Upload
darren-quinn
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Solvency II
Open Forum 4th March 2008
Michael Aitchison
Solvency II : Agenda What is Solvency II
Change Context
Aims
Key Features
Implementation
Impact & Benefits
Solvency II: What is it?Solvency II is:A European Commission Directive that will provide a far reaching new model for the supervision and regulation of insurance companies. The Directive will lead to the adoption or more sophisticated risk and capital management techniques across the EU built on a foundation of modern market-based valuation of assets and liabilities.
“At the same time, we see Solvency 2 as a contribution to the emergence of a world-wide standard.” Commissioner Charlie McCreevy
Recent implementation of revised shareholder reporting in IFRS Phase I. IFRS Phase 2 to follow.
Continued need for supplementary reporting on an embedded value basis, due to stakeholder preference
Development of European Embedded Value, and Market Consistent Embedded Value reporting in quest for consistency and shared standards
FSA has developed the ICA assessment – stepping stone to S2?
Insurance Industry Context: All Change Please!
Solvency II: Aims
Increase confidence in the insurance industry Deliver a more competitive single market Increase efficiency in the use of capital: higher
returns Facilitate more streamlined supervision of
insurance groups
Solvency II: Key Features 3 Pillar Structure (cf. Basel 2) Market Consistent Valuation of Assets & Liabilities SCR & MCR: risk responsive capital requirements Focus on improved risk & capital management, including
use of Internal Models
Solvency II – 3 Pillars
Pillar 1: Asset and liability valuation standards; Minimum Capital Requirement; Solvency Capital Requirement
Pillar 2: Supervisory Review Process More interactive relationship with regulator Enhanced focus on risk management
Pillar 3: enhanced public disclosure and confidential supervisory reporting
Harness market discipline to encourage good practice
Solvency II: proposed Pillar 1 “The overall objective of prudential regulation must be to ensure that an insurer
maintains, at all times, financial resources which are adequate, both as to amount and quality, to ensure there is no significant risk that its liabilities cannot be met as they fall due.” (CP20, 2.2)
Solvency II – Capital Requirements
The Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) should deliver a level of capital that enables an insurance undertaking to absorb significant unforeseen losses and gives reasonable assurance to policyholders that payments will be made as they fall due.
Standard Formula Internal Model
The Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) is the minimum regulatory capital requirement, the breach of which would trigger major regulatory intervention.
Relationship to SCR
Ladder of regulatory intervention Extension Ladder!
thanks to Towers Perrin for the diagram
SCR – QIS4 specificaton
Solvency II – Group Issues
How to evaluate diversification benefit at Group level
Ability/Obligation to pass resources around a Group
‘Sum of solo’ approach gives no credit Group Internal Model approval if credit taken? Non-EEA group companies
Solvency II – Implementation
Timetable QIS Internal Model Approval
Solvency II – Implementation Timetable
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011/2
Directive Development (Commission)
Directive Adoption (Council & Parliament)
Implementation(Member States)
CEIOPS work on Pillar I
CEIOPS work on Pillar II and III
QIS1 QIS2 QIS3 QIS4
Model calibration
Priorities - Impact assessment - Group issues
CEIOPS works on implementing measures
Further QIS?
Solvency II – Quantitative Impact Studies
Part of extensive and open consultation process
QIS4 running now Participants quantify the capital requirements
based on QIS specification rules Consultation was run on the specification IAS 19 basis for employee benefits
Outcome will shape detail of ultimate implementation
Solvency II – Internal Model Approval
Supervisory objectives
better risk management, which also improves policyholder protection,
continual upgrading and encouragement of innovation in risk management methodology and
improved risk sensitivity of the SCR, especially for undertakings with non-standard risk profiles.
Solvency II – Internal Model Approval
Conceptual framework Base methodology / ‘actuarial model’:
Statistical quality test Are the data and methodology underlying both internal and regulatory applications sound
and sufficiently reliable to support both satisfactorily?
Internal risk management: Use test Is the actuarial model genuinely relevant for and used within risk management?
Regulatory capital requirement: Calibration test Is the SCR computed by the undertaking a fair, unbiased estimate of the risk as measured
by the common SCR target criterion?
The combination of the actuarial model and the risk management function built on top of it is called the 'internal model in a wider, risk management sense' (CfA 11.14).
Solvency II – Internal Model Framework Governance & Policies
Policy Governance
Risk Strategy Accountability
Risk Appetite
Internalising
Actuarial Models Reporting
Projection & Analysis Models
Annual: planning, forecasting, budgeting Risk Monitoring
Risk Maps Risk Analysis
Economic Capital BAU: pricing, capital management Risk Reporting
Sensitivity Measures & Analysis
External Factors
financial markets, competition, tax & regulation
Solvency II – Impact & Benefits Best practice risk and capital management
In particular: Risk management - processes and controls Capital management - eligible capital and quality of capital
Improved market perception: enhanced reputation for risk management
Reduced capital requirements + improved return on capital
Enhanced management information to support more optimal management decisions
Reduced costs: Operational efficiencies from better risk management
Solvency II
Open Forum 4th March 2008
Michael Aitchison