse
of Projected Lost Time
Return to Work
Reactive Case Management•Employee set expectation of return to work date•Onsite Care Nurse notified after the fact
Pro-Active Intervention • Onsite Care Nurse Works with Disability Center and Operations Management team• Each Monday, all open cases are reviewed
yOnsite Care Nurse
of Projected Lost Time
Return to Work
•Onsite Care Nurse notified after-the-fact•No structure for early return to work • Opportunities for early return to work
identified and communicated to employee
•Onsite Care Nurse notified after-the-fact•No structure for early return to work • Opportunities for early return to work
identified and communicated to employee
48% R d ti i L t Ti D S i $356k
University of Akron • College of Business Administration • Fall 20096500:333 Supply Chain & Operations Analysis • Guest Speaker: Michael Ryan
DMAIC | November 10, 2009 19
48% Reduction in Lost Time Days, Saving $356k