solutions of end semester paper-2013

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 solutions of end semester paper-2013

    1/12

    Page 1of 12

    Page 1of 12

    Roll No.:

    End Semester Examination

    UCE 502: Water Supply Engineering

    B.E.Civil Engineering (3rd

    year)

    Instructor: Dr. Akepati S. Reddy

    Date: 14-12-2013 Time: 3 hours (02-00 PM to 05-00 PM) Max. Marks: 100

    Note:

    1. Please assume if any requisite data is not given.2. Answer all parts of a question at one place

    Q.1 Answer the following?

    1.1 A rapid gravity filter has 0.6 m thick layer of sand. During backwashing the filter is expanding

    to 0.9 m thickness. Find the filter backwash velocity and the minimum head required for the

    fluidization of the filter bed during the backwashing? Assume D10, D60and D90as 0.4 mm, 0.75mm and 0.96 mm respectively. Take specific gravity of the sand medium as 2.65 and porosity

    of the sand bed as 0.4. If the filter is run at 7 m/hour rate and backwashed after running for

    10 hours, and if the backwashing for 20 minutes duration, find the percentage of filtered

    water used in the backwashing?

    Sand bed thickness (L): 0.6 m

    Sand bed thickness when expanded(Lfb): 0.9 m

    Porosity of the bed material (): 0.4

    Specific gravity of the bed material (SG): 2.65

    Porosity of the expanded bed:fb

    fb LL

    1

    1

    1-(0.6x(1-0.4))/0.9 = 0.6

    D90 of the bed material: 0.96 mm or 0.00096 m

    Terminal settling velocity of the D90 particle:

    p

    fluid

    fluidparticle

    d

    p dC

    gv

    3

    4

    34.0324

    RR

    dNN

    C

    pp

    R

    dvN

    Take density of water as 1000 kg/m3

    Take acceleration due to gravity as 9.81 m/sec2

    Take kinematic viscosity as 1.003E-6

    Assume terminal velocity of particle as 0.1 m/sec.

    Find NR value

    Using the NR value find Cd value

    Using the Cd value find terminal settling velocity of the particleUsing the calculated terminal settling velocity as assumed terminal settling velocity iterate and

  • 8/13/2019 solutions of end semester paper-2013

    2/12

    Page 2of 12

    Page 2of 12

    obtain the terminal settling velocity (continue iteration till assumed velocity becomes same as or

    closer to the assumed velocity)

    Iteration No. Assumed velocity NR Cd Calculated

    velocity

    1. 0.1 m/sec. 95.7 0.897 0.152 m/sec.

    2. 0.152 145 0.754 0.166

    3. 0.166 159 0.729 0.169

    4. 0.169 162 0.724 0.169

    Terminal settling velocity of the D90 particle (Vt): 0.169 m/sec.

    Backwash velocity of the filter bed (Vb):5.4

    fBtB VV

    0.0166 m/sec. or 59.7 m/sec.

    Filtration rate: 7 m/hr.

    Filter run time: 10 hr.

    Filtered water produced in 10 hours: 70 m3

    Duration of backwashing: 20 min.

    Backwash water generation: 59.7x20/60 = 19.9 m3

    Percent filtrate used in the backwashing: 19.9/70 = 28.43%

    Minimum head required for the backwashing: w

    wmfb Lh

    1 = 0.594 m

    1.2 Using Hardy-Cross method,

    balance water flows through the

    following pipe network loop?

    Flow velocity in the water supply

    lines should be between 0.9 to

    1.5 m/sec. Pipe sizes available are

    in the increments of 25 mm.

    Assume friction factor as 0.02.

    Qi1 flow through flow balancing is (100+150+125+175+75)(300) = 325 m3/hr.

    Assume flow rates and flow directions in different pipes through flow balancing at each of the

    nodes. Show flow rates and flow directions in the figure as

  • 8/13/2019 solutions of end semester paper-2013

    3/12

    Page 3of 12

    Page 3of 12

    A B

    C

    D

    E

    100 m3/hr

    450 m

    500 m

    400 m

    700 m

    250 m

    350 m

    150 m3/hr

    Qi1

    Qi2

    50m3/ho

    ur

    50 m3/hour150 m3/hour

    75m3/hour

    Find pipe diameters by taking flow velocity as 1.5 m/sec. and adjust the diameter to the available

    higher pipe diameter for ensuring the velocity to be

  • 8/13/2019 solutions of end semester paper-2013

    4/12

    Page 4of 12

    Page 4of 12

    B C -52.087 0.109 0.125 350 18937 -3.964 274.00

    C D 98.719 0.154 0.175 500 5030 3.782 137.94

    D A -76.281 0.133 0.15 400 8698 -3.905 184.30

    -0.124 692.16 0.323

    B E 50.806 0.109 0.125 250 13527 2.694 190.90

    E C -74.194 0.133 0.15 700 15221 -6.465 313.70

    C B 52.087 0.109 0.125 350 18937 3.964 274.00

    0.193 778.59 -0.447

    iteration-3

    Pipe Flow

    rate

    (m3/hr)

    D

    calculate

    (m)

    D

    chosen

    (m)

    Length

    (m)

    K

    value

    hL hL/Q correctio

    n to flow

    (m3/hr)

    A B 149.042 0.188 0.2 450 2322 3.980 96.13

    B C -51.317 0.109 0.125 350 18937 -3.848 269.95

    C D 99.042 0.154 0.175 500 5030 3.807 138.39

    D A -75.958 0.133 0.15 400 8698 -3.872 183.52

    0.067 687.98 -0.176

    B E 50.359 0.109 0.125 250 13527 2.647 189.22

    E C -74.641 0.133 0.15 700 15221 -6.543 315.59

    C B 51.317 0.109 0.125 350 18937 3.848 269.95

    -0.048 774.75 0.112

    Iteration-4

    Pipe Flow

    rate

    (m3/hr)

    D

    calculate

    (m)

    D

    chosen

    (m)

    Length

    (m)

    K

    value

    hL hL/Q correctio

    n to flow

    (m3/hr)A B 148.866 0.188 0.2 450 2322 3.971 96.02

    B C -51.605 0.109 0.125 350 18937 -3.891 271.46

    C D 98.866 0.154 0.175 500 5030 3.794 138.14

    D A -76.134 0.133 0.15 400 8698 -3.890 183.94

    -0.017 689.56 0.044

    B E 50.471 0.109 0.125 250 13527 2.659 189.64

    E C -74.529 0.133 0.15 700 15221 -6.524 315.11

    C B 51.605 0.109 0.125 350 18937 3.891 271.46

    0.026 776.21 -0.061

    Iteration-5Pipe Flow

    rate

    (m3/hr)

    D

    calculate

    (m)

    D

    chosen

    (m)

    Length

    (m)

    K

    value

    hL hL/Q correctio

    n to flow

    (m3/hr)

    A B 148.911 0.188 0.2 450 2322 3.973 96.05

    B C -51.499 0.109 0.125 350 18937 -3.875 270.91

    C D 98.911 0.154 0.175 500 5030 3.797 138.20

    D A -76.089 0.133 0.15 400 8698 -3.886 183.83

    0.009 688.99 -0.024

    B E 50.410 0.109 0.125 250 13527 2.652 189.41

    E C -74.590 0.133 0.15 700 15221 -6.534 315.37C B 51.499 0.109 0.125 350 18937 3.875 270.91

  • 8/13/2019 solutions of end semester paper-2013

    5/12

    Page 5of 12

    Page 5of 12

    -0.007 775.69 0.015

    Iteraction-6

    Pipe Flow

    rate

    (m3/hr)

    D

    calculate

    (m)

    D

    chosen

    (m)

    Length

    (m)

    K

    value

    hL hL/Q correctio

    n to flow

    (m3/hr)

    A B 148.887 0.188 0.2 450 2322 3.972 96.03

    B C -51.539 0.109 0.125 350 18937 -3.881 271.11

    C D 98.887 0.154 0.175 500 5030 3.795 138.17

    D A -76.113 0.133 0.15 400 8698 -3.888 183.89

    -0.002 689.21 0.006

    B E 50.425 0.109 0.125 250 13527 2.654 189.47

    E C -74.575 0.133 0.15 700 15221 -6.532 315.31

    C B 51.539 0.109 0.125 350 18937 3.881 271.11

    0.004 775.89 -0.008

    Iteraction-7

    Pipe Flow

    rate

    (m3/hr)

    D

    calculate

    (m)

    D

    chosen

    (m)

    Length

    (m)

    K

    value

    hL hL/Q correctio

    n to flow

    (m3/hr)

    A B 148.893 0.188 0.2 450 2322 3.972 96.04

    B C -51.524 0.109 0.125 350 18937 -3.879 271.04

    C D 98.893 0.154 0.175 500 5030 3.796 138.18

    D A -76.107 0.133 0.15 400 8698 -3.887 183.88

    0.001 689.13 -0.003

    B E 50.417 0.109 0.125 250 13527 2.653 189.44

    E C -74.583 0.133 0.15 700 15221 -6.533 315.34

    C B 51.524 0.109 0.125 350 18937 3.879 271.04

    -0.001 775.82 0.002

    Iteration-8

    Pipe Flow

    rate

    (m3/hr)

    D

    calculate

    (m)

    D

    chosen

    (m)

    Length

    (m)

    K

    value

    hL hL/Q correctio

    n to flow

    (m3/hr)

    A B 148.889 0.188 0.2 450 2322 3.972 96.03

    B C -51.530 0.109 0.125 350 18937 -3.880 271.07

    C D 98.889 0.154 0.175 500 5030 3.796 138.17

    D A -76.111 0.133 0.15 400 8698 -3.888 183.89

    0.000 689.16 0.001

    B E 50.419 0.109 0.125 250 13527 2.653 189.45

    E C -74.581 0.133 0.15 700 15221 -6.533 315.33

    C B 51.530 0.109 0.125 350 18937 3.880 271.07

    0.000 775.84 -0.001

    Iteration-9

    Pipe Flow

    rate

    (m3/hr)

    D

    calculate

    (m)

    D

    chosen

    (m)

    Length

    (m)

    K

    value

    hL hL/Q correctio

    n to flow

    (m3/hr)

    A B 148.890 0.188 0.2 450 2322 3.972 96.03B C -51.528 0.109 0.125 350 18937 -3.880 271.06

  • 8/13/2019 solutions of end semester paper-2013

    6/12

    Page 6of 12

    Page 6of 12

    C D 98.890 0.154 0.175 500 5030 3.796 138.18

    D A -76.110 0.133 0.15 400 8698 -3.888 183.88

    0.000 689.15 0.000

    B E 50.418 0.109 0.125 250 13527 2.653 189.44

    E C -74.582 0.133 0.15 700 15221 -6.533 315.34

    C B 51.528 0.109 0.125 350 18937 3.880 271.06

    0.000 775.83 0.000

    Marks: 2 x 10 = 20

    Q.2 Answer the following?

    2.1

    For the water with the above ionic composition (expressed in mg/L as CaCO3) suggest the

    treatment scheme for water softening? If the water has 25 mg/L of dissolved carbon dioxide,

    find the chemical (lime, soda ash and carbon dioxide) requirement for the softening? Indicate

    where or at which step how much of each of the chemicals should be dosed?

    Since Mg2+ is 41.2 mg/L as CaCO3 (or 0.824 meq/L), excess lime process should be used. The

    process involves the four steps:

    Step-1: Precipitation by dosing 1.25 meq./L of excess lime, raising pH to 11.0 and settling to remove

    precipitates

    Step-2: Recarbonation to neutralize hydroxides and reduce pH to 10.3.

    Step-3: Precipitation by dosing soda ash and settling to remove precipitates

    Step-4: Recarbonation to neutralize carbonates to bicarbonates and reducing pH to 8.5 to 9.0Lime requirement in the step-1:

    Ionic species Concentration Chemical dose as meq/L (mg/L

    as Ca(OH)2Mg/L as CaCO3 meq./L

    Lime

    CO2 25 1.136 1.136

    Ca(HCO3)2 90.2 1.804 1.804

    CaSO4 9.6 0.192 ---

    MgSO4 41.2 0.824 0.824

    Na2SO4 19.1 0.382 ---

    NaCl 6.6 0.132 ---

    KCl 8.9 0.178 ---

    Dose 1.136+1.804+0.824+1.25 = 5.014

    = 5.014x28 =140.39 mg/L as CaO

    Carbo Dioxide

    Mg(OH)2 0.2 0.2

    Ca(OH)2 1.25 1.25

  • 8/13/2019 solutions of end semester paper-2013

    7/12

    Page 7of 12

    Page 7of 12

    Dose 1.47 = 1.47x22 = 32.34 mg/L as

    CO2

    Soda ash

    CaSO4 9.6 0.192 0.192

    MgSO4 41.2 0.824 0.824

    Dose 1.016 = 1.016x53 = 53.848 mg/L

    as Na2CO3

    Recarbonation

    MgCO3 0.2 0.2

    CaCO3 0.6 0.6

    Dose 0.8 = 0.8x22 = 17.6 mg/L as CO2

    2.2 Using the settling profile graph given, design

    a clari-flocculator for the clarification of 250

    m3/hour flow of water with 65% TSS removal

    efficiency?

    If TSS of the water is 300 mg/L and if the

    consistency of the sludge is 4% find the daily

    quantity and volume of the sludge

    generated?

    Estimation of overall TSS removal efficiency by different times of settling (HRT) and for different

    overflow rates:

    S.No. Tine (HRT)

    (min.)

    Overflow

    rate (m/hr)

    Removal components Overall

    removal %

    1. 20 7.50 = 40% +

    10%x(2.5+0.75)/2/2.5 = (6.5%) +

    10%x(0.75+0.4)/2/2.5 = (2.3%) +

    10%x(0.4+0.24)/2/2.5 = (1.28%) +

    10%x(0.24+0.12)/2/2.5 = (0.72%) +

    20%x(0.12+0)/2/2.5 = (0.48%

    51.25%

    2. 40 3.75 = 50% +

    10%x(2.5+1.15)/2/2.5 =(7.3% ) +

    10%x(1.15+0.65)/2/2.5 = (3.6%) +

    10%x(0.65+0.35)/2/2.5 = (2%) +

    20%x(0.35+0.0)/2/2.5 = (1.4%)

    64.3%

    3. 60 2.50 58%+

    2%x(2.5+2.25)/2/2.5 = (1.9%) +

    +10%x(2.25+1.25)/2/2.5 = (7%) +

    73.9%

  • 8/13/2019 solutions of end semester paper-2013

    8/12

    Page 8of 12

    Page 8of 12

    10%x(1.25+0.75)/2/2.5 = 4% +

    20%x(0.75+0.0)/2/2.5 = 3%

    4. 80 1.875 66% +

    4%x(2.5+2.1)/2/2.5 = (3.68%) +

    10%x(2.1+1.2)/2/2.5 = (6.6%)+20%x(1.2+0.0)/2/2.5 = (4.8%)

    81.08

    Theoretical HRT and overflow rate for 65% overall removal efficiency from the graphs is 42 min and

    3.57 m/hr respectively.

    Corrected HRT and overflow rate values are 63 minutes and 2.38 m/hr respectively.

    Settling area of the primary clarifier for 250 m3/hr flow is 250/2.38 = 105 min or 1.75 hours.

    Settling zone volume of the primary clarifier is 250x1.75 = 437.5 m3.

    TSS of the water is 300 mg/L and removal efficiency is 65%

    Sludge generation rate is 250x0.3x0.65 x24 = 1,170 kg/day or 29.25 m3/day volume of sludge at 4%

    consistency .

    2.3 Water demand pattern of a township is as given below:

    Time4

    AM

    5

    AM

    6

    AM

    7

    AM

    8

    AM

    9

    AM

    10

    AM

    11

    AM

    12

    Noon

    1

    PM

    2

    PM

    3

    PM

    Demand

    (m3/min) 0.4 0.8 1.8 3.2 2.2 1.2 07 0.6 1.0 2.8 2.1 0.9

    Time4

    PM

    5

    PM

    6

    PM

    7

    PM

    8

    PM

    9

    PM

    10

    PM

    11

    PM

    Mid

    night

    1

    AM

    2

    AM

    3

    AM

    Demand

    (m3/min)

    1.0 1.7 2.8 3.0 1.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.3

    Water to the township is supplied from an elevated service reservoir under gravity. A

    pumping operating at constant flow rate for 14 hours/day (6 AM to 2 PM and 6 PM to

    midnight) supplies water to the elevated service reservoir. Find water storage capacity of the

    service reservoir required?

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    0 20 40 60

    0

    10

    20

    3040

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    0 2 4 6 8

  • 8/13/2019 solutions of end semester paper-2013

    9/12

    Page 9of 12

    Page 9of 12

    TimeInflow Outflow Net inflow

    Cumulative net

    inflow

    m3/hr m

    3/min. m

    3/hr m

    3/hr m

    3

    4:00 AM 0 0.4 24 -24 -24

    5:00 AM 0 0.8 48 -48.00 -72.00

    6:00 AM 129 1.8 108 21.21 -50.79

    7:00 AM 129 3.2 192 -62.79 -113.57

    8:00 AM 129 2.2 132 -2.79 -116.36

    9:00 AM 129 1.2 72 57.21 -59.14

    10:00 AM 129 0.7 42 87.21 28.07

    11:00 AM 129 0.6 36 93.21 121.29

    12 Noon 129 1 60 69.21 190.50

    1:00 PM 129 2.8 168 -38.79 151.71

    2:00 PM 0 2.1 126 -126.00 25.71

    3:00 PM 0 0.9 54 -54.00 -28.294:00 PM 0 1 60 -60.00 -88.29

    5:00 PM 0 1.7 102 -102.00 -190.29

    6:00 PM 129 2.8 168 -38.79 -229.07

    7:00 PM 129 3 180 -50.79 -279.86

    8:00 PM 129 1.4 84 45.21 -234.64

    9:00 PM 129 0.6 36 93.21 -141.43

    10:00 PM 129 0.5 30 99.21 -42.21

    11:00 PM 129 0.4 24 105.21 63.00

    mid night 0 0.3 18 -18.00 45.00

    1:00 AM 0 0.25 15 -15.00 30.00

    2:00 AM 0 0.2 12 -12.00 18.00

    3:00 AM 0 0.3 18 -18.00 0.00

    Total water over the day = 1809 m3(sum of the outflow column)

    Duration of pumping: 14 hours

    Water pumping rate: 1809/14 = 129.214 m3/hr.

    Inflow is by pumping between 6 AM and 2 Pm and between 6 Pm and midnight (shown in the inflow

    column)

    Water stoage capacity of the service reservoir = 190.50 + 279.86 = 470.36 m3.

    Marks: 3 x 8 = 24

    Q.3 Answer the following?

    3.1 Differentiate water softening (by ion exchange process) from de-alkalization (by ion-

    exchange process) and from de-cationization (by ion-exchange process)?

    Water softening involves exchange of calcium, magnesium and other divalent cations with sodium

    by passing the water through a strongly acidic cation exchange resin bed. The resin be is regenerated

    by sodium chloride solution.

    Dealkalization involves exchange of calcium and magnesium like cations with H+ ions by passing the

    water through a weakly acidic cation exchange resin bed. Water coming out from the resin bed is

    subjected to degasification. This results in the removal of alkalinity from water. The resin isregenerated with acids like hydrochloric acid.

  • 8/13/2019 solutions of end semester paper-2013

    10/12

    Page 10of 12

    Page 10of 12

    Decationation involves exchange of all the cations including sodium with H+ ions by passing the

    water through a strongly acidic cation exchange resin bed. The resin is regenerated by acids like

    hydrochloric acid. Output water from the resin bed is degasified to remove the alkalinity.

    3.2 Write note on chlorine gas application systems and state how the chlorine dose is

    controlled?

    Chlorine from the liquid chlorine bullets is

    vapourized into chlorine gas. Source for the

    latent heat required is provided.

    The gasous chlorine is dissolved in water to

    prepare chlorine solution of

  • 8/13/2019 solutions of end semester paper-2013

    11/12

    Page 11of 12

    Page 11of 12

    n e al increase

    1951 98,000

    1961 125,000 27,000

    1971 161,00036,000 9,000

    1981 220,000 59,000 23,000

    1991 270,000 50,000 -9,000

    2001 342,000 72,000 22,000

    2011 405,000 63,000 -9,000

    Average 51,167 7,200

    2

    1030

    YnnnXPP

    P30 = 405,000 +3x51,167 + 3x(3+1)x7,200/2 = 6,01,701P40 = 405,000 +4x51,167 + 4x(4+1)x7,200/2 = 6,81,668

    Marks: 4 x 6 = 24

    Q.4 Answer the following?

    4.1 Write note on breakpoint chlorination?

    4.2 Write note on bio-sand filters?

    4.3 Write note on the laboratory experimentation required for the coagulation-flocculationtreatment of water?

    Laboratory experimentation involving use of jar test apparatus is required.

    The experimentation involves finding rough coagulant dose, optimum pH, optimum coagulant dose

    and appropriate dose of polyelectrolyte.

    For rough coagulant dose, specific volume of sample is taken, pH is adjusted to 6 and then dosed

    with coagulant in small increments. After each dosing the sample is flash mixed for a minute and

    slow mixed 1 minute and then observed for visual flocs. The dose at which visible flocs are formed is

    taken as the rough dose.

    For optimum pH, the sample is taken in the jars of the jar test apparatus, pH is adjusted to different

    values in different jars, rough dose of coagulant is applied to all the jars, flashedmixed for 1 to 3minutes, then slow mixed for 12-15 minutes and then left for settling for 30 minutes. the

    supernatant is tested for turbidity. The pH at which the turbidity is lowest is taken as the optimum

    dose.

    For optimum coagulant dose the experiment is repeated this time with optimum pH in all the jars

    and varying coagulant dose around the rough dose. The dose at which turbidity is the lowest is taken

    as the optimum dose.

    For the appropriate polyelectrolyte dose also the experiment is repeated at the optimum pH and

    optimum coagulant dose with one difference. Polyelectrolyte is dosed after flash mixing and before

    slow mixing. The dose at which desired level of turbidity is achieved is taken as the appropriate dose

    of the polyelectrolyte.

    4.4 Write note on the adsorption isotherms?

  • 8/13/2019 solutions of end semester paper-2013

    12/12

    Page 12of 12

    Page 12of 12

    Langmuir Isotherm

    e

    e

    KC

    KbC

    M

    X

    1

    X is the mass of the solute adsorbed on the adsorbent (mg)

    M is mass of the adsorbent used

    Ce is equilibrium concentration of the solute in the water/wastewater after adsorption

    K and b are constants.

    Freundlich Isotherm

    n

    ekCM

    X /1

    K is constant.

    4.5 Write note on the classification of waters?

    Marks: 5 x 4 = 20

    Q.5 Answer the following?

    5.1 Write note on Chicks law?

    5.2 Write note on Darcys equation?

    5.3 Write note on solar water stills?

    5.4 What is Baringo curve?

    5.5 List the techniques that can be used for the removal dissolved solids from water?

    5.6 Write note on fecal coliform bacteria?

    Marks: 6 x 2 = 12