Upload
ulfa-fadilatul-ula
View
2.196
Download
71
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
\
. l
7:
I
:
:
:
I
tl - |l t
l lI
l
I
:
:
I
r lI
:
t :l rI, '
i :
Tnblg of Conrerur
Part l-Costs: Concepts and Objectives
Management, the Controller, and Cost AccountingCost Concepts and the Cost accounting lnformation System l3Cost Behavior Analysis 25
Part l-Cost Accumulation
4. Cost Systems and Cost Accumulation . . . . 6 |5. Job Order Costing 806. Process Costing 1027. The Cost of Quality and Accounting for Production Losses 1458. Costing By-Products and Joint Products 178
Part 3-Planning and Control of Costs
Mater ia ls: Control l ing, Cost ing, and Planning . . . . . . . ' 203Just-in-Time and Backflushing . DgLabor: Controlling and Accounting for Costs . )45Factory Overhead: Planned, Actual, and Applied )7 |Factory Overhead: Departmentalization 288Activity Accounting: Activity-Based Costing
andAct iv i t y -BasedManagement . . . 319
Part 4-Budgeting and Standard Costs
15. Budgeting: Profits, Sales, Costs, and Expenses 34016. Budgeting: Capital Expenditures, Research and
Development Expenditures, and Cash: PERT/Cost 3 8 5Responsibil i tyAccounting and Reporting... 410Standard Costing: Setting Standards and Analyzing Variances . . . . 443Standard Costing: lncorporating Standards
t .2 .3 .
t 7 .1 8 .t 9 .
into the Accounting Records
- l l l -
4 8 8
Part 5-Analyris of Costs and Profits
Direct Costing and Cost-Volume-Profit AnalysisDifferential Cost AnalysisPlanning for Capital Expenditures . . .Economic Evaluation of Capital Expenditures . . . .Decision-Making under Uncertainty
5 t 35435 8 86 r 865)
Profit Performance Measurements andI
lntracompany Transfer Pricing 688
- . 1I
- l v -
CHAPTER 1
DtscusstoN OUESTIONS
Ot-1. Plrnnhg ir hl drvobprnrnt of e cqrrirron rl
of eglbnr. taaoutc.tr md mer'ur'm'ntt by
which thr lchirvrmrnt of obi'cilivtt cm b'
a.r.$.d Pbnnhg trkor hto eccornl thr irtrr'
Etitlt botwren thr orgrni:atkxr errd itr rnvi'
tqln nl ir whrt'l|r b b br donr'Cqrtrol ir thr preolr by which trlrnrg"r
grutl lhrt rr6urcrr rta obtrir'd rnd urd in
rn ollbbnt and .ttactiw ttlrnn.r !o crtty ot',l ttrtpbn rnd rccornglirh thl orgrnizeti'cri'! obi'c'tivor. Cotrtrol inpliot thrt prrlocnrrc' 'tr{lut..tn.ntr rto rrvilwod to drt.rmin. if corrrctivortbn ir nquircd
Plennirg rnd cantrol rn htrnrbt'd' Canttol
ir crrrird out wilhh thr ortlblirhrd plrnnhg
tnrnrworl elrd rrrrrr !o ovrludo enfqnrrrcrb th. Phn rc ttrd o,Fnirrtisd obieclivor rto
rfiirwd.Of -2. Shod.rrrge plenr ucully d.d with r plrird of e
qu.ttar or I y..1, while long[nga plmr ururllycovrr thr.. to livo yern. Shon'rrngr Pbnt |''d.tdl.d rnangh b prrmit pnprntin of e csn'
Pl.l. l.l of finrnchl rtrt.moritt u cf r lulundd., tiilb bng'nngo plenr cubnindr h r wryturnrnrrizrd rt ol lrpoc{rd ruultr or t hwqurrditie<! obiostivtr, lrdr u firrtcld rdbr.
Ol-3. Lorg.rrngr plrnl contrh quenlitalive rtlultt'wtrilr rtrdogtc ptrnr rn tfir l..|t quryltiti.bl. cilr.[ pbnr. Lary'nngr plrnr urudty lrlrnd lhrcoto tivo yorn hto tho futsrc, wtrib rlntogb pbnrtily csrlomPbta thodar fi much longnr prri'odr. tmgFrrngr plrnr covrrirg r throo'lofivr'yo|r poricd would br ytgr'd.vrty lht.. lofivo yln, or might br ryrtrrnrlialty updetrdreclr you lo mdnlrh I compbtr pbn, wtrilortntrgic plrnr rrc lofirrbt.d rl inrgub irlrr'vrb by en crmtLlly myrtrmrtic Prcort.
01-4. Accounlebility ir klmticrl with ruPonribililyrccounling. Accosntrbilily dmlr with lhr dir'c|rrtgo of gr irdivitulr rrrponrltility to echirvrurignrd otrirctivu wibh hr e*l md .rP.ns'.. dbrd fot.ito prdonnmcr end egrord to bythr irdivilll
01 .5. Thr cqfrolbr 6o nct ccnllol. bst ri! lh. csr'trol tut of tht mrnrgorirl lovrl l by irruing
' ttpodt pohthg out dcvielisc lrqn thl prcdctlr'min d courta oa &iim.
Ol€. Thr st d.plrtrnoflt ko.pt d.teil.d ncordr ol.nattrdr. lrbor, lrsfory ovorhoad, |rld m..k.t'hg rnd tdnhrttntiva axpon3.t: analyrs tirrr
corlr: irturr cgrtrol taPortt; Ptaprt.t cort
dudier tor plrnnhg end d*irbn tridhg; rnd
coordinrt.t cott rnd budgrt drte wilh olhrrcr.trylnril.
O1.7. F Pdrrct roorrdr rnd derign, thr rrrnufr'Urhg cbperirr|.ntr nord ortinrtd cl nrlrrirl.hbor, rnd rtrrdlirr PtE.3l] str; lor m.'rutingsrd officirncy ol rchrduling. producing. rndhtP.siing pmductr, tho drprrtm.ntt n'od lobd |ha codt irun d. Thr plr:anrl drprrr'tnlrt rrrpplba mpfoyror'wrg. r.1.3- Thr trs'|Ury dfrytm-t n..dt rccounting, budg.lrlg.rd nhtrd rlgo.tr h rhrduling culr roqur'tnatrtl. Tho rnrrtothg dlgertmrnl n.'dt cottirlsnrtirr h riting prE.t. Tho ptblic rrblitudagrtltn-n nreir'hfornrtbn qr Ptc... r'F'.
PtoaL, end divUrndr h sdrr to infotm thl puts
Ia Tha Lgal'dapstrnrnt noods st hfo'mrtbn
br frqirg rrny dteirs ol thr snpany h can'b.mfy wlh lhr lrw.
Ol€. ltodrm trctlrluor h csrrnunrcatlcnt giv. th'contrdbr end rntf lh. m.ant to tnnttnil hfor'mdin in thr torrn cl cruttr. sutye.t. end foo'
crtto in r wry ntvrr bdorr poriblr ' Profit
oPPortuni t iar or conl ro l .c l iont h lvo boln
drbyrd or misrd rntiroly bxaurr ttn'ly hfot'
tilli*1 thrt mi!fit frrvr imprw.d lh' cosl 'ndprolit poitbn of thr cornpeny w.s poorty cdtl'mr,'rEsiad.
Ol-9. Thr budgot ir rn oclonlbt colt plennrng tool
brcaser it (r) lupplilr hfonnation and lrrvrl
rl e rtrlderd of prrlormarc. lor c€t cdtttol by
thr luprrviroc rciponriOto lor cg (b) ptwitor
Jr ..tt mrthod for enticipeting prolitr rt rn
$ticiPlt.d nlor'bvol; (c) hrlpr in foncarling
trbl, cotl3. rrponra3. and pro{ils lor t pricd
of orc Yorr or rrlr. h rdYs'tc..Ol-tO. Thlr dendudr rill not nocr*arily bo rbb lo
pt.vonl rilntg.m.nt ftrud' but th'y do give
inttnrrl accounbtrtt scnr guilanct on how lo
preerd il thry rncountar ! qu'stiaublr prr'
ticr.01-ll. CASB rtandard$ (l) rnuncialr a principlr or
pnrriy'rl lo b. lollow.'{ (b) Glablbh Prtdicttis 5rj rpptiod; (c) rpcfy crilrrie to br ornpbyrdh rlcthg lrqrr allrnretivr principbr rnd prl:'
t!.! in orlinrting rccutnubtng, end rcporrr'g
cgltrrst cosb. Th. tttndatds at' btcktd tsf lho
lutt torc. trld .l{.ct ol thr tew.
Chapter 1
. EXERCISES
Ei-1 The exercise requires turo examples of the inseparability of planning andcontnol. Thrce are listed here, and the third one gives two illustrations:
The most obvious erample of the inseparability of planning and con-trot is found in the definition of control: managementb slrstematic effortto achieve objectives by comparing performance to plans and takingappropriate agtion to correct important differences. The definition showsthat the specific results of planning ane an essential input to the controlphenoinenon; there cannot be any such thing as a control effort withoutreference to some set of plans.
A second exampla of the inseparability of planning and controlresults from the fact that they are simultaneous' In practice, the imple-mentation of the first steps of a plan, and any control action needed inthose steps, are begun before all parts of planning are complete. Earlyresults and the early findings of control activity can then be used in final-izing later parts of the same plan. An example is that a single annualbudget is usually not completely finalized before customer orders beginto be received lor that year, and consideration of the number of theseactual customer orders may point to trends that need to be considered infinalizing the budget. Even actual financial results of the early weeks andmonths of the year can provide a basis for better
'establistring the budget
for the later portion of the year.The most elegant example of the inseparability of planning and con-
trol results fronr'the fact that both planning and control are complexhuman activities, and almost all complex human activities are plannedactivities and also controlled activities. In other words, planning can beso compler that the planning effort is itself controlled (and planned), andcontrol can be so compler that control activities are themselves planned{and controlled}. T\,rro illustrations of this are provided as follows:(t) A case in which planning is itself planned and controlled is when a
complieated budget (plan) is to be prepared. To facilitate the cre-ation of the budget, a detailed weekly schedule (another plan) isfirst agreed upon, showing which steps in the preparation of thebudget are to be carried out during each week. Because it isdesired that the creation of the budget not be allowed to fall farbehind schedule, the responsible manager will exercise control bymaking comparisons between (a) the actual progress made on thebudget each week and (b) the schedule. The manager will also takesome corrective action if the difference between the schedule andthe actual progress is considered irnportant.
(21 A case in which control is itself planned is when a manager decideswhat kinds of control reports will be used to compare actuat resuttswith plons in each future period of business operations. That deci-sion, any efforts made to acquire a supply of preprinted reportforms to be f i l led in each per iod, and any changes in the design of
' . q
a
ChaPter t
El-1 (Concluded)
the cost accounting system to capture and compile the needed informa-
tion about actuat results represent evidence that the future.control activ-lty is being Planned.
El-2(11 B(21 A(3) c(41 A(51 ciOi B - although the time frame involved in this kind of plan may be.�
extremely long, there is nothing strategic about this kind of plan or deci-sion. ln flcti the plan and obligation to pay off the bonds when they
come due is so routine that management would not consciously
aPProach it as a decision.
E1-3(11 paragraph (bl comes closest to describing the kind of control used in
maniging a business, atthough it is described in a nonbusiness setting.
There is I plan lormutated in advance, there is a measure of actual
resutts, there is a decision maker who compares actual results with
plans, ihere is a selection of a corrective action to bring results closer in
line with tae plan, and there is a foreshadowing of repeated periodic con-
trol activit ies (the remaining quizzes)'The fact ifrat i lre measures of ptanning and actual performance ane
nonfinancial measures is not the governing consideration. Much planned
and actual information used in controtl ing a business is non-financial '
including some cost accounting infor:mation such as the number of units
produced, the percentage of units that were defective, and the percent-
age of available machine time that was uti l ized'(21 R-ragraph (a) is a perfect example of an engineering control ' rather than
the kind of control managers use in business. The simple device
described, which is founi in any home bathroom, is the kind of control
device deiigned to monitor a physical condition, and so it is analogous to
; th;r;;;Jt or any of a varieiy of devices called "industrial controls." of
course, devices of tnis kind art used in manufacturing and other busi-
nesses, but they do not possess the essential attributes of control in the
sense used in business and in cost accounting. The device achieves a
continuous monitoring of the results, rather than a periodic comparison
of results with plans, ihere is no human decision maker who selects a
corrective action to be taken. A human decision maker is probably-the
salient attribute of control in managing a business that is missing in
paragraph (al.
Chaoter 1
I
E1-3 (Goncluded)
P a r a g r a p h ( c } c o u l d b e i n t e r p r e t e d a s a n e x a m p | e o f p | a n n i n g , b u t i ttacks som! essentiar inntfris'ot "ontiolGven though the word "con-
trol,, is used in its tast senili""i. rn"-te is no periodic comparison of
actuar resutts with plan" ;;;';; provisioi ioi -moairyins
the treatment
based on periodic resuttsl eor "r-".ple, the contract requires five treat-
ments each year, even it no;";dt are visible' The actions taken are
"r.r*J::l"jxtlil'�,";efers to the concept of contror that appries to porice
work and mititary scienc;: ti;;;sts ot being abte to phvsicallv deter-
mine each event ttrat ocJu; il iot" tocaiion- and being able to prevent
certain events from o""rJring. rn" pot""li"i use of coetcive fotee' which
is very ctear in paragraprr rot, i, alwayspreient in achieving this kind of
control. ln paragraph (d), ti;;'r" i" no inOi""tion tft"t resutts wene periodi-
cat tycompanedwi thprans. l ru |e thatsays. 'obta in theobiect iveatanycost" issomet imesassociatedwi th theseact iv i t ies '
- F
Chater t
CASES .
c l -1
( 1 } Y e s , W i | | i a m s h a s a n e t h i c a | r e s p o n s i b i l i t y t o t a k e a c t i o n .d;'nilis
-itanaards of Ethicat Conducl states that manase-
ment accountants t'shall not commit acts contrary to these standards nor
shall they condone the commission of such acts by others within their
organizations.ttl2l ffhe requirement does not ask which standards have been violated' but', - ' r a t h e r r w h i c h o n e s a p p l y t o W l l i a m s ' s i t u a t i o n ' )
Managementaccountantshaveanesponsibi l i tyto:cori-"i"n"": perform their professional duties in accordance with
relevant 6n s, tegulations; and technical-standards' (Dumping toxic
wastes in a residential landfill is generally a violation of law.)Confidentiatitv: Refrain from disclosing confidential information
""quff ieoftheirworkexceptwhenauthorize.d.,u.n|esstegitly obtigated to do so (Williams m€y be legally obligated to take
action and make certain disclosures'!fnteqritv: Refrain from either actively or passively subverting the \
attainmeffi the organizationb legitimate and ethical objectives'(Williams, avoidancJot the issue woutd passively subvert attainment of
ethical obiectives.)Comm-unicate unfavorable as well as favorable information and pro-
fessionatjudgments or opinions. (Williams is obligated to report his unfa-
vorable tindings to appropriate persons')Retr?il tion, engaging in or supporting any activity that would dis-
credit the professionl (lflitlia1ns' sitence would provide support to the
dumping activity and, ihus, could discredit the profession')'Obiectivitvi Disclose fully all relevant information that could reason-
aory G eilffid to influ"ncJan intended usefs understanding of the
reportS, comments, and recommendations presented' (Witliams should
disclose his lindings to the'appropriate persons')(31 Atternative (a|, to seek ttre adiice of his immediate superior, is appropri-
ate. This is itri first step he is reguired to take, unless the superior is
involved.Atternative (bl, communication of confidential information to per-
aons outside the company, such as the local newspaper, is inappropriateunless there is a legai obiigation to do so. lf reguired by laq Williamsshould contact the proper authorities.
Alternative (c), contacting a member of the board of directors, wouldbe inappropriate at this time. Williams should report the problem to suc-cessiveiy trigher levels within the company and turn to the board ofdirectors only if the problem is not resolved at lower levels.
-l
Chaoter t
C1-1 (Concluded)
(4) Wliams should follow the company's established policies for resolvingsuch issues, if such policies erist. lf the issue is not resolved througheristing policies, he shoutd report the problem to successively higherlevels within the company until it is resolved. ffilliams is not required toreport this action to his superior if his superior appeani to be involved inthe conflict. He is not to disclose the matter to persons outside the orga-nization, untess required by taw.) During these steps' Wlliams may clarifyrelevant concepts by confidential discussion with an obiective advisor toobtain an understanding of possible courses of action. lf tfie conflict isnot resolved after erhausting all these coursies of action' VWlliams mayhave no other recourse than to resign and submit an informative memo-randum to an appropriate representative of the olganization. Consultationwith one's personal attorney is also appropriate.
c1-2(i ) 61he requirement does not ask which standards have been violated' but'
rather, which ones apply to the CFO'S behavior.)Mana ge ment acco untants have a' nesponsibility to:CompLtgnce: Perform their professional duties.in accordance with '
relevant tawC, regulations, and technical standards. ffhe CFO has askedDeerling to account for informatlon in a way that is not in accordancewith generatll l accepted accounting principles.)
Prepare comptete and clear reports and recommendations afterappropriate analyses of relevant and reliable informatlon. [The CFobrestrictions on disclosure will resutt in incomplete reports.)
Confidentialitv: Refrain lrom using or appearing to use confidentialinformation acquired in the course of their work for unethlcal or illegaladvantage, either personally or through third parties. (The CFO isattempting to use confidential information to protect the fob security andbonuses of top management.|
Inteqriw; Avoid astual or apparent conflicts of intercst and adviseatl appropriate parties of any potential conflict. fThe CFO has failed toavoid a conflict of interest and has not informed the stockholders of theconflict.)
Refuse any gift, favor, or hospitality that would influence or wouldappear to influence their actions. [The GFO's bonus appears to be aninfluence on his actions.)
Refrain from either actively or passively subverting the attainmentof the organization's legitimate and ethical objectives. (The CFO has sub-verted the attainment of the organization's legitimate objective, profit forstockholders, by pursuing, instead, the job security and bonuses of topmanagement.)
Communicate unfavorable as well as favorable information and pro-fessional iudgments or opinions. fl 'he CFO is attempting to restrict dis-closure of information about the acquisi t ion.|
I
-
F
!
:
Chaptor t
C1-2 (Continued)
Refrain from engaging in or supporting any activity that would dis-
credit the profession. fihe CFO's actions could discredit the profession.)Obiectivitv: Communicate information fairly and obiectively. ffhe
CFO is attetnpting to unfairly control the information reported, resultingin a rePort that is not obiective.)
Disclose futty all relevant information that could reasonably beexpected to inftuence an intended userb understanding of the reports'comments, and recommendations presented. ffhe CFO is attempting torestrist disclosure of relevant information.l
(21 fthe requirement does not ask which standards have been violated' but'r:rther, which ones apply to Deerling's situation.)
Management accountants have a nesponsibility to:Comoltence: Perform their professional duties in accordance with
relevant laws, regulations, and technical standards. (Deerling is beingasked to violate generalty accepted accounting principles.)
Prepare complete and clear reports and recommendations afterappropriate analyses of relevant and reliable information. (Deerling isbeing asked to piepare an incomplete report.i
ggg1iEe$bt6i Refrain from using or appearing to use confidentialinformation acquireO in the course of their work for unethical or illegaladvantage either personally or through third parties. (Deerling must notuse the confidential information about the possible takeover to his ownadvantage or to that of the person(s) mounting the takeover attempt.)
lnteqriw: Refuse any gift, favor, or hospitality that would influenceor woutd appear to influence their actions. fihe last sentence of the casesuggests that Deerling is considered a member of the top managementgnoupr so he may be eligible for a bonus.)
Refrain from either actively or passively subverting the attainmentof the organization's legitimate and ethical objectives. (Deerling is beingasked to subvert the attainment of the organization's legitimate obiec-tive, profit for stockholders, by pursuing instead the iob security andbonuses of top management.)
Gommunicate unfavorable as well as favorable information and pro-fessional judgments or opinions. (Deerling is being asked to restrict dis-closure of information about the acquisition.)
Refrain from engaging in or supporting any activity that would dis-credit the profession. (Deerling is being asked to take actions that coulddiscredit the profession.)
Obiectivitv: Communicate information fairly and objectively.(Deerling is being asked to prepare a report that is not obiective.)
Disclose futly atl relevant information that could reasonably beexpected to influence an intended user's understanding of the reports'comments, and recommendations presented. (Deerl ing is being asked torestrict disclosure of relevant information.)
Chaoter 1
C1-2 (Concluded)
(31 tf the company has esta-blished policies for dealing with such issues,Deerling shouia first follow tAese policies. lf such policies do not erist'or if they ane unsuccessful in resolving the problem, Deerling should pre-sent the problem to the chairman of the board. Deerlingb immediatesuperior is involved, so he need not be informed of this action. lf thematter remains unnesolved, Deerling should report to the audit commit-tee, the board of directors, and finally the maiority owners. During thesesteps, Deerling may ctarify retevant concepts by confidential discussionwith an objective advisor to obtain an understanding of possible coursesof action. lf the conftict is not resolved after erhausting all these counsesof action, Deerling may have no other necourse than to rcsign and'submitan informative memoriandum to an appnrpriate repnesentative of theorganization. Consultation with one's personal attomey is also appropriate.
(4) The primary nesponsibility tho company must tulfill betore taking defen-sive actions is its fiduciary nesponsibility to stockholdens. Other respon-sibilities inctude the effects that the takeover and defensive actionswould have on creditors, bondholders, empfoyees, customers' and the 3community. The company also has a nesponsibility to inform its externalauditors and legal counsel to avoid putting them in a compromising posi-tion.
c1-3(f l ffhe requirement does not ask which standards have been violated' but'
rather, which ones apply to Dixon's behavior.)Management accountants have a responsibility to:Comoetence: Maintain an appropriate level of professional compe-
tence by ongoing development of their knowledge and skills. (By system-atically rejecting all minority applicants, Dixon is ieopardizing the level ofcompetence among the staff.)
Perform their professional duties in accordance with relevant laws,regulations, and technical standards. (Equaf opportunity in employmentis required by law.)
Inteqritv: Avoid actual or apparent conflicts of interest and adviseall appropriate parties of any potential conflict. (Dixon's preiudice is inconflict with the company's legat obligatibn to provide equal opportunityemployment, and with the companyfs need for the most competent staffregardless of race.)
Refrain from either actively or passively subverting the attainmentof the organizationb legitimate and ethical objectives. ffhe company'sobiective of equal opportunity employment is being subveded by Dixon'sprejudice.!
(21
(3)
'l
L!l>
Il>
I
fL
I!
I\'
,lb
II
b
II
b
Ib
I
E
Il- (41
II
E
il-
I\.
I
Chapter t
Cl-3 (Concluded)
\b
Refrain from engaging in or supporting any activity that would dis-
credit the profession. (Such peristent, systematic discrimination in hir-
ing coutd discredit the profession')ff[e requirement does not ask which standards have been violated' but
iather, which on"" apply to Foxworthts situation.) Because management
accountants may noi condone the commission of unethical acts by
;ihd *ig,in ttreir organizations, all of the responsibilities listed in the
solution to requirement (1) also apply to Foxworth's situation.In addition, the following aPPIY:Management accountants have a responsibi|ity to:ConfiJentialitv: Refrain from disclosing confidential information
acquired in the couor of their work except when authorizedr unlesslegally obligated to do so. (Foxworth's suspicions about Dixon's behaviorshould not be disclosed inappropriately' See requirement (3)).
gbiectivitv: Communicate information fairly and objectively'(poxworttr is oOtigated to make obiective hiring recommendations tobiron, in spite oitris belief that Dixon will be prejudiced in acting onthem.)Alternative (a), discussion with the director of personnel, who is one of
Dixonb peets, is inappropriate at this time. lf, however, Foxworthbetieves the directoi bt personnel is an obiective pafty, Foxworth maydiscuss the matter with the director, confidentialln to clarify the relevantconcepts and to obtain an understanding of possible courses of action.
Alternative (b), informal discussion with a group of MAD senior man-agement accountants, is inappropriate.
Alternative (cl, piivate discussion with the CFO, Dixon's superior, isappropriate. Because Foxworth has atready approached his immediatesuperior, Dixon, who is invotved in the conflict, it is not necessary forFoxworth to inform him of this action.Fonarorth should follow the company's established policies for dealingwith this type of conflict, if such policies exist. lf policies do not exist' orif they are-unsuccessfut in resolving the conflict, Foxworth should dis-cuss ihe issue with the CFO. tf the matter remains unresolved, discus-sions with successively higher levels of management, including the auditcommittee and the board of directors, should follow. During these steps'Foxurorth may discuss the matter confidentially with an obiective advisorto clarify the relevant concepts and to obtain an understanding of possi-ble courses of action. lf the matter remains unresolved after exhaustingall of these steps, Foxworth may have no recourse other than to resignand submit an informative memorandum to an appropriate representativeof the company. Consultation with one's personal attomey is also appropriate.
Chagter 1
c1-4 ,
{1) ffhe requirement does not ask lor a list of responsibllities Rodriguez hasviotated, merely which of the fifteen responsibilities apply to hissituation.)
Management accountants have a nesponsibility to :Comoetence: Perform their professional duties in accordance with
relevant laws, regulations, and technical standards. ffhe figuresHodriguel is being asked to prepare might amount to fraud in the loanapplication.)
Prepare complete and clear reports and recommendations afterappropriate analyses of relevant and reliable information. flhe reliabilityof the information is in doubt, and the fact that certain sales figures areor are not sufficient to justify the bank loan are not relevant to prepara-tion of the budget)
lnteoritv: Refrain from either actively or passively subverting theattainment of the organization's legitimate and ethical objectives. (Thereis a push to subvert legitimate objectives to the immediate need for abank loan.)
Recognize and communicate professional limitations or other con-straints that would preclude responsible judgement or successful per-formance of an activity. (Rodriguez has not expressed to Czeista the con-flict between his desire to be a team player and his ethical responsibili-ties.)
Communicate unfavorable as well as favorable information and pro-fessional judgements or opinions. (Rodriguez is being asked to reportinformation that reflects so favorably on the company that lt may not bejustifiable.)
Refrain from engaging in or supporting any activity that woutd dis-credit the profession. (Preparing a deliberately misleading budget as
' part of a loan application could amount to obtaining mon-y by iraud.)Obiectivitv: Communicate information fairly and objecfivety.
(Rodriguez feels pnessuned to abandon his objectivity in preparing thebudget.)
Disclose fully all relevant information that could reasonably beexpected to influence an intended user's understanding of the reports,commentsr and recommendations presented. (A comparison of the newtargeted sales figure with the actual sales of tlre coresponding periodsof past years would be likely to influence the bank's understanding ofjust how large an increase in sares is being portrayed.)
12) Rodriguez coutd have clearly stated his concerns to Czeisla at eachstage of the budget's creation and revision. He could have consultedwith the marketing manager and production manager.i "r.ry stage,rather than only upon receiving the initial budget olata. He coutd presentthe budget, or a summa ry of it, in a comparative form to highlight thedifferences between each guarterts budget and the actual resutts of thecoresponding quarter of the preceding year, and he could even
t0
II
t t
II
!
I\-
Ii
l>
IL
II
b
Ib
I:
I!
Ib
Chapter t
C1-4 (Concluded)
calcutate the percentage increase being budgeted and compare it with
actual perceniage increases that were achieved annually in the past. He
could have conJulted with his staff superior at the headquarters ofNorttrwestern (the parent company) - Gzeisla is his line superior'according to the second sentence of the case'
(31 In addition to his ethical responsibiliUes to CD, Rodriquez has ethicalresponsibiliUes to:(a) The banks(b) The management accounting profession
c l -5(1) ffhe requirement does not ask for a list of responsibilities Jones has vio-
iated, merely which of the flfteen responslbilities apply to his situation.)Management accountants have a responsibi||ty to:ConfiJentialitv: Refrain from disclosing confidentlal information
acquirEA in the counse of their work except when authorized, unlesslegally obligated to do so. (lf Jones accepts the consulting engagementwith Crimson, lt is tikely she will be asked to disclose confidential SMIinformation about the desired computer system')'
Refrain from using or appearing to use confidential informationacquired in the counse of their work for unethical or illegal advantageeither personalty or through third parties, [The size of the consulting feesuggests Grimson is seeking to buy confidential information to help winthe job.)-
lnteqritv: Avoid actual or apparent conflicts of interest and adviseall approptiate parties of any potentiat conflict. (The consulting iob wouldconstitute an apparent conflict of interest and probably an actual one'because Jones has been named to the SMI committee that will evaluateand rank all the proposats, inctuding Crimson's proposal, which shewould have helped to write.)
Refrain from engaging in any activity that would preiudice their abil-ity to carry out their duUes ethically. (The consulting iob with Crimsonwould preiudice Jones'ability to evaluate and rank the proposals forSMl, because one of the proposats would be Jones' own work.)
Refuse any gift, favor, or hospitality that would influence or wouldappear to influence their actlons. (Regardless of wbether the size of theconsulting fee is construed as being a gift or favor, lt Is likely that othergifts, favors, or hospitality will be extended to Jones by Grimson duringthe counse of the consulting engagement)
Refrain from either actively or passively subverting the attainmentof the organization's legitimate and ethical objectives. (SMl's legitimateobiective of obtaining the best computer system at the best price wouldbe subverted to Jones' personat need for money, as a result of Jones'disctosing crucial information for Crimson to include in its proposal,especialty i f Crimson might not deliver a system with the crucialattributes.)
I
L
IIt
I
!
b
I
b
llb
12 chaDrcr t
C1-5 (Concluded)
Recognize and communicate professional limitations or other con-
straints that would precluJ" *=ponsible iudgmen-t or sucoessful perfor-
mance of an activity. (Accepting-tfie consutung iob would preclude
responsibte iudgment in .rlfu"ting and ranking the proposals for SMI; on
the otheirr-anu,Lthicat llmitations-of Jones' employment at SMI would
preclude successful performance of the consulting engagement for
Crimson, Liplcially li Crimson does expect her to leveal crucial lnforma-
tion to fr"lp Lin ttre ioU-her ethical duty to SMI would prevent her from
delivering what Crimson is paying for)'Refiin from engagin! in or supporting any activity- that would dis-
credit ttre profession. (Selling confidential SMI information to a vendor
would be a discreditable act)Obiectivitv: Gommunicaie information fairly and obiectively. (Jones
would Ue unliLely to communicate obiective evaluations of proposals lf
she had tretpea write one of ttrem')Disclose fully all relevant information that could reasonably be
expected to influence an intended useCs understanding of the reports'
comments, and recommendaUons presented. (JoneslPtt ln writing the
Crimson pioposat would be relevant information in SMlts use of her eval-
uations oi pioPosals.)(21 Jones might have disclosed, either orally or on her personal vita sheet or
iob application, the extent of her involvement on the SMI task force and
the committee.(3) Jones could have first investigated all her caneer opportunities with firms
that presented no potential conflict of interest of this kind, but for the
sake of the arE,ument, it is reasonable to assume she did exactly thatbelore applyin! for a position at Crimson. Knowing that Crimson ls a sup-plier of computer systems, Jones might have revised her personal vita
sheet and the wording of her application for this one iob interview tolessen the chances of Grimsonis being tempted to pursue an unethicalplan. (Of course, her invotvement in SMt's upcoming purchase might have
become known to Grimson anryay, or it might have been known toGrimson from other sources before her interview or even before herapplication for the position.)
(41 In addition to her ethical responsibilities to SMI (and her financialresponsibitity to the hospltal that provides treatment for her child)' Joneshas ethical responsibilities to:(a) her family(b) the management accounting profession(c) Crimson
I
III
II
S.
II
L
Il-
Ib
I
o2-1. (r)IS
I\,
Ib
I
!
CGt it lha curnnt nrnetary Yaluo c' @'
nqnic tatou.cet givon uP or to bo givcn
up in obta in ing goodr and ! ' rv ices 'Ecgrqnb toloulE.! tnay bo given up by
trandening cash or othcr propcrty, bsuitgcapital stoih prrloming rrvbe, or ircur-
ring liabilttbt.Coclc rrc classifird er unexpirod or
expired. Uncxpired sl! at. aslet! andapply to tho produclict cl fulure r.venues.Erarnplet of uncrpired @sts at. invenlo-rira, prepaH exPent.E, plant and equip'ment. and invcstmcnts. Expircd corls's'hi$ ngl costl bosnc eventually, arethosc that er. not applbable to tho pro'dus{bn ol luturr rcvonuos and are dodud-rd l rom cur tanl tevonues or chargedagohst retahrd oamings.
E:grncr in its broadesl gense hcludesall expired catr; i.r., costl $'hich do nothavc any polential futurc cqlofiiic bene-lil A mar prrcire ddinition linits thc usecil the tcrm'axpcnlc'!o lhe et9ired coslsariring from uring or con3uming goodsand srrviccr in tho preesa ol oblainingrcvenuss: o.g.. co3l of goods sold andmarkelhg and adrninistrative expenses.(t) Cost of 9oo& soH is an cxpired cosland may bc rclorred to ss atr erpensc intho broad t .n !o of thc tcrm. On theincqnr stal.m.nt. it b most sften Uenti'f icd ar e co!|. lnvrnlory held lor salewhich is destroyed by an abnotmal casual'ty strould be dssitied as a loss.(2) Urnollectble accounts exp€nse is usu'ally classilied as an exPenso. Howevcr,some aulhorilicr belicvc thal it is moredesirablc to clasrify uncolleclible accounlsas a direct reductiqr of sales revenuc (anof lset to r rvcnue). An uncol lect ib leaccounl whi:h was nct proviJod for in theannual adiustmcnt, such as bankruptcy ofa maior drbtor, may be classified as abes.(3) Dcprcc ia l ion .xpen!c lor p lanlrnachhcry is a corrpooent o{ factory over-head ard r.presrnts thc rectassifbation ofa portlcn od thc mEdrinory cqsl to productcct (hventory). Whcn the producl ir sold,lho doprcciation bccomes a part of lhoco$ ol gods rold which is an oxponso.Deprccbtian cl pbnt m*hinery durhg anunplanned atd unptoductive perir:d cl iCle-ncss, suctr as during a slriko, should beclassified as a lcs. The torm 'expense'
CHAPTER 2
DrscussloN ouEsTloNs
a2-2.
02-3.
shouH preferably be avoided rr'hon rnak'hg relcrmce to Productbn coss-(a) Orgattizatirr ccls arc tlnse cqsts thatbenefil the lirm for its entire perird ol exs'tcncs and aro most approprbtely classi'fiod ss a rsrcurcnt asset. When lherc ishilbl evijence that a firm's life is limiled'thc orgranizatbn costs Crould be allocalcdovor the f i rm's l i le a! an expeneo otshould bc amortized as a losg whrn agoing conccm foresees terminalion. Inpraclice, however, orgranizalbn costs areoftcn writlen ofl in the early years of afirm's eristence.(5) Spoiled gods reaulling from normalmenulacluring preessing shoub be lreal'cd as a cost of the prodwr rnanulastured.Whcn thc Producl is so ld ' tho coslbecomes an expongs. SPoi led goods
rcrull ing from an abnormal occurrencoshouldbe clrssilied as a kr-ss.
Cost objrts are unils for wlrich atr arrangementis mede lo accumulate and measure cosl. Theyare imporlant because ol thc need lor multipledimensians ct dats (c.9., by produci' csltrasl" or
departtnent) to accornplish the varbus PutPosesof cost accounling, including cosl fhding' pbn'
ning, ard contrcl.(a) To ctassily costs as direst or indirct. the
col t accounlanl musl l i rs t know lheanswens to lhe questlcns -Directly tracedto what?' and'lndirectly identif ied wilhwhat? ' Olherwise, there is no way lo
assess the direct or indirect nature ol acost. lt is the choice ol a cost obiecl lhatanswers lhose lwo qugstbns.
(b) For erample, lhe cost of a department'smanager's salary cannot be cbssified asdirect or indirecl without lelecting the coslobject first. lf the cost obiect is a prcductunit produced in the manager's deparl 'ment, thon the sabry is indirect. ll the cctobject ir the departmonl, lhe salary isdirecl.
(a) The product unil, batch, or b is tho costobiect. (8e careful about the lack cl cbrilyof the term the product' when it is nolknown whether il is intended to meen (a) asingle unil, batch. or lol ol a Ptoducl. Bsoppced lo (b) any large number ol benti'cal unils. lt couH easily bc laken to meatr.say, Product 1321, as oPPosed to somoother item in the cornpany's catalog' anclthat could suggost the grand total ol aliidentical pieces ol t321 produced during
Ib
Ib)
b
l:
i
:
I
!
I\'
I
\.
\t
l-
13
Q24.
14
lhc onliro product lilc eycb. Thr rignili'csnc. o{ lhb dbthstion it thal sstr. cGls.eucn s! product dceign' Ptotoqping, 8ndhilial worker trahhg' arc dincl codr with
rosPccl to th. tolal of all unitc tvct pto-
ducod, bul ero indirccl with tocPesl to e
eingle uil, bdch' or bl')(b) A diaaggrcaatkrn of ovcrhcad would be
uselul for lny ltudy of lpw to brttlr rnan'
age cost!. or ol what cau!'s €tl l'o b'incurr rd. Rola l ivr ly l rw o l lho coeleincurrod.,in a factory arc causld by lherqrthe proargin ol ale npre unit of qte
producl.(c) (l) A bstch of Henlical vnits'
(2) Th. rum o{ all Uenlical unils cver po-
duced.(3) An activity or proco3s carried out inprroduclicr.(4) A gtoup or 'ccll ' ol machinos andworkerc wilhin a d.Parimont-(5) A departmcnt in which productionGUnS.(6) A plant or clher produclion facility.(7) A et ratcgic Aoal o l lhe f i rm (1.9. 'inprovod qualny).
O2-5. A cost system ir a combinalim of prceduresand rccordc dnignrd to providc the varioustypes of informEtiqr reguired in thr conducl o{the enterprise; including cosl lhdhg, planning,and cqllrol.
02€. A gnod hformatinn rystem_reguires lhe crtab'l ighment of (a) long.rangr obicclivcr; (b) anorganization phn rhoing dclegated rreponsibi l'itier in dotail; (c) ddailcd phns for luture opera'tbna, botr bng and rhod-lem; 8nd (d) pree-dures for implomcnling and controll ing lheseplans.
A2-7. A charl of accountr ia ncccraary to clarrifyaccounthg data, ro that thr data may bc uni-'formly rccordrd in irumals and posted to lheledger accountr.
02€. Advantagcr of tho rlectronic data processinglyllem for rccord keeping are: spced. larger!torag., ringb rntry ol mulliplo transaclions.aulomalic conlrol f laturel, and f lexibil i ty inr.port lonrlats.
O2-9. Thc ldbrrhg poceived weaknessos wore mon-lined h lh. text(a) Tnditionel m.rrur.r ettompl to rcrvc
rniny purp€rg, arrd ar a rcault lhey arcnot univorrslly rcanrdcd ar srrving anyqt. purp6. iJcally.
(b) Tredi t ional mea.ur . l aro r l lectcd byaccannting ctroicor that arc rrl ahrayr rol-cvant to lh. purpo.. al hard; cramples odthrsr clrobcs aro c6l flow agsumptisrsand arbhrary fircd et allocatixrs.
(c) Traditional meesuro! arr calculated bysy3lcns lhat aro ueually sbw to rospondto cfnn gin g srditiorrs.
Chapter 2
(d) Tndhbnal m.lrurot of plenl uliliz'attonc8n t .m lo ancourago orrrrutilizatbn of
caPritY'(e) Traditional m.ltuto! of officirncy err
cilton rcPorted b bl.. ato t@ 899m9ai-.4 lrd rt. .rry b mbhlrrPrct-
02-10. Nqtthancbt pcrlonnerrr rn aaur.t rr. basod
an rinplr count! or clh.r phyrical date rathor
tun dlocat.d eunlhg dala. thry !n uncql-nocird to tho grnrral fhrrcial rccounlirg rys-trn, and thoy en cfrorn to rrflcl me sPecifbalp-t ol Prdorrnrncr.
O2-1 1. Four rrampbr ol nonlinancial prrlormancc
mcasunrs givcn h tho lort and the a.rpects ofportonnancr hry mi1t'tl b. ustd lo nsrits, an(a) rcrap woighl .s r p.tc.nlag. of lolel
shppcd wcigfiB lo rnslitot cffbiency of a- prs.s, pariicr.rlarly cllbioncy of matcrial
u8a€l(b) proccring limo er r p.rc.ntaP of total
timc; to nsrita qade etlicicnry or inv.nterY vclcitY
(c) dbtancc rrcvcd by a unil while insUc thrplant to nutitc rinplifbalbn of a prarrs
(d) ruggcrlicnr P.r y.rt P.r cmployoe: lorrr itor rnPryea ilotvrmrnl
O2-12- Tht cfiallcngr poscd by lhr ircrrasod inlcrcrl h' nqrfinanciel pldornam maarBurcs ir to defho
thc cost accountanl't rob broadly cnough loirctude rEr. rnasuror that arr nol preceded bydolhr signs and thst at ncl thi lo the financialeccqlnting !)rrlsn.
Q2-13. Cctr an most co,lutbnly claroified borrd stlhcir rcbtictshP to(a) thc produci (a ahgb bstch' lctt' or unit of
tho gmdorrrubo);(b) thc Yolurnr od Elivity;(c) tho manulacturing dcparlmcnts, Ptsca!-
.t. o6t c||ltoili s othcr aubdivbixts:(d) thc accounthg Pctii;(e) a Propecd decbirr, Elitn, or cvalualbn.
O2-t4. lrdircct rnstedab an thco rnslorials nroded fortho csnplotion of lhc product bul whorc con'aumptict is eithcr so amall or rc cornplex thatthcir trestment ar dirccl nralorialr would no( bcfoasible. For eramplo, nailr uerd lo mako theproduct arc irdirccl malorialr.
02.15. lndirrt labor. in csltrasl to direct labor, b laborrrponded lhat doo not efbc{ thr cqrrtrustiqtor thr snpoilion of tho lhirhrd Produc.t. Fororarnple. thc labor of custodians ie indirct labor.
02-16. (a) A cervicr dcpartmont ir onc that ir notdiroc'tly cngngod in production, brtrl rrndrraa partbular t!rp. of rrybo for the bonolitod otrcr drpartmcntr. Erarmhr cf rorvbodopartmonl! aro rrceiving, ltor.rooms,mainlenancc, t imekeeping, payroll, andcalelcria-
(b) Produchg dcparimentr clauify thcir aharoof rorvice departmrnl .xpcnr.t ar indi-rccl ovorhoad cp.nac8.
:
(c)
(b)
LIL
LI!
II
L
Ii!
Is
Itr
LI!
II
b
II
!
I
t
tI\,
Ib
II
t-
Cluptar 2
@-17. (r) Cepital expcndilunr are irdended lo beno.lil nprt Oran ql. accounting pcricd. Throxprndiluru rhould lhoroforr br rccordrdby e cfrargr to an ac!.t ac@snt for dls'tin !o thc periodt bcncfiled.
Fbvrnuo cxprnditurcr brncfi l throporationc of |hr cunrnt perird mly. Thryrhould bo rocordrd by chargrr lo thrappmprialr ctp.ilta accounts.It e ccpilal elgcndituro ir irnproperty clar'r if ird ar .n axpantc' 8tlelr, rrtainrdoamings, and hcsnr for thl perird will boundrrstEted. In future pcrids, hqnr willbr overstaled by any arnount thst wouldhavr bcen arrpdiecd had thc epcndiluroborn proprrly capitalizrd. Anrtr andrrtained eamings will bo undersialod sttulurc balanc. !h..13 by ruccoraivrlyrrnaller amounts unlil the erct ha! becnfulty countebalrnced.
lf a rovenuo elgonditurc ie improprrtycapilali:ed, asset!. rclained earninS' andincqno for lhc period will br overstaled.lrsnc will bo underslated in subrcquentperiodr as the impropedy c.Fitalized ilerrtb cfiarged to thr goratbns of thoc peri'ods. Agsets and retained earnings willcqrlinuc to be ov.rstatod in subscqucntbalance sheots by succesrively smaller
t5
arnounlr until thc improperty capilalizedilom has bocn canplelely writlcn ofl.Tho basic critrrkxt for classifying eutbyser rovonu. or capital cxpondituros is theprriod of brncfit. Thr amount ot detailn.cossary lo mairnah subsUiary rccotds.tfu rratcriality of lho ctgrnditurcs, and thccanrirtrncy wilh which vari<rur crprndi'turu roc'rrt ftun period lo pcriod arc dtlrcrileria generally eqrridered in ertablish'h9 a capitalizatbn poli;Y.
Firmr lnqurntty ortablirh ctt stbiltaryrrnount bckrw wtrich all oxpendilurrts ateoxpenscd, inespectivr ol their period olbenefiL Thr level at which thb arnount brot b dctrmined by itr materiality h rrb'tirr to the rizr of hr firm. The obirtivr o{sucfi a policy is to avoid lho rxpcnso olmaintaining exccssivcly detailed sub'rUiary rccordc. E:genditurer for iternt thaltall belnw th. lot snlounl but a't tnatorblin thc aggregale shouH be cePitalized, iltctal expenditures lor these items vary sig'nificantly lrom period to period. A capilal'ization policy lhat roasonably applieslhcsc criteria, although il disreganls thepedod cl benefil and is thsrefore bcking inthooretical just if ication, will not sign il icanttymisstatr periodic incomo.
t6Chaotar 2
s16,957,500
17r458,350
gERCISES
38 + 33 = 39 Prime costSg .31 = 94 variable convet:ion cost
S * Si . ir = $io variable manufacturing cost
ii,oob fired + (Slo r 5oo) = $6'0oo
E2-2 ',({} $1o + $15 + 38 = $?1 convorcion co'st
izi $32 + $t o = $42 Primc costi - i 3 3 2 + i . i o * i r s i $ 3 = $ 6 0 v a r i a b | e c o s tioi (($sz + ${o +g{5 + $6 +$5) x 12'ooo)
i 1ss x 8,ooo) = $8{6'000 + $ 24'ooo.= $84O'OOO total cost incurred with 12'OOO
units Produced and 8,OOO units sold
E2-3 First Method:Sa|es(tilg'95o'ooox85o/o|...............x.........Lcsr: variable costs (irrrizr,o00 x 85chl"' $9'q1?'1?o
FiXgd COSTS...""tr"tt""t"t""t!t"t""tt"t' 7t623tOOO
E,.-l (rll2l(3)(4)
E24
OperaUng loss.-...
Second Method:
ls t Stap:
2nd Step:Salgg (tlt9r95orooo I 857o)..'........o"""""""L.ass: variable costs (sl6195715OO r .58).'... s9r835'350
Firgd costs .............,.............,............. !1623 |AOO
OpgraUng loSs """"t""t" 'o"""t ' tor"""""""o"
$16,957,500
1714581350 -
s (500,8501-
1 . d2 . b3 . b4 . 45 . tg . c7. c8. I
s (5OO,85O)
Variable costs s l 1 ,57 l , Ooo = .59 variable cost ratiol9A sales s l 9 , 9 5 O , O O O
l_I
!
IIL
IL
!I!
Ib
:
lb
1 7Clppter2
E2i5 The cost of direct labor Par computer is sloo'ooo' calculated as follows:
' -"t--l 'rina aac:l---- """' $6ootooo Givgn)Total manufacturing cost"""'o""""""""'L,gssprimocost.....r...............o........."""" 3OOtOOo (giVen)
EquaIsovorheadGoSt.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . .$3oo'o09
COnVgfSiOn COSt..............................."""" $4OOtOOO (giVgn)
Less overtlgad cost..,'...................o....."" 3OOtooo (calculated abovel
EqUatS difgCt 1abOf ,..,....-o........-............... SIOOtOOO
E24 Ttre amount of factory overheadlows:
cost per blade is 93O0, calculated as fol-
3l ,OOO (givenf4OO (givenl
LeeTotal manufacturing cost'.'.""""t""""""Lgss convgrsion cost"""'o"""""""'o"""'
Equals dirgct matgrial cost.""""""""""'
Direst labor cost = 116 of direet material cost= 1t6 x 3600 = $1OO
b
Convgrsion costtt"t t t t" t""""t t t t" t t t t t"ott""
Lgss dirggt labor C(13t"""""""""r"o""""Equatrsove.fieadcost..............................
E2-7 The direct labor cost per system is S200'
Total manufagturing costs """""""""""'Lgss prime Cost """""t""t"t"tt""""tt""t '
Equals overfi gad GoSt """""""""""""""
ConYgrsion cost.........t"""'i"to"t"""t"t""Lgss overhgad cost o'..""'r"'o'o"""""'o""'
Equals dirgct tabor cosl..'.......r...""""""
sitoo
calculated as follows:
S1,00O (givenl8oO (givenl
s 200
gAoO (given|2OO (calculated abovel
Szoo
s400loo
(givenl(calculated above|
1
b
!
!
I
\,
I
t8 Chaoter 2
Ez-g The ampunt of faetory oyerhead cost per machino is $1'5OO' calculated \-as follows:
Total manuf-acturing c95t......,....r....'.......r S3TOOO (given) L
Lgss conversion cost..,.......r.......,.,.......... 2,.OOO (given)
Equatsdircctmatgrialcost......-.- ' ."......... SITOOO
Direst lalor Gost = 112 oI direet material cost= 112 r $ l '0O0 = 95OO
Conversion cost.. .... $2'OOO (given)
Lgss dirgct labor cost.............................. 5OO (calculated above|
EqualsovgrhgadcoSt. . . . . . . . . i . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . Sl15OO
E2-9
(1) The.rclevant cost obiects are:(a) An item of mErchandise. t(bl The use of a bank credit catd'
(21 lt implies that cash-paying customers are paying a part of the cost of thebanks'fees for processing credit card transactionsr bscause these feesare paid by the merchant who then necover€ them in the form of slightlyhigher prices for all melchandise,
(3) The competitive implications ana that the prices paid by cash customensare too high to be competitive with the prices chargad by merchants whodeal only in cash, and the prices paid by customens using bank creditcards arp too low to reflect all the costs of a credit sala.
(4) The raason lor not reducing all prices and charging extra for the use of acredit card is because of the psychological effect of an extra charge. Tocustomsrs, lt sounds like a penalty, as If the merchant wants to discour-age the use of bank credit cards. A discount for cash customers has apositive connotation, even if prices marked on menchandise are higher to vbegin with. Raising all prices and offering a cash discount yields theaame net rsvenue as leaving prices alone and charging extra for using a 'bank credlt card, but the former method feels better to the customer -than the latter.
t 9
2s14
(3)
>
I\-
lt-
LIt
IIt
L-II
bt
L
LI
L
L1
It
E2.-1O ,
(f l Thc rolovant cost obfecta arr:(al A repalr.(b) A PlckuP and daflvery
l1l JTRSb r€palr pricor Include an sllocaUon of thc cost of picking up anddallvering traAors, ln addlUon to thc cost of thc rtpainl' administraUvocoata, markeUng costs, end profll CompeUtont rcpair prices raflect onlytic cost of the llpalrs, adminlgtrstlve snd marko$ng costs' and profit.GompeUtort 8hould bc ablc to prlcc thclr rcpalr rcrvlces lower, becausetSey do not have to reflect plckup and dellvery costs in repair prices.
F2-11
Cluplx2
(11 Dlrect leborVariable factory ove rh eadFifed faCtOfy OVgfh gad...............o......o....o.o..ro.........o............."r
Gonvemion cogt..
(21 Dlrect matoriaf 0umberfDirOgt 1abOf. . .o. . r . . .o. . . . . . r . . r . . . . . . . r r r . r . . . . . . r . .o. . . . . . . . .o.o. . . . .ot . . . . . . . t . . to. . t
Prime GOSI...............r..............
a a a a a o a a a t a a
a a a l a a a o a l a a
sq
$ 1 1
s l2
s l225
s le
s l2251
s20
I
b
II
lE
III
(4) Dlrect material 0 umberl ...'.........o'.......Dlroct laborVariablg factory ovgrfieSd .........o.........r.............'..........oo.......'.Variable markotingTotal variable cost.
I\' a a a t a a a a a a a
Chaoter 220
E2-11 (Goncluded)
(5) Total cost =
(6)
rr)
total variable manufacturing cost+total variable marketing cost+ total fixed cost
2 , O O O r ( $ 1 2 + 3 2 + $ 5 1+ l r g O O r $ 1+ 2,OOO' x ($4 + $3.50)
= $38,OOo + $l '9Oo + ${5'0oo= 55419OO
r The volume used here to catculate total fixed cost is the 2'OOo-unit vot-ume levol that was used originally to calculate the amounts of fixedcosts per unit, as stated in the data given in the exercise. The 2'OOO-unit tevel of production stated in requirement (5) is not the reason that2,OOO is used here to calculate total fixed cost'
The data indicate the bookcases are made of lumber, and some examplesof the indirect materials used in making wooden bookcases would beglue, sandpaperr and nails.
An estimate of costs referred to in the answer to requirement (6! wouldbe inctuded in the variable factory overhead of 55 per unit.
;
E2-12 Factory overhead = 113 x prime cost, so:
Totalmanufacturing
cost= prime cost + factory overhead
= prime cost + (113 x Prime cost)
= 4i:3 r prime cosl;
muftiplying both sides by 314 gives:
Total314 x manufacturing = 314 x 413 x prime cost
cost
3l4xS2O,OOO = 1 x pr ime cost$15,OOO = pr ime cost.
Prime cost .....................Less direct material cost.......Diroct labor cost.......
s15,OOO12,OOO (given)
s 3,ooo
2 l
(3)
(41
i'S
II
L
LLLLII!
I
I
b
L
!
L
!
I
!
Ctuotar2
c2-1
(11
CASES
The percentage profit margin will be 82.5oh, calculated as follows:
Rgvenugs (92 r 4)..............,,o........................Cost of iuice (S2o r 4| .....'....""""t"'r"""""
t Cost of ong de|ivery """""""""x""""""t""
Profit ...............ro....,......................o.......r.......
Revenues (S2 r 1!
Percentage profit margin = 36'60 profit divided by SB revenue = 8.2'5oh'
(21 The percentage profit margin will be 6ooh, calculated as follows:
s.80.60
s.20.60
s€!.o0
1 . 4 0
s6.60
s2.o0
.80
s l .20
Cost of iuice (S.2o r 1) .....'....-............'o""o"'Gost of ono dglivery ..'...""'o""""o"""'o"""o'
PrOfi t . .o.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." 'o"" 'r""""""""""t" 'e"" '
Percentago profit margin = $1.2O profit divided by s2 revenue = 609/o'
The manager is treating the menu item as the cost obiect, for erample'
one glass of orange iuice.
The rpfinement of the definition of cost obiect that would result in the
ptanned profit margin is the use of two different kinds of cost obiect' the
Item and the detivJry, which can be priced separately at S.8O and $2'4O'
respectively.
I
z Chaoter 2
C2-l (Concluded)
(5) For an order consisting of four gtasses of orange iuice, the profit margin
will be 75e/ot calculated as follows:
Revenues: ($.8O X 4)......... ' ...+ (92 .4O X 1 ) . . t t " t t " " " " ' i " " " " t " t " " " t " " t " ' o " '
9.80.60
9.20.60
s3.202.40
$5.60
1 . 4 0
9{.20
$ .802.40
$3.20
.80
Percentage profit margin = 90.2o profit divided by $5.oo nevenue = 75oh.
For an order consisting of one glass of orange iuice, the profit margin wil l
af so be 75oh, calculated as follows:
Cost of iuicg ($.2O I 4) ."""""""""""t""""'Gost of ong dglivgry .........--....-..........o...o.r."'
PrOf i t . . . t . . . .aaa. . . . . .a. . . .a. t "" t """" t " t " """ t "o"" t '
COSt Of !u ice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . .o . . "o"" t t '
Cost of ong delivery .............................o......'
RgVgnUgS: ($.8O X' l ) . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r .o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o t '
+ ($2.4O X 1) ..............................................t..
(6)
PrOfit ........o....t........ s2.40
Percentage profit margin = $2.4O profit divided by $3.2o nevenue = 75oh.
The food seryice managerb plan allocates the delivery costs over anarbitrarily selected number of items (two). This plan would result in high-or-than-planned pnofit margin pencentages on noom servico orders thatcontain more than two items, as demonstrated in the answer to require-ment (t). Prices on these olde6 would be higher than those of a Gom-petitor wlro traces costs mone carefully to cost obiects and sets pricessccordingty. The plan would also result in lower-than-planned profit mar-gins on room service orders containinE only one item, as demonstratedin the answer to requirement (21. Prices on these orders would be lowerthan what is needed to achieve the target profitability.
23
I
L
lt-
I
I
I
l-
lb
I
!
L
LI
L
t
L
I
E
l
b
L
I
l-
\,
I
b
Clppter2
c2-2,
(il The cost objects tor which somo amount of cost is identified in the case,and tho amount of cost idenUlied lor each' ate:(al A new product variation r Zsggo (which means all units of Zeggo ever
to be producodl' S25O'OOO.(bl A batch of Zeggo' S1'OOO.(cl A unlt of Zeggo, $5 + $1O = $15. (Notlce the $1o indirect cost
amount Includes all Indireet production costsr so it must include the, $1 amount stated in the problem, along with an allocation or averag-
ing of the $1r0Oo-perbatch setup costs, a shar€ of the S25O,OOOcost amount, and a sharo of any other indirect manufacturing costs.It would be double-counUng to add the $1 and arrive at a total of$16 per unil|
(21 The other items mentioned in the caso that could serve as cost obiects,and a purposo each one could sorv€r ano:(al CCN Company, which is the relevant cost obiect when external
financial statements are prepared.(bl The assembly line on which Zeggo and other products are to be pro-
duced. This cost object would be relevant in a decision on whetherto discontinue production of all the products produced on the par-ticular line, or a decision to shut down the line and shift its produc-tion to other lines due to a redustion in customer orders.
(31 The totat "o.t erpected to result from producing the first batch of 3oounlts of Zeggo is:
Cost accounted for as direct cost of a unit....,.....Cost treated as indirect by the CCN s1ctem........
units
Add: setup costs1,8OO
. . . r . . o . r . . . . . . . r . . t r . . . . . . . 1 tOOO
Total Co*... . .r . . . . . . . .r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . . . . .o.. . .r . . . . .rr .rr. s2,8oo
The cost erpected to result from producing ono mone unit of Zeggo is 35+ $ 1 = 3 6 .
For the first batch of 3OO units, the CCN cost accounting system willreport a cost of:(35 direct cost + $1o indirect cost allocation) x 3oO units = S15 r 3OO =s4,5OO
$ 51
S ox 3OO
I
(41
(5)
it-
I
v
I
L
LIL
i-LLI
I!
L
LI
b
t
O3-l . The total dollar amount of a fixed cost is con-stant at difrerent levels of acttvity within the rele-vant range, but f ixed cosl per unit ot activityvaries. In confasl the total amount of a variablecost varies al differeil levels ol acwity, but thevariable cost p€r unit remains consEnt wilhin lherelevant range. A semivariable cost containsboth frxed and variable elements. Consequently,both total semivariable cost and semivariablecost per unil vary with changes in activity.
Q3-2. The relevant range is the range of activity overwhich a fixed cost remains constant in tolal or avariable cost remains constant per unit of activi-ty. The underlying assumptions about the rela-tionship of the activity and lhe incunence ot coslchange oulside the relevanl range of activity.Consequently, the amount of fixed cost or thevariable cost rate musl be recomputed for aclivi-ty above or below the relevant range.
O3-3. The fixed and variable componenls ol a semi-variable cost should be segregated in order toplan, analyze, control, measure. and evaluatecosts at difterent levels of actMty. Separation olthe fixed and variable componenls of semivari-able cost is necessary lo:
CHAPTER 3
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
03€.
semivariable costs are: (1) the high and lowpoints melhort: (2) lhe statistacal scanergraphmethod; and (3) the method of least sguares.The high and low points method has the advan-lage ol being simple to compute, but it has thedisadvantage ol using only two data points in O|ecomputation, thereby resulting in a signilicantpotential lor bias and inaccuracy in cosl esti-mates. The scanergraph has the aclvantage otusing all of the available data. but it has the dis-advantage of determining the fixed and vanablecomponents on the basis of a line drawn by vGu.al inspection tirough a plot ot the data, therebyresulting in bias and inaccuracy in cost esli-males. The method of leasl squares has theadvan tage o l accu ra te l y desc r i b i ng a l i nethrough all the available data, thereby resultingin unbiased estimates of the fixed and variableelements ol cost. but il has the increased disad-vantage of computational complexity.The $2OO in.lhe equation, referred to as the yinlercept, is an estimate ol the tixed portion ofindirect supplies cost. The $4 in the equation,referrecl to as the slope of the regression equa-tion, is an estimate ol the variable cost a:isociat-ed with a unit change in machine hours. Thesees t ima tes may no t be pe r l ec t l y accu ra tebecause they were derived lrom a sample oldata that may not be entirely representative ofthe universe population, and because activitiesnot inc luded in the regression equat ion mayhave some influence on the cost being predict-ed.The coefficienl ol correlation, denoted r, is ameasure of the extent to which two variables arerelated linearly. lt is a measure of lhe covariationof the dependent and indepenctent variables.and its sign indicates whether the independentvariable has a posilive or negative relaUorship tothe dependent variable. The coeffcient ot dster-mination is the square of the coeffici€nt of corre-lation and is denoted F. fne coefficient of d6ter-mination is a more easity interpretsd measure otthe covariation than b the coefficient of conela-lion, because il represents the percentago ofvariation in the dependent variable explained bythe independent variable.The standard enor of ihe estimate is defined asthe standard deviation about the regression line.tt is essentially a measure ol the variability of theaclual observations of the dependenl varaablefrom the points predicted on the regression line.A small value lor the standard eror ol the esti-mate indicates a good fit. A standatd errcr olzero would indicate a pertect ft, i.e., afi sctualobservations would be on the regression line.
IS
I
!
Itb
03-7.
(a) compute precletermined tactory overheadrates and analyze variances:
(b) prepare flexible budgets and anatyze vari-ances;
(c) analyze direct cost and lhe contributionmargin;
(d) determine lhe break-even ooint and ana-lyze the etfect ot volume on cost and prof-rt; o3-8.
(e) compule differential cost and make com-parative cost analyses;
(f) ma(imize short-run protits and minimizeshort-run dosts;
(S) budget capital expenditures;(h) analyze marketing profitability by terrilo-
nes. proclusts, and customers.O3-4. The obvious advanlage to using managerial
iudgement lo separato fixed and variable costsis expediency, i.e., il requires less time and is,theretore. less cos0y than the use of any of thethree com putational methods. The disadvantageis that the use of managerial judgement to sepl_rate fixed and variable cosls otlen results in O3-9.unreliable estimatG qt cost. Cost behavior is nolalways readily apparenl lrom casual observa-tron. As a conseguence, managers otlen err indetermining whelher a cost is fixecl or variableand frequenily ignore the possibility that somecosts are semivariable.
O3-5. The three computational methods available lorseparattng the ftxed and variable components of
25
26
03.10. Hotuoscodssttcity mcrn:i t|d tha distibulbn olobservations around thc rogrcrsion linc is notunilorm lor dl values of thc indcpcndonl vari-able. tf hetaroscedasticity b prcocnt. thc den-rlard eror of tp Blimde and confdcnct intlr'val catitnd63, btsed on thc Etmdsrd 3fior, lreunreliabh tnolsuros.
03-11. Serial coneladon mourt thd rdtcr tlun bcingrandom, the obsenralions arcund thc rcgresionline are conelated n'l$ onc ltlcfficr. ll ecrid col'relation b prssctlt thc stlrrtttd cnor of t|c 6ti'
Chapter 3
malt tnd coflfidcncc intervai cstimltes. blsed
on thc Etandlrd olrotr atc unrcliabb molsuros.
O$12. Muldcollinaarity moatrs f|at two or moro of tho
Indcpendent veriables in a mutliple regrassionandFb aro conohed witfi one anodtor. Whenthc degrcc of multicollinearity is high. the rela.lionship bctlloon onc or moro of tho corrol8ledindcpcndont vadables and the depondonl vatiablc may be obscured. However, this circum'clt lcc would normdly not aflecl the astimate ofcost
z /
It-
LL
IIL
L
Clppter 3I
E3-1
E)GRCISES
Foo(,
olrfJGg3o
L
!
L
IL
L
L
IL
itiL
I
l-
Il-
Il-
High ........ a a t a a a r a a a t a a a a a a a a a
s]ivitvlgv"l21600 hours2,1OO
_5Og hours
Costs1,3OO
1 , 1 O O
9__399
Low
s l , 1 O O
840s 260
variable nate: s2oo -r 5o0 machine hours = $.40 per machine hour
TOtal COSI.........................
High
$1,30O
I,O4O
E3-2
Variable cost:$.4o x a6o0 hours ....,....,.....$.40 x 2rl O0 houns ...............r.........r.............
Fixgd cost.. . ' . . . . . . .r . . . . . . . . . .r . ' . .rr . . . . . . .r .r ' . . .r ' . . . . . . . .r . . . . . . . s 260
$lroo0
s900
Saoo
3700
3000
3500
$400
3300
!3200
$100
30
S4O7.5O average totat variable cost
800
$757.s0350.O0
$407.50
5.6936 variable cost= p", direct labor hour5,87s total direct tauorffi
Chapter 328
E3-3
E3-4
Janu3fl.. '...February ....MSFCh'........April ...'....o..M?!. . . . . . . r . . . .
J l l l l€ . . . . . . . . . . .
JUI!............August. . . , . . .September.October.,'...November. .December. .
T(ltal ....."
r - x ( x r - x ) ( v r - Y ) _ 8 7 , o o o _ s 6 og - -
x (x r - r ) 2 1 ' 450
a - 9 - b, - $1o,ooo - (Soo x 125) - $z,5oo
Travef and entertainment expense tor 2OO aales calls would be:
! i ' - a + b x r - $ 2 , 5 0 0 + ( $ 6 0 x 2 O O c a l l s ) - S 1 4 ' 5 O O
(1)v
ElectricltyGost
$ 1 ,6001 r 5 1 01,5O01,450114601r52O1r57O1r53O1,48O1r47O1,4501,460
_sl8,oo9
(21v -nGost
Deviation
(3)x
MachlneHourc?,7902,68O2160O2,50O2F1O2161O2r7502,7OO2,53O2r52O2r49O2r52O
(4)F - A
ActMtyDevlatlon
(6)a -nv -n
(a) x (2119,OOO
800o
5,OOO3,6OO
2001O,5OO
3,OOOI,4OO2r4OO515OO3r2OO
s,600
(!l-squared36,1O0
6,4OO. o
IO'OOO8,10O
10022r5OOto,ooo4r9OO6,4OO
12r1OO6,4OO
!e3.0oo
(5)(x -i)2
tg0t oo
Fo)(40)207030(20)(30)(50)(40)
19080o
(1oo)(e0)1 0
150toorfo)(80)
(1ro)(801
31.200 0o
,
,
- 2 y + n - $ 1 8 r o o o * 1 2 - $ 1 r 5 0 o
- Xx + n - 31r2OO * 12 - 2 ,60O
Variable rate (b) -: (x - rXY - t ) cotumn o totat 54'600 - g.4.4
123'OOOr ( x - i ) 2
Fixedcost (a\ - y - bx
= $1,5OO - (S.44X2'6OO)= *t56
Column 5 total
x ( r r - x ) ( v r - y ) 1 , 5 f f _f - ' - f f i - ' 9 2
f f i -y) ' J(sso)(s 'ooo;
r 2 - ( . g 2 ) z - . 8 4 6 4
E3-6
Month
Jenuary-. I 600Fcbnnry - OOOMtl.rch -..... COOAprll...-....., 680Mry.*......., 570Juoa---.. 6ltOJuly..--.-... 600Augurt --- OIOScptcmbcr. GsOOgtobor--.. G2ONovcmbcr.. 6il0Elccambor.. 640
29Ctwpter3
E3-s
(31x
(11v
l2ll y -n
(40)oo
(201(301(60)(r0)t o502030.lo
3 2016003O,OOO20rooo2qooo27,OOO25,^5OO30,OOO33r0OO35,OOO3aooo30,5OOglr50O
IOOO500
3,500
l1600
oo
400900
2,5o,o,rooloo
2,50O4(,0000
1,OOO
(4) (51
F -a I -712
(3rEOO) 12i2j,O,OOO I4O,OOOoo
(aooo) 4,oo0rooo 40,ooo(3,OOO) 0,OO0,oO0 0o,ooo(+5OO) 2O'25O,OOO ?'2SrOOO
0SrOOO I,OO0TOOO 3OTOOO5,OOO Z,,OOOTOOO 25O,OOO
(81 ct)V -AV -tl tv -r12
ailpplng Expcnrc Sdcr ActtvttYErpcmc Dcvlrtlonr Bcvcntr Dcrvlrttonr (4}Squrrsd (a) x F) (2lSquared
(lrOOO) ITOOO,0OO
oo 8t]60.ooo
4TOOOTOOO 4OTOOO
2!lgr@0 l5,ooo12,25,O,O0�O laOrOOO
07.ooo.ooo 97o,ooo t 1.o(x)Totel --.. 373OO
j ' - I y - + f t - $ 7 r 2 O O + 1 2 - $ 6 O O
i - xx + n - $3601000 + 12 - $3o,ooo
J : ( r t - i ) ' z (y , - Y) '
rz - ( .939 )2 - .882
- .93997O,OOO
[9?"ooo,ooo Xl lrooo )
l t>(r r - i ) (v t - y l
x ( r r - ; ) z z (v t
30
E3-7(11
Clpoter 3
l2l
rz=( .98Y=.9216
x ( r r - i X v r - 9 )
2,1OO = . 9 6.',/( e,zso X I,ooo)
2r4OO tt,384 varlable malntenance6,250 cost per machlno hourb -
x ( r r - i ) '
( 3 ) | - \ r 1 + t l
i ' X X l + J l
Slnce 9 - a
a - g _ b Xa - $5rO00a - tl5rooOa - $31464
- t35O r0OO * |
- 4O'O00 + 1O
+ bi, then:
o - $5 'O0O
- 4'OOO houru
($.sar )(4,ooo )$1,536
E3-8
(1) For elsctrlclty cost and dlrost labor hours:
5,7OO . |oH -.e4e7
- +f33 -.88o5
f t
ra = (.9497F =.9O19
For electrlclty cost and machlne hours:
l t7,OOO
(21
I ( x r - r ) ( v r - y )
( r t - i ) ' z ( y r - y ) '
x ( r r - i ) ( v t - v )
x ( : r - i ) ' z ( y t - v ) ' J(so,o0o )(r ,264 )
ra=( .880512=.7753
ln ttrlr e88€, dlrest labor hours shoutd be chosen as the approprlateacthrtty meaauno to be used In predletlng electrlclty cost because thecocfilclent of determlnatlon (ts = .9O19) lc hlgher than that for machlnehours pa = .77531.
(3)
Cluptor3
E3-8 (Goncluded)
( 4 ) b '> ( r , - x ) ( v t - y )
_ 5 r7OO - $ .2O28,5OO
variable electricltycost rate
- Xx t + n r t hen :
3 1
x ( : r - X ) '
Slnce I - a + bi and 7 - ZYr + n and fa ' ( z f t * n ) - D ( x r t * n )s - (42,ooo + zo) - (.zo)(rao,ooo + 2o)a - 2t1O0 - ( .ZOx9,OOO )? - 2tlOO - 1,8OO - $300 flxed electriclty cost
E3-9
MonthJanuary .........r........February ..r.............tMarch ..........r.......r..AFd1........................May..JUng . . . . . . r . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . .
JUI!. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r . .r . .r . . .
AUgu8t ......r.............SeptembrBl...,..........OctObor ............r.....l{ovombgl ..r............Docgmbg1............,..
TOtal ....r.........r...!
(3)l y i = a + b x )Predicted
UUlltyCost
$ 3,6504rOOO3,9OO3,8OO3r70O3,55O4rOOO413OO4,5OO4r2OO4,05O4,35O
(4)th- vil
PredlctlonError
(2) - (3)
(solo
1 0 0oo
(so)(1oo)(2oo)
oo
25050
(s)lh - til2
(4)Squared
$ 2,5OOo
l O,OOOoo
215OO1O,OOO4O,OOO
oo
62,5002,500
$13O,OOO
(r lX1
.LaborHourc2,65O3rOOO2r9OO2,8OO2r7OO2,55O3,OOO3r3OO3r5OO3r2OO3r05O3r35O
l2lIt
AstualtltllltyCost
$ 3,6004rOOO4,OOO3r8OO3r7OO
. 3r5OO3r9OO4,1OO4,5OO4r2OO4r30O4,40O
36,OOO $4g,OOO $48,OOO o
" ' - {
> ( y , - y ' , ) 'n - 2
/ $ l30 ,ooo G11 10
- 51 14 .O18Column 5 total
32
E3rlO
Chapter:
6 t -i l ( v r - y ' r ) '
n - 2
The g0 percent conlldence lnterval estimate at the 1'SOo-hour level ofactivlty would be:
. ; - r ( x r - , ) 'Y t - t m X S r i l + :
I n > ( x , - i ) t
ssoo = (t.tztXsoz ) {, . # . (t'uotlu;#?oo )'
S5oo - (1.771X$ez)ffi ' .
35oO ; (1.771X$62 X1.1547 )$5OO r $126.79
lb
33Ctvptar3
P3-l
PROBLEMS
Coefllclent of corrtation and co€fnclent of determlnation between:
{a) TFavel oxpsnses 8nd lho numb€r of calls made:(r)
L ({) {5) (6) m -F -a g --rf F -49 -D tu -#
AemtyDcvlrdonr ({l Squarcd (A) r (21 €l-Squt-dilonth
Jrnutty---. 3 3rOOOFobnlry.-.... 3'2OOHfrch-F€-. 2'8OO
Apdl*---. 3rOOil!f-- qtOO
Juno -- qzOO
July...-....--. agOOArilu.t.*-. 3F3OOScptrmbor.-. 3'5OOC)GtoboJ---. 3r.fOONolrrnbor..-.. 3'2OODccamber...... 3r4OO
Tltll ......-- E3&l!99
l l)v
TravclErpcnro
l2l (31V - n x
Erponro CellrDevlaUonr iladc
410120380400430450390a70.180.l90
40aoo
6,000 aO,OOOo o
2{'OOO tOOTOOO4,OOO 40 OOO
1,O@ IO'UOOo o
l5,ooo 0orooo3'OOO lorooo
12,OOO 9O,OOO
l0,ooo 40,oooo o
4,OOO 4OTOOO
79.OOO 520,OOO: :
6 total
12oo)o
(.too)200(1oo)
o(3oolloo300200
o200
o
(301tm)(60)20lro)1 0
(50)30&60o
20
900400
3rOOO400100100
a5oo900
l16002r5OO
o.loo
6.280 0: : _l-g,4oo
l -Column 5 total )(Cotumn 7 total )
79,OOO 79'OOO
J(tg,4oox52o,ooo) i6 '968'OOO'OOO79 .OOO, ' d5;7u
-.9464
fz - .8957
x ( x r - x ) ( v t - r )
x (x r - , ) ' z t y t
34
P3-1 (Concluded)
(r)v
January...... 3 3,OOOFebruary.... 3,eOOMarlh...-,.. aSOOApril ...-.--. 3r4OOMay....-..-. 3,1o0June........... 3'2OOJu|y..,......-. 2,gOOAugust....-. 3,3OOSeptembcr. 3,SOOOctobcr...... 3,400Xovembor.. 3eOODccember.. 3r4OO
Total.-... g?8.40O
(31 (4)x F- i )
(s)tx --xf
l69,OOO,OOOITOOOTO0O
Chap@r 3
(6) ttltr -rw -h tr --y*
(41x (2) (2) Squared2,600,000 4o,ooo
0 O
(b) Travel expenses and otderc neceived:t2l
u-nTnavcl Erpsnsc Ordcrr Achrtty
Erpensc Deviations Rcceived Dcviatons {4) Squarcd(200)
o(4ool200(ro0)
0(3Oo)100300200
tt 53,OOO65,OOO48,OOO73,OOOoaooo67,OOO60TOOO76rOOO82rOOO6210OO64rOOO80,OOO
(t3,oool(t,ooo)
(r8,o0olTrOOO
(4,OOO)
I,OOO(6,OO0l
lO,OOOtorooo(4,O00)(2,OOO)
t4,oooo
200
o
324'OOO'OOO 7,2OO,OOO l60'0004g,ooorooo 1,40O,(X)O 4O,OOOI6,000'000 4OO,OOO lo,oooI,OOO,OOO O O
30,oooro0o lrSoorooo go,oootoo,ooo,ooo I,OOO,OOO lO,OOO2sETOOOTOOO 4,goo,ooo 9O,OOO
t6,000,000 (goo,ooo) 4O,OOO4,O0O,OOO o o
tg6,ooo,qoo 2,8OO,OOO 40,OOO
l -
7 total )
(2' Perfect direct corretation would be evidenced by a coretation coefficientof one' The coefficient of .94il neyealed in (lXa) is closer to one than thecoefficient of .8602 in (l)(b). This means trat the variabte portion of t'v-el expense Yaries mone directly with mov.-"nt" in the number of callsmade than with the value of orfoers received. To exptain this further, therelative coefficients of determination are obtained by squaring the coeffi_cients of correration and expressing the ""=*.i.s a pencentage in eachcase. The coefficients of determinalion are ag,ii oh torcarts made andonly 73'99o/o tor ordens received. This mea"= irt"t approximately gooh otthe movements in the variable portion of travel "tp"r=" are retated tofluctuations in the number of ca[s made, ,no itr" remaining 1o% of themoyements are related to other factors.
s7s2o99 -9 1..'168,000.000 2t,2oo0gg g3o,oog
x ( x r - t X v r - y )
J:(', -;f;G:ry2Tr2OO|OOO
G -
r / ( l , r68,OOO,OOO X52O,OOO )
21,2OO,OOOr - - 8 G O 224 16441675
)r ' - .7399
6Golumn 5 total)(Colurnn
35
o
IL
t-IL
LLIL
LLLL
LI
!
b
I
l-
IIIl-
Clnpter 3
P3-2(1)
Month
(51tr'itz
{a} Squared
0160,00025rEO0lo,ooo28r9OOc2?5OO1O,OOOI/roo
aorooot61900z'5,OO
0orooo
{6)E- rW-n
(al r P)o
42,OOO1O,4OO
lrSoo9r350
21',25O3'5OO
.lool5'OOO4r550
o24,OOO
cr)ly -rP
(2) Squarsd
(r)v
SuppllcrCo.t
(21v-nCost
Dcvlrdonr
5(ro5l
oltt 5Fq(851(351
57535o
80
o
y - 7.y + fr - $181000 * 12 - $11500
i - Xx + t r -601000 + 12 - 5 r00O
l t
(3) (41x F - a
L-abor AcdvltyHoun Dcvlatonr
January.-... 31r5O5Fcbruary.... l'395Mrrth --.... 1't65Aprll --...-.; tr5l5Moy............ f r45Junc..-....... tralSJuly-.-..--. 1rf65Arguet.--. IFOSScp,tcmbcr. 1'576Octobcr...-. 11535NoYombcr - f i6OODcccmbcr.,__-!f99
Totel......9!8,rU
SrOOO4r6OOSrtooSrtoo4'a30417504r9OO6,O805'2OO611304r05O513OO
6O,OOO
0{4o0}180100
(1701(250)(roo)
80200130(50)
300
23111025
4r2i25225
3,0257,2J257,2i25
255,O251,2ir5
og,40o
452.800 131.950 40.250
131,950 - .977J(*sz,Boo X 40,250 )'
12 - ( .g rz )z - .gss
b
: ( x - * ) ( v - l )
ffi
3 7
!.
I!
{6)(x -7W -h
iII
L
I
I
b
IE
Ctnpter 3
P3-3 1
( 1 )
@
(1)
vElcclrlclU
Cort
t2lv-nCott
Dcvirtiorr
{4}F - a
(5)
lt -rPrt)
v -rtz(3)
xLrbor ActvttY
L Jrnulty.'-.. 3 t'OOO
Fcbrue4y.... 1$7OMerch....,-. I 'ClOAprll -...,..-. 1r35O
May---.-... t'530Juna--....- 1r.640July.-.*.-.. 11620Augurt...- f F3OSoptcmbar. 1'580OctobGr..-.. 1'O5ONoYcmbcr.. 11660Dcccmbcr.. IrO2O
13oo (30)4,OOO (230)
4,3OO t3O4,OOO (2301
4,050 (r8ol4,too (l3o)4,t60 -(8Ol
+2n 204,tEO l8o)4FOO tto4,OOO 37O4/rOO 17O
20(rol30(30)(501(40)(ool(60)
o708040
Dovb0onr (a) Squercd (4) x {2} (2) Sguared
(600) 4Oo
2,3OO too3,9OO 9OO6,900 9OO
I,OO0 2,5005r2O0 116004r8OO 3,600(l'OOO) 2,5OO
o o18,900 4r9OO29,600 6140OorSoo lrooo
85.800 25.400
90062r0(x)tor0oo52r90032,400lG'9OO6r4OO
.lOO
0t'fOO
710OOt3o,9oo
28r9OO
ib
ib
b
I
I
b
I
L
ib
I!
Total...... tl&OOO O
, - 2y + rr - $181960 + 12 - 31r58o
x - xx + n - 501760 + 12 - 4,30
I
L
x ( x - r ) ( v - r ). / > ( t - r ) ' z ( v - 7 ) '
. )r - - ( . 8 2 6 ) - - . 6 8 2
424.80050.700 0:: :
85,8OO - .826
I
(-*za,soo X 25,4oo )
u
Pg-3 (Concludcd)
(r)v
ElcctrlcttyHotr$ Co.t
(5)
lx --rr2
{!l_squrt*. o
z2,5AOIO'OOO4N
tgrcootrc@
ta/aOOror0oo
I'COOaorooo67,600zAEo{,
(c)tr -iw -h
(.) x 12)o
t'5oot oootr8ooTrOOO11OOrr2!,Oc'aoo
0t+ooor0'2ooc,ooo
trltv -tF
{21Squrrcd.lOOtooD|00900
asooI 'OOOSrOOO
z6,�0�oo
4190O6"lOOI'GOO
25.aOO
Cllopter3
elu --nCort
Dadrdonr
f3)x
f,lrchlncHourt
(4)
F -ifAEdYttt
Dadedonc
Jlurery-..- E I'EOOFobrurry.... f r57OMlch..--. lr6tOAptl!-....-- tr660Hry--..,.-. tF63OJunr..-.-.- f rAfOJuty-.---- f r52OArrlturt..-- f r.B3OSopilcmbcr. f 1680Oc{ob.r,-. f rttONovrmbcr.. Ir0coDcccmbcr- IrC2O
Totrl....- Ig.gg9 27,COO O 2rt.200
20Irol30(301(to)(40)lcolt60l
o708040
o
2,goo1760244oo2.2&2r7CO2J4o1r801r7O42fi4&O2W2t4tj{)
o(r60)too(60)
(r.o)lco)
lr20)(tso)(401no2&160
oa.aoo
y - 8 + f r - $181960 + 12 - 31r58O
i - Xr + tr - 271600 + 12 - 2r3OO
- rr(y - y) e8,3oo -.93t1x(x -
rz - ( .g33 )2 - .g lo
(21 Slnce the coefllclent of determlnaUon for electrlclty coat and machlnohoune Qe = .a7Q le grestor than the coetficlent of determlnaUon for elcc-trlclty cost and labor houra pe =.682), machlno hours should be used asthe barls for estlmaUng electrlclty cost. Machlne hours explsln morp ofthe varlanco In electrlclty cost thsn do labor houlr,
(3) Wtth machine houru a8 tfio bagls for predictlng elesffcltlr cost, the l|redcogt and Ore varlable cogt rato can be determlned by the method of leastsquanos ae followrr:
var iabte rare ( t , ) - .x(r : iXY I Y)'
X ( x - i ) 'Column 6 to ta l _ 68 ,300 _GGofumn 5 to ta r ' m
- $ ' 32339
Fired cost (a)
t ilfi: - ($'3233e ,.2'3oo)
: ( r - x ) ( v - y ' )r) ' :( v - -v)z (zt'l,2oo )(zs,4oo )
39II
L
I
I
It
!
Ib
br
I!
ib
Clwter 3
P34 ,(11
Janualy'..-.Fcbruary '...March -.--.Apfi1 ...........Mry-....-.'..Juno-.........Ju|y..,........'Atgud.......Soptcmbcr.Oclobcr......llovcmbcr.'Dccombcr..
I2'2OO2r1302rOOO
117O2,O502,2202r7502r25O2r20O
&1602'21O2rlOO
2r5OO
a35O2rOOO2r4OO211OO2rOOO2r*5O2r55O2,7o/0
a45O2rlOO2,3OO
28.800
torooo2r5OO
lOO,OOOo
9OTOOO
40,OOo215OO
22'5,OO90TOOO
2,5OOo
lorotx,430.OOO
4rOOO1,5OO
04,oooo
st,ooo12,OOO
(5Oo)13r5OO39,(XX)
(5oo)o
6,OOO
I'COO000
25rOOOtoo
12r' loo3rOOO
looIrloo
16,9()0loo
15'OO
_g€99
H l g h a a . a t a a a a a t t t t t " t t " " t t " " t " " " r t t t " " " t t " t t t t " t " t t "
LOsf ...... a a a a a o a a t a a a o a t a a " " t t " t " l '
Dlffelonce.'. a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a " t t t t t t '
(1) l2lvt ln-h
Malntcnancc Cott
Cod DevlaUon
{31 {4} (5) (6) rt} -';; ui-a lou-# tot-lwt-h tu-vf
Machlnc ActtvttYHoure Dcyilqgn! (4) Squercd (4) r (2) Q93urrl!
MalntenanceGost
s2,2902,OOO
3 2s0
MachineHours2r7OO2,OOO
700
Low
$2,OOO.OO828.57
$1.171 .43
Varfabfe rate = 3290 + 7OO hour:s = 3'4142857 per machine hour
Hlgh
Total cG,Et...........r.r.............................r.r......... $2t290t00
Total variable crogt..,.r.'...........................r..'...' l tl 18'57
Average ffxgd c(tSt ............................'...'.......r $1 .1 71 .19
l2lI
E
I
b
I
I
!
40(30)
(roo)t 0
(rroloo(10100
130(r0)50
{o0l
100(50)
(.o0)0
13oo)200
60lEO3{}0
50o
(roo)Totrl.-.. E25,920 O o 172.OOO 76,200
,
,
I
b
II
- I ;Yt + f l - $25r92O + 12 - $2J6O
- Xx, + o - 28r8OO * 72' 2t4GO
I ( x - r ) ( v - i ) Column 6 total- 6lu;;;-5-GGf
- 172'ooo - 3.40 Yariabte cost rate4it0,oo0b -
x ( x - i ) 2
S l n c e Y - 8 + b X ta - y t - b t
a - 32 '160a - t12,160a - $1 '2O0
then:
- ($ .eo ) (2 ,4OO )- s960
10
P3-4 (Concluded)
Chapter 3
l -x ( : - z ) ( v - 9 . ) Column 6 total(31
f t172,OOO a' 1 W , - . 9 5 6 5
(r)X1
(41
1 2 -
MonthJanualy......Februaty....M8hCh.........Aprll r..........M8!. . . . . . . . . r . .Jlllte..r..... '..Jlll!.... '.......AugU8t. . . . . . .September.Octobor......llovembor..Decgmbor..
Tot81.......
t2lIt
ActualMalntonancc
Cort$ 2,2OO
2r1302rOOO2rl7O2,O502r2,2O2rl602rzf',O2CoO2r1502121O2rtoo
(31ly i=a+br ,Prodlstcd
MalntenenceCost
$ 2,2OO2r1402rO(X'2r1602t04o2r2tn2r18f.2r2i2o2r2g02rl802rt60ztl20
(4tlh - v'l
PredlctlonErrpr
(21 - (318 0(ro)
ol ot o
(201(301
. 3 0to
(30)50
_e9)9_e
(s)Ut - t'12
(4)Sguarsd
$ o100
otoo100400900900100900
2r5OO400
$6,4Ot)
2r50O2r3li02,ooo2r4OO2,1(x)2,6002r4EO2,5502,7AO2,45O2,4AO2,3OO
28,800:
- ^ ! A ^ AE t y - Y:: t125,920
Column 5 total -1 2 - 2
8 t -
(5) The 95% confidenco tnterval for matntenance cost 8t the 2r5OO machtnohour level of acdvlty lr
mY ' * t p ; s x s ' . 1 1 + i + \ - - ' - ' f
:! n x ( r , - r ) '
!+ff - sz' .zs*22
s . | , 2oo* (s .eo ) (e , soo ) ' ( z . zz8X?5 .2g822 ) { ' -+ " -w
32'2OO = $59.29
v:(x 1 - i)t :( yt - i lz ./(column 5 total )potumn i totat I
172,OOO _ 172,OOO
@ - @. . ,' ( . 9 5 8 5 ) - - . 9 1 4 8 9
MachlntrHourt
4 1
I
!
IIt
IL
I!
I!
ItE
II
!
I
b
I
!
I'!
I
!
Il-
IIE
Ctnpter 3
P3-5 1
(1) (a) The method of least sguanct:
(11vt
l2ltn-f,
Dtllcrcnccfrorn
Avrngc of
(3) (41 (s) (6) Ct)
\ Fl- i t tn-xr2 h-rui-h ln-iFDlllcrcncc
FromAvcragn of
\ tToo 3F0o K) Squared {4} r (2}
Ebc{rlclty Elcctrlclly Orrcrt OuGtt (OOOI (OOOs
Co.t Drvladon Dryr Dryl omtttcd)- omtttedl
t2lSquarcd
(oOOsomlttedl
Jenuery.-.. $ 4OO g3OO) I,OOO (21600)
Fcbruery -. 5oo (2o0) 1F0O l2'Ooo)ar2,,,o4rOOOI'OOO
EOI'OOOlr0ooIrOOOG'25Oarooo
250trooo
o
3 750400200
o100100900500400
o100
o
s e o4040o
t ol o904040o
1 0l o
M{-..-.-... 600 (tOO) 2'5OO (1'OOO)
March --- 600 (2OOl
Aprll--.-.., 7OO O
Juns--.-... 8OO lOOJuty-..-.-... I'OOO 3OOAu!tt3t..-... 9OO 2goScptcmbcr. gOO 2OOOctobor.-- 7OO ONovcmbcr - 600Dccambor.. 8OO
2,500 (trOOO)3,OOO {5O0}
aFoo I,oooo'5oo 3,oooo,ooo 2r5oo6FOO 2,OO03,O0O l5o0l
gtaoII
tt
lroo) 21600 (1,000)too 3'5OO
Total...... E8.4OO O 42.OOO 0 34.000 . lxl.450
: ( t r - r ) ( v , - y ) Column 6 total - tl3'45o - 3.1015 variable rate34,OOO
b -
I
!
x ( r , - i ) ' Golumn 5 total
S l n c e f - a + b i l t h e n :S T O O - a + ( t l . t O l 5 x 3 ' 5 O O )
a - $7OO -$355e - $345 llxed coat por month
12
P3-5 (Contlnue{)
(b) The hlgh and low Points method:Electrictty
Gost$1,OOo
400$ 600
Clupter 3
GuestDatrs
6r5O0l,OOO5,500
Hlgh ..r. . . . . . . . . .a t a a a a a a t l a a a t a a a a a a a a a a a a a l a a a a a a a a a t a a a a a a a a a a a
Low...
D1ffergnc18..r...r.....r.....................r........... ' .. ' . .t
Varlable nate - #= - $.1091 per guast day5r5 t )O
Fired cost = $1,OOO - (61500 x $.1091)= $1'OO0 - $7Og= 3291
ORFixed cost = S400 - (1,OO0 x ll.1091l
= 9{OO - StOg= Szet
(c) A scattergraph wlth trend llne fltted by Inspectlon:
tEluo,Fooo t
l-> 2= o9 EIEFoulJlll
s1 ,1OO
st,ooos900
:8800
3700
3600
r3500
3400
3300
3200
8r00
$oo t ,ooo
Fixed cost per monthdetormlnecl byI nspcctlort ............_SSSO
Averago cc'61 ......,..,.. SZOOLess llrcd cost......... g5Ovariablo rGrolt ......,..... G:
2,OOO 3,OOO /3rOO0 S'OOO
GUEST DAYS PER MONTH
3s50
crooo 7r00o
$.1O variable costper guest day3r5OO avorlge guest days
43t-t_
IS
tI!
IE
Clpoter 3
P3-5 (Continued)
(Zl The coefflclent of coretatlon (r) and tlre coefficlent of determination (rz)'uslng data from the requiromcnt (lXa) answen
x(r , - , ) (v, - Y) cotumn 6 tota l- -
l : ( t r - x ) '>(v , - y ) ' . ' / (cotumn 5. to ta l ) (cotumn
3 '45o 'ooo -@. l 72r92Or0OOrO0OrOOo
3r+50,O003r5g4 r44g
' '9598
r2 - .9212
7 total )
LIb
II
b
II
b
I
tL
(3) The standard error of the estlmate:
(11X1
(21YI
I
!
lIL
Ib
III
b
I
!
b
MonthJanuary......Fobrualy ....Ma1ch.........4pr11 .......,.r.M8!... . . . . . . . . .J ltJlo .........r.J ll l! ...... '.....August .,,....September,Octobor.,....NoYember.,Decembgr..
Total .......'roundlng eror
iZU t - y ' r ) ' j Golumn 5 total
s (5)' s29,975
GuestDaysI 'OOO1r5OO2,5OO3,O002,5O04,5OO6,50O6rOO05r5OO3rOOO2,50O3150O
42.OOO
AstualElectriclty
Cost$ 4oo
500500700600800
I 'OOO900900700600800
sg.4oo
(3)V i = e + D x 1 )
PredlctedElectrlctty
Cost$ u 7
4f'7599650599ao2
1,OO59S903650599700
39.405'
(4)th-vl
PredlctionError
(2) - (3t'
9(47)3
(ee)50
1l2l(51
(sl(3)
50I
1 0 0
(s)th-vF
PredistionError
Squared(4)
Squaredg 2,209
I9r8O12,5OO
I4
252,916
I2r5OO
I1O,O00
5 ' -n - 2 1 2 - 2 - v s2 ,gg7 .5 - $54.75
chapter 3
1
r3-5 (Goncluded) ,
4)The9o%conf fdence|nterua| fore |ect r |c } tycos i lsat2 'oooguestdayswould be:
tz, ooo - 3,5oo )2
(sg{s + ($.tor5 X2,ooo ))t35483318
(t.atz X330.75 )f * #, *
(t,atz X3s4.zs )(r.ozz )$106.35
!
t
34,OOO,OOO
P3-6
(1) (a) The hlgh and low polnts method:
H l g h a a . . t a . . " " t " t t t " " " " " t " t t t t t t t ' l t " t t " t t t t t t " t " t t t " t " " '
L O W a a a a a a a " l t " t t t " t " " t " " t " " " t t " " " " " " t t " l t " " " l t t " l "
Dlf igrcnc9 . t t t t t t t t t t t t t t """ t""" t t ' l t "" t" t"" t t r" t"" ' r t"
Varlable rate = $f OO + I;OOO Bllletr = $lO
Flred cost = $5Oo - Sl'1o r2r4OO Blllets) = 3260
orFlxed cost = $4OO - (!l'lO x l,4OO Bllletr) = $260
Cost 4stlYttY2r4OOl,4ool.ooo
:1500400
Sloo
45
I
Ib .
!!
I
L
Il
b
L
ChsPwS
P3-6 (Qontinued)
(b) A scattergraph wlth a trend line fitted by insPection:
F
IEl-oulJlll
t500
:oo
9300
$200
$too
30t rOOO I
BILLETS
Fixed cost detormlned by Inspection = $260
Average cogt = S5t52O total cogt + 12 months = $46O
Average aetlvtty = 24,OOO total Blllets + 12 months = 2'OOO
Var|ablecoat=(g460aver iagecost-s26of ixedcost)+29oooaveft lgeagtlvl$ = $.1O Per Blllet
IIg
I
Chapter 3
P3-6 (Continued)
(c) (r) l2l f3) (4) (5) (6) rt)y V-n x F-; l lx- i f lx-rv- t l lv- t r
Elccrriclty Cost llumbcr Activity (a) (21
uonth Cost DcviaUonr of Bllletr Devletionr Squrrcd (4) r (21 Sguarcd
Jenurry,,.... 3455 (51 2,OOO O O O 25Fcbrury.... 450 ll0l 1'8OO (2OO) 4O'OOO 2'OOO tOO
Mrrch........ {35 (251 1,900 (l00l t0'O0O 2'5OO 625Aprf1....,.,.... 4S5 25 2,2OO 2OO 4O'O0O 5,OOO 6251fry............ 4?O 10 2,1oO tOO IO'OOO I'OOO lOOJunc........... 475 t5 2,OOO O O O 2i25Ju1y........,... 4OO (60) l,4OO (8OOl . 3EO'OOO 36'000 3'8OOAugust....... 450 (f O) l,9OO (f O0l i0'OOO I'OOO 'lOO
Scptamber. 4:t5 l25l 1,8OO (2OO) tlO'OOO 5'OOO c,25Octobcr....,. 5OO 40 2,4OO .lOO 160'000 iO'OOO 1'600ilovambcr.. 495 35 2r3OO 3OO g0rOOO 1O'5OO 1r2i25Decomber.. 47O lO 2,2OO 2OO .3O,OOO 2'OOO loo
Total...... 35.529 _9 _?!.OOO ___9 -999,099 gr.OOO _8.950
f - zy + n - $5r52o + 12 - $460i - Lx + f t - 241000 *12 - 2rOO0
variabte rate (b) - :(x - rXv.: f) - Sq9 loFl - i l9x( x *7) '
-cotumn s totat
-6dd;66d'$ '10125
Fixedcost (a) - y - b i- ($.r olzs X z,ooo )- $257.50
(21 The coefficient of correlation (rl and the coofffclent of determlnation (F),using data from the answer in requlrement (lXcl tollow:
- l - \ / - \
- f t x r - x ) l y , _ V )- 81'099-- - .957
V:(x r - i ) ' z (y , - y ) ' J (8oo 'ooo X8 'e5o )1 2 - 1 . s s z ) 2 - . 9 1 6
4 7
t
!
II
L
IL
ItL
ItL
I
L
iI
!
I
-
IIb
Ct8pr( 3
P3-O (Concluded)
(3)
MonthJ8nuary.r....Februaly....M8J1Oh.r...... '
Aprll r..........M8!.r. . . . .r .r . .
J1tJ|9...........Jlll!............Au$ust.......SeptemberOctober......NoYember..Decamber..
Total ..,..'.
g ' -
(r)v
ActualElectrlclty
Gost$ 4{ts
4lto4{ls4854704754004504it5500495470
35.520
(21x
Numberof
Blllets2,O001r8OO119002r2OO2rlOO2rO001r4O0lr9OO1r8O0214OO213O02r2AO
24,OOO
(3)l y '=a+Dx)EstimatedEleetriclty
Cost$ 460
#o4{to480470460399450#o501490480
t15.520
(4)lv - v'l
(1) - (3)
(s)1 0(1s)
5o
1 51o
(5)(r)5
' ( 1 0 )
(5)U-vT
(4)Squarsd
251 0 0?25
25o
225Io
251
25100752o
lcolumn 5 total - $8.672i\,
Ii!
The 9506 conlldsnce Interval level for electrlclty costs at the 2r2OOBlllets level of agttylty would O" 0","--
a + Dx * tesst" ' . , / . t * * * ( t - f ) '=
Y " > ( r - i ) '
$257.5o + ($.rorzs )(z,zoo) ' ( 2.?2s)($a.eze )
1 2 - 2
$48o .25 * (2.zza )($e,ozz )(t.oos )
$48O .25 * $2O.58
or between a low of 3459.G7 and a high of SSOO.83,
!
b
I
b
I
gt52l o
48
P3-7
(1 ) (1)vi
Month
t2lrl'.1-91
Dlffcroncrlrom
(4)
Fi - i )Dlflcrencc
Frctory Dirrct from AveragcOverhead Avcragc lrbor of 1'80O
Coctr of 37,900 Hourr Hours
Chapter 3
(61 (6) rr)lq -|12 lry - rWi -h rq - vlz
(41Squrrrd
'(4) r (2)
l2lSquarcd
4O,OOO |2O,OOO 360,000S60'000 l'2OO,OOO 4TOOOTOOOt0orooo {2oro0o Irt02,5oo2SO'OOO S5O'OOO tr2lOrOOO
4OTOOO 5O,OO0 62,500IO'OOO f3SrOOOl 72i2,5OO
too,ooo 34o,ooo 72t2)5oo640'000 lrl6OrOOO 2tlO2rSOO360,000 OOO,O0O ITOOO,OOOto,ooo 4o,ooo 160,000ao,ooo tSorooo 5o2,5ootorooo (lorooo) to,ooo
90,ooo 2/3O,O0O 84O,OOO250rO0O TOOr0Oo I,060,000t6o,ooo
- 680,000 1,060,000
tSo,ooo S2orooo o4o,ooo4O,OOO 2OTOOO IOTOOO
o 0 c2r6oo360,000 C9OTOOO tr322,5OO25O,OOO 4{tOrOOO 640,000
0o,ooo l6li,ooo 3o2"5ool0,ooo 85,ooo 122,soo9O,OOO 24O,OOo C4OTOOO
o o tbo,ooo
.3O,OO0 !4O'OOO a9O'OOO25O,OOO 7O0,OOO 1,9OO,OOO25O,OOO 75O,OOO 235O,OOOt6o,ooo 320,ooo c4o,ooo4O,OOO 4O,OOO 4O,OOO
o 0 9o,ooo25O'OOO 45O,OOO 81O,OOO360,000 OOOTOOO ITOOO'OOO25O,OOO 4OO,OO0 84O,OOO
o 0 t8o,ooo9O,OOO 27O,OO0 81O,OOOl O,OOO (3O,OO0) 9O,OOO
(3)xi
20A '{
J!ll.'....... 3 81600Fcb....-... gr9O0
ll!1...-... 81050APt- '..-... grOOO
lhy--.., I '160Juno.--. 7'550July --... 7,050Aug....-... 61450Scp......... 6'900OcL........ 7'5OONoY.-.-... 7rl50Dcc...--. 7'8OO
4pJan.....,... 8r7OOFcb.-...... 9,3OOMrr......... 9'.iOOApa........ 8,7OOifry,..--. 8,OOOJune.....- 71650July........ 61760Aug....--. TrtOOScp......... 71350OcL........ Tr25,O!lov..,-... TrtOODcc..-.-. TpOO
20cJrn......... 81600Fcb...,..... g,3OOMer......... gr4OOApr....-... 8r7OO
_ llty..-.... SrtOOJuno....... ?1600July -...... Z'OOOAug.-...... 6,900sop......... ?rlooOsL........ Z,EOONov......... Z,OOODcc.. . . . . . . Z,OOOTotal....... S2g4.4Oo oo
ooo2r0oo1,060I r loo
25O{3so)(8s0)
(1/450)(t,0ool
(4oo)frso)(roo)
800lr4oolr4OO
800loo(2rol
(t,tgol(8ool(6s01(cs0l(8ool(4ool
700lraoo1Foo
800200(3oo)(eoo)
(1,OOO)(8o0)(4oo)(ooo)(3Oo)
2rOOO2,4O02r2OO2,3OO2rOOOlr0oolr4OOI'OOOl'2oolr7OOI'COOlr9OO
2,1O02FOO2.,.OO2',,OO2rOOOtrSootr2ootr3oor'5oo'tr7oorr5oolr8OO
2rOOO2poo2r3OO2,.OO2,OOOt,8oolr3OO1,2O0lr3oo1,8001,5001,9OO
64.800
20060040050020�0ro0(4oo)(8oo){600}lro0)(2oo)100
300500aoo4(}0200
o(oo0l(5oo)(3oo)(ro0)f3oo)
o
200500600aoo200
o(5oo)(0oo)(5o0)
o(3oo)1 0 0
5.280,OO0 11,625.000 29. lA5.OOO
(9
I
LIIlL
t-Ib
I,\,
LIi
b
I
!
Ib
I
b
ILr
iL
I
b
I
qww3
P3-7 (Continued)
p - z ( x t - x ) ( v t - l )
x ( x r - x ) ' Golumn 5 total 51280,0O032.20 variable
cost rate
then:
Column 6 total 11'625'000t -
Slnce j - a + biand t ' I;yt * n and i ' Xr 1 t rtt
(Sesa,4oo + 36) - , + ($z.zo)(o* 'aoo * 36)
, tz ' eoo
: 3.tl fdT:.t ovelhaad cost
(21 The coefficlent of correlation and the coefficient of determination' using
data from the regulnement (1) answen
x(r , - 7)(y, - Y) cotumn 6 totat
11r025,OO0 11rA?S '@9-:' - @)
.v153,938,4OO,OOO,OOO
1 2 - ( . g g z o ) 2 - . . 8 2 8 0
1 11625 ,O0O12r4O7 1191
- . 9 3 7 0
chspttir3
(3)
fi
P3-7 (Continued)
MonthgJanualY......FobruSrY '.'.M8FCh.r.......APrl l . . . . . . . . . . tM8! r . . . . . . . . . . .J11JIo...........Jlll! ..... '......August .......September.OCtobOl......November ..December..ryJanuatY......Feblarary....MdFGh,.. . . . " .Aprll ...........M8!. . . ' . . . . . , . .JUll€ ' . . . . . . . . . .Jlr l ! ' . . . . . . . . . . .August.......September.Ogtobor....,.November ..Decembgr..20cJanuary......February....MihCh.. ' . . . . . .Aprl l . . . ' . .o... .M8!... . . . . . . . . .Jung. . , . . . . . . . .Ju|y . , . . . . . . . . . .August. . . . . . .September.October......November. .December..
Total
$ 8,3409]2i2O8r780I,OOO8r34O811207'p,zo6rl406r58O716807 146081120
8,5O0I,OOO8,78O8r78O8,34O7,9OO6,58O6,8OO7 t24O7,680712447r9OO
8,34OI,OO0I,OOO8,7808,3407r9Oo6,8OO6,5806,8OO7,9OO7,24O
_ 8 ,120
E284.4O9
(4)Ui-vl
PrudlctionEmor
(21- (3)
It 160680170
o(1eo)(5701
303 lo320(r 80)(31o)(320)
140300520(80)
(34o)(250)1703001 1 0
(43o)(r40)(4oo)
260300400(80)
(240)(3o0)200320300(4o0)(240)(s20)
(5)tvi - vF
PredictionError
Squared(Cl_Squarea
$ 25,600462,4OO
28,9OOo
36,1OO324,9OO
90096,1OO
to2,40o32,4OO96,1O0
1O2,4O0
19,6009O,OO0
27Or4OA6,4OO
I l5,60062,5OO28,9OO9O,O0O12, lOO
184,9OOl91600
l60,000
67,6009O,OOo
16O,O(x)6,4O0
57160090rooo40rooo
1O2|4AO90,OOO
160,OOO57,6OO
27O,4OO|x1.580.200
The standard omor of thc cstimate:(r) l2l (3)x1 lr luj= ?.+.brJ)
Actlsl PredlctedDlract Factory FactoryLabor Overhead OverheadHouns Gosts Costs
2rO002'd,oo2r2OO2,3(X)2,OOO1,9O01,4(X)I,OOOl,2oo1r7O01,6001,9O0
2r1O02,30O2r2OO2r2OO2,OOOlr8OO1,2O0lr3oolrSool,7oo1,5OO1,8O0
2,OOO2,3OO2,3OO2,2OO2,OOO1,8OOlr3OOI,2001r3O01,8O01,5OOl r9OO
8r5OO9,9OO8,95OI,OO08rl50715507rO5O6,45O6,9007,5007r l507,80O
8,70o9,3OO9,3008,7OO8,0oo7,6506,75O7rlOO7,3lio7r?So7,10o7r5OO
8,60O9r3OO9,4O08,70O8,1OO7r60O7,OOO6,9OO7,1OO7,500TrOOO7,600
s284.400 off,800
IIiL
II! chtPrer 3
l_ Ps-T (concluded)
5 t
= - - i > ( y , - y - ' , 1 2 - , @ -
; $ i l , 5 6 o ' 2 o o - - [ r g a - z t 2 - s 3 2 4
b i I t - 2 ' \ - 6 : z \ 3 4
| (4) Slncc a large sample ls usod In thls probtem, tgS% = zgsYo and the confi'
r dcnce lnterval ls:
i Y ' t i z e s y r 9 '
(sspm * ($z.eo )(z,zoo )) t (t.eoo )($sze )l38, 78O t $635
IIb
tI
tt
I
I
L
IIb
*
II
E ,
!
I
L
!t
)b
I
Cnsgter 3
52
P3-8
(r ) (1)vt
(4)
Fr -t)ActlvltY
Dovlation
(5)
ui-7f(4)
Squarrd
(6)
Vt-7Wr-htt)
til-h"(2)
Squarsd
(2)ru-h
(3)xi
[.aborjloto
9501rO241rlo0' l , l€
1r3131,.C11155211372t,36011455tp lI r lSo
0091)Oz21por}283r,&?9r'260lr44O
r}20or1335Ir l641$7311124
2,.JCO
Maintenancc Coct
Ug1!r Cost Dovlrdon
.lan, ZOe '.-.$'l'l05 (286)
Feb., 2OA ,.. . l '110 (365)
fnar., 2OA ... tt39O Pf)
Oot., tOO.... l'449 F2)
May, 2OA.'. ' I tGtS t37
.tune,2OA .. lF?5 U
JulY, 2OA -.. 1'687 2Oo
Arg.r 2OA ... I;OSO 169
Sep., ZOI ... f 1595 ll/f
o"t., ZOI .... 1t675 104
not. ,2OA .. . 1,405 t t6)
o"". , 2OA.." 1125.1 1230)
.,;;:;io" ..' eso (cgr)
;;;:, ro",.,. I '175 (3oc)
"" . ,2O8 " ' 1/ ;?5 158)
;;;:;ro' "" r'5oo 25
""r, aOt "" I'COB 127
,;;,2o8 .. l '6s3 172
,ri t , ' to" "" 1'675 tg4
;;;; 2oB "' 1'724 243
;;;. ,2oB "' 1'626 145
O",.r rO" "" 1]576 04
*;".;2oB "' l '633 172
;".: 2oB ..' t,/tt' (63)
Totsl.-..$$ J
(2e0)(210)(13r)
(02)7321
312132128216(ro)(eo)
(24r)(2r8)1zo)4300l o
2006005ct6)133(1r o)
J
84,1@46,656l7 , l6 l
8,{d61329
u197rg17,12116}8764,Sl?,l5
3C18,loo
68108t471324
aoo11849
eBOrloo
40,OOO2"oo9rO2551776
17,68913,456
543.682
82r94O78,84Ot1,921
zo4to,o0t
921c4..:7222FOBr4,30441r?to
1t4/420'7OO
1271''7106'708
Ir l20I1076
12$731'72O
38,8OOt2'150
' t3r776
ct,t+0)2i2,876
T,3S
G51.300
8i1796
133)2258128t
I ,O24
18,769
11936
12143'6
2AF8112199637,636
6t77652,90O
281196193r636
3r136c,25
t3rt2923F8437,6;:!660,o4921rO?5
8rgl6zf�F84
3r9O9<
34€ee
-v7
- I y t + n -
- ! X , j * n -
f -
3 3 5 , 5 4 { + 2 4 - $ 1 1 4 8 1
? 9 , 7 6 0 + 2 4 ' 1 1 2 4 0
x ( x r - t X v , - i )- r 2
x ( x r - f ) " x ( v r - Y ) -
651,30o 651,300
- 0 6 )J(ss3,682 X t 'o
Column 7 total )
651,3OO- fr|sfr
eolum4
ffitumn 5 total
r2 - (,ezotzs )z - .758162
. E59798,983 '092
- .870725
53
I
b
tI!
lS
I
I
b
It
i
I
-
I
!
I
t
!
Cnagter g
P3-B (Cohtinued)
(r) (2) F)vt ru-f, -.-:!
Mtlnttnanct ion Machlnc
Uontf,, . *" Dcvladon ry
,I',-r0o....31'195 (2so) 8oo
;;;:; too,,'. r'116 (365) 7u
;;20A... i '3eo '
Pl) ?ttior- ioo-.. ttas t32) e87
mty, tO",. . . I '018 197 I '186
,;;;, 2oA.. t,EE u l' ltn]",r,'ro"-. 1'087 2Oo 1391
;;;.,20A... t,6o loe 1'2u,
Sep., 2OA... 1 '595 1t4 I t l86
oct. ,2OA* l '675 194 t , l$
Nov.,2OA'.. l '4O5 f'O) 997
Dec., 2OA..' 1331 (23O) 841
Jan.r 2oB '.' 95o ($r) 60'2
Feb.,2OB.' . 1 '175 (306) 73t l
Mar., 2o8... 1,4?5 FO) 1'O*Apr.,2OB... r.rfo 25 1't*MaY,2OB ..' I 'OOB 127 1'174
June, 2o8.. I 'O53 172 :2*July,2oB '-. ,, izo t94 1,.oA
Aug., 2O8... 1t124 28 13,23
SeP., 2OB '.. 1'026 145 133x)
Oct.r 2OB... 11675 94 l '1S
Nov.,2oB'.. 1'653 172 \A7
Dec.,2oB.- 1118 (O3) I 'O35
Totll..-.€5.!!!l J 25'8oo
({)
trl -i)ActivttY
ry!91!gn(2o0)(3:lr)
(88)(88)t t t
70214163t l l171rrsl
t234.l(573)(342)
1 6oo00
17118928'155
00l02
(5)
v,-il'(4)
(6)
V - xW'rtrD
v- jf(2)
Souarcd8rJe6
$332s8,'811'o24
l8'76911936
42,4362,.FO112'99637'Gi:l6
6J7652'9OO
28t'0ol93'636
3'136. o,25
t0'129z?.F8437'33659'o4921,p25
8p3O2aF843,S9
Squrrod
7oJ56to9r50r
7r7U7;t+4
12,321a,|1
a8,65023FOe1215212',3l1
oro84641753
328r38116,964
a253,ooo0r8Ol
29,l19,72101r5O421tQ?s
Irloo26,44
(4) r (2)
76,076120,8t5
8roo821816
15.r2O73,a76
44,4S27F1712,A3133,174
5192853,82O
304,2031041652
(s4ollFOo
121573N,11236'665oo,,:0,�n1476
8'4OO27r8*
I
!
bI,013.8?9 lol0'600
,,
- x Y t + f t - s 3 s r $ &- f ' 2 5 r 8 O 0 *
- - '
1 i r ( x t - x ) ' x ( r r - Y )
+ 24 - $1,48124 - Iro75
(Golumnz tout )
1,O13,8261,o13 ,826
@ , 5 0 6 )
- f f i - 'ee1176
(10) l,600 2F20
J J.o35349
Columq
Cofumn 5 total
r ? - ( . 9 9 1 1 2 6 ) 2 - . 9 8 2 4 3 0
ffi46@366'o88
v
54 chaotar 3
P3-B (Contlnued)'i2l
- ' Th; activlty moa3uro us9-d to predlct- maintenanco cxpcnee should be
machlne h6urs, nrhlch wlll result In ttre following cost cstlmates:
b -x ( : - t ) ( v - Y )
: ( x - f ) 2
Cotumn 6 totalColumn 5 total
s I ,195I , l l 61,39Olr4d.g1 ,6181r5,?S116871,6501r5fi5I ,6751,4o51r?J5',l
950111751r4?S1,5061,6081165!l116751?724116261,57511653I , 4 1 8
sss.5!{
1, Ol3 ,826 3.979213- mEim
- variable rate
slnco y r a + bi rthen the estlmated fixed cost ls determlned as follows:
t r j --blx
r r s1,481 - (3,e2e213 x1'O75 )t - $ l '481 -31 '052.65e r 3428.35
(r) l2l (31x1 rt Ui= 1.+-bx!
Actiral PredletedMachine Malntenance Malntenance
]lours Cogt Cogt
(5)tq -viF(3)
Months
(41ln -vil
PmdlctlonErtor
(2) - (31q26)(4r)(s)
542A(33)
(0)I5 .
27o(r)
3029('tl)(34)30
5Iort)6
i 3 'lze'1
E-lg)'
(4)Squared3 676
1168125
2,9167U
IrO89368t25
729o
. 1900841
5r041I ,156
9002581o
4936
1 6 9576
sl zsr 7
Jan., 2OA....Feb.r 2OA ...Mar., 2O4...Apr . , 2OA.. . .May, 2OA,. .June, 2OA�,.Ju l y ,2OA, . . .Aug. , 2O4. . .Sep. , 2OA.. .Oct.r 20A,...Nov., 2O4...Dec., z0n....Jan. , 2O8. . .Feb., 2O8...Mar., 2O8...Apr., 208,...May, 2OB ...June , 2O8 . .Ju ly , 2O8. . .Aug. , 2O8. . "Sep., 2.O8...Oct . , 2O8. , .Nov . ,2O8 . . ,Dec., 20-Et...
Tot81.... . . .
8097#9879,87
1 , 1 8 61r154-11291112381 1 1 8 611246
997841
. 502733
I,O9OI ,1351;17411246�1126,.1,3231,23O1 , 1 6 511237I ,O35
39.8gg
3 1&211r1571,3951,3951r59O115581,693116411,59O116481,4O51r?52
920Ir l46114961r54O11578116481,66611724116331,5691,ffO1r4f .2
€g€{z''rounding error
j t ( " t - v ' ) 2 Column 5 total2 4 - 2
I\
" ' - \ n - 2
1317 ,817 ,- \ fr- - S2B.4sBlo3
lF
II
>
!I+ Clqter 3
I
I P3-8 (Cgncluded)!
r (a) ffirfflffi:;|;ffi,T:"t""'
lor maintenance cost at the 1'1oo machine
b
II
b
II
I
t
I
!
I
tt
II
!
55
t - t l
{ { r r - x lY ' * tg ; s * S ' . , i 1 + I +r - - ' c v ' -
\ n t ( r , - x ) '
i - _ _ - ^ - . i r ( t r t o o - 1 , o 7 5 ) 29028 .3tt + (s.ezezl3 )(r,1oo) r (e.ozl )(ze.rcarm )! , * * - r,agsff
31,505.48 * $80.26
I
! :
!
b
\,
1
>
I
56Cnapter 3
W = a + b S
CASES
= 5.062 + (.023) (1'20O)= 5.062 + 27.6= 32.662 or about 33 total workens
Total workgl.s negdgd ....,.........rr...............................r.
LeSS pgnnanent WOfkgllS ......'......................t"""""""
Number of temporary workers needed'
Regression 2 appoars to be better than Regrcsslon 1 because:
i"i- O"t outside the rclevant r.tnge have been excluded' thereby nemov'
ing anY bias.(b) fhe standard error of the estimate (s') for Regrcssion 2Js smaller
than the standard error of the estimate for Begression 1 (.432 com'pared to 2.012).
(c) The coefficieni of determinatlon (r2) ls hlgher for Regrcsslon 2 tfian
the coefficient of determinatlon for Regrcssion t (.998 compared to
.962).
Jim Locter can use the legression in his plannlng for tempolary workers
lf the foltowing condltlons exist:(a) The forecasted dally shlpments are greater than 3oo and do rrot
deviate too much from the agtual shlpments.(b) The amount of work to be done is dependent only on the number of
shipments to be made and does not change from shipment to shlp-ment.
(c) Worlier productlvlty is erpected to remain approximately the sameas that experienced during the period used to develop the negnes-sion.
(d) A strong cause and effect relationship exists between the depen-dent variable and the Independent variable.
(e) The time frame for a forecast ls short'term'
The regression could be improved by the following:(a) Redeveloplng the regression using the number of hours worked as
the dependent variable.(b) Performlng another analysis ll rush orders or deviations of actual
otderc fiom forecasts occur wlth any degree of ragularlty.(c) tnvestigating the historical data used as a basis for the regrcssion
to determine lf there aFe any further unusual circumstances thatshould be temoved from the data set.
td) Redoing the regression after a period of tlme' such as four to slxmonths, to discover lf thens have been any changes In the relatlon-shlp between the dependent and the Independent varlables.
c3-1
(r)
331 023
tzl
(3)
(4)
l-
II
t
Clnpter3
c3-2
(1)The|nc toase |nyassoc ia tedwl thaun| tJncnease inx ls . l .2 ,There fore ,eSoo-untt tn"r""i" tn x wtti-J;ilin a 6'O'unitln"t"t"e 11'2 x 5O0) in y
(2) [:i"T,::riJ"i?,1P."rr. unreriable rf the corrararon rs spurious' rhe
' assumpt ion is t t ra t1 ;# i " " ]og i * r .L i " i i " "sh ipbetweenoutpu tand the use of efee#c powgr and dirsct labor'
(b) rrre equa$on may b; Ji"ble undsr ii" "onattions at the time of th
studv,butfconOltiJns-tt'"ng"'theresultsmaybeunreliable'(c) D"tj;;;;;- limitJ i" " l'ige of 5oO.2'ooo unlts.
(d}rts-assumeatrratastralght-| |neassumption|sva||d.(e)rrrecoemcbntofcorrelat|onlg"'""", '"ofttreextenttowhich
two varlables ars ,;;i;ttiearty. n i" t t"railve m€asune of good-
ness of fit. More or iil"-""tiatlon ln yi" ttpl"lned by ora rugrcssion
egua*on for direct f,rl]o, nours than'ior elbctrfc Powen that ls' the
esuatlon for dlrsct ffi;; iiouo ts a uJtt"r flt ttan the equatlon for
elecilric Power'(0Thestandarderoro f thees t lmate . lsameasuneotvar |a t |on f rom
the regrcsston ltne.li il; ;;t "tlon" tt" not-alty dlstrlbuted
about the regrc"",on .qu"ii*, tne sGndard errcr can be lnterpret-
ed ln tllre same r"y'", it " "t"no"tu-i-"'r"uon' The stsndard entr ls
gruater In the case ;id;; i"Uo' f'o'u-o tft"n In trs caso of elestric
power' GGA-canada (adapted). Reprint wtttr permisslon
( 1 ) An advantage of Alternative A ls that using time-as an IndePendent vari-
abte is a conyenl""i*"V to take il; ;;;;ideqtlon all posslble factors
that may be lnfluencing the depeidtnfvartaUrc Juring each period of
time. A disadvantage of Alternatire A rs that there ls no loglcal rclation-
shlp between years and rental expense'An advantage of Atternatf"e b-ts that this method ls loglcal because
as rovenu"" tnciase, the stgryi lnrr""r", and, thus, rsntal exPense
lncreases. A di;-d';tage of eliernatfv" 6 t" that an estimate of ruv-
.n""il"J#[l; of Arternative c is that the mathematicar carcurationr
are relailvely eaiy and the mc-thod ls easy to underctand' A disadvantag
of arternativ, diJ.ffi il; arnrrm"t. .rr-r"9" rs an oversrmptfica*on
that does ,rot *r"oi;;;';;t rchilonship between varlables'
OuPter 3
C3-3 (Concluded)
|2|MotorcoGor?orat ionshouldse|ectA|ternativeBbecau.sethere|at ion-rhtp between neyan,r" riJt} " ,"nt"l .;;;;;b ioglcal' the coefficient of
corrslafion ls hlgh, rnaiii" tt"ndard eqor of the estimate ls low'
(3) A "t"ti#;iirr[iiq* i" "'n-"pp-priati-ieirtoa for es*matins rental
cxpense betorp i[otorro-;;ft.d"iTi'il;[" attto Parts' A statistical
tcchnigue attempts to- -"""r- ttrt "o'"iation between tre variables
trat aru pnesumeO to fral]IE"it "nA ttftA rclatlonshlp' and such a
relailonship appea* to "iriiiirti" "ttuauon' of cout:e' Motorco ls
lssumrng that any neratl-J"iiJs tnat-.rr=t in *re hrstorrcar data wttt con'
tlnue ln ttre ftrture wnnout-ln;ig"' Management mav-want to adiust the
variabtes for chang". i;i rr"ip*tt *irr"t"iu6 and Motorco may wish to
i ntroo uc-e -oit'tt
q Jantltative vari ab les'
c3-4
(r) The phraso ,,-gle""ion provides a rclational statement nther than a
causal statementn means that reg;"ion analysls ls used to determine a
relationshlp, but not nt"""sarffyi cause-and'etfect relationship' A spe'
clftc value for a negnession cosfficlent does not imply that the lndepen-
dentvar|ab|e(s1ca-usesachangeinthedependentvar iab|e.The meaning of each of the "VtJb;i" in tt i basic formula for a tegression
oquatlon follows:y'r = estlmateJ value of the lth observation of the dependent variable'
a = t h e y . a x l s | n t e r c e p t o r c o n s t a n t t e r m ( 9 . 9 . , t h e f i r e d p o r t i o n o f asemivariable exPense)'
b = the rcgrcsston coefficient corresponding to the Independent vari-
ab |er (e .g .g thevar iab tecos te lementassoc ia tedwi thaoneun i tchange in actlvlty r).
x1 = the tth ou""r""tibn-of the first Independent varlable.
c = the regrcsslon coefficlenl iott""ponding to the lndependent vari'
ab |ez(e .9 . , thevar iab |ecos te |ementassoc ia tedw} thaoneun| tchange ln activity:).
21 = the lth observatibn of the second independent variable.
d = the error term associated with the lth observation.
Statistical factors used to test a negrcssion equation for goodness of flt
include:(a) The coefficient of determination,;2, which lndicates the portion of
the varian"" i" the dependent variable erplained by the lndepen-
dent variabtes. A coefficieni of determination approaching I lndi-
cates a good llt.
l2l
(3)
59
(b)
(a)
(b)
(4)
I
lv
IL.
lb
Ilb
I|-
Ib
Lt,I!
II
!
l!
b
II:,
L
Clapter3
l -
C3-4 (Concluded)
c3-5
( 1 )
(c)
(d)
(e)
The standard orror of the estimate which measures the dispersionof the observed points about the regression line. A standard error ofthe estimate approaching zeno Indicates a good flt.The term "linearl$l wlthln a relevant ranget' means that in a specificsltuation, a straight-line relationship between the dependent vari-able and the independent variables can be assumed only within therange of historically observed values.The term rconstant variance (homoscedasticltyl" means that thedistrlbution of the observations about the regression line is unlformfor all values ol the independent varlables within the observedrrange of values.The term "serial correlation" refens to the lack of independence in ageries of successlve observations oyer tlme. The deviation of avalue from the regression line should be unrelated to the deviationof any other point from this line.The term 'normality" means that the ioint probabllity disHbution ofUre variables ls normally distributed (multlvariate normal). The fre-quency of the observatlons should approximate a norrnal curve.The term smultlcolllnearlty' refers to tfie correlatlon of lndependentvariables. When Independent variables are hlghly correlated wltfleach other, the relationshlp(s) between the Independent vzrlableemay obscure the relationship between the lndependent varlables(s)and the dependent variable.
(a ) D = (2 .455+( .188X1,5OO,O0O* 1O01O00) )x 1O,OO0un l ts= (2.455 + 2,821x 1O,0OO unlts= 5.275 x 1O,OO0 unlts= 82,750 unlts
(bl D = (2,491 + (.441(12,OOO,OOO + 1,O0O1OO0)) r IO,OOO unlts= 12,491 + 5.28| x IO,OOO unlts= 7,771r lO,OOO unl ts= 77,71O unlts
The 5o7o confidence interval for demand is calculated as follows:D = 104,160 unlts= {.59X,922 x 10,OOO untts)
= 1O4r16O unl ts * 6,361.8 unl tsor between 97,798 unlts and 1 10,522 unlts.
l:
\
\
tzl
&
c3-5
(3)
Cl?€.pter 3
(Concluded)
Eguation 4 ls the best The coefficient of correlatlon and the coefficientof determination arp the hlghest of ttre four equatlons. The coefficient ofdetermination Indlcates that 70.3oh of the sample variance of automobllesales ls explalned by the rcgrcssion. For predigtlve purposesr the stan-dard arror gf the estlmate a|.922 is also tfie lowest of tfie four models'giving the tlghtest (smallestl phyrsical confidence Interval of any of theequatlons.Equation 3 assumes that factory rebates (R) are dependent on advertls-ing funds (A). The rcsuJts of the analysls show that factoly rcbates andadvertlsing funds are almost totally independent andr ttrereforc' cannotbe used to predict each othea The rcsults of Equatlon 3 lend credlbllltyto the use of A and R ln Equatlon 4. The Independence of A and Rleduces ttte posslble negative aspects of colllnearlty'
(4)
I!
S
I
CHAPTER 4
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
'I
O4-1. The five Parts arc:(a) Direct nraterblg reqtbn(b) Direct lsbor ceclbn(c) Frlory ovefiead(O Work h Pr@oer hventories(c) Fhbhed grood hvmtorbr
*2. iho bahnc" rhoet ir t 3tal.ment ct finsncblpcrttbt; the hcqrr ctBternont b a dalement of
sttYity. The incqne lbtement is ccnplementaryto thc babnce sheet, munthg in padicubr fortho ctrange in hr prcprietary equrty Bs a resullof operatims during the year. In |hat respecl' theincornc atatemenl ir eeaentially nothing morethan a major rection of the retained eamingsaccounl. Thereforc, tht rsvenue and expenseaccounls in the income 3talemont have beenlcrmed'cxplanatoqf ac@unl3, explaining thecbb and lkrw of r.YcnueE and cxpensee lhatbod to thc new hcqno (or bce) and to the newrrtahed camhgs balancc h the balance sheet.
O4-3. Thr ordinary babncr rhecl and incqne slate-menl aro htended to ptwkJe hlormalist as lofinancial peilion and resulb of operation of aburinesl, in sctordancc wilh several assump'liqs that arc made h preparhg |he stalements.Frqn the standpoinl cil the criticisms rnade, themost important cil these assumptions are lhalcocl lost appropdale arnortization of cost mea'rurca unelgired cct, and that a business meybo a$umod lo bc gohg to conlinue operatbnsindclinilely into lhe future. Accounting state-mcntg sre usually prepared on lhe heory lhal acale or gome other definite event is essenlialbcfore revenur is recognized. Basically, theaseot sUe of a balancc aheet coctaha a preson-tstbn o{ the anrounts cl cost incurred, which canbc presumed lo bencf i t f u ture per iods. 'Anincornc slalement presents the srnounl of rov-cnue recognized as having been realized duringthc period, less the podioo cl all cosls incunedthsl doe3 not appear to be lairly delerrable loftnurc perinds.
Thc ircome staternonl is prirrnrity a m€asurecd what lres been camcd, and not a measure of'camhg power.' For plant assots, the balancerheot b pdnarily a rnasure cl accountability forcxp.nditureE, rhowing acguisit ion cosls leescodr sllocalod to past operatbns. This rneasureof accounlability may br quile diflerent from1rur velue.'
To hcreese ilg usefuhess as one elemerd injudChC eaming porver, the ircsne stalement ispicparcd with a dietinclion between operatingand nonoperaling items. For the samo roason,c.rtain iterns may be climinoled frorn the incorne
slstomenl and shown in the statemont o lnrtained eemings. However, the effec-t of nmre'
curring and nonoperaling transaclions is notentirelY eliminated.
lnfonnalion revoaled by a serios of income3tatcments b morc rignilinnt in iudghg eamingpower than informatbn revcaled by ane hcqncstatcmstl. The incqne of a bushess rnay folbwor .Yen exaggetat€ the ups and downs ol thebueinesg cyclo and, therefore, lhe inccne of anycrc year will ncl represent eaming powor.
Changes in law or local zoning ordinancesmay result in a marked change in lhe eamingpower ol a bushess. Ukewise, changes in public
taste, devebpment of new prodtrts' apPgaranceol new conrpetilion, acquisition ol subsiJiaries'changes in management and lhe like, all maychange earning power and yet not be clearlyrellecled, il reflected at all, ir one incorne stale'menl.
The accounting use of historical. rather lhancurront, dollars in measuring depreciation andcost of goods sold may resull in distoding anyview of earning power obtained frorn a singleincorne statemenl.
ln regnrd to plant ass€ls, il can be said lhattheir value to a going concetn is usually depen'dent uPon the eaming power of the business.Such s value is not necessarily the same as lQ'uidation value, cost, cost legs amortization.repbcement value, or any other kind of value'The phrase .true value'has no definile connota'tion.
O4-4. Actusl describes the way cosls are measured.i.e., at actual historical arnounts; /ull absaptiondescribos which elemenis of cost are allocaledto hvenlory accounls, i,e., all elements of rnanu-lacluring cost are fully allocated to hventories;p/ootss describes how cqsl infonnation is accu'mubted, i.e., costs are accumulated for eachprocoss or deparlment in the laclory.
O4-5. Prime costing systems albcate only lhe primecosts, direct material and direcl bbor, lo hvento-ry accounts. Direct costing syst€ms, abo calledvariable costing syslems, albcale the variablemanulacluring ccts, direcl materbl, direci labor,and variable factory overhead lo lhe inventoryaccounts. Absorpticn costing systems albcate loIlvenlories parl or all of tixed frtory overhead,in addilioo to all varlrble manufacluring costs.
04€. Actual costing m€asuros product costs at actualhislorical arnounts, while standard ceting mea-sures product costs by ueing predeterminedarnounts ol resourceg to be coosurrned and pre-determined prices o{ those resources.
62
Q,4-7. Preess costing aicumulates costs fot oachpt@olts or department in the ladory end rnah'
tains detailcd recordr and calculationr of the
cotl of *ork h preest. Job order cting accu-
mulales cotr lor oach irb, lc', balcfi' or contrasl
and mEhtains detBilsd records and calculalbngod tho cost! of tork in prceas. BacHlush €st'ing accumulal.r coltr by working backwardsthrough ihc availablc inlormatiqr afler produc-
ticn is cornpleted (i.e., at the end of the accounl'hg pori<rd) and rnahtahr no detailed records ol
lhe costs cl ttPrk ir Prcesr.O.4€. Actual cosihg il more cornmon lhan standard
coothg in defense'rebted industries, while stan'dard cosiing ic adnewhat more cornmon else'where.
O4-9. Super'full absorpfbn or suPer absorption refersto tho income lax requiremenl thal some pur'
chasing and storage costs be allocated to inven'tory ac@unts.
O4-lO. Job order costing would be colrlmon in repairshops. buiHhg cotslructicr, and prhting; and in
servicc bushesse€ guclr as medical, legal' archi-leclurat, corutrucliqr engineering, accounling'and consulling lirms, as mentioned in the lexl'Other examples include shipbuilding. bridgebuilding, tool and die manufacturing, arl andantique resloratirn, and contracl rossarch'
o4-1 1. As mentixred h tho text, Pr66!ts costing wouldbe common in thc mill ing, brewing, chemical'and textile industries; in sirnple assembly oP€ra-tions: and in seryice businesseg serving largenumbers o( cuglorners simultanrcusly, ruch asairlhes. Other erampleg include petroleum refin-ing, basic food preessing, and manufacture of
ChaPter 4
low*ost @nsumor products such as toys, dis'posable Pens, na:ronr' and lighters.
04-12. Aspecls cqrtrnon lo icb order and prccess cost-ing are:(a) They can be used by rervice organiza'
tbns.(b) They requin cqrsiderablo detail to calcu'
late tho cost ol *ork h Procells.(c) The wprk h process accotnl in the gener'
a l lcdgcr i r lupported by subsid iaryt€cordg.
O4-1 3. A blended cthg method uee irb order cctinglo accumulate soflrc clement(s) ol cost andprcces3 ccthg to accumulale ofien-
O4-14. Flcxible manufacluring 3yslems consisl of anintegrated collection ol automated productionpnocesges, autornated rnaterials rpvemonl, and
cornputerized systetn csttrob lo utilize facilitiesln etticiently rnanulacturing a highly flerible vari-
ety cl Products.Q4-15. The adnantages of a llexble nranufacturing sys'
le.n over the cther systems include shorl (near-
zero) setuP limes, lhe absence of a learning
curve, lflet lead times to chipmont' lower diresllabor cost per unil, lower direct labor cost in
total, and bwer work in prccess invenlories.O4-16. Thc hilial cost of creathg a flerible rnanufactur'
ing system is much higher than lhat of olher
rngnuf asturing systoms.O4-17. l,lanufacturing setthg suiied for bacHlush cosl'
ing are distinguished by very fasl processing
speeds, which rernoves both the incentive and
the opportunily to track the detailed costs of
work in Pr@ess'
63
l-
It
LI\-
Ib
Ib
IS
Ib
IS
I
b
I
b
Chaptor I
. EXERCISES
E4-1 Calculation of cost of goods sold (in thousands):
TOtal manUfaCtUfing COSt ........... ' ................r.r.....tAdd work in process inventory beginning """""
Less work in process inventory ending.r..........".
Cost of goods manufacturgd r.......o.r.-........ ' ....r.. ' .,Add finished goods inventory beginning ........!....
GOSI Of gOOdS ayaitablg fOf Sa|g.. . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . .oo.. . . . . .Less finished goods inventory, ending ...o...... ' ......
Cost of goods sotd ..... ' . .-,.................... ' ..
E4-2 Calculation of cost of goods sold (in thousands):
DirgCt matgrials used.....................r...,...r,... ' ........DifgCt 1abOf . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . .FaCtOfy Ovgfh gad .o.. . ' . . r . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total manufaCtUring COSt . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . . . .Add work in process inventory beginning ........ ' ..
Less work in process inventory, endingGost of goods manufactured.. . . . . .Add f in ished goods inventory beginning . . . . . . . . ' . . . .
Gos to fgoodsava i |ab te fo rsa |e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � � � � � � � � � � � � �Less finished goods inventory ending..............,..
Gost of goods sold .......o............. ..t...... ' ..
s l 1080
$1eo90
$t oo1 5 0
$25060
$.11D
$230250
$480210
$27o'340
$61027fJ
s340
$ s o6080
i
I
Clpptcrl
E44 (Goncluded)
(21 Gost of goods manufactured:
Stores, April 30....... '. '........r.,.. .....--..----.PUfChaSgS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . .
LoSS: StOrtSt May 3t ro....rr...........r.................r....o......r..o....or....
Dirgct matgr ials COnSUmgd ' . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . . . . t . . r . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . . r .Dirgct tabor used (4r25O x5221..r,.....,.........o.,............r.,...o......FaCtOfy OYefhead . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . r . . . . . . . ' . . . . .
Total manufacturing costAdd work in process, beginning inventory
Loss wgrk in process, ending inventory................r.....,...........COSI Of gOOdS manUfaCtUngd .... '..... '.........r...................... '.......
Ending balance of finished goods:
Finished Cost of Finishedgoods, + goods goods, =
April 30 manufactured May 31
S 4 5 , 6 0 2 + $ 2 8 2 r O g O X =
X =
Therefore, the finished goods ending balances is $47,662.
E4€ (al *",i135";;;;;il..:::.::::::.::::::::::::::-:::::: 35,ooo
(b) Work in Process............ t...........r.... 33'OOOFactory olrgrhead Gontro| ..o............r...,........ 21000
Matgr ia ls .or . . r . . . . . ' r . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . r . . . . . .o .
(c) Payroll 4O,OOOAccrugd Payro11.....,....,.r,.r..,.....r....,...r...,
Accrugd Payroll .r................,......,...,.............. 4OTOOOCaSh . . . . r r . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . o . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . o r . . . .
Work in Procgss ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . .o,.. . , . , . .r. . . . . . . . . . g2rOOOFactory Overhead control,.. S'OOO
Payroll . . . . . . . . . .
(0 Factory gverhead Control 4,OOO
65
(31
s 1O,25O105,OOO
s l15,25012r7AO
sl 02,55093,50077.390
5273r4/,O61.420
s334,86O52,80O
s282,O60
Cost ofgoodssold
s28O,OOO
$ 47,662
35 ,OOO
35,OOO
4O,OOO
4O,OOO
4O,OOO
4,OOO
(d,
(el
Cash
ffi
E4-S (Concluded)
(g) Factory Overhead Control .."""'r"""""""""Accounts Payable . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . .""""
Factory Overhead Gontrol .....-................. '."'Accumulated Depreciat ion.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' .Prepaid Expenses .. . .r , . . . . , - . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . .Accrued Property Taxes .,..,........r........"'
WOfk in PfOCeSS .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Factory Overhead Control
Finishgd GOOdS.. . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . .Work in Process.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts Rgceivabl€ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gash . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Accounts Recgivabl€. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "
Cost of Goods So1d.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! . . . . . . . . """
E4-6 (al
Work in Procgss ...................... ' ...............,..,.Factory Ovgrhead Control .r....r..,r. ' .............,.Marketing Expenses Control ........-...............Administrative Expenses Control
Payrol l . . . . . . . . . . . , . .
Factory Overhead ControlCash.. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Factory Overhead ControlAccounts PaYable
Work in Process . . . . . - . - . . - .Factory Overhead Gontrol
Finished Goods.. ' .Work in Process """"""
Chapter 4
l8 ,ooo _18,OOO
4 , 1 3 02 , 1 O O
78011254
36,1303 6 , 1 3 0
92,OOO92,OOO
8O,OOO8O,O0O
4O,OOO4O,OoO
60,000 :
1 7 , 5 O O' 1 7 , 5 O O
1 , 8 0 01,800
27,OOO
17,0OO2,0005,0003,000
27,OOO
2r5OB :2,5O8
8,5OOB,5OO
1 4 , 8 O 81 4 , B O B
6 0 , 1 O O6 0 , 1 O O
(hl
(il
o
(k)
Finished Goods . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . , . . . , . , """" 6Ot000
13,50OAccounts Payable 13'5oo
(bl
(c)
(d)Accrued Payroll .....,. ' ...... 27 |OOO
(e)
(0
(gl
(h)
Chaptor I
E4-O (poncluded)
O Accounts R9cgivab18.............o...............oo'....
Cost of Goods Sold'Finished Goods'sl5,ooo + $oo,roo -$1s,roo = $8o,ooo
67
Sa8O,OOO
6O,OOO
8O,OOO
60,o00
E4-7 WALLACE INDUSTRIESCost of Goods Manufactured Statement
For May( in thousands of dol lars)
Direct materials:Direct materials, April 30, 20A.........oPurchases ......,...,.Freight i l l . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . r . r . . . t . .
Direct materials available for use.....t.Less direct materials, May. 31r 2OA...
Dirgct materials consumed ..........DirgCt tabOr.........roo........ i ..r.......o.,Factory overhead:
Indirect factory labor ..............,...r.......Utilities ($f gs r go o/o).............,..,...o..r..Propefi t?,if, ..........r.....,.............r.........lnsuran co ($2O x gO%1..r...,...............r.Depreciation Sl2O + $3O).....
Total factory ovgrhgad,r...r..r.r.......Total manufacturing coSt..........o....r............
Add work in process, April 30, 2OA,...
Less work in process, May 31, 20A.,.Cost of goods manufactured
s5f ot 5
$ zs ,
525
sss323
$ e o1 0 8601 250
s s30260
320
$ t , t 1o150
$1,28O210
$ { . 0 5 0:
Chaptor Iffi
E+8 cll{l{ABAR 69ffiplMfStatement of Cost of Goods SoldFor Year Ended December 31
Raw materials:Purchase3 .........'."
Less dlgcounts on rawmaterials Punchagod .""
Lesg raw materials on handtDgcgmbgr 3{ e 2OA.........""t
Cost of raw materials consumodDirgct labor ...........o."""""""""""r'Factory overheads
Factory mainte na!1co"...............Factory suppllgs used ....""'t""'Powgr and hgat-factofl ......'...'lnsuranco erpense-factorY
building and equiPrllollt...."Dep reciation-factory bullding
and eqUipmgnt .."""""""""Factory superintendence ..........tndirgct factory |abor.........."""'
Total factory overhead ........
Total manufacturing costs-,....--.....-.-.Add work in Process, January 1r 2OA
Less work in Process, December 31t204
Cost of goods manufacturgd....-........Add finished goods,Jbnuary 1r2OA.
Cost of goods available for sale o....-..Less finished goodsr December 3l'
2OA' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . t . . . . . . " t " " "
Cost of goods sold ....................o.......
$40o,ooo
4,2OO $ggs,goo
24,0O0s371'8OO
lEo,ooo
s?8,4OO22t4AO19,400
4,8OO
l7,5OO1O0,00020,OO0
222,5AO
$774,3OO. 84,OOO
$858,30O
3O,OOO
$828,3OO37,5OO
s865,80o
. 7O.OQ0
szggJsq
CGA-Canada (adaptedl. Reprint with permission'
Chaptor I
PROBLEMS
P4-1
(rl BRTDGEWELL COMPANYGost of Goods Sold Statement
For Month Ended July 31(in thousands)
Direct materials consumed,...,....... .....r......r...,.D i r g C t 1 a b O f . . . . . . . . r . r . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . r r . r . o . . . . ' r . . r . . r
FactOry ovgrhgad ................ ' ..................................... ' .....r............Total manufacturing cost (a)...............................rr..,....,............Add work in process inventory July 1.......,......,.....,............,........
s7sLgss work in process inventory, July 3'l ..........,.......................,... 25Cost of goods manufacturgd r.....,........r..,r....r...,........o..........,....... 55OAdd finished goods invgntory, July I (b) .............r....................... 20Cost of goods availablg for salg r........r............,.,..........,.....o......... S?OLgss finishgd goods inventory, July 31(G) ................_.-.-.u.r.......... 15Cost of goods sotd ........,......... ' ......r.r....................,..,.....,...r......,.. GCalculat ions:
(a) Costofgoodsmanufactured... . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . .Add work in process, ending
Less work in process, beginning.. . . . , . . . . . . . - . , . . .Equals total manufactur ing cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b)
69
s 1 62420
s601 5
$5025
s75l 5
_999
(c)
Cost of goods available for sa|e.,.,......,..r...o. $ZOLess cost of goods manufactured.. . , . , . . . . . . , . . . 50Equals f in ished goods, beginning . . . . . . , . . . . , , , . . 14
Gost of goods avai lable for safe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ZOLess cost of goods so|d. . . . . . . . 55Equals finished goods, ending gg
' 70
(b) Work In Process a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a l a
a a a a a a a t a a a a a a a a a a a a a a '
Chapter 4
25,OOO
16,OOO2,OOO
29,OOO
24rOOO5,O00
25,OOO
29'0oo
5O,OOO5O,OOO
105,O00105,0OO
55,OOO55rO0o
P4-1 (Concluded)
l2l (al Matefia1S.o..r.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o... . . . . . . .o... . . . . . . . .AccountsPayable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . | . . . . . . . . . .
Factory Ovgrhgad Gontrol ....."""""""""""'Matgrials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r ' . . . . . . . .""""""""""" '
(cl Payrolt ($ZCrOoO +$5'OOO)"""""""""""t""'Accru gd Payro11 """"""""tr"""""D"""'r '
(dl work in Procgss ..............r....r..................... ' .Factory Ovgrhgad Gontrol r""""""""""t"o"
PayrOl l t . . . . . . . " t " " " " " " " t " t " " r t " " " " " " " t "
(e) Finished Goods
18 ,OOO
29,OOO
Work in ProcesS """t"""""""""""""""
(0 Accounts Rgceivabte""""""""""""""""""Sales ($60'000 + (75o/o of $6O10O0)) """'
cost of Goods so1d............................,..o.......Finishgd Goods """"""""""""" ' r"""""
Chapten4
P4-2(11 SCOTTSBURG COMPANY
Cost of Goods Sold StatementFor Month Ended June 3O
(in thousands)Direct materials:
Materials inventory June 1 ........................Purchases........................., ..........Materials avai lable for use.. . . . . . . . . .Less: Indirect materials used.................... S 1
s ls33
s48
Materials inventory June 30... . . . . . . . . 19 ZO
Total manufacturing cost (b)........Add work in process inventory June 1.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less work in process inventory June 30...............Cost of goods manufactured ......Add f inished goods inventory June 1 (c). . . . . . . . . . . . , .Cost of goods available for sale.,Less finished goods inventory, June 30 (d)..........:.Cost of goods so|d. . . . . . .Ga lcu la t ions :
(a) indirect labor + direct labor = $4gindirect labor + (indirect labor x 6) = $49i n d i r e c t l a b o r x T = 9 4 9indirect labor = 37d i r e c t l a b o r = 6 x $ 7 = 9 4 2
(b) Costo fgoodsmanufac tured . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . $120Add work in process, ending gO
sl 50Less work in process, beginning.. . . . . . . . 40Equals total manufactur ing cost. Sl iO
(c ) Cos t o f goods ava i lab le fo r sa le S19OLess cost of goods manufactured . . . . . . . 12OEqua ls f in ished goods, beg inn ing S ?O
s ,t,
$ 17
1 72
1 3 4
s l 14
s1s3
s l27
s l 93
s l s
72
P4-2 (Concluded)
(d) Cost of goods available for sale r...... '..""""'Lgss cost of goods so1d......................,......,..Equals finished goods, ending ..............."""
Chapter 4
33 ,OOO
29,0OO
49,OOO
49,OOO
120,OOO
210,OOO
155,OOO
l2l (al
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
n
Matgf ials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . .Accounts Payable ...,......r.....,.........o..,....
Work in Procgss . . . . . . . . . t r . . . . t t 'o t r " " " " " " " " t ' r " '
Factory Ovgrhgad Gontrol ............................Matgrials . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . ' t """"""""" t"" t"" '
Pay ro l l . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " " " " t t t t " t " t " " t t " " " " " t "
Accru gd Payro11...t..r..""""""""""""""'
WOfk in PfOCgSS . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . ' . . . . . r . ,o . . r . . . . . .
Factory Ovgrhgad Control ....t..r......"""""""Payroll ...............""""""""""""""""""'
Fin ishgd GOOdS.. . . , r r , . . . . . . . r . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . .o . . r . . . . . . . . .
Work in ProcgsS.... . . ' . . . . .""r"""o"""""" '
Accounts Rgcgivabl€... . . . . .". . . . . . . ."""""tt"""Sales ($14o,ooo + (50% ot $14o'o00))...
Cost of Goods So1d...................,....,..ro..........F inishgd Goods . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . """"""""""" '
$1 90{ 5 5
s 3 5
33,O0O
28,OOOI ,OOO
49,OOO
42rOOO7,OOO
12O,OOO
21O,O0O
{55,OOO
- ChaPtar I
P4-3 ,
(11
73
MADEIRA COMPANYSchedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured
For Month Ended March 31
work in process, March I .............r.......r,.......Production costs:
Dirgct matgriats.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $lo4rooo tr
r Direct labor....r.-....." """""""" l6otooo ttt
Factory overhead ..............,......""""""" 8or999 *tt -344t009
Lgss work in procgss, March 31 ............."""'
Cost of goods manufacturgd..-.'....,............... '
r Cost of goods sold ($345,O0O) + ending finished goods inventory($tos,ooo) - beginning finished goods inventory (slo2,ooo) = s348r000.
'rpurchases of materials during March ($l tO,OOO) + beginning materialsinventory (S2O,OOO) - ending materials inventory ($26'000) = SlO4'OOO.
r.' production costs for March ($gCC,OOO) - direct materials ($t Oe 'OOO1 =direct labor and factory overhead ($24O'0Oo).
Letx = d i rect labor1.5r = S24O,OOO
x = $l60'000 direct labor.5x = $8O,OOO factory overhead
(21 Prime cost:Direct materials (requirement (1)) .........,..r.o........, SlO4r0gODirgct labor (requiremgnt (1))....:....,..................... l6OIOOO
_9261poo
(31 Conversion cost:Direct tabor (requirement (1)) ' . . . . . . r . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $160rO0OFactoryoverhead(requirement(1)1.. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . 80'0OO
_9240,999
s 4o,o0o
s384,00036,000
$ a 8 , @ '
P4-4
CompanY A:Salgs " " " " t " " " " " t " t t " " t t t " t t " " t " " " t t t " " " " " t "
Cost ol goods sold:Finished goods inventory Janualy i """Gost of goods manutactlli9d"""""""""
Gost of goods availablo lor sa|e""""""'Finished goods Inventory December 3l
. Cost of goods Sold tt""t'o""t""""t"""t"'
Gross profit l2oo/o Of Sales).o......'..............r.....
GompanY B:' ctst of goods availablg tor 3a1o.,..r.........,......Less finished goods ending inventory""""""
COSI Of gOods Sold "t t"" t""""""""""r""""" '
CompanY C:Sal eS . . . " " " t " ' r t " t " 'o t " " t " " " " " " "o" t1" " " " " " t "
Cost of goods sold:Cost ol goods manufacttlrl9d"""""""""Add bsginning finished goods inventory
Cost of goods availablo lor 8a1e""""""'Less ending finished goods inventory""
Cost of goods Sold """"'o"""""""""""'
Gross profit """"t""""'r""""""""""""""""'
P4-5
S 600,0003,80O,OOO
$4,4oO,ooolr2OO'OOO
51,5{O,OOO_ 2'l o.oooslJggJoo
$ 34O,OOO45,OOO
$ 385,OOO52,OOO
Work in Process
Chaptor 4
s4,oo0,ooo
3,20O,OOO
s Soo,ooo
S 429,ooo
333,OOO
$ 96,000
346,OOO
13 ,OOO55,OOO
2OO,OOO268,N
End.9,Ooo
Finished Goods
Beg.(41
34,0OO348r00O
38Ct,o(toEnd.3O,W
2O,OOO65,OOO
85,O@
End.7S,OOQ
35O,OO0
2O,OOO5O,OOO
70,O@
7,0oo5O,OOO
20O,OOOloo,0oo
357,WEnd.17,@
Beg.ML(2)FOH
Materials and Supplies Accnred PaYroll
(8)(11
259,OOO Beg.
75Chapter 4
P4-5 (Concluded)
Accounts Receivable
54,0005OO,OOO
554,OOOEnd.22,OOO
,Factory Overhead Gontrol
Accounts Payable
77,OOO Beg.(7) (6) 18 ,OOO65,OOO
83,OOO
End.6,00O
2O,00055,00010,00o
2,OOO13,OOOlOO,AOO
(3)
532,OOO
lOO,OOO
55,0002OO,OOO
255,OAO
Payroll Cost of Goods Sold
350,OOO55,00O20O,OOO
255,OOO
(5)
(11l2l(3)(41(51(61rtl(81
Materials issued to production' 55O'OOODirect labor, $2OO,000Total factory overhead' $1OO'0OOGost of goods manufactured, $346'OOOCost of goods sold, S35O,OOOPayment of accounts payable' 577'0OOCol lect ion of accounts receivable, 5532,OOOPayment of Payroll ' S259'0OO
GGA-Ganada (adapted).Reprint with Permission.
Sales
t
1 ,<
76
P4-6
Work in ProcessMaterial8...
Cost ol gOodg SOld ttt"tt""t"""""t""tt""
Add finished goods inventoq/ incl€ase"
Cost of goods manufactllhod..'...'...r..""'Add work in process inventory increase
Total manufagturing cost -....--.-...........o"Less : Factory overhead.t..... $35'OOO
Dirgct t:lbor.......,....o... 4OTOOO
Materials used in manufacturing .,.r,......
Mate r i a l s . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . t . . . t " " " t " " " t t t t t " t " t t " t t t t "
Accounts Payablg .....'.."""""""""""""
Materials ussd in manufacturing(from above| .........o...."r""""""'rt"""'
Add materials inventory increase ....'.....
Matgrials punchasgd ".........""""'r""""'
Payroll ..... ' . ' . ......
l a a a a t a
Chapter 4
84,OOO84,OOO
91 ,OOO9l ,ooo
40,ooo4O,OOO
4O,OOO4O,OOO
35,OOO35,OOO
35,0OO35,OOO
t57,0oot57,OOO
l40,oool4o,ooo
$14o,oool7,ooo
s157,OOO2,OOO
s159,OOO
75rOOO
l_84,OOO
$ 84,OOO7,OOO
$ er,ooo
a a t a - a a a a a a a
Accnrgd Paytoll.......'.........""""""""to"'
Work in ProcgsS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t t " " t " " " t t t r t '
Payro l l . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . " " t " " t " " " " " " " " " t '
Factory Overhgad Gontrcl ......r'.r.t,,.....""""'Va ri o u s C rgd its.'........ "' t " " "" " " "r'r t " " "'
Work in Procgs3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . t " " t 'o " t " t " t t t " r " ' t r
Factory Ovgrhgad Control o..r........ro""""
Finished Goods (12'OOO + 84'OOO + 4O'OOO +35tOOO - 1 4tOOO) ... . . . . . . . . . ."""""""""t
Work in ProcgsS .............'...r"""""r""""
Cost of Goods Sold (28'000 + 157'O0O -45tOOOl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . " t " " t " t " " t " '
Finished Goods ..............
GGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission'
n
(c) Payroll... 86,000'' Accrued Payroll .............. 86,000
Work in Process....................r............................. 6Or5OOFactory Overhgad Contro|..........,.,....,...........,..... 1215OOMarketing Expenses Control ,..............t............., IrOOOAdministrative Expenses Gontrol 5,OOO
86,OOO
92,OOO
26,530
47,33O
188,OOO
241,150
185,5OO(hl Cash !........,r.........,......,.. ZOSrGO2
Sales Discounts,........... ...,...... 4r2igAccounts Receivable........... 212rg2}
(i) Marketing Expenses Control ...,............ 18,oooAdministrative F.xpenses Control 12,OOO
Accounts Payable 3O,OOO
0 Accounts Payable 1O4,OOO
rt
Cash 1O4,OOO
78
P4-7 (Gontinued)
88,25Ol04,o0o
't92,250
212,924
2,25O86,OOO
Materials
Machinery
Chapter 4
9O,8OO
15,5OO92,OOO26,53O3O,OOO,64\030
l / l Bal'(hl
Cash
20,O0O2O8,662
2i28,66236,412
Accounts Receivable
(c)0l
t7,2OO
l /1 Bal '(gl
25,O0O241,15O
26art50
(hl 1/1 Bal . 4O'OOO
53J,3O
Finished Goods
(g) 1B5,5oO
188,O0O
Accumulated DePreciation
111 Bal. 1O,OOO
Accounts Payable
1 t7(0
Bal.
t/ l Bal.(c)(dt(e)
9r5OOl88,OOO
,97,5OO
4,50O6O,5OO82,50O47,330(q4,>e3<t
Accrued Payroll
88,25O 111 Bal.(c)
Sales
104,OOO 1/l Bal .(a)(b)(i)
Retained Earnings
111 Bal. 21,25O
Cost of Goods Sold
(g) 185,5OO I
Payroll
(c)
111 Bal. 1o'ooo I (d)(a) 92,OOO
102,OOO
Work in Process
241,15O
Sales DiscountsI
86,0O0 | (c) 86,OOO
LLLI\
79Clppterl
P4-7 (Concluded)
(b)(cl(d)
(cl(i)
(cl(il
t_I!
I!
II!
b
Administrative Expenses Gontrol
5,O0O12,OOO
17,AOO
Factory Overhead Control
26,53Ol2r5OO
8r3OO47,33tO
(e) 47,330
Marketing Expenses Controf
810oo'l8,0oo2l,ooct
(31 HOPKINS & WHITE COMPANYThial BalanceJanuary 31
Common Stock
CSSh '........AcCOuntS RgCgivabl€...tr..............r............................r......Fin ished GOOdS.. . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r .o . . . . ' . . r . . r . . . . . . r . . . r ' . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . r .
WOrk ln PrOCgSS......... ' .o,.r.,.....,..r ' .......r. ' .... ' .rr. ' .....r........t
Materfals a a a a a a a r o a a a a a a a a a a t t a a a a a a a a a a a a
$ 36 ,41253,23O12,OOO
6,8301 1 r 2 O O4O,OOO
4,258185,5OO
26,OOOl7'OOO
s 60,030l O,OOO6O,0OO21r25O
241,15O
MachineAccounts Papble a a a a a a a a a a a a o a a a a a a a a t a a a a a a t t a a a l a a
Accumulatgd Depreciation....,...,......,,.,.....,....,................Common Stock..,. a t
Retained Earnin a a r a o t a a a a a a a a a a a t a a a a
SalesSalgs Discounts,...,..
1993,430 _$3e2,499
l
CHAPTER 5
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
O5-1. The cost attached to 8 Producl il an amount '
assigned by the costing melhods uled-an
amounl contro l led by the c i tcumstancer,
assumptions' and limitations ol lha melhod
under which il was ccrnfiled' Product cosb ato
cornposiles ol historbal outlay thal have, per'
haps, been modifki by estlnateo or slandards,
by processer assigning or proratlng expendi'
tures to periods, or by lracing the direct costs
and allocating the indirect cosls lo particularproducls so thal the total period outby b spread
over the aggr€gatt or'ipli. Despile these shorl-comings, product costs aro uselul in coslinginvenlories, cornpaling prices and tolal unit cost'
measuring current profil or loss, and indicatingthe rninimum cosl below which a sales price
cannot go in the long run. Sorne confusion willresult al times in usitlg cosl intonnatbn h mak'ing management decisions unless informatioorelevant only to the decisbo is used.
O5-2. The primary obiectivc h irb order costing is lodetermine the cost ol materiats, labor, and faclo'
ry overhead used to produce a specific otder orconltact. Cost estimatss ato made when theorder is taken, and the iob order praeduros atedesigned lo reveal cosls as lhe order goesthrough prodrrction, thereby giving an opportuni'ty lo control costs.
O5-3. The typ€ of cost accumulaiion melhod used by acotrlpany will be determined by the tlpe ct man'uf acturing operatbns pedormed. A rnanuf actur'ing company should uso Process c6l accumub-tion lor product ccthg putpos€3 when like unitsare continuousty nrass Produced; when cuslorn'rnade or unQue gpods are produced' icb ordercosting would be more aPProPriale. Processcosting is otten used in industries such as chem-icals, food processing, oil, mining, rubber, andelectrical appliances. With a continuous massproduclian ol like units, lhe cenler ol atlenllcn isthe individual process (usually a dopartmonl)'
The unit ccts by cost category as well as lotal
unil cct lor each Ptocess (deparrment) are nec'
e3sary lor product cosling PutPosss'O5-4. A icb order cost sheet is used:
("i to keep track of the direct rnaterials and
direct labor used on a icb plus atl aPPro-
Priate share cl frtorY overhead;(b) to comPara actual cost3 to estimaled
cqsts:(c) as a subsidiary ledger for the work in
procoss accounl.O5-5. The work in procesr accounl is a conlrol account
in the general ledger, ref lect ing lo la l coslsassigned or applied to jobs. The individual iobcgst shoots lorm the work in process acco{'nt'ssubsidiary ledger, indicathg the direct malerbls'direct labor, and factory overhead charged toeach irb.
05€. Job order cosl sheets serve a control funclion'Comparisons are made between estimates olpb cosrs and cosls actually accumulated lor lhejob. ln addition, cost control is enhanced byaccumulating direcl materials and labor as wellas factory overhead co3l3 by cost cenlers ordepartments, and by comparing lhe aclual coslsto cGt conter budgets.
O5-7. Actual lactory overhead consisls of the day'by'day cosls that ato actuatly experienced andincurred by the cornpany. Applied lactory over-head is the overhead charged to pbs based onthe predelermined factory overhead rate. Thisrale is crealed by divirJing total €stirnated over'head by toial estimated nurnber ol units (or any
other appropriate base). ThE dilference betweenaclual and applied factory overhead is lhe ovet-or underaPPlied faclory overhead,
05€. The characteristic of a service business lhal
rnakes likely the use ol job order costing is lhat
all jobs are not alike and cost information for
each iob is desired.
8 lChapter 5
E5-3
(1) The amount of d i rect labor in f in ished goods:F in i shgd gOOdS. . , . . . . . . . . . . . . o , . . . o . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t t . . ' . ' . . . t ' . . . . .
Mater ia ls inctuded in f in ished goods {$15'5OO - 93'2OO}.. . . . . . .
Direct labor and lactory overhead in finished goods """""""
s l 1 , 8 0 O a= - = ds l4 ,75O
s84,OOO1,5OO
s24,07O2218321OrO24
s56,926
S 4,4202,6002,OOO
s 9,o2o
s37,5OO12,30O
s25,2OO
$ I ,OOO
85,5O0
$94,5OO4,5OO
Let X = direct labor in f in ished goods1.8X = $25,2OO direct labor and factory overhead in f in ished goods
X = 514'ooo direct labor in f in ished goods
The amount of factory overhead in finished goods:X = $14,OOO
.8X = .8 ($14,000)
.8X = $11,2OO factory overhead in f in ished goods
Factory overhead charged to work in process
Direct labor charged to work in process
December mater ia ls used:Materials inventory, Decembei 1 ....................... ' .Mater ia ls purchased.. . . . . . . . . . .Freight-inMaterials availableMaterials inventory, December 31 .......
l2l
(1 )
E5-4
$9O,OOO
82
E5-4 (Concluded)
l2l Work in Process, December 3l:PerUnit
$6,4OO312OO
Chapter 5
s 9O,O0O3O,OOO6O,0OO
sl80,OOO
l4 ,4OO
s 5,ooo3,OOO6,OOO
$ 14,OOO
Directmaterials.......r.. $2.4oDirgct tabor -.r.,-.......--. .8O
, i?.2o r 2,ooo units =
Factory overhead .....'..32 machine hrs' @ $t OO =$9,6OO
(31 Dscember cost ol goods manufactured:Materials used (direct) (requirement (1)) """""t""""""t""""'Di f | 'C t 1abOf . . . . r r r r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . ' . . . . . .Dr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' t " " " " " " " '
Factory overhead (600 machine hours (}SlO0)"""'t""""tt"""
TOtal manUfaCtUfing COSt.. . . . . . . . .or. . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . """""" '
Add work in Process, December 1:Direct Material' S2.4o x 3'ooo =Direct Labor, $.8o r 3'ooo =Overhead, $t0o r 48 machine hours =
Finished goods, December 31:DifgCt matgf ialS., . r . . , . . . . ' . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . .Di fgCt tabOf . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . r . . r r . . . . . . . . . .o . . t . . . " r " " " t t "
Factory overhead (60 machine hours CDSl OO)""'r""""""""t'r'
December cost of goods sold:Cost of goods manufactured (requirement (3))""""""""""""Add finished goods, December 1'-.............""""""""""""""'
Cost of goods available for sale '............ ' """""""""Less finished goods, December 31 (requirement (4))"""""""
s7,2Oo2r4OO4,8OO
s194,40OLess work in process, December 31 (requirement (2))""'r""" 9'600
s184,8OO
(4)
(sls184,80O
12,00Os196,800
14 ,OOO
9l_93,8oopermission.CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with
83Chapter 5
E5-5 Materials:Beginning inventory """"
PUrChaSgS t t t t t t t t t t t " " " ' o " " " r t " " " " " " " " " " " " '
Materials avaitabte for usg """"""""""""" '
LeSS ending inVentOry .. . . .r. . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . .
Matgrials us€d..,r. . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . .Direct labor (($gaO - $s201 'r 1'61""""o""""""""Factory overhead (S225 x '6)""""""""""""""""
' i
TOtal manUtaCtUfing COSt .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . t"""""o
Add work in process, beginning inventof """"" '
E5-6
(r l
$ 7 5336 (1 )
$ 4 1 185
9geo2251 3 5
s76630
s736 (3)90
s826125
s701 (4)
s13,OOO15,OOO
2,7OO2 , 1 O O
s32,8OO
$13,00015,000
s28,009
s15,0oo4,8O0
s19,8OO
l2l
s58680
(21
(31
Less work in process, ending inventory
Gost of goods manufactured ""'r"""""'Add tinished goods, beginning inventot] """"""'
cost of goods availablg for sa19........,.,..............o.Less finished goodsr ending inventory""""""""'
Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . r . . . . . . . ' . " "" ' t """ t "
Materials .... 'r""""Di feC t 1abOf . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . r . . . . . ' . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . t . . . t t " " " " " " " " " " " '
Factory overhead:Molding (1,OOO DLH x $2.70) . . . ' . . . . . . . , . . . . , """""""""""""Decorating ($6,OOO x 35oh1...............
Estimated cost to produce -........-..........,..""""""""
M a t g r i a l s a a . . . . . . . r . . o . . o . . . r r . r . . r . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . a . . r . . . . a . . . . a r . . . . . . . . . . . . r a . r o 4 a r
D i f e C t 1 a b O f . . r . . . . r . . r . . . . . . . . . . r . r . . r . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . r . r . . . . . o . . . . . . . r . o . t . . . . . . . j 1
Est imatgd pr ime COSt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . r . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " " " r "
Di reC t 1abOf . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . o . . . . . . ' . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . , . " ' t
Factory ovgrhead ($zrzoo + $2rl ool........... '....o..............""""'Estimatgd convgrsion cost................ ' """""""""""'
Est imated cost to produce (requirement (1)) . . . . . . ' , . . . . . . S32'8OOMarkup ($32,8OO x 45'hl 14'760
Bid price S4?F6o
(4)
a
E5-7 I
(r)
Chaoter 5
WADSWOBTH MACHINE WORKSJob Order Cost Sheet-.Job 9O9
Dlrgct MaterlaltDatc
lgsucd
9114 t OOOsl20 3319122 200
st ,13 l
Dlreet l,.abor
HounDatc
gt(ryO
Appligd factory ovgrhead'.r. . ' . . ' . , . . . . . . . . ."" 'D"'
Total factory CoSt...'........t...t.."""""'o"'o"""'
Appllcd Factory OrerheadDatc
(Week o0 Houn Bate Cost
sl20 1 0 s80 s800
s800:
800
s3,OOO1,5OO
Debit Credit134,OOO
12O,O0O
96,O0O
288,OOO
Rata Cogt
sl20 909126 70
3s.20 37.30
558511
31,060
(2) sales price of Job 9o9, contracted a markup of Sooh of cost:DifgCtmatgfia1S.... . . . . . . . . , . . . . . .o... . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . ' . . . . S1tt31DirgCt labOr .. . . . . . .r.r. . . . . . ' . . .r . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o.. ' . I tO69
Markup SOoh of cost
SalgS pf iCg.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! . . . . . .o. . ' . . . S4r500:
E5-8
(f ) Work in Process (35'OOO + 45'OOO +54'OOO)........Matg f ia ls . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . r r r . . . . . . . . .o r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t t . . . .
(2) Work in Process (45rOOO + 4O'OOO + 35r0OO)."....,Payro l l . . . . . . . . ' . . . " " " " " t t ' r " " " " t t " t " " " " t " t " " " '
(3) Work in Process (36'000 + 32,000 + 28'O0O)....1."Factory Ovgrhgad Control ..'o'......r........."""'
(4) Finished Goods (156'000+ 132'O00)........ '- ' ...-.o.,.WOrk in PfOCeSS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . r . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . .
134,OOO
l2o,oQo
96,OOO
288,OO0
I
I
E
II
I- ,
Ib
Chapter 5
E5-9 , (a )
E5-10
Inv.Purch.
wtP 1 1O,OOO lnv.MaterialsFactoryoverhead
Labor
35,OOO
8,OOO2,OOO
9,4OO
7,6OO1 , 8 O O
1r2OO
1 r 2 2 O
4,5OO
1r25O
6 , 1 0 O
4,50O
Work in Process
I 1O,OOO
90,00018O,OOO
41O,OOO
11O,OOO
85
(b)
(clII
!
(d)
(e)
(0
(g)
I
b
L
b
Materials
35,OOO
10,000
9,4OO
9,4O0
1,2OO
1,22O
4,5O0
1 , 2 5 O
6 , 1 0 O
4,5OO
1O,0OO138,O0O
,48,OOO
5O,OOO3OO,OOO
35O,OOOtSo,ooo
3OO,OOO
:Finished Goods Cost of Goods Sold
2OO,OOO FG 2OO,OOOInv.wtP
CGS
GGA-Canada (adapted) . Repr in t wi th permiss ion.
Es-t I
( f l WOfk in PrcC€ISS.. . . . . ' . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . . r . t . . .Matgf ials . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . r r .
PayfOll . . . . . . . . . . .or.. . .r . . .o.. . .r . . .r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . .
Applied Factory Overhead ................""""""
(21 Finishgd GOOdS.r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . r . . . . .WOfk in PfOCBSS .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19,1 12 .5O
19,1 12 .5O
Chapter 5
gr25O.OO3r945.0O5rgl7.5O
19,{ t 2.5O
I ,
87Il>
I
Ib
I
:'
\,
Chapter 5
Ps-1
(1) Total
PROBLEMS
cost of work put into Process:MatgrialS.r . . . . . . . . . .o. .r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . r . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . S 6OtOOO
Labon Grinding t8r00O hrs. x S5.60l ...............,...o.......... 441800Machining (4,600 hrs. x $6). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . " . 27'600
Factory overhead: Grinding (8,ooo hrs. x $6) ......... ' ..,... 48'oooMachining (4,60O hrs. x S8). . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,800
s31l,2oo
s217,2OO15 ,OOO
Cost of goods sold:Cost of goods manufactured (from requirement (2)) .......Finishgd goodsr beginning invgntory. . . . , ' . - . . , . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . .
F in ished goods, ending inventory . . , . . . . . . r . . . . . . . , . . . .
s232,2OO17,600
s21_1,699
s214,60022rOOO
s236.60021.000
52{ 5 .600
I
b
(21 Cost of goods manufactured:Total cost of work put into process (from requirement (1)lWork in Process, beginning inventory........
Work in process, ending inventory.. . . . . r , . . . . . ,
Cost of materials purchased:Mater ia ls put into process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . r .o. . .oAdd mater ia ls, ending inventory
Less mater ia ls , beg inn ing inventory , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . ! . . . , . , .
(3)
(4) Gonversion cost:Labon Grinding (8rOOO hrs. x S5.60l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r r . . . . . . . . . ' . . $ 4418OO
Mach in ing(4 ,6oOhrs .xSO) . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271600Factory overhead: Grinding (8,OOO hrs. x $6). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48rOOo
Machining (4,6OO hrs. x $8). . . . . . . . . . . ' . 36'800
g!_qz'209
$ 60,00018,000
$ 78,OoO2O,OOO
s_99p99
(s)
I
.t
I
P5-2
(r) Materials
Chapter 5
Job 206 Total
411 2r75OPurchases t l'5OO
14'"2501,755
lndirectMaterial
DirectMaterial
2r790
gr7o5 |
114s5
r $9,7OS = $2r45O + S97O + 36'285(Job 2O7) (Job 2O4) (Jobs 2O2,2O3,2O5, & 206l
work in process ending inventory consists of iobg 2o3 & 206:
Job 203
Dirgct matgria|s.........................r..... (Slr48O + $ 555)
DifgCt |abOf .,...r............................... ( I rOOO + 115OO)
Appliedoverhead.....'.,.'.........-......... ( SoOr+ 14991Total ...r....r......r..,.................. F3,.280 " #-S-l
'Applied overhead is 80% of direct labor cost'
l2l WorkinProcess....o.....,.................Mater ia ls . . . t . . " " t " " " t " " ' t " " t t " " " t " " " " " " " t r '
Payro l l " " " " r " " " t t " t " " " " " " " " " " t ' r " " " " r " " ' t
Applied Overhgad ....""""""""""'t"""""""'
Finishad Goods (4'7OO + 1r25O + 2,OOO + 116OO) "
work in Procgss ..........r..........r,.....,........r.....
COst of GoodS So1d"""t""""""'o""""""t""""""'Finishgd Goods................................r. ' ..........
ACCOUntS RgCgiVab18.. . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . .o. . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . ' . ""S a l g 3 t t t t t t " " t t " t t t " t " t t " t t t t t " ' r " " t " t t t " t t " ' r " t " " '
+ St '98O+ I 'OOO+ 8OO
+ S3'78O
4,85O
9,550
9,55O
14,325
s 4 ,0153,5OO2,8OO
$1o,gt s
1r25O2,OOOI ,600
9,55O
9,550
141325
I
I
IIL.
I!
t-89
iE
II
!
Chaoter 5
P5-2 (Concluded)
(31 Cost ol goods manufactured = cost of iobs finished in April'
Job 2O5:Dirgct matgrial ........'........Dirgct 1abor......"......... ' .o..Applied overhead'....,.o'....
' Total Job 205... ' ...... ' ....
Job 2O2.. . . . . . . . r . r . . . r ' . . . . t . . . . . . . . . " " t
Job 204 r . . . . t . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . t . . . ' r " " " '
JOb 2O7' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . ' . . r . . ' . . . . " ' t
$ 2,5OO2,7OO (l 05 direct labor hours x S2OlI,O8O (105 direct labor hours x 516)
$ 6,280
9,550 (see requirement (2))6193O5,87O
I
!
Bal.(i)
(4)
s 5,2801r52O
800
$36,420124,2801, (1 ,76s)
$1O,375
s 9,365
7,6OO
91t99
(5) Jobs 2O1r 2O2, and 205 wene sold. Their costs are S8'45O + S9,55O +56'280 = S24'28O.Sales (524,280 x 1.5)Cost of goods sold .......Underappli gd ovgrh€3d ...... ' .......... ' .........r..r.. ' ......
Gross profit for April .'....r...r....'
P5-3
Finished Goods Work in Process
32O,OOO8O,OOO32O,OOO
40O,OOO
36O,OOO
3OrCnO'$?3o,ooo - SSo,ooo - $25o,ooo direct labor and factory overhead.
Factory overhead is l50% of direct labo6 thereforo, direct labor issl oo,ooo
Bal(c)(e)
Tota|.. .r. . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . ' . . . . . . S28rO3O
Actuat overhead (1'375 + 2,5OO + 2r7OO + 2r790l.Applied overhead:
Jobs 2O2' 2O3, 2O5' 2Og (330r hours x $16!.Job 207 .'........ ' .... ......... ' .."""'r"""'Job 2O4 ($l rZgO - 5960l.r.. ' .r.......t..........".."
Total appligd ovgrhgad r... ' ........r-........r.....
Undefappl ied. ' . . . . ' . .D.. . . . . . . ' . ' r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . ' . r . . . ' . . . . . . ' . . . . . .' 1 O O + 7 5 + 1 0 5 + 5 O
20,OOO l(il15O,OOOgo,ooo
l OO,OOO'35O,OOO
Materials
90
I
P5-3 (Concluded|
ChwterS
l5o,ooo
I I ,OOO175,OOO
l8o,@o
Cost of Goods Sold
360,OOOBal.(b)
Bal .(a)
l5'OOOloo,ooo
t t ' ,NO29,N
8O,O(X)12,OOO
92,W
(1 tl2lt3)(4)(5)(6)rr)(8)
Factory Overhead Gontrol Applied Factory Overhead
6OTOOOl2'OOO75,OOO147,N
Accounts Payable Accrued Payroll
1O2,O0OBal. TrOOOloo,ooo
707,N
t72,OOO Bal.
5rW
Accounts Receivable
45,OOO5OO,OOO
g5,o@
65,AOO
480,OOO
"Cost of goods sold is 72% of sales (r0o% - 28ohl.
Materials purchased-$l oo'oooCost ol goods sold-$360'OOOFinished goods ending inventoryt4O,OOOWork in process ending invento4;-$3O'O00Direct labor cost-$l o0,00oApplied factory overhead-$l 5O'OOOOvep or underapplied factory overhead-$3,OOO overappliedGlosed out to the cost of goods sold account
Sales
GGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission-
Chaptor 5
P5-4 l
(1 )
9 l
COLUMBUS COMPA}TYCost of Goods Sold StatementFor Month Ended October 3{
Materials:Materials and supplies inventory, OcL IPurghaseS ......... '..r.........o........r................................t
Materials and supplies available for ]|so......,..........,.Less: Factory supplies used.......r...r........ $ 3195O
Materials and supplies inventoryOcL 31 31,75O
Materials consumedDirgCt labOr .........rr..r.......... '...r.'.Applied factory ovgrh€ad.....r.,r.....,.........D,.....rt...............Total manufacturing cost........o..o............r.......r.......r........Add work in process invgntory Oct 1................,........o,..
Less work in process inventory Oct 31Gost of goods manufactunad o.r.,........o..................r.........,Add finished goods inventory Oct 1.,..,..............r......,....Cost of goods available for salg .............r........o..,....o.......Less finished goods inventory, Oct 31 (2,500 units x
53.7O)r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of goods so!d...................... .............r....,....
rCalculations:Units in finished goods inventory, OcL 1Units manufactured 20,4OO
(2Or7OOlUnits soldUnits in finished goods inventory, OcL 31
Cost of goods manufactured
s4O,7OO24,8OO
sgs,5O0
35r7OO
2,8OO
(3oo)
_3's09
s29,8OO18,60027,45O
s75,8504,O7O
s79,9204,44O
$75,480g,g0o
s85,280
9,250s76,03O
Units manufactureds75,480= -t- - '1-.�-.�- - Sif .7O20,4OO
92
I
P5-4 (Concluded)
tzl COLUMBUS COMPANYIncome Statement
For Month Ended October 3{
Chapter S
Sales t a l a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a r a a a a a a a a r a a a a o a a s144,9OO1,3OO
$143,60076,03O
$ 67,570
$25,O96
19,744 44,940
$ 22,730
Less safes returns and allowances ......................N g t s a | g s . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . t . . . . o . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . r . . . . . . . . r r . . . .
Lgss cost of goods so1d...,...,.........,................,.r.r.Gtpss prof i t . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . r . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . . r . . . r . . . . r . . . . . . .
Less commercial expenses:Marketin g expens€r ............Depreclation-building ....,.........Depreciation-office equipmentAdministrativg expense.....r.......Depreciation-building ..............Depreciation-office equipment
Incomg bgforg incomg t?x..........r...r..
Amount of over- or underapptied factoryActual factory overhead:
Factory overhgad paid,.............rIn direct materiaf s ..,...,...............Depreciation-building .....r.....r..Depreciation-machinery and
gguipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . r .Indirgct 1abor.,.......r...,...,....,...r..
Applied factory overhgad ..........,......,Underappf ied factory overhead.........
$25,O5O301 6
$19,7OO2024
(3t overhead:
$2O,1OO3,95O
1 5 0
8004,4OO .s29,40O
27,45O$ 1 ,950
\' Chapter 5
- " P5-5 '
(11 MORRISVILLE CANNING COMPANYBalance sheet
December 31, 208
93
Assets-
Current assets:CaSh.. . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . r . . . . r . . . .D. . . . . . . . . $1 9tOOO
Accounts receivablG!............................... 1O,OOOlnventories:
Finishgd goods .........,......r............r.. S4roooWorkinprocess.. . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . r . . . . . . . . l r0O0M atgria lS.. ' . ' . . . .r . . . . . . ' . . . .o... . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . ' 2tOOO 7t OOO
Prgpaid expensgs....r. . . . ' . . . . . . . . . .o... . . . . . .o... . 5OO
v Property, ;[:1: lllTll,lr',i?",";ffiil::::.::.::::TOtal aSSgtS t . . . . r . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . .
- Liabil it ies
Currgnt l iabi l i t igs.. . . . . . . . . . . , . . r r . . r . . . ' . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . r . .
s3o,ooo15 ,OOO
s36,5OO26,00O
s63,599
sl7,5oo
45,000
s62,5OO
Stockholders' Eguity
Common stock' , . . . ' . . ' . . ' . . . . . . . . ' . . ! . . . , rRetained earnings,. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Total stockholders' equity ............
Total l iabil i t ies and stockholders' equity......
94
P5-5 (Concludedf
l2l
Chagter 5
MORRISVILLE CANNING COMPANYlncome Statement
For Year Ended December 31, 2OB
S 3 l e s a r a a a a a a a . . . a a a a r a a a a r . . a a a . a a a a a a . a . a a a r a a a a . a . a a a a a t a a a a a a a a a a a a a a r a a a a a a a a a a a
Gost of goods sold:Materials:
tnvgntOryrJanuary1..... ' ......r... ' .. ' . ......... ' ............ $ 4tOOOPUrchaS gS ....r....................r....r......r..... ' ....t..o.t..t.. I 5t O OO
Matgrials avai|ab|gforuser......................... ' ...... $lgrOOOLgsSlnventOryrDeCgmbgf3l... ' ........ ' ................ 2rOOO
Matgrials consumod.... ' ........o..........r.......... ' ....... SIZpOODirgCt 13bOf .......o..rr..........................r.........o.............. ITOOO
s60,000
Appfied factoly overhead r.,....... I,O0O
Total manufagturing GoSt .....,........,.......,...ro.............. 335rOOOAdd work In process Inventoryr Januafl I ......'..r,..... jrOOO
s37,DDOLess work in process inventoryr December 3l ...o.o... I'OOO
Cost of goods manutactllrr8d...........o....r.....r.........r.... S36r,OOOAdd finished goods inventory Januafl't ........o........o 6'000
Cost of goods availabtoforsale.. '. ' . ..oo................o'..r- $.02rOOOLess finished goods inventory, December 3'l .....-..... 4rOOO
Gost of goods 30ld.. . ' . . ' . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . ' r r . . . . . . .o. . . . . . . . . ' r . . . t t . t t $38^OOO
Add underappllod factory overhgad.,...,.................... 2t999
COSI Of gOOdS SOld-adiUStgd . . . . . . . . . . . . , . .o. . ' . . . . .o. , . . . . r . . . 4O,OOO
$2O,OOOGross profitLess commencial expenses:
Markgting expgns(0..........,,.............. ' ... ' . . ' . .... ' ... ' . ...r.. $ 6rOOOAdministrativg gxpensg... ' ....o...... ' ............,.. ' ..,.,......t 9t9OO 15tOOO
lncOmg bgfOrg inCOmg t8X.'. . , .J... . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' r . . . . . ' . . . . s 5,ooo
a a a a t a a a a a t a a a a a a a a a a a a a t a a a . a a a a a a a a a a a a a t t t t " '
Chagler 5
P5-6
(1) and (2)
9:
TROPEZ INC.Job Order Cost Sheets To Post Beginning Inventory Data
March 1, 19-
Matgrials . , . . . . . . . . . r , r . . . . r . .LI lbOr . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . r . . r r r . . . . .
Factory Overhead.......,TOtal .D. . . . . . . . . . r " . . . . . r .(bl M ............,.......(cl M.., . . . . . . . ,( f } L . . . r . . . . . ' . . . r . . . . . . .
(hl oH ......,.........,.Total . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . .
0l Completed andto warehouse
(21
s29,e49Completed and trans-ferred to warehouse
Job 621
$ 2,8OO2r1OO1,680
$ 6,5805,30O
6r42O51136
s23,436transferred
$ 8,2607r4OO(4oo)
8r1606,528
Job 622
$ g,4oo2r7OO2,160
Job 623
s 1,8001,350I ,O8O
s 4,2305,9OO
6,32O5,056
s21,s99Stil l inpnocess
Cr.(a)
(b)
(c)Materials
Bui ld ing & Equipment. . . . , . . . .
Dr.22,OOO.OO
22,OOO.OO
18,6OO.OO2,4OO.OO
u 21,OOO.OO
600.0o400.oo200.00
800.o0800.oo
38,OOO,O038,OOO.OO
2O,9OO,OO7,6OO.OO5,7OO.OO3,8OO.OO
38,OOO.OO
9,404.5O7,154.5O
2,OOO.OO250.0o
(d)
(e)
(0
(gl
Prepaid Insurance
.t
_ t l
Chatsr 596
P5-6 (Concluded)
(h) Work in ProcgsS""""t""'r"""""ott"t"'t"""""""'
Faaory Overhead Control (or Applied
Factoryoverhead)... '..................... '.....|t...
{ i l F in ishgd GoodStt"" r " " " " 'o t 'or"""" t " " " " t " " " " "o '
Work' in PrcCess """"""""""""""""t"""""
nl AccountS Rgceivab16.............o.."""tto""""""""'Y'
S3 l9s t t t t t t " " " " " t t t t " " " " " t " " " t " " t t " t " " t t1 t " " "
GostofGoodsSo|d..............t...........|.t................Finishgd GoodS"""""""""'r""""""""t""""
( k ) C a S h t " t r t t " " ' t " " ' r t t t " t t " t " t t " " " " " " " t " t " " t t t " t t t t " '
AccountsReceivabIo'... ' ........................t......' (s53,38 4 r 4oohl+ $53,384 = $74'738
Dr.16,720.OO
53,384.OO
741738.OO'
53,384.OO
69,45O.OO
Cr.
16,720.O0
53,384.OO
74,738.O0
53,384.00
69,450.O0
Work in ProcessMaterials
311(a)(c)
Bal . t 4 '00022,OOO
60038,600
14,8N
(b)(d)
21rOO0800
2t,8oo
53,384
3/1 Bal.(bl(0(h)
19,O7Ot8,60020,9OO16,720753X)
40053,384
53,784
(c)(i)
27,506
3/1 Bal '0)
Finished Goods
15,00053,384
68,3U| 5,OOO
(31 TROPEZ INC.Schedute of lnventories, March 31
s14,8OO21,50615 ,OOO
s51,306
Chapter 5
P5-7 '�
(r) and (3)
311(g)
Bal. 78,83O.OO94,5O1.65173,331.65
78,83O.U'
97
Accounts Receivable
I 17,5OO.OO
Finished Goods
(g) 94,5O1.65
Materials
3/1 Bal. 65,000.00(al 42,3OO.OO(bi s,aoo.oo'
tt3,loo.ao59,37O.OO
53,73O.O0
Accounts Payable
42,3O0.O05,8OO.OO48,tOO.OO
Accrued Payroll
(c) I 1 1,364.00
Payroll
(c ) 111,364,00 | (c l 11 1 ,364.00
Applied Factory Overhead
3O,20O.15 30,2OO.l5
(dl
(al(b)
Work in Process
3/1 Bal. 2921627.OO(cl 98'884.00(d) 53,73O.0O(0 3o,2OO.l5
475,435.15380,933.50
12,48O.OO281467.87
40,941.87
94,501.65
3O,2OO.151O,741.72
40,941.87
(g)
Gost of Goods Sold
94,5O1.65
Factory Overhead Control
(cl(e)
(f)(3)
Over. or UnderappliedFactory Overhead
281461.87 (311,558.28
.S5I8OO could also be posted directly to the work in process accountr reducingentry (d) to $47,930.
Various Credits
Sales
(g) 117,50o.oo
98
Drrcct matcrrarr.,.. rtlill:ll
Dlrcct labor......-.... 21'4alO.OO26,844.OO
FactorloYerhosd.. l3'8OO.0O7,717.65 '
Total CogL $94,501.65
Chapter 5
3 OO,875.OO slO,O4Olo,49o.oo 5,800 $170,285.00
43,800.O028,920.00 2O'37O 210,414.OO
19,388.009,314.50 0,893 85,736.15
P5.-T (Concluded)
l 2 l T h e t o t a l c o s t o t e a c h f o b a t t h e e n d o f M a r c h :
Job 2O4 Job 2O5 Job 2OO Job 207 Total
t 4or4lio11r32O
33,24Oa2t750
22137O7'375
The balancd in the work in process account(JObS 2O5, 206, an d 207)... . ' . . . . . . . . . . .o' . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . , . . . . ' . .
' 3,355.5 hours r sz.go = $7r717.65
Dr.
M at g f i a 1S. . . . . . . r . r . . r . . . . r . . r . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . r . r . . . I
Accounts Payable......- ' .-......
Pay rO11 . . . . . . . . . . .D . t . . . " t " " t ' r t ' r " " " " t " " " " ' r " r " t " t " " " '
ACCrugd PayfOll . .r. . . .r. . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' .". . .
(c) Work in ProcessFaCtOry OVgfhgad COntlOJ... ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . ' .Marketing and Administrative Expenses """"""
P a y r o l l . . . . . . . t t " t " t " " t t " " t " t " t " " " t " t t " " ' t t t " " " '
Work in Proc8sS..........."""""""""""""""""'t" 'FaCtOry OVgfhgad COnttO1.........r..... ' .............,,...
Matgfials ................................r.................. ' .,
WOfk in PfOC9SS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . r . . r ' . . . . r . ' . . . .
Applied Factory Overhead.... . . . . . . , . . . . .""""""
Cost of Goods Sold'.. . .-. , . . .r. . . . . . . . .r. . . . , ' . .""""r"""Work in Procgss ... i .- . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . .r" '
$159,605 3171,825.50 $49'503 3475'495j 5
s38O,933,50
Cr.114,52O
I I O,OOo
78rOOO12,00O2O,0OO
I 0 8 , 1 7 57 r52O
42t75,0
190,35O
1 1O,OOO
P5-8
(21(a)
(b)
(d)
(e)
(0
114,520
1 1 O , O O O
1 1 5 , 6 9 5
421750
19O,350
Chapter 5
P5-B (Continued)
99
SalgS DiSCOUntS . . . . . . r . . . . r . r . . .o . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . .
Accounts Rgcgivablo .....................o....r.........
(hl Marketing and Administrative Expenses...........-Factory Ovgrhgad Gontrol........'.....r........'.....'-..r,
a C a S h a . a a a . a . . a a a . . . . . . r . . r . . a . . . . r r . . . r . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o .
Acc u m u I ate d D e p re c i ati o n{tl a c h i n e ry .......
( i l ACCOUntS Payablg' . r . . r . . . . r . . . . . . , . " . . . . . . . r . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CaSh . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . t .
0) Applied Factory Ovgrhead ... . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . .--. . .Factory Ovgrhead Gontrol .....r..r'.....'...'r..-.-r.
GOSI Of GOOdS SOld ... . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Fagtory Ovgrhgad Control . . . . . , . . . . . . ' . . . , . . . . .r. .-. '
(11 and (3) GENERAL LEDGER
Gash
(sl Gash
47,0OO247rOOO
294,OOOl7't,32O
Accounts Receivable
Bal. 5O,00o255,OOO
3O5,OOO
(gl 26O,OOO
Finished Goods
32,5OO I
Work in Process
Machinery
1/1 Bal . 45,3OO I
Accu mulated DePreciation-Machinery
111 Bal.(h)
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a o a t t t a t a a a 247 |OOO13,OOO
l5 ,ooo24,68O
85,O0O
421750
1 ,45O
Materials
260,000
37,68O2,O0O
85,OOO
42,750
1,450
1 15 ,6951/1 Bal.(g)
(hl(i)
37168085,OOO122,680
1/1 Bal .(al
22'oOO114,520
138,52O
(dl
1 t1(0
1/1 Bal .
Accounts Payable
111 Bal.(al
lO,OOO2,OOO12,OOO
59,375114,520
173,895
1 t 7(c)(dl(e)
7,5OO78,OOO
1 0 8 , 1 7 5421750236,425
Bal . 19O,35O 85,OOO
IN
P5-8 (Continuedl
Accrued Payroll
Chapter 5
Sales
Retained Earnings
lor 11O,OO0 lrn zss,oooFactory Overhead Gontrol
l2,o0o7,52O
24168041t 200
(cl(dl(ht
42,7501,45Ou,2oo
(gl
1/1 Bal.-MaL1/1 Baf.-[lb.1/1 Bel.-OH(c) Labor(d) Materialc(e) otrerhead
1/l Bal.-Mat1/l Bal.-L.b1/l Bal.-OH(c) Labor(d) Materlalr(e) Overhead
13,OOO I
Cost of Goods Sold
19O,35O1,45O
79r,goo
Common Stock
6001,OOO
4004O,00042,OOO18,OOOto4@o
It/'r e"r. g4,gzs
Sales Discounts Applied Factory Overhead
(t) 42,7so l(e) 42,750
Marketing and AdministrativeExpenses
2OTOOO15,OOO
35,OOO
111 Bal . 100,000
WORK IN PROCESS SUBSIDIARY LEDGER
Job lo i Job 1O3
(cl Labor 18,0oo(dl Materiala 14,575(e) Overhoad 13,5Oo
16,O75
Job l02
Palroll
Chapter 5
P5-8,(Concluded)
(4) MID.STATE COMPANYTrial BalanceJanuary 31
1 0 1
MID.STATE COMPANYCost of Goods Sold StatementFor Month Ended January 3{
1 7 1 , 3 2 O45,OOO32,5OO46,O7520,92545,3OO
35,OOO
13,OOO1 9 1 , 8 O O
12 ,OOO88,895
1 1 O , O O OlOO,OOO
34,925
255,000
600,820 600,820
(sl
Less work in process inventory January 31Cost of goods so1d.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . r . t . . . . . r . . . r .Add underapplied factory overhead .........,,....Cost of goods sold-adjusted......
$ l 0 8 , 1 7 578,OOO42,750
s228,9257,5qO
$236,42546,O75
s190,3501,45O
s191 ,8O0
06-1. The basic obiective ol process costing is lo
determine the costs of the products manufac'
tured by the conrpany. Determinhg the cost of
the productr manutactured is necessary h order
to properly cost ending invenlories for exlemal
reporting Purpo3o! (i'e., teporting to credilorsand ownen of thd company, lhe SEC' and theIRS) and lo evalual. the ptofilability of the man'
ulacturing ac-tivity. In order to cost products, thecosts musl be determined for malerials, labor,and taclory ovefiead used to process each unitof producl lhtough eaclr deparlmenl.
06-2. The products rnanufactured wilhh a departmenl(or cost center) during the period can be helero-geneous il pb order costing is used, but musl behonrogeneous if process costing is used. In icborder cosling, producls are accounted lor inbatches. The cost cil each unil ol product manu-factuted on a pb is determined by dividing lhetotal cost charged to the pb by the number olunils produced on the iob. Since the nranufactur'ing cosl ol each iob is accounted for sepamtely'accuralo and uselul product cosl can be deter'mined even when the producls rnanulac{urad ondilferent ircbs are substantially diflerent' By con'trast, in procesr cosling, all nranulacturing costgare charged to the departrnent, and the unit costis determined by dividing the cost charged to thedeparlment by the number ol units produced' Asa consequence, the unils ol producl manufac-tured within a department musl be essentiallyalike in order tor the cost allaated to each unillo be meaningrtul (i.e., to reasonably reflect theactual c6l of the resources used to manulacturethe prcducl).
06-3. (a) Process(b) Process, unless signilicantly ditferent rnod'
els are manulactured(c) Process(d) Job order(e) Process(t) Process(S) Job order(h) Process, unless dillerent fabrics are used
lor d i f ferent models, in which caso theconversion cosls may be accounled forusing proce*s, but the materials using ioborder
06-4. Three product fkrw fonnats are: sequential, par'allel, ard seleclive,Seouential maans that the producl f lows or ismanulactutod in an unchanging f ixed set o loporalions, 9oin9 lrom one d€parlmsnt to thonen.Parallel moans that certain operational phasestake place simultaneously in othor departments
CHAPTER 6
DtscussloN ouEsTloNs
06-5.
06€.
and the partially completed unils or Parls atg
brought togethet in subsequenl deparlments'
Selective refers to the fact that a product does
not necossatily rnove through every dopatiment'
Depending uPon the characler or shape of the
fhal product, ditlerent deparlments are angagecl
in ccnptethg the desired PrcductMaterials Costs-{n irb order costhg, rnaterials
fiuisitbnr are uged and charges are nrade tojobs; in procoss costing, charges for malerials
isgued to productinn are rnade to departmenls'
with inlrequent usc of rnaterbls requisilians'Labor Costs-Time tickets are used h iob oder
-osting lo accumulate labor costs for each job; in
process cost ing, labor cosls ats chargod lo
departments, and, therefore, dela i led l ime
racords arg nol nocossary.Factorv Overhead-Job order costing requires
lho use of predelerminad rates for charging
overhead to jobs; in process costing, actual
overhead may be used. (However, predeter'
minEd rales are otten used in order lo smooth
ovefiead that is not hcurred at the sarne rata a3
productior activity to the products manulactured
throughoul the Year.)Summarizino Costs-A iob order cosl sheet is
*Ja to accumulate lhe costs of an order in ioborder costing; a cct of production rePorl is usodin process costing. In iob order costing, costsaro summarized on completion of the job; inprocess costing, costs charged to lhe depart-menl and cosls accounted for are summarized in
the cost of production report each month (or
sornetimes each week).Predetermined overhead tatos can and shouldbe used if the pattem of overhEad cost incur'rence does not follow the pattern of produclion
activity. Some items of overhead are fixed and
not responsive to changes in production aclivity'
It production volume varies each month, thenpredetermined overhead rates should be used'
Some items of overhead are incurred only at
cerlain times during the year, but benefil produc-
t ion throughout the year (e '9. , payro l l taxos,
insurance, property taxes, vacalion pay, eic') '
These i t ems can be reco rded as p repa id
oxpenses and amort ized uni lormly to each
rnonth it actual overhead is charged to produc'
tion. Altematively, estimates of such costs can
be included in the predetermined ovefiead rale'and the actual cosi charged to overhead whenincurred. The use of predeterminsd rales is oftens imp le r t han the a l l oca t i on o l ac lua l cos t sbecause a s ingle predelermined ra le requi resonly one overhead charge to aach departmenteach monlh. ln contrast. the capitalizalbn and
l5,
II
L,
I! Clppter6
arnorli:alion of .ach itcm ol astual ovcrheadnogld rcquirc nurrr.,orr. chargcr rach rnoth.
OO-7. A sl of prodtgtioh npod b an offetivo rnqth-ly (c wookly) ourynary of tho cod of rnatorbb,labor, ard overhcad consrrm.d by eadr deparl-rrJrl or cocl c.nl.r, abng with a rrcord cl thoguenlity ol productr menufrclurcd. ll providorhfsnnlbn necrslary lo col prodrctr, prep.r.
irumel .nlrier lo rccord lhr trandcr of coslrbolwecn departmcnlr, end cmtrol cob.
06€. The rectbns ccnnurly lound in a cocl of producttn reporl arc: (a) e quantity achcdub incJi-calhg thc soursr and dispeitim oil thr unib ofproducl, (b) a cel charged lo the departrnentt clbn, indicathg the cost h total and pcr unilfor lho c€l lrenlf.rrod in from tho procodingdopartmont, as woll as rnatcriab, labor and ovcr-hoad cfnrgod lo the depadrnent, and (c) a eleounled for seclisr indicalhg the anpunt ofcod assigned to thr unitr tranderred oti c/ the
143
dsparfnml, as well as tho eet of ending hven-tory.
06-9. Scparalo depar lmenla l cosl of product ionropgrtt arc uced to accumulalo costs moreaccuralely and to prwUe rnore detailed data lorc6t cqrtrol purpooo. than a planl-wUe cct of;roductbn rcport couki prwirto. In sornc ceses(c.9., a msnuteglurhg plant tul hss a sel*liveprodwtim flow for its producta), a planl-widec6t of prcduclirn reporl cannot bo us€d.
06-10. An cquivalenl unit cil produclicr ir thc anrornt cila nrsounco (r.9, malcrbb, labof, or ovrfiead)lhat wouH bc required to csnplcto qrr unit ofthr producl with respecl to thc cost clemenlbehg cansidered- Thc lolal number of equiva-lonl unite. with rcspecl to a particular element ofcod, ropresonls lhe number ol unils of the prcd-usl lhal could have been cornpletod with lheresource3 used durhg the perird.
I
t
Ib
\,
ta1Chaptar 6
Factorylabor Overhead
Cort fromPrecedlng
Department Materlalr
2O,OOO 2O,OOO
5r00o
5,O0O
l5,oo9 __?!,ooo
Cost fromPrecedlng
Department Materialg
EXERCISES
E6-1(11
Equivalent units transferred out """"""Equivalent units !n ending inventorln
Cost from Pniceding dePartment(1OO% r 5rO0Ol "'t"""""r'r""""'
Materials (l00oh r 5'OOO) """"""""'
Labor (60% r 5rOOO)"""""""o't""""
Factory overhead (4O% x 5'OOO) """
Total equivalent units... ' .,..........." 'r""""
l2l
Cost in beginning inventory....."""""""Cost added during current period'.""""
Total cost to be accounted fot'.....,....... ' .Divided by total equivalent units......,. ' ...
Cost per equivalent uni t . . . . . . . .
S15,OOO s 9,200 sls,4oo25,OOO 23,OOO 22,AOO
2O,OOO 20,OOO
3,OOO
23,OOO
2,OOO22,AOO
FactoryOverhead
ost5,4oo
o$4o,ooo$4o,0oo
25,OO0
osl5,ooo
os 9,200
E6-2
WOfk in PfOCgSS-Depaftmgnt X'.. . . . .". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . .""" '
WOfk in PfOCgSS-Depaftmgnt Y ... . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . ' . . ,""""" 'Matgr ia1s. . r . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WOfk in PfOCgSS-Depaftmgnt X.... . . ' . . ' . .r . . . . . . . . . . . t""""""WOfk in PfOCgSS-Depaftmgnt Y.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ."""t""
P a y r o 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . " " t " " ' i " " t " " t t " " t t t " t " " t t " " t t " " t t " t "
WOfk in PfOCeSS-Depaftment X.... . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . ."WOfk in PfOCgSS-Depaftmgnt Y ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . .o.,. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FaCtOry OVgfhgad ..r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." '
WOrk in PTOCSSS-Depaftment Y ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. .Work in Process-Department X'.. . . .""""""""""
F in ished Goods lnventoryWork in Process-Department Y ..""""""""""""
5O,0OO4O,OOO
8O,OOO70,00o
18O,OOO7O,OOO
31O,0OO
476,OOO
9O,OOO
l5o,ooo
25O,OOO
31O,OOO
476,OOO
105Il>
:Ib
\
L.
l-
ClppterO
E6-3 Tlndol FabricatorE Inc.Cutting and Forming DePartment
Cost of Produstion RePort' For November
QusnUV SchcdubBcglnnlng lnvrntotY!'ttrt d h proccg thb Prrlod
Tnnrfcrrrd to Aromblhg DopertmrntEnd h g lnvcntoty..,...'.........'.......'..--.
Cost Chargcd to DePartmcnt
Eeglnnlng Inventory:
MatcrlafrLaborFsdory ovcrhced
Totel cort h bcglnnhg hvcntory ..otso'-...'..'....Fo..
Cort rddcd durlng currcnt Pcrlod:Matarlalr - .......oo...'...r...'.F......'.'.
[.:borFrctory
Totel coot eddcd durlng currcnt pcdod......*-.-
Total coct chargcd to deparbnct|t.......................'....'..,.'...,.
i/lst rbb Labor
7l4r 1gY. EV.
TotalCort
Overhcad QuanUty
8003"20O
a,ooo3/lOO
ooo4,OOO
Equlvalent UnltUnlta' Cost"
3113,3773137,452
VtGompleta Unlt Cogt
too% 336.70Cort Accountcd tor ar Followr
Tnnrlrrrcd to Arrembllng DcprrtmcntWort In Prccclr, cndlng hvcntory
Equtvebnt unttr tranrfrrrcd o9t......Equlvelent unttr h ondlng Inventory
Total cqulvalent unltr -
s36.70
Total Cogt3124,780
310,1 I O1,128
Unltr
1719232rJ523l8OO
t 21',07|'
t 08,02514r75|,29190O
3U2A81.700.52
3,85O3rO4O3,55O
t22,4aa,709.52
MetrrlelrLaborFactory ovcrhcad 11428 12,f,72
Total coct accounted tor t137,452
.Total number of cquhralent unltr roqulrcd In thc coot accounted tor rccUon detormlned ar tol'lorvr:
Mrt rlsb Lebor Orcrhcad
34oo 3/fOOalro 240
3,8!tO 3rO4O
- Total cort 0,c., thc cort In beglnnlng Invcntory plur thc cort edded durlng thc curront pcrlod)dtvlded by thc total number ol cqulvalent unltr requlred ln thc cost accountod lor ractlon
3/|OO
@ooooooo
75t/.&.hat.h
I
t
3/0OO150
3,55O:
ta6 Chagtor 6
E6-4
Quantlty Scheduls
Beglnning InventorYStarted In procesa thlr per|od...........
Transferred to Flnlshlng DepartmentEndlng inven tory,.................,
Sonora Manufacturing GomPanYMolding DePartment
Cost of Production RePortFor August
Materiatr L:bor Overhead Quantity
75% 25o/o 25o/o
TotalGost
I 'OOO0,ooo
lOrO0O
9,200800
I O,OoO
Equlvalent UnitUnlts' Cost"
Cost Charged to DepartmentBeginning inventonn
Materials
Factory overhead
Total cost In beginnlng inventorY
Cost added during current period:Mater ials[abor....Factory overhead
S 4,1205229El
Total cost added durlng
Total cost charged to department
Cost Accounted for as Followr
Transterred to Flnlshlng DepartmcntWork In Process, endlng Inventory:
Mater ialslabor. . . . . . . .Factory overhead
Total cost accounted for',..-,.............
:::::::::ll ::::::::::::::: ffi:
o/o
Unlts Complete Unit Cost
$e.so
Iotaf Coet
378,200
33,ooo28042O 3,700
s81,900
9r200
800800800
lOOo/t
750h25o/c25%
3 5,603
344,88012,63818�r779
s8.50
35.001,402.10
9,8009,400-!9,400
s5.001,402.10
Total number ol equivalent unlts required In thefollows:
Materials
Equivalent units transferred out....Equivalent uni ts in ending inventory
Total equivalent units
cost accounted for section determlned
Labor Overhead
9,200 9,200200 200
9,800 9,400 9,400
Total cost (1.e. , the cost in beginning inventory ptus the cost added dur ing t f ie current per iod)
d iv ided by the tota l number of equivalent uni ts requi red in the cost accounted for sect ion
9r2OO800
L
\--
I
I
L
IL
I
b
ChapterG
E6-5
QuantitY Schedulc
Beglnnlng InYentotY..Received from Cutting Departmcnt"'
Trangfcrred to Paintlng DepartmenL'
Hypertec CorPorationForming DePartment
Cost of Production RePortFor SePtember
Materialr Labor Overhead
TotalCost
t 21,1205,8802,9145,228
g 34,U2
3178,24O
Unlt Cost
QuantitY
1r4OO4,600
Endlng InventorY 80o/. 3Oo/n 300h
Coat Charged to Departmcnt
Eeginnlng lnventorY:
Cost from precedlng department"""Materials
FactorY overheadTotal cost In beglnnlng lnventory """'t""""""""
Coat added during curent Period:Cost from precedlng department"""""""'Matarialr ....."...-....-.Llbo 1...............o......r.......ro......r.....-......o...o...................
Factory overhcad .""'t"""""
Total cost addcd durlng crrrcnt period"""'
Total cost charged to departmcnt..""""'
3 70,38020,Uo17,52635,052
tl43,398
6,000
5,0oo1,000I ,OO0
Equivalent UnitUnits' Cost"
Coat Accountcd for as Follows
Tranrtcrrcd to PainUng Dcpartmcnl.Work lrr Proccssl cndlng InventorY:
Gort from preccding dcPartrncntMatorlalr ........o.......'..[.abor........Factory overhead
Total cost accounted for ...-.'....-..-..
Equlval ent unitc transf erred out....Equlvalent unlts In ending Inventory
Total equivalent units
5'OOO 5,000 5rOO0 5,0001,OOO OOO 300 3O0
6,O0o
Unlts
ch
ComPlete
o,0oo5,8005,3005,30O
sl5,25O2,82O1 , 1 4 02,28O
5,300
s15.254.703.807.60
331.35
Total Cost
s156,750
21,49O
s178,240
5rOoO
IrO0O1r00oI ,O0O1,00O
1000h $31.35
lAOo/. sl5.258go/o 4.793ooh 3.gO30,h 7.60
I
Total number of cqulvalent unlts required In ths cost accounted tor eecuon determined as
followg:Prior DePL
Gost Materials Labor Overhead
5,OoO 5,300
- Total cost (i.e., tJre cost in beginning inventory plus the cost added during the current period)
dlvlded by thc total numbcr of cqulvalent'unlts required ln thc cost accounted for gecUon
\
1@
E6-o ' Ramirez CorporationAssembly DePartment
Cost of ProducUon RePortFor February
Quantlty Schedub
Beglnnlng InventorYRecahved lrom Cuttlng Departmcnt.-
Trangferrcd to Flnlghcd Goodg..-.....En dln g Inven tory..,..........,..r....,....8....
Cost Charged to DepartmcntBeginning inventory:
Chapter 6
Materlalr l.abor Overhcad QuanUty
400aloo2,5O0
Fooo8Oo/, EO'/o 8Oo/o 50O
2r5OO
Totat Equhralent UnltCoat Unlts' Cost"
s 67,410 2,500 s32.0021,200� 2,400 10.50
Cost from precedlng deparbnent.............,. . $ 12'590Materials 4,OOO
1,20O2,49O
3 20,190
Labor.Factory ove
Total cost In beglnnlng Inven
Cost added during eurrent perlodlCort from preceding department.Materlalal:bor 171060 2r3OO 8.2O
35,320 2,3OO 18.40Factory overhead
Totat cost added durlng current perlod..,.... 8141,59o
Total cost charged to department:-sl81,78O
.h
Cost Accounted tor ag Follory! Unltg Complcta Unlt Cort
Transferred to Finlshed Goodr..,....... 2,000 l00th 387.10Work In Process, cndlng Invcntory:'
Cost from preceding department 500 lOOc/, S32.OO 316'000Materia1s....,............ 500 8O'/, ' l O.5O 4,2OO[abor....,... 500 $Oc/o a.2O 2,460Factory overhesd
Total cost accounted for................... s191,780
' Total number of equlvalent unlts requlred In the cost accounted for gectlon determined asfollows:
Prlor DepLCost Materialg labor Overhead
Equivalent unlts transferred out.... 2,0OO 2,OOO 2,OOO 2,OOOEquivalent uni ts In ending lnventory 5O0 4O0 3OO 3OO
Total equivalent unlts Z"SoO Z*C}O Z,SOO ,"3OO: : : :
- Total cost (1.e., the cost In beginnlng inventory plus the coat added during thc current period)divided by thc total numbcr ol equtvalent unlts rcqulrcd In thc cost accounted tor secUon
s67.10
WIsi34,20o
L.IL
LClppter6
E&7 Zupton Manufacturing CorporationFormlng DePartmant
Cost of Pmduction RePortFor June
Matcrbl A Materbl B
109
Overhead QuanUtYo00
31000
4,500
4, looa00300h
4'50O
Equlvalent UnltUnltr' Coct"
II
Lt
I
I
b
i-
QuanUV tlchsdulc
Bog lnnln g hvcntorr...m'o..--....c.Recolvcd fl.,om Cutdng Drpartmont-.
Tranrlerrrd to Fhlrtrlng DepartmcntEnd lng lnvcntory...-'..--...o..0-......6..
Labor
100% o% 30%
Cort Chargcd to DePartmcntBeglnnlng lnventorY:
Cort trom praccdlng dcpartmcnt......-"'-""""""""""*letarbl A.--..**...,.'.'..-o-oolletrrld 8........*..--........'.-.6.-6'Fts|.e bor....'.....'..........D...................Frctory ovcrhcad
Total cogt ln beglnnhg hventorY
@et addcd durlng curcnt Perlod:Cort from precedlng department...........""Matsrlal 4..-.....................,......
TotalCost
I
I
J 4A222,805
01 , 2 5 O1.875
3 1 0 . 3 s 2:
3 29,32E19,69514,35015163023.4a5
JtOZ.tt$
rl_1_?@o
Unlt Coot
326.00
97'505.003.504,OOo.oo
4,5OO4,5OO4,1OO4,2i2O4,2J20
$!l,ooo2rOOO
o4ao720.
3 7.505.00
326.O0
Total Cogt
3100,000
o,200
sl12,800
Fectory ovcrhcad
3.504.00o.00
'fotat cori rdded durlng csrent porlod"""'
Total cort charged to department..-'.--'--V'
Unltr GompletcCort Aceounted tor r Followr
Trandrrrod to Flnlrtrlng DoparbncntWork h Proccgr cndhtg hvontorY;
Cort from procsdlng dePartmcntMatsrlal A -.-.-*Matsrlal ILeborFectort ovcrhcad r....-................
Totrl cort eccountod for ..-....,...-*..
Equhralcnt unltr tranctcrcd out.... 4,1OOEqutvalent unltr In cndlng Inventory 4oO
Total cqulvatent unltr I,5OO
4rloO
400400400400400
100%
100.hlOOc/.
Ot/o
4r l oo400
4,5OO-
3Oc/o3004
' Tottl numbor of rqutvelent unltr rcqulrcd In the cost eccounted tor rccUon dctormlncd ar
followr:Prlor DepL
Coot {ttttbt A Utt.t"li l ' 'abor Overhead
4rl ooo
4,1OO 4,1OO120 120
4,1OO 4,220 1,220.
- Total cort (1,c., thc coct In beglnnlng Invcntory ptur thc coct added durlng thc current porlod)dtvlded by thc total numbcr of cqulvalont unltr requlrcd ln thc cogt accountod for rcctlon
QuanUty SchcduloBeglnnln g lnvcntotT -x..o'd"""-"'-o".*tr"Recelved from gyn rp Depe rtm c J1t....."""'-'-'Addcd to grocou ln CarbonsUon Departrncnt
Tranrferrod to BotUlng Dcpertmcnt -......-.....End In g brventory...osso....F.r-.-......h"'!"il'
. l
_ _
Pop Cola CompanyCarbonation Department
Cost of Productlon ReportFor October
Hatcrllb L^abor
100% 25%
TotrlCo.t
Chaoter 6
ry QuenUtYI rOOO2,OOOc,ooo
25V.
e,ooo7"8OO13OO
0,ooo
Equlvelcnt UnltUnltt' Cocti'
o,ooo9rOOO8,loo8,1OO
32.0O
Totel Cort
il5,ooo
1 1 0
E6-8
Cogt Chargcd to Dsprrtmcnt
Beginnlng hvcntorY:
Coat f mm prcccd In g departmcnt..............-lvlaterlalrLaborFectory
Total colt ln boglnnhg hvcntory
Coat added durlng curcnt Pcrlod:Cort from prrcrdlng doptrtmcntMatorlelr[aborFactory ovcrhced
Total coct addcd during current pcrlod....-.,"""'t
Total coet chargcd to deparhnent.........--
Unltr7'800
lSoo112001'3,OO1,200
xComplctr
100%
1oo%100%
25.h25.h
3 1 , 1 2 0190oo
120
t f/a90
3 o,oao1,O1OlFEo3,120
315,e7O3t7/|60
Unlt CctSrLOO
31:O20.20AO
31t€O2AOco
120
tl.2020.20AO
Cort Accountcd for r FollowrTranrforrcd to Botdlng Dcpertrnrnt -Wort In Ploceur cndlng lnvcntoryl
Cort from pncedlng dcPartrncntMats r1a1r,...........,......LaborFactory ovcrhcad -..............'......
Total cort eccounted for -'.-...-.*.
lBOO
317,400
. Total numbcr of rquhutlcnt unltrr rcqulrod ln thr cort eccountod tor locUm dctcrmlncd I
followr:Prlor DcpL
Coct Matcrlab Lrbor Ovcficed
Equlvelcnt unltt trenrfcrcd out ... TBoo TBoo 7,8oO TBooEqulvalent unltr h cndlng lnventory l,2OO 1'200 3OO 3OO
Total cqulvalsnt unttr !'099 I'o99 JrL99 81199
* Totat coet (1.r., tfir cg4t ln bcalnnlng Invcntory plur thc colt addod durlng tlro currcnt perlod)
dhvldsd by thr total numbcr oi oqulwlcnt unltr rcqulrcd ln thc coat eccounted for rcctlon
Chapter6
E6-9 ,
Labor
1 1 1
Quantlty Schedule
Beglnnlng lnventory,.Recelyed trom Reflnlng Department............,..Added !o process In Blending Department..,..
Tranaterrcd to Fin lsh In g Departmen t .............Endlng lnventory..
Cogt Charged to Department
Beglnning lnventory:
Donegal Chemical CompanyBlending Department
Cost of Production ReportFor March
Materials Labor
100ah gooh
TotalCost
Overhead QuanUty
5,0o02O,0OO
5,000
goeh
3O,0OO
26,OO04,OO0
99'o99
UnltCosttt
EquivalentUnits'
Cost trom precedlng department
Gost added during current period:Cost from preceding department...............Materlale
Total cost In beglnnlng Inventory I 8,072
3 4,75021375
1807fJ7
s25,25O_12,A25
2r7408 , 1 1 3
94,8,728
956,80O
Unlt Gost
. . . a . . . a . a a a a a
29,000
4,0004,0004,0o04,00o
'1000h
1000h1000h
aoehsooh
91.90
$1.oo.50. 1 0.30
3O,O0O3O,O0O29,2OO29,600
$4,OOo2,0oo
3201,08O
s1.o0.50, to.30
$1.eo
Total Cost
$49,40O
7,4OO
358,80O
Factory overhead
Transferred to Finlshing DepartmentWorl In Process, endlng Inventory:
Cost from preceding departmentMaterialsLabor........Factory overhead
Total cost accounted for ......._..........
Equ ivalent u nits transferred out....Equivalent uni ts In ending inventoryTotal equivalent uni ts
Total cost added during current period.......
Total cost charged to department...........
Cost Accounted for as Foltowtc/o
Unlts Complete
r Total number of equlvatent units required In the cost accounted for gecUon determlned aafollorrs:
Prior DepLCost Materials Labor Overhead
28,000 26,0004,OOO 4,OOO
3O,0OO 3O,OOO 29,2OO 29,600
26,OOO3,20O
28rOOO3,OOO
" Tgtal cost (i.e., the cost in beginning inventory plus the cost added during the current perlod)divided by the totat number of equivalent units reguired In the cost accounted for aectlon
1 1 2
E6.10 APPENDIX
For JulY
euanUV Schedulc Matertalr ry
onerhead
Bcginnlng Invcntory....""""'o"""''"- AOoh 2O'h 2Oo/o
Starbd ln Procesr thle Perlod
t
Chapter 6
Brimhall Manufachlrlng GomPanYCuttlng Departrncnt
Cort of ProducUon Reoort
\Transferred to Assgmbly DepartmentEndlng lnventorY'.
Cogt Gharged to Department
Beginning inventorln
MaterlallLaborFactory overhead
Total cost In beglnning InventolY
Cost added during current Period:
Cogt Accounted for aa Followr
Transferred to Assembly DepartmentsBeginnlng inventolY.
Gost to complete:Materialg.-LaborFactory overhead """"
Started and comPleted this Period
Total cost transferred to AssemblyDePartment .... '..........
Work in Process, ending inventorY:Materlals..Labor........FactorY overhead
Total cost accounted tor .............. '.. '.
To complete beginnlng inventory..Started and completed this PeriodEnding Inventory..
Total equivalent unlts
- Cost added during thc current period
durlng thc currcnt Perlod
lOOo/. 50'/o 5Oolt
CurentT.
$ 2,940390585
3 3 ,915
340,530t8,10027r15O
39t,78o
395,895:Unit Gost
QuanUtY
100000
I,OOO
850150
I ,OOO
EqulnalentUnlts'
33,915
1,98O1,6002,4O0
87,4251,50O2,25O
UnitCostt'
349.5020.00
. 30.oo
See.5o
Total Cost
$ 9,895
74,A25
s84,520
1 1 1 1 7 5
s95'695
as follows:
TotalGost
Materlala ..............-......Labor...'...Factory overhead t....................................................t.'
Totat cost added during current period'-'-""o""'
Totat cost charged to department """""""'
940905905
Unltc
1 0 0too1 0 0
750
1 5 01 5 0t 5 0
7so1 5 0
40ch8Ac/osooh
100.h
t4e.so20.o030.o099,50
. Number of equivalent uni ts of cost added during t t ro current per iod determined
Materials l:bor Overhead
40 80 80
lOOo/c $49.503Oo/. 20.005Oo/o 3O.OO
750 75075 75
940 905 905
divided by the number of equivatent uni ts of cost added
1 1 3Chapter 6
E6.11. APPENDIX
QuanUty Schodulc
Beglnnlng InventorY
Kandu Tool GomPanYAssembly DePartment
Cost of Production ReportFor November
Materlals
5Oolo
Becelved from Cutung Department...
Transferred to Finished GoodsEndlng lnventorY..
Coet Charged to DepartmentBeginnlng Inventory:
Cost trom precoding department.......... '....Materlals .................LaborFactory overhead
Total cost In beginning inventorY
Cost added durlng current period:Cost from precedin g d epartment."..........................,...
Factory overhead
Total cost added during current period.......
Total cost charged to department...........
9Oo/. gooh gooh
l.abor Overhead
4ooh 4Oolo
QuanUty
1r2OO2,80O
4,00O
3,O0O1,000
4,O00
Equivalent UnitUnits' Cost"
TotalCost
17,28O5,55O2,4OO3,8OO
s 28,830
s 40,60030,89O1A,9�3225 398
I_1_3,610s142,450
2r8OO3,3003,3203,320
314.509.305 . 1 07.65
s36.55
l l 1
E6-1 I APPENDIX (Concluded|
Coat Accountcd tor ar Followa
Tranctcrrcd to Finlghed Ooodg:Beginn ing Inventoty """""""""'
Cost to comPlete:Materlall.-Labor.....'..Fa ctg-rY ove rh ca d ...'....
Started and comPlatcd thll Pcrlod
Total cogt transferrcd to FlnlshcdWork In Proce3s, cndlng InventorY:
Cogt trom Preceding dePartmentMater ialc. .L:bor .................-.Factory overhead
Total cogt accounted tol .......-.-... '....
To complete beginning inventorY -Started and completed thil PorlodEnd in g inventory............................
Unltr Currcnt'/o Unlt Coot
Chagter 6
Total Cott
328,&tO
5,39O3,A725,508 3 {3,590
o5,79O
3100,380
314,5008,37O4,08Oa,12O 3:!,070
s142,45O
determlncd ar totlow::
Overhced
. Number of equlvalent unlts of cogt added during the current perlod
Prlor DepLCott Materialr Labor
1,2001,20O1,20O
I ,8OO
Goodr
1 ,00o1,00o1r0001,00o
3Ot/tsooh60.h
1OOV.
100.h00.h80e/o
800h
EOO1,800
900
3 e.305.107.85
36.55
314.500.305 . 1 07.85
o1,8001,000
7201,80O
800
7201,80O
800
Total equlvalent unlts -2'800 -9'399 -3'339 -3'329
Cost added during thc current pcrlod dlylded by thc numbcr ol cquivalent unitr of colt added
during thc current per iod
Chapter 6
E6-12 APPENDIX
1 t 5
QuanUty Schcdulc
Beglnnlng lnvcntoryRecelved from Retinlng Department..,..........-Added to proceae In Blendlng Department.,...
Transtered to Flnlshed GoodsEndlng Inventory..
Coat Charged to DepartmentBeginnlng lnventory:
Cost from preceding departmentMaterlals ........,.....,L:bor........Factory overhead
Total cost In beginnlng InventoryCost added during current perlod:
Northeastern Chemical CorporationBlending Department
Cost of Production RoportFor May
Materlals Labor100.h 20ch
lOOo/t 800h
Overhead Quantity
4OV. 2rOOO5,0005,0o0
gooh
12,0O0
1O,5O01,5OO
12,0OO
Equivalent UnitUnits' Cost"
TotalCost
3 2,4905001 5 0600
Cost lrom procedlng departnrant;,Materlals...l.aborFactory overhead
Total cost added during current period,......Total cost charged to department.........
$ 3 ,71O
s12,5OO2,5003,3OO7163O
$25,930
_s29,64O
1O,O0O10,o001 1 , O O O1 O , 9 O O
s1.25,25,30.70
32.50
n6
I
Ef-l 2 APPENDIX (Concluded)
Cort Accountcd lor er FollorYr
frz-"tf-"tt"a to Flnlrhcd Ooodr:
Bcglnnln g Invcntory """""""''-Cogt to complcta:
Matcrlrlr """"""""""""Itbol."*-Fecto rI oYcrh4ad............
Started and comPleted thla Perlod
Total coat trancferrcd to FlnlshcdOoods
Work ln Proces!, cndlng InventorY:Cost from Prsccdlng dePartmentMatedalr . . . . . .Labor...............Factory overhead
Total coat accountsd lor ...................
To complete beginning inventory..Started and completcd thla PerlodEndlng InventorY..
Total equlvalent unltr
Unltr Curcnwl Unlt Coct
Chagter 6
Totel Cort
3 5,030
21,25O
s26,28O
31,875375
3,360
s20,640
Prlor Dept.Coat Materlalt
31.25.25
270840
L:bor Ovarhoad
1,000 1 ,2008,500 8,500
900 1 ,200
2,OoO2,00o2,00O8,50O
1,5OO1,50O1,5OO1,5O0
08,5001,500
ooh8.0chaoch
100%
100ch1000h
6Oc/c80o/c
08,50O1,500
3 .25.30.70
2.50
t3,71O
n
480840
.30
.70
, Number of equlvalent unltr of coct added during thc cutzent perlod detsrmlned aa followg:
l O,OOO ' l O,OOO 1 l ,Ooo 1O,9oO:
Cost added durlng thc currcnt pcrlod dhldad by thc numbcr of cqulvalcnt unltr of cost added
during thc current per lod
Chagter 6
1
P6-1
(1)
1 1 7
PROBLEMS
Modern Cabinet ComPanYCutting Department
Cost ol Production BePort
QuanUV Schedulc
Beglnnlng InventorY..Startgd In proceso this Perlod
Transf erred to Assembly DepartmentEnding Inventoty
Cost Charged _to Department
Beglnnlng Inventorp
For August
Materlalr Labor
Materlalslabor...Factory overhead
Total cost in beginning inventory.... '...-...... '...-.r...
Cost added during current period:Materlals[.aborFactory overhead
Total cost added during current period-.-.-..
Total cost charged to department...........
Overhead QuanUty
200800
gooh 60ch 600h
TotalCost
800
650150
800
Equivalent UnltUnits' Cost"
S 5,385530795
s 6,890
s28,0358,35O
12,323$48,91O
s53,6O0
Unlt Cost
7A5740740
3f0.oo12.O018.OO
Cost Accounted for as FollowsTransferred to Assembly DepartmentWork in Process, ending inventory:
Materialsl-aborFactory overhead
Total cost accounted for ...................
' Total number of equivalent unl ts requiredfollows:
Unlts
1 5 01 5 0
%0omplete
050 lO0o/c
150 900h
s70.o0
rot"l C*!s45,50O
35,4O01r08O1,620 8,10O
gooh
6Ao/c
970.00
s40.0012.OO18 .00
s53,000
in the cost accounted for sect ion determined as
Mater ials Labor Overhead
Eguhralent unl ts transferred out. . . . . . . . . . . . 05O 05O 85oEqulvalent uni ts in ending inventory.. 135 90 90
Total equivatent unlts _JE _J79 _Jl9
- Total cost (1.e., the cost in beginning inventory plus the cost added during the current per iodldivided by the totat number of equivalent uni ts required in the cost accounted for aecUon
Chaptar 61 t 8
P6-1 (Continuedi
Modern Cabinet ComPanYAssemblY DePartment
Cost of Production RePortFor August
QuanUV Schcdulc \
Beglnnin g Inventory.-,........""""'-'dRacelved from Cuttlng Departmsnt"'
Tranaferred to Finiahed Goodr ""'-'-En d in g Inventoty..-..'...-.....'...
Coat Charsed to DcPartmcnt
Beginnlng InvcntorY:
Matcrialr l:bor Overhead Quantlty
Coct trom precedlng d epartnrent """"""""""""""""' 3 17,41O3,4513,8113,011
MaterlalaLabor
Total cost ln beginnlng Inventory 3 28,083
Cost added durlng curtent Pcrlod:Cogt from pt ""oiiJ departrnent"""""""' ' 3 45'5oo
Materlall 13'43:l
tabor...... '. 20'989
Factory ovefiead 20'989
4ooh 2Oo/o 20t/.
250050
900
8001 0 0
TotalCost
900
Equivalent UnitUnlts' Cosf'
sl oo,911$128,994
$ 69.eO20.1030.o030.00
s150.00
900940820820
Total cost addcd durlng curent perlod"""'
Totat cost charged to department"""""'
fi9Chapter6
P6-1 (Goncluded)
Coat Accounted tor as Follows
Trangferred to Finlshed Goods....-....Work ln Process, endlng lnventorY:
Cogt from Preccdlng departmentMaterlala-laborFactorY overhead
Total cost accounted for..... '.......-.....
%Unlts Complete Unlt Cost
100% s'|50.00
Total Cost
sl20,ooo
8,994
s128,994
800
1 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 0
1000h I4Ao/.
69.9020.1030.0030.00
36,99O804soo600
20o/c200h
' Total number of equivalent units reguired tn the cost accounted for section determined as
followr:
Prior Dept.Cost Materials Labor Overhead
Equlvalent unlts transterred out....Equtvalent unlts In ending Inventory
Total equivalent unlts
8001 0 0
80040
80020
80020
420�840900
* Totat cost (i.e., the cost in beginning inventory plus the cost added during t*te current periodl
divided by the total number oi equivalent units required in the cost accounted lor section
(21 Work in Process-Cutting Department""""'Work in Process-Assembly Department
Matg f i a l s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . r . . r . . . . . . ' . . . . t . .
Work in Process-Gutting Depattment""""'Work in Process-Assembly Department
Payroll .. ' ........ ' ......."....r..
Work in Process-Gutting Department ........Work in Process-Assembly Department
Appl ied Factory Overhead' , . . . . . . , . . . . .
Work in Process-Assembly DepartmentWork in Process-Cutting Depanment......."
Finished Goods InventoryWork in Process-Assembly Department ..., '
26,O3513,433
39,468
8,35O2O,989
29,339
1215252O,989
33,514
45,5O045,50O
120,OOO12O,OOO
ChaDter 6120
P0.2
(rl
Endlng lnventoty.
Coat Charged to DePartment
Beglnnlng InventorY:
Rathbone Tool GorPorationCasting DePartment
Cost of Production ReportFor December
QuanUty Schedulc Materialg
Beglnnlng Invcntory-""""n"'xo""'r"StartcO In Prcccg thlc Perlod
Trancf errod to Flnlghlng Department
Labor Onerhead QuanUtyI ,OOO8,OOO
1000h 80% 8Oa/c
0rooo
7150O1,5O0
-9'ooo
Equlvalent UnltUnltsr Cost"
Mater lalr
TotalCogt
$ o ts6090
Total cost In beglnn
Cost addcd durlng current Pe
Total cost charged to department...
Cogt Accounted for aa Followg
Transferred to Flnlshlng DepartmentWork In Proceal, cndlng inventory:
Materlalslabor........Factory overhead
Total cost accounted for ..'....--..........
Ing lnventofl ...........-......t..."'
rlod:
s 1,085
Materialr sl7,0854,29O6,435
I,OOO8r7OO817OO
$3,OOO600900
7,5OO1,2OO
32.0O.50.75
s3.25
Total Cost324,375
4,500
FactorY overhead
Total cost added during current period""-' s27,81O
Unltg
7r5oo
1,500115001,500
.hCompleta
100eh
7,5O01,5OO
s28,875
Unlt Cost
$3.25
7,5OO1,2OO
l0Oc/o 32.00gO./o .50ggoh .75
Total number of equivalent uni ts requlredfollowg:
Equivalent unlts transferred out...........Equivalent unl tr in ending inventory..
Total equivalent uni ts
s28,875
ln the cost accounted for gecUon determined as
Materials Labor Overhead
9,ooo 8 ,7OO 8 '7OO
- Total coat ( i .e. , the cost in beginning inventory plus the cost added during the current per iod)
divided by thc total number of equivaient units required In the cost accounted for secgon
- ClpPter6
- . P6-2 (Continued|
Rathbone Tool CorporationFinishing DePartment
Cost of Production RcportFor December
QtrenUV 9chcdulc
Bcglnnlng Inventory..- RccelvcdfromCastlngDcpartmcnt.............-.
Tnnrforred to Finirhed Goodr- Endlng lnventory..
Cogt Charged to DepartnentBcginnlng Inventorp
Cort from praccding departmcnt...............r.r....oo6.ooeoor. 3 a'78!i[.abor-. 291Factory ovcrhead 555
Total cost ln beginning inventory 3 5,54l
Cort edded during currcnt pcrlod:
121
l-abor Ovcrhced QuantitY
1 ,50O715OO
9,00o
7,00O4O.h 'o.h 2,0oo
I,OOO
Totel Equivalent UnhCort Unttr' Cort"
324,375 I,OOO 33242,130 TBOO .303,18 A,OOO AA
Cost from prccedlng departmmt[-abor.-.-Faetory overhcad
Totrl cct charged to dcpertmcnt-.-........
Totel cst rddcd durlng current period....... 32r"g3,
335,180 9r.oo
t2
P&2 (Goncluded)
%Cort &countod tor er Followr Unltr Compbtr Unlt CqtTnnrferrrd to FhLh.d Ooodt.--.- 7,000 1o0% 3t.ooWork ln Ptpcs, oodlng hvrotorn
Cort trom pncrdlng dcprrtrnrnt 2,O0O lOO% 33.2a $S/38O
Crtcplcr 6
Totrt Cort328,OOO
2,OOO /30L 30 21OFretory ovrr.hord 2,0OO 30.A .U 4CO 7,i8O
Totrl cot eccountrd tor,.......--.-- t35,180
' Totel numbcr of rqulvelcnt unttt ruqulrcd In thr cqt rccountcd for rocUon dotcrmlncd erfollowr:
Prlor DrpLCort t-abor Ovcrhcad
Equlvrlcnt unltr tnnrfcrrcd out........... 7,000 7,OOO T'OOOEqulvelcnt unttr h rndlng Invontory.. 2,OOO 8OO I,OOO
Totel cqutvrlcnt un|tr..........-..... g,0OO 7€OO 8,0OO
- Totel coet 0.1., tfrr cort In bcalnnhg lnvcntory plur tfrr cort rddod durlng llrr currant pcrlodl '
dlyldod by t|rr totrl numbrr of rqulvrlcnt unltr nqulrrd h tho cort rccountcd for rocUon
l2l Work in Process--Casting Department | 7,085Matgrials ......,....,.,,..........,..,.............
Work In Process--Casting Departmont....o........... 4r29OWork In Process-Flnlshlng Department... 2,139
Payrol l . . 'o . . . .o . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . .
Work in Proces!-Casting Department................ 6,435Work in Process-Flnlshing Department.............. 3,125
Applled Factory Overhead ....,.........
WorkinProcess-FinishingDepartment.. . . . . . . , . . . . . 241375Work In Process-Castlng Departmont ........
Finished Goods lnventory-.................,................. 28rOOOWork In Process-Flnishlng Department ......
17,085
6,429 -
c l EAAg r J v Y
_
24.375
28,OOO
Ctpptcr 6
P€.3
(11
chrtnUty gchodub--Beglnnlng lnirrnbryatrrt d h procrs thb porfoa
Hetrrletr *F.-_.-.€bbor-_.,_Fr ctory ovcrft ced,......8_..,.rts,..
Totrl cct rccountad for.__.**.
Totel rgutvelcnt unltr
Jettcr Engine CorporationGasting Departnrent
Cost of Production ReportFor February
123
Hrt rbb bbor orlrrhcrd QuenUty
5003,OOO
Tnnctrrr.d to Anmbly DcprrtnmtEndhg Lrvrntory-E*_Ea
Tnnrfrrrrd to Arrmbty OlptrtnrntWort_h Proce, rndbrj hyrntorrl
-
Coct Chrrpcd to Dc?rrtnrrtBeetnntng h;;t"m
-
Mltarbb --..-EE----H-E*-8..-bbof -*..s--.E..-*_Frctory ovcrtrced
Totrl cqt h beghnhg trvcntoryCort eddrd durlng currurt prrlod:
Hetrrlelr b&8,I ^ L _ -
H . - . - _ _ * _ c _ a a
Itbof ---.----., D - - - a a - a a - g F a _
Ftelory ovcrhotdTotrl cort rddcd durlng currrnt p.riod_.._
Totrl cst clrergad to rlcprrtmont_.._..-
Co.t A€€orrntrd for rr Folbwr%
Unltr Compbtr
too!a 80'. 90%
TotrlCost
t 1O,9?Sssa
2.&?9
3 ta,1o2
s1.0575to,3E24a/aEl
35OO
2,7ooaoo
3"5OO
Equtvrhnt UnltUnltr' CotF
2r7OO
aoo800800
loo%
100%80%go.h
3211'398s23g5og
Unlt Cctsas.oo
845.OO 33E,OOO5.OO 33OO
15.00 IO,SOO
3,5OO3r3ao3lzo
345.OO5,OO
t5.oo
305.o0
Total Cort3r75^5OO
50,oo03225,5O0
'
A;*mbrr of rqulvlbnt unltr rogulrcd In thc cct rccountad tor rocuon dctarmlncd er
Equlnbnt unttt trenrtrrrrd out..Egulnhnt unttr h rndtng rnvcntory-:*.*.
Mrtarbb Lebor OYcrhced
2,7OO720
3r42O
17ooaoo
2,7ooG40
35OO 3,340
- Totel cct (lr- thr.cort In bcainnlng brvcntory plur thc cor-t edded durrng $rc current pertod)dhddcd by thr totrl numbct ";;;;bnt unti -r.oo-"ii"l'n
t,,a cort rccountod tor rccuon
Chaoter 6121
l
P8-3 (ConUnued) Jetter Engine CorPorationAssemblY DePartment
Cost of Production RePortFor February
QuanUty Schcdulc Matcrials
Bcglnnlng Invcntqtt-Rccclvrd from CerUng DcPartment -
I'latcrialr1:bor
tabor Orerhead QuanUty
I 'OOO2,7OO
3,700
2,9O0800
Trendcrrcd to Flnlrhlng DcparlrnentEndlng lnvcntolY- 7Ot/. 3oth 3Ot/t
Cort Charged to Dcpartmcnt
Beginning lnvcntoDn
Cost trom prcccding departmcnt.*.-...Matcrlalr...[:bor.......-Factory ovcrhcad
Totel coet h bcginnlng
Cost added durlng current Pcrlod:Cost from praccdlng dcparlrncnt -..*-...
3,70O
Equivalcnt UnitUnits' Cost-
TotalCost
3 ql , l5040',2812'42612,424
3128,260
3175,5OO119,480
44r4O844,4O8
3,7OO3,49O3,'t4O3,140
3 04.5045.3018.101 8 . 1 0Factory ovcrhead
Total coct added durlng current period"""' 3380'798
Totat cct charged to departnent.-.--...... €t"ttg
Coat Accountcd for ar Followr
Transf crrcd to Flnlshln g DcpartmcntWorl in Ptlceca, cnding invcntorY
Cost from prcceding dePartmantMaterlalr[:borFectory ovcrheed
Total cct accounted for .'.................
Equhralent unltr transferred out....Equivatant unlts ln cnding inventory
Total oquhrelent unlts
c/o
Units ComPlete Unit Cct
s146.OO
Tottl Coslt423'4OO
351,60025,368
41344
2,9OO24o�
2,90O
800800800800
2,900800
3,7OO
2,9O0s60
2,9O0240
10c�.h s't40.oo
10o�.h s 84.5070�.h 45.3030.h 18.1030ch ' t 8.10 4t3'44 85,65O
3509,058
' Total numbcr ol cquivalent units required in the cost accounted for secUon determined as
followr:Prior DepL
Cost Mate rials Labor Overhead
3 ,400 3 ,140 3 , ' t 40
- Totel coct (k., thr cort ln bcglnning invcntory plus ttrc cost added during thc current period)
dMdcd by tho total numbcr of cqutvetcnt unlts requlred In the cost accountcd for rccdon
125A189ter 6
P6-3 (Cont inued) Jetter Engine CorPorat ionFinishing DePartment
Cost of Production ReportFor February
QurnUtY Schcdulc
Bcglnnlng InvantorY..Rccclvcd from Ascmbty Dcpaftment ."""""""'
Tnnctorcd to Finlshcd OoodlEndlng lnvcntotT..
Cort Charged to Department
Beglnnlng lnventory:
Tnnslcrrcd to Flnlched GoodsWork ln Proceu, endlng Inventory:
Cost trom preceding departmentLabor........Factory overhead
Total coct accountcd for ...................
2,8O9
' Total number ol squivalant unl ts requiredlol lowg:
Equlvalent unl ts transterred out. . . . . . . . . . . .Egulvalent unl ts ln ending lnventory..Total oqulvalent unl tr
- Tota l coat (1.o. , thc cost ln beginning inventorydMdcd by the tota l number o l equivalent unl ts
Lrbor Ovcrhcad QuanUty
3002,9O0
50% 50.h
3,200
2,8O0ao0
100ch 3158.20
100ch s145.7050cL 5.O05Oc/c 7.5O
in the cost accounted lor
Prior Dept.Cost Labor
2 ,800 2 ,8OO400 200
3,200 3 ,OO0
plus the cost addedrequired In the cost
3,2O0
Equlvalent UnltUnlts' Cost"
3,200 3145.703,OOO 5.003,00o 7.30
-
3158.20
Total Cost
34f2,9O0
858,2801,O001,50O oo,78o
35O3'74O
gection determlned al
Ovefiead
2,BOO200
g,ogg
durlng thc current Perlod)accountcd lor recuon
TotalCort
Cort lrom p reced in g d epa rtment.'..............l-aborFactory overhcad ............... '.
Total cost in beginning inventorY
Cort added during current period:Coat f rom p reced in g d epartm ent..... '..........Labor. . .Fectory overfrcad
Total cost added durlng current pcriod...............'
Totel coct charged to department..,,.......
Cort Accountod lor ar Followr
.h
Uni ts Complete
I 42,8402,78�04 ,140
3 49,740
9423,4O012,24018,300
agj,ooo3503,740
Unlt Cost
400400400
tfi
P6-3 (Concluded|
(21 Work in Process-4asting DepartmeJlt """"""""Work in Process-Assembly Departmellt """"""'
Matgrials ..o......,................o.,.........................
Work in Process.-Casting Department """"""""WorkinProcess-Assemb|yDepartmetlt.............Work in Prccess-Finishing Department """""""
Payroll " "" "" """ """""" """"" ""
Work in Process.-Gasting Departmont "..""""""Work in Pttcess-Assembty Department "o"""""Work i n Process-Finish i ng Department """"""o'
Applied Factory Overhead....""""""""""""
Work in Process-Assembly Department """"""'Work in Process'-Casting Department
WorkinProcess-FinishingDepartmellt..............Work in Process-Assembly Departttlgrlt ""'
Finished Goods Inventory'......-.'.Work in Process-Finishing Depalt[lellt """
148,5751 16 ,480
16,36244,4O812,240
48,46144,4O818,360
175,5OO
423,4OO
442,960
haoter6
263,055
73 ,O lO
111,229
175,5OO
423r4OA
442,960
s Ctnptar6
P6-4 ,
(11
- Quandtf Schcdulc
Startad In procegs thls period
Transterrod to Flnlshlng DepartmentEndlng hventory..
Cogt Chargcd to Department
Beglnnlng Invcntory:
Persona Cologne CompanyBlending Department
Cost of Production RoportFor June
127
Materlalg Labor Overhead QuanUty
1rO0O8r000
6Oc/t 2oth %'/.
7,00o
6,4OOooo
7,OOO
Total Equlvalent UnltCost Unlts' Cogt"
Materlalc $ 19,620tabor 9UFactory ovcrhead 2,375
Total cost In beglnning inventory....o..,................. 3 22,939
Coat added durlng current perlod:Matcrlall .to..........'.r....................................i.......-......... $129rloo 61760 S22.ool,.abor o,88O 0�1520 120
29,005 E'55O /3.80Factory oycrhcad ..r..............
Total coct addcd durlng current perlod...,... SlO5,o45Total cort chtrged to department......... ...... 3187,984 328.OO
Total Cortoh
Cort Accountad tor ar Foltowe Unlts Complete Unlt Coat
Traneforad to Finlshlng Department 0,400 lOOc/o 328.00Work ln Pmcess, cndlng Inventoryn
Mater|a|r.,..o......,,....................... 600 6ooh $22.00 $7,920
s179,200
Iabor..........,....... 600 200h 1.20 1UFactory overhead,...................... OOO 25% 4.8O 72o 817&4�
Total cocteccounted for"""""""""' 3187'984
' Total number of equlvalent unlts required In the cost accounted for secUon detarmlned ae, lollowr:
- Materlals Labor OverhaadEqulvalent units transferred out........,.. 6,400 O,4OO 6,400Equtvalent unlts In endtng Inventory.. 360 1?:O 15OTotal cqulvalent unltg
_ | cqulvalent unltg SISS _q,*9 li?gg
" Total cost (1.e., thc cost in beglnning inventory plus the cost added durlng the currsnt pcrlod). dtvidod by tho total number of equivalent units required In thc coet eccountcd for rcsuon
128
P&,4 (Continued)
Pelsona Cologne ComPanYFlnishing Department
Gost of Production RePortFor June
Hrt rbb
100% 70%
ChWter6
Ovrrhoed Quan0Vrroo6,.1o0
10,2O0
70%
27IOOO
20,OOOI,OOO
27,OOO
Equlvalcnt UnltUnltr' ColF
thranUty Schcdub
Beglnn Ing Invcntoty..F--.o.'--E-o.*@'FRccclvcd from Bbndlng Dcpartmcflt*--'-".-Added to proccta h FlnbhlnO Dcprrtmont '."""
Transferrcd to Flnlsh.d OoodrEndlng Invcntory
lrbor
t to,61o
317e'2OOz'r6051g,e looo,75l
Coat Chargcd to DePartrncntBeginnlng InvcntorY:
Total cot h bcglnnlng lnventorY
Cogt eddod durlni currcnt Pcrlod:
Tote!Cort
Coat frpm pnccodln g d cpartmcnt.-..-.--.---..-F.*.-.-MatsrlalrL-cbor...Factory ovcrhced
i g/aso11395
100050
Cort f ro m p nccd In g d epertnrcnt --.---.-.-.'-..Matsrlalrt-aborFactory
27,OOO27t OO2Q,7OO2gr7OO
36.e5t.oo
.752.30
311.OOTotat coot rddcd durlng curront pcrlod-..-....-... 3245/a75
Total cst chergc'd to dcPrrtmcnt 329O,O85
Clppter 6
P€-,4 (Concluded)
Cort Accountad for er FollonTnnrf rrrrd to Flnlrficd Ooodt.-....-Work br Proccr' rndlng lnventorY:
Cort from Pncccdlng dcPartmcntlletcrlrlr-lrbotFectory ovcrhcad
Totrl cott rccounted for .....--.-..---
Equhralent unltr transfered out....Egutvalcnt unltr In cndlng lnvcntory
Totel rquhnlcnt unltr ...................,
VrGomplctr Unlt Coct
129
Total Cost
3280,ooO
t8,950I rOOO
5251 , 8 1 O 1O,O85
329O,O85
26,OOo700
26t7OO
l 29 ,1OO25r605
1541705
6r88O1 9 , 9 1 9
26,799
29,O656O,751
89,816
179,2O4. 17g,2OO
286,OOO286'0oo
Unltr2OTOOO
I'OOOI'OOO1,000I 'OOO
20,0OOlr0oo
100%
100%100%
28rO0OI'OOO
tt 1.oo
3 6.e51.OO.74
230
26,0OO700
7OY.70%
. Totel numbcr ol equlvalent unltt rsqulrcd In thc cot accountod for rocUon determlned er
lollorvr:Prlor DepL
Cort Matsrhlr Labor Overhead
27',0OO 27IOOO 26,7OO
il Total cort 0,c., thc cort In beglnnlng lnvcntory plur thc cort addcd durlng tlrc curront perlod)
dMded by thc total number of cquhyalent unltr reguirsd ln thc cort accounted for recUon
(21 WorkinProcess-BlendingDepartment. . . r . . . . . r . . .oWork in Process-Finishing Department'.............
Matgrials ..."........".....-... ' . '-.
Work i n Process-Blen ding Departmellt ...'.....'....Work i n Process-Finish ing De partment .............'
PayfOl l . . . . . . . ' . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Work i n Process-8len din g Department ...r..'...,r.'Work in Process-Finishing Department..........'."
Appli gd Factory Ovgrhgad .'.....o..'......'.....r""
Work in Process-Finish ing Department...'.......o..Work in Process-Blending Department ..'...
Finishgd GoOds Inventory.........,....,.................... ' .Work in Process-Finishing Departmont.-'...
tfr
Hytest Chemical CorPoraUonReltning DePartment
Cost of Production RePortFor March
*btrrLrb Labor
100rA 75i*�
TotelCort
Chaptor 6
Otrcrhcad Quentty
8007r2OO
8,OOO
50}|T'OOO1,O00
P6-5
(rl
ol-nnEhr Uchcduh
Beglnn ln g Invrntory --....-'-"""''d"'d---.*Startod ln procccl thb prrlod """"""'d""-'s
Trenctcrrad to B|cnd In g Dcpartmont'*""""'--Endlng lnvrntort
Coct Chargcd to DaPartrncnt
Beglnnlng InvcntorY:
MatorlelrL-aborFa gtort ovcrhced ....""r"-".-'D-t'-F""""n'-""""-o
Total coet ln bcglnnlng lnvcntory
Cort rddcd durlng cunrnt Pcrlod:Matcrlrlr ......E....-'-r""-"--"'--""-"'Do'-'-'--oF
[ :bor. . ' - - . . ---Mo"h"""""*---H" 'E'F ".- 'F '
Factoryovcrhcrd...-....o8....'.|..g.-'.........-...-....9...d
1o1t1 6oct rddcd durtng curcnt perlod
Total coct chargcd to departmcnt....--...
3 7253000
818
, 7,2721,9204*O
311,732
tl2,550
xComplotr Unlt CoetCoct Accountcd tor ta Followf
Tranglerred to Blcndlng Dcpartncnt.Work In Procc.r, rndlng lnvcntorY:
MaterlalrLabor........,...
Unltr7r0oo
I 'OOOI ,OOOlr0o0
100%
100%73.h50%
ll.ao
31,00.20AO
8,OOO7r75O7,5OO
t1,ooo150200
31.0020,10
31.60
Total Cort
i l1 ,200
1,350
312,550Total cot rccountcd for.-..--**
Totel numbor of oqutvtlcnt unltr rrqulrod ln tfir colt rccountrd for lccUon dctarmlncd ll
followr:Mrt rbb Lebor Ovcrhcad
Fastory
EquhraIcnt unttr trandcrrcd out...........Equlvalcnt unltr ln rndlng Invcnto:y..
Total cqulvalcnt unltt
T'OOO 7,OoO 7,OOoI,OOO 75O 50o
7,5OO8,OOO 7,75O
- Total coct (1.r., ttrr cort ln bcalnnhg lnvcntory plur thc cort added during thc currcnt pcrlodl
dhyldcd by thr total numbcr oi rgulvatcnt unltr rcqutrcd !n thc cort eccountcd for rccuon
8,O0O
Equlvalcnt UnhUnltr' CorF
Chaptor 6
P6-5 (Continuedl
Quandty t]chedulc
BeglnnlngRecclvcd from Refinlng Dcpartmottt ........-..--.Addcd to proccrr ln Blendlng Departmcnt.....--
Transferred to Finlshed GoodaEnding InventorY.. 89t/t
Cogt Charged to Departtnent
Beglnnlng Inventory:
Cort fro m p rcccdln g d epa rtment'......'........Materlala
1 3 1
Hytest Chemical CorporationBlending Department
Cost of Production RoPortFor March
Matcrlalr Labor Overhcad QuanUty
1r4O07'Oo01,80O
40o/c
10,20o
9,20o1,O0O
10,200
Equlualent UnltUnlts' Cogt"
40ch
TotalCort
$ t ,7sl42088
100laborFactory overhead
Total cost ln beglnning lnventorY
Coat addad durlng curront porlod:
t 2,602
Goat from precedlng department 911,2004,3803r looSrOOO
MaterlalrLabor.....,.Factory overhead
Total cost added during current pcrlod 924,280
Total cost charged to department...........
10r2OO10,000
9,6OOI,OO0
s1.27.50.33.60
t?n
t32
P6-5 (Goncludeil)
Cort Accountcd for ar Followa
Tnngfcrrcd to Flnlghed Good3"""""Worlt In Proccar, cndlng InventorY:
Cort from PrPcedlng departmcntMaterlalaLaborFactory overh gad ..""""""""""'
Total cogt accounted for .........-..---
Equlvalent unib transferred out..'.Eguivalent units In ending Inventory
Total equivalent unlts.......:..........-.
%Complctc Unlt Cost
Chapter 6
Total Cost
s24,840
2rO42
s26,882
9,200400
9r60O
7 12724,38O
1 1 , 6 5 2
I ,5203 , 1 O 0
41620
2r9405,6OO
8,54O
11,2OO11r2OO
24184424,84O
Total number of egulvalent units required in the cost accounted for secuon determined as
followa:Prior Dept.
Cost Overhead
0,200.
I 'OOO' l ,0oo1,OoOI 'OOO
g,2oolrooo
1O,2OO
100%
1OO'/ogooh
49o/c10o/o
s2.70
91.27.50.33.60
sl,270400132240
Materials Labor
9,20O400
9r8OO
g,2oo800
1O,Ooo
- Totat coct (1.c., the cogt tn beginning Inventory plus the cogt added during t|re current period)
dlvlded by thc totat number oi equivatent unlts requlred In the cost accounted tor sectlon
l2 l WorkinProcess-RefiningDepartment.. . , ' . """" 'Work in Process-Blending Department ....,""""'
Matgrials . . . . ' . . """"""" ' t " t ' r"""""""
Work in Process-Refining Department'...... ' t"""Work in Process-Blending Department """""""
Payro l l . t . . . . " t " " " t " " t " " " " " " t " ' r " " " " " " " " " "
Work in Process-Refining Department """' �r"""'Work in Process-Blending Department
Appt ied Factory Overhead' . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . """" '
Work in Process-Blending Department r......."""Work in Process-Refining Department """'
F in ished Goods 1nventory. . . . . . . , . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .Work in Process-Blending Department """
Chapter 6
P6.6 APPENDIX
(1t
Cluand(y SchcdubBeglnnlngStsrtrd h proccs thb pcrlod..-.'.-.
Tranrf rrrrd to Asrombly DopertmontEnd hg lnvrntory........--x..€.
Cort Chargcd to DcpertmrntBeglnnlng Invcntory:
Upton Manufasturing CompanYCuftlng Department
Cost of Production RoportFor October
t33
H.trrbb Labor Orerhead Ouantlty00t6 1AV. 20Vr I ,OOO
0,ooo
100% 80% 'loo.h
1O,OOO
8,5O01,50O
lO,OOO
TotelCoet
l-abor8 ,01O1,750
790Factory overhcadTotal cct h beglnnlng hventory .'...... $ 10'550
Cort rddrd durlng currcnt pcrlod:Matarlelr 3 81,900
18,OOO3930O
l.borFectory ovcrhcrd
Totrl coct rddrd durlng currcrit pcrlod-.'..' 3130'7oo
Equivalont UnltUnltr' Cogt"'
1o61 sot chergcd to depertrncnt
Cort Accountcd for rr Followr
Transtcrrrd to Arocmbty DcpartmcntsEcglnnlng lnvcntoty .s.-6*
Colt to complctr:Metcrlelt-[rbor-*.-Frctory ovrrhred ----
Strrt d end complct d thb pcrlodTotrl coet trenrfrrnd to Ascmbly
Doprrtmcnt --*.fVork ln Proccs, rndlng hvcntory:
Metcdelrl.eborFactory ovcrhced
Total colt eccountcd tor ...................
-... 3150J250
Unltr Current'A Unlt Cogt
I ,OOOI 'OOOl,OOO
7,5OO
1,50O1,50Ol r5OO
10.hgo.h80%
100.h
100chaooh
1O0'/.
3 c.ooLOO4.OO
15 .O0
t c.oo2.OO4.OO
9,1OOor3oo9r800
310,550
ooo1r2OO3,2OO
313,50O2,4OOorooo
$ 9.oo2.004.00
3 l5 .OO
Total Cogt
3 15,850
112,500
3128,35O
21,9O0
$15O,250
134Chapter 6
P6-6 APPENDTX (Contin ued)
. llumbcr of equlvalent unltr ol colt added durlng thc c'urant perlod detsrmined ar follows:
Materlab Labor Overhead
100 0007r5OO 71500 7'5OO
Endlng lnventorY 1,500 1r2OO 1r500
To comptetc bcglnn|ng Invontory"""o'D,""'o"
Startod end complgtad thlr perlod o'�D'-oo"o-"
Total cqulvalont unltr e,1o0 o,3oo e,8oo
- cogt addsd durlng thc current perlod dtvlded by thc numbor ol cqulvalent unlts of cost addod
durlng the current Perlod
i-.'<--
Clwtor6
P6-6 +PPENDIX (Gontinued)
t35
Upton Manufacturing CompanyAssembly Department
Cost of Production RepodFor October
Materials laborQuanUty Schedulc
Beglnnlng InventoryRccetved trom Cuttlng Department...
Tranctcrred to Finished Goods InventoryEndlng lnventory..
75% $Oo/t 8Oo/o
60c/c 4Oo/t 40ch
Overhead QuanUty2,OOO8,50O
' lo,5oo
915OO
1 , O O O
1O,5OO
Equivalent UnltUnits' Cost"
Cort Charged to DepartmentBcglnnlng Inventory:
Coet from preceding department................................. $MatcrialrlsborFactory overhead
Total cost In beglnnlng Inventory
Coat added durlng current period:Cort from preccdlng department...,........,....................Matorlalr...Labor..........Factory overhead
Total cost added during current perlod.......
Total cogt charged to department,..........
Cort Accounted tor as Followr Units Current % Unlt CostTrangtarrad to Finlshed Goods:
Beglnning inventory,.Cost to completc:
Mater ials. .Labor........Factory overhead ........
Started and completed this period
Total cost transferred to FinishedOoods
Work In Process, ending Inventory:Cost from preceding departrnentMater lalsLabor........Factory overhead
Total cost accounted for . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TotalCost4,000
400800
1,800
$ 0,800
3128,35030,10021,31530,015
$2O9,78O
s216,58O
8,50O816008,7OO8,7OO
315.103.502.433.45
2,0002,OOO2,00o
7,5O0
1 ,0oo1 , O O O1 , O O O1 , O O O
2s%40%40%
1000h
1000h600h400h400h
s 3.502.433.45
24,50
3 1 5 . 1 03.502.453.45
s24,50
Total Cost
$ 6,800
1 , 7 5 01,9602,760 g 13,270
18:t,75O
3197 'o2o
$ 1 5 , 1 O O2.1OO
9801,38O 19,590
93:l'599
t6
P6-6 APPENDIX'(Concluded)
Chapter 6
. llumber of equhralent unlts of cort added during thc current perlod determlned as follows:
7o completc beglnnlng Inventory..tltartsd and completsd thlc pcrlodEndlng Inventoly-r.-...................t..Total equlvalent unltr
Prlor DepLCort Materlale
0 5007,500 715001,000 Eoo
'8 ,500 8,60O
Labor Overhead
800 8007,500 71500
400 4oo8,7OO 8,700
- Coat added durlng thc current perlod dtvlded by the number of equlnalent unlts ol cost addeddurlng ttre currpnt perlod
tzl Work in Process-Cutti n g Dep artm ent'................Work in Process-Assembly Depa rtm e nt ....--....-'.
Matgrials r . . . . . . r . . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . ' . . ' . . . r . . . . . . . .
Work in Process-Guttin g Dep a rtm 8f1t......'..........Work in Process-Assembly De partme nt ....."..'.o.
Payro l l . . . . . . . r . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t " t " " t " " " t " t t " '
Work in Process-Cutti n g Departm gflt'................Work in Process-Assem bly De partm ent ........'..,.
Applied Factory Ovgrh gad ......".............. ' .....
Work in Process-Assembly Department....r.....r..Work i n Proc ess-Cutti n g Depa rtm gllt'........
Finishgd Goods 1nventory...,....o......"........ ' ,..r.......Work in Process-Assembly Department ..,..
8 1 , 9 0 03 0 , 1 O O
18,6002 1 , 3 1 5
39,20O3O,Ot5
128,350
197rO2O
1 12,OOO
39,915
69,215
128r35O
197,02O
Chapter 6
P6.7 APPENDIX
(rl Marston Manufacturing GompanYFabricating Department
Cost of Production ReportFor August
QuanUty Schedulc Materiala Labor Overhead QuanUty
1OO'/. 4och 80o/o 4001,2OO
1,600
Beglnnlng InventoryStlrtod In process thls perlod
Tranrfered to Finlshlng Departmcnt 1,100
y Endlng Invcntory.. 1OO'h 8oo/c 9Oo/o 5OO
-1f99
Coet Charged to Department Total Equivalent Unlt- Beglnnlng Inventory: Cost Units' Cost"
Materlals .. $ 29,280
Factory overhead1,900
11,80O
Total cost in beglnning inventory
Coat added during current period:I 42,980
Materlalc... $ 9O,OOO 1,2OO $ 75.OO1O,o8O 1,340 I2'OO48,740 1,230 38.00
137
. a . . . a a a a a a a a a a
l.aborFactory overhcad
Total cost added durlng current period....... S152,820
Total cost charged to department........... !199f99 s125.OO
,g
P8-7 APPENDIX {Continued}
ochaoch2Oolc
lOAo/"
3 75.0012.0O38.00
125.OO
942,980
$37,5004,800
1 7 , 1 0 O
80700450
Chaptar 6
Total Coet
g 48,90087,500
$130,4O0
59,4OO
$195,8OO
Cort Accountod for ar!g!!ow:
f-rtf"-.a to Flnlshlng Department:Bcglnnlng lnventory.'
Cort to complste:Materlalr..l-abor..-.--.FactotY overhead """"
Startcd and completed thlr Perlod
Total coct transfcrrsd to FinlshlngDcpertmont
Work tn Procesr, ending Inventory:Materlale..Labor........
' Factory overhead
Total coat accounted for ...-.--.-..........
To completc beglnnlng InventoryStartad and completed thls PerlodEndlng InvcntotY..
Total equlvalent unltg
- Cost added during the current period divided bydurlng the current Perlod
Unitg Current 7r Unlt Cost
o2,88031040
400400400
700
500500500
1000h I 75,00800h 12.OO9Oo/o 38'00
240700400
. llumber ol equlvatent units of cost added during the current period determined ac follows:
Materials Labor Overhead
o700500
1.200 1,340 1,230: : :
the number of equivatent units of cost added
CluptcrG
7g--7 APPENDX (Contlnuod|
Marston Manufasturing CompanyFinlshlng Departrtent
Cost ol Produstion ReportFor August
Or||nuU&hodub llrt rbb lrbor Ovrrhcrd*tnV. 20V. 3gYr
Rocrlvod from Frbrbrtlng D.p.rbnltt
Tnnrfrrrrd to Flnlrhed Ooodr hvrntoryEndhg lnvrntory...,.o..m..F6.os,,o IOO%
Cort Chrrg.d to Dopertm.otBoglnnlng Invrntory:
Cort from pncrdlng dcprrtnont --*...n...-.,...,. t 74'OOOlbtarfrb-es.e..-F..F= Ant bot I ,OOO
2,52OFrctoryTotal coct h bcglnnlng hvcntory
Cort rddrd durfng curnrnt pcrlod:Cort from pncodlng drprrtmmt---...-,......,,.....,.HltarhbH*ed-nare
s 78r3!to
trbor
3130/a0o2r02O
19,88020,42oFrctory ovrrhred
Totrf coet rddrd durlng currrnt p.r|od.......Totel cct clrtrgcd to dcprrbncnt.,.*.-
ti80,020
Cort Accountod tor rr Followt Unltr Currrnt 16 Unlt CortTnnrfrmrd to Fhlrhcd Ooodr:
Boglnnlng Invcntory .-.-..-F.,-.-Cort to complctr:
Mattrlalr.-F.-.*nEbbor.--€.*ffiFrctory oyrrftlad -*
Ettrt d end complrt d trb p.rfodTotrl cort trrnrfrrnd to Flnbhcd
Omdt Hhs.*Wort h Procan, ondlng hvrntory:
C;ort from pncrdlng dapertnrrntHttorletr _ F.....r........
139
oo?6 oof)6
TotelCo.t
Quentfuooo
1 , 1 O O
1,7OO
l r3OO.3OO
1,700
Egulvelent UnltUnltr' CorF'
oo0oo0
ao.h s 2-oow.A 14.OOw% 2t.oo
100% 101.00
3267,37O
l r l oo1r4OO1t12O1 l2O
t78,&5O
720Q1720
lOrO8O
3124.00LOO
14.0021.O0
3101.00
Totel Cort
3 95p7O
112t7OO
3208"570
58r8OO
3267,370
ooo700
L^aborFectory ovcrhcad
Totel coct tccountcd tor ...................
100% sl24.00 3{9,OOO100cA 2-oo aoo
o�o.h 14.OO 3,3OO6O.h 21.OO 5,O4O
400.fOO.3OO400
140Chapter 6
P6-7 APPENDIX,(Goncluded)
. llumbcr of cqulvalent unlta of coct added durlng t{rc curent perlod determlned al follows:
To compteto beglnnlng lnvanto4y "st *.0-"nd comPletcd thlt Perlod
Prlor DepLCoct Materlalr
o700400
Labor Overhead
480700240
380 4ao700 700400 240Endlng InventorY
Total equlvalent uhltl 1,42O 1,42O
9O,O0O21920
921920
16,08019r880
35,960
46,7 4029,82O
76,56O
136,400136,4OO
208,570-208,57O
1,46O
ft Coat added durlng the current perlod dlvided by the number of equlvalent unltc of cost added
durlng tlrc currtnt Perlod
l2l Work in Process-Fabricating Department """""Work in Process-Finishing Department...... '... '...
Matgrials .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . , ' . .r
Work in Process-Fabricating Departmeflt ..........Work in Process-Finishing Department.... '..o.r....
PayfOl l . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r t r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . t . r .
Work in Process-Fabricatin g Departm ellt .'........Work in Process-Finishing Depa rtme nt ..'.-....,..'.
ApFlied Factory Overhead ......-......... '......,....
Work in Process-Finishing Department........r....,Work in Process-Fabricating Department "
Finished Goods InventoryWork in Process-Finishing Department..... '
1 4 1ClvgtorO
P6.8 APPENDIX
(1)
QrranUV SchcdulcBcglnnlng lnventorYStrrtld In Proccsc thla Pcrlod
Trandcrrcd to BlEndlng hvcntory
ending Departmant.
TWonka Beverage GomPanYMashing DePartment
Cost of Production RePortFor SePtember
Matcrlalr [.abor
9Oc/, 60oh
0�0% 400h 20c/o
gvcrhead QuanUtY
30o/c 8003,OOO
3,6OO
3r loo500
3,600
Equivalent UnltUnits' Cost"
Cort Ghargcd to DePartmcnt
Beglnnlng Inventory:
Matarlalsl^aborFactory overhead...
Total cost In beginning inventory........... '.. '..,.......
Coat added during current Pcrlod:Materlalr
TotalCost
3 1,088172172
3 1,432
3 O,O0g1.47O3,020
2,84O2r94O3,020
32.10-50
1.O0
33.60
FactoryTotal cort addcd durlng currcnt period....-.. 310'496
Total cogt charged to department............ 3t1i93g
112
P6-8 APPENDIX f0ontin ued)
Cort Accountrd for al Followr
Tnnrtcrad to Etendlng DepartmentBeglnnlng Invontory .......,...""""
Cogt to comPlete:Matgrial g..."""""""""labor.-..,...Factory overhcad """"
Stsrtad and compteted thls PerlodTotal coct trancterred to Blending
Departn ent .....'..................Work ln Proccct, cndlng Inventory:
Materlalr..l-abor........Factory overhead
Total cost accounted for....,..............
Untts Currant 7o Unit Cost
Chaptor 6
Total Cort
$1,4i12
I 2,098
IrOOO
311,008
t 6:10100100 830
800600600
2,5OO
500500500
10%40o/o7Oo/"
'loooh
8Oo/.400h200h
s2.10.50
1 .00
3.60
$2,10.50
1 . 0 0
126120420
. Humbcr ol equlvalent units of cost added during the current period determined ar tollows:
To completc beglnnlng InventoryStartod and com pleted th lg period .................Endlng InventoryTotal cqulvalent unltr
Coat added during the current period dividedduring tfie currrnt period
s l1,928
Materials Labor Overhead
240 4202,500 2,500
200 100
2,890 2,940 3,020
by the number of equivalent uni ts of cost added
602,500
300
Chapter 6
Po-8 APPENDIX (Gontinued)
143)
Twonka Beverage CompanyBlending Department
Gost of Production ReportFor September
QuanUty Schedule
eeglnnlFg Inycntoty.......,..r.,.........r........,............Recclvcd from Mashlng Department..................Added to process In Blending Department.........
Matarlala Labor
50ch 20.h
Overhcad QuenUty
2otlo I 'OO03,1OO3,1O0
60o/c
73OO
6,40O800
J-,n9
Equlvalent UnltUnlts' Cogt"
Transterred to Finished Goods InventoryEnd ln g lnventory.......... 1000h 6Oc/o
Coat Charged to DepartmentBeginnlng inventory:
Cost trom precedlng department................ $
TotalCost
MaterlalsLaborFactory overhead
Total cost in beginning inventorY
Cost added during current period:Cort from precedlng d epartment........... '...Materials
Factory overhead
Total cost added during current period.......
Total cogt charged to department...........
Coat Accounted for ss Follows Units Current 7n Unlt Cost
Transferred to Finished Goods:Beginning inventory..
Cost to complete:Materials..l,-abor........Factory overh ead ........
Started and completed this period
Total coat transferrcd to FinishedGoods
Work In Process, ending inventory:Cogt from preceding departmentMaterlalsl:bor........Factory overhead
Total cost accounted for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1r77O1 0 05574
s 1 ,999
-lt t,ogg1r4O72,OO42,''72
$17,181
$19,180
6,2OOg,7ooo16806,ego
$1.7021.30.40
1 , 0 0 01 , 0 0 o1 , 0 0 0
5,400
goo800sooBOO
500h800hsooh
1000h
1000h'loooh
600hgooh
3 .21.30,40
2.70
s1 .79.21.30.40
$2.70
Total Cost
s i ,999
s 2,66414,580
317,244
s1,4321 6 8144'192 1,930
3 1 9 , 1 8 0
1 0 5240,320
,41
P6-8 APPENDIX (Gonctuded|' Xumbcr of cquhrafent unltr of cogt added during
Chapter 6 .
thc current period determlned as foftows:
To completc beglnnfng Inventory..gt"rt"d and comptetad thlc perl;dEndln g Inven toly..-,F.F.........,.......,Total cqulvalent unltr
Prlor DepLCogt
o5,400
800
6,20o
Materlab Labor5OO 8OO
5,400 5,400800 480
6,700 9.880
Overhead
8005,40o
480
6,ogo"
ff:;ffi'"HlllSil;t"'t perlod divlded bv the number or equivarent units or cost added
(21 Workinprocess_MashingDepartment.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Work in process_Btending Department,o............
Matgr ia ls ' r " " " . . . . . - . . . r . . . . r . . . - . . . - . r . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . .
Work in process_Mashin g Department ...........r,..Work in pro.cess_Blen din g Depa rtm ent .....r..,.,...Payro l l " r " " r " " " r r r " " r . . . - - . . . . r . . . r r . . . . . . . . . r r - . r . - . . . . .
Work in tT: ::s_!l-ashi1 g Dep artm € nt,......,.......Work in process_AlenOini Departmelt ..............Applie d Facto ry Ovgrir ga d r.................,......rD.
6,O067,4O7
1r47O2rOO4
3,O2O21672
7,413
31474
5,692Work in process-B_lending
Department ............,. I 1,Oggwork in process_rraainini oepart-;;f::.:::: 1l,oegFinished Goods Inventory.............. ......... 1Tr244work in process-Biending
oepatt.;;i:::::: I t 'z'rq
12,244
I
CHAPTER 7
DTSCUSSION QUESTIONS
O7-1. Ot slity cost! rnay be groupcd hto the folbwingthree classifications:1. Preventicn costs are the ccts hcurred lo
Ptcvent product failure. They include thecdt ct designing high quality productr andprcductbn rystenrs, irrludhg thc coett o{implementing and maintaining such sys'
' lems.2. Appraisal coots ate the coets incuned to
detecl producl failure. They include lhecet of inspccting and testing malerials,hspecting produc'ts during prodwlion, andthr cogt d obtahhg hlonnatinn lrqn cus'lorners aborn product salisfastiqt.
3. Failure ccts ato the cosls incuned whena product tails, ard may occur inlemally orexternally. Intsmal failure cosls are thosethat occur during the manufacluring gr Pro-ductbn procoss (e'g., scrap, spoilage' andrework), and external failure cosls arothose that occur at ls f the Product hasbeen sold (e 'g. , warranly repai rs andreplacements, 3al€s refunds, handl ingcuslom€r cornplaints, and bsl sales result'hg frorn Poor Producl qualtty).
Q7-2. TOM stands for total quality nwragemenl' whichb a cornpany'wirCe approach to quality improve'menl in all processes and activities. TOM is apervasive philosophy ol doing business thalapplies to all funstional areas of the companyand to ail personnel.
Q7-3. Five characteristics of TQM syslems are:1. The company's obiective lor all business
activily is to serve ils cuslorners' The termproduct' is extended to include services
as well as groods, and'custorner'hcludeshtemal usors as well as those outside ofthe cornpany who purctrase the company'sproducts. Each empbyee's activity is ori'entod to provirCing service to the cuslorner.
2. Top marngement prcvlCes an aclive lead-ership ro le in the qual i ly improvemenlrnovoment.
3. Al l employees are ac l ive ly involved inquslity improvement. Employees aro nolonly asked to contribute ideas, but also lol i nd ba t te r ways o f do ing l h i ngs -Involvemenl can be successlul only whenthere is oncourago.neol and an open andhonest environment cl trust.
4. Thc cornpany has a sysiem of idenlifyingqual i ly problems, developing solut ions,and set t ing qual i ly improvement objec-t ives. This typ ical ly involves organiz ingempbyees lrorn all ranks and lrom dilfer-
enl orgnnizational units along with man'agers who have authority to take the nec-essary actbn lo solve Prcblems.
5. The company places a high value on itsempbyees and proviCes cqrtinuous train-ing, ar well as recognition for achieve'ment. Employees perform besl wfien theyare well lrained, and they have the greal'est capacily to contribute when lhey arehightY educaled.
Q7-4. The concept cl continuous quality improvementditlers frorn the cmcept ol quality optimization inthat csrtinuous quality improvemenl is a dynam-b process of change under lhe assumption thatthe iCeal is not an abrclute loown value; where'as, quality optimization is a slalic approach tofhding the best solutbn to a given set of fixedand knorvn constraints.
O7-5. The first problem with trying to inspect quali lyinto the product is that il delects inlemal lailuresonly afler coosiderable cost has been incurred.The second problem is that the rnagnilude ol thecost of the internal failures, delecled by inspec-lion, is rarely measured and typically ignored.
Q7€. Cornpanies should concEntrale their eflorls onpreventhg poor gualily rather than on lrying loinspect it into the Process, because il will resultin less total quality cost. The approach is found'ed on the belief ihat by increasing preventioncosts, the cosl of in ternal la i lures-such asscrap, spoi lage, rework, and downt ime-wi l ldecline by a larger amount than the increase inprevention cosls'
O7-7. Ouality costs should be measured and reportedlo managemenl in order to provide incenlive and
direct ion for improving qual i ly . Large qual i ty
costs indicate large opportunities for improve-
menl. Also, moasurem€nts provide a basis lor
moniloring the cosl of quality and evaluatingimprovemenls.
07€. Scrap inc ludes (1) the f i l ings and t r immings
remaining aller processing nraterials' (2) defec'
live materbls that cannot be used or returned lo
the vendor, and (3) broken parts resulting trorn
employee €rrors or machine failures' Spoiledgoods differ lrom scrap in that they are parlially
or fully completed units lhat are in some way
delective and are not econornically or physically
conectable. Spoiled goods rnay be unils of theproduct or componont Parts, and they may ofmay not have a salvage value. Bework is lheproc€ss o l correct ing delect ive manufacluredgooos.
Q7-9, Tho cost of scrap, spcilage, and rework shouHnol be ignored, because such costs are oflen
1 4 5
,16
quit. high and ofton re3ult trom hternal failures
tirat can Uc elimihatod lgnoring lhe cosl of these
htemd failures s€nds a signal to rnanagers lhal
urc*r codr arc acceg,table. Reporling such costr
provido inccntivl tor improvement, particularly
il tho cctc are la'rgc'
OZIO. tn ordor to know what to do with lhe cosl' the
accountant musl know whether lhe spoilage or
rework is caused by thc custorner or by an inler'
Chapter 7
nal failure. ll spoilage or rework is the result cl acustorner requiremenl, lhe unrecoverable coslshoutd be charged to the trb. On lhe other hand,il the spoilage o rework is thc cutsequerrc o{an intemal lailuro, lhr unrecovrrabb cocl shouldbe removed l rom thc iob ( i .e . , charged loFactory Ovefiead Control) and reported toresponsible managomenl
CliwterZ
E)GRCISESI
E7-1
(1) Accounts Rgcgivabl8... ' .......o..o..o................."....... 1 r8O0Scrap Salgs (or Other Income)...'.............o....
l2'l AccountS RgCgivab|o......................r..'.................. I r8O0Cost of Goods Sofd
(31 ' ACCOUnIS RgCgivablg."...'."...'......'r.....".'...'.....'.'. 1r8O0Factory Ovgrhgad Gontrof ..r....'.....r..r...........
(4) AccountS RgCgivab19........................ ' ................... I ,8OOWork in Procgss ........,.,.,,,.r....................r..,..
E7-2 Spoiled Goods Inventory.,...,.r....,..ro...,................. 12oFactory Overhgad Control ......,.........,..........o........ 152
Work in Process .........,.. 272
E7-3 $27,OOO total iob cosVl,00O chairs = $27 cost per chair
Spoi led Goods lnventory ($g x 1OO chairs) , . . . . . . , . . . 9OOFactory Overhead Control ((,$zz - $9) x 1Oo)......... 1,80oFinished Goods Inventory ($22 x gOO chairsl ...,... 24,3oo
Work in Process...................,.,..r. 2TTOAO
E7-4 Spoi led goods Inventory ($9o x 1OO'uni ts) . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,OOOGost of Goods So|d.,...., .r.............,...,r...D. 95.OOO
Work in Procgss ,.....,,.....,,.............o.......o..r,.. l O4'OOO
t47
1,8OO
1,80O
1,800
1 , 8 0 0
E7-5 FactoryOvgrhgad Contro1.r..,..,....,............,........,.Mater ia ls (10O uni ts x $1.5O). . . . . , . .Payroll (1OO units x 114 hour r $1O per'hour)Applied Factory Overh ead
(1OO r 114 hr x $12 rate) . , . , . , . . . . . . . . , . . r . . . . . . . .
700
Finished Goods Inventory.....,........ .,.....,. 6,900Work in Process
1 5 0250
300
6,80O
18
E7-6 Work in Pnocess """"""Matefials (1 ,OOO UnitS X $1)...r. . . . . . . . . . . .r, . . . , , . . .Payroll (l 'OOO units x 116 hour x $151...........ApbtieO Factory Overhead (l'ooo r 716 r $3ol
COSt Of GOOdS SO1d........................... 'r...r.........o....
Work in Process ($651000 + $8r5O0!.....'.......
Accounts Receivable ($73r5oo r I 5oVo1...........r...Sal gSt ' . . . . . r . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . .
8,5OO
73,50O
I lo,25O
ChapterT
1r0oo215OO5,OOO
73,5OO
1 1O,25O
ChapterT
E7-7 ,
(11
Quantlty Schcdulc
Beglnnlng InvenloryStarted In procesc thla perlod s.........
Transterrcd to Finishlng DepartmentEn ding Inventory............,.....,.............Spolled In procccr.....x..,,........,.'s.....
Gogt Charged to Department
Beginnlng Inventory:
Manx ComPanYForming Department
Cost of Production RePortFor August
149
Matarlalr Labor Otrarhcad QuanUty
I ,OOO9r000
19'0098,OOO1,50O
500100%100%
7,rh100.h
50o/o100.h
TotalCogt
$ 1 ,260770
1,4O0g 3,430
$?6,24010,78O21,725
s7.45
3S.ZS1.202.50
s3.7s1.202.50
1O,OOO
Equlvalont UnltUnlts' Coat"
L.aborFactory overhead
Total cost In beginnlng lnventorY
Cost added durlng curent perlod:MaterliglrLabor
Transfered to Finlshlng DcpartmcntChargc to Factont Overheod tor gpollage:
Materlialc....l-abor.....Factory ove rh ead .......................
Work ln Procees, endlng InventorpMaterials,.Labor.....,..Factory overhoad
Total cost accounted for ...................
1O,O0O9,8�259,25O
s3.751.202.50Factory overhcad
Total cost added during current period-..'... Soa'745
Totaf cost charged to department.......,.., Sry-
Cost Accounted for ac Follolvl Unltr '/aComplste Unlt Cost
I ,O0O
500
1r5001,50O1r500
100.h
lOgo/.1000h100.h
1000h750h500h
s7.45
f:trt C-!
s59,OO0
s1,875800
1,250 3,725
s5,6251,35O1,875 8,850
372,175
500500
150Chapter 7
E7-7 (Goncluded|
' Totat number of cqulYalcnt unltr rsqulred h thc cort eccountod lor recuon determlned ar
lollorvr: Matsrlalr Labor ovcrhead
I,OOO I,OOO I,OoO1,500 1,125 750
500 500 500
to,ooo 0$25 er?99= a : : :
Egu hra I ent u n ltr tran cto rrcd ou t "-""'-"'o"""Equlvalent unltr ln cndlng lnventory"Equ lva tent unltr of rpollagc...*."'-"""""':'
Total equlvalont unltf .....'............,..............""
h Total coet fl.c., thc coct In beglnnlng Inventory plut the coet added durlng Bro currant period)
dlvtded by the total numbcr of equlnalent unltr requlrad ln tha cogt accounted for section
(Zl Work In Process-Finishing Depattment............., 591600FactoryOverhgadCOntrol.. . , , . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . , .r. . . ' . . .ro. 3r725
work ln Process-Forming Department.,. . . . , 63'325
Totrl cort ehargcd to dcpertnrcnt.........- 1126'200
Cort Accountcd lor er Followr Unltr %CompletrUnlt CortTnnrlrrnd to Flnlrhrd O,oodr-..---Trenrtcrrr'd to Spollcd Ooodr krvcntory
rt rahrago vrlur .-s-.....-..*..Ghergr to Ftctory Ovrrhod for rpollrgo:
Cort of complctcd rpolbd unttrl.rrr ratvagr vtlur oil tpotlcd unltr
Work h Proccsr rndkrg brwntorfCod from prrcrdlng dcpertnrcntMatrrlelr_L-e bor..-....Fectory ovcrhcad
3B0O
400
400400
800800800800
100.h $27.00
510.OO
100.h s27.oo10 .oo
100.A 31e0010.h 5.oo20ch29Vr
4.OOo.oo
5,OOO
Equlvafent UnltUnltr' Cst"
1 5 1ClppterT
E7-8 ,
(r) Juniper ComPanYFinishing Department
Cost of Production ReportFor Ju ly
QurnU(y Echrdulo
Rccrlvcd trom CutUng Dcprrtmtnt-
Trenrfrrrrd to Flnldt.d Ooodr...-*Frd hg humtot7...*.-.o.s....'......-r.8polbd h prccoE.-.m--..,.x.d.
Cort Chrryo'd to DcprrtmontBoghnlng hvontory:
Coct from prcccdlngMatcrlalrL.aborFrctory ovcrttcad
Total cort In bcglnnlng InventorYGort rddrd durlng cgrrant prrlo'd:
Hdrrlrb Lrbor Orcrhcad Quan$ty
50041500
5,000
3,800800400
&Vr100%
20%100%
20%100.h
TotalColt
3 5r5OO1ro5o1118011770
s 1o,4oo
3 54,50020,olto10.20024,39O
3115,800
Coct fromHrt rlrlt
prrcodlng dcpr
Frctory ovcrhcad
Totrl cort eddcd durlng currcnt pcrld.--..
5,0001r52Oar36Oar3oo
$1O,80O4.O00
s or6oo1,600
040000
31e005.OO
327.0O
Total Coat
t i02,000
4,OOO
6,8OO
12,800
312O,20O
4.OOo.oo
Totrl cort rccountcd for
152Chapter 7
E7-g (Gonctudedl
. Totat numbcr of rqulvrtent unltr nqulrrd h thr cott tccountcd for rccUon dctcrmlnod r
followr:
Equ hva lent unltr trandcrrcd ollt -"Equlyalsnt unttr h rndlng lnvcntoryEqu bra le nt unttr o'f rpof bgc....'.*'
Total equlvalcnt unltr
HorDcoL Gct Metorbb Labor Ovorhced
3BOO 3BOOt8o l8oaoo aoo
15,20 a,3oo 4,3OO
spoo320400
3r8OO800400
5,000
- Total cort (1.o., thr coct In bcglnnlng Invcntory plur thr-colt eddcd durlng llrr currcnt pcrlodl
dtvtdcd by thr toUf i"iUrr oi rquliiini u"ftt rrqutrrd br t1'r cort eccountrd tor rostbn
(21 Finishgd Goods Inventory.., , . . . . . . . .o...r. . ' . ' . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . 1O2t60O
spoiled Goodg Inventory ..'...r...........'..........'...."" 4tOOO
FaCtOly OVgfhgad COntfOl .....,r.......t..""""""rtt"" 6t8OO
Woik in process-finishing Department""" l13t4OO
ChagtarT
E7-9 1
(11
$ 'l,9oo380
127,72O
_320,989
QuanUty
55,0OO53,200
$2,400sro
t53
UnltCogtt'
3.no.15
s.55
Total Coat
326,950
3rO3O
QuanUty Schgdulc
Beglnnlng lnventoryStartsd In procer tfilr perlod
Transfemad to Reflnlng DepartmentEndlng 100chlogt h pnocar
Coet Chargcd to Departmant
Beglnnlng Inventory:
Matcr1a1c..............,.o...........'..... .......'.....'.....Convgrrslon cost................,.....,.....................,.o,..F...r...
Total cort added durlng current perlod.....-..,......
Totel cort charged to department...........
Cost Accounted for ar Follorrr
Coastal Petroleum Inc.Cracking Department
Gost of Production RsportFor MaY
Matcrbb Convcrslon Coot
7O'/.
5,OOO55,000
9949949,000
6,0O05,00o
60,ooo
Total EgulvalentCoet Unltr'
Total cost In beglnnlng Inventory.......'...'.........o... 3 2'280
Cost added durlng current Perlod:Materials s2o,1oo
- 7,420Convenlon colt
Trangferrcd to Reflnlng DepartmentWork ln Procesc, ondlng Invontorp
MaterlalgConvcrgion coct
Total cost accounted for
Total number of equlvalent unltstollowr:
Equhralent unltr translerred out....Equlvalent unltr In ending Inventory
Total equlvalent unlts
Z. C"-prclc Unlt Cost100ch s.55
7000h70.h
49,OoO4r2,OO
53,2OO
Unltr49,OOO
o,o0o9,000
40,00oo,0oo
55,00o
,4O. 1 5
s20,980
raqulred ln the cost accounted for lecUon detcrmlncd ae
Materialg Conversion Coat
Total cost (1.c., thc coat In beginnlng Inventory plue the cost added durlng thc currcnt parlodldivlded by tho total number of equlvalent unlts requlred In the cost accounted for rectlon
(2) WorkinProcess-Ref in ingDepartment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Work in Process-Cracking Department......
26,95O26,95O
1il
E7.1O APPENDIX
(r)
Chapter 7
15,00o
Equlvalent UnltUnlts' Cost"
Sun Valve GompanyTooling Department
Gost ol Productlon ReportFor March
l,lstrrlab Labor
lO0t/o 70%
100%lOOt/o
QuanUV lichcdulr lB eglnnln g InYcntoly',...."""""'€"r"{Startod thlr pcriod........"""""""!"-',
Tranderred to Flnlshlng DapartmentEndlng InYcntory........"'t""""""FF -'
Spolled In proccar.-...................-."'-
Coet Chargcd to DePartment
Beglnnlng InventolY:
Total
Cogt edded duMatcrlalaLabor
Total coct charged to departmcnt
Cogt Accounted tor er Follorvr
Transterrcd to Flnlshln g DcpartmenbFrom bcglnnlng lnvcntory ---*
Coat to complato thla perlod:Materlala,..........F...-d
Chargc to Factory Ovartread for apollagc:Materlalr..Labor.-.....Factory overhead
Work ln Proccu, cndlng Invantory:Mater lalaL:bor........Factory overhcad
Total cqt tccountod 1or.........-...-
Chrerhead QuanUtygo.h 2r0oo
13rO0O
15,000
7r0003r00o5,000
c0%9Ot/o
10?r,90./,
3 1,600290950
3 2,&oO
3 0,7502r32O0,2oo
13,OoO' l1 ,60011 ,500
s2,840
o120640
g?,75O900
3,80O
s2,25O3009EO
3 ,75.20.80
s1,7s
Tota! Cost
$ 3,ooo8,750
sl2,350
8,25O
3 , 5 1 O
324,1 ' lO
TotalGogt
LaborFactory overhead ....
cost ln bcAlnnlng lnventory ..'..........r........-
ring current pcrlod:
Factory ovcrhcad
Total cort added durlng currant perlod'...... 821,270
324,110
Unltr Currcnt % Unlt Cost
labor2,0002,OoO2,000Factory ovcrhead -....-
Startod and completcd thlr pcrlod 5,000
Total cost trangforrsd to Flnlahlng Departmcnt
5,0005,00o5,00o
3,OOO3,0oo3,OOO
o.h30'/t40t/o
100.h
lOOt/.9O'/o99o/o
1000h30c/t40ch
3 .75.20,80
31.75
t .7520.80
$ .zs.20.80
ChapterT
E7 -1O APPENDIX (Concludedl
' llumbcr of cgutvalcnt unltr o,f coot addcd durlng tlto currsnt perlod determlned as follows:Matcrialr Lrbor Overhoad
155
To completo beglnnlng hvcntory,€.*.m.oabrtrd end complctrd thlr pcrlod Em&iEndlng lnvcntory
c o00 8005,OOO 5,OOO 5,OOO3,OOO 1,5005,000 4,500
1r2OO4,5O08pollcd unltr
Total cqulvalent unltr ' t3,ooo 1't,600 11,50O
' Cort added during thc curront period divlded by thc number of cquivalent unlts of cost addeddurlng lfic curent perlod
(2'l WorkinProcess-FinishingDepartment.............,Factory Ovgrhgad Control ..........'......r.,,...'......r....
Work in Process-Tooling Departme[t.....,,.. 2O,600
12,3508,25O
1ffi
E7-1I APPENDIX
(1) Plastico Furniture ComPanYFinishing DePartment
Cost ol Production RePortFor SePtember
Quantlty llchcdutc Mlterlgls ry,
Overhead
Beglnnfng InYontoty"""'F""""""""o' . 8Oo/' 4Oc/o 4O'/o
naiclvcd-trom Fabrlcatln g Dep artment
Tranrtercd to Flnlshed Goodg"""""
Chaptar 7
Quantity
1r2OO0,000
7,2OO
5,0001,50O
7007,2OO
Equivalent UnitUnits' Cost"
Endlng lnvantorYSpolled ln Prccer
Coat Chargcd to DePartmen!
Beginnlng InYcntorY:
Cort from precedlng department """"'
labor'..............Factory overhead
Totat cost In beginning inventorY
Cost addod durtng current Perlod:Cort from precedlnf department """""""'
Matcrlalr ......'.""""'Labor..'...- ...."i"""""FactolY ovorhead
Total cost added durlng current period"""'
Total coct charged to dcpartmet1t """""""""""""""""""'
lOOo/o1 0 0 %
80.h100.h
80%1000h
TotalCost
i 14,1601r21O1,30O3,250
s 19,920
s 72,0006,24O
12,24f)30,600
!t r1,o803141,0O0
IrOOOa,24O8,1206,120
312.OO' l .oo2.OO5.OO
320.O0
Laborr3oo13oO1r2OOFactory ovsrft cld ....-..
St rt d rnd complctod thb porlod SBOO
Tottl cort tranrfcrrod to Flnbhhg DcprrbncntTrenrfcrrod to Spollod Ooodl lnventort
rt uhragn velur rs...'...-.......s.. 7ooChargo to Factory Ovcrhcad for rpollagc:
Cort of complctrd rpollcd unltr 7OoLcg ralvagc valuc of rpollsd unltr 7oo
Work h Procaor, cndlng hvcntornCort trom Prccedlng dePartment 1r5OO
1,5OO1,500I,50O
MatorlalrbborFrctory ovorhead ...,.......n-....'..,.
Totel cott eccounted tol .......-..........
ChapterT
ET -1 1 APPENDIX (Concluded)
Cort Accountad for lr Followr
Trenrfrmd to Flnlsh.d Ooodr:Frorn boglnnln g lnvontott .-.-..--
Coft to complctc thb Pcrlod:Metr da b.....-o.od-..D.
To completc beglnnlng lnvontory..atert d end complctcd thb PcrlodEnd ln g hventory.........'.....-...........Spolled untts
Unltr Currcnt 116 Unlt Cot
20%@.h
31e,e2o
3 1.00 2a2-oO 1r4.4o�5.OO
3zo,oo
312-OO
320.001LOo
i lzoo t18,ooo1.OO 1,5OO
157
Total Cort
25,80O
t l4t,ooo
oo%100%
100%
100%10a.h
80%oo%
2.005.00
trSoo4,500
3,O00 $ 25too7O,0oo
t lol l2oo
8,4OO
tlJtr0oo8/fOO 5'800
. Xumber of cqutvatrnt unltt of cct addcd durlng tfio currrnt pcrlod dctrrmlncd .r followr:
HorDcpL Coat Materbb Lrbor Ovorhead
o3FOO1,5OO
700
2403B0O1,500
700
720sBOO
900700
7203BOO
900700
Totaf cgulvalent unltr O^0OO 6,rAC' o,120
* Cort tddcd durlng tttr curcnt pcrlod dtvldcd by thc numbcr ol cqulvalont unltr of cort addcddurlng tlrc currant pcrlod
l2l Finishgd GOOdS InVentOfy.oo.... . . . . . . , . . . . . , .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lOlr2OO
Spoilod Goods Inventory .................r.t.o..........r..... 8t4OOFactory Overhead Gontrol .'...............-'.-..-......-.-... 51600
Work In Proce*s-Finishing Departmetlt . . . . . ' 115t20O
a'J20-
tfi
E7.12 APPENDIX
(1)
ouenutv !c!g!g!: iBeglnnlng InvcntotYRacclvcd from Mhlng Depertncnt-
Tranrferred to Botulng E)'epartmont -End In g lnventory..F.o"o""'o'tr-"-i"Loat In procotl ......"o"@'
Gost Chargcd to DePartmcnt
Beglnning InventorY:
Cost from Preccdlng departmcntMatcrlalr[abor....'.....
Local PoP Inc'Cooking DePartment
Cost of Produstion RePortFor December
Mtt rbt! Labor
7s% At%
100.h 73.4 75V.
TotalCort
(hrcrhred QuanUtyat% lorooo
aor0oo60,o9937,0008,OOO5,OOO
ChaptorT
5O,O0O
Equlvalent UnltUnltr' Colt"'
t 2,9�20305140210Factory ovcrhcad
Totel
Cogt added duCost fromMaterlalr
cct In bcgtnnlng lnventory
rlng currcnt parlodlprscedlng dcPartment-..'.
t 3,575
3lo,85Ol,5oo21430�3,645
sl8,425
Unltr Currant 7r
322,OOO
Unlt Gost
35,OoO3715004Or5OO40,500
3-5o
Total Cort
33,575
too/gto673 3 4,8OO
13,50O
3't8 '3OO
32,480320360540 3,7OO
322,OOO
S,31.04.o6.o9
Total coct chargcd to
Cost Accounted for ar Follorvr
Translarred to Bottllng DepartmcntFrom beglnnlng lnvcntotY..."*
Cort to comPlcto thir Psrlod:Mater1a14.................o..La bor........r.'..r""""'..'FactorY ovcrhcad ...--.
Work ln Procesr, endlng Invcnto4nCost lrom preccdlng dcPartmentMaterlalrl-abor........Factory overhead
Total cost accounted lor ...-.--....--..
IOrOOOlOr0OO10,ooo
8,0008,0oo8,oooI ,OOO
100ch100ch
3.31.o4. 06.09
8.04.0E,oo
9.50
25t/o
75%73.h
Started and compteted thla pcdod 27.OOO 1OO'A
Total cost transferrad to Flnlshlng Departmant
7sch7'ch
CtpptorT
E7-72 APPENDIX (Concludad|
s ; ' XumUer of rqutvaturt unltr of eort rdd.d durtng ttrc curcnt pcrlod dctarmlncd rl follorvr:
HorDcpL Cot tlatcrlab lrbor Ovcrhcrd
To cornplctc bcglnnhg lnvcntory.. O 2FOO 7,5OO 7r5OOStlrt d rnd complct d thb pcrlod 27,OOO 27POO 27,OOO 2T,OOOEndlng 8'OOO 8,OOO O,0OO O,O0OTotel rquhnlcnt unttr -3s,o09 gFog _lo'5gg JoFgg
" Cost lddod durlng Ott cgrrent pcrlod dtvHcd by thr numbcr of cgulvelent unltr ol cort tddcddurlng thr curant pcrbd
(21 Work in Process-Sottling Dopartment................ 1gr3OOWork in Process-Cooking Department ....... 18,300
t59
1ffi
4501,35O
IrO0O
3,00o600
86,4OO
120,960
3,OOO
87,OOO
1 2 1 , 8 0 O
Chagter 7
1,80O
550450
3,6O0
86,400
120,960
3,OOO
87,000
121,8OO
PROBLEMS
P7-1(1) Spoiled Goods lnventory (2oo units x $2'25)""""
FaCtOry OVgfhead GOntfOl .r............r................. 'o.r
WOfk in PfOCgSS .................r......r...........t.t..t.
l2l Accounts Receivable ($55O + $450) """""""r""t'SCfap Sa1eS r.,.....r.............r..r....................t...
Spoiled Goods lnventory t..o...."""""""""""
P7-2
S9O,OOO total job cost = S18 per uni t(1 )5,OOO uni ts on job
Spoiled Goods tnventory (200 units x St5 salvage)FaCtOry OVgfhgad COntfOl .. . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . .r. . ' . ' . . . . . . . .
Work in Process (2OO units r $18 cost).."'r"
COSt Of GOOdS SO1d.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . ' . t . . . . tWork in Process (S9or00o - $31600|,.'......,...
Accounts Receivabte (586,400 r l 4O%l,..............Salgs""" """""""' """""
{2) Spoiled Goods tnventory (200 units x $15 salvage}Work in Process . '...... ' ......,..r....r.... ' .... ' . .. ' . ....
COSt of GOOdS SO1d.. . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . r . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . .Work in Process ($90,00o - $3,000).-...-...-...
Accounts Receivable ($azrooo r 1 4a%l,.. '.....--r...Salgs ' . ' . . . " " " " " " " " 'o" ' r " '
ChaPtarT
P7-3
(1) Factory Ovgrhgad Control ,.......,...,.....,...,...,.......,. 2r2ooMatgrials (1 oO units x $4|.....,....,,.,r.....,.,...,..Payroll (lOO units x 112 hr r $12 ratef ..........Applied Factory Overhead
(1 OO r 112 hr x $24 ratgl ,.........,.........,......
Cost of Goods Sold..
161
2OOTOOO
3O0,0oo
2r2OO
400600
l12oo
20O,OOO
3OO,OOO
WOrk in PrOCgSS r.....rr...r...............o.r.o...r......r
Accounts Receivable ($2OO'O0O x 15O%)..,..........SalgS.. . r . . r . . r r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . ' . . . r . . . r . . . . .or . .
l2l Work in Process.,.......Materials (1 0O units r $4).....r......,....r,..........Payroll (lOO units x 112 hour r $12 ratel ...,..Applied Factory Overhead
(1 OO r 112hr r $Ze rate)....,..............D.......
Cost of Goods So1d.,.,.....,....r..........,r...rr.....r.........Work in Process ($200roo0 + $2r20O|,,.........
Accounts Receivable (S2O2.20O x 1 50%) .............Sa | gS . . . . . . r . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . r . r . r r . . . . . . r r . . . r . . . . .
400600
1r2OO
202,2OO202,2OO
303,3OO3O3,3OO
'te
P7-4 (1) I
QrandU Schcdub
Bcglnnlngtltrrt d ln Procar tlrb Pcrlod
Tnnrferrcd to Ascmblln g DcpartrncntEndlng lnvcntorY.' ...-d-Spolled ln procog
Cort Chargcd to DcPertmcnt
Be!lnnlng InventorY:
MateLaborFactory ovcrhaad
Total cogt ln beglnning InventorY
Coct added durlng curcnt Pcrlod:Materialcl:borFactory ovcrhcad
MetcrlalrLabor
Factory overhead
Total coct accountad fof ..........-*...
' 25,OOO
Total Equhnlcnt UnltCost Unttr' Cort"
3 1,260780
lr78O
$ 3,838
330,240 25,OoO 3150lo,7ot 23,100 5021,311 23,100 t.OO
Chaptar 7 ;
ir.oo
@!$54,OOO
Overstrost GompanYCuttlng Department
Cost of Produetion ReporFor April
Matcrlrb Labor Orcrlrcrd Quen$ty5,OOO
2O,0OO
2!t,ooo:18,OOO
1AO.A OO% 60% a,oootoo% g0% eo% 3,000
Total cort addcd durlng curcnt pcrlod...---..-. $88,312
Total cogt charged to 372,150
Cost Accounted for !t Followt Unltr y.Co.pl"t" Unlt Coat
Trangferrcd to Asscmbttng Departmcnt i8,OOO l0O% if'OOCharga to Factory Ovcrhcad for rpollagc:
3,OOO lOO% 3150 34'5003'OOO eO'/. 50 1'350
Factory overlrcad u.,...-.-.d.--. 3'OOO g}'h 1.00 2r7OO 8'550
Work In Proccsr, cndlng Invantory:Materlalr....... a,ooo 1oo'.h $l.so 80'000
a,ooo ao% 50 l'2oo4,OOO 6O.h 1.00 2,4OO 9'600
$72,150
l:bor.........
. Total number of equlvalent unltc requlred In thc cost accounted tor recUon determlned aafollorvlr:
Materlalr Labor Ovefioad
Squlvalcnt unltr translerrad out.. 18'oOo 18'o0O 18,OOOEqulvatent unltg ln cndlng Invcntory'.. 4,OOO 2,4OO 2'4ooEqulvalent unltr of rpollagc.... 3'OOO 2,7OO 2r7OO
Total cqulvalcnt unltr 3!'099 39'109 -23'199
- Total cort fl.c., thr cest In bcAtnnlng tnvcntory plur thc cott added durlng thc currant pcrlod)
dtvlded Uy tfrc totat numbcr of cqutvatcnt unlb rcqulrcd ln tho cort accounted tor rcstlon
ClppterT
P7-4 (ConUnued|
CFenU(y Schcduh
Rccrlvrd lrom CutUng Dopertm.nt-.
Tranrtrrrrd to Fhlrhrd Ooodr lnvcntoryEndhg hvrntoryEpolbd ln proccs
Cort Chargcd to Departmcnt
Ecalnnlng hvcntory:
Overttreet GompanyAssembllng Department
Cost of Produstion RoportFor April
tletcrtrb Lrbor Otcrhced
,63
QuanUty
80%100%
2gYr100%
20?i',100%
TotalCoct
$ 1O,9OO38,028
t 54,OOO"ll,4.r4g2
15Aat23,1OO
8257,U2
9314,300
4'OOO18,OOO
22,09917,0O04,0ooI rO0O
22,OO0
Equlvalent UnltUnltr' Cort"
Cort from prcccdlng departmcntMatcrlelr
t 57pr8Totel cort ln bcghnhg lnvcntory@rt rddrd durlng currrnt prrlod:
Cort from pnctdlng drprrtmont....-..--.lletrrfaltLrborFectory ovc
Totel cort eddad durlng current pcrlod.......
Total cort chargcd to deparbncnt ..,...,,.........r,....r..............,
22,OOO21,2OO18,8O018,8OO
t ze59.551,O0150
a4,360g?14,3OO
Cort Accountcd for g Followr Unltr % Complctc Unlt ColtTnndcrrod to Fhlrlrcd Ooodt.....-..Trenrfcrcd to Spollod Ooodr hvontory
rt rahragc virlur M-o..mo..o...
17,OOO lOO% 315,OO
Chergc to Fectory Ovcrtrcad lor tpollagc:Cort ol complctod rpollcd unlttbu ralvagc veluc st rpollcd unltl
Work In Proccr, cndlng InvcntorpCort lrom precedlng departmcntMaterlalr..t^ebor_......Fectory ovcrhcad.
Totel cott rccountod lor .......-...---.
I,OOO $ 5.OO
I,OOO 1OO.A 315.00I 'O0O 5.OO
t15,00
Totel Cort
3255,000
5,000
i15,OOo5,000 10r00o
a,ooo4,00o4,OOO4,O0O
100.480.h29Yr20ch
2.95 311,8000.55 30,5601.00 8001 '5o 1 '2oo
164Chaoter7 .
P7-4 (Concluded|
. Total numbcr od rqulvalcnt unltr rrqulnd In t||r cat rccountcd for rocUon dctcrmlncd ar
follom:
HorDcpL Cot Mtt rbtt lebor Ovcrhcad
Equlyalent unltr tranrtorrsd out-.. l7rOOO lTtOOO l7'O0O '17'0OO
Eiun^i"nt unttr ln ondtng Invcntory ''OoO 3,2OO 8oO 8oo
iiuhralent unttr of ryollagc'-"--- I'OOO I'OOO I'OOO I'OOO
Total equlvalent un|tr..r..............r.. 2,OOO. 212OO. 't8eo9 l8po9
- Total coct 0..., thr cort ln bcglnnhg hvcntory ptur thr cort eddrd durhg tfro current pcrlod)
dtyldod by thr total numbcr oi rqulvatcnt unltr rcqulrcd h thc colt rccountcd for rccdon
l2l Work in Process-Assembting Departmellt."...."' 54IOOO
Factory Ovgrhgad COntrOt ....ro.,.....r...................... 8t550
Work in Process-Gutting DepartmeJlt......... 621550
Finished Goods lnventorY.... 255,O00SpOiled GOOdS InVentOfy ..r....r.....r......'....r............ 5r00O i
FaCtOfyOVgfhgad COntfO|......r........,.................'.. lOr00O
Work In Procegs-Assombling Department.. 27O'OOO
ChapterT
P7-5 ,
(11
10.h 1OV.
TotalGoot
4rOO036,OOO
10'9.9928,0OO
6,OOOo,0oo
4O,OOO
Equlvalent UnltUnlts' Cost"
34,0OO3O,4OO3O,4OO
165
s.23
Total Cost
36,44O
1r1?8
Hometown Brewery ComPanyMiring and Brewing Department
Cost ol Production ReportFor January
Meterlrb l.ebor Ovcrhcad QuanUty
Matarlaltl,.aborFactory overfiead 124
Total cort h beglnnlng lnventory 3 8 1 0Coct addcd durlng currunt perlod:
Metrrhlr 9{rso8.24
1,O88LrborFrctory ovcrbcrd
Total cott eddcd durlng currcnt pcrlod.......Total cort charged to departmcnt...........
38,752
QuenUU llchcdulc
Bcglnnlng lnvcntoryStartod ln procer thlr perlod
Tranrfrrrrd to Cennlng DcpertmrntEndlng hvcntory 100%loet h pnoc..f
Cogt Chergcd to Dcpartmcnt
Beglnnlng lnvcntory:
Cort Accountrd lor tr Followr UnltrTnnrfcrrcd to Cannlng DcperbnantWork h Procor, ondlng hvcntorln
Matrrlelrl^eborFectory ovorhcad
Totel cott tccounted for
Equhratont unttr trancf orrcd ou t...........Equhralcnt unltr h ondlng Inventory-.Total cqulvalent unltr
$ 6008a
$ 1 6.o3.o4
s7,5O8
VrCompleta Unlt Gogt
28,000
6,0oo0,00oor0oo
1OO'/o
lOOt/o40ch&ch
28,OOOo,ooo
34,OOO
3.zs
3.ro.03.04
28,OOO2r4OO
39607296
28,OOO2,4OO
3O,4OO 3O,4OO
h Totel cort (1.c., thr coot In beglnning lnventory plut thc cort added durlng tho currant perlodldtvldcd by thc totat numbcr of cqulvalent unltr roqulred ln tho coet accounted lor tectton
37,568
Totel numbcr ol cqutvalcnt unltr requlrcd In tho cogt accounted for recUon determined asfollowr:
Materials Labor Overhead
tffi
P7-S (Continued)
ChaoterT
UnltCoett'
Hometown Brewery CompanyCanning Department
Cost of Production ReportFor January
QuanUty Schcdub
Becelvcd from Mlxlng andB rewln g Departm4nt..................
Translerred b Flnlghed Goodg lnventoryEndlng lnvantory..Spolled In procau
Cort Charged to Departmcnt
Beginnlng Inventory:Cost lro m p rec edln g d epa rtment............................'....
LaborFactory overhead
Total coat ln beglnnlng Inventory
Cost added durlng current perlod:Cogt from precedlng department...............Materlalr[-abor...Factory overfrcad ........
Total cort addad durlng currcnt pcrlod
Total cost charged to departmcnt
Mltrr|lb Lebor overhced Quan$ty
,poo
28,00030,OOO
25r0001,OOO4rOOO
3O,00o
Total EqulvalentCogt Unlts'
3 5501 9 075
150
0gtt
1OO'/o,looc/.
30% 50!h800oh ao.a
Cogt Accounted lor aa Followr UnltrTrancferrsd to Flnlshed Goodr lnventory25,0OOChargc to Factory Ovcrhcad tor apollagc:
Cost from precedlng departmcntMatcrlala..Labor...-..-Factory overhead
Work In Proce8s, endlng Inventory:Cost from precedlng departmentMatarialt..Labor........Factory overhcad
Total cost accounted for .................-
a,o0o4,0004,0004,000
1rOO01,O001,OOO1,OOO
100%
100.h100.hao.h80t/c
lOOo/.lOOo/.
50ch500h
3,38o
3.23:t.057.030.060
s.233.057,030.060
V.Completc
3 6,4401,52O
7861,572
i1O,318$11,28dt
Unlt Coat
30,00030,00o28,7OO28,7OO
s932228.96
192
s233571 530
$.23:t.057.030.os0
s.380
Total Coat
I 9,500
lr4/.g
$11,2a3
fuptor7
P7-6 (Concludedf
' Tottl numbrr ol ogulvrbnt unltr nqulrrd In thr cot rccountrd for rcctlon dctarmhed atblbwrs
PrbrDopL Co.t lbtrrbb bbor Ovcrhod
t67
Equlvrbnt unltr trenrfrrrcd out* 2tt,OOOEqulyetrnt unltr ln rndlng Invcntory lr0OOEgulnlcnt unltr of lpol!rgo.-.-.. ar000Totrlrqulvdrntunltr-.*...o...-.. 3OrOoO
25,OOO ZI,OOO Z,,OOO1,OOO 5OO IIOO4,OOO 33OO 3'200
3OTOOO 2,,r7OO 28!7OO
- Totel coct S.l.r thr coet In boglnnhg lnvrntory plur the cort rddcd durlng thc cunrnt pcrlodldMd.d by tltr totrl numbrr of rqulvelont unltr mqulr.d h thr cort eccountcd for rcctlon
(21 WorkinProcess.-€anningDepartmeJtt..,..........,.Work In Procass-Ittliring and
Brewing DepartmeJlt .......................r........
6,44O
6r44O
Flnished Goods Inventory 9,5OO11448
a a t a a a a a a a a a
Factory Overhead ControlWork In Process--Canning Department ....... 10,948
168
P7-A APPENDD(
(r)
Chagter 7
OuenUty Schrdub
Handy Tool GompanyFabrlcatlng Departmont
Cost of Productlon ReportFor April
l/lrt rbb trbor orrcrhred QurnS(Y
Strrtad thlr pcdod*i..-.rude100%?6 7O% 70% 2'OOO
3'000
:l-'oo9Tnndcrnd to Flnbhhg Drplrtnrrt e'OoO
Endlng hvontory-s-dFs lOO% &* 'aota
t'5o0
spoilcd In procctrD-...-..-d-.H lOO% 60% COta EooI I,OOO
Cort Cherged to Dcpertrncnt Totel Equhnlcnt Unlt
Beglnnlng Invontory: Cort Unltr' Cort"
Hgtafletf -t..--.-.dr,....''..s.--qd*o.*.-is I ItgOO
Labor 340IrO2O
I 33oOFactory ovcrhcad
Totat coct h bcglnnlng lnvcntorY
@rt addrd durlng surtrnt Pcrlod:Metadalr-.---.F-H6.E*d*-dd-.*s t gtt80 gtooO 3t'02
1sbor..........--.r.r..-d.m.._..-Fff.-.....-'.'F.* 21125 8r5oo '25 ' I
Fectory ovcrhord ----6-..tr.--.*.-.r.--..-.* C'375 8i5OO '73
Totet coet rddcd durlng curont pcrlod-...' 317'O8O
Totaf coct chargcd to dcprrtrncfrt ---.-aimrp..-..,.m 32O'?4O _-t2,o2
ClppterT
P7-q APPENDIX (Continued)
@rt Accountcd lor er Follon
Tranrlcrrrd to Flnlrhlng DcprrtmcnEFrom bcalnnhg lnvcntoty -........
Cost to complctl thb Pcrtod:1:bor-*.FactorY ovortctd.*-
8trrttd end complctcd thb PrrbdTotrl cort trenrtcrrcd to Fktbhlng
DcpartmontChergr to Ftctory Orrcrhead for rpollagc:
Metorlalr .-.i....-..-.-OlaborFactory ovorhcad'.---.1...-........
Work In Proccsr' ondlng InventorFMatcrlalrlrborFrctory ovcrhead
Totel cort rccountcd fot ..--..-"......
Unltr Currcnt !6 Unlt Cost
2,0002rOOO.TrOOO
500500500 '
1,5O0l"5oo1,5OO
30%3(,%
100%
100%EOV.AOV'
1000h10ch10V.
t 2 5.73
3LO2
31,02.25.75
$1.0225.75
33,26O
1504so
169
Total Cost
3 3BOO
14,140
318,OOO
8 1 0
2,130
32O,94O
3 s lo75
225
91r5:!O150450
r Humbsr of cqulvalent unltr of cott added durlng thc cument perlod determlned ar lollowg:
Materialg Labor Overhead
To completc beglnning lnventorytltrrted end completad thlr perlodEndlng hvcntorySpolled unltl-....... a................,......
Totel rqulvalcnt unltr
oTrOOO1r5OO
500
9,OOO
600TrOOO
ooo300
600TrOOO
ooo300
8,5OO8,5OO
- Cort rddcd durlng trc currcnt pcrtod dlvlded by thc number ot oqulvalent unltr of cost addeddurhg thc curront pedod
,70
P7 -6 APPENDX (Continuedl
Qurndty tlchcdubBcglnnlng InvcntorY
Chapter 7 ;
Handy Tool CompanyFinlshlng Department
Cost ol Produetlon ReportFor APril
Hrt rbb Lrbor otrcftcrd QurnUS
Rccclved trom Febrbrtlng Deplrtnrtt
Tranctercd to Fhlth.d Ooodl--* er000Endlng hvcntory-o-sffiH_ l0Ort 2!'?A zr?i� 2'OOOSpollcd ln procar roo% 100% loot6 100
l2,ooo
Coat Chargcd to Dcpertmcnt Total Equlvelcnt UnhBeglnnlng lnvsntory: Cort Unltr' Cortft
Cort from prccrdlng dcprrtncnt i c,roo
Factory520780
Totel cort h beglnnlng hvcntory 310,000Cort rddcd durlng currrnt prrlod:
Cort from prrcodlng drprrtmMetorlelrl.aborFastory
lO0.A &% /fo?l trOOO
\ I'OOO12,OOO
Totel colt eddrd durlng curront prrlod-.** :l38,too
Total cot cherpod to dcprrtncnt t4rpoo
lt8,ooo o,ooo Szoo ' 'l0Boo o,ooo 1,;o3,720 eFOo ,A5r38O 0,3OO .3O
3r.,:o
I
t7 ,
Fectort ovcrhoed .'......3,OOOSrOOO
Sttrt d rnd elmplctod $b pcrlod 6'900
Total cort trenctcrred to Flnlsh.d OoodrTrrndrrrrd to Spollod Goodr lnvcntory
rt rehregr vrlur ......Fo.o..........xr l OO
Cfrrrgr to Fectory Orrrhead for rpollrgc:Cort ol complctcd rpolbd unttrLor relvagc velur of rpollod unltr
Work h Procc+ ondhg hvcntorPCort trom prcccdlng departmcntMrtrrlelr.-lrbo r......................,..Frctory ovarhaad ..............-.......
Total cort eccounted for .'.................
ChapterT
P7 -O APPENDTX (Concludedl
Cort Accountad for r FolbwrTnnrforrrd to Flnlthod Ooodr:
From beglnnhg lnvcntort ----.Co.t to comPlrtl thb Pcrlod:
To complctr bcglnnlng lnventory..Strrt d end complet d thb perlodEndlng lnvcntoly.....o.......-...o.........Spollcd unltr.......-.,..-......-...........
Unltr Curront !6 Unlt Coct Total Cogt
31O,9OO
7201,O8O 312,700
28,980
3f 1'880
1 0 0
9 .20100 320
3 4,OOO2,4OO
6,90O
s49,O0O
1,8O08,90O
500100
100100
2,OOO2,O0O2,0002,OOO
oor0oo2,00o
1 0 0
60%60%
100%
100rA
100%100%
t r o.60
3f30
tl.oo
3l:o1.OO
32OO1.20
200300
AO,60
%t/.
%rh
. llumbcr of qqulvalent unltr of coot edded durlng thc curront perlod determined ar follows:
PrlorDcpL Cqt Metcrbb Labor Ovcrhcad
oGreoo21000
100
1,8OO6r00o
5ooroo
Total rqulvalent unltr ,POo I,OOO 9r3OO 9r3OO
n Cott rddcd durlng lhc currcnt perlod dhlded by thc number of cquivalent unlb of cogt addeddurlng trr curront pcrlod
l2l Work in Process-Finishing Departmeflt..'.'......... l8roooFactory Overhead Gontrol ..o........ '.... '-.-.......r.-...... 81o
Work in Process-Fabricating Department.. 18'810
Finishgd Goods tnventory'...........,.....o.......r.......... 41r68OSpoiled Goods lnventory.. '...... ' . ' . .o.......r.-......- ' .--.r l OOFactory Overhead Contro|.............. 32O
Work in Process-Finishing Department..-... 42r1OO
172
P7-7 APPENDD( .
(f l )OO( Chemical ComPanYDlstillaUon Department
Cost of Produstion ReportFor June
Chapter 7 -
QuanUty tlchcdub
Beglnnlng lnvcntory.iStlrtod thlr pcrlod
Tranrfcrrcd to Rcflnlng Dcpertmtnt .End In g Invcntory...,.-*,.--l-ot In pnocclr
Coet Charged to Departmcnt
Beglnnlng Inventory:
Matedalr
, M8tortlb l^rbor overhced QuenUty1OO% z0.h 20% a,000
1Or00o20r0OO
1{,00o1OOV. 80% 80% 2'OOO
4,OOO20,OOO
Total Equlmlent UnltCost Unltrr Costs'
Labor3 3,824
90480
Total coct h beglnnlng lnvcntorYCoct addcd durlng currrnt parlod:
MaterlalrLaborFactory
t 4,200
sto,8oo 12,ooo 3 ,eO1/480 14r8OO .lO i7,4OO l4r8OO 50
$'t.50Total cort addcd durlng currcnt perlod..,,.-.......- 31e1680
Total coot chargcd to dcparbncnt 323,880
Chapter 7
P7 -T APPENDIX (Gontinued)t
Cogt Accountad for ar Followz Unltr Current 7r Unlt CostTransferrcd to Refl nlng Departnrenb
From bcginning lnventory ......*Cogt to completa thle perlod:
Factory overhead
Total cmt accounted for ..........-..-...
173
Total Cost
94,2OO
labor 4'000 BOV. S .10 32OFactoty overhead........ 4,OOO AOoh .50 1,600 S 6,120
Startsd rnd complstod this period 1O,OOO lOOo/. S1.SO 15,OOOTotal coet transferrsd to Refinlng Department SC1)12O
Work In Proce!1, cndlng Invcntory:Materlalg 2,OOO l00o/c $ .eO 31,800
2'000 8Oo/o .10 1802,000 Sooh ,50 go! 2,78'0
323,880
Labor
' Number of equivalent unlts of cost added during tfie current period determined as tollows:
To complete beginning inventoryMaterials Labor Overhead
0 3,200 3,2001O,OOO IO'OOO IO,OOO
2,OOO lr8OO lrgoo12,OOO 14,800 14"SOO
Started and completed thts periodEndlng InventoryTotal equlvalent unlts .,o..,..,..r
: :
- Cost added during the current period divided by the number of eguivalent units of cost addeddurlig the current period
t71
P7 -7 APPENDTX (Continuedl
QuanUty Schcdulc
Beglnnlng InventoryBccolved from DlcUllaUon Dcpartment
Trangferred to Flnlghed Goodr lnventoryEnd In g lnventory........-...'ar-......D'-..lost In procest
Cost Charged to Departmcnt
Beginnlng lnventory:
Labor
)OO( Chemical CompanyRefining Department
Gost of Productlon ReportFor June
Matcrblr Labor olrefiead QuanttY
339,540
lOO% 50% iOV. 2'OOO1a,0oo
:_6,0Og12'OOO
100.h 30ra 30'h 2,ooo2rOOO
ll'o9.9
Total Equlvalont UnRCct Unltr' Cocti'
Coct f rom preccdlng departrnent..,..-............-.-.-.-.--6. I S'SOOMaterlals 240
tooLaborFactory overhead........'.....,.. 9oo
Total coct ln bcolnning InventorY 3 a,8ooCost added during curont pcrlod:
Cost lrom precedlng department............... . SZtrtZO 12'O0O 31.7CMa terla lr .......,............ 1,Ua 12,OOO .12
1,740 1 l ,600 .151O,t '4�O 1l,600 .9oFactory ovcrhead .....
Chapter 7
t2.03
Total Gogt
Total cost added during currcnt prrlod.--- SSarTaO
Total cost charged to deparbnent
Cost Accounted lor ar Follorw Unltr Current % Unlt CostTransferred to Finlshcd Gooda:
From beginning Inventorlf .....,....Cost to complete thls perlod:
Started and completed thia pedod 1O,O0O lOO'/t 92.93Total coat transferrcd to Flnlshcd
GoodrWork In Procest, andlng Inventory:
Cost from precedlng department 2,000 'l00ch 31.76 33,520
335,150
Materlalr 2,O0O 1OO.h .12 24O2,000 30ch .15 90[abor....
Factory overhead 2,OOO 3}oh .9O 54O 4'390
939,540
$4,80O
[abor 2'000 5ot/o 3 .15 15OFactory ovsrficad..-,-. 2,OoO 50% '90 g0O 3 5'850
20,300
Total cost accounted tor .............,..-.
QEpterT 175
P7 -7 APPENDIX (Concluded)
I Xum,brr of equlvalcnt unttr of cot rddcd durlng thc currcnt prrlod dctcrmlncd er lollorrr:
HorDcpL Cot Hatcrbb Lebor otrcrhced
To complrta bcglnnhg hvcntory - O O I'0OO I'OOOtltlrtrd end completod $b perbd lO,OOO lO'OOO 10'OOO 1O'OOOEndlng 2,000 aooo ooo GooTotrl rsulvalent unltr..................., 12'999 i2'999 _11'099 l_1499
.l Cort rddcd durlng thr currrnt pcrfod dlvHcd by thr numbor of rqulvalcnt unltr of cort eddcddurlng llrr currcnt porlod
121 Workin Procegg-Refinlng DepartmeJlt,.......,.,.... 21r12oWork in Process-Distillation Dopartment... 21,120
Finishgd Goods 1nvOntoryo....o...r...............'......D...o 351150Work in Process-Refining Departmeflt.,.,... 35r15O
t76 Chapter 7
CASES
C7-1 Although improvement in product quality was clearly a stated goal at StarDisk Corporatlon, the company's reward structure suggests otherwise.
Employees cannot be expected to put quality first if rewards are dis'pensed for achieving obiectives that are often in conflict with quality
improvement (i.e., short-run production volume goals). The quality
improvemgnt itto* seems to have been focused solely on manufacturingaciivity, and the approach taken seems to have been to improve quality
by inspecting it into the product. Such an approach is inadequate,blcause it waits too late in the pnocess (i.e., after costs have beenincuped in manufacturing defective prcducts, instead of before) andfocuses on only one piece of the problem rather than the whole problem.
In order to turn the problem anound, top management must becomeactively involved. The reward structure should be changed to ensunecompatibil i ty with quality goals. Quality teams that include employeesfrom all business functions (product design as well as manufacturing)and all levels (labor as well as management) should be created to helpidentify quality problems and find ways to solve the identif ied problems.Top management should actively participate in these teams in order toemphasize the importance of quality, coordinate efforts between organi'zation units, and provide direction. Employees are more l ikely to becomemotivated when they understand the importance of qualitg and top man-agement participation and leadership underscore that importance. Inaddition, alt employees must refocus their efforts on serving theirrespective customers. The data presented in the case suggest that man-agers frpm the different departments put all their attention on meetingproduction volume goals rather than on meeting the needs of their cus-tomers (i.e., the department receiving their output).
Atthough product inspection should be continued, emphasis shouldbe shifted to preventing poor quality rather than detecting it. Preventionshould start with product design and extend throughout the entire manu-facturing process. Some things to be considered include:(al reducing the number of parts required in the product;(bl using higher quality materials;(c) using standardized parts;(d) using wel l -known product ion technologies where possible;(e) minimizing retoolings;(0 increasing employee training;(g) reorganizing the manufacturing facil i ty from production depart-
ments to manufacturing cells to promote teamwork and decreaseinventory costs;
(h) upgrading or modifying machinery;(i) install ing a statistical process control system to monitor production
qual i ty and reduce product ion var iabi l i ty .
Chaptor 7 t77
C7-1 (Concluded)
A few of the biggest and most urgent problems should be identif iedand tackled. In order to achieve results, effort should be concentrated ona lew costly problems that can be solved. Tackling too many problemsresults in dispersed efforG and little observable accomplishment.lmproving guality takes time and never ends. The company and itsemployees need some successes to build confidence and create themomentum needed to turn the quality problem around.
C7-2 Product cost may be increasing as a result of an increasing amount ofscrap, spoilage, and rework. Since the costs of these internal failures arenot measured, management cannot evaluate the significance of the prob-lem. In addition, since these costs are not measured, employees have noincentive to reduce or eliminate them. Treating scrapr spoilage, andrework as a norrnal production cost encourages such waste. As a conse-quence, overall costs rise. The company's cost accountants shoulddevelop a system of determining the cost of scrap, spoilage, and rework;implement the system 0.e., begin measuring such costs); and repodthese costs to responsible managers. lf the cost of scrap, spoilage, andrework is high, management should initiate a guality improvement pro-gram that concentrates on preventing these internal failures. This mayinvolve organizing employee quality teams to identify problems anddevelop solutions, locating new vendors to obtain higher quality materi-als, redesigning products to improve quality, modifying or upgradingmanufacturing machinery, training or retraining employees, andlor reor-ganizing the production processes.
CHAPTER 8
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
Og-1 . Joint products represenl lwo or more produds
sepaiated in the course ol the same processing
operation, with each produci having such rela-
live vatue that no one produd can be designated
as a maior Produd.A by-product is relatively minor in lerms of
torat vaiue and is derived incidsntally ftom lheproduction or manufac'ture ol onE or more maior
Producls.O8-2. Revenue from the sale ol by'producls may be
listed as olhet incoms, addilional sales revenue.
a deduction from the cost ol goods sold of themain product. or as a deduaion from the cost ofproduclion of the main Product-
O8-3. Yes, when by'producl revenue is deducled fromthe total production cost ol ths main product' lhe
unit cost of the main product is reduced; conse'quen t l y , t he cos t o f t he end ing i nven to rychanges also.
O8-4. The r€placement cost method can be used in
such cases. In this method, the by'ptoducls thatgo into making other unils are valuEd at ths cost
the company would have to pay il it wete to 90out on the market and purchase such materials'
O8-5. (a) Ths treatment described tor by'productsmay be justit ied when, relative to mainproducts, the revenue generated by lheby-producl is insQnilicant; when no clearlydel ined basis o l ident i fy ing by 'productcosls ox is t : or whsn the cosl of morerelined accounting would be disproportion-ato to lho benelits teceived.
(b ) The t rea tmen l desc r i bed has seve ra lshortcomings. All gross profil is ascribedlo maior products and is incorrscl as ameasure of total gross profit, since theinvenlor ies of by-products that may beunsold at the end ol the period wil l have azero value. Failure to assign values lo by'products may well mean lhey are not rsc-ognized as inventoriss at all. This' in turn.could lead to their wasls, lheft, or othermishandling. ll by-products are sold irregu-larly and invenlories are albwed to accu'mulate, bolh a material understatemont otinvenlories and a distorlion ol reported netincome of suqcessive periods may rssun.
QB-6. Yes, some of lhe in i t ia l manulactur ing cosls ,additional manufacturing costs (when by'ptod'ucls aro lurther processed alter separation), andpe rhaps even marke t i ng and admin i s t ra l i veexpensss may be charged to lhe by'produds.
O8-7. Methods for allocating the total ioint produdioncosl to joint products are:
(a) Allocate the pint oost on the basis of therelative market value of lhe pint producls.
(b) Allocate the Fint cosl by using an .werageunit cosl obtained by dMding the tolal joint
manulacturing cost by lhc total number ofunits produced.
(c) Al locate the jo int cosl on the basis o lweight factors such as size' ditficulty olmanufaciure, ot amount ol materials used.
(d) Atlocate the joint cost on the basis of someuni t o f measutement such as Pounds,lons, or gallons. ll lhe ioint products aremt measured in the same way' they muslbe converted to I denominator thal iscommon to all the unils Produced.
O8-8 . The marke t va lue me thod cons ide rs t he
revenuegroducing ability of lhe ioint produds by
assuming that each shouH be valued accordingto ils cost absorption ability. Resulling invenlory@sts are in harmony wilh revenue producingabitity and, il the combined joint producls areprofitable, the market value method avoirJs allo-
cating more cosl lo a producl than hs revenue;thus achieving a neutral elfect. However, this
method may be diflicult to apply if the matketvalue al the splitofl point is nol known.
The average unit cost method, while simple lo
apply when unils are measursd in l iks tsrms'lails to consider the heterogeneous nature of tho
individual Products.O8-9. Joint costs musl be allocated to ioint producls
when lhere is invsnlory to be costed.
O8-10. Not exaaly. A new manufadurer would do well
lo consull the Internal Revenue Service aboul
the methods to be used, so that an IRS agentcan make a decisbn before the tax rslutn is pro'
pa red . l n o the r cases , whe re an a l l oca t i onmethod has been apdied consistently lrom year
to year, to apply for a ruling would not be good
$ralegY.O8-11. The method used in cabulating unil costs pro'
duces the same unh cost lor all grades of lumber
sold. The owner is then led to bolieve thal lhe
same cosls in the sams ratio are attributable to
the low as well as the high grade number.h must also be recognized that because of lhe
inhotent nalure ol thE materials and the mill ingpromss, il is not possible to eliminate low gradenumber. Thus, the profitability of the oPerationcan be viewed best by considering the aggre-gale ol tovonue and costs of both the high andlow grades ol lumber, coupled with conttols toassure that all practical stsps are laken to obtainhigh quality logs and to mill them properly. A
I
I
I
I
LI
!
I|}
CtuptorB
highor prbo lor bgr rf,y b ,utttti.d h tonrr ofr gnclrr erncrnl of ltigh grrado lumbor'
6-1?4 Fq debi'rcrt nnoh,itrg, iinl ab ero inolovanlrnlo{ thoy arc rlgrslcd b changc !| t r..ui
179
of h. docitixr. Uaualty, stly co.ts bcywtd thrlplldl ero rebvanl
Chapter I
E8-l (f l Net revenuo method:
PGRGISES
Grogs ngvenuo lrom sale of by-product..............Productlon cogt aftgr soparatioll.......'.............r..Ngt rgvgnue film sale of by-product'.................
(21 Market yalue (reversal cost) method:Final market valuaLess: Profit ($eOrOOO r lOTo)........... $2,ooo
MarkeUngandadministraUveerpetlsos... 2'OOOPrpductlon cost aftor 8oparaUoJl.............. 5'OOO I,OOO
$2O,OOO5,OOO
glg,ogg
$2o,ooo
Jolnt cost allocated to the by-produGt......'.........
E8-2
(1) Calculation of manufacturing cost betono separation for by-products,
By-Product
A B
Sales. r.............. $61000 $3r5oo
Manufacturing cost gftgr separatioJ| ..............,...,....... $trlOo S 9OoMarketing and administrafive oxpenses..........,.......... 75O 55OProfit allowance (A, l5%i B, 12oh1 ..........,........,,.......r. 9OO 42O
$2,750 $1,87O
s11,OOO
Manufacturing cost beforg separation,.......,...r..,..o..,. S3r25O 9I'639
L
I
IIt'
I\>
II
!
Chapter I
E8-2 (Concf uded)
t2l
t8 l
\
LOGAN COMPAI{Ylncome Statement
For Month Ended Apri l 3O
MainProduct
$zs,ooo
s32,6201 1,5OO
$30,880
6,000S24,ggq
By-ProductA Total
s3,500 sg4,soo-
b
Sa lgS i r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . r . r r . . . . . . . . . . r r r r . r . . . . . r . . . . r . . . . .
Cost of goods sold:Before separation (requirement (1)).Aftgr se paratiort...,..................,.,.....,
GrOSS p rOfi t . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . .Less marketing and administrative
gxpgnsgs r . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . r . . . . . . . . r , . . , . . . . . , . . . . r .
Profit from operationS..........,.........,....r..
E8-3
s6,0oo
t
\
Productt t ,U l r r r r r r r r r r r r . . . . . . . . . . . r . .\t, 4 . . . . . . . . . . . .
YI r a . a a a a a r a . . a . . . . a a a . . . r . a a a . a a a . r . r . a a r r . . a a t
,G r r r e r r r o r r r o a a a a a a a a a a a a a a r a a a a a a r a a a a a a a a a a t a a a a a r r a r r a t a a ,
? a a a lI V r C t l o r r r e o . . . . . . . . . . . r . . , r . . r . . . .
s44,12O $4,350
s3,250 51,6301 , 1 0 0 9 0 O
$1,650
750s 900
s37,5oo13,500
$2,530 $51,000$ 97O s33,5oo
550 7,300$ 420 s26,200
Apportlonment ofJoint Production
Gost's 64,000
48,OOO32,00016,000
$160,000
$ 6,00
2.AO$ 4.00
2.OO$ 2.00
91'009
Market Valueat Split-Off$ 8O,OO0
6O,OOO40,OO020,000
s200,000
'9Ln9,00O. = goo/o
s200,000
E8'4 z: Market valug pgr untt . . . r . . . . . . . . . , , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , , , . . . . . . . . . r , .Gross profit, consisting of:
Operat ing prof i t . . . . r . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . 31,OOMarkeUngandadministrat iveexpenses.o. . . . . . . . . . 1.OO
Further processing costValue per unit of by-product at split-off..............Value of by-product to be credited to joint cost
(2,OOO uni ts x 52)
rI
I
\
ta
I
E8-4 (Goncludedl
X and Y:
UttlmateMartetValucpor
Product UnR
E8-5
{1}
Product$4.3o
6.OO6.OO
Spllt-Off
ProcessingCostAfter
$ 4O,OOO7O,OOO
ProcessingGostAfter
Split-Off$3O,OOO
2{,OOO27 |OOO
991'o09
Chagter 8
Apportion-ment ot
JointProduction
Cost'Units
ProducedIrOOO
I O,OOO
UltlmateMar|cetValuepor UnitsUnit Produced
UttimateMartetValue
Hy?o-theUcalMarkotValue
$eo25
xY
318O,OOO25O,OOO
UltimateMarketValue
$129,OOO99,OOO78,0OO
33O8,OOO
$l2o,ooo18O,OOO
$ 8O,OOOl20,ooo
s4lO,O{)q sllO,OOO - sstoo,ooo $2oorooo'r
' Ratio to allocate cost prior to separauon :19'999 = 3$3OO 'OOO 3
..$2O4,OOO cumulatlve foint cost less $4'OOO value of credit for by-producl
Hypo-theticalMarketValue
Apportion-ment ol
JointProduction
Cost
Esc
Total
3OTOOO15,OOO13,OOO
$ 99,OOO75,0OO5l ,ooo
$ 66 ,000 '5O,OOO34,OOO
Net eflgct of sgparable processing .""""o""""t
Conctusion: Based on tho Information given, S should be sold at the
split-oft poinL
$(3,7sO)
s225,OOO $15O,OOO
'$15O,OOO + SZ2S'OOO= 2/3; $99,OOO r 213 = 966'000
l2l Differentlal revenue (t5rooox ($6.60'$5'25)1"""""""""'t""Diffgfgntial COSI... . . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . . . . . .o.. . .r . .r . . . . . . . . t tr t t t""""""t t ' t t" t '
$20,25O24rOOO
CGA-Ganada (adapted). Reprint with permission'
f
t83ClvpterS
II
II
l>
I
I
EiEgg3q;lgfcl Fs Frfuil is 3Ei:EI iFfli]IiFiti irqgl$fiil iaqfllr
i'sgl $allfll#l ffflfll
I\,
sNFtlooo_ooI,o+0o0_€oq,NJ'
r oeo0(,trItJ
T'9b
ct
Ea
or i r ! 0c 9E 9C L Et o9 . v. L o= E DcL r0d =
o d+ o..t O
r !
cil ssg!r; il ;' '
uJ I
H?
oI
c'lrl
b
\
\
i< !o o 6
F
\
___ __--t\
,u
E8-o (Conctudedi
t2l
Diffgrgntial revgnue per unit ....,""""""""""""""""'Differential cost Per unit:
$25rOOO * 1rO0O.... . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .360TOOO + 31O0O..r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . . .o . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sl O5TOOO + 5rOOO..... . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ProductA B
900 $rs
2520
Chwter I
$zsc
27
3,OOO4,OOO3,OOO
$ 30,ooo4O,OOO3O,OOO
sl oo,ooo
$ 2o,ooo3O,OOO5O,OOO
s 4
$rs1 4
$ r_
TotalProduction
Cost
$ 5o,ooo7O,OOO8O,OOO
s2oo,ooo
$1s
(3)
(ln the long-run decision to invest in the capacity (facil i t ies) needed toiurther process B, the fixed cost should, of course, be considered.)
(4) No. From part (31, the benefit of further processing is 91 for each of the3,ooo units of b,
-or $g,OOO. But that must be compared with the benefit
of the alternative use of facil i t ies, $6,000 - $1,OOO = $5'O0O of short-runbenefit. So it is better in the short-run to selt B at split'off and devote thefacil i t ies (the ones that woutd have been used to do B's further process'
ing) to their alternative use.
CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission'
Differgntial rcvgnu€................r.........-.Differential cost: ($60,000 - $18rOO0) + 3'OOO ... ' ."""
Bgngfit to furthgr processin$ .........,............... ' .o""""'
E8-7 (1) Average unit cost method:
units ooT;*.1:ilf""t H:,'ffil:
Product Produced Production Cost Split-Off
ABc
$ (5)
Conctusion: Only product Bts differential cost exceeds its differentialrevenue. Therefore, only product B should be sold at the split-off point.
Yes, because the short-run impact ol further processing of B is then:
Total sl oo,ooo
ChagterB
E8-l (concluded)
(21 Market value method:
A
cTotal.....
ProcessingGostAfter
Split-Off
$ 2o,ooo3O,OOO5OTOOO
s1g9'oog
3.02.O4.O2.5
Hypo-theticalMarketValue
s 4O,OOO8O,OOO4O,OOO
Joint CostPer Unit
s1.401 . 4 01 . 4 01.40
Weighted= Units x
15 ,OOO4O,OOO6O,OOO25,OOO
14O,OOO
Apportion-ment of
JointProduction
Cost$ 25,OO0'
SOTOOO25,OOO
JointCost
s 7,OOO28,OOO21,OOO14,OOO
s?o,ooo
per unit
JointCostPer
WeightedUnit '
$.so.50.50.50
185
TotalProduction
Gosts 45,ooo
8O,OOO75rOOO
JointCost
I 7,5oo2O,00o3O,00012,5O0
$7O,OOo
UltimateMarket
Product Value
I 60,00011O,OOO
9O,OOO
$26q999
5,OOO2O,OOO15,0O0l O,OOO
Joint cost
$169,009 sloo,ooo 9?oo,00g'
$l oorooo * $160,000 = .6zsi $4o,ooo x .625 = $25,ooo
E8-8
(1) Average unit cost method:
UnitsProduct Produced
' Joint costTotal number of units produced
(21 The weighted average method:
UnitsProduct Produced x points
5,OOO2O,OOO15,00O1O,OOO
_so,o99
KLMN
tr|ffi = $1.4o
KLMN
$70.oooiAopoo
= S'5o Per weighted unitTotal number of weighteO units
)
186
l
E8-8 (Concludedf
(31 Ttre market value method:
Product
UltlmateMarketValueperUnit
s5.50 .1 .601.503.OO
UnitsProduced
SrOOO2o,ooo15,OoolO,OOO
UlUmateMarketValue
$ z7,soo32100022r5OO30,0oo
ProcessingCostAfter
Split-Off$ 1,5OO
3,OOO2,500 -5,0oo
Hy?o-theticalMarketValue
$ 2o,ooo29,OOO20,0O025,OO0
Chapter I
JointCost
Allocation$18,2OO
2Or3OOl4,oo017,50O
MaterlaltCost porProduct
Unlt
ConveraionCogt perProduct
= Unlt
37.5o6.00
KLMlf
Joint costHypothetlcal market value
E8-g Materials cost:
Welghtedproduct Unlt r Polnta = Unltr
st t 2.ooo sl2,ooo sl oo'ooo $7o,ooo
- $7o'ooo - .7o = Tooh$1OO,OOO
lo,ooo8,0oo
x topoo 6Y 8,000 1
32
xY
30TOOO
16,00O
50,OOO
32,OOO
82,OOO
MatsrlalrCost pcrWelghted
Unlt =
ConverslonCoct par
WclghtodUnlt
31.5o1 5 0
TotalMaterialg
Coat
360,OoO32,000
392,O00
TotalConvcrrlon
Cort +
3 75,00048,O00
3123,O0O
ProductUnltg
1O,OOO8,000
ProductUnltr
1O,O008,00o
$64
322
40,OOO
Gonversion cost
WelghtedProduct Unlt r Polntr = Unltt
CtnpterE 187
Tot81..,.... 20 00O
PROBLEMS
$53O,OOO slr3OOrOOO
I
P8-t
- ' (ll Average unit cost method:
Apportionmont Processing TotalUnits (kgl of Joint Cost After Production
Product Produced Production Cost Split-Off Cost, B. 1OO0O S2O5,OOOr $ 58O,OOO $ 845,OOO
c f o 0oo 2o5,ooo 72qooo 985,OOOgl,83g,ogg
'Jolnt cost of $59O,0OO less $€O,OOO by-product credit ($f S r 4 OOo kg) =SS3O,OOq $S3O,OOQ + 20 OOO kg = $26.5O per unig $28.50 r 1O OOO kg =$265,00O.
Total Production Units in Finished Finished GoodsProduct Gost per Unit Goods Inventoly Inyentory
B $84.50 I OOO kg $ B4,SOOc 98.50 5OO 49,250
9193,?sg(21 Market value mothod:
Apportion-Processing Hypo- ment of
Ultimate Cost theticat Joint TotalMarket After Market production production
Product Value Split-Off Value Gost CostB $1,300,ooo $ 580,ooo $ 72o,0oo $318,000 $ 898,OOOc 1,2OO,OOO 720rO0O 4go,ooo 2l2,ooo 932'OOO
Total...-.-. $2Ego,ogg 91,3og,ogg $tggg,oog $sgo,ooor $t,B3o,ooor Joint cost loss by-product credit SS3O,OOO * $1,2OO1OOO = .4417; .441T x
$72OrOoO = $318,ro24 = 8ppnoximately S3l8rOoO; .4417 x $ego,o6o =$21 2r0i O = approrimately $Zi 2,OOO.
Total Production Cost ofProdust cost per unit Units sold Goods Sold
B agg^Bo , ooo kg $ 8og"?ooc 93.20 e 5oo 885;4OO
$1,693,6o0
{\
tffi Chapter I
P&l (Concluded)
(31 Neither the market valuE method nor average unit cost method of allo-cating joint cost is a more accurate way of determining ioint productcosts. Joint cost, because of its nature, cannot be accurately split upamong ioint products, sincs joint cost is incurred to producs ono or all ofthe ioint products. That is, ioint cost cannot be reduced by dropping oneof the products. Thus, to make decisions about joint productionr onemust look at the revenue and separable cost of each product to deter-mine whether it ls profitable on the margin. In such decislonsr foint costls not relevant. The only purpose for allocating ioint costs is to determinea cost for inventories on the balance sheet and for cost of goods sold onthe income statement.
For financial statement purposes, in most situationsr better argu-ments can be made for a value-based allocation basis rather than aphysically-based one. At times, the physical base can result in absurdallocations of costs among products because of the disproportionaterelationship between the relative value of the joint product and the unitsproduced, relative to other ioint products.
189ChaptorB
o t o t lo l 0 l lOJ 'f,JInl$ll3alo ln l l'l$llolc, l lIJ tJI$lBllo lo l lot c)tlo to t lFlfill
ooao
o
0o5)tro
oc)oI)|1,
ooou)F
, o cl o ct o nl l j FI F E
ol B oo oo nf , F? o{t6lo oo c )o oo ra)o |1 ,N r!,
o o0 0q ql ()u)O F
t)
o oo oq qo oCD| . )
ooqoCD
o
ss Els! 3{rflE3l
€;=€*li6c* l6 l l
0 0 1o o lo 0 to o ln l ' lg ) |
oIo_ct!t
&t lo00c';!.
s AO . -! t 0 t -
i :8-6x 0 l lX t o a- - N xP { D 56 r r d. g l o F
r C { r, o :R x Po o o
I q EC { ( l l -Q - { tF o . t ?
ststlo t o t l'lgll
I-fqrAa1axSi'lr-qfle - l o o o t o t tE E 318 8 8l8lls s slgr Flgll
d
oF
F i it : 3
F i i I i? a ! g5-!3 iO i l C l yo r ! g o o
egj :! s ! 63 B : *erg g
sl
*sleee= g l u i d d
q l r r c l
! lss lqeq= E s b l R P .
sJ 3tI
e lo l5 l
N S l o J Fob tlo . = N
'_\\
190
P8-3
(rl
ProductAlpha.. . . . .
Gamma '..
Tota1.........
UltimateMarketValueperUnit$ 5
1 2
UnitsProducedl
46,2OO
4O,OOO
MarketValue
ProcessingGostAfter
Spllt-Oft
Hypo-theticalMarketValue
Chapter 8
JointCost
Allocation3
t$zgt,ooo 1$t 15ro6oe r
38'OOO slgs,Ooo $ 44,4OO23r66O
4SOrOOO 1651000 315,OOO 75,600
Alpha
Beta
s23,76O8,1OO
$15,660
s726.66O $220,O60 S5OO,OOO $l2O'OOO
rDiagram of Flow of Pounds (not raquiredl$?8,OOO
$23,660(41 46,200 pounds
(2) 66,00O pounds
$120,OOOl9,8OO pounds
(11 11O,OOO pounds
$l65,OOO Gamma(31 44,OOO Pounds
-4'OOO Pounds lost
_4O'OOO pounds'
'Computation of pounds of good output of Gamma:Le tX= loodou tpu t44,OOO - . lX = X{o,ooo = X
zMarket value of Beta (19r80o pounds x $1.2O| ...r,.................Less marketing expense of Beta ....r.........."......-...............'...
Ngt rgalizablg ValUe Of Bgta.'....r..............o.....o......... '..r.r......ro
sThe joint cost is 24oh of the hypothetical market value.
Chapter I
P8-? (Concluded)
(2'�1
t 9 l
BROOKS CORPORATIONStatement of Gross Profit for Alpha
SalgS (38r4O0 poUndS X $5) .. . , .r. . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . .r. . , .Productlon costs:
Allocated joint cost
s192,OoO
t a . a r a a a r a a a a a a a a a . a a sl 02,ooo38,O0O23,660
Gross cost of productlonLess net realizable value
(11Sa|es.....................Cost of goods sold:
Joint cost ($236,000 - Bynd net revenue($l1,OOO - $5,000 separable cost))..,.
Separable cost ($215,0OO - $5,OOO forBynd) . . . r r . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total cost ..........r.r....e...rrr.............
Gross profit (12% of sales).......,o,.....
(21Ultimate sales va1ue.....,..,r..r..Less 72oh gross protit .........t..,.....,Total cost..,....................Separable cost ......................Joint cost allocation......
s163,660l5rgOO r
$147,7602gr552t
Jana Reta Total$2OO,OOO $3OO,OOO S50O,0OO
$23O,000
21O,OOO 2.1O,00O
s44O,OOO$ 60,000
Total Jana Reta
of BetaNgt cOSt Of prOduCtlOIl.... '.. '....... '.....ro.....,.........r......... '...rLess gnding inventory.....r.,...............,...........r.,,..............Cost of goods so1d...........rr.r........ ................,...,GfOSS prOf i t . ' . . r . . r r r . . . r . . . . . . . . . ' . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r r .
1 1 8 , 2 0 8
s 73,792
'Net realizable value of Beta equals the revenue fnom Beta (S24,OOO) less itsrelated marketing expense t$erf OO).
nEnding inventory eguals the net cost of production (S147,760) times 2O%.
P8-4
$5OO,OOO6O,OOO
$44O,OOO21O,OOO
S2OO,OOO24|AOO
$t76,OOO
$3OO,O0O36,000
$264,0O021O,OOO
$23O,OOO 9176,000 $ S4,OOO
(31 Gross profit for Jana and Reta-see line 2 of requirement (2),
t.
192
P8-5
(ll UltimateMarketValue
Chapter I
Apportion-Processing HYPo- ment of
Uhimate Cost thetical Jointper units Market After Market Produetion
Product Unit Produced Value Split-Off Value Cost'
spr--g 3o.oo Too,ooo S2,8OO,OOO $ 874,000 $1,926'000 $ 960'000 *psT-4 6.00 35O,OOO 2rlO0rooo 816,000 lr281rO0O 640'000
$4,9OO,0O9 9!,690,009 99,2lO,OOO 9!,8OO,OOO
'Joint production cost ............ $l rTO2rOOOLess cost assigned to by-Product
RJ-s (f TOrOOO gallons r (S.7O*S.1O)!....-..... 1O2'OOO$1,8oo,ooo
"(51,926,000 + s3r2lO,OOOl rsl ,6OO,dOO= $960'000
l2l sPL€ PST-4 RJ-s
Jointcosta1toc3tion..................r............ $ g6OrOOO $ 6401000 $lO2,OOOAdditional processing cost.........r,.......... 8741000 81qr090
Total cost $1,83{,OO0 $1,456,000 $lO2,OOODivided by galtons produced.......,........., TOOIOOO 35OrOOO lTO,OOO
Cost per gallon....
lnventory costing:
s2.62 $4.16 $.go: : : :
November I inventory (gatlonS) ....... l8rOOO 52'OOO 3'OOONovember production 700,ooo 35o,o0o 17o,ooo
7t8,OOO 4O2,OOO t73,OOONovember sales 650,000 325,OO0 15O,OOO
November 30 inventoil[.................... 68,000 77rOOO 23rOOOCost per ga||on...o.......,.,.................. $2.62 $4.16 $.OO
Cost assigned to November 30finished goods inventory....,...,.... 9._!-Z91169 $ 32or32o $ l3'8o9
(31 Per gallon sales value beyond the split-off point.,.... $6.00Per gallon sales value at the split-off point.......,...... 3.8o
--Diffgrontial salgs value .r......,.........r..r...r.....r,............ 52.20Additional processing cost per gallon
(S816rOoO + 35O'OOO gallons).....................r.......... 2.33
Per gallon gain (loss! of turther processinft.............. l_!:!31
Alderon lndustries should selt PST-4 at the split-off point, as the difforentialnovenue of the sales beyond the split-off point is less than the additionalcost of further processing.
-T
I
193
I
I
Chaptor I
( ' t o lr \ l O lF . l !o lo t F l
l g , lt F tl ral
g lgtl- l - l l
o t F l l-lsll
I ( ' o lI F o l
F O I- - l
o o ts lI
Folt\1\N
I
No(o{o('{,
q t l(oilco lla? llEllo t lo t ln t lr t l(? t l
5l lo r l(o t lF I Ieil$tl8 i l t l 8 lol l ( ' , o lr-11 d oilS l l o l
8il I tEtlo l l o l o l lql l d ld l l$ll E l8ll
o r o r lI lalr t l r t l l
tEil: : ia a
; : :o : : :
; : F E :E :EEg it r t r c x o :
- - . - - r r
*Ecgs i- L Y F -g ^ r - b- u b . - L
! f i ?E e iE g , [ H ; t- = | / ) t r . U ' :I I o o .o 9- !1t, - 0 E? * P t r ' a fHE A€g E^ - - - 6 -
-rY+: rr : i ()- V r - - l ^ j rD . _ J t r . a Y- - - a T
F E b 6 iF }
I
Lotto
.Y
3o(,t,ooo(t
IE
ttfi,or-oobooo
!tcot-otrn
J
o
o.H
ooog
I
it
G t O - r \ t l Oo o o i l o l os i r o o l l o l Iq r c l l l c ? l qs" Ell 8l 8o o r o r o oo o l o l o ot ( ) o l l ( ) l o o
- - l - l
r ( l t r t i c ) Or @ l F I t o
o l ra l a
5gg.g
oooo(,eq.
oe.9ctIt(J
EEgaoL
EL
aoIo|lq,Iec L E
. E . tr 6E Ei l o: 2 2: d t5 E g5 ()<! o lE u t t S
I gsEs 9 s EI s EEiF ; g E: E Ge ; E; 9 p
E a 9X e , - (s 5 v
5 sE 63 t tE 9. Eo ES oF O(); ; €6 . 9E o; t t rt €g !
9 r ;D € V
o l -o F I
i E E
o t o lo t o to t o tq t q IN I N Il''t{''�l
o o t o Io o l o lo o l o lN C O I O I
r l N l& l s ) |
to n to i lN F t O i lr (? l l f ) l lq ol lHIF l N l lo rs)ll
0 0 t oo o l oo-o_l o_c0 0 lCon c ' t @& ts,
El=slflE.'l
o o t oo o l ( og O l f .o r l oc ic i lo ig l{,
o o l o lo o t o lo o l o l
- - l - l
@ - l F lN I N Ig ts ) |
ulsslils.il
:t-o
Ito
; U 't r lo c )o =^ r O5 u -o n
a . Lo oo r 'o !
otg .,a grL' 37 O
oo
ttooo
t t :
H :6 :n Ee €j 9
s +8 Bo
J
!toEt,ooo(t
o.o
ttGoLo0
ooG
!tctl,Lo.ctG
J
! t :o :L .
o :C L :o :l - .
a !- o
E 3'Ft L? r o= + .w ( E
6=,oC)
b io :E iE :c t t.- t!
sic ot r >. 6 oo Ff 6
*!3 r- cs a Uc L L
.s3r_5o=
gy E
E ;F O
F og8_P;f i o
E E *q l r r O= o t r: O EE q FP(v) cr- N or . - EU , +6 8 :E 3 €o F t t59? O
E Eo
fit
: !> :O 3E :
;, 9EH s tE'E.9P c tL. - f€ frso' i 'Et r l : t
Efi :F t ;A E . EF.E.Eg * E+ l O t !
8= ' :o
vtro
fitCLooo
o!toB|ll
oooo
194
P8-O (Continued)
Additional GomPutations:
Equivalent Production:
Transfgffed oUt " i""""" ' r"""""" 'o"""""r""""" '
Ending inventory (work this period)""""""""""
Unit costs:
Matgrials, Process 1 ............ '....""""""""""
Labor and factory overhead, Process 1""""
Total cost to be accounted for, Plocess 1 ""
Labor and factory overhead, Process 2.......'
Labor and factory overhead, Process 3........
Cost from preceding department, Process 2
Cost from preceding department, Process 3
Joint cost apportionment:
Chapter I
Labor and Factory OverheadProcess 2 Process 3
9,OOO units 20'000 units'l,000 1,000
21,OOO units
= $1.8125 Per unlt
= $ .9375 per unit
= S2.g00O Per unlt
= $2.0000 Per unit
= S3.0ooo Per unlt
= $2.0769 Per unit
= $3.2391 per unit
Process 2 Process 3Product Product
Sa lgs p r i ce . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . t t t " " " " 1 " t " r t t " t " r t " " ' t " t t " t " " t l "
Less processing cost subsequent to split-off point r"""'
Hypothetical market value at split'off point:
58 x 1Or00O units transferr€d .....'............r""""""""
S12 x 20'OOO units transferlgd ....................""""""'
Joint cost allocation:SSO,OOO x .2625'.
S24O,OOO r .2625
. S84,OOO -. (S8O,OOO + $24O,O00) = -2625
$ 1 02
$ e:
$8O,ooo
$1s3
$te-
9240,009
1O,0OO units
s58,OOO
32,OOO$30,000
32,OOO
$ga,ooo30,ooo
92,0OO + $18'0OO10,0oo
i3,OOO + $60'O0O21,OOO
s27,OOO
13,OOO
$74,500
23,OOO
s21,OOOs63,OOO
f- Chapter I
: - P8-6 (Continued)
.
'"ttt?"t",:oo + lo,ooo units............o.. s2.1o
$691000 + 2o,ooo units :
s3.15-
.- Transferred to finished goods storeroom:Procgss 2.............,r.......,.............r.... 54.O769 x Iroo0 units = $ 361692
, Pnocess 3.........................r............... $6.3864 x 2OTOOO units = S12T.T2Z,
'S6.3864 x 2O,OOO units = $1271728, To avoid a decimal discrepancy, the costtransferred to finished goods storeroom is computed as follows: $137r5o0 -
s S9,773 cost assigned to ending inventory = 51271727.
r *ot[,T":T"";:'-"noins inventory:
Cost from preceding department...,.. $2.0769 x 4,OOO units = Sg,gOBLabor and factory overhead.. . . . . . . . . . . . . S2.O0OO x l ,OOO uni ts = S2,OOO
- Process 3:. Adjusted cost from preceding
. department..............,.....,...,.......,... 53.9864 x 2'OOO units = $61723*
. Labor and factory overhead.. . . . . . . . . . . . . $3.oooo x 1,ooo uni ts = S3,OOO
(2t fii:flTHllSl;:;;;;;;';':::::.::::::::.:::::::::.::::.:. "l;BBlWork in Process-Process 3 ..,.... O3,OOO
Work in Process-Process 1........ 8B,OOOFinished Goods
Work in Process-Process 2. . . . . . , . . , . . . , . . . . . , r . . . . . . . 36,692Finished Goods.. . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Z7.TZ7
Work in Process-Process 3........ 12Z,TZ7
195
Chaotor I
o o! f ot s ) odr irh Jll | t l
( \ | Oc ? qc r c 'rll thx xo oo oo _ qN F
F O
} r r
9 EF ;d 6
_E .gE :
! FE O
$iFio 6 r .3t i 9 O
E g ;6 ! t t€ e gd ? d -! ? 3 r oi E { tF : ? +e - o! : F of ' 6 | l )l l L ^ -
' t l $' , l l i r
? # s6 t r U t! g t '
, = d c '
o P o
3 ! ir l i Jo
oo o o( 9 0 0
d q o -N @ G Iu l o ai l l l l l
o o oI I g! ' 6 | ( \ |,/ '1'�{r '}x x xo o oo o oo - q o -O ! F
ooooa't looo0xoooo|
It
ooo_!?J}
t loqo|anxooo(\|
0o o t o oo O I O ! tl o o l c t t o
- - l t
O l r l F Oo . O l c {
F I Fo la ,
F Oo o l? o lo o lr r lr ' l
I
o l oo t o? t oc , l l r" 1 3
oo o ro o lr t o li o lF lr ' l
I6a
o o t oo o l 0o o l o
- - l -
N r t l oF 6 | I | 1 ){ ' t r '
| l ' ?o o lo c r lr t o lQ t { Ia r l
o o lo o lo o l
s" l
ilillFll;il fit ;t; tsll
Filo t oq t cN I N* 1 ,
I
o t o t t c ,o t o t l oo t o t l C )c o l c t l l F; l ; I l s
HulnllFllo t lcti l
3llryDll
o o t o o lo o l o o lo o l o o l
- - l - - l
o o t c o t lu t o l o I+ t t { ' l
o lo lo l
8 li ; l
=31E3l
o
N4l
o t o lo t o lo t o l- t - rc o l r l
, l $ l
331E3l=rl331
o lo ln li t' - l0 ,
o,sa)g
g
Nt€0)oIA
a€0,(,eo
o0o?63'
Lo
?c,t=o|J()ocloI
|ll0F
oc)o_rtCo+l
: i : :: ! - :
F '
: t r :E : E :! : E :E 3 6 3r 3 c l :
: { r !a r . v !
e U F o !€ E o t r J
r - € E E E: g : ! E t; o E - E l ti : 6 H e o. - E T E F bE I ' L ' I Y
= " ! I E H; s ; e u ;i a = g 3 Fr E - e 3 !
9 c E ' tr I - < J
t. o
3
()Fotrt,
t
I F€ . 9s g9 c
€ gt ' E! t rX E D6 3t l -O E€ o
€ n=
ILC,-G
oE
:IEEl ;6 t t '. l t r;l s- l !x l o; I E= t gE I Eo t F< l Fs lo lo l
oroa,
3C'ot)aotto
dtooE0F
(,t
tCLa
5o:to!{,ggIo6oJo
''o-3
!t
!E6
g,orJ
a!o
F
!€0,f,a,0
iooo
T'g€otl
J
t(t
t,(!=
:? 8
E EB !3 ott c,
: F
! rE € . .; : Eg C ) Es -e. 'n: ! ? E I
H r ] €
T A ;i s ;-rt
oo
c,3r 9g E
3 o€ 5r t DE t t r1 ' E! r 56'ElE sT ' oo g ,9 r t ra g? l t
9 F
Foo
Fotr(,
€E.:trtrsE6)€
aoc,tctEt03
trq,ut!clq,
oo
o!g)IL
6
ot,o(t
o t t8tlE'll|/'il
t96
3tt(D
> =
3 fE I9 t >
! $ l= b . I l
g E cIt Ol|.
g gs8 EO LI E E
dt
6
6't
=
oo
t
P 6
I
:\ - .
III
E
Chapter I
P8-6 (Continued|
Additional Computations:
Equivalent production:
Thanslgrrg d o ltt .................. "..r..... t.......o...t... r't....
Less beginning inventory (all units) r..........r........
Started and finished this period........,.,.......... ' ...Add beginning inventory (work this period)........Add ending inventory (work this period).............
Unit costs:
Matgrials, Process 1......,,......,.. 'r..................
l-abor and factory overhead, Process 1........
Total cost to be accounted for, Process 1 ....
Labor and factory overhead, Process 2........
Labor and factory overhead, Process 3........
Joint cost apportionment:
197
Labor and Factory OverheadProcess 2 Process 3I 'OOO units 2OTOOO units3,OOO 3,OOO6,000 units 17,OOO units2,OOOl,OOO
I,OOO units
358,ooo
units
= 51 .8125 per un i t
= S .9375 per un i t
= S2.8OOO per uni t
= $2,oooo per uni t
= S.3.OOOO per unit
Process 2 Process 3Product Product
!
I
t-2,OOOI ,OOO
2O,OOO
32,00o33o,ooo
32,00o$€t4,ooo
3O,O0O
$18,OOO
9r0oo36O,OoO
20,OOO
Sales price ,ro,.. . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . .Less pnocessing cost subsequent to split-off point ........
Hypothetical market value at split-off point:$8 r 1O,OOO units transferred .....
$12 r 2OrO0O units transferred ..,....,......,.....,,....,.r....
Joint cost allocation:SSOTOOO r .2625t. . . r . . , . . . . . . . . .
S24O,OOO x .2625
r SB4,OOO + (S8O,OOO + S24O,OOO) = .2625
s lo2
s l 53
$_g
99o,ooo
s2lr9oo
s 1 2
9319'099
99!'o99
r - lIr
tw
P8-6 (Goncluded|
Unit cost:$21 rooo + I Or0oo unitS .....r.......r.............r.....r.o...o'.'..
$6{lrOOO + 2OTOOO UnitS r............r...............'......,...."t'
t4l Finished goods.............r.............r.........................I ' WOfk In PfOC.SS-P.OC.SS 2.,......o.....'-""""""""
Work In Process-ProcgSg 3 """"""'t"t"""""""r
WOf k I n PfOC oSSl-PfOC g!l!J I ..............t.o"r" "o"'
Finishgd Goods .. . . . . . . . . . f . .rrrrroIrroirr.r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . .
work I n Proc gss-Procesa 2................'.........r.
Finighed Goods ...........r.............,.......... ' .,.............work In Proc gss-ProcgsS 3......................'.....
Chapter 8
$2.1o
4r0oo21r00o63,OOO
88,OOO
36,8OO38,600
727 1860127 $60
s3.15
CASES
c8-1
(1) The markot valuo method of ioint cost allocation assigns cost in pnopor-
tion to oa;h productb markel Yaluo to all products as follows:
Market Value of EachProduct at Split-off
Total Market Value ofAll Products at SPlit'off
Jointx Production
Gost
lf thera ls no market valuo at split-off, then the value at the first sales
point, tess separable cost, lg used. lf ioint products have a markot valuo
at the split-off point, the margin for ail ioini products at the split-off will
be the samo.
The joint cost i3 altocated in proportion to n8v€nuo gensrating ability (as
contrastod to some quantita*re'measunes not r€lated to rsvenue)'
Therefore, this accomplishes Jim Simpsonb obiective that inventoriabls
cost shoutd be based on each productb ability to contribute to the recov-
ery ol ioint production cosltt
Chapter I
C8-1 (Continued)
(21 (a) Because both main products have a marketpoint, this value, rather than the tinal salesthe ioint cost
199
value at the split-offvalue, is used to allocate
Joint production cost to be allocated ..r.t..................Net revenue value of by-product (24OrOOO x (.55 -.05))
Joint cost to be allocated to main products
Market Value at Split-off
Product Units Produced Per Unit Total
$2,640,00012O,OOO
93,s20,009
Percentageof Total
Market Value
Pepco-1......,.r.r.......... 900r0OO gallons
Repke-3............r.,...... T20rOOO gallonss2.00
1.50s1,800,oo0
I ,080,0OO62.5o/o
37.5
s1,575,000945,00O120,O00
s2,880,OO0 100.0%
Allocation of Joint CostNovember
Pepco-1 (s2r5Z0r00O x .625)...........................Repke-3 ($2r52or000 x .375) .,...,.......,.....o.........r.......SE-s ............ a a t a a r a r a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
(b)
November ioint production cost.... 52,640,000
Pepco-l Repke-3 SE-s
Allocation of joint productioncost. . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . r . . r . .
Additional processing costaftgr split-off .....................r'
Total manufacturing cost.........Divide by gallons produced......Manufacturing cost per gallon.
Inventory costing:lnventory November 1 .,......November production........,.I nventory available ..,r.o.......rNovgmber salgs ..................Inventory, November 30 ......
Manufacturing cost per gallon.
Cost of f inished goods
s1,575,0OO
1,800,000s3,375,000
90o,0oo
s 945,000 s120,000
720,OOO
s 3.75
20,000900,000920,000800,o0o
s1,665,00072O,OO0
$120,ooo24O,O00
50,000x $.50
9_23125 g___-99
40,000 10,000720,000 24o,ooo760,000 250,00070o,o0o 200,000
120,Ooox S3.zs
6O,O0Ox 52.3125
inventory :_glggfoo S13B,ZsO S25,ooO
T
E
Chapter I
C8-1 (Gonctuded)
(31 When SE-s becomes a main product, the joint production cost would bealtocated proportionally to all three products on the basis of the marketvaluo of each product at the split-off point. The net revenue of SE-5 willno longer be deducted from the joint production cost prior to aflocationbecause SE-s will no longer be a by-product.
c8.2
There are a number of areas that appear to be problematic in Hayes Products'costing and decision-making pnocesses. These areas, which are outlined below,need to be reviewed and perhaps modified.
(f l The use of the average unit cost method for altocating joint product cost.Units produced, although a simple method of allocation, is not necessari-ly the best method for apportioning cost across joint products. Thismethod can distort the cost-value relationship of a joint product and givean ospecially misleading picture of the gross margin provided by a iointproducl For example, assume that in meat processing of cattle, oneproduced ground beef and steaks. Each pound of ground beef would beassigned the same ioint cost as each pound of steak, yet the sales pricesper pound are quite different. For this reason, it is better to use somevalue-related allocation base, such as the market or sales value method,to allocate cost.
l2l Inclusion of all spoilage costs in product cost. Spoilage in productionpnocesses can be assessed as normal or abnormal. Whether spoilage isnormal (expected) or abnormal (unexpected) should guide the way inwhich spoilage costs are handled in product costing. Normal spoilage ispart of product cost since it is planned for in implementating the produc-tion technology. Abnormal spoilage should be written off as a loss in theperiod, and if the amount is material or the spoilage continues over someperiod, the source of spoilage should be found and corrected. HayesProducts does not seem to be distinguishing clearly between normal andabnormal spoi lage. This needs to be studied, and some changes need tobe made in the appl icat ion of spoi lage costs to product.
(31 Decision making based on fully altocated cost. Hayes appears to beabout to make a product line decision on fully allocated cost data withioint cost included. Decisions with relation to any of the products shouldbe based on the separable contribution margin of products, i.e., separa-ble revenue less separable variable cost. This problem needs to belooked at closely since the al located joint cost f igures should be usedonly for f inancial statement purposes.
Chaptor I
cg-3 ,
(1)
c8-4
201
I
t-
L
The market value mothod does not proviile additional data for the rlsr-keUng deeision. Joint cost sllocation is necessarily arbitrary and'although used lor financial accounting purposes, ls not relevant to thedecision to market DMZ-3 and Pestrol, The VDB joint cost is irrelevant tothis decision because it ls incurred in both cases, i.e.' the method of costaltocafion has no impact on tho differential profit. Talor ChemicalGompany should calculate the differential prolit of its alternate choicesby comparing the differential rsvenues and diflerential costs.
Talorb analysis is incorrsct because it incorporates allocated portions ofthe joint cost of VDB. The weekly cost of VDB (3246,000) will be incurredwhether or not RllA-2 ia converted through lurther processing. Thus' anyallocation of the ioint cost of VDB is strictly arbitraty and not rslevant totho decision to market DMZ-3 and Pestrol. Talorb decision not topnocess RNA-2 further is incorrect The decision results in a loss of$2O'OOO in profit per week, as indicated by the following analysis:
Revenue'from further processing of RNA-2:
(21
DMZ-$ (4OO'00O r ($57.5O + 1OO)|,...................,..............Pestrol (40Or00O r ($57.5O + loO))'... 'r. ' ...................-......
Total nBvenuo f ro m fulther p rocessin 9...............r..........L8SS ngvgnUg f fOm Sale Of RNA-2,. . . . , . . . . . .D.. . . . . . . . . . . . .o,r . . . . . . .
Di f fgfgnt ial f9V9nU9.. . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . ' . . r . . r . . . . . . . . . . ' .Differential cost' . '. '...r'.,....r........"...
Diffgrgntial profit .......,......r........-........, ' .. ' . ' . , ' .
s23O,OOO23O,OOO
s46O,OOO32O,OOO
sl4O,OOO12O,OOO
s 2o,ooo
(11
'The cost of VDB is not relevant and, thus, is omitted lrom the solution.
[The requirement does not ask for a list of responsibilities Vickery hasviolated, but, merely, which of the fifteen responsibil i t ies apply toVickeryb situation,)
Management accountants have a responsibil i ty to:
Comoetence: Perform their professional duties in accordance withrelevant laws, regulations, and technical standards. ffhe inventory costVickery is being asked to accept violates accounting principles of con-gervatism and of matching current cost against current revenue.)
Chapter 8
c8-4 (Concludedl
preparo comploto and clsar reports 8nd nocommondations after .appropriate analy:et of rolsvant and rsllable information. (Vickery hascoiryinclng evidence that lallure to make the adiustment will misstate theresulting fi nanclal stataments.|
lnteoritv: Befraln from either actively or passively subverting theattainmeFt of the organizationb legiUmate and ethical obiectives. fflrereis prrssurc to subvart legitimate and ethical obiectives to the immediateneed for tavorable financial statements.|
Communicate unfavorable, ag welt ag favorable, Informatlon andprofessional fudgmentg or opinions. (Vickery is being asked to thwartcommunlcation of unfavorable information.)
Refrain from engaging In or supporting any activity that woulddiscredit the profession. (Preparing deliberately misleading financialstatements, clearly ls a discredit to the profession')
Obiectivihn Communicate information fairly and objectively., Mckery would violate this responsibility if the inventory wete not
restated.)
Disclose lutly att relevant information that could reasonably be ' -erpected to influenco an intended userb understanding of the rtports'comments, and nocommendations presented. ffhis material overstate-ment of inventory and profit violates this ethical responsibility.) -
(21 In addiUon to his ethical responsibilities to his company, Vickery has eth-ical responsibilities to:(al the bank(bl the companyb stockholders(cl the management accounting profession
:_
CHAPTER 9
DISCUSSION OUESTIONS
O9-1. The mosl lreguently used documents in the pro-curemenl and use ol materials are purchase reg-uisit ions, purchase orders, receiving reports,materials requisil ions, bil ls ol malerials, andmalerials ledger recods.
O9-2. The invoice shouH be routed to the AccountingDepartment immedidely upon receipt. A copy oflhe purchase order and a copy of the receivingreport'with an inspection report should be com-pared by lhe accounting clerK When lhe invoiceis found lo be correcl in all aspects or has beenadjusted for errors or rejects, the accountingclerk approves the invoice, anaches il to theunderlying documents il they are in hard-copylorm, and sends these documenls to anotherclerk for lhe preparation of the voucher.
O9-3. Inventor iable cosl should inc lude a l l costsincrrred lo get the produc.t ready for sale to lhecustomer. lt includes not only the net purchaseprica bul also the olher associated costs, suchas freiThl-in, incurred up to ths lime producls areready for sale to the customer.
Q9-4. No, administration costs are assumed to expir€with lhe passage of time and do not anach lo theproduct. Furthermore, administralive costs donot relale directly to inventories, but are incursdfor the benefit of all lunciions of the business.
O9-5. The three key questions to anstv€r in designingan inventory control syg€m are:(a ) how much to o rde r -economic o rde r
quanlity(b) when to order-order point(c) satety stock required
09€. The firm benefils lrom lhese techniques by hav-ing a crnsistenl, standardized approach to itsinventory managsment. lnventory costs and ser-vica lo customsrs will be optimally balanced.
O9-7. The purpose ol an economic ordor quantilymodel is to determine the optimum quantity toorder or produce when fi l l ing inventory needs.The optimum quantily is delined as lhat quanlitylhal minimizss the cost of inventory manage-ment.
Q9-8. The decision concerning how much to order orproduce at a given lime involves a compromisebelween inventory carrying costs and ordering orsolup cosls , Examples o l inventory carry ingcosts are: in terss l on the monsy invested ininvontories that could have b€en invested else-where, property tar and insurance, warehousingor slorage, handling, deterioration, and obsoles-cence. Ordering costs include ths cost of prepar-ing the requisilion and purchase order, receivinglhe order, and accounling for lhe order. Setup@sts involve the costs ol sening up equipmentto make lhe actual production runs. For all these
costs, only lhose thd vary with adivity are rele-vant lo the E@ model.
O9-9. The @nsequencos of maintaining inadequareinvenlory levels indude hi;her purcfrasing, han-dling, and transportation costs, bss ol quantitydiscounls, produclion disruptions, inllation-relat-ed pr ice increases when purchases aredeferred, and bst sales and customer goodwill.
Mgasursment of the costs of lost orders andz bst repeat business is not easy because mea-
suremenl may be largely subjective. On theother hand, the other factors listed can be mea-sured with fair certainty and grealer ease.
09-10. In computing optimum produaion run size, COropresenls an estimale ol lhe setup cost and CUis lhe variable manulacluring cost per unit.
09-11. (a) The order point is the low poinr ol stocklevef that, when reached, means a replen-ishing order should be placed.
(b) Lead time is the interval between placing anorder and delivery of lhe ordered gmds.
(c) Salety stodt is the minimum inventory tharprovides a cushion against reasonablyexpecled maximum demands and againstvarialions in lead time.
O9-12. Mater ia ls regui rements p lanning (MRP) is acompuler simulation that integratos each prod,rjct's bill ol mderials, inventory slalus, and man-ufacturing process into a feasible productionplan.
09-13. Eftective uti l ization of capital, which inctudesinveslment in inventory, is the responsibil i ty ofgeneral manag€ment; lhere lore. the pr imaryinterest is in linancial control. Atthough generalor top-level managernsnl is inlerested in provid-ing customers with gmd products and services,the scheduling of produaion inrolves unit controlprimarily and is the responsibility of productionand purchasing departm€nts.
09-14. ln the control ol materials, the opposing needsare the mainlenance of an inventory ol sufficientsize and diversity lor efficient operations, andthe mainlenance of an investmenl in inventory ata level that will maximize earnings and minimizacosts.
O9-15. When a relatively few malerials it€ms accountfor a considerable por l ion o l to ta l inventoryinvestmonl selective control is indicatod. Hbh.value ilems would be under tight control, whilulow-value items would be under simple physicalconlrols.
Automatic control refers lo ordering when amalerials record shows that lhe balance on handhas dropped to the order point. At this time, thequanl i ly to ordor is aulomal ic , having beendelermined by balancing the cost to order with
203
(-_ \
2U
the cost lo catry inventory' Aulomatic control ismosl ellective ih companies lhat use an EDPsyslem.
09-16. Appendir The average cost m€lhod assumesthat each batch takon ftom the slore'room is composed ol uniform quanti'ties from each shipment in slodt at thedale of issue. The lilo method is basedon the assumption thd the firsl goodsreceived are the first issued. The lilomethod is based on the assumplionthat lhi latest gds received are lhelirst issued.
O9-17. Appendir In an inflationary economy' lifo pro'v ides a bet ter matching o l currenlcosts with currenl rovenue becausecosts ol inventory issued are at mora
Chapter 9
recen l pu rchase p r i ces . Ne t cashinflow is generally increased bscausetaxab le i ncome i s gene ra l l ydecreased, resulting in payment ofbwer income lax.
O9.18. Appondix Fifo. The higher costs ol the earlierpurchases would be charyed againstcosl of goods sold.
GGA-Canad a (adapted). Beprint with permiss bn.
09-19. Appendix (a) lilo(b) filo(c) fifo(d) lifo(e) lifo(t) lilo
CGA-Canada (adaptsd). Roprint with permissbn.
- ChaPter 9
EXERCISES* \
Eg-l-
(1) Freight allocated to materials based on cost
E9-2
205
= l=21o= = = $- 016 Per doltar of costs17,5O0
Part A: $ 8,600 x S'or0 = $137.60Part B: 5,060 x .O16 = 80.96Part C: 3,840 x .016 = 61.44
qlzrsoo s280,oo
(21 Freight allocated to materials based on shipping weight
s280 = S . 2 0I 400 kilograms
Part A: 63okg x S'2O = S126Part B: 49O x .2O = 98Part C: 28O x .2O = .!!
1:j99kg E289
Units
Total to be provided ...,........,.......Quant i tyonhandrSeptemberl , . . , . . , . . . . ' . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . .o ' . . ' 4r4OOOn ordgrfor Septembgr dg1ivgryr....r........................ 'r 3r600On ordgr for October delivery,.........,.......................... 4.1OO 12.1OOQuantity to ordgr for Novgmbgr dgliv€]1| '................... 4.800
4,2OO4,4004,7OO3,600
16,90O
I
206
E9-3
(1) Forecast usage:J a n U a r y t t t " " t " " ' t t t " o " " t " " " " t t " " t t t ' t t t t "
February "t"t""""t""""t t"t""tot"t t""" '
M a r c h t " t " " " " t " t " t " t " t ' t ' t " " t " o t " t " t " t t "
Desired March 31 inventory level(61000 x 80%)"""""""" t " t " t " r " " " " " t "
Total to bg providgd""""t""""r"""'Scheduled suPPlY:
January 1 lnvgntoff """"""""o"""""r'On orden
January delivery'.."""""""""""""'February delivery'r""""'o""""""""'
Quantity to order for March delivery """'
4,8OO unlts5,0005,600
15,400 units
4,8O0
6,000 unlts
4 ,1OO:l,6oo
Chapter 9
2O,2OO unlts
l2 l JanUary 1 inVgntOf] . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . .o.r . . . r . ." . . . . . . . . . """"" ' t t " t t ' r t ""
On order for January and February de|ivery"""""""""""'
FOfgCaSt USagg-ranuary and Fgbruar1/.'........""""""t"""'
(a ) MafCh ' l
inVgntOf l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . t t " r t t t t t t " t t
To order lor March delivery (requirement (1))"""""""
FOfgCaSt USage-M3lch . . . . . . . . . r . r . . r . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . ' . "
(b) MafCh 31 inVgntofy .. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . .
14.7005.5OO unl ts
61000 units8.700
14r7OO units9.8004r9OO unlts5.500
1O'4OO uni ts5.500
-4eo units
E9-4
(1) EOQ =
tzl EOQ = = fiopoo = 3oo Aiets
, a l(3) EoQ = r l =r $25
= J5iloob- = 24O units
2 x100 x $5S55 x 15o/o
2 1 2 , 2 5 0 x $ 1 2
1 ,440 ,000
L207Chapter 9
E9-4 (Continuedl
(41 (a)
(b)
(a)(6)
(b)
EOQ2 x 2 5 , 0 0 0 r $ 2 0
$8 x 25o/o
= 7O7 cartons
Annual required unitsEconomic order quantitY
= ry = 35 order: per year
J 5OO ,O0O
I
S
\-365 days = 10.4 orevery 1O days orders should be placed35 orders
= Jl8o,ooo = 424
18J990 = 42.4s or approxlmately 42 orders per year424
365 days = 8,2 or approximately one order every 9 days42 orders
(a)(s)
(b)
-(c ) EOQ = -12 x 18 '000 x S15 -
\r| $6 x 2Oo/o
= {450,000 = 677
E O e = - j 2 x 1 8 ' 0 0 0 x S 1 5 -Y 57.50 x 2oo/o
= 600 units. 6 A A A
# = 30 orders per yearOUU
= { 360,OOO
lr
\
365 days in year30 orders per year
E^A mE L ' I J = ; - =
Y 52.50 x 2Oo/o
= 11039 unl ts
= 12.767 or approxinratelyone order every 12 days
(c)
l ,oooroooalI
540,0ooLN
540,000
54O ' OO0 E---;1i5-
= 11,08O,0OO
I
Chapter 9n8
E9-4 (GonUnuedl
2 x 4 8 r O O O r $ 1 Oftl (al EoQ =
$ 2 O r 1 2 V o '
632 dozen baseballs
lo5-oFdd-l J z ; l r -
t'4o + 1oo/o return on investment$20
Annual ordering cost = $ffi =
-EoO = -f2 r 5t0oo r $Jrooo -
V Sg r 2oo/o
^ /6125O 'OOO = 2 r5OO co lumns
= 12oh
48,OOO r $1O800
= $600(bl
Annual carrying cost = C U T C C T E O Q2
$2O x 12oh r 8OO -
Total annual inventory cost to sell 48'OOO dozenbasgbal1s. . t . . t1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r i t t t " "" t t t t t " t " t " t " t " "" t ""
960
sl.560
(8)
(al(e)
(bl
EOQ = 2 r t 2 , O O 0 r 5 1 6$9 r 2ooh
384,OOO1 . 8 0
= 462 units
The frequency of order placement:
l2roo0 annual usage = 26 orders per Year462 EOQ
(cl
365 days26 orders
14 days
2 r 8 , O O O r $ 1 6$9 r 22oh
EOQ =256,OOO
1.98
36O units
- .,!Tzg,zgg
2 x 5 0 0 x 5 6$1O x .25
Chapter I
E9-4 (Qoncluded)
(10) (a) EoQ = 16 ,00o= 4 l - =
Y 2 .50
209
E3,ooo3,OO0
s6,ooo$9,600
5OO x $649
= 49 units
$61.22 + $61 .25 = $122.47= total ordering and carrying cost
per year(b) 49 + (49 x.10) = 54 units per order
5ot}9q . Y = S.5s.56 + $6z.so = $123.06
The effect is small because the total cost curve ls relatively flataround the optimum level.
(11) To compare the two alternatives, the carrying cost and the productioninitiation cost must be calculated for each alternative. These twoamounts are calculated as follows:
Carrying cost = Annual cost of carrying (2OYol x manufacturing cost(SSO1 x average annual inventory.
Production initiation cost - Number of runs x cost to initiate a run(s3oo)
Current situation: 2 production runs of 3,000 units per runAverage inventory: 3,OOO units + 2 = 1,50O unitsPresent costs:
Carrying cost (.2O x $5O x 1,500)..... 51S,O0OProduction initiation cost (2 x $3OO) OOO
s15"600Proposed situation:The EOQ formula can be used to determine production runquantities by substituting cost per order with production ini-tiation cost
production quantity, ,/2 x 6-'000 x 9?00
r $ 5 O x ' 2
= V360,000 = 60O units
$ 1 0 x . 2 5 x 4 9
6 O O + 2 = 3 0 O u n i t s
6,000 + 600 = 10 runs
Carrying cost (.20 x $5O x 300)......,.....,......Production iniUation cost (1O x $3O0)
Average inventory:Number of runs:Proposed costs:
2r4OO
3,600,000
Expected annual savings
2t0
E9-5
(11
(21
Chapter g
-l z r ( ' t z x l , 5 o o ) r S 5 o
E O Q = r l - =1 i 3 r . 4 O
= t';500, ooo = tin?"u
Lots ol 2,AOO units should be ordered, based on the following computa-tions:
QUANTITATIVE DATA
Order size '11225 units 2r00O units'14.7 I
612.5 units 1,000 unlts
a a . a . a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
Number of orders Per Year.Average inventory .. . .r. . . ' . . . . ' . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. '
. COST DATA
Gost of placing orders at $5o r..........r.....,..r.,rGost of carrying inventory:
612.5 x $3.00 x .40 ..r......r......... ' ....r...........IrOOO x 92.85 x .4O ..............,........,............
Discounts lost (12 x 11500 x 33 x .05)..,.....,...
Cost to ordgr and carry.. ' ............r.,......r" 'o.....
$ 735
735
2r7OO$4.170
$ 4so
1 , 1 4 0
$1,590
E9-6
(1) Ordering and carrying costs under current policy:
(T , $3Bo)* (sr ' #) = s2,2Bo + $zso = s2,s3o
(21 Economic order quantity and the related ordering and carrying costs:
j2 x 3'ooo t stSo = \fm-o- = 1,5i0 units! s l
i+#x$380). ( t " ry) =$zss + $755 = $1,510 relatedordering and carrying costs
I
Chapter 9
E9-6,(Concluded)
(3) George should decide to order In quantlties of 3'OOO unlts, based on thefollowing computations:
QUANTITATTVE DATA
2 l i
3,000 unltsI
1,50O unlts
COST DATA
Cost of ptaclng orders at $380 '...'...o............. $ 755Gost of carrying inventory:
$1 x755. . . . . . . . . . .o . . . r . . . . . . . . . . t t . ' t r . . r . r r . t . . . t . t . . . . . . . 755
($f - S.05) x 1r500.. . . . . ' . . . . . . . t . . . . 'o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .orDiscount lost (31000 x $5 x .05).................,..o. 750
Gost to ordgr and carryr.o........................r...... $2r260 $1,805
CGA€anada (
E9-7 91600 + 24O = 4O units daity usageNormal lead time usage (2O days x 4O unlts)...,..................,....Safety stock ((30 days - 2O days) x 4O unlts)..........,i.o.............Ordgr point. . . . . . . i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , r . . . . . . . . . Le99
E9-8
(1) Maximumuseperday.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . ,o- . . . . 6OO unl tsNOrmal usg PgrdS!... ' .............r.....................r 500Safety stock (maximum)..........................r.r.... i6-O unlts x 5 days of lgad
tlme = 50O unlts
Order si2g., . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . r . . . . . r . . . . . .o. . . . . . ' . . . 1r510 unlts
Numbgr of orders pgr year.....,..........'........'... 1.9868,Averageinventory....................o........r..r......... 755 unlts
$ 380
11425
adapted). Reprint with permission.
800400
(21 2,500 unlts500
3.000 unlts
3,000 unlts2,500
500 units3,500
(3)
{0AA units
Chapter 92r2
E9-8 (Concluded)
(41 Order poiot.........r...........rr.....................o....ttt""""'o""""t"""' 3tOoO units
Minimum'*" Juring leaoii;6 (1OO r 5).....,..o....'..---.'..-......... 5oo
on hand st time order ngcgiyod......................................."f' "" 60 units
QUanUty Ofdgfgd ......"..."t""""""r"t""t"t"t"""""""""""""t' 3'500 UnitS
Absolutg marimum inventoly .........................""""""'o"""""' gJQg units
. c G A - G a n a d a ( a d a p t e d } . R e p r i n t w i t h p a r m i s s i o n .
E9-9
(1) Marimum ugo per dS!""""""""""t""o"""""Normal uso por d8!"t"""""t"""""""""""""
Safg$ stock {marimum} """"""""""""""""'
2OO units1206 units r 12 daYs of
lead time = 960 units
l2l Normal use per day (120) r days of lead time (i2!........o......,... lt44O units
Saf ety stock .r......or.................... ' ......o.............." ' tt"t 'o"tr""t""' 96O '
order po1t1t............r....t....r........r..........r..............""tt"t""""tt " & units
2r4OO unitsI ,44O
960 units3,OOO
Order poi
3,960 units
2r4OO units960Minimum uso during lead time (8o r 12)
On hand at time ordor t€ceivod......--..r. 1r44O units3,OOOQ u a ntity o rd ergd ..r..........o....'....""'
Absof utg marimum inventory.........r...,................. ' ...o....r.,....... 4A4O units
CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission'
(31 Ofdgf pOint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1. . . . . . . . . . " t " t t t t t t t " '
HOrmal USe dUring lgdd timg (t20 I' '1 2| .'..'.................'........"'
On hand St timg Ofdef t€CeiV€d.........'....,........r'..o..................'QUan$ty Ofdefgd r........r... ' .........r.o...........r................ ' .." 'r""""
NOfmal madmUm inVentOry...r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . .o... . . . . . . . ." ' t"
(4)
E9-10
3efcUStock Lcvrl
(Unltel1 0204080
AnnuelHumbcr
ofOrdorr
AnnualStocltout
Coat +
3t50.oo75.OO30.oo15.OO
AnnualllafetyStock
CarrylngCo.t Ffpcr unltl
AnnualComblncd
= Coct3100.oo
95.OO70.ooc5.oo
Probabltl$ ErPcsted Goctof Annual P.r
x Secr(993 =9tockoutlr gglgt =
. 4 � 2 3 7 52 1 7 5.oa .1 75.o4 .2 76
level of saletY stock is 40 units.
66!6
31020tn8('
The recommendod
I!
I
Chapter I
E9-11 APPENDIX
r- (1) Average costing:
II
:,
I!
I
!
! el Fifo costing:
213
Date
Received lssued InventoryQuan- Unit Totaltity Cost Cost
Quan- Unit Totaltity Cost Gost
Quan- Unittity Cost Balance
Jan, I 5OO S1.2O S 6006 200 $1.25 $250 70o 1.21 g5o
1 0 400 1.30 520 l r1OO 1 .25 1 ,3701 5 560 $1.25 SZOO 54O 1.25 67025 500 1.40 700 1,040 1.32 1,37027 400 1.32 528 640 1.32 842
Date
Received lssued InventoryQuan- Unit Total
tity Cost CostQuan- Unit Total
tity Cost CostQuan- Unit Total
tity Cost Cost BalanceJan. 1
6500 $1.20 $600 $ 600
2OO $1.25 $250 500 1.20 600200 1.25 250 850
1 0 400 1.30 520 so0200400
1.20 6001.25 2501.30 52O 1,370
1 5 500 s1.20 $OOO50 1.2s 75
140 1.25 175400 1.30 520 695
25 500 1.40 700 140 1.25 175400 1.30 52050o 1.40 7OO 1,395
27 140 1 .25 175260 1.30 338
140 1 .30500 1.40
182700 882
I
214
E9-1 1 APPENDIX (Concluded)
(3) Lifo costing:
Chapter g
Date
Received lssued Inventory
Quan- Unit Totaltity Cost Gost
Quan- Unit Totaltity Gost Gost
Quan- Unit Totaltity Cost Cost Balance
Jan. 1 s00 $r.zo $600 s 6006 200 $1.25 $250 500 1.20 600
200 1.25 250 8501 0 400 1.30 520 s00
200400
7.20 6001.25 2501.30 52O 1,37O
1 5 400160
$r.go1.25
$seo200
500 1.20 60040 1.25 50 650
25 s00 1.40 700 500 1.20 60040 7.25 50
500 1.40 7OO 1,35027 400 1.40 560 500 1.20 600
40 7.25 50100 1.40 140 790
I
Chapter 9 215
P9-1
(1)
(21
PROBLEMS
Budgeted acquisition costBudgeted purchases
$148r5O0 net purchases x
_ $18, O0O _ 12.Soh applied acquisition= - - - =S144, OOO eosting rate for the month
12.5o/o applledacqulsition = $18,562.50 applledcosting cost addedrate to
materialspurchasedduring themonth
(3) The overapplied acquisition eost of $362.50 (Sig,562.50 applied cost _S18'200 actual cost) should be credited to Cost of Goods Sold or prorat-ed to Cost of Goods Sold and inventories.
P9-2(1) EOe = . /2
x 2-4 '00O x $1.20 -\ l S1O xTOYo
(21 Annual regulrements _ 24.OOOEOe
'W = 100 orders needed peryear
(3) E$ (Cartying::"t ) * Annual reguirements fOrderins cost )z 1 per unrr / EOe ( p", order )5240 total cost
= ry($ro x 1oo/o) .'hi#o ($r.eo ) = $reo + $120 = :t#iltr"illfor the year
(41 The next order shoutd be placed in three days. This conctusion is arrivedat as follows:(a) Number of days' suppty in each orden
Days in year
@ = # = 3 ' 6 d a Y s(b) Number of days' supply left in inventory:
Units In inventory , Days, supply _ 4OO
6 days'f x in each oii"r
= ffi x 3' 6 days - supply
left(c) Days before next order should be placed:
(Days' supply left) - (Delivery lead time) = 6 days _ 3 days = 3
= 24O units57,600
1
Pg-2 (Gonctuded)
(51 some of the difficulties most firms have in attempting to apply the EoQ
formuta to Inventory Problems are:(a) Inventory ls not always used at a_ constant rate; the constant usage
assumptlon ls lmpllclt in the EOQ formula'(b) fne Ede lormularequires estimates of (1) annual requirements' (2)
orde-ng cos! (3) purchase price per unit, and (4) cost of carrying
lnveritoiies. These estimates may be extremeff difficult to obtainwith accuracy.
2,3001,500
8004,0o04.800
2 1 6
P9-3
(1) Normal use per day (2OO) x days of lead time (10) """""""'Safg ty S IOCk. . r . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . . .o . ' . . . r . . . . . . . . r " " "o t "
Ofdgf pOi t1 t . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chapter 9
2,000 units300
3i3o9 units
2,300 units2,000
300 units4,000
(21 Ofdef pg in t . . . . . r . . . . , . . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . i . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . ' .3 . . . ' . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . t
Normal use during lead time (2O0 x 1O)..... ' .."""""""""""'
On hand at t img Ofdgf fgCgiVed ..........,...... ' .,....r..................QUant i ty Ofdgfgd. . . . . . . . . . ' , . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . 'o . . . . . . . .
Normal maximum inventory..-......r.... """"""""""'
Ofdg f po in t . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . ' . r ' . ' . . . . r . ' . " "
Minimum use dur ing tead t ime (150 x 10). . . . . . . . . . . . , . """""""
On hand at time order receivedQuantity ordered.... ' ....... ' . .... ' ..,......
Absolute maximum inventory.,.,..............r............ ' ..""""""'
Let S equal cost of storing one unit for one year.
EOQ =
(3)
4.3OO unlts
units
units
units
(4)
!2 x (2oo x 250) x S8o4 ' o o 0 = r l >, Y S
4'000 =
16 '000 '00O = s8,000,ooo = S . 5 O
1 6 ,0OO , OOO
2 x R U x C OC U x G G
8,0o0,o00
g,ooo,ooo
S -
GGA-Ganada (adapted). Reprint with permission.
2 1 7
.FooI
foo3o
l
I
ir
L
b lg n l€ ; Ir . L Io t l
-
,_:_-.J I8 o Ii c - lS E s lf i ; o lE o Io l
Chapter 9
I
o o o o o FC ' ( \ | F O C D FN ( r | N C { r ' -o
o o o o o 6 |o € N C O r t FC ! r r{,
E 6x oF O
. " .
39 EE 6u,
I
b
I
E
t
:
I
S. o o o o 0 0E r . c o c o c o
o
;fiso o o o o c Dt O $ c ) $ l r -
3 : E3 - " aEEg5 5 8
1x
n n o n | o l o
( ' ) ( ' ( ? ( ' ) ( ' ) ( l )0
I
It
b o o o o o u )( ? ( o g ) N u ) ( oF F Fs,
t l
fui; i r
€ : '
!tI
o)o.
o o o o o t { )v - C { C ? r C l O l { '
Chapter 9218
I
P9.5 APPENDIX
(1) Fifo:
Date
Recelved lssued Inveniory
Quan- Unittity Cost
TotalCost
Quan- Unit Totaltity Cost Cost
Ouan- Unit Totaltity Cost Cost Balance
Marchl 75O 32O.OO $15,OOO $15,OOO
3 40() s19.50 $ 7,800 750 2O.0O 15,0OO4O0 19.50 7,8OO 22,8OO
5 600 $20.00 sl2,ooo 150 20.00 3,0004O0 19.50 7,8OO 1O,80O
1 2 a5o 21.50 7,525 150 20.00 3,0004OO 19.5O 7,8OO35tO 21.50 7,525 18,325
t 5 15O 2O.OO 3,O0O350 19.50 6,825
50 19.50 975350 21.50 7,525 8,500
1 8 s00 22.OO 11,0OO 50 19.so 97535O 21.50 7,5255OO 22.OO 11,000 19,500
22 50 19.50 975350 21.50 7,525 5OO 22.OO 11,OOO I 1 ,OOO
26 550 21.OO 11,55O 500 22.OO 11,00055O 21.0O 11,550 22,550
28 5OO 22.OO 11,000150 21 .0O 3 ,150 4OO 21.OO 8,4OO 8,400
3 1 2AO 20.00 4,OOO 4OO 21.0O 8,4OO200 20.00 4,000 12,400
219Chapter 9
1
roo:'g
ooxozu l oo . =o . J
u)I
d s t
l-
!
Fo
lH
o
ootr.g!oo
t ;E 6
ET,s 6
* ao
l ol ot otutl pIU'
ooqu,F
0
ooctNrn
ou)t\
oo@-N(\|
o oo o0_ @-r o FF
o oo r oct o;N r
o ou t oF ! t
oocl
ooo_F
oodN
ou)u)
u)Nlt'-q,F
o u )O No_qF FF
o oo tf)d ;N N
o oro u)u?(?
ooo_CT'
ooo_CD
og 'oN
oort
ooo_oF
o oo oqo_€ ?
o oq gO NN N
o oo ott ut
oo(\to
o c )o oo- olq , N
o og gO ( \ |N N
o oo o$ r
olo\|F
N
o o oo o u )q qn-C l N r
F
o o oo o oO N rN N N
o o oo o u )! t F u )
ooq@
ooo-CI'
oociN
oC)rf
ooo(\l
o oo oqo_@ ! t
o og qo oN N
o oo o$ N
ttq):'og
E f iE 6
v l
5.g* ao
o oo oq ql \ r tg
o ot r )od c tF Na
o oo o\ ' N
l o oN Oro- 0-F ( '
o ou ? o; c iN N
o ou ) l og , F
oo@_@
oqc.|N
oov
o c )u ) o'o- otF ( \ I
o oq qF (\lN O t
o or o ot ( l r
tto:o('occ
E f i= oI Y O
.= Vl
s 6
* ect
oo@_F
g
oqoooo\t
lt)Nqt\
orqF
N
ou)(l,
ooqF
oqNol
ooro
ou)n_
oqFN
ou?1',
ooo_!t
ooctN
oool
ooo
F
o(tE
(t to GI Lo @ Nol
(oN
@(\| (?
T rII
Chaptor 9
i
!loE5(,
oox 69 3- L
u l oCLE
lot
R O
n
Fo+tcog
o(,cgqt@
5gI
F ao
ooctoolo?o
oooctN0
ou)F
oqooqNN
(DNqt
a
oF
orO
;
o!trtoqoF
(DNqoF
ou)lo
oqo(\|qqt
FFqoN
o0o
ooool-
o
FFrtc;N
o€,tt
oooo?
o
G'G|('.F
$l
ooo
oFF
@@o.F
G,(\|a??6|
ooro
oF
FG|NN
t'u)F
aF
N
ou)o
o(ol-
@l'
Co
llu)F
?N
oo\t
o@
ort(\|.F
o(oFctN
ooo
ttono
EEF O
E 6s 6
* ao
o(outoGo-F
I
oNqotfi
oo(o
ouloc'$to7
FFqoN
oou)
o6|o;o|lo-co
a)Ng??6|
oort
oF
Iolo\g'F
rtu)l-
?N
olOtO
tto.toooG
E f i= oF O
E E3 u )
* ag
ooqFg
oulooooIt
u)({|o-F
oq?c|
oro(t,
ooo-F?
oqNN
oou)
oloro-FF
oqF(\|
orou)
ooo_rt
ogoN
ooN
otEo
C,6=
(, u) (! ro q' NN
(oC!
co(! (?
Chapter I
\. - P9-6 APPENDIX
(1) Cost of the ending inventory under the fifo method when a periodic! inventory system is used:
b 133'"'o 3 tll : tl:i33100 @ 12 = 1,2OO
$4.300
(21 Cost of the ending inventory under the lifo method:
(a) When a periodic inventory system is used:
20ounits @ $tO = S2,0001 0 0 @ 1 1 = 1 , 1 0 0
$3,100
(b) When a perpetual inventory system is used:
221
Date
Received lssued lnventory
Quan- Unit Totaltity Cost Cost
Quan. Unlt Totaltity Cost Cost
Quan- Unlt Totaltity Cost Cost Balance
Jan. I 2OO $rO S2,OOO S2,OOO1 2 l OO 31 I $1 ,1OO 2AO 10
1 0 0 1 l2,O00t, loo 3,1OO
Feb. I 100 9r r $1,1oo1OO 10 1,000 lOO 10 I ,OOO I,OOO
Apri l 16 200 12 2,4OO 100 10200 72
1,0002,4OO 3,4OO
May 1 100 12 1 ,2OO 100 10100 12
1,O001,200 2,2OO
July 15 lOO 14 1,4OO 100 10100 12100 14
1,0001,2OO1,400 3,600
Nov. 10 100 14 1 ,4OO 100 10100 72
1,00o7r2OO 2,2OO
Dec. 5 100 1 7 1 , 7 0 0 100 10100 72100 17
1,0001,2OOl,7oo 3,goo
CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprlnt wlth permlsslon.
r +
Chapter 9
Y
j
222
Roco
oo-gGo
EE3 c )
,F eo
o0
a
ooo_o?n
ooqu)I
ooo_N
oo
a
oou)F
ooo
au|
ooloF
o0ooo-t
ooqlo
o0q,
ooooN
t
oo(oto
o0qN
o0
aortqF
ooqu)
oo\t?
ooo0GIN
ooqlo
oou)
0qooc,l|F
ooqF
ooo-N
oqo(oc'ot
ooqF
oo\tt
oo
a
ort.r-rt
ooqt\
oo(o
ooa
o\tFFrF
oo,0F
ootl)-N
oc,6lFF(\l.F
(Dgt0F
oo@
o(ou)o@F
(oo)o
a
F
o0?
t-
tlonn
c 6F 6
E E= c ,
; ao
ooctou)N&
o0qu)6
o0|(|
ooctou)gi,
ooqu,
o0F
ooa
o(oqq,
ooqu)
o0(o
ooct\tortl
ooEu,
oog,
oo
a
0\t-a-t
ooqF
oo(o
ooo(\|q|o
oo\t'.F
ooqt
oN
a
F(oo\t
(og'qF
ooF
oN
t
F(og'
!'
(ooqF
ooF
Ito.:ot)oG
EEF O
, - o' s o= o
* ao
oo0-o?6
u)o
oo0N
oo6lF
(o
oost
ooo-NF
o
oou)-
ooo-oF
F
oosIF
oqto
N
(s?
roc,
N
rio
l.L
u) ctl$l
Nd(oE
u| (, Nl:q
u) oG'
!o
o
oCD(E
^ o=g .Illlo . ?o . g
tiI
O -
.t
Chapter g
P9-7, APPENDIX (Continued)
(b) First-in, first-out method:
223
Dste
Received lssued InventoryQuan- Unlt
tity CoslTotalCost
Ouan-tity
Unit TotalCost Cost
Quan- Unit Totaltity Cost Cost Balance
Jan.2 2,000 s5 310,000 2,000 35 $10,ooo15 500 s5 $2,500 t,500 5 7,50031 700 5 3,500 800 5 4,OOO
Feb.2 1,200 6 7,2OO8OO 5 S e,ooo
1,2OO 6 7,2OO 11,2OO1 5 600 5 3,000 20o 5 1,0oo
1,2OO 6 7,2OO g,2oo28 200 5
700 61,0oo4,2OO s00 6 3,OOO
Mar.21,500 8 12,0OO
5OO 6 3,OOO1,5OO g 12,0OO .ts,(x)o
t 5 s00to0
6 3,000I 800 1,4OO I 11,2OO
31 800 8 6,40O 600 8 4,800DOr.2
1,900 7 13,3OO600 I 4,800
l,goo 7 l3,3OO 19,1(X)1 5 600 8 4,8OO
100 7 700 1,800 7 t2,6OO30 700 7 4,900 1,100 7 7 ,7OO
r - rI t
t
224
P9-7 APPENbIX (Concluded)
(c) Last-in, first.out method:
Sales (5,500 uni ts @ SIO)Cost of goods sotd:
s55,000.00
$42,5OO.O07,805.60
s34,694.4Os20,305.60
(21Average Fifo
Chapter I
Lifo$55,oOO
$42,5OO6,8OO
s35,7OO
El e,gqg
permission.
Purchases ........,...Less inventory, Aprit 30..........
s55,00o
$42,5007 r7OO
s34,gOO
939199
Reprint with
Date
Received lssued Inventory
Quan- Unit Totaltity Cost Cost
Quan- Unit Totaltity Cost Cost
Quan- Unit Totaltity Cost Cost Balance
Jan.2 2,000 S5 91O,0OO 2,OOO 35 |S|O,OOO
1 5 5OO $5 $2,500 1,5OO 5 7,5(X'
31 700 5 3,50O 800 5 4,OOO
F e b . 2 1,200 6 7,2OO8OO 5 S 4,0OO
1,200 6 7,2OO 11,2001 5 600 6 3,600 800
6005 4,0006 3,600 7,600
28 600 6300 5
3,6OO1,5OO s00 5 2,500
Mar.2 1,5OO g 12,000500 5 2,5OO
1,500 g 12,OOO 14,5OO1 5 600 8 4,800 500 5
900 82,5OO7r2OO g,7OO
31 8OO 8 6,400 5OO 5 2,500100 g 800 3,300
Apr .2 t ,goo 7 13,300
500 5 2,500100 I 800
1,900 7 13,300 16,6001 5 7OO 7 4,900 500 5 2,500
100 I 8007,2OO 7 g,4OO 11,7OO
30 70o 7 4,9OO 500 5 2,500100 8 800500 7 3,500 6,900
Gross profit
CGA Canada (adapted).
I
Chapter I
CASES
c9-1
(1) (a) Topp Desk Gompany would be attempting to minimize total setupcost and total carrying cost
(b) Variable manufacturing costs per unitt
Di rgCt matgf ia ls . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . t . . r . . . . .o . . .
Di fgCt |abOf. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . ' . . r . . ' r r . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . .
Variablg factory overhead..,..........................,.,.,.......*....Total variable manufacturing cost per unit........
Numbgr of dgsks destroyed,.........,r.,..............,...................Total setup cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . r . r . . r . . . . r . , r ' . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . .
225
$ 5 0x 1 2
s 3 01 46
s600
Optimum production run:
=1 $50 ' x 10 .870
{4F66p6o = 2,ooo desks
rVariable manufacturing cost per unit
(c) Number of production runs per yean
Annual demandOptimum production run
= €#
= 9 Production runs
(a)(21 The following factors affect the desired size of the safety stock forany Inventory itemr '(1) Variability of product demand(21 VariabiliU of lead time(3) Stockout costs(4) Carrying costs
The minimum safety stock level that could be maintained withoutbeing worse off than being unable to fill orders equal to an averagedayts demand is the level at which the safety stock carrying costequals the cost of a stockout, i.e.,
Stockout cost s2,295
(b)
=ff i =42s desks
21,600,000
Per unit carrying cost S50 x 1O.B%
226
c9-2 1
(1)$ 90.00
18.00
Chapter 9
$108.00
Equipment Maintenance Department costs:SalafieS (2 X 5 X $91 ' . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . ! . . . ' . . 'Employee benefits ($90 x 2O%1.............-.. '....... '.
Production department costs:Salafigs (5 X 5 X $7.501 .....................r........ '........Variable factory overhead:
Direct labor hours base (25 x $2.75).-..'.....-....Maching hours basg (1 x $5).....,.,-..-............,r.
Direct materials ($ZOO - $50).... '.......... '............. '..r.. '..Estlmate of Model JE 40 setup costs...........,..........-,.
$r gz.so
68.75s.00 261.2s
150,00s519.2s
Explanation of costs:
(a) The full cost of the maintenance salaries and employee benefits lsincluded because the $1o.8o St9.0o + ($9'00 x20%17 incurred perlabor hour is incurred solely for the purpose of effecting thechangeover.
(bl The other costs of the Equipment Maintenance Department are notinctuded in the estimate because they are fixed costs of the depart-ment and will be incurred regardtess of the maintenance workers'activities.
(c) The sataries of the 5 production workers for the full 5 hours eachare included in the setup cost because they must be in attendanceall of the time, though they are needed only part of the time. lf theworkers could have been assigned to other iobs during thechangeover, then the full amount would not be charged to setup.
(d) The variable factory overhead costs of the production departmentapplled on the direct tabor hours base are incurred as a function ofthe direct labor hours; therefore, a full 25 hours of cost areassigned to the setup cost.
(e) The variable factory overhead costs of the production departmentapplied on the machine hours base are incurred as a function of theoperation of the machineryl therefore, I hour is assigned to setupcost for the t hour the machinery is used in testing.
(0 All production department fixed factory overhead costs (both thoseapplied on the basis of direct labor and those applied on the basisof machlne hours) are not included in the setup cost because theywould be incurred regardless of the activity in the departmenL
(g) The net materials cost of $f SO is included because it represents theunsalvageable portion of the materials used for the setup and notfor the production of a salable desk.
II!
I
-Chapter 9 227
- C9-2 (Concluded)
\, (21 The cost items that would be included In an estimate of Pointer Furniture
Gompany's cost of carrying desks in inventory include:
' (a) All costs related to warehousing and handting the desks In Inventory! that vary in amount by the number of items stored.
, tb) The cost of the funds committed to the investment in inventory.
b cg-3
' (11 Circumstances necessary to shift raw materials inventory carrying costs
\ (a) Reliability of the supplier. Will the supplier ship products on a mone
rigorous timetable and be willing to keep inventory within its ownstorage facilities?
. lf;:$ff""1H;i*:;iili,g,""""XXiii;i1""ff'il#i:fiS"?$il':i,-traet terms.
* (c) Careful control of inventory requirements. Are production schedules
clearly defined to reduce the potential for stockouts?
(21 Gircumstances necessary to shift finished goods inventory carrying costs! to the customer include:
> (a) i.,?::[FT[il:;:?H'i;ffill=ll?lil?ll#:,'take the risk or
(bl Closer production planning. Gan production schedules be refined tosuch an extent that delays in the sale and distribution of the fin-b ished inventory are minimized?
(c) Gareful controt of inventory reguirements. Are customer orderscarefully monitored and anticipated to reduce the probability of fin-E ished goods stockouts?
OlO-1. The purpooe cil a JIT system is to minimize thelevelc of raw malerials and work in processinvcntory inverlmcnt!, while improving thcwerall rnanufacturing pr€oss. Thc htent b topull inventory through the syslem mly as il isrequired.
010-2. JIT seeks loleliminate all formr of wasle,including produclion losses such as defects.Successful reduclion of these problems con-tribules lo producl guality, and, so, is a part olTOM.
010-3. To avcid inventory buildup, the entire JIT sys-tem shuts down whenaver defecls are found;so to achieve a good rale of flow, lhe numberof defects must be srnall.
Qt0-4. Theoretbally, h an ideaf JIT system the EOQi! o.re; each time nrcre oulput is needed, onemore part or unil is produced.
Ql0-5. Although a zero inventory level is unattainable,JIT stimulates improvernent in the environmen-lal condilions lhat cause inventory buildup,such as long seiup times, high selup costs,
. p@r guliy, and poorly bahnced work loads.O10€. The relalbnship between velocity and WIP lev-
els is an inverse relationship; doubling thevekrcity m€ans lnlving the WIP level, providedlhe outpul rate is held constiant. This is sirnilar,bul not irdentical, to the relationship expressedin lhe familiar inventoqy tumover ratio used inf inancial statem€nt analysis.
010-7. The stralegic advantage ol improving velocityth roughou t l he company , l r om p roduc tresearch and devekrpment to shipping, is thatlhe company can then respond taster to anychanging cuslomer need or to an opportunityfor a new or altered product.
Ql0€. Reducing the level of WIP also reduces lhamaximum numbsr ol detectives, il the defectsare c{ a kind that will be discovered al the nexlwork staiion afler lhe unils are held waitingbelween s la l ions. l f . l00 uni ts are wai l ingb€tw€en stations, up to lOO detectives mightbe produced before the problem would be dis.
CHAPTER 10
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
covered; il 10 units ars heH waiting, no rpr.than 't0 delectives could b. produced beforelhe prcblem would be discovered.
Q10-9. A blanket purchasc order ir an agreementbetween buycr and seller slaling lho totalquanlity exp€cled to be needed over a periodol three or six rnonthr.
Ot0-10. In many JIT work cells, these distinctionr-between dirrl and indirecl labor and betweenproducing deparlments and ssn6 service lunc-tions--do nol exist, because the sarne workers(lhe leam assigned to the cell) perlorm allthese tasks.
Q10-1 1. In bacldlush costing, the work in process inven-lory accounl is not adjusled lhroughoul lheper iod to re l lect a l l lhe cosls of uni ts inprocess; thore are no dela i led subsid iaryrecords mainlalned for work in process; and asingle accounl may be used lor both raw male-rials and work in process.
010-'12. In bacKlush costing, lhe rnaterials and work inprocess inventory accounts mighl be cornbinedinto a single account because malerials mightbe pul irnmedialely inlo production when lheyare received.
010-13. Posldedusiion is the sublraslbn lrom the workin process accounl cil sorne or all elements dthe cosl of completed work, afler the work iscompleted.
Q10-14. The periodic inventory method used by manymerchandis ing companies is analogous lobackllush cosling as used by manufacturers.
010-15. lf a backflush costing system exp€nses all con-vers ion costs to the cost of goods soldaccount, tho corrgct arnounl of conversion co.slis included in hventory accounts by making anend-ol -per iod adjustment of the invenloryaccounts' balances. The oflsetling entry is anadfustment of lhe cost of goods sold accounl.The corracl amounl of sonversion cost to beincluded in each inventory account is estimaledwhen invenlories are physically counled.
228
I
I
Chapter l0
EXERCISES
b ' Elo'l rhe:::ffi: :llt"ir:1H'""J,rr:ii'.'r'i;l:n',"r'J,'"ll"liiilSlJiJ?I,tollows:
> Carrying cost savings = 2Ooh r reduction in average variabte cost of Wlp= ZOoh r 3O7o x past average variable cost of Wlp= .2 x .3 x (1O r 3OO x SBO)= $14r4o}
Savings in cost of defects= $25 x reduction in number of defective units
\' (reduction innumber of (number of out-of-
= S25 x defective units x control conditionsproduced per not discoveredundiscovered immediately)out-of-control
v ondition)
= $25 x l3O% x 3oO x S%l x (1/3 x 600)= $25 x 4.5 x 2QO= $22,500
\- ElO-z The average lead time wil l be 26 days, calculated as follows:
Reduct ion of vendor lead t ime = 116 x 18 days = 3 days
Because the rate of output wi l l be unchanged, a reduct ion of Wlp to one-third of its present level wil l tr iple the velocity. The average order wil lthen remain in wlP only one-third as long, saving two-thirds of t imepresently being spent in WIP:
Reduction of t ime in WIP = 213 of present t ime in Wlp= A3 x i2 days= g days
New lead time = present lead time - reductions
= 26 days
- IH::iJffx""n.;:H: :ffs,:Tlillff :'xiJ":"J3::i:ff'.:il"i,i11'"components of total lead time are known, as in this exercise, then the
i new lead t ime can be calculated by adding al l i ts components:
( 5 / 6 x 1 8 ) + 2 + ( 1 1 3 x 1 2 ) + 2 + 3 = 1 3 + Z + 4 + Z + 3= 26 days
- -
2g Chaptor 1O
EIO-3 The expeited annual savings is S2,2OO,OOO, calculated as follows:
Doubling the velocity of all tasks, from receipt of order to shipment and
from ordering materials to issuing materials to production, will reduceWIP and materials inventories by half' therefore:
. Reduction in materials carrying costs = Z}oh x materials reduction= 2Ooh x(112 x $3,0O0'OOO)
$3OO'0OO
Reduction in wlP carrying costs = 2ooh x wlP reduction= 2|oh x (712 x $5,OOO'O0O}= $5OO,O0O
This change will also reduce customer lead time from eight weeks tofour weeks. Because customers are will ing to wait up to five weeks forshipment, alt shipments can then be made-to-order. There will no longerbe a need for finished goods inventory. Once the existing finished goodsinventory is liquidated by sales or scrapping, the annual savings from notcarrying finished goods will be:
Reduction in finished goods carrying costs= zloh x finished goods reduction= zloh x (l OO% x $7'O0O'OOO)= sl,400,oo0
Total savings = s300,000 + s5o0,0oo + sl,4oo,o0o - $2,200'OOO
flhis exercise is based closely on an actual case of a partial JIT imple-mentat ion. The name of the company and dol lar amounts have beenaltered.)
E10-4(1) (al Equivalent production = 4,500 + (.5O t-2gl = 4,51O units;
s3OO,74O _4 , 5 1 O $66.683 per unit
. \ -
. -
(b) st,o9l?oo = $i66.067 per unitr - ' 4 r 5 O O
(c) units started = 4,500 + 2O - 24 = 4,496 units;
s3oo,o0o= 566.726 per un i t4 , 4 9 6
(2) 5667, because 2O x .5O x 566.683 = $666.83.5667, because 20 x .5o x 566.667 = 5666.67.S667, because 20 x .5o x $66.726 = $667'26'
i -
Chapter l0
EIO-4. (Goncluded|
(3) Considering that the results of requirement (2) wene the same (to thenearest dollar) for all three methods, then method (il (b) would be recom-mended because of its ease and simplicity. Method-tii ttl is a ctose sec-ond choice, also because of ease and simpticity. The detii ls of method(11 (al may not be iustifiable in these circumstances.
(41 Prccessing speed is very fast, with the result that work in process inven-tory levefs ane kept to a very low level-both in absolute terms and inielation to totat production activity for a month.
Elo-5 Journal entries involving Rrp and/or finished goods are:Raw and In Procgss.. . . . . . . . . . . t . r . . . . ! . . r ! . . . . . . . r r . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .
Accounts Payable .r . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . r .o. . . . . .456,OOO
456,OOO
A-summary entry for all receipts of raw materials during the period.when direct materials are used, no entry is needed, be-ause thematerials remain in RlP.
Fin ished Goods. . . . . . t . . . . . , . . r . . . . - . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .o . . . . . . . . r 4SSTOOORaw and In Procgss' . . . ' . . . . . ' . . . r ' r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . , . 455,000To backflush material cost from Rfp to finished goods. This is apostdeduction, The calculation is:
Material in May I Rlp ba1ance...,.....,.....,.,. S 19,OOOMater ia l receiveddur ingMay.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 456;OOO
s475,OOOMater ia l in May 31 RIR per physical count 2O,OOOAmount to be backf lushed.. . . . . . . . . $4SSpOO
Cost of Goods So1d.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . 461rOOOFinishgd Goods.. . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D.. , . . . . . . . . . 46i rOOOTo backflush material cost from finished goods to cost of goodssold. This is a postdeduction. The calcutation is:
Material in May I f inished goods r......,....,. S 16,OOOMaterial backflushed to finished goods.... 4S5,OOO
:_--$471,00O
Material in May 31 finished goods, perphysica l count . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . IOrOOO
231
L
Amount to be backf!ushed.. . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . .$461,OOO
, rIi
Chapter l0232
Eto-5 (Concluddd)
COSI Ol GOOdS SO1d. . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . .o . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . t . . . ' .
Raw and In Procgss.....o.....Finlsh gd Good3... . . t t . t . . . . . . . . . . . t""t""t t t" t""t t t" t t '
Matgriat In Jung I RIP balance o..'....r......i.Matgrial rBcEirgd during June r............... '.
Material In June 30 RIR per physical count
Amount to bg backflushlgd ...........'.......""'
Material in June 30 finished goods' perphysical cou!1t.. . . . . . , . . . .r, . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . ' .- . ' .
Amount to be backflushed ... . . . . . . . ' . . . .o..r ' . . . '
2,300300
2,OOO
Conversion cost in RIP is adiusted trom the $2,3OO of May I to the$2'OOOosgmato at May 31. bonvsrsion cost In finished goods is
aOjusteJ trom ttre $Sr5bO of May t to the $4'5Oo estimate at May
3i. The offsettlng ontry ls made to the cost ol goods sold account'where all conve*ion costs weno charged during May.
El0-6 The Journal entries Involving RIP and/or finished good! 8r1o:
Baw and ln Ptlc8ss.........o......' '...... 222'OOOAccounts Payablg.....t""'r""'ot"""o""""""""" 222,OOO
A gummary ontry for all receipts ol raw materials during tho period.
When direct maierials atu used, no entry is needed, because the
materials nBmain In BlP.
Finishgd GOOd3...r..r.r...............r........r....r....r......."r.. 221r5OO
RaW and In PfOCSSS..............i.... '........r..o..... '.!. 221 ,5OO
To backflush material cost from BIP to finished goods. This is'apostdeduction. The calculation ls:
I I O,5O0222,AOO
$232,5O01 1 , O O O
s22t,5OO
Cost of Goods Sotd.............................-..............r.tt.. 223t5OAFinishgd Goods....r.....o...........i.....................'... 223r5OO
To backflush materlal cost from finished goods to cost of goods
sold. This ls a postdeduction. Tho calculation is:
Material in Juna I f inished goods............ ' $ 8rO00MaterialbackflushedfromRlP.""""""""' 221r5oo
s229,500
o,ooos223,5OO
II
!
Clppter 1O
Elo-O (Concluded|
Raw and In Process..........r.....................................rFinishgd Goods.....................D........r...r,.....r......Gost of Goods Sold ;..........,.,..................,.!....r..
Elo'7 Journal ontriss Involving the Rlp accounta arl':Raw and in Procgss r................r....................r..........
Accounts Payable .r . . . . ' . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . r , ,or. . . . . . . , .
2s3
300200
Gonverslon cost In Rtp ls adjusted lrom tho $lr2oo of June I to the$lrT0oostimate at Juno 3o. convorsion cost in finished goods isadjusted from the 94rooo gt June I to the $3rzoo estima.-te "i .1u""3o. The offsetting entry la made to the cost of goods sofd account,nfiero all conversion costs wero charged durini June.
500
20O,OO02OO,O0O
A-summary entry for all receipts of raw materials during the period.when dlrect materiafs aro used, no entry is needed, belausJtrrevremain a part of RlP.
Finlshed Good8....................r..........r.........o.....o........ 199 ,8OORaw and in Process 199 ,8O0r t a a a o a a a a a a a a a a a
To backflush material cost from Rtp to Finished Goods. This is apostdedugtion. The calcutation is:
Material in March I RIP balance s I ,OOO2OO,OOO
s2O9,OOO9,2OO
Materiaf rcceived during March,..........,...,
Material in March 31 RIR per physical countAmountto be backflushed.,.....,...,,,........,. Si99,gOO
Raw and in Procgss...........................................o...o, 3OOCost of Goods So1d............,.......,........,.......,..,. gOO
conversion cost in RIP is adjusted from the $1,ooo of March 1 tothe $lr3OO estimate at March 31, The offisetting entry is made to thecost of goods sold account, where all conversion costs wenecharged during March.
rIIII
Y - )- . 1
I: . ;!
Chapter lO . e
El0-8 Journal ehtries involving the RIP accounts are:Raw and in Process............ 367'000
Agcounts Payab|e.r............,.,........................... 367rO0O
A summary entry for all receipts of raw materials during the period.When direct materials are used, no entry is needed, because they .'remain a part of RlP.
Finishgd GOOdS,... . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . .o... . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o... . 365r4O0Raw and in Process..,.. 365,4OOa a a a a a a a o a a a t
To backflush material cost from RIP to Finished Goods' This is apost-deduction. The calculation is:
Material in April I RIP ba1ance.................. $ 291600Mater ia l receiveddur ingApri l . . . . . . . . . , . r . . . . . . . 36710OO
$396,6O0Material in April 30 RIR per physical sount 31,2OO
Amountto be backf |ushed.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S365,4OO:
Raw and in Process..........,...r,........,.. 4OO yCost of Goods So|d.,..... .........,.......... 4OO
Conversion cost in RIP is adjusted from the $1,4OO of April I to theS1,8OO estimate at April 30. The offsetting entry is made to the costof goods sold account, where all conversion costs wene chargedduring April. '
_,
EIO-9 Journal entries involving the BIP accounts are:Raw and in Process.. . . . . . . . . . . 246.000
Accounts Payable .............. 246,OOO
A summary entry for all receipts of raw materials during the period.When direct materials are used, no entry is needed, because theyremain a part of RlP.
Cost of Goods So1d...................... ,........o...,. 24Z.OOORaw and in Process........,.,. 247r0OO
To backflush material cost from RIP to Cost of Goods Sold. This is apostdeduction. The calculation is: v
Mater ia l in May 1 RIP balance., $ 11,000Material received during May........ 246,000
$257,OOOMater ia l in May 31 RIR per physical count lO,OOOAmount to be back f lushed. . . . . . . . . . S24Z,OOO
l
, / tt -
1)V
I>-
II
1
Chapter 10
EIO-9 (Concluded|
' Raw and in Process ,..........,...,.r.
Elo- lo
235
800Cost of Goods So1d....,.......o,....... 800conversion cost in RtP is adjusted from the $lr3oo of May I to the$2'1oo estimate at May 3r. The offsetting entry is made tb the costof goods sold account, where all convercion costs were chargedduring May.
(1)
(21
(3)
(41
The most recent purchase involved a quantity greater than the totalmaterials in ending inventories, and that purchase gives a cost of materi-als of $42o'o0o/l,4oo, or $3oo per unit of output; t6erefore,Materials cost of finished goods ending inventory
= 50 units x $3OO per unit = $15'OOO
The conversion cost per unit is calculated by dividing the total GoDV€r-sion cost by (al the number of units startedrlb) the number "o.pl"t"d, or(cl the number completed plus the number oi partially "onu"tt"i units inthe RIP ending inventory (not an equivalent units calculation|:(l) $eSOrlSO + 3,OOO = $96.72 conversion cost per unit(Ot $29Orl6O -r grlOO = 993.60 conversion cost per unit(c) s29o'l6o + t,f 2o = $g3.oo conversion cost per unit
The three possible amounts for the conversion cost of the 5O units in fin-ished goods ending inventory are:5O units @ $96.22 = $4,93O of conversion cost5O units @ $93.60 = $4,690 of conversion cost5O units @ S93.OO = $4,650 of conversion cost
L-owest = g15,OOO materials + g4,650 conversion = $19,650Highest = $l5,OOo materials + $4,g36 conversion = btg,ggbDollar di f ference = $19,936 - $19,650 = $1gODifference, to nearest l/1O percent = $1gO * $19,650 = O.9%
b
7-1-
2ffi Chapter lO
810-1 | r
(f l A $3OO materials cost per unit was calculated in requirement (lf of thepnevious exercise; therefore,
Materials cost of RIP ending inventory = 22O units x S3OO Fer unit =$66,OoO
\
(21 The three possible amounts for the conversion cost of the RIP endinglnventoly ol 20 units, SAoh converted, are:
2O units x SOoh x $96.72 = $967.2O of conversion cost20 units r SOTo r $gg.0O = $9gO of conversion cost2O units x SOoh x $93.00 = 9990 of conversion cost
It seems inconsistent to assign 50% conversion costs to RIP when theunits in RIP lyere counted as whole physical units in the denominator ofthe conversion cost per unit calculation in requirement 2(c) of EIO-IO, yand when they were not counted at all in the denominator of the calcula-Uon in requirement 2(b) of El0-10. But the total dollar differenceassigned to RIP is immaterial. Whatever the amount of conversion costs \dassigned to RIP and finished goods, the remainder of total conver':sioncosts simply remains in cost of goods sold.
- t s
(3) Lowest = $66,000 materials + S93O conversion = $66,930Highest = $66,OOO materials + $S0Z conversion = $66,967Dollar difference = 566,967 - $66,93o = $37 - -Difference, to nearest 1/1O percent = $37 + $66,930 =.1oh
I\-
L1l>
tIt
Clpptsl0
PROBLEMS
Pto-l
(11 The erpected annual savings 8no $72OrooO, consisting of $gg4,ooo csny-Ing costs savings and $336'O00 savings in the cost of defects, calculatebag follour:
Carrying cogt savings = 30% r redustlon In avoriago variable cost of Wlp= 3Ooh r 4Ao/o r past avoriago variable cost of Wp= ,3 r .4 x (4O r 2OO r $lOO1= $384,0OO
Savings in cost of delects= $60 r rsdustion in number of defeetive units
(reduction in number= $6O x of defective units x
produced perundiscovered flaw)
= $60 r (4O% r 2OO r 2Oo/ol x= $ 6 0 r 1 9 r 3 5 0= $33610OO
I
-
b
!
(number of flaws notdiscovered immediately|
(114 r 1,4o0l
(2', Likely benefits that are not assessable from the information givenincluds the following:(al Faster cycle time resulting from the higher velocity of VUlp. (Because
the rate of final output will not change, velocity wiil change'inverse-ly with the change in WIP levets.) The faster cytle time will imptovethe speed with which orders can be filled, thul increasing cusio;ne1.saUsfacUon and perhaps increasing perceived prcduct value so thatprices can be raised (or price cuts delayed oravoided|.
(bl lf, as a rasult of the shorter cycle time, total lead Ume becomes lessthan the Ume customens are willing to urait for an order, then thecompany would no longer need to maintain a linished goods inven-tory. This possibility woutd resutt in additional savings in ffoor spacoand other Inventory carrying costs.
flhe value of the floor spacg ireJo up by eliminatin g 4o7o of Wlp storagelc not an addltional benofig Inventory cirrying cosfi includa etoragecosts, so the valua of the floor space is incluoed in the cirrying cJst s""-Ingr calculated In requiroment 1i;.|(31 Costs and other negatives to be comparsd with the savings inctude:(al Tho Increased liketihood of shutdowns due to work l6cations beinggtarved for WIP; lower WIP levels at each staiion nepnesent lowersafety stocks, so stockouts are mone likely at all toca-Uons,(bl The cost 9f -starting a larger nu-u"iof baiches oi lot" into produq-uon, which incrudes the iost of processing .o* ;;* orderc, pro_
2fi Chapter l0 .- -
Plo-l (Concluded) : -
duction orders, and material requisitions. flo reduce average WIPsize, either smaller batches must be started at shorter intervals, orprotracted stockouts must be allowed to occu6 otherwise, theaverags size of WIP will not drop.l "
(c) The cost of handling more loads of materials. lf lot sizes are smallenough to require only one load per lot both before and after thechanCe, then a larger number of lots will result in a larger totalnumber of loads.
(dl The cost of performing a larger number ol setups to permit runninga larger number of batches or lots of smaller size. ldeally, as part ofthe JtT implementation, setup cost will be driven down to eliminatethis problem.
Pl0-2
(1) Protech could achieve an average lead time on these orders of 42 days'calculated as follows:Reduction of time in WIP = 314 of present time in WIP
= 314 r (360 days + I O!= 314 x 36 days= 27 days
Reduction of vendor lead time = 113 r27 days = 9 daysNew lead time = present lead Ume - reductions
= 78 days - 127 days + 9 days)= 42 days
Note: lt is not stated that Protech defines WIP and WIP turnover in a waythat excludes the two days spent in receiving and the three days spentin linal inspection. To check that the average cycle time of 360 days/lO,or 36 dalrs, does excludE those steps (sothat there is no double-count-ing), note that a cycle time of 36 days, when added to the other intervalsmentioned, gives the stated total lead time of 78 days: 6 + 27 + 2 + 36 +3 + 4 = 7 8 .
(21 The advantages of shorter lead time inctude:(al The value of the floor space freed up by eliminating three-foudhs of
WIP storage,(b) lmprovement in the speed with which orders can be filled, which :
should increase customer satisfaction and perhaps increase per-ceived product value so that prices can be raised (or price cutsdelayed or avoided).
(c) lf the new 42-day total lead time is less than the time customersare willing to wait for an order, ttren the company would no longerneed to maintain a finished goods inventory. This possibility wouldresuJt in additional savings in floor space and other inventory carry-ing costs
-T
IiI
dnpW'10I
rc
Plo-2lConcludcd|
t3l Costs and other negatlver to bc compatrd rxlth Ste savlngs Includa:(al The Incrsaged llkellhood of rhutdonmr duc to work tocations belng
gtaryed for WIB lower WIP levelg rt cach ctatlon repnosont lowersafety rtockr, so stockoutr erc mort llkely at alf locaUom.
(bl Tha co;t of startlng r larger numbcr of bgtchee or totr Into produc-Uon, wlrlch.lncludcr thr cort of pmccedng monc work ordera, pro-ductlon ordan, and mgtorlal nqulgldonr (Beduclng averagc WIPrlza generally rcqulrca rtartlng rmaller batcher gt ghorter Intervals.)
(cl Thc cogt of hendling morr loadr ol materlalr. ll lot sizac arc srnallenough to rcqulra only onc load pcr fot both befgrc and after thechange, then a larger number of lotr wlfl rosult ln a larger totalnumber ol loads.
(d) The cost of performlng e larger numbcr of eetups to permlt runninga larger number ol batchcc, or lo'tr, ol rmaller 3lze. ldeatly, as partol the JIT lmpfementatlon, lotup cogt wlll be driven do*m to elimi-natc thlr problem.
(el The tmc and eftort that may bc rcqulrcd to Induce yendors toreducc thelr lead Umc by onc-tlrlrd.
Pt o€(1) (a) Raw and In Procasg 85O,OOO
AccOunts Payable ........o........................r.......r. 8so;oooA summary entry lor all receipts of raw materials during theperlod. When dlrect materlals aro used, no entry ls needed,because they rrmaln a psrt of RlP.
(bl Fastory Overhead Gontrol l3,oooSupplles ,..or....... 13,OOOlndirest materials ara rccorded as used.
Pa1rro11...........r.D....o..r...........D.rr..............o....o........
AcCru gd Payroll ................r...o.........r.....r.........
ACCru gd Payrott .o...................r..r.........................G a s h r . r o . . . . r . . . r . . . . r - . . . r . . . . r . . o o . r . . . . . . . . r . o . . a a . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
cost ol Goods sold -......r.r........oo............o...,,.,.....Factory overhead contro|.....D....o..,,,...................MarkeUng Erpenses Control ..................o.....o...o.Admlnlstrauvg Expensgg contro|,.o............o.,.,...
P81rO11...............ro.rr..,... 4OO,OOODirost labor ls crpenaed to thc cost of goods gold accounL
(e) Factory Overhead Gontrot......r........,.....t....,..r..,.. 6gi'OOOAccumulated DepreclaUon .,.....D..........,...r...... OggroooPrepald In9urance...............................o........,.. t3'OOO
(c)
(d)
4OO,OOO
4OO,OOO
6O,OOO120,OOOl3orooo
9OTOOO
4OO,OOO
4OO,OOO
\
rI
24)
PlO€ (Continuedl
(fl Factory Overhead Contro1.o,................,......'.
Chaptor l0
83,OOO54,OOO29,OOO
897,OOO
844,OOO844,OOO
CashAcCounts Payab1e................o....................
bl CoSt of Goods So1d.............. 897,OOOFaetory Overhead GontrolOverhead ls erpensed to the cost of goods sold account.
(hl Finlshed GoodsRaw and In Process......r..
To backflush material cost lrom RIP to finished goods. This is apostdedustion. The calculatlon ls:
Materlal in Juno 1 RIP balance '.'r.......r.. $ 4OTOOOMater ia l receiveddur ingJune.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . S5OrOOO
$89O,oOOMaterial In June 30 RIR per phyaical
COUl l t . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . .o . . . . . . . 46rOO0
Amounttobebackflushod... . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . S844.OOO
(il Gost of Goods So|d,...........,.............. '..r....,.. ' tt**Finishgd Good3.. . . . .oo.. . .o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . . t . . ' t 852IOOO
To backflush material cost from Finished Goods to Gost of GoodsSold. The calculation ls:
Material in June I Finished Goods.,r....o $ lgor0ooMaterial cost transferred trom RlP..'..... 844'OOO
slr034,OOOMaterial in June 3O finished goods, per
physical CoUtlt.....'r'......r.................'... I 82tOOO
Amount to be backflush€d '...... '.. '.......... 3 852'Ooo
0l Raw and in Procgs3...o... . . , . . .o..r. . . . .r. . . . . , . . . . . . . . . 3ooCost of Goods So1d...,,....r..t......'..r..r..r........... 2r7OO
Finishgd Goods.... . ' . . . . ! . . . . . . . . . .r. . .r. . . . .". . . . .r. . 3IOOO
Conversion costs In tho inventoly accounts are adiusted to theestimates made in ths June 3O physical counl For RIR the adiust-ment is from the $11600 of June I to $1r9OO on June 3Q forFinlshed Goods, the adiustment is from the $18O,OOO of Juno I to$177'OOOon June 3O. The offsetting entry is made to the cost ofgoods sold account, where all conversion costs were charged dur-ing June.
:v\_/
. 242 Chapter 10 . -
P1o-4 (Continued) . -
(gl Gost of Goods So1d..,.,.....,........... 656,000Factory Overhgad Control ....,...................... 656'000Overhead is expensed to the cost of goods sold account.
(hl Finished Goods........rt..........................r....,.... ' . 6t 5roooRaw and In Process................o.................... 615rooo
To backflush material cost from RIP to Finished Goods. This is apost-deduction. The calculation is:
Mater ia l in May 1 RIP ba1ance., . . . . . . . . . . . r . ,o. . $ SO,OOOMater ia l receiveddur ingMay.. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . 620rOOO
5650,000 !
Mater ia l in May 31 RIR per physical count 35,OOO
Amount to be backf lushed . . . . . . . . . . S615,OOO:
( i ) Cost of Goods So|d. . . . . . . 605,000Finished Goods.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . r . 605,000
To backllush material cost from Finished Goods to Cost of GoodsSold. The calculat ion is:
Mater ia l in May 1 Finished Goods.. . . . . . . . , , . . S15O,0OO r vMaterial cost transferred from RIP ........... 615,OOO
$765,O0OMater ia l in May 31 Finished Goods, Fer
physical count. . . . . 160,000Amount to be backf lushed.. . . . . . . . . $605,000
0) Raw and In Procgss.. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . r . . . . , . . . . . 800Finished Goods.. . . 4,OOO
Cost of Goods So|d. . . . . . . 4,8OO
Conversion costs in the inventory accounts are adjusted to theestimates made in the May 31 physical count. For BIR the adjust-ment is f rom the $1,30O of May 1 to $2,10O on May 31; forFinished Goods, the adjustment is from the S13O,OOO of May 1 toS134,OOO on May 31. The offsetting entry is made to the cost ofgoods sold account, where all conversion costs were changed iduring May.
24a
I
I
Chaptar l0
PlO-4 (Goncluded)
(21 The three completed accounts are
Raw and in Process Finished Goods5t1(al(r)5/31
3 l r3OO62O,OOO
80037,1OO
(h) 615,OOO 511 28O,OOO(h) 6i5,OOO0 4,OOO5/31 294,OOO
( i) 605,000
s 12.OO
s4.501 . O O
$5.50
$6.50r 2O,OOOs(l3O,000)
s (4O,OOO'6O,OO0
13,5OO14,OOO
120,000
Gost of Goods Sold511 -O-(d) 50,000(g) 656,000(i) 605,0005/31 1,306,200
Plo-5
(f ) Contribution margin of lost sales (2O,OOO units):Revenue ($1 O,gOO - 900 uni ts) . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .Variable costs:
Gost of sales (S4r050 + 9O0),.............................,....Marketing and administrative ($gOO - 9O0).,.,........
Total var iablg cost . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , , . . . . r . . . . . , . . . . . . . ,Uni t contr ibut ion margin. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . r . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,Volume of lost sales. . . , , .
Total contribution margin of lost sales,...,.....,........Overtime premiums (overtime cost is less than the.additional contribution margin of tost sales):
15,OOO x $6.50 = 597,500 > $4O,OOORgntal savings.. . , r . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . .Rental income from owned warehouse
(1 2,000 x .75 x S1.50) . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . , . . , . , . , . . . . . . , . . . . .Elimination of insurance and property taxesOpportunity cost of funds released from inventoryinvestment:
Investment in inventory
Interest belore tax i . tz '1
\ 1 - . 4 0 /
Estimated before-tax dollar savings
$6OO,OOO.20
I
I
II
t>
9_q2tr9_
v
Chapter tO . *
PIO-S (Goncluded) : -
l2l Conditions that should exist in order for a company to install just-in-timeinventory successfully include the following: -(al Top management must be committed and provide the necessary
leadership support in order to ensure a company-wide, coordinatedeffort.
(bl A deQiled system for integrating the sequential operations of themanufacturing process needs to be developed and implemented.Raw materials must arrive when needed for each subassembly, sothat the production pnocess tunctions smoothly.
(cl Accurate sales forecasts are needed for effective finished goodsplanning and production schedul ing. s
. (dl Products should be designed to use standardized parts to reducemanufacturing time and reduce costs,
(el Reliable vendors who can deliver quality raw materials on time withminimum lead t ime must be obtained.
I
L
I
I
!
CHAPTER 11
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
,l
b
Ol 1-'1. Yes, lo lhe exlent that il is practical to m€asurethe r,ralue added or the productivity of a worker.However, msasurement of lhe cootribution ofeach individual is never exacl. Also, a businesscannot pay more for materials or labor than thesales price will recover. Materials, workers, andmachines produce products and services.There must be a difference belween revenueirnd oosts consumed; othenrvise, lhe businesscannol sun/ive.
Otl-2. Productivity may be defined as the measure-menl of produclion performance using theexpenditure of hurnan elfort as a yardstick. ln abroader sense, it may be described as the etfi.ciency with which resourcas are converled intocornmodities ancVor services that people wanl.
Ql 1-3. Productivity is important to a lirm because highproductivity reduces the unit cost ol the outpuland makes ihe f i rm more compel i t ive. t t isimportant to workers because lheir real earn-ings should be increased when productivity ish igh. Product iv i ty is importanl to societybEcause increased productivity enables societyto gel moro and better oulput from the basicresources of lhe econorny.
Ql 1-4. To measure labor efficiency, it is necessary toeslabl ish a standard of per formance. Thismeans determining how much a worker shouldbe able to produce, or how much a worK cr6wshould be able lo produce. The standard isdelermined by time and motion study, lest runsby skilled workers, and averages oi past per-formance by skilled workers.
Q1 1-5. The purpose of an incentivs wage plan is toinduce a worker lo produce more, iesulting in ahigher wage and reduced conversion cosl oe,unit. Freguenily, machine outpul is l imited byworker performance. lt employee perlormancecan be increased, machine cost per unit of pro-duclion will decreasa. An incentive wage ptanmay atso reduce loaf ing, ind i f ference, andcarelessness, and may generate a cost.con-scious labor force.
Q l 1 -6 . Gene ra l l y , hou r l y ea rn ings go up w i thincreased production, and labor co.-st per unit oloutpul is reduced. High production rates alsoreduce overhead cosl per unit of output, which
_ is often the most significant savings.Ql 1-7. (a) During periods ol curfailejactivity, it is
iust as n€cessary to keep cosls down asi t i s when ope ra t i ng a l f u l l capac r t y ,Assuming that the incenlive wage planresul ted in grealer labor ef f ic iency anolower cosls per unit at full capacily, thanthe labor cost per unit should be lower ina slack period if the incentive wage scate
is conlinued, A shdrter workweek orsorne other syslem of sharing lhe workwouH be indicated.
(b) Ordinarity, it is not a propiliour tine to hi-tiato an hcentive wagr ptan wtren a phntis operating far below capacity, becausethe worker is already fearful d sornethingless than full employrnent. ll a ,eason-able day's work is being received for thegoing rate ol pay, po.stponement of the. incenlive plan is indicated. However,there is a nalural tendency for workers loreduce output durhg such perlgds, there-by increasing cosls, wilh a lendency lobring about further reduction in the vol-ume lhat can be soH. With luft e4plana-lion and underslandhg of thc situation,the incentive wage could be htroduced
- with a planl operating at 6006 capacity.O1 1-8. In the straight piecework plan, each worker is
paiC a certain amount for eadr unit produced,while being guaranteed a base hourly wage. lnthe 100% bonus plan, €ach workor L pai<J forthe standard time to cornplete the job or unils ifthe job or units are finished in slandard time orless. In the group bonus plan, workers in igroup are paid lheir standard hourly wage. lfthe group produces unils in oxc€ss of the stan-dard, lhe workers are paid for the time saved.
Q1 1-9. An organizational or gainsharing incentive planis designed to provide incentive pay to allemployees by way of an organization-wideplan thal rewards for improved productivity.
01 1-1O. The basic concepl underlying the relatbnshipinvolved in the cumulative average lime learn.ing curve modet is that every time the cumula.live quantity of unils produced is doubled, thecumuhlive averags lim€ per unil is reduced bya given pgrcentage.The learning curve lheory is used to solve.problems such as determining labor costs inbids for governmenl conlracls, determhing btcosts tor various slagos ol production runs,predicting labor-hour requirements, permittinglhe calculations of slandard labor cost varilances, assisting in lhe evalualion of a manag-er's performance, and providing a basis forcost control.
0 1 1 - 1 1 .
Q1 1-12. The f inancial accounting aspecl is concemedwilh a record of earnings of each employeea n d p a y m e n t o f t h e w o r k e r s . F i n a n c i a taccounting records income, FICA, and otherpayroll laxes and deductions wilhheld; proviCerlor disbursing lunds lo workers and to taxingand other agencies; reporls io each employeeal least annually the arriount ol wages eamed
245
246
and tho arnountl withheld for various PurP€'es; and recordg the payroll liability and pay'
ment each PaYroll PeriodThc cost accannting 8sP€cl is concemod with
time worked oo each Fb or h each cost conlet,in order to detetmine the labor houn and bborcosil ol Ptoduclion.
Ot1-13. tui eflbient labor force beghs with the designol the producl gnd en analysir of produclionteclrnQuce and i9b reguiremenls. Wi|h he per'sonnel department adeqtntely informed abouljob specifications, it is lhe lunclion ol thisdeportneot !o locura the pcrsanel qualilied lodo each iob. The produclion planning deparl'menl keeps the work llowing smoothly. Thstimekeeping, payroll, and cost accountingdepartments contribute to lhe lotal elficiency byaccounting for the time purchased and by rnak'ing payment lor the work as well as chargingthe cost to lhe proper dePartment and producl.
Q1 1-14. (a) Delermining labor hours worked by eachempbyee is prirnarity lor payroll PurPo3-es and linancial accounting,
(b) Determinatirn ol labot hourc consumedon each irb or h a department is a parto l cosl determinal ion for a job orpnocoss. lt shouH also be a measure oflabor efliciency, since hours consumedand productive output can be cornpared.
Ol 1-15. (a) The cbck card showg the amounl ol timean employee spenl in lhe plant €ach dayol a payroll period. lt is evidence that lheempbyee's time has been purchased.
(b) The time ticket shows tho amounl ol limean employee spends each daY on 6achicb or in each department. ll is an ilem'ized invoice ol the time thal the employ'ee selb to lhe empbyer.
01 1-16. Since the clock cards show the time employ'oes are h the pbnt, the lirst step is to makesure no error exists on the time tickets. lf thetotal time shown on the time tickets is cortecl,trren the workers speot time in the phnt whennol working or not assigned lo specific' jobs otdopartments, gr when assigned lo mainte-nance or repair work For the time thal is idle orassigned to indirect bbor, a chargo is made toFactory Overhead.
Chapter 11
01 1-17. Bar codes are symbols thal can be processedelectronically to identify numbers, letlers, orspecial characlers. Bar-coded empbyee idenlFlication cards or badges, and lask identilica-tbns can be used to replace clock cards andtime tickets to collect payroll data ard to mea'sure worker activitY.
Q1 1-18. Appendix One method would be lo charge thepremium costs directly to lho Prod'usts in thc same rtra rne, as straighl'l ime labor cosls . This would beaPproPr iate when Part icu lar iobshave to be rushed to ccnPlelbn. Asecmd method woub be to tr€at theptgmium as an ovefiead elem€nt lobe ctrarged to all ptoduclirxt throughthe allocation ol overhead. lt wouldbe appropriate when lho ovatlim€ isa recurring condilion normally inci'dsnt to the level of oPeratiens'
011-19. AppendixThe bonus and vacation pay shouldbe accrued ovet the benefited timeperiod. When the bonus and vaca-tinn pay are pairJ, the accrued liabililyaccount is debited and the cash andwithholding accounls are crediled.
Ol 1-20. AppendixThe recornmended method in com'puting costs under a pension plan isto detemine aciuariatly lhe eventualpension paymenls lo covered empkry'ees and to cfrarge these luture pay'menls as a cost gt curt€nt productionover the exPected geriod of acliveservice of covered employees' Costsbased on Past services should bewr i t len o l l over some reasonableperiod on a systematic and rationalbasis that doos not distorl the operat'ing results of anY one Year. Thesecosts are incurred in contemplationof lhe presenl and luture seryices nolonly of the individual employee' bulalso ol lhe organi:ation as a whole'Bene f i t s o l t he P lan -such asimproved morale. removal of super'annuated employees' and attractionof more desi rable Personnel-areexPecled lo imProve the oPeratingetficiencY of a comPanY.
I
217Chapts ll
El 1 -1
EXERGISES
ORANGE CITY CA"I{NING COMPANYt^abor Schedule for Terry Paco
For First Week in June
Units producod a r a a . a a a a a o a a r a . a . a a a a . . . a r . a r
4 01,32O1r2OA110o/o
S99396
s9.90s.30
E11-2
(11 Tuesday Wednesday
Hours x hourly ratg............Unlts above standard.H ou rs saved............r..........Value of tlme gavgd....o...o..SOoh of value of Ume savedEarninga ............................
U9"d"y$64.00
os64.OO
t o.50
s 4.OO$ 3.20s67.20
s64.OOl 5
.75$ 6.00s 4.80$68.80 s200.oos64.OO
(21 Efficiency ratio: lo7,50h
Earnings: 1O7.soh r $8 hourly rate r 4O hours = $344
(31 Earnings: ($8 hourly rate + 5Yc rate increase) r 24 hours =S8.4O x 24 hours s $2O1.EO
860- =800
!
II
Chapter 11248
t oe 5; !: qo E )
8 gE{ tE TE :E ss 3E g. L= oo bE O
r 3S FE r r
$ g3 egtEtg cDr t co !E ! to oO L> 5' 6 9
E Eg.E: t r oe f -E t r +o 9 u ).g t r rO(, tt, -:g€g' E r9; t tu i O O< ' 3
EEI i;gnFl
rfrI ;EFH3lo r { ) o o o l ol r F t f g ) r \ l
a a a a
t o r t @ t r q , t r '
o
s Eo
O r- tll \r n @ o N ot
N 6 l J d o i ' { i d c . if i t
F F F F ' .
\ t O @ O (1, lF l lN O r t @ ( ' l o ) t lq r \ ' o N G ' l c o l l
- l q I
r = N N N l o l l
I t O q , g g l l F l lN O I r CO ( , lo | l lo N o l ' F l N l l
- t d l
N I O c l r \ ( o l C ) l lF F F r - l @ l l
o o o o o l o lo o o o o t o lo c , o N \ t l \ t l
- l - l
o ! t o l o t r l @ lF r F r r l F l
- < l r O C {0 ) C O O f - f r lF 1 C { $ l r -
a tg ) g , ( ' , ( ' ) g ,I
F r - O Nc o N n N @q q e q qN C \ l p p r{,
! t f i , o o oo | o n s r r o( Y , N N N N
a a t a at - F ? . r F Fg,
o o o o oo o o o u ,d d u i u t F :O O v . N Oo ( o ( o ( o ( o{,
o o oo o g ,
o o u i u i r " ir ( Y G l
{,
o o o o oo o o o oo a o ( o ( o ( o{,
E e l. j J i @ € € @ @
€ f l t r t c * ' r i t ! c
. bl 9 q s
.3 EE5!tGIc ' € . tZ t t a - *
T ' C l v L
6 ( ) q 3
o
s g i g
oo[)(,xur
t'Ft:B gl3 o 5 l
i o l
FFut E ro l
E slt E l
L Ig '
E ! l
E;Io ; l
s ir ;I
>l(0 lo l
? l
,.l( E l" l
(!,I
ul
E . E , ^ E It e # 3 l q u ? q q qE = s ; i g l s 3 6t r , = d l
o r o N o ot r l F Q O r\ t \ t c l o t o
(!
. > E ef f ; ! E e Y: o x = E F
; F ; F E i l
!o $
. i :! ! t- r P
o.
C\|
o <t o @ c{t ottlc o r - o - - l S l lG
Et$rs sE F } F T
lglrfrrllfl
r t r t G ' O Oo o o o l |
a a a o
r F O ? G |q ( , t t t o l o
6
t r ot 3o ct r oi r 0
II
I
I
ChWtar ll
Ell\5 19A productivity ratio =' 194 standard hours for work done *19A total actuar dirsct and Indirect rabor hours =943,823 + | $251324 = .422089
Hours needed for i 98 production at l gA productivity ratio =198 standard hours for work done -r i 9A productivity ratio =558t51o + t422o89 ..r.rr.........o.....r.r....o.....o...............................Less l9B total actual direct and indirect labor hourt,...,....:.-,Hours savgd ............-...o...........r...........r..r...r.r.......
Value of wages saved = hours saved r lgBsvoriage hourly pay plus labor fringe benefits =38,221 r $i4.7O = $561,949
Employee gainsharing incentive totaf =vafue of wages saved r 5OZo =S561,849 x SOoh = $28O,g24.5O
Gainsharing incentive per employee =total gainsharing incentive r- numberof eligible employees =$28Or924.5O + 755 employees = $?Z2.Og
219
1132312041r2g4rgg3
38'227
Ef l-6 I batch ...r. . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . t . , . . . . . . . . . . . . .o... . . . . . . . $60rooo2 batches..........,...,...........,.............,..,.,, $lgroOO lgo% of $6Oroogf4 batchgs..o.r.......................r.r................ Sggrcoo igorh or Scgroooi8 batches....................,..........r...,.r.......,. $gorzzo iaoy" or $grcooi16 batches............r.,..........,........r............ $zorszg igow of $3or72o)
E11-7Cumulative Average
Required Weeks per Bridge1 0 0BO (1OO weeks r 8O%l64 (8O weeks r 8O%f57.2 (64 weeks x 8O%)
7 additional bridges must be buitt in order to bring the cumulative BVB'-age below 52 weeks.
BridgeNumber x
I24I
I
YI
I
Chapter | 1
E l l - 8
(f l The schedule below demonstrates the 8O7o learning curve that the com-pany expects to experienco in producing the time devices:
CumulativeLots x
CumulativeAverage
Time =9O.OO hours72.OO57.6046.08
CumulativeTime
9O.OO hours144.OO230.40368.64
I248
At an SOoh learning factor, the cumulative time to produce 8 lotsshould be 368.64 hours. At a standard labor rate of $9 per direct
' tabor hour, the standard amount for total direct labor cost should beset at $3,317.76 (368.64 x S9).
l2l The company shoutd estabtish the standard for direct labor time equal tothe marginal direct labor time required to produce the eighth lot' provid-ing steady-state production occurc after the eighth lot. To assure thatthis standard time will be accurate, the company should:(al Keep accurate records through the first I tots to determine if an
EOoh learning factor is experienced.(bl Continue to keep accurate records for each successive production
lot to provide a basis for:1. Conformance to expectations about labor time (i.e.' steadystate production after 8 lots)' or2. Determining when steady-state production does occur.
E1 1-9 APPENDIX
(1) Overtime premium charged to production worked on during the overtimehours:
Work in ProcgsS...,......,.....,..............,,.......,.................Payroll (4O hours x $91 + (1O hours x 1.5 x $9)..,,..,.
(21 Overtime premium charged to factory overhead:
Work in Process (5O hours x $91........,....,..,......o.........Factory Overhead Control (1O hours x.5 x S9)...........
Payroll.... .........,.....
495
45045
495
495
II
I
I
IChagter ll
E1 1-1 O APPENDIX
SubsidiaryRecord
Factory Ovgrhead Controt.........,.................Bonus Pg1|... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l34.4OtVaCatiOn P8f.......r........r...r.............o.... G7.ZOz
Liability for 8onus..........r............r,........r.Liability for Vacation Pay .....o.r..........;.....
" (9lO + g32l x 40 hours r 4 weeks = S6'Z20 + 5O weeks2 ($fO + $32) x 4O hours x 2 weeks = g?,36O + 5O weeks
EI 1.' 1 APPENDIXFactory Overhead Controt lgeS,OOo x 2gTo1...,....Marketing Expenses Gontrol (SgrOOO x Zg;/o1......AdministraUve Erpenses Control ($7,ooo x 2a./"1
Liability for Pensions (S5OTOOO r T.go/o1..,...,,-Liability for Other postretirement Benefits
($5o, ooo x 2.3o/o1.....r.r.,,...r......,......Ff CA Tax Payab le (95 0,O0 O r T .S%1..........,...Federal Unemployment Tax payable
($50, ooO x .g/ol ....r,....r.......r.....................State Unemployment Tar payable
($SO, OOO x 4.6Tol ...,..........ro...............,.....,Workerst Compensation Insurance payable
($5o,ooo r l%1.,.,. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . .Medical Insurance payable ($SO,OOO x 4%1..
GGA-Canada (Adapted). Reprint
El 1.12 APPENDIX
t l ) The entry to record the payroll liabilitpPayrol l . . . t . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26r7OO.OO
Employees Federal Income Tar payable ..........Employees State Income Tax payaL|o.......,......Employees City Wage Tax payable .......,.,...,,....l lCA Tax Payab18....................,.....Accrued Payroll !.,...,,......
25r
l-
b
Dr. Cr.201.60
134.4067.20
= 5134.4O= 67.20
9,8OO2124O1 , 9 6 0
3rgo0
1 , 1 5 03,750
400
2r3OO
5002,OOO
with permission.
2,5OO.OO500.oo267.OO
2rOA2.5O21,430.50
(21 The entry to distribute the payroll:Work in Process,....................,......,..,,........fac-tory Overhead Control ..,............Marketing Erpenses Control ............................r...Admin istrative Expenses Control .............,....,..,...
Payroll
l
18,OOO.OO3,OOO.OO4r2OO.OO1,5OO.OO
l-26,7OO.OO
_\
252
E1 1-12 APPENOfi (Concluded)
(31 The entry to record the employer's payroll taxes:
Factory Ovgrhgad Gontrol .................... '...........--..Markgting EXpenSgS COntrOl ........'.......................Administrative Expenses Control ............or'..........
FICA TaI Payab19.... . . . . ' . .r . . . . . . 'o. ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . .' State Udemptoyment Tax Payab|g...............,..,.Federal Unemployment Tax Payabl€....'.".........
2,394,OO478.801 7 1 . 0 0
Chagter | 1
2,O02.5O854.40186.90
IL
I
LII
II
!
ChWter tt
Pr l -1
(fl Present cost
Direct labor per hour
PROBLEMS
$101 2
$22 -r 5 units per hour =$4.4O conversion cost perunit
253
Convcnbn Calpcr Unlt
tlI
!
Factory overhead per dirrct labor hour...
PcrWorkcr por 8-Hour Deyunltrlrromblcd Plccowort Dlrcct Fectory Totaf convcrzlonpcr &Hour Day Rrt Labor Ovcrhead Coot
( t )
Boguhr Worksoot
EmployoeHourtyRrtr
Clrnct D--...- !O.OO rl,,ukon, T.--..- B.OO r&hott, J...-..... I.0O r
3 80.oo rs9s.oo05,40 eo.00
110.00 06.0012650 00.00144.00 03.00
Totrl dlnct lebor -
lncrndyo lflagr Plan
Boe PayIncrntlvr Pay
(Unltr Producrd r(Boo Frtr r Wort Hourr) + InconUvo prrmlum) r
10 szoo4ft 2.1250 z.2o55 e.3o80 z4o
3176.00101,4020s.00222.50240.00
Sf.4o1.81.12.3.05a.oo
(21 lf a producuon rate above 4o units per employeo per g-hour day isnoasonably attainable by the worksr, the employeo oarnings wili increaseunder the plecework proposal, Since convercion cost per-unit decreaseswith increased output, management should favor the iieceworkproposal.
P11-2b
TotrlWorl- l'borWork Cort
4O hn, E 32a0,3O h.!. r 320aO hrr e 280
lc.go r 4o hn = 't.to5.5O r 4O hn - 2t2O4.5O r 4O hn = 18O
TotrlLrborCoel
Totrl dnct hbor._._._. _t&ao
flrclt - t8.fo r llog hbor oori Incroor
lO5 r $t ,OO= 3to!t t OO5iO5 r l.OO = t0tt 3S!t105 r l.0O = t0tl O45
tl,ql5
Proot: #*
= 2g.2% trborcort Incro'r
b
254 Chaptor | | '
Pl1-2(Gonctudedl
l2l To assess properly the effectiveness of the new plan, it is nocessary toanallze lts eftect on convorslon costs and not just on direct labor costs.Although dlrect labor cost per unit may rise, this Increase may be morothan offset by distributlng the overhead over a larger Yolume.
A comparison ol the two pay plans and their effects on convsrsion costper unit shows:
Totrl lrbor Tctrl Totrl Unltbbor Cort Frctory Ovorlrerd Convotrlon CorwonlonCort prr Ur*t orrorhod por Unlt Cott Cott
tncsntlvc wagc plan tl,o35 tA.Zt tlr2Oo J|ZZ t2,235 $1355rStnfght hourly ratc 84O 5,OO IJIOO 8.OO 2,O4O 13.002
Dtflcrcncc t .o7 l.El 9_1.09) nctdecrearc
152 ,235+165=$13 .552 $2,O4O + 150 = $i3.OO
The decreaso In conversion cost is minimat; however, the fact that cus-tomels can be s€ryed sooner might be worth additional labor cost.Based on learning curyo theory the productivity of the worker mightincrease sufficiently to reach a more satisfactory output and cost level.
Chapter 11
I
tI
L255
. , I + , l
s !6 i ; E E q qsisl 5 q q q i€ E r l E t t P Ig € s l 3 3 3 3 SN E
, ' , 8
E F g l e E ' n o oFEFI g F E i f iE $ l I q E$t l S ' r t I
II
L
!
$gil ; 5 E E g9 9 9 o oq q q i 69 9 l r @ c , iu r ] \ q , c ,g
Eat
P
otOst
o $ l| ! t r l" .ilF 8lgsl: 9F O
E fir (\l
$ s@ = o
u _Er* 6 l oE j t 6 I I I IE E I F t . - Fu , d r
t t l, ^ o l
E ; l 3 I p s I: l E l F ? d l
G r F
l >>l g .E 6 rl^ sl E E fi s s
s ! t E F ; F E
@ @ q ,iit \t tfg "
oo-,r!ccIr-o! 1O Io lo lo . I
r , o o oh o og d P
gE Ftu ) o o\ q q
F N
eE9ltr,t gl
l i i g o o , o o
5l ., o .,t t
? r
€ i g i e R gs e # l.f gl $ NEgl 5 N s s s
t t l
.e El o.E€t \ ' I p I I= 6 l
F t ' F F Nl - lr i i l
l >! e,i € f i E il: A d l 5 e H 5 dn = , t E P I F E
5;l ;q r @
-1
256
Pl l-3 (ConcludeUf
Hours worked
Chaptar l1
. a a a r a a a a a a a a 40855800
Units producedStandard produgtion (20 units x 4O hours|..-..............Efficiency ratlo (855 + SOOIBase wage per hourBase wage plus bonus (1.O6875 r $91 ...............o.....,..Wggkly earnings ($9.9t975 r 4o hou1s1........r.............Unit cost ($384.75 + 855 unltsl ..or.......t.....r....,....,r.o...
1.06875$9.0o
$9.91975$384.75
$.45
(_
Clpptor l1!
257
g'ilglcr o i IA - - I
i i s$! iq f in$r,3 iE "l'
- o i I
iEfFl fiFFEFt i i { l ; . .EE
;eE^lEs$gl sesss5 i!
tl$ n 6r c! '!
€g;FsF"
i El"*=*=* "
si;l "
sil tFF$s
r : c ! t F S E igsrgli EsfE sl gfiggH5 i i ' i - 5 - E ! = 1 "
l r O r . O U t@ N O t o NO u ) N ( \ | @N N N N N
a a a a
o
E E I B s s s sE $ l g B d d d
NoF
g;l '
! r o 63 s Eo s E: 5 €&l r- r-c t o SJ e g
grliS;$3ifl$; $;l;; $l'
EgE3E33
o o l 'O N NN N N
b s'rg e sleE g l
'lgggFsu l
r 8 l o= : 1 55 F l - -
_ l
G I
l : l3 x l 3
g = i r A
t
r l g i l i .-' gEJEF
o o 6 | ON ( '
: -El€ E l g5 3 l 'o i l
F$ lg33Es
I> !t
I
G g
- i
2fi
P 1 1 - 5Straight Piecework
Units produced-regular tlmePiecework ratePigCgWOfk p3!r. . . . . . .r .o.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . . . . t . .r . . . . t . . t . . . .
Downtimo PaY
Chapter | 1
Dodd Hare Lowo
400 410 370$ .66 $ .66 I .O6
$264.00 $270.eo 9244.2030.oo o 24'OO
o 54.OO r 36'00
s294.OO $aZc,oo $304.20284.OO 277.2A 302.20
$ IO.OO $ 47.40 $ 2.99: = - z :
Ober RuPP
a a a a a t a a a a a a a a a a
OVgftime p8!....r...........r....r....rr........r...r........o...........
Total l \ r3$lB3 . . . . . . . t t t " """ t t " " to""" ' r t t t " " t t " "" t " ' t t t " "" '
WaggS por bookst t" t t t " t t t " " t t t " " r t " t t " ' r " to"" t t " t " """ '
U n d efp aym OJ1t...............r......r..... i ....o.r.. r.....o...........r..
t6.r $6 x 15ooh = $54
Percentage Bonus Plan
UnitS pfOdUCgd,o..r . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' r . . . . ' . . . . . ' r . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . " '
Standafd pfOdUCtiOtl................ '..o...... '.......o......r..............
Eff iCignCy fat iO.o... . . ,o.r. . . .rr . . . . . . . . . . .r ' . . . . . .r . . . .r . .r . . .r . . . . . . . t . ." ' r '
RegUla f Wa993. . . . . . . r .o . . . . . . . . . .D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . r . . r . . . t . . . . t r . . . . t " '
8OnUS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .oo . . . r . . . r . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . r . r . . . . . . . r . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . " "
TOtal wageS .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t""t tr t t" t""t ' t t ' t""t"t t""""t"o
WageS pef bOOkS . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . . r . . r .o . . . . . . . . . r . .o . r . . . . r . . . t . .
UndefpaymO; .1 t . . . . . . r . . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ro . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . .
r25oh pnemium x $24O regular wage = $60or S6.00 hourly rate
x .25 pnemium
51.5O bonus pay
S1,5O x 4O hours = $60
250200125o/o
s240.oo60.oo1
$3OO.OO280.OO
1 8 0200
goohS2oo.oo
o$2oo.oo
l 7 1 . O O
$ 20.oo s 29.OO=: ::z:
I
I
I
E
Chaptar 11
Pl l-5 (Concluded)
Em erson Effi cien ca System
Unitg produced..t.........r..Standard productionEfficigncy ratio..........BOnUS li l l t8 .......r..,.,....r...............
Rggular wago.r...or............r..........,......r..................r...Bon us'uraff o ...............r.r......r.....r.r...r...................r.r...Downtime pay (2 houra x 35.60}.Total wages ............,.....
b Wages por books........r........,.,
I
b Suggs Ward
259
5905701103.5%
450hs2l2.go3
95.7611.20
240300
80o/o20o/o
5224,oo2$ 44.90
a a t a o a a a a a a a a a a a r a a a a a s268,8O S319.76233.20 2go.o0
:----$ 35.60 $ sg.zoUn d erp aym (!Dt....r..rr".........r........,.r.r.....r.r...... i ..........
t6OO units (standard production for 4O hours ) = 15 units per hour
15 units per hour r 38 productive hours = 57O units (standard production for 3ghours)
z4O hours x $5.60 = $Z24,OOs38 hours x $5.60 = S2i2.gO
P 1 1 - 6
(1 ) Hours worked (5 workers r 4O hours)................,,.r...,,.........,...Regular wage (2OO hours r $61.........,..........Units produced.. . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . .D.. . . . . , . . r . . . . . . r . . . . r . . . r . . . .B o n u s " " t ' o t ' r t a D t a a a a . a a a a a t a a a a r a a . a a a a . a r r a a a a a a a a a a . . a a a a o a a a a r a a r r . . . . . a a . a a a a a a o r . a .
we-ekly garnings.o....r......rr........r...................,...........,..o.......r...
unit labor cost Gtl1252 + 452),.. . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . , . . .o... . . . . .o..r. . . . , . .Unit factory overhead ($f r4O6 * 452).............r..r..,...,...o.r..,.r..,Unit convgrsion coSt... . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. .r. . . . . .rr. . . . . . .r. . . . .r. .r. . . . . . .r. .
t452 unlts produced4OO units standard
_52 units above standard52 units x $i workersr share = $S2 bonus
200s1,2OO
45.2s52 r
$i,252$2.7699$.?.0973$5.8672
b
l-
b
II
Chaptor | |
P11-6 (Concluded)
t 4Oo units per 40 hours = 10 units per hour1O units per hour + 5 workerc = 2 units per hour72 units produced + 2 units per hour = 36 hours standard time
z lf the group bonus is computed for the week, rather than daily' the bonuswould be 36 x 2o hours saved, or $156. Then, $1,356 + 432 units = $3 unitlabor cost. Overhead cost would be S1,4OO + 452 units, or 9?.O973 per unit.
P11-7
( 1 ) THOMAS INC.Quarterly Bonus Allotment
At End of March
Unltl-...'......-..Standard hounfor unltt.--..-..Actual houn..-Bonurr to rhoun ttvcd..-Total carnlngr.Unit labor cort.Unlt factoryovgrhcad ,....,.{Unlt convcnioncoat ,............,.-
72
3 6 1. , 4
3zlo333333
*r.8e8e
glzaul
8t
nrn&
3 s32'tilSr.oooo
33.45A8
toJ508
95
171t210
t r s328!t33,0000
32.94�71
35.947a
102
5tao
f 0 63sooir.oooo
327451
35.74tn
102
5 l40
f o o330033.OOOO
3Z74nl
35.74tt1
152
22A200
3 t 8 o 231,380$3.Os31
33.0073
30.1504
EmployeesParticipating
1 Works managgr....r......2 Produstion engineers.,5 Shop supervisot'tg.........1 Storgkgopor.,.,..,....r...,.5 Factory office clerks ...l5O Factoty workefs ......
PointsAllowed for
Each Employee250200200loo
1 020
Sharaper Points3.125r
3.7253.1253.1253.7253.125
TotalShare
s 781.251,25O,003,125.0O
312.50156.25
9,375.0O
9!9'o99.09
TotalPoints
250400
l ,0oo10050
3,O0O4,8OO
ra27O,OOO24O,OOO
3O,OOO
3O,OOOs15 ,OOO
units actual productionunits normal production
units excess ovor normal
u n i t s r $ 5 O = $ 1 5 , O o O+ 4,8OO points = 33.125 qer point
f' l
I
Chapter | 1
P l 1 - 8
(r lGumulative -Cumulative
Number Number of Units Cumulativeof Lots (Lot Size = 50) Average Time Per Unit Cumulative Time
50 4.0000lo0 3.6000 (4.oooo x.9l 360.00 (3.6000 x 1oo)2OO 3.24OO (3.60OO x .9! 648.00 (3.24OO x 2OO)4OO 2.9160 (3.240O x.9l 1 '166.40 (2.9f 6O r 4OO)8OO 2.6244 (2.916O x .9) 2rO99.52 12.6244 x 8OO)
Time in Hours
I24I
1 6
DireCt tabOr hOUrS reqUired tO prOdUCe the firSt 8OO UnitS r..,............... 2tO99.52
Direct labor hours required to produce the f irst 2OO units .. . . . . . ' . . . .o' . . . . , 648.00
DireCt fabOr hoUrS feqUired tO prOduCe the next Ordet' . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11457.52:Numbgr of units in thg ngxt ordgt' . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . .r. . . . . .o... --- 600
Direct labor hOUrs per unit for the next order (1'451 .52 + 600) . ' . . . . . . . . . . 2.4192
Catonic Part Number PGB-31Unit Costs and Prices for Rex Engineering Company
EstimatesIncorporating
a 9ooh LearningGurve
Materials S18O.OOLabor and employee benef i ts (2,419 x $20). , , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . , 48.38Variablo overhead (5O% of labor) , . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.19
Total variabtg coSt.,.......r,..r.... i ................,,..,.... ' ..r...... 5252-5|�Fixgd ovgrhead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . ' . . . . r . . . . r 4O.0O
Fult cost. .....!........ SZSZ.SZProfit contribution (1 Ooh of full cost) .,...........,...,.... . 29.26
Estimated contract price...........,.,. S321.83
l2l The implications of an 80% learning curve as opposed to a gOoh learningcurye are:(a) An 80% learning cunre indicates a greater effect of experience on
efficiency.
(b) Most of the increase in efficiency (decrease in time and cost perunit) due to an SOoh learning curve occurs early in the productionrun; thus, saturat ion in learning is achieved ear l ier wi th an AOohlearning cun e.
f' l
I
Chapter | 1
P l 1 - 8
(r lGumulative -Cumulative
Number Number of Units Cumulativeof Lots (Lot Size = 50) Average Time Per Unit Cumulative Time
50 4.0000lo0 3.6000 (4.oooo x.9l 360.00 (3.6000 x 1oo)2OO 3.24OO (3.60OO x .9! 648.00 (3.24OO x 2OO)4OO 2.9160 (3.240O x.9l 1 '166.40 (2.9f 6O r 4OO)8OO 2.6244 (2.916O x .9) 2rO99.52 12.6244 x 8OO)
Time in Hours
I24I
1 6
DireCt tabOr hOUrS reqUired tO prOdUCe the firSt 8OO UnitS r..,............... 2tO99.52
Direct labor hours required to produce the f irst 2OO units .. . . . . . ' . . . .o' . . . . , 648.00
DireCt fabOr hoUrS feqUired tO prOduCe the next Ordet' . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11457.52:Numbgr of units in thg ngxt ordgt' . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . .r. . . . . .o... --- 600
Direct labor hOUrs per unit for the next order (1'451 .52 + 600) . ' . . . . . . . . . . 2.4192
Catonic Part Number PGB-31Unit Costs and Prices for Rex Engineering Company
EstimatesIncorporating
a 9ooh LearningGurve
Materials S18O.OOLabor and employee benef i ts (2,419 x $20). , , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . , 48.38Variablo overhead (5O% of labor) , . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.19
Total variabtg coSt.,.......r,..r.... i ................,,..,.... ' ..r...... 5252-5|�Fixgd ovgrhead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . ' . . . . r . . . . r 4O.0O
Fult cost. .....!........ SZSZ.SZProfit contribution (1 Ooh of full cost) .,...........,...,.... . 29.26
Estimated contract price...........,.,. S321.83
l2l The implications of an 80% learning curve as opposed to a gOoh learningcurye are:(a) An 80% learning cunre indicates a greater effect of experience on
efficiency.
(b) Most of the increase in efficiency (decrease in time and cost perunit) due to an SOoh learning curve occurs early in the productionrun; thus, saturat ion in learning is achieved ear l ier wi th an AOohlearning cun e.
I
I
i
Chapter | 1
P11-a (Goncluded)
(31 '
The degree of tearning that takes place in an industrial operation wouldbe reduced by(al a low proportion of assembly labor to machine labor;(bl an operation ol low complerity;(cl high employoe turnoveq(dl tedium;(el poor working conditions.
Pl 1-9 APPENDIX
(11 Charge to work-in-pnocoss:Normal working houns = 40 houra r 2 = 80 hoursLetX=over t imehours
X =s r , r 4 o - ( 8 o r $ r 2 )
( $ l z r r . 5 )X = 10 hours
Therefore, charge to work in process = gO r $lZ = $l,OgOl2l Factory overhead charge for Emptoyee tloTl:
Gompany benefits paid by employer....,, $273.20Overtimg premium t............oo.................. 6O.O!t ($trf 40 _ Slrogol
s."9€9(31 The cost of idleness should be charged to the departmentaf factory over-
head account
PI I.I O APPENDIX
(l) Apr. 7 Payroll,..,.......... ........,....r.Accrugd Payro|1......r.....r...rr..................r.Employees lncome Tar payable (9.5olo)..FICA Tar payable (2.5|.,.....,....r..r,..,........
14 Payro11........................,..r....,.........Accrugd Pa1rclt.'..........r...............r......,..Employees Income Tar payabfe ..,....,...,.FICA Tar payable ..,...,.......,.....,..,....,,.....
5,8gO.OO
21 Payrol l . . . . . .o...r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . t . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r srgoo.ooAccrugd Pa1ro11.... . .r. . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . 4rggZ.OOEmployees Income Tar payabts... . . . . . . . . . . 560.50FlcA Tar payabto .............:..................... 44z.so
2A Payro!| .......r.......r........,..r. ...r.....,. 4rggo.ooAccnred payroll.... ,................... 4,O5O.4OEmployees lnco^me Tar payabfo.............
463.60FlcA Tar payable .............:..................... 366.00
4,92O.OO
4,888.70559.55441.75
4r083.6O467.4A36g.OO
I
l-
264
Pl l-1 O APPENDD( (Goncluded|
t2l
Apr. 5189O4rg205,9OO4188O2164(,24.23O
Chapter l1
Dr. Cr.Apa 3O Work In Procgss ..r........r..............o.....
Factory Overhgad Gontrcl'...,....'.......lndirgct Labor .'.......r.........'.....
Payro|1 tt...............................t........
Apa 30 Factory Ovgrhgad Gontrol .................FlcA TaxlS22rOOO r 7.5o/o1.,....Federal Unemploymont Tax
($22rOOO x'8oh1.....................State Unemployment Tar
($2Zr OOO x 4oh1...,..................Vacation Pay l922rOOO x 8o/o1..
FICA Tax Payab19 "..................r.....Federal Unemployment Tar PayableState Unemployment Tar PayableLiability for Vacation Pay.......,......
Payroll
SubsidiaryRecord
5,6OO
16,4005,6OO
4r4eB
22rOOO
1,65O176880
1,760
(31
1r650
17f,
8801,760
Accnred Payroll
I7
1 42128
Apr. I30
71 4212830
2r23O Apa22rOAO24J,sO
Mar.31 Bal.2,23O.OOApr. 7 4r888,7O
14 4,083.6021 4r897.OO2A 4'O5O.4O30 2,04O.0O
2e�789.742,840.OO
2,6402,640
2r23O.OO4r888.7O4,O83.604r897,OO4,O5O.4O20,149.7O
I
I
I
b
I
b
Chapter 11 265
CASESI
c t 1 - l
(1) Arguments used by each proponent:
(a) 1,00O-pieces-per-hour-rate:{1} Studies show that machines can be operated at this rate.(21 Variances determined by this output rate will measure the inef-'' fective use of the machines.(3) This rate can be a target level to be strived for, and the chang-ing variances will show pnogness toward this ta4get.(4) A goal of this natute will motivate the supervisor, and therebythe workers, to reach this rate of output.
(b) 750-pieces-per-hour-rate;(1) This rate of output has been attained by some workers.(21 The IroOo-pieces-per-hour rate has not been attained, nor hasany rate near to it been attained.(3) The 6oo-pieces-per-hour rate is an average of actual perfor-mance and does not represent good economical performance.(4) The standard cost should reflect production rates that can beattained when good economical performance occurs. The 75O-pieces-per-hour rate, capable of being achieved by some workers,would seem to be such a per{ormance.
. (5) The variances would measune the extent by which this economi-cal levef has been exceeded or the extent to which it has not beenmet.(6) lt should provide motivation for the supervisor to improve on the60o-pieces-per-hour cunent rate and in turn motivate the employ-ees to improve their performance.
(c) 6OO-pieces-per-hourrate:(1) This rate has been achieved by the departments as a whole. Thestandard costs should be set to reflect the ability of the wholedepartment.l2l The variances from standard cost based upon the 6Oo-pieces-per-hour rate would measure the departures, favorabte and unfavor-able, from the current effective level of operations.(31 For two thirds of the workers, the 75O-pieces-per-hour ratewould be dlfficult lo attain and would tend to frustrate them, thusmaking even the present 6oo-pieces-per-hour rate difficutt to main-tain. For all workens, the 1r0Oo-pieces-per-hour rate could not beattained' thus lowering the morale of the department and probablylowering output below current levels.(4) The 6oo-pieces-per-hour-rate, when passed down to the pro-duction worker, wourd be an appropriate goal for those threeemployees who are producing fewer than 6oo pieces per hour.
I
!
E
!
t
E .
b
266 Chapter | |
C11-1 (Concluded)
l2l The purpose of standard costs and standard cost reporting is to measurethe performance of a department against a level of cost incurrence thatnepnesents attainable good economical performance. The variances indi-cate the periods when the performance varied (favorably or unfavorably)from this acceptable level.To be used effectively, the rate to motivate the supervisor and, thereby,
the worker,s to improve performance would depend upon the perceptionsas to what is attainable. lt would also depend upon the reward structureswithin the firm. Other variables would also affect what output rate wouldmotivate improved performances.The value picked (e,9., ir00o, T5o, or 600) must be a compromise
between the level that witt have the most effective motivational resultand that which will be an effective representation of the costs when thedepartment is operating at an acceptabte economicaf level. The 1,OOO-pieces-per-hour rate should be reiected because it does not provide thebasis for a measure of an acceptable cost tevel. lt woutd also be of ques-tionable value from a motivational point of view, because it appears to beunattainable by the production workers.The 75o-pieces-per-hour rate is a possible choice. lt is capabte of being
achieved by some workers and as such may provide motivation to thesupervisor to bring other workers up to that level, thus achieving adepartmental output of 750 pieces per hour. tt also may represent theappropriate basis for a standard cost because it is a possible acceptablelevel of performance. tt may also be a suitable departmental targetestablished in connection with the introduction of the standard cost sys-tem.The 6oO-pieces-per-hour rate is also a possibte candidate. The Punch
Press Department has achieved this tevef, and three of the six employeeshave been able to achieve it. lt is, however, the current level of ouiputand that may make it ineffective in motivating the department and itsworkers to improve the level of output. As the basis for standard costs, itcoufd represent an acceptable level of output; but it does not incorporatethe possible improvement tikely to be obtained in connection with anintroduction of a cost system.The 75o-pieces-per-hour rate seems to be the best choice of the three
alternatives. More information about the conditions under which theengineering studies were done, the training and experience of the work-ers' and the trend of worker and department output in recent periodswould be necessary before the number could bs chosen with someassurance that it would meet the stated objectives.
;I
II
S
Ib
Chapter 11 267
c11 -2(1) ' An advantage of the new payroll incentive plan is that it recognizes a
problem' which should improve employee motivation. Action taken bymanagement will be perceived as a positive effort to resotve a problem,and employees may feel more a part of the group and behave as teammembers.
Some disadvantages, which could lower employee motivation, are thatemployees' f i les are open to scrutiny by peers, and that employees mayfeel that they have to be a part of the "in grouptt to be assured-recogni-tion for wage increases. The plan could degenerate into a popularity con-test.
some advantages that should improve employee productivity are theincentives the plan provides for employees to perform effici lnt|y andeffectively, and the beneficial competit ion it promotes among employees,as long as it is in harmony with corporate goals.
A disadvantage that could lower employee productivity is that the plancould lead to collusion among groups of employees to keep productivitylevels artif icialty low. Employees could approve each otherb'wagerequests without appropriate merit. The plan also coutd resutt in ineffi-ciencies, because employees who have had their wage increases turneddown may not work up to capacity due to a loss of inierest.
some advantages that shoutd improve goal congruence between theemployee and the company are that the plan indicates the company'sinterest in the needs of the employees, and that the plan may result inincreased profit through improved productivity, which may lead toemployees earning a larger income through increases in wages.
Some disadvantages that could lower goal congruence are that employ-.ees may mistrust a wage plan suggested and implemented by manage-ment, and that there may be an overemphasis on a l imited range of per-formance measures.
Some advantages that should improve administration of the plan are thatprocedures for requesting a wage increase and for its approvat are clearand unambiguous, and the plan allows for relatively quick positive feed-back and peer recogni t ion.
Some disadvantages that could hamper plan administration are thatthere is a l imited amount of management input and control, and thatthere wil l be additional record-keeping responsibil i t ies associated withthe voting procedures and maintenanJe ot'empiov"" productivity recordsand personnel f i tes.
t!
l>
\,
a
(21
(3)
(41
It
rI
I
l2l
(31
2ffi
c l1 -3
(rl
(41
Chpter 1l
I
The basic premise of the learning curve is increased productivity asexperience is gained in the performance of repetitive tasks. Variouslnputs to the production process may be used more efficienily as cumu-lative output increases, but in most production processes the maiority ofcost savings associated with a learning phenomenon involve the use ofhuman labor.( s , z o o + 2 , 2 4 o ) + 1 6
= ;;3
= BSoh tearnins rate3,200 + 8
With a learning rate up to cumulative output of 32 units, average directlabor hours used to produce these 32 units should equal gs% of theaverage direct labor hours used to produce the first 16 units. tn short,average hours employed for each unit when 32 units are completedshould equal:
340 x .85 = 289 hours per unit .This implies a total of 289 x 32 = 9,249 hours used in the production ofthe first 32 units, or
91248 - 3,200 - 2,240 = 31808 hours
usgd in the production of units lz through 32.lf the average hours perunit in this production batch is taken as the direct labor standard, thestandard per unit becomes:
3,8O8 hours238 hours per uni t16 units
Bid price on order of 96 units:s 1 ,500
5,95O9,52O
1 6 , 9 7 O5,091
22rO61x 9 6
(5)FoT" applications of the tearning curve in the planning and controll ing ofbusiness operations are setting performance siandardi, preparing costestimates in competit ive bidding, determining budget ailowances forlabor and labor-related costs, schedul ing labor requirements, and deter-mining performance evatuat ions in which per iodic progress reports arecompared with accompl ishments expected under the curve.
---I
I
b
Chapter | 1
c l 1 - 4
Shoitcomings:(1) Actual payroll hours are not approved by production managernent.(21 There is inadequate segregation of duties within the Payroll Department.(31 Personnel Department should not have access to payroll checks.(4) Departmen-t supervisors should not distribute the payroll checks.
Suggested corrective action:(f l All incoming time cards should be signed by both the ernployee and
supervisor.(2'l The payroll clerk preparing the input for data processing should not do
the reconcil ing, but rather a second clerk should reconcile the payrolljournal to the time cards.
(31 An employee of supervisory level should authorize voiding of computer,generated checks and the subsequent preparat ion of a manuat replace-ment check.
(4) Replacement checks should be processed fol towing good internal controlprocedures.
(5) Al l payrol l checks, including unsigned replacement checks, should thenbe given to the Accounting Department rather than to the PersonnelDepartment for storage in a secure location unti l payday. No AccountingDepartm ent emp loyee with payrotl recordkeepi n g responsibil i ty sh ouldhave access to the undistributed checks.
(6) On payday, checks should be distributed, preferabty by a TreasurerrsDepartment employee or by an Account ing Depaftment employee whodoes not have record-keeping responsibi l i t ies.
c l 1 - 5
f i fhe requirement does not ask for a l is t of responsibi l i t ies Osborne hasviolated, but, merely, which of the f i f teen responsibi l i t ies apply toOsborne,s s i tuat ion.)
Management accountants have a responsibi l i ty to:
Comoetence: Prepare complete and ctear reports and recommen-dat ions af ter appropr iate analyses of re levant and ret iable informat ion.(Osborne knows that if he consents to Wallace's request, the resultingmaintenance job cost reports would be mater iat ly misstated and wouldpresent fa lse and misleading informat ion.)
Integrity: Refrain from engaging in any activity that would prejudicetheir abi l i ty to carry out their Out i ls et t r ical ly. (osborne is being asked tobe a party to an activity that woutd erode hii abitity to carry out hisduties ethically.)
Communicate unfavorabte as wel l as favorabte informat ion and pro-fessional judgments or opinions. (osborne is being asked to thwart com-municat ion of unfavorable informat ion.)
Chapter l1
Cl1-5 (Concluded)
Refrain from engaging in or supporting any activity that woutd dis-credit the profession. (Preparing deliberately misteadin! maintenance jobcost reports clearly would be a discredit to the profession.)
Obiectivity: Communicate information fairly and objectively.(Osborne would violate this responsibility if the maintenance job costreports are,altered.)
Disclose fulty all relevant information that could reasonably beexpected to influence an intended user's understanding of the reports,comments' and recommendations presented. (The shifting of cost amongmaintenance iobs would violate this ethical responsibility.)
\I
\!
I
012-1. Supervircrs' salaries, hdirect labor, overlimoprcrniurn, lupplier, indirrct nratorials, payrolltarq tactory hlurancc, and deprrciatian.
Ql2-2. Thr nst inportant r.elon fa variatbn in fae-lory ovrfiead b tho pnroncc of lired and rarFablo rrpenrer. Thordorc, ar prcduction vol-urno changs frqn nrnth to rrcrth, tho coCcwill do likowicc. Howcvor, ovcrhead alco wifl'' cltrtgo bccause of inrprovcd or dccrcssed cflFciencies and ctrangos in pricer paU for over-head ilrns LEh s! rupplies ard repairs.
012.3. Predclerminod ra lcs aro ured when i tbeconres obvious that 8ny other melhod ofcharghg overhead resullr in inequilabfc coct-hg and delays tho reporthg ct firancisl results.Charghg aclual overhead io ic6s and producircan resufl h charging unreasonable arnounlsof owrhead to varbur perirdr and in dehyedrcporling of corl data. Thc urr ol prcdclcr-mined ralcs alao onhances control throughanalyria ol over. or underapplied laclory over-head
012-4. Sir bases used for applying taciory overheadaro unitr prodrced, direst rnateriatr cost, direcilabor cosl, direct labor houc, machhe hours,and transaclions. lmportant consideratioog inseleclhg a base are the relatbnship (conela-tion) ol the base used and lhe use d ovefieaditems in manufacturing operalbns, as woll asthe clerical prac-ticability ol using a particuhrbge.
012-5. Predetermhed rde! are used to charge over-head and becorne the basis for determining thecost cil a lcb or producl. Thereforo, the reason-ableness of such costs is to a hrge exlentdetermhed by the reasonableness ol-the rat€.Shce these cqsts are used for costing hvenlories and play sn important ole h esiabtishingsales prices, the selectbn ol proper predeter-mined rates can be appreciated.
Q12€. An objective in seleciing the baso lor a prede_lermined factory ovefiead rale b lo engure lheapplication of factory overhead in reasonableproporikm to a benefbial or causal relatbnshiplo jobr, producls, or work perlormed or lo beporformcd. i ,c . , for r r t imal ing purpose! .Ordiurily, the base selostod ehojj be'closetyrolded to ttnctions represenled by the applioCoverhcad cost. lf tactory overhead cosls arepredorninantly labq oriente4 such as supervi-sirt and indirect hbor, the proper base wouldprobably be dirccl bbor hours. lf taclory over-head costs are predominantly retated to thecosl incurred in the ownership and operatbn olthc madrinery, the proper base would probablybe machhe hours.
GH4pTgR 72
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
Anotrer otriectivo in selecthg the base b tominimizo clericel st and dfort relativo to thobonrlitr ottaincd. When two or more ber.spro\rid. apprcximatcly thr rgrno applicrJ ovor_hood cst to specilb unils 6t prodrrtbn, therirplcsl ba$ lhouH be usrd.
Q12-7. (a) Theqrfrcal capecity b actuslly tho nrari-rnum produclion possible frorn e givonpbnl wit|r no allo*arrr rnade for ccsla.lion of operations for hotidays, wrok_endr, malerials shorleges, or machinobnakdorns.
(b) precticsl capacity ig theoretical capechylege an ellow.ance for interruptimr euchas brealdo*,na, delayr in recciving rupplict, and worker abgencer. prjcticslcapacily is usualty 75 to 85 pcrcent oftheorelical capacity.
(c) Erprctrd ectual caprcity ir prtcticalcapacity adjusted lor tho lach of autfbiontdcmrnd h a tinglo oporathg period andmay br usod h building oporating bu+gelr tdrcn expected capacity ditfen gub.,stantially lun norrnel capaciV.
(d) Normal.capacity is practical capacityadjusted to give consideratbn to t o tociof suflicient dernand over a pcrird bngenough lo hclude cyclical and reassralfluc.luatbns. This is usually the basis forlong-range p lanning. s landarda, andpreferably for the determinalbn cJ owr-head rates.
012-8. The underapplied overhead wil l be higher lfmarinum capacity is used and bwer if normalis used. ll this cost is charged lo lhc currrnlperird, then nraxirnum capacity will prcducr akrwer, and normal capacrty a higher, operatingprcrtii.
O12-9. (a) ld le capaci ty costs ar isc f rom id lcemployees and idte tac i l i t iec. ld leemployeer give rise lo colte auch arbase wages paid, employor,r sharc ofpayroll laxes, and other lr ingo benefitcosls. ldle facilities cause capacity 6tedue lo delerbratbn with time, appreh-ing obaoleoconce, cost ! for upkorp,readiness, maintenance, repairs, lhelter,and pro lect ion of va luablee ruch arhsurance.
(b) When iile capacity b prescnl, an dtenrptshould be made to regregalr id loemployees and idle lacil i t ier throughproper recbssiticatbn. Tho rcurnula$onol lhe cost attributabte lo theso Ulc work-srs or facililiec in excess _cl a reasonablcbudgnted arnounl migrht be in aorno ki,rd
\
271
t-
272
ol overhead account to be lreated sepa-rately aa e'rnanagemenl by erceplion'faclor. ldb capacily corlr should btaccounlod lor soparalely lor lhoro rea-!ons: (1) to Pttv.nl dittortkn end srlu-rirr h thr rna[air of ptoduclin cctt;(2) to bililetr ircqne dclominalixt; (3)to csrtrol ogcraticts; 8nd (4) lo phn nrrtyear'r hdget edrquatdy.
(c) Exeorc crpe.*ty cod h8! bem iJentilhJwith thoo capacity.cootr thol rcrull frqngrealrr produclion capacily lhan lhccqnpsny couH rvcr lrqe lo usa, or frcrnunbalancrd rquipmenl or machincrywithh dcparUnenls. In creatng lhc fotecasl budgrl, il ir irportanl lo bobto the.xc.r capacily cosl ro lhal manago-mcnl can bo made aware cil ilr responsi-bility rcaardng the excess invesUnent inlabor and machhec.
Q12-10. (a) Anaty":r and identify the ovefiead trans-actisrs.
(b) Joumali:,c thc lransrlisrs.(c) Enlcr transaclbnr in general and gub-
sktbry lodgen.Ol2-1 1. Ovefiead applicd lo prcduclicn ir enlered as a
credil h |he lactory orerhead control accounLAclual ovrrhrad i t debi led lo lhc same
Chapter l2
accounl Therefore, ovefiead has beon oer-applied when lhc account lras a crcdil balanc..
Q12-1z- Ovcrhead cen br ovcrappliod beceuso (a)actual oveficad waa bss than budg.l.d; (b)capeity utli:.d war greetor |h8n that eslirnaFod h cnpdhg ovofirad rale; (c) lho wcr-hcad cdinatc war lo hiCh (a mirtate); (d) lhrproduclian ortimab wat l€ low (a mirtakc);(r) corn|liulkns of thr abor.
Q12-13. Over. or undcrapplicd faclory ovcrhead maybe proralod arrrcng work h proc.ss, finishedgoods, and cosl of goodr sold, or it may bclrcaled rntirrly ar a period cogl. The firslmethod would have a smsller effcl oo cct ctgoods soH and |hcrelqc qr lho net ircorne forthe pcriod.
012-14. Thr cxislcncc ol largc undcrabcorbed vari-ancis doot nol necossarily mcan ihat unilcosts ar. incorrecl. An analysis of thc under-absorbod figwer will irdlplc (a) whether actu-al ororhead ir loo high or whcthcr oxponseghavo been incorreclty estirnated; and (b) whatpart of thc underabsorplion is caused byunusod capacity. ll Eclual ovrhead is cmtiJ-ered lo b. t@ high and thcro ic Ule capacity,unil coctr ccnpulcd ate morc rearcnablo lhanthey would bc if overhead rale! wero cornput-ed to absorb all of the aclual overhead.
1
\-;
Chapter 12 2n
EXERCISESI
E12-7
(l) $l'75oro0o fixed overhead and $72o variable overhead per ton, calculat-ed as follows:
For both the ngrmal capaclty and expected actual capacity, the problemstates the total budgeted overhead cost and the number oi ton" of activi-' ty. The high'low method of estimating cost behavlor can be used todetermine the overhead budget, usin-g those two points:
Activity LevelNormal capacityExpected actualDifference
Tons6,0005,000I ,O0O
BudgetedOverhead
$6,O7O,OOO5,35OrOOO
s 720,Ooo- .
Variable 5720,00O .o v e r h e a d r a t e = f f i - = $ 7 2 o v a r i a b | e o v e r h e a d p e r t o n
Budgeted fixed overhead = $5rg5O,0OO totat overhead- ($ZeO x 5,000) variable overhead
= 55,350,000 - S3,OOO,O0O = g1,75O,OOO
or, budgetedfixed overhead = $6,070,000 total overhead
- ($72O x 6,000) variable overhead= $6,070,O0O - $4,320,OOO = gt ,TSO,OOO
lv
\
274 Chapter 12
I
E12-1 (Concluded)
(2'l The predetermined rate at practical capaclty would be $895 per ton.Using the budget for fixed and variable overhead, a predetermined oyer-head rate can be calculated at any level of acUvity withln the relevantrange. Assuming practical capacity ls wlthln that range, Ore calculationis:
Predeterminedoverhead rate at
practical capacity =
(8,0OO tons )
Budgeted total overhead at practlcal capaeltyPracUcal capaclty In tons
Budgeted fixed overhead+ Budgeted variable
overhead at 1O,O0O tons _ $1,7S0,000 + ($ZZO x lOr0OO)= -{O'0OO tons IO'OOO tons
_ 91,750,000 + $7,200,00O) _ $8r95OrOOO{OTOOO tons IO'OOO tons
o\ $72o variable overhead per ton + ($trT5orooo/lorooo tons)= $72O per ton + $175 per ton = $895 per ton.
Factory overhead..........Direct labor, . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . ,
515,840 dlolot x20 ,160 56 x
= $895 per ton
$6,6406,640
$12,2005,56O
$ 6,6co
= $2'921.60= 3t718.4O
$6,g4O.Oo
E12-2
Work in process balance, Septernb:r 3O........,....r........r...r.r.....,.........,..Lgss materials sti! l in procgss...,...,......,.,.....,..,.............................,,....r.Factory overhead and dirgct labor sUlf in pnocgss...,.,.......,.r.,...........,..
Charged toV/ork In Process
Amount o/o
s36,o0o 100%'s15,840
* $36,o0o = 44oh(or)
S15,840-(factory overhead) * S2O,16O (direct tabor) =.7gSTLet X = direct labor sti l l in processT h e n , X + . 7 8 5 7 X = S 6 , 6 4 0
1.7957X = 56,640X = $3,218.429T direct labor sti l l in process
.7857X = S2,g21.SZO2 factory overhead stilt in processs6,639.9999
>
;
I
l .
I:
I
t_
I
-
b
Chapter 12
El2-3'
(11 135 peopte r 8 hrs. per day r 5 days per w6ek r 4g weeks =259r2OO direct labor hm.
l2l {35 people r lo hrs. per day r 4 days per week r 49 weeks =259,2OO direct fabor hrs.
Et24
275
!
b
Factory overhead rates:
(11 Units of production: $225,000 + 5y000 units = S45
(2f Materials cost $ZeS,OOo * $SoO,oOO =,{5 = 45oh
(3| Direct labor hours: $225,OOO + 56,25O DLH = 34
(41 Direct labor cost: $225,oo0 + (56,2s0 DLH r $81 = .5o = soo/o
(5| Machine houns: $225,OOO + 75,OO0 machine houns = i3
El2-5
(fl Assuming normal capaclty:(al The factory overhead rate: (90OO,OOO + 5O,OOO| + $6.69 = $14.69(bl The fired part of the factory overhead rate: $e6o,ooO + 5o,ooo = 38
l2l Assuming erpected aetual capacitln(al The factory overhead rate: 1$lOo,oOo + 4oroo0! + $6.89 = $i6;69(bl The lixed parf of the factory overhead rata: $lbo,ooo + .to,Ooo = $lo
El2€
Actual llAoty ovgrhgad r....... '.r...r.....r.....r,...r...,.............,..!......r..r,........ SZZgTOOOApplied factory overhead (S2rSoO machine hours r $5.iOrt..............r... 267.TSo\--
underapplied factory ovgrhgad for thg period ......,..........r......,r.........a - r"se'sPP"tttl l.lgtClry overneao tor tne pgrlod ......,..........r,......r............ $ 1j1r?54
! t$255,o0o + 5oro0o budgeted machine hours = $s.1o
,:
Chapter l2
I
El2-7
(1 l Work in Process.'.'..............................o......o................1 ,45OrOOOMatef|a18..........r..r.........r.......o.....o....rrr.o.....o........ l r45OrOOO
Work in Procgs,.....,......o...o... 928,OOOPa1rc!|...... 928,OOO
563,OOO
551,OOO
551,OOO
Factory Overhead Contrcl... . . . . . . i . . . . 563tOOOMaterials, Palnoll, Accruals, and Various Credlts
Work In Process 551,OOO
Overhead rato :Estimated factoly overhead $57O,OOO
Applled Factory Ovgrhgad,..........,.........,.......,...r
Appfied Factory Overhgad .r.................'.,......'rj-,r.rorr S5lrOOOFactory Ovgrhgad Contrcl...or......,..o.,rrr-ooooorrroiror
Estimated production
l2l Underapplied factory overhead: $563,000
E12-8
E12-9
(f l Applied factory oyerhosdss l6,92O
36,OOO machine hours
30,OOO
. $551,0OO
$19 per dr i l l
= $12'OOO
Agtual factory ovgrh gad r.....t.......r......!.................t.....Applied tactory oyerhead (4rlO0 units x $2.46)r..,....r.Overappligd ovgrhead....?.......o......o..r,,.,..,.......r......,....
* va tiabl g facto ry ovgrh gad fiito .......,...........,r....,..r.o....Fired fastory overhead rate ($ir44O + 4'OOO units)....Total fa ctory overhead rilto ......,.r,...........r......rr.....,..,.
$ 9,5OO1 0 . 0 8 6
s (586)
$2.10.36
92.46
= $ .47 lired portion of rate
2.7O variable portion of rate
_S2€I total rate
$2.57 x 2,7OA machine hours = g6,939 apptied factory
Actual tactory overhead ........................,...Applied factory overheadUnderappl ied overhead
overhead
57,4OO6.939
s 46,1
t2l
I
II*
LL .I
Chagter 12
E t2 -10
Agtual factory ovorhoSd ..D.....................r'................r..!....o..,... $836roooApplied factory ovarhoad (2ro,ooo machine hours r tt.:::::. -iio.ooo
o1rgrapplied factory overhe8d............'.................,................. s ta.ooot
E72-17
(21
(11 Fixed portion of the factory overhead application rate:st50, ooo = $1.50 per machina hourtOOTOOO machine hours
277
II
b
I
I
\-
I
variable portlon of the factory overhead application rate:
= $2.5O per machine hour1OO,0OO machine hours
(31 Actual factory overhead . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . $4i {,OOOApplied factory overhead (lOS,ooo x S4.oo1.....:::::::::: -654
Overapplied factory overhead ... r......... r(9€oo)
E72-12
fctu--al tactory overhgad ......... ' ........r...........r......................... $141334Applied factory overhead (2Oo% of $gri lZ) .........,...,.,,...,..... 16.234overapplied ovgrhg?d.........,...,..........................,....r..,.ro.r...... E_f:.gggl
: t
Chapter 12278
812-13
Work in process ..'o""'r"t""'Finishgd $ood8..,.....t""""""Cost ol goods 8old.-.....,......
Regulrements (11 & (21Account PercentageBalance of Total
5 %31 zgoh631noh
t00 ch
Applled PercentageOverhead of Total
$ 2,ooo16,00032rOOO
$50,ooo 1oo%.
3001,9OO3,8OO
o,ooo
$ 6,00038,00O76,OOO
4%32%64oh
(11
(21
Tota1...............r................... $12OtOO]9
work in Procesz l5o/o of $8r0oo) ,.......,......r.......'..'r....rFinishgd GOOdS 131 Znoh Of $8rOO0)............'......,...'o'..cost of Goods sold 1631noh of $610001.....,................
FaCtOfy OVefhgad GOntfOl.,,.,..'...,..,....'....'..r'o.....
FaCtOfy OVgfhgad Contt!|........,......'.............r..'....'.r"'Work in Process (5% of $6t000|""""""""""'t"'tFinishod Goods 131 znoh ol $6'0OO)""-""""'o""Gost of Goods Sotd (63 lnoh of $6tooo1"""""""
WOfk in PfOCgSS l4o/o Of $6rOO0| .'...,...'..'r..............t.."Finished Goods l32o/o of 361000)""""""""""""""""'Cost of Goods Sotd lA4% of $61000!"""""""""""""'
Factory Ovgrhgad Contt!1 """" """"""t"""t"""'
2401,9203r84O
o,ooo
300l r9OO3r80O
6,O0o ' v
(31
L
lI-
II
lF
IL-
l-
b
a
I
Chaptu 12
P72-7
(rl
)b
II-
II
i-
!
E
Agtual oVorhead lpcurred .........'...'....'...........r.r...r,.r..........r.....Applied ovorhoadt..........................r.....r.........t......,.o...............
Underapplied ovgrhgad r.......'.........'..............r..tr..D......r..........r
PROBLEMS
MachineHours
lo,oooI,OOO
279
$3r3g5,OOO3.325.000
s 60.000
(21
'acrr3!It41_t_ prodoterminsd rate based on expected astual capacity= 9,5OO MH x ($3,500,000/lO,00O MH)
= 9,5OO MH x $35O per MH = $3,325,OOO
The predetormined rate at practicaf capacity would be $316.67 permachino hour (MHl, calculated as follonrs:
Flrsg find thc budgeted total lired oyorhoad and the budgeted variableovorhead rato par MH. The problem states both the total budgeted over-head cost and thc number of MH of actlvity, at both the normil capacityand orpected astual capacity levels, so the high-low method of estimai-ing cost behavior can bE used:
Astivlty LevelErpected actualNormal capacityDiffersnce
BudgetedOverhead
$3r5OO,OOO
_ 3TOOOTOOO
$ 5OO,OOO2,OOO
Variable $5OO,OOO aor"rf,""J'i"t" =
frffi = $25O variable overhead per MH
Budgeted fixed overhead = S3,50O,O00 total overhead- ($2SO x 1O,OOO| varfable overhead
= s?r500,ooo - $2r500,ooo = $l,ooo,ooo
or, budgetedfired overhead = $3,ooo,oo0 totat overhead
- (S2SO r I,O00f variable ovorhead= $3,0001000 - $2rooo,ooo = $l,ooo,ooo
Then, using the budget for fixed and variable overhead, a predeterminedoverhead rate can be calculated at any level of activity within the rele-vant range. Assuming practical capacity is within that range, the calcula-t ion is:
7-- '1
\
2W
I
P12-1 (Goncluded|
Predeterminedoverhead rate at
practical capacity =
(15,OOO MHI
Budgeted total overhead at practical capacityPractlcal capacity in MH
Chapter 12
Budgeted fired overhead+ BUdgeted variable
overhead at 15'OOO MH _ Sl,ooo,ooo + ($25o x 15,OOO}15,OOO MH
$1,0OO,00O + $3,75O,OOO
15,OoO MH
$4,750,oOO= $316.67 per MH15,OOO MH $15,OOO MH
ot'r $25o variable overhead per MH + ($f TOOO,OOO + 15,OOO MHf= $25O per MH + $66.67 per MH = $.?16.67 per MH.
(31 lt the actual overhead ol $?,405,O0O yyere underapplied by $1O,OOO, thenApplied Overhead would have a credlt balance of $3r4O5rOoO - Slor0o0,or 33,395,000. The closing entries ane:
Applied Overhgad.....r.......,.,......................r...o...... 3r395rO0OFactory Ovgrhgad Control r...,,.........r.,.......... 3r395rOOO
Gost of Goods So|d....... ..,...........r........ ' .. 1or00oFactory Overhead Control .r.............r........t... IOrOOO
(41 AccountBalance
Work in process ............o...r.r.,r.......Finishgd goods.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .or., . . . , . . . . .Cost of goods sold
Total _s8,ooo,oo9
Work in Process (2.5 % of $lOr0Oo)...........r......r...r.....Finished Goods,.,.Gost of Goods Sold
Factory OYgrhgad GonttD1..............r...'..........t.....
$ 2oo,ooo4OO,OOO
7,4OOrOOO
Percentagsof Total
2.5%5.O%
92.50h
100.ooh
1O,OOO
250500
9r25O
Ii L
281C@ter 12:
IIIt - :
iI
5 - '
II
-
I
I
>
II
b
I
!
igvloELo' c t
3]Pg
CLotr4!loo,G!t(E
GttcttrooI
go
o t o t lt o t l
tfllooo-oI'
0 0oto-7
o oo on- o-t t NF0
- Ao oo oo o- -rD ra)Y Y
o oE NN'aD I+ +6 6
- -o oo o0 0u ) u )
t-Y . Y
o ot t F
0 0+ +6 6
i l i l i l l l
^ l ^ ^ l ^o l o o l oo l o o l oo l o 0 l 0- t - r t -o l o N l o@ l ? ' r l pe l { a lI l r r l r
t lo l o o l oo l o o l oo t o o l o- l - - l -
o l l o o l nF I r p l pr h l o lv l v v l v
^ l ^ ^ l -o l o o l o8_ 18- t_ 18-o l o x l o. "1 " * l -r l , , l ,3 1 8 8 1 8313 3 lFsl: gl:
G
.o
ooct!cO
'=
=
: :
o ic :r r !3 :€ iL
o. J l -( J 06 r tb oco 6o , c )o . !X n
F S
!too5ooo.CL:ta
!:
Lo
:t r P- 3o
$FE.'iiFi5E I E F f
l l n i l t l
s 3glo 6 0 6o oo- o-o oF Fo 9
or l
;lloN
n
ooN
I
o 6 0 q to oo- ro-q ' o
F
r h 0
oF
o!l
a
th
l l
=tr5l-Eg il
P12-3
(f l Total cost of Job 50:Work In process, December IDecember costs:
Matorlal8..... a a a a a a a a a r a a a t a a a r a a a a a a a a t a t a a a r a a a a
Chwter t2
3 54,OOO
45,OOO42|OOO15,750
(21
(3)
(4)
(s)
(61
Direct labor ($lO2,OOO + 8,5OO| r 3,5OO|Factory overhead (34.50 r 3,5OO|
Factory overhead costs applied to Job 52 during Decemben$l .SOx2,O0O=$9,OOO
Total factory overhead costs applied during Decomben$4.5Ox8r5OO=$.?8r25O
Actual December factory overhsad incured:
Supplies a a t a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a t a a t a a
$156,750
$ 3,soo15,00o
6rOOO3r5OO6,OOO5rOOO
Indirect labor lygftos....,...Supervisory sa!ari|B3.........r....or..........oo......r......r......r.r.....rr......Building occupanqy costs..t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' r , . . . ' . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o... . . .rFactory equipment costs...o.....'...........o.............................r.o...Othgr factory costs...r. . . . . . . . . . .r. . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r ' r . . . . . . . . . . ' .r . . .r. . . . . .
$3e,999
An insignificant amount of ovep or undsrapplied factory overhead woutdbe treated as a period cost.
Agtua l ovgrhgad. . . . r . . . . . r . . . r . . . r . . . . . . r r . . . r . r . . . . r . r r . . . . . r . . . r ' . . . . . . . r . . . . . . t r . . $39,OOO38,25OApplied overhead
Underapplied overhead $ 75o
I
I
Clnpts 12
P724,
(11 Actual factory overtread:
Indlrect materlalg and supp1ies....................................o.,...,.r..lndlrggt 1abor....t....r........r...............r..o......r.o.r........................r.
Employec benefits.....................r...............r,.............r..............Depreciatroll tttt.t............r.....r....r............t........1.............r...r......
Supgrvisioll "tttt...o.'..r.o.r......................1..rrrr.t1..r.......r.....o.r.......
l2l Ovep or undoriapplled factory ov€rhead!Totaf dlrect labor, 2o- r.r.............r........'......r...........r.....rr......oFactory oyerhead rato per direct rabor dofrar o......,,.....,......r.,.
283
$ 18 ,O0o53,0Oo23,00O{2,OOO20.o00
fl?s'qaa
s 7o,0oo1600h
st 12,OO0126.OOO
s 14.000
$ 72,5OO8,OOO
11,2OO
Applied factory ovgrhgad .........o..........o..Actua I factory oygrh ea d ..........o,.,.r,,.......Underapptigd factory overhe3d...........,.o,...........r.,........r.......,.
(31 Amount included in cost of goods sold for Job 1376:Beginning ba1ance. . r . . . . . r . . . . . . r r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . r . . . . . . . r r .
Matgriafs and labor r 20- ..r.Drr.....r.....r......................r.......r....,.
Appf ied factory overhead, 2O-- (S7,OOO x l6O%)
9_91,?og(41 Gost assigned to the work in process account at the end of 2o-z
$ 72,500
$ 43,ooo7O,OOO
1l2,ooo 225,OOO$297,5OO
91,7O0
s205,8OO
Beginning balance (Job i376). . . , . . , . , . . . . .o. . . . . . . , . . . . . . rCost charged to work in process, 2O-:
Materialg ..........rr...................r...................o..L € b o r a . . a a a a a a r - . a a a . . o . a . a . a . a . - a a . . . . . . . . . a a . . . a a . a a . a r r a . . a . . a
Appfied'factory ovgfi ead .....r,......................
Less cost of Job i376, wtrich was completedand so |d . . . . . . . r . . . . r . . . . .o - . . - . r .o . . . . . r r r . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . r . . .
--I
2UCtlpter 12
P12-5
(11 Predetermined factory overfisad rate based on nonnal capacitln$29 t25o ' - r - r - r - - - r ! ^ -
4sroooTF = S.65 variable portion of rate for erpected actual and
normal capaclty$18,OOO
6o,o00TH =
=.19 fired portion ol rate based on norrnal capacity
.-- $.95 total rate based on normal capaclty
(21 Predeterminad factory overhead rate based on expected actual capacitrs 2 9 t 2 5 o r - L r - - ^ r ! - - -
4s,ooo MH = $ .65 variabte portion of rate for erpected actuat and
normal capaclty$18 'OOO
A5^ooo itH = .4o H:,rffon
of rate based on expected actual
9!.Og total rate based on erpested actual capacity
(31 Amount of-factory overhead charged to production if the company usedthe normal capacity rate:
47,OOO MH r $.9S = $44,650
(4) Amount of factory overhead charged to production if the company usedthe expeeted actual capacity ratel
47,OO0 MH r $1.05 = $4g,3SO
(5) Actual factory ovgrhgad .........o..................,..r..r...o....r....,......... $42,1 ooApplied oyerhead (from (3) normal capacity ratel r......,........... 44.650Underappligd overhgad '............'......................rr.o....roo...r....r... $ 2.4so
(61 Actual factory ovgrhgad ....o..'..r........o.o..........D..r....r................, $42,1 ooApplied overhead (fmm (4f erpected actuat capacity;i;t..,.. 4e.3soOverappligd ovgrhgad ...'..............'...r.........,.i........r......o,.o..,...r $(?€gA)
I
I
Chapter 12
Pl2-q
(11 Work in Process:
a a a a a t t a a a a a a a D a a t a a a a a
285
$1O,OOO4O,OOO
l8,0oos68,OOO
s t7,5OO29,05023,goozqpp4,00osOoo6,5.O08,2507r5OO9,goo
9r.z,oog$l l7,ooo
115,200
9_1999
Dfrect materialg ....,..Dlrect 1abor..............Factory overhead
(2'OOO x $3.601.....Total .........,..r....
$ g,ooo161000
7r2OO
Flnished Goods:
Dlreet materials r.....,...Dltuct labor,........,.......Factory overhead
(5r0OO r $3.601 r.....r.b
\-
(21
s32,2OO Total
Heat, light, and powerDepreciatlon-fa ctonr b u ll dlngs
Depreciation-factory eguipment ...Miscellaneous fastory overhead ..
Total actual factory ovgrhgad r.,............................r!.,r..,...
(3) Agtual ovgrhgad ........r..........................Appl led ovgrhEad r. . .o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r .o. . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . .
Underapplied overhead
i-
2ffi
P12-O (Concluded)
(41
ChWter 12
COLUMBUS COMPA}|YCogt of Goodg Sold Statsment
For January
Materialc:Inventory January IPurchasar
lnventory Janualy 3lDlract laborApplied factoryJanuary man ufacturlng cost..,........,............rAdd work in procesr, Janualt 1...................
Lgss work in process, January 3l ,........,...,..Cost of goods manufacturedAdd finished goods, Januaql IGost of goods availablg for galc.......,.,.........Less finishgd goodq January 3l ......,......!....Cost of goods sold gt normal ...r...r...............Add underapplled factory overhead .......D..o..Cost ol goods gold at 8ctua|........................r
$ 2l,ooo$1O8,OOO
Lggt tlturng to rupplleJ''t!,..........r........... 61050 lO2r95O
Matgrials ava11ab1c................................. $123r95O9'OOO $114,950
25O,OOO115,2OO
$488r15O s32r50O
$5l8,6lio32r20O -
9080,450l8,ooo
$so4,lsoo8,ooo
s436,45O ' -l rSoo
$438,25O
I
Cluptcr 12
CASES
Dlres{ l.aborHours
217601000 hours2rl60'000
287
FactoryOverhead Gosts
334r5OO,OOO2grggo,000
$ 4,620,000- '
Lows29rgg0,0oo
lor632,000$13,249,0oo. -
SlT,zloroool3,24g,ooo
s3O,g5g,ooo- -
cl2-1
(t l
High..aa.......r....................a.1...........r......a,
!owDiffersnce
Total OOSt ......r...r....rrr'xlr.aarar..lraal.r....lrr..............
Variable cost $!Z.ZO per dlrcct labor hourl.........Firgd elem gnt ......1.....1.......r.r...r..-.....r...............r.
Total factory oygrhead,................,...,..........
600,000 hours
Estlmated total fagtory oyerhead for next yoanTotal yariable factory overhead (zr3o0;o00 r $7.70).....,........Total firgd fagtory ovgrhgad .........,.,.......r....o.r..,..D.......r..r......
varlabfc rate = ${ro2orooo + 30oroo0 hours = $7.7O per dlrect labor hourHigh
$34r599r9992lr252rOOO
$l3,24g.ooo-
(21 Utility ol cost behavior Informailon:(al EYalustlon ot product pricing decisions-Tha calculation of the fac.tory overhead rate requfred the company to esUmate the variablefagtory overhaad cost. tn short-term-priie-cutting srtuations, theprice get should cover at least the varlable materials, labor, facto'/ovarhead, and nonmanufacturing cost8. For the longer toil, tfr"total cost asslgned to the various products may pnovide some basisfor price dlfferentials among the ltems.(bl cost control eYaluation-Tho calculauon of the factory overheadrate rcqulrsd the company to estimate tho fired t*b;y-;;rhead
cost and thc varlable lactory overhead eost per direct labor hour.The amounts arc esumatesbt what ttro cost shoufd or witl be duringt" let! yoar. Thc amounts can be used aJtnr uasis roi prsparagonof a budget alforvance lor actual activity to U" compared to actualcost incunrd. Any drftenanco between ine ruoget amounts anoactral cogt woufd be I moasuno of the ereaivJness or ractory ovor-head cost contlol.
(c) Development of budgets-The estimates of fixad factory overheadcost and the.variable factoryov_erhead "o"t p"l' direct tabor hour arousefur In budget deveropment. They p.rriith" "o,np"nito carbu_late thc estlmated factory overheal iost roioirerent activity levelsthat arc berng consrdered as the budget tsteveroped.
te l
CHAPTER 13
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
01},1. Departmental ovefiead ralot aro prcfrrrrd to a. sirgle talc becausc they irprovr tre cmlrcl of
orcfiead by deparlnenl headr rosponrbb forcsrtrollablr ovrrtrrad, and lhry incroar lhr
' accuracy ol product and job corting whcnproductr or iobt rovo througfi variql prduc-h9 depsdmonb.
01$2. Deparlmrnlalizing faclory ovrrhrad ir anexlension of mclhodt used in ralablishing asingle ralc becausr (a) an application basomusl be selected and crtimaled; (b) ovefieadestlnales musl bo rnadc; and (c) adual wer-head musl be accwnubl.d sd cqnparod withapplied overhead. Thcsc rteps an reguired foreach producing deparimenl, whereas wilh asingle rale, mly tolal factory dale ere neccr-sary.
Ot3-3. The surn cil departnatal over- or underapgliedovefiead would be diflerent. Every direct laborhour *ouH havc thc sarno arnount of appliedoverhead whcn a planl-wiJr ovrfiead rato bused, assuming lhal thr applicatbn base irdirecl labor hours. However, tho usc crf depart-menlal ralec resulls in ditlcrcnt amounts olapplied ovorhoad, depending on thr laborhoun in cach dcparlmcnl and tho indivirJualdepartmenlal ovcrhead ratos. For cxarnple, afirm wilh an ovorall ratc ol $2 would haveS20,0@ ol applierJ ovefiead la 10,000 hours;the seme firm wilh departmcntal rates ol 9land $3 lor its twe produchg dopartnents couldhave more or lcss applied orerheed, depcnd-ing an the breakdown c, labor houn receivhglhe S't ard 33 overhead charge.
Thc lotsl cet cf gmdr lold ard tdsl hvcnto-ry rtould also be differerd, becausr departmen-tal rate! could cauro diffrrcnt unil cogts.Thereforc, invenlory and cost of gods soldwould be hfluenced by products s<ld q still qrhard. This hpuH not be thc case il a blanketralc were uced.
Q13{. A prodrrcing department b dhestly csrcomedwith manufrturhg prodrctr or dc*rg ucrk qrvarious jobr. A service department rendenservico to variour deparlmenls and ig notdirectly asrociated with manuf acturing opcra-tbns" Tho naturc cl tho nprt dono by a Otp.rf-ment dclcrmhca rrhrther I b a rcrvicr or ptrducing deprrlmont. Exemplcr ol producingdepa.,tm.nl! arr cuilhg, fhirhing, m*hining.mir ing, and rcf in ing. Exampler of scrv iscdgpartmontr arc mainlenancc, medbal, power-houso , pu rchas ing , recc i v i ng , and cos taccoonting
Q13-5. The kinds o{ deparlments ertablishod to con-trol snd chargo ets depend on (a) simibrity
of a company's operalions, processes, andmachinery; (b) locatbn of operatbns. process-es, and machhery; (c) responsibilities lor pro-duclion and cosls; (d) rclalionship ol opcra.l ions lo l low of product; and (e) number oldeparlments or work centers. Thc number ofdepar lmenls es labl ished depends on lhoemphasis placed on cosl control and on thedevelognenl of overhead rates.
Qt}€. Physbally different segrnents of a departmentor clst pools for ditferent kjrds ol costs wilhina deparlment rnay be driven by activity baserthat are guite dillerenl, lhur callhg for lhc usrol subdepartm€nF tor taclory overhead accu-mulalion, application, and analysis for eachphysical segmenl or cest pool.
Q1$7. No. A more correcl method is the use of thcplanl assel records lo c€mpute deparlmentaldepreciation, property tax, and fire hsurancccharges, provided the recordg arr sufficienllydetailed lor this pufpos. and thc rvork hvolve'dis nol too complex. Swh a rnethod wouH giveproper recognition lo lhe various depreciationrales used and fire insurance premiums paidbecause ol varying tlpea of equipmenl
0198. Factors involved in selecting the mosl egui-table rale lor applyhg factory overhead includeconsideralion of the nature of a department'soperalions, the relationship ol overhead ele-ments to operalians involved, and any clericaldifticuties arising through the use of a particu-lar rate.
0139. The several s leps fo l lowed in es labl ish ingdeparlmenlal factory overhead rales ar6:(a) Estimating direct overhoad ol producing
departments and lhe direcl costs of ser-vice departments.
(b) Preparing a lactory surv€y for the pur-pose of distributing indirect departmentalcosb and servics deparlment costs.
(c) Estirnating and allocating indirect deparl-mental cosls.
(d) Dislribuling service deparlment coste.(e) Compuling deparlmental factory over-
head rates.Ol$10. The questlcnr lhgt musl be resolved in allocal-
ing service deparlment cosl! to benefit ing' departmonts include:
(a) Determhing which departments are bon-elited.
(b) Selecting an allocatiqr base.(c) Choosing the a l locat ion method, i .e . ,
direcl, slep, or simultaneous.Ql3-11. (a) Direct-No service departmenl costs are
allocated to other service deparlments.(b) Step-Service department costs are allo-
288
I
1I
I
t
b
t:
I
b
b
llr
I
Chapter 13
celcd in thr order of th. d.partmonlr, !.rying tho grcatest number of depart-
mentr and rrcriving tcrvic. lrom thoarnallesl numbor, or in thc ordcr of thcbrgesl rorvb. deportmont st allcatodlo oth.r cervict dcparlmrnts. Onco ar.rvicr dcpartmenlie cortr havr bcenrllocalod, no cortr of othrr r. ivicodcpadmontr an a.lteatrd to it.
(c) Simullanoour-Tho full rcciprcal inter-relalio'rshipe ol bcnolitr amo.tg servicod.partrnontr an csrs idcrcd.
Tho rinultanoour method b thr mat accuralt lor prduci coclhg ard for iJerdifying tcfalc6lt tor ogeraling particulnr geryice depart-mmtc. Howevcr, thir mrthod b atao thc nroddifficull to conrput..
01$12. Contrcl of crtrtrhead ia achieved by oornparhgaclual rcsul la wi th ptanned or est imatodrreullr. To makr arrh cornpericcrr, both tlgorof orrcrhead must br aocumubled and rcport-od in lho sarn. rE.tnor. Sincr thc ernputdbnc{ overhead rater with required ovcrhead osti-rndcs procodec lho ircun.ncc and accumuh-lbo of astual o\rcrhcad, th. cqnputatiort prc>duro dolermho tho accounling lq aslual wcr-head.
01313. Oepartmental over- or underapplied ovefieadit determhed by curqrsring astual and appliodovcrhced.
01$14. ll a cornpfer product lhe is produced in a nqr.deparlrnentalized factory or in a single depart-
289
monl of r taelory, onc appnoach lo accurattproducl cosling is to use muhiple overheadcosl p@lr and mulliplo bases wilhin a sirgbrospcrbility c.nlcr.Nqrmanufacturing businorses (lrch ar rrtailltdcr, fluncbl iuilildilu, irsuranc. cdnps-niot, oducalionrl i,nttitutirnr, tnd horpitela)rhouH b. divu.d into dopartrrrnb to brrdgrtand control stl. For oranlpb, a rrtail rtoomighl br dcprrUn nlalhed as folkrp* a*ninir-lralirr, occllplrlc)r, ralc prwnclin and advcr-tirhg,, purc{rarhg, relfing, and dclivcry. Ar hmmulrturhg butirosser, departmcntal cootfafr proreled lo ?ov3nuc-producing ralordopadrncnts by urhg a cfrarging or billi.rg ratc.Departnentalizatinn ir partic ub rty n""J""rrylor hcpitab and cducatioral hstitutbnr, whbimust budgel lheir costr on a deparlmenlalberb fo ccrtrol costs and to chargc adcquatrrut rccorcring feee,Govomrnent agencies employ targc numbcnof people, and as they spend brgei and targersurnt ol lax money for varbus seruicer, lax-payor! arr domending more otficient urr oflhd nrmey. Thercfore, rervices CrouH bo ren-dered al thc l*ost coct with thc Arrdcst cffl.cioncy. Govcmmcntal activilier stpuU b. hrd.gnlod and lheir csts controlled on a reaponsi-bility accounting baeis. The efficioncy of ter-vicer ahouH bc mcasurcd by ushg stch unit3of measurement as per capita, per milo, q porloi1.
01$r5 .
or$16.
\i
290
Et3-1
Work In Proceer
EXERCISES
33,31O
Chagter 13
1 5 1 1 3 0
1 8 , 1 9 O
3,OOO,OO
I,O()0.00
1,0oo.oo
850.00
750.0O
1,8OO.OO
4,6OO.OO
Applied F8story Qverhead--Department A(1 TtOOO r $89 J -.......................,... j..,...,(
Applled Fac,tory Orerhead-Department B(1 SIOOO I $l rOl
--f ...............o..r...........rr.......r.r.r.....
' $l7'8OO + 2O'OOO = ti89*$2or2oo + 2o'ooo = $l.ol
El3-2
Dcprrtmcntal Ovcrh cad Column r Gencral trdgcr
Crcdlt(al
trl
Factory OncrhcrdControl ....,.,D...-.-F
AccumulltcdDoprrSulldhg[
Frctory OvrrtrodCon trol ...,..--ro....-
AccumuhtrdDepr.-filechhrry
Fectory OvcrhcrdControl ......ro........-
Accrucd Proprr$Trr Pryrblo--.-
Fectory (hrrrhrldControl -,....8h-
Accr. WortorrrCompmteUon...
Factory OvrrhodControt-...
Accrucd PoworPeyebb...,...*..
Frctory OvrrhodControl ..........,F...,.
Accountr peyebtr
Ftctory OvrrhredControl
360.00 360.00 18O.0O 1 ,800.00
5OO.OO 4,60O.OO
Mecfilnlng
GenenlFactory
Pelntlng Arrccmbly Cogt Pool
l '5OO.OOO 600.00 300.00 3,ooo.0o
or00o.o0 aooo.oo 1,2oo.oo 4OO.O0 0,800.00
550.00 20it.33 170.00 74.67 1,000.00
450,00 180.00 100.00 850.00
ooo,oo 60.00 90.00 750.oo
(cl
{d)
(e)
tr)900.00
1,8OO.OObl
Mstrrbb2,3OO.OO
t_1E
I
b
Chapter 13
Et3-3 I
(1)
Budgeted factory ovorhoad ""'t""
Oepiltment Sl distribuUon(g o/3OO, 2l o/3o01 ..-u..D-.....""""bepartment 52 distrlbuUon -(64/8Ot I 6180l """"""""o"t"""""r
Budgeted factory overhead "D"o"t'Machlne hoUrlB tt""""t"""o""""'ro'
Prgdetgrmlned rstc ........'r""""o"'
Diroct lsbor houfE'."""""'r"'o"""'
Prgdgtormlned rate ......ro,o"""""D'
Job,437 ovorhead cost:Department Pl(3 x $6.5O) . . . . . . . . . . " " " " t " " t " " t '
Department P2(2 x $4.48)""""""" ' t """" """ '
P2
$346,O0O $368,OOO
3O,OOO 7O,OOO
40,0oo$416,O00+ 64.000
---_$6.5q
I O,OOO
$aae,ooo
- l0q0m$4.48
$19 .50
8.96
$?glg
291
s2$IOO,OOO SSO,OOO
(lOO,OOO)
(5O,O0O)
slP1
I
S
(21 Plantwide predetermined factory overhead rate:
, ,T1lo1o. ' . = $6.40 Per DLHi35,OOO DLH
Job 437 ovgrhead cost (2 x $4.48) """"""""""""""""""""" Sl9 '2O
cGA.Ganada(adapted} 'Hepr in tw i thpermiss ion .
292
E134
(11
(21
I
$4O,OOO +$25'OOO + $361'956 +$420'OOO $846,956
Chaptor t3
= s.83
Budgeted factoryoverhead r.........rr.,..Distribution of:
Building andgnounds .........!..Factoryadministration..
Total
Base:Machine hoursDirect laborho urs, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
Rate.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . , r
452rgOO + 567125O 1rO19 ,25O
Building Factoryand Admin-
Total Machining Assembly Groundg istration
$846,956 5361,956 $42O,OOO S4O,OOO 325,OOO
18,OOO 2O,OOO (4OrOOOl' 2,OOO
13,2OO 13r8OO l3z€gg)"$846.956 $393.156 s453,800:
195,60O
567r25O$2.01 $,80
t- gl2o, 1ol2o, ltZo to Machining, Assembly, and Factory Administration,respectively.
n 44lgor 46190 to Machining and Assembly, respectivety.
CGA-Canada (adaptedf. Reprint with permission.
E13-5
Main- Admin-Total Gutting Assembly tonanco istration
overhead budget. . Si ,29o,ooo S52O,OOO $42o,ooo S2OO,O0O Si5o,oo0Distribution of:
Maintenance12113O,9/g0l,.. 14O,OOO 60,000 (2oO,OOOlAdministrationl lslzs, lolzsl. 9o,ooo 60,000 (15o,oool
overhead budset.. gl,ZrrJAA S*g€gg fr_4JlQg : :
Machine hours. . . . . . 2STOOO 2O,OO0overhead rate.. . . . . . 3o,oo $27.oo
CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission.
--1
dlaptcr 13
' E13-C'
293
Producing ServiceDepartments Departments
ProductTotal Mixing Finishing Cafeteria Design
$364,000 $1O4,O0O $2OO,OOO slO,OOO S5O,OOO
3,250 6,500 (1O,O0O) 25O
16,750 33,500 (50,250)
Budgeted factoryoverhead beforedistribution ofsorvictmentr
depart-
DistribuUon of'sorviee department
costg:Cafeteria ($1o,000-r 2OO employees= $5O) ....'.'......'....P;oduct DesignG!SO'250 + 3OOproduct orderc= $167.50| ..,,.,.....
E . g364.000 S124.OOO S24O,OOO
Bases: machine hours 4O'OOO 6OTOOORates r............,. $3.1O $4.OO
GGA-Ganada (adapted). Reprint with permission.
E13-7
(f ) Producing ServiceDepartnients Departments
Total Pi P2 Si 52Budgeted overhead ... $5s2,75o $2o8,ooo $300,000 $1o,ooo S34r750Distribution of:
Department Sl ....Department S2....
4,500 5,250 ( lO,OOOr 25020,000 15,000
Total fastory overhead ,$EEZJSO $Z3Z€O_q S3?9€99
' t8O/4OO to Pi,27O|4OO to P2, 10/4OO to 52i ' {,OOO/7,OOO to Pl, 3,OOO lT .OOO to P2
Pl : $232,500 + 4,OOO machine hours = $58.{25 rate per machine hour
P2: 3320,250 + 10,000 d i rect labor hours = 532.025 rate per d i rect labor hour
(35,OOolfi
Elg-l (Conctuded)
l2l plant-wlde rate: $544r75O r- l5rOOO direct labor hours = 336.317 plant-
wide rato Por direct labor hour
(31 Individual fobs lnal rsquiro relauvely different amounts of time in eachdepartmenl ll Pl is machine-intehsive and P2 is labor-intensive, thenssparate departmental rates would provide a-fairer allocation of costs to
iobs.
CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission.
El3-8
(1) Main-Total tenance Personnel Machining Assembly
Budgeted factorYoverhead....,.......... $27O,OOO s3OrOOO sl5,OOO SI5O'OOO $75'OOOAllocate Maintensnce
(S3O'OOO + 4OTOOOsq. ft. = $75 Persq. ft.) r..!......o..
Allocate Personnel(S18'OOO + 12Oemployees = $15Oper employee|.
(30,0001 3,ooo 14,250 12,750
( l B,ooo) 6,000 12,OOO
$27O,OP
Divided by machinehours ..............
Divided by direct laborhourS.. .r . r . . . ' . . . .
Factory overhead rate
(21 Job No, 37522
MaterialsDirect laborFactory overhead:
1o machine hours O $7.5o..................... 7511 direct labor hours O 36.00
Chapter t3
s170,250 $99,750
, 22,700
16,625s7.50 s6.oo
Machining Assembly Total
s 6 0 s 7 $ o z24 99 123
66 141
slse s172 $331: :
CGA-63nada (adapted). Reprint with permission.
lL - Chapter 13
s Er3-g '
(21
Dcpartmcnt_ oycr|t eed
! bcforr db-
295
(11 Equation 1: E = $2O,0OO +.2OFEquation 2: F = $2O'OOO +.2OEEquation 3: G = $1O,OOO +.3OE + . iOF
SubstituUng Equatlon 2|nto EquaUon l:E = $2OrOOO +.2.O($2O,OOO + .2OE)E = $2orooo + $4,ooo + .o4E
.96E = $24rO0OE = $25'00O
SubstituUng E = $25,OOO into Equation 2:F = $2OIOOO +.2O($25,OOOIF = $25'0O0
Substituting E = $25,OOO and F = $25,OOO into Equation 3:G = $1O,0OO +.30($25,OOOI +.1o($25,o0o1G = $2O,OOO
ProduclnEDcptrtmcntt Mrrlcgng licrvlcc Dcpartrncntr
Dcprrt- OcncnlS T m c n t O f f l c o E F O T o t a l
trlbuUonof rcMcr
> dcpertmrntt iEoroOO igo,OooDlrtrlbutbnol!
Dcprrt-nrnt E.....Dcprrt-
12,50O
mlnt F-..., 7r5OO 1O,OOODcprrt-ment O..... g,o0o O,ooo i4,ooo iz,ooo
Total..... ST5,SOo 311g,5oo S4,ooo S2,ooo
320,000 t20,000 $1o,ooo 32oo,ooo
(25,O0O) 5,OOO 7,5OO
5,000 (25,oo0) 2,5oo
{2O,OO0}
s2oo,ooo
Chapter 13 : -296
il9rr$ll
A
l o ol o o
u-| o- o-t o ol q ' c ,r a Y
ts g t* l3 3ll
ltB�iF'tr
o o t lo o l lo o l l
l l
o o t lN r r l l3 l l
o o to I toilo o N t N i lO O I l r l l
- t d l
N O @ t O l t= r t r l l 0 l lF t$ l l
to tlt\ llo t lo t lo l lF t lglll
o o l o lo o F lo o c0 l
- l
n l o o lN - lI
i o o ol o o o
rulo- o_ o-l|o Qo cot ?t g +
r o o Al o o o^ 1 9 0 0- l d d u t
l l o l Ol g + Y
otrotrLTECLoooo.Eoo
floEoEt-(gCLqtoo.9too
o ' o o t o uo o ( o t ( o i lo \ t c v l l r . l l
- l - { lF ( I l - l O l l
rstl
l ol o' 1 3l FI g ,
l ol o
- l Q- l dl Ft g +
o
€ EO E5 f
F 3a 3
o o oo o oo - q qC\|6
qu
o t l
8ila l lifil
o oo oo ( oq,
@
"ll ol o
o l o -- t ol N@
o I8Jl!t ll- l ltn.tl
t o ol o o"13 sl F, 9 ,
€ El'lFt'l"l Fq
l o r o r l= l o l o l l
f l 3 i o r lr r o l a l l'S a i8 l l
q
;gsir:* jEEES$$Fg Ei E E E g F ; s ;€ 5 3 , . o o u r E{ O s
I(1'
ul
t8 i lI oJl
lsll
tr
El;P
? -
6 9. - F! ba + ,
5 h'tr o.'li o
3 Ei 3" i otlt
o o o l o t lo o l ; l \ i l |@- q 0_16ll l
r r N l o l lt g ' i lt { f^ t l
Chapter 13
Et3-12
Lot Sl = $2O,OOO +.2OS252 - 317,600 + .1OSl
SubsUtutlng: Sl = $2O'OOO + .2O ($iZ,600 + .1OSt)Solving: Sl = $2O,OOO + $3,52O + .O2Sl
.9gSl = $23,520Si = $24,OOO
SubsUtuting: 52 = $17,600 + .1O ($2C,OOO;= $17,600 + $2,4OO= $2o,ooo
Total Pl overhead = $94,OOO +.4O (Stl + .5O (S2l= $94r00O +,40 ($Z0,OOO) +.5O (S2O,OOO}= $94r0OO + $9,6OO + $1O,OOO= $113,600
Ef 3 -13
(11 The dual predetermined overhead rates are:S4OO,OOO
lO,OOOffi = $25 per direct labor hour
$3OO,000
and
= S75 per machine hour
Job f345
4,OOO machine hours
297
l2l
$1,OOO300
1.500
s2.BOO
2ln
E13- t 4 I
(11 The dual predetermined overhead rates are:
$9OO,0OO
Chagter t3
(21
3,600 machine hours
s6oo,0oo30O tonr
= $250 per machine hour
and
= $2'00O per ton
Job f lo3
Parts and matsrialsApplied overhead:
7Or $250 = $17,5OO4 x $2rOOO = 9r0OO . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . r . . . . r . . .
T O t a l . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . a a . . r . . . a a a a a a . r a . . . r r . . . . . . . . r . r . . . . . . . . . r .
$22,OOO
25.500
$47.500
b
iL
I
IL
Chapter t3
Pl3 - l
(r)
Overhead beforedistribution otsorvicrg depart-mOntS ....r............rDistrlbuUon ofMaintenanco..,...,..Gentl Factory..r.....Total factory
OVefhgad.r.,........
Machine houtg..,..,Direct labor hour:.Overhead ratos:
per machine hr..,per direct
labor hr. . . , . . , . . . .
PROBLEMS
Producing
Total cringl1g s-ooutilg
SorvicsDepartments-_
f,lain- Genertenance Fector
DigtrlbuUon of Sorulcc Department OverheadUsing the Dirsst Method
$68l,ooo $l7s,ooo $23o,ooo $76,000 Szoo,of 2,667 83,333 (76,000I'
133,333 06,667 ___
s32t,ooo $soo,ooo+ 4'OOO
l3gg,os681,O0o-
$ 80.25
-r 3OTOOO
$ 7 2-
i19:{t,98.o tg Grind-ins, eoo/l,o8o to smoothins6/9 to Grinding, 3/9 t; Smootiiing
b
go
P13-l (Continued)'
l2l First, the simultaneous equations ane solved:
L e t M = $ 7 6 , 0 0 0 + ( l / l O l GG = $2OO,OOO + l72Oll,8OO)M
Substituting; M = $76,00o +.1($Zoo,ooo +.4oM)
Solving: M =, $76,0OO + $2O,OOO + .04M.96M = $96rO0O
M = $1OO,O0O
Substituting: G = $2OO,O0O +.4O ($1OO,OOO1= $2OO,OOO + $4O,OOO = $24OIO0O
Distribution of Service Department OverheadUsing the Simultaneous Method
Chaoter t3
Producing ServiceDepartments Departments
Main- GeneralTotal Grinding Smoothing tenance Factory
Overhead beforedistribution ofservice depart-ments $681,000 S175,OOO S230,OOO S 76,000 $200,0OODistribution ofMaintenance.. . . . . . . .Gen'l Factory
1O,OOO 5O,OOO (1OO,OOO) 4O,OOO : -144,000 72rOOO 24,OOO (24O,OOO)
--
Total factoryoverhead S681,OOO $S29,OOO S352,OOO
Machine hours. . . . . ,Direct labor hoursOverhead rates:
per machine hr...per direct
labor hr. . . . . . . . . . .
+ 4,OOO+ 3O,O0O
s 82.25
s 11.73
180/1 '8OO to Grinding, 9OO/1,8OO to Smoothing, and 72011 ,8OO to General.* Factory
6/1O to Grinding, 3/1O to Smoothing, and 1/1O to Maintenance
Chagter 13 JOi
Pl3- l (Concluded)
(3) Distribution ot Service Department OverheadUsing the Step Method
Producing ServiceDepartments Departments
Main- GeneralTotal qin!!ry Sr*!!gg tenance Factory
Overhead beforedistribution ofservice depart-ments ..r.......,...r.,. $6911000 $175rooo $23orOOO 576,000 S2ooroooDistribution of:
Maintenance.....,Gen'l Factory..... 153,600 76,800
s 84.05
s 1 1 . 4 9
7,600 38,OOO (76,000) 3O,4OO'(23O,4OO)"
Total factoryoverhead.,........,. $691,ooo s336,2oo s344,gOO
Machine hours.. . . . .Direct labor hoursOverhead rates:
per machine hr..,per direct
labor hr. . . . . . . . . , .
+ 4r0OO+ 3O,OOO
' 18o17'8oo to Grinding, 9oo/1,Boo to smoothing, and z2otl,Boo to GeneratFactory'*6/9 to Grinding, 3/9 to Smoothing
w2
P13-2
(1)
Predetermined lactoryOVgfhgad ft1t9...................""'.Actual activity base amount...Applied tactory overhead ...,...
(21
s25,920 s92,oo9
Chaptor l3
FinishingDepartment
$ 1 .60 /DL$
ryg!_os,60o
CuttingDepartment
AssemblyDepartment
s 2.40lMHx 10,800 MH
s s.oo/DLHr 12,4OO DLH
/Actual overhead for\ first six months
f /Proiected overhead for 1/
- |. second sir months )Revised factory
overhead rate /Actual activity base \ . /Proiected activity base \( for first sir months /
- \ for second six months /
Cutting Department (machine hours):
szSro-o-9 + $-z?t'1oo - ry- - s2.3o per machine hour1O,8OO + 9 ,2OO 2O,OOO
Assembly Department (direct labor hours):
$56,80O + S57,5O0 _ $ l 14,3C-12,4oo + rg,ofo:
' f f i
- s4'5o per direct labor hour
Finishing Depaftment (direct labor dollars):
s98 '5oo + $96 '5oo - $1 95 '0o0 - sl .5o per direct labor dol lar566,0OO + $64,000 S13O,O0O
Chapter 13
Pl3-2 (Concludedf
(3) The applied overhead accounts should be adjusted by the differsnce inthe factory overhead rates (revised rate less original rate) ilmes the actu-al activity for the first sir monthg.
GuttingDelartment (9?.3o-$2.4O) r tO,BOOl $ (i,O8OlAssembly_Department (f.!o - $s.oo) x t z,looi is,zooiFinlshing Department ($|.SO:-$1,60) r $gO,ooOi iO,oooi' Dgct8ase in applied factory overhead..............,......... gFa*t,
The applied overhead adiustment is altocated to the inventory accountsand cost of goods sold on the basis of the unadjusted overhead compo-nent in each accounL
Workln Procgss.... . . ' r . . .r. . ' . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . .o,.. . , . . . . . . . .D... $ t2rOOOFinishgd Good8.......r ' .r..............r.oo.. '..r...........o.......ro 4BTOOOGost of Goods So1d.... . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .r. . .o...o. f BO;OOO
50h2075
Applied Factory ovgrhgad-cutting ..r......,........,..,.rfnntieO Factory OverheachAssembty...,,......,.......,.Appf ig9 Factory Overh ead-Finishin g r..........,...,..,..
Work In Process Inventory (Sf grggO x.05).....,Finished Goods ($l3rgg0 r .20|............... j .,.,,..Cost of Goods Sotd fit i3rggo r .ZS)........,......r.
$24O,OOO looo/o
Debit Credit1,09o6r2OO616OO
69421776
l0 ,4 lo
n4
P13-3
Chapter t3
Dlrcct departrncntrloverherd:
3u pc rvlr lotl'....-.....'..tndlrcct bbor **Indlrcct ruppllrl.*Labor frlngc bcncfltrEquipmcnt
deprccleUon......--Property ter'. deprecbtlon ol
bulldlngr, ctc..-....
Total ..........'.......6,..-..oProraUon of llght end
pOWCf ...-.......n.'-.--.
Dlrtrlbutlon of rcMcrdepartmenta:General Factory Cort
Pool ..'........-......F..Sto rcroo m ...,...ro-F....Repaln end Mebi-
tenancc...Total--produclng
departmontr .............
Macilnc houn.....-.......
Ovcrhead ratc pcrmech lnc hr.....,....,-.,,
'General Factory Gost Pool can be distributed either on the basis of S.8O persquaro loot ($67p2OO + 84'OOO sq, ftl or on the basis of the following pencent-ages: 25ohr 3goh,35oh, 4oh, and 6oh tor the first five departments. The per-centages aro determined by dividing the squans footage in each departmentby the total sguano footage.
- Storeroom can be distributed either on the basis of $.07 per requisition($18,900 + 2TO'OOO requisit ions) or on the basis of the tollowing percent'sgos: 4gohr 30ohr TSo1r' and 9% for the three producing and one servicedepartments. The percontages aro determined by dividing the number ofrequisit ions in each department by the total rsquisit ions.
*Repairs and maintenance can bs distr ibuted ei ther on tho basis of 31.88 permaintenance hour (S28'2OO + l5 'OOO hoursl or on the basis of percentages:32ohr Zgoh, and 4Ooh to the throe producing departments. The percentagesare determined by div id ing the maintenance hours in each department by thetotal maintenanco hours'
Sorvlcc DcpertrncntrProduclng DepartmentrGcnarelFrctory
Cort Pool
:!8,0007 j2OO3r6tt1
700
1r74O
324,00018,00o
I,O7O2,100
1 1 1 0 0
31{,ooo8r0oo5/a3O
10,14!t
10,000
37r2OOorlglrraoo
640
500
32or3OO5r.4OO'lr85Oap72
!rooo
316roooG,0oo5,OOO0,349
8,000
367,200
167,2OOl'
31O,212
2,688
32i2,4673{5,482
16B0081894
'47,271
20,16051670
35O,38lt
23,52O2,83!t
11,2,�O
!
CluptxtS
Pt3-4I
(tt
Department costs,.....................Allocation ol service departmentcostr:
Repalr ll 19, 8191.......,....,,,,..Power F 18, 7 l8l ......'.r.r.....r
Total ovgrhgad Gost....,,r.....,......Dirsct labor hour:Overhead rate per direct labor
h O Ur .a . . .a .aa aaor . . r . ra r la a r r a a .a . o . . . . . .
(21 Algebralc calcutations:R = Repair DepartmentP = Power Department
Substituting:
Sofvlng:
SubsUtuUng:
DepartmentsRepair
s48,OOOPower Molding Assembly
s2o4,ooo s32o,o0o
5,333218.750
s42soa34O,OOO
$ro.70
42,6673lr25O
s3s3,e1Zl60,o0o
s2.46
R = $48,O0O+.2OPP = $2501000 + .10R
R = $48,000 +.2O (SZ5O,OOO +.1OR)
R = 948,000 + $5O,O00 + .O2R.98R = $98rOO0
R = $IOO,OOO
| = $250,000 +. iO (S1OO,OOOIP = $260,000
DepartmentsHeparr power Molding Assemblv
s ;a,"ro sffio $zo4poo s3zo^oooDepa rtment costs...............,......Allocation of seruice departmentcosts:
Repair ll l l0, it7O, g/lO1.....Power l2y'lO, 7 l7O, l/l 0i ..,,.
Total overhead cbst,...,.......r......Dirgct labor hours .......,,.......r.,,.Overhead rate per direct tabor hour
(1O0,ooo)_92,ggg
1O,OOO(26O,OO0l
l O,OOO182,OOO
$396.OOO4O,OOO
s9.90
SOTOOO28,OOO
$426,oo91O0,000
s2.68(3) Altocating service department costs to producing departments ontyignoras any service rendered by one ""fuil" department to another,whlle the simultaneous method t""ogni."s service departments' supportto one another through the use of simultaneous equations. The lattermethod is more complete and shoutd lead to results of greater use tomanagemenL
fis
s25O,OOO
(48,000)(25O,OOO)
ffi
Pl3-5
(rt
Distribution of Sl (4/9' 5/91.'..Distribution of 32lUAr 4l8l....
Total Pl P2 Si 52
Chagter 13
Before distributioJt........,.,...... $65,000 $25,ooo $23r8OO $ TrZOO S9TOOO3r2OO 4,OOO ftr2ool3'OOO 6,000
tzl
Aftgr distributioJl-,.........o........ $65.ooo 53i.20o $33r8OO
Total Pt P2 Sl 32Before diStributiott................. $65'000 $25'OOO $23r8OO $7r2OO $9rOOODistribuUon of 52 (21O, 4l70l
4/1 Ol . . . . . .r . . . . .r . . . . . . . .ro.. .r . . . . .r . t
Distribution of Sl (4/9, 5/91,...l,8oo 3,ooo 3rooo (9,oool4,8OO O,OOO (lO,8OOl
Afterdistr ibutiolt . , . . . . . , , . .o.r.. .o.. S65.ooo $3{.6oo $tgr{OO
(31 Let 3l = 33:333 l:133?Substituting: Si = 37,200 +.40($9r0OO +,10Sll
Solving: .9651 = $iO,8OOSl = $11r25O
Subst i tut ing: 52 = S9,OOO +.10(S11,250)52 = $10,125
Total Pl P2 Sl 52
Before distributioJt................. $65,000 $2s,ooo $231800 $7r2oo I 9roooDistr ibuUon of Sl (4/tO, i l lO
I /1 O1 t..........r..................r..r.Distribution of 32 (U7Or 4l7O,
4,500 5,625 (ll,25ol 11125
411ol 2p25 4,O5O 4,O5O ( lO,t25): -
Afterdistributioll..........,r...,,.,. $65.ooo iCr.szs $33r{75: :
(9,OOOl
\
Chapter 13
Pl3-O
(11 Let r= Powerhouse; y= Perconnel; z= General FactoryEquation l: r = $ 1 6 1 0 0 0 + . f o y + . 2 0 2
x - .f oy - .2o2 = $161000E q u a t i o n 2 : y = $ 2 9 r 5 o o + . 1 o r + . 1 5 2
- . l o r + y - . 1 5 2 = $ 2 9 r 5 o oEquation3: z = $42rOoO + .2ox + .OSy
- .2Ot - .Osy+z = 30aOOO
Muftiply Equation 2by 1O and add to EquaUon l:r - . l O . y - . 2 O 2 = $ 1 6 1 0 0 O
-x + 1o.o0y - 1.502 = 295r0OO9 . 9 O y - l . 7 O z = S 3 t l r O O O
Multiply Equation 3 by 5 and add to EquaUon l:r - . l$y - .2Oz = $ 16,000
-x -.25y + 5.Oot = 2lorooo- .35y + 4.802 = S228'OOO
Then eliminate y between the resulting equations:9 . 9 0 y - 1 . 7 0 2 = $ 3 l t r O O O- . 3 5 y + 4 . 8 O 2 = $ 2 2 8 ' O O O
(.351 (9.9Oy) (.35)(l.7oz) = (.35X$3tl,OOOl(9.90X-,35y1 + (9,90)(4.802) = (9.90)GB226,Oo0l
3.465y-.5952 = $ 1O8,85O-3.465y + 47.5202 = s2r237,40o
46.9252 = $2,346 1250z = g 5O,OOO
From the last equation, z = $5O,oOo; putting z = $SOrooO in any one of theeguations in which r has been eliminated enables one to find f
9 , 9 O y - 7 . 7 O 2 = $ 3 l l , O 0 O9.9Oy - l.7O ($5O,OOO) = $31i,OOO
9-9OY = $398'OOOy = $ 4O,OOO
Then putting y = $4O'0OO and z = $5O,OOO In any one of the original egua-tions enables one to find r
r - . l o y - . 2 O 2 = $ 1 O , O O Ox - . iO($4O,OOO} - .2O($5O,OOO} = $16,000
x = $3O,OOO
Hence the solution is:I = $SOIOOO
Y = $40'oooz = S5OTOOO
g7
w
Pf3-6 (Concfuded)
(2tMhtng Rcftnlng
^-:-irzcsrooo t 0o,ooo
PowrnFtnlattng ilil:
Porrm- ocncnft r d "ooo f f i ##
Chagter t3
!,ggo (3o,ooo, 3,OOO:':::
'-i"-9;'dffi i:3332rooo
Prlmaty @!t........DbtrfbuUon:
Powcrhouro.....Pcltonncl ...._.Ocncref Fectory
Totel-_$g2,goo
3482^3OO-
T'SOOlfrooo12|SOO
- -
Ttoot2rOOOlO,OOO
srs.,ooo fr.gg 3*r"6torooo ro,ooo
r -vtvYv' z.t;,go
# '-'-vv ?'5oo tso@l
P73-7
(1) Annuaf normat cost center overhead ratesl
(21
Departmont 1O:Gost Centgr
!!-f ...............o..,.......cost center I o-2 ;:;::::::::........Department 2O:lost Centgr
?9-! .....r................r...Gost center 2o-2::::::::::.::::::.:.......
Factory overhead applied to:
Department 1O: .Gost Center
l9_1, 7,220 machine hours x $e.eOcost center to-2: tboo rnlinin" hours x $l.ooDepartment 20:Cost Center 2o-1:
?r??O labor hours r 31.15cost Center 20_22 t;6s; ffi; t'ours r S1.25
Jolat Fixed VariabteRato Rate Rate
s2.403.OO
$ l . f s7.25
I .gof . f 5
s .32.30
$f .501.95
$ .83.95
(3)
Costenters Depts.
= S2,928= 6100O Sg,g2g
= $2rsgz.so= 2,O62.5O $4,650
Dept. 2Os4r005.oo4,65O.oo
-$ (ocs.oor- - . - - ,
3-T:lfactory overhead........,..... qe&lqr'actory ovgrh ga d "fi ;;:;!!'!'t""'t""""'.r.... $9, 430. ooUnderapplied (overapptied) ...r..,._..,....:.:_:.;
ffi
Chapter 13&
Pt3-8! i
1
(11 The dual prodetermined overhead ratas art:- $4oorooo _ .ra! ___ r!-
lorooo ffi = $25 Par direct tabor hour
# = S3o Permachinehour
(21 Job 1564
(31
Direct rnateriaf ...... ....................... $2rOOOliregtlabor(3or$101............r.................r,......,...
--t;;;
Applied overhead:3Or$25 = $75O1O X $3O = 3OO...........,.,......r............,....... IIOSO
? a l a lt l 'L t1 "r""""" ' r " . . . . . t .ar . . . . . . r . . . r . . . .oa. . . . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3r3so
Job l6il2
:i::l :i:gTl.::::.:........r...,............................... S2TOOODirgct fabor (3O x $i 01.......r,o.r..r.r.. 300Appfied overhead:3OrS25 = $ ZSO60 r $3o = lr8oo .....................r..r.... zrsso
Total .........,.r.......,;;.....,...............r....... $4rg5o
(41 (a) A single predetermined overhead rate based on direct tabor hours wouldbe:
S4OO,O00 + $600,00Ol6,000 OirCAlaOor trours
= 362.50 per direct labor hour
310 Chapter 13
Pl3-8 (Conctudedf
(bl Job 1564
Dirsct materlalDirgct labor (3O r $1 O1................'.........."o.D...................t.........Applied overhgad (3O r $62.501....j..................r...........oo.'........
Total
Job f6il2
$2,OOO300
1,875
9!'1?9
(cl
Direct materlalDirgct labor (3O r $l O1..............r......o.........................'....'........Applied ovgrhgad (3O r $82.501............'....................,...D.o......rTotal
$2,OOO300
1,975
(51
$4,175
The competitive lmpllcatlons of a single overhead rate are that on jobsrequiring much labor and littfe machine time (e,9., Job l5gdl, Mn willcompute lts cosB at too high a level and will thsrefore quote too high aprice to the customer. These iobs will probably be lost to competitorswho know their costs betten on fobs requlring much machine time andlittle labor (o.9,, Job 16321, MTI will calcufate its costs at too fow a leveland will, therafore, quote too low a price, These jobs will probably bewon by MTI because of the low price, but will generate less profit thanerpected, or perhaps eygn a loss.
CItWter 13
c13- l
3 1 1
(1)
CASES
Empco Inc. is currently using a plant-wide overhead rate that is apptiedon ths basis of direst labor dollats. In general, a ptant-wide manufactur-ing overhead rate is acceptable only if a similar relationship betweenoverhead and direct labor erists in all departments, or the company man-ufacturcs produc-ts which receive proportional services from each
-
department"' In most casesr departmental overhead rates are preferabte to ptant-wide overhead rates because plant-wide overhead rates do not provide:t a framework for reviewing overhead costs on a departmental basis,
identifying departmental cost overruns, or taking corrective actionto improve departmental cost control.
' sufficient information about product profitability, thus, increasingthe difficulties associated with management decision-making.
Because Empco uses a plant-wide overhead rate applied on the basis ofdirect labor dollars, the etimination of direct tabor in the DriilingDepartment through the introduction of robots may appear to reduce theoverhead cost ol the Drilling Department to zeno. However, this changewill not reduce fired manufacturing expenses such as depreciation, p-lantsuperuision, etc. In reality, the use of robots is likely to increase firedexpenses because of increased depreciation expense. Under Empco'scurrcnt method of allocating overhead costs, these costs wi1 merely beabsorbed by the remaining departments.
(a) In order to improve the allocation of overhead costs in the Guttingand Grinding Departments, Empco should:o establish separate overhead accounts and rates for each of
these departments;' select an application basis for each of these departments that
best reflects the relationship of the departmental activity tothe overhead costs incurred (e.g., direct labor hours, machinehours, etc.);
' identify, if possible, fixed and variable overhead costs andestablish fired and variable overhead rates.
(bl In order to accommodate the automation of the Dritting Departmentin its overhead accounting system, Empco shoutd:o establish separate overhead accounts and rates for the
Drilling Department;' identify' if possible, fixed and variabte overhead costs and
establish fixed and variable overhead rates;' apply overhead costs to the Dritl ing Department on the basisof robot or machine hours.
(21
(31
: * i
(21
312
cl3-2
(11
cl3-3
Chapter 13
I
The company should use departmental ovorhead ratos since the twodepartments ano producing heterogeneous producta. The added accura'cy is requlred for pricing decisions and for better cost control informa-tion.The fixed cost of both seruice departments should be allocated based onlong-range facitiUes utilization. Variable cost of purchasing would be bet-ter lllocated using a cost driver, such as purchase orders, because thereis a stronger explained relaUonship than by use ol volume of materialsordered. Allocation of variabte cleaning cost basod on square footagesoems reasonable; however, the variable cost of maintaining equipmentshould be isolated and charged to departments based on the cost of ser-vices provided.
A futler consideration of the interactive benefits of departmentswoutd be achieved by use of thE step or simultaneous methods' andpreferably the simultaneous method. Such consideration is desirablebecause the ssrvice departments provide services to each other.
A letter to the president of Summerville InC:
Dear Sin
From a study of the manufacturing operations of Summervil le lnc.' i tis recommended that in distributing its factory overhead, the companyuse predetermined overhead rates applied as percentages of the directlabor cost. Tho company should use predetermined rates based on nor'mal capacity rather than actual overhead rates because of the widecyclical flustuations in its business. Using actual rates would, due totarge frxed overhead costs, make the per unit overhead cost high in thelow production periods and low in the high production periods. Usingpredetermined rates, the per unit overhead cost would be level the yearround. For quoting prices and pricing inventories per unit, costs whichare neither Inflated nor deflated by the cost of factory facilities are best.
The company shoutd use departmental overhead rates because therateg obviously yary so markedly between departments. An overall ratewould not be correct for any department. Summerville lnc.ts overhead isa large part ol factory cost, and any inaccuracy in the per unit costcaused by the use of an overall rate would be material. lf all the productsmade used all departments proportionately, an overall rate would resultin a substantially accurate total (but not departmental) unit overheadcost. Howeve6 in Summervil le lnc. the products do not use all thedepartments proportionately. Furthermoner use of de partmental ratesaids in pinpointing cost control responsibil i ty'
(1 )
Chapter 13
C1'3.3 (Concludedl
(21 Wage rates are substantially uniform within the separate depart-ments, and departmental labor costs ara closely proportlonata to labortime. Therefore, distributing the factory overhead on the basis of directlabor cost would in this caso effest about as accurate a distribution aswould the direct labor hours baso. The clerical erpense of the dirsctlabor cost base would be low because the method does not requiro accumulaUon of the number of direct labor. hours applicable to each job.
Applying overhead on the basis of prime cost is not recommendedbecause of the wide differences in the costs of the materials used tomake a given lamp or fixture. Factory overhead is the cost of factoryfacilities. The factory facilities used to make a lamp of silver are notmorc'than those used to make the same lamp of copper. For this nsason,the use of prime cost (since it includes materials cost) would rasult in anercessive charge to lamps using erpensive materials.
Sincerely,
cl3-4
(1) The ten cost items can be categorized into four basic gnoups for purpos-es of discussion:
ItemAllocation
Method JustificationAll ltems in thiscategory should bedistributed.(a) Salaries and
benefits .....,.,,..,,.,(bl Supplies ..,......,,.,....
The costs of these two itemsare directly incurred by theactivity centers and can becontrolled by the supervisor.A part of the salaries andbenefits might be ercludedfrom a variable cost chargingrate.
3 t
l.
DirectDirect
l l .
311
Cl3-4 (ConUnued|
ItemAll ltemr In thlrcategory rhosld bedlstributed becauge adlrast caussl baslrerlstr, but theYghould be crcludedfrom a variable costcharging 18t8.(cl EqulPment
malntenallclg .......(dl lnsurance......-.....
(gl Equipment andfurnituredePreclatloll ........
(el Heat and alrconditlonill! ..'..'.
(hl Buildlnglmprovementsdepreciatig ll ........
lll. This item should bedistributed because areasonable measurefor estlmatlng thecaugal relaUonshiPeristg.m ElgctricitY.........'..
Chapter'13
Justification
The costs of these items aredirectlY Incurred bY the activitYconters but are controlled bYcorporate PollcY' TheY would beincluded in a lull cost chargingrate and excluded from avariable cost charging rate'
The costs of these items arediroctly incurred bY the activitYcenters. TheY are notcontrollabte bY the centerc inthe usual sense. TheY would beinctuded in a lull cost rate andexcluded from a variable costcharging tate.
AllocationMethod
DirectDirect
Direct
Direct(onc eenter onM
Direct(one center on$
Equipmentandwattageratings
A reasonable estimate canbe made of the electricalcharges that can be controlledby effieient use of equiPment.The cost should be includedin a full cost and a variablecost charging rate.
g
Chapter t3
Ct3-4 (Conctuded)
Itamfv. Tlrc roJi6Gis ftems
thould be dlstributedlf r fufl cost chargingrato lg required.m Buitdins
3 t 5
There is no cost controt benefitfrom allocation of these costs.The only reason to ailocate isfor a futl cost charging rate.
other generafbasis
Thc number of hours serected for.determining the charging rate dependsupon the purpo:" 9f estabfishing the rati. ii tie ouiectiie is-to "i"rg"utor departments for all the coslts-of computer-operations, the actualhours that can ba identified wittr ur? $;e;p"ir"nt" wiil be incrudedIn thc base hours. This amounG-to 3r5oo hour:, determined as fogows:
Actual User TimeTesung and debuggingffiSetup of jobs .......,.....,.Procgssing jobs ...r......,...................
Total hout€....r a a a a a a a a a a a r a a a . o . a t a a a a a . r a r a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
To promote cost contror, the company might consider a duar chargingrate, whereby the variabre costs wouid uJ crrirg"d or",. actuar user time(31600 hoursl and fired costs over avairabfe timl (cre42 hours).
occupancy andsecurity............... Squaro
ol Gorporate feet
admlnlstrativechargesr.............. i lumbgrof
employeesor some
AllocationMethod Justification
250500
2,7503,5OO
250500
2,750742
4,242
(21
Chapter 13316
cl3-5
(rl
I
Actual factory overh gad """""""""t""""Applied factory overhgad .....""""""""""
Underapplied tactoly overhe3d """"""""
$85,OOO60,000 (15'O0O hrs. x S4l
l2l (al The too overtime hours resulted in $4oo additional applied tactory
overhead. The overtime premium increased ttre astual factory over-
head of the department 3525 (StO.5O + 2l r lOO hoursl' The extent
to which these items ifect the underapplied factoryoverhead
depends on whether or not they weno included In esumates used in
compuUng the $4 factory overhead-rato'(bl Wagi l;cia""" to direJ laborers do not affect lactory overhead
directly, However, such incteases will cause an increase in numer-
ous lringe benefii costs such as FlcA tar, unemployment taxes'
worter{ compensation, and pensions. lt the incttase wers also
granted to indirect worierc of all categories, the increase in factory
overhead might be substantiat, causing a largor underapplied over-
head amouni, or a smaller overapplied amount'(cl The Fabricatlng Departmentb share of the loss would be sll2'5O
and would be a tactoi in causing a targer, underaPPlied overhead
"roun{ * a smalter overapplieO amount' Slnce the distribution was
mosi tlkely a management decision, the reason(sl should be given in
an erplanatory note in the cost reports and the superuisor relieved
of the responsibility.
Clppter 13
cl3-O
(tl Allocation basis:
3 t 7
October NovemberHours % Hours %
f,lachine hours:Fast lood f urniturg .....r........Gustom fu rnitur9.......r...r.....
Direct labor hours:Fast food furniturg .........o....Gustom fu rniturg.,........,......
Cost reallocation: October NovemberDollars % Dolfarc %
1r32O18r48O19,8OO
IO'OOO30,OOO40,o99
6.6793.33
l_9o,oo
25.OO75.OO
100.oo
17r5OO28)25O43r75O
13.0686.94
100.oo
40.0o60.oo
100,oo
2156017,O4O
_1_Uoo
Machine hour base:MaintonaDCg.................,..... $ 5oroooDepreciatioll ,..,......r.r..,....... 42tAgOProperty tgx .....,.......,....,r..., IrOOOAll othgrr........,.....,............,. 32rOOO
Total to bg allocatgd .,,...,............@f99Fast lood furnitur9.,....,....... $ 8r8OOCustom furniture,,..r.......r..., 123r2OO
s132,OOO
6.6793,33
$ 48,OOO42,OOO
IrOOO24,5OO
_grzpeg$ 16,000
l06,50013.0686.94
1oo.oo S!_egoo 1_gg.oo
October NovomberDoflars % Dollars %
$ 13,0OO1O9,5OO
$122,5OOFagt food furn|ture..............ffi 25.oo Fffirasf rgog rurn1run9.............. $ zTrogo z5.oo $ 49IOOO 4O,OOGustom furniture..r..t,.....,.... 81'OOO 75.OO Z3'5OO 60.00
_$log,ogg l_oo.oo _$123,s99 !-oo.o0
Whon gross profit is recalculated, with the factory overhead reallocatedon the base necommended by the controller, as shown in the fotlowingSchedulo, the figures tend to support the controllerb conclusion. Also,the allocation bases suggested appear to have a neasonable relationshipto the costs being allocated.
Labor hour base:Supervisio|l .........,...r,..r,...... $ 13rO0OEmployee benefits...,.,........ gS,OOO
Totst to be attocated ..................,5io6, oE
(21
318
I
Cl3-O (Concludedl
AEiler 13
AOUA FURNISHINGS COMPANYRevlsed Statement of Gross Prolit
(ln thousandsl
October NovemberFast Food Custom Fast Food CustomFurnituru Furniturc Fumituro Furniture
Gross sa1os...........,......r............. $400.0 $900.0 S8O0.0 $ 800.0
Dirgct matgriats.................r....... $rOO.o $225J $4OO"O $ ,OO.oDirect labon
,FOrming...o.............,.......r..... 17.O 82.O 31.O 72.OFinish|ng.............,............... 4O.O 142.0 7O,O 125.0Assemb1y.....r....,...D...r.......... 33.O 8O,O 58.O 53.O
Factory ovsrhoad allocation:Machine hour base...,........, 8.8 123.2 16.0 106.5labOf hOUf bi!1O.................. 27.A 8l.O {9'0 73.5
Cost of goods gotd....,.........r....., $gzs.g $713.2 $624.0 $ 830.0
Gross profit s 74.2 s180.8 $176.0 s 170.0Gross profit percentaffo............ 18.6oh 20.f|oh 22.Ooh 21.?lt1,:h
Ql.t-1. C.;qnpared to tradticnal coeting, ABC b I rprolhorough applicalion of cost traceabil ity.Tnditioal corthg traccr crly dirccl matcrialrrd dirrsl labor to odput; ABC ncogni:er thatrnany cther cosils aro traceabb, it'ncl to ouput,Uten looftercod obieEtr called activitiec.
Q1+2. The rcle ol aciiviilbs h assigrrhg cctr to prod,uc l r , ur ing ABC, i r to rcrvo ar thc l inkb.lwcon products and cogls; activit iec arcnquired to producr cr.rtput, and it b hc activi-l icr lhat consumo rcaourccg, thur causingcodr to be hcuned This dtten lrorn traditbn-el cooting h whicfi output ir ossurnod !o causecod!.
Q14.3. Examples of rignificant, costly activities inmanufaclur ing ef r rc t t ing up, changingdcrigns, recciving matorials, reguisit ioningmalerials, moving materials and products,oderhg lrorn yendo6, and inspecting.
014-4. Thc two circumgtancer that mugt be presenlfor a traditbna, cocthg ryrtcm to repod distort-ed prodwt c€st! arc a oqnplax cosi strustureand a diverss prodrrt line.
Q1+5. A conrplex €sl Elrusture is presenl if a signifi-cant parl o{ overhead cocl b not related to thevolume ol ouput
Q146. A dversc prdwt lhe is me h sfibh diflerentproducls consumr different mixes s{ volume-relcled and nonnolume-relaled ccts.
Q1+7. Thr four leveb cil cqb and drivers in ABC aretho tnit level, the batch level, the product level,and the plant level.
O1+8. l l a product conrumer l0% of all unit. levelastivities and 3ogl of all batch.level activities,lradilbnal costing will under-report its cost byassigning 10% of all overhead costs lo thoproduct, including l096 of batch-level costs,whon 3096 of batch-level costs should beassigned to tho produc{.
Q14-9. When both bw-vdume and higft-rolume prod.uctr arc produced h a cornpany using tradi-li<mal cethg, lht lorutolume prodrrt is likelyto havr ils coet distorted by a hrger percont-agr than lhe high-volume product. The low-
CHAPTER '4
DlscusstoN ouEsTtoNs
volumr product'r cost b gencrally distortcddownwad by tradilinal ctinq and thr high-volurnc prcdrrfr cct b diCodod rpwerd
01+10. In assigning pbntdvol co€il! to prcclrtr, ABCoffen little or no advantagt ovor traditbnatclh9.
01+11. Thr dillercncc bctwecn CM and ABC tr pri-rnarily rrplahed by thc fact thd AgC b a bngrun decicion-making technique, while CM icahql-run analysis.
Ot+12. lf a procl.rct b dirqrthued, lhe cocir reportedlor that producl by ABC will rpt necessarily borvoided, bocaucr ABC only measuns howrasource3 arc cgrsumed by products, not howspending will be affecled by discontinuing aprdusl. AvoHhg a cosl requircs ttrat lesr brspstl ql sorrp rosqtnoo(s), and ABC docc,ptpredbl changos h spending Cfhis it also lrurof Iraditboal absorption costhg.)
01+13. The relstbnship between ABCand ABM b hatABM uses inlormation obtainod fronr ABC tornake improvornents h thc finrr
Q1+14. The area ol ABM that lollows directly fromABC's revisbn of product ccts b the strategicrealigrnment of thc tirm,r prbhg rtructuro andproduct line, permitting thr firm to retain orregnh high-volume business h spitc of prbhgpressur€, and pronrpling managoment lo reex-amine lhe roles ol sorne lorv-volume prcducts.
Q1+15. The high costs ol eqne activitiea, especiallynon-value-added act ivit ies, can f ocus aientirrm lhe need to reduce or elimirate them.
014-16. ABC can lead to improved dociriona h design-ing a producl becauco ABC tella thr coot c{each activity required h prcduchg thc productThis information permits designen lo makcdesign decisionr more acsuralely, eo that thenpsl cosl-ettsctive design can bc selecled
Q1+17. The link between ABC and TeM is that ABGreveals the cosls ol each activily, includinglhose that do not add value, and TeM aeeks toreduce or elimhalo non-value-added asliviliec.Thus, ABC can focus attenticn h a TOM ollortand can prbritize TOM's imprwernentl.
3 1 9
l2l
Chapter 14
Pl4-4 (Continued)
329
SHAUTON COMPANYProduct Costs from ActiviW Eased Costing System
overhead rates:tl3ttrooo aetup-related costs divided by 90 aetups = 81'5oo per setup
S24O,OOO design-related costs divided by 8,OOO design hourr = 33O per design hour
S825,OOO ou:er overtread divided by 3O,OOO direct labor hours = 327.50 per direct labor hour
Fancy Plain Total
Direct material .....,.....r......... S 60,000 $ 160'000 S 22O,OOODirgct fabor......,.............. ' .. ' . ............ ' .. 28r0OO 272rOOO 3OOTOOOOverhead:
S l r5OOx45setups , . . . . , . . . . . . . ' . ' . . . . . . . . . . . 67r5OO$1r5OO x 45 setups,. . . . . , . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . .$3O x 3rOO0 design hrs...... ' ........,..... 9OTOOOS3O x S'OOO design hrs. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . .S27.5Ox2,800DLH,. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . ' . , , 77'OOOS27.50 x 27 r2OO DLH ,.......,,........r.,...
67,500 135,OOO
15O,OOO 24O,OOO
szoO,0OO sl,OOO.OO
122,5OO 612.5O
993?,s99 q,6l3.59
748,OOO 825,000
(3) Because the existing system used direct labor hours as the only alloca-tion base and Fancy consumed 2,8OO|3O'OOO = I rrcoh of direct laborhours, the existing system allocated 9 lrcoh of all overhead to Fancy. Theactivity information indicates Fancy consumed 45/90 = SOoh of setup-related activity and 3,OOO/8,00O = 37.ioh of design'-related activity, so thereconcil iation is as follows:
perTotal Unit
Cost of Fancy from traditional system,calculated in requirement (1) . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments fonUnderstatement of setup costs,$135,000x(5O% -g t rcoh l $54,900
Understatement of design costs,S240,OOO x (37.Soh - g t,coh|..,...,.. 67,600
Total adj ustme nts.........Cost of Fancy from ABC system, as
calculated in requirement (2) . . . . . . . . . .
Chagter 14 321
El4-5 The existing system allocated only 5O/5O,OOO = O.l oh of all overhead to'
Product RK last yean but Product RK accounted for 120161000 = 2oh otdesign change activity last year. Therefore, with respect to designchange costs only the existing system understated RKb cost last year bya total of:
(2% - O.1%l r S2,ooO,0Oo = S38'0OO understatement
E14-6 The existing system allocated $40'OOO/S2OO,OOa = 2Ooh of all overhead'to Product BB last yea6 but BB accounted for only 2I2OO = 17o of the
activity of maintaining supplies of purchased subassemblies last year.Therefore, with respect to the cost of maintaining supplies of purchasedsubassemblies only, the existing system overstated BBts cost last year bya total of:
l2o% - 1%l x S5o,ooo = $9,5oo overstatement
El4-7
(11 $126 of overhead cost wil l be allocated to a unit of f456, calculated asfollours:
s l , 4OO, OOox 9O machine hours = $12 , 600;
lO,OOO machine hours
$ 1 2 , 6 0 0 = Sieo per un i t1OO units of Product f 456
9554 of overhead cost wil l be allocated to a unit of #456, calculated asfollows:
## x 6 setups = $15, boo of batch -level cost;
$5O0,000 x 2BO desisn hours = ,r"ot"T:[t"t",olo",,
l2l
x 90 machine hours = s5'4oo of unit-lo ,ooo machine hours
" ' r 'v "v . 's - and p lant - level cost .
4,OOO design hours
Therefore, the overhead allocated to a unit of Product #456 is:
(S15,OOO + $35,OOO + $5,4O0) l lOO units = S55,4OO/1OO units = 5554 perunit
ChWter t4
El4'8 Because itt" toCiti:ltlsJstem uses machine hours as the onty alloca-tion bas-e' Product f456 is allocated 9o/1o,Ooo = O.9079 of all overhead.The actlvlty data indlcate f456 shoutd be assign ed 6112o = 5oh of batch-level costs, 28ol4ro00 = 7Vo of product-level costs, and o.g7o of all otheroverhead. The reconciliation is:
PerTotal Unit
Cost of #456 from traditional system, aseafculated in part (f l of El4-7,.........,..,.
Adiustments for:Understatement of bateh-tevelcosts, $3OO,OOO r (Soh - O.g%1............
Understatement of product-levelcosts, S5OO,OOO r (Zoh - O.9%) .....,..,...
Total adjustments .......,............,rr..r...,. ' .Cost of f456 from ABC system, as
cafculated in part (21 of E14-l,..,....t......
$12,600 $teO
$12,300
30.500$4z,goo
s55,4OO
428
s554
E14-9
(1) 5140 of overhead cost witl be allocated to a unit of #456, calculated asfollows:
s l , 4OO, OOO20, OOO DL hours
r 2QO DL hours = Sl4, OOO;
s l4 , O00= $140 per uni t1OO units of Product # 456
S74o of overhead cost will be alfocated to a unit of #456, catculated asfollows:
$soo, ooo5OO setup hours
x 3O setup hours = $i B,OOO of batch-tevel cost;
ssOO,OOO4O design changes
S2O0,0OO + S4OO,0OO2O,OOO DL hours
(21
x 4 design changes - S5o'ooo of product-tevetcost;
2OO direct labor S6,000 of unit-X . =
houni and plant-level cost.
Therefore, the overhead allocated to a unit of product #4s6 is:(S18,OOO + 35O,OOO + 56,OOO)l lOO uni ts = S74,OOO/1 OO uni ts = SZCO per uni t
Chapter 14
E14- l O
323
Because the traditional system uses direct labor hours as the only alto-cation base, Product f456 is allocated 2ool2o,ooo = 1oh of all over-head. The activity data indicats f456 should be assigned 3O/5OO = 6ohof batch-level costs, 4l4o = looh of product-level costs, and 1 oh of allother overhead. The reconciliation is:
perTotal Unit
Cost of #456 from traditional slstem, ascalculated in part (1) of El4-9...,,....
Adjustments fonUnderstatement of batch-level
costs, $SO0,OOO x (O% - 1oh1.........Understatement of product-level
costs, Ssoo,ooo x (1o% - 1oh1.......Total adjustments ...,...,.
Cost of #456 from ABC system, ascalculated in part (21 of El4-9 ......
s l 4 , O O O 5 1 4 0
$15,000
45,OOO
s6O,OOO
s74,OOO
600
s740
E14'11 Activitias gr u, y, and dd are the only ones that definitety add value.Activity k is questionable, because a single deburring aiter drilling
. would be sufficient to remove all burrs. The first deburring, k, is proba-bly performed to make it easier and safer for workers to handle theproduct in the interim. lf the need for so much handling can be elimi-nated (perh-aps through automated material-handling eguipment), kcould be eliminated with no toss of vatue to the custbmer iand perhapsat a net savings to the company), so it is really a non-value-addedactivity.
Chaoter 1n
PROBLEMS
P14- l
(f l The overhead rates in the eristing costing system are S20 per machinehour, and 31 4 per direct labor hour, calculated as follows:
SSO,OOO of machine -related overhead
S28O,OOO of remaining overhead costs2O,OOO DLH
(21 Making only the changes suggested by the study, the structure of theABC system would be:
Pool Drivermachine operat ion.. . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . , . . . machine hourssetup and material handling ....... setups *other materials-re|ated.,.,..,........ purchase ordersall remaining overhead.....,.. direct labor hours
. !
The study did not suggest any change for machine operation cost, norfor the "other overheadtt category.
, _
(31 The ABC slEtem's overhead rates (driver rates) are S16.25 per machinehour, $45 per setup, $5o per purchase order, and $1o.ZS per direct laborhour, calculated as follorlrs: -
565,OOO of machine operat ion overhead = S lo .25 per mach ine hour4,OOO machine hours
515,OOO of mach ine-se tup overhead p lusS3O, OO0 of materials handling overhead = $45 per setup
1,00O setups
SgS,ooo of other materials -related cost = S5o per purchase order7OO purchase orders
S215 ,0OO of t r other overhead t l
ZAffi = SlO.75 Per direct labor hour
= S2O per machine.hour
= S14 per direct labor hour
II
Chagter 14
P14 '2- '
11) The three overhead rates in the edsting costing system are S17.5O perl r
machine hour, S.8O per direct material dollar, and $1 .25 per. direct labor
s dollar, calculated as follows:
S8OO, OOO of materials -
refated overhead Sooh of direct material cost or
@ -
S.8o per direct material dollarI
material cost
$2,5OO,OOO of otheroverhead cost 125% of direct labor cost or
m =
$1.25 per direct labor doltardirect labor cost
l1l Making only the changes suggested by the study, the structure of the
ABG system would be:
Pool DrivermaChing OpgfatiOn.......r.....,...,..., maChing hOUfSsetup and material handlio$ ,...... setupsmaterials administration..........r.. purchase ordersf fe ight- in r . . . r . . . . r . . . . . . . r . , r . r . . . . . . . . . . , . . . matgf ial pOUndS
all remaining overh€ad.......,..."... direct labor cost
The study did not suggest any change lor machine operation cost, norfor the "all remaining overhead" categoly.
(3) The ABG system's overhead rates are $12.5O per machine hour, 51'OOOper setup, $35 per purchase order, $.75 per pound ol materials, and$1.25 per direct labor dollar, calculated as follows:
$700,O0O of machine -related overhead = $12.5o per machine hour4O'O0O machine hours
$5OO, OOO of machine -operat ion overhead = $12.50 per machine hour
40,OOO machine hours
b
$2oo,ooo of machine -setup overhead plus$3OO,OOO of materials handling overhead
5OO setups
S35O,OOO of materialsadministration overhead
= $1 ,Ooo pe rse tuP
IO'OOO purchase orders= $95 per purchase order
326
I
P14-2 (Concluded)
$150,0OO of freight - in= $.75 per pound of materials
2OO,0O0 pounds of materials
S2,5OOr00O of otheroverhead cost 125oh ol direct labor cost or
m =
$1.25 per direct tabor dottardirect labor cost
Pt4-3
tl) DRAPER COMPANYProduct Costs from Eristing Costing System
Chaptar 14
Overhead rate: 94,5O0,0OO of overhead divided by $3,OOO,OOOof direct labor cost = 150oh of direct labor cost
Standard Custom TotalDirect materia1.... . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . , $ 882rOOO S 1215OO $ 894r5OODirgct l?bor'. . . . . . ' . . .r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . 219t 0rO0O 9OrO0O 3rO0Or0OOOverhead:
150ohr $2r910rOOO........,..r,r..,.....,.... 41365rO0O1 SOoh x 59OrO0O... . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . r . . . , . . 135,OOO 4,5OO,OOO
Total cost .. . . . . . , .-. . . . . . . , . .r. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $8r157rOOO $23715OO
Uni ts produced. . . . . . . . . , . . . . . - . . . . . . r i . . . . . . . . . . + 731500 + 125
Costperuni t . . . . . . . . . . . . .o , . r . . . , . . . . . . . r . . i . . . t . . . $ 1 lO.rB S l r rOO
gg,3eds09
I
I
E
v
Chapter 14
P14-3 (Continued)
l2'lProduct Costs
.v
DRAPER COMPANYfrom Activity Based Costing System
Overhead rates:Si:IOOTOOO aetup-related costs divlded by 6O retupr = $STOOO per aetups9oo'o00 deslgn-related costq divlded by 15rooo deolgn hourr = $oo per design hour$il'300,000 other overhead divided @ 1'loo/o of direct labor cost
Standard Custom TotatDirect materialDirgct 1abor. . . . . . . . . . , . . r . r . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . .Overhead:S5TOOO r 3O setups .....................r,....35r0oo x 3o setups .......................,...$60 x 12rO0O design hls.........,........,$6O x 3,OOO design hrs,........,.,....r....I f ioh x $2,91 Or000.........r....,r...........1 1 O% x S90r00o.......,....,..r,..,.,.,.,...r..
Total cost . . . . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! . , . . . . . r . . r . . . . . . .
s 882,OOO2,g1Or0Oo
150,OOO
720,OOO
3,20 l ,OOO
s?effipoo ##
s 12,5OO9O,OOO
15O,O0O
180,OOO
s 8r4FOO3,OOO,OOO
3OO,O0O
9OO,OO0
3,3OO,OO0
2r352
s4E2
s8,394,599125
_L _1,252
Because the eristing system used direct labor cost as the onty allocationbase and custom consumed $9o,ooo/s3,ooo,ooo = JTo of direct laborcos.tr-the existing system allocated 3oh of ail overhead to custom. Theactivity information indicates custom consumed 30/6o = sooh of setup-refated activity and 3,ooo/15,ooo = zooh of design-rerated activity, so thereconcil iation is as follows:
PerTotal Unit
(3)
Cost of Custom trom traditional system,as calculated in reguirement (1)..,..,..
Adjustments for:Understatement of setup-related. _ costs, $3oo,ooo x (So% - g%1........ 51 4 i ,oooUnderstatement of design-related
costs, $9oo,ooo x (Zo% - g%1..... . . . 1s3,oooTotal adjustments.........
Cost of Gustom from ABC system, ascalculated in requirement (2) ............
$237,5OO s1,goo
294,OOO
s531 ,5OO
\* \
Chapter t4
P14-3 (Concluded)
(41 The only costs handled differently by the two costing systems were theS3OO,OO0 of setup-related costs and S9OO,0OO of design-related costs,for a total of $l,200r00O; this nepresents only 27% of the total overheadof $4'500'00O.
The change in the costing system caused the reported cost of Custom tochange from $237,500 to 9531,50O, which is'an increase of 124oh.
P74-4
(r l SHAUTON COMPAI{YProduct Gosts from Eristing Costing System
-
Overhead rate: $l,2OO,OOO of overhead divided by $SO,OOOdirect labor hours = $4O per direct labor hour
Fancy Plain TotalDirect materia|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ro... . . . . . . . . . . S 601000 $ 160,000 $ 22O',OOODirgct fabor... . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. , . . . . . . . . . .r. . 28'OOO 272.OOO 3OOTOOOOverhead:
S4O x 2r8OO DLH ... . . . . . . . . . . . . , .o... . . . . . .-.r l lZ,OOOS4O r 27r2OO DLH ... . . . . . .r. . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . lrOBSrOOO ir2OOrOOO
Total cost ...........................o..,.,.......,... Srooilooo $1FzO^ooo $1r?ro^0ooUnits produced..........r......,................, + 2OO + l6'000Cost per unit,.....,.....,.....r.................... S l^OOO S 95
l2l
Chapter 14
Pl4-4 (Continued)
329
SHAUTON COMPANYProduct Costs from ActiviW Eased Costing System
overhead rates:tl3ttrooo aetup-related costs divided by 90 aetups = 81'5oo per setup
S24O,OOO design-related costs divided by 8,OOO design hourr = 33O per design hour
S825,OOO ou:er overtread divided by 3O,OOO direct labor hours = 327.50 per direct labor hour
Fancy Plain Total
Direct material .....,.....r......... S 60,000 $ 160'000 S 22O,OOODirgct fabor......,.............. ' .. ' . ............ ' .. 28r0OO 272rOOO 3OOTOOOOverhead:
S l r5OOx45setups , . . . . , . . . . . . . ' . ' . . . . . . . . . . . 67r5OO$1r5OO x 45 setups,. . . . . , . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . .$3O x 3rOO0 design hrs...... ' ........,..... 9OTOOOS3O x S'OOO design hrs. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . .S27.5Ox2,800DLH,. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . ' . , , 77'OOOS27.50 x 27 r2OO DLH ,.......,,........r.,...
67,500 135,OOO
15O,OOO 24O,OOO
szoO,0OO sl,OOO.OO
122,5OO 612.5O
993?,s99 q,6l3.59
748,OOO 825,000
(3) Because the existing system used direct labor hours as the only alloca-tion base and Fancy consumed 2,8OO|3O'OOO = I rrcoh of direct laborhours, the existing system allocated 9 lrcoh of all overhead to Fancy. Theactivity information indicates Fancy consumed 45/90 = SOoh of setup-related activity and 3,OOO/8,00O = 37.ioh of design'-related activity, so thereconcil iation is as follows:
perTotal Unit
Cost of Fancy from traditional system,calculated in requirement (1) . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments fonUnderstatement of setup costs,$135,000x(5O% -g t rcoh l $54,900
Understatement of design costs,S240,OOO x (37.Soh - g t,coh|..,...,.. 67,600
Total adj ustme nts.........Cost of Fancy from ABC system, as
calculated in requirement (2) . . . . . . . . . .
t - \
330 Chapter tl
P14-4 (Concludedl
(4) The only costs handled differently by the two costing slrstems were the$135'OOO of setup-related costs and S24O,OOO of design-related costs,for a total ol $375,00O; this repnesents only 31.25oh oI the total overheadof $1r20OrOOO. -
The change in the costing system caused the reported cost of Fancy tochange from S20O,OOO to $322,500, which is an increase of 6l .25oh.
P14-s
(11 TUNNry COMPANYProduct Costs from Etisting Costing System
Overhead rate: $1,OOO,O0O of overhead divided by 5O'OOO directlabor hours = $2o per direct labor hour
lrlormal Enhanced Super Total
Direct materia|.. . . . . . . . . .o... . . . . . . . . $ 6OTOOO S 2OTOOO S S'OOO S 85rOOODirect tabor,.. . . . . .o... . . . . . .r. . . . , . . .o 30O,OO0 35'OOO 5rO0O 34O'0OOOverhead:
S2O r 45rOOO DLH.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9OOTOOOS2O r 4r5OO DLH.... . , . . .r, . . . . . .D,S2O r 50O DLH.... . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . ' .
9O,OOO1O,0O0 1,0OO,OOO
91,425,oO9Tota lcost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . S l r26OrOOO $145100O S2OTOOO
Uni ts produced. . , . . . . . . . . . , . + 30,OOO + I 'OOO + 5O
Gost per unit . , . . .r. . . . . . , . . . . . ,o... . . . $ CZ $ . t AS $ 409
Chapter ll
P14-S (Concluded)
(21 TUNNEY COMPANYProduct Costs from Activity Based Costing System'
331
Overhead rates:3400,000 batch-level overhead dhvlded by 500 rcgulslUona = 38oo pcr requlsltion$800,000 other overhead dividedby 5O,0OO direct labor houn = 312 per direct labor hour
Normal Enhanced Super Total
Direct materia1....,............... s 60,000 $ zorooo s 5,ooo s 85,oooDirect 1abor,......,...... 3OOTOOO 35,OOO 5'OOO 34O'OOOOverhead:$8OO x 150 t 'ee. . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , 120r00O$8OO x 2OO |1ee..............,..,$8OO x 15O Fee..........,.......$12 x 45r0OO DLH.. . . . . , . . . , , . . 54O'OOO$12 x 41500 DLH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$12 x 5oo DLH
12O,OOO 4OO,OOO
6,000 600,000
160,OOO
54,OOO
Tota|cost . . . . . . . , , . r . . . r . , . . . . . . . . ! . . Slro2oro0O S269'000 $136roooUnits produced.....,...r........r. + 3OTOOO + I'OOO + 50
s1,425,099
Cost per uni t , , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . S 34 S 269 $ 2r72O
(31 Because the existing system used direct labor hours as the only alloca-tion base and Super consumed 5OO/5O,OOO = Ioh of direct labor hours,the existing system allocated 1o/o of all overhead to Super. The activityinformation indicates Super consumed 15O/5OO = 3O7o of batch-levelactivity, so the reconciliation is as follows:
PerTotal Unit
Gost of Super from traditional system,as calculated in requirement (1).....,......... $ 2O,OOO $ 4OO
Adiustment for understatement of batch-fevel costs, S4O0,O0O x (3O% - 1%1..,,..., 116,000 2,32A
Cost of Super from ABC system, ascalculated in requirement (21.......... S136,000 $2,720
(4) The only costs handled differently by the two costing systems were the$4oO'oOO of batch-level costs, which represents onty 4}oh of the totatoverhead of $1,OOO,OOO.
The change in the costing system caused the reported cost of Super tochange from S2O,OOO to $136,000, which is an increase of Sa}oh.
3g2
Pl4-6
(r l
Chapter tl
TEKSIZE COMPANYProduct Gosts from Eristing Costing System
Overhead rate: $1,500,00O of overhead divided by 5O,OOO directlabor hours = $gO per direct labor hour
Regular Large Total
S 4o,ooo48O,OOO
l r20OrOOO
$43O,00O 91,72O,OOO+ |OTOOO + IO 'OOO
I 1o,ooo120,OOO
3OO,OOO
s 5O,OOO6OO,OOO
I,50O,OOO
s2d90,999
(21
4 3 $ 172
TEKSIZE GOMPANYProduct Costs from Activity Based Costing System
Overhead rates:S515,OOO setup-related costs divided by 1O3 setups = SS,OOO per setupS985,OOO other overhead divided by 5O,OOO direct labor hours = 319.7O per DLH
Regular Total
$582,O0O $1,568,OOO 52,15O,OOO+ lO,00O + 1O,00O
I l O,OOO120,OOO
255,000
197,00O
Large$ 4o,ooo
48O,OOO
26O,OOO
788,OOO
s 5O,OOO6OO,OOO
5l5 ,OOO
985,OOO
s 58.20 s 156.80
Chapler 14 33?
Pl4-g (Concluded)
(31 Because the existing system used direct labor hours as the only alloca-tion base and Regular consumed 1O,O0O/50,00O = 20oh of direct laborhours, the existing system allocated zooh of all overhead to Regular. Theactivity information indicates Regular consumed 51/103 = 49,51456oh otsetup-related activity' so the reconciliation is as follows:
Gost of Regular from traditionalsystem, as calculated in requirement (11 ...... '.... S43o,0oo S43.oo
Adiustment for understatement of setup-
PerTotal Unit
refated costs, $515,O0O r (49.51456% - 2oo/o1...Cost of Regular from ABC system' as
calculated in requirement (2).".........,...... ' .,. ' . .... 9582'OOq 998.20
Yes, Teksize Company does have a diverse product l ine in the sense inwhich the term is used in ABG. The fact that the two products have thesame annual unit volumes does not matter, because the existing costsystem does not use units as the atlocation base. Regular representsonly 2Ooh of direct labor hours but nearly SOoh of setup-related costs,while Large has a very different mix, so a diverse product l ine is presentin Teksize Company.
152,0O0 15.20
(4)
334
c14-1
(1)
Chaoter t4
CASES
DALI-AS DIVISIONProduct Costs from Existing Costing System
Overhead rate: SSOO,OOO of overhead divided by 2OTOOO directlabor hours = S{Qper direg! labor hour
1327
s 6,0003O,0OO
288,OOO
s324,OOO+ 2r4OO
s 13s
#333
S l so600
4,80O
s5,55O+ 6
s 92s
(21 DALI-AS DIVISIONProduct Costs from Activity Based Costing System
Overhead rates:S24O,OOO batch-level costs divided by 1,BOO eetupe = Si5O per setupS2OO,OOO product-level costs divided by 2,OOO design hours = SlOO per design hours36o'ooo other overhead divided by 20,0oo direct labor hours = sig per DLH
#327 #333
$ 6,000 S30,000
6,OOO
32,00O
12g,600
1 5 0600
600
2O,OOO
2 , 1 6 0
$2O3,6OO+ 2r4OO
s 84.83
s 23,510+ 6
gegeeg
Chaptor l1
Cl4-1 (Cont inued)
(3) Usualsel l ing pr ice. . . . . . . . . . . . .o.PfOdUCt COSt." . . . . . . . . . . , . . . ' . . . . . . r . ' . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . .o .
Usual selling price ...............,. '.,................ '.......Product cost. . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . " . . r . . r . . . ' . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . ' r . . . r . . . .
Gross margin 0oss) ......................r..........!.........
Pgrcent of salgs r . . . . . . . . . r r ' . . . r . . . , . ' r . . . . . . ' . ' . . . . t . r" t . . . . .
(4)
#321
sl so1 3 5
9_!s10%
#321
slso.oo84.83
s 6s .17430h
3a5
f333
s1,50o925
s 5753goh
f333
s 1,5OO.OO3,918.33
(s)
s(2,418.331
The ABC system shows that the relative prolitabilities of the two prod-ucts are the reverse of what is shown by the edsting system: the existingsystem shows a very modest gnoss margin of lOoh on f321r which isprobably not enough to cover its marketing and administrative costs,while showing a respectable 38% gross margin on f333. ln contrast, theABC system shows a 43oh gross margin on #321 and a substantial losson f333. The low-volume product appeans to be the more profitable ofthe two under the existing system, but appears to be a money loserunder ABC; the high-volume product appears weak under the existingsystem, but highly profitable under ABC.
Based on the results of the ABG study, Dallas division managementshould consider meet ing the compet i tor 's pr ices on f l321; th is pr ic ingstrategy can be profitable in the long run and should avoid loss of marketshare. The strategy for f 333 is not as clear. Gustomers are not l ikely toaccept the 20O% price increase needed to make #333 reasonably prof-itable, and Dallas could lose some customers who also buy largeamounts of #321, if management discontinues #333 or increases itspr ice too much. Management should consider several possibi l i t ies forlow-volume products such as f333:(a) Reduce batch- and product-level costs enough to become an effi-
cient producer of low-volume products. This may require creation ofa small job-shop environment in a portion of the plant (or in anotherfacil i ty) where low-volume products could be made more efficiently.The case indicates the existing plant was designed to produce longruns efficiently, which may explain the high batch- and product-levelcosts.
(6)
Chaoter l4336
I
C14- t (Conc luded)
c l 4 - 2
( 1 )
(b) Reduce the number of products by designlng " new one that can besubstituted for several low-volume, unprofitable products that canthen be discontinued; this essentially erchanges several low-vol-ume products for one of much higher volume, with substantialbatch- and product-level savlngs'
(c) Convince one of the current buyers of the low-volume products tobecome a distributor of several such products; buying them fromDallas in larger quantities, maintaining small inventories, and sellingthem to othJr customers. This can reduce Dallast batch-level costsand marketing costs, but it risks the loss of customers who like tobuy the full l ine from one supplier.
(d) naise prices gradualty until all products ane neasonably priced. Thisdoes not mean all products must show profits. (lt is acceptable for agood customer to occasionally buy a money'losing product.) Rather'it means that the company should not continue making a money-tosing product without a good reason. lt is not acceptable to have acustomer who buys only the money-losing products, nor for thecompany to continue making a money-losing product that no "good
customerstt are buying.(e) In addition to the usual penunit prices, charge a lump-sum amount
per order for any small order of a low-volume product. This charge. coutd be set at a level to cover estimated batch- and product-level
costs.
WARRENTON DIVISIONProduct Costs from OPICS
Overhead rate: s1,930,000labor hours
of overhead divided by 25'ooO direct= 577.2O per DLH
fl33 #44
sl5,ooo s120,ooo6,000 60,000
341740463,20O
s643,2OO+ 2'OOO
s55,74O+ 1 O O
s5s7.40 s 321.60:
J ) /
Chapter 14
Cl4-2 (Continued)
(21 WARRENTON DIVISIONProduct Costs from TPTCS
Overhead rates:$gCOTOOO machine-related costs divided by 2O,OOO machine hours = S17 per MH
iigO,OOO materials-related gosts divided by $1'32O,OOO direct material cost =25% of direct material cost
S360,000 + $9OO,OOO of remainingcosts divided by 25'Ooo direct labor hours =S5O.4O per direct labor hour
#33 r44
Di fgCt matg f ia1 . . i r . r . r . . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . . r , . r . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . t t . . t . . . .
D i rgCt 1abOf . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . r . . . . r . r . r . . . . . . . . . . r . r . . .
Overhead:$17 X 300 MH .. , . . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . . ' r . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$17 f 3rOOO MH .. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . .25oh x $l5rOOO r. . . . . . . . "r ' . . . . . . . . . . . . , . ' . . . . - . . . . . - . - . . r ' . . , ' . . . r . . . . . ' . . .25oh x $12OrOOO . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . ' . . . . '55O.4O X 45O DLH... . . . . , . . . . ' . . . .o. . . . r , . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . .
S5O.4O X 6rOOO DLH... . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . r . . . . , . . . . . . . . . i . , . . . . . . . r . . . .o. . . . . .
TOtal COSI., . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .Un i ts p roduced. . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . r ' . . . ' . . . , . r . - .
COSt pe f Un i t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' r . . . . . . . . , . r ' . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r .
s15,OOO6,0o0
5 , 1 O 0
3,750
2216fjo
s12O,OOO60,000
51 ,OOO
3O,OOO
302,4OO
s52,530+ 1 O O
s563,4OO+ 2,OOO
I
s525.30 s 281.70
(3) TPICS is not an ABG system because all the allocation bases are at theunit level. The changes management made do show many of the attribut-es typicalty associated with a change to ABC: the increase in the numberof overhead cost pools, the attempt to create homogeneous cost pools'and the use of three distinct allocation bases. These changes show anattempt was made to capture differences among the demands placed onresources by the different products. But because there are no batch- orproduct-tevel drivers used, the system cannot capture the demandsplaced on batch- and product-level activit ies, i.e., it is not an ABC sys-tem.
3g
Cl4-2 (Continued)
WARRENTON DIVISIONProduct Costs from Proposed New Gosting System
Overhead rates:SI OO,OOO troubleshooting costs + $140,000 machine setup costs divided by
3,OOO setup hours = $8O per setup hourS135,OoO material handling costs divided by 15,000 loads = 39 per loadS195,Ooo materiali administration costs divided by IO'OOO vendor orders =
919.5O per vendor order3260,000 engineering design costs divided by 4,000 design hours = $65 per
design hour$2OO,OOO machine operation costs + S90O,O0O other overhead divided by
2O,OOO machine hours = $55 per machine hour
f33
(
Chapter tl
(41
s l5 ,OOO6,OOO
24|OOO
1 8 0
1 , 7 5 5
18,2O0
16,5OO
s81,635+ I O O
#44.
sl20,OOO6O,OOO
32,0OO
540
2,925
19,5OO
165,OOO
$399,965+ 2'OOO
s816.35 S 199.98
(5) The proposed new costing system is an ABC system because it uses costdrivers that include non-unit-level drivers. The unit-level driver ismachine hours, the batch-level drivers are setup hours and loads han-dled' and the product-level driver is design hours. Vendor orders couldbe either a batch- or product-level driver, depending on whether ordersare placed for each batch; the case does not tell whether this is so.
(6) For the low-volume product, #33, the proposed ABC system shows a sub-stantially higher cost than did either of the other two systems. This is thegeneral result when ABC implemented and compared with traditionalsystems. At the usual sell ing price of S8OO, the ABC system says thisproduct is a money loser. Equally, or perhaps more importantly, the pro-posed ABG system shows that the high-volume product can be pr icedvery competit ively.
Chapter 11.t r:t
C14-2 (Concluded)
f/) Based on the results of the ABC study, Warrentonb management should
consider meeting the competitorb prices on #44; this pricing strategycan be profitable in the tong run and should avoid loss of market shat€.The strategy for #33 is not as ctear. Some customers may not accept theprice increase needed to make il33 reasonably profitable, and Warrenton
could lose some customers who also buy large amoqnts of #44 ifmanagement discontinues i l33 or hikes its price too much. Managementshould consider several possibil i t ies for low-volume products such asf33:
(a) Reduce batch- and product-level costs enough to become an effi-cient producer of low-volume products. This may reguire creation ofa small job-shop environment in a portion of the plant {or in anotherfacil i ty), where low-volume products could be made more efficiently.
(b) Reduce the number of products, by designing a new product thatcan be substituted for several low-volume, unprofitable productsthat can then be discontinued; this essentially exchanges severallow-volume products for one of much higher volume, with substan-tial batch- and product' level savings.
(c) Convince one of the current buyers of the low-volume products tobecome a distributor of several such products; buying them fromWarrenton in targer quantit ies, maintaining small inventories, andselling them to other customers. This can reduce Warrenton'sbatch-level and marketing costs, but it r isks the loss of customerswho like to buy the full l ine from one supplier.
(d) Raise prices gradually unti l all products are neasonably priced. Thisdoes not mean all products must show profits. (lt is acceptable for agood customer to occasionally buy a money-losing product.) Rather'it means that the company should not continue making a money-losing product without a good reason, lt is not acceptable to have acustomer who buys only the money-losing products, nor for thecompany to continue making a money-losing product that no ' igood
customers" are buying.(e) ln addition to the usual sales price, charge a lump-sum amount per
order for any small order of a low-volume product. This chargecould be set at a level to cover estimated batch- and product-levelcosts.
d l
01$t. Profil plarning oncompasses (a) sales estirnat-hg and sales plannhg prograrns; (b) budgetingprogra,nr lor contol cf all costs, both rnanufac-turhg lnd nqrrnanufacturing; (c) planning andprogramming addilions to or deletions lromworking capilal an'd plant hveslmenl; and, (d) areview of all laclors that have an impacl mretum on inveslmcnt, both from a shorl.lermviewpoinl of one year and longer periods oflime. Thr profil-planning function must not bemerely financial in scope. ll must disckrse themelhodg and programs by which the financialgroals are to be achieved.
O1$2. A budgel is the oxp€cted targ€t that manage-mont strives lo achieve, whereas a lorecasl isa level of revenue or cosl that an organizalionpredicts will occur.
Olt3. The three approaches lor setling profit objec.lives are:(a) A oriori. Management specifies a given
ratc of rolum to be achieved in the longrun ard then draws up plans lor achievingthat rale.
(b) A msteriori. lr/lanagemenl draws up plansand.then sels lhe rate resulting frorn theplans.
(c) Praomalic. Managemenl uses a targetp ro f i t s tanda rd t ha t has been tes tedempirically and sanctioned by experierrce.
Qt$4. Long-range phnning deals wilh specilic areasof the cornpany's plans, such as future sales,long.lerm c-f ilal expenditures, research anddevelopmenl astivilies, financial requiremenls,and the proti l goal. Short-range budgetingplrces the plannhg and particulariy control intoperirds of three. 3ix, or tw€lvo mstths.
Ql$'5. A budget is a detailed financial stalement ofthe organizalion's strategy. lt converts generElls t rategy sta lements in to speci f ic p lans o laction, measured financially. lt is related tocontrol, because it is the fundamental guidelinefor whal the organization should do. Thus, it islhe benchmark against which aclual perfor.manco is cornpared. This process of ccnpari-son is a vital gart ol the conirol function in lheorganizaticr.
QlS. In carry ing out managoment 's lunct ions ofphnnhg, organizing, and control lor lhe deveFopmenl ol a budgetary conlrol program, il isneco3sary to:(a) organize the budget commiilee(b) organize the entire budg€tary control pro-
gra!71(c) plan sales wilh the sales manager(d) determine the linished.gods inventory
CHAPTER 15
DlscusstoN ouEsTtoNs
requirement in harmony with the salesbudget
(e) plan production with the production man-ager based on the sales budget
(f) -meel with heads of all dopartments-tothproducing and service-relative to directrnalerials, direcl labor, and lactory over-head coslr required for the productionbudgeted
(S) es tab l i sh mater ia ls purchase requ i re -menls based on production planning, adoparlment's malerials raquiremenls, ortho produclbn budgel
(h) eslabl ish €xpsnso budgels wilh market-ing, administrative, and financial divisionheads
(i) budget capi lal expenditures and preparea researeh and development budg€t.
0) develop a cash budget(k) coodinate and surnnrarize ccrnpany.wide
budgets into a masler budget..+umma-rized in the budgeled incorne stalEmontand balance sheel
O1$7. Thc periodic budget ropresents a formal com-munication channel within a company for thelollowing r€asons:(a ) The per iod ic budget invo lves a lo rmal
comrnitment on lhe parl of managementlo lake posi l ive actions to make actualevents conespond to the formal budgel.
(b) The periodic budget is usually raviewedand approved by a higher authority and,qrco approvod, is changed only in unusu-a.l specif ied circumslances.
(c ) The per iod ic buc jge t con la ins exp l i c i tslaiemonts of the imolementation of man-agomenl objectives for a period ol time,p u b l i s h e d t o a l l p a r l i e s w i l h c o n l r o lresponsibility.
(d ) Compar ison o l ac tua l resu l ts w i th theperiodic budgel forms lhe basis tor man-agoment control, motivation, and pedor-rrance evaluaticn.
Q15-8. Budgels are required for planning, moniloring,and molivating, and because they include esli-mat6s, they always involve uncertainty. Theprocass ol budget preparation forces idenlifica-l ion ol variables and attsmpts at esl imation.Reiteral ion should improve the process, andthe process should cause a positive atlhude toa t la in goa ls . Of course , a poor ly es t ima ledbudget can causs dysfunctional behavior.
In th is s i tua t ion , the budgst shou ld p rov ideincentive lor going after bids. The inclusion ofbudgsted and actual conlr ibul ion margin data
I
t-
[ ;
a0
Chaptor l5
h periodic roporb c{fers an early hdkxtion c/' bobtf, par ccrlributbn, or the pesible noed lo
reduce bid prices, or olher corroctive actionthst rnay be reguire'd.CGA-Canada (adantcd). Beprinl with permis'airr.
Q15-9. All omployeec (including txoculivr manago'rncnt) must accoPt fir inportancr of budgetingand bo wil l ing to parlicipalr fully in budgolprcparatbn and irnpbmentatirxr, or hc budgnt
. will nst rtork.a1$10. (a) Etlective ur cl budgrthg rholH rocult in
botter perlorrrlinc. by the organizatbnbecause ol betlcr pe rformance by thernanagonr. Tho behavirral bonefit lies hthe ability crf thr budget and he btdgelingproqgss to rnolivalc tnatragtB to accorn'plish thc orgranizatbn objec'lives. This isdone by ushg the budget ss a vehble forcommunicat ing company object ives,etablishhg subobjectivee in accord withrnanager objectives, and providing a thq-qrghly undcrctood ccrrvno.r bssie for por-fonnenco rrreuuilTlont ard fcedbck.
(b) The budgeting procoss has been sublectto criticism by behavioral scienlislr andclhers on sevcral counls:(1) The mosl scrbus charge is that thebudgeling pr€oer faib to recognhc thalindividuals may not accopt companyobjective as their own. The resull is hckcl eflort to achieve these objectives.(2) The level of objectives sel may beeslablished without regard lo how this willmot iva lc lhc manager lo achicve lheob jec t i ves . Tho resu l l s may i nc ludeunderachievcment ol polenlially obtein-able levels o l per formance and/ordostruclbn of employee nrorale.(3) The budget ie used as a pressuredevice lo force conlormity lo and accop-tance of lhe objectives eslablished in thebudgel. This often resuhs in employeesfinding ways lo beat' the budget ratherthan actually impoving pedormancc.(a) The budget b adrnhbtercd by hdivU-uals noi direclly hvolved in the operalingelivrty ol thc organizatbn and not partic-ubrty skillful h dealing wiih people.
(c) Thc rnosl coriour problem lhat must beovercome h qdor to rclve the problemsidenlif ied by tho cri l icisms in (b) is the
u 1
bck o{ understanding of the lorccs thatcause ma Bgcrs to 8cl as they do. ll muslbc recognrized that the tradilbnal assumPtims undedying thc budget and budgel
P roces ! a t c no l . n t i r . l y va l i d . SuchagsurnPliats includo:(l) Managcn tulqnaticslly acc.Pt cqn'pany obiecfivee as lhcir qwn.(2) Tighl gtandards ate best bocaur theyropr.rent hard-to-reach goals, whichrrwt pcople strivc lo achicvc.(3) Uppor levolc of managcment an bolequFped lo ostablish operathg subobirc-tives.
ll is necesssry to rccognize thc bchav-brsl influence (psychobgi=l and rcbbgbal) 6r tho rrprk ol menagers.
The rnost corr[Tron specific neoorrvrpn-dali'on is thc use cd parlbipative budgel-hg, sinco il prwide lor an opportuniiy loidentify objeclivos of thc managcr andccrrrpany, hcreaseg the ability of both todevelop opcralhg activitier to reach throbjcclive, and onhances iho likolihood olsetting objectives at levels elfcctive inmolivaling managors loward companygoals.
01tl1. Conrnercbl €xponsos are grouped into lunc-tions by their actions or operalhg units. Thescfunctisrs are boked upon ae departmenls endshould br gel along organizalional lincg inorder to identify lhe expente with an autho'rized and responsible individual. Grouphg byprcducls and by lenitqies may be desirabL alwell.
015.12. The budgeled incorne stalement summarizerin one stalernent the result! of lhe compleloplan of aclion. lt expresses in financial lermsthe erd resuhs of proposed plans. ll can alsobe used lo lesl the adequrcy or inadeguacy ofthose phns.
Q lF13 . The budge led ba lance shee t revea l r l hcexpected l inancial condition ai the end of Iparticubr perird. One ol the measurec of thoadequary ol propoeed operaling and linancblplanr is the etfed ol the cxecution of thcropbns on the linancial condilbn of the buainesr.lf the budgeied balance gheel shoflg a polen-lial unsatisfactory condilion, propooed plantcsn be reviewed end perhapo revised lo ptc.ducs sallsf aclory resulls.
Chapter 15342
Ei5-1
E)GRCISES
BROWI.I BROTHERSiBudget of Sales Revenue 8nd Grcss Profit
For the Year 2OB
Rer-ZSip-XTok-Y
2O,OOO12,0007r5OO
Saler InProdust Poundsr
AveragcSaler
Pricc perPoundr$34.50 $25,00
24.15 18.0018.90 14.30
20a.oooh140.OAoh1OO.O07o
lncrease115,00%I O5.OO%lO5.O07o
I9A GP
Cost of GrosEGoods Pttlit
Sold per porPoundffi Pound
s9.506.154.60
198 Sales
SalecRevenue
$ 690'000304,29O141,750
s1,r36,O4O
GrcgsProfit
s l90,OOO77r49O34,5OO
$3O1,990
'Product
Rer-ZSiP-XTok-Y
"Product
Rer-ZSip-XTok-Y
*'!'od*!
Rer-ZSip-XTok-Y
E15-2
l9A Sales lncreaselO,OOO9,00o7,50O
l9A Prices30.00
23.0018.OO
19A Price
20,OOOl2,6007,50O
198 Prices34.50
24.1518.90
19A Cost$20.oo
l5.ool3.oo
lncrease
125.OOoh12A.OAoht lO.OOTo
198 Costs25,OO
18.OO14.30
s30.oo23.OO18.OO
$lo.oo8,OO5.OO
FINEFLEX CORPORATIONProduction Budget'
For the Second Quarter Ending June 30, 20-
Units olFlop
21,O0O6,OOO
27,OOO(s,5oo)
2 1 , 5 O O
Units ofOlap
37,50OI o,5oo
Units ofRyke
Salgs forgcast..........,... ...,.........r,Add desired ending inventory (June 3O1,...Quantity required for tho quarter.............,Less beginning inventory (Apr i l 11. . . , . . . . . . . . .Required product ion for the quarter. . . . . . . . .
54,O0O13 .OOO
48,OOO 67,000qf_,o99) (14,soo)9Z€99 l-z'seq
Chagter l5
E15-? '
u3
MAGIC EHTERPRISESProduction Budget
For the Quarter Ending March 31r 20-
Moon Glow Enchanting Day DreamUnits required for sa|9s..............o...,..Add ending lnvontory of finished
Unitg .. i . . . . . . . . . . . .rr . . . . .r . . . . . . . . . .rr . . . . . .o.. . . . t
Total units roguinad ..o.,o,................Less beginning Inventory of finished
U n i t S r a r a a a . . . . t o r . . r . . . . . . . . r ! r . r . . a . a a . . . . . . . . . r r . .
Units to be transfered to finishedg O O d s o . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . a . . . . . a . . r . . . . . . . o o . . . r . . . . r a a .
Add endlng work in processinventOry . . . r . . . . ro . . . . . . . . r . . r . .or . . . . . . . . . . r . . . .
Less beginning work in processinventOry ...............r..........r....o.........
Equivafent units to be ptlduced.......
E15-4
(11
25O,OOO
t5rooo265,OOO
1O,OO0
249,0OO
4r2OO253r2OO
2rOOO
251,2OO
Mid HighBand Band
30030
175rOOO
I O,OOO
185,OOO
12,OOO
173,OOO
2,OOO175,OOO
1,8OO
173,2OO
LowandMid
Band
25050
3OO,OOO
2O,OOO
32O,OO0
25,00O
295,0OO
6,OOO301,OOO
5.600
?p�5Jp9.
MidandHigh ThreeBand Band
35050
Units reguired to meet salesbudget .r . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . r . . . .
Add desired ending Inyentoty....Total units required during
period . , . . . . . . . . . , . r . . . . . . . . . . r . . . .Less beginning inventory ..........Required production quantity....
LowBand
20040
20030
40050
240(sol
1 9 0
330(30)
_999
450(701
_380
300eal
280
400 230(3ol (201
370 210
344
El5-4 (Concludedl
(21 Materialg purchases'req uirements:
MrtrlTublng1O feet
75
1 7
MctrlTublng
l r9OO leet2r1OOl ,9oo
4r780
4,44O41620
lnduc-tort
Chapter 15
Fccd-llnc
Con-ncctorr
1 9 0300380
280
370z'�ro
l r73O500
2'23O
1.500
730
Pcr Unlt Matcrbb Rcqulrrmcntr Total Metcrlrlr Fcqulrcmcntr
Produc'fbn
Requlri-Modcl mcnt
1 9 0300380
280
Fccd'llnrCon'
Inducton nccton
Low band......Mid band,......High band......Low and
mid band.. . .Mid and
high band.. . 37OThree band.... 21O
Quantity rsquired to meet production budget....Add desired ending materials lnventory.....'.......Total quantity of materials required for the
period
1II
7917207,0oo
261720
6.OOO
z,SJ20.
1 9 0300380
560
740630
2r8OO800
3,6OO
I,OOO
-2'609
III
1I
1 222
23
Deduct matorials on hand at the beginning ofthe per iod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . t . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . t . . . . . t . . .
Matgrials punchases rgqui re m e nts .......'.......'.'...
E15-5
(1) Sales budget for fourth quarten
UnitQuanUty PriceProduct
x 4,5OOY 2,OOOz 3,0oo
Budgeted sales in uni ts. .Desired ending inventoryQuantity required ..............Beginning inventoryR e q u i red p ro d u cti ort..,.,..................
$12.OO25.OO20.o0
SalesRevenue$ 54,OOO
5O,OOO6O,000
s184,OoO_
Product
(2)
Total budgeted sa1es...............,...t....
Production budget for fourth quarten
x4,5OO
9005,4OO
600
2,OOO400
2AOO500
1,900
3,OOO500
3,5OO400
Y
lf99 3 , 1 0 0
Chapter 15
E15-5 (Concluded|
(31 Materials usage budget for fourtfr quarten
Product
PlannedPro-
dustion-4,8OOl ,9oo3rl oo
(41 Materials purchase budget for fourth guailen
Material
345
Materials Required Per Unit Total Materials Required
A32I
cBAc242
I23
xYz
l4r4OO3r8OO3,loo
4r8OO3,8OO9,3OO
9,6OOTrgooo,2oo
23,4OO
Total
s83,O5O
21,3OO 17,9O0
cBAProductlon requiremgnt r.......,...Desired ending inventory .....o....Quantity required ..................r...Beginning inventof''lf .......,..........Quantity to be purchased ..,..,....Unit COSI...r . ' . . . .r . . . , .rr .r . . . .r . . . . .r , .r , .
Purchasg req uiremoot....,..........
E15-6
(1)
Units required to meet sales budgetAdd onding inventory
Total units 1equirad.......,.............Less beginning inventory ..,,..............
Planned production............
21,3OO2,5OO
23,8OO2,0oo
21,8OOs ,50
17,9OO2rOOO
19,9OO{ . 0 0 0
18 ,9OO
3 z.oo63z.goo
23t4O42,AOA
25,4OO2,5O0
22,gOO3 1.5o
slo,9oo $34,359
Tribolita Polycal Powder X8O,OOO
6r0oo
86,OOO5,OOO
81,OOO
4O,OOO2,OOO
42,OOO4rOOO
38,OOO
lOO,OOOSrOOO
lOSrOOOI O,OOO
98,OOO
a6
Et5-6 (Concluded)
tzl
TribOli tg r . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . r .Polycal .......................Powder X ............,,.....
Add ending inventory
Less beginninginvgntorY........... '......
Units to be PurchasedCost per kilogt'ar[ ......Total cost ot
pU nC h aSgS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(31
Material A
8 1 , 0 0 0 1 1 = 8 l O 0 0 k g38,OOO 12 = 76 ooo
Chapter t5
Material B
8 i ,OOO 12 = 162 OOO kg
g 8 r O O O r l = 9 8 O ;
260 00o kg
15 000
275 ooo kg
1 1 0 0 0264 OOO kg
x $ . 1 0
$ZOrlaIl
Total
I 16 ,200l5 ,2OO16,20O
9,8OO
s 57,4OO
s 32,4OO38,OOO
9,8OO
s 80,2oo
Materials:A: gt 'OOO x I x S.2O r. . . . . . . . . . ' .
38rOOO x 2 xS.2O . . ' . . . . . . . . . .B : 81rOOO x2xS. 1O. . . . . . . . , . . . '
98 ,OOO x I x S .1O, . . . . . . . . . . . .
Direct Labon8t r 5O I 38 . . . . . . ' ! . . . ' . . . . t . . . . . . . . .38 r 125 r $8 ...,...............r....98 x 12.5 x58,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Factory overhead-variable:81 X 50 X 56 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . r . . r39 r 125 r 56. . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . .98 x 12.5 r S6 . . . . . . . . . .
157 Ooo kg
12 000
169 oOO kg
I 500{59 5oo kg
x s.20
s3{.900
Tribolite Polycal Power X
$16,2OOs15'2OO
16,20os 9,8OO
$32,4OO 915,2OO s 9,8OO
s32,4OOs38,OOO
s 9,8OOs 9,800$32,40O s38,ooo
s24,3oO
$24,3OOTotal variable manufacturing
cost. . . . . . . . S89,1OO
s28,5OO $ 7,350 s 60,150
99l,7oo S26,e59 s1e7'75O
s28,50Os 24,300
28,50O7,35O$ 7,350
Fixed manufactur ing cost (not at tocated to products) . . . . . . . . . . 4O'OOO
Total manufactur ing cos1.. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . . 'g?%ttg
Chaptor l5
El5-7
u7
wt(z lNc.Budgeted Gost of Goods Manulactured and Sold Statement
For the Year 20-
Materials:Beginning inventory....PUrChaSgS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . .o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . . . . . . . . . t . t . .
Matgriats avaitablg for usb .........o..........r......r.....Ending invgntory'...........'..'........o...o...-..............'..
Cost of matgrials usgd....................................t't.L3 bO1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . .o . .o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o .o . . . r . r . . . . . . . . . . . t t . .
FactOry ovgrh gad .........r........r.........r.t....................
Total manufacturing CoSt .,...................... '..............Add beginning work in process inventotlf........ '.....
Deduct ending work in process inventory.......,..,..Cost of goods manufactungd r.. .r, . . . . . . . . . . ' .r . . .r. . . . . ' . . . .Add beginning finished goods inventory..... '.."......Cost of goods availablg for sa|e......., '...,.....r. '.r. '....Deduct ending finished goods inventory .,...,..,...,.rGoSt Of gOOdS SOld . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . .o. . .o". . . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . ' . . . .
tEarnfngr lE h of S2O,OOO,00O = tlr200,OO0lMarketing, administrative, and financial erpense3
Cost of goods sold (Sa,280,00O).. , . .
$ 5OO,OOO.2.600.0oot
$3,1OO,OOO600.ooo
looh ol sales21
31ah of sales69
lOOc/c of sales
s2,5OO,0004,34O,OOO1'840'000e
S8'68O'00001O0,000
s8,780,OOO3OO,OOO
S8r48O,OOOzSOO,OOO
s9,280,00O1,000,000
s8,28O,000r
zCost of goodsrold
s8,290,000
rCost of goodamanufactured
88,480,000
.Total manufac-turlng cost88,gg0,ooo
o Cost olmater lals
useds2,500,000
Ending linishcdgoods inventory
81,oO0,ooo
Ending work Inprocess inventory
q3o0,000
Labor lSOc/o olmanutacturing cost)
94,340,000
Endingmater ialsInventorys600.ooo
Beginning finishedgoods inventory
s8oo,00o
Beginning work inprocess inventory
sl oo,ooo
Cost ol materialgused
32,5oo,ooo
Beginningmater ialsinventorys500,ooo
Cost of goods= manufactured
s8,48O,OoO
Total manulacturing cost(materials, labor' and
= lactory overhead)s8,680,OO0
= Factory overheads1,84O,000
= Mater ia lspurchasess2,6OO,OOO
-----7
ChaDter 15348
E15-8PATZ COMPANY
Budgeted Income StatementSecond Quarter, 20-
Sales (S500r000 first quartgr sales r 2) '..'..,......r...'.."...cost of goods sold ($1'ooo,ooo sales x (1o0% - 4o%llGross profit (9 t rOOOrO0O sal gs x 4Ao/o1,..............,......!o...Commercial erpenses:
Uncotlectible accounts ($l,o0o,ooo sales r2%1.'. ' .. $ 2OrOo0Depreciation (($8OO,OOO + 2O yearsl r 114 year! ..- ' ... 1O'OOOMarketing:
Vafiable ($l rOO0rO0O SaleS X lO%1,..,......r...D..,...... {OOr000FiXed. r . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . r ro . . . . . t r . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . ' .o . . . SOtOOO
Administration (all f ixed).....or..,,... ............. ' . 3o.ooo
lnCOmg bgfOfg inCOmg tax ..,.....,..,............. ' .,..,..............
slrooo,ooo6O0,0oo
$ 4OO,OOO
2{O.OOO
3 l90.ooo
E ls -9
GGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission'
ME)OA CORPORATIONBudgeted Income Statement
For the Year Ending December 3' lr 2OB
Sales (S9,OOO,OOO in l9A x 1.O5 quantity increase x1 . 1 0 pr ice increase) . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .D' . . . . ' . r . . . . , ' . . . . . . . . . . .
Less cost of goods sold(56,000,0OO r 1.O5 quantity increase xI .O6 cOSt inCfeaSe!...,............,...,.. ' .,.. ' . ..............
GrOSS p fo t i t . . . r . . r . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . . r . . r r . . . . . . . r . . . t . . . . .
Less commercial expenses:Marketing expenses
(S78O,OOO + S42O,OOO increase in advertising).Administrativg gxpens gs,......,... '...............r............
Operating income before taxes and interest.........-....
sl,20o,0oo9OO,O0O
$1O,395,000
6,578,OOO
s 3,717,000
2,1OO,OOO
Less interest expense($14O,OOO + ($4OO,O0O asset increase x 1oo/o rate))
ln com g bgforg income IEIX.... . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . .Less income tax expense ($l ,447 .OOO x .4O tax rate)
Net lncome. . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , , . . . . . .
s 1 ,617 ,O0O
180 .OOO$1,437,00O
574.800s a62.200
- anpbr 15 349
Pt5-1
(11
PROBLEMS
Sales Budget
Unit Price Totalb
Thingonc .....................!......oir..oo....oor.....r.............. OO'OOO S 70 34t2OOtOOO
Thingtwo...... . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . 4Ot0OO l OO 4tOOO;OOO
PfOieCted 881OS.r..r........oo...o...........rr..r.............
Produstlon Budget
f f i f f iOejired inventoriosr Decamber 3l' 2O8.. 25'OOO I'OOO
85,OOO 49,OOOLess elpected inventories, Januar! 1, 208...'..... 2O'OO! 8t0!9
99,ooo 41 ,OOO
Raw Materials Purchases Budget
l2'l
(31Raw Mrtcrlrlr
C Total
Thlngoor (O5'OO0 unltrprolcctcd to bc produccd) 260,OoO lbr 130'OoO lbr"
Thlngtwo (41,OOO unltrprolectcd to bc producr'd) 2O5,OOO 123'OOO 41'000 unltr
Produc,t|onrrqulnmrnt..........- 485rOOO br. 5it'Oog br. {1'OOO unltr
Add dcllnd lnvcntorlcr,Dccrmbrr 31, lg8*...- 3E,ooO 32'OOO 7'OOo
Totel nqulrrmcntr..* 5OI,OOO br, 285'000 lbr. 48'OOO unltrL.cr rrpcctcd brvcn-
- torlcr, Jrnuary 1, 198.--. 32,000 20'OOO 5.oooh,rrchar roqulrcmcntt....- 469'OOO lbr. 256'0OO lbr. 43'000 unttlCort pcr pound or unlt.* $8 35
'sr
Totel coct of purchaeGr...... 33,252,000 3i,2go,!o9 'g13gggg
sl,rclpoo
Chaoter l53fi
I
Pt5-l (Concluded)
(41 Dlrect Labor Budget
Prolected HourrProductlon Per
Unit Total Ratc Total
Thingonc .. . . . . .o.ott t t"r"t"t"t t '
Thi n gtwo .. . . . . . . . . . .r .ot"t"t"t t t t '
(Unltslg5rooo4t,ooo
t3o,oool23,OOO
$l,o4oroooIrloTrooo
s2,147'OOO
$89
23
(sl Flnlghcd Goods Inventory Budgc! Deccmber 3l' 2OB
Thingone:Raw materials:
A-4 pOUndA O $8 ...r.....r....r...r.. '. '......... '."""'b2 pOUndS O $5 ...............r..............r...r.......
Direct fabor-2 hourg O $8 o.r............r.......'.."""Factory overhead-2 hours O $2 per direct labor
h o l l l a . . . . . . a r . . . a . . t a a . . . a . . a . . . a a " t t r ' ! " " " t " t t t t " " t t " t
$82 r 25tOOO unlts r...........o.. ' ........"t"""tt"ot"
Thingtwo:Raw materials:
A-5 poundS O $8.......................r. ' ..r......r......B-3 pounds O $5 ..........o..o......o.""""""""""C-l uni t O $3 . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . t t ' r " t 'o 'o"" t " t t " t t t '
Dirgct laborq? hours O $9 r.....................'..""""Factory oyorhoad-.? houra O 32 per direct labor
h o u r . . . . . . . . t t . . . . . . o . . . t 1 . . . t . . . . . . . t . . t . " " t " t " t " t " t " "
591 r IrOOO unit8... . . ' . . ' . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . ' .o... . .
Budgeted finished goods inventory,December 31, 2OB
$gzl o 9,42
1 6
4
s62:$l,55O,OOO
$co1 5
3 $ss27
6rlel
8l9,OOO
I34w
Clwptor 15
P15-2 ,
(11
35t
ROLETTER COMPAT.JYBudget for Produetlon and Direct LaborFor the Quarter Ending March 31r 2OB�
Month
January February March Quarter
Salgs (uhitsl .....................'............ IOTOOO l2rOOO I'OOO 3OTOOOAdd ending inventOt'.........,...,.... l6'000 12r5OO 13r5OO 13r5OO
TOtal UnltS feqUifed ....,,..o,....,..,.... 26'000 24r5OO 21r5OO 43r5OOLess beginning Inventoryr...o......... lO'OOO.. l6'000 12r5OO 1or00o
Unlts to be producod.................... IO,OOO 8r5OO 9'OOO 27r5OODirect labor hours per unit......... ' . r 2.O r 2,O r 1.5
Total hours of diract labor timen ggd ed ........o...........r....... 20,0OO t7,ooo 13,5oo 5o,5ooDirect labor costs:
Wages 1$8.00 per DLHI ........r... $l oO,OOO $136'000 $1 O8,OOO S4O4,OOOPension contrlbutlons
($.25 pef DL10...........r..r.,..... 5'OOO 4t25O 31375 121625Workergt componsatlon
Insurance ($.1O psr DLH)..... 2'OOO 1r7OO 1r35O 5'O5OEmployee medlcal Insurancc
(3.4O per DLI[.'.......r............ S'OOO 61800 5r4OO 2O'2OOEmployerb social security and
unemployment tares(ss.oo r.1o = g8o per DLH| 16,000 13,600 1O'8OO 4O'4OO
Total direct labor G(tst......... $191rooo $182,350 s128,925 s4�82,275: : -
rlOOc6 of the first foltowing monthb sales plus 5O% of the second followingmonthb sales.
- - -
Chagter l5
P75-2 (Concludei!)
(2) (al Gomponents of the perlodic budgot, other than thc producUon budgetand the direct labor budget, that would algo use tte saler data include:(1) the saleg budgetl2l the cost of goods manufastured and sold budgetigl the markating and administraiivc oxponsos budget(4) the budgeted Income statement
(b) Gomponents of the periodic budget other than the production budgetand the direct labor budget, that would also use the production datainclude:(11 tho dlroct materiab budgetl2l tho tactory overhead budget(3) the cost of goods manulactured and sold budget
(cl Gomponents of the periodic budget, other than the production budgetand the direct labor budget, that would also use ttro direct labor hourdata include:(1) the tactory overhead budget (for determining the overhead applica-tion rate il based on direct labor hours!
(d) Components of the periodic budget, othcr than thc production budgetand the direct labor budget, that would elso use the dirsct labor costdata include:(11 the lactory overhead budget (for determining the overhead applica-tion rate il based on direct labor dollars and for dstermining the cost ofemployee benefits attributable to wages earned by direct labor)t2) the cost of goods manufactured and sold budget(3) the cash budget(4) the budgeted income statement
Chagtor 15
P15-3 '
(1) EsUmated cales lor third guarter (July-Septemberf .........r.,.....Add ending Inventory p'OOO r 8O96)....,.r.o.....,..........o..o.,............
Lgss bgginning lnventoly ..................r....'.....
313
18,OOO5,600
23,6OO5.600
18.OOO
t2l Material
Unlts to bo producgd'. '.........r.o...............Matgrials I'irto ...,.......,...o,.,.Unltg of matgrials required ...,.......,...o..,..Add ending Inventory:
5t60O I 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5t6OO I 4 ...............t. 'rr...t................o.t.
5t0OO I 2 .........r............r..........r.. i .......
1 0 1
l8rOOOI 6
211
lSrooot 4
242
18,OOOx 2
36,OOO
1 1,2OO
lOS'OOO
33,600
72,OOO
22r4OO
141,600Less beginning inventory.,.....,.,......,.r..o.. 35rOOOPUrChaSgS......r...........r............................ f OO"gOO
Hourspor
Production Unit
94,400 47,2OO3OTOOO 13.OOO
34r2OOx$1 .20
$4'to4Q
TotalLaborGostProcess
FOrming .o.........tr...rr...ASSem b ly ....r..............Finishing .o... . . . . . , . . . . . . . . ,
Cost per unit r s2.4064,4O0x $3.60
Total cost of purchasoS.............,............. 9255r84O $231,84O
{31TotalHours
TotalLaborRate
18,OOO18,00018,O0O
,802.OO
.25
l4,4OO $8,OO36,000 5.5O
4.500 6.00
54,9OO
$115,2OO198,OOO
27 |OOO
9940'299
(41 ErpectedannualproductioJl.............r........ 60,000 units27,OOOAstual producUon through June 30
: , Erpocted production during last six months of 20A...,.. 33pOO unitsVariable factory oyerhead per unit ($i gZ,Ooo + 27,0ool x $6.00Budgeted variable factory oyerhead...........,.r.,,..o....,..... $lgBrOooBudgeted fired factory overhead 93,OOOTotal budgeted factory overhead
3gt
Pl5-4
(t l
Chagter 15
Revlsed Salea Budget in Unlts Bagod on tho Inder
Terrltorles
1 -lb. pack3ff o......."'2-lb. packago...o.---.-
Total ....'....'.........
t lO ,OOO r .9 = I 'OOO212 'OOO r .9 = lO '8OO
(21 Sales Budget in Dollars
IIrO00 t
1O,8OO r
llf99
. i l
l3,5OOlo,2oo29'-7OO
llltorSOOlo,8oo21,600:-
Other551r7OO704,7OO
1,256,4OO
6-MonthTotal
585,OOO7{2,5OO
tl327,5OO
Territories
I l l$2,ZSO' $ gPZS
5,4OOr I, l OO
E?rsso 9!Jr475
lll Other$2,7OO $137,925
5,4OO 352,350
$8.roo
$2,25os5,4OO
s490,275 $glJ.soo
6-MonthTotal
$146,250371,25Ol -lb. pack?ff o..........
2'lb. package..........
Tota 1................
| 9,9oo revised estimate r i25 (per packago! =,1o;8oo revised estimate x $.5o (per package) =
Materials Purchases(3)
Grain R Grain S Total
January..o..r. . . . . . . . . . .February ........o..r...Malth. . . . . .o . . . . . . ' . . ' . . r
April,...,.................May . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o.June,............,...,..,.
2,OOO $ 2,4OOI ,0oo 1,2OO3,OOO 3,750.,:o .,ojo
4,OOO 4,OOO
13.OOO sl4,350: :
Bu.5rOOOt,oro
I,OOO3,OOO4,OOO
4,OOO.
@t$ 6,5oo
''rjol2,ooo
4,5OO614OO
$32,200
Bu. Gost Bu.7,OOO3,0o03,00o
1 1 , O O O3,OOO8,0oo
35doo
@t$ 8,9oo
4,OOO3,75O
15,OOO4r5OO
1O,4OO
E4Or5s9
Chapter t5
Pl5-4 (Concluded)
(4) Materials Requirements for Production
a q E
Production of 585rOOO 1-lb. packages.. '.....-..........................r.....Productio n ol 7 4215OO 2'lb. packages ...r....-............-......
Total materials requirements for six months ............... ' ...............
585,OOO lbs.1,485,00O
2,O70,0OO lbs,
Three bushels of grain in the proportions of 2R:1S produce 198 lbs. of f inishedproducl R weighs 7O lbs. per bushel and S weighs 80 lbs. per bushel.
Weight perGrain Bushels Bushel Lbs.
R 2 7O lbs. 14OS 1 8O lbs. 80
2201O7o loss 22Weight of f in ished Product. . ' 198
Since each 198 lbs. of product calls tor 22O lbs' of grain, the total weight ofgrain required tor 2.O7O,O0O lbs. is:attatt# r 2,070,O0O = 2,3OO,OOO lbs., to be apportioned as follows:l Y o
Grain R = x 2,3OO,OO0 = 1,463,636 lbs. = 20'909 bushels @ 70 lbs. each1 4 0220
Grain S = # x 2,3OO,Ooo = 836,364 lbs. = 10,455 bushels @ 8o lbs. each
Materials Account (Fifo Basis)(5)
Grain R Grain SBu. Cost Bu, Cost
1 O , O O O22,OOO
32,OOO
1O,O0O5,OOO2,OOO
3,909
s l2 ,OOO32,2O4
s44,2OO
$12,ooo6,5O02,8OO
5,864
3,OOO2,OOO1,OOO3rOOO11455
$ 3,0002r4OO1r2OO3r75011455
3,0oo s 3,ooo13,0OO 14,350
16,OOO s l7 ,350
2O,9Og s27,1641 1 ,O91 S l 7 ,036
1 0,455 sl 1,8o5
5,545 s 5,545
, rI
Chaotar 15356
P15-5
(1) Budgeted Incomc Statoment(Ooos omittadl
Quarter
Sales:CommglciSl .........."""""t"GovgrnmgJlt.'..........t"""""
tota t . r . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . t t t to" t t " "
Cost of goods 8old ..".,....'..'...Grosg profit .........r.....'.......".t.Other op€rating arponses:
Advertising ..'.............-----.--Sgl l ing . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t """ 'Admi n istrativg ............'...r..Gengral ofticg ...........r. ' ....-.
TOISl . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . . . . . . tr . . . . t .
lncome before income t?r..'...Incomg t3I..... ' .................""...Ngt incomo .............................
ft$
s250loo
33sOto t
$l05Sl03
41$ 5 6 ' $ 6 2
Second Third
3268 3275120 l to
Fourth Total
$goo sl,o91115 445
9{1sl 9 l
$113 s 41e$ r r r s 4 1 0
44 163
$1 8e
$ o353223
$ g os e 3
37
s1,536707
$ ezg
$ 2 41 5 51 4 01 0 0
b
- i
s386 s38lt178 177
$208 3208
$ 6393525
$ 6393525
$,224
9 o423827
$los31 03
41s 6 2 $ 6 7 s 247_
j
I
-
357Chapter 15
P15-6 (Goncluded)
(21 Budgeted Income Statementwith 5% Incrtaso In Gommercial Sales
(OOOs omitted)
QuarterFi$
$zsgloo
$36s1A7
$1 e6
$ 8
$27e120
s390184
s2l5
$ 6
$l 08$1 07
439_g!
Second Third Fourth Total
Sales:Comm grci8l ................trt'ttr
. GovgrnmOrlt...........t'.....'."'Total . . . . t . . . . . . . . . .o.. . . ." tr t"t '
Gogt of goods Eold ............-....Gross protit ............o......'...t...'Other operating expensos:
AdvertisingSelling .............................t'AdministraUvc ...................Ggneral oftico .........t....t.r...
TOtSl . . . t . . . . . . . t . . t . . . . t . . . . . . . . . '
lncome befora income tir"....lncOmg t3L.....r.....-................Ngt inCOm|Et t.....r...............tr.....
$zssl l o
$3e9184
$31s1 1 5
$21 5
$ 6
9f301 9 8
s232
$ 643392a
$108sl 07
43S s e s 7 0
s | ,146445
s1r591733
363324
40362g
403626
s 858
$ 2 41 5 91441o'4
$ e g$ e 7
39
s l 1 6$1 rs
46
s 4319 427
171s 2563 5 8
Chapter tS
oto l'Olr-l
o co o o @ (o o lo lrr co lo (D lcolc , l o l
I ' tl F l
st nlo o o o iD @ OtOl Ol i
tr co n cD lcol ollF I'l :ll
o g o R I t ol8l 8ll3 F l:l 'll
. F s I3 3 *l$l g]lrDlN I(oln
O - r l O @ @ cOllDl@ N CO U' g) c,lnlP l * l
o R o 8 E r "lgl g]lo co o o (o (o olol oll
o N t o o , l € l o l l(') F lnl lo.ll
l l - l l
c, e, o C' (D o olol a[q i o o - F n l c o l o l l
( ' , ( " F lo l l l ll l - l l
o N o ( ' (o o oto l o l lr O) F. tO \t lcOl OllF E) F l3')J Fll
l - l l l
Et orEt 8lFl "il
o lcolo l6fl
F l o r€ l o ldl "=lIr
EI BI6l oJx r N l
o lo t()la{'l
!l slg l o l>r oil
5 l o l
El rlN l
:l sl3l "i]
a ! r
e l| l t Io l
o l
i l
o50
o
: i t: : n )
E : EE r = o? J !I e s: ' o: crtJ ! t
5l0
o-a-
l,.7t U}; o lo :
i ! : ii o c : i i
il:iE'E;ti
358
oFzFz:tooo( t of 6 tl0 rDd
E E Ta E E; i ? c 5= o ' )
3 E sH g Eo a r u; O FF , E r gF F r
6 8ozzo6zo.)
(oI
u)g
359
o o o l o l lo F o l o l lo o o t F t l
< q t
to N o l o l lo to rot Fil
I F l lI ggJl
ool!_
c'3{
o
6 l oo|l o-rJ to-|'l ocll ?- F
t + l
A oo l ot l od d
t 3 t
3Ela < l
! t Rt l B' 5
ol l o l lq i i lsll Bllll :llull fll
3ll Elli l q l
oilo t loill8ll
:ot\t
E'|559tD{,gl
!5lo
o t lo t lnJl-ll
gaqtoPa
(,T'oa,CD
!3t0
ot l3ilN t ltot l(rtl
o t lo l lo l lcollF. l l(rtl
(,o@
€I
o o lo q lq -rJ! t F iN O IJ ' I
o o lo o l3!. oJF O Io * la + l
. . ?: . . ! j i ?
! t: . i E : i € E r :i 5 : s i 3 * E E--i i E 3 F g * !f g g ! ? P ! E E6 H 3 P b A E 6 q '
* t I E 8 ! F € €{ r O F
,oat,Il,It
* r- 9L Tg => g. E €| ! l ,. E Dg €
ol o l lo l n l l
il Hlol ol la 8tl
< i lol roll| $rl
ol ol lo l o l lot uill
i q l
c l o l l
I ;ll
ol o l luil ntlNl t \ l l
nl €11I c'll
o lo lN I
ol
o lo l(\|I
ol
ooct-o(\|g,
oc,qoNo
o l oo l o@ l o{ -rDl o
I J 'I
o t oo l ool ro
l a
rl ()EJ +|
Fl e-5t $
0
El BEl $. # t 6
tl s.3l :
a)
otr l oE t @3 l osr s fll ql fll
oil lnl l ot l
rjt sjt :il$ll
"ll 8ll
!cutr.(!o
Lolr
st IFt 3s l $
oo t o! t qsr *
+,
E t 3r r l N
il i;
b3Qcl
t0
F
Clapter 15
oooCLEU 7>rOI | N; i o- c o; : o
E D 'c ?
oou(lltrID
€
Eocu3CLEo(,g r3E'ooo
U'l-zFz3o(,ooJo3GouJlrl-G]U().F
tr=ooz=oozo.?
to3c
oo(o
tto
c - Nt
C
Chaptar 15w
P15-6 (Concluded)
(3) JOHNSON AI*ID SMITH, CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSBudgeted Income StatementFor Year Ending June 3Or zON
Revenue from chargoable Ume:
EmploveeJohnsonSmi th t . r . . t ' t t t t t t t ' r ' r t to " t " " " " t t " r " " t "
V i ckg r3 . . . . . t t t t ' l " t r " t " " " " t to t " t t t " " " '
Lowe
BlllableHourr
700l , l oo1,5OOl,6001re2511625
500I , l oo1,0o0
siliingRate
$90.oo70.oo52.OO39.OO32.OO32.OO17.50l5.oo15.OO
GrossFees
$ gg,ooo77,OOO78,O0O02,4OO52rOOO52,OOO
8,75Ol6150015.OOO s424,650
stoo,ooo97r76O39r52035,OOO0�2'37o 334,650
s-lgpoo
- a a a a a a a a a a a a a t a a a a r a "
KennedY... ."" 'a a a t a a a a a a a a a a r r r r r o o o o r t r r r r o
Quinn '...G a r C i a . . . o t t . t " " " t ' l t t " t t t t t " t t " " " t ' l " t '
Hammond '.LyOnS . . . . . . . t too" t t " " t ' t t " t " t " t t t " " " " "
Erpenses of Producing revenue:Salaries:
Partner:8....Profgssi onal staff ....,r.r."""'Sgcrgta ri g3""""tt "r" "t "" " "
Frin ge bgn gfits""""""'o"""""'
Other oporating erpenseg .o.."'
Gross prcfit.......o.."t 'o"t"tt""tt"""'
Chapter 15
P15-7l
36t
Schedule 1Saloc Budget
Areas
Model l5OUnits ...r..r.....t..ot.
Unit pricoTotal . . r r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . .o. t . t t . r .o. . t .
Model lOOUnitgUni t pr ice . . t . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r r . . . . . . r . . r . r . .
TOtal . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . r r . . . . . ' . r . . . ' . r . . .
Model 50Units ..............Unit price ...............
TOtal r..'.....r....TOta l a .aa .ar . . . . r t r ra . r . . . . r . . r . r .a .aaaa aa aa a . .o . r r t
South
3'OOO 4'OOO9__!-75 9_l_Zgt__925€99 g_7ooeg
Southwest Total
TrOOO775
g!,?ailoo
5rOOOq__! 209_eoop.99
7,OOOt_eo9-_e99€99fllTsE.OOO
I,OOOs___99gl20{99$3fgg,ooo
15,OOO90
il-egpoos{ptlpgg
7,OOO l2rOOO$ r zo $_139E__glgpoo 91,41!.ooo
s
Schedule 2Production Budget
Model
Units required to meet sales budget (Schedule l)Add gnding invento}y., . . , . . , . . . . . . . . r . . r .o. ,r , r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . .
Total units requirad..............r..........................r,.....Lgss beginning inventory.,....,...,...o..,..............r....,.Planned producUon tor thc year........r...............-.. 7 ,OOO 12.100 14 .gOO
t-sTrOOO
2007 r2OO
200
1_99 9912,OOO 15,OOO
400 30012,4OO 15,3OO
300 400
Chapter 15fi2
P15-7 (Continued)Schedule 3
Direct Materials Budget in Units
Unitstq Be
Lumberln Board
Finishln
Pints
Model 15OUtits to be manufacturod
(schgdulg 2! ""t""""""""""Matgrials lSte """""t""""t"tt"
Units of materials rcquired """
Model loO-Units to be manufactured
(schgdulg 2| """""" ' t""""" 'Matgrials lSto "tttt"t"t""to""t" '
Units of materials requlred """
Model 5O-Units to be manufactured
(schedule 2) ......"""""""""'Matgrials lSto ....."""-""""""'Units ol materials required...."
Total units of materials requirad "
Manuiactured Feet 9Peakers
7,O0o1 2
84.OOO 35.000 14.OOO
l2 , l ooI
96,800 36.300 12,100
l4 ,9OO
29,800 14'900
lE-loo 91poo89.400
270.200
Schedule 4Purchases Budget
Materials -. - .@ Finish Total
27O,2AO30,ooo
3OO,2OO40.ooo
26O,20O$ ,75$_esJlg
Units required for Production(Sch edule 3)..............-.......
Add gnding inventofl.........-..
Less beginning inventolY...'..Units to be Punchasod ..........Estimated unit cost ..............Total cost of purchaseS........
l o t , l oo8.OOO
1O9r10OI O.OOO99,1oo
s r5.oo@
41,00O2.OOO
43,OOO1.500
41r5OO$ z.oo$83.OOO s1.764,650
Chaptor 15
P15-7 (GontinuedfSchedule 5
Cost of Materiala Reguired lor Production
3&3
MaterialsLumber Speakerg Finish Total
Model l5OUnitr of materialr roquired
lor producUon(schedule 3|.........,......... g4rOOO 35'OOO i4rOOO
Unit cost..,..........,,.........r... t__ .25 f_l!E.og $ 2.ooTotal ....,....,....,................ t-lgrg0O U2SOgg $28.OOO $ 6i O'OOO
Model 1OOUnits of materials reguired
tor producUon(Schedulc 3f .......,..r..r.,,..
Unit coSt... . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. i . . . .Total
Model 5OUnits of materials raquirod
for production(Schedulc 3) .. . . . . . . . . .r. .r. . . .
Unit COSt r.. . .r. . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .oTOtal ...... r......r............r....
TOta1...........r.....r..r..r........r..
90r8OO 3gr3OO 12,1OOt_- .75 L-19:oo $ z .ooL72€oo $__gg{,5OO $24,2OO 641,3OO
89,4OOt---75r_o7ggggg?.s5o
2grgoo9__--1-g.og$lrJsee!E! !,soo
l 4 ,9OO$ 2.OO$29,800$82.OOO
543.850$1.801.150
f
url
P15-7 (Continued) '
Schedule ODirsct Labor Budget
Chapter l5
Cuttfns Assombll$ Finishinq TotalModel l50
Hourg per unlt '.................. .375' 2.OOO .375Unitg to be manulactured
(schedulg 2)..........o.....o.. 7.OO0 7.OOO 7.OOOHourg of labor l€quiJ€d..... 21625 l4rOOO 21625Labor cost per holtt.'."..'... 3 6.00 3 5.oo $ 4.oo
Total labor CoEt..,..........., S15.750 i 7O.OOO $1O.5OO $ e6'25O
Model 1OOHciurs per unit................... .375 l '5OO -25,OUnits to be manufactured
(schedule 2). . , . . . . . . . 12. lOO l2. lOO 12.1OOHours of labor rcquircd..... 41537.5 18rl50 3'025l-abor cost per ho1tt........... $ 0.oo 3 5.oo $ 4.oo
TOtal labOr COSI..........!.... 527,225 $ 9O.75O $12.lOO 13OrO75
Model 5OHours per unit... ' ...r ' .......... .375 l '5OO '25OUnits to be manufactured
(Schedule 2) ................... . l 4.900 14.900 l4.9OOHours of labor rlquired..... 51587.5 22.35A 3t725L:bor cost per hour........,.. S 6.00 $ 5.oo $ O.oO
Total labor cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . 333,525 Sl I 1.75O $14,9OO 160'175Total....... 376,500 $272.5OO $37,5OO 3386,500
----------T\
Chapter 15
P15-7 (ContinuedfSchedule 7
Factory Overhoad Budget(Applied Overhead|
Cutting ASSqrnb[lg Finishins TotalModel 15O
Unlts to be manufactured"(Schedule 21 ..................r TrOOO TrOOO 7rO0O
Estlmated departmsntfactory overhead.,,or......, $ {'OO $ Z.OO $ .ZSTotal cost..................,..... $ 7,OOO $l 4.oOO S 5.250 S 261250
Model tOOUnits to be manufactured
(Schedule 2f .....,,,.,......... 12r7OO 12r1OO 12r1OOEstimated department
factory overhgad ..r......... $ 1.OO $ 1.5O $ .5oTotal cost........................ 912.1OO S18,150 $ 6,050 36,300
Model 5OUnits to be manufactured
(Schedule.2|................... 14r9OO 'l4r9OO 14r9OOEsUmated department
factory overhead r........... $ Irog $ 1.51 $_'l!!Totaf cost........................ $14.9OO S22.35O $ 7,450 44,7OO
Total factory overhead.......... $34,OOO S54,5OO Sl8,750 SlO7.25O
365
\-I
- \
\
366
P15-7 (Gontinued) '
Chapter 15
Schedule 8Beginning and Ending lnventories
Materials:Lu mb g r.............Speakers ..........Finish .r.....t.......
Total
Work in process: None
Finished goods:Model 150.. . . . . . 'Modgl l OO ...... ' .Modgl 50.. . . . . . . . .
Total r...........Total
Units
4OrO0OlO,OOO
1,50O
Cost
9 .7515.O02.00
ry$ 3O,OOO
150,0003,OOO
s183.OOO
Beqinning Invenlo_ry- Endinq lnventorvUnits Gost Total
3OTOOO $ .75 $22,5OO8,OOO 15.OO l2O,OOO2,0oo 2.oo 4,0oo
$146.500
200400300
200300400
se8.oo62.OO47.OO
s 19,60018,60018.800
s 57,OOOs240,ooo
slos.5066.7550.25
s 21 ,1OO2617OO15,O75
$ 62.875s209.375
Schedule 9Budgeted Cost of Goods Manufactured and Sold Staternent
Materials:Beginning inventory (Schedule 8)............... ' ......,"Add purchasgs (Schedule 4!...........r............r.,......Total goods available for use............,r.......,..........Less ending inventory (Schedule 8) ..... ' .. ' . ...........Cost of materials used (Schedule 5l ............. ' ......
Direct labor (Schedule 6) ....................t.....,.,.........,...Factory overhead (Schedule 7).............. ' ...... ' .oo.. '.,.. ' .Total man ufacturing cost .,....,....r..........r.......r...........
Add beginning inventory of f inished goods(Schedule 8| ............,..r.......................... 'r.... ' ....
Gost of goods available for sale.. ....,.......,...Less ending inventory of f inished goods
(Schedule 8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . .Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 183,OOO1.764,650
$1,947,650146,500
$ 1 , 8 O 1 , 1 5 0386,5OO107,250
$2,294,90O
57.000s2,351,9OO
62,875
€3;!9,939
%7Chapter 15
P15-7 (Concluded)
ScheduleBudgeted lncome
1 0Statement
Sales-all models (schedule 1) ...."""""""""""""Cost of goods sold (Schgdulg 9) ,. . ' . . . . . . . .""oro""" ' t '
Gross profit.......,......,.........,.,................,....Markgiing' erpgnsS ....--.. '.............. '.. $5o0roooAdministiative expenses ........r.o...r.. 3O0'OOolnCOmg bgfOfg inCOme taX,. . . . . , . . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . .
PfOViSiOn tOf inCOmg tax i . r . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . r . . . .o. ' . .o. . . . . . . . .
N g t i n C O m € ) . . . . . . . r r . . . , . . o . . . . . . . . . . . o . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . . , . . . r r
P15-8
Amounts4,o15,ooo.oo
2,289,O25.OOs1,725,975.OO
800.ooo.oos 925,975.OO
462.987,509192€gZ.so
Schedule 1-Sales Budget
Economv ModelWestern US EuroPe Asia Total
Units.. . , . . . -oqooo
5O,OOO 75,000 25,0oo 210'000Unit price S so S so A------5o $ so S so
Tota1...,.... s3sooJoo s2,soo.ooo I 3,?lo,o0o sl,25o.ooo 9J9r999rOOOStandard Model
Units . , . . . . , 4OTOOO 45,OOO 6OTOOO 35r0OO 18O'OOOUnit price S 70 S 70 S---7o S zO S_-7oTota1........ Si.AOO,OOO $3,15O,OOO SIT2OOP.OO S2.45O.oOO Sl3f99pOO
Deluxe Modeluni ts . . . . . . . 2o,ooo 25,oOO 35,OOO 3O,OOO I 10'OOOUnit price S 90 S go S---9o $ 90 9---9oTotat........ 51.8OO.OOo -S2.25o.OOo q--9rl-99roo0 S2.7oo.ooo S--$99o.ooo
Total ........,... 57.600.000 S7,9OO.OO0 S11rl0op99 €9499p99 q93-ro00p99
Chapter t5368
Pl5€ (Continued)
Schedule 2-Produstion Budget
Units required to meet salec budget
Economy Standard DelureModel Model Model
2lorooo lSorooo l lorooo(from Schedule 1! ............o..o."'lAi Ogslrod endlng Inventory.................o......... 20.OOO l5.OOO IO.OOO
Total units ruquircd lor Year zto,ooo 105rooo t 2o,oool5.ooo ls.o(xt l5.oooLess beginning Inventory..........-.
Productlon required for the year..........,....rorriror 2f 5p99 !-8OPOO 1O5P99
Schedule 3-Direct Materials Budget in Units
Economv ModclUnltr to bc msrutrcUrcd
Tranr Dlodc WlrcBor formcrr Rcstlflcrr Fltten Rcrleton 0n tcet!
(Schcdufu 2)..*......,..*. 2151OOO 215'OOO 215'O0O 2lSrOOO 215'OOO 215'OOO
Metcr lelrquen0Uporunlt 1 2 2 5 5
Total quanU$ o,fmttcrleb pqulrcd..,..,.-. 215,OOO 2I5,OOO 43O.O0O 43O.OOO i.O75.OOO 1.075'OOO
Standard ModelUnltr to bc manufectrrcd
(schcdutc 2)...-.............. 18O,OOO 18O,OOO 180'OOO 18O'OOO l8O'OO0 18O'OOOMaterlalrqutndtYperunlt t 2 3 8 o
Totel quentlty ofmetcrlabruqulrcd.......... ISO,OOO 360.000 72O,OOO 54O,OOO 1.44q.OOO l'08O.OOO
Dclurc ModclUnttr to bt manufecbrcd
(schcdufu 2],.-....-.-...... !O5,OOO lOtt,OOO 1O5,OOO 105'0OO 105'000 105'0OOMatcrlstr quanflV pcr unlt .3 5 6 10 8
Totel quanU$ otmstorlrlr rrqulrod.......... 1O5,OOO 3i5,OOO 525.OOO 630.000 LOSO'OOO 840'OOO
Total unltr of matorlalrrcqulredforproductlon.. SOO,OOO 89O.OOO 1.675,000 1,OOO,0OO 3.585!OOO ?f9EOOO
sti9
ot lI'il3Ulcrll7 t lo l l
fltr 8t 8 8l I Elsllr a l r ; l a l s � | lo_ | q I o I n l lcf I ct. I ct ldl
.glFI
s:lr3l
r 8t 8 81 8 plsll3 3 3 3 1 S t i l : l lo c { l c { N l o lo l l3 l : - l s l H lr a r a tR la iq oJ q oJ c.rilrul
8 . 1 i R l 8 .h l lF l " l - l 5 l l
ft *q*qiffil! lo l
lL l
o o t o o l o o l o l lo o l o o l C ' n l o l lq oJ q oJ q {lnJlcr ol o I)l rt) ,y'l oltla r l € , r l 6 l c o l l!o I o I Co l?Jlr r r 8 lo o t o o t o o l o t lo o l o o l o r o l o l lq oJ q oJ q JlnJlc , n l n o l n tD |N l lO I g F i o l T l lo I D I i lhjl
! lo o l3El
iElF e l
iootr
I,A!.'
oa-I
t-g3!a,()ct
x lEI
i :! :
; t= a- 6
T Ee a. C L
E tr?t -
I ta ot r -s aa ou r F
T
€3got
5!
! :l a
! !i F u. J 5 s
T 9 E !n 5 v tt a s ;n 9 - E o el 3 r S ?E o 3 E s; € 5 € el € : 3 !0 0 t r
F J : )
bIto
s
,:t
a.g:E t
s ! t rs f , !: ; 5€ 3 Xt € r€ g :t r T ':'
Chapter 15
po5cgooq,
Ilo
o.
II
Chapter 15
o o l lo ot lo ot lp s'llo o l lo o l l
alo ot ot ot lo lol ol ollo_iloJ nJl3 lfl3lo o l o l o l lo ( \ | t o t o i lq.d oJ oJlo t o t o t lU ) l r l r l l
:- l"l^ilto t0 ) l
o rl'il ol ollo t \ l o l o l lq JlnJ oJlo rtl Nl ollc t l o l o l lto l r l c0 l l
ldsto o l o l o l lO t \ l ( ) l Ol lqcd nJ nJlro IFI (\| l lN l o l F l lr { r lo l -J l
I l l . l lISu {iul
o ot o l o l lo n t o t o t lq {lnJ oJl!o {at Ft U)tlF l r l o l lo l r l o l ltcct
o o t o r o o t o l o o l o l o l l- o u'rl ol o tol ol o lol ol oll
dl o_ J lnJ q J loJ o J l 'ororrnr gq s'l d6lpl I q hl s'llN l8l F l$l F l6lBll
oooFoat
oo0_ooc)ct+l
o o l o lo lo l o lo-si{nJn t F l! r l G l lo_ l,ol? l{tl
9 t o o l o l
il 3E3lg 3 l to n l o l
$l 3;lRlE r s l ; l
3t8 l
sg o o l o lo ult ol'q
il oJo l o l@ t ? lq l n l?- l.al
o o l o lo N l o lqd loJs t3 lr t l N l-- lJo n l o lo F t o lq J I O Jo st{ nlr t l t lu r l (D l
lrJ
o o l o lo F l o lq q o Jo l r i lN t o lF lu ) l
t lt{| l ' l
o o t o lo rol olq { l oJo rvt{ olo t N lo l : l
|€ l
F r o O l o l
€ gl aHtl3Et g tHl
lc r | |I i}lr
E Et Flfl
dtoot!0F
: +a g
. € !ifrgE€ i! Es
i i !a s :
. € ! ie.E rf !E I T 6 ; !
ilE* it !E l l i f = i
5l= ru*i6o(,€oF
3 ;: ?
a s
, €Eu'! 89EIE" E :; J e E t
FI! EEut l
370
!tq,J
o()
coI
tr)
o.
Chaptor 15 371
P15-8, (Continued)
Schedule S-Dlrect Labor Budget
Economy Standard DelureAssemblv Department Model Model Model Total
Units to be produced(schedule 2|......,........ ' 215rOOO lSO'OOO lO5rOOO
Hou.rs reguired per unit.. '5O .75 l.OOHours required...o...r....... 7O7'5OO 135rOOO lO5rOOO 347r5O0Labor rate por ho1tr,.,..... t__ los t____l_o.oo $ lo.oo $ lo.ooTotal departmental labor
cost for pnoduct......... $!ro751Q99 t1€gg'1Q99 $!ro5o€oo 93.{75'1|ooTesting Department
Units to be produced(Schedule 2!,.........,..., 215'OOO lSO'OOO lO5'OOO
Hours required per unit.. ,O5 ,O5 .O5Hours required...D.....r..... 10r75O I'OOO 5r25O 25rOO0Labor rate per hour...,.... A-___l3.oo E__13.o9 S__U.og S__!3,ooTotal departmental labor
cost for pioduGt......,.. t-_Izsoo s-l-9999 t__qg.ooo so.oooTotal labor cost for the
period.............or.r.....,. 9!r?9!r00o $rlggfoo $!rl-!3rooo aJzjpgg
Schedule 7-Budgeted Machine Hourc in Testing Department
Economy Standard Deluxe
units to bo produced Model Model rotal
(Schodule 21 .......... 215'OOO lSO'OOO lO5'OOOb Hours ol machine Ume
required to test ufl it....... .15 .25 .35
b Total machine hoursrequired................,.....r... g2r2so 45rooo 36rzso tl4rooo
Chapter 15372
Pl5-8 (Continuedl
schedule g-Budgeted Factory overhead and Departmental Rates
Variable Budgeted VariableFixed Coit Rate Hours Gost
Assemblv DePartmentlndirect materials and
suPPlies o..........."""'lndirect labor.....-.'......rPayroll t?ros'........-......Employee fringe
bgngfi ts... . . . . . .-. .r. . . . . . .Equipment dePreciationRepairs and
maintgnar|c(t ............Allocated building costAllocated general
factorycosts............ 241t125TOtal depaftmental bUdggtgd OVefhead..'...'.....o..,..........."""""o"'BUdgeted OVerhead attOCatiOn baSe (direCt labOr hOUrS),......""""
Predetermined departmental factory overhead lElt€ ............o...r....
Testing Departmentlndirect materials and
suppl ies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $157,OOO $ .gS 114,OOO S 39'9OO S 196'900
Indirect 1abor..............t 25O;OOO l.OO t l4'OOO 1 l4,OOO 3641000
Payrol l taxes.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,OOO .tO l l4,OOO l1r4O0 66'400
Employee fringebenef i ts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . r ' . . . . l l4rOOO I l4tOOO
Equipment depreciat ion 215'ooo 215'ooo
Repairs andmaintenanco . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,OOO l .5o I l4,OOO l71rO0O 2061000
Allocated building cost I 'OOO 9'OOO
Allocated generaltactory costsr.........., |ftzr7}O f32'70o
Totat departmentat budgeted overhead r..... ' ............ ' .....""""""'D"' 91t254tOooBudgeted overhead altocation base (machine hours) .........!.t......... 114.OOOPredetermined departmental tactory overhead rate...'....
$158,O0O $r.so 347,5OO $521'25O35O'OOO .5O 347r5OO 773r75O382;5OO .05 347,500 17,375
347,5OO65,000
25,OOO .4O 347'5OO 139,OOOl2,ooo
BudgetedDepart-mental
Overhead
$ 679,2505231750399,875
347,5OO65,OOO
164,00012,OOO
241,125$2,432,5oo
347,500
$-_7.09
s3,9ggE99-
Assembly Department budget factoryTesting Department budgeted factoryTotal budgeted factory overhead .......... j ....
s73
F c , l t o o oF
r - N t o o o n | r )F ( )
r F N N U } I D O I f )q q
o n l n l n t lq q l q l l l lF |r, l ol tollo laf l l
ul lllt \ N
o l I |n F
o oC ' O
J'
o u )o ( l ,r O
o u )o or gEH
Et o o o u ' r o ornr o or or ro nrolrolol u? q e c! q qlr l q qlr l q \ l q l c l l
g l ; ' * " - " 1$ l ; l ; l ; " 1 ; l $ lo oq q
{ . ' � F
o l- e l o o o o o o t o t o o t o t o n l r o l r o l( , l u l u l 1 q q 'q l l l q q le l u? q l r l r l3 l F r F r - * l : l n l r l
( " - l t l R l
€l t, l+fl 0 l{d a, tr'tarl
( f oo o
o F
E l o o o o o o r o r g e r o lo l u? u l u l q q e lc l q q lq li l - P o ' g " o l g l I l 9 lEl
o l{fl o l{'l
I s l E E t l B q 3 3E s l i F F
E = l - O If i 5 t
t t drrl, 6lZ 9 - l o o o u f o o o o: : ( J l n U l F t r ( t | U f C t C )F t a
€ 3 r r ! F O ( r I
E S I a , 5 -
T E I o o o n o o o c t
Eg l l 3n : ' ! ' ! EF; E I J ' 9Itl -, I
EttoEoxtoo
9ElgFl
o€E?.tt!tc.sa
tU1toEEotro(,lrl
>r l t l= ! ,1= r lE S IIJ tr|
i i! y
t , EE '
? l ,- C LD eo o- oa ( ,. o ?F ;
F
3oqt
ll-=
CIootttro|l'F
To64t
Jo
E$se3 gt <
! : ! ! : !! 3 a . r : :. . - 6
: i f E E J! i ; i o . t3 : E t 9 -s* d 3 ' : g ; 33 = P . 3 { ' s g
J
e(|,
tt
: :
i B, ( uo =t r o! c ,g , 0g Eo oF 6
oqtx0l0
g(t
c,fitE
a0C)
o5tteB2trDt,tOe,
Chapter 15
1
!,o:'
'j=
trooq,
Ino.
Chapter 15371
Pl5€ (conclud?n"or,e io--Beginning and Ending Inventories
Beolnnlng lnvtntety Endlng Inventory
Matarlrlr:
Trrnrtorm crr ...--..-...--.Dlodc rccttllen -..6-....Fllten ........-.....-.H--.-x
S/lra ........-r....D,.'............
Totel mated8lt.--*...-Worlr ln Prpcccr: lloncFinlghed Ooodr:
Economy ModclStandard Modcl x............Dg lurc Model..-..............Total flnlrhcd goodr .......
Total InvcntotY .....'.-.
IO,OOO 3 r .5O ' t
l5,ooo 4.5ozt,ooo .70*t,ooo 1.75to,0o0 .2o
l5,ooo 5,ooog7r3OO - IOTOOOl7'5OO 2!',OOO€r75O 2O,OOO
2,000 5OTOOO
chranutv unlt cort Total cot Quanutv Unlt colt Tstalsost
I t.5o t 7"5OOaso alt,ooo
.7O 17"5OO1.75 3li,ooo.2O IO,OOO50 20,ooo
Ll3r0oo3OiOOO .5O 15'000 4O'OOO
t loo.750
15,OOO ti2s.oo 3 375,00015,OOO 38,50 7Tf FOO15,OOO 35.25 828'750
tL78'!-e!!991,942f0o
2O,OO0 325.15 3 5O3,OOO15,000 30,25 588,75010,000 58,4!t 564,500
tL,050,25O$J9125o
Schedule 1l-Budgeted Gost of Goods Manufactungd and Sold
Materials:Beginning inVentOfy (SChedUle 10| ........................ 'or.............. ' .Add pUfChaSgS (SChedUle 4). . . . ' . ' . . . . . . . . . . .o. . ' . . . . . . ' . . r r . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . .
Matgf ials avai lablO fOf USe. ' . . r . . . ' . . . r . ' . . . r . r" . ' . . . . . . ' . . r . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Lgss ending inventOry (SChgdUle i0! . . . . . . . . ' . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . . ' . . . . r .
Cost of materials used in production (Schedule 5) '..'..........-....DirgCt labOr (SChgdUle 6|.. . . . . . . . . . ' . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .".FaCtOry Overhead (SChgdUle 8)....'..'..'.....'r............r......'...............COSI Of gOOdS manUfaCtUf8d dUfing the pefiOd...........,.....,.........Add finished goods beginning inv€ntory (schedule l0) ...'.-......-..GOst Of goOdS available fof 3a1e.......................... ' .r. ' .............r.r.r..Less fi nished goods ending inventory (Schedule I Ol.--. ' .--.---.-.- ' ..GOSI Of gOOdS SO1d. . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . .o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . r r r . . . . . . . r . . .
Schedule I 2-Eudgeted Incomo Statemont
$ l60,75010,912,250
$11,073,O0O135,OOO
$1O,938,OOO3,775rOOO3.686.500
$18,399,5OO1.781.250
$2O,18Or75O1.656.250
s18.524,500
Sales (from Schgdule l l .,.......................,...............Less cost of goods sold (Schedule 11!....,............o.Gross pllt i t...............................r.r.o...rr..rr......r........
Less commercial expenses:MarkeUn g exponsgs ... . . . . .o... .r. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. .AdministraUve erponse3 .r............oor-.ri-r..r
lncomg bgforg taxgs .. ' . . . . . . . . . . . .o... . . t . . . ' . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Less income tar (4O% tar rate).Net incomo.... . . . . . . . .
s6,145,OOO2.330.500
$33,OOO,OOO18.524,500
$14,475,5OO
8.475.500s 6,000,000
2.400.ooos 3.600.000: -
Clppler 15
Pl5-o '(1)
375
CL CORPORATIONProspccUvo Ststoment of Incomc and Retained Earnings
For Year Ending December 31r 2OB(OOos omitted!
Revonuc:Sale f aa .aa . . r . . .a .a .a4 . . . . . . . r . . . . . . t . . . . t . . r . .o . .a . . r . . . . . . .a
Oth gr' lncorllC ..r..........r.....r...r...r...............t
Erpenrcr:Cost of goods manutacturad and sold:
MaterlglcDlrect laborVariable fagtort ove rh ead ..'.......r...........Firgd factory ovorh gad ......o....'-'...........
Boginning inventol]f ...'...............o..........o...
Ending lnventory r.r.r... i .......r.................. ' .. '
MarkeUng:Salari gr r.r..............r......r..,,..Gommiss1on3............r.rt.......r't......r............PromoUon and advgrtisln$ ........................
General and administration:Salarl es ....o..'.r'...r.............Thavel
S600,OOOI,OOO S609,OOO
s5O7,OOO
81,OOO
$213,OOO218,OOO130,OOO
12,750$573,75O
4g,ooo$621,75O_!l-t!J!o'
$ to,ooo2OrO0O45.O00
$ lg,ooo2r5OO
Office cost3......Incomc flossl bglorc Incomo t8r......'..o..'....'.In comc tar rgfun d (4O%1............r,..............r.llet InCOmO (IOSS|....r........................'.'......'.'.Beginning rctaingd earningS ..'.........r..rr..,....
SubtotalLess dividends
Ending rgtain gd earnings ..,........r.......o.........
t tseginnlng Invcntof l . . . . .o. . . r . . . rr . . . . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . r . . . . . . . . . . . . .oo.. . ror. . .Adding to Invgntory (45OrOO0 - 4OOrO0Ol r . . . . . . . . . r . , , . r . . . . . . . r . . .o. . , .Ending Invento ly . . . . r . .oo . . . . . . c ' . ' . .o . . .o . . r .o . . . . ro . r ' . . . . r . . . . . . ' . . . . . . ' . r r . . . . . . .
198 cost per unit ($573175O + 45OrOOOl ...............,..,,..rr..,...,..Gost of ending lnventory .......i......
9.000 27.500 015.500$ (6,500l
2,60,0$ (3,e001
108.200$lo4,3oo. 5.OOO
4O,0OO units50.ooo9OTOOO units
x s1.275s1 14,750
Chaptar l5376
P15-9 (Gontinuedl
CL CORPORATTO}IBalance Sheet
Prospective as of December 31' 20B(0o0s omittedl
Current asseta:GaSh r..............
Assets
a a o a a t a a a a r t a a a a a a a a a a a a a a t " t t o t t " t "
Accounts receivablelnVentOfy .. . . . . . . .aa..a.. . . . . . .r . .a.. . . .aarr.. . . . . . . . . .rr . . . .ar.. . . . . t . . . . . .-a
lnCOmg taf fgCelvablA ............... '....o...........D...o...r.....o...
Plant and eqUipm6llt-...........,............r.o...... '............ '.....t..LaSS ACCUmUlatgd depfgCiatlOn r.r.'....... '..........D..t..."'t '
TOtal aSSets.....r......r.......1..r..........r.. '...r'.r.....r..............t
i l,2oo80,OOO
1l{ ,75O2.800
$l3o,ooo4l.ooo
$198,550
89.OOOs287.550
Llabilities and Shareholdsrs' Equity
Current liabilitieg:Accountg pa1nb1e.......o...........o.....rr.....r................'....'.' 945tOOOlccruaO paya0tes..r.....................rr....'....o.........rt......... . 23r2SO
Notgs pty"ble .,................!.o.............t......r.........t.......... 5O.OOO Sl l8t25O
Shareholderg' equltfCommon stOCk....o....o.........................................r......... $7Ot0OORgtaingd €arnings ...........................r.........r.......r..... ' ..r. 99t3OO 1O9t3OO
Total liabilities and shargholderst €QUit!......,.....r...r..... :9?!l?:55O
l2l (al The profit performanco lor 2OB is forecast to be much pooner than in
2oA.-A loss after Income tar of 3.?.9 milllon ls prodicted, companod-to a
profit aftor Income tar of $12.6 mitlion. Tlre company erperienced the
loss despitc a ggoh Increase in unit sales Yolumo. The maior problem
sosmE t6 Ue in the inabitity to raisa prices and/or in cost contlol. Tho
costs noso In every anoa of activitp(i l Variable manufacturing costs per unit increased 7.loh (from $1.16 to
sl.2464.(21 Fired manufacturing costs increased s750,000, or g.3oh.(31 Marketing costs, erctuding commissions, increased 316 million' or36o/o.(4) General and administrative costs increased $3.5 mill ion' or 15oh.
Chapter 15 3n
P15-9 (Goncludedf
(bl All srsas will require spectal cost analysis because the costs in all aneasIncreased, but apecial attenUon should be paid to:(ll Produstlon cost Incroaseg, because although relaUvely small in pencentage, the dollar amount ls high due to the volume of units.l2l Selllng and promotlon coat Increases, becauae the rate of thesecost Inc;gaset was lraater tlran the rate of sales increase.Tho saleo prlce wa8 not Increa3ed in spite of the increased cost. Thehlgh sale! volumo Inciaase may be the result of too low a price. FurtherInvestigatlon Into markbt prico and price-volums relationship is needed.
A review of tho balancc gheet Indicateg a material deterioration in thecompanyb working capltal position. Inventory has more than doubled.This increaso appears to have been financed by a significant incraase incurrent llabilit ies (more than a three-fold Increase| and a materialdecllne In cash. The need for so large an Increase In Inventory and theeffeet of dectlning profitability on tho cash and working capital positionneed to ba thoroughly lnvestigated.
(cl The following lmprovements should be considered by management:(ft lmproved coordlnatlon between gales, Inventory contlol' and pro'ductlon, an a no-€Yaluatlon of the product pricing policy'
l2l Development of a standard cost system to monitor product sosts.(31 Development ol a line of credit for short-term liquidity problems.
Chapter l5
CASES
ct5-1
(ll Businesg plannlng and budgetlng acUviUes lor Maiton Company ane impontant because:(al A long-run commitment of resoirrceg to specialized assets is about to
be mide.,A one-time decision for major erpansion that could involve alarge amount of financial resounces ovor a long period of time is aboutto be undertaken. This Investment will be committed to specializedassetg and can be rccovercd only from the production and sale of oneparticular YalYe.
(bl Tfte daily operatlong of the company will becomo mono compler. Maihas had no erperience wlth the day-to-day operaUong of a large busi-ness. The business ptanning and budgeUng proceduras will provide Maithe opportunity to review the company performanco and will allow thecompany to develop and evaluate atternative counses of aetion to satisfycorporate objectives.
(cl They will asslst in obtainlng capital from erternal souncss. An erpansionpnogram ol this magnitude, with a significant amount of initial funding'will require the generation of additional capital either through borrowingor issuing stock Obtaining nacoliliary funds can be enhancad bY andmay requlra an orderly presentation of, the business plan and budgetacUviUes.
(dl They will highlight potential problem situations. Disciplined businessplanning and budgotary procedures could emphasize a variety of prob'lem situations that might be encountered during the period of the plan.
l2l Listed below are the major probtems that would most likely be disclosedbecause Maiton Company is about to erperienco a significant growth.(a) The lack of adequate production facilities to manufacture the valve at
the quantities required. The company has served a small part of themarkeL The new segment is much larger, thus calling for more produc'Uon facilities than previously needed.
(bl The tack of adequate Internal capital gources to finance the asseterpansion (both working capital and plant and equipment). The companyis smalt and probably generates modest amounts of capital. The amountis not likety to be enough to meet the new requiremonts. Gonsequently'the company witl need to seek capital from the outside, and probablyhas little erperience because it grew slowly and had no previous needfor outside capital.
(c) The lack of adequate management nesources (people) to administer thecompany as lt gFo\ rs. The company ls small and, thus, probably solelyrun by George Mai. As lt grows, there will be the neod for more manage-rial people. This need probably cannot be met with current employees.
Chaptor l5 379
Cl5-1' (Concluded)
(d) Lack of planning and budget skills. The company probably has had littleneed for planning. Consequently, it may experience difticulty in organiz-ing for and developing a five-year plan. Specific problems could occurwith regard to forecasting, production, marketing, and cost of capital.
c15-2
(1) Factorc that Marval Products needs to consider in its periodic review otlong-range planning include the following:(al The curent state of the economy and its expected future statusl(bl The current and future availability of resources, such as personnel,
plant and equipment, and capital;(cl Consumer attitudes with regard to product appeal, changing travel
modes and patterns, and changing life styles and affluence;(d) The level of industry sales, Marval's current and projected market
share, and Marvalb degree of influence or dominance in the industry;(el The product lines with respect to the naturs of the production pnocess,
length of t ime the product has been establ ished, and ut i l izat ion ofnesources and plant capacity.
(21 Factors that Marval Products needs to consider when developing the salescomponent of its annual budget include the following:(al The pricing strategy;(bl The size of Marval's market share and the relationship to its competi-
tors;(c) The sales mix of products so that contribution can be maximized;(dl Available production capacity;(el The effect of advertising on sales volume;(f} National and international economic conditions.
g0 Chagter 15
cl5-3
(r) Division and plant personnel biases that may be inctuded in the submission
of budget estimates include the tollowing:(al Budget sales estimates probabfV w9.9lO, tend to be lower than actually
expected because of ths high volatility in product demand and the cur-
rentreward/penaltysystemformissingthebudget.(bl Budget cost'estimates n itt u" higher [han actually expected in order to
protect the divisions against thJ effects of down'side risk of business
stumps and the possibility ol increased higher costs' The reward/penal-
ty system encourages this action.(c) Plant and division management can incorporate slack and padding into
the budget without the litetitrooo that it will bE temoved, because c9r-porate ieadquarters does not appear to get actively involved in the
actual budget PreParation.l2l Sources of information that corporate management can use to monitor divi-
sional and plant budget estimates include:(a) Regional and naiional leading economic indicators and trends in con-
sumer preference and demand;(bl Industry and trade association sales proiections and performance data;
i"i prior year performance by reporting units as measured by their finan-
cial, production, and sales rePorts;(d) Performance of similar divisions and plants'
(31 Services that could be offered by corporate management in the develop'ment of budget estimates are as follows:(a) providir ig economic forecasts with regard to expected inf lat ionary
trends and overall business cycles;(b) providing national and regional industry sales forecasts for products as
developed by corporate rianagement or obtained by management from
other sources;(c) Sponsoring training pnograms for ptant and divisional personnel on bud'
geting techniques;(d) lnforming divisions of overall corporate goals in terms of sales, market
share, and profit.(4) Factors that corporate management should consider in deciding whether or
not it should become more involved in the budget pnocess include consider'ation of costs and benefits and the resulting behavioral effects.(a) Costs to be evaluated include:
(f ) tncreased costs at the corporate level, because mone time and per-haps additionat staff will be required.(2) possible tower profits, due to an unfavorable change in division andplant management attitudes and motivation'
ffi1Chaptsr 15
Cl5-3 (poncluded)
(bl Benefits to be considered inctude possibte profit improvement from:
(il More accurate budget estimates that might reduce lost sales and/or
reduce costs incurred;l2l More effective management because of more realistic budgets;
igi lmproved coordinatlon and control ol the budget pnocess'
(cl bin"rioral variables to be considered Include:(f l Effect on goal congruence;-izi Effect on lhe communication channels between corporate manage-
ment and divisional management;(31 EfeJ of restricting authority over the budget process at the divi-
sional level;iossible negative effect on motivation and morale, due to loss of
authority and autonom$Effect oh pertormance due to a potential reduction or increase in
bonuses.
(4)
(sl
Chapter 15
cl5-4
Schaffer Company appears to havc a woll'doveloped budgetary 3ystom'
Budgetg for each of tlre important areas requiring attention'-€ales, production'
inventory levels, olpense", Jii capltal invesiments-are Included In thc
pnocoss. Insufliclbnt detailg are frovided to properly evaluate the constntction
and uso ol the UuJg"t" lor ssleq capltal lnvegtmentr and prcduction and Inven-
tory levels. Thug, t{re analyslr li this caso must focus on the arponse side of
the budgeting Pnoeac8.Although an elaborate budget pmcosr odsts' analysia- of the elponse proca-
dures raveals a number of gtroricJrJng" for ptanning and contrcl purpose3: Tho
basic Input to the oxpsnso nuOgoi fotift" comlng yoar i9 the first slr months ot
the current yearb actuat pedofrance' tfic oxponso budget (modified to rsflect
unconttollable eventsl, and the corporato olponse rcduction porcontage' The
next erpanse budget ii basically tait yeart actual costs reducod by the com-
puted orpense percentage.This approach does not capture the full potential of the budget lor planning
purpo"."l--niln shoutd Ue torward-looklng. Thc Schaffer budget ls based pri-
marily on past r""rft" and doeg not tpcognizs any planned changes in operating
activi$es, The acrcss-the-board corporata olponso reduction target does not
consider the diffenencss among ptantg in opportunities for cost improvemonF'
The review ol division r"n"g"iJni t"V permit the lrstrong' managers to build
slack into the budget And tho lacts Ao not make ctear whether the proposed
budget is based upon the currsnt yearb sales volume or ttre planned volume lor
the budget year. Witnout such an idiustment, an additional weakness exists in
the procedurc.The process atso falls short for contrcl purpose":-Tl" maior shortcoming is
i ts fai lure to Incorporate changes in operat ions that occur subsequent to
August. Comparisons of perforriancos that inctude these late changes' with
budgets that do not, will not provide usEful information for control' The inclu--
sion of allocat"O "orporatton and division costs in plant budgets would t-afo
the erpense budgets less ettecUre for control purposel-Pe9.ausa they contain
irrelevant data iJr ptant-level cost control' The possibility that some division
managens may be iUte to Introduce slack into their budgets also reduces the
effectiveness for cost control.The budget process appeaF to omit the plant managels trom active partici-
pation in budget preparation "nC revision. Their participationvould improve tho
cost control and'ptanning benefitg of the budget pnoce:s'--The use of acnoss-the-board oxpensc cuts and Inclusion of allocatld costs in tho budgets u19d-f9rperformanco moasurpment lr further avidence that tha connpanlf has 'failed toconsider the effect of lts system on management employees.
With its budgetary syst-em, the company tries to plan and control its opera-tions. To this end, tne company ls be*er off for having developed its_ _tJt"r'However, tuttft"r benefits coulibe gained by eliminating the weaknesses in itsprocedures.
g3Ct;gtpter 15
c15-5
(rl
(21
Tho manstaeturing managert vievrg can bo ssparatod into two argu-monts-thc ugc oi ttre Eamc lmprovement tsrgetr lor all plants sndlnconsistent appltcation of target ravisions. In both casesr the manufac-turlng managefe argumontg 8rc valid.
ihc manufaciuring manager claims that the use ol the aamolmprovement targets'tor att plants fails to racognize the different abllitiesoi-pf"nt" to achiive targeta. His,criUcisrn ig valid because plants do haveditierent opporhrnlues ior lmprcvemenl and thls should be recognized in"gtaUtfnind mprovement tailetr. Wrilo hlr arguments- ma-y be valid to
aupport trir vie* thet older plantr havo lesc opportunity for impmYement'tn6re are Insufficlont dst8 presented to vorify his claim.
The manufaclgring maneger obiects to the nowor plants' obtainingrevised targets and th6n being able to perform better than the ruvisedtargel ThJ modification of targets in light- of new information is an
apiropriate budgefrng technique. Newer plants may need such revisions
because their lnixpeience makes it morc difiicutt to get parameters and
crercise contrpl. ilo*erer, the manufacturing managerb alSumant is
valld becauge adlustmentr iravc not been avallable to ell plants' and' tur-
thermorc, Ute "Oiu*rn"nts granted to new plants appear to make lt easi-
r lorthem to achleve target*The rssultng treatmint in establishing end revising targets' when
coupled with e pertotmanco sppnrisal and rcrvard system' does sppear
to discriminate in fayor of the newsr plants. This would apparently lead
to lower bonuses, appraisats, and morale among management of theolder plants.Both old and new plants have the capability of concealing slack in theirbudgets. The otderptants cannot introduce budgetary slack t*rrough theircost estimates because their costs havo ostablishod a pattern over'theyoars. HoweYer, the ptant managoment knows thoso aneas of operationswtrere changer and'improvements can bs initiated. These operatlng
changes c8n be Initiated after tho budget io adopted'The newer plants can incorporato budgetary slack in other ways'
Their coSt estimates ang mgno uncertain because the plants an6 newar'
The plant operafions havo not stabilized, so ptant management may be
able to intlate costg slightly above what can be realistically erpected ofthom. There may be more o-pportunities for improved operations that maynot be recogniz6d at the ti;; the budget is adopted. In addition, there is
aomo lag ln lncorporat ing Into the budget the cost savings of thoIncreaseJ erperience of tho workerg and the efficiency in functioning ofthe equipmsnt and machinerF
g1 Chlptt 15
cl5-6
(f l The budget practlcg? d?:c4bed ln thc cas. err not llkely to prcduca eftec'r-'
tfuo budget?ontrol In thc long runr'bccsusc rcveral weaknesscr can bc
ldentified:(al There 8ppoars to be no partlclpaflon of plant poFonnol In thc budget
develoPment.Ol Cii"n ttrit ttrere have been flvc manage6 In lour yoarE' thc manags'
havo had nobpportunity to assess whether thc budget lr rcalistic'(cl. lt app""rr ihst adlugtmentr to tho budget, oubsequent to ltr adoption'
are not permitted even In tho tlght of newlnformatlon.(dl The budget la being uoed to pressuts Fc plant menegoa
(21 ile lmmedlite effect wltl Ue a tnrstrated manager, who wlll not meet thc
budget and who will bc reptaced a! 8 noault of belng unwllllng to cacrilfccthe luture for the present, or s frustratsd managorr who meets the budgetby making decisions that raerlflco thc futurc for thc preaent. ln elthercasor Drake Inc. ls unfavorably affected.
Ttre long-term eflect wllt be to rcducc thc management affectivenes! of
Drake Inc. imployeeg. The arbltrary method of budget developmelt' lack ofpartlcipaUon, in,i ttrc usc ol the birdget as t pnossurc devlca wlll result In
loss of talenied managors, development of nonproduetlve methods by man'
agors to nbeat' ttre Uudge! decisions taken to meet the budget but wttich
arc detrimental to the company in the long nrn, and low moralc and motiva-tion.
ll the present methods of budget administratlon continue' Davld Green
may adopi nonptoductlve methods and becomo an Ineflectivo managsr.However, it tre is talented and conUnuas to raise such lssues as the poor
condition of thc plant and hls short tenuto, lt lg likely ho will rssign or be
fired.
r t ' -
Ol&1. A capibl olgcndituro b an upcrditure hlrtd'od to bcnelil futun pcrio6. ll ia nornally asro-cblrd wilh thr acquiritbn or imprwemrnl ofplant asrcte. Thr rral dislinclist betweln acopital and rcvenul cxpendilure is not lheimmediato charging of the expendilurc toilcotnc, as gppood to ita gradual atrprtizatim,but thr bngth cil limr required lor ils recoveryin castr. Bccovericr ol rvenur expenditurel,rtrch ee product c6ll, aro expected to lakoplacr in a matlor ol weeks or, at the mosl,monthr. Thc tinancial rccovery of capitale:gendilures b measured h lerms of years.
O1&2. Purpoces cil e reoearch and devebpmonl PteItarn are:(a) A planned gearch lor new knowlodgc
pertaining to the industry withoul reler'ence lo a specific applicatict.
(b) Crealion of a new producl or improve'ment of an exislhg ptoduct.
(c) lrwcnlkxr cf a new or impoved procostor machhery lo mEke a fhishe'd produciorgnponenl
Bcs,rsrg fc a research and devclopmont Pro-grarn arg:(a) To protcct thc cabc dolbr, that ic, to
meet csnpotitbn. lmproving lhe qualityof pedonnancr cl produds or achievingcod savhgr in eilher openting or capilalerpenditurer falb hlo this categpry.
(b) To do research to promole new salegdollars, eiiher by enterhg a new marketor by aignili:anlly expanding an existingmsrket.
(c) To invesligate problems with respecl loenvironmental protrtbn, saletv"-rvorkingcordilirns, elc.
Q1S3. Budgetary prccecbres for research and devehopment expendituro are designed to:(a) lorce management to lh ink aboul
phnncd elgendilures;(b) coordinate rosearch and developmenl
plans with thr inmediste ard lang-rangepbns of the conpany
(c) lorcc lhs research and developmenlstaf l to considcr major nonl inancia laspects cil lhc prograrn, such as person-nel, equipmcnl. and facil i l ies require-rnenb.
Q1S4, A cash budgct involveo detailed estimates ofanticipaled cash rcceipls and dicbursemenlrfor a rpccified perird cil time. lt Lr designed toassbl monagemenl h coordinaling cssh tlowlrcrn operaticr3 an a basis lor financial plansand conlrol. The cash budget provides a sys-
CHAPTEB 16
DtscussloN QuEsTloNstemalic approach lo lhe synchronization olcaglr regorlrce3 with needs. n a$bt! mansge-rnent h rnakhg hlelligenl dccbionc corccrningcapilal expcnditures, dividend polbies, hvegl-ment3, and other financial matler3, and oftenexerls a caulionary influencc on any ol lheabovc phns. Porirdic roporb wnparhg aciualwith planned receipls and disbursemenl! per-mil effeciivc ard cqrtinuous csrtrol ol cash bysignalhg signili:ant deviations fronr the firan-cial planr for |he perird.
O1S5. (a) Nqrmanulasluring busiresses musl planla the tulure jusl as carelully as rrra lu-faclurhg cqtcerns. Seasonal pattemr inngyonuqr and expenditur€s must be po-v ided for , and requi rcd rquipmcntreplacement and expansions musl bebudgeled.
(b) Not-for-profit organizations generallyoperale on relatively fired incomes lhalare received at ono time. Such recoiplpatlernr aro common for organi:ationsthat rely sr tax dollars lor support. Thesefunds must be allcaled throughout thcyear in order to mainlain operalions.Careful budgel plans are a necessity forsuch albcalbns.
QlS'6. PPBS gtEnds for Planning, Programming,Eudgeting Syslem, and is an analytical loolfocueed on lhe outPul ot final results ralherthan input or inilial dolbrs expended. The oul'put is directly relatable lo planned goals orobjectives.
O1&7. Zerobase budgeting [ZBB) is a planning andbudgeting lool using cost.benefil analysis ofprojects snd functbng to imprwc an orgraniza'l ion's regoutce allocation. Budgel requeclsconsist of declsbn packages lhal are analy:ed,evalualed, and ranked in a priority order basedon cost-benelil analysis. lvlanagernenl can thenevaluate pqssble astivitier for the corning peri'od, selecting those that will best achieve orga'nizalioal grels.
Traditional budgeling tends lo concontraloon the differential change fmm the gdot yean,assumhg hat existhg astivitiec arc essenlial,must be cmtinued, are currently performed ina et-officient and optimum tr16tr1er. and willbe cost-effectivo h the canhg yest Cost! arcdevebped monr on a line-ilem tather lhan atractivity basis. ZBB orgranizer all budget cootrh the lorm of activilies ancl/or operaliau (deci''sion packages) and evalualec tho effeclivc'ness of each decision package as if it were anew aclivity.
85
ffi
I
cl16-8. (!) Zcro'btsc budgcting tcquirc! mlnlgcrgtb justity thclr Lntirc budgat rcQuast' lt
Plates -thc
burdan d Progl on thcmantgcr lo i|J3tify why any.moncy tt tllchould bc budgctc'd' ll docs thb bYsttrting wilh thc essumplion lhet zcrowill bc rpcnl on arch tctivity' to thcbudgating plocctr bcainr with r brrc ofzafo.
(b) Thc two kinds of tllcrnrlivca contidcrcd' for cach rcrNiry erc (1) diflcronl wrp oilpcrforming thc ectivity end (2) diflcrcntlcvcls d cftort In pcrlcming thc lciivity.
(c) A dccirion prckegc include en enrlyrisd an sciivitYt cat rnd Purpotc,sltcmativa courlcl of rclion' mcltura3ol pcrlormencc d thc rctivitY'consaquoncct of not Pcrfaming Urcactivity, and thc tctivity'3 bcncfitr.
(d) A packegc idcntifico end dcscribsr onctctivity in ruffrcicnl dcteil eo thtt it crnbc cvaluatcd rnd compercd with olhcracllviticc.
(c) Succesr in thc imPlemcntation of zcrobasc budgcting rcquirer thc following:1. Unkagc d :aro-balc budgcting
wilh short-.snd long-rangc planning2- Susteincd 3upport end commitmcnl
from axocutivc mlnlgomcnl3. Innovelion bY mtnsgcn in
dcvcloPing dccislon Prclcrgcl4. Acccpttncc ol zcro'besa budgcting
by Pcnont who murt Pcrform thcbudgcting work
O1e9. Prorprtivr hformrtbn lhouH br prwitod hoxlornrl f inencial ltr lom.nlr whrn i l wil lenham thr rli:rbility cil tho ucor'r pndi:ticnr.
016-10. PERT b prttbulatty rpProprhto u e rchlduFhg and ccntotlhg trd'rniquo fot Ptoioctl sl'rirling of e lergl numbor of trskr, roorr olwhidt cannol bl strytrd unlil otrrn rt. corY}'
Plclr, and lsno of rttrbh can br undrriakoncdrcurtontly.
Conceptually. lhr rllrrrncl ir to e nrtrrprlof intordependcnt ectivities wtrijr. rr I group'roquiro cocli.tabb tlm to ccrnpbto. Thrn busually subctsntbl srt.up linr (and cel) a$o-ciated with enatyzing, defhhg, and onln8lhgc6ch discrot. prcied sstivity; thur, lhl bonefiiis h proicctl rcquirhg a cstsUerablo sttpunlol limo and consbth! of r reblivcly ccnplernetrrorlc
PEBT albw: thr ucrr to uPdal. erd rovisrrchrdubd activilis rnd thoroby drtrmilr thrrilrts ol changor st tho worall pojrct. lt bPattbubrty apprgrbte whon thl timing cl irdi'vdual aciivitbr and thr Proi.ct cotplolict dalearc criibal lo lr,rccatt.
016-1 1. Slack is c6npd.'d by rubtracting thr rarlicsloxpocled timo lrsn thc latctt allowablo limo.
Chaptdr t6
Th. .rtlbtl ap.cl.d linr L th. .arl'Ltt titnlhrl rn rctivity cln br orprclrd lo ttrrt.b.ctutt cl'ltn roldbnrhip to pondng rtivitior.Thr btort ellrrrrbb tino b tho blst llna thd
9rr ldh;ily mey brgin rtd nca doby catpblbn
of tho Poioa. Sbck ir drlorminrbb onty in
rrbtbn !o an ontirr path th ngh thr noilorlL
Ol&12. PEBT/iort ir rmtly rtr .xl'nlion of PERT'
Wih linoqtins evailabb, il sootnt sdvttsbb
to .ltign cat to llnr end eclivilior, thorobyproviling load fiu rcbl pbnnhg rd cc'rttol by
I rnctistsl rcPonribilitY.Ot&t3. CanrPulr lrpport olfon dbtirrl advanlagor lo
PEFIT urn. PEF|T'tr e rnethrnltrtbalty'orionl'ed itdrniqur rnd is thlr.ld. U.rlV ruilod to
thr high'rpo.d t.tpont. of compulrn for
drriving lhr crit ical path' l lack l imrr, end
elr, elrd tor storhg erd rrporting tttultt !o
tnanagom.nL Flovisbnr to all sch'dulo olo'mtnlt' whothor during thr initiel retirnalingphar or durirg tho seiiv. Ptoiccl Phar' canbr updatod and thr rlvircd rcluhs PrqnPtlyreporlrd.
Cornputrr'ruPPorf b hdpful in dosling withlargr, canplox nrtworkt cil intrrdepondenciorand whon proirct conlrol roguirol t imrlyprogt.3r rrporting againrt th. uPdat.d Platl'Most program ptcktgrt oflrr e varirly ofrrporling frelunl and tormrl!. includinggtsphic notwork dirphy !t w.ll er prinlrd
r.Porlt el verioul summrty lovrlr. Curronlrrpodhg prwidrl inlonrulbn !o Ptoj.cl tnsn'
agon, rnabling qubk t.|ctigr to dovietiqts'
Cl'ppter 16
Q1&14. Tho lrcditioal budget focurer on qrc rel cl'aseunptirtr. Thc probabilbtic budgel povbes
for tvaluating rlvoral gets of acsumplions,ircludhg the prcbability od each and a ccrnPc'ilc oxpected value, range, ard standard devrs'
tiqr lor eaci budget elemenL
g7
w
EXERCISES
E16-1
Beginning cash balanceBudgeted cash recaipts:
Gollect accounts rtceivable:November cradlt sales:
(S60TOOO r 1 Oohl ..o.'.....,.........'..tDecember credit sales:
GiTO,OOO r OO96) ...GlTO,ooo x 1o%l
January credlt sales:GGGGtsO,ooo r 25%lGlso'ooo r 6O%l(S5O,OOO x lOTo| ....
February credit sales:(S6Ot OO0 r 25%l .........o..............($60rOOO r gO%l .........D.'.r'..r..o...
March credlt sales:(llTOrOOO r 25ohl .,..r......r.,...,..r...
Total cash receipts....................r.t.r........Cash available during month..............,.........Budgeted cash disbursements:
Pay accounts payable:December purchases:
S!2OTOOO r S0ohl ........................January purchases:
Stf 5'OOO t2Oc/o1 ....Gll5rOO0 r 8O%1,...........,.....,.....
February purchases:G$E2S,OOO r2Oohl ...
Chagter 16
January @s March
$ o,ooo s2o,5OO 326,500
$ 6,000
42,OOO
l2,5OO
$ 7,ooo
3OrOO0$ 5,000
f 5,ooo36,OOO
17,50O
$srilooo $sB"soo$72,5OO s85,OoO
$6O,5oO$86,5OO
$16,OOO
3rOOO$l2,ooo
5,O0O$2o,ooo
4,OOO23,OOO
6,OOO26,OOO
$46,000 $4g,ooo$2O,5OO $26,5OO
21,0OO6,OOO
22,OOOTrOOO
s79,OO0$ 6,000
ChaPler 16
E16-2 Finlshed Goodg
g9
April May June
UnitS reqUirad tO meet SaleS bUd9et..........-. I'OOO IOTOOO l2rOOO- Add desired ending inventory l2ooh ot
fotlowing monthb sales|.....o..r...o...o...... _4tOO€ 2r4OO 2r2OO
- Total units required.....i,..r......r.............r... l lpOO I2AOO l{/rOOLess estimated beginning Inventory
l2}oh Of CUrrent mOnthb 8a1e31............. 1r8O9 2rOOO 2r4OO
Planngd productlolt'........... 9,2OO lOr4OO l1,8OO
MaterialgAprfl May June
Units reguired to meet planned pmduction(planned productioll r 3|....-................. 27rgOO 31r2OO 35r4OO
u Add desired ending inventory pO% of follow-ing month's production requirements) 12r48O 14'160
Total matgrials requ|red.....,......,......o..r.... 4O'O8O {51360- Less estimated beginning Inventory (4ooh ot
current monthb requiremoJltsl..........-.. 11rO4O 12r48O
Planngd purchases...,........r,........o..... -2grO4A -92r88O
Gash disbursements during May for payment of accounts payable for materialpurchases:
113 r 29 ,040 r $2O x .98 = $189 '728a3 r 32,880 r $2O x.98 = 4291632
$619,369
CGA-g3nada (adapted). Reprint with permission'
3 n l
Et6-3 Par produetion budgets
Chagter 16
June JulyUnlts regulred to meet sales budget............o....... 5Or0OO 3OrO00Add desired endlng inventot"lf ......... 3'OOO 3,OOO
Total units req 53'OOO 33'OOOLass beglnnlng Inventory S'OOO 3,OOO
3O,OOO \
June JulL
48'OOO r 3 ......... 144,OOO3O,OOO r 3 9OTOOO ,
Add dgsired endlng inventot! .....,..........,,..........r. l4'OOO I I,OOO158^OOO f Ol "OOO
Lass beginning Invento1yo.................r......r..o.......r 2OTOOO t4'OOO ,
Unlts to bg punchasod..............................r...o......r 138rOOO 87,OOO
Cash disbursements In July for purchasss of Tee:
138,OOO r $5 r 113 r .98= $ZZ5,4OO87,0OO r 35 r 213 x .98= 284r2OO
$5O9,8OO
GGA-Canada (adapted!. Reprint with permission.
Planngd prcductf oll ................'o..
Tee purchases budgets
Units required for producUon:
48,OOO
CMptcr 16
E16-4(rl CROCKETT COMPAT$Y
Gash BudgetFor July
Cash balance, July ICash receipts:
June salgs Sl3OrO0O r 4S%1.....o...............o.r........-.......July sales (S4otOoo r 5O%1,o...r............o..r..........o.........
Cash aYailable r..r........................................r.r...r... 'r.........Cash dlsbursements:
Jung purchasas ($r orooo I 75%1.......'..r...........'........,July purchasgs ($l 5rooo r 25o/o1...,r,o.r.............-..........Other marketing and administrative expeflsoS............Incomg t3Xt....r.................ro.....r................................o...Div idgnds. . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . r . . .o . . ' . . . . . . . . ' . . .o . r . ' . . r . ' . r . . . . r
Gash balance, July 3t o..r..o........................o.........r.o...r...r.
tCalculation of June income tar:S a l e s . . . . . . a a . . . a . a . a . t . . . . . . . . r . a . . . . . . . t . r t a a r . r . . . . . t . r . . . . o . a a . . . a r a . . r r . a r r . . . .
Cost of goods so1d.. . . . . . . .o. . . r . , . ! .o. . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . r . . . . r . . . r . . . . r
Gross proti t t . . . . . . . . .rr i .rr . . . . ' . . . . . .o.r. . . . . . .r . . . .r .rr. . .r . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . .
Commercial erpenses:
$14,4OO20,OOO
39t
s 5,OoO
34,4OO
$39,4OO
I 7,5OO31750
lO,OOO2 r O O O *
1 5 . O O O
DepreCiatiofl ....................r.............,..........Other marketlng and administrative.........
38.250$ 1 . 1 5 0
$:o,oool2,ooo
$l8,ooo
13 .000
sl,gag$.2,99q
arrangements should
$4,OOO9.OOO
Taxablg income................r......... '.r'...r.r...........r....!,...r.....
I ncom g tar ($4 r gg O r 4Oo/o1............................
(21 Since the desired minimum cash batance ls $5,OOo,be made to borrow $3,850 ($S,OOO - $i,1SO),
CGA-g3nada (adaptedl. Reprint with permission,
392
E16-5 I
(f ) PERT netutork:
Chapter 16
l2l Alternate paths and times and the critical path and the erpected projecttime:
1-2€-6-7 = 11 weekg r- critical pathl-2-3-5-8-7 = lO weeks1-2€-4-5-8-7 = lOweeks
The two activities In question ano 3-4 and +5. lf these activities wenoeliminated, thelt would be no effect on the critical path or the expectedcompletion time because 3-4 and 4-5 are not on the critical path.
(3)
Clppter l8
E{ 6-6
(r l Astivlty (to
393
hl396
t 8I56
I2t2434
_bl2 + 1O.673 . 8 3 + 4 + 55 , 8 3 + 6 + 5
= Total -F
66o60o6
Total t,
12.6712.8316.83 + critical path
+ tm(41 +2(416(414(41
1r(416(414(415(41
2.OO5.833.83
10.676.OO{.oo5.OO
t8
1-21-31-42-63-54-55-O
Path
l 23523u302430
l2l1-2-6t-4-5-61€-5-6
CGA-63nada (adapted|. Reprint with permission,
Chwtert6
E16-7
t f ) 6 + 1 1 + 5 + 4 + 3 = 2 9l . + 2 - - 5 - . O - r - f 7 - d 9
6 + r l + S + i + 2 = 2 5I € 2 - - { 5 - r 0 I - r . . 9
6 + I + 9 + 4 + 3 =3Ocr i t i ca lpa th1 . . . . r 2 + 4 . - d O - - . 7 ' d g :
O + g + g + | + 2 = 2 6I . . . + 2 . d 4 6 8 . . - - . I
6 + g + 1 3 + 2 = 2 9I -.+ 2 --.) 4 ..-.+ 8 g
6 + O + 3 + I + 4 + 3 = 2 51 . + 2 - 3 . + 4 6 . - . + 7 - 4 9
I + O + 3 + I + I + 2 = 2 1I - 2 -€ 3 .r- 4 .r..4 0 --+ I ---| I
6 + O + 3 + i 3 + 2 = 2 4l - + 2 - . + 3 - + 4 - { 8 9
i O + 3 + 9 + 4 + 3 = 2 9' l - + 3 - - + 4 - . d 6 . . d 7 . + 9
i O + 3 + 9 + 1 + 2 = 2 51 - + 3 - - r 4 O - - 8 - 9
i O + 3 + 1 3 + 2 = 2 91 - . 3 - . 4 - + 8 - - . . + 9
',21 Earliest Erpected Latest Allonrable SlackEvent Time fime Time
CGA-Ganada (adapted!. Reprint with permission.
o o6 0t l 11 4 01 8 I2 3 02 7 02 A 13 0 0
1 02 03 t o4 1 45 1 76 2 37 2 78 2 79 3 0
Cluptcr 16
E 1 6 - 8 '
(41 CflUCal pathtl t l |O"... . . . . . . . . .r ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . .r.r. . . . . , . . . .Less time rsquired after event 2:
Activlty 2.6Agtivity tl-7 ..............
395
(11
(21
to = $o + 4t,,, + ty' + 6 = (1 + (4 r 2l + 9l 'F 6'= 3days
(31Path Time Reguired
O - 1 - 2 - e - - T = 4 + 3 + 6 + 5 = l S d a y s0-1€-4-6-7 = 4 +4 + 3 + 3 + 5 = 19 daYsO - l - 3 - 4 - 7 = 4 + 4 + 3 + O = l T d a Y s0 - 1 € - 5 - 7 = 4 + 4 + E + 6 = 2 O d a y s
The critlcal path is O-1-3-5-7, because lt requires the greatest total time(2O days|.
6 days5 days
2O days
1l dayrs
9 daysMarimum time lO gVent 2 ......................"....'..............Estimated time to event 2:
AgtiVity O-l .t.tr...r.....r...D.............r.........................r..Astivity l-2
. a a . a a r a a a a a t a a a a a a l a a a t
a o a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a l a a a a a a a l
4 days3 days 7 daYs
2 daYs:::Sfack t img at evsnt 2.., . .o... . . . . . .o... . . . . . . .r. .r. . . .r. . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . .
I
396
PROBLEMS
P16-l
(11 Budgeted cash disbursements during June:Purchase of materials:
May (1 1r25o1x $2o r 460/;1...,. 'r...."""""" Slo3tsooJung'(l irlgo' r $go r54%l r.........."""""' l3lt544
Marketing' general, and administrative expenses:rufay tSSirSSOa xa6%1,.......t.o.r.......,.......... $23r713June'($a6reOOl x 54%1.............................. 261622
Waggs and salad€S . . . . . . . " t""""" t ' r""" t"""" '
To ta l . t . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . ! . . r " " " " " " " ' t " o " " ' t " " " t " " '
$ g,goo38,000
$41,30O3,40O
Budgeted cash collections during May:March sales ($354,OOO x 9%).,t...,.............-,..-...Aprif sales ($gogroo o r 97 oh r 607o)......................- ' ........ ' .-.April sales ($SoS,OoO | 25ohl . '-....-....-.--...
Total
1 May 3l ending inventory (11,4O0 x 130%) ..,..... l4r82O unitsMai pfOdUCtiOn .r.. . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r.r. . . . . . .r. . . . . .r. . . . . . I l t9OO
Matgf ia lSnggdgdinMay, . . . . . ro . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . 16r??oUni tS
Apri l 3O ending inventory ($309,4OO + $2O1.... . . l5'470
May pUrchaSgS ..r......r....r............t.........r..r......... :!j!r25O UnitS
2June 3O ending inventory (12IOOO x 13O7o)... . . . ' 151600 units
JUng pfOdUCtiOft.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . .o... . .o.. I lr4OO
Matgr ia lsnggdedinJung. . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 'OOO uni ts
May3l ending inventoryo.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. .r. . . . . . . . . 14r82O
June purchases.........,......,.......,.............-- !-2J!9 units
3 (S357,OOO May sales x t5%) - S2,OOO depreciation = Sst'55O
1 a - ^ - ^ ^- (S342'OOO June sales x 15%l - $2,OOO depreciation = $49'3OO
5Accrugd payroll on Jung 'l .,.......'...Payroll earned during June.......r...r
Accrued payrol l on June 3O... . . . . . . . ,Cash paid out for payro11................ 937,90O
Chaptar 16
$235,O44
5O,335
37r9OO 5
$323,279
$ 31 ,860211,266
90,75O
99s9dz9
(21
397
(3)
Clvpter 16
Pl6-1 (Concluded)
July purchases
Budgeted units ol inventory to be purchtg-d during July- 3ilv 3l ending invento ry l12,2ob x f goohl "" 15'860 units
JUii' ptOOUCtiOn ..,..............r....'.............r....'... | 2tOOO
MatgfialSnggdgdinJUly... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o..t . . . ' .o.. 2?rS60UnitS
June 30 ending inventory (12'OOO I 13O7o!"' l5'600
.......... 12e6O units
. t
398
P16-2
Beglnnlng cash balancc
Cash recclPtr durlng monthlCottecttonr of accounts recelvable:
February sales:($2rOOOrOO O I 4O'/c1""""'o"""t""t"""""""'
March aaler:(Sl 18OO'O0O r 60olo)..'.""""""""!""""""""Glf rSOOrOO O I 4Oohl.-....................ro......""""'ts"'d
Aprll rales:(S2,200,O00 r E0%)..-'.'..-...-...r..
tS212oo'ooo r 40%)-....,..o..-.o...--....-....................dMaY sales:
(32,500,000 x E0%)................-.'- ......o.x.
Total cash collecUons
Cash available tor use during
Cash disbursements during month:Accountc payable lor Purchascs:
FebruarY Purchasec:(S2,OOOpOO February sales I SOoh r 4O'/o t 20ohl(S1,8OO'OO0 March sales r SOch r 600/o | 2Oo/ol ...-
March purchases:(S1'8OO'0OO March sale3 r SOt/t r 4Ot/o I 8Oo/.) ...-(S2,200,000 April sales r 30o/o t 60'/. t 8O%)......-(St,8OO,OOO Mareh eales r SOoh r 4Oo/o | 2O'/cl .....(S2,200'OOO Aprll sales r 50% x 600/o | 2Oo/o1........
April purchases:{32,2OO'OO0 Aprit sales I 5O'h t 4O1/o r 8O%).....-'(S2,5OO,OOO May eales r 5Oo/t t 8O'/o t 80%)......-.(92'2OO,OOO Aprit galG3 r 5Oo/c t 4O'h z 2Ot/ol.*...-(S2,5OO'OO0 May sales r 5O'h r 6o'h t 2O'/c1...-...,.
May purchages:(S2,5OO,OO0 itliy salcg z SOth x 4O'h r 80t41.........(S2'8OO'OOO Junc csler r SO'h r E0% x 8O%)"---.
Wages l2Oo/o ol current sales):April (92'ZOO'O00 t 2Oo/o1...... -.-..-....o.........May (S2'5OO'000 x2Oo/cl-*.. ...................,.Jun e (32'800'000 t 20041..........
General and administrative expenses:Saf arles 11 11 2 r 3480,000).PromoUon 11 112 x SS60,000).Property tar6 1114 r S24o,000)f n guranca 11 I 1 2 t 936o,oO0)UtiliUea (1 I 1 2 z S30o,00O)
lncomc tarer (St,o2Orooo lncomc t 4ooh tar rate) .-..-
Total cash disbureements............
Cash balance beforc borrowing or lnvestment.-...............Cash to be borrowed (or invested)...-.-.-...-
End ing cash balance'............
Aprilt loo,ooo
3 SoO,OOO
1,080,OOO
May3 loo,ooo
t 72O,OOO
l132O,0OO
Chapter 16
June3 lOO,OOO
t 88O,O0O
l ,Soorooo
31,88O,OOO
s1,98O,OOO
i32,o4O,OOO
32r14O,OoO
32,38O,OOO
s2,48O,OOO
3 80,000108,OOO
2g8,OOO528,OOO
44O,OOO
40,00055,OOO
o3O,OOO25,OOO
408,OOO
3 72,oOO132,OOO
352,OOO6O0,OOO
5OO,OOO
40,00055,00o
o3O,OOO25,OOO
o
3 88,OOO150,OOO
400,ooo672,OOO
50o,ooo
40,ooo55,O0O50,ooo30,o0o25,OOO
os2,Oo2,Ooo3 (22,OO0)
122,OOO
3 l OO,OOO
$1,806,OOO s2.07O.OOO
3 334,OOO S 4 'O,OOO(234'0OO) tgro.oool
3 loo,ooo s__1!-qp_q_q
Chaptor 16
Pl6-3TVIAY1I E II/!A1 gP'4"- BIH G COM PA}IY
Ca*r BudgetFor thr Ycan Ending March 31
399
208 20c
Balancc of cash at beglnnln! ..........-.-......Caeh generated from operatlons:
CollecUonc from curtomerg-Schedule A....,..........
Digburgcments:Dlrect materla ls-Sch ed ulc B ...,.,...,.......Dlrect 1abor..........a.-6....F....Varlablc overhead
Total disburrementg 3750,00O
Excess of caeh collectlong over cashdisbursements f rom operationg
Carh avallable lrom opcraUonrCagh recelvcd from llquldaUon of erlsUng
aicountr rcceivablc end Inventorier -.-.Total cash avallablc ....,...........,......,_.....r....Payments to generat credlton
fllguldatlon proceeds)
Balance ol cash at end
3825,OoO
3220,000300,000100,ooo
$1,O65,0oo
3 245,ooo360,00o120,O0Ol3o,00o
3 855,OOO
s 75,OOO
2l0,ooo
s285,OOO
s285,O00
270,OOO2
t ts,ooo
3 75,Ooo
t 75,000
eo,0ootl85,OOO
90,O00
$ 7S,OO91
i Thlg amount could have bcen uaed to ply gcnoral credlton or cerried forward to thc begln.nlng of the next-year.
2 6ooo,ooo r Eoo/c| - sgo,ooo
. :
Pl6-3 (Concluded)
Schedule A--Collections from customets:
S a l o S t t t t t t " t ' t " t t t t " t " t t o " t o " r " o t " " t " t t " t " " t " " " " " '
igginning accounts rgcgivablo """"""""""r"
T O t ! l t t t t t t t t t o ' i t t t t t t " ' o t " t o t t " t l " ' o r r " " " t t " t ' o " " ' o t "
Less ending accounts rccgivabllB """"""""""
ColIections'romcustomen;........................|. ' .
Direct materials requined for production """"'
Requirgd ending inventory o""""""'ot"""""'t"
Tot3 l t t t t t t " " " " t " " r " t " t t " " " " " " " " " " " " " t t t ' l t "
Lgss beginning inventory"'t'Do"""""'t"""""""
PU fC h a S93.. r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . t . . . . . . . .o t " t " t t 'o " t ' r " " '
Beginning accounts payab1e""""""""""""""
T O t a l . . . t t t t t " " " " t " " " " " t " " " " " " t " " " t " " t " " t t t '
Less ending accounts payab|9 ......t.........1....,..
Disbursgmgnts for diract materials """"""""'
3 12,Ooo units | 2112 = 2.AOO; 2'Ooo x S2O p€r unit =. is,ooo units x 2112 = 2-r5oo7 2,5oo x S2o per unit =
208
sgOo,oooo
$9OO,OOO75,0OO
Chapter 16
20csl,08o,ooo
75,OOO
$t,155rOOO9OTOOO
s2oo,ooo4O,OOO3
$240,OOOo
$24O,OOO0
$24o,ooo20,OOO
s220.ooo
$4O,OOOsso,ooo
s 24O,OOO5O,OOO '
S 29o,ooo4O,OOO
$ 25O,OOO2O,OOO
$ eTo,ooo25,OOO
s 245.OOO-
Pl6-4
Production Budget:Required to meet sales fotecast
January ($3601000 sales + 915O per unit}""""""""'Feuruary (Sas6rooo sales + S15o per unit) ""t""""r'March (54-gorooo sales + $150 per unit """o"""""'o'
Desired finished goods ending inventorlr: -((S600,000 A-pril sales * 5f So per r-rnit) a l0ohl'r 1o0)
Total quantity of product to prociuce ""-"""""""""""""
214OO3,0oo3,2OO 8,600
500
9 , 1 0 0
s182,ooo2,OOO
s l B4 ,OOO
Direct Materials Purchases Budget:Materials *quii"J ior proOuttion (9,1Oo units r S2o).. ' ..
Desired materials ending inventotY """""""'
Total di rect materiats pu rchases during first quarter """""""""
s829roo9 $o65poo
Schedute B-Disbursements lor direct materials: - 2oB 20c
Clpptor 16
Pl O?4 (Concluded)
Cash Budget for First Quarter Ending March 31, 2oA:January l, cash balanco .............o..o.........r.'..o...r....Cash receipts:
InYestment by ownerMortgage taken outCoflecUons of sccounts receiyable:
January saleg:(SS8O,OOO r 3Ooh r Seoh r 98%o1.o..,..,..(s360rOOO I 3ooh x 2O%1..,...,.o,.......o...(S360, O0 I 3 O 7of ......o....r,o.,..........r...,...St3 6 O, O 00 I 38 7o) ...,..............oo....o.,.....
February sales:Gt4sOrOOO x 3Ooh x SOoh x g$o/ol,,...,..,rG|45O'OOO x 3Ooh r 20%1,.....r........,ts...(S4 S O, 0 0o x 30 ch1...oo..........r....r.......r...
March sales:
101
os
f 98%1 ...'......
s 5OTOOOt5o,ooo
94167221,6OO
108ro0ot36rgoo
105r84O27',OAO
135,OOO
112189628rgOO
G!48O,OOO x3Ooh xSooh(S480,OOO x3Ochx2O%l
Total cash availabte for use during quarter,r.......D.Cash disbursements:
Accounts payablea a a a a a a t a a a a a a a a a a $184,OOO
265,5OO1361500t5orooo68,8OO36rOOO
IrOOO3O,OOO
l50,ooo
96O,608
$ 960,608
$ (69,18218,4.16.2
$ ts.ooo
Dlrect labor (grlOO r $3O) - $7r5OO1r.,.............Varlablg oyerhgad (grlOO x $l5i .....-.........,.......factory rent (910 r S'OOO capacity x 3) .,.........Sales commlsslons (gr60O unlts x-$g;...........,.,Office rgntals ($t ZrOOo r 3! .,..,...........,.....,.,.,.rfnterest payment ($iSOTOOO x 2oh r 3|.,....,,.....Payment of princlpal on long-term note..........Equipment pu rchasos..........-.
March cash balance before currsnt financing,._...Currgnt financing reguired ..,............r,r..................Desired March 3i cash balance .................r....r.r..r
III
Chapter l6102
Pt6-5
('t l TRIPLE.F HEALTH CLUBBudgeted Statement of Income (Cash Basis)
For the Year Ending October 31r 2OC
(000s omitted)
Cash nevenue!Annual membership fees' $gSS r 1.1 r l.O3
Lgsson and cfass fggs, $234 r $234 '......r............o..o.............'.......-s180
$,402.2
304.2
2.792'0Miscellaneous, ;i"
I $ 2 a . . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . a a . a . . a a a . t . . a . a a a . . a a . a . . a a r a r a t o ' r " '
TOtal CaSh fgVgnUe.......rr.............rr........rr..........r............o...........
Cash expenses:Managefb Salafy and bgngfitSr $gg X 1.15.. '.......................r...........RegUtaf employeest Wages and benefitS, S19O f 1.15'. ' . ' . ... ' . .........Lesson and class employee wages and benetitsr 3195 x 1.3 x 1.15TOWeIS and SUppligS, $16 f 1.25 ... . . . . , . , . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . .Utititigs (heat and lightl , 522 X 1.25...................o.r......'r............i..,..Mortgagg intereSt, $gOO X .09....r. . .o... . . , . . . . . . . . ' r . . . . . . . . ' r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . .MiSCgllangOUS, $2 I, 1.25 ..................r...r....................r..............r.....
$
s709.1
s 41.4218.5291.5
20.o27.532.4
2.5
30.02.5
15.025.O
Total cash expgnsgs.....rr.................ar........r.........o...........t.....r..t.. 3633.8
Cash income.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . ' . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 ?53
Cash payments:Mortgage paymgnt . . . .o. . . . . . . r . r . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . rAccountS payablg balanCg at 10131 IB ....'......".".......o...............'....Accounts payable on equipment at l0l31lB....Planngd new gquipmgnt purchase.................r.
TOtal CaSh paymgnts..r................r.........................r...............t..to. s 72.sCash surp1us.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . .o. . $ 2.8
Beginning CaSh ba1anC8.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' t . . . 8.3
Cash available for working capital and to acquire propetty.......o.......... LlQ-t
(21 Operating problems that Tripte-F Health Club could experience in 2OGinclude:(a) The lessons and ctasses contribution to cash wil l decrease because tho
projected wage increase for lesson and class employees is not made upby the increased volume of lessons and classes,
(bl Operating expenses are increasing faster than nevenues from member-ship fees.
(c) Triple-F seems to have a cash management problem. Although thereappeani to be enough cash generated for the club to meet its obliga-tions, past due amounts occur. Perhaps the cash balance may not belarge enough tor day-to'day operating purposes.
Ctle,pta- 16
pto-s (concrudedf tog
(31 Jane c':'::'*fli^d*Tl#$,fn ttre cannuaf iclubb rrmentpun^has-e:6ffi ;iir"irH:rr:r,if rri:fi }H"Tl"v."qui;_-'-purchascant incll"-:9r"!"ins prope'ty, lil"-g;'i;"otr""Tlilt ln: !":F o"li.5" ,osl,ipuonTil.l""nffi
":*i[**_.':l;;*"ff :"","j1*;i1fu:"P'O.E
(1) Schedufe of b.gdgeted cash n(ooos omitted): - -r" '| eceipts by month for the thtrd guarter of zoA
BillingsReceipts
Actuat/
Itfonth |ut"t"o
Percentages
n'6;.-...... # * Timins slv Auou-sr .jip:frli-::-...- T;SSS- ?:" ffi s ffi August L.d;'
.1.:::........... SrOOd ;: 40J,ne""'...'.1 srooo ;9 # 2oo
{.::"....-;; s,ooo nl i9, "'333rf1JDo...,....... ;r;;; uo 20
i{g i'iii ;s # I,o $;ss
u"ry..-...] :,::g to ,ouurv..-....._ :':99 90 # 45.tuf!"....,...,.. :'::: iJ ;3 2'o2s{u1r.,..."'..... iffi l3 20 t8o
&ff"; :,,1?: d; :3 $ ffSi,T$* :;fri J3 'o eooseptembe, f;::: il ;3
soseptembe, F,:9g eo 23
2'2so
."j:#idTfrilfrfu","'.: *: > ;3srota, ";; ;"J;,f::::::::::.--# S _C-- qF....................91980
@ d
Chaptar 16&1
Pt6-6 (Goncludedl
l2l schedule of budgeted cash dlsbursements by month for the third quarter ol
2OA (OOOs omitted):
Disbursements
July August SePtember
SalarierVariable:
$4,500 t 2Ooh$5,OOO t2Aoh$5,5Oo x 20oh
3 900$l,ooo
$1,1oo
FiredTotal variabl g .o.'o"""""""""
t a a aa aa a t a aaaaa t t t t t "
'
$ 9OOl,5oo
Stroool r5OO
$2r5OO':"
$t, l ool r5OO
$z,6ool rSoo
450
13,67O
$tg,g7o
I l ,9OO
$ 2,O7O
185
S 1,885(3.700)
$J915)
Total salarigs """""""""t'trtPurchasgs of pr€vious month """""""'ln tg l tSt . . . . . . t . " """"" t """" t """ t t to" t""o '
Depreciation (not relevant! ""'o""""""'Total cash disbursgm€llt3 """"""""""
$3,750#
s4,55O
$ 300
s2,4OO' :"
$3,60O::
(31 (ooo omitted|Cash balance-.fuly 1, 20A...,.....Cash receiPts in third quarten
J U l ! t t t t t t t t " " t t ' r " " t " " " t " " t t ' o " t " t t " " " t " " " 'o t t t t '
Augus t t t t t t " " t t t " t " " " t t t ' t " " " " t " " " t t " t " " " " r t t t
SeptembgFt t t " t t t t t t t r t t " t ' t t t r " t " " t ' r " " " t " " " " " t '
Total cash availablg .r.................'.....................,.."Cash disbursemcnts ln third quarten
J U l l t t t t t t t t " " " " " t " " " ' t " t " " t t " " " t " " t " t " " t " " " '
August a a l a a a a a a a a a a a a " " t " ' D t "
$4,5804r43O4,660
$3,8OO3r75O4,55O
Septembol t t t t t t t t t t t " " t t t " t " " t " " " t " t t "o t " " " " t t '
Proiected calrh batance-September 30' 20A"""Minimum end-of'month c:rsh balance noquirod
Gtt ;SSO r IOo/o) """""o"""o""""""'t""""""'Cash available to acquire capital items """""""'Gapital erpenditures planned for October l' 20A
Amount of borrowing necessary on October l' 2oA
Cnaprcr tA
Pr8-7 ,
(1'
46
1
7
I
7
tr + 7 +
Rv + 1 0 +
Ee + T +
- - r _ 4Er + S +
1 0
5
5
t o
= 2 27 -
= 2 07
= 1 77
= 2 0
critical path
(2'l Et Activitiest +-i--2 A s
3 A ' BI 4 eo A ' B
I E c , D , E: I ' C , D , E; 5 l ' o , t
16 3,1' o, t
ii i 3;3;i: : F , C , D , I.t: H, c, I: : H , c , l.,: H, C, I.,: H, G, I: : H , G , I
J : H , G , IJ : H , G , I: : H , G , I. ' r H2 2 H
Cost
: : : : * s 8 o o = $ 1 , 6 0 0: : : : * s 8 o o = $ f , 6 o o: ^ : : : * $ 8oo =$ l ,600
ffi*ff*$,ffiill;;li -:,;;; ==s;,i;lse,ood
--'-vv ;Si;lll
f 8 0 0 + $ ,: : 9 9 . $ B o o = $ t , 6 o o
= $2roooGGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission.
Chapter 1616
Pl6-8
(rl
StartFinish
(21 Path
A-B-E-G-H =A-B-E-F-H =A-B-D-E-G-H =A-B-D-E-F-H =A-C-D-E-G-H =A-C-D-E-F-H =
Time Required
2 + 5 + 3 + 3 =2 + 5 + 4 + 3 =2 + 2 + l + 3 + 3 =2 + 2 + 1 + 4 + 3 =l + 4 + l + 3 + 3 =1 + 4 + 1 + 4 + 3 =
13 weeks14 weeksll weeks12 weeks12 weeks13 weeks
The critical path is A-B-E-F-H, because it is the longest path'
(31 The totat cost of the proiect as planned is:
Activity
A-B ...................tt
A-C. . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . .o .
B_D. . . 4 . . . . . . . t . . . o . . . t a
B-E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . ' . .C-Dt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D-E.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. .E-F .....................E-G.. . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . .
F-H .....................G-H.. . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . .
Total normal cost
Normal Cost
$ {,ooo800
1,50O5,1OO2,5OO
6001,70olr2oot ,4oo1,3OO
stT,too
B Go
rl,% &xxH
A D E I
F#c
\ .\
Chapter 16 407
P16-8 {Concluded}
(41 Since the critical path requires 14 weeks, at least 2 weeks must be cutfrom the project in order to complete it in l2 weeks. As originallyplanned (determined from requirement (2)), the following three pathsrequire mone than 12 weeks:
Path Time Required
A - B - E - G - H = 2 + 5 + 3 + 3 = 1 3 w e e k sA - B - E - F - H = 2 + 5 + 4 + 3 = 1 4 w e e k sA - C - D - E - F - H = 1 + 4 + 1 + 4 + 3 = l 3 w e e k s
The first place to start reducing time is the critical path, A-B-E-F-H,because the largest amount of time must be cut from this path. tn thisproject' each activity on the critical path can be crashed, so the firstactivity to crash should be the one that has the smallest crash cost perweek. By crashing activitr F-H, which costs S2r8oo, path A-B-E-F-H isshortened by one week to 13 weeks. ln addition, since activity F-H is onpath A-G-D-E-F-H, it is shortened to the required 12 weeks. Now onemore week must be cut lrom activity A-B-E-F-H and from activity A-B-E-G-H to bring each path and the total project down to 12 weeks. Theactivity that costs the least to crash and that is common to both paths isactivity B-E, which witl cost $5,2oo to crash one week. The only otherway to reduce both paths by one week would be to crash one activity oneach path (activity E-G for 9rl,6o0 or G-H for $2,300 on path A-B-E-G-Hand also activity E-F on path A-B-E-F-H for s3,zool, which will result in aminimum additional cost of $6,000. Therefore, the minimum cost toreduce the total proiect timo from 14 weeks to l2 weeks is $g,ooo,resulting from reducing activity B-E and F-H by one week each for costsof $2'8oo and $5,2oo, respectively. Since the minimum additional cost of9lqilg two days off of the total time reguired to complete the project is$8rooo, the minimum total cost of compieting the project in 1?weeks is$25'lo0 ($12''loo normat cost from requirement (3) pius $8,o00 addition-al cost).
IL
Chapter 16
Pl6-9
(ll The normal critlcal Path ls:3 + S + I + I + I = i l w e e k s
A B E H - K LThe normal cost to be incurrad in openlng the stors is the sum of thonorrnal cost of all l4 aetivities-$85'ooo.
(2t The minimum time in wlrich the store could be opened is I weeks at anadditional cost of $l l,5OO, or a total cost ol $96,500 ($85,0OO +$t I '5ool'
PotentialAlternative ErPected Time New
Paths Time Redugtion Time
A-B-E-H-K-L l lweeks 4(A-B'B'El TweeksA-C-F-!-K-L 7A-C-F-.,-K-L 10A.D-G.J.K.L 7
2 FJJ-n '"
2 (D-G, J-R 5
The new critical path becomes A-C'F-.r-K-L.
Reduced Ume pnograms would be initiated on the following activities:
Reduced ReducedActivities Time Cost
A - B l w e e k $ 4 , 5 O OB-E 3 3,500F-J 2 2,OOOJ-K I 1,500
sl l,5oo
The activity D-G reduction ls ercluded because it would not contribute toreducing the total proiect time.
(31 The store should be opened on the normal schedule because the costFllr5OOl erceeds the benefit Gt6,OOo). The reduced pnogram would save3 weeks at a cost of $11r5OO, while the earlier opening can be expectedto yietd an operating income of S2,OOO per week' or a total of $6'O00.
\
409
I
1t-
l\.
I
Ib
ib
l
b
II\,
b
Chapter 16
l "b
, CASES
c16-1
(f ) Network snalysis torces the company to plan ahead and develop adetailed plan for proiect completion, lt presents a visualization of alf indi-vidual tasks and their interrelationships. Network anallrsis proyides ;;;-sgement with timely information lor controlling schedules, shorrs theeffects on tho entira proiec! of changes mado lo individuai activiiies, anoallows for the continual updating of project pnogFess.
DisadYantages of netnrcrk analysis as e means of organizing andcoordinating proiects include the use of probabilistic schedules lh"t ."ybe highly subiective, a bias torvard overly optimistic time estimates oftenbased on management erpectations, and the need for cooperationsmong a large number of units to estabtish consistant priorities. A dis-proportionate amount of management time and effort may be requiredfor planning for the benefit reclived; there may be other alternatives thatcould be mors effective.
(21 Norm Robertson would be concerned with the defay in activity A-Dbecause it would shift the critical path from sta*-B-c-F-l-.J-Finish. shielaNeilPs estimate of the time tor activity A-D (i o to r2 weeks) results instart'A-D-G-J'Finish requiring 23 to is weeks. Furthermore, Neillb com-ment that activity A'D cannot start until after activity-B-E means that B-Ebecomes part of this new. criticat path, making ttre criucal path start-B-E-A-D-Gd-Finish with a time requirernent of Cg to 3o weeks. Thus, thechange in the relationship of ths activities woutd change the critical pathoven moror so that the project will be completed I to io weeks later thanthe originaf estimate.(3) Norm Robertson developei tlre PERT diagram for the vector.12 projectwith inadequate input. Robertson stroutJiave consulted alt tho depart-ments involved in the project to ensure that the expected times requiredto complete the activities wora attainable. Because Neill was not con-sulted, the Ume reguirement for activity.q-D was incorrect, and the rela-tionship between activities A-D and g-E was missing from tho network(41 The behavioral problems that could arise within caltron Inc. as a conse-quence of-the pranning of tho vector.l2 project incrude:(al A lack of commitmentJo the proiec[on the part of the departmentdirestors, particularly Neill, beciuse of their exctusion from theplanning process.
(bl conflict among the department directors that could affect futureworkin g relationships.(c) A tack of goal congiuenco among tho departments involved.
l!
-
Ol7-1. Respcrsbilirty accounting b a program encotn'
paming all operalhg managomcn! f.ot whiclt
ihr accountlrg, oill' or budget dMritrrr pro
vidr lcclrni:al aristanc. h thr form ol daily'
wcckly. or rurthly ontrol t'pottt' Th' obiec'
tivt of rerponrbility accounting ir to prcvilo
managcrnont with I weilul cod csrtrol Ool" To
bo clfrctivr u I control mochaniam, thr
rerpontibility accounting tyd.m rccordr andreportr cootr ircurrod ar a neull of roch ecfivFty to the individual in thr company who irreoPonsbb lor cantrolling ho aclivity.
O17-2. Tho crnpharb of nrpcsbility reunting ia orhtemal coct csrtrol raher ttran on deierminhgptdtrt cod. Thb reguircr a rtritt h cnphasirfrqn delcrminhg tho cost of reoouncot used hmanulacluring e product to dctormining lhoamounl of control indivkjual managen hovcovor cost. Fblponribilily accounling deler-minc thc cst ircuncd by an rlivity or group
ol aslivilier, rathcr than thc cost incurred loproduce a Producil.
O17€. Cartrolbbb c6lt arr thool thal arc lrcunodal thc rerult of. or lor thr bcnefil of' a businssactivity. Presumably, suclr a eocl will ircreasoor decrease as a reaull ol lhe lovel of effriencywith which trc aclivity lhal genenles lhc costis conducted or managed. To bc ctfeclive,reoponsbility reunlhg mud hold e managcrresponsble fa crly tlpse cods thal he or shecan conlrol.
Ol 7-4. Tho organization musl br arrangod so thslthcro aro m ovortapphg lher of mrpcnibility(i.c., no morc than onr indivkJual rhouH bercponcbL tor.adt eslivity). In edditbn, caclthdivi48l h thr organizalirr murl havo a cbarunderstandhg cl hir or hcr rcsponsbilities, andmusl havr rulf icirnt aulhority lo lakc thoactbnr necellary to meel ttroot respctsibili'liec.
017-5. Thr cet of any oxpondilurc clarcifhalion irof t*p ebmenll: thr unit pricr and
thr quantity cl thr itenr ured. Ono irdivirJualmay havo cqrtrcl of pricr wtrile ano0ror hdivU-ua! har control ol quantity. Evon in carorwhoro prico door nol changr, lhc quanlityurcd mey nol bo fully cofrollabb by tho irdi-vUual ufio o\^rrilr.r fho acfivity that srrurnectho ilrn. Thr qrality cl tho itsn nrsy dtrt th.guantity urod and tho quality may br delcr-mined by thr purcfrascr, or tho ctfbiency withwhich tho item ia used may be affeclcd bydecbboa rnsd. at the executivo monagemrttlevcl (e.g., porsannel ctranger and machheryacguisit ionr). Sincr lha accounlanl cannota lwayr dc lcrmino absoluto contro l , costs
CHAPTER 17
DTSCUSSION QUESTIONSshould be assigned on lho basis of relaliveconlrol, and variancor should be viewed alquedbnr rather than as atlewcn.
017€. Opinion ic dividcd on this subiecl. Somcbelieve that for thc mel effeclive overheadcqrlrol, &partrnont headr shouH bo chargpdcrly for ho.. codl thal they ircur. lf lhey arccfiargod wilh uncsttrollable costs, they couldspend rignili;ant atrpunt! ol limo lryhg !o cct'tlol cosl that they havl no ability lo cqltrol, orthey may bccqn hultrated and givc tP tryhgto csrbol 8ny stt. On the ofter lrand, ssnebelieve that deparfnent headg should aPprocFatc thc fact that many auxiliary costs musl boincurred to tuPPort their activiliel; thereforc,they $ould bo charged with a fair share ofsuclr cct+ clearly labeled as uncsrlpllable,
Ol7-7. Total costs c/ servica departmenl overhead aroincluded in overhead rales h order lo charge
irbs and prod.rcts wilh all overhead hcurred htheir production. Aclual service deparlmenlcetl et. cqrtolled il they are accumulated inseryice departmenl accounts where they canbc assigrred to setvico deperlmenl managen.ll rervice dePatltnent ccls atc charyed direct'ly to producing departmonte, 3uch costg
becsne an indirect, noncontrolhble item of the
departmantb receivhg lhe charges.017€. Servicc department costs should be charged lo
user deparlments by predetermined bil l ingrales rather than by allocating aclual ccat allhr end of the period. The use of predeler'
mined rates maker i l posrible lo determincsewicc departrnent gfticierEy through lhe corn'putalbn of spending and idle capacily yari-
. anooa. ln addilixr, uscr department elficiencycan bo evaluated nrore elfectively by eliminat'ing noncaltrollable cosb frorn service depart'menl charges. This is parlicularly imporlantwhere user dePariment3 have some controlover lhe anrount of the services usod. In suchcsses, usors thould be held accounlable for
their usc ol seruices, but the rales lor pricing
ttpoc eorviceg strouH be known by the users inaclvancc.
Ql7-9. (a) No. Thc ctrargc is an arbilrary allocalbnol cost. lt cannot bc influenced directlyby acticrs of ihe divisinn rnanagorneni.
(b) Yea and no. The amounl ol computerseruicc used ir within the contol of thedivbbn managemenl However, lho c€tpot unil of service varieg with the effi-ciency of the computer facil i ly and lhcamoun l o f use by o the r d i v i s i ons .Consequently, the charge is cnly partlycontrolbblo by divisicn rnarragemenl-
110
I
I
1
!Clnpter 17
417-10. (e)
(c) Yct. Thr chargr for goods purchaced' tro.n anothor diviridt is conlrotlablo by
thc diVisbn managcment, provided thatthr quanlity of g@ds purchascd b car-trollabL by tho divbbn managcrncnt andlhat thr prb. it an rxtemally sCsblishedrnarkcl prict.
4 1 1
formed during the period into budgetedMaintcnance Dopartment cost for thcsamo period. Using lhis predeterminedralo, cach usor deparlmcnl's maintc-nanor cost rouU deperd qr lhc nunberof furrs of servbe il reeived. By usingthc predetermhed ralr, lho aciual cqtcould be compared with totel chargesmadc to u3ere and thc dilfcrrrrcr decqrFposed into spending and idb capacilyvar iances lor tho Main lcnancoDepartment. These variances arr usefulin tva luat ing the e l t ic ie ncy o lliahtenanco Dopartrned scnivity.
A fudher ref inement would be torequirc ho lr,lahtenanco Dopartmcnt to
- lubrnit estirnates cil cct lo users beforcprovidirg services. This rvoutd not mlygive the dopartment reccivhg the sorvberqne idea of the cogt of tho work, bulwould afso restrain the MaintenanceDepartment from spending loo muchtime on a icb.
Q17-12. The flexiblc budget (a) provides the monthlybudg€t allowance regardless ol the flucluatingnurlhly volume of produclitxr; (b) permits nothaving to estimate the operating activity ol arnooh in advancc ol the period lor wtrich thebudgot is prepared; and (c) recognizes lhefixed and variable nature ol costs, wfrich leadsto easy adjustments when evaluating actualperfornancc,
Q17-13. A spendhg variance is the dilference belweenactual cost and the budget albwance (i.e., thebudgeted anrowtl sdiusted lor the aclual levelof aciivity erperiencod). tt is caus€d by difter-encos b€tween the prices and the quantities ofthe variotrs ilemr ol cost budgotod and actualtyincurred. To the extent that a manager hasconlrol over eilher price or quanlity, or bolh,the manager has control over the_amounl ofthe spending variance. However, il the mrnagcrdoeg not have conlrol over both prices andquanlities, lhe rnanager has mly lirnited csrtrolover lhc amounl ol thc spending variancc.Ncvcr theless, s ince a managcimay havcsomr control over spending variances, theyarp us€d lo evaluale efficiency h responaibitityreportirg.
Q'l 7-14. To aiJ rnanagoment in evaluathg and cqrlrol-ling cosl, a spending narbnco tor each ilem orclassil ication of cost should be reported loresponsib le management each per iod.Itemizcd varianccl tell responeiblc manago-menl which ilem war inefficiently ured. Thicdetoilod hto.rnatbn phpohts wtreie thc roarshio iJentily causos shoutd begin.
at7-15. An idlo capacity variance is lhe amounl ofovor- or underapplied budgeted tired facloryoverhead. In responsibility reporthg, it b used
b
Thr highor al.ctric pcrfler cob rnay bethr resull of any ono or snbination ofthr folbring(t) ircroaser h tir prbes paU tor tuel,labor, rnsinlcnorco, rlc.,(2) incfl icicnt oporaling praclices ormacfiho lailurcr withh thc porrer deport-,nont,(3) lhr acquirit ion ol erpensive newcrFacity, ancl/or(4) incrcarcd production of electricityrequircd to rroot uror demand.To lho oxtont thd any incffbiencies existh tho po'vor drpartmcnt tho cunent slb,calbn rctremr wilt pass them on to thewcr dcparfncntr. Wlth the kind of alb,catirn usod by Errmonr Cornpany, il isnol possiblo lo drlermine wtrat causedlhc cost incroatr. A better syslem ofhandhg lhis depsrtment's cosl wouH beto chargc user deparlments for acluaturagrr on lho basir ol a predeterminedvariablc rdc, and lor available usage onthr basb ol tho power doparlmont,s abili-ty to provUo rowbo at maxinum capaci-ty. Bndgetrd fixcd cogt rhould be allocat.cd on lhc barir of abil ity to provideoeryico, becausr the Electric powerDopartnrent canncl control aclual usage.Thb apprc*h rucuH make it possible-tocompula sprnding var iances lor theElectric Powcr Dcpartment, which areureful in cvaluating lhe department,soptraling effir:iercy.
b
ib
(b)
b
II
b
!
I
tb
Ot7-11. (a) Highcr tota l cor t incurred by theMahlonsrrcr Drpartrnent (i.o., hcreasesir lht priceo andor quantilies ol the varFour ilem! ol corl in the MaintenancoDcportrmrn), fowcr tolaf hours of mshte-nancr rorv icr prov ided lo a l l ure r6partn.nt! during the period, o, a com-binatlxr of both could rcsull in a higheraclual main lonancc co3l pcr hour ,Howcvor, rucfi incrcaser in cosfr shouldremain in thc Maintonance Departmentartd nd be drargred lo the usorc.An improvcd mcthod tor distributingi/binlmancr Dtpartnent cost would bilo rslablbh a prcdetermined rate lo bechargod lor oach hour of maintenancetorvbo prwirJod to users. Thc ratc wor,rldbo octablirh.d annually by dividing thcoudgclcd hours of servico to bc por_
l
(b)
112
l
er a mcarut. of capacity utilizatkxl. To the
ortent thal rnanagement can cstlrol capacity
utilhatinn, thr kilo capacity variancr can bo
controlled. Howevlr, lho arnounl of capacity
utilhed ir cillrn a furction ct fotcs ot ttij' th'
cfittol d hdivHrrsl depadment suprrvboo'
Ql7-16. Thr two primary PutPolct of rrsponsibilityraPotlt tra:(a) To nrolivato inclvi<Juralr b achiovo a high
levol of performancr by reporting etli'cieircbr and helliciencier to rerPonsiblcrninager! and thcir ruPerirrs.
(b) To providr inlormation that wil l helPresponcblc rnanagot'r3 ldernity ineff bien'ciet so that thcy can rnoro rflicirnllyconlrcl code
Afl-fi. Dyslunclianal behavion that can result |tom' the practice ol evaluating managerial perfor'
,nanc. rathr tlrsr cvaluathg aclivitier lcilow:(a) Managera trnd lo lakr aslirmr lhal an
rell acrvirg rathrr than bcndicittl b |hrcqrtPany ar a wfiob.
(b) Managcru coflcontral. or mceling lhebudgBt rather than an obtahhg the beetlevc l of Prr formancc thal can beachieved. Tht usr of budgelr lends lothwarl continuour imProvement.
(c) Since budgell are bared on currentopcraticrr, rnanagoF lend lo fcur lheiraltontivr qr short.run targels and ignorethe bng.lerm needg of hc business.
(d) Managen *tro arl unablo to subwrl thelysl.m rutl icicntly to gcl acceptableevalualbnr, bd who are othelise corrt'petrni and rfficient bccqno fruslraled,do ttot gct prornolcd, and olten bave thecornpany.
Ol7-18. Responsbility accounthg and reporthg shouldnot be abandoned despile lhe lacl trat its usein evaluating lhr perlormancc of rnanagortresultr h dyslunctirnal behavior. To overcornche prcbbm ol dydurrlimal behavix, tcsPo.l'sbillty reportr lhorrld br Lrsod b ovalulr lhlperlornrancr ol burinccs eclivilirr, nol tnan-agen. Maragon rhouH bo ovaluatod qr lhcbasis of multiple ac-tivitjes cil whk*r ccl cstltolis crty ane. lvlanagon shoub bo rncouragedto expcrinent with now approachcr, lo irplwoproducl quality, lo onlist th. coop.ration ofthcir departmonl rc*on in irpoving output,lo cooporalr with cthor departmontt, and lorcrk tor thr fmgttem succosr cil tht canpa-ny. Using respansibilily reports ar an aid incvaludhg thr olficbncy of busho$ aclivities,hslead ol managroo, takcr procsurc off man-ageru to defend hoir acticos ar thoy reble locod, and rnaker il po+rblo for hem to pursuecficr desirable bushess activilioc.
Q17-19. Somo problemt that l lmit thr usofulnesr olcootrol data repqld to rnsnagcr' in a rcspon'sbility accornrhg and reporfhg qFtom 8t :
Chaptor t7
(a) Most rcsponsib i l i ty account ing andrepodhg rlalrns irnpmperly bese allour'ablc budgrtl on volume'based mca'ruret of astiv,ty thal havc litlle to do withcosl incurr rncr (1.9. , labor hour l ,rnacfihc houn, rtc.). lf nqlvolune rnca'surcr (o.g., m*hinl rcluP!, relooling,nrwhg or do.ing parlr or prodtrl' ctc.)arr maior corl driveru, aclivity basedcethg should br uced as thc basis lorbudgct ing end PrcPar ing var iancrreportr.
(b) Conhol daia ryailablc in a nsponsibilityreporting ryrlem are lo aggregated lobc ucaful. Thb ctilicicrn slems frotn ananemPt lo ur rcspotsbility reporis toroperating control. Even ilemized vari'ancr reporlr may nol bc suflicient lorolvo thic problern
(c) Cqrtrol data availabl. lo rnanagen ar.financbl and not oalily intcrpreled byoperating lcvol managers' I'ho are noltrained in accounting and finance. Theaccounting slatf chould provide assil'tance, when practbal h trainhg operal'ing pcrsonnel in lhe use ol t inanciElreporls. ln addition, nonlinancial mea'surer that can bc easily understood byoperating managers shouH be reporledalong with lharcial data, when pnclical.
(d) Control data availablc lo tnanagore atenot tlnefy onough to br weful. This critl'cism cteint frqn an atlempl to use finan-ciat based reponsibility roPorb for day'today operathg controL Morc frequenttePorting will not likely solvc lhir prob'lem, because il slill takeg dalts or weeksto collect tho necegsary dala and pre'pare financial reportr. A better solutitx isto use statistical procesr conlrol andother operatirg control syslems lor day-today openthg csrtrol ard lo use peri-odic financial rcporlr lo cvaluate thlfinancial elfcclivenclc of lhe businesrt)Etomt and thr Prees! cooltol syslemrused h mcriloring activtty.
Ot7-20. Despile thc tact that nsrfinancbl measures ofoporating podormancr arc mot. easily hter'preted and can br nradc avaihble qt a morotimoly bacir than linencial data' f inancialreports genrrated by a responsibility accounl'hg syslem slill havr value bocau3e they Pto-vUc hformation about tho impact ol bueinesssystemr sr incornr. To bc effective, manago'ment musl nd d|ty bclievo lhal roducing invcn-tory, spcilagc, c rework will inprovc proCilabilFty, but also it must rrpnitor thc lmpact that guch
cf for l r havc on incomo. Thc t io belwcenclrogor h bushess s)lstems and the effect ofthoo change3 on it6ne Lr provided by lhan'cial ropodr-
\,
: Chwter tZ 413
RCISES
E17-1
(11 Maintenance Department cqst should be charged to all dopartments onthe basis ol a predetermined charging rate and could be computed asfollorvs:
Fixgd COSt...................r......................r.......r...........r........o
'I
!
b
b
Variable cost (15,00O r $8.5O|$ z,5oo
l27r5OOTotal Maintonance Department cost sl35,OOO
ffi = $g Per maintenance hour
The agtual Malntenanco Oepartnrent cost for November, gl32rOOO wouldbo chargod dirscUy to that departmenl The $9 charging rate is used tocharge other departments for Maintenance Department service received.The November charges would be $1261000 (l4,ooo actual maintenancehours x $9 charging rate|.
The same approach woutd be followed for Generat Factory cost, exceptthat transfem and charges for such costs would be made to producingdeparunents only. The rate woufd be determined as foilorvs:
Fixed cost $3O,OOO20,OOOVariable cost (1rO0O r $201..r..r...,...
Total General Factory cost
lv
sso,OOO
$5O,OOO = $50 per employeeI,OOO employees
The actual cost chargod to tho Gonoral Factory In November would be$51r0o0, and Gonoral Factory cost charged to producing departmentswould be ${srooo (98o actual employees x $50 charging rate}.
{'t11
efl-1 (Concluded!
t2l
Chapter t7
f,lalntenance DepL General Factory
ACtUal COgt ........D......o...... $l 32rOOO $511500Budget ellomnce:
Variable cost:l4rooo hours I $85o.. $119,OOO98O employees r $20 $19'600
Fired cost 7r5OO l20,5OO 3O,OOO 49,gOO
Spending varlancc..r........ S 5r5OO unlav. $ {.90o unfav.
Budget allowancc..,...,..,.. $128r5OO $491600Cost charged oub
l{'OOO hourc r $9.........990 employees r $50....
1 2 3 TotalCarpenter Shop. .................o...,.. $ 4rooo $ Irooo $ 4r5oo $l61500E|octriciansn...............r............. l2'OOO lO'2OO 61600 281800
Tota1......t..........r....,....rrD.......r. $l6rOOO $l8r20O $t I,too $45,300r4oo r $io = 34,o0o; Boo r $to = $8,000; 45o r $io = $4,5oo- 1,ooo r $12 - t l l2,OO0; 85O r $12 = $lo,2oo; 55o r $12 = $6,600.
126,OOO49,00o
ldle capacity varialrcro...... $ 500 unfav. $ 0oO unfav.Total var|ance............... 5-TF unfaY. $ 2.5oo unfav.
El7-2
(11 Billins rates: Carpenter Shop: #ffi
= $lo per hour
Electrlctans: -qggjo-oo = Si 2 perhour2,5OO hrs.
(2) Charged to producing departments: Department
II
It
Ii
! Chapter 17
E17-2 (Concludedl(31 Variances In each service department:
VarlablcGost
1r5
VarlablcRata
Per Hour
Garpenter ShopElectricians
Actual co!t-*-......Eudgct ellowanccl
Varlablc coct (1,050htt. r lXr,OOl.-, 3
Ftcd colt*.-*
Monthly Flrcd CortBudget Percentage
$2O,O0O 70%3O,OOO 80
$l4,ooo24LOOO
Acbral corEt-**Budget allowancc:
Varlablc cost (21400hn r 32,401 ..-. I 51780
FLod Go!t*...-- 24.OOO
Spcndlng yarlancc -
Budget Ellow8ncc...Coat chargcd to
produclng depart-mentr (ttg.2)-....
ldlc capaclty varlancc
$8.70
$6,000 s3.OO61000 2.4O
Electrlclana
FLcdCoet
Carpenter Shop
31e ,8OO
4195014,000 18,050
Variable rate per maintenance hourfor other costs:S up ervis io Jl ...,..,,.....Tools and supplies,.Mlscellangous ..r...r..
$.so.75.o5 1.30 10,00
s27,7OO
2017go
S (2.06O) fav.
t29,760
28,80O
3 96O untav.
$ 4,00 per hour
$1{.99 per hour
$lo per employee2
Spcndlng Ytrlanc. -
Budget rllowlncc.,.Cort chargcd to
produclng depart-mcntr {mq.2}..-,.
ldlc capaclty varlancc
t 85O unfav.
s18,95O
16,500
S 2,450 unlav.
Ib
E17-3
(11 Billing rate for Maintenance DepartmentFired rate! $12r8OO total lired cost + 3,2OO normal
maintgnanCO hOUf3.. . . . . . r . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . rVariable rate: Variable rate per maintenance hour
for labor. . . . . .
T o t a l a a . . a a t a a a a t a a a a . . . . r . . . . . . . . . a a a a a a D . a . a o a r . . . . . . . r . . . . . . r r r . . . r . . . . . . . . . . .
Bllfing rate for Payroll DepartmenbFixed rate: $12'OOO budgeted fired cost + 1,290
aygr:lgg numbgr of employggS ...........,.Va ri ab I g r iNto .. . . . , . . . . . . r. . . , . . . , . . . , . , . . r. , . r,Tota1. . . . . , . . . . . . . ro . . r . . r , . , r , . . . . . . . . _q!_? per employee
The billing rate for the Maintenance Department was based on the rurt-ber ol maintenance hours worked, because it was the only variable givenon which a measure of operating results could be computed. For thePayroll oepartment, the billing rate was based on the number of employ-ees' because it was an adequate measure of operating results for thatdepartment.
416
E17-3 (Concluded)
(21 Maintenance DePartment
E17-4
(11
Firgd costt ...,.....r....Variable cost (rate r hours)n........
Total.......
Actual CoSt..........."""Budget allowance based on actual hours:
Variable cost (31355 hours r $101..'.....Fired cost
Spending varianceBudget allonrance based on actual houls.'.Cost charged out (31355 hours r $14)....,,...
ldl g capacity variar|G19.............'................'.'
Payroll Department:AgtUal 9OSt....'..................... '...."""""t"""t'Budget allowance based on actual number
ol employees:Variable cost (l rl65 employees r $21Fired cost
Chapler 17
g47,2OO
933,55O12r8OO tf6r35o
9_99.9 unfaY.s48,350
46,970
Spending variancg ............'.'.........t........'...'
Budget allowance based on actual numberof employees
Cost charged out fl '165ldle capacity varianco...
employees r $121
ProducingDepartmentr
3oruiceDcpartments
xBAst,2oo $2,4oo
l,600 2,600$ 1 , 4 4 0 $ 9 6 0 $ O , O O O
1r4OO 1,20O 6,800
$2,800 89p99 $2,849$2,840 $2,160 q!?f99
% Firedcost rA = hls.' Dept. Hourcl O,OOO2OTOOOl2 'OOO
I,OOO
$6 ,8oo
hrs.
ABxY
200h40241 6
$l,zoo2r4OO1r44O
960
I,OOOl3,ooo
TrOOOorooo
34,O99
B =X =Y =
$ (62o) lau
s13,875
$ 2,330l2,ooo l4r33o
L:('t9!l tar.
3l{,33Ol3198O
3 35O unfav.
Total
5O,OOO lOOo/o s8,ooo34, OOO hrs.
= 3.20 variable rate
Cltwter 17 4 1 7
El74 (Goncluded)
(21 The two general principles for the allocation of service department costsapplicable under tho circumstances are (a) distribution on the basis ofservics or benefit received for the variable cost; and (bl distribution onthe basis of readiness to serve or capacity that must be maintained forthe fixed cosL
This solution distributes all variable costs incurred. A predeter-' mined variable cost rate should be calculated, so that the efficiency ofthe power plant could be judged. The present $.ZO rate is based on theactual monthly consumption and cost.
E77-5(11
BenefitingDepartmentCutting,... . . . .o...o..
QuarterlyStandby oh of Fixed CostGapacity Total Billing
35'OOO 35oh S2,45O26'000 26 1,920Grindin9,........r...........
Polishing ........,...........,..,.,...,.......... 3OTOOO 30 Z,I OOSt0J€S.'...o.......o.. ' .....rr............ 'r....... I;OOO I 630
TOtaf r................................... '.r........ I OOTOOO lOOo/o
Variable rate = Variabte Cost * ,*""*O Onnr"ilp""i= S30,OOO + 30O,0OO KWH= $,1o per KWH
s?,oo,9
ry
118
El7-S (Concludedl
First Quarter Bllllng:Variable lilto.."""""-"'Agtual consumPtloo ....
Variablg Gost ............'..Firgd CoSt....."...""'o""
Total . t . .oo..t . . . . . . ." t"" t""
Second Quarter Billing:Variable lllto.........-.'.t..Actual congumPtion ....
Variable cost ...............Fired GoSt............""""
Total ...........r........r""tt '
Third Quarter Billing:Variabl g itlto........'.......Agtual consumption ....
Variable cost ...'...........Fired GoSt....................Total .....o............. ' ....... '
Fourth Quarter Billing:Variable rato......,..,......Actual consumption ....
Variablg cost ...............Fixgd CoSt'.........r.........
Total '.'...........
Chapter 17
Benefiting Department
Grindlng Pollshing Stores Total
$ .1o29r5OO
$ 2,9502A50
$ 5,400
$ . 1 020,0OO
S .1o2910OO
$ zrgoo2rloo
$ 850630
s 2rooo1r82O
$ 3,820 $ 5,OOO 3l,2gO S15,5Og
$ . l o $ . t o33,5OO 24r75O
$ g,gso $ 2,4752r45O 1,820
$ 5,goo $ 4,295
$ . 1 0 3 . 1 08,250 9O,O0O
$ ' . 1 023,5OO
$ 2,3502rlOO
s 4,450
$ 2,5502,10o
s 825630
$ I,ooo7,OOO
$1,455 sl6,000
$ . 1 0 $ . 1 0 $ . l o25,5OO 6,500 86,000
$ . l o32.-750
$ 3,2752,45O
$ 5,725
$ . l o21,25O
$ 2,1251r82O
$ 3,945
$ 650630
$ 8,6007,00o
$ 8,5OO7,OOO
$62,60O
AnnualTotal
$ , 1 o28,25O
$ 2,825 $ 2,3oo2r45O 7r8�2O
$ 5,275 $ 4,120
$ . 1o $ . 1o23,OOO 27,75O
i 2,7752r lOO
$ 4,gso $1,280 $15,600
$ . 1 0 $ . l o6,000 85,OOO
$ 600630
$ 4,875 $1,23O $15,500
$5,345
Fourth@s l5 ,4OO$15,450 $16,200 sl5,9OO $ 62,950
$ . t o85,OOO
$ . l o $ . 1 o $ . 1 O $ . 1 O9O,OOO 86,000 85,OOO 346,000
$ 8,5OO7,OOO
s I,ooo7,OOO
$ 8,6O0 $ 8,5OO $ 34,6007,OOO 7,OOO 28,OOO
$15 ,5OO $16 ,000 $15 ,600 $15,5OO s 62,600
s (so) s 2oo s 3oo s (1oo) s 35o: - : : :
l2l
Actual cost.......Less budget allowance:
Variable rato ..............Actual KWH providedVariable cost..............Fired cost..,....Budget allowance ......
Spending variance ......,.,.......
First SecondQuarter Quarter
ThirdQuarter
$ . l o $ . 1 o61500 85,OOO
s 8,5OOTrOOO
lav. unfav. unfav. fav. unfav.
Ctapter 17
E17-{'
4 t 9
\-UNTYERSITY MOTOR POOL
Budget Report for March
Gasoline
MonthlyBudget
$ 5,51337t'236525
2r5OO2,31O
$!1d93. 2 1
63,OOO$ .1819
2,5OO2,31O
March (OverfActual Under
$ 5,323 $ tgo38o (21
186
9!rf99 9--32!21
63,OOO$ .1700 $,ooss
Oll, mlnor repairc, parts, and supp||gs........,......r.Outside repairslnsuranceSalaries and benefitsDepreciation....... ' .r............o..o..!r.rr.,,....r....o...r......
Total
Total m11g3............................r..r.r.......rr.................Gost per mile
Supporting calculations for monthly budget amounts:
Gasoline:
Oil, minor repairs, parts,and supplies:
Outside repairs:
Insurance:
Salaries and benefits:
6(l,000 miles16 miles per gal.
50525
b
b
Depreciation:
x $1.4o pergal lon = $srs lz .So
63,000 r $.000 per mile = $.328
= $23o.25
Annual cost for one auto: $0,O0O + 20 autos = $3OOAnnual cost for 21 autos: 21 r $3OO = $61300Monthly cost $g,3OO + 12 = SSZSNo change
$3O,OOO annual cost = $2,5oo per month12 monthsAnnual depreciation per auto:
$26,400 + 2O autos = $ir32oAnnual depreciation for 2i autos:
$lr32o per auto r 21 = $2T.T2OMonthly depreciation: $27l2O + 12 = $2r3lO
. :
120
E77-7 CLAYTON COMPAITYAssembly DePartment
Flerible Bud g et-9Oc/o lovel
Dirsct materials l9O% r $2O'0O01Dircct labor lg0% x $l 1'2501SUpefViSiOJt.. . . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . .1.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . .o.. . ' . ' ." t ' r" t"
" ' t '
hdirect materiats ($zsO + lgOoh r ($l t75o - $2sQlll """""""'t"""""""PfOpgfty t3I . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . t . . . . t . .o. t . t . " " t " t t " t t t " t t '
Maintgnanco ($600 + (9O% r Gtlr600 - $600111...'........r....o....................Power Gt2oO + Paoh r ($3OO - $200jll '.........Insurancer....r.r......'........Depreciatioll ..................
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a o a a a a a a a a a a a a a t a a a a a a a a a a a a a
Chapter 17
$18,OOO1O1125
500I,600
3001r5O0
29017s
l1600
Tota t. . . . . .ro., . .D... . . . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . .r . . . .r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . .r .o.. . . . .r . . . .r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t .r . S34 t 09O:
Chapter 17
E174 ONE MONTH FLEXIBLE BUDGET FOR FINISHING DEPARTMENT
Ooeratinq levelBased on labor hours.....,.r.. 8OO 9OO I'OOO lrlOoPercentage of cipScit!....... 80o/o g0oh l00oh l7Aoh
Variable cost:Indirgct |abor.........o.........o.. s lr2oo,oo s 1r35o.oo $ lr5oo.oo $ 11650.00Factory supplies....r.r......,.r.. 1r88O,O0 2rl15.OO 2'35O.OO 2r585.OOPower.,...,......,..r..,............... 600.00 675.00 750.oo 825.OORework operations.............. 4OO.OO 45O.0O 5OO.OO 55O.OOPayroll tares....................... IrO40.OO 1r17O.OO lr3OO,OO 1'43O.OORepair and maintenanco..... 320.00- 360.00 4OO,OO 44O.OOGeneraf factory.......,........,.. 160.00 18O.OO 2OO.OO 22O.OO
Total variable cost........... $ 5,600.00 S 61300.00 $ TTOOO.OO $ 7'7OO.OOFixed Cost:Indirect |abor................,...,. $ 4r000.oo S 4roo0.oo $ 41000.00 $ 4rooo.ooSuperuisior|......,.....r......,...., 2'5OO.OO 2,5OO,O0 2'5OO.0O 2'50O.OOFactory supp1ies............o..,.. 9OO.O0 9OO.OO 9OO.OO 9OO.OOPowgr'..........'....r..........r...... 5OO.OO 5OO.OO 5OO.OO 5OO.OORework operations......,....... 2OO.OO 2OO,OO 2OO.OO 2OO.OOPayroll tares.....,....,....,....... 8OO.OO 8OO.OO 8OO.OO BOO.OORepair and maintenance,.,.. 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00Property insuranca.........,.... 7OO.OO 7OO.OO 7OO.OO 7OO.OOProperty taxes..................... 3O0.OO 3OO.OO 3OO.OO 3OO.OOVacation p3!.....,......D..,...,.... 2r2AO.OO ZT2OO.OO 2,2OO.OO 2.2OO.OOEmployee pension costs.,... l,2o0.oo 1,2oo.oo 1,2oo.oo i,2oo.ooEmployee health p1an...,...... 1,8oo.oo 1,8oo.oo irgoo.oo f ,goo.ooMachinery depreciation,..... Irooo.o0 l,ooo.oo 1,ooo.oo i,ooo.ooWater and heat..........o......r.. 600.00 600.00 ooo.oo 600.00Building occupanc!......,...... Irooo.oo lrooo.oo Irooo.oo Irooo.ooGeneral factory................... lr5oo.oo irsoo.oo irsoo.oo ir5oo.oo
Total fired Gost................ $ir"goopo $1r"goo"oo $ir"BooJo $lr"BooooTotal co$..................r......... $r5,4oo.oo $A6rtoo.oo $r6"900.00 $r?Foo^oo
421
Chapter 17
El7-9Spending
Original Budget Aetual VarianceBudget @ Cost Unfav. (FaY,l
Gapacity hoursVariable costs:
Supplles $ 2 , o o o $ 2 , 2 o o $ 2 , g o o $ l o oRepairc and maintenance ...... 8OO 88O 9OO 20lndifeCt 1abof.......................... 4rO0O 4r4OO 4r3OO (f OOIPowgr and !|ght.....r..............,. lr2OO 1t32O lr4OO 80H63t................r........,...r.....'.r.. 40O 44O 5OO 60
subtotal ................,.......... $ Sroo $ ,"r4o $ ,rooFixed costs:
Buifding orpense.................... $ 8oo $ 8oo $ 84o 4oDepreciation-machinely....... 2r4OO 2r4OO 2r4OO OProperty tar and insumnco.... 4OO 4OO 42O 20
Subtotal $ 3,600 $ 3,600 $ 3,060
8,0oo
Total costs sr rpoo $l r^s4o $13,060 s 220unfav.Appliedfactoryovgrhgad...o.., . . . . . . .r. . . . . , , .o... . . 13r2OO
ldlecapacityvarlaDCo.... . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. , . . . . .o. $ (36Olfav,
Actual factory ovgrhgad........,..r...,..,..........o. $l3r060Applied lactory overhead l3,2OOOverapplied factory overhead 3 (r 4ol
Spending varianceldle capacityr varianceOverappliedfactoryoverhead.r.................... $ (140)
S 22o untav.(36O! fav.
IL
il-
LIL
Direct labor hout'r8.....'......'............ IOpOO ,"gOO ,1600: = : : :
Variable costs:
Clppter 17
Er7-I o
lndirgct 18bor......r........'r.........Payroll t3xg3.............r......o.....rFactory suppli gs'..r................rEl gctric utility......-.!...r............Gas utility...oo....o..-.o.....'.......or.Wate r Util ity.......'...........,........Machinery ropairB ..................Maintenatlco ...............r..r....'..Ovgrtimg pnomium ..,.r....r.......
Subtotal ....o........r......r.."..
Firgd costs: ............r..................r..Supgrvisiofl ...........r.....'........r.Indirgct labor.......'........r......r'.Vacation p?!....................."....Payrol I t8I33......r................'...Employee insurancg...............Factory 3upp1i6s.......r.r.....'..r.'El gctri c uti1ity................r.......,Gas ut i1i ty, . . . t . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . r . . . .Watgr util ity..... '..!....ror...... r.....Maintgnance ............,........,...,Machinery depreciation .......,.Building rlB!1t.........'.....'.r.........Pro p g rty targs ....,..........tr.......Pro perty insu ra n c g..,.....,........
Subtotal ............o......r.,....,Total costs .r.........D...
.123
SpendingOriginal Budget Aetual VarianceBudget Allonrance Cost Unfav. (Fav.)
!
I
Ib
b
t
L
$ 7O,OOO6lr5OO27rOOOl2,ooo
6,OOOlr5OO
io,ooo2l,ooo
IrOOO
$ gz,zoo59r04O25r92O11,52O
5,76O1r44O9,60O
20,1OO8,640
$ 7o,ooo6O,OOO28,OOO't2,ooo
6 , 1 O Ol15OO
l0,ooo' 15,OOO
IrOOO
32,8oo960
2rO80480340
60400
(5,t 60l360
48,OOO O36'000 O4O,5OO 5O0
I,OOO O72r25O 25O19,OO0 Ol5 ,ooo o
I,OOO O5,OOO O
23,OOO O5O,OOO O15,OOO O13,OOO I,OO015,250 25O
$2O9,28O $2t t,600$2l8,OOO
$ 4g,ooo38,OOO4O,0OO
8,OOOl2,oool9roool5rooo
I,OOO5rOO0
23,OOO5O,OOO15,OOOl2,oool5ro0o
$ 48,OOO36rOOO4O,OOO
8;OOO12,OOO19,OOO15,OOO
I,OOO5,OOO
23,OOO5O,OOO15,OOO12,OOOl5,ooo
S
i-
I
$307,OOO q3O7,OOO$3O9,OOO
91'329untav.
ldle capacity variallcg ...................,.....r........Und erappli ed f actory ove th ead ........,,.....,....
3525,OOO $51O,28O $52O,OOO
S 4r32O unfav.12,280 unfav.
il_6,6OO
Appli ed factory overhoad ..........o........t...,.....ldle capacity variallco ..,...,..,..........r.o,..,.....r
5O4,O0O
$ 12,280 unfa%
Agtual factory overhgad....r.r...........r............ $SzoroooAppliedfactoryoverhead.......,..................... 5O4rOOOUnderappliedfactoryoverhead.................... $ l61600
t_ Spendlng varianco
i-
424
P77-7
(1)
Chapter 17
PROBLEMS
Factory overhead applied for each prcducing department:Dept. A: 20r48O hrs. x $4.2O = S881016Dept, B: 291850 hrs. x 3.10 = 921535Dept. C: 2O,l0O hrs. x 3.75 = 751375
Oner. or underapplled factory overhead for each producing department
Producing Departmants
Erpenses
(21
cAActual department factory
ovgrhgad,. . . . . . . r . r . . .Proration ol seryice departments:
Utilities (on actual hrvh)..........Repairs and maintenance
(on actual dlhl .-....o...'......Total actual department factory
overhead ..o.r......r.................rr.
Applied lactory ovgrhgad ........,..r.(Oven) or underapplied factory
overhead
$56,02O
131755'
181432r'
$88,20786,O16
s52,85O
1 6 1 1 7 0
26,865
s95,88592,535
$42,580
12r53O
18,O9O
$73,2OO75,375
r 39r3OO r $.35 = s13r755t ' 2 0 , 4 8 O r $ . 9 O = 1 8 . 1 4 3 2
(31 Total variance for each geruice department:Repairs andMaintenance
Actual cost befors allocation of UtilitiesDepartment COSt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . r . . . . . . r r
Utilities Department cost allocation(1 8195O kwh x S.SS; . . . . r . . , . . . . . r . .o. . . . . . . . . . . . . ,o. . . . . .
$ 2,191 unfav. $ 3,95O unfav. $ (2'1751 fav.
Utilities
$56,320
6,633
$5O,O4O
$oz,sssServices allocated (sold) to other departments:
ffOt43O hrs. x $.90;............. ' ........ ' ............. ' .. 63t387(1 4orz5o krrh r gssl r...........,....................... 4gro88
$ (434! fav. $ 952 unfav.
LtL
I
L
I
I
Cllo,pty� 17
P17-2
(f l Maintenancs Department
Total estimated costTotal osUmated malntenance hours
UUlitles Department:
Total estimated cost - S8'40o -Total esUmated kwh 70'OOO
425
= 3 3 per maintenance hour_ sto,Soo3 , 5 O O
9.12 per kwhl
b
b
b
I
b
I
L
(21 Service
Variable overh ga d..........D.......Dr'.Fired ovgrhead .....,...r....,..,,...r...
Direct departmental ovefiead ..DistribuUon-eeruice d epts.:
Maintenance:(2r5OO x S3) .,................,(1 ,OOO r 33)... . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . .
Utilities:(45rOOO r $.1 2|.,............(25'OOO r $.1 2)..............
Total factory ovgrhead..,.,......r...Dirgct labor hours .o..,................Overhead rate per dlh ...............
333,oOO $24,oOO $f o,5oo s8,4OO
3rOO0 (1O,5OO)
5,4OO3rOOO
_$15,eoo12,0O0$3.825
$l5roool8r0oo
I I,OOOl5,ooo
$ 4,5OO6rOOO
Otilities
s3,6OO4,8OO
(8,4O0)
igo,ooo7,50O
$4
126
I
P17-2 (Continued!
(31Spending variance:
Astual factorY overheadAdd distribuUon-
garvice dePartmentsrTotal departmental factorY
ovgrhgad ..........r..o....Budget allowance based
on actual hours:Variable:n
Planera (1'O2O x$2.325;..........r.r. $21371.5O
Radial Drills(680 x $2f .........'
Firgd.t . . . . . . . . " . . . "" t"" l tSOO'OO
Spending Yarianc8..........
Planerg
93,l2o.oo
l ,44O.OO
s4,560,oO
3,871.5O
S 688.50 unfav.
Chapter 17
Radial Drills
s2,3OO
480
$2,780
2,61O
S 170 unfav.
RadialDril ls
480
$2,61o
$1,ggo1r25O
rDistribution of service department costs to producing departments:
Planers
Maintenance:Ptaners(32O hrs. x $31 r,.r.............. ' ......... ' ...r.... ' .r.......... S 960
Radial Dril ls (8O hrs. r $31......... ' ... ' . ....................""""'Uti l i t ies:
Planers (4,OOO hrs. x $,121Radial Drit ls (2,OOO hrs. r $12'..........-.........
$ 24o
240
s1,44O $ 480
RadialDril ls
"Variable ovorhead rate:Planers: 33.825 - ($tS'OOO + 12,OOO} = $2.325Radial Drills: $4 - ($1510oO + 7,5oo) = $2
ldle capacity variance:Budget allowance basod on actual hourE......Lass applied factory overhead:
Planers (1,O2O hrls. r $S.aZq..Radial Drills [680 hrs. r Sa].....'.
ldle capacity varianco ........
Planers
$31871,5O
3 ,9O1.5O2r720
$ (1 10 )s___19_9€9) fav. fav.
Actual sgrvicg department cost..............................,.... $ t1170 $ 710Distributed to producin g departments:
Maintenance(4OOhrs.x$3|. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . l r2OO
Chaptor 17
P17-,2 (Continued)
(4)
f df e capacity variance...,.....,....,.. g (i gS.7 2ltav.Net variance........ $ (go.oo)t"*r.
427
Maintenance Util i t ies
720
9l1l:o9) rav'$ (lo.oolfav.
s (3ol s (tol
Spending variance:Actual service depart-
ment cost .............,. S1'17O.OO STi O.OOBudget allowance
based on actualhours:Variab1e.,r........,...... $ S14.Z8l $Og.4O2Fixed................,...... 5OO.OO IrO74.28 4OO.OO 7OB.4O
spending variance..... -
$ iss.?z unfav. $ i^6o unfav.
ldle capacity variance:Budget allowance based
on actual hou1s.....................r.. $1roi4.2g $Zog.4oLess applied overhead:
Maintenance (4OO hrs. r S31 ..., i ,2OO.OOutil i t ies (6,000 kwh x $.121 ...... 72o.oo
t Estimated variable expense $4, SOOgst imff i - 3,soo ' Fr
$1.2857 r 40O hours = $5i4.28
Estimated variable expense $31600ffi- zo;ffi - $.0514 Perkwh
2
. . $.0s14 x 6,o0o kws = $gog.qo
Chapter 17
P17-2(Concluded)
(51 Reconcillatlon of total variances:
Agtua I ta gtory ovg rh gad ...........r........Lsss: Applled to work In Process-
Planers...........'..............""tt $3t9Ol'5O
Ngt total Yariance.......'r.r..............o...o
Variances:
$713OO.00
Applied'to work in Procsss-Radiat Dfit13,..........r......o...... 2'72O.OO 61621.50
$ 678,50 unfav.
Spending variance-Pt3ll9!'t3....... $ 688.5OSpending variance--Radial Drills 170.Oold le capacity variance-Plan 8t3..ldle capaclty variance-
Radial Drills ."..........'...............Spending variancFllllaintenance 155-72Spending variance-utilitios.'..... 1.60ldle capacity variance-
MaintgnaDCO ..........'.......r.......'.ldl e capacity variance-lJtilities..
Unfavorable Favorable
$ 3O.0O
110.OO
185.72l l .oo
s1,o15.82 S 337.32
$ 678.50 unfav.Net total variance
Chapter 17
Pr7-q(1) Budget allowance for each producing department in Januarp
(a) Based on scheduled production hours:
Variable factory overhead:(5,000 units r S.45t per unit) or
(1r25O hours x S1,8O per hour) .r......r........(5,OOO units r $.gge per unit) or
(l rOoO hours x S1.9O per hour) ..........,......Fixed factory overhead:
($17r52O + 12 months)... . . . . . . . . .o,,. . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . .($34r23O + 1 2 months).........'..............r.r......r
Share of service department cost:Maintenance (1r25O hours r $.SOs per hour)Maintenance (1,OOO hours r S.5O per hour) .Janitorial (9lrggO + 12 months).....,...,..........Janitorial (S2r97O + 12 months)....................
Total budget allowanc€ ...."...,.......,..r.......,.........,..
Machining
S2,25o
1 , 4 6 0
'625
1 6 5
Machining
$2,412
1,460
670
1 6 5
429
Assembly
sl,90o.oo
2,852.5O
500,oo
247.50sdggg s5,5OO.OO
r Machining: S2T'OOO + 6O,OO0 units = S.45 per unit; S2Z,OOO + l5,OOO hours =$1.80 per hour
z Assemblr $22'800 + 6o,ooo units = S.gB per unit; $22,Boo + l2,ooO hours =$1.9O per hour
3 Maintenance: $13,5OO + 27.OAO hours = $.5O per direct tabor hour(b) Budget allowance based
Variable factory overhead:
on actual production hours:
(1,34O hours x $1.8O per hour| , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .(1,030 hours x Sl .gO per hour) . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . ,
Fixed factory overhead:Gl17r52O + 12 months).,........,r.................r....($34r23O + 12 months),............................,...
Share of service department cost:
Assembly
st ,957.0O
2r852.5O
515.0O
247.50
s4,707 99,s?2.0o
Maintenance (1,34O hours x $.50 per hour) .Maintenance (1,03O hours r $.5O per hour) .Jani tor ia l (91,ggO + 12 months). . . . . . . .Jani tor ia l ($ergZO + 12 months). . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , .
Total budget allowance
Chapter 17
P17-3 (Continuedf
The budget atlowances catculated in (af and in (b) include the servicedepartment shares by two different mothods: the share of theMaintenance Department cost is based on the charging rate of $.5O andthe actual hours worked, which is in harmony with the general procedursadvocated. The share of the Janitorial Department cost is based on 7112of the apportioned cost. This approach ls used because it is believed thatianitorial services have no relationship to the number of hours worked Inthe producUon departments, In fact the lllustratlon could be made moForealistic by basing the apportionment of Janitorial Department cost onthe basis of the relative amount of floor space occupied by the producingdepartments. As long as no change in the spaco has been reportedr theshare would remain as established in the budget figures.
It should be noted further that the maintenance cost could becharged to the producing departments on the basis of maintenancohours and not direct labor hours. An additional refinement would appor-tion fixed cost on the basis of a predetermined maintenance schedule'and the variable cost on the basis of maintenance hours actually used.
(21 Spending and idle capacily variances for each producing department'based on astual produstion hours:
Machining AssemblyAetual departmental factory
ovgrhgad ..............r....... s4,2OO S5,24O.OOAdd share of budgeted service
departrnent costs:Maintenanco Department r.......... 670Janitorial Department................. 165
Total actual factory overhead..........,, $51035 $6'002.50Budget allowance based on actual
production hours.. 4r7O7 8,572.OOSpending variance .,....r......r.......r...... S 328 unfav. S 43O.5O unfav.
: :
Budget allowance based on actualproduction hour:s,......,...........,....o S4r707 S5r572.OO
Applied factory overhead:(1'34O hours r $3.6O per hour).... 41824(1'O3O hours x 95.50 per hour).... 5,665.OO
s15;oo247.50
ldle capacity varianco ...,.... 9_Ill f) ta* $ (93.oo) fav.
Chagter 17
Pf 7-q (Concluded)
(3) Spending variance for each service department:
Maintenance
431
JanitorialActual cost (month ol January) .,....,.. $lr3SO.Oo $iro4oBudget a||owancgt..............r............. 1rl4Z.g3 g?s
Spending variance.,,..o................r...... $ ,OrJ? unfav. S 215 unfav,
*Variable lactory overhead:($S,t AO + 27rO0O budgeted hours
= $.189 per hour) l2r370 actualhours x $.199 per hour) r......,.. $ 447.93
($ZTZOO + 12 months)..............h.. S zasFixed factory overhead:
(SA,COO + 12 months)........ 7OO.OO(S7'2OO + 12 months) ..............t... 600
Budget a||owancg....,.,.....,..,.............. $1rl4Zr3 $ g25
P17-4
Capacit1r...t...,...r............................o....,........ g}oh gooh l OOohDirgct labor hou!s.....................r...,........,,... 4OroOO 4srooo soroooVariabfg costs:..r........t....o......o.....o.............. $ 4rOOO $ OrSOO $ SrOOO
Indirgct |abor..................r....r................ IBTOOO ZO'.2SO 22rSOoPayrolf taxes and fringe benefits.......... slrz4o oc,ggs 71,5solPower and | ight . . , . . , . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . , . . . . r . . . . . . . . , 1r2oo r igso 1r5oo2Inspectiott.........,........r.........,o,.............. 4rgOO SrAOO grOOOg
. Other sgmivariablg costs....,.,.,.,,.......... 6'OOO O'ZSO 7r5OOaTotal variablg costs.r..r..o....r........,..r.r... g 91 ,24o $io2r64s $1 lqoso
Fixed costs:D e p r e c i a t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . , . $ g r o o o $ g r o o o $ g r o o oInsurance ..r . . . , . . . . . . , . . 1r5OO t,soo l r5OOMaintenance cost......,......,.......r....,..r.,. Z4rooo Z4'rooo 24rOoOPropgrty tdr.,...........r....o.....,.........r...,... l r5OO f 'SOO l r5OOSupervisory staff ' ..,.. ' ....o...r.....,.....t..o... gorooo gorooo 361000Powgr and |ight.,....,..........r...,..,........... 2OO 2OO 2OOInspection......,.............r....r..............r.... 4r2oo 4r2OO 4r2OOother semivariable costs...................... i,4oo i;a;o 1,40oTotal fixed costs,..,....,..... ...... $ 77,goo $ ??"soo $ ??"goo
Total factory overhead ...-.....,--... .. slqt,t* lirttras $t "t,t*
432
P17-4 (Concluded)
rPayroll taxes and fringe benefits:Direc't labor cost = 50'OOO ht€. x S7.50Indirect tabor cost = 5OTOOO hr:s. x $ .45
2Power and light:
s300 $. 03 per direct labor hour10, OOO hrs .Total cost
s375,ooo22,5OO
S397'5OO x
Chaoter l7
.18 = S71r55O
Hours CostLt:-t-t l l U a a a a a o a a a a a a a . . a a a a . a a r a a a a a a a a t a r a o r a a . . . r . . . . t . . . . . . . . a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a . . . . . t . . . .
L O W . . r . a . r . . a . a a . a a . . a a . . . . . a a a a a a a . . r . . . . . . . . . . a a a a a a t . a t . . a a a a a . r a a a a a a . a a a a a a a o . a a
5OTOOO4O,OOO
5O,OOO4O,OOO
st,7oo1,4OO
s1o,2OO9,OOO
a a a a a r r a r a a a a a a a a a a . a a a t a a a a a a a t a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a r l a a r a a a
10,0oo s 3oo
s1,7OO1,5OO
Fixgd cost. . . . . . . . , . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . S 2OO:
clnspection:Hours Cost
Llt- r.I l l ! r a l a . a . . . . . . . a a a a a a a . a a a . a a . . . r a a . a a a a a a . a a a r a a a r o . . . . . . a a a . . a . . . a a a a a . t a a a t a . a a t a l a
Low..... a t a a a a a t a a a a a a a a a a a a r a a . . a a a a a t a a t a a t a t a a o a a a a a a t a a a a
Dif fgrgn cg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r ! . . . . r . , . . . r . . . ' . . . .
s1 ,2OO .ie-dffi;
- S' 12 Per direct labor hour
10499 $ 1,2oo
Total CoSt . . . . r r . r . . . . . r . .o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . ' . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S l Ot20O
Variablo cost (5OrOOO hrs. x S.12)... . . .r. . . . . .r. ' . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . .r ' . . . . . 6tOOO
Fixgd GoSt . . . . . . . . . . r r r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . . . r r . . . . . . . r . . . . .1 . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . r t . . . . $ 4 t2OO
lOther semivariable expenses:Hours Gost
5O,O0O4O,0OO
1O,0OO
$8,90O7,44O
s1,5OO
s8,9OO7,5OO
s l ,4OOFixed cost
t
Chapter 17
P77-5 .
(1} ONE MONTH FLDOBLE BUDGET FOR FABRICATION DEPARTMENT
Ooeratino levelBased on machine hours,,..Percentage of capacity .......
Variable costtIndirect labor .....o..Factory supp1ies,,r....,...,......POWgr . . . . . . . . . r . r r . . . . . ' . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . r
Rgwork operations.......,.,....Payroll targs ..,.r......r.r.........Repair and maintenanco.....Ggngral factory ..,.............o..
Total variable cost...........Fixed cost:
lrgoo 2,OOO 2,2OO_so% |_oo% 11o%
$ 3,87O.OO $ 4,3OO.OO $ 4,73O.OO1'35O.OO lrsoo,oo l1650.00
goo.oo ITOOO.OO lr loo.oo540.Oo 600.00 660.00630.00 700.oo 770.OO450.oo 500.oo 550.OO360.00 400.oo 440.OO
$ 8,1OO.OO $ I,OOO.OO $ grgOO.OO
1r600gooh
--
$ gr44o.oot,2oo.0o
go0.oo490.00 .580.0O400,00320.0O
s 7,2O0.0O
Indirect |abor....,..o.....,..r.r,.. s 2rooo.oo $ 2rooo.oo $ 2rooo.oo $ 2TOOO.OOSupervision..,...................... 2rooo.oo 2rooo.oo zjooo.oo erooo.ooFactory supp1ies.,................ 600.00 600.00 600.00 OOO.OOPower...,....,..,..............,t..,... 4SO.OO 4SO.OO 4SO.OO 45O.OOPayroll taxes """"""""""'.. lrooo.oo irooo.oo rrooo.oo rrooo.ooRepair and maintenance,.... i,!oo.oo t jooo.oo lr4oo,oo 1r4oo.ool-p"tty insurance.....,........ z5o.oo 7so.oo z5o.oo 7so.ool-p"tty taxes............,...,.... 5oo.oo 5OO.OO 5OO.OO 5OO.OOvacation pay......................., l '7OO.OO l,TOO,OO l'7OO.OO l'7OO.OOEmployee pension costs..... Irooo.oo trooo.oo Irooo.oo Irooo.ooEmployee health p1an.......,.. goo.oo goo.oo goo.oo goo.ooIltlachinery depreciation...... 3,5oo.oo 3,soo.oo 3,soo.oo 3r5oo.ooWater and heat..o..............r.. 4OO.OO 4OO.OO 4OO.OO 4OO.OOBuilding occupancy............. 9oo.oo 9Oo.oO 9oO.Oo 9oO.oOGeneral factory...,.........r..... lrog,g jg ITOOO,OO ITOOO.OO Irooo,ooTotat fired cost.........,,..... !@f9 $lgpoooo !!t sr;ffiTotal cost.....,.,..r..............o.. ffirr* $rrrrrr", *rr*gg ffi
s * ' .
134
I
P17-5 (Goncludedl
t2l
Based on machlnc houn..o-...€Parccntagc ol capacl$ o.........-.-
Varlabla cott:Indlrcct laborFactory suppllctPowerRework opo rat!ont........,..'.....'.....Payroll taret ..........x......,....o,.......Repalr and malntelEDCC...... '.......Gen era I lactory ..................o..o......
Total varlable cost .'............xo
Flxed costlndlrcct laborSupcrvlglonFactory auppllelPowcrPayroll taxegRepalr and malntenancc..........--Proporty In su rancc ......................Propgrty t8jf 8t......,.oo..............-...VacaUon pay -.-..-.Employee penslon cocbEmployec health plan ...-.-.Mach Inery d eprcclaUon ...,.....-..-Water and hcat .............,.,.Eulldlng occu pancyoo...................General factory
Total fired cost
FABHCANON DEPARTMENTVariance Report
For the Month of Februaryr 2O-
Chapter l7
SpendingVariancc
unfav.(lav.)
BudgetAllowancc
HormalCapaclty
1,80000%
I g,azo.oo1,35O.0O
000.00540.O0so,oo450.00360.O0
BudgctAllowancc
ActualCapaclV
ActualCoct
t 4,125,001r5:t4,00
e705011088,25
675.50125,753a5.OO
$ 8,370.00 3 8,924.99
1,88O93'/o
3 3,999.001,395.0O
930.0O558.OO651.00465.0O372.OO
3l2E.OO150.OO40.50
530.2524.50
(ql0.25)13.OO
o.ooo.oo0.ooo.ooo.ooo.oo
35.OO(1O.OO)
o.ooo.oo
+t.qo0.00
olt,o00.00o.oo
3 8,1oO.OO
3 2,ooo.oo2,OOO.O0
000.00&50.00
1rooo.0o1,40O.0O
750.OO500.0o
1,70O.O01,ooo.oo
800.0o3,500.00
400.00900.00
1r000,00sl8,ooo.oo
3 2,OoO.OO2,OoO.OO
600.004no.00
1,ooo.0o1,40O.OO
750,OO500.oo
l,7oo.oo1,O0O.OO
800.0o3,500.0o
400.0o900.00
I,00o.oo
t 2,ooo.oo2,009.0O
o00.004!to.oo
IrOOO.OO1,4OC,OO
785.OO490.00
1,7Oo.OO.1 ,OOO.OO
845.O03r500,OO
405.00900.00
I,O0O.OO
Total costApplled factory overhoad
(S14.5O rate x 1,880 actual hours)...,-......,.......ldle capaclty varlancc
Actual tactory overhead cost..........Applied factory ovsrhead..Un derapplled factory ove rh ead
Spendlng var ianceldla capacity variancc
Underapplied factory ove fi ead
stS,ooo.oo $18,135.00
$2O,loo.og s26,370.00 9p'o5o.o9
28,g7O.OO
@f"".s27,059,0O
2g,97O.OO
9__-_@3 689.00 unfav.
(800.0o) fav.
3 89 .00
3689.0O
untav.
' l
Chaptar 17
P17-6 '
(T} ONE MONTH FLDOBLE BUDGET FOR ASSEMBLY DEPARTMENT
435
1,5OO 1,650Iga% yo%
$ 3r375.OO $ 3,712,50l ,goo.oo 1,ggo.0o
525.OO 577.50750.00 825.00525.OO 577,50225.OO 247.5A300.oo 330.OO
_--S 7,5oo.oo $ 8r25o.oo
Ooeratino levefBased on direst labor hoursPelcentage of capacity.......
Variable cost:Indirect laborFagtory supp11es..................POWOi . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . r r . . . r . . . . . r . r . r
Rgwork operations..............Payoll targs ......................rRepair and maintenance.....Ggngral factory r...........r......
Total variabl g Gost...........
Fixed cost:Indirect labor ...................r..Supervisioll ............r............Factory guppll gs......D...or......POWer.....r.......r.rr.r...............
Rgwork o p g rations ............,.PayrOll targs r..............r.......Repair and maintenance.....Propefi insurance..............Propgrty taxes.....,.....o.........Va cation p8|....................r...Employee pension costs.....Employee health p131t..........Machinery depreciation ......Water an d h gat..............,..r..Building occupancy....r........Ggn gral factory ........o..........
Total fixgd cost.,......r.,.....
$ 6,000.00
lr2OO_80%
$ 2rzoo.oo1,44O.0O
420.0Ogoo.00420,OO180.OO240.00
lr35O
_90%
$ 3r037.5OITO2O.OO
472.50675.OO472.50202.50270.OO
$ o,z5o.oo
$ 2,5OO.OOlrSoo.oo
500.oo150.OO600.oo
ITOOO.OO350.OO150.OO200.oo
lr8OO,OO1'20O.OO
500.oo450.0O400.oo900.oo
IrO00.oo
s 2,500.001,80O.0O
500.00150.00600.00
I,OOO.0O350.0O150.00200.0o
l'8OO.OO11200,00
500,00450.00400.0o900.00
ITOOO.OO
s 2,5OO.OO1,8OO.OO
500.0o150.00.600.oo
ITOOO.OO350.OO150.0O200.0o
lr8OO.OOl,2oo.oo
500.oo450,00400.oogoo.oo
I,OOO.O0
$13r50O.0o
$ 2,5oo.oo1,8OO.OO
500.o0150.OO600.oo
ITOOO.0O350.OO150.OO200.00
1,goo.o01r2OO.O0
500.oo450.oo400.oogoo.oo
lr0oo.oosl3,5OO.OO $l3,5oO.OO $13,5O0.0o-
$21'75O.OOTotal cost.......r............r....r.. slgr500.oo $eor2so.oo s2lrogo.oo
16
I
P17-O (Concludedf
t2l
Bs$d on dlnct hborhourr *Prrccntagr of cePaclU F@n
Verleblc cosi:hdlrrct bborFecloty stppllclPowrrRcwort opcraUonrffiForuPlyroll tarcr ...-o.Hffi6...o.d
Repalr rnd nulnteflttlcl --*--Oencrel tactory ---...*.E.--.-
Totel varlrblc @tt ..-.'...D...s
ASSEMBLY DEPARTMENTVarlance RePort
For the Month Ending August 31r 20-
Budgct BudgotAllowancr Atlowencr
Norrnel ActualCapacltil CaPecltY
ActuelCod
Chapter 17
SpendlngVarirncr
unfev.tfavJ
t 0,750.00 3 6,450.00
tFsO90.t
3 3,Oil75OIrO2o,OO
172.5O675.0O172,4O202-50tlo.oo
t 2'5OO.OOlBo0,oo
500,ool50,ooooo.oo
I,OOO.OO3rio,o0l50.oo200.00
l18OO.OO1300.00
9o0.00450.00400.00000.00
t,ooo.oo
lr2,�080%
t aoo2-5o1r5a&oo
45150o45.OO41t1.50103'50258.0O
t 2,5OO,OOlpoo.oo
500,o0150.00oo0.co
I,OOo.oo3:io.00150.00200.0o
1BOO.O01300.00
500.00450.00400.00900.oo
I,OOO,0O
3 srso.oo1,6!t+OO
405.OO4€a,3rtalt150
1,173.753a5,OO
3 7,800.50
3 2,5OO.OOI,aoo.o0
500.o0130.00ooo.oo
1,o0o.oo3:to.oo1s5.OO21050
2120O.OO1300.00
500.004llo.00a65.00000.00
I,OOO.0O
3a7.50100.0013.50
(150.751o.oo
982.25127.OO
o.ooo.ooo,ooo.oo0,ooo.oo0.oo
15.0010.50
400,0o0.00o.oo0.oo
05.oo
Fhed coaElndlrcct
Factory ruppllcrPowcrReworl opcratlonr-offi-.-.ffiPapoll terarRepalr end malntenlnc!...,......-Propcrty lnlurancc -tr*-ffiPropcrty t-rcr,..-*VacaUon patEmployco pcndon oortt -**Employcr hcrlth phn *.*.-Machlncry dcproclatlotr -o--*Watcr rnd hoetBulfdlng occuprnqyOencrel factory
Totel lhcd cod tl3,50o.ooTotal cst, tt20,250.00Appllcd factory ovcrhred
Fl5.00 retr r 1'290 rctuel houn),.-...,......,-...ldlc capaclty varlrncr..-ActrtI tectory ovrrhud eort...-....,Appl led factory ovcrhcrd...Undonppllcd fectory ovrrhcedSOondlng varlanctldlo capeclty verlancr
o.oo0.oo
Itt3,5OO.oo 313,090.50
319,950.00 321,800.00
19,3!10,00
3 OOO.0O unfav.
321,89O,OO19,35O.0O
3 2 ,510,00
3 1,910'OO unfav.OoO.O0 unfav.
3 2,51O.O0
t1,010,09_unfav.
Undcrappllcd fectory ovc
Chapter 17 43t7
c17-1
' QASES
(f l The factors that influence the behavior of the production managers,described in the case, conflict with the factors that motivate the mainte-nance managens" The production managens have been given a monetaryincentive to improve the costs in their own departments. They requirethe support of the other departments, (e.9., Storrrcom and Maintenance|to achieve their objective; but the incentives (monetary and otherwise)have not changed in the other departments.
To lmprove their costs and earn the incentives, the pmduction man-sgonr have postponed repairs; demanded emergency repairs more fre-quently than in the past demanded repair work be done mone quickly toreduce downtime; demanded special treatment in some cases; pfacedundue pressunes on maintenance manageni; and complained about themaintenance charges.
The results of the demands by the production managans conflictwith the following tactors, which appear to be important io the mainte-nanca managens and reflect on their performance: good relations withother managens; high quality repair work, inctuding making machinerysafe and maintaining its normal life; and orderly work schiduting.
(21 lf monetary incentives to the pmduction managens are to be continued,complaints and conflicts could be reduced by revising the charging sys-tem as follows: develop predetermined hourly charging rates for eachskill level within the Maintenance Department; Oertloi predetermined orbudgeted hours for routine or repetitive maintenance work; develop bud-geted costs for parts and materials; use maintenance job time cards thatare initialed by production managers when the job is done; and develop apenalty rate to be charged to those production man"g"o ;rho need quicfservice that could have been avoided by timely maint-enancs schedut'ing.
lncreased productivity and reduced conflicts between managensprobably could be more effectively achieved by revising the renrard andevaluation structure. Evaluations lnd rewards tor indiv'idual effortsshould be eliminated, and cooperation and continuous imfrovementshould be encouraged and tewarded. High rejection rates and internalconflict suggest that far moro is wrong wittr ttre current "yit"- than justthe charging rates.
KB
c17-2
(11
Chaptor l7
Various alternative answerE may bo considered acceptable dependingupon the lustifications given and top managementb reacUons to anyresutgng wriances. The main objective ig to ensure that the costs areallocated to the aneas that ara rasponsible for the incurrenco of thecosts.(al $8,OOO cost of idle time in the Assembly Department-This should
be charged to the Machining Department because it is a directresult ol their decision to change production schedules. By chargingMachining with this cost, they beeome awano of the overall effectsof scheduting changes and the overalt cost to the company of theirdecision. Some justificaUon could be given to charging $3OO of thisto the Purchasing Department becauss.that would have been theadded cost to the company if the schedule had not been changedand it is a direct result of the Purchasing Depaftmentb decision togo with a new supplier.
(bl $1,OOO savings in costs due to layoffs in Machining Department-This should be credited to the Machining Department because it isa direct result of their decision to lay off machinists'
(c) S1,5OO cost of training in the Machining Department-This shouldbe charged to the Machining Department because it is a directresult of their decision to lay off machinists who must be subse-quently replaced, This would ensuno that they ane aware of the totaleffegt of their decision on the overall company instead of iust theirown department.
(d) S2OTOOO lost profit on sales resulting from Assembly Depaftmentdowntime-This ls an opportunity cost that is not normally recog'nized in the accounting records and, therefore, would not becharged to any departmenl In evaluating the Assembly Department'consideration should be given to the shutdown that occurred in theMachining Department and its effects on the output of the AssemblyDepartment,
Overall, the companyb present budget and leward (bonus) system wouldappear to be causing a fack of goal congruence, poor communicationtand an overatl employee dissatisfaction caused, in whole or in part' bythe following:(a) The company does not appear to be following the basic concepts of
responsibility accountlng and reporting (as evidenced in (1)). Thecompany should try to ensune that the responsibility for a cost isdirectly retated to the authority to control the cost in order to estab-lish a fair evaluation system.
(b) The company appears to have a "budget-constrained" style of eval-uaUon, in that all managers seem to have their prime concernfocused on meeting their budget regardless of tho overall effect onthe company. A sprofit-conscious" style would be more appropriatot
(21
Clppter 17 Ag
Cl7-2 (Concluded)
whery a -manager would feel free to exceed his budget if it wouldbenefit the overall company {without fear of aoreoJlv affectinghis/her evaluation). For example, Winston woutd have been preparedto have the added cost of air freight charged to hirs oepartment,resulting In a considerable cost savings to the overal company(el The companyb present renrard system of giving uonuses based on amanagerb ability to meet budget tends to ptaci ioo mucrr emphasison the short-term, to the possibte detriment of thelong_term.Managers are making decisions to ensuno their bonuses instead ofmaximizing the overarf ggrpany objective". An "-,,.,pr" of thismight be the decision-of Valquez tolay off workers tJsave $l,ooo inthis period and, therefore, gat the bonus, evsn though output wasreduced. This action wourd rssuft in adaed "o=t" ;ili,5oo toreplace the workens in the next period.
(dl Generaily, an ail or nothing bonus "y"i". such as this is a poormotivator, because too much emphisis is praced on meeting thebudget' This may lead to a lack oi goal congruence as evidenced inthis case-manipulation of the dati to meet the budget in one par-ticular period and/or overatl employee frustratio;;;;1, their inabit-ity to meet unreatistic budgets. '
(el The companyb overalf attitude seems to be that yariances frombudget represent poor performance by the ,"n"g"r;-This courdlead to serious motivational and Inot"i" problems with the staff.Emphasis should be ptaced on the raci tirat variances are onlyattention directors and indicate the need to invesiig"t; why thingswere different frcm expected. The variances may indicate that thooriginar budget uras wrong and shourd be up_dated (for exampre, theprice of part # 88 would appear to be unrealistic), that overalt com-pany objectives and/or procedures need to be ";;;;a or thatthings hava happened that are oifterent from ext;;ilbut beyondthe control of anyone within tfr" org"iLtiorr.(0 The company woutd appear to be u-sing a static budget for its evalu-ations, as evidenc-ed by the fact ttraivitquez and Diron receivedtheir bo-nuses for being under ilteiioriginal budgeted costs for theperiod' ft is also evidenced by the ractirrat Wnston had an annuatrimit to the amount of air freiiht costsattoweo instead of anailowance based on the totar purcrrases made in the period.Evaruations shourd be based.il r ""ip"ri"on of actuar resurts anderpected p.sults using a fterible uuog;t, based on actual levels ofactivity achieved' Thi; is to isolat"-trtll"riances caused by efficien-cies/inefficiencies as op.posg{ to ttrose caused by a change in vor_ume of activity from that whict'"r"i o-riginariy;#;i";
440
c17-3
(11
Chapter 17
I
(al Danielb perception of scott, the controlle4 is that she is:(i) an accountant who knows and cares little about the production
aspects ol organization;(21 unsympathetic and not helpful in providing sertices to the pro'
duction dePartments;(3! an accountant who is unwilling to change or nequest executivemanagement to make changes in reporting requirements.
(b) DaniePs perception of corporate headquarters is that it is:(11 unfair beciuse they are using the cost report as the sole-iudgeof performance, thereby ignoring monE realistic cost comparisons'product quality, employee pride, and motivation;iZ1 ins"niitiue io the needs and concerns of production people;
igi resistant to change in reporting policies and budgetary pnocess'
es,(c) Daniel's perception of the cost report is that it is:
(il a shortsighted report overemphasizing cost minimization as a
singfe obiectivei(21 lnflexible and not subject to the changing production levels andoperating conditions of a dynamic production process;
til a biaied repoft highlighting shortcomings and failing to givepnoper recogniiion to lmplovements in performance or innovativepnocesses.
(dl Daniel's perception of himself is that he is a:(il qualii ied production manager interested in a quality product at areasonable price;(2! frustrated manager unable to get satisfactory cooperation fromthe Accounting Department or executive management;(3) discour"gJd production manager recognizing that the currentreporting situation is nearly hopeless, and that others before himhave been equallY unsuccessful.
(21 Danielts perceptions adversely affect his behavior and performance as aproduction manager. Operating in a ttno wintt situation in which hebelieves performance neports do not fairly represent his accomplish-ments, pius the inability to communicate his desires or needs to appro-priate people in top management, can inhibit motivational desires andcurtail incentive.
(3) Ghanges that could be made in the cost reports that would make theinlormation mons meaningful and less threatening to the productionmanageni are as follows:(a) Include a mone detailed breakdown of labor and overhead costs.(b) Use a budget allowance based on actual activity rather than a static
master bulget for measuring performance' so that changed condi-tions, volunie changes, and fixed versus variable costs are recog-
nized in the rePorting Process'
-
ChWter 17
Cl7-3,(Concluded)
cl7-4
lUl
(cl
(d)
Separate controllable costs from noncontrollable costs and clearlyidentify those erements or the report for whicrr the production-man-ager is diresily nesponsibte. Tlrese actions wiii p-ride a morsmeaningful anarysis or operations and manago; wil kn;;Lsponsi_bilities.A variance column that highlights both favorable and unfavorabrecircumstances would provide a less negauve report. significantvariances could be hightighted to drawlftention to them.
(11 Functional_anddysfunctionalbehavioralnesponses:(al Delaying action on certain reports during pttioo" of peak activitycould be dysfunstional. lf the reports contain information requiri-ngimmediate attention' any delay in action woulJ h;r; tr be dysfunc-tional. lf the reports continue io accumulate with no action takingplace (i.e., the department heads do not catch up during the tulls),this definitely is dysfunctionat behavior.(bl Having too many reports so that no action or the wnong action istaken is a dysfunctional nesponse and a gooo eia;;i" of informa-tion o.verloqd. The department heads were unable to assimilate thesupplied information pnoperly, and therefore ttreyeiitrer did not useit, or used it incorecily.(c) Delaying action untit reminded by someone can be dysfunctionat. lf
9"!")rs continuafly take place "nJ re"ult in complications and/ordelays in other departments, this tack of action is dystunctional.(d) The department heads' actions ""n u" considered both functionaland dysfunctionat. The development of information f;m alternativeaourrcss is dYsfunctionaf to the firm because the formal system isnot producing the information in a usable form ano irtl process ofdeveroping information from other "our"", probabry has a cost.However, the fact that the departmeni tr""o ,r"" "dl" io generatethe needed information from other "our""" in order that actioncourd be taken is a functionat nesponse to the probrem.
ra
I
\
Chapter t7
I
C17-4 (Goncluded)
l1l The dysfunctlonal behavior that occurred In McCumber Company was a
dlrect rcsult of management's lailure to recognize that inlormation sys-
tems "r" Jyn"mic. Once a system is designed and lmplemented' it
should be iontinually rcviewed to acknowledge and incorporate any
changes.-A "y"i";situCy committeo' c-omposed of bolh systems staff
and users, siiould Ue estatrtished to reYiew the present system and to
educate ui"rs as to Information needs and the uses of information.
During U," systems review, the committeeb attention should be directed
toward informagon needei by department heads and the information's
form and timing. Unnecessary reports ghould be eliminated, and individ-
ual reports sno-utO be rsdesigned- so tlrat only relevant information is
included. once the reporting system is rovised, the systgm should be
reviewed periodically to seJttrat it is functioning smoothly and to make
any necessarY corections.
Ol&1. Standard clr ar. thr predetermhed coet! ofrnelru{ac{uring prodrdr durhg a specifb pod-od mdcr cunonl or anthipded opcrathg cr-dtkrrr. Stsndardr airJ in phrning and wrtrol-lirp opcntims.
Q1&2. A ftw uscr cil etgrdard catr are:(r) oatablirhhgbrrdgntt(b) conlrclling coetr by nrotivating .rnploy-
oot and rnrarurhg rtfpbncier(c) rirplityhg coting preeduroo and epc.
diilhg cod roportr(d) aaaigning cortr lo materials, work in
proc.sr, and finklhrd god inventqicr(r) forming the barir lor ostablishing con-
lrecl bidr and for retthg saler prbesOt&3. To tol rabr pricct, exccutives need cogt hfor-
malion lumished by tho accounting depart-rnont Sinct $ardard cod! repr$€nt the ostthat shorrld bc a&ained h a weil-nanaged plantoporalrd al nollral capacity, thcy arr ideallycuitrd lor fumishing hfonnati:n that will enablclhr aalor depaimont to prbc products.
Eudgetr are urcd for planning and coordi-nalhg lulurc activitics and tor curlrolling cur-rrnl rliviticr. ttlhcn budget figurec erc bagedqr rtendad c€lq the aocuracy ol lho resultingbrrdgct i! strwrgly hfluenced by the retiability Jtho rtandard costc. With standards avaihLb,prodtrction figurer can be translated into themanufacturhg costr"
Q18-4. Sbrdards are m htegral pE t of irb order andproce$ co3l accumulation, but do nol com-pdr a lydom that ouH b. utilized h licu ofsro of lhc accumulaftxr rnothoclr. C,ets rnaybe r.cumuhtcd wilh or without thc use d stan-ct rdr.
Q1&5. Critcria to bc used wtron rolecthg thc opera-lirnal activitiea lor which rtEndar& are lo berrl includc thc fdbrrhg:(e) Thr activity should be repetit ive in
nalur., with thr repetition occurring inreldively short qrcles.
(b) The hpd-and output (product or rervice)of thc aclivily shoub be measurabte andunilonn
(c) Tho obmonlt ol coal, ruch as direclmeltriab, d,act labor, snd facto.y orer-hoa4 mud b. dsthed cfoarly at the unitlovol of act vity.
Qt8-8. Norrtel or currntly attainablo standards arcproforablo to th.oretbal or Ueal siandafdr for(a) porformancc rvalualion and/or emptoyeernolivation, qn!, (b) budgeting and ptanning.Thoorctirl or Ueal ctan&rds-are nol realisti-cllly attainabtr. Ar a con3oquenc. of using
CHAPTER 18Dlscusstoil QUEST|ONS
rucfr standards, employees rnay bocanr dir.couragcd ralher lhan rrolivated, and budgetror pbns arr likely to be distodod end unroli-abL,
Qt&7. Behavinral bsuer lhat need b br cqrsUendwfien selec.ling tho level of portorrnsnc. to b.ircorporated into ctandards inctudo tho fdl*,hg:(a) Thc standards musl bo fcgitimatc. Tho
atandads noed not rellect thr actual coglol a ahgb ilem or o7clo. Fbrrew?, lhcyiteally will repraent the coci bst thouldbo incuncd in the productbn of a gironprodugt or the perlorrrlance ol a jivenoperatian.
(b) The standardr musl be attainable. tt/trcnthe atandards arc set too h igh, thcropealod failure to chievc them wilt tondlo reduca thc rrotivatbn lor attahment.Thc cqrvenr b sbo trur. Standadr h8taro loo looro represonl an invitatiqr torelar.
(c) The participant shoutd havc d voice orinfluencr in the establirhment of rlan-derda and reeulting pedormancr mea-sures. Innolvement in the formutatbn otstandards gives the participant a gmalorsense ol understanding and commil-ment.
Q18-8. (a) The role of the accounting department inlhe establ ishment of s tandards ia todetermine their ability to be quantifiedand lo provide dollar valuee for ryecificunil standards.
(b) In the establishment of ctandards. thtlole of the depariment in wtrbh thc pcr-formance is being mearured ir to prwidohformatim lor realistic dandards, and toalbw tor subsequent perfonnance evalu-atkrn lor the purposc of delecthg prob-lems and irprwhg perfomance.
(c) The role ol the industrial engineering. department h thc estsblishment of ctan-
darde b to provide reliable nreasurer c,phyaical activitieg related lo thc rtan-dardr ol performance, and lo vcrity thoconsirterry of the pertomancr botwcondepartrnents.
Q1&9. Thr factory overhead variablo etficiorrcy varFanco b ! ,nea3ur. of tho efficient or ineflbirntuac ol lhe tase. thet wac used in allocatingfectory overhead to production. To thc crnontthat the activity used as an allocatircn basodriver variable lactory overhead, lhc variabloefliciency varisncc is a mearurc oil tho cort
/t43
444
savings or cost ircJnence that is attributable to
tho etlicieot or hefficient uso cl lhal acfivity'
01&10. Thr factory overhead spending variance ir a
mealurr cl the ctficient or inefficient use of the
varbur itsns of tsctory ovefiead ll ir caused
by dilfcrmcea in thc prices paiJ lor thc itens cf
ovcrhcad actually used (i.c., lhr differences
between tho ac'tual quantity at thc aclual prbe
and the sctual quantity at the standard prico for
all ilomr ol lactory. overhead) and lhe ditf er'
encee h the quantities ol the varbus ilerru oftactory ovefiead adually used (i.e.' the difler'ences between the standard quantity allorvedfor the actual level of the aclivity base at the
etandatd price and the actual quanlity used atthr gtandard price lor all items ol lactory over'head).
01&11. The factory overhead volumc variance is ameasute ol the under' or over'utilizalion ofpbnt failitier' lt it tho diflererre between thetotal budgeted lixed factory overhead and theamounl charged to (or chargeable to) aclualproduction based on the standard quantilyallowed for thc activity base used lo allocateoverhead. Thc volume vat iance may oothought of as ttle emount cl under' or ov€raP'plied budgeted fixed lactory overhead.
01&12. Atter variances have been dEtermined' rnar:'agemenl should:(a) decide whether each variance ig suffi '
ciently signilicant to require invesligationand explanaliro
(b) hvettigate and obtain, frorn the resPo.r-sible department head, explanations ofsignilicant variances
(c) take coneclive acticn and recognize andreward desirable performance, whsro
(d)
018-13. (a)
spproprialerevise standards if neededFeatures ol lolerance limils include:(' l) A standard cost control syslem isestablished, specilying exPocted perfor-rnance levels.(2) An hforrnation syslem is designed lohighlight the areas most in need ol hves'tigntkrn and poesible coneslivc action.(3) Variancc rangos for areas and ilemsare compuled. Managemenl does notspend tirne on parts of the operationsthal producr satislactory pcrlormanceleveb wilhh theso ranges.(4) lvlanagemenl's Ettenlion and etlodsarr csrcentraled on signifi-nt variancecfrorn expccted resuhs. which sigoal theprosonca of unplanned condilions need-ing investigalion.
(b) Tolerance limils have potenlial benefitsbecause they may resuh in more eftec'live use ol management time. Thc rnan'
Chapter l8
age/s tirne b not wetod on lho prcestol kJentilying important problems or inworkhg m unirnPottant ones. Thc man'ager should bo able lo concenlratbetforls on inPottant problems' becauscthe teclnkPc highlightr lhern.
(c) lt may br difficult to determine whichvariancor ere rigrrilicant. Also. by focus'ing on varianceg abovc a cadain level,other sscful hformatbn, suclr as trends'rnay not be notbed at atl oatly stago.
ll thc evaluatbn lYltrn b h anY waYdircctly tied to thc variances, subordi-nals! ttlsy be ternpled lo cover up n€$a'tive exceptbns or not tePort lhem al all.Jn addilirn, subodinatea tnay not receivote infotcam€nt for tho reducl ion andrnahtenance cf coat leveLg, but only rep'rimands tor those itemc which exceedthe range. Subordinate morale rnay sut'fer because of the lack ol Positive reh'lorcemenl for work well done. Using toFerance limits rnay also atfest supervisoryemgloyeer in an unsatislactory m'vlner'Supervisors may feel that lhey ars nolgetthg a cornplete review of operalionsbecause they are always keying on prcb-lems. ln addiliqt, superisors may thinkthat they are excessively critical of theirsubordinales. A negat ive impact onsupervisorY rnorale rnaY resuh.
01&14. Overemphasis on prico variances can resull in
a large number of lorr cast vendors, high levelsof invenlory, and poor quality materials andparts. Since lhe emphasig is on price ratherthan quslity or reliability, purchasing will likelyhave a large number ol bw cct vendors avaiF
. able, who can be played cre against the other
to got the lowest pqssible prices. ln addition'purchasing wil l l ikely purchase invenlory in
largo quantities to take advantage ol purchase
discounls and to redwe the need to place rushorders that resull in premium prices. Inventorytends to becorne unnecessarily large, resultingin excessive €rryhg costs, and rnaterial qualF
ty tends to decline, resulting in poor produclquality andor excessive spoitage, scrap, andrework
Overemphasis on efticiency variances canreault in long production rung, largc work inptocoss inventories, and attemptr to controlquality through hspestbn alone. Long produc'tion runr reguire lewer mschino set ups andreduce tho amounl ol inelficiency resultingfrorn thc leaming tequired to changc produc'tion lrorn one product to snother. Large work inptocoss inventorier resull frgn bng prodrrclionruns, and large invenlorieg are l ikely to beviewed by department managors as buftero
Clppter 18
thet ern bo utod to rbrorb rnschino broak-rdownr, rmployrt ebrrnlorism, end rlackdemand for thr product. Atthough carryinghrge hvernori.. b €3ty, thr carryhg sn donot affri thr offbienqy yariansf, whi*r in tumoncourlgor d.plrtmantrl rnrnagrn to ovrr-producr. Shco offlcioncy variencot meerur.lho utr cJ inRlr h nhtixr to ouput volum,rtto.tr b sttrol Crrsfrty l.nd to bo orisrtd to
45
intprctbn elone. Stopping lho procorr lrrrprrinrnl wlh allemdivc prodrrtbn nrethoc!.lo pormanen0y conect a problem or improv,,Cualty can rccult h an unlarorable labor rfficbncy v8rianc.. In cqrtrast, increasing tht vol.umr of prodrstbn and rrrodrhg or di*ardingdotccb har e rnaller inpact sr rtrr cttbiencivarianca.
El8'l
Aetual materlals Purchasodat aCtual OOSI """"r""""'
Actual matarials Pur'chassdat standald cogt""""'o""
Materiatg Punchasc PriccYariancc
Actual matariala used 8tactual cost
Astual materialg usod atstandard GoSt """""""""
Materials Prico usagoVafianCO ...."t"tttt"ot"tttt"'
Actual materiat3 usod 8tstandard |ElO8t..."""""""'
Standard quantltY allowedat standald cogt.'.....o"""
El8-2
Actuat materiab Purchasadat actual ClOSt ..'.....-.'.....'.
Actual materials Purchg$orlat standald coSt......'t'....'
Materials purchaso Pricovariance .r........r..r............
Unlt Cost =
$13'4{ actual
13.5O standard
Ll.ogi
Unlt Cost =
$13.41 actual
13.5O standard
9l.oe)
Unit Cost =
$13'50 standard
13.5O standard13.5O standard
Unit Gost =
522.10 actual
22.50 standard
$__J.49)
Unlt Cost =
$22.50 standard
22.50 standard22.50 standard
Chapter 18
Amount
$60,345
60,750
S (4O5) fav.:
Amount
553,640
54.OOO
S (36O) fav.
Amount
s54,OOO
51,3003 2.7OO unfav.
Amount
${ 1o,5oo
I12.500
S (2.00O) fav.
Amount
$112,5OO
99.OOO:B 13.5oo unfaY.
pGBClsES
-a
QuantlW
{,5OO lbc;
4,5OO
4r5OO
Quantltv
4'OOO lbg.
4rOOO
4,OOO
QuanUtv
i,o6o lbs.
3.800Materials quanUty variancc -2AO. lbs'
Quantltv
5,OOO
5,OOO
5rOOO
QugnUtYActual nnaterlals purchased
at standard cost.,.,...or..-. 6,000Actual materialg lssued at
standard cost..,,....,.o...r.., 4.4OOMaterials inventory yariancc __q99
Clppter 18
El8-2" (Conctudedl
Aetuaf materials issued atstandard CoSt .....,...r........
Standard quantity ofmaterlals at standardGOSt aa...aa..........r..o............
Materials guanUty varlanoo
Et8..?
(rtAstual materials purchased
at actual Cost..................Actuaf materials purchased
at standald cost........r.....Materials punchaso price
YafianCO ..rr....r.................
Astuaf materials used atgtandard Gost ......r....ro.....
Standard guantity allowedat standatd cost...........r....
Materials quantity variance(21Materials beginning_ inventOt]f .........................Materials punchasod during
If|O11th...................r..........
Materials avallable for use..Materiafs lssued to
Unit Cost =
$22.50 standard
22,50 standard22.50 standard
Quantitv
4r4OO
Quantitv
6,OOO
6rOOO
6,OOO
Quantitv
Trloo
6.9o0200
Quantitv
2rOOO
I,O00I,OOO
Quantitv
7rl OO
Trloo
7rl OO
Unit Cost =
$4,2O actuaf
4.OO standard
$ .2o
x Unit Cost =
94.OO standard
4.OO standard4,OO standard
x Unft Cost =
$4.12 actual
4.2O actual4.f B average
4.18 avor:lgo4.18 averago
r Unit Gost =
$4.18 average
4.OO standard
_Lli2oo unfav.
unfav.
4.300_t_99
Amount
$99,OOO
447
unfav.96,750
l-3e9
Amount
$25,2OO
24,OOO
produCtiOr1....................... 7rf OOMaterials ending inventory Too
Amount
$28,4OO
27.600g__e99
Amount
$ 8,240
25.200s?3,44O
29.679_$_9,762
Aetual materiats used at- actual averago cost........actual materials used at
stan dard GGISI ................r.Materials price usago
varlanca ......o.......
Amount
$29,678
28..400
$ . 1 8 -$_ff78 unfav.
Chaptar 18
El8€ (Concludedl
(31Materials beginning
inventory .t"t""t"'rtt"tttt"'
Materials Purchased duringmOnth . . . t t t t t " t t " t " " t "o t t t t t "
Materials available tor use"Materials issued to
pfOdUCUOfl."t"t""""""""
Materials ending inventorY
Actual materials used atactUal GOSI """"""""t""'
Astual materials ussd atstandard cost.........."'r"ot
Materials Prico usagoYaf ianCO .r . . t " " t t " " 'Dt t t t " t t '
(41Materials beginning
inventoqlMaterials Punchased during
mOnth . . t . . . . " t t t t " t " " " o " t t " '
Materials available lor uss.'Materials issued to
production
Materiats ending inventorY .
Actual materials used ataCtUal COSI ......... '......... '.r
Actual materials used atstandard GoSt.......r..........
Materials price usagovarianCg . . . . . r . . . . r . . .
Unit Cost =
9.12 actual
4.20 actual
4.12 oldest4.29 nowost4.2O newest
Unit Gost =
$4.12 oldest4.2O newest
4,OO standard
Unit Cost =
$4.12 actual
4.2O actual
4.20 newgst4.12 oldest4,12 oldest
Unit Cost =
$4.20 nswest4.12 oldest
4.OO standard
Amount
$ 8,24021.420
$29,66O
28.400
l-11260 unfa%
Amount
$ 8,240
25.200$33,44O
25r2OO4.532
S 3,708. -
Amount
$25,2O04,532
329,732
28'40�0
3 1,332 unfav.r
QuantiW
210oo
Amount
$ 8,240
25,260�$33,44O
8r24O21,420
6,0008rO0o
2rOOO5.100
_900
Quantitv
2rO0O5.1ooTr loo
7,10O
Quantitv
2,0oo
It.ooo8r0oo
6t0oo1 .100_900
QuantiW
6,000t � l o oTrl oo
Tr loo
-
dlg.ptcr rs
Et8:{
Aetual tabor hours rvorkod..Actuaf labor hours work6d,.Labor rate varialtco.............
Aetual labor hours workod..Standald hours allowed
(lr2OO unlts r1l2 hour1abOrf ...r....ror...............o....
Labor efflclency varlancc...,
Et8-5
(11Actual materials purchasedActual materlals purchasedMaterlals purchase prtce
Vafia nCg .r........D...............
Agtual materlals used ........rActuat materlats used,..r,....Materfafs prica usage
Vaf ianCO . . .o . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . .
Actual materials used .........Standard quanilty allowed ..Materlafs guanUty yariance
Rstc =$ 9,8O 8ctu8llO.OO stsndard
qj.2qt
, Rate =$t o.oo standard
lO.O0 standard|O,OO gtendald
Unlt Cost =$3.8O actual
4.OO standard
-Unlt Cost =$3.8O actuat4.OO-Etandard
r Unlt Cost =$4.Oo standard4.OO standard
1.OO standard
x Rate =$12.20 actual
1z.oo standard$ .20
r Rate =$12.0O standard
72.OO standard72.OO standard
Houn650650650
Hourr650
600
Amount$51370
6.500S (i3o) fav.
Amount$6,5oo
I,OOO
Amounts5,7OOo.ooo
l-(3OQl fav.
Amount$5,1305.400
50 $ 5OO unfav.
Quantltvl,5oolr5OO
1,5OO
Quantity1,35O'1,35O
1,350
Quantltv1,35OI,O20
_930
Hours3 lo
340(301
$ (.2o1
$ r.201
I2l HounsAstual labor hours workod..
-Tio-
Actual labor hourc workod.. 3rOLaborrate variallcrg............. 3lO
l$uqt fabor hours worked..Standard labor houre
allowed...r,.....labor "rri;;;;#il::.:
$_EZO fauAmount$5,4OO
4,Ogo$!,329 unfav.
Amount$3,782
3.720
$_0? .unfav.
Amountq?,72O
119
4,OgO$ (geQ) tav.
150Chaptcr 18
E18-6$166,000
Actu a l la gto ry ove dl ea d "" " " """' -'-':: ::;':'::: :: ^ -
" "" " " "'
ililari-o""?rt " " d. chare eab I e to :"Y:1 tP1.::17iil,ffir-"t-"i;;ffip ; ."."d r 312.5o overhead rate).. 137.500-
S 28,5OO unfav.o"Lraff factory ovefi ead varianco """ t a a o a a a a o a a a
Volume variance a o a a a a a r a a a . a a " t " " " o " t " " '
controllablg varianc9...."""""""""" """"""'r"""o'o
volumg variance ......""""""""""o' "" 'r""""""""""
Overatl factory ovefiead variance
s166,OOOACtUal taCtOfy OVgfh gad ..........t.......""""'o't"""""'!"""t"""'
Budget allowancJ Uased on standard hours allowed:--v;;;tle overhead (11'ooo standard machine
hours attowedi'sn.so variable ovefiead rate) s49'5OO
Fi;;;;;;rreal ruageted """""""""""""""' 96'000
COntfOltablg Vaf ianC1O... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . . . .o. . . . . . """""""""" '
Budget atlowance based on standard hours allowed
( f fOm abOVe) . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . . . . . . . . " " " " " " t " "o" " 'o " t " " to " '
Sta nda rd factow o"e rhead chargeabt^" !o g"duction(t I rooo standard hours ailow;o r sl2.5O overhead rat6)'.
VOlUmg Va f i anCg r r o r ro ro ro rL ro . . . . o . . . r o t . . . " . " t " " " " o t " " " " t t " t t " " o "oo '
COntfOllablg VafianC8.......................""""o $20t5OO UnfaV'
volumg yariance............................!o...'r..... 8.ooo unfav'
orrerall factoly ovefiead variance """"o"r 128'5oo unfav'
Et8-7
ACIUal f aCtOfy O.Vefh gad o.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " " " " """o""""""""r"
CianOarO overhead chargeabte to actual producUon- iS,ZOO standard hours allowed x822 overhead rate)""""'
Ove ra tt. f actory overhe ad variance """"' ""'t""""""'
Agtual factory overhgad """"""" """""""o""""""'
Budget allowance based on standard hours:variable o""ttt"iJis,zoo standard hours r 36) 33!'?99Fixgd ovgrhgad """""""""""o""""""""""""
90t0OO
GOntfOllable VafianC18.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .""""""""" '
Budget allowance based on standard hours( f fOm abOVe). . . r . . . . . . i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . r . . . . . . . . .or . . . . . . . . . . " " " " "
Standard tactory overneaO chargeable to production( l fOm abOVe) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " " t " " t " t " 'oo t '
145.500S 2O.5OO unfav._
s145,5OO
137.500
-t 8.OOO unfav.
$13O,OOO
125.400S 4.600 unfav'
r
$13O,OOO
s130,20o
t 25.4003 4.8OO unfav._
$ (2oo| fau4.8OO unfav.
-$-:!J99 unfav'
v
130.200
Ctnpter 18
Elg-g ,
Overafl factory ovorhsad variance
Actual factory ovgrhgad ..'.........o..........t.o............,....o..o.........Budgat allowance based on actual machine hours:
Variable overhead (41600 actual machine
t*51
Agtual factory ovgrhgad ...-...........-...rD.....................--...........standard overhead chargeabre to actual producuon
(4r2OO gtandard hours aflowed r $2{,gb overhead rate}....
s l2l ,OOO
l04.l go
hours r $5.8O variable overhead ratef .....,..Firgd ovgrhead budgeted ..,..o...Dr.........r..........
Spending variancg ...........,..oerorr--r'orr
Budget allourance based on actual machine hours.......D......,Budget allowance based on standard hours attowed:
variable overhead l4r2oo standard machine hoursallowed r $S.8O variable overhead rate)..... g ZCTSOO
Firgd ovgrhgad budgeted r'........r.......i............ g5.5oovariabla efficiency variance....r.o.......'.r.......o.,.............,r..r......
Budget allowance based on standard hours allowed.,..........Standard overhead chargeabrE to actuar production
(4,2oo standard hoursailowed r $24.gb ;verrreaa rate)...,volume variancg t 'o...........r......r.............o..r..r.......rr.o.........r.....
spending variance "...............'........o.....r....r......................o....variabfg efficiency variancg......r....................r.............r.........volumg variancg " ' . . . . r . . . . . . . . r . ' . . . . . . . . . i . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . r r . . . r . . .overal l factory ovgrhgad variancg.,r . . . . r . r . , . . . r . . . . r . . , . . . . . , r . . . . . . . . . .
_S 2.320 unfav.
$f 09,860
f 04,t 60E_5'7O9 unfav.
$ 8,820 unfav.2r32O unfav.5.7OO unfav.
_$_16.840 unfav.
_L!grq40 unfav.
$12f ,ooo
$26,gBo95,500 I l2,1go
j$__e,820 unfau
$ 1 1 2 , 1 8 0
109.960
r t \
\. \
El8-9
AgtUal ladtOfy OVgfigad ...............................o......tt"""""""t'
sundard oyerhsad chargeable to actual prcductlon--(''OSO Standard hOUrS atlOWed f $5 OVerhead rate1...........
Q1fgfall faCtOfy OVgfhgad VaflanCe ............o....'....""""""'o""'
Astual lastorY overheadBudget atlowance based on actual hourc:
VJriaUle overhead (l,9OO actuat hourg r Sl.5Ol S 2'850FiXgd OVef hgad ............................................... 7.OOO
Spending variance
Budget aftowance based on actual hours ffrom above) """"'Budget atlowance based on standard hours:
Variable overhead (2'O5O gtandard hours rs1.5Ol rr .r , .o. . . . .o. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . s 3to75
Fired overhead 7.OOO
Vafiablg effiCignCy VafianCO........r...o...!.. '...r.......r.......t....."t"'
Budget allowance based on standard hours (from gbovol....
Standard factory overhead chargeable to productlon(from above)..,.. a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
Chpler 18
3 1O,5OO
I 0.250
_$ 25o unfav.
3 1O,5OO
9,8503 65O unfav.:
t 9,850
fav,
3 65o unlav.(2251lav.(1751 tav.
3 25O unfav.
sToo,ooo
684.OOO
3 1O,O75
10,250s (17s1
Volume varianCg .....r.....o"'.o.'t.... '....."t""'
Spending Vaf ianCg.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . .o. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o.r . . .Variable eff iCignCy Vaf ianCO... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . 'o. . .o. . . . . . .o." 'Volume Yariance... a a r t o a a a r a a a a o a a a a a a a a o a a " " t t t t o " " "
Ovgrall faCtOfy Ovgfhgad VafianCe r..o.........r..'....................""
E l 8 - 1 0
ACtUal faCtOfy OVgfhgad r.....r.r............,......r...r.......r.o.....r.r.t..r
Standard overhead chargeabte to actual produc$on (38'OO0units r 2 standard hours por unit r $9 ovefiead rate|"""'
Ovgrall faCtOry OVgfhgad VafianC9.... . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . S 16,000 unfav.
I0.o75
Chapter ta
E18-1 O, (Concluded)
(1) Tlro-variancemethod:
Actual factory ovgrhgad ...........rrr.r...r...........r.r.......r.........r.r..Budget allowance based on standard hours ailowed:
Variable oyerhead (ggrOOO units r 2 standardhours per unit x $6 variable rate) .....r......... $456'000Fixed.overhead (SO'OOO budgeted hourcX $3 fiXed riate)..................................,......r.. 24O.OOO
controllablg rrarianc€.-...........r...'.........r........................rr......r
Budget allowance based on standard hours ailowed-
( f rom above)t t t t t " t "4. t . . . . t . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . .h. r . . . . . . . . . . . r r r . . r . . r rD. . . .
standard overhead chargeabre to actuar producffon (sa,ooounits x 2 standard hours per unit x $9 overhead rate).......
vofumg variancg "tt1..r....rr...r...........r.D...r.rr......................r......
controllablg varianc8....r...r............t.....D..r...........,r.....,......or...vo lumg var iancg t " . r . . . . . r . . . . . - . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . r r . . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . . r . ! r . . . r . . . r . . .ovgrafl factory overhgad var|ancg.......,...................r.r...D....,,.(21 Three-varlance.method:
Actual factory ovgrhgad r.....r........ro.r.r..........r....r..........r..t.....Budget allowance based on actual hours worked:
Variable overhead (TTTSOO actuaf hoursx$6 variabfe rate)........,..,......,.....r...o........,. $465rOOOFixed overhead (gOrOOO budgeted hourcx93fixgdrate).,..,............1..........,..r............
24o,oooSpgnding var iancg. . . . . . . . . . t . r . . . . . r . . r r . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . . r . . . . r . . . r . , . . . . .
Budget allowance based on actuat hours worked- tlry 1!ove)ttt.tr..r.....................r....r.......!...tr....r................rBudget ailowance based on stanoard hours ailowed.-
( from above)tt t . . . . . . .r . . . . . . . . . .r . .r . . .r . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . . .r . .D... .r . . . . . . . . .r . . . .
variablg efficiency variancg...r...D......r.......r....r.................r.....
453
s7OO,0oo
6g6.ooo_L {.OOO unfuv.
$696,OOO
694.ooo
$7O5,OOO
696,000
Budget allowance based on standard hours atowed^ -
(from above)...............r...,.......sta n da rd ove rir ea d c rr a rg ea b il i;'#;; ilil;;;;'&ft;units x 2 standard hoJrs per unit x $g overtreJd otry.......volumg var iancg r"" ' r ' r " r . . . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . r , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . t r r . . . . . . . r .
.Spending variance .............,........_YbflA b le effi Cie n Cy Va fia n C g.....,..'
" " " "' t " " " " " " " " " " " " " r " " "volumg var iance. : . . - -_-___-__r . , . . , . . . . r . . . . . . r . . r . . . . . . .o . r . r . . .or . . .o . . . . . . . . .overari r*iil;;;;';;;.:::.:.::...::::::..::.:.................
r a a a a a a a a a a a a . a a a
]L__grgqA unfav.
$696,00o
684.000]EIS.OOO unfav.
$ (5,ooo) fav,9r0OO unfav.
12.0OO unfav._L _10pgq unfav.
S_j!-&ggq unfav.$ 4'OOO unfav.
12.OOO unfav._$ 16,]0o9 unfav.
$7OO,OOO
705,OOO
1 { \
E l & 1 1
Materials Price variance:Actual Standard
QuantitY CostIngredients {LFs'}, - Per Lb'
Cocoa nedtls'..... 325rOO0 $eOMi|k... . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . 1t425IOOO '5O
Sugar..r. ' . . . . . . . . . . , ! 25O'OOO '4O
Materlals mix varlance:
StandardGost
$ 195,0q,712,5OO100.0q)
31.OO7,500- -
Actual. Cost$2Ol,5oO
684,0(X'97.500
:198{l,ooo::
Chapter 18
MaterlalsPrlce Varlance
$ 6,500 unfav.(28,500) fav.(2,5OOl fav.
$(24,500) fav.-:
StandardForrnula
Actual for ActualQuantitY QuantitY
Ingredients (Lbs.l (Lbs.)'- -Cocoa Ue?DS...'.. 3251000 32OrOOOMi1k.................... 1r425rOOO 1r480r000Sugar.t.r,....,....... 250.000 200.000
2.OOO.OOO 2,0oo,0oo-
Differencein Lbs.5,000
(s5,000150,000
0
StandardCost
per Lb.9.60
.50
.40
MaterlalsMix Variance
$ 3'0OO unfav.(27,500) fav.20.000 unfav.
fav.
'cocoa beans = (8oo + 5,000) x 2'0o0'oooMilk = (3,7OO'+ 5,OO0) x 2'OOOTOOOSugar = (5OO+5,OO0) x 2'OOO'OOO
Materials yield variance:
Expected yield: 2'OOO'OO0 lbs. input + 51000 lbs' ="""'t"o""ACtUal yield in Ong-tOn batCh€S....,........,...'..'.............'..r.t.'."
UnfaVOfablg yigld in batChgs ... . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . ' .r . ' . ' . . . . ' . .r .r. . . . . . ."r" 'Standafd COSI pef One-tOn batCh...........'...............r'..rr....r.."'Matgrials yigld VafianC9..., . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . .r.o'. . . . . . . . .r. . . ' . . . . . . . ' . . . . . t"r
400387
1 3s 2,530932,890 unfav.
Chapter 18
ela42
(1) Materials purchase price variance:
Actual StandardQuantlty Gost
Purchased por Standard ActuallnErcdients in Llters Llter $]_ CostEchot:..;.........,..... 2s ooo $-zoo f srooo $ sr36sPlotgx.....t..r....r.r!.... i3 0OO .425 S'S2S 6'124089n2.......'............... 40 ooo .iso orooo srgaoCT-40"'...r...r...,.,..... 7 5OO .3OO 2.ZSO 2'.iO
$18,775 $'l9.665
(2) Materials mix variance:Standard
Actual FormulaQuantlty for ActualUsed ln Quantlty
lnqredients Lttens in LitersaEcho| .....,....1...,...,... 26 SOO 2g OOOPtot9r............,........ i2 660 i4 OOOBgnz ...,r.........,.r...,.. 3Z 4OO 95 OO0CT-4O.. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . T l4O TOOO
g1-�org 84 ooo'Echol = (2OO + 600) x g4 O0O lltersProtex = (1OO r. 6O0) x 94 000 llterslenz = (25O + 600) x 84 O0O titersCT-4O = (5O + 6O0i x 84 0OO titers
Materials yield variance:Erpected yiefd: 84 OOO llters input + 6O0 liters E''..--.-'r,Agtual yield in 50o-lltgr batchgi.........,..r..r.......D.....r.r............
I:frYoTbte yield in batchgs ............r..r.....r.........rr..,.,...r..r.,..-o-"-noltd cost per SOo-lltgr batch .........r,..............................f, ' latgriafs yigld variancg..r............,.........r....r...r.....r........r.......
455
MaterialsPurchases
Price Variance$365 unfav.
715 unfav.(160) fav.(3O) fav.
$99O unfau
Dlffen Standardence Gost per
j4 Liters Lfter(1 2001 $.20o(1 340) .4252 400 .150
140 ,300o
MaterialsMlx Variance
9(24O.0O) fav.(569,50) fav.360.00 unfav.
42.OO unfav,fav,@s)
740136
4$13s$SCO unfuv.
Chagtar 181fi
El8-13BENJAITIIH PRODUCTS COMPAHY
DePartment 2FaEtoly €)vertread Varlanco Report
FoiMonth Ending June 3O
Dlrgct labor hourg ................'.CapaClU t . . .o. . . . . . . . t . . . . . " t t t " t t t " t '
Variable factorY overhoad:lndirgct 18bo1.........r.. 't 't"t"'Man ufagturing SuPPli€3......Repairs t....t..........tt!"ttt"t'o"
Heat poworr and llght...-....Total Yarlablg cost ..........
Fired taetory oYefisadsSupervisionlndirect laborManufagturing 8upp|183......MaintgnallCo .'...r................Heat, powor, and light r.....r.Machinely depreciaUotl .....lnsurance and targs ".'r.r.r..
Total firgd co8t..'............
(rlBudget
AllowableNormalGapaclW
6000loo%
$ 2,4OO2,1OO
800100
$, ,5 .4oo
$ o,ooo514OOl r02o
960120540360
$14.4oo
$ 2,1OO1,8O5
850l05
$6020(3012A
$ 4.660
$ 612005,40OI,O20
960720540372
200ooooo
1 2
wunta%
_l 0.830s 2,180
319r272
16.8303 2.442s 282
2.1g�03 2,442
Totat factory overhead ........... J!-g€Oo
Standard factory overhead chargeable towork In process (5'tOO standard hourar $3.3O ratel
Volumg Y4riancg.r.o..rr.........D............r......
Reconciliation of variances:Actual tactory ovg rhead .-.ri.....!.......'.Standard factory overhead chargeable
to work In procesS ........'.....""""'o'Glerall factory overhead v8rlsnce .....
Controllable nrlanCo .."""""""""""'VoI u m g Yarianc e.'.""'o"""""""o""""'Overalt factory overhead varlSnco ""'
l2lBudget
AllowanceStandard
HouruSloo-Eolo
$ 2,o4o1,785
68085
3 {.59O
$ o,ooo5,4O07,O2O
960120540360
$14.400$18,990
$14.612s19,272
unfav.
unfav.unfav.unlav.unfav.
(3)
ActualCost
(4)Controllable
VariancoUnfaY. (Fav.l
(31- (21
< \
Clnpter t8
E18.I4 APPENDD(
$15,OOO budgeted overhead= $8 overhead tato
= $2 variable rate
457
$f 6,500
t4.400lliloo unfav.
$f 6,500
15.400
2,5OO budgeted m-chino houF
SSTOOO variable overhead2r5OO budgeted machine hours
ovgrall factory ovgrh gad variance .............r.r
Overafl factory overhgad variance ...........
Agtuaf factory overhgad.'........................r.....rr........o.....r..r.....standard overhead chargeabfe to astuar producuon
(2r4oo standard hours attowed r $o ovirtrJal ratel..-..or...
Agtual factory ovgrhgad...........'......D...................,...........Dr.....Budget allowance based on actual hours:
Variable overhead l2rTOO actual hours r $2|... $ 5r4OOFiXgd OVgrhgad.........................r..r.............r....
1O.OOOspending variancg.........r.r..r...r.......r..........t..D....r.r,................
Budget allonrance based on actuat hours (from abovef .........2'7oo actuaf hol,' r $o factory overhead ratg...,.,................ldfg capacity variallco..r..........-r..r..r..rrro.rr.rrrr.r...o..r............rr...
2r7oa astual hoTs r $6 factory overhaad rate (from above|standard factory overhead chirgeabre to pruduction (fromabovef t t " "" t """ t ' . . . .a.D. . .a.a. . .aa.r . . . .a. . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . .o. . r . . . . . . . . . . .
Eff ic igncy var ianco . . . . . . . ' . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o i . . . . . r . r . t . .o. . . . . . . . .
spending Yariance.........-......r.....r..............r......r....................l-d.l-e ganacfty varialtcG) .........."::::'..,................r....r..,......r........Efficiency Yariancg .............r......r....................r............ro.......r
_S_l,.:!gq unfav.
$t5,4oo16.200
fav.
$to,zoo
14,400_$_l.8OO unfav.
$ 1,1OO unfav.(8O0| fav.
1.8OO unfav.-jFl.lOO unfav.
Chapter 18
ACtUal taCtOfy OVefhgad......................""tt"""tt"tt""t""""""-Ct"nJ"tU ovirhead chargeable to actu8l producUon-
d;to standard hours allowod I $14 overhead rsto)""""'
iFoTuageted labor hours
$4,8oO variable overhead
iFo-oE-dg eted la b or h ours
orreratl factola overhoad variance
Agtual lactory ovgrh9ad..r......."""""""'
48
E18.t5 APPENDX
$t6'8oO budg"t"d o""th""g
Budget allowancs based1.J2O actual hours r $14ldle capacitY variance
= $14 overhead rate
= $4 variable rato
$15,8OO
16.380
Budget allowance based on actual hours:Variabte overhead (7r12o actual hours x 94|"' $ 4t48O
Firgdovgrhgad"""t"""""""""" 'o ' t""""" ' t "" I2tOOO
Spending VafianCe .. . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . .r .r . . . . . . . . . t .r . t . . . . . . . t t t t"""ot"t"t"t '
I ta a a aaaa a -a 4" " "
a a a a a a a a t a t a t a a a a a " a t t t t t " '
3 (58o1 fav.'
$15,8OO
$16,48015.680
on actual hours (from above) """"'lactory ovgrhgad 13t8 """"""""""
1r12O astual hourg r $4 Variable factory overhead rate .t......
tittO standard hours x $4 variable factory overhead r8t6...'
Vafiablg gffiCignCy VafianCg ........................t......r't"""""t""r'
1r12O actuat hourS r $1o fiXed factory overhead F3to...........f rtZO standard hOurs x $10 fixed factOry Overhead Fiito """'
FiXgd gffiCignCy YafianC18 .................r..r....r....ttr..t.."""t""""r'
Spgnd ing Vaf ianCe. . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r .o . r . . . . . . .oo . . . . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . t t t "
ldlg CapaCity Vafia11CO..............rr......... '...................o........""tiVariablg eff iCienCy Vaf ianCg,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . "" 'Fi fgd gff iCignCy Vaf ianCO,.. . . . , . . , . , . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . ' . . . .o. . ." 'Ovgral l faCtOry OVerhead YarianCO .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . r rr . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . "
S (5ool fav.:-E:
$ (6801800(2ool(5001
$ (5801
16,480
S 8oo unfav.#
$ 4,4804.680
S (2OOl fav'-
$1t ,2OO11.700
lav.untav.fav.lav,fav.
\
\
'----
ClpOlcr 18
PROBLEMS
Pt8- l(f l Factory overhead per unit:
Variabl e ($3 o r 2l gl ..'.........,..................o.............Firgd ($go r 1/31 ..............................................r..
Variable tactory oyerhoad por unitDlrcct tabor hours per unit
451
(21Agtuaf quantity purchased .....Agtual quantl$ punchased .....Materlals punchaso prlce
VAfianCO ....-.r.....r................
Actual quantity usgd ...........r..Standard quantity allowed .,...Materials quantity varian co....
Actual hours worked ......,,....r.Ac-tual hours workgd ..............Labor ratg variaJlGo ........r..t.o,,
Actual hours worked .......r..,...Standard hours allowed .........Labor efficiency vgt'ianco .......
r Unit Cost =$1.35 standard
1.35 standard1.35 standard
x Rate$9.15 actual9.OO standard
x Rate$9.O0 stanCarC
9.OO standard9,OO standard
s20to
$go
= $?O _ $5 variabfe overhead rate4 per direct labor hour
l'lormal capacity dircct labor hours (2r4ool r Fired tactory overhead rateper direct labor hour Gtto * 4l = 2r4oo r $zso = $6,000 nr"Ji"Joryoverhead based on norrnaf monthfy capacitp
Yards r Unit Gost = Amountls,ooo $rssaffit St4tiiii;l8rOOO 1.3S standard 24-.gOO
= Amount$ 1 9 , 2 1 5
19.900$ 315 unfav.
= Amount$t8,9OO
19,000$ 909 unfav.
$16,650
t8,ooo
Yards9,5OO
10.000
Hours2,1oo2rlOO2r7OO
Hours2,1002,000
too
$ .o3 $ 54o unfav.
fav.
unfav.
Amount$f 2,825
13.500s l67sl
s .15
lctual factory ovgrhgad....r................r........................,....,.....,.,Budget allowance based on standard hourc aflowed:
Variable overhead (2'OOO standard hours attowedr $5 variable ovgrhgad riltg|.......r...................... $lOrOOO
Fired overhead budgeted.o..........,....................o.... O.OOOcontrollablg varianco........'..................r....................................
Budget allourance based on standard hourg allowed ...............Orerhead charged to production (2rOoO r $2.5o!.......,..........,.r.Volumg variance ..,........... ......................,
f 6.ooo$ 650
$16,OOO15.000
$ 1,000 unfav.
\
1@
P18-2
(1)
Units completed and transferred out thisperiod
Less all units In beginning Inventofl.....'....,...Equivalent units started and completed this
pef iOd . . . . . . .a. . . . . . . . . .o. r . . . . . . .a. . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . .D. . . . . . .
Add equivalent units in spoiled units..............Add equivalent units required to complete
beginning Inventory this period.................,Add equivalent units in ending Inventory.......Equivalent units of production this period......Standard quantity allowed per unit of
pfOdUCt ....r.......r.........r
Standard quantity allowed for current
5,2OO 4,930 5,150
2 units 112 hn t hr.
MaterialsA B
4,600 41600500 500
Chwter 18
Direst FactoryLabor Overhead
41600 4,600500 500
4r lOO 4r1OO200 0
500ooo
4r lOO 4 ,10Ot40 200
0600
150540
250600
4,9OO
3 units
Amount
$73,600
72,OAO
9_11609 unfav.
Amount
$66,600
66.1509__450 unfav.
Amount
s23,4OO
24.OOO
productiol| . . . . . . , , , . . .r. . . . . . . . . . .r. . .r. . . . .r. . . , . . . . , . . . . . . 14.700 lO,40O 2,465 5.15O
(21Actual material A purchased at
aCtUal COSI ........r......o.......r.Actual material A.purchased at
standard Gost .....,,..............Material A purchase price
variancg ...........,..,............,.
Actual material A used atstandard cost .....................
Standard quantity of materialA allowed at standard cost
Material A quantity variancs..
Actual material B purchasedat actual cost..................r.r
Actual material B purchasedat standard cost .................
Material B purchase pricevariance .r...........................
Quantitv x
16 ,000
16,OOO
l6 ,ooo
Quantitv
14,800
14,700___t_99
Quantitv
12,00o
12,OOO
12,OOO
Unit Gost
$4.60 actual
4.50 standard
$ . t o
Unit Cost
S4.50 standard
4.5O standard4.50 standard
Unit Cost
S1.95 actual
2.OO standard
$ (.os1 $ (oool fav.
Clppter 18
P18-2 (Continued)
Actual material B used atstandard COSI .....................
Standard guantity of materialB allowed at standard cost
Materlaf B quanUty variance..
Actual labor hours worked atactuaf labor riatg.................
Astual labor hour: workod atstan dard labor it1to.....,.......
Labor ratg variartco ............,...
Actual labor houru worked atstandard labor lilt€..,..........
Standard labor hours allowedat standard labor JZlto ........
Labor efficiency vSrlilncg .......
r Unit Cost
S2.oO standard
2.OO standard2.OO standard
r Rate
$lo.2O actual
461
Quantitv
l l rooo
10.400_6OO
Hours
2,550
2,550.2,550
Hours
Amount
$22,ooo
20.goo$ l,2OO unfav,
Amount
$zo,oto
25.500lO.OO standard$ .2o
x Rate
$ 5tO unfav.
Amount
$25,50o
24.650
fctuql factory ovgrhgad ................r........................o................r..standard overhead chargeable to actual production
(5rl50 standard houns allowed r $lS overhead rate) ...,.....r...Overall factory overhead variance................ ................
Actual factory ovgrhgad ..... '...............................,........,....,.........Budget allorrance based on standard hours:
Variable overhead (5rl50 standard hours x $5!...... $2S'7SOFixgd ovgrhgad'......o............r.............!..r..r..r.r.....ro.. SOTOOO
Controllablg variancl9.... ' ....................r..................,.......r............
Budget allormnce based on standard hours (from ilbov€f........,.Standard factory overhead chargeable to production- - t f rom
above)t t t t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . ro . . . r . . . . . . . r . . r . r . . r . . . . r .
2,550 $lO.OO standard
2.465 IO.OO standard85 lO.OO standard S 85O unfav.
s75,0oo
77.250.il3€99 fav.
$75,OOO
fav.
fau
75,750_$ _l7so)
$75,75O
77,250l.ll_,€gg)
$ rtsol(1.5001
$ (2,2501
Volume varianca .r.. . . . .r. . ! . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gontrol lablg varianGo.... . . . . . . .o.r.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . , . . ,r. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . .Volume variance...r. . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o... .r. . . . .ovgral l factory ovgrhgad variance.o... . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . .
fav.fav.fav.
62
P18-2 (Concludedl
(31
Standard cost ol units transferred to finished goods:(41600 units r $37.50 Standard cost per unit of product!,............
Standard cost of apoiled units charged to factory overhoad:Materlal A (2OO units of product r l0ooh complete r 3 units each
f 9 4 a 5 O ) a a . . . . . a a . a . a a . a . a a a a a . . a a a . . . . . a . . . . r . . . a . . . . . a a a . . . . . . r . . D . - . a a a . a . a a a a . . . . a a t a t t t '
Material g (ZOO units of product rOoh complete r 2 unitg each IS 2 a O O l a a . a . . . a a a a t . a a a a a a . a . a a a a a . a . a a . . o a . . . . . . a . a a . . . a a . . a r a . . o a . a a a t . . . a a a . a a a a " " t " t t t t '
Direct labor (20O units tTOoh completa t1l2 hn each r $lO.OOI, Fastory overhead (20o unlts r l0o% completa x I hr. oach
x S15.OO|TOtal COSI Of SpOilgd UOitS,.........rt.....r.o,.........r........
Work in processr ending inventorPMaterial A ((iOO units of product t lAooh complste r 3 units oach
f 3 4 . 5 O ) a . a . a a o . a . . . a a . . a a a . . . o a a a . . . a a . . . . . . . . a a a a a . l . . . . . . . . r a . . t . a a . . . a a a . o . a . . a a ' a t t t " t '
Material A IOOO units of product r loOoh complete x 2 units eachf S 2 a O O l t a a . r r . . a a a a . . . . . a . . . . a a a . a a r a . r . . . . . . . . . . a a . . . . r r . . . . . . . l . . . . . a . . . . . a t r " t t t o " t t t "
Direct tabor (6OO units r 9O% completo r1l2 hr. each x $1O.OOIFactory overhead (6O0 unlts r IOO% complets r I hr. oach x
$ l 5 a O01 . . .ao . aa . .a a . .o a r . . r .ao . . . .a . . . . . .a . . . r . r . . . . .o . . . . . . . . . . . ta . . . taa . .4 .4aa. . . . . a '4 " t "
TOtal Standard Cost Of work in process, ending inventory......r....
Pl8-3
(11 January equivalent production:
Chapter 18
sl72,500
$ 2,7OO
o700
3,OOOs 6,400
$ I, loo
2,4OO2r7OO
9.OOOg 22.200
TFansferred outLess beginning Inventory (all unitsl....Started and finished this period,.,.....,Add beginning invontory (work this
period)Add ending inventory (work this periodlAdd abnormal gpoilage .............,.....,...
MaterialA
8,00o3.0005,O0O
o5rOOO1.OOO
llpoo units
MaterialB
8,OOO!t.o0o5,OOO
3,OOO
ConversionCosts8,OOO3.O005,OOO
ol .OOO9.OOO units
2rOOO2rOOO1.OOO
I O,9OO units
I
L-
ClpOter 18
Pf 8-3 (Continuedf
(21Actual guantity of Material A
USed r...r.....Aetual quantity of Material A
Uged . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . .1a.1. . . .a. . . . r .a
Material A price uliago varianee
Astual guanfity of Material AUSOd ...............
Standard quantity of MaterialA a11OWgd.....or.....................
Material A quantity varianco..
- Actual quanUty of Material B
, USOd .. . . . . j . . . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . . . . .o.. . .
s Actual quanfity of Material BUSed .. . . . . . . . . .a.a.. . . . .a.. . ._.. . . . . . . .
Materlal B price ulritgo- VafianCe....r...........rr.........,.
Actual quantity of Material BUSed ..............................
,tA
Gallons
5O,OOO
50,0OO50,0oo
Galfons
5OrO0O
44.OOO6,O00
SquarcFeet
l8ro0o
l8,OOO
l8r0oo
x Unlt Gost
$t.0o actual
l.2O standard$ (,201
x Unit Cost
$1.2O standard
1.2O standardl.2O standard
x Unit Cost
$.75 actuaf
.7O standard
r Unit Cost
$.7O standard
,7O standard.7O standard
r Rate$12.oO actuaf
tl.5O standard.50
x Rate$11.5O standard
11.5O standard1f .5O standard
60.000_$(!-e'.!999) fav.
Amount
s6O,OOO
52.goo
Amount
$ so,ooo
$,05
Standard quantity of MaterialB allowgd ....r..r.................D.
Material B guantity yarianco..
Agtual hours workgd ............r.Actual hours workgd .r,.....,.....Labor ratg variaJtco ................
Actual hours workgd ............r.Standard hours alfowed ......:::La bor effi ciency ydriancg .......
SquareFeet
1g,o0o
l8,0oo__q
Hours7Or2OO10,2007Or2OO
Hourslor2ooI o.o00_ 200
= Amount
$12,600
12.600__!
= Amount$722,4OO
t 17,300
= Amount$l t 7,soo
I t5.ooo
S_5OO unfav.
_Lzi2og unfav,
= Amount
$13,soo
12.600
S gOO unfav.
]9_ 3i99g unfav.
&l
Pl8€ (Concludedl
Actual tactory ovgrlr gad ..D."""""""""'
$t8,ooo
39.OOO
COntfOllablg VaflanCO,... . . . . . . . . . . . . .r .r . . . . . . t . tot. . ." t""""""t t"t t" ' t t" t"
Budget allowance based on standardhOUfg allOWgd (abOVe1r...r....r......r.............rt.t.....t...tt'o"tt"ttt"tr
Standard overhead chargeable to actusl producUon(lO'OOO gtandard hOUrS allowed r $6.80 oyerhead rate) ...'."'
VOlUme YafianC4... . . .r . . . . . . . . . . . .o.. . .r . . . . . . .r . . . . . .or.. . . . . . .r .r . . . . . . . . . ." t t t t t" t '
CGA-Ganada (adapted). Reprint with permission'
-euJget altormnce based on standard hours allowed:--Viri"Ole
overhead (lOrOoO equivalent units r--i *anOard hour per unit r $l'8o Yariable ratel
Fired overhsad budgeted (7'8OO labor houraat normat capacity r $5 fixgd l?ltof ....,.....'.......'.
Pl8-4(11
UnitS COmpleted and tfanSf gffg d OUt'.......................LoSS bgginning lnVentOfy (all UnitS) ..........'....r....r.....Units started and complgted this period .....'."""""'Add beginning Inventoly (work this period) ........"""Add ending inventory (work this period)........""r"""Add abnormal spoilage (work this periodf ..........."""Equivalent units of production this period..........r""'
Chaptor 18
$ 60,100
57,OOO3 3.loo unfa%
#
$ 57,oOO
Materialsl7 'OOO
4.OOO13,OOO
o2,150
85016.OOO
(21 Quantitv rActual materials purchasod at
actuat CoSt ......................... 6O OOO kgActual materiafg purchased at
standard GoSt..'.................. 60 OOOMaterials punchase price
variancg ............r................ 6O O0O
QuantiW
50 OOO kg
48 0002 OOO kg
Unit Gost
$3.95 actual
4,OO standard
Unit Cost
$4.OO standard
4.OO standard4.OO standard
$Js) $ (3.0001 fav.
Actual materials used atstandard clost .....................
Standard quantlty allowed atstandard cost (l6,000 r 3 kgl
Materials quantity varianco....
68.OOO$(11,oOOl fav.
ConversionCosts
lTrooo4.000
13,0003,20O
860850
1 7 . 9 1 0
= Amount
$237rOOO
240.OOO
Amount
S2OO'0OO unfav.
192.OOOS 8,ooo unfav.
\
l?1to........o.o......r................... 9r0OO I l.OO standard 99.OOOLabor rate varia11cg................ 9r0o0 $ 1.oo $ 9.ooo unfa%
Chaptar 18
, Pt8-4 (Goncludedl
H o u r s x R a t e = A m o u n t' Actual labor hours at actual
' lZltG!.................'..'................ 9rO0O $1 2.OO actual SI OS;OOO. Actual labor hours at standard
H o u r s r R a t e , = A m o u n tAstual labor hours at standard
rirto..................................... IrOoO $t t.OO standard S99r00OStandard labor houns allowed
at standard rate (l7r9lOequivalent units r 1/,2 hourper uni 8.955 11.OO standard 98.505
Labor efficiency variance....... 45 1 l.OO standard S 495 unfav.
Actual factory overhead.... $134,9OOBudget allowance based on actual hours:
Variable overhead ($6 rate r grOOO actual hours) S54,OOos Budgeted f|Igd factory ov9rhead.......r........r...... 8O.O0O i34.OOO
Factory ovgrhead spending varianc9.r........................r........r.... S 90O unfav.:
. Budget allowance based on actual hours(compUted abOve). ...r ' .....,..................................................... S134tOOO
Budget allowance based on standard hours:Variable overhead ($6 rate r 17,91o equivalent
units x 112 standard hour per unit).,...........,.. $53r73OBudgeted fixed factory overhead...........,... 8O.OOO
Factory overhead variable efficiency variance .........................
Budget allowance based on standard hours (computed above| S133r73OFactory overhead chargeable to production at standard
. ' ($14 rate x 17191O equivalent units x 112 standard hour)...- 125,370Factory ovgrhgad volumg variancg.......r,...................r.............. $ 8r360 unfav.
GGA-Ganada (adapted). Reprint with permission.
133,730s 270unfav.
ffi
Pl8-5
(rl
Units completed and translerrsd out this period"""
LgSg all UnitS ln bgginning InVento;1f ...................""'Equivalent units started and completed this period
ld6 equiyatent uni6 nequined to complete beginninginVentOfy this pgfiOd ......................r.......'.......r......
Add equivalont units in ending lnventory""""""r""'Equivalent unitg of producUon this period""'r"""o'r'Standard quantlty atlowed per unlt of product """"'Standard quantlty allowed for current produetlotl""
Materiall32rOOO
5.00027,OOO
o2.000
29,0oo- 3 unltr
87,OOO
Chaptar 18
GonversionGosts32rOOO
5.OOO27 rOOA
3rOOO1.600
3l ,600114 hn
7.900 hrc'
Amount
$654,OOO
600.ooo
$ 54,ooo unlav.:
(21 QuantiW xActual materials Purchased
at actual GoEt ......-r-..........r. I OO'OOO
Actual materials Pur,chasedatstandard cost........'-..r.... lOO'0OO
Materials punchase pricevariance
Actual materials Purchased atstandard G(l8t ..................'....
Actual materials issued atstandard cost ...'.............'.....
Materials inventory varianco..
Actual materials issued atstandard cost
Standard quantlty ol materialsat standald CO8t.....r...!..r'.....
Materials quanUty Yarianco....
Astual labor hours worked atagtual labor riato........,,.........
Actual labor hours worked atstandard labor riatc........o......
Labor rate varianco ........'.......
Unit Cost = Amount
$o.OO standard $600'000
552.OOO
Unit Cost =
36.54 actual
6.00 standard
s ,54
6.0O standard6.0O standard
Unit Gost
$6.00 standard
6.O0 standard6.00 standard
Rate
$l 0.60 astual
l O.OO standards .60
1OO,0OO
Quantitv
loo,ooo
92.OOOI,OOO
QuantiW
92,OOO
87,OOO5.000
Hours
I ,OOO
g,oooI ,OOO
3 48.OOO unfav.
= Amount
$552,OOO
522,OOO3 3o,o00 unfav.:
= Amount
$84,8OO
80.ooo3 4,8OO unfav.
\
Chapts 18
Pl8-5 (Concluded)
Hours x Rate
167
= Amount
$8O,OOO
7g.oooll.OOO unfav.
fav.
fav.
83.gOO
l__ 2oo unfav.
$83,8OO
79.OOO$ 4.8oo unfav.
fav.unfav.unfav.fav.
Actual labor hours worked atstandard labor t'gto............. 8rO0O
Standard labor houru allowedst gtandard labor tilto ........ 7,9OO
Labor efficlency yarianco....... ____!_gg
$lO.0O standard
lO.0O standardIO.OO standard
Agtual factory overhead..r..............'......................'...................Standard overhead chargeable to actual prcductlon
(7r9OO standard hourg allowed x $1O overhead riStrB),...,.,.......Overall factory overhgad variance .,...r...........r..........................
Astua| fagtory overheadBudget allorrance based on astual houra:
Variable ovefiead (81000 actual houns x $21..r...,.. s16,00068,OOOFired overhead (8r5OO budgeted hourc x $81,.......
Spending variance
Budget allourance based on actual hours (from above! ,,....,.,...Budget allonrance based on standard hours:
Variable ovefiead (7r90O standard hours x $21..... $l5r80OFixad ovgrhgad............. ., 68.000
Variablg gfficigncy varianclg ......................................,........r.....,
Budget allonrance based on standard hourg (from above) i.......Standard factory overhead chargeable to pruduction
(from abovef.o....r........................r.....................................r....Volume variance
Spending wriance.. . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . r t . . r . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . r . .o. . . . . . . . r . . . .Variablg efficiency variance.......r.,.......................r.,....o.............Vofumg var iancg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . r . r r r . . . . . r . . . . . . . .
Ovgrall factory ovgrhead varianca ..........,..........,.....r.......o,.......
975,OOO
79.OOO
_s_rcpgg,$75,ooo
84,OOO3p.ooo)$g4,ooo
$ (e,o00l200
{.800_$_(!poo)
a
--
4@
Pl8-6(1) Standard cost of Production:
QuantitYLot (dozensl22 l,ooo23 1,700i 1,2ao (direct materials)
980 (direct labor andfactory overhead)
Yards x
Sbndard Gostper dozen$53.10
53.1026.&26.70
TotalStandard Gost
i s3'toogor27O31,68025.632
s200,682-
= Amount
$t06,100104.500
3 1,9O0 unfav..
Lot 2428,825
Chapter 18
28.80025
xl-L!-g._$27.50 unfav.
Lot 242,890
2.8801 0
x $4,90$ 49 unfav.
Lot 24s5,oo
4.90$ . 1 0
(2)Actual guantitY Purchased .....Actual quantitY Purchased .',..Materlals purchase Price
variancg ...r. . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." '
(3) (alAchral quantity used .........Standard quantlU allowed:
'l rOOO r 24 Yatds ...........1 r70O x 24 Yards'....'.....1 r20O x 24 Yards .'.....'.'.
(b)Actual hours worked r.......'Standard hours allowed:
11000 x 3 hours...."..r....1170O x 3 hourcr. '..,.......
960 x 3 hours'..r.........
Standard cost per hour..'.'.Labor efficiency variance ..
(c)Actual labor rate.........,......Standard labor rate ...........
Actual hours worked .......',Labor rate variallco '.....'-...
95'OOO $1.12 actual95'OOO 1.1O standard
g5,oo0 _$ .o2
Unlt Gost-
Lot 2340t4d,O
40,800
(360)x $1 .1o
$(3961fav.-
Lot 235,130
5,100
30x S4.9O
fav. 3 147 unfav.
100Standard cost per yard..'... x $1.1OMaterials quantity variance -$ l f O unfav'
Lol 2224r1OO
24,OOO
Lot222r98O
3,000
Lot 22$5.OO
4,90$ . ro
x 2,9803 298 unfav.
(2-o)x $4,90-tjgg)
Lot 23$5.oo
4.90$ , 1o
x 5,13O x 2,89O$ Srg unfav. 3 289 unfav.
- \
lm
Pt8-7
Chapter 18
CI-AFFY MAilUFACTURING COMPA}TYDepartment 2
Factory Chlerhead Varlance RePortFor Month
Btrdgd Budgd
t3l
BrdgtrtAllomlrr Allowrncr Allowrncr
lforrill Strtrdrrd A.td Acfirrl9:negry ]bun Houn Coet
(.1(21(r) trlVrrlrHo
Et|lctongtYertrnoe
lJnilv.(Frv.l
Fl-f iD
3 1 7
{o}
SpcndlngVtrlencc
Unfrv.(FrvJ
f.l - {31
tl2t2unfiv.
Proccrelng UmcIn houn....,...'.. O'OOO 5r7OO
Ccprclty,......F.- IOO% 95%6r84O
97.33%
I 1,047 t tr92o
2,gto 2$125073 I'OSO
a2 szlt
t 6Ji48 3 6.620
Varlgblc factory ovcriud:lndlrcct labor... 3 2'OOOManufacturlng
ruppllcr....-.,. 2r4AORepr|rl..,......... I'OOOHcet, powcrr tnd
llght......--.-. 3OOTotalvarhblc
'Fhcd factory ovcrhcrd
Supcrvirlon -... g ar(XX)lndlroct lrbor... 6'200
IOOOtr loo
1/0OO
ar5oo
9q)
t lr9OO
428{)opo
246
q27l
(r 1)77
3.t
oo
o(201
o
o
70
5023
7
cort........-. li 6.700 E 6,415
Menufecturlngrupplloc.........
ilalntcnanco..,.Heet powcr,
end llglht..,.....Mechlncry
deprcclaUon..Inrurencc tnd
lrtc!.......,...-.
Totel lhcdcort........... 32O,1OO t2O.t0O
Totrl frctoryovcrhcrd 32!t,8OO $21t,"5f 5
Strndrrd fostory ovtrhoedchargceblc to wort Inprocrsr (5r7OO rtandrrdhoun r 3l3O rrtcf .r.-.-... 2a.6lO
Volumc verienca... E 1.oo5 unfev.
t a,o@63OO
aoool r lOO
1r4OO
416oo
900
3 +Ooo63OO
aooo1110O
ir4oo
a'5oo
900
3 +OOO63OO
IOOOI'OSO
lr4oo
4r!OO
070
oo
0o
o
o
o
s20.loo 3a0,160
s25.O48 !326,770 31grunfrv,
I
171
s8,"sFp, lgl lgo o F o o o s o
l g l l g
g g F " g g S '
l F a a
s F s eF ! t
' Y
e f*ifl
s $ a e? ?r t Y
E fi g6.6a6o F l ) 6F - Y F
5 Y
o iflg
s f$!flHili
D
o o o o o o o o l g l i
s lJl i$uqfl ;s33i3-Hdl=!tiigl i*uilg ii$sss,iflg1a silsl3-ll $$'31fl ii3333'ff1flI :s tii;le*il i3uqg ils$33"1g$ fl1e gilfl3Fll i$s:lfl iisi*ru1$g1_
'n
' ' i i isii i i iji i i is,; i,s ii i: l
i igi igii i i; i i ;rsFi; f:S;tiig;ifi i;ff3jF;friifi6;
l'--
IIt-
lIL '
IL
t-
I
5
Clapter 18
I
L
t_tL-I
!2
3� ,E,s=iFP 5 s ;9 5 r , S
$ F€EE " I E
f $F,o l
t-
IE
oI
oF
G
l
Chapter 18
I
Pt8-8 (Concludedl
Reconciltatlon of variances:ACtUal faCtOfy Oygfhgad ..................."'t""""""""""""tt""t"'
Standard oyorhead chargeable to work in process """"""""
OVgfalt faCtOfy OVgfh gad Yaf ianC9..""""""""""""""""""""
Spending variance:Spending quantity variancg """o""""""""""Spgnding price Yarlance """"o"""""o""""""
variablg efficigncy YarianctB .,............,......'....'.......VOlUme VafianCe .. . .r . . . .r .r . .r .r . . . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . . . tr . . . t"rt ' t"""t t t t t" t t""""
OVgfall faCtOfT OVOfhgad VafianC9.........""""""o""'r"""""""""
$3O,OOO28.800
$ogo unfa%150 untav.
S l.2oo unfaY.-
$ 84o unfav.(36O) fav.72O unfav.
$ 1,2oo unfav.
P18.9 APPENDIX
Equivalent production for Septemben
Than sf g rrg d o lrt.... t. t " " "t " tt"" " t' t " " t' t t t " " " t t t "'
Less beginning inventory""""""""""""t""""Startgd and finishgd this period'""r""rt"i"""t'
Add beginning Inventory (work this periodf ""'Add ending inventory (workthis period!"""""
Equivalent units of product ....""""t"t""i""""
Materials42,00o1O,O0O32,OOO
o5,OOO
37.OOO:z:
.49 standard
.4g standard
.48 standard
gonversion42r0oolo,ooo32rOOO
510oo4,50O
41.500
Pieces x Unit Gost
Actual quantity used.,..,......... Zopoo $'5o aetual
Actual quantity used.............. ZOTOoO ,'48 standard
Materials price us:lgo variance 76'000 S'02
Pieces x Unit Gos!
Amount$38,ooo
36.480$ 1.520
runfa%
Actual quanUty used ..........r...Standard quantitY allowed
76,00o
(37rOOO I 2! ..................'.."' ZI'OOOMateriats quanUty variance.... -3p99
Hours x RateActuaf hours workgd.............. lzrsoo $8.0o actualActual hours worked....r......... 22'tsao 7'60 standardLabor ratg varia11co................ 22r5g0 -$-'4O
Actual hours worked .......-....-.Standard hours allowed
(4t r5OO I 1 121.""""""""""Labor efficiency variance ...""
Hours x RateTz,soo $7.9o standard
2O.75O 7.6O standard1,75O 7.6O standard
= Amount936'48o
35.520S 960 unfav.
= Amount$18O,ooo
17 l .OOOS 9.OOO unfav.-
= Amount$171 'ooo
157.700S 13.3OO unfav'
Chapter 18
Pt &e APPENDTX (Conctudedf
173
Actual fastory overhead .................... $42rOOOBudget allorrance based on astuaf hours worksd:Varlable cost (22r5OO astual hours r
$1.4O variable overhgad ratef r..........r............ g3l,5ooFired cost budgeted
Spending rrariancg......r.................................r..or....D.r.r......r.......g,ooo 39,500
,......,....... _L3rsOOa unfav.'ll|e spending varianco Includes the difference between actual and budgetedfired cost, $zoo ($8'200 - $8,oool. Thil portion coufd ue separately labefed asa fired spending variancc, leaving a batance of S2,3oo ss the varia-ble "p"roiigvarianco.
Budget allovyance based on agtual hours worked..r...r,,..........rActual hours l2Z,SOOl r standard overhead rate (Si.BOi:.:::::::::ldle capacity variaJlco '.......... '........".....r..............r.,rr.......o......o.Actuaf h9gr" l22rSOOl r standard overhead rate ($l.gO).,.....,...Sl9f! hours (4t,5OO r1t2lr standard overhead rate
Gtl tB 0l t t t t " t " t " t t t 'o . . . t . . . .a. . . . . . . t . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . r . . . r . . . . . . r . . . . . . .
Eflicigncy varianco .........-....r......o...........,.............................r...
CGA-Canada (adaptedl. Reprint with permission.
Pl8.1O APPENDIX
Raw material:
Actual quantity purchased..,.,Actual guantity purchased ...,.Materials purchase price
Yariancg . . . . . . . . . , . . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . r . .
Drums:
Actual quantity purchased,....Actual quantity purchased.....Materials purchase price
variance ............................,
Raw material:
Actual quanUty usedStandard quantity altowed .....Materials quantity variance....
g39,5OO40.500
$ (1.OOOI
$4O,5OOfav.
Gallons6OO,OOO6OO,O0O
600,o00
Drums85,000g5,0oo
g5,oo0
Gal lonsTOO,OOO600.oootoo,ooo
x Unit Cost =$t.ef 7 actual. 2.OOO standard
o
r Unit Cost$1 actual
I standard
Unit Gost$2 standard
2 standard2 standard
Amount$ 8s,ooo
g5,ooo
= Amount$1,4OO,OOO
1.200.000$ 2OO,OOO unfav.
37,350l__9'!5g unfav.
Amount$1, i5o,ooo
1.200.o0o
Chapter 18171
I
Pl 8-l O APPENDIX (Continued|
Drums:
Actual quanUty used ....r.........Standard quantltY allowod .-...Materials quantltY varianco....
Dirsct labon
Actual hours workgd .......'......Actual hourg workgd ..............Labor rate var|atlGo................
Actual hours workgd'......r...'..Standard hours allowed '...or...L-abor efficiency varianco ......'
Rate$l gtandard
I standardI standard
r Rate37.231 actual
7.OOO standardg_.231
x Rate37 standard
7 standard7 standard
S l5,OoO unfav.
= Amounts455,OOO
420,OOO
Drums6O,OOO60.ooo
_____9
Hours65,00O65,OOO65,OOO
Hours65,0OO60,000
5,O00
= Amount$8O,OOO
60.ooo_9
= Amounts47O,OoO
455.OOO
Factory overhead:ACIUal faCtOfy OVgfhead....................,....................'..................Budget altoumnce based on actual hours worked:
Variable overhead (65,000 actual hours r36 variable overhead ratel.r.o,.. ' ...r..,............r. S39OroOO
Firgd ovorhgad budget...................................... 275.OOOSpending var iance r. . . . . . i . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . ' . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Budget atlowance based on actual hours worked (see above)Actual hourg (ssrOool r standard overhead rate (S10) ..............ldle CapaCity variaJ|C8.... . . .r. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . .o.,. . . . . . . . ' .r . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . ' .
_S 35-OOO unfav-
$666,5OO
665.OOO$ 1,5OO unfav.
$665,OOO650.OOO
$ 15.OOO unfav.
Crlaptr� 18
Pi &1 q APPENDIX (Concludedl
hr,
O8r75O normal capaclty hours r 94 fixed overhead titto...........651000 actual hours worked r $4 ffxed overhead ri8tg,,.......,....ldle capacity variancc (3175o hours r $rll .......................o.........
Budget allowancc bassd on actual hours worked (see above)Budget allourance based on standard hours allowed:
Varlable overhead (60,000 standard hoursallowed r 6 mriable overhead rate).o.......,...,.
Fired ovgrlrgad budgeted r.....r..rr.r.'.....r............
175
$275,OOO260.Ooo
Va ri abl g cffi ci e ncy varia nce .ro............,..,.
hd
65;O00 actuaf hours r $O variable overhead rate601000 standard hourg allowed r $o variabre overhead rate....Variable efficiency variance (5rOOO hours r $61 ,......,..r.........o..
651000 actual hours r 34 firgd ovgrhgad rirtrg ..........................60,000 standard hours allowed r 30 fired overhead J?to.....,...Firgd cffi ciency variance (STOOO hours x $4).............................
... S 3O,OOO unfav.
$39O,OOO360,Ooo
$ 3o.ooo unfav.
$zoo,ooo240,000
$ 2O,OOO unfav.
S l5,OOO unfav.
$665,ooo
s?6O,OOO275.OOO 6:15,OOO
Chapter 18
CASES
cl8-1
(il Fl The use ol participgtive cost gtandards to motivate plant managorgand department heads has several benefits. These benefits rcsultfrom contact with erecutive managoment through the interchangeof ldeab, negotiation between the partles, and a final compromise inestablishing the standard. This allorvs the plant managers anddepartment heads to personally idenUfy with these standards'which wilt increase their desire to achieve a goal they have accept-od.
In this caso, howeve6 the standard-setUng pnocess does notsppoar to be partlcipative. Erecutive management appears to followthrough with the interchange of ideas, but the negotiation and finalcompnomise are missing. Executive management merely reviewsnecomm€ndations before setting the standards, without discussingthe standards further with plant managemenL As a consequence'plant managons may become frustrated with the standard-settingsystem and a negative irnpact upon motivation could result.
(bl The use of tight, but attainable, standards can have a positive moti-vation effect on department heads and plant managers. Ttris is par-ticularly true if they participated In setting the standards and areconfident that good performance witl be recognized and rewarded'However, if the standards aro perceived as being unattainable' thenthe motivation'will probably be negaUve because they leel there isno uso in trying lor an unreachable goal, The unfavorable variancesbeing the norm seems to imply that the standards aro too tight' andthis coutd be part of the causo for the low motivation among first-line supervisors.
(21 Under the present system, there is no motivation for department headsto control overhead costs because all overhead costs are allocated onthe basis of actuat units produced, and the actual production output inother departments can have a significant impact on the overhead costcharged to each department.
The use of standard, pradetermined department factory overheadrates, apptied on the basis of standard activity allowed for actual produc'Uon, should provide useful cost control information and enhance costcontrol on.,the part of department heads.
Chapter ta
c18-2 ,
(r) (a)
477
The characteristics that should be present in a standard cost sys-tem to encoufiage positive employee motivation include:(f) partlcipation in settlng standards from all levels of the organiza-tlon including purchasing, engineering, manufacturing, andaccounting;(21 the integration of olganizatlonal communication by translatingthe organizational goals and objectives into monetary terms for theemployees;(3) support of the standard cost system by executive management;(4) standards that ane perceived as achievable and accurate andapply to contlollable costs.A standard cost system should be implemented to motivate employ-ees positively by:(1) communicating the corporate objectives of a standard cost sys-tem;l2l solicitlng imprcvement in standards fipm employees;(3) using a standard cost system to prcvide a guide-to action, not astraight lacket. (Although signlficant variances should be expiained,employees should not feel that the standard ls a mandate.Gontinuous imprcvement shoufd be the goal.);(4) not overemphasizing variances, although standard cost vari-ances often are used for individual perfotrnance review and reward,(Employees should be encouraged to take actions that will benefitthe company as a whole rather than simply to meet standard.)Management by ercepilon focuses management's attention only onthose ltems that deviate significanily frc; the standanl, Theassumption is that by foregoing a thorough, detalfed analysis of allItems, the manager has morre time to concentrate on other manage_rial activities.The behaviorar rmplications of management by exception Incrudeboth positive and negative implications. on thl positive side, thistechnlque increases management efficiency by concentrating onlyon slgnificant variances, ailowing time for the h"n.gg to concen-trate on other activities. on the negative side, managens tend onlyto focus on the negative variances rather than the positive ones,limitlng their employee interactions to negative reinforcement orpunishment. This technique may not indicate detrimentar trends atan early stage, and fragmentation of efforts can occur fipm deallngonly with the specrfic probrems rather than gtobar issues.
(b)
(a)(21
(b)
Chapter 18
I
ClA-2 (Concluded|
(31 Employee behaylor could be affected advercely when standard cost vari'snces aro the sole basis for performance evaluaUon. Employees maygubyeft the system and attempt to build slack into the standard so thatthey can meet or exceed the standard. There can be a mlnimal level.ofmotivation sinco erceptional performanco is not rewarded' Employeesmay tend to engage In acdvlUes that atp not In tlre best overall Interestof the companffust to mest standard. Oveltmphasis on price variancescan rtsutt in a large number of low cost vendorsr hlgh levels of Inventorytand poor quality materials and parts. Oyet€mphasis on efficiency vari'ancas can ltsult in long production run3, large work ln process invento-ries, and attempts to control quality through inspection alone.
cl8-3
(1) Had Stevens not confined his initiat remarks to telling the employees thatproducgon standards were too tow, but rather erplained whyr the resultsof the confsrence would certainly have been mono effective.Furthermore, he should have lemained with the grouP and ioined the dis-cussion. He lailed to establish two-way cotnmunication' to exchangeideas, to air differences of opinion, and to provide neasons why certainpractices could or could not be followed. Had he remained with thegroupr Stevens coutd have stated that he had been thinking about theproblem of production standards and, In his opinion, such and suchshould be done. Then he could have asked the group what lt thoughtabout fottowing the ouUlned approach. The ensuing discussion shouldshape a suggested course of action nopresenting tho groupb opinions aswell as those of Stevens.
lt is poor pracUce for a manager to abdicate, as Stevens did in thisincidenl An important part of a managerb iob is to provide effectiveleadership, to show tha way by offering a plan, by giving neasons' and bytaking into account suggestions offered by the members affected by thoplan. Using this approa-ch, the managerls ideas, the groupb wishes, andthe needs of the enterprisa can be blended into an effective program.
h might be that the employees wene correct, that standards should bereduced. For example, errors In calcutating the standards ano possible.The employees must be given the opportunity to present reasons fortheir nocommendations.
Both facts and experience are important in determining the level ofproduction standards adopted. Stevens should abstain from forcing anydecision. lt may tako several weeks or months for events to demonstratewhat standards shoutd be established, for they will bo influenced, amongother things, by the verification of the employees' major beliefs, the cor'rectness of Stevens' statements, the extent of modifications requiredtand the fult comprehension of the situation by tho employoes.
Chapter 18179
Ct8-3 (Concludedl
The subject of raising production standards, in itself, is not a popularono among e-mployees. Ons must be quite naive to betieve that an
-
employee will_accept an increase in production standards without someexplanation of the reason it is requested or required. The issue in thisIncident could be better identified as sHow can the enterprise survive?'or sHow to Increaso our production outputD or .rHow to regain " st-ngcompetitive position for our company.tone might also raise the question of whether Stevens was adequately
in touch with the attitudes and beliefs of the Department B employ"u" '
torrard their workn especially prcduction standards, He does not appearto be. Better communication, improved supervision, and effective leader-ship apparenily are in order.(21 Stevens should calt another meeting with the production employees ofDepartmelt-B' indicating that he wishes to off-er to the group additionalper t inent in format iononproduct ionstandards.Next , t re1t rou loget � �
together all data dealing with the companyb produciion it"ndards andfair profits on the ownerb investment, the continuity of the enterprise,and other significant and applicable dlta. Preferabli it " "aoitional datashoufd be in a visual form to increase their effectivdness. Also, it isadvisable for Stevens to talk informally with leaders oi o"p"rtment Bempfoyees t-o discover why-the group recommended tower productionstandards. He can use this information to shape friJpiesentation at theforthcoming meeting,
The best approach for Stevens to foltow at the meeting is to:(al thank each member for his or her interest and past participation,(bl advise that additional information, vitat to the modification of pre-sent production standards, will be presented, foltowed UV a g.oupdiscussion,
(c) present the adrJitional information in a forthright manner,(dl remain with the group and join in the discussion from which thedecision on production standards wifl evorve.
CGA-Ganada (adaptedf. Reprint with permission.
Chapter 18
)18-4
:il Standard direet cost of I ton-gallon batch of raspberry sherbert follows:
Direct material:Raspberrles (25 qtst r $gO per qt.l ..............'. S8.ooOther lngredienb (1O gal. I $45 per gat.!........ 4.5O S1O.5o
Direct labonSorting (((3 min. r 6 qts. raspborries) + 6O min.)
r$gperht- | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . . .o. . . rr . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2.70Blendlng (ll2 min. + 6O min.) r $9 per hB)........ 1'8o 4.5o
Packaglng (4O qts.- r $.38 per qt.l 15,20Total dirsct standard cost per ten-gatlon batch of sherbert ... 99o.2o
'6 qts x (5 qts. + 4 gts.! = 7.5 qts. reguired to obtain 6 acceptable qts."4 qts. per gal. r 1O gal. = 40 gts.
l2l (al For the most Fartr the purchasing manager is responsible for unfa-vorable materials price variances. Gauses of unfavorable materialsprice variances at GoldKing are likely to includo one or mone of thefollowing:(11 failure to correctly forecast price incraasesl2l purchasing nonstandard or uneconomical lot sizes(31 purchasing from suppliers other than those offering the mosttavorable prices
(b) The production manager or foreman is usually held responsible forunfavorable labor efficiency variances. Causes of unfavorable laborefficiency variances could include one or mora of the tollowing:(ll poorly trained emplolrees(21 substandard or inefticient equipment or machinery(31 inadequate supervision(41 poor quality of materials (in particular, the raspberries that mustbe sorted by handl
Clppter 18
cl8-5,
181
$4 .5o.20
9l.zo
(11 Standard unlt cost per cutting board
Diract material:Lumber (1.25 board feet r (F + f) + 5| r $3 per board foot)..Footpads (4 pads r $.O5 per padlTotal direct materials
Direct labonPrcparc and cut 112 + 6O hour per board r ((5 + 1! + 5 x $80Assemble/finish (15 + 6O hour r $8;,.... a a a a t a t a a a a
si.922.00
$3.e2s8.93
(21
Total dirsct laborTotal standard unit cost......r.......r..........r................,..........r.ro.
The advantages of implementing a standard cost system include the lof-lowing:(al Standard costs are incorporated into the accounting system, making
record keeping easier and facilitating cost anallsis.(bl standard costs provide the basis for building a company budgeL(c) standard costs ssrvo as goals; they encourage cooparation and
coordination among all elements of the corporation. The varianceanalysis associated with standard costs provides a feedback slrstemto those responsible for controlling costs.
(a) The role of purchasing manager in the development of standardsincludes establishing the standard cost lor material required by thebill of materials, determining if the company shoutd take advantageof price raductions available through economic order quantity, andobtaining data regarding the availability of materiats.
(b) The role of industrial engineer in the development of standardsincludes preparing the bill of materiats that specifies the tlpes andquantities of material required; establishing, in conjunction with themanufacturing supervisor, any allowances for scrap, shrinkage, andwaste; and participating in time studies and test runs to facilitatethe establishment of time standards.
(cl The role of cost accountant in the development of standardsincludes reviewing all information regarding material and labor stan-dards received from other departments, establishing the labor rategtandards based on the type of labor required, deteimining apptica-tion rates for indirect costs such as material handling and factoryoverhead, and converting physical standards such aJ hours andquantities to monetary equivalents.
(31
/t82
cl8-6
Chapter 18
(r lActual Standard Unit Gost Price
Material Quantitv Cost . Cost \/afiancg Variance
Maran................ 8r48o $2'05 $2.oo So5 $ 424 unlav.SatOI.................. 25r2OO .7O .75 (.051 (11260l laV.cra|yn..o.....r....... l8r54o .9O 1.OO (.tol (1.8541 faV.
Ngt matgrials purchase price varianco..........r.........'...r.....o...' -$(3€9Ol fav.
Actual quantifies at individual standard materials costs:Maxilo...,.... 8r48O gallons O $2.0O......-.r.. S161960
92220-gallons
Standard (expectedl output from actual input (52,22O x.8O = 4lJTAI multlplled by $1.3O wolghted average otstandard materials COSI Outpftt ...,..'...................r........o.....
Matgrials mir Varial|CO......r................'r.................'......o...'.....
Materials yield varianc
Safer......... 25r2OOCralyn....,... 18.54O
Ma:en....
o .75.. . . . . . . . , . 18r9OOo 1.0o.......,... 18.540 s54r4OO.OO
54.308.80
a a r a r a a a a a a a a a t a a a l a a a a a a a t a . a a a r a a a a a
,La.trl
OulndV
Totrl Urlnc at nd.td [lrtrrirb
. Actu.l ttrrd..d Acfirl ltryrdrrd Qurntity lJnlt }Ir
Qr,rrnttt Forrnslr r gg3ggl r Fonnrdr Yrrirdon r- Co.t I Vrr!gg911
8,48o sab. :H 52,220 gay 8,355 salr 1% gab. 32.00 S25o.oo unfav.
Selcr.....253OO
Crayln... 18,540
62,220 25,060
32"220� 18,799 l%0,
300o25
2t23625
.75
1.OO
lOO.5O unfiv.
(259.oo) fav.
(.30)
f_9!39 unfav.
t_9!.2O unfa%
Standard (expectedl output from actual input at weightedaveragO Of etandafd matefials COSI OUtpUt.,.....,..,............. S541308.8O
Actual output quantity at weighted averiage of standardmaterials cost (4OrOOO r $1.3O! ...,................,...,................ 52.OOO.OO
$1i998.8o unfav'
An analysis of the portion ol the mix varianco attributable to each materialfollorvs:
34-9c"r. Wgar". JRoundlng dl f lerencc.
Clppter 18 4&t
Cl8-6 {Concluded}
(21 Belore LAB Chemical Company management can controt costs, theyneed to know which costs ara out of line, within whosa area of-responsi-bility has the cost varianco appeared, what is the ggtuse of the cosi vari-snce' and who has the responsibility to correct the cause of the vari-gnce.
Standard costs and the variances from them help management tobegin to answer thess issues. Specifically, the variances indicate wheremanagement should begin its invesfigation:(al Price variations-the information to identity the causes of the price
variances usually can be obtained in the Purchasing Depart-unt. Areview of purchasing procedures and rccords woutd disclosewhether the variances wena caused by permanent changes inprices, poor purchasing practices, or poor production sJhedulingrequiring incurence of extra costs to expedite shipments. Theinformation obtained wifl identity the department responsible forthe extra cost and provide clues to improve the control.
(bl Mix and yield variances-the information to identity the cause ofthesa variances usually can be obtained in the proiuction depart-ments. A review of materials records and handling procedurcswould disclose whether the mix variance was caused by the use ofwrrong proportions, entering excess materials into the processbecause of carelessness, or adjustment of the mix to accommodateoff-standard materials quality caused by the same factorr. Thus, theyield variance would often be explained by the same information.Nonstandard proportions would often result in nonstandard yieldsand excess materials inputs. Tho information obtained would hetpidentify the department responsible and provide clues to improvethe control,
c18-7
( 1 ) (al
(b)
(c)
Materials-quantity purchased ..............,.........,.....,.. 5,2OO lbs.Unfavorable unit cost ($2.iO - 32) ........,...........t....... x $.lOMaterials purchase price variance.......,...............,,... $ S2O unfav.Materials-quantity used.o.....,...... 5,30O tbs.Materials-qu a ntity req uire d at sta ndard (5, OOO
units produced x 1 lb. per unit)............. ' ..:............. S.OOOUnfavorable quantity.................o............,......r........... 3oo lbs,ItanOlrO cost per lb. ........................ r $2Materiats quantity variance ......,.....:.:::::::::: . $ ffi unfav.Direct labor usedUnfavorable unit hourly rate ($4.1O _ S4).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,20O hrs.x $ .1O
S 82O unfav.Direct labor rate variance
r
i
481
1
C18-7 (Continued|
(dl Direct labor used
Chapter l8
8r2OO hrc.Direct labor required at standard for 5'000 units
pfOd UC gd .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . .r . . . . . . . . . . . . .ooo...r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t .r . . . 8. OOO
Unfavorabtg dirgCt labor llS€...................................'. 2OO hrs.Standard wagg rate per direct labor houl...-'...r........ x $4DirgCt labOf gffiCignCy VarianC8.............,....rt..........., -9999 unfaU
(el Analysis by expenses of the factory overhead controllable variancefor 5rOoO units of production:
J:*"9.'Ji:-''l:'"f;' or":*'iloJ,:";'9, !:Jll1il,i "ilH:l'.:.Chargcd Output Ovcr (Undcrl
Variable factory overhead:tndirgct 1abor.......o......r.....r.....r......r...,. $ gr84O $lOrOOO s (1 6OlSU ppl ieS.-Oi l . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . .o. . . . . r , . . . . . . ,o. . . . 3r3 0O 2t5OO 8OO
Allocated variable seryice departmentCOSI.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . r . r . , . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2OO 2.5OO 7OO
Total variable factOry overhead....o....r. $16,340 315.OOO 31.34O
Fixed factory overheadzSuperuisiol l . . . . . . . . . . 92,475 $2,250 S 225Depreciat ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . r . , .o. . . . . , . . . . . r . 3r75O 3r750 OOther fixed costs ..,........... ,.... 1,250 1,250 O
Totat f ixed factory overhead .. $ 7,475 $ 7'250 $ ZZS
Totaf ........ro....,......................................... 523.gl 5 522,25O Sl ,5.99
(21 Clearly indicating where the responsibilit ies for price and quantity vari-ances tie and charging the variances to the departments with initialresponsibility reduces the conflict but does not eliminate it.
The specific cause(sl of the variance needs to be determined beforethere can be certainty that the proper department is charged. For exam-ple' if materials were purchased at higher than standard prices becausethe Manufacturing Department required a rush order, then the price vari-ance is the responsibility of the Manufacturing Department. l l the materi- :
als provided by the Purchasing Department were of slighUy lower qualitythan specifications required, due to careless purchasing, the excessquantity used by Manufacturing is the Purchasing Department's respon-sibitity.
Clppter tg .rEs
Cl8-? [ConUnued]
Even if the variances anB pnopedy charged to the two departments, itcan be argued that the purcjrasing b"p"rtrentb varianli is influencedby the orc€sr_quantity requirod bi M;;-"cturing. fi this case, the extra3oo poun ds will increase. itr.e. ryrd_rrasin g -oepartrienit
G ri"n"e (accu-mulated over_several periodsl by $SO t36O lbs. I $,iO;. The S3O is thefoint responsibility of the two dipartments.
(31 Generally, the Manufacturing Department manager cannot controf theprice of the overhead items' T?r"'r-rore, $te prices srrouiJ not inffuencethe data in the departmental repo*. r,irn"r, the allocation method forgervice department costs is not "umci"nliv erptained ioletermine whatpart (if any) of this variation can be identirilo iliut il; ;-";"rtment. Thefixed overhead items listed in this case iirmattv "r.� ort"ioe a depart-ment managerb control. Supplies and indirect labor remain.control can be erercised-it ne o"p"*r"ntal level over the amount ofitems used' Therefore, emphasis srroirci be placed on the quantitieswithin the variances' wittr iittte ;r;;;ii""i" on dolar vatues. Themajor use of the doliar values woutd be io estabfish the guantity level ofeach variance that would be economicatly worth managementb atten-tion.
III
Chapter 18
1
Cl8-7 (Concludedl
TO: Departmont Managen-ManufacturingFROM: Performance AnalYsis
RE: Gontrollab I e Factory Orerh ead Perf orman ce-N ove mb erPercent
Gompared
rndirect tabon Quantitv to standard
Favorable indirect labor use(doltar value-94O01
Supplies-olt:Unfayorable oil use (dollar value-SSOOl I'O0O gals. 2ooh
Commentarv:The dollar value of the oil variation and its large percentage require iden-tifying the cause and applying control procedures.
The indirsct labor variation, although favorable, should be investigated tobe sura that it does not represent unaccomplished activiUes affectingother aspects of the operatlons.Gomoutations:lndirect labor:
Hours usgd.. .r . . . . . . . ' . . , . . . r . . . ' r ' . . . . .o. . . . . ' .o. . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . 214OO hrs'
Standard hours for 5,OOO units of output(5rOOO r .5 hrs.)...............,o...,....r.... ' ................ ' ..,
' Favorable indirect 1aborvariation...,.......................Dollar value at standard wage rates.........,....... ' .
Supplies--oil:Oil consumed....,..............r................,.......r.... ' ..... ' . ' 6rOOO gals.Standard quantity for 5,OOO units of output....... ' ... 5.OOOUnfavorablg oil consumption........o.........,............... lrO0O gals.
Doltar value at standard oil prices,..................r ' ..... lSOt(4) The immediate reaction might be to dismiss the department managen
However, careful thought would require analysis of the situation to detenmine (al if, on an overall basis, the department is being operated eco-nomically (if so, then dismissal may be undesirable|; and (b| if the causeof such behavior is due to management reaction to unfavorable vari-ances without regard to size, or to undue emphasis by managsment onindividual variances to the erclusion of measurement of overall perfor-mance.
lf it is assumed that the manager is porforming satisfactorily on anoverall basis and should not be dismissed, then two possible solutionscan be considered:(al Revise reporting methods to emphasize overall performanco.(b) Revise reporting on labor to combine direct and indirect labor into
one item for performance evaluation-
1OO hrs. 4oh
2.500__1991199
hrs.
I
Chaptor l8
cl8-8
(1 )
487
(21
(a) Revising the standards immediately would facltitate their use in amaster budget. Use of revised standards would minimize productioncoordination probfems and facilitate cash planning. Revisld stan-dards would facilitate monE meaningful cost-volurie-progi anafysisand result in simpter, mono meaningfuf variance analysis. Standardsare.often used in decision analysis such as make-o".-lrv, p-ar"tpricing, or product discontinuance. The use of obsolete standardswould impair the analysis.
(b) Standard costs are carried through the accounting system in a stan-dard cost system. Retaining the current standaroianJ eifanoingthe analysis of variances would eliminate the need to make changesin the accounting system.Changing standards could have an adverse psychological impacton the persons using them. Retaining the current standards wouldpreserve the well-known benchmarks and aftow for conJi"tln"y in,reporting variances throughout the year.Variances a-re often computed and ignorcd. Retaining the currentstandards a1d expanding the anallrsis of variances wou-tJ-io.r" "diagnosis of the costs and woutd increase the lirerirroooltrit signifi-cant variances would be investigated.
(a) changes in prime costs per unit due to the use of new directmaterial.
Changes due to direct material price:((new material price - old material price) x new
material quantity = ($T.Zt - $Z,OO) x t pound).,Changes due to the effect of direct materialquantity on direct material usage:((old material quantity - new miterial quantity) x
ofd materiar price = (1.25 - 1.ool r iz.ooi.:.:..... (r.75)fav.Ghanges due to the effect of direct materialquantity on direct labor usage:((ofd labor time - new rabor time) x otd rabor rate =((24 + 60) - (22 + 60)) r $i2.6oj............:.:........... (.42ltav.Total changes in prime costs per unit due to theuse of new direct materia|............,.....,.............. $(i.4Olfav.
(b) changes in prime costs per unit due to the newlabor contract((new rabor rate - ord tabor rate) x new rabor time= (S14.4o - Si2.60l rl22 * 6d))............:.:.:......... .66 unfav.Reduction of prime costs per unit ($1S.OS _ $13.79) $ (.7alfav.
$ .77 unfav.
, r- \
O1$'1. Whm rtandetd cotr an nof ircorponlc4 hryrnay b. uced fotth. Putpocs cl prichg' budgrel'hg, and canlrolling 6t bd if |hcy an not uscdtor twrntory cocthg, tho advaniager lrqn lhoBving cl clodcal dlorl in accounthg cannol bcoblahed
O1$'2. With actual cost methodq it ir tirsl noceesaty lorolect a coat flow melhodJifo, fifo, averago,ob. lt
'l lhen ncccsgary to keep detsiled rccordr
ol quarililicr and prbo atd b mrko laidy cun'phx calcubticrs cl invontory cods. Wilh a statl'dard cocting syclm, crly quantitieg, nol prirxs,murl br taken into accounl' facililaling bothncod keephg and cabubtbnr. Stan&rd codlabo prwiJr el stllol
Ol 9'3. Tho nurnber of variance occountg is delermhedby (a) the nunrber ard typc cil variancec lhat areto lppeat in ttatomont! for managemont u!c,and (b) lho need for casy dbp€al of variarcerat thr ond O ,6" ;ircal prrird, particularly whonthr variancec are not trested uniformly h finan'cial Catementg and for analyrcs.
Ol$.t. (a) The standad coct ol prcduc-tr csnpletedand productc sold can be detorminedinmedbtely withord wailing lor lhe asludc€l to be cabuloted. With stsndsrd costr,rnmhly stalomontr can be prepared nrorcqubkty.
(b) A firm producing a greal many dillerentproducts finds it praclically impossible todelermine the actual cost of each productThe use ol standard costs will facilitate thepreparaticn of hcorne statements by prod-ucl lines.
(c) Keeping linished goodr stek recor& inquantiiier mly will result h derical savhg,s ince lh is e l iminales lhe necessi ly forrecording lho aclual unil cost of eachnceipl and i*ruc or strbmml.
0195. Thr standard cethg ol invcntorics depends cr(a) lhe types of standardr cmployed, (b) thedegree of guccesg that the company haa inkceping overall sstual cost! h lhe with standardcod!, std (c) the ccrrcept hcld with regard io thensl suilablc khd of cost.
at$€. (a) Defenal of variancor is supported qr thegrounds that. il th. rtandardg in usc arcbasod qr nqmal prbr, efficienqy, and orn-pul levels, posilive and negstivc varioncescan be expoctod to offget src anothcr hthc long run. Becaule varisncc accountbelances al any givon point in limo aroduc to recurring rcasonol and businesr
CHAPTER 19
DtscussroN QuEsTloNS
cycb llwtuatbnr. and brcaur prrkdicreporlhg requirementr rcault in arbilrarycutcill daleq varianc. smt balarcer da parlicuhr culrff dalc ar nd astignabbto oprrating r!!ull! of lhr prriod lhrnond€d They will carrcel oul ortr lino andherefore shorrH br carriod b |hc balarrcorheeLVarbrccq appesrhg ar clrarger or credilrqr |frr ircqnr rtdemrnl an rognrdrd arapproprbr ctrarges or crcdils in thr pcrFod in whk*r they arise. Thcy an conskirrcd tho resuh €t larrorable or nfavorsblodcpadurcs frqn nonnd (ttatdatd) condi'tione and aro disckcscd rcparalely frorncot of goodr soH at stendatd" Thb pro'vUer rnanagemerd wih mobscured hlo.'mElbn for inmedialc correclivc aclkxt
lnventory etl and cod cil goods soldshouH not b. digtortod by variancer thatrepresenl abnormal etficienciet or ineffi'cionci.t. Thc slandard cocl roprorenlrthal Irnount which is rearcnably fieces'sary to produce finishcd products andshould lherelon be considored the bcctmeasure of the scst of goods mgnufac'tured and inventory cool, as bng ar theunderlying operating conditionr remainundranged.The argumenl for allocating varianceabelrvo€n invenlories and cost of goodssold is that standard cogts are a uselul tolfor purposes ol managerial control, bulshqrld not bc substitutes for actual hictorFcal cetr h the financial slatemenla Onlyaciual historical costs shouH be used fortinancbl reporlhg, even though lhey arcgreater or leas than stEndatd cootl, andwilhgut regard to lho reasqlr for their dif-fersnceg lrom stan&rd costt. Standardcod varianco3 are no{ gahs or loeses butcosts (or reductions therein) ol goodlmanufactured and should be allocaledbetween invenlorieg and cosl ol goodrrcld. To treat |hem ar gahs or lcser hthe period h which they arise disfofi boththo inventory and gres profit figurea. Thirdistortbn will bo cven gtealer if tho clatl'dardr are Lackhg in rccuracy or rcliability.Further, lo tubsliluto standard coslt loractual historicaj cost8 h thc lirancbl atal*.rnrnb rgptslontr an unwarranled cacrilicrol objeclrvity.
(b)
(c)
488
Clupter t9
Er9-1
E)GRCTSES
Price Yarlance rocorded at the time materials are received and pfacad in thestorcltom:
8,400600
6rggg42
189
ilaterials (2oroo0 r $.421 ..r.o.r..........o..........D..........,....Materials Purchase prico Varlance (2O,O0O r $.O3)....
Accounts Payable,(2o,OOo x $.45)..,..,,.r.,...............Work In Procass (8r2oo r 2 r ilZl r...............,..........o.Materf atd euanuty Varlance (t oo i $.42; ...,..:::.::::,,.,..
Matgrlalg (l 0r5Oo r $'lzl .................,.................o...
Materials rscorded at astuaf cost when- reccived, and price variance determinedat the time materials ars lssued to production:Mater ia ls (2O,O0O x $.45) . . . .
Accounts Payabte .'.......'.....,..r.r.r......r.....o..-....r...r..
work in Proggss (8r2oo x 2 rg42l ..,..,..........,.o,....D....Materials Prica Usqge Varianca lio,soo , S.0g1.........Materials euanUty Variance (t oo , i.ce;...J..:...::::,.....
9,OOO
6,930
9,OOO9,0o0
6,ggg49542
7 1425Materials (16,500 x $.as).
Prica variance determined when the materials ara- received, but not charged toproductlon until the materiars are actuarty praced In process:Matgrials (2oro-oo r $a2)....,........................,............,. grfooMateriats purchase prici variance ,iid,doo x $.o3).;. 600Accounts payable (2o,oo0 , S.asi..... 9,oooWork In Prccgss (gr2o0 x 2 r-$.42) ..,,......,...........o..r... 6rgggMaterials
luqntitrVariance (ioo;C.4t::.,.,...,,n..,.... 42Materials (i 6rsoo r $,42) .-................,:::........,.......,. 6,930Materials
|rig Usage Variance (16,500 x $.o3) 4ssMateriars purchase price varianie.,1..,.,................. 495E19-2
(1) Materials (l2'O.OO Ae purchased r $S Sp) ..........or..,.o. 961000Materials purchase piice Vari"n""..,...,:.:.:....,............ g60Accounts payable 96,9g0
Work in process (12,BOO Se r Sg Sp) lOZ,qOOMateriats euantity Variance .........::.:.::.:::::...... 1,600Materiats (r3,ooo Ae issued r 38 apt::::.........:.::::: 1o4,ooo
#n1
E19-2 (Concluded)
l2lAveraqe costing Total Cost
$ 15r88O96.900
Chaptor t9
UnitCosts7,94
g.og8.OO averago
96rg6096,96O
780I 04,78O
Beginning inventof!..,..............PUrChaSgg.........".rr..................Available for use.
Quantitv2,OOO
12.OOO14.OOO
Materials...Accounts Payable ...r..........o....r..r... '................r.r....
Work ln Process (12r8oo SQ r $S Sn,............o......t...! lO2rdooMaterials Quantlty Vadance (i3,OOO - l2rBOO) r $S Sn i,600Materials Price Usage Variance (t3'OOO Ae r
(s8.o6 AP - $8 SP))Materials (13rOOO AQ r $8.O9 AP}.,..,..,..,,..........,...
(3) Fifo inventorv
Work in Process (same as abovg|...............,.............r.Materials Quantity Variance (same as above|.,........i..Materials Price Usage Variance
Materials (($Z.ge r 2'OOO units) +(S8'o8 r I l rooo units)) ..........o......o...............,..r.,.
(4) Lifo inventorv
work in Procgss (same as above) ...........................o...Materials QuanUty Variance (sarne as above}..........,..Materials price Usage Variance.....,.......r...,..,.......r.,...
Materiats ((SB.OA r 12,OOO units) +(S7.94 r l r0oo units)) ............,...........o..........,......
E19-3
Payrol l ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t , . . , r . . . . .o . r . . , . . . . . . . . . , . , , r . . , . . . . . . . . .Accru gd Pa1rrclt. . . . ' . , . . . . . . . ,r. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . .r. , . .r, . .
Work in Process (2rdOO x 314 r Sg.5O).r.. . . . . . .r. . . . . .r. .r,r.Labor Efficiency Variance (1Zo x Sg.io)
L a b o r R a t e V a r i a n c e ( 1 , g 2 O x S . 1 O ) . . . . . . . . . . . .Payro l t (1 ,92O x $9 .4O)
102,4OO1,600
760
102,4OO1,600
900
1 8 , 0 4 8
1 7 , 1 O 01 , 1 4 O
1O4,760
104,90O
18 ,048
19218 ,O48
Ctlr,Ots t0
Elg-4'
191
Work in Prpcess(lO'OO0 unltg r 2 SQ per unlt r $2 Spl'....,..r.,....
Materials Prlce Varlancc(($e.tO AP - $Z S4 r 2lrO0O AQI .....................,..
Materialg QuanUty Varlancc($2 SP x (2O'OOO SQ - 2l'OOO AQ)).........r...,.....,..
Materlals (21,OOO AQ r S2.1O API
Work in Procass(lo,oo0 unlts r 114 SH per unlt r $i2 SR)
Labor Rate Variance( ($1Z.ZO AR . $12 SR) x 2,4OO AH). . . . . . . . .
l-abor Efficiency Variance[$12 SR r (2,40O AH - 2,500 SHD
Payroll (2,4OO AH x SIZ.ZO AR) ... . . . . .
Work in Process Gt7 FO rate r l2rO0O SH)..................Applied Factory Ovefi ead ..,...,,,,...................,.......
Applied Factory Overhgad ....r.........r........,..................Fa gtory Ovgrhoad Contro1...r.,..,...r.........-,..roo.
Volume Variance(S4.5O fix. rate r (l5'OOO BH - l2'OOO SH)f ........,
Controllablg Varianc6.....................r......,.......,........Factory Overhead Control
(S91,00O actual - S84,O0O appt ied). .
Factory ovgrh gad Contro1....................r................,.....various crgdits r-...,..r........r.......,............................
Work in Process (i l 'OOO SH r $5 FO rate)..,........,......Applied Factory Ovorhead .o....,........
Applied Factory Overhead ............r.,....,..........,.......,...Factory Overhead Controt.. ..,,.....,....
Controllablg Variance ....,........r....... ' ...............r....,.,...Volume Variance
_ (S2 fir. rate r (1O,OOO BH - 1i,OOO SH))Factory Overhead Control
40rooo
2,too
2,OOO44, lOo
Er9-5( f )
l2't
(31
3OTOOO
480
84rOOO
84,OO0
l3,5OO
56,OOO
55,OOO
55,OOO
4,00o
1,2O029,2go
84,0OO
84,00O
6,5OO
7,00oE19-6
(1)
(21
f3)
(4)
56,0OO
55rO0O
55,O00
2rOOO
2,OOO(S57,OOO ac tua l - $55,OOO app l ied) . .
r - l
- \
KP
=79-7
llt Work In Process (4rgOO SH x $10 FO tiato),.,...............Applled Factory Overhead
i2l
B}
Applied Factory OverheadFactory Overhead Gontrol
Variable Efficlency Variance($4 var. rate x (5r2OO AH - 4r8OO SH)l ............,.,.r
Volume Varlance($12 llr rate r (5
Spendlng Varlance;OOO BH - 4800 SHll .......,,r.......
Factory Overhead Contml($78,200 actual . $7618OO applied)..r,..,.,.,...,...,...r.
:19-8
f l Work in Process (Z'0OO SH r $11 FO ritof ,..........r,.....Applied Factory Ovgrhgad r...........o........r.........o.....
2l Applied Factory OverheadFactory Overhead Control
3) Variable Efficiency Variance(98 var. rato i (Z1600 AH - Zroog SHlt ..........,....,.
Volume VarianceGt3 fix. rate x (BTOOO BH - T'OOO SH}!...........o......
Spending Variancg'.........r.r...............r..r..r.........r.....,r..Factory Overhead Control
($86,500 actual - $ZZ,OOO appl ied). . . . . . . . . . , . . r , . . , . . . . . .
7618OO
76,8OO
Chagtor 19
76,8OO
76,8OO
I'OOO
214OO
77,OOO
77,OOO
4,8OO
3,OOO1,7OO
2,6OO
1r4OO
77 |OOO
77 |OOO
9,50O
I
l-
I:
Clppter rg
Ei9-9 .Percentage of curnent-year labor cost element In finished goods and costgoods sold:
Flnishad goods, lgrooo units x $,0 1abor..,...............D.. ##:;Gost of goods sold (ftom cumont production),(91ro0o unib - lSroOO unitsix Sl faiot ............._g94.ooo
of
sgsq@9
oh
20
80too
b Allocation of cumant-year tabor variances:
I
b
Allocation of variances:
Finished goods (*?f0_9o_l 2o%o1,.............r...r.............. Sior4oocost of soods sotd (g52,ooo r tioy"1...............:::::....... 4t.600lga€99
End-of-year batances:
FinishedGoods
$tTirooolO'4OO
Balance at standald...'.........r......o........r...r...o...............
P:f:ll:arb Jabor variances aiiocation...................,.I
!t
Last yearb variances, alt appllcable to "o"i-oi-;;il;sofd on a fifo ftow assumrition .r......................-__-_--
E19- t o
Percentage of units in inventories and cost of goods sotd:Direct Labor and
Factorv OverheadUnits %
5OO lOVo7 r2OO 24oh3.300 660h5.OOO 10c.o.h
Gost of .Goods Sotd$819,OOO
41,600
5,goos866.400-
Gost ofGoodsSofd
$ (82.so)275.OO396.OO7g2.oo990.oo
(1 ,188.OO)
$:,i-g3.sg
MaterialsUnits o/o
1'500 2sohl r2OO 21oh3,300 55oh_q@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@�g 7_oo%
II
>
I
TotalAmount
$ (150.001500.oo600.0o
l12OO.OO1,5OO.OO
(1,800.00t
$r,sso.gg
Work inProcess
$ (37.501125.OO60.oo
120.oo150.oo
(180.oo1
FinishedGoods
$ (3o.ool100.oot44.OO288.OO360.oo(432.OO1
s43o.og
- \
$1
E19.I I APPENDD(
Work In Procest ($4 FO rate r 3'{5O unltr I 1.5 SH per unltlApplled FaCtOfy OVgfhgad.............................'..............F...
Appllgd FaCtOfy OVeffiead .r........o............x'or8r.o.,............-.o.Lifci"n"y Varlinco St4 Fo rate r (5'320 All -5'175 SHll """ldle Gapiclty Varlanco (33 llr rats r (8,000 BH - 5'320 Al0!
Spendlng VarlanccFagtory Overhead contJol ..-.
EI9-i2 APPENDX
Work In Process ($2o FO ratc r 9'4OO SHIApp ll g d Factory Overh ea d .......r....rr.....
Apptled FaCtOry OVefhgad....o...........'....o..o....'.....o.'........D..Varf able Efticlenqy Varianco
Gt4.5O Yaf. I (f 0'600 All - 914OO SH))..'......'.'...........Flxed Efflclency Varlanco
GNl5.5O fh. r (10'600 Alf - 9r4OO SHll ..'.""r"""'o""Spending Variance ...o.o....ldle Capacity Variancc
Glt5.5O fir. r (lO'OOO BH - lOr6OO Al'l)1.............'.o...Factory Overhead Control a a a a t a t a a a a a a
2Or7OO
2Or7OO680
4040
188,OOO
188,OOO
614OO
18,600
ChWtor 19
20r7OO
1r97O21r35O
t88,OOO
7,2OO
9r3OO195 ,5OO
1lE
t\,
tI
t
l\-
I
L
It'
I
I
\,
IL
I
!
Clpptcr19
PROBLEMS
Pt0-l
Materlats (33rOOO AQ purchased x 32 SPI ..'........r................tMaterials Purchasg Pricg VariancO ..............,............o'....Accounts Payable (33,OOO AQ purchased x ${.96 AP) ..,.
Work In Prcces8 (OroOO oqulyalent unlta r 6 SQ r $2 SPf '.'...Materials Quantlty Variancc
Materlals (4O,OOO AQ lssued r 52 SP)
Work In Prtcess (5r8OO equivalent unlts r7l4 SH r $8 SRl.,.Labor Rate variance ($g.zo AR - $s snl r 1r5o0 AH)......,.....labor Efficlency Variance ($8 SR r (1,5oo A]l - 1,45O SR]l....
Payroll Gb8.2O AR r l 'SOO AH|.....,.......,....o...........,...........
Factory Ovgrhgad Contrc|..,...r.....Various Crtdits...
Work in Process(5,5OO equivalent units r 314 SH r Sl0 FO rate1........
Applied FaCtory Ovgrhgad '.D......'.......'......o.................t...r
Appli gd Factory Overh gad .'...'.'............o...r...........r................Controtlab lg Varianco ......,.,..r..........r..........r.r....r........r.,..,.....
Volume Variance ($12 fired rate r (4,OOO BH - {,125 SH}}Factory Overhead Control ....,r...............,.................,.......
Finished Goods (5r2OO units r $26 standard cost),......r....o....Work ln Procgsg ..........,,.......,.,,.., ..r,.,.r....r,
Accounts Receivable (5r50O units r 940 sales pricel ..,..,......Sa1es.. . . . . . . . . . ' . r . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . , , . . . . . . . .
Cost of Goods Sold (5r5O0 units r 326 standard cost).,.........Finlshgd Goods.. . , . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . , . . . . r . . .
b
tt
I
L
tr
iD
!
I
>
I!
I
66rOOO1r32O
64,68O
72rOOOSrOOO
80,OOO
l1 ,600300400
12,3OO
65rOOO65rOOO
66rOOOg6,ooo
66,OOO500
1,5OO5,OOO
135,2OO135,2O0
22O|OOO22O,OOO
f 43,OOO143rOOO
t
I'''
1#
P19-2Materials Labor
2r4OO 2r4OO300 300
Chapter 19
Overhead2r4OO
300
2rloo 2,1oo
Units completed gnd transferred out this periodLess all unltg In bgglnning Inventofi,...............,rEqulvatent unlta gtsrted and completed thla
period 2r1OO
o2ao
Add equiyalent unlts requlred to completcbeginnlng Inventory
Add eguivalent unlts In endlng lnventory r......-..Equivalent unitg ol producUon this period.........Multlply by standard guanUty of lnput per unit
of productStandard quantity of Input allowed for work
produced during the period
Materials (l1,0OO AQ purchased r $0 SPIMaterials Purchase Price Vari
Accounts Payab1e.. . . . . . . . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . .
Work in Process ($O SP x 11r5OO SQ allow€d).....,.,,......,.......Matgrials QuanUty Variancc r...........o................o....................
Matgrials ($6 SP r 12roO0 AQ lssugd|............o.....,,........r
Work In Procesg ($i2 SR r lrT25 SH aflowodf .............,...o.....l-abor Rate varlance ($12.10 AR - $rz snl r l,7oo AH!........
Labor Efficiency Variancc($12 SR r (1 ,7OO All - 11725 SH)l ...,...r i..........,,.......r.
Payrolla a a a a a a a a a t a a a a a a a a a a a t a t t a a
15050
2r3OO
2MH
1_J25 !.600
66rOOO1 , O O O
67,OOO
69rOOO3rOOO
72,OOO
20t7OO170
69,OOO
64,4OO
64,4OO
8404r48O
30020r57O
09,ooo
64,4OO
72069,OOO
213OO
5 unlts
l_l.5oo
too100
2r3OO
3/4 DLH
Factory ovgrhgad Controt..............................o.....,.................Various Grgdits. . . . . . . . . . ro, . . . . . . . . . . . r . . , . . . . . . . . . , . r . . , . . . . . r ,
Work in Process (Sf 4 FO rate r 41600 SH a!!owod|...........,....Applied Factory ovgrhgad........,..-.r.r.,r.......,..r..........,,....
Applied Factory overhgad ......o.,........,r............r..o.r....,..r........Variable Eflici ency Variance
(S2.80 yar. rate'r (4,9OO AH - d,6OO SlIl) .................Volume Variance (St t.Zo fix raten x (5,oOO BH - 4,600 SHI)
Spending Variancg.t,........,,.. ...........r,.Factory Overhead Control ,..........,.....................
'S14 FO rate x2Ooh var iablo = S2.gO var iabte rate" 314 FO rato - S2.8O variabte rate = 311.2O fired rate
I
I\-
IL
I
b
Ib
I
I
-
t
\
Ctaplstg
Plg€'
-Unlts ggmqfot-od and transfermd out this period .......L'8gs all unfts In beglnnlng lnventoty........:......:.:.,......Equlualent unlts startod and compteteO this perlod...Add equlvalent u-nfts rcqutred to complete
beginnlng lnvantofl ...r.......D...t...................Add egulvalent unlts ln ending Inventory....D...o....r....,Equlualent unlts of producUon Urtg penoA ....,........,...Multlpfy by standard quanilty of lnput p"i uiii
---'
_ Of prOdUCt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Dor. .ea11..11. . . .1. . i . . . . . . . ! . . . . .
Standard quanilty of fnput altowed for workproduced durlng thc perfod,............o.,........
197
ConversionMaterials Cost
5,ooo -Efoo3,OOO 3.OOO2,OOO 2'OOO
o2,OOO4,O0o
2rOOO1.5005,5OO
6 unlts 1t2 hour
24.OOO Z,ISO
Materlals ($'5q sP r gorooo Ae purchasedt .,,.........,..o.......... lsroooMatgrials Purchase Price variancg.........ror.....................,o..r., lroooAccounts Payab|ett"rr.........r.........r..... '...........r...r.r.......... 16rooo
work fn PrccesL.F:?o _sp , 24rooo Se altowed),.................., izroooMaterlals euantity Variance .....Materiars ($.sb sp;-;d#iliiffiil':::::.::.::::.::.::::.:::: 2so
72,zsoWork In prccess 6f 9-9! , 2r7SO SH -a-fl91ved| .............,....o..o. 2TTSOOLabor Rate varianco ((sro:t6 AR - sro $ii;'iiiiooAH usedt r,esoLabor Effi ciency Variance
Glf o sR r (2r8oo AH - 2r7s_?sl0).....,..............ro,.......... 1r5ooPayron Gto.zs AR r 2,600 ax useii:::::::::::.:...............::: 27,e5o
Work In Process ($12 FO rate r 2rlSASH allowrod),............... 33roooAppligd Factory ovgrhgad.'.......................,....t,............... 33rooo
Factory Overhead Contro|.....,.....various credits......:.::::::::::::::.::::::..::::.:.::::.:.:..:.,::::::..::.:: 3 i ,ooo
sr,oooApplied Factory Overhead ....,..,..controltable varian"" .....,....:::::::,
""""""""""'..r.... '...........,. 33rooovofume varfance Fe nred;;;i{iilH;ffi;1iil. 2so
2,2soFactory overhead controt .-.::............,r............,...,......o.... 3i rooo
rI
i
Chapter 19
P19-3 (Concludedf
Finished Goods Inventory (5,OOO unlts x $14 standard costr) 7O,OOOWOfk in PfOCeSS ..r.........o...r.r...........o.........r..................... 70tO0O
'Materials (6 unlts O $'50 eachl'.'... $ 3.oo5.(X'Labor lll2hovr O $1O per hour)
Overhead: Varlable lll2hour e 33 por hourl...... 1'50Fixed (1/2 hour O $9 per hour).......,.. 4.5O
Total standard cost per unlt of product.............. 9!4.00
Cost of Goods Sold (5r1OO units x $14 standard cost).,......... 71r4OOFinishgd Goods lnventory...................'.'...o...........'.......... 71t4OO
Accounts Receivable (5r1OO units x922 sales prlce|....,....... 712eOO1"l2r2OO
P19-4
GGA-Canada (adaptedl. Reprlnt wlth pe rmlsslo n.
ENSLry CORPORANONIncome Statement
For Year Ended December 31. 2OASales ((2O'0OO unlts + 1101000 unlts - 12r0O0 unltsl r $251.....r...... $2,950,000Cost of goods sold at standard (118,0OO unlts x $17.60) .. 2.076.800Gross profi t at standard ... . , . . . , . . . . . . .r. . . .r. , . .o.,, . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . $ 87312OOAdd ngt manufacfuring variancg....r. . . . . , . . .r. . . .o.,. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9O1Gross profiq adjusted to actua1...,..... $ 873,290Lgss markgting and administrative expe[s€s,...,..............r,...t........ 68O.5oOOpefat ing InCOme... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' t . ' . ' . . . . .o. . . r . . . . . r . . . . r . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . ' . " . t . r . ' r . . $ 192.79O
I Manufacturing variances: Unfavorable Favorable
$ 3,750
44,OOO
1 ,100s48,85O
48,780Net favorabte vartanco ........
s48.760
!:-s fa*
I
I
IvI
L
s37tr25O
375.OOOE_e,7sof
I:
Clnpter 19
Pl9-4 (Gontinuedf
Materials:Agtual quantity r average cost
[25OtoOO fbs. r 1.485 per lb.]..........,...,.........rr.r....,.........Astual quantity r standard cost
(250,OOO lbs. t $i.5O per lb.f
199
fav.
$360,OO0
345.OOO-L _!5l0o9 unfav.
I
l-
!
I
Matgrials purchase price variance .........,..........,..............r.
Thansferred into production (24O'O0O lbs. x $1,So1 ...ri.......standard quantity for l is,ooor eguivafent production
ynits (23O'OOO lbs. r $1.5o per lb., or liS'OOO units r$3 pgr unitl.t...............r..................o...r..............r........o....
Matgrials quantity variance...........,.,.........
Thansfgrrgd out of work in process..,...r.............,.,.r..Beginnlng inventory (all completed|..........................Startgd and compfgtgd this period .............,.r...........Add gnding inventoly....,.......................o.........r...,.....
To ta l 'D r " t t . . . . t . . . . o t . . . r . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . r . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . r r
Labon
PoundBasis
22OLOOO20.ooo
2OO,OOO30.ooo
?39e9
UnitBasis
110,O0olo.ooo
I O0,oo015.OOO
1 1 5 , O O O
Ac'tual labor cost.......D......".. ' ...r............r.,......r....o.........,. $l,3l3rzGoActual hours r standard rabor rate (16r,ooo hours r $81 -iiiea,ooo
l-abor ratg variallco ,'.'."........'.'......r...,..,....r,,.,........,.,.,.i. E-zsrzeo unfav.v
-
$1,288,OOO
1.332.000S__(4!.,OOO} fav.
Actual hours x standa rd labor r?ttG)....,................,........,...Standard hourc r standard labor rate (l661500 hrs.il I. $8 per hour, or ll irooO units * r $i 2 per uniU..........Labor efficiency Yariance..,..,.,........................r......,.,......
I
ffi Chapter 19I
P19-4 (Concluded)r* Computatlon ol equivatent pmductlon for labor and tactory overtread:
Hour UnitBasis Basis
Thansferred out of work In Process 165,000 11O,OOO15.OOO IO,OOO
l5OrOOO lOO,OOOI,OOO 6,OOO7.500 5.OOO
166.500 I I l ,OOO
Factory overhead (two-variance rnethod):ACtUal fagtOfy OVgfh gad ....o....,.r.'...r..........r'.......... '..... '..o.'.
Budget allowance:Variable overhead (1 I t 'OOO units r $1 .5O| ... $169'500Fifgd OVgfhg4d........,...r..,.....,...,...........r....... -!3L@
COntrOltablg VafianC8.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . . . ' . ' . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . ' . ' . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . .
BUdget a11OmnCO.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .o . r r . . r . . . . . . . . r .o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . .o . . . .
Applied lactory ovorhead (t I l r0OO units r $2.601 ..............VOlUmg var ianCg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . .o . . . . . . . t t . . . . . . . . . . . .o .
287.500
Beglnning InVentOltsflOfk In pfOCeSS.'....................
Staftgd and COmplgted this pefiOd .,...........o.............Add 3/5 tO COmplete beginning inYefltgtJ..........r......Add I /3 Ol endlng inVentOfy.r..t..........'............o...r.....
T O t a l . a a a a . . r a . . . r . r . . . a . o . . o . . . . . a a a a . a a a . . . . . r . . . a . a o a . . r a r . . a a a r . a a r . a a
KALMAN COMPANYlnterim Income Statement
For the Second Quar te r , 2O-
$295,5OO
$ 8.OOO unfau
$287,5OO288,600
S (l,1ool fav.:
P19-5
SalgS (SOOTOOO f $3Ol ....r....o.....o..................r....................'............COSI Of gOOdS SOld at Standard (600'000 f Sl 81 ......'..'...t.o'.......o...GrosS prOfit at Standald .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . .ot.. . . . . . . . . . . .Adjustments for standard cost variances:
Matgrials price variance 1.......... ' ... ' . ..o.................Labor efficien cy Yarianco2......'...........................Overhead spending yariancos....Variabl e oyorhoad eflicie ncy yarianco4 ..............Ovgrh gad Yolumg yariance5.....................o..... ' ... ' ---j
Adjusted gnoss profit o...,........, ......,....... .............Less commercial erpenses:
MarkeUng orpensos ($t8,OOO,OOO r 1Oo6).. '....... $1'8OO'OOOAdministrative oxpensos (SOTOOO,OOO r 25oh)'.... 1'5OO.OOO
lncome before Income tax. . . . . . . . .Loss income tar erponse (S3,483,4OO r
(s3 ,75O,O00 / 57 ,5OO,OOO)) . . , .Ngt incom€ . , . . . . . . .o . . . . , . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . ' r . . . . . . ' . ' . . . . . ' . " " "
$ 237,80038,OOO
t35,OOO8,00o
$18,o0o,ooo10.800.ooc
$ 7,2oo,ooo
416.600$ 6,783,400
3.300,oooS 3,483,4oo
' 1 ,741.700
sJJ4E-9e
501
tt
LIl>
II
=
I!
iIE
lb
Chapter 19
Pl9-5,(Continued)
rrhe materials price variance should be prorated between work in process,ished goods, and cost of goods sold as ioltows:
Ending balance ofwork in process -
Ending balance offinished goods
$72,OOO
$18 per unit
Total units in ending invgntori€s...,........................
Jo!"! units produced during second quarter..........Total units in ending inventori€s.....,....,.........,.......Units produced and sold during second quarter..,
fin-
$18 per unit
$goo,ooo
- 4'OOO units
5O,OOO units
5!_,ooo units
45O,OOO54.ooo
3g6.ooo-
I
b
\,
I
lL
Materials price variance charged 396,OOOto cost of goods sold
- T56:FOO x 27O,OOO = 5237'600
zsince the tabor efficiency variance is not regarded as significant, all of it ischarged against second quarter income.
oA portion of thE overhead spending variance is attributable to the overtime pre-mium paid. since the overtiire-premium was incurred in order to meet salesforecasts for the entire year' the portion of the spending variance resuttingfrom the overtime premium isg.ob rabor p",' unii at regurar rate x Sooh =S4'50/unit) should be prorated over the entire y""r. in proportion to the sales ofeach quarter as follows:Production in excess of capacity (euarters 1 and 2 onry):Quarter 1 = 465,000 _ 43OrOOb = 35,0OO units
Quarter 2 = 4SOTOOO - 43O,OOO = 2O,OOO unitsovertime premium resurting from ercess production:
Quarter I = 35,OOO unit! x $4.SO/unit = $f SZ,SOOQuarter 2= 2OTOOO units x$4.5o/unit = 9O.OOOTotal overtime premium for first six months _S24Z,SOO
Proration of overtime premium portion of spending variance based on sales:
Quarter 2 = -s600'ooo A' Et.-^r^^-.$l FoAooo
x s247'5oo total overtime premium = $99rooo
I
>
-
Chapter 19
Pl9-5 (Goncludedl
The overhosd spondlng varlanco charged against second quarter income is
calculated aa follorvs:
Total overhead spending variance for second quarter.-............... 91261000AmOunt resulting frOm SeCOnd qUartef OVertime premiUm......,... 9O'OOO
Amount rgtatgd io unexpgctgd Ingff|cignc|93.................r............ $ 36tOOOAmount ol overttme premium chargeable to second quarter on
the basts of salgs attocatlon dgtgrmingd abovg .................... 99.OOO
Total spending variance charged against second quarter income SI-95'O0O
aSince tactory overhead is charged to production on the basis of direct laborhours, an unfavorable variabte overhead efficiency variance occurs because ofthe inefficient use of direct tabor. The amount of the unfavorable overheadvariable efficiency variance is determined as follorvs:
5The company pollcy is to report a volume varianco on Interim statements onlyil actual producgon Oitters irom the ptanned production schedule. Sincs actualproduction is equal to budgeted producUon through the end of the secondquarter, there is no volume yariance to be charged against second quarterincome.
labor eff lclency varlanccl-abor coot per unR
P19-6
(1) Material MaterialA B
Units completed and transferred out...... 15r0OO 15rOOOLess beginning Inventory (att unitsl....... ' . 6.000 6.000Started and compteted this period..... ' .... 9rOO0 IrOOOAdd work this period in inventories:
r varlablc ovsrhead per unlt = #
r 32 = $g,ooo
o 2,OOO5,OOO 2.500
14,0OO 13r5OOx i x o
FactorYLabor Overhead
.| 5,0oo 15,OO06.000 6,0009,000 I,ooo
3,OOO 2rOOO1,250 2.500
13,250 13,5OOx 11l2 x 113
Beginning inventorlf ..........,.r.'....r......Ending inventory .............r.................
Equivalent units of Wgstco.....,..,......,......Standard quantity per unit of Westco......Stand ard quantity al I owgd.................,.....
Materials ((15,OOO r 314) + (BO,OOo x $21) .
14.OOO 81,OOO 6,625 --l!I! ioo: :
, . 3TO'OOO65rOOO
435,OOO
358,OOO5,4OO
363,4OO
Materials Purchase Price Variance,..............,.r......'........Accounts Payable (15,OOO r $13) + (8O,OOO x S3l)....
Work in Process ((14,OOO r $f e} + (81,OOO x $2)1...........,.Materials Quantity Variance ........r....... 'r............
Materials ((14,2oO r $14) + (82,3oO r $2ll
503
t
I
I
tI
-
I\-
I\t
!
C@ter 19
I
Pl9-6 [Goncluded]
Work In Plocgss (0t825 r $r o) ........................,...r.........r..labor Rate Varlanco (61500 r GltO - $l l)l ror,,,......,.,.....,..
labor Efficienciltariance ((6,025 _ tirsoo, r $lO) .....Payroll (8t5oo r $l ll ..o...o........'..rts...,...........,........o.-.
Work In Procggr (4r5OO I $24.............................r..........,Applled Factory Overhead.....
Applied Factory Ovorfi o8d .......Volume Variance ((5,OOO - {,5001r $241 ........,..............oD.
a a a a a a . a a a a
o6,25O6,5OO
12l ,5oo
t2t ,5ool2,OO0
1,25O11r2OO
30076,150
7r25O71,50O
1 2 1 , 5 0 0
1 1 , 2 O O300
722,OOO
65rOOO5,4O061500
12,OOO
:
b
Ib
S
b
\
Spending Variance ..............o.......-.........o...o...ro.....oo..Variable Efticiency Variance ([4'SOO - dr4oOl x $3]..::Fa gtory Ovgrhead control ....r..........................,.........
(21Labor-Efficiency Varianc4.................o..............................Spending Variance.D............r...............................r..,........rVariablg Efficigncy Vartanco...........,................................Income^ Summary.. . . . . . ! . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . r . . . . . . . .
Materials purchase price Variance .......,......:::..........Materials QuanUty Varian ce,..........o....r.,......r..,..,......Labor Rate Variancg............o.....o..........r.o..................Volumg Variance....r.r.......r.......r...o.....................r......
PACIFI C MANUFACTURING COMPAilYIncomo Statement
(3)
I
v
lales ((4r0oo + l5rooo - 3roool r $601......t,...........r...r.....Cost ol goods sold (f 5r4oo x Slol r............o........,o........o..9-* profh at standald ..............D...................................Adjustments for standard cosi variancos:
Matgrlals purchase price variancg....,.........,.............Matgrials quantity variancg ..............................,r...,..Labor rate varianto.......... i ........!..............o..r.........r...La bo r effi c i en cy va ria n ce ........,......,..r....... t....,.........,.spending var iancg.. . . . . . . . . . . ' r . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . t . . . . . . . rD.. , . . . . r . . . . .Va ria b I e e ff i ci e n cy va ri a n ce :..........,.......r.,....,.t.........Volume yarianco.. . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r .
Adjusted gross profit.....Less commenciir expen";; ::::::::""""""""""""""""""'
::.::::.:::::::::.::. ::.::::::::.::::l n c o m e t a x e x p e n s e ( 3 O 7 o x S 1 1 1 , g S O ) . . . . .Net income,. . . . . . .
s924,OOO. 6t 9.000s3O8,OOO
s65,ooo5,4OO6,5OO
(1,2501(1t ,2ool
(3oo)l2.ooo 76,150
$231 ,850120 .OOO
$1 I 1 ,85O33 .555
s_7q.?95
I, tI
w
t2o,ooo4,OOO
35rOOO2,O16
75,0OO
8lr5OO
230,OOO
184,OOO
32OlOOO
5O,oOo
Chapter 19
800159,2OO
124rAOO
I ,4OO351016
75rOOO
81,5OO
23O,OOO
184,OOO
320,OOO
5O,OOO
?79-7
ill Materialg (4O OOo llterr AQ purchas€d rMateriale Purchase Prico Varlancc ..ACCOUntg Payable ....'...r.......................................ro..
Work In Process flO'OOO units r 3 liters SQ Per unit r$4 SPI
Matgrials QUanUty VarianCe ...,......r.'r.............o.r.....'o......Materials (31 ooo llters AQ issued r $tl SP|...........".
Work In Procegs (lOrOOO unlts r 112 SH r $Z Sn1.'-'...---tLabor Rate Variancs ($7.42 AR - $7 SRI r {1800 AH).-....
L^abor Efflclency Varlanco Sl7 SR r (4'8oo All -StOOO SH)|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . .r . . . ' . . . . . .r .o.. . i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t .
PayfOll Gt7142 AR f 4180O AH) .......,......r.o....r.r...........
Work in Process (iO'OOO units ,,112 SH r $15 FO ratel...Appl ie d FaCtOfy Ovgrh gad.. . . . . .o. . , , . . . . ' . r . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FaCtOry Ovgrhgad COntrOl .o.r.............o...'...................t.....VariouS Grcd1t3....r...o.r.........r......................t..............
Finished Goodr (l O'OOO units r $23 standard costl ........Work In ProcgS8.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,o. . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . r . . . . .
Cost of Goods Sold (8,00O units x $23 standard cost) .'.-Fin ishgd GOOdS.. . . . . . . r ' . . . r . . . . r . . .o . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . t . ' .
Accounts Receiyable (81000 units x 340 sales ptieo) ""..S a 1 g S . . . . r . . . . . r . . . r . r r . r r r . . r . . . . . . . . r . . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . t . t . .
Markgting and Administrative Expenses......'...D..'...........VariouS Ct€dits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . r . . . t t . t . . . . . .
94 Sn.r............ IOOrOOO
Chapter 19
P1s-7 iContinueCl
121 Aetual factory overhead.Budget aflowance based on ir8OO sctuaf hours:
Variable overhead ($8 variable r:ate r4rgoo Al{ ....... ...........4..... S28r8OO
Firgd ovgrhgad.............r...r....................r.,...r 4g;5ooSpending variance......r.......'.......r.o.......rr.r.......rr...r........rr..r
Budget allorlrrance based on 4r8OO actual hours(from above)......... 'D.....r..r..rr....t....r....... ' .................
Budget allourance based on B'OOO standard hours:Varlable overhead ($6 varlabfe rate r
5rO0O SH) ... . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , .r. . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . 33OTOOOFirgd ovgrhgad.'.o...-....r'.-....r.o...r.'.D.............. lgrsoo
Variable efficlency Yariance....'.........o...........r.,..........,....or..
Budget allonrance basod on S'OOO standardhours (from above) ........o.. ' ......r..r...............,...r.....,r
Applied factory overhead (Sf S FO rate r 5,OOO SH)............Volume variancg.. ' . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . r . . . . . . r . . . . . .o. . . . . . r r . , . . .o. . . . . , . . . . , . . . , . . r .
505
s81,5OO
78,3OO$ 3,2OO unfav.
s78,30o
s79,5OO75,OOO
$ 4,5OO unfav.
(3) GRINDLE CORPORATIONIncome Statement
For November
S a I e s t t t t t t " " " " " t t o " " ' . o . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . . . . . . . r . r . . . . r . . . . . r . r . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rLess cost of goods sotd:
Standard cttSt............i............o..,r................ri. $l g4rOOONetunfavorabtevariances(Schedule i1.. . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . 1O.316
Gross pro f i t t t " " " to " . . . . . . r r . . . ro . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . r . r . r . . . r . . . . r . . . . . . , . . rD . . . . r . . ,
MarkeUng and administrative orpenses.............. ...,r............Income bgforg tar95.. . . . . . r . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . rr . . . . . . .
$320,OOO
194,316s125,684
50.o00$ 75.684
i l 'I
ffi
P19-7 (Goncluded|
Chaptar 19
Schedule 1GRINDLE CORPORATIOII
Schedule of VariancesFor November
Materials purchase price varianceMateriala quantlty variance ...........Labor rate variallco .................'.....Labor effi ciency varianceFactoly Overhgad epending YarianC9..................................r..Fa ctory ovg rh gad va ri a bl g eftl ci gncy vari anc8 ...............r...'..Factoryovgrhgadvolumg variancg.. ' . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . .r ' . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . 4r5OO
t a a a a a a t a t a S 8oo
1r4OO
1r2OA
$ 4,OOO2rO16
3r2OO
$13,716 $3,4OO(3.4001
Ngt unfavorablg YarianCg.... . .r. . . . .r. . . . . .r.r. . . . . . . . . . ' . ' . . . .r . .r. ' . . . . . . . . . . SlOt316
CGA-Canada (adaptedf. RePrint with pennission.
P19-8
( 1 )
Materials price usage variance......r..Materials quantity variance.......,.......Direct labor rate variaflco .......,.........Factory overhead spending varianceTotal variances ..r..r.,.................,.......,Discounts lost on purchases............,
Allocatad to Coctof Goods Manufachrred
Coat otFlnlghed Goodl
Total Gooda Sold
sl,ooo $gzs s625440 165 2752AO 75 125l24ol _(99J (1501
4
$1,4OO $SZS 987580 30 50
Allocatedto
Wor|r InTotal Procaar
sl,5oO ssoo660 220250 50
(30o) (60l
$z,t 1o $7ro120 40
Tota1 ..................................,.....,,.... $2,23o $75Q Si,48o 35€5- S925: : : : :
MaterialsPro-
ductionUnits
Work in Procesg:Materials (t r2OO units r I O006).....,..,.. .l r2OODirect labor (1r2OO units t 5O06).......,.Factory overhead (l,2OO units x 5O%)
Finishod goods (9OO uni ts x lOO%).. , . . . " 9OOGost of goods sold (1,5oO uni ts r 1OO%l 1.5Oo
Total . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . ' t . . . """"" ' 3teOO
FactorYDirect Labor Overhead
33 lrs
2541 2B
1_99_
Pro-ductionUnits %
600 20
9001 ,500
_gpoo
Pro-ductionUnits %
600 20900 30
1 ,500 503 .OOO too: -
%
3050
1 0 0
Chapter 19
Pl9-8 (Conctuded)
(21
Work in process at standard costlOOVol ...
Direst labor 17r2AO units r $g r SOo/o1..Factory overhead (ir2OO units r
$2 r SOTol . . . . . .r . . .r .o.. .r .r . . .r . . . .r .r . . . . . .r
Finished goods at standard cost:tt tai"@.....,r,.......Dituct labor (9OO units x $g) .....D......r..Factory overhedd (9OO units x $2)....,..
Cost of goods sold at standard cost:tvtatg .........Direct labor (i'SOO units r Sgl ............Factory overhead (lr5OO units x S21..,.
Total mfg. cost at standatd cost...Less work in process, Dec. gi, t9_...Gost of goods manufactured at
Standard COSI ....................r....,...r.Add: Variancg a11ocation.................,.r
Allocation of discounts lost onpurchases...............,........r......
Cost of goods manufactured at actual
(3)
Materials at standard cost ...........,Materials-price variance ailocation........ ' ..
-quantity variance allocation .......-allocation of discounts lost onpurchase3............,............r....
Total matgriats.,........,... ,........rDirect labor at standard cost .....,.........,.,.....Di rect labor-rate va riance allocation ..........
Total direct |abor....................................!a ctorV overh ead at sta n dard cost...D..r........Factory overh ea d--op.n ain g r"ii"n ""
allOCation .........,.....................r.....r...
_ . Igt"l factory overhead ....,.,....,loull inventories at actuat cost...
fi7
Materiafs
s 8,4OO
FastoryDirect OvenLabor head
$ 4,8oo
Total
6,3OO
1O,5OO
7r2OO
12,O0o
sl,2OO $t4,4OO
l ,goo 15,3OO
s25,2OO9.400
$16,8001r44O
80
s24,OOO4,800
$1g,2oo200
3.OOOs6,OOO
1,200
$4,8oo(24o1
25,500$55,2OO
f 4.400
s4O,80O1,4OO
80
cost...,.......r...............r.....,.,........... [q€20 $lgrgoo $4€so s4e/80
Work inProcessS 8,4oo
500220
40$ 9 . 1 6 0$ 4,8OO
50$ 4.950$ 1,2OO
(601$ 1 . 1 4 0$ 1 5 . 1 5 0
FinishedGoods
$ 6,3003751 6 5
30$ 6,870$ 7,2oo
75$ 7.275$ i,Boo
(e0l$ 1 . 7 1 0$15.955
Total$14,7OO
875385
70$18.030$tz,ooo
725$12,t25$ e,ooo
(150)$ 2.850$gl .oo5
*t
PI9.9 APPENDIX
CottonCloth
Units comploted and transferred out this period....,. 3'OOOLgss all units In beginning Inventol'1f ........................ 1,00OEquivalent units started and completed this period 2,OOOAdd equiyalent unitg required to complete
bgginning InvgntOfl .t................'..........r.............. OAdd equivalent units in ending inventory.............r..., 75OEquivalent units ol producUon this period.........,o...., 2r75aMultiply by standard quanUty of Input per unit
Ol p rodu Ct ........................o...........r.o.i..........r.......3-@.g.Stardard quantlty of input allowed for work
produced during the period......,..,............,......... Eg99
Materials-Cotton Cloth (5,OoO yards AQ purchased r $f SPIMaterials Purchase Price Variance--Cotton Gloth ................
Accounts Payable (5r0OO yards AQ purchased x $1,1O AP)
Materiats=Dyes [2r5OO pints AQ purchased x $,50 SP]......,..Matgrials Purchasg Pricg Variancg-f,l1/€s ........r...,.........Accounts Payable (2,5OO pints AQ purchased x $.49 API
Work in Process (5r5OO yards Se allowed r $l Sp) ..,.,..,..,....Materials Quantity Varian ce-Cotton Ctoth ....................,..,..,
Materials--Cotton Ctoth (5,OOO yards Ae issued r $1 Spl
Work in Process (2r75O pints Se atlowed x $.5o Sp) ........,....Matg ri a I s Q ua ntity Va rian c e-Dy€s ......,..........,,...,........,.Material-Dyes (2r7O0 pints AQ issued x S,50 SP|.....,....
Payroll (1 ,55o All r $5.9o AR| ................................................Accrued Papoll (and employee withholding accounts),..
! ' l/ork in Process (lr5OO SH attowed r $6 SR)............,..........t.Labor Efficiency Variance ($e SR r (1r5SO AH - I,SOO SR)}..,.
Labor Rate Variance ((gs.go AR - $6 sRl r i,550 AHi .....Payrol l " ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r . .r . . . . . . .r . . ' . .r .r r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Factory Overhead Contro1....,......r..,, ..rr.....Various Credits.......,.......................
Work in Process (1r5OO SH altowed r $1O FO rate)....,..Applied Factory Overhead..........,... ......o....r.......
Dver3rOOOLOOO2rOOO
o750
2r750
I pint
2J50
5rO0O500
1r25O
5,5001 0 0
1,375
9 , 1 4 5
9,00o300
Chapter 19
Convcr-alonCost
3rOOOI,OOO2rOOO
750250
3,OOO
tt2hour
1 .500
5,5OO
257 1225
5,goo
251,35O
9 , 1 4 5
1 5 591145
1 6 , 1 O O
15 ,OOO
l6 r l OO
15 ,OOO
I
C,lWter 19
Pt 9-9 )APPEHDIX (Conctr.rdedl
Applled Factory ovgrhead ......r...........r....,.............r...............Chlerhead Spending Variancg...o........r...r..............or................Overhead Effielency Variance gllO rate r
llt55o fH - lt5oO Slfl) .............r.....................r.r........
Overhead fdle Capactty Varianco Gt7 flxed rata r(t t600 BH - 1 t55O AH)l ....:...'...............r,o......o............
Factory overhgad Cohtroi.......r...........,..................,.-,...r.
Finished Goods (3'OOO units r $i O.5O standard c(lst!.....,,.....Work In Process......o.............o..........r...r...r..rrrr......D.........
Accounts Receivabre (3rroo units sotd x $rc sales price)...,.Sa1gs t t t r " " t t t " " t t . . . . . . . r . r .o . r . r r . . . .D . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .a . .a . . . . . r . r . . . .o
Cost of Goods Sold (3rlOO unlts r $lO.SO standard costl...,..Finishgd Goods '....r........o.tr.................o......r.rt..o............r,
Cost of Goods So|d tt...........o.......r.r.o.......................r..............Matgriafs Purchase price variance-DyiErg..,.,......,....or....o......Matgrials Quantity varf ancg-.Dygs.............r,........!.........,,...t.Labor Rate Variance............rr.....t..............o........o..........r.......
Materiafs Purchase price Variance_Cotton G|oth..........Materlals Quantity varianc+--cotton croth.,....D......r..,....Labor Efficiency variancg ......r.......,............,......,.......,....Overh ead Sp_en d in g Varia nce,....,..,.................................Overh ead Efficien cy Varia n ca ..r.....................,,...............overhea d I dle Ca piclty Varia n cr) .,..,...::.::::::...,...............
Pl9.IO APPENDIX
Materiafs (1o ooo kg Ae purchased r $z sp).........,...............Materials Purchase Pricg variancg,..,...,.,........r..............Accounts payabte (tO OOO kg Ae purctraieJ r $i.9S Apl
Work in Process (90O units r 9 kg Se per unit x $2 Sp1......;..Matgrlals Quantity variancg '.:..............................,.........,......Materiats (B 600 kg Ae issueo r $z spt.:::::::..................
Work in Process (9OO units r 2 SH per unit r $1O.5O SR) ......Labor Rate Variance ((Slr.55 An-_-S_to.so sR) r 1,74oAH)...l-abor Efficlency Variance (SlO.5O SR r(71740 A|l _ 1,goo sH)) ...,....r..........,..Payroll fSt r.ss AR r i,7do AH) ........::::::::::::::::::::.::.:..::::
509I
lr
I
> 15,OOO650
500
350
31,5OO
{3,4OO
32r55O
2r1952525
t55
2O,OOO
1612OO1,0o0
18,goo11927
16,5OO
3l,5oo
43r4OO
32,55O
500100300650500350
5001g,5OO
17r2OO
63020,Og7
t.I
5to
Pl g-l o APPEIIDX (Concludedf
Factory Ovgrhead Conttpl.....-...........'............................'...... 24rOOOVarlOur Crgd1t4...r....................................r.....o................t
Work In Procegg (9OO unlts r 2 SH r $13 FO rgtel .............ror. 23r4OOApplled Factory Oryerhead
Applled Factory Overhead 23r4OO
2rOOOldle Gapaclty Varlano SilO fhed rate r
[2,OOO BH - I,74O At0'Spendlng Varlancc...Varlable Eftlclency Varlancc Str? var: rstc r
ll,74o Alf - 1,8OO SHllFixed Efticloncy Variance ($f O fir. ratc r
11,7 40 All - 1,800 SHllFactory Overhead Gontrol
Chagtor 19
2d,ooo
23,4OO
520
180
00024,7OO
Finished Goods (9OO units r $65 gtandard costt..........o......... 58r5OOWork In Procgss r..'...........................r..rr.......................... 58t5OO
CGA-Canada (adapted|. Reprint with permiesion.
-TII
5 t l
LI\-
iIf-
LLtIb
!It:
Chaptcr tg
l
CASES
c l9- t
(1) The guotation implies that sactuaf'manufacturing costs form tha prefer-able basis for inventory costing because they we; incurred in producingthe inventory,The notion that actuaf costs are the only acceptable costs for inven-tory purposes has been ctrallenged by advotates of stanoard costs.Accountants who advocate usinl stanoaru "o=tr-1or repo*ing purposesbelieve that standard costs ate iore nepnesentative of the true cost ofthe product than actuat costs. Ttr"v r"intain that r"t"n"us ars mea-sunes of abnormal inefficiencies oiabnormal efficien"i""; therefore, vari-ances cannot be inventoried and should bs immeJiai"iv t""ognized indetermining net income of the period-rather than p--#"o to inventoriesand cost of goods sold. Thus, tire costs attached t'o irre-product aru thecosts that shoufd have b?:n in"uo"J, not the costs itr"t rrur" incurrpd.Many accountants believe that u"ri"n""" do not have to be invento-ried as long as standards ale currentty attainable. gut it standalds anonot up to date, or if they reflect ttreoriticat pe*orm-ance rather than per-f ormance und er t""=onib ty efficieni "onoition", irr "i, l-on""ptualty, th evariances should be split uet1vg.en,rr" o"r,ion tirai;it}" departuresfrom attainabre standirds and til;;i;n that does not.Most accountants agree that unfavorabfe r"ri"ni"lresutting fromthe difference between standarus uaseJ on theoleticai parformanca andthose based-on normat p-erforman* "r,ourJ i" ti"ffi'i" product costsand pr''orated to inventoiiu" "nJ-il"t iiiooo= sotd. n ; is ress agres-ment relating to variances. resulting fror; the diffeilr""'i"t,reen actuatperforman ce an d standards based ;; ;;;,nd (attainabrel perforrnance.standard cost advocates befieve irr"lii-"=e variances should beexpensed because they nepresent abnormal conditioi"-.'t,,"ny otheraccountants believe that tirese t"ri*t"" nepnesent part of the actuatcost of producing the goods and, theref;, shourd u":irr"t"d as productcosts and prorated to inventories and "o"t or goods sord.(21 The three
To"t-appropriate atternative me$rods of variance dispositionwoufd require the ioltowing entries:{a} Cost of Goods SolJ..Finished cooJ" rn;;;i;:::::::::::::.::::.:::::::::.:::.:: r,l3lVariance.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .fb) Cost of Goods Sotd. . . . . . - - - - - - - - - -"""""""""""o"" ' l tso0
variance........:.::.:::""""".. l ,soo(c) Finish.ed Goods rnr"ntorr::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_:::
1,soo t,soo
variance............... .............:.:..:::::..:::: , 1,soo
I
Ir ' l
5t2 Chaptor 19
Ct9-l (Concludedl
(3) The first journal entry is in accordance with the discussion in part (ll as.the most appropriatE method of handling variances. Cost of Goods Soldis charged-with the excess cost above what it should have taken to com-plete the proiect, based on a nonnal (attainable) standard. Tho costs
ivariancei| resutting from the differencs between the theoretical stan-dard the normal standard should be prorated to cost of goods sold andinventories, based on the relative proportion of the associated cost con-tained in each. ln the situation presented, the entire $l'OOO is charged toFinished Goods tnventory instead of being prorated to inventories andcost and goods sold because the production is included solely in finishedgoods inventorY.
The second;ournal entry can be justified as an appropriate methodfor disposition of the variance primarily on practical considerations buthas litge theoretical justification. The practice of charging all variancesto Cost of Goods Sold (or against current revenue! often has been justi-fied on the grounds of simplicity, convenience, and immateriality.
The last entry woufd be appropriate where it is desired to adiust thestandard cost inventory to actual costs. Many accountants would advo-cate this entry in the circumstances presented because the inventorywould then bi stated at actual costs of production. However, when thismethod of variance disposition is foltowed, the asset inventory will becarried on the financial statements at an amount that exceeds the costthat should have been incurred. Thus, inefficiencies in operations anebeing capitalized as assets in the financiat statements when this methodis appl ied.
O2Gl. Diracl cosls arc dirccl tnaletials, dirccl labor.
and clhcr cost3 ditccuy assignrabb to e product
Aj1qgl-Cailigg ir r procrduro by which only
prirn costt plur variabb faclory ovrrhoad aro
rttigrt d !o ! Ptoducl or irvrntory; ell firrd cods
aro srrUorcd porbd cstc.O*Z Ptoduc{ €ir rt esrcietd wilh thc mrnulac'
turo of e product end ircludo di?cct mat.tieb'
dirrl labor, and lactory orcrhead. Thcs. catr
arc chstgod againsl rcvcnuc Es s€sl of goods
rold. or shovn on thr bahnco sheel as invenle
rier of work in ptocett and f inished gooda'
P.riod costs are asseiatcd with thc passage cil
t imc and sre included as cxponggs in lhe in'
cdrrc stalemerd. Under dircct esting, lired frc'
tory overhead is trealed as a pcriod coet ntherthan !s a produc'l cosl.
O2O3. Under direct costing, only Ystiabl. manulac'
turing 6ts are ircludcd in invcntory. Undcr ab'
rcptioo costing (thr cunrnt. gcncrally acccpledmethod of cor'ling invtnlory for extemal rcporl'hg), all nranufeeturing coets, bolh variablt andtixed, are included h invontory.
O2G4. lt iB argued that lired manulacturing cosls 8tethc exp€nses of mahtahing productive capacfy.Such expenses ara mo.c closoly associatod withthc passage ol time than with produciict activityand rhou ld , there forc , bc chargcd lo Per ioderp.nre ralher than to tho product.
O2$5. The direcl costing method ir useful lor hlemalroport ing because i l locuses attention on lhofixed-variable cosl relalbnshp and the contribu-l ion marg in concept . l t fac i l i l a tes manager ia ldecisioo making, product pricing, and cosl con-Irol. l t al lows corlain calculal idrs lo bo readi lyrnade, guch as break-even pohts-and contribu-tian mirgins of products, cales lerrilorios, oper-alrng divisions, otc. Tho leus on the contributionmargrn (salos revonue less variabie costs) en-ables managemont lo cmphasizo prolitabilily inmsh ing shor l - run bus incss dec is ions . F ixedcosls aro ncl oasiv cstlrollable in the short runand hence may not bo parl icuhdy relevanl forrho.l.run bushess decisistr.
O2O€. Argumenls lor thc urr c{ direcl cosling hcludetho lollrwing:(a) For prof i t-planning end decit ion.making
purpo3es, mln lgem.n l requ i r6 r cos l -volumo-profi l rolel ionship data that 6r.moro rradi ly evei labb from direcl cortl ta l .mcnt r than f rom ab3orp t ion cor trtalements.
(b) Sincc lixcd laclory overhead is abrcrbedas a perird cogt, fluctuatbns in productionand dif fcrcncrr briwcen thr numbcr oluni ls produccd ahd tho numbcr rold do
CHAPTER 20
DrscussloN ouEsTloHsnd aflect the per unil Ptodttt cosl.
(c) Dirrct costing toports Ete mote oasi ly
undcctood by managemcnl becausc lhcEtal.mmi! f ollo* mrna genronl's doctsbn'rnsking Ptoc.r33s morc closely than doa\rorption 6l gal.ments.
(d) Rrpodhg thc tctal fixed ccl lor thc perirdin tho incorrrr rlatcrnent dirccts manag.-rncnfs dlentian lo the relatirnship of such
6l to Prolils.(o) Thr dirninatbn ol allocated jcint fixed cet
pr rmi t r a mot . ob jec l i ve appra isa l o lincornr conlributions according to prod-
ucls. tafes areas, kinds of cuslorners, elc.Cot-nclurnr rclaticnships are highli ghled.
(f) Thr rinilarity ol lho undertying concepts oldiroc'l cosling and flexible budgels facili-tatca th. adopibn and use of theso meth-ods for reporting and cost conlrol.
(S) Dircct coeling provides a means ol cGtinginvrnloqy lhat ir similar to managemenl'scqrcopl of invenlory cosl as lhe currenloul-of-pockel erpenditurei necessary loproduco or replace the hvenlory.
(h) Cle&al costs ate lower under direcl cosl-ing because the m€lhod is simpler anddosr nol require involved al local ions olfired cosis o special analyses of absorp-tion data.
(i) The cornputation ot product cosls is sim-pler and rnore reliablo under direct cclingbecause a bas is lo r a l loca t ing lhe f i xedcosts, which involves eslimales and per-aonal ludgment, is sliminatod.
0,20-7. Argumenls 8gainsl lhe use of direcl cosl inginclude the follaring:(a) Separalian of costs inlo fixed and variable
might be d i f f i cu l t , espec ia l l y when suchcos ls a ro semivar iab le in na lu re . More-over, all coslsincluding fixed c6ts{tcvariable at sorne level ol produclion and inthe bng run.
(b) Long-range pricing ol products and olh€rl o n g - r a n g e p o l i c y d e c i s i o n s r e q u i r e aknowledge o l comple le manufac tur ingcost, wtrich would reguire addilirnal sepa-rsto computalions to allocale lixed over-head.
(c) Thc pricing of invenloricr by tho directcotl ing method i3 not accoptable lor in-co.r|c lax cornpulation purpo!os.
(d) Direcl costing has not been recognized asconlorming with general ly acccpled ac-cotnling principles applied h lhc prepara'tbn of financial statomonls for rtockholcl-orr and lho gencral public.
5 1 3
5 1 1
(r) Prbfitr dotorminod by dirrct cothg ennot'trua rnd prcpor, b*llr cl lhr uclu-rixr cl fnrd prcductixt qtr thrt rn prnof tolel prcductbn corl. .nd invontory.Pradwtion rculd nd br porbb wilhortplrnl frilitiel, rquipmonl, olc. To dirrrg.rd lh€. fu.d str violdeo tho grrnlpdrrcipb cl mrbhhg co.t, with rov'rrnu..
(f) Tho olnirdim ol tir.d str lrqn hvrn.tory r.rultr ir r lowor figuro end @rutqurot red|rticn G|| rrpodod *odrhg crpfdfq firerrciel rnrr),!b purpor.
A2O€. Assrrnhg thrt h. qurntity cf rndhg invmtory blarger than thr qurntity ol btginning invrntoryand lhr lilo mothod b urod, op.nling incqnrurhg dirrt strrp rpuld br rrnallor tun oprr-ating irrornr urhg abtorptbn corting. Diroctcorling oxcludor firod lrctory ovrrhord fronrinvonlorio boceul ruclr cotr rro conridrrcdto bo porbd cortr which rf. axponrod whonincunod. In cqrlrerl, ebrcrptin sthg ircludottirrd frtory ovtrhred in invrntorio bocrurosirch cotr en suidond to br product ots,whbh aru rxprcrod crly whon thr prcdLnt arcsold. Whrn tho guentity of invrntory irrcrotrlduring a poriod, dr.st c6ti1g producco a brrerdolbr ircroaro in hvrntory than obcorptbn ccot-ing, bocaurt firtd cortr aro oxp.nsod rathrrlhan cherg.d lo invrntory. Sincr e rmelbranpunt of cuntrl prird sl ir chargnd epirutincornr undrr tht lbrorptioo corting mrthodwhrn invonlorior incrour, ebrorptioo catingIncom. would br lergor thcn d i r rc t cot t ingncgTl..
Q2G9. Thr brrah-ovm pcirl b the Xint et rtrbh costrand r.vcnua irrc h eguilbrium, rlowing noitherpofil nor lora lor thr busirrsr.
O2Gl0. Thc ccntrbutixr rnargh it lhr nsutt ol rrrbtract.n9 variablo cql lrcrr tho ralcs figun. Tho con-
. tributiqr margh indicatcr lhr arrpunt rvailablofq th. [email protected] of tirrd co.t arrd lot proltl.
o2Gt 1 . , F(a) R(BE) = -t - v
or (ir *ordr):
Brv$uo rt tho Totst tir.d c6tbrrakrvrnpc*rt = EJ,ilf,Gffilr
por dollar cl ralos
(b) O(BE) =;LP _ C
or (h rords)
Unilt of ubr atbroehrvrn pc*rt = Total tix.d coot
Cartribulbn rrrargin
Clnpter fr
(3) Totrl cat lin .(4) Verieblo cod rna.(t Firrd coet rrrr,r(0) &rl-rvon pcirlm Lorenr-(8) Pnlil enr(9) Sd..litr.
@o13. An rdpb of tho rrpra.d bohrvbr cl a firm.tfrporrr.f end rtvrnur lor thr purp€o of csr-dructhg r bn hvm ch.rf b uruetly nrtrictodlo tho qrtpr, lovrlr rt whi*t Uro firm i likrly tooponh. Artumplbor rbout thr lovrl of firodgod, tro nlo of verirbb st, and salcs prbosrn buod qr tho oprnting srditisrr ard msn.rgrriel policior thtt will bo in olfrct ovor thoreoclrd ostpul bvob. Thesc oxp.cled outputlovrlr roprcsrnt thr firm,r rrltvanl rangc, andthr sl-vplumr-prc{it rrbtlxrr}ripr r}ronn in ebrodr.evtn ctrerl err applkrblo mly to outputltvob within thir rango. Tht bohavior of fixcdcod. variablo cod, md ralot prbco at tcvob olorjtpul bobw or oboyr thr rebvenl rangc er.lik ty lo ruuft in an ontiroly dilforrnt rt of cool-yoluntr-prc{il nlaticxrshiu bccauro of cfungrdop.trling csrdtbnr c nranagrrbl polbio. Thotrl Srat hr cct and nvtnuo lirer qr e breal.rvon cherl arc typically txtrndcd past thc upporand lowcr lirnitt of thr rcbvant rango thouH no!thordoro, bo intrrprotod to mean that thcy arovrJU for lhrao bvob of ouqpd.
A bnakrvon chart rtr*ing cot-volumoprof.it relalicnrhigr for rll bvdr ol ovtput could btdrvolopod. Tho rhrpor of hr cod and rovonuolinrr in euch r chart could not, howcvor, botrpoclod lo approrimatr rtraight-l inr (l inmr)p.ncrnt. By rcstricting thc undorlying ccl.and
. rov.nua bchavior aslumptionr in broak-ovonInalys.s to a relatively narrow output range (thorang. orcr whi:h thr firm b likcly to opcrate), itir urually poesiblo lo rlsumo linear bchaviorpaltornr wilhoul any rignificant dietortbnr insl-volurno-prc{il rc latianrh pr, th e reby a irnplify-ng the analyris.
tf tho rangr wer wtrich o firm ir likely to opor.a|l ir guitr widr, curvilinear funclionr may boompbyrd; or it may bo dcsirsblo lo dcvclop enumblr of brcak.ovrn charlr, oach hlving i lrown rl lovanl rang., for which thr undrrlyingcort and rcvcnua bohavior arrumplionr ercvaliJ.
O2G14. Woaknesses hherenl h thc preparatbn and uscof brcak.cven analpis arc:(a) Whon morc thst ane product ir producrd,
lhr cqrtribulicr margin of ooch produclwill probably diflor. Accordhgly, a broak.ovon analyrb for tho urholo oprratbn wiilnot hdbat. tho csttribtuirn of rach pred-uci to firod co.t and thc volunr rcquirodlor oach product
o2or2. (r) Dolr' of 'vonw #;1of product
(21 Volurrr oa orrtp{rt, rxprrsed h unrb, ptr-cant of capacity, lelol, or lom. othi lrnaatun|.
Ctugtcrfr
, (b) Somo'costr en elrnosl impouible todalsify ccrduJvcly ar bchg ri{rer firedavarbbh
(c) Grnrnl rcqronic conditioor and othrrrrtrmal hcton rmy rflect ho dete urodh th. rrtsl)ttb.
(d) In thr final enalyrb, fird coct b nlatod!o productir:n end ralor rn4 thrrofon,may drcnrtr romrwhat dur todocreard production and ralcr-cndvbr vonr.
(r) Ouilr oftcn cstr hcrcare tharpt el crr-. tah pcirn! in prcdraion and raler lcvett
and lhen levol or,lt until a ccrtain gmsterrlagr of production andlor rahs irrcedrcd, el wtrbh tino hc phrnanoncrir rcpealcd ar production and/or talrrare agair ircreased.
(0 Pedormancr murl bo conrlanlly com-parod to thr bnal-ovcn analyab h olderto determhr whrihcr thr csrdilirrrr thatrxirlrd at tho timr of thr colculatlonshavc heH lruc, and whether any changeshave been cqrsUered.
42S15. (a) With cales pricr prr unit and totat firedcogl rcmaining cqrrtant, thr brcak.evcnpoinl movcr up rapidly ar unil variabb
- cool ir increased; at thc samc timc. thebrcak-ovon poinl moves down as unilvariablc cost ir decreased
. (b) A decrease h fired cst krwerc the break-even poinl. An increase in fired costnpver the break-cven poht higher.
Q2S16. The mangh ol salefy b a seleeted Lbs fgureless break-even sales. The rnargh cl satety is acushion agninst sales decreases. The greaterthe margin, lhe groatef the cushbn against suf-fering a bsc.
Q2Gl7. Cct-ye1g6r-profil relationship i: lhe retatron-ship of pofil to sales volurne. Thb relaticrshipis importsnt lo,rnnagement because ,rEvrago-ment lr ies el all t imos to keep volume, cost,prrce, and product mix in a ra l io that wi l lachievc a desirod level ol profit.
O20-'t8.Thc.Tf,"9ty of Conrtreints lr r spccializadycnion d dirud corUng for urc in ghorl-runoptlmizaton dccirionr. A dittincUon batwecnTOC and dircct costing ir thgt TOC focuscc ononly thc purely verieblc coltr rnd doa notconsider dlrcci labor to bc puroly verieblc.
Q20-19.Mosl cornpenict thrt deesify 6nt tnto ftxeOand variablc c8tcgoric! bcst dircst lebor arverlablc, co In dirrl cottinE, dircct lebor i,arigncd to productr ar e wrleblc or- incramantsl cort-of producilon. tn thc Thcoryof Conrtreintr, dlrcct labor lr sdpuletcd to banot purcly vsriablc rnd lhcrclorc is not traltcdar an incramcntsl cost of output.
Thc diffcrcncc betwccn thc contributionmargln rnraruru ln dlrcct coillng snd thclhroughput mcalurc in TOC lr that ilroct leborlr onc of thc cost! daduclcd from sslcr tocelculsle conlrlbutjon mergin, but dircct hboris not r coEt to bc drductcd hom relcr incalculetin0 throughput
Thcrc arc mrny dtflcrencs in Grnphesirbctwecn dlrcct corting and tha thc6ry olconrtraints. For aremplc, whllc dlrect coitlngir widaty ug6d er sn eccounling epproach foii:t!"ln"t reporting of incomc and pioduci cort.TOC dcalr hcavily wlth thc improyorncnl otconslreinl! or botilaneckr In . producllonsyslcm.
Q2o-20.Throughput ir tho rata at which a rystemgangratas moncy through s8ler. lt i3cslculsted ar srlcr minur thc purrty varisbtecoslq and ottrn th. only purcty varieblc cost iglhc cost of materials.
Q20-2l.Elevating a conrtraint maanr improving thaconslrairtimproving thc condltions at abonlenecl In the lystsm. tts slgnificanca isgrcatrst lf the constraint ls thc fightast one in' lhc aystom: thcre, any improvcmcnt wilfincreaaa lho totsl throughput of lhe entire3yElem.
An improvoment in product guallty can hetpelavalr a constraint bccausc lt can iaducc theworkload on r bottlcnecl resourca. Foroxemplo, ramoving - dctecilva unilt _baforaralhor lhan eftor thsy roach thc bottteoeckmeens therc wll l bo fewer units passingthrough lhe botilanock. Thig har approrimatetfthc samo cffect on thc bottteneck aiincreesing ita capacity.
5t5
\\
516
E20-l
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a t a a o a a a $ 72O,OOO
18,OOO
s 702,O0O
340.OOO$ 362.OOO
S3O per unit
35 per unit
Chapter2O
slrOSO,OOO
14O,OOOl OO,OOO
4O,OOOs30
sl ,20O,OOO
Variable marketing and administrative expenses(9o,00o r $2ol
Contribution marglJl ........ '.........o...r.......r.r.r...r...o....r............r,Less fixed expensess
FaCtory Overhgad .'..'................................o.. $2OOTOOOMarketing andadministrativeexpenses..... 14o.ooo
Operat ing incomg.. . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . r . , . . . . . r . r . . r . . . . . , . r r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r
E20-2
(1) Variable cost per unit:. ST,OOOTOOO total variable cost
eO% manufacturing cost portionql2oo'999- total variable man ufacturing costS4,2OO,OOO total variable manufacturing cost
1 nFixed cost per unit:S11,2OO,00O total fixed cost
59o/o manufacturing cost portionq_5,6oo,00o total fixed factory overhead
55,600,00O total fixed factory overhead160,000 units normat production votume
E)(EBCISES
Operating income tor 2OA using direct costing:Salgs (9Or0oo r $1 21.............r.rVariable cost'of goods sold (gOrOOO rGross contribution margin
Full cost per unit at standald ..........................Number ol units sold during the year.. . . . . . . . , . . . .Cost of goods sold at standard under
absorption costing .., , .r. . . . , . .r. , . . , , . . . . . . , , . . . . . , . . .r.
s65x lOO,OOO
s6fggooo(21
9nit" actual ty produced dur ing the year. . , . . . , . . . . . . . .Uni ts sold dur ing the year. . , . . . . . . . . . . .Unit increase in inventoryStandard var iable manufactur ing cost per uni t . . . . . . . .Ending inventoty at standard direct cost ..............r.........t..
Chagterfr
E9,O-z (Concluded)(31 Normal producUon volume
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
5t7
lgo,oool40,ooo20,ooo
$ss$ Too,ooo-
$ tg,ooo,ooo
3,OOO,OOO
$ 15,OOO,OOO2,9o0,000
$ l2,2OO'OOOl l '2OO'OOO
$ I,OOO,OOO
$ 27O,OOO135,OOO
$ i3s,ooo50.ooo
$ 85.OOO-
$ zzo,ooogo,ooo
$ iBo,ooo
Unlts actually produced during thg ygar,..o..........,r..........o.Ercgss of budget over actual productiort .............r.............Fixed fagtory overhgad per unll...,....D..........o...o..............r..Factory ovgrh gad volume variancg...,..-..,..............,,......o,...
(4) Sales (tOO,0OO unlts r $f AOlStandard varlable cost of goods sold (iOOTOOO units x $?O
unlt variable cost!.........r............r.......r...r......r.....r..r........Gtoss contribution margin...D....,........variabfe selling erpense (sz,oooroOo variabfe cost r 4avol.Contribution margill ........,.'...............D.'...o...........o...r..........Less fired costs.operating income undgr dirgct costing.......,,........,.,.....r....
E20-3(11 Income statement using absorption costing:
Salgs (9'OOO r $SO1 .....,. '...........,......."...,....,...,.......,.......,...Cost of goods sold (9r00O r ($lO + $S)l .....r,..........r.,...r......Gross p fo f i t . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . r . . . . . . . . r . . ro . r . r r . . . r . .o . . . . . . . r r r . . r . . . . . .
Less commercial expenSBS ... . . . . . . . . . 'or.. . . . .o... . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . .Operating Incomg..o............r"....o...rr.........o..,............,,........
(21 Income statement using direct costing:9ales (g,OOO r $30)..........,.... ....r,............,..r.........Variable cost of goods sold (9r000 r $1o)................D....,..o..Contribution marg ilt ...................or..,,,.........Less fired erpenses:
(3t
Factory ovgrhgad.,..or.. .ro... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r, $COTOOOCommgrcial erpens€S...,...,..................,.. so.ooo go.ooo
Operating incomg '....................,...,.........r,..,.r....,..........,.* ll_goJqgcomputations explaining the difference in operating income:Absorption costing operating income..,.....o,.,.....,...o,.o..r..... $ g5roooDirgct costing operating incomg.,,.........,...,.,..................... go.oooDiffgrgnc8""..................r.....,o...................r.......................,.
l_.(5,ooglUnlts produced during the period.....................,........,.,..r... grOOOUnits sold during the period................,............ grOOOUnit decrease in finished goods inventory ...,...,....o. f f "OOOIFired factory overhead charged to each unit of product
under absorption costing .......................,........ r 35Differenco............ ....,.,...,.......r.......r....., g_ (SrOOO}
.=
I
5 1 8
E20-5
Dirgct 18bor..........Variable lactory oYefiead a a
Variable marketing gxpsnsG)...'.....'................o!......'.......r.r...r........'....r..
Totaf variable cost per unit
SalgS price per Unit. ' . . . . . . . . . ' . . . .o' . . .r. . ' . . . . . . . . . . . .r. .Variablg cost pgr U11it..r. . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . .r.r. .r. . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . .".r. .r. . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Contribution margin per urt i t . . . . . . .o... . . . . ' . .r .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . .o... . .rr. . . . ' . .
Fixgd factory ovgrfrgad.... . . . . . ' .r . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . t . . . . ' . . . . . .r. . . . . .rr.r. . . . .r. . . . . . .rr. . . . . . .Firgd markgting erpensrg ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,r, . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .rFirgd administrative expeflSg.... . . . ' . ' . . . . . . . . . . , . ' . . . . .r. ' . . . . . . . . . . , . . .rr. .r.r. . . . . . . .r.Total f ixgd grpgnse,... .r. . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . .o... , . . . . , . . . . r. . . . . . . . . . .r.
(1) 326,000 total fixed cost = 13,000 units of sales to break even$2 contribution margin
Chagterfr
E20-4$6ro00 = $e'ooo - $g,ooo = $iorooo break-eyen point in dollars
t E - i - . e o - 6 0s2.OO
$lO'OOO + $2 = 5rOoO break-even point in units(orl
$8'ooo - $,6'ooo - srooo break-even point in unitsStroffi-o m-5,OOO units r $2 = $lO'OOO break-even point in dollars
$ 1 .oo1 . 2 0
,50.30
s__g,og$ 5.OO
3,OO
(21 13,OOO units r $5 per unit = S65'000 sales to break even
(3) $26,00O lixed g.ost.+ $1O,09O profit = i8,000 units$2 contribution margin
(41 18,OoO units r 35 per urit = $9O,OOO sales
E20-6
Plannod salgs r . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . r , . . . . . .o. . . . . .Break-even sal es .....r........
Margin of safety
-oo'90=o llryin of,stP = zs'h Margin of safety ratio52,OOO,OOO Planned saleJ
S 2.oo
$15,OOO5,OOO6,OOO
s26,OOO
$2,OOO,OOOl r5OO,OOO
s 5oo,ooo
LLLLLLLLLLLL
L
Clpptarn
E,.o-7'
5r9
$82,5OO25,OO0
$37,5OO
r{r $9r3OOl - ,
.42$l 5,OOO break-even salos
t2l
(31
S'o99= $16'ooo = g2o,ooo agtual saleo1 - .25 .76
PR = C/M r M/S; PR = .62 t .25 =.15532O,OOO r .155 = $3rlO0 profit for the month
E20-8
(r) $3o'ooo = $so,ooo brsak-evon saleg.oo
(21 T0'oo:o = $59'9oo = $o2,5oo sales for the year1 - . 2 0 . 8 0
PR = C/M x M/S; PR = .2O t .6O = .12$92,500 t .12 = S7,5OO profit for the year
(3) S a l g s a a . . r a a a a . . . a a a . . . a . a a a r a a . r a . . r . a a a a a . . r . . r . o . . . . . .
variable cost stg2rsoo r (l -.60)).......contrfbution margin (38215oo r .8o)..,..r...,........,....,.,..............
!
Ilb
L
L
E20-9
Sales:(1 OOTOOO r $S! ..o.......r......r........,...(2OOTOOO r $61 .,, . . .o... . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . .
Variable cost:GIaOOTOOO r 30g6)............r....
GfrDl,2OO,O OO r "5oA1....,............,....Co ntri b uti o n ma rg i n...r...o.,......r........Planned operating prcfit.........r.o......Firgd cost .r..............,.........,.
Chip A
$8OO,OOO
24O,OOO
Chip B
$l,2oo,ooo
Total
$2,OOO,OOO
540,OO0
$1,460rO00
270.OOO$ 1 . 1 9 0 . O 0 0
3OO,OOO$560,000 $ 9OO,OOO
Ii-
5m
E20-10
Chairs$gs
20
_81_€$l'5OO,OOO salesto break even
Chaptor2O
= $st
Sales price per unit.Variable cost per un|t,.......r.........Gontribution margln per ultit ......
$72O,OOO fixed cost1 - ((Sso + (4 x $zop * (9t 1o + (4 x $3s))l
or alternativelp
$72O,0OO flxed cost($60 + (4 r $15)l * (911o + (4 r S35)l
$1,50O,OOO salesto break even
Produst L$20
1 2
s 8x 2
s 1 6
Tbbles$ 1 1 0
50
s 6 0
$lr5OO,OOO sales
rc = 6,0o0 hypothetical packages
or alternatively;
S72O,OOO fixed cost
61000 packages r I table per package =61000 packages x 4 chairs per package =
360 + (a r Sis| CM= 61000 hyryothetical packages
6,000 tables to break eyen24'OOO chairs to break €ven
6,000tab fesr31 iOper tab le = $ 660,00024,oOO chairs x $ 35 per chair = B4O;OOOTotal salgs to brgak evgn.....,...o....,. $l r5oorooo
E20-1 1
Salgs price per unit ................-...r...Variablg cost per unit,..........r.....r,r..Unit contribution margin..................Expected sales mix,........,r,..........r...Contribution margin per
hypothetical pickigo .................. +
Product Ms ls
1 0
s sx 3
s15
Ctpptcrfr
eo-1i (Concluded)
(11 S372'OOO fired cost$31 contribuUon marginl2'OOO packagee rl2'OOO packager r24rO0O units of L r36,000 units of M x
l5'OOO packages x15,OOO packages r3O,O00 units of L x45,O0O units of M x
Bfgak-gVgn Sa1gS.t......r..................r.
$372,OOO fired cost + $93,OOO profit -$31 contribution margin
521
= l2rOOO packages to brsak ovon
= 24rO0O units of L= 38,OOO units of M$ 48o,ooo sales of L
54O,OOO sales of M
9l,o2o,oo9
l5rO0O packages to achieve profit
= 3OTOOO units of L= 45,OOO units of M
l2l
2 unlts of L3 unlts of MS2O =$ f 5 =
2 unlts ol L3 units of M$zo =$ 1 5 =
$ 600,000 sales of L675,000 sales of M
$2to,ooo8O,OOO
105,OOO6O,OOO
_$4s9,oo9
(21
(3)
Sales to achieve profit....D......,...r..... $1 1275,OOO
E20-12
(il Variablg manufacturing CoSt........r......'.........r.........r.,.........Firgd manufacturing Gost.,....,.,.........r...r..,..............,.........,Varia ble marketing expenso ..........,..r..,.........r...o..D....r.Fired marketing and administrative axpenses .r.,,,.............Total costs to produce and sell 70,0OO units...oo............,...,
S455,OOO total cost = S6,50 sales price per unit to break even70,OOO units
($80r9OO.+ 360,0O0) fired cost = Si,g52 units38 -$4 .5o - ( r o%r$B)
($124,ooo + $5o,ooo) f ixed cost = 8o,ooo uni ts
38 - $4.5o - (r 5% r S8l
CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission.
AnW20P
( t S- =o - 6t oto U ,< t9 a -e -a
mNC't
J(t
tpeErIoo:toE;ra a
. ' t t r l | | o J l g l t - t , | a= - l J9 = N ! f r q q ! o r g oo o o o c r o c r o c r o 6 c t
s s E s B ' s E ' s s s E g8 g : g E 3 E 3g E g g g g s g
o'ooo
6r31oC,O
ta
attaaa
taa
a
cta
EaI
Ima:'ogt
Ioaoo
ro
3- -1 6 O I- o to o l. o - ' o - lq o lP - O I
o 1 9 lo i t
; b
' 3 ) ] t
t 8 os E 3
5 o € a r . . J t J t 3 l
3 6 B 3 3 t s t d Bs s E E g ' s E ' g g
l , 5 0 o a J 1 9 6 6- N O - U d l ! O @o o c l o o o o o o9 a - o ' o ' o - o ' o - o ' o9 O o O o l O o c 'e g c r c r c t O o c r O
g-r3c)o2cfa
o30a
oCTeErIoo:'otrt
r
.oI u,
I
ot:0oo
ot-
o
(Dot-m
E
E
;oo
r5o
ot 2
./ 'o
/ ?
o
ot
I
!!
L I
L173
. E2&|4I
L (i) throughpuUunit =sales-materiats cost= $45-($fC+ ${) = $i:}0
, (2) Maximum thmughput per mon0r is ${44000. Total thmughput tur a period is tre
L g3o/unit (hom rcquircmed f) multiplied by the number of units shipped; units are
limited by ttre loyrestcapacdy operation, which ls Surface Prep's 4800 units per
i month: d800 units/monfi x $3olunit = ${44y000lmonth.I
(3) Surface Prep is the tightest constraint with a dS0Gunit capacity.
r- E2o|5
(f ) No, Orey should not acquire tre equipment Gloss Coat ls nst the tightest
! constraint so increasing its capacity will not help.
(2') Tgto,llaximum monfily tlrroughput will not increase'
! (3) Yes, an addifonal Surface Prcp (SP) crew should be hired. The increase in overall
thmughput rnore thaniustilles ffre cost!
. (4) Maximum ttrrcughput witl increase by about ${5'000 per montfi (500 unitsfnronth
x $3o/unit). SP is the tiglrH constrain! so increasing its capacity will incrcase: $roughput of the entire system until SFs improvement causes anofrer
conslraint to become tfre tightest Glcs Goat, tre secon&tightest constraint
! presentfy has capacity 500 units higherifian SFs.
E2G'6
s (1) Yes, an inspection should be created just prior to Surface Prep (SP). For each
1,000 shipped, 50 defectirrcs enter SP-26, 1d and 10 arising in tlre tfree
s preceding operationq rcspectivcly. SP trs tlre tightest constraintr so removingde{ectives priorto SP will increase total system tfrroughput At S30 throughput
, p€runi! the 50 added units (perthousand shipped) doiustify the added\' inspection.
', (2) Removing all defuctives just prlorto SP will increase tfie number of good units! entering SP by 5U1r000 or atrout 5"/o. Vyilfi SP presenffy handling 4800 units per
rnonffr, a 5o/o inclease in units shlpped lE .05 x d80O = ?4r0. Additional thtoughput
\. will be 240 unitstnontr x $30funit = f/r200 per mon0r. BGGau$e ltre inspectionwill cost $1,800 per montlr, tre monfirly adrantage of the added inspection
' operation will be Ft,200 minus $11800, or $5'4O0 per nrcnffr.
I
I
521 ChwterZ0
PROBLEMS
P20-1
IIIASTERPIECE TOOL CORPORATI ONProduct-Llne lncomo Statement(ContribuUon Marg in App roachl
Ecctronlc PncumaUc HandTotal Tooh Tooh lpolr
Sslct.-,-....-.....o*...s--...roo.ru- StrOOOrOOO 31 '5OOIOOO tir00O'OOO 35OO'OOO
Locr varlrbb co.t of goodr told-..*. lrOOr00O 7O0r000 5OO'O0O 2OO'OOq
Orocr.contrlbuUon mlrgh.....o-o.F. llr6O0rOOO t 800'0OO 3 SOOTOOO 33O0'OOOl-acr wrlcbb markcUng crpcnrc!
(packlng rnd drlppln!).....-..-...-.-.. 25O,OOO 1OO,99q IOO'OOO 5OTOOO
Contrlbutlon nargln sl,3:to,ooo t 700,000 3 aoo,ooo 3250,000
Leu tracceblc thcd opanlc*Manufacturlng t 25O,OOO t loo,ooo 3 loorooo 3 5o,oooMarkcUng (advertblng)..,.............-.. 450'O0O 200'O0O 2OO'0OO s0r0q!-
Totel tnccrble lked arpcntc...-. ! 7OO'OO0 t 3OO,OOO 3 3OO'OOO 31OO'OOO
Product contrlbuUon-.*..-.-H-- t E|IO,OOO f aoo,099- U9'009. l1!0'@_Leo common lkcd arpontrt:
Manufuctrrlngl.MarkeUn92
AdmlnlgtraUon ...--.
3 3r0,oooIOOrOOO
150 .O00Totel common thed crpcnrc3 --. S 550.000
OporaUngIncomc $ IOO.OOO
r $1,950,000 abaorpUon coat of gmdr rold - $tTAOO,OOO vnrlablc costr - $250'000 traceablcfhed coct
2 Ssoo,ooo total marlcettng cottr - i2sgrooo yarlabto openao - 3+5o,ooo advertlalng expenaa
Ctpptcrfr
P2A-2'�(rl
$78O,OOO2,OOO
525
787,OOOc 513'OOO
232.OOOs 281.O00
5O,OOO49,O0O
I'OOO$s
$ 5,000
ROBERTS CORPORATIONIncome Statement
For Year Ended 2O-
Sales (52,OOO r $251Cost ol goods gold:
$1,3OO,OOO
Standard full cost (52rOoO r $f 5! ...'...'.....Net unfavorablo variable cost variancos '.Untavorablo volumg varlancer.'.'.......r...... SrOOO
Grcsr prlflt.Less commenclal erpenseo:
Variable orponses (52'OOO r $11.,......o......Fired orpsnses
Operating fncome under absorption costingrUnlts budgeted for production during ttte year.........r......,
Unlts actually produced during the year ....o.....................
Fired factory overhead chargedto gach unit.......,..,...,....Unfavorable volume variance
ROBERTS CORPORATIONlncome Statement
For Year Ended 20-
$ 52,OOOt80.ooo
l2l
Sales (52,OOO r $251Cost of goods aofd:
Standard variable cost (52r00O r $lO)...... $52O,OOONet unfavorabla variable cost variances.. 2,OOO
Gross contrlbution margin......D.....'...'...........................o.....Variable commencial expensgs (52rO0O x $11 .....,,....,..,...,..Contribution margill ...........,.,r.........Dor..........Less firsd costs:
Factory sverhead(5O,OOO units budgeted r $51 $25O,OOO
180 .OOOCommgrclal expensBs .........,o...,,...r...,......Operating Incomg undgr dirgct costing..,.............,Do....o....r.
(31 Operating income under absorption costing.......,..,.....,.....Operating Income undgr dirgct costing...,o..o..i.........r....,....D1ffgrgnco. . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . r ' . . ' . . . . . . . r . . r . . r
Unlts produced during the year... . . . . . . . . .o.o... , . . . . . . i . . . . . . . . .r. . .r. .Units sold during the year .. . . . .r. . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .o,.. . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .rUnit decrease in finished goodsFired factory overhead charged
inventory.
$1,3OO,00O
522,OOO
$ 778,ooo52,00o
$ T26,000
430.OOO
$_?egJgq
to each unit under
$ 281,000296.O00
l__0_9'o99149,OOO52,OOO(3,OOO)
35$ (15,OOO)
rII
g l
526
720-3(1)
Chapter 20
PLITCID CORFORATIOHIncome Statement
For Year Ended 20-Sales (48,000 x $161 $768,0OOCost of goods sold:
Standard full cost (481000r $9)............... 9{32'OOONet unfavorable yariable cost yarlancos,, lr0OOFavorable volume variance' (3,OOO}
Gross profltLess commenclal erpenses:
Varlable erpenses (48'OOO r $l)...............Fixgd oxpenses......o..........t......r..........r.....
Operating Income undgr absorptlon cosdng ...,o...........r.,...tUnlts budgeted for productlon durlng the yoar.................Units actually produced during the yoar...,r.....,..r.......,.,...
$48rOoO99.O00
€o,ooo$338,OOO
147.AOO
$_1e,Lqoo50,OOO51,000(r,o0o)
x 3 3
tzl
Fixed factory overhead charged to each units (3.OOO)
PLACID CORPORATIONlncome Statement
(3)
ded 2(FSales (48t000 x $f 0) ......r ' ..................... ' ..............,......o.r.r...Cost of goods sold:
Standard variable cost (481000 x $61......., $2g8r0OONet unfavorable variable cost yariances.. 1,OOO
Gross contribution margin.......................o.............,,Variable commercial expenses (48,000 x $11Contr ibut ion margiJ| . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . r . . . . r . r . . . t . . . . . r . . . r . r . r . r . . . . . . . . . . . .Less fixed costs:
Factory overhead_ (50'000 units budgeted r $3)...-........,.. $15o,o0oCommerclal expenses.................,..,...r..... gg.0oo
Operating income undgr dlrgct costng.,.......,...................,
Operating income under absorption costtng,..,,.......o.,r..,...uperating income undgr dirgct costing........................o.....D i f fg rg n c ,e . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . r . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o o . . . . ' . . r . . r . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Units produced during the year.......r.........,...,..r,................Uni ts sold dur ing the year. : . . , . . . . . . . . .Unit increase in finished goods inventoryFixed factory overhead charged to each unit under
absorption costingDiff erence............
$768,0OO
289,OOO
$czg,ooo48,OOO
$431,0O0
249,OOO
$1_g2J9g
$19{ ,OOOt82 .OO0
$__9,OOO51,OOO48,OOO
3,0oo
$ I,ooos3
Qppterfr
P204
(rl
527
I
Absorption costing;
Sa1 gS r . .a. . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . r . . r . . . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . .
Dirgct matgrlals ......,..............,......Dirgct 1abor.......... '..,r.r.... '.. '... '......r.......rr..r.Variabl g factory overhead ..,...........,......r.....Fixgd fagtory overhoad ......'.................'..o.r.Cost of goods manufagtured ....r,......,.........Beginning inventoryCost of goods available for 8a19..r............,..Ending inventoryor..'..........'................'..r.'...
Gost of goods so1d......................,...r........o..GrOSS pnOfit.............. ' ...........r....rrt..............t
Marketing and administrative oxpenses,....Operating incOme ....'................r.......r.........
| $1 + $2 + $1.5o + ($62,coo + 30,0001 = $6.s8$6.58 x IO,OOO units = $65,9OO
2 $1 + $2 + $1.5O + ($6Z,COO + 2O,OOO) = $7.O2$7.62 x 4,ooo units = S3o,4Bo
Direct costing:
Sa lgs . . . . i r . o . . . . . . . ' . r r . . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . r . . . . . . r . . . r r . . . . . r . . . .
Dirgct matgrials .......,..r....r..r..............r...,....Dirgct 1abor...........................r.....,.....,,........Variable factory overhead ........r..................Variable cost of goods manufactured......,..Beginnin g inventory......o...,.....r.....,r............Variabte cost of goods availabfe for safe....Ending inventory........,.....,.,................,.....,.Variable cost of goods so1d,..,....,................Gross contributi o n marg in,...........,...,.........Variable markeUng and administrative
exp9ns9s..............
Gontribution margin...............................r....-- t-Hfi".iffffffi:............. .......
Marketing and administrativeTotal f ired expenso ..r.................,,.Operat ing income . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . , . .
J
QuarterFirst
$2OO,OOO3 3O,OOO
6O,OOO45,0OOg2,4OO
$197,4OO
sl97,4OO65,800 t
s131,600
$ 68,40025,OOO
$ o3.4oo
Seconds26O,OoOs 2O,OOO
4O,OoOSOTOOO62,40O
s152,4OO65rgOO
s2l8,2oO3o,480 2
s187,7203 72,zao
28,OOO
s_9.289
(21 QuarterFirst Second
s2oo,ooo $260,ooo$ 3O,OOO $ 2O,OOO
6O,OOO 4O,OO045,OOO 3O,OOO
$135,OOO $ 9o,ooo45,00o
$135,0O018 ,OOO
$1 17 ,OOO
$143,O00
13,O00
$13o,ooo
$ 82,40015,OOO
$ 77,4oo
s 52.600
$l35,OOO45,OOO
$ go,ooo
$l l o,ooo
1O,O0O
$1oo,ooo
$ gz,4oo15 ,OOO
$ 7z,4ooE 22,609
'528
P2O-4 (Concluded|'
(31
OperaUng Income under absorption costingOperating lncome under direct costing......DiffefgnC g ............!..........r.r............ i ...r.......t
Change In inventoly under absorption costing:Ending inventory,.. . . .r. . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . , . .Beginning inventofl . . . . . . . . . . .r.r. . . . . . . . . . . .r. .r. .
lncreasg (decrease| in invento[.....,.......Ghange in Inventory under direct costing:
Ending inventory......, i ,....,...,...D........o......Beginning inventorlf ................o.,,.....r......In crease (decrease) in inve ntor]......,......
Differencs between absorption anddirgCt COSt ing. . . . . . .o . . . . . r r r . . . . , . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . r . . .
P20-5(11
Chapter 20
QuarterFirst
$4g,4oo22,AOO
$2O,8OO
$65,8OOo
$os,goo
$4s,oooo
Qrri nnnw v t v v v
_$2o,8og
Second$ e4rzgo
52,600glg'3291
s 3O,48O65,80O
s(3s,320)
S 18,ooo45,OOO
s(27,O001
CapitalIntensive
s (8,320)
LaborIntensive
Sales price ....,........,Variable costs:
Matgrials ............,...........,...Direct labor ....,....,.,..Variable factory overhead.,..........,........Variable marketing expens€s ...............
Gontribution margin per uflit......,..........,.r
$30.oo
$5.6o7.204.80
_l_6.0.9 2.oo
sg
s30.00
19 .60
sl o.40
$2,44O,0005OO,OOO
_S2,94o,oog
break even
s1,32O,oOO5OO,OOO
_S1,829,ogq
to break even
ss.oo6.OO3.002.OO
(al Gapital-intensive manufacturing method:Fixed factory ovgrhgad..........r. ' .... ' ..............r.rr. ' ...r..r...rFixgd markgting grpenses....,.................r.....,..........,....
Total f ixgd cost...................., ...........r..r......t...S2,940,OOO fixed cost = 21O,00O units of sales tos l4
(b)
contribution margin per unit
S1,820,OOO f i red costSlO.4O contribution margin per unit
= 175,OOO uni ts of safes
-\
Clppter fr
P2O-5,(Concludsdl
(21 Klmbrgll Company would be indifferent betweon tho two alternaUve man-ufacturing methods at the volume of sales for which total cost was egualunder both alternatives. Let O equal the quantity of units of product man-ufactured and sold.
6lo r al + $2,94o,oo0 = l$ig.oo r el + $f ,B2o,ooo$2'94O'OOO - $1,82O,OOO = (Stg.eO x Ql - ($fS r O1
$i '12O'OOO = $3.6OrQ3 1 1 ' l l l = O
Total cost will be the same for both manufacturing methods at 311,l i lunits of sales.
P20-6
(11 The number of units to break oven at a per unit sates price of $38.5o:Variable costs:
$ 60,0004O,OOO2O,O0O1O,O00
Dirgct 1abor... . . . . , . . .r. . .r, . . .r. . . .Variablg factory ovgrhgad,.r..............Variable marketing and admlnistrative erpensgs r,.......o......
s?o'ooo + $15ro99 = Y,ulo=o,o = 3,60o break-even unitss38.50 - $26.00' 512.50
(21
(3)
g
$13O,0OO
'S13O,OOO -r 5,OOO units = $26 variable cost per unit
units that must be sold to produce an $1g,ooo profit, at a g4o per unitsales price:
$45'990 + $18,ooo = su?'99o = l,soo units90o - $zs S14
The price castleton must charge at a SrOOo-unit sales level, in order toproduce a profit equal to 2Ooh of sales:
Let r = sales price per unitS,OOOx = 5,000(926) + S45,OOO + 5,OOO (.2x14,OOOx = $175,OO0
r = $Cg.ZS sales price per unit
CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission.
T 't
ChWter fr5g
P2A-7 I
Saleg prlce Per unitLess:
92 E4$180.OO s176.00.
Variable manufacturing cost per un|t......,..,.... $121.oo $ 96.00Variable gelllng erpenso per unit
15oh of sales pricel 9.OO 8.8O !
Total varlablg cost per unit...........,....i............. $1 3O,oO $1 04.8o
ContrlbuUon margin per unit 3 50.oo $ 71.20
*S160 sales price per unit In 1 9A + (9f 00 r 107c increase in 19Bl
Total fixed factory overhead((2O'O0O B2b + 4Or00O B4ts) r S25 per uni$,....,.....,,...... Slr50OrOOO
Totaf fixed selling and administrativa orpenseS............r..r, 2O7r33O v$1,7o7,33O
S1,7O7,33O fired cost + (S135,OoO protit + (1 - .4!fl2B2\ x $5O GM eachl + (3 B4b r $71.20 CM eachf
$1,7O7,33O fixed cost + $225,OOO pretar profit =
$313.60 CM per package
$1,932,390 = 6, i62 packagessi!13.60
6,162 packages r 2 units of 82 = 121324 units of 929,162 packages x 3 units of 84 = 18,486 units of 84
Clpptcr fr
- , P2Gg
(l) The 2OA sales mir in units is l:2 (7O,OOO tape recorders; 14O,OOO elec-- tronic calculators).Lat r = Number of tape recorders to break oven
2t = Number ol elastronlc calculators to break evenAt break ovon:
Salec = Variable cost + Frred cost$tsx + 2 gt22.5or) = $8r + 2 gi9.5o$ + $l,32o,ooor
$15r + $,45x = $8r + $l9r + $1,32O,0O0$8Or = $27r+$1'32O'OOO$33r = $1,32O,OOO
r = 40,OOO tape-recorders2r = SOTOOO electronic calculators
r Fired costs;Factoryovgrhgad.o.,...,..r.............r I 2gOrOOOMarkeUngandadminlstrailvo...... ITO4OTOOO
Tota1...........,.....................,......, gl!92o,ggg
:
53'
,Q Chaptorfr
t2o€ (Contlnuedl
2l The followtng lormula can bc used to calculatc the galcs dollars requiredto carn an aftertar proflt ol 9oh on ralec, using 2OB estimates:
s = vc(sl+FC+ #]}Where: S = NecessarY sales dottars
VC = Variable cost stated :ur a pencentage of sales dollars (SlFC = Fixed costr
p = Desired profit stated as a pencentage of sales dollars (S)T = Income tar rato
. s = .4esr+$1r3??rqoo2*-'O9(Sl-' (1 -.551
s = .465 + $1r377rOOO + .2S.34S = Sl'377'OOO
S = S4'O5O'OOO
'lVariable cost rate for tape recordels and electronic calculators:Tape Electronic
Recorders CalculatorsPer PerU n i l % U n i t % _
Sates price...,.......... .,.........'...... 91!.OO l00oh$?g{q lOO.O%Variabfe costs:
Matgrials . . . . . . . . . . r r , . . r . . . . , ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . r . . . ' . $ 3.60 $ 3.60
Direct labor 2.2O 3.3OFactory overhead............,. 2.OO 2-OO
TOtal vafiable COSI...............,.,......... $ 7.8O 52c/o $ 8,9O 44.5oh
Composito variable cost rate per dollar of sales: s
(.2O r Tapo recorder variabte cost rate| + (.80 x Calculator variable costrate| = .2O (.52) + .8O (.445) = .l04 + .356 = .46
zFired costs:Fagtory ovgrhgad .............,.,...............,..,...r....,,. ' .. ' . ......, ' . $ 2SOrOOOMarkeUng and administrative I 'O4O'OOOooi:u,:::.:::::::.].].::..:::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::.:::.::::#,-
Contributlon margi11............r.......t........... $f-.n & qU.lo W
Chagter2O
P?IO-A.(Goncluded)
(31 Let x = Number of tape recorders to break even3r = Number of electronic calculators to break even
At break even:Sales = Variable cost + Fixed cost
$lSr + 3($20xl = $7.80x + 3(g8.9oxl + $t,37Z,OoO9l5x + $6Or = 7.gox + $26.ZOx + $trgZT,OOO
$75x = $34.5Or + $1 ,377,OOA$4o.sor = $1r3z7rooo
r = 34,OO0 tape recorders3x = 102,O0O electronic calculators
= 5OO unlts
533
P2A-9
(11 (al In order to break even' Almo must sell 5oo units determined as fol-lows:E $100,000O(BE} =
P - C 3 4 0 0 _ s 2 0 0
where F = fixed cost, p = safes price per unit, and c = variable costper unit.
(bl To achieve an afteptax profit of $24o,ooo, Almo must sell 2,5oounits determined as foltows:
a = F*" _ $1OO,OO0+(S24O,oOo+( l - .eo))
_ $ iOo,ooo+$4oo,ooo S5oo,ooop-c $4oo_s2oo =F=-66_-
= 2,500 units
wfierE R F, and c are defined the same as in (lxa), and n is theafter-tar profit objective.
534 Chapter 20
P2O-g (Conctuded|
l2l Almo Gompany should choose alternaUve (a! because it will result in thelargest aftertar Profit.
Attematlvc (al:
Revenuc = G34OO unlt ralct prlcr x 350 unltrl + ((3{OO - 3lO prlcc rcductlon} r 2,7oO unlta} * \
= !14O'OOO + $972'000= t l r l laOOO v \
Varfablc Coct = 32OO por unlt x (350 unltr rold + 2r7OO unltr to bc roldl= i810,000
Atter-tar Prcflt= (Rcvcnuo - Varlablo C5gt - Fhod CorQ r (l - Tar Batel -= Gtl,l12,ooo - 3o1o'o00 - 31OO'Ooo) r (l - "t)= 3{O2,OOO r.6= t241,2OO -
Alternattvc (bl:
Revenuc = Gi4OO unlt asler prlcr r 350 unlts) + ((9400 - 3SO prlce reductlon) r 2,2OO unitg)= 3140rOoo + $814'Ooo= 3954rOOO
Varlirblc Coct = {320O per unlt r 35O unttr} + ($2OO - t25 coat reducUon) r 2,2OO units)= 37O,OOO + 3385,0OO= $4.f5,OOO
Atter-tar Proflt= (Revenuc - Varlable Coct - Fked CosQ r (1 - Tar Rate)= S1954,000 - $455,000 - 3100'oo0) r (1 -.4)
= 3399,000 r .6= $230,400
Alternattvc (c):
Rwenuc = CI4OO unlt rabt prlco r 350 unltrl + $4O0 r 11 - 5% prbo reductim) r ?rOOO units)
= 314O'O0O + 370OI0OO= 39O0,00O
vartablo Cost = izoo per unlt r {35o unltr aold + 2,ooo unltr to bs aold}= 9470,00O
After-tax Prollt= (Revonuc - Vartablo Coct - Fhed Coge r (l - Tax Rate)= ($9oo,ooo - S47o,ooo - Gl l0o,ooo - 31o,00o cost reducUon)) x (1 - .4)= S34OTOOO r.O= $2O4,00O
Clppter fr
P20-70
(1) Egtimated brpak-even point based on pro forma incomc statement
3819t ttttt"""............tr.........................r................................ $l orooorooO
Varlablc costs:costof goods80ld...-....r-...........t.'....,..... $6roooroooCommlssions paid to agents................... ZTOOOTOOO 8TOOOTOOO
Contribution margill.....'.............r....................o.o.....r......,.... $ ar"ttrt*
Gontribution margin ratio - $. ?'oo0'ooo = 2oo/o CIM$t0r0oo,0oo
$loorooo fired cost , '
zortffi = $5o0,o0o break-even point
(21 Estimated break-even point with the company employing its own safes-pen;ons:
Variable cost railos:gost ol goods sold to sales (g6rOOOrOOO + gIO,OOOTOOO)........Commissions on salgs.......r.-......r......r.........r............D...........r..
Totaf variablg cost ratio...r...'..r....,..r..or...r...,................r..,...
contribution margin ratio = 1 - 6soh variable cost ratio = 3soh
Fired costs:Administrat ive". . ' .o. . . r . . . . . . . . . . ' . . ' . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . r . . . ! r . . . . . r . r . . I
!af es manager " t . . . . . . . . . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . r . . . .o.r . . . . . , . . . .o. , . , . ro. .
Salaries of satespersons (3 x $30,ooo) ....::::::::.....,.........Total f ixgd costs.'.................. ' .........,...,..r...r.,..r..,.,r.....
S35O,OOO fixed costgsoh CIM
= SI,OOO,OOO break-even point
600h5%
65%
$1OO,0OO160,000go,ooo
_$3sg,oog
536 Chapter 2O
P2O-10 (Concluded|
(31 Estimated sales volume to yield net Income proiected In pro formalncome statement with Independent sales agents receiving 25oh commis-sion:
Total Income bgforg Income t3I ..........'r..r..!r.....'.........r.....r.t Sl T9OOTOOOFired cogt lOO,OOO
_Eooo,ooo _Total lixed cost and pJEfit...,.............................
Variable cost ratios:Cost of goods sold to sa1gs.................o....,....,..Gommissions on salgs ....... ' ...,..............r.....
Total variablg cost ratio .,..,r,....o..r..,.,.,.... g50hw
600/o *
250h
Gontribution margin ratio = 1 - 85% variable cost raUo = 15oh
S2,OOO,0OO fixed cost and profit = S13,333,333 safes15% CtM
(41 Estimated sales volume to yield an identical income regardless ofwhether the company employs its own salespenions or continues withindependent sales agents and pays them a 25oh commission: . v
Total cost with agonts = Total cost with companybreceiving 25oh commission own sales force -
(85% variablo cost r sales| = (95% variable cost x salesl+ $100,00O fired cost + $350,0O0 fired cost -
29ohxsales = s250,000
sales = $1,25o,Ooo
Chapterfr
c20- l '
537
(ll Becausa star Gompany useg absorption costing, Income from opera$onsla Influcnced by both sales v_otume and productfl; volume. sales volumewag Incrcased In the tlovember 3o forecast, and at standard gross profitratag this would incroasc Income- from operafion" lv SSri-oo. XorrLJ"i---during this same period, production volume uras belo* it e January Iforecast causrng an unprannad votume va;anc; ;i $;ffi. Tho vorumevariance and the increased marketing erpenses (due to the lo%Increase in sales) overshadowed ttre aoaid pronL trom ""1"", as folours:
CASES
InCrgaSgd 881O8...............r...............r.......r...Increased cost of goods cold at 8tandard...Increased gross profit at standa1d.,............Less:
Volumg variancg ...rr....o..........r.........r......lncrgasgd marketing erpenso.,.....,........,
Decrease in income from operations,.,....,..
s26,80027',2OO
$ 5,goo
$6,OOO1r34O 7.340
$ (1,7401-
t
5g Chapter 20
STAR COMPAMTForecasts of Operatinq Results for 20-
Foracasts as otJanuarv I November 3O
.,....,......,... $268'000 $294r8OO
C2A-1 (Goncluded!
l2l Star Company coutd adopt dlrect costing. Under direst cosUng, fixedmanufastirrin-g costs would be treated as period costs and woul.d not beasJigneO to pfoductlon, Gonsequently, earnings would not be affected byproA-ucUon votums, but only by sales Yolume. Statements prepared on adirect-costlng basis ars as follows:
Sal e3.... . . . .o... . .
Variable costs:Manufacturing .t . . . . . t . . . . t . . t . . . to"to""""o'ot"r"t t '
Markgtin$ .. . . . t . . . . . . . .r . t t . . . . . . t . . . . . . ."""o"tt"t t t t t t t
Total var iabl g CoSt . . . . . . . . . t t . ' . ' . """"""" ' r" '
COntf ibUtiOn mafgi f t , . . . . . . . . . . . . . r , . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . 'o. . . ' . .
Fired costssManufacturin g .......t............o.ir.o.....""tttrt"r"
Administrativg o... . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ."" 'r"t"""
Total f i xed cost ' . . . . ' . . . . . . . .r. . . . . .r. . . . .-. . . . . . . .-. . '
$182,OOO $2OO,2OO'l3,4OO 14r74O
sl95,400 s214,940
S 72,600
$ 3O,OOb28,80O
I 79,860
$ 3O,OOO26,80O
$ 56,800 I 56,800
Income from operations '......".......r.....r...r..,..... $ 15r8OO 9-23'960-'S182,000 x l looh = S200'20O
Reconciliation of differences in incoms from operations:January l: No difference In absorption vs. direct costing because$3O,OOO fixed factory overhead was expensed in both cases.
November 30:
DifeCt COSting.r . . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rAbSOfpt iOn COSting . , . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . ' . . . . . . '
D i f f g r g n c g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . ' . . . . . . t " r " t " " t t t t t t " t t " '
Fixed factory overhead included in cost of goods sold atNovember 3O lorecast (S3O,0OO in January 1 forecast
+ lQoh sates volume increase) . . . . : - . . . . . . . .January 1 forecast. . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . , . ' , . . . - . . . .
Und erapplied fixed factory overhead
lncome fromOoerations
$23,o6014,060
s 9,ooostandard:
s33,OOO3O,OOO
s 3,ooo6,OOO
Diff grgncg.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . t . ' . . S gtOOO
Clppter fr
c20-2
539
(rl In absorpuon costiDgr Bts curently omployed by RGB Corporation, firedfactory overhead is considered a product cost rather than a period cost.Firad tadory overhead is appfied to production based on a normalcapacity of I'ooo,ooo units. Thu3, the fixed factory overhead is appliedto products in the samo manner as variable costs, even though it doesnot vary with production. In addition, lf production ano sai.s are notequal during the year, fired factory oveihead is deferred as part of inven-tory costs-(when production erceeds sales) or releas"o ,pon sales of theInventory (when sales erceed producUon)-
During 2oA, production exceeded sales, rcsulting in a portion of thefired factory overhead being Inventoried in finisheigooo-s-rather thanbeing expensed in 2oA. This resulted in 2oA operatin! income being tar-ger than lt woufd have been ll all fired factory overhead had beencharged against 20A sales revenue. Then in 2oB, sales exceeded produc-tlon, resulting In more fired factory overhead being ctrargeo against 2oBsales nevenuo than was incurred ii 2oB. First, RniJtreo gioos were sotdout of inventory which meant lhaf th9 part of fired factiry overtread thatwas incurred in 2oA and inventoried in 2oA was charged against 2oBsales revenue. Second, fired factory overhead ,^r"" uid"raiptied in 2oBbecause only 85o,ooo units lvere produced (isorooo units less than nor-mal capacity used in determining itre tactory overhead iaie). This result-cd In an unfavorable votume variance that was charged to the cost ofgoods sold in 2oB. Both of these occurences increased the cost ofgoods sold and resulted in a reduction of gnoss profit and operatingi n c o m e i n 2 O B .
5
ffi
C2O-2 (ConUnuedf
l2l (rt
Chapterfr
ROB CORPORATIOIIOpcnUng lncomo 9tatamcnt
For the Years Ended November 30, 20A and 20B(h thourend$
Vrrlrbb cst of goodr rold:g0OrOOO unltr et 35,00---IOOTOOO unltr rt 35.OO-*-TOOTOOO unltr et 3550**-
@ntrlbuUon nrrgln *...*,.-s-.Fh.d.pcntc$
Fllcd frctory ovcrlrced D...s.'. 33'000
20A, ?OB
30,ooo
.3r500
tr'5oo
311,2OO
3p5O 5,350
t4,5OO t 5,850
33'3oo8cllhg rnd rdmlnlttntlv. -.* 1.500 .f'5OO f "5OO 4"800
OpcnUng Incomr ....'.-......o'o...ts
tr) RccmclllaUon:
OpcnUng lncomc-rbrorpUon corUn g .,.-.....--.{
OperaUng Incomo-d lrcct coaUn9,...........-.,.......,.
3 900
Dlfferrncr 3 9oo
Dtffsroncr eccounted for rrfollowr:hvcntory changr undcrrbrorpUon cocUng:
Endlng Invcntory:30O,0OO unltr rt 38,00..., tZragg150,000 unltr rt 38'80,...
BcAlnnlng Invcntory:..-....... 0 32r4oO
SOO,0O0 unltr rt 38.00....
hvrntory changr under dlrcctcoaUng:Endlng lnvcntory:
3OO,OO0 unltr at $S.0O.... t1"500150,ooo unltr at 35.50.. . .
Baglnnlng Inventorp O 1,5OO
3OO,O0O unltr at 35.OO... .
o 1,050
r ro*r
31,320
2,1OO 3 (1,080)
$ 825
1,5OO (s75)
t eoo 3 {4o5)
0
204
3 lro5o
208
3 o 4 l t . u
Dlflcroncr
Clpptrfr
Cz.G.? (Goncluded)
(3) The advantages of direct costing for internal reporting include the follow-lng:(al Direct costing aids In lorccasting and in erraluaung reported income
for internal management decision-making purposes, because fixedcosts alt not arbitrarily allocated between accounting periods (oramong different products, eafes territories, operating dlvisions,etc.!.
(bl Fired costs ars raported at Incurred vatueg (and not absorbed val-ues|' Increasing opportunity for mono effective controt of thesecosts.
(cl Profits vary directly with sales volume and are unaffected bychanges in inventory levefs.
(dl Analysis of the cost-volume-profit ralaUonship is facilitated, andmanagement is able to determine the brsak-oven point and total :profit for a given volume of prcduction and sales.
The dlsadvantages of direct costing for Internal reporting inctude the fol-lowing:(al Management may fail to consider properly the fired cost element in
long-range pricing decisions.(bl Direct costing lacks acceptabitity for external financial raporting or
as a basis for computing tarable income. As a consequonce, addi-tional record-keeping costs must be incured to use direct costing.(c) The separation of costs into fixed and variable elements is a costi-ypnocess. In addition, the distinction between fixed and variabte coitis not precise and not reliabte at alt lEvels of activity.
541
c20€
(11
(21
Daly would determine the number of units of Product y that it wouldhave to sell to attain a 2oo/o profit on sales, by dividing total fixed costsplus desired profit (t.e.r 2ooh of sales price-per unlt multiplied by theunfts to attain a !o% profit) by unit contribution margin {i.o., sales priceper unit less variable cost per unit).lf variable cost per unit increases as a pencentage of the sales price,Daly would have to sell mone units of Product Y io break even. Becausethe unit contribution margin 0.o., sales price per unit less variable costper unit) would be lower, Daly woutd have to selt mora units to cover thefired cost in order to brreak euen.
it-r
t12
C2O-3 (Goncludedl
Chapterfr
(31 The llmitatlons of brpak-eyen and coat-volume-profit analysis ln manage-rlal declslon maklng follow:(al The snalyslg lg fundamentalfy a gtaUc enalysis' and, In most casor'
changeo can be determlned only by recomputlng ltsults. lf a break-oyen chart la used, changes can be shown only by drawing a n€Yvchart or geries of charts.The amount of fired and yariable cost as well as the slope of thoeales llns, ls meanlngful ln a defined riange of acUvity and must beredefined for actlvity outside the relevant range.The analysis ls hlghly dependent upon a meaningful geparation ofllred and varlable costs, whlch may be dlfficult to obtain In actualpracUco.The analysla is based on a slngle mir of producta. lf the mlx lserpected to change, the rpsults must be rpcomputed.The analysls assumes that production technology (i,e., labor produc-Uvity, level of automation, and product specificaUons| will beunchanged. ll changes In production technology are erpectpd tooccur, the analyst must consider tho expected effects on costs.The analysis assumes that selling prices, input prices' and othermarket conditions will not change. Erpected changes must beIncorporated Into the analysis. lf a rango of possfble changes canoccur, e different rasult must be determined for each possible corl-binaUon.
(bl
(cl
(dl
(el
(0
@1-1. Dillcrential6t b thr ditference h the cct ofallrrnative choicoc. Thc cconqrrist calb ruchcdb marginal, and the engineer calls themircnrncntal.
A21-Z Marginal cosl (or ditlerential cost) is the costircunod by increasing thc present outptrt Thecoeil, lhenfore, would nol have been hcuned illhr
-addi t ional uni t r had not been made .
Marginal cosling (or diract costing), on theo,trer hand, is a cclhg approach h wtridr crlyvariablc rnanulacluring cost! are charged to' prcducls, and thur to invenlory, while fixedmanufacluring coelt ar. lreated ar periodcoslr and are charged olf withourt becomingpsrl of hventory cools.
@1€. Incremcntal coslr are important in decisionrnakhg, bccausc the least cosily or most prof-
. itablo allemative cannol be determined unlessincremental costs are known. lncremenlalcoslr are lhe costs that musl be incurred inorder to cornplete sn €ctivity that is being con-riicred. These co3tt must bc known h oderlo onrpare each arrailable Eliernative.
O21-{. Differential cets do nol clrrespond to any pe.eibb accounting calegory, because they areoriented loward the future rather than the pastand lhey treat producl costs on a differentialrather than a total cost basis. Furlhernroro, cor.tain costs relevant for ditferential cost analysis(o.9., opporlunity cost and imputed cost) arenol recordod h lhe accounls. Conversely, cer-tain costs recorded h the rccounts (e.g., fixedcosls thal will remain urchanged) are inelevanlfor dilferential cost analysis. The diflerentialcod corrcept is a corcept for cosl analysis andnol cosl accumulatbn purposes.
O2t-5. The flexible budget b uselul h differenlial cetanalyses, because lhe incrementg belweeneach ditferent tevel ol ouiput represent tho cclthal must be incurred il additisral business isundertaken. As bog ar lired costs rernah con_rtant under all rates o{ oulpul, variable costsare alwala the ditferontial costs. lf fixed costgchange in the flexible budget, differential costswill include the incremenlal element of f ixedcogl rellected in the llexible budgel
O21€. Historical costs are usually irrelevant becausethey have been created by a past decisbn lhatcannot bc changed by a lu ture decis ion.Historical costr obtained frorn accounling rec.ords oflen include arbitrari ly allocated fixedcosl thal rnay not be relevant to dilferential coetanalysis.
CHAPTEN 27DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
@,1-7. Variablc corl ir important bccauso it canalways be idantif ied as a differential cost.However, dillerentbl ccls msy also includraddltiqtal fixed cctr.
O21€. Sunh coeils are incccrerable ccts that ar notrelevanl b futuro decisisrs.
O2t-9. A fixed corl would bc relevant in decidingbctwecn altcmstiver il the lhed erpenditun iran oul-of-pockot cost required in ordor toundertake an allemative (e.g., the cet d rcnt-ing eguipment needed lo provido sulficienlcapacity in deciding whelher or not to acceplan offer); or if a fired erponcfture can bt avciied by undertakhg an altemalive (e.g., supervi.eory ralaries that will be discontinued in theevenl of a plant cbeing).
Q21-10. Oppoatnrty coctr are the measurablo value olan opporlunity blgassed by rejecling an alter-nalive use ol resources.
021-1 1. Appendir Lhear prograrnming b a rnathemati-ca l lechnique decigned lo arg ia ldecision makers in detcrmining thcallocalbn of resources that would bereguired to mEximize or mhimize theobjeclive lunctim; i.e., it b a tool thatcan be used by business ,nenagerlllo determine the mix of inpuis hecer-sary lo maxirnize contributbn rnarginor minimize cost. Linear program-ming is an algorithm that maximizesor minimizes a function ol severalvariables subject lo one or,Tpre con.s l ra ints . The funct ion being opt i -m ized and the cons l ra in t l s roagsumed to be linear wilh respect toproduclion activity.
Q21-12. Appendix The unit costs usod in linear pro_gramming problems are the lracc-able variable costs. Costs murl betraceable lo the prcduct and variablcwith respect to prcducticr quantily inorder to affect changes in total po-
. duclion cost and total contributionmargin when changes in productbnquantity and mix occur.
O21-13. Appendix(a)The area bounded by the tineeAB, BC, CD, and DA b calfed thrsohrlbn space because il repre-senls thooe quantilies and cqnbi.nalions ol standard and doluromodels lhal can be produccd,given the available caprity o{ thcgrinding and polishing mrhiner.
g3
I!
544
(b) Trlangle BCF represenls lhosecomblnat ions of s landard anddolura models that could bc PtDduced by thc poltshing maclrlneshJt mt by the gdnding rnaciinee.Trlanglc CDE reposonte $c lovolol productlon that tho gtindlngnracfrhcs could atlain, bul nol th.poliahfng macfilnor.
(c) Polnt C denoles thc oPtimumsolutbn bocause anY olher levelof snalnablc prodwtbn will resultln a srnaller total contdbulion mar-gin. ll can bc identilied bY com'putlng lhe lolal conttibulion mar-gin available lrom thc productbnand sale of thc combinatlon ofstandErd and delure models-dcnotcd by cach corncr point-and chooslng thc cornor poinlwilh thc largosl total conltibutionmargin. Altematively, a series olCM l ines can bc construclod,which havc a slopc cgual lo -lmultipliad by lhc unit conlributionmargin available lrom lha produd
Ct@ter 2t
identified by thc horizontal eris,divided by thc unit contribulionmargin availablo trorn Utc prodrclidontified by tn verticsl 8xb. Thcptofit lino farthest frorn lhc ori$n.poinl A, rcPtts.nb lht gtcalosltotel contrlbullon margin. and Inthb casc, il Passas thtottgh Poinlc.
021.14. AppendixThc simplex msthod i3 an ilsrativcptoaas tul finds lhc oPtimum so|trtion to a llnoar pmgramming Protslem. Thc simplex method, which isbased on malril algobta, is a sys-lematic way ol cvaluating sacfi cor-
- nor point in the teasiblo araa. Thaprooass begins at thc zero level ofprodrclion and systematically rnoveslrorn onc comct poht to anothcr untiltho optimal soluuon is found. Eachmovc provitJes lhc lsrgosl por unllimprovement in the objeclivo func'tion. Th€ ptocess continuss until lheobjsdivc fundion can no longer beimprovod.
Clnpter 2l
F27-7
E)GRCISES
Saleg ($1.90 r 5 0OO kg).............r....,...........r........Gost to manufactut€:
Dlrcct materlalr ($.eO + $.0i| r 5 OOo kg).._...
545
$9,ooo
Dircct labor (3,50 r 5 O0O kg)..,..Factory overhead:
Indirect labor ($.2O r 5 000 kg) ...........,.......Power ($0OO + 3O'OO0) x 5 0OO kg).,.r.........Supplies S1.02 x 5 OOO kff)...............r...........Maintanance and repair ($.027 r 5 000 kg)Deprcciation (i3r00o + 24 months),..........-j..lnsurancg ($,OOZ r 5 oOO kg)......,.....,......,,.rPayroll targ!.......oo.......r......r........rrr....o.....o..r
Gost of goods produced and so|d,......,.................Gross profit contributiGtll ..,............rD....................rAdministrativg gxpenso......D....ro...,.................,.....
Profit contribution from accepting new business
E21-2
(1) Estimated cost of the additional loo,ooo units:Mater iats (($150,OOO /1SO,OO0 uni ts) x iOO'0OO uni ts)Direct labor ((${f z,5oo / 15o,oo0 uni ts) x loo,ooo uni ts) . . . .Variable factory overhead
( ($75,0OO / 15O,OO,uni ts) x 10O,0OO uni ts) or($125,o0o at loo% capicity - bzs,ooo:Jt dol% capacity)Fixed factory overhead
(9125'o0o at 1 ooo/o capacity - $f oo,oo0 at 6o% capacity)Total differential cost of manufacturing the additional
10o,o0o units ' . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . .o. . . , . rr . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r
Total cost of producing 250,O00 units in Janua4n
s3,O502,5OO
I,OO0100' too13572535
1 6 0
{2}
Budgct for15O^0OO Unitr
$150,OOO112,500
75,00010o,ooo
$437,5OO
Diffcrcntial Costfor lOO.OOO Unitg
$too,ooo75,OOO
5O,OOO25,OOO
$2gg,ooo
. 7 .205s1 ,795
1 5 0
s1.64s
slOO,OO075,OOO
5O,OOO
25,OOO
$25O,OO0
Total Cort for25O.O0O Unltgs25O,OOO
187,50O
125,o00t25,OOO
J68Z@
Materials .. . . . . . . .D,Direct |abor... . , . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . .Factory overhead:
Variabfe. ....,...Fixed
Total cost
lr \
546 Chagter 2l
E21-2 (Concluded)
(31 Saler price rcguirsd to achiev e a 2Ooh mark up on production cost:
Production cogt per unlt ($6871500 + 25O'O0O units)..,....r...........r $2.75Plus 2Oo/c mark up on cogt ($2.75 r 2O%l .55Safer price reguired to achfeve 2Ooh mark up on cost............o..... $3,3O
E21-3
Revenue from ttre rpecial cale (15,0OO units x $12,5O each).. $1BZ,5OOLesr differontial costs:
Direct materialr ($2O,OOO + lO'O0O units) x15,000 unftsl $3o,ooo
52r5OODirect labor (($3S,OOO + 1Or00O units) x
l5rOOO units|.......Additional overtime premium on apecial order l0r0OOVariable factory overhead (($1Or00O + 1O'0OO
units) x 15rO0O units).......................,,.ro. 15,000
7,OOOAdditional fired overhead from equipment
t€nta1 ......Variable marketing oxpen3es (($201000 +
t0rO00units)x l51000uni ts) . . . . . . . .o. . r . . . . . . .^ . . . , 3OTOOO i44.5ooAdditlon to annual company profit resulting from
special 3a1e...........,.....,.......
q
:!
|-
!
I
S
Chapbr2l
F214
e3-5
547
l
No, Hunungrton should not accept Lufkinb offer because it would be$5'OOO cheaper to make the part.
Gost lf purchased from Lufkin (1O,OOO r ttf S)Cost lf manufactured by HunUngrton:
s180,O00
Direct materiab...Direct labor....,o.rvariable factory overhgad ............-.o.......,......r..Rent from thlrd party forgone lf part
manufactllF9d........r...........r..t......r...ro...r.r..... 15rOOOAdditional fired factory overhead eliminated lf
part purchased from Lufkin (1O,OOO x $3)..,. 3O.OOO 165.000Savings lf part manufactured by Huntin!fto11...,.... $ ,|5.ooo
This solution assumes that a mono profitable use of the fucilities doesnot exist than that derived frcm the saving of $is,ooo. oth;;;, ir woufdbe preferable to buy Part M-l from Lufkiriand'use Huntington's facilitiesfor the mono profitable activity.
s2O,OO055,OOO45,000
\-
The company ehculd purchase the pistons from the outside supplierbecause lt woufd cost $6,oo0 less than manufacturing them at theTlcson plant.
The differential cost of manufacturing pistons at the Ttrcson prant:Dircct matgria|s.r.....r...........r........,......t..r...r..... $i 6OrOOO'Dirgct |abor. . . . . . . . . r . . . . r . . . . . . . .oo.. . . . . . . . r . . . r . . . . . . . r . , . . . . . SOTOOOVariable factoly overhead (2Oo/c r S24O,OOOi.... 48,OOOIncrpmsntar fixed cost for machinery r6ttri.... gorooolncremental fired cost for additionai
supervisol ..........,..r.o................ 4O,OOOTotal differential cost to manufacturr
80ro00 pistons..........o..r...r.r....,.,.......,....... $3SgrOooGost to purchase g0,OOO pistons lrom WichitaMachine Works (ge.CO per piston x SO,OOOpistons)...r..,......,.,,..,............r...........
352roooCost savings available from purchasing thepistons from the wchita Machine w-orks rather
than manufacturing them at the TUcson plant. $ 6,O0O
I
-
548 Chapter 2l
E21-6
(ll Yes, the sales managert pnoposal to drop Tift from the product line andincrease the produetlon of Mift should be accepted because it willIncrease the companyb income by $4,OOO, determined as follows:
Contribution margin from sale of Tift:Revenue from sale of Tift (So r T,OOO units)...,. $czroooLess variable cost of manufacturing Tifts
Materials ($Z x T'OOO units|....... $14'OOOLabor stl x 7r0OO units)............. 7r0OOVariable factory overhead
($f x T'OOO units!.......o.....,.... T'OOO 28'OOOGross contribution margin from sale of Tift ..,.. S14,OOOLess variable markeUng erpense from sale of
Tift ($1 r 7rO0O units|..................r..........,...,.. 7ro0o $ 7ro0o
Contribution margin from sale ol4,0OO additional units of Mift:
Revenue from.sale of additional Mift{$lOr4rOOO units}.......,..r.....r....,..,......,........ 9{OTOOO
Less variable cost of manufacturing additional Mift:
Materials ($2 x 4r00O units)......, S 8r0O0Labor ($2 x 41000 units|..,.......... 8r0OOVariable factory overhead
($1 r 4'OOO units1o.................r 4'OOO 2OTOOOGross contribution margin frpm
salo of additional Mift..................r..........., 92or00OLess yariable marketing oxpense from sale of -
addiUonal Mift ($f r 4,OoO'units|.....,....,r....o. 4'OOO 16,000Additional contribuUon margin from converting capacity to
to production of 4'OOO additional units of Mift...,......,......... $ I 'OOOAdditional advertising expense required to sell 4,000
additional units of Mift ..r............................,.......r..........,..... 5r0OO
Additional income from dropping Tift from product l ine andconverting capacity to production of 4,000 additional unitsof Mi f t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . ' . ' . . r . . . . . . . . .o . . ' . . . . ' . r . . . . . . . . . ' . . . r . . . . . . . . $ 4,ooo
\
Clppter2l
E2l-e (Goncluded)
(21 Montreal should consider whether dropping Tift from the product line willresult in decrcassd sales of Mift and Lift in the long run. For erampte, ifthe three products ara complementary, customers may prefer to maintainonly those Eouncs3 of supply from which the full product line is available.The present ability to sell moro Mift by dropping Tift may be a short-runcondition. lf this is a concern, the cost of resuming Tift production at alater date should also be considerad.
CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission.
E21-7Silver Polish
per Jar
Sales price..,... ,.r,,............,............. $a.oo
E21-8
(1) Direct tabor hours (DLH) = 1,000,000 doses to be packagedrequired for the job I,OOO doses per DLH
= 1,000 DLH
Direct labor ($S x I 'OOO hours) ......,..,,,........r.Variable factory overhead ($2 x l,OOO DLH)....,..Administrative expenseTotal traceabl e out-of-poc ket costs.............
Minimum price per dose = Total traceable out-of-pocket costs1 ,
= .sPlo9?= = $.ooel rOwr.r rvuu
$ .4o2.50
.30
s3.20Contribution margin . . . . . . . r . . . r . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . $ .80Opportunity cost from further processing rather than
sefling Grit 332 (7/D4 r ($2.0O - Sl.60)).r,....,.......,...,........ . loNgt contribution margin per unitr.................................,,.... !_ ,tg
$5,600 avoidable fixed cost + $.7O = 8,OOO, the minimum number of jarsof silver polish that must be sold to justify further processing of Grit g37.
s5,OOO2,OO01,OO0
_gg,ogg
1 - -
; \
sfl
E21-e (Concluded)
l2l Marimum allowable =return belore tarog
Marimum rsturn after tares
Chwter2l
$ g,ooo5rOOO
$13,O0O1,95O
(l - Tax Ratel
'Og !! 'O9 = -t5 or 15o/o= F Z o i = s o _ =
r r o i r
Total traceable out-of-pocket costs (from requirement (1ll--r-....FiXgd laCtOry OVgrhgad ($5 f I rOOO DLFI r.........o.r.....'..'..r...........
TOtal lUll COStrr....................o.............r...........t..............t....r....t....
MaffmUm allOWable f6tgfn 115% f $1 3rOO0),...,........r.............o'..
(3)
TOtal bid pr iCe.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . r . .o. . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . t . . . S14t95O:
Bid price per doso =
sl4.950 = s.o1495= iFociFoo
The factors that Hall Company should consider before deciding whetheror not to submit a bid at the maximum allowable price include whetherHall has orcass capacity, whether there aro available iobs on which oarrl-ings might be greater, whether the marimum bid of $.O15 contributestoward covering the frxed costs, and whether this iob could lead to moFoprofitable business with Wyant in the future.The competitive environment of the industry should have been consid'ered by Wyant Memorial Hospital to determine whether or not a lowerprice could be obtained through competitive bidding. The hospital shouldalso have considered that cost-plus pricing is not usually viewed uni'formly by prospestive bidders, is difficult to compute lor products pro-duced in smass' quantity, and is better suited lor products that areunique and high priced.
(4)
Total bid priceITO0O,OOO doses
Chapter2l
v3-0
Franchlse fee collections per dayAverage gllss rovenuag per tnanchise per dEl|............,..........Numbgr of franchiSOS............'..................o........o...o..r..............
Total gnoss rBvenu8.......r.....o......'..............r'............orr.......r.r... s2lO,OOOx .25Franchisg fgo .............
Avgragg daify franchise tge collgctiofls ..........,.,o.......,..r......... _$ 52r5qg
First proposal (i.o., use local messonger service to collest and mait checksonly):
s 52,500x2sl05,OOOx 15%
s 15,7502O,OOO
55',t
$ soor 42O
Average daily franchise fge coflegtions ,.....,..........,...............oDays savgd.,...r,..Total float saved.,,,,.Beforg-tar opportunity cost.'..o...."..........,r.......ot.r..........r..,..r.Avgragg annual savings.... . ' .r . .o.r.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .r. t , . . .r. .Lgss cost of mgssenger sg| ' icg... . . . . . . . . .r. . .o... . . . .r. . . , .r.r, . . . . , . . .r. . .Annual reduction in income if pmposal implemented.............
Second proposal (i.o., use local massonger.service with a lock-box arrange-ment):
a a a a a a a a . r a a a a a a
_s (4,2sO)
s 52,5OOx5$262,5O0x 15o/o
$ ss,375
22,25O
Average daily franchise fee colteetions ....,....,r...........,.,.......D.Days saved. . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . r . r . . . . . r . r . . . . . . . . . . i . . r . . . . . . . . . . r ,
Total f loat savgd r.. . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . .Before-tar opportunity cost .. ! , , . . . . . . . . .Average annual savings.... .r. . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . .r, , , . ,r. . . . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Less costs:
Messenger service $2o,ooo2,25OGompensating balance ($iS,OOO r i5yo)...,......
Annual increase in income i f proposal implemented... . , , . , . . . . . . $ l?Jr5
I
-
' H
552
Ezl-10
Silk-gcreen method:Prepare tcraon 17 1/2 hours r 2O'OOO circuit
bOafdA f $6.5O).........r.................................r...r.Scrsen patterns (1/3 hour r 2O'OOO circuit
bOafdC I $0.501......r.........................r................
TOtal cO8t.................rr.........
AZ-17 pnocess:Labor (1t2hour x 2O'OOO circuit boards x $6.50)Monthly cost for materials and equipment
rental gnd operation ($41000 r 12|.............--....TOtal GC)3t.. . . . . . . . . ' . . r . . . . . .r .r . . .r . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t .
Annual savings from changing from silk-screen methodtO thO ngW AZ-l 7 prOCes3.......... '....r.........r.r.....t..
$l95,OOO
#t,333
$ 65,000
48,OOO
Chagter2l
$238,333
113,OOO
$125,333
Chapter2l
E27-11 APPENDIX
553
Let Mr = marking board as.semblod in automated assembly departmentMl = marking board assembled in labor assembty depirtmentTe = tack board assembled in automated assem6ly departmentTr. = tack board assembled in labor assembly oepirtmlnt
Me Mr- Tr.TrSalgs price per unit........o.................. $60.OO $60.00 S4s.oo $4s.ooLess yariable costs:
Direct materials:BaSg ...........r..... $ o.oo s 6,00
14.50 14.508.25 8.25
2.OO 2.OO.60 3.OO
2.45 2.453.30 2.253.OO 3.OO
6.00 S 6.007.75 7.7s4.25 a.25
2.OO 2.OO.60 3.OO
2.45 2.453.30 2.253.OO 3.OO
CoveringFrame .r.................r....................
Direct labonCutting Departmeftt.....,...........,.Assembly Departmellt ...............
Variabla factory overhead:Gutting DepartmeDt.....,.......,.r.,.Assembly Departmellt ...........,...
Variable marketing expens€s ......,.Total variable costs per unit....r.,...
Contribution margin per 1111it.............$40,1o s41.45 s33.35$19.90 $18 .55 $11 .65
@$10.30
Objective function:
Maximize CM = $f g.gO Ml + $i8.55 Mr- + $t t.OS Te + $iO.3O Tr-
Subject to:.2O M^.05 M^.15 M^O M ^
.O5 M^1 M ^0 M ^
+ 2 0+ .25+ .15+ .O2+ O+ 1+ 0
Ml +Ml +Ml +
M ! +
Ml +Ml +
M t +
.2O Tr + .2O Tr. < 3O,OOO DLH In Cutting
.05 Tr + 35 TL S 4O,OOO DLH In Aesembly
.15 Te + .i5 TL s 25,OOO MH In CuttingO Te + .02 Tr s 1,5OO MH In LaborAssembly
.05 Tr + O Tr. S 5,OOO MH In Automated AssemblyO Tr + O 7r, ) 3O,OOO unlts eales contract1 Tr + 1 Tr- > 3O,OOO untts salee contract
. 5r1
E21.12 APPENDX'
O U
504 E
40
30
20
1 0
ABcD
Let L = the number of legal padsR = the number of rcgular pads
Objective function:
Maximize CM = $f 8L + $12R
Subject to:2OL+ lORs9OO
Chaptor zt
9 0 R
= S O C M= $a1o CM= S9OO CM <- Maxlmum CM= S72O CM
minutes labor(2 people x 7.5 hour r 60 minuteslboxes daily marimum demand(3O0 boxes per week + 5 work daysl
L+ Rs 60
0 ' r0 20 30 40
= ( L = 0 , R = O ) == ( L = 4 1 1 , R = 0 ) == ( L = 3 0 , R = 3 O l == ( L = O , R = 6 0 ) =
50 60
(S18Xo) +(318x4tt) +(318X3o1 +(S18Xo) +
70 80
(312X0)(312X0)(812X3o)(sl2xso)
L + R ( 60 boxes dai ly ' demand
10R s 900 minutes ol labcr
CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission.
Qppter 2l
E21-13 APPENDIX
Graphic method:
555
Objective functlon: Marimize CM = 4 a + 3 bConstraints: Za + b
a+ba
When: a = Ob = 11000 Timeb = gOO LeatherNo b Buckles
I 'OOO Time8OO Leather4OO Buckles
When: b = O:a=5OOe=gOOa=4O0
s
't200
1 ' t 501 1001 0501 000950900850800750700 -
650500550500450 -
400' l(n
300 -
250200150100
4 n
Time Constra int
,Bocxle
Constraint
Leather Const ra in t
A- l l l_1 "s0 I 1s0 l zso l sso l aso l sso l oso i zso i aso l gso l r oso l l l so r l 25o r100 200 300 4oo 5oo 600 7oo Boo 900 1o0o .1100 1200 1so0
Tlying values at each of the corner points,A=(a=o , b=o); 4(o) + 3(61 =g OCMB = (a = o--, b= Boo); aioi + giabot = $2,aoo cMc = (a = 299, p = 600); cizbol + sioooi = Sz,ooo cM <_D = (a = 499, p = 2oo); cicooi + sieooi = Szizoo ciiE = (a - 4o0, b = o); nicooi + 3iot
-' = Sr,ooo cii
Optimum combination woutd be 2OO a and 600 b2OO (4) + Goo (3) = $2,6OOCM
:
sffi
E21-14 APPENDX
Graphic method:
cost function is: Minimize C = $3x + $4y
Subiect to constraints: 4r + 8Y7r+2y
1.51 + 5Y
3 . 5 (1 , 3 . s )Product a Constraint
r . 5 *I
0
Possible solut ions:
q
,
Chapter 21
Uge 1 ton of xand 3.5 tonr of Y tora mlnimum totalcost of 317
,,',K%w
Points x v 3x 4y 3r + 4y
A o 7 o 2A $28B 1 3.5 3 14 t7c 5 1.5 15 6 21
D 10 o 30 o 30
-+ OpUmum golut lon:
Chapter2l
E21.15 APPENDIX
Subject to: x,gr.2x
557
+y+ .5y+ .5y
Let x = pounds of hardwood per batchy = pounds of softwood per batch
Minimize: C =.sOX +,4OY30.000
FEASIELEAREA
5.000
Gorner point B values:,2x + .5y= 6'000.9r + .5y= 12,OOO.ox = 6,000
Corner point C values:.2x +.5y = 6,000
x + y=24 ,OOO
I
]
x = lo,ooo Mult iply by 2z,4x + y = l2,oooSubst l tu te: - r+ v=?9.99o.2 (lo;oobJ+ .sy = 6,ooo '6r
= ff33,5y = 4,ooo Substitute:y = 8,O0O .2 (2O,OO0) + .5y = g,OO0
.5y = 2,OOOTryrng vatues at each of the corner points:
y = 4'oooA = (r = o. v = 24,ooo!; $.19!
-ol+ s.4o (z4,ooo)=$ g,soocB = {x=1o,ooo, y= sioooi i i . :q i ro,oooi * i .oo( s,ooo}=$ 8,200 c+c = (r =2o,ooo, y = e,oooi i $.soizo,oooi. i .co ( 4,ooo)=$1i,600c
optimal solut ion: 1o'ooo pounds of hardwood per batch and groo0pounds of softwood per batch resurts in a cost equar totho Sg,2oo standard-per batch
.2r . .5y>6.000
x . P o u n d s O t H a r d w o o d D e r B a l C h
5g Chagtar 2l
PROBLEMS
P21-1
(il The dlfferenUal cost analysls for the Glasgow Industries' order forI 20,O0O valves lollows:tncremental revenue ($18 per unit x 120'000 units) $2'160'000lncremental costs:
Variable costs:Dlrect materials ($5 per unlt r 120'0OO
unitsl $ 8OO,OO0
' 72O,OOO
36O,OOO
120,OOO
$1,8OO,OOO
48,000 1,848,O0O
aCCeptlng thg Offgr. . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . ' . ' . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . ' . . . . . r ' . . $--XZ'99O
The mlnimum unit sales price that Sommers could accept without reduc'ing net income must cover all differential costs (i.e,, tho variable costsplus the out-of-pocket fixed costs). Therefore, the minimum sales priceper unit would be:Variable cost per unit:
Dirgctmatgria|s.. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.ooDirect labor .. , . . . .r. . . . . i . . , . , . .r, O.OOVariable overhead ($6 per hour r 112
hour per unit)........r................................... 3.OOShipping grpgnse....o... . . . . . . . . .o... . . . . . . . , . . . .r. . . . . . . , 1.O0
Additional fixed cost per unit:Supervisory and clerical costs (S12,000
total cost + 3OTOOO units!.,........................
Direct labor (96 Per unit r 120'000U nltSl . . . . .o.. . . . . . . . . . .o.. . t . . t . . . . . . . . . . t t . . . . . . t . . . . .
Variable overhead (36 x 1/2 hour perunlt r l2OrOOO unlts).. . . .r. .".D.... . . i . .oo...
Shipping expense ($1 per unit rI 2OtO00 unitS) ..o...........................t.....
Total variabl g costs .....r.............r. ' ......Fixed costs:
Supervisory and clerical costs(12O,O0O + 3O'OO0 per month x$1 2r000 pgr month|...............r............
Incrsment to pretax profit as a result of
tzl
.40
L
Minimum uni tsales pr ice. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . r . . . . . . . . r . . $15.40
Clnpls2l 559
P27-7,(Concluded)
(31 Sommers Company managament should conslder the following factorsbefore accepting the Glasgow Industries orden8' The effect of the apeclal order on Sommers'aales to other cus-
tomers at tfie rcgular sales price.b. The possibillty of establishing contactg in the internaUonal market-
place as a nesult of the sales to Glasgow Industries, which couldlead to market erpanslon.
c. The wear and tear on machinery that might increase maintenancoand rcpairs and result in a premature replacement of the machinery.
d. Possible retaliation by competitors who may learn of Sommens'deep price-cutting actlon, including risk of a price war that woulddisrupt rcgular selling prices;
P21-2
(tl lmpact on net income if APA accepts bid:Submittgd bid... . . . . . . .rr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r.o.., . , . . . . .rLgss salgs commissiofl . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . ,rr. . . . .r.
Ngt sa1gs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t r r . r r . . . . . . . . .Variable costs:
Dirgct matgria|s......r.,,................r...........,......... 32gr2OODirgct 1abor. . . r . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . r .o . . .D. . r . . . . . r . . .o . . . . . r 56rOOOVariable factory overhead (3O% of
dirgct labor)* . ' . .r . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o... . . . l618OO
"J:*J";Tl',f,*:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::l02,ooo
$ 46,50018,600
$ 27,9OO'The lactory overhead rate is Sooh of direct labor dollars. Based on theerperience for the fiscal year snded September-3o, the rate due to the.variable factory overhead cost is gO% ($2,ZSO + $7,5O0).
(21 Framar would realize a positive contribution margin of $1z,goo beforeincome tax, increasing net income by $7,380, if the $l 27rooo counter-offer is accepted:
$t65,000| 6,5OO
s148,50O
$127,OOO12,7OO
sl l4,3oo102,OOO
$ 12,3OO4rg20
g__L389
ffi Chapter 2l
Pzl-2 (Concludedl
(31 The lowest price that Framar could quote on this machinery withoutreducing lts net lncome ls $1131333 ($IOZ'OOO + ,9f. This bid woufd coverexactly the sum of the variable manufacturing costs ($I OZ'OOO| and thel0oh sales commission, thereby resulting in no increase in contributionmargin and no income tax.
(41 lf Framar Inc. accepted all of its work at prices similar to the $127,OOocounteroffer, a loss situation could result. The analyses for requirements(11, (2), and (3f vvero short-nrn decisions In situations In which Framarhad ercess capacity. Consequently, the analyses concentrated or cover-ing only tha differential variable cost. However, wfien all orders ane con-sidered, Framar must cover both its variable and its fixed costs. A bid forall work similar to the one for $127r0OO would not cover Framarbfixed cost.
Galcufations restating the most recent entire fiscal year on the $127,000price/variable cost relationship aro as follows (00Os omitted!:Salgs ($l StZSO x 1.2451'. . . r . . . . . . . . . . . .or. . . . . . . r . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . r ' . . . .o. . . . . ' r . . . $1 91609Lgss COmmiSSlOl l . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . .o. . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1r961
$17,648Expenses (per income statement for year ended 9/3O|:
Variable cost....... $15,750
$15,75O
Markup on variable costs = 9127'OOO - 7.245s102,OOO
Clppter2l
P27-3
56't
(1t An analysis comparing costs of each alternative:(al Sehedule overtime hours:
May
otrertime HourcReouircd
I 'OOO2rOOO2,OOO215OO2r50O2,OO0
l2,ooo600
_13€oo
JuneJuly
f n efficien cy fa ctor (25%r....r...,t..,Total hourc tequi1ed...,.....r.....
AUgUSt .r.............o... ' . ' . ...
Septemb91.,..................Octobgr ............r...r....,.,
In efficien q (5oh1....-.....Total overtime houns.....
Additionaf labor costs (72r8oo r $6 r f .5)...........,..r........rRglated fringe bgnelits ($l tgrcoo r .10f .........,.o.......,.r....Differential cost if overtime is scheduled ...D....,,.....,........
(b) Hire temporary workers:Ertra hours ttquiled ....
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ,
a a a a a t a t a a a l a t a a a a a a t
$t 13,40011,34O
$124,74O
12,OOO3r00o
15,000xSos 9O,OOO
Hourly rate for temp orary workgrc.....r....,.....t.....D.........D..Differential cost if temporary workerc hired.......,............There ano no fringe benefit costs with temporary worker€.
Y
, g
w
721-3 (Continued)
Clppter2l
(c) Erpand labor foree and rchedufe level productlon of IO,OOO unitsper monthl lf the labor force le expanded co that level productioncan be gcheduledr Valbec will produce lOrO0O dolt house unitr permonth, requiring 5'ooo dlroct labor houn. This meanr that 12,oooadditlonal regular dlreet labor houra will be roquired during zoawith no ccheduled overtime or need for temporary wortens, archown below:
RequlrementsMontfr
_Iggoo5,OOO4rOOO
_l'ooo
$72,0OO14,4OO
Annual
Diroct labor hours required
Regular time (12,O0O x $Ol
Forgcast production In units.o....o................
Former direct labor constraint in hour!......Addltlonal regular hours In zOa ..,...............
Direct labor costs:
Related fringe benefits ($72,OOO x .2O|...
AddiUonal inventory carrying costs (referto the achedule of lnventory levelr below):Average monthly inventory with
overtimg or temporary wortol'tl ..........Average monthly inventory with level
productiort .,r,................DiflerenceEsUmated annual cost of carrying
Inventory per unit ....r.............r...,........Differential costs if level production is
U S g d i . . . a . . . a . . . a . . . . . r a a a a . r . . . . . . r . . . . . r r . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13,846
16,231
l_?g,ooo6O,OOO48,OOO12,O0O
$86,4OO
21385
sqgn85
2,38,5
r31
drapter 2l
P21-3 (Concludod)
Lsrt Dayof MonthDocrmbcr.Jenurry 8.............Fcbnrery
Aprll'..-...........................May.........-rt..o...............!r
JUlf ....r....-r......r........r...rr
Scptcmbcr.........r.....,......Octobcr ....,............Novtmbcr.......................Dcccmbcr.
Avcngr pcr montficrcludlng Etotyrtock (divldo by t3)......
Salaty rtock ............,....,.
Schedule of Inventory Lsvels
5A?
Urc Ovcrtimcor Tcmporery
Workerr'I,OOOI,O0OI,OOO8,OOOIrOOO
1O,O0O12,OOO12,00013,00o13rOO0t2,oooI,O0OI,OOO
128,099
9,8494,O00
Lcvcl Produetion
Bcolnnlnar Prcductlon Salcr
qooot0,ooora(X)ol4'OOOl6,0ool8,ooot8,000f 8r0o0t4,oool l,ooo8,OOO6,OOO
to,ooolo,oootoroooto,ooolo,oootoroool0r0o0lO,OOOto,o0o1O,OOOIO,OOOlO,OOO
IrOOOI,OOOI,OOOIrOOO8,000
IO'OOO12,00012,OOOl3,ooot3,ooo12,OOO8,OOO
Endino'
8,OOOlo,ooot2,oool4rooo16,OOO18,OO0lg,ooo16,000t4,oo0t I ro0o
IrOOOo,oooI,OOO
159,000
12,2314,O00
Avcragc monthlyinvantory 13,848 unitr 16,231 unltr
'Ercludcr ralcty rtock of 4,OOO doil hougc unltr.
Alternative (c) affords the lowest estimated differential cost.(2', There ane several noncost factors, or factors that are difficult to cost,
that Valbec should consider in conjunctiorwith the cost analysis of tirethree alternative courses of action. Relevant factors include:(al Consider the degree to which Vatbec's negular tabor force is wilting
to work overtime.(b) The tabor force may plan on ovsrtime pay as part of their normal
work situation. lf wages should be reduced because overtime is notscheduled, due to the use of temporary worke6 or an expandedlabor folee, then the morale of the tabor force coutd deteriorate,laborers might seek wo$ elsewhere, laborers might seek base payinc*ases, or the tabor force might decr€ase its efficiency.(c) Overtime does provide a certain degree of flexibility, should salesvolume and patterns not occur according to the fo#casted plan.(d) lf the labor force is to be expanded, Valbec must be sure there is anadequate supply of skilled workers.
I
a iIl
i - lI
I
P274
Group I production costs: "Matgrials ($9.27 + 251 .....................i......"......t....o....o...........Labor (S19.48 t2.51 + 251........Variable factoly overhead ($eee x 150Total variable unit cost......o.....o.....r.,..o,.r
Total variable cost (S2.5Ol x (3 + 2l r 2'OOO1..........t.............Additional fixed factory overhead .......
Gmup ll productlon costs:
Chaptor 2t
.131,948
1.422
$ 2.501
$25,01O..........r.. 7 rO4O
Materlals (93.9O + 20)LabOr (($tZ.l6 X 2) + 2O!....r.r.....'.....r...r..........r.....................Variabfg factory ovgrhead ($t.ztO r 150%1................-.,......
Totaf variable cost (t03.22O x (2 + 2 + 4l x 2r0OO1..r.....,....,....Addit ional f ixgd factory ovgrhgad ,.r. . , . . ,r. . . . , . . .r. . . . . . . . . .ro... . . . . . .
Sales ($54 x 2,000)
Group I costs:Outside suppliers:
Dissection knives ($.f,ZO r 3 r 2,OOO)...,......,.Scalpels ($3.SO r 2 x2rOOOl oo,..........,.,.,.......r
Group I production costs (computed aboye|..,..
Group ll cosG:Outside suppliers:
s32,05O
Scissors ($g.OO r 2 r2,0O0l
$
TWegzgrs ($2.97 | 2 x 2rOOO)..........r..............Clamps (Sg.za r 4 r 2ro0o1........i.........,...o.....
Group ll production costs (computed above|....
$19,2oo13,2OO
q?2,40O
sl2,ooo11,88026'24o
s5O,120
957,520
s 32,O5O
,1801.2191,824
9__3.22O
951,52OIrOOO
s57,520
$116 .O00
i$ 32,05O
\l so. tzot '
/6rOOOI,OOO
12,OOO6,OOO
s l14 ,170
s 1 .830
Clppter2l
P214 (Goncluded)
Production of Group I compononts fc l_ess costly than purchasing fiom outsides.and purchaslng G-,u-p lt componenta lrom outsiders ls fess "o"tiv
i[;;;;;:'fng them. However, tho estimated operating profit contribution ls only marginaf-ly posluve ($1'830 or 1.60/o of the eifimated iares fi-gure) anJ"nv oecossaryaddiUonal marketing cost ralated to the dlssection Instrument sets would fun-tlrer reduce the erpected protit contrlbuUon.Present annual fired factoly overhoad ls ercluded from the differentialcost analYSls' because these costs wllf be Incurrad whether oinot the setsalt marketed.
Based on the information assombred by the study team, the proposar haslittle merll
II
-
ffi Chaptor 2l
P21-5
lll The lowest prlce Chemco should bld for a one-Ume speclal order of2STOOO pou;& (25 totsl would be $?4r75O, whlch is equal to the variable
costs ol the order, determined as follows:
Diroct materlals:on a one-tlme-only speclal order, chemlcals used In manu-facturing the firmb main product have a relevant cost oltheir expected future cost, repnesented by ttre currentmarket price per pound. chemicals not used In currentproduction have a relevant cost of their value to the firm.CW-3 (4OO pounds per lot r 25 lotsf = 1O'0OO pounds'
substitute cN-S on a one-foFone basis to its total of5,5OO pounds. The relevant cost iS the salvage valuo.. s
The remaining 4'5OO pounds would be CW-3 at therelevant cost of $.gO per poundr its expected futureC O s t a a a r a r a a a r a a a a a a a a a . a a a a . r a r r . r a a a . a a a o . a a a a a a a a a t o a . a a a a a a a a a . . a a a a a t t . a a a a a "
JX-6 (3OO pounds per lot x 25 lots r $6O per pound) """""'MZ-g (2OO pounds per lot x 25 lots x $1.60 per pound) .."""BE-7 (1OO pounds per lot r 25 lots r ($.eS cost per
pOUnd - $.lO handling pgf pOUnd|).. . . . . . . . . . ' .r . . . , . . . ' . . , . . ' . .r ' . . . .
TOtal d i fgCt matgfials COSI'.. . . .". . . . . . . . ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ."
Direct labon(60 DLH per lot r 25 lots) = l,5OO DLHBecause only 8OO DLH can be scheduled during regulartime this month, overtime would have to be used for theremaining 7OO hours; therefore, overtime is a relevantcost for this order.l r5OO DLH x S7.0O per DLH at regular time lilte."'.. '...""'r"'
7oo DLH r $?.50 overtime premium per DLH..""""""""."
TOtal d i fgCt labOf COSt, . . . . . . r . . . ' . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . ' . . r . . . . t . . . r
Factory overhead:This special order will not increase fired factory overheadcost, and it is not an order for a continuing proiect thatshoutd contribute to the Fecovery ol fired factory overhoad.Thereforo, the fixed factory overhead is not relevant, andthe retevant factory overhead charge is the variable factoryoverhead rate.1,5OO DLH x $2.25 variable factory overhead rate $ 3,375
Total differential cost ol manufacturing this special order andthe minimum bid price for the order....- g1/99
500
4r05O4,5OOIrOOO
1,375
sl8,425
s1o,5oo2,450
$12,950
Cluptx2l
P2t €'(Concludod)
l2l Calculation of the price for rccurring orders of 25,OOO pounds (25 lots)follours:Dirsct materials:
Because of the posslbillty of ftrtura orders, all raw materialsmust ba charged et thelr erpected future cost, reprasentedby the currrnt market price per pound.CW-3 (4OO pounds per lot r 25 lots r $.gO par pound|..,......,!t6 (3OO pounds per tot r 25 lots r $6O pgr pound|.,.........MZ-9.(2O0 pounds par lot r 25 lots r $l,gO por pound)........BE-7 (l OO pounds per lot r 25 lots r $,65 per pound).:.........Total dirggt matgrials cost .........-...........t......o........r..........D...,
Direct fabon$oo/c ol the production of a batch (goo DLt{) can be done onregular ume; the remaining 600 DtJl direcuy ciause oveFtime to be Incured and aru, thus, a retevani cost of thisnew prcducl1r50o DLH r $7.0o regular rate per DLH..........,.r,.................
600 DLH r $3.5O overtimg premium per DLH....D................Total direct labor cost
Factory overhead:All new prcducts should contribute to the racovery of firedfactory overhead as wert as cover ail variable costs. There-fore, the overhead charge woutd be thE full overhead rate.l t50o DLH r $8.0o per DLH..r.. . . . ' .r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . , . .r, . . , .r. . .r. .
Full manufacturing cost.. ' . . . . . . ' . . .r . . ! . . . .r. . . .r. . . . .r. . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . .r. . . . . . .r.Markup ol 4O"/o on cost ($44rZ2S x .4O)Fufl manufacturing cost plus 4oo/o rf.arkup........,...!....r,.,........,...
fi7
$ I,O0o4r500g,oo0IrE25
s23,125
$lo,5oo2rlOO
$t2,6OO
$ I,O0O
$c4,7ZS17.ggo
$62.6{s
5ffi
P27-6
Sales:5O,O0O r $1025,OOO x $lO
Variable erpenses:Direct materials:
5Ot0OO I $2..........r......rt..... '......25,OOO r ($2 x.94)5O,OOO x ($Z x.O6)
Chapter zl
Present AdditionalCaoacity Capacity Total
$5oor0oo$25O,OOO $75O,OOO
$loo,ooo$ 47,OOO
(6,0ool $l4t ,oooDirect labor (94 x'1.O51......Factory overh gad...r.....,...r.
$4.2oL30
JifJ"s,:ffi : . : : : : . : : : : : . s*
Total variablg gxpense,......o,o....
Contrib ution margifI.,........,.............o........
Fired expenses:Fa ct o ry ove rh ga d'........ r.......r....... tMarkgtf n g erp gnsg ................r.r....Increaso in advertising
(511 ,O0Ox.1Ox.251Additional plant depreciation:
3260,000 + 25 yrs. = $1O,40OS 84,OOO + 20 yrs. = 4r2OO
$14,600
S14,600 r .95 r =
Total fixed expense
$184,5OO
$113,O0O
I 72,5OO1 1 ,000
$ 15,oOO
275
13,870
$ 83.500 S 29.145
$_298O_q S 36.355
275,OOA
12,00o137,5OO
6,00o412,5OO
$ 87,5OO
11,275
13,870
s112.64s
$__85,955Operat ing incomg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
'57o allocated to inventories.
The expected operating income from additional capacity ($36,355) should beevaluated as to whether or not it is a satisfactory return on the additional capi-tal investment of S344,OOO ($2OO,OOO + $84,OOO) (See Chapters 23 and 241.
I
U
Chapter 21
P21-7(1)
569
MAru( CORPORANONBoston Plant
Gomputation of Number of unlts of Xoff Requlred ro GoverFixed Factory orerhead and Frxed Regional promoilona! costs
Total fOOOs omitted) per UnltSa|9s....,..r....,...1 a a a a a a t a t a a a t a a a t a a a a a a a t a a a
Variable factory costs:Difgct matgrials ..ro..,r.....r.r........r.r........o..Di rgCt labOr ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . r . . r . . .Dt . . . . . r .
Variable factory overhead.......r...............Total variablg cost ..............r......ts....t....o,
Contribution margi11,..................rr..r..r....,....
s2,200 s2o
Units required to cover fixed factory overhead and fixed regular promo-tional cosls:
$ sso $s660 g440
s1,8502rO2O1,390
s5,250s2,150
slsss
s 85O $t,0001,O2O tr,000
680 700
sl,g5oS sso
(21 MARX CORPORATIONschedule of Budgeted contribution Margin and operating Income
lf Boston Operations Are Expanded Under plan A(OOOs omlttedl
Total Boston Ghlcaqo$7,400 s3,4OO g4,OOO
l .
S3,4OO Boston satesff ixt t -
54,000 Chicago salesffi
s2,55OS Bso
s2,700$1,300
s1,600320
S 7oo220
$ 9oo100
$t ,920$ z3o
310
s s20 $t,ooos 300
168-$ (70)
142.s (8o) s(2121 $ 132
$31O Home office cost = $tAZ
x $3f O Home office cost = $f Og
r l' l- l
-
Chapter 2l570
P21-7 (Continuedl
MAR)( COBPORANONSchedule of Budgeted Contribstlon Margin and Operatlng Incomelf Boston Plant [s Closed and Ghlcago Operations Are Expanded
Under Plan BChicago Operations
(ooos omittall
S 3 l O E a . . . a a a a a a a a a a a a a . . . . a a . r a a . . . a . . . . . . r r . . . r o . . a . . a a a . . a . a . a a r a . . . .$8,2OO
Variable factory costs:Diroct matgria|S........i...r..r....... 'r....r..r.'...r.r Sl t55O
DirgCt labOr ..r...........o..r............................. 1t55O
Variabl g factory ovgrh gad............"""""""
Total variable factoly GoSt'.".........""""""
GOntf ibUtiOn mafgi l l . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . r . . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed cosB:Fixgd factory overhgador......--.....'.....-..o.-... $ 95O
Regional promoUonal cost............,...r.r...... 200
Total fixgd CoSt ...............'.......................... Si t 1 50
Plant Opgfattng InCOmg ....r,........r........,....,.r...... $ 865Allocatgd homg office cost........r....................... 3lO
operating income...,.........r.".o............r.............- $ 555
I ,O85$4,185
Chapter2l
P21-7 (Concludedf
57'
schedure "r B"dsm"??ff ?iH:lI oo"ratins Incom elf Boston Plant rs ctosed_and Royarty Agre",n;;t rs contracted
Under Plan G
Revenues;Sal eS .. . . . .r . . ! . . . . . .rr . . .r . . . . .ROyalt ieS ... . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . . , . . . . . .r. . . . . . . . .
Total rgvgnu gs .................r........t..r......r...Variable factory costs:
DirgCt matgrials r................,..rr......r......,..DirgCt lab or,....,.....r,..........o.......r.t,,r...o,...Variablg factory ovgrhead.....r..D............r.Total variable factory cost ...........,..o..,....
Contribution margirt...........................,.......rFixed costs:
fixe-d fa ctory ovgrh ga d ..........,.......r..o.....Regional promotionat cost,....,.......,........Total firgd cost .,.,......r..r...,....r.........o.r....
?llnt operating income and royafties.........Allocated home office cost..,..]...........,.....,.Operating income (toss) ..........,....
$4,O0o
$4,ooo
$t,oooITOOO.
700
$z,zoo$1,30o
$ eoor06
$t,ooo$ 3oo
310$ l ts $12s $ f lo t
. . (o0os omittedlTotal Boston Chiceoo
$4,ooo275
$4,275
$l,oooI rOOO
700
$2,7OO
$1,575
$ eso200
sl , t50$ 42s
310
$27s$27s
$27s
$so100
$rso$1 2s
5n Chaptor zt
P21-8
Source: lrhnagoment Aa unting @npus Rofr,tt(lttonNale, N.J.: lnstihrte of Managemonl Accountants (br'
,rrrV N"ri*al-Associsttn olAccoontants), Spring, 1987), pp.4-5. Gopyd0ht Spring, 19f3fl'W Inslihtlo of
Management Accountants (tcrmerly Natirnal Associatbn of Accountants). All rights reserved. Beprinted by
permisskrn.
Ler Gtass Gompany should imptement the pnoposod plan to punchase silica in
the dlscount quantitr rne annuat savings from implementauon of the plan
would be 9{8rl5O, determined as follouts:
Annual cost with quantity discount plan:
Interest orpense to flnance carrying Inventorp-
Average level of InventorY In tons:Ler Glassb roquirements.........' I OIOOORequirements ol other manufactuners
(3OOTOOO + 12 months + 2| average +(3O0'OOO + 12 months * 2)minimUm).'........."tt"""o""'t"' 25tOOO
PfiCe pgf tgn With d|SCOUBt.......o..'.................o.
TOtal ayefage COSI Of inVentOfy..... '. '..... '..r.......
Ratg of intgrgst to carry inventory..............,....
Gost of purchasing Inventory (42ofooo tons x $1'801.....""'o"' 756tooo
Additional costs to carry additional inventorp[ -abor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o ' . . . . . $ZOTOOO
Administrative expenses................................. ' I OrOOOLost revenue from rental of warehouse
required to store additional inventory..,...."' 1O,OOO 4O'OOO
$799'150Less novonuo from the sale of silica to other
manUfaCtUfgfs (3OOTOOO tOnS X $2 pef tOn|... . . . . . . ' .r . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AlnUal COSI Of qUantity diSCOUnt p13fl. ' . . . . . .r. . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . .
Annual cost without quantity discount plan:Interest expense to finance inventory':
35,OOOr $1.80$g3,ooox 5% $ 3,150
6OO,OOO
$199,150
1O,OOOx $2.OO$ 2o,ooo
rSoh
$ l ,OOO
24O,OOO 241,OOO
Average level of inventory in tons......... '.........rPrico per ton without discount"...................... ' .Total avgrage cost of inventory r.......,.....r.........Rate of Intgrgst to carry inventory '.....-............Interest oxpense ..............
Cost of purchasing silica (12O,OOO tons r 32) .'.".
Annuat cost savings available by implementing quantity discountp|an....... ............................ s (41,85O)
Ii
-
Chagter2l573
oor lo; ieNE9
8E : 5-5-;; 8 g8e ?- itS'E 8 rrnr q go 'o N EEB x rr c j i r :_o8g =Ea5_- :3ep x qXE6 g {D{r6riois xx[ E =
. = N l - r -
5; €S; i l o o
i i qg i i P s6 r/)E .g ; X
_6 E,5 F E IG E t r = o . Aa l
O _ Oo 9 0 0
AFB E 33Eir ;'*BItE t|l=s8; E;5qsF gsggii gi$x E. : x E. :
55s .. EEiE Hi5 s B?;[ €$g € glrg f;s; E fg8
3333331 3l 3llg ' c o N \ r l @ f - l l
v, 'o
l;l;ll
o lo to lo to lN I
- l
N I6t
3tlol
f;fl-glU
#Fl *3F3Fqflfl_s.ss.ag.al g.t ailr gR $$l Fl$llro | ,of ,o-lfs lol 6l l
o lo to ldlo lN IN Ie l
wolol+tlgtr.l
Hr $l :'F33lflFilssggssisisil,h
F '*l;l;il
Loct(9G
oootc
t-oEL(!GttEgoo
: o
- : o- yv ! oo
oo 5
d q ,-o
qtz
tCDc
!tcnt
aoEDnlU)oo
n
oooCD
c(L
gE
sFC.9ooo
o lo l0 lo lo lN IF lrhl
!.ui o
38? c Do.=I ' tE Eo bJ t lt r Co q tiEv, -cO O9o(t dl
.s bg( ! q 5 l
E89l
oI
N Ao.3
I
- \
-
Chapter 2l
P21-g (Concluded)
l2l Net revenue Potential:The cofored paper brochurg prcvides the most net revenue if it can bemailed at bulk mail rates; however, there is a risk of earning only thethird best revenus if it must be mailed first class. The glossy paper' ifIt can be mailed on time, produces tAe second largest amount of netngvsnue; however, the ranking slips to the fourth best net revenue if itis mailed late. The plain paper bulk mail brochure has a substantiallylower net levenue than any of the other alternatives'
lmage as a well-run organization:The image would be based upon comparison of two things related to
. the mail campaign-the quatity of the brochure (appearance| and thearrival of the brochure immediatety following the radio and televisioncoverage. The glossy brochure, if it arrives on time, would probablyconvey the best image; however, there is some risk that it would notarrive on a timely basis. The colored paper brochure would be the nextbest in terms of guality, but the bulk mail alternative raises some riskof a timety receipt of the brochures by the potential donors. The plainpaper brochure would be ths poorest quality, and because it is to besent bulk mail, it runs the additional risk of not being delivered on atimely basis.
lmage as a fiscally responsible organization:The image of fiscal responsibility will be based on a comparison ofpotential donorst perceptions regarding the cost of the brochure andcost of the mailing. The glossy brochure mailed first class may be per-ceived as an extravagance by the potential donors. At the otherextreme, the potential donorc may conclude that the plain paper bulkmail alternative is an indication that the organization is unwilling todevote adequate financial nesources to the fund-raising efforts.
The foundation staff must weigh the consequences of each of the alter-natives and the risks associated with them on the three criteria to selecta specilic alternative. The staff has good information on net revenuepotential, but needs to obtain information on the effects of the quality ofthe brochure, the timeliness of the mailing, and the type of mailing onpotential donorst opinions as to what is a well-run and fiscally responsi-ble organization.
Chapter 21
P2t-t o
(rl JUSTA CORPORATIONQuarterly Income Statement
575
Total LocalSalgS . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . r . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Variable expenses;Manufacturing (Schedule A1....Marketing (Schedule B).....,.....
Total variable expensg .....r..Contribution ma1gi11,....,..........r...Separable fixed marketing
expense
(3)
Local Saless4OO,O0O
300,000300,00o
a a a a a a a a a a a a a
(4)Local Variable
Exoenses (21x f3ls12 ,000
6,0006,000
824,0O0
(6)Regional VariableExoenses f2l r f5l
s3,ooo2,0002,O0o
37,ooo
$ 63O,OOO24rOOO
$ 654,000
I 346,000
Locals6O,OOO
24,OOO
_$36,oog
mTotal Variable
Exoenses f4l + l8l$15,000
9,0009,00o
a31,OOO
Reoionals45,O0o
7,O00
S3B,ooo
Netmarketcontr ibut ion. , . . . . . r . . , . . . $ 3TSrOOOGommon fixed expenses:
Manufacturing ($l,Of O,OOO -sg2orooo).............o.........,....
Admin istrative... . . . . . , .r. .r. . , . . . . . . . ,
Total common fixed expenseOperating incomg r..r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r
(1)
ProductABc
(21
%322
(s)Regional
Sales
$100,000100,0001OO,0oo
Separable fired marketing erpense computation:Total marketing expense.............r..,..t.............,Less variable (schedule B),..................... i ........Fixed marketing expenss...,........
sl,3oo,ooo $I 'OOO,OOO
$ 82O,OOO3l ,ooo
$ 851,OOO
I 449,O0O
74,OOO
$ 19O,OOO52,OOO
$ 242,ooo
l_lg3,ooo
(r) el (3) l4t (sl (6) mLocal variabre Regionar Regionar variabre Totar varrabreProduct % Local Sales Exoenses f2l x f3l s-ales Exoenses l2l r (5) Exoenses l4l + {glA 60 $4oo'ooo $24o,OOO $100,o0o s 60,000 s3oo,oooB 70 3OO,OOO 210;OOO IOO,OOO 7O,OOO 28O,OOOc 80 3OO,OOO 180;OOO roo,ooo BO,OOO 24O,OOOTota1.........
9630,009 $ro,ooo S82o,ooo
36'000 38,OOO$ glo,ooo s 65,000
ReqionalS3OO,OOO
sl9O,OOO7,OOO
s197,OOO
sl 03,OOO
I
Y
576 Chapter 21
P21-10 (Goncluded)
l2l No. Ttre regional market should not be dropped. The regional marketsates are adequate to cover variable expense and separable fixederpenso of the regional market and contribute $65,000 toward the recov-
ety of the $242'OOO common fixed expense and operating income.
lf the regional market is dropped, the local market contribution marginmust absorb its own separable fixed marketing expense plus all common
fixed expense as shown below:'
Contribution margin o... . .r. . . .r.r. . . . . ."""" 'r S 346,000
Separable fixed marketing expense """ 36'000
NgtmarkgtcontributioJl........................ $ 31Or00OTotal common tixgd expgnsg.....o........." 242r0oo
Operating incomg.....,. '.....t........r..."" 9-994OO
Thus the corporation operating income declines from $133'OOO to56g,OOO. This $65,0O0 reduction is the amount of the contribution lossfrom the regional market.
JUSTA CORPORATIONQuarterly Income StalE!!en.!
(31
ProductA
ProductB
Productc
Variable expense:Manufacturing
(Schedule A)'..................Marketing
(Sch edu le Bl'.--.....1.-....
Total varlable expense ...
Gontributlon margin
Fixed erpen3es!Manufacturlng .......-,MarkeUngAdministrative ..........
Total fhed expense ......
Total
$1,30O,ooO sso0,ooo s4OO,oOO s4oo,ooo
s28O,OOo s24o,ooo$ 820, ooo
31,00o
3 851,000
$3oo,ooo
15,000 8,0oo 8,00o
i?15,ooo s288,ooo S248,OOOs152,oOO
(4)
3 449,000 3185,O0O s112,oOO
s loo,ooo74,00052,000
3 31O,ooOOperatlng Income..... _!._19t,009
iSchedules A & B are in tlre requirement (tl solution.
When the new product reptaces Product G, the minimum contributionmargin per guarter must be at least S162,000 (the present contributionmargin of Product C + SI O,OOO of new fixed expense) in order for JustaCorforation to be no worse off f inancially than it is currently. This contri-but ion margin wi l l s t i l l provide operat ing income of 3133'OOO.
Chapter 2l 577
, cAsEs
c27-1
(f ) $21 per unit, a total of 9210,000 for 10,000 units, is the lorpest price thecompany could accept without reducing budgeted income of tne comingquarter' At any lower price, the speciat order woutd add mono to costs than itadds to rcvenues, rcducing the coming quarte/s budgeted openating income.The price is calc-ulatod to equat ttre retevint costs of filling the special order.First' calcufate the following per-unit variabfe costs of $ubrunits:
Budgeted manufacturing costs for the quarter. . $5,400,000Less: Budgeted fixed co_st (3 mo. x $i,ioo,ooo; -i,zoo,ooo
Budgeted variabfe manufacturing costs . . $i,200,000Budgeted vo lume of regularbus iness. . . . . . . . . + 100,000 uni tsBudgeted variabte manuf. cost per regurarunit ffi
Budgeted selling & admin. costs for the quarter $3,200,000Less: Budgeted fixed cost (3 mo. x $900,000) 2.700.000Budgeted variable S & A gosts for the quarter $ S0O,0OOBudgeted vo lume of regularbus iness. . , . . . . . . + 100.000 uni tsBudgeted variabte S & A cost per regulatrunit $ S.0ORegufar sales commission (S/o of $9i pricel. . . . i.SOBudgeted s & A cost per unit, exct. commigsion i-,jEA
The case states how much to add to the regular direct materiat anddirect labor cost rwo other adjustments must be calculated: (1) The saw isneeded for onfy two months, At a rental of $S,S00 per month, its cost totafs$11'000 for the speciar order, or $1.i0 p"r *ir 1zy'v"ri"ot" oerrr"ad perspecial unit is tripte that of a regutar unit, and the case states that this appliesto total variabre overhead and to the variabfe overhead of the cut_offoperation. The totat variabte overhead cost of a regurar unit is 92.50, andvariable overhead-of the regular cut-off operation is a part of that total, so theentirc s2'50 is.tripled for th6 spec-iat oruer t.nJ no separate adjustment ieneeded specifically for the cut-off operation). il" sz.bo ig inctuoed already inthe budgeted costs of regufar rllF, so the adjusbnent needed to cost thespeciat order is an addttina, $s.00 p", ,nitJ6lSr.ro) _ $z.so1, or a totaladjustment of $50,000 for the special order.sufficient capacity must be availabte for the special order. (othenrise,accepung it wourd require cancering
"oru ,"gulr oroe4s), and anopportunity cost aqual to the tost contribuuoi margin on cancetfed orderswould be a rplevant cost of the special ord"r.i Crinoing-rn""t in"
""p""ity ielimited to 60,000
S.OuLar units per monilr, "o
ih" quarterrs capacity is 1g0,000regutar units, and the budgeted y9rlt" "r
roo,Job regurar units reavesavailablo capacity equivatent to 80,000 reguilunit". Each special-order unituses triple the grinding time of a regul"t ,init, "o-io,ooo
special units requirethe equivarent of 30,00b regurar uni6' gri"Jiig time, we[ within the 80,000regular units of avaifable cipacity.
t ', l
- lI
578
eI-1 (Concluded|
Cttptor2l
Special OrderRelevant Gogt Analvsig
Total oer unitUnits .... . _IO.0AARelevant costs of special order:Regular manufacturing costs. . . , $120,000 $12.00Regular selling & administrative', costs, excluding commission.. S,0OO .50Additional costs of special orden
Direct material. 20,000 2.OODirect laborVar iab leoverhead. , . . . . . . 50 ,000 S.00Saw rental (2 mo. x SS,S00) 11,000 1.10Metallurgisfs fee 4,000 .40
Relevant costs of special order. . SA0-A09 $Zl,qA
The relevant cost of $21 per special unit, although considerably higherthan that of a regular unit, is far below the regular selting price of $g0. This iabecauge the company's costs are predominately fixed costs, plrsumably dueto high levels of automation. The company will try to negotiate as high a-priceas possible, but the $21 figure should be regarded as an absolute minimum.
(21 Nonquantitative factors to consider include the foltowing:(a) Effects on regular sales
ls the customer who placed the special order a now customer? lf so, willthey become a regular customer provided the special order is successful?will that customer always demand large price discounts?Will (or does) the customer use a targe quantity of the regular product andpay the full regular price lor it?Will regular customer-s leam of the speciat, low price? lf so, will theydemand rarge price discounts on their future orders?Will this special, low price start a price war that can erpde regular prices?(b) Effects on empfoyeos and communityWill the special materiafs and equipment affect levelg of safety,environmentar poilution, and noise in the company,a prant?will emptoyees and managers gain valuable new ikills and knowledge byproducing the special order? (ihe case states that this ig the company,sfirst opportunity to produ-ce and gell thia particutar type of producl)Will the special orderrs affect on totat production volume enable thecompany to avoid laying off valued employeee in the coming quarter?(c) Strategic effects lmJrtet share, grou/thl innovation, etc.)Does the speciaf order product rapresont a new or fastgrowing market?Are there leaming-curve effects oi other advantag"" t" 6r g"in"a fromadding the new type of product sooner rather ttrair tatereAre prices and profit marg. ins on thig type of product expected to improve,or is it a mature product likely to decline goon?
Chapler2l
czl-2
579
flt continuing to obtain coverg from lts own Denver cover plant woufd aflowBlg-Auto to mafntain rtg cunpnt fever of coniroior", the quarity of thecoverE and the timing of therr delive-p,--Keep-i-ng the Denver coyer ptantopon atso alfour Brg-Auto mon. nexiuitityif,"n-pu*hasing tie ttve.inglrom outslde suppli-r* BIg:Auto coutd niore e"llty alteit"ne'l-oJ"ring",deslgn and change the quinuues pro.duc"+ ""p""iaily
if rong-term con_tracts are raqulred with outside suppliers.lilg-f,*r should also considerthe economic lmpact that closing denver coier will have on the Gomfnu-nlty and how this might affest ail-autot otrr"i op"rauons in the region.In addiuonr nolationgwith the woikforce at ;th"; plants could be affectedby nenvs of a ctoslng and layoffs at Denver C;;;;.(al The fofrorving recurrini annuar buogeteJto"t" can be avoided byclosing the Denver Gover plant(21
Matgria 1s.a.o.r........r.............-..r....................o.o......r r....,.Dirgct tabor.r......r...r.........o.r.......r
Indlrgct costs: ,-..,..r.r................... '..o....D....
supgrvisfot ....'...-...r......or....r......or.....r gSroooroooIndirAct labor .. .r. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4TOOOTOOODifferentiaf pension erpense
(S4'00orooo-$3r0o6rooo;.. . . . . . . . . . . . l rooorooo grooorooo
(b}Thefo l |owingn9cut7 ingannua|budgetedcosts" , 'no .#the decision to close the Denver Cover ptant:Depreciation--+quipment... .............. $ S,oooroooDepreciation-building .........r................,............,,...... 3,oooroooContinuing pension erpenses 3,OOO,OOOPlant manager and staff ......corporate a-rocation...*.....::::::::::::::.:::::_.._.::::.::::::.:: 3:333i3S
s*,r*pgqThe depreciation amounts are not retevant to the decision becausethey represent portions of sunk costs tnat are being written off dur-ing 2oA. Three-fourths of the annuar pension e)(pensa ($3,ooorooo,is not relevant because it wourd
"ontinr" wiettrer or not the ptant isclosed' The arnount for ptant manager and staff is not relevantbecause vosito and his it"n rrorrd continue with Big-Auto andadminister the three remaining ptants, ir,":"orporate arocation isnot relevant because this represents non-avoidabre costs, incurredoutside Denver cover, that a?e assigned to the prant.
sl2,ooo,ooo13,O0O,00o
II
- iI
- I
I
Chapter2lfio
C21-2 (Concludedl
(cl The following nonrecurring costs would arise due to the closing of
the Denver Gover Plant:Termination charges on cancelted material orders
($IZTOOOrOOO i157ofr..........,....,....r........................ $lrSOOtOOOgnipfoymgnt assistSl|C€..............'..o....'.r.................... 1 tOOOtOOO
$t'tt"Pgg
These two costs are relevant to the decision because they areincurred only if the Denver cover Ptant is closed. Gonsequently'they can be avoided if the plant is not closed'
(d) ltems not specifically mentioned in the case that should be consid-ered by Big-Auto before making a decision inc|ude:
(i) The disposal vatue or alternate uses of the plant(iii Any income tax implications; including the income tax ratesr ' '
appticaUle to gain or toss on the sales of plant and machinery'cost of losing-depreciation tax shields, any depreciation andinvestment tax credit recapture, etc'
(iiil Outside supplierb prices in future years'
fiui Gost to manufacture coverings at the Denver Cover Plant in
future years.
Chapter 2l
c21-3I
(1) Factors Calco shoutd consider, before entering the consumer productsmarket, follow:(al the productb contribution margin and break-even point(bl consumer demand for the proOua in the short nrn and long run(c) the companyb ability to produce the quantity needed in the short
and long run(dl the companyb lack of erperience in the consumer market and theneed for different marketing techniques for products sold in theconsumer markets(e) quality of the competition(n the impact of the decision on employees, and the effect of thediversion of calco management effo-rt on total business(21 Alteration ol linanciaf forecasts for use in deciding uetnreln the atterna-tives:
58t
(3)
Galcors
|ncomebeforeincometaI.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . .W,ff iooAdd fired manutacturing cost:
lOOrOOGunit lgvgl . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . TSOTOOOl2Oroo0-unit lgvgt .. . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .o... . . . . . .
- ' - - - 9OOTOOOAdd share of current Marketing Depart_
ment,s management costs . . . . . . . . . , r . . . . . . . i OOTOOOoperat ing margin r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . . , . . . . , . . . . . r $1p?5poo $l proroooInstead of a difference of $35,000 in391ne FffitGalco, the new catcuration shows a $ts,ood operating margin(S-1'O75,O0O - $f 'o9o,Ooo) favoring Jasco. Ths financial difference isslight' adding significance to the reliability of the financial estimates aswell as to the rerevance of nonquantitative factors,9ng :rl only speculate about tire reliabitity oi ttre two proposars. Thefact that Jasco has experience in the conslmer market is significant inpredicting success or fairure of the proje"i;b; not necessariry for theestimates for the expected benefits of itre i""ii"ting program or theassociated costs. lt shoutd be remembered that the Jasco people recent-ly lost their jobs and pa.v be twing especiaily hard to rook good.similarly, Gatcob Marfeting'Department may be biased in its esti-mates in an effort to avoid eti-mination of existing emproyee positions.--L"nytTturing costs are the same because citco will manufacture theproduct' The sares price differs an_d an
"ipr"n"i[n of the s% ($5 per$t oo of saf es) differencl il il Jates
"orili"Joi ,ate is not given.calcob inclusion of assigned Marketing oepartm"nt management costsis perhaps an attempt to hedge i ts est imates.
I
Y
Chapter 2l
C21-g (Concluded)
(41 Significant nonguantitative factorg that Calco's management should GOrl-sider inctude:(al impact of the decision of Galcors present work force; 1.o., moralo
tosg of lamaining employees if layoffs happen versus the ability ofretained employees to work effectively in the new market'
(b) abiliUec and expectations of employees from Jasco, if Jasco isselected,
(c) the possible diversion of Calco top management effort from its reg'ular tine of business, if it does not hire experienced talent.
No single item may in itself be important enough to warrant selectionof one atternative ovsr anothea The information presented in the caso is.limited and does not give an indication that any one nonguantitative fac'tor is moro important than any other. However, any one of the factorccould be sufficiently significanl For instance, the impact of eliminatingCalcots Marketing Department positions, if Jasco is acquiredr ls perhapsthe biggest single nonquantitative tactor for consideratlon. Since ttresenew omployees displace existing Calco.employeesr the managementpnocess coutd be hampered by serious human relations problems.
c21-4(1) (a) The product-line income statement for Precision Gauge Corporation
is presented on a full costing basis and, consequently, is not suit-abte for analysis and decision making. The fact that tho statementdoes not distinguish between variable and fixed costs hinders anyanalysis of the impact of volume changes on profits. ln addition' thestatement does not distinguish between costs that are directlyrelated (traceablel to a product line from those that are sharedamong all products.An atternative income statement format that would be mone suitablefor analysis and decision making would incorporate the contributionapproach to costing, Expenses woutd be classified in terms of vari-ability and controllabitity; such as, variable manufacturing, variableselting and administrative, direct fixed controllable by segment (dis-cretionaryl, direct fixed controllable by otherc (committed)r andcommon fixed. The common fixed costs would not be assigned tothe product lines bscause such an allocation would be arbitrary. Thecontribution approach is mono suitable for analysis and decisionmaking because there is a meaningful segregation ol costs.
(b)
Chapter2l5&3
C27-4.lGonUnuedf
(21 (al The suggested discontinuance of the T-gauges would be cost effec-tive, but the suggestio;rs retating to Dgiuges and p-gauges wouldnot be cost effectivo. These conclusions ano based on ttre foilowingquarterly differential cost anallsis.
Unit salg8 prico......r...t.....,....D.r..,...P-gause @
$2oo $18o
D-gauge
seo
(b)
Unit varlable costs: -
Dirgct materials r.............,..o....... $f Z S gl S 50Dirgct 1abor..................r......r...... 20 40 60Variable factory overhead.....,..., gO 45 60Selling expenses.......r................ 4 .;O 10Total variable costs.................r.. $7f qF Slgo
Unit contribution matgin........,...,.,. $f g $ ?4 $ olncrcase (decrease| in units
suggested:D-gauge ($SOOTOOO sales +
_ $gO price| 1.5O....o..,.........,.... x (5rOOOIP-gauge ($l,600,00O sales _r
$2O0 price) I .15......,............. x lr2OOT-gauge ($soo,ooo sates * $tgo
pf iCef I ' l .O,, . . . . . . r . . , . . . . . r .o. . . . . . . . . X (5rOOOltncrease (decrease| in total
contribution margin ................... $ (95roool $ ggrgoO $ oDecrease (incrcase) in fired costs:D-gauge, $10o,oOO - $2O,00O.... Bo,oOoP-9auge.... . . . , . . . .r. . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . (1 OOTOOOIT-gaUge ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . , . . .r. . , 4OTOOO
lncrease (decrease) in segmentcontributioD ..........o.,........,......... $ (ls,oool $ll1,2ogl _S 4o,oog
Yes. The president was correct in etiminating the T-gauges. The T-g?.ug€ sales price coverc only lts variabte cost and doeC not con-tribute anything to the .ecoviry of fired tactory overhead o,' p-ro-tion costs. Thus, the T-gauge tris a zeno contribution margin.
I
-
- rrt
Chapter2l
C21-4 (Concludedf -
(cl Yes. The president was corect in promoting the P-gauge line ratherthan the D-gauge line because the unit contribution margin and
' Econtribution margin per labor dollar is greater for the P-gauge linethan the D-gauge line, determined as follorlrs:
D-qauqe P-qauge b
Unitcontributionmargin(see(a)1......r............. $19,OO $74.OOContribution margin per labor dollan
$19 contribution margin * $2o labor..o..o.... .95 v974 contribution margin + $4o labor r.......o. 1.85
However, the presidentb decisions regarding promotion expense donot seem well conceived. The decreased promotion on the l)-gauge
' line and the increased promotion on the P-gauge line do not pro-duce sufficient contribution margin to offset the promotion costs.
(dl No. The proposed counse of action does not make effective use ofPrecision's capacity. The 15% increase in production volume on theP-gauge line will not require all of thE capacity that has beenreleased by discontinuing the T-gauge line and reducing the
u
D-gauge line by S0oh.
(31 Yes. The non-quantitative factors that Precision should consider before it ' -
decides whether to drop the T-gauge line include:(a) Customer relations-the sale of D-gauges and P-gauges may be
related to the sale of T-gauges (i.e., Precision may neLd a complete ' -
l ine of gauges desired by many customers in order to maintain salesdemand for D-gauges and P-gauges).
(bl Labor relations-reducing employment may create labor (personnel)problems.
nt
ClWter2l
C21-5 APPENDIX
(11 Let r = rolls of commarcial carpetV = rolls ol resldential carpet
Heavy duty fiber constraint 80r + 40y = 42,OOO lbs.Regular fiber constraint: 2Ar + 4Ay = 24,OOO lbs.Solving by slmultaneous equations:
80r+ 4Oy = 42,0002Ox+ 4oy = 24,OOO60r = 18,OOO
r = 3OO rolls of commercial carpet80 (300) + 4gy = 42,OOO24,OOO + 4ty = 42,OO0
4Oy = t I 'O0Oy = 45O rolls of residential carpet
Leastan cannot manufacture these quantities of commerciat and residen-tial carpeting, because the direet labor constraint will be erceeded:Labor constraint 15r + 15y = lO,5O0Using the requircment (lf solution:
r5(3001 + 15(450) = 17r25o, whlch exceeds the direct tabor hourconstraint of 1O,5OO by 75O hours.
Linear pnogramming is a mathematical model for solving two or moneunknowns in two or more equations. Linear pnogramming is used todetermine a mir of products that will marimize the contribution marginor minimize costs by identifying the inputs, outputs, and their relatedassumptions and limitations (constraints) and combining them in themodel. Linear programming can be used to alfocate limited facilit ies andresources among their many alternative uses in such a way that optimumbenefit is derived from their utitization.
585
t2l
(3)
I
II
ffi
C21 -5 APPENDIX (Gonclud edl
Chagter 2l -
(41 Commerclal ResidentialSalgs prlce per unit.......... '.,.o............r.............r.r $lrOOO $8Og '| +
Less variable cost Per unit:Hearry duty fibgr........................o.r.,...............r $ 24O $120RegUtar fib€1..'.........r'...... '............................. 40 80DirgCt labor... . . . ' . . . . . . . . . .o... . . . . . .o... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 50 I 50
Vafiablg faCtOfy Ovefhgad.......,r...,...........'..... 90 90
1.r . . . . . . . . .o . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . r r . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Stro S44O
Contribution margin per unit................ '....o....... 9-199 -3360
Let x = rolls of commercial carpety = rolls of residential carPetc = pounds of scrap of heany duty fiberd = pounds of scrap of regular fiber
Objective function:Maximize CM = 480x + 36Oy + .25c + .25d
Constraints:8Or + 4Oy + c = 42r00O pounds of hearry duty fiber2Ox + 4Oy + d = 24rOOO pounds of regular fiber15x + 15y s 1O,5OO direct labor hours
Chapter 2l
C27.8 APPENDIX
fi7
The linear programming modol starts with an objecuve or goal to beachieved aubject to a set of limiting factors, calted constraints. The lin-oar pnogramming model allours the usor to optimize (marimize or mini-mlze| the objecUve function subject to tha constrainG. The cantralassumption ln all linear pnogramming models In linearity. The linearityassumption means that the objective function and the Constraints in lhemodel can be expressed in the form of linear equations. The constraintscan be in tha form of strict sgualities, upper bounds (less than or equalto constraints)r and lower bounds (greater tAan or equal to constraints|.Linear pnogramming methods are applied mainty to allocation problems,1.o., allocating scance nesourcos among atternativo usas according toaome objective. The scarco rosourcas for a business firm may includepersonnel, material, equipment, or capitat. The objective fun&ion maytake the form of profit marimization or soma other measuno of desiredbenefiL In this particular cass, linear pnogramming is appropriatebecause the firm of Miller, Lombardi, and york hasan o-uieciive in theform of profit maximization subject to restricted r.sou.cis, i.e., staffavailable in the short run is restricted in each area.The following data woutd be needed to develop the tinear programmingmodel for Miller, Lombardi, and york(a! Total management hours availabte in each category of service pro-
vided.(bl Total hours avaitable for each category of service provided by each
type of staff person, i.e., erperienced and without experience.(cl Number of microcomputers and hours avaitabte(dl Bill ing rates for management and staff.R. Oliva should consider the foltowing alternative objectives before mak-ing the staff allocations:(a) Maximize the computer hours available(b) Minimize total variablo costs consistent with maintaining a high
level of professional service.(c) NonquanUtative objectives such as the preferences of individuals in
management to be in specific areas of service.
(11
l2'l
(31
(4)
o2)-1. Effective phnnhg and control ol capital exP€n'dilureg are impodant because:(a) financbl risk is increased by long'lerm
conmiUnentr;
)22-2.
(b) lhe magniludc of capilal expendilures isaubstantial and the.penaltier for unwirdecbbnr arc us0ally severo;
(c) deciebnr mEde in this area provide thesupporting slruclure for operalhg activFlies of he firm.
Exampler ol opportunities ard templations lorunethbal behavbr in the caPilal budgeting areainclude:(a) prossuro applied to the cosUmanagerial
accountanl by superiors or associates toc i rcurnvent the capi la l expendi tureapproval process, in order lo gel a pelprojocl approved
(b) pressure to wrile olf or dovalue asselsbelow their lrue valur in order lo jusiilyreplocemenl;
(c) exaggerating the expecled economicbene l i t s o f a pe t p ro jec t i n o rde r l oi nc rease the l i ke l i hood o f ge t t i ng i tapproved.
The ccUnranagerigl accountant has an obliga-lion to the company to make sure thal the corn-pan/a legilimale polbies and procedures ar€not circumvented and lo make sure that thedata used in the evaluation of capilal expendi-lure proposals are as reliable and realistic aspossib le. l l an e lh ica l v io lat ion occurs, thecosVmanagerial accountant should f irst discussthe perceived problern with his or her immedi-ate supervisor (in order to clarify the signilFcance of the problem and idenl i fy possib lecounres of aclbn) and lhen with the individualor individuals hvotued. lf lhe individual involvedis the accounlanl's irnmediale supervisor, lhe.cosVmanagerial accountanl should consull thenext higher level of management. l l the prob.lem cannot be resolved through discussicn, thecosvmanageria! accountant is obligated to prq.vide a full disclosure ol all the details to theoxocu l i vos respons ib le l o r eva lua t i ng andapprovh g capilal expenditures.The econornic lile of a project ir the perird dur-rng tvhbh il produces eamings. lt need not, andprobably will nct, be equal to the physical lile c/the related asset(s). lts length depends primari-ly upon lhe obsolescence of the product ormanufaciuring procoss involved or the natureol the product itsell. Managers usually f ind itqutle diflicull to estirnate econornic life becauseil depends upon future evonts ov€r which theymay have little or no control.
1))-3.
CHAPTER 22
DISGUSSION AUESTIONSA22-5. Gash oulflows lhat might be expecled for a
capilal oxpondilure includo:(a) purchasc prbe of one or rnore assets (or
a down paymont il prcpe@ b purdrasedm irslalknont);
(b) conslruclbn pericd inlerest and taxes ilthe prcperty b behg concructcd;
(c) machinery and equipmenl letup cost,padiculady if mehhery behg evaluatedutil izeg a more advanced lechnologytfran that currently h use;
(d) cornPuter software development cost if acornpulgt aided design, cvnpuler auednranufacturing. or tully cornPutet integrat'ed manulacluring system is being pur-chased;
(e) increased annual maintenance and/orpower costs resulting frorn more canplFca ted o r t echno log i ca l l y advancedrnachhery or equiprnent
(0 lease paymenls, if some or all of theassets being acquired h the project areleased:
(g) increased working capital reguirements(inventory, cash on hand, receivables,payables, etc.) may hcrease as a resullof increased business generated by thecapital projecL
Q22-6. Cash inflows that might be expected fronr ecapilal expenditure include:(a) rov€nu€s lrorn additional business gen'
erated by the project;( b ) cos t sav ings c rea led by t he cap i l a l
expendilure that resull in a reduclion ofcash outl lows (8.9., maintenanco sav'ings, labor savings, reduced inventoryrequirements resul l ing t rom reducedsetup l imes, etc.);
(c) retention of market share that mighl havebeen losl il the capilal expendilure werenol made (par t icu lar ly in the case ofadvanced techno log ies t ha t imp roveproducl qual i ty , reduce costs, prov idemanufactur ing l lex ib i l i ty , € tc . that canprovide a competit ive advantage lo lhofirm wilh the techrology);
(d) salvage frorn the sale of the property atthe end of the economic lile c/ the capitalProlect.
A?2-7. Sorne nonquantil iable benefils lrom investingin advanced manulacturing technobgies, suchas ClM, FMS, and robotics, include:(a) improved producl qualily (abilily to meet
closer production lolerances and at thosame time reduce lhe variabil ity in pro-ducticn output);
)224.
588
fuptsP
(b) docmrod nrrchhr trtup and rhorlor, nrmufaclurhg aTcb tirnra (wt bh prot ido
lho company with tho ability to adjustoutpul quanlity end veririy guickly tomo. l rapid ly changing cur lomcrdornane).
A2,4. Tar &procbtion ie guito likoly to diffcr fronrboofc dcprcciatbn boceurc thc cool r.coverypodcrd ueod fc tex purpooor ir. uaually rhorfcithan tho oconornic lilr ol tho'assrt uted forfinarcial @unting purp6er. Abo, an ecccl.onled melhod of depnciation is tlpbaly usedfor tex purpo..r, whrrosr tfre iiraigirt-tinrmolhod ir npn c{trn trcod for bok purpoer.
Q2-5. Book dopreciatbn lhorrH not be cqrsiJored inulindhg tho friun c8!h tbr, lrrn a projoctbelurr bok deprcciatinn har no elbcl qrlho rnornt or linhg of cash tbm.^)2-1O. Tax deprccidbn stould bo conrbered in ostFmaling lho luturc cach llowr frorn a proioctbocaurc lax deprccialion reduces tarsbloircqno and, thereforo, tax liability. Tax depro-ciation rccult! h a tar ravhgs, i.j., a reductionoa tar liability that is a caqh outtbw. The timingof cssh flnn's lr affoctod by the tar d€p.scratbornothod and thc recovory period used-
@2-11. Fiunciel accotrnthg dora sro nol mtirely ruit.ablt for ucc h evaluathg capital expendilurepropocsb becauss:(a) Finenciel accounling uter lhc accrual
buir. Capilal oxponcftun docioicrr 9en-rrally rety on eslimales of cash flows,ra lher lhan r lvcnues and expenlre sdelermined sr the rccrual basis.
589
(b) Firancial accounting ir desiTrcd b rner-ruro prricdb oamings. Capilal rrpondi-turc eva.luatbn is cqrcomed with tho lileof a given prc,iecl, rrhiclr reldorn corro-rpqrds to urual accorrrting p.rkdr.
(c) F inancia l tccounl ing mcalunr thorccultr of oporati<xrr ol a ccrrpany or aaegmenl of a company. Although thirontity romelimrr corrorpondr with rcapital cxpenditun prciect, il b urualtycomposed of rnany interminglod capilaterpenditure prciedt.
(d) Fiuncial accorrrthg capitalizer .p.ndi-lurcr if lhr cxpenditure ir dermed tohavs a futuro rraluo or benefit to the csrrpany. Capitalization ir an attcmpt tomalch expendilurer with revcnue! g.n.traled by thoao rrprndiluroc. Whtnlulun nalue or boncfit cannd bo roliablyrneasured, financial accornthg treats thcexpendituro ar a porlad axpcnla rath.rthan ar an ascel acquisilbn.
o)2-12. Benefitr of folblving up prciect regulls irctude:(a) comparis.on ol actual with projected
resulls to hsure lhat a project b meethgexpecled performance, or taking cofiec.tive astbn or lermhathg a projecl that bnol achievhg expected pedormancc;
(b) evaluation of accuracy ol projcctionrtrorn diff erent depsrtrnerrtr;
(c) improvemcnt of futuro capital projccteslimdes;
(d) mot iva l ion of peraonnet ar i r ing l romknowledge that lolbw.up will occur.
59
E2t2-1
Year ln Unitr Price Cost Margin @SalggI t2,ooo $25 $15 $ro $l2o,ooo2 12,OOO 25 153 12,OOO 25 154 12,OOO 25 15
. 5 12,OOO 25 15
Total net pretar cash lnflowr from 36OO,OOOInltfal cash outflow (cost of asset}r....r........ $55or0ooLesr pretax estimated salvage y?hro.......... (i2s.ooo) 42s.oooExcegs of net pretax cash inflows over cost................. fl.75J9o
v2-2Estimated Unit Unit Unit Net PretaxDemand Sales Variable Contribution Cash lnflows
Year In Units Price Cost Margin f:g- S"l*1 o,ooo $12 $g $3 $ 18,OOO2 8,0OO 12 I 3 24,OOO3 IO,OOO 12 I 3 3O,OOO4 1O,0O0 12 I 3 3O,OOO5 10,0oo 12 I 3 30,0006 1O,OOO 12 9 3 30,0007 1O,0O0 12 I 3 3o,0oo8 8,000 12 I 3 24,OOOI 0,000 12 I 3 18,OO010 4,0oo 12 I 3 12,000Total net pretax cash inflows from sa|es.,....r........r...,.r $r46pOOInitial cash outtlow (cost of machine).....,... $15O,0OOLess pretar estimated salvage va1ue.,........ (15,000) 135'OOOE:<cess of net pretax cash inflows over cost.......,.....,.o. $1 I I rOO0
ChapterZ
E)GRCISES
Estimated Unit Unit Unit Net PretaxDemand Salec Variable Contribution Gash Inflowa
to 12o,0oo10 12O,OOO10 12O,OOO10 120,000
dtWtsz
Year
I23456
Year
EstimatedNet Pretar
Gash Inflowr
$f 5,oo020,OO02O,OO020,OO0l5,ooolO,OOO
8% AnnualPrice-levelloiu"t-g!t
( l +.06) l = 1.060( l+ .06)z=1 .124( l+ .06) r= l . l g i(1 + .O6) r=1 .282(1 + .O6)c=1338(1 + .06)c=1 .419
Price-levelAdiustod Netcast Elgfs 15,900
22,49023,92025,2&20,07014.190
59t
Total price-level adjusted net pretax cashInflows from operaUons
Plug cash inflow from salvagePrice-level adjustln g!|t.............
. $121,700$5,ooo
1.419 7.095
I234567II
10
Total price-level adjustednet pretax cash inflowa $128,795
75.000Larr Initial cash oufftow...,........r...Ercess of net pretax cash inflowr over
Initiat cash outflow,..,........,....r........o... Li3J95
E2249% AnnualPrice-levelAdjustment
(1 + .O9) t=1 .090(1 + .O9)z = 1 .188(1 + .09)a = 1 .295(1 + .09)a=1 ,412(1 + .Og ls=1 .539(1 + .0910=1.677(1 + .O9)z=1 .828(1 + .09)a=1 .993(1 + .09 ;e=2 .172(1 + .oo) to=2 .367
EstimatedNet Pretar
C"sn t"now"
$2o,ooo3O,OOO4O,00o80,o0o60,o0o6O,O0Ogor00o6O,O0o4O,OOO2O,O00
Price-levelAdjusted NetC""tr lnno*s
$ zr,8oo35,64051,goog41720921340
too,82o109,680| 19,58080,98o47r34O
Total price-levet adjusted net pretax cashInflows from operations...............r....o..
Plus cash inflow from salvage. $iO,OOOPrice-level adjustment............. 2.316l
$750,4o0
23,670Total price-tevel adjusted^ not pretax cash inflows ........Lesr Initial cash oufi|ow.....t......r....Ercess of net pretar cash inflows over
Initial cash outflow
$774,O7O25O,OOO
$524,O7O
Chagter22592
fil- !o loooooorool'EgE3lgrgffglFEil
"Fifi?l sRBeeg-E 5 E Flg's s s E
^ -Ol oooooo: : T I g O O O O O- oE - l oooooN
s I Rg l ddd j ju ig1E r l o c t e l e l t o-==l ra
irl
r ! O O O O O O! a i O O O O O O
- I t r ! O O N . 0 O c o - A r -( , , . o c L . = l o s t u ) o ) o l r tl - o ? lN O r C l (O Gt
O . r r- ( J t g )
o
-E Eo Erg g g g -g g"lEtglfiRRniin
- F - ' - to o o o o o^ s * Pfii8 8 I 8I tF F ! . . I - r
- F - ) e ! O O O O O O: : o = l o o o o o o-SU)E lS te t r ! t ! t t t
oooooo lo l toooooo lo l l00Nc 'oe r l o l l
- - - - t - t l
o N l o o ) o t t l o l lN CD r (o (o g' I Oll? F ? l ( o l lo t#) t l
F
ou
x -9
8Rt8il p Eo g l l o l l c L
R lr-ll E" lsll
o ll l r O o o O O Oo o l o o o o o o' d ' 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
gfil88S8SSg lE'.o(o.o.o
8il:il
ooNn loq ,O N O T T U )$ l f i l r r r O
r t a a a a
h.9o ll,?.ccrI, B| ,a )
$iggLG
I
'Eif i r :c t :G :( ) !
P=to!s -cg5o L
E3Pfis*sr .gs >t r ( !<o
a
!o
5o
o(!oat
L(D
oo3o
o(ltox€aoC'€o
onoo)oxUJ
trq,
9'
ooof!
e:'CLo
tt
!o
to
onlo(ll
=
;oo
J
o'o
o(gox(!ttAoG
€)
=
-ou)I
e{(\aul
- O { ( ' ) r t n ( o
l l-N.',$.,,.o
ClvpterZ
E22-8
YearI234567
(1)Estimatedlnflation-
Adjusted NetCash Inflowa
(21
TarDeprc-.ciation'
(3)TarableIncome(Loss)(tl - (2)
qlo,ooo)(24,OO0)t 1,60037,OOO47,OOO6g,40O6O,OOO
(4',1Tar UabilityWith 4OVoTar Ratea0% x (3)$ (4,OOO)
(9,6O014,64O
l4,goo18,8OO27,38,O24,OOO
59?
(5)Net
After.taxCash Inflows
$ 34,OOO49'6004{i,36045,2OO51,2OO52'04036,OOO
$.?14rOOO2OOTOOO
q!_u,o0o
$3O,O0O40,0005O,OOO6O,OOO7O,000go,0oo60,000
MA6pg S-yearrear Recovoty Rate
.200,320.192.115.1 15.058
DepreciableBasis
$2OO,O002OO,OO02OO,O0o2OOrOO02O0,0oo200,O00
TarDepreciation$ 4O,0o0
64,00o39,40o23,OOO23,O0O1 1,600
gegg,ogg
$40,00o64,0Oo38,4OO23,0OO23,00o11,600
oTotal net after'tar ca$h inflows.,,....t..................,........,.Lesr initiat cash outflow to purchase system,_.ro.,.t......Excess of net after-tax cash inflows over initial cash
outflow .......r..r..................i
t2345I
1.000
w
vJ2-7
Year
Chapter2
(11EstlmatedPeriodicNet Cashlnflows
$1O,OoO15,00o20,OOO25,OOO25,O0O25,0OO25,OOO20,OOOl5,0oolO,OOO
l2l
TarDepre-ciaiion'
(3)Taxablelncome(Loss)
(1) - (2)
$ (4,3ool(9,5ool2,5OO
12,50O16,1OO16,10o16,1OO15,5OOl5,ooo10,000
(4)Tax Uabilitywirh 40%Tax Rate
q1,72ol(3,800)I rOOOSrOOO
. 6,440g,UOgr44O
6r20O6,OOO4,O0O
(51Net
AfteptaxCash lnflows
(1) - (41
$ 11r72O18,80019,OOO20,OOO18,56O18,56018,56013,80O
I,O0O6rOOO
9154,OOO
6,OOO
$160,000l0o,0oo
$ oo,ooo
12345I78I10
$14,3OO24,50O17,5OO12,500
8,90O8,9OO8r9OO4,5OO
oo
Total ngt aftErt-tax cash inflows r........................,.........r.....Aftentar cash Inflow from salvage at end ol economic life:
Pretaxcash inflowfrom sa|vage........r......... $1Or0O0Lesr tax payable on sale at 49% tat rate.... 4,OOO
Total net aften tax cash inflowsLesr iniUal cash outflow to purchasg systemo...r..o........o...Erces8 of net after..tax cash inflowg oyer initial cash outflow
' MACRS 7-year Depreciable Tax
Year Recovery Rate Basis Depreciation
I2345678
.143
.245
.175
.725
.089
.089
.089
.045
$lOo,OOOlOO,OOO1O0,OOO1O0,O0O1O0,00olOO,OOO1O0,00o1O0,OOO
$ 14,30024$OO17,5OO12,5O08,90O8,90O8,90O4,50O
sl oo,ooo1.000
Chapter 22
P22-1
Year
595
PROBLEMS
$ 20,000?2,OOO24,OOO19,00015,OOO1O,0OO
(1+.08)(1+,0$)z(l+.08)g(l+.08).(1+.O8)r(1+.0$)c
(3tInlladopAdf usted
EstlmatedGash
lnflours(1) x (21
$ 21,60025,65230,24024,48,a22,O3515,970
s139,877
(1)
PeriodicCash
Inflows
(21
I "r6Jrlce-Love I AdJ ustmentI23456
1.O901.1697.2601.3601.4991.597
Year
9lgg,ogg
(1)Depre-ciable
Basis ofProperty
$60,ooo60,00060,0Oo6O,O0o60,OO060,000
(21S-Year
PropertyRecovery
Perrentage.200.320.792.115.115.058
(3)Tax
Depre-clatlon(1) r (2)
$12,Ooo19,20011,5206,9006,9003,490
$8O,OOO-
I23456
ChagterZ596
O p N C l r r ? l @ O l ( o i l@ t \ l o q o r i N o l C { t lF O F 9 0 0 l O O l O l l
- - - - l - - l i l
F ( , c { F l o O I F O l F i lr -c ro t?F ' l9 t lo l lo lo l {E l l
I
I ? l o-oor tot r xY i \ t co !oc ' u tu lo ' 6 x t@to r t ooot -A ' r 9 6f F: t 'd t '- l -
ssssssooooooI t r t r t r t ! ' t t=$ErEf
'g !g ET
!o
5o
o6o(g
trL.o0
oq,
eCL
trot-
b
o!o
'=
oooxo{oqt
ooano(JxUJ
a a
o :o :9 :C L :
o :r b :
v ra' i0 :=>-=o
N Eo0 )( J G
xE( g -
J O; i r -t >=o
E5- - cY Ogna [ Y
t r ( go , =o . =zoi i o_o q)F J
u)
oNoo 'ooo toNoa)oo- .q_ \n_ao-O O t r l t \ | o N
? . F F I -g
ooooooooc{ooq,o_6gn-o_qqN O T ( 9 g G l
o
oNoonoO u ) l l C D g ' Foo ( \ | t t oq ,- I I | O A N I ON N ( l 6 | N -0
- N f i l t t t O Q o
6.gt l9 v .
. F
P6E L !
6€r
s tl6=lz- l
oo- -A b
- - b
c t G l oY E!
A xN - 6Y F
tb
! ooo
+t .Jt
B A 3Eq -
9 H -- - e= <oou lc0gt
NNq.
ChapterZ
P22-2,
cost of now mach|nettt.................r..r....r........rr...........o...r.......o,.........r...
Thade-ln allouranco tor old machillo ..........Do........,...........o....r,....,.r........llet cash outtlow at beginnlng of proiegt .......,.....r.D....o.........................Tar basis of otd maching tradgd |J| ...................o....ro.........r..D..r...,or...r...rTax basis of new machine ..........r.........t.........
a r a a a a a t a a a a
597
$t8,ooogrooo
S o,ooogro0o
slT,OOO
S2o,ooo1g,0oo
$ 4,ooo
Annual cost of oporaung old machino..............,....o.......,..,r,.,................Annual cost of operating ngw machino......,......r.,Annual cost savings with new machino............
(11
OriginalTar
Basisof Old
Machine-$lo,ooo
10,000to,0oot 0,000l O,OOO
(21
S-YearPropertyRecovery
Rate
Depre-ciationon Old
Machine(1) x (21s3,2OO
1rg2o1r150I , l50
580
(31Tar
Year
Note that year 1 isactually the secondy6ar the old property isdepreciated. Therefore,the recovery rate forthe second year ls usedto compute the amountof depreciation on theold property in the firstyear of the capltalerpenditure proposal.
12345
.320
.192
.115
. l l 5
.058
Year
(r)
OriginatTar
Basisof New
Machine$17,ooo
17,OOOl7rooo17'OOO17,OOO17,OOO
(21
5-YearPropertyRecovery
Rate.200.320.192. t t5.115.o58
q9'ooo
(3)Tax
Depre-ciationon New
Machine(11 x (21
$ s,4oo5,44O312641r9551 ,955
986
$17,ooo
123456
Chapter225!n
o c r o 6 | o t l o o t o l lq t o ! r N t o o l o o l o l lrr qt N F o F I 0 0 | olt
- - - - - - l - - l d l
c { t l , a , 6 |NC \ | f (Do lo t lo 16 lgrll
s gg EE glfi.$ F tg-e ig8;-g16 F?F
i
O l
E x e I ;qSS;qbq;q
Eseisessss
o IgE E 3lfie s3$3=EE Fs g 5ig33ss3
c
'€rE;;li Rqin$.HE g't=-i*t*
r
glo o o o o ogElR$993"$lErrr
oo r tn l o (oo \ t ( ou ru t@I ' \ t N o ' g ) OGl lll fil r- rg>
r N g ' \ | 1 { | @
F
I
rte ssg
o
oc
oa!tr'o
Lo
(!
3o
oooo
cr.oon3o
a(!IJcooGq)
o
o
(,fit
!oLo
(tl
=o
nGont
oao
J
n!oc
ooo(JT'0
oCLcon(I'oo
:(g
o
or€EE
=
G
E
trfr' .9Y
o f ;EE
A l l t o9 3 :* sd- - aooxc v . ( oo FgN*Ng.
ClppterZ
P22-3,
599
$l1600,000
$ 360,000232,OOO
72|OOO
$ 664,000
$ 936.000-
(t l cost to purchage yar,ve gtem from outside supprior($2O per unlt r gOr0OO unitg per yearf .......:.....,..,
Incremental cost ol manufacturlng yalve stem:Dirgct materialg (1i4.5 o x Sorooo u n its) ...........,........,o..........Direct labor ($f.ZO - $Ao1 per unit r gorooo units)...,.......r.Variable factory overhead (($l.ZO - $aO) per unit r
80to0o uni ts} " " " t " " " . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . r . . ' . . . . . . r . . .o . r . . . . . t . . . .o . r . . . . . .
Total incrgmgntal costs......r.'........r......r...D........r.....
Total annuaf costs savings to make rather than blr1l ................
Year1234
(1)
TarBasis
of NewTools
-$2,5OO,OOO
2,5OOrOOO215O0roo02,5OO,OOO
l2l
3-YearPropertyRecovery
Rate
.333,444.149.o75
(31Tax
Depreciationon NewTools
(1) x (21$ 8g2,5oo
1,1 10,000370,OOO187,50O
$2,5OO,OOO-
Chapter2ffi
o t lo t lo i l
. t lco tlo i lf i ,t l-llr l lc'tl
o0000 lo o ro t t oo loo000 lo o to i l oo lqqqqq q q lq i l qq lI t u )o@r i@ o lq t t l cOO loooq ,o lo o teo i l @o l@o-Fo ' ( , l q iGoJ i o_ |o_ l
o- l8 l8ll I *l
a
to0L.
Ct
6
CLtr(,
IF
0.Paooo
cLoot93o
t,o(J
xa{o
G'
o
G'
o
0og,q,oxUJ
d
oo
lH
ooo
Jcto-rg
ao
o(,atlt
E
. t
oottq,
?trCL
oL
1Y(,
EoL.CLCD
xoE
eo3o
oooxQ
totr(E
o
.F():'lt0L.CLtD
J6ttr
egt
]oc
otgoxoAog
o-o
o o ro o lo o lo o tO ! t lF lo l
g0o€0og,o:G3t
ox6
octo
J
Ioo€
r>oocDo
6u,Eor-
!-
Bo
=oC'o
I9o
ttog(,oeCLo
l-oo
Eoooctgttx6
ao
stosaggl
.,dooG3trc6
Eot-
gt
3o
=oot)gT'oEoCL
€o
o6ooooooooq Qo-.t- q !'_r O g Q r lI t r o N o F- N N g ,s|
o
s Ftft r -
oooooooooon-qqr r_q( I ' r t @ o ( 9o F ( o q ( ' ,? F U ) F O
t
^lN I
r lr l-l
'gBE I=95-
c9- rooooo
A ,!6erEttEst F E:Ei$eEiC t O r E l - G l ro l -6 ' g r -
* r O O O O O- ; f i i oooooE d i qo_o_qo_,,i? 5 ! to tct to E, ac,9 rEl(' ( ' ( l ' (? (I '
q l t o O O O Ot 0
ll-N.o.',"
o i ,ltJoooc'
I
NNq
I
I
fl=l
"l;lol
'gfs€
'sBE$=gE
sssssooooor ? l | r t r t ! t
N
&lChapterZ
(v,
'f ; E€;lfF$$F$g$$*/E{o E p s fls.es.s-s.s-9-s s sv
€triEISRRRRRR$RR
'gg8 $3l$$$gFg$$rFg
$sr3ggs arsilo 'l$ll
'fFF$/*$r{sssso=f ,€ FieaFFFg$$-E - r5gl$ F
L I
$l -Nt ' l t r 'ooFc l
9gfNcoo$eopqNgrS i6 iod6cns-Et3:::::{4Q{6 5 g i - - v ' F r F F r r r T T
g EEf; l t r r r t rnrrnrnr l; !g l -a ' ? q o b . o 3a < rEqOOO6rtrF66
oqqqe6o666
EssssJjjii oE.9oct .ll6g; a g- >d<o
E
$sgji;s;a;r;aFg3
EPBlooo
# $#IFFFtFFFFFFt! r. l€- uis s ugggggraE 5 0 lddd
fir$lfis::
N
\?I
NNo.
L l( t lg l -N( '1 r to (o r - - . rS
Chaptor 22w
E iu€rlr33$$$*;$*l;31fl1I
,g g€ $ 3ls3i$$$$$$$II
o l- E x-gI :eSSSSSSSS;qr r o . r ! 6 l o o o o o o o o o o
I F CCl.t .' \t rt tt tt It It tt !t- l
- lIII
'!gEl=1a33$$$$$*tB r.9 o lo o o o o o o o o o: ? lo o o o o o o o
x . l ! ? l O O O g O O q , Osr - *lEl$oB
R ::: d
- lo o o o o o o o o ox E - P lo € Gr (o I t N N N $ t ta i * 51(D 0 N o o n q ' lo g ' (p
? = t a A l - - - - - - - -
I E t l t ; l ( l t c 0 t o o F ( t ) o F : pd € o E lo to F co t t g 9 . t
| ,g)
o
:'o
o(goo
Lq)
on'o
oooxctto
.ll
o
ooo0,oxul
a
t
a
t
oa.to
nGo
o
noc
at
6oo
J
$l- N o -, . , , o n.. r P
6s!t5(,
oort
IoaNo.
ChapterZ 603
s Fgfflfs33333l$ll88888o"lHJll oNoo3?
Is - lsll
"feF#$|gFBs*asll1l=Ff ffSlroooooo
o- : E r l
O- SfSlE'.orD'o.oror U r
I
- . : 8 f l I - - F F r - y - FS ! € i ' i l . E - F F F F F
- a L l - 'I
X r c t: t r lQoooooo9q |9990006E E lo_oooo66
- = l
6 3 1 7 . F ? F F F Fl u - '
o
"s;;F$E
o3g
orttoo!to
oo.
a
F
krg l -Not rn toF
u)I
NN A( L 5
&1
P252-6 (ConUnuedf
Chaptor22
Year
1234567
$ 7,5OO7r2OO6,9OO6,6OO6,3OO6,OOO6,OOO
$46,90O
(t)Depre-ciable
Basis ofMachine
$4o,ooo40,0oo4O,OOO40,ooo4O,OOO4O,OOO
Ll oo1.2701.3317.4841.01 I7.7721,949
(t)
PeriodicNet CashInflorvs
(21
Annual lOo/cPrice-LevelAdf ustment
(31Adjusted
Estlmate ofHet Gashlnflows
$ 8,25o8.r712911849,662
1O,14910,83211 ,694
$68,399
(1+.101 =(1+.1Olz =(1+.1Ols =(l+.10p =(1+.10;r =(1+.1O10 =(1+.lO)z =
RecoveryYear
(215-Year
PropertyRecovery
(31Tax
Depre-ciation(11 x (21
$ 8,0oo12,80O
7,68O4r6004,6OO2r32O
$4o,099
123456
Clppter 2 ffi
$il
i : :a
a a
i i ia a aa a
: : :
iiEg i;*!97 : t rE:-9!.sirt : .=
. ?
si;,A:E( 1 r : . ^
3: n5E eF J T -
t r o c9 -L -
s8 fi€E !" t r t* -n gfr9b
L
ogE 6l c . rgF EEb n=o o; t o oP-3 fi
'8"€ooxg ' 6J . ,
Eg( D : i
.lto!.CI .EA F
E+F' ->gS E€l - -Oa
E :$- o o E
l- :E*; tssE e9 x
v .Pftf ; E3g Ee3€ sdg; 6 : {DS e 5"8: 3Io
I $igi Eg$$ sefiE Et ro 8gFt t t t s , !g !orq t o . g =t r =v .=i i sE=i i E g l -: 91 ; ,?E :3I.S .Fig
I t c '@ o( D oc ,oo l 'I
85$tsRB9l3 etsll?_g l_ toeoe lo l o o l o l ldddt't ' t ' t ' l d t ' i ccll{D - 18 l8l l
6.1Ir. l-l
'sgs#o EE-=t - :=-
=-FxsEgi SUSSRRP i SPI !sSPti ! | id_6qoioi io- I 6_q! !t r .ESl l E , N$re ' r? i = t l itg-l {, i 6 l i
? o.et i'Fii-!utEEl55a$5ss i E ii=F=fi:et vt ' \?r't 'vv !gs iE
er RsE$$$s gg i i $st l3{: i siruir irFgs= i {E t t : c r - i o
F FE i "eSlsRePeeofE.E"iS
A Xs EEI 31333$ E#$* CFi ."- r;ES Eg €s; F;
s e EEc$l $533sss:fil f; EFEslra FFFESEgE
f ur
$r-N.'.",.@FFgE'EN(L
6l
I
-
ffi6
P22-6
Chagter 22
(t l (31Inflation-Adjusted
Unadfusted Annual 10% CashCash Price-Level Inflows
Year lnflows Adiustment (1) r (21
I $15,ooo ( l + .1o) = 1.1oo Stg,soo2 2O,OOO (1 +.1O)2 = 1.210 24,2OO3 25rO00 (1 +.10)o = 1.331 3312754 25rOO0 (1 +.1O)r = 1.464 36,6005 25,OOO (1 +.1Oll = 1.611 4Or2756 25 'OOO ( l + .1Olo = 1.772 44 '3007 25'OOO (1 +.1olz = 1.949 4B'7258 2O'O0O (1 +.1O)8 = 2.744 42,880I 15'OOO (1 +. lole = 2.358 35'37010 1O,O0O (1 + . l Olto = 2.594 25'940
(1) l2l (3)Tax 7-Year Tax
Basis of Property DepreciationDepreciable Recovery Available
Year Property Rate (1) x (211 $roo,000 .143 $ 14,3002 1OO,000 .245 24,5OO3 I OO,0OO .175 17,5004 l OO,OOO .125 12,5OO5 1OO,OO0 .089 8,9006 lOOr0OO .089 8,9OO7 1OO,O0O .089 8,900I IOO,OOO .O45 . 4,5OO
st 09€99
CluptarZ&7
s i'€$Fsrar$rr$q$ =l;qfl'frf Egil sgigqggqgl i EEt i i i-gtsFal
JI=roro'ro 3SdS' * f . , - - ;?,FFFF i E* l i i i: ! i i
i',iliolliiii- E:giffffffSsss i 9!!;:s SgEl eeeoooo66b i E: ! !*! ._tr lo- ' . r r r r rqqrrv i i ; ! ! ! E
i iiiig"ggEEsJigrq*.e.$.F.s.a i gi iiE-FgFFrJ cr- 'oy. t 'pqtd ' r t r t : o 3 : : c
sds=el- ;"'i 'dt66tiii i #S j iFi :s'E i :
q B. .Fx g! Is'ftt;srrl**r"" fffgff Eo ;sf;F*;6; rJ€ = 6 -L
- *Ee- si ESPBPs,FFFg €€g; Efi gg erEEEglSiisi$E E=.d'=r;*,",.'iS$gR iEEf $g gE :< t | !O=$tA:E E*ti€E;g stJo hr EgEgEg gi gl-No\tr 'o@t\ot3PE Fi,nNo.
r lI-
ffi8 Chapter 22
Eg:sffRls stEtco_c ! r le rco l<o 6 la i i rhfhssEls slstiF F F F F I C O N l C l l l
& l,u rldl
y O
s EgiEIE
\ A r 6 o l l @ o | r ".aE 3t o N N (o (', @
- x F E J I o - t o - o L ! o - c o - c o -g F€€:I TSg93N- . t g i r - - v Y -- l p - ! g r -
O l
.= 'i *glssssss-v !i & Gl o o g o o o
g -cc ! - t . f l f r t \ t ! tu l l
- | - - - - -9o^5{ MoIoo
=3i3Eli EAe.EE_e. o EEgii il$tsFgEF; StiEEgSSS F5==i3.8-S.ssz."
dstgi l ; - ---- , i i - -
g t - l
f eisBBsssA x . = ! t l l l O o o o O os' PEF'€lsB$BEs
E L O I N ( I , C { r ' -o trt{#.o i l
r s . . O O O O O O
-!giFEt t39S$F"giS;at EFFgsi!
&
O r l r N q r g ;. ( o N O ( O ( j r
\ . : l9r .c lqqb - 8 g i - - F F F F
3 . G = 5 1 l l l t | | | l I t li , J J | , ' l
F E g l o r . " i n oI A ^ A - - A<r < l (o (o (o (o (o@toooooo
ddddd i? F F F ! ' ! 'Y Y V V Y Y
s, poElooooooi lgE gfilt_8_B_8_q8--f; s E $;l$8 s s E B
ooooooooooooooooooton lo l onu )F c . . ( r , C , ) c . ' c ,s,
o t to a ! l !- E O O
F - o f - C lv > t r .i o s E jO t r
I
N Ls l - 3o .g
oo loo loo loo loo loN lF llf' I
o(t,.;(!nx
t'o
L0)
o
q,
oo=,ooooooooq,oX
UJ
v,oooct3ov)
ooo
oE.93
ltJ
F
o
o
oq)
' :
0L
ocn
(gvt ij
.i C,i j c
c rof 0 ,; >
3 G
( o . :; oJ J o.o q)
*sFar888883i e -EEge ; l o_o_o_ooo=.EBgsigEtBBB
*E=EtEiEggEEg*!s56flg=eeee
B-EFl 888888a €53?lo-qqqqo-
t"E:|fiR3883
ooooooO @ 0 ) € N rQ ( g r t O \ t t ta ) c 0 F q , o FU l f \ O r C r l C {
? F F F
o
.€gfH;ll - la l
slT N O \ l I O ( o
r - C { C l \ t l o ( o
ChapterP@9
,$f -FI;F$FFqf, 'lg$'€:rgr;**F/gq$ilr ,sgsigFgspg i i itr sgg;l==$fs$; i i i'-iii
s r^ iiio ltgl&$5555 i i i
S_r io.avrrv i ! i ;!it: 3 n t
sEasrFFaals i i 5!o , no: ' r .?-99-9o-ro- i ' *.i I ! grll E: i$$ ii ;i "
c. . ,g9oooo rF€
c r gE : ; Er8_BB-48_F_ = s !=Fr'IFtIi$ggp-gn:g $r \ . s r s l . r . F
; E *ogE
o sr€E:tqis.tgf;. ff g{' 'F;giiHggHEi3=;uf;dHH5 Eg H
!aL
,€iFliEt33$33g gg i!xISgBl*sR*RR Ii BU.E x'€ssfFF/;r5sgF ig gr s 'F o
; l z i E*l_Nccv.o@ Eg #
: "I ssl gggE.8'l8rls pE**tdcccJ lSil'E f i? l . t r r r r r r c lO i lo " -1,
l*l loct ro
L - d i
o gE$€iFEfissE"t EE
tl '! c! 3! c! ct s6e
r " leooooos ; ; I 9 O O O O Oq 5 S1333333Y
E;1o65550Egls**(\ |NN
I
I-
= ' ;E gt g.a A g. A g.i g.iisr Pf:l 8R$ggeeleii
*iel xs3=='l3llo o ldrl l
I
.iBrplF' ;u d.tlsn$998Y Eg'ffln'i.r.{
s rsflgggggg: 3 eS.fi leeeeddE I E',xl888888b d . ' t '
-
g * '6F
ct krN . i i l - N ( ' \ t l o ( oo. r Fl av-
610 ChWtor22
P22-7 (Conctudedt
,}r (lt l2l (31lnflatlon- ' eAdiusted
Lost PeriodicLost Periodic Gontribution v
Contrlbutlon Arnual 696 Margin SavedMargln Saved InflaUon with GIM
Year with GIM Adlustment (1) r (21 '|U
I $20O,OOO (1 +.O6| = 1.060 $212'OOO2 2OOTOOO (1 +.O6!2 = 1.724 224,8OO3 2OO,O0O (1 +.O8)s = l, lgf 238r2OO4 2OO'OOO (1 +.06){ ; 1.292 252r4OO5 2OOTOOO (1 +.06)5 = 1.338 26716006 2OO,OOO (1 +.06)o = 1.419 283'8OO
Chwter2 6 1 1
. GASES
c22-1
Some of the factors that affest the decision of whether or not to delay theinvestment in new cleaning equipment are given below. Each factor can havetwo sides (1.e., delay versus no delay) depending upon the circumstancesinvolved.(al' " " r3l,?Hhiil:1i"J#l: fi:Hl "oT;: " oiu o ns i n s e n e ra r'
Business outlook deteriorating-delay.All of these factors affect the climate for business and should be consid-orgd.
(b) Difficulty associated with acquisition and installation of equipment andtraining of operators.
$f'?' J"#it',H;, I ot d e ra,'
The greater the lead time involved, the sooner the equipment should beacquired so that it is ready when needed.
(c) Extent of operating efficiency improvements.Great-do not delay.Little-delay.
The greater the efficiency, the less it should be delayed because costs
(d) il[ffH:,T:3"T;i3l"H1;T'i:""" not increase'Cost of equipment not expected to increase drastically-delay.Cost ol equipment erpected to inclease drasticalty-do not delay.
Company wants to minimize its initial cost outlay.(e) Dependabitity of present equipment and likelihood of breakdowns.
Dependability is good-delay.Dependability is not good-do not delay.
Company could defer, or have togo ahead with investment due to conCi-tion of present equipmenl
(0 Chance for technological advances in equipment.Good-delay.No chance-do not delay.
lf there is a chance that technotogical advances will develop in the designof the equipment, the company might want to take advantage of the new
, design.(gl Ability to obtain market advantage by providing better quatity service at
- Eame or lower price.Good-do not defay.Poor/neutraf-delay.
Better service means more customers or justifies higher rates.
I
612 Chaptor 22
C22-1(Conctuded)
(h) Gompetitors' plans for obtaining similar equipment and achieving marketadvantage.
High probabili$--do not delay.Low probability-delay.
Company wants to maintain competitive advantage or meet competition.(il Ability to predict timing and increased volume of demand fmm new or
edsting customens.Good-better quality of decision; could defer switch longer.Low,-less reliable criteria for dscision.
The better a company is able to predict new business, the more certain ilcan be of its decision and, possibly, the longer it can wait to make achange,
c22-2
Knight is probably corect in her assessment that the proposed capital invest-ment framework grants too much freedom to the divisions. Neoglobeb long-runperformance depends on its capital investments. While divisions must havesome responsibility for capital investments for the proposed organization stnrc-ture to be effective, corporate management must maintain adequate control todirect the future courss of the firm. Under the proposed frameworlg divisionmanagement controls a substantial portion of the capital budget, and in someyear:i' few funds would be available for investment by corporate management.The present proposal would reduce corporate managementb ability to diminisha product line, and it also would impair managementb ability to have adeguatefunds available for investment in new businesses.
Capital investment procedures should involve both division and corporatemanagements in such a way that division management stilt should be able toinfluence the future direction of the firm. Such procedures might include classi-fication of capital projects into groups, some of which could be approved bydivision management without corporate management study,
An alternative to the Neoglobe capitat investment program might have the fol-lowing features:(a) All proposed investment proiects would be classified according to their
natunHeplacemen! cost savings, erpansion.(b) Replacement and cost savings proiects could be adopted by division man-
agement alone, without approval of corporate management, provided anindividual project did not exceed a specified doltar timit and the totat ofsuch projects did not exceed another specified dollar timiL The doltar lim-its would reflect the nature and size of each divisionb operations.
(c) All oxpansion projects, or other projects that exceed the doltar limit,would be submitted to corporate management for evaluation andapproval.
ClppterZ
c22-3
6 1 3
The process of planning for and ovaluating long-terrn commltments of resourcesis normally relerred to as capital erpenditure planning, evaluating, and controt,or capital budgeting, The capital budget is distinct in that it focuses on thelong-term effect of lesources committed. lts primary objectives arc to providemanagement with (ll a formal process to chart its futura coutlsef (21 a means ofranking and selecUng among altornative nesounce commitments to maximizercturn on investment and (3) I pnogr:lm for ongoing evaluation of extantnesourco commitmsnts.
Any significant resource commitment is viewed as a projecl Hence, the capi-tal budget is composed of projects, some of which are in pnocess and some oiwhich are pr,oposed. Each project affocts significant periods of time in theongoing life of a company. A project often involves the evaluation of atternativesand the purchase of such assets as property, plant, and equipment. lt shouldalso consider, howevor, any proposal or pnogriam that reguires a signifieantresounco commitment over an extended period, such as the development of newproducts' opening now markets, and the design and development of major com-puter pnograms.
Onca nesources have been committed to a particular project, the projectreguires ongoing evaluation; i,e., are the projectb objeciives being meti lf not,it needs to be evaluated in terms of wtrether the project should UJ iutained asis, modified if possible, or abandoned.
McAngus can make significant use of capital expenditure planning, evaluat-ing, and control. At the division level, projects will need to be defined in termsof those elements of the plant, or operation of the division, over wtrich the man-ager has control. On the basis of the facts given, the division manager hasauthority to operate his or her plant essentialty as if it were an independentcompany. Hence, anything affecting operations, which has required or wiltrequire significant resource commitment over i significant period of time,should form an integral part of that divisionb capital budgel At the top manage-ment level, the president may view each division as a project, particutarly forevaluation purposes. The other described activities of top management (investi-gating and evaluating_such things as new markets, etc.) are projects in the capi-tal budgeting sense. These and othel new proposats may be defined, anafyzed,and evaluated using a variety of avairabre tectrnigues.
c22-4
(1 ) Ametfs revision of the first proposal described in the case can certaintybe considered a viotation of the Sfandards of Ethical Conducl Arnett dis-carded the reasonable proiections and estimates after being questionedand pressured by Earlg, and used figures ttrai frave only a remote chanceof occurring. By doing this, Amett viotated tha standard of objectivity(which requires that the management accountant communicate informa-tion fairfy and obiectivety and disctose fullyi"iur"nt information that
611 Chaoter 22
C22-4 (Concluded)
could noasonably be expscted to influenco an intended ussrb under-standing of the report pnesent€dl. By altering the analysis, Arnett alsoviolated the standard of integrity (which requires that the managementaccountant (fl refrain from engaging in an activity ttat would prciudicehig or her ability to carry out the rcquired duties ethically, and (2) com-municate unfavotable as well as favorable information, profes.sional iudg-ments, and opinions|. Arnett also violated the standard of competence(which reguires that the management accountant pnepano complete andclear ruports snd rccommendatlong efter appropriate analysis of relevantand reliable lnformation).
l2l Based on the facts in the case, Earle was certainly in violation of theStandafds of Ethical Conduct as a result of pressuring a subordinate to pre-paro a proposal with data that weno false and misleading. Earle has vio-latad the standards of competence (failed to perform professional dutiesin accordanco with ,.. technical standards; and failed to prepare com-plete and clear reports and reliable information!, integrity (engaged in anactivity that would prejudice his or her ability to carry out required dutiesethically, actively or passively subverted the attainment of tho organiza-tionb legitimate and ethical objectives, failed to communicate unfavor-able as well as favorable information and professional judgments or opin-ions, and supported activity that would discredit the profession), andobjectivity (failed to communicate information fairly and objectively anddid not disclose fully all relevant information that could reasonably beerpected to influenca an intended userb understanding of the reportpresented),
(3) The elements of the proiestion and estimation process that are compno-mised because of a predetermined, misleading outcome include:(al the quality of the base data,(b) the quality of the assumptions used,(cl the probability of the projection occurring, and(d) the credibility of the people submitting the projection.
{4} The internal controls Fore Corporation could implement to preventunethical behavior include:(a) approval of all formal capital expenditure proposals by the controtter
and./or the board of directors,tb) designating I non-accounUng/financo manager to coordinate capital
erpenditune noguests and./or sogrogating duties during tho prepara-tion and approval of capital expenditure requests,
(c) requiring all capital orpenditurs prsposals bs roviowed by senioroperating managemen! which inctudes the controtler, belorc theproposals are submitted for approval, and
(d) requiring the internal audit staff to reviow all capital erpendituroproposals or contracting with external auditors to review the pro-posal if the corporation does not have sufficient personnel.
QydsZ 6t5
c122-6
(11 '
Referring to the specific standards in the IMA's Standards of Ethicat Conductfor Pnctitionerc of Management Accounting and Financial llanagement, theconduct of H. Dodge and G. Watson is unethical as discussed below:
(al H. Dodge! first rcvlsion of tlrc proposal for the warrhousc coDyor-eion was unethical becauso Dodgeb actiong violate the followingstandards:
Gomoetence. Although thc sstimates used in the analysis are basedon managementb judgment, Dodgeb action in changing reasonabfeestimatea to ramote assumptions ls unethlcal. Management accoun-tants havo the responslbility to propare complete and clear reportsand rucommandations after appropriate analyses of relevant andreliable information.
Inteoritv. Dodge has the rtsponslbili$ to avoid conflicts of interost,refrain from subverting the attainment of the organizationb legiti-mate and ethical objectives (profitability), and refrain from engagingin or supporting any activity that woutd discredit the profession.
Obiectivitv. Dodge has the rcsponsibility to communicate informa-Uon fairly and objectively and to disclose fully all relevant informa-uon that can influenco an intended userb underistanding.
(b) G. Watsonb conduet in giving H. Dodge specific instructions onpreparing the second revision of the proposal is unethical becauseWatsonb conduct violates the lotlowing specific standards:Gomoetenee. Watson has the responsibility to perform his profes-sional duties in accordanco with relevant technical standards, suchas using conservatism and realistic estimates in the net presentvalue analysis. Management accountants should prepano compteteand clear rspons and recommendations after appropriate anaiysesof relevant and reliable information.confidentialitv' Watson should refrain from using or appearing touse confidential information acquired ln the courso of his work torunethical advantage for personal gain (saving on commuting timeand costs).
Intearitv. Watson has the responsibility to advise all partios of anypotenUal conflict of interesl Watson shoutd refuse any favor (thowarshouse rcducing his commuting time| that woutd appear to influ-cnco his actions. Watson should communicate unfavorable as weilas favorable lnformation and professional Judgments and opinions.obiectivitv. Watson has the responsibility to disclose fuly alt rolo-vant information that can influence an intended userb understand-ing of the analysis.
I
6rO ChaPtor 22
C22-S (Concluded)
l2l Steps recommended by the Sfaadards of Ethical Conduct for Pnctitioners of*lanagement Accounting and Financial *lanagement that H. Dodge shouldfollow in attempting to resolve this situation are as follows:(al Dodge should first investigata and see if Evans Company has an
estabflshed pollcy for resolving confllct, and lf such a polict erists'Dodge should lollow lL
(bl Since it sppears tAat G. \f,/atson, Dodgeb superior, is involved, thereis no need to confront Watson or discuss this lssue with Watson anyfurther. Dodge should present the sltuaUon to the nert higher level,the vice president of finance, tor rpsolution.
(c) lf Dodge does not receivo any saUsfacUon, Dodge should continueto successively higher levels, including the audit committee and theboard of directors, if nscessary.
(d) Dodge should clarify the concepts of the issus at hand in a confi-denUal discussion with an obiective advisor, i,o., a peor.
(el lf the situation is still unlesolved after erlrausting all levels of inter-nal revieq Dodge will have no nocourse but to resign and submit aninformativo memorandum to an appropriate representative of theorganization.
(0 Unless legally bound (which does not appear to be the case in thissituation), it is inappropriate to communicate this situation toauthorities or individuals outside the organization,
(g) Dodge may consult with personal legal counsel.c22-6
(1) By referring to the IMA's Sfandards of Ethicat Conduct and taking intoconsideration the specific standards of competence, corfidentiality,integrity, and objectivity, L. Forrest should evaluate B, Rolland's directivesas follows:Comoetence. Forrest has a responsibitity to present complete and clearreports and recommendations after appropriate analysis of relevant andreliable information. Rolland does not wish the report to bs comptete orclear, and has provided some information that is not totatly reliabte.confidentiatitv. Forrsst should not disctose confidentiat information out-side of the organization; but it also appears that Rolland wants to refrainfrom disctosing information to the board of directors that it should knowabouL
Inteqritv. Roltand is engaging in acUviUes that could prejudice him fromcarrying out his duties ethicatty. In evaluating RoltanOt Airective as itaffects Forres! Forrest has an obligation to communicate unlavorablo aswell as favorable information and professional judgments or opinions.
ChapterZ
C22-8,(Concluded)
Obiectiviw. Tho responsibility to communicate information fairly andobjectivety, as welt as to disclosa fully all relevant informaUon that couldrrasonably be erpected to influsnco reports and rtcommendations pre-sented, is being hampered. The board of directors will not have the fullscope of information they should have when they ars pnesented with theanallsis.
l2l By refening to the Slandards of Ethical Conduct, L Forrest should takethe following steps to resolve this sifuation:(a) Forrest should first investigate and see if lDl has an established pol-
icy for resolution of ethical conflicts and, if so, follow thoseprocedures.
(bl lf this policy does not resolve the ethical conflict, the next stepwould be for Forrest to discuss the situation with his supervisor,Rolland, and see if he can obtain resolution. Ons possible solutionmay be to present a "base casst' and sensitivity analysis of theinvestmenL Forrest should make it clear to Rolland that he has aproblem and is seeking guidance.
(c) lf Forrest cannot obtain a satisfactory resolution with Rolland,Forrest could take the situation up to the next layer of management,and inform Rolland that is being done. lf this is not satisfactoryForrest should pnogress to the next level, and eventually to all high-er levels of management until the issue is resolved (i.e., the presi-dent, audit committee, or board of directors).
(dl Since Rolland has instructed him not to discuss the situation withanyono else at lDl, Forest may want to have a confidential discus-sion with an objective advisor to clarify relevant concepts andobtain an understanding of possible courses of action. Forrest maywant to talk to a close professional friend or the IMA "EthicsHotline" lor this purpose.
(e) lf Forrest cannot satisfactority resolve the situation within the orga-nization, he may resign from the company and submit an informa-tive memo to an appropriate person in lDl (i.e., the president, auditcommittee, or board of directors).
(f) Forrest may consult with personal legal counset.
6 1 7
CHAPTER 23
DtscusstoN ouEsnoNsO2&1. The weighted average cost of caphal is com-
putd by lhe lolbwing steps:(a) Calcrlale ech componenl of caFital as a
p€rconlage of total capital.(b) Calctlale the after-tax cost of each indi-
vidual capital componenl(c) For each capilal componont. multiply (a)
by (b) and sum lhe resulls.Q23-Z Using the cosl of a specific source of funds
may lead to laully decisions. For example,when debl is used, low.return projects wouldbe acceptable while better investments nrruldhave to be ruled out in a following period, when@mmon stock shares are soH lo obtain tunrjs.
023-3. There are two problem areas associated witheslimating the firm's weiThted av€rage cost olcapital-the proportions of each source olfunds and lhe cost ol each souroe of funds.The proportions that are expected over theinvestment hor izon should be used. Sincethese amounls are typically unknown, the pro-portions desired by management in the longrun aro usually used. With fesp€ct lo costs, themarket prices of each source of lunds shouldbe used. Since the market price varies overlime as creditor and investor expectationschange, curr€nl market prices adjusted forchanges expected by managem€nt ar€ Com-monly used.CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permis-sion.
Q23-4. The payback (or payout) period method mea-sures the length of time required by a project lorecoVer the inilial investment outlay.
023-5. In computing the accounting rale ol relum onor ig inal inveslmonl , the denominator is theorrgina.l investmenl, whereas in computing theaccounling rale of relurn on avaraoe invesl-monl, lho denominalor is the average invest-menl-
023-6. The presenl vatus concepl states that a dollarrecetved today is worth more than a dollar tobs receivsd al a fulure date because of theearnings the 1oday. dollar can generate in theinter im. l t is importanr in capi ra l budger ingbecause ol the relativeV long perircds belweenlhe investment of tunds and ihe return ol thosefunds as eamings (i.e.. dollars ,eturnod a longItme in the tuture aro wlrth considerably lesithan lhoso invested today).
Q23-7. The basic d i f lerence between the paybackmethod and the nel presont value method con.ca rns l hs recogn i t i on o f t he t ime va lue o lmonoy. The payback method, which ignoreslhe t ime value o l money and a l l cash l lowsbeyond the payback pericd for the project, is
the measure od the time it will take lo recoverthe inilial cadtal inveslmenl in nct cash infbws.
The net present value method does consiierlhe lime value d mon€y. This method involvescomparing the present velue d all future cashinflols and outflows of a given project, usingsome minimum desired rate ol return A posi-l ive resuh implies that the project,s rale ofrelurn erceeds lhis minimum ralg, whereas anegative resull indicales that the projed,s rateol retum is less than thb minimurn rate.
O23€. ln the net present value method, the discountrate is known; whereas, in the intemal rate olrelurn melhod, the discount rate is not known.ln the internal rate of return melhod, the dis-counl rate is the one that wil l resuh in a netprgsenl value ol zero.
023-9. The net pr€sent value method assumes thatearnings are reinvesled at a rale of relurnequal lo the tirm's cost of capitat, whereas theintsrnal rate of return method assumes lhalearnings are reinvesled at the rate o'f relum ofthe parlicular project being considered. Thefirm's cost of capilal rate is more realistic. ll aninves tmen t p roposa l i s p red i c ted to beerlremely profitable (e.9., having an internalrale ol return of 50%), it is unlikely that similarproposals are avai lable. Holvever , a f i rmshould ord inar i ly have several investmenlopportunilies al or near the ralo of its cost olcapilal.CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprinr wilh permis-sion.
023 -10 . Ss t l i ng t he d i scoun t ra te a t some th ing i nexcoss of the cost of capital in order lo com.pensate for risk and uncerlainty associaled*;16 3 r.qpilal expenditure proposal is conceplual ly unsound, because the re investmontpolenlial of cash llows is overstated. Cashreceived in early periods has more value thancash received in later periods, because onlythe cash received in the early periods can bereinveslsd. As a consequence, the use of arat€ in ercoss ol the reinvestment rate in thenol presonl value method wil l result in an over-statement of the value of cash recsived earty inthe life of the capital erpendilure project. A bet-ler approacfi would be to clmpute lhe terminalvalue of the cash lbws using lho reinvestmentrate (i.e., compute the value of all cash flows atthe end ol the l i le of the projecl), and then dis.counl tho total to pres€nl value at a risk-ad,iust-ed discount rate. An even bener approach is toexplici l ly consider unc€rtainty by using proba-bility analysis, as discussed in Chapter 24.
6 1 8
E23-1
Funds-SounceBondg ll0% r (l - 45o/o tar rate)) .,....,....Prcferrtd gtOCk ......................r.r.'....!......Common stock and retained earnings...
QrWtsA
Capital Component8ond3. . . . . . .o . . . . . . . r . . . . r . . . . . . .
Prgferrgd gtock....,..,....rCommon gtock and
rstained earnings...
Capital ComponentLease.r.........,..Bonds..................r.........Preferred stock.............Common stock and
retained oarnings...
gERCtSES
Proportionof Funds
390h20o/o5,00h
1000h
Percent Pretaxof Totaf Cost
6r9
' l12o/o r $l OO par value for prafered stockl * $96 market value* ($TS,OOO + 5O,O0O shares of common stock) .F $f O markst price per
gharo
E23-2
Weighted averago cost of capital before bond retirement and sale-leasebacktransaction:
(r) et (31 (s)Weighted
Gost(21 r (a)2.40h.s%
5.Ooh9.30h
Amount
Weighted avarage cost of capitat after bond retirement and sale-leasebacktransaction:
$ 5,ooo,ooo1,000,0o0
4,0oo,ooo_91_qogo,ogg
(r)
Amount$ 1,o00,ooo
4,O0O,OOO1,00o,ooo
4,O0OrOOO
s!g,ogg,oog
50%10%
400h1000h
(21
Percentof Total
100h400hlooh
400h1000h
8.Oo/o9.Oo/o
72.50h
(31
PretarGost10.oohg.oohg.ooh
12.50h
(41
After.tarCost4.8o/o9.O%
12.5Vo
(4t
AfteptaxGost6.Aoh4.gohg.ooh
12.5o/o
AfteptarGost5.5oh
l2.5%o '15.O7o *f
WeightedCost
1.65o/o2.500h7.50oh
11.0,50h
(slWeighted
Cost(21 r (al
.600h1.920h
.gooh
5.OOo/o
_8.42%
"-\
w
F,.3-3
tl) Annual cash inflow before fncome t3r.....,..,....,....r,....Less depreciation (the samo for financial accounUng
and Income tar purposes (94O,OOO cost +8 years)f .,......o...
Annual tarable income ......,....o.....Annuaf Income t* ($f or0oO taxable income r AOohl..Annual income after tares
E23-4
$15,OOO
SrOOOslo,ooo
4,OOO$ 6,000
Chapter23
sl5,ooo
4,OOO
$l1,ooo
t1l
Annual aftgrttax cash inflow.,.....,...,.........o.,r,.....r,.,..r.
$4O, O0O Initial cash outflow = 3.636 years to payback$11, OOO annual cash inf low
tzl S6,0OO averago annual Incomo _ .15 or 15oh rate of returnon original investment$40, OoO original investment
$34,OOO init ial cash outf low
SlO, OOO annuaf cash inflow= 3.4 years to payback
Present value of annual cash inftows for six years($1O,OOO annual cash inflow r 3.284).,...o.......,
Less init ial cash outftow to acquire investmsnt.,.......Net present value of investment,.......r..........r..
cash dgsirgd at gnd of six yeani .....D.....,.....r...r,.,..or........r...r...Present value of $i co-pounded annually at l ioh,................lnvgstm gnt required ....,................,.,,........,....r.
Net present value of investment
Presentvalue inder
= $6,520 ne t p resent va lue
E23-5tl) Present value of annuar cash inftows for io years
(S20rooO annual cash infl ow r 5.2i6).....,...,...............,.,..Present value of satvago value at end of i o-year life
(Sl O,ooO cash inftow from salvage r .2701..............Present value of alt cash inf|ows.....r..r....,.r.......,.....,.Less initial cash outflow to purchase pness
tzl
t3)
$37,84O34 .000
___3'940
534,O00x .432
fl_4$sq
s 104,320
2.700$107,O2O(1OO.5OO)
L__ j.52q
tzl$ 1 O O , 5 O O i n i t i a l i n v e s t m e n t
= .O65 or 6 .5"h
ClapbrA
E23-8
tr)
MACRSFrcoYory
Brio
t2l
Stnlghl-UnoRrtr
f3l
Co.lRocovrry
UndrMlg35
r)Stnlght-
UlrrDrPr-chUon
I lo,ooo2OrO002O,00020,ooo20100010,000
3100,000
(5)
Dlffononc4l
t3l - l.)slo,ooo
12,OOO(8o0)
(8,5OOl(8,500)(4,200)
o
{01
lncomrTer
Srvingr( ! l x .o%
9fr0oo4l8OO
(320)
[3/4OOl(3/4oO)(1,6801
______9
c4
PrreontValrr of
t t 0 ta%
o.477o.7E0o.6750,592o.519o.456
el
t8)PrurntVrfri ol
TrrSrvingn(olr f7l
t3,5083,691(2r0)
(2,O13)(1,785)
cr88)_93'499
123a5c
0.200o.3200.192o.115o. t t5o.o58
o.tooo3000300o^200o-200o.to0
s 2o,ooo32,OOO19"20011"500t I r5oo5r800
_$!oo,goo
E23-7
(11
YearUnadiusted Estimate
of Cash InflowsInflation
Adiustment1.1oooorl .2 looo1.33iOO1.464101.61051
Inflation-Adjusted Estimate
of Cash Inflows$22,OOO.OO
2l,78O.0O21,296.0014,641,OO1 6 ,1O5.1O
12345
s2O,OOO18,O0016,O00l O,OOOt o,ooo
$74,ooot ( l +.1O)n where n = number of per iods
(21 PV ofAdjusted
Gash Flowss(58,OOO)
19r14016,46614 ,013813758,004
$_z9eg
UnadjustedYear Gash Flours
o $(s8,ooo)I 2O,OOO2 18,0OO3 16,0004 I O,OOO5 l O,OOO
AdjustedCash Flowss(s8,ooo)
22,OOO21,78O21129614,64116 ,105
PV of $1Q 15o/ol .OOO
.970
.756
.658
.572
.497Net present value of investment.........
s95,822.1O
PV ofUnadjustedCash Flowss(s8,oo0)
17,4OOl3,6Og1O,528
5,7204r97O
$ (s.7741
I
* \
e^
E23-8
( t l
TarBasis
Of New
$5OO,OOO5OO,OOO50o,ooo500,oooSOO,OOO5OO,OOO5OO,OOO5OO,OOO
o.143o.245o.1750.125o.089o.o89o.o89o.045
$ 71,5OO122r5OO87,50O62,5OO44,5OO44,5OO44,5OO22,5OO
$goo,ogg
Chapter23
PrrrntVrltr of
(31Tax
7-Year DepreciationProperty on NewRecovery Airplane
Rate (11 r (21
l2l
YearI2345678
(11 (4 (31 (4t Ft {ot m (8tlncnar
(DocnerIAnnrrrl Trr In
lnclrrr{Oocrosrl
In Aftenter Pnronl Aft*terPr.trr Drpn- Tereblo lrcorrrr Incorrrr c.dr vrluo cuhc..h clrtlon tncomo Ter Ter Inflowr of $1 lnflowr
Yrar lnflowr Dodugtlon (tl - (4 Rrtr (3) r {r} (t} - {51 e 7gy. (ol r ftl1 313o'ooo t 7r"50o t 58,500 |;o'h 923'4oo $1oo,ooo o.87o t 92,7422 13o'ooo 12!2'5go 7r5oo 4o'h 3,ooo 127'ooo 0.756 96,0123 l3OrOOO g7.5OO 12,50,0 lO'h 17,OOO llSrOOO 0.658 74,39{ 13o'o0o 02'500 67'500 4och 27 'goo 1o3,ooo 0.572 58'9165 130'000 4ar500 8tt"5oo looA {}2oo 95'8oo 0.497 47'0136 130'000 a4r500 8!t'5oo 4o',A u,2oo 95'8oo o.{t2 41,3867 13o'o0o 44'500 8tt'5oo 1o'h 34'2oo 95'8oo o.37o 36,0218 13o,ooo 2!2,5oo 1o7r5oo 4oV. #l'ooo 87'ooo 0.327 28,'#}e9 130'000 o 130'ooo 40% 32,ooo 78'ooo o.2g 22,152
10 130,0OO 0 13O,OOO 40ch 52,OOO 78,OOO 0.247 1g,2$oPrercnt valuc of pcrfodlc after-tar caah Inflows 35'l O,911Plur prercnt valuc of cftar-lax ralvagc Gtloo,ooo r 11 - 4o%l | .24n...... "14,8i20Prcrcnt valuc of carh lntlorvr ovcr urcful ttfc of new a1rp1rnc............... 3s31r73itoq Inlttal caeh ouulow (cost of new arrprane),.. 5oo,oooNet prcrent valuc of Invettment-.----.- t 31,?31
Alrplane
CtppterTS
F23-0
GOSI Of neW maChine....,.. ' ..r......... ' .............. ' .....r. ' ......... ' ............., ' .... ' . . 'Tt'adg-in allOWanCe fOf Old maChlJtO ............'......'.................'................
Net cash outllow at beginning of proiectTar basis of old machino traded in
Tal! baSiS Ot nOW maChine .'.....r..r..... '...rr.r..rt... '........r........
6?3
90o,ooo34,OOO
$38,0O0l8,o0o
s2O,OOO16,000
_999'oo9
AnnualAnnual
COSI Ot Opefating Old maChit1O...........o.."........................or.'.......
COSI Ot Opgfating neW maChiltt8 r...............r..... '........................ 'r
Year
Year
12345
$20,OOO2O,OOO2O,OOO2OTOOO2O,O0O
(1 )Original
TarBasis
Of NewMachine
_ (21
5-YearPropertyRecovery
Rate0,320 '0 .192o.1150.1 150.058
l2l
S-YearPropertyRecovery
Rate0.2000.3200 .1920 .115o.1 15o,058
(31Tar
Depreciationon Old
Machino(r) x (21
$ 6,4003,8402r3OO2r3OOI , i 60
sl6,ooo
(3)Tax
Depreciationon NewMachine(11 x (2)
$ 7,2oo1 l ,52O
6r9124r1404J402,OBf,
$36,OOO
'Note that year I is actually the second year the old property is depreciated.
Therefore, the necovery rate for the second year is used to compute theamount of depreciation on the old property in the first year of the capitalerpenditure proposal.
123456
s36,OOO36,OOO36,OOO36,OOO36,OOO36,OOO
Annual cost savings with ngw machine........'........."r'......'...'.'r'.'r.r.'..... -$ 6rOOO
(1)Original
TarBasisot old
Machine
' t
e1
E23-9 (Concluded)
(tf t4 t3lAddiUonel
TarEbPn-
Allowablo Tar Doproclauon *tfitflHow Old Machlnr
Machlnr Machlno (11- (21
s 7,2OO 36,400 3 8OO
(41
AnnualCort
SavingrwthHcw
Machlno
FI
Incrrar(Docnarcf
lnTrHbbIncomo(4) - (31
S 5,200(1,E8ol1,3994r lE03,0203,912
IncomoTaxRrto
mInctrrlo
(Dccruarc)ln
IncomrTar
(51r (o l
S2,o801fJ721555
1,8O4' l ,208
1,565
Chapter 23
(E
HctCarh
Inflow(4 ) -m
s 3,9206,6725,44!i4,3i104,7924,435
(0,
12315o
11,52O6,0121,140
3p4O 7,8802,300 +A122,300 1,940
so,0o00,00o6,0006r0000,0000,ooo
400h
400h
400h
400h
400h400h
(4)
PresentValueof sl
@ 14o/o
4r14O lr l8o 2rggo2,089 o 2,Ogg
Total Increagc In periodlc cash inftowLesg InlUal cash ouUay for new machine,..lncrease In cash lntlours over Initial cash ouuay for new machine..,.
(11
NetAfteptax
CashInflow
(Outflowl$(2O,0O0)
3rg2O916725,4454,336417924,435
(21
PresentValueof sl
@ 120h
1.OOOo.8934.797o .712o.6360.567o.507
(3)PresentValue
of CashFlows@ 12%(1) r (21
$(2O,OOO)3,5O15,3193,8772,7582,7172,249
!_139
s420
l .OOOo.877o.769o.6750.5920 .5190.456
s29,6oO20,o0o
l_g'809_
(5)PresentValue
of CashFlows@ 14%(11x (al
s(2o,oool3,4385 ,1 313,6752r5672$872,O22
s (680)
YearoI23456
Internal rate of returnS42O + $680
Recommendat ion: The investment may be acceptable because the internal rateof return exceeds the companyrs cost of capitat; howeyer, the internal rate ofreturn on.this project shouid bt compared with the internal rate of return forother proiects to determine if this is the best use of avaitable funds.
- lzoh . (z"n ,( ) )= t z .76oh
Chaptor23
E23-10
(rl Proiect A
Year
Yearo5
Cash Inflow(Outflow)
Gash Inflow(Outflowlql5,0001
35r0OO
PV of $1@ 75o/o
PV of $1o 150h
PV ofCash Flow9(t5,OOOI
16,760
_g_l-i60
PV ofGash Flow9(1s,000)
17r395$ 2,395
PV of 31@ 200h
l .OOO2.991
PV of $1@ 20o/o
1 ,OOO.402
e5
o $(ts,oool l.oool-5 5,000 3.352
Ngt presgnt va|u9..,..............r..,.........r....
Pmiect B
Net present va|ug........................ ' .........!
Proiect A
Cash Inflow(Outflow)$(15,OOO)
5,OOO
PV of $1@ 18%
1.0003.127
PV ol $1@ 18%
1 .OOO.437
1.OO0.497
PV ofcgghllgw$(1s,ooo)
15,635s 63s
PV ofcegb_Eow$(15,OOO)
15,295s 2es
(21
Yearo
1-5
PV ofGashFlow
ql5,oOOl14,955
g__l4s)
19.g70hlnternaf rate . / / S635 \ \ . ,
oir" trrn - - 18oh +
lzv" t( f f i*
)) - r9oh + (zw r.s34) -
s295S295 + S93O
(3) Using the internal rate of return method, Project A is superior to ProjectB. Using the net present value method, Project B is more attractive thanA. The decision hinges on assumptions made about reinvestment of'cashinflow. Theory suggests resorting to the net present vatue methodbecause the cost of capital reinvestment assumption implicit in thismethod is considered more realistic than the internal rate of returnmethod, where a reinvestment at the project's internal rate is assumed.
PV ofCashFlow
s(t5,ooo)14,070
$__19991
- 18 .48%
Project B
Cash lnflowYear (Outflowl
o $tls,ooo)5 35,OOO
lnte-rnaf rate - fioh * (Z"n ,(o f re tu rn D |
\ \
\ \
I l - laoh+(2" t "x .241)
!
e6
P23-1
(rlAlternative
Plan(al
Source ofFinancingDebt
PBOBLEMS
Aftertax CostPortion ol
Total Required$lo,ooo,ooo$l0,ooo,oo0$ 5,ooo,ooo$lOrO0O,OOO$ 5.OOO,OOO
$IOrOOO,OOO
$lo,ooo,ooo$'lo,ooo,ooo
Portion ofCurent Totalszo,ooo,ooos9O,OOO,0OO
slo,ooo,ooo
Chagter 23
WeightedAverage
Cost7.200h
3.60%
4.6goh
_9.2e%
11.o9%
WeightedAverage
Gost1.330h
l .OOoh
7.OOo/o
9.330h
(b)
12oh r (1 - 40% tax rate)
Debt 12"@tel
Preferedstock
goh
(1 - 4% issue cost)
Common S2.1O earnings per sharestock ($2O x (1 - S% issue cost)l
After.tax CostlOoh r (1 - 40% tar rate)
goh
(c)
(21Source ofFinancingDebt
Preferred stock
Common stock
sgo,ooo,ooo
. $2,10 earnings per share 560,000,OOo *$2o market price per share Sgo,o0o,ooo
3,ooo,ooo shares outstanding x s2o market price per share
Chapter?3
P23-1 (Concluded)
(3)AlternaUve
Plan(al
Source ofFinancingMarginal cost
(from part (1)) .......o....Current cost
(from part (2)) ......r....tTotal cost .........,.....r,.r.
Marginal cost(from part {1)} .,..........
Current cost(from part (2)l .,...,.....,
Total cost ............,.o...,,
(b)
After.tar Cost7.200h
9.33o/o
8.29o/o
9.33o/o
Portion ofTotal Reguired
$loo,ooo,ooo$ 9O,OOO,OOOsloo,ooo,ooo
$ lo,ooo,ooosloo,ooo,ooo$ 9O,OOO,OOO
$lOO,OOO,OOO
&7
WeightedAverage
Gost.720h
9.400h
_sJ2%.
.83%
8.4oo/o
9.23o/o
(c) Marginal cost 11.O5oh $ IO,OOO,0OO 1.11oh(from part (1)1 ....,....... $IOO,OOO,OOO
Current cost 9.3370 $ 9O,O0OTOOO 8.4O%(from part (2)) ..,.....,... $1OO^OOO^OOO
Total cost,......r-'rirororr _g€l_%
\I
t s - tIi
r - l
e8
P23-2
Appraised value of the pnopertyr excluding storage tank andwatgr lY€ l l t t t t t t t " " " " " " 'aa .a . . . . r .o . . . .aa . .a . . . .a r . . . . . .a r . . .o . . . . . . . . . . .a . . . . r .a . . . . . . .oo .
Replacement cost of storage tank .....,.,,..r......::::.................r.......r.....
Differential cost of water resulting from ross of wefr:Water from Glty
of Grant Welf
Chapter 23
$19O,OOO250.ooo
$44q.ooo
WaterfromCity reof Darnett At g% tenance present
at 8o/o Annuaf Annuaf and ValuE of presentYear Increts-e- -!"".eas" Repair Difference Sili r o"z, value2oA $ zz,7zo $ 35,2oo s gzreo .9p- ttffid208 79,539 3g1016 40-,522 ,g26 ggr477zoc g4,g?! 4r',os7 49,264 .Tsl sz,s6.zoD 91,999 qqisaz 4z',264 .683 s2,2s1zOE 98,?1? ez,aag $zo,ooo 31,046 .627 1g,28OzoF 106'850 s1'r72o zo,ooo 35,r 30 .564 r 9,8r 3zoc 1is,398 ssieig zoiooo 39,540 .5i3 2o,2s4zoH tro,g-?Z - 60;322 ggry 44',so2 .aoz 2o,6geSzzgllgz s324,4o9 Jqqpoo Eqlr,oru- s212,7s1ertir"t"a-1"ffir"..ffi....-..:
s€EZJelThe city of Grant must also consider the offsetting increase in property andsafes tares arising from the onioing economit heatth of this part of the totatbusiness activity that occuo t^ritrrin-the city, nri"
"onrideration may cause thenegotiated land price to be reduced. of course,-$r, irncertainty of the variousestimates must be recognized.
P23-3
(1 )
YearPV of Sl
@12%1.OOO
.893
.797
.712
.636
.s67
Projoct 1Aftertax
Cash Ffows$(120,OOo)
l O,OOO2O,OOO3O,OOO6O,OOOgo,ooo
PV olProject 1
Cash Flows$(12O,OOOl
B,g3o15,94O21,36039 ,16051 ,O3O
s 15,420-
Project 2Aftertax
Cash Flowss{12O,OOO}
5O,OOO45,OOO35,OOO25,OOO2O,OOO
oI2345
PV ofProject 2
Cash Ffowss( l2O,OOO)
44,65035 ,96524,92015 ,9OO11 ,34O
l__u,szgNet present value
Q9Chaptor?3
P23-3, (Continued)
l2l Project 1Afteptax
Year Casn Flowso q12O,OO0I1 1O,O0O2 2O,OOO3 3O,OOO4 60,0005 90,0oo
Project I internalrate of return
Proiect 2After-tax
Year Casn flowso $(120,00011 50,OOO2 45,0003 35,O0O4 25,OOO5 20,OOO
PV of 91@ 140h1.000.tt77.769.675.592.519
PV olCash Flowsql2O,OOO}
8177O15,38020r25O35r52O46t71O
-9--9193o
PV ofGash Flowsql2O,OOO}
8162014,86019,23033rl20
PV ofCash Flows
PV ol $1o 160h
l .OOO,862.743,641,552.476
Net preSent va|u9.........r........t." '
- 14oh . ( r* ,($0, oso + $t ,33o ))
- r s, , ,zoh$6,630
PV of PV of $1Cash Flows @ 18oh
PV ot $1o 160h
1.000.f362.743.641.552.476
9(12O,ooo)43,10033,43522,43513,800
9,520$ 2,290
$(l20,ooo)42,35032,31O21,31512,90O
9,7 40$ (2,385)
l .ooo.B,47.718.609.516.437
Pro iec t 2 in te rna l _ . ,6oh +( "o /o ,rate of return l. )
- t 6 .s 'oh$2 ,29O($2, zso + s2, 3Bs )
42,840
Chapter Zg
P2g-g (Concludedt
(31 The net present value of Project I ls greater than the net present vatueof Project 2 ($15r42o compared to $12,6751; however, the internal rate ofrsturn lor Proiect t ls less than the fnternal rate ol return for proiect 2ll5.A7%o comparod to I e.9B%ol. As a tosult, lt ls not altogether clearwhich profect ls the moro profitabte. The difference In rankings occur:;because of the dlffersnce In the pattern of cash flows; 1.e., the cashInflor,Ys for ProJect 1 are smaller ln early yearc and targer in later yearsthan those of Profect 2. The Internal rate of return for Proiect 2 ii sub-stanUally larger than the companyrs weighted averago cost of capital. ltmay not be possible for the cash flours roceived in early yea6 to be rein-vested at a rate of return equal to the internal rate of return of project 2;consequently' cash florrvs rcceived from Project 2 may not be as vaiuableto the firm as indicated by tha internat rate of return. On the other hand,the weighted avorago cost of capital is a realistic earnings rate erpectedby the company ovor the Investment horizon. Assuming that there is nodifference ln the riskiness of the expected cash flor,ns ior the two pro-jects' lt may be safer to raly on the net present value ranking than theintemal rate of return. This woutd mean that Project I shoutO Ue setect-ed.
P23-4
(1 )
Year123456
After..tarCash lnflow$3OO,OOO35O,0oo4OO,O0O45O,OOOSOO,OOO55O,OOO
Needed$2,2OO,OOO1,g0o,ooo1,550,00o1,150,o0o
700,o0020o,ooo
Balance$1,9oO,OOO
1,550,0O0lr t5o,0oo
70o,oo0200,00o
o
Payback YearsRequired
1 .OO1.001 .001 .001 .OO.36
Recovery offnitial Outlay
(21
Total payback in years......,,..,....r.....,........,.....,..,...r,...
Net income over economic l ife of asset...,......
_9.39s5,25O,OOO
2r2OO|OOO$3,05O,OOO
AccounUng rate of roturn (on originat investment
= t i * Original investment
* $2 ,2oo, ooo = 13 ,9oh= (
Net incomeEconomic l i fe
s3, O5O, OOO10 years
Chapter?3
P234 {Goncluded}
{3} Accounting rato of return = (on averiage Investment \ )
*,ar"oge investment
63t
Net incomeEconomic life
PV of $1o 140h
PV ofCash Flow
(41
Year
(51
Year
lnternalrate ofreturn
Cashlnflow
(Outflowl
PV of $1Q 160h
/33, o5o, ooo.) * f 32,2oo, ooo )= 2T.toh=( ro-l-t 2 )
o $(2,200,0001I 30O,OO02 35O,OOO3 4OO,O0O4 45O,OOO5 50O,0OO6 55O,OOO7 600,000I 650,000I TOO,OOO
10 75O,OOONet present valug . . . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . . . . . r . . , r , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . .
- 1 .000.877.769.675.592.519.456.400,351,308.270
$(2,2OO,OO0)263,10O269rl5O27O,OO0266,4OO259,5OO25O,80O24O,OOO2281150215,60O2A2,5,OO
$ zos,zoo
CashInflow
(Outflow)q2,2oO,OOO}
3O0,OOO35O,OOO4OO,OOO450,OOO5OO,OOO55O,OOO6OO,OOOo50,oooTOO,OOO75O,OOO
PV ofCash Flow
PV of $1o lgoh
PV ofCash Flow
o1234567II
10
1.OO0 $(2,2OO,OOO).862 259,600.743 260,050.641 256,400.552 248r4OO.476 239,000.47O 225,5OO.354 212,4OO.3O5 1gBr25O.263 184,100,227 17O,25O
E-- jlr999
$(2,2OO,OOOl25417OO251,300243,60O232r2OO218,500203,5OO188,40O172,gOO157,50O143,250
g_(134lggl
x .278 )=16 ,6%
1.OOO.947.718.609.516.437.370.314.296.225.191
=16oh . ( " * ,sst ,95O )
, )
=160h + (2'h$134,75O($s l ,95o +
I
\ - iI
6p
l
P23-6
(1) Machlnc I
Chaptcr 23
Total paybackIn years
Mach ine 2
InlUal outlay s500,0ooUnltonn cash lnftows 3125,0OO
- 4 years
Recovery ofln l t laf OuUay
AftentarYear Cash Inflow
1 $ 60,0002 75,OOO3 1OO,0OO4 i25 ,OOO5 15O,0OOI 2OO,OOOTotal payback In years
Machlnc I
Needad BaleneePayback Yoars
Rcquired1.OO1.OO1.001.OO1.00
.505.50
S6OO,OOO65O,OOO475,0OO375,OOO25O,0OO1O0,OOO
355O,OOO475rOOO376,OOO25O,OOOlOO,OOO
o
(21
Net after*tar cash Inl lows .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . Sl,ooo,oooLess depreclailolt ........ soo;oooNet Incomo ovor economlc i l fe of Machins 1. . . . . . . . . . . . Fsoo,ooo
Account ing ratc of roturn i Net income \ _on or ig inal Invegtm.i t
- lE"onorni" r i r " J+
or io inal investment
/ Ssoo poo \ .- l - - - t+ SSOOpOO - 12.5%\ 8 years )
Mach ine 2
Net aftentar cash lnflowsLess depreclat lon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . .Net Income ovsr economlc l i fe of Machlne 2
s' l ,4oo,0ooSOO,OOO
s SOO,OOO
Accoun'ng ratc of return - r $goo poo ) . seoo Foo - 1s.7.hon original Investmont -
l.T yoan, ) '
Clnpter I
P23-6 (Continued)
(31 Machine I
Machine 2
(4t
Accounting rate of roturnon average investment
Machine {
YearCash lnflow
(Outflowl$(5OO,0Ool
125,OOO
t 'gsoo'ooo ) /Ssoo,ooo )=[ffiJ-[.:f)="u*
633
Accounting rate of return _ (on average investment
- \ )
* ar"r"ge investmentNet incomeEconomic life
o1-8
[$soo, ooo )I I y"""s J
PV of $1a 150hl .ooo4.4g7 '
Net present value of Machino 1rPresent value of $.| received annually for 8 yearc from Table 23-2 of thetext.
Machine 2
PV ofCash Flows${50o,oool
56O,875
__9_99,87s
PV ofCash Flows$t6oo,ooo)
43r5OO56r7OO65r8OO,71r5OO74r55O86,40O
112,8OO130,80O
E_lefsoNet presont value
@$oorBzs = .122$soo,ooo
- "
$42, O5O. : - r - =
$600 , OOO
o1234567I
Cash lnflow(Outflow)$(600,000)
5O,OOO75,00O
10oro00125,OOO15O,O0020orooo30O,OOO4OO,OOO
PV of $1o 150h1.OOO
.fJ70,756.658,572.497.432.376.327
Net present value of Machine 2,,.........,..r.,......r.].
Net present value index for Machine 1
Net present yalue index for Machine 2 . o70
I
P23-S (Concludedl
(51 tt4aqlilel
Cash Inflow(Outflowl
$(5OO,OOO}l25,OOO
Machine 2
PV of $lCl 18o/o
LOOO4.O79
PV of Sl@ 160h
PV ofGash Flows
PV of $1O 20o/ol .ooo3.837
Chapter 23
PV ofCashFlows
Yearo
1-8
Year
$(5OO,OOO)5Og,75O
srtlg
$9,75O
PV ofCashFlonrs
$(soo,oool479,625
_9_eo'gzgl
fnternal rate l1oh + ("n ,(ofreturn -
\ \ ) )$9,75O + $2O ,375
- 18oh + (zW x .324) - 18 ,67o
Cash Inflow(Outflowl
$(6OO,OOOl5O,OOO75,0O0
100,o0o125,OOO150,OOO20O,0OO3OO,OOO400,00o
PV ofGash Flows
PV of $1@ 78o/o
o12345678
l.OOO.862.7 43.841.552.476.410.354.305
l .OOO.847.7lfj.609.516.437.370.314.266
$(600,O00143,10O55,72564,lOO69,OOO71,40O82,OOO
1O6,2OO122,OOO
$ 131525
$(6OO,OOOl42135O53,8506O,9OO64,5OO65,55O7 4,OOO94,2OO
106,4OOs (38,2501
Internal rateof return
/ s13525 \\Y l : r r
\ $l 3,s2s + S38 pso //
x .261)- to.SZo
-16oh,.(r*
-16oh +12%
ChapterB
P23-6
(1)
635
f8)
Attcr-taxCtsflFlow
(4) - {'t}3 g,ooo
l2,oo015rOOOl8'OOOl8,o0o15rOOO13,500
sloo,5oo
3,OOO3104,1O0
(5)
TarEleprc-.claUon-
StoBoo17r28,O1Or3O88}21O4,21O3r132
o
(s)
Taxablclncomo(Loas)
K)- (5)t (3,OOO)
(8,8O0)7r72O
19rO5O19,85019178022,5OO
(71
Tarcr(61r 40%
3(1'200)(3,52O13,O887r80O7,89071912
0,000
(4)
TotalCaahFlow
(21+ (3)
t TBoo81480
18rO88u'Sao25,88022re1222,3OO
12315o7
{2) (3}Gash
Savinga Cash Flowlrom trom
Reduced lncreascdMalntenancc Capaclty
$1,500 I O,3OO1,2OO 7,,80
000 17,188oo0 25,2AO3Oo 25,560
o 2219120 22,5OO
After.taxYear Cash lnflow
1 $ 9,ooo2 12,OOO3 15,OOO4 l g,ooo
Caah Inflow trom aalvagc at snd of economlc lifc' net of tar
Gt6'000 aalYage x (1 -.,fO tax rate)).
Total after-tax caeh lnflowr
rThc tax depreciaUon lr determlned by mulUplylng the depreclable basla of 354,O0O 0.e., thocash purchaeo prlcc plur the tar baclc of zero) by the MACRS percentagea provlded In Exhlblt224 of thc text for the five-year property class.
Recovery ofInitial Outlay
(1 )
Needed BalancePayback Years
Reguireds54,OOO45,OOO33,OOO1B,OOO
$45,OOO33,OOOl B,OOO
o
I11I
_tTotal payback in years.r.. . . . , . , . . . . . , . , . . . . . . , , . . . . , .r.
(21 Netafter-tax cash inflows (excluding salvage),...,.............Less financial accounting depreciation
(:ts4,ooo cash + g4,0oo book value - 56,000 salvage)..
Less tax on salvage ($6,000 salvage x .4O tax rate)Net income over the life of the property.
$1OO,5oo
52,OOO$ 48,5OO
2r4OO$ 46,1OO
!
'-lttI
P2g-6 (Concluded)
Accounting rate of returnon original investment
Accounting rate of returnon average lnvestment
/ Net income \I -:;F 1 + Original investment\ ECOnOmTC i lre /
- f g-) * ssa,ooo - ir. ssoh\ 7 years /
- / Net income- )
* aretage investment\ Economic lifr
/ $ lo,1oo \ |- l?ye*s / * | . + $6,O00 \2 ) '
958,ooo +
Chapter2S
20.580h
(3) Cash lnflow(Outflow)${54,OO01
9r0ool2 'OOO15,00o18,00o18,OOO15,00o17,1OO '
PV of $l@ 120hl .OOO
.893
.797
.712
.636
.567
.507
.452
PV ofCash FlowsYear
Net present valug .............,...r.....,..,............,........*$13,500 cash inflow in year 7 plus $3,6O0 aftentar salvage.
Net present value inder - s l l ,269 - . 2O9s54,OOO
o1234567
$(54,OOO)9,0379,564
10,68O'111448
10,2067,6057 1729
___9_!!399
(4)
YearPV of $1@ 16%
PV ofCash Flows
s(54,OOOl7 17588 ,9169 ,6159 ,9368,5686 ,1506,053
gl€99
PV of $1@ 18%
PV ofCash Flows$(s4,oool
716238,616I ,135gr28g7,8665,55O5,369
$ (s531
o1234567
Cashlnflow
(Outflowls(54,OOOl
9,00012,00O15,00O1g,oool8,ooo15,OOO17,10O
*
tS13,5Oo cash
l .OOO.862.743.641.5s2.476.410.354
l .OOO.847.718.609.516.437.370.314
inflow in year 7 plus 53,600 aftentax salvage.
$2 ,996fnternaf rato of return - 16oh + lZ"t" r($z,sso + $s53 ))
- t z.oaao/o
ChapterB
P23-7
Year
(1)
PeriodicNet Cashlnflows
(2',1
Annual7ohPrice-LevelAdiustment
(3)Adjusted
EsUmate ofNet Cashlnflorus(r) x (21
$ 21,4OO28.162536,75O39,33042,OgO45,03O4Or1503413602Tr5TO191670
$334,975
87
I2345678I
10
$ 2o,ooo25rOOO
. 3O,OOO30,o0o30,ooo3OrO0O2510OO2O,OOOl5'OOOl O,OOO
_$239,ooq
(11
DepreciableBasis ofMachine
$1OO,OOO1OO,O0Ol OO,OOOl OO,OOOl OO,OOOlOO,OOO1OO,O0O1OO,O0O
( l +.Oil = l .O7O( l + .o f l2 = l '145(1 +.Oflo = 7.225(1 + .Ofa = 1 .311(l +.Ofls = 1.403(1 +.04o = 1.501(1 +.07}2 = 1.606( l + .Of lo = 1.718(1 +.O7)e = 1.838(1 +.o71to = 1.967
RecoveryYear
I234567I
(217-Year
PropertyRecovery
@!egeo.143o.245o.175o.125o.o89o.oggo.o89o,o45
t3l
T:axDepraciation
(11x (2)$ 14,3OO
24,5OO17r5OO12r5OA8,9OO8,9OO8,9OO4,5OO
_9!_oo,ogg
,- ' l
v
ChWter236g
P23-7 (Continuedf
9 27,57010 19,870
Estimate of Tar lncome State Payment GashNet Cash Deptu- (Lossl Income (Reductionl Inflows
Year lnflours clatlon (11- (21 Tar Rate (31 r (4) (11 - (5)
1 $21,4OO $l4,3OO $ Z, iOO 40% I2,840 $ 18,5602 281625 24,500 41125 40% 1,650 26,9753 361750 17r5OO 19r25O 4goh 7r7OO 29,O5O4 39'330 12'500 26'830 4oo/o 7Or732 28'5985 42rO9O 8r9OO 33rl9o 4ooh 731276 28.,8146 45,O3O 8,900 36,130 4goh 141452 30,5787 4Or15O 8r9OO 31,250 4ooh 12,5OO 27rg5o8 34,360 4,500 29,860 4A% 11,944 221416
(11 @ (31 (41 (51 (61Federal tncome Net
Adjusted Taxable and Tax Afteptar
0 27,570 40% 11rO28 16,542o 19 ,670 40% 7,868 11 ,802
Total inflation-adiusted aften tar cash inf!ows....r................,............. S24Or985:(f ) Payback period:
Recovery ofInitial Cash $!!ey_
Net Aftentax Years RequiredYear Cash lnflow Needed Balance Until Payback
1 $18,560 $100,OO0 $81,440 l .O2 26,975 81,440 54,465 1.O3 29,O5O 54,465 25A15 . 1.O4 28,598 251415 o o.9Totaf payback period in yeats.,..,.........,,,........,......,.... 3.9
(21 Accounting rate of return on original investment:
Total inflation-adjusted afteptax cash inf|ow.................,, $24o,985Less financial accounting depreciation ..................!......... 1OO'OOoNet income over economic l ife of project..,..........,.....,..... l1.!g999
Average
"r,n.rJl - -Nellqqgrng- - S14o'985 - sr4.oes
return Economic l ife 1O years - - - ' -
Accounting rate ofreturn on or ig inal Average annual return $14,099 _ 1410 or 14 . looh
inves tment -
o r ig ina t ' rn "es tme" t -
S loo"ooo - r r '
- t -
Chapter 23
P23-T (Continued)
(3) Accounting rate of return on average investment:
Average annual return
639
.2820 or 2A.200h
Accounting rateof return
on averageinvestment
Year
$14 ,O99$5O,OOOOriginal investment + 2
(41 Net present value and net present value index:
o1234567II
10Net
1234567Total
(1)Net
After-taxGash
(Outflow)Inflow
(21
PresentValueof $1
@ 150h
(3)PresentValue ofNet Cash
Flow(11x (21
$ (1OO,OOOI1611472O,3931 9 ,1 1516,35814,32113 ,21O1O,396
7,33O4,6982 ,915
e__31€99
$(1OO,OOO)18,56026197529,05028,59828,8143O,57827,65022,41616,54211,8O2
1 .OOOo.870o.7560.658o.572o.497o.4320.376o.327o.284o.247
present value
Net presentvalue index
Present value
Net present value $24,883Required investment Sl OO,OOO
payback in years:
- . 249
(s)
Year
PresentValue ofAfter-tax
Cash Inflow$16,147
2O,39319 ,11516,35914,32113,21Ot o ,396
Recovery ofIni t ial Cash Outlay
YearsRequired
for PresentValue Payback
1 .OO1.OO1.OO1.OO1,OO1.OOo.046.04
Needed Balance$l oo,ooo
83,85363,46O44,34527,98713 ,666
456
$83,85363,46044134527 198713 ,666
456o
payback per iod in years
l lt -
640
P23-7 (Concludedl
(61 lnternal rate of return:
Chapter 23
Year lnflow
(t)
NetAftertar
Cash(Outflowl
s(roo,oool18,56026r97629,05O28r5982818143O,57827 165022,4181615421 l ,8O2
(21
PresentValueof $l
€r 20%
(31PresentValue of
Gash FlowDiscounted
o 200h(rl r {2}
s(1oo,oool15,46018!72116,82013r7841 1 ,5831O,2447,7145,2233,2O91,912
-I--!'670
(41
PresentValueof $l
Gl 22o/o
(51PresentValua of
Gash FlowDiscounted
o 220h(r) r (4)
s(1OO,OOOl15 ,21918r12716,OO712,8981O,661
9,2656,8854r5732,7631 ,617
$ (1,98s)
o12345678I10
l .OOOo.833o.694o.579o.482o.402o.335o.279o.233o.194o.162
S4,670S4,670 + $1 ,985
LOOOo.8204.672o.551o.451o.3700,303a.249o.204o.167o.137
.2140 or 21.40h
(ol
AdditlonalMalntonanco
Cort wlthCIM SFtom
325,ooo25,O0O25,OAOz'rO0O25,OOO25,OOO
Internalrate ofreturn
P23-8
(1 )
= Zooh. [t* " (
) ) =
Ycar
123456
( t )
Roduco'dLrborCort
315,O0O25rOO030,0OO30,O0o30,O003O,0oo
' l2l
RoducrdMachlno
Sotup Tlmo
34O,0oO50TOOO
oor0oo60,OOO
oo,ooooo,0oo
t3)
BoducodInvrntorTCarrylng
Cort
325,0003:t,ooo40,0OO40,OOO40,0OO40,0oo
(41
LortContributlon
MrrglnAvoldcd
320O,0O03{)o,ooo40O,OOO
50O,OOO
ooo,oooTOO,OOO
(51Total
PoriodlcSrvlngt fromCIM Syrtcm
('l)+{2}+{3)+(ll'3280,00O
4lo,o0oa3o,o0oGto,ooo73O,OOOSilo,ooo
c4Nct Pcriodic
Savingrwith CIMSyrtom(5) - (6)
3255,000385,0OO
5O5,00o
605,OOO
7O5,00o
BO5,0OO
N.tPorlodlc&vlngr
Ycar wlth CIM
Chaptor2S
P23-f3,(Continued)
rr) {81
TarDcprc-
(0) (1ol (r 1) 112l
PrriodicNet
Trr AltontrrUablllty Carh(Botundl lnflowr(e) r (1ol ft)-(1rl
a l
lr4)lnflatlon-AdjurtrdPrriodis
Nrt Aftor-tlr C.fhlnllorr
(121r l13l
3 3ri5,32o580,498595,470640,560780,039840,'158
s3,798,051
95,22O
93,893,2712,2OOrOOO
s1,093,271
c4Total TarAmortl-
:atlon andElcprcciatlon
(31+ (0)
$ 440,ooo880,000424,0OO2TO|OOO27O,OOO118,000
clatlonrnd
Amorll-ratlon'.
( t3 l
lndcx forAntlcl-prtrd
8% Ratrol
Inllation
1 3255,000 344O,OOO $(185,000) lOcA 3 rt4,Ooo) 3329,000 1.0802 38ti,O0O 88O,OOO (295,OO0) 40% (118,000) 503,0.00 1.1603 5051000 424|OOO gl,OOO lgoh 32,400 472,OOO 1.2604 605,000 2TOrOOO 335,OOO 4Oo/. 134,OOO 471,OOO 1.3605 7O5,0OO 2TOrOOO 43{irOOO 4Ach 174,000 531,000 1.489o 805,000 110,000 889,000 40% 275,gOO 52g,4OO 1.587
Total annual InflaUon-adJusted sfter-tar saulngc lrom Investment In CIM systemCagh Inflow from salvage of egulpment and machinery(S1OO,O0O salvage x 1.587 adJ. x 11 - 40% tax rate))
Total Inflation adJusted atter-tar cash lnflowl trom Investrnent In CtM system....Less lnlual Investment (S2,ooo,ooo In equipment ptus S2oo,ooo In software)......Ercegs of cost of clM system over inflation-adjusted after-tax eavings
t
(1 t
RoeovcryProporty
Y="r_ Tar Earlr
1 82,000,0002 21000,000
3 2 ,000 ,0004 2r0oo,0005 2,000,000
o 2,00o,00o
Tarablolncomo Effcetlvo[.ou) Trr
fD - (81 Bato
s2OO,ooO200,o00200,00o200,000200,000200,0oo
(5)(4)(3)l2l
0.2000.2000.2000.2000.2000.000
(ol
TaxAmoRl-:ation(al x (3)
$ 4O,OOO
4O,0OO
4O,00o4O,0OO4O,0OO
o
Bato for TarMACRS Dcprc-3-ycar claUon
_&gFrty (1) r (2)
o.20o $ 400,0000.320 640,0000.192 384,0000.115 230,0000.115 230,0000.058 116,000
$2,OOO,OO0
5_ycarStralght-l lno
Softwaro AmortiraUonTar Barlr Fatc
s20o,ooo $2,20o,o0o
I
Chapter 23
P2g-8 (Concluded|
l2l Inflatlon-Adlusted
Periodic Net PaYbackAfter.tar Years
Year @[!1.1[gl Needed Balance Requiredr $55,320 $2,200,O0O $l,844,O8O 1.OO2 5861498 1,844,680 112581182 1.OO3 595,476 1,258.J82 862,700 1.OO4 640,560 662,706 221746 1.OO5 78O,O39 221146 O O.O3Total paybaCk in yearS.......r..r..........r... '..r.............o...rr 4.o3
lnflation-Adiusted Present Present
Periodic Net ValueAfteptar of $1
Year Cash lnflorrs @ 14% Inflowso s(2,2oo,oool 1.OO0 S(2,2OO,OOO)
(31
Valueof Gash
1234
355,32O588,498595,47664O,580
o.877o.7690.675o.592
311,61645 t ,O17401,946379,212
5 78O,O39 . 0.519 4O4r84O6 935,378' 0.456 4261532 _
Net present value of investment.............r.......r.... 9--IZgrI-qg
t --S84Orl58 aftentax cash inflow for year 6 plus $95,220 after-tar salvage value at L
the end of year 6.
Chaptor23
P23-9,
Purchase alternative:
{1) (4 (3)
mACAt lrrconreD.prool. Ter
C..h rlon Drprocl-Yoar lnllon Hatr aUon'
1 SAOO'0Oo2 600,0003 60010001 O0Or00o5 g0o,o0o
0 0oo,00o7 600,000I 600,000I 800,000
10 800,ooo11 600,00012 600,00013 600,00014 600,00015 O0o,o00
.1*l $286,0002# 490,000.175 350,000.1Ai 250,000.080 178,000.089 178,000.080 178,000.o4{t 90,000.000 0.ooo o.o00 0.000 0.ooo o.ooo o.000 0
&B
l0) mX.l
Incnoo Altrntexln Incomo C.dl
Tar Inflowrlal r (51 (tl - (ol
tl25,OOO44,OOO
lOO,OOO14Or0OO1O8,8OO1e8,80016a,8OO2O4,OOO24O,OOO24O,O0O24O,OOO24O,OOO24O,OOO24O,OOO24O,OOO
$ 471r4OO556,OOO5OO,0O04EO,O00431}2004il1,2OO431,2O0396,0O036OrO0O360,OOO360,00036O,OOO360,OOO360,OOO360,OOO
EE,2OO,OOOl2O'OOO "
s6,32OrOOO2,OOO,OOO
(41
lncngrln Tenblo
lncomr11) - f3l
$314,00011O,OOO25OrOOO3ti0,0o0aa2,ooo422rOOO122,OOO510,OOO000r000800,0o0000r0oo600,000g00ro0o
600r0ooo00,000
{q
lncomrTrrFrto
40AOAOAOAO.40AOAO,40AO.40AOAO.40AO
Aftsr-l-r cagh lnftow from ratvago at ond of cconomlc |ife........Total after-ter cagh hflbw frorn the purchacc attarnaUvsl-eca ln1g"1 cagh ouUtow -........,...Total after-tar cash Inflow over aconomic tifc of project 90,32O,0OO
'Tho deprectatlon b determlned by muttlptylng the depreclabte basle of g2,ooorooo by thorilAcRg cost recovery percantageg provldod ln E$lbit 212.4 of the text for aeven-yosr proporty.
-P" ealvage rscslvod at tho end of tho economlc llfe ol the asset would bo fuily tarablobecause the tar baslr of tho property would be zero. The aftor-trr cash Inflow would bo3120'000, l-e., (s2oorooo rorvago vuiuo r (1 - .,{o tar rate)).
644
P23-9 (Concluded)
Year
NetAftertax
Gash Flow
Chapter 23
PV ofGash Flow
oI234567II
101112131415
Net present valug ...r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . . . . . .r. . . . ' . . . . . . .
Lease alternative:
Annual cash inflow before lease payment. $OOO,O0OAnnual lease payment ....,.....,... . 32O,OOOAnnual pretar cash inflow and increase in tarable income $28O,OOOAnnual increase in income tax expense ($2BO,O00 r 4o%l i 12,OoOAnnual af tentar cash inf low from lease a| ternat ivo. , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . , . . . , . . S168,O0O
PV of $1@ 14%
$(2,OOO,OOO)474,4OO556,OOO5OO,OOO46O,000431,200431,20O431,2OO396,OOO36O,OOO36O,OOO36O,OOO36O,O0O36O,O0O36O,OOO36O,OOO
s(2,O0O,OOOl416,049427 )564337r5OO272,3202231793196,627772,48O138,9961 1O,88O
97,2OO95,32O74,98O65,52O57,60O5O,4OO
$ 727,129
l .OOO.f377.769.675.592.519.456.400.351.309.270.237.208.182.160.140
Cashlnflow
PV ofAnnuity
s l @ 14%
PV ofCashFlows
1 -15 $168 ,OOO 6.142 s1,031 ,856
The lease al ternat ive appear to be preferable because the net present value ofthe estimated aftentax cash flows is greater than for the purchase alternative(s1,031,856 versus $727,1 29).
ChaplerA
P23-1oI
(1) Gencral-RrrpoacEqulpment
Leasc Purchasc
ils
Selt-Constructod
EqulpmentRecurring cash flows from operiations:
Estimated sales volume in units.,....Unit contribution maryin..................Estimated total contribution margin
Less fixed costs:SupervisioJl ........................'..o..r......rPropefi tares and insuranco....,,.,.,MaintenaflCO .......................rrr.........r
Total fixgd COSt .r'................r.r......."'
4O,0OO 4OTOOO 4O,OOO$ l.ss s 1.55 $ 1.90$62,000 S62,000 $76,000
$16,O0Ooo
$1o,ooo
$16,000 $17,OOO3,O0O 5,O0O3,OOO 2'OOO
s22,OOO $24,OOOAnnual cash inflovrrs before tax...,.,,...,.,.. 946'O0O $4O'OOO $S2'OO0
Lease equipment altemative;Annual gash inflow bgforg tax.,..,.........o......,..r..,..r..,.....r..o...,r..r.Annual lgasg paymgnt. . . . . . . . . .o. . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . .o. . . . . r . r . . . . . . r . r . i r . . . . . . . .
Annual incrgasg in taxablg income... ..,..o.........,,......-.r.Annual increasg in incomg tar ($6rOOO x 4Oo/o1.,..,e.......r..........,..Annual aftgrtax cash inf!ow....,.r...........o....r.,..........r.........,r.....,.rPV of $1 rgcgived annually for G years O 14oh.........o........,.......,Net present yalue of lease altemative.................,........ sl4,ooo
$46,OoO40rooo
s 6,0002r4OO
$ 3,600x 3.889
646
1
P23-1O (Continuedl
Purchase equlpment alternative:
ChWtor23
Yrar
123456
l l l
ProtlrC.rh
Inflowr
(4
lncomrTrr
Dcprrcl-rllon'
l3l
TaHblolnconrr(rl - (2t
$15,OoOo
10,00025,0.2525)82572,750
({)lncomr
Trrat lO%
Tar Fatol3l r 40%
3 E,oooo
8,40010,25010,25029,100
(5tNrt
Allrr-t'rC.rh
lnflowrtlt - Ft
$3l,ooo40,00033,80029173029,7505O,9OO
t0l
P{l of ilo 71%
$lo,ooo4O,OOO40,0004O,O0O4O,OOOgorooo r'
$25,OoO40,00024,000141375
141375
7r25O
mPll of NetAftrntrr
C.ehlnflowrl3l x (01
$ 29 ,81830,78022,f,8O17,fJ1215,44O23,21O
s139,520 "125,00O
.aT7
.780
.975
.592,519.456
Preaant valuc of net cagh lntlow!L"ecr InlUal caeh outflow
Net preaent value of purchase alternaUve s 14,520'Tar
depreclaUon le determlned by multiptying the depreclable basir of the equipment underthe purchaae alternattuo (Si2s,oo0) by tho tylACBS depreclaUon nlter provlded ln Exhibit 22-4of the terL
-tncludea aalvagc vatue of S4OrOoo, all ol whlch woutd be tarabler Blnce the equlpment would
be tully depreclatad for Incomo rtr purpo3es at thc end of the ahth year. Thc total after-tarcagh flow from opcratlonr of S5OrgOO chown tn column (5) b compoaed of after-tax cashInllow trom operaUons of S20,goo (9co,ooo - ((S4o,ooo - Sz,2so) r ,40 tax rate)) and the after-ta: cash flow from aalvagc of $24,0oo (S4o,Ooo r (l - .40 tar rate)).
Chagter 23
P23-1O (Gontinued)
Self-constructed eguipment alternative:(31
TrnHolnconrrIr) - (21
31g,ooo(5,800)
17r/UO31,30031,30071,580
647
123156
(t)
ProtlrCrdl
lnflowr
352,0oO52rOOO5210oo52,00052,00og2rooo "
H
lncomrTer
Doprocl-rtlon'
$3O,OOO5716OO
341560
20r7OO
2017OO
10r44O
t4)lncomr
Trrd 40%
Trr BetrFl r ao%
3 o,4ool2,240l6197A
12152072,320281624
(51N.t
Allor-trrC..h
lnflowr( r l - t l
3o5,ooo54.'2.4O4!iro243er48O39/{80st,37E
{0)
Ptl of tlo 1a.h
mFV ol ifotAftor-trr
C..fllnflowr{5} r lol
3 3e,99141171130r39123137220,49O
, 24,3:t9
s180,294lE5 'OOO' -
,a77.769.875.5925 1 0,4.58
Prccent valuc of net ca3h lntlow!Lclr Inltlal crsh outtlow
Net preaent valuc of purchagc alternativc 3 15,294
'Tar depreciation b determined by muttlplying the depreciabte basls of the equipment
undsr tho self-construction alternaUve ($180,000, whlch ls the full construction costIncluding allocated fired cost) by the IJIACRS depreciaUon rates provided In Erhibit 224 olthc text.
" tncludes aalvage valuo of 530,000, all of whlch woutd be tarable, lince the equipmentwould be fully depreclated for Incomc rrr purpogeo at the end of tha rlxth year. Thc totalattor-tar cash flow from operaUons of 353,376 ahown ln column (51 b composed of aftcr-tar cash Inflow from operatlons ot 335,376 (352,000 - (|3SZ,OOO - 31O,44O) x ,4O tar rate))and thc after-tar cash flow from talvagc ol 318,000 (S30r00O x (1 - .4O tar ratel).
-' Because Egelston Corporation ls operaUng at normal capaclty and the construcUon of thenew equipment will not Interfere with regular acUviUes, the company ahould not incur anyaddlUonal flxed tactory overhead. Therctore, the 815,OOO of fixed factory overhead ls notIncluded In the differential cost of the sett-constnrcted asseL The initial caeh outlay woutdbo $180'000 tut l cost less $15,00O of al tocated f i red factory overhead, or 31O5,OOO.
Chapter2S
P2g-1O (Concludedl
(21 Egelston Gorporation should consider sny proposal that is erpected tohave an.earnings rate In ercess ol the firmrs cost of capital. lf a proposalhas a positive net present value, that proposalb erpected earnings willyield a rate of return that erceeds the firmb cost of capital. In this caso,the purchase of general-purpose equlpment, the constnrctlon of special-purpose equipment, and the lEase ol general-purposa equipment are allacceptable to Egelston CorporaUon, because the net present value of allthree proposals is positive,
Egelston Corporation should attempt to marimize the earnings thatcan be obtalned from the funds available for capital Investments. Whencomparing a set ol mutually erclusive alternatives, the atternative withthe largest net present value will result in a marimization of stockholderwealth. Accordin gly, constnr ctio n of special-p urpose eq ui pm ent ap p earsto be the most attrastive alternative. Howeve4 the net present valueshould be related to any required investment by calculating a net presentvalue index as follours:
Construction of special-purpose equipm enb
Net present value Sl5,294 = .4927Required investment $165 ,OOO
Purchase of special-purpose equipment:
Net present value Sl4,52O = .1162Required investment $125,O0O
Purchase of general-purpose equipment promises a larger net presentvalue indsr and would be preferable, provided that the investment differ-enco of $4O,00O ($t65,000 - S125,OOO| can be used to earn a net presentvalue greater than S774 ($1S,eg4 - $14,5201.
\
Chapter?3 &9
CASES
c23-1
(11 (al The payback method measures the number of years required for theaftertax cash inflows to fully nocover the initial cash investment in aproject. The payback method emphasizes an organizationb financialliquidity and the riskiness of the capital project in terms of invest-ment recovery. Since long-term forecasts contain mone uncertaintythan short-term forecasts (i.e., it is easier to predict what will hap-pen next year than what will happen lO years from now), the leastrisky projects will have the shortest payback period.
(bl The net present value method recognizes the time value of moneyby discounting the after-tax cash flows for a proiect over its life totime zero using the firmb weighted average cost of capital. The netpresent value is the difference between the present value of the ,after*tax cash inflows, measured over the life of the capital project,and the cash outflow required to undertake the capital project.Projects that have a positive net present value are acceptable, whilethose that have a negative net present value are unacceptable.
(c) The internal rate of return method (also called the discounted cashflow rate of return method) incorporates the time value of money bydetermining the compound interest rate for a capital project thatwould result in a net present value of zero. A proposal would beacceptable if the internal rate of return erceeds the weighted aver-age cost of capital, and unacceptable if it is less.
(21 ln order to maximize the value of the company, Caledonia Division shoutduse the net present value method or the internal rate of return method todecide which capital projects should be inctuded in the capital budgetsubmitted to Quible Industries. Both of these methods would identifyProiects A, B, D, E, and F as acceptable (each has a positive net presentvalue and an internal rate of return in excess of the companyb hurdlerate)r and Project C as unacceptable (the net present value is negativeand the internal rate of return is less than the company's hurdte rate).However, Proiects A and D are mutually exctusive (meaning that ultimate-ly only one of the two can be pursued). The selection between the twodepends upon the criteria used to rank the proiecB, i.e., the capital"expenditure evaluation method employed in the selection process. tf thenet present value method is used, Galedonia would select Proiect Dbecause it has a higher net present value than project A (s24,g74 for Dcompared to 3691683 for A!. On the other hand, if the internal rate ofreturn method is used, Caledonia would select Project A because it has ahigher internal rate of return than Project D (gsoh for A compare d to 22ohlor D).
6fl Chapter 23
C2g-l (Concluded|
(31 In order to maximize the value of the company in this capital rationinggituation' the net present value should be used to select the projects tobe included In the capital budget because the cash inflows aro assumedto be ruinvested at the hurdle rate (the company has a demonstratedearning rate equal to lts weighted averiago cost of capita!|, The intirnalrate of return should not be used, because it violates the rsinvestmentrate assumpUon and may be unrellable as a basis for maxlmizing thevalue of the company in a capital rationing situation. Using the net pre-sent value method, the most profitable combination ol proiests withinthe $45O'00O budget constraint would be to include Projects & B, and Fbecause this combinatlon yields the greatest total net present value (netprssent vafue of $l621929 for an initial investment of $4sorooo). (Notethat the combination of & D, and F is not possible because A and D aremutually exclusive proiects, and that the combination of B, D, and F isnot possible because it would require a combined investment in ercessof $45O,OOO.|
c23-2
(1) The 18.2o/o rate of return on the investment differs from tha 24oh internalrate of return because the methods used to measure the returns are dif-ferent
Tha return on investment (18.2Vo1calculation is based on accrualaccounting concepts. lf the reduced operating expenses-legs deprecia-tion-remain constant as planned, the numerator in the ROI fraction willnot change over the life of the investmenL The denominator in the frac-tion, the investment base, decreases each year by the amount of theannual depreciation. Gonsequently, the rate of return calcutated willincrease each year oyer the life of the investmenl
The internal rate of return calculation PA%l is based on discountedcash flow concepts. The cash flows erpected to be received over the lifeof the investment discounted to the acquisition date aL 24Vo, eracttyequaled the initial cost of the machine. This measuns of return on invest-ment provides a percentage that is constant for each year of lifE of theinvestmenl This rate can be computed for each yearb actual operatingresults if the annual savings in operating erpenses ane constant and thenew equipment is depreciated using the effective interest method basedon an interest rato of 24o/o. The method would be essentially the same asthat emptoyed in amortizing leaseholds and bonds. Tho depreciationcharge each year would have to be such that the numerator and thedenominator of the ROt computation would change at the same rate inorder to keep the annual return on investment ratio constant.
Cllagter23 65t
C23-2,(Concludedf
l2l Recap Corporation can restructure the data from the cash flow analysisto make lt consistent with ths accounUng reports (which containstraight-line depreciationf received by the department manager. Oncethe investment ls accepted on the basis of its internal rate of return, thedata can be converted into the lormat consistent with the accounUngbasis used for reporting. Annual contribution from the new investmentwould be calculated by subtracting the straight-line depreciation fromthe net cash operating savings. The accounfing book value for each ofthe years of the investment lifo would also be calculated. The annualcontribution would be divided by the investment base (book value| foreach year to obtain the rates of return. This would then present the man-sger with the different rates of return for each of the yeans of the invest-mentb life. Thus, the rates would be more comparable with the actualreturn on investment rates experienced each year.
Alternatively, rather than computing an annual rate of return, it maybe more expedient to comparo actual net cash operating savings eachyear with those forecast in the capital expenditure analysis, lf actualperiodic savings equal those forecast, tho internal rate of return woutdbe equal to the 24% budgeted.
I!
S
I
CHAPTER 4
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
'I
O4-1. The five Parts arc:(a) Direct nraterblg reqtbn(b) Direct lsbor ceclbn(c) Frlory ovefiead(O Work h Pr@oer hventories(c) Fhbhed grood hvmtorbr
*2. iho bahnc" rhoet ir t 3tal.ment ct finsncblpcrttbt; the hcqrr ctBternont b a dalement of
sttYity. The incqne lbtement is ccnplementaryto thc babnce sheet, munthg in padicubr fortho ctrange in hr prcprietary equrty Bs a resullof operatims during the year. In |hat respecl' theincornc atatemenl ir eeaentially nothing morethan a major rection of the retained eamingsaccounl. Thereforc, tht rsvenue and expenseaccounls in the income 3talemont have beenlcrmed'cxplanatoqf ac@unl3, explaining thecbb and lkrw of r.YcnueE and cxpensee lhatbod to thc new hcqno (or bce) and to the newrrtahed camhgs balancc h the balance sheet.
O4-3. Thr ordinary babncr rhecl and incqne slate-menl aro htended to ptwkJe hlormalist as lofinancial peilion and resulb of operation of aburinesl, in sctordancc wilh several assump'liqs that arc made h preparhg |he stalements.Frqn the standpoinl cil the criticisms rnade, themost important cil these assumptions are lhalcocl lost appropdale arnortization of cost mea'rurca unelgired cct, and that a business meybo a$umod lo bc gohg to conlinue operatbnsindclinilely into lhe future. Accounting state-mcntg sre usually prepared on lhe heory lhal acale or gome other definite event is essenlialbcfore revenur is recognized. Basically, theaseot sUe of a balancc aheet coctaha a preson-tstbn o{ the anrounts cl cost incurred, which canbc presumed lo bencf i t f u ture per iods. 'Anincornc slalement presents the srnounl of rov-cnue recognized as having been realized duringthc period, less the podioo cl all cosls incunedthsl doe3 not appear to be lairly delerrable loftnurc perinds.
Thc ircome staternonl is prirrnrity a m€asurecd what lres been camcd, and not a measure of'camhg power.' For plant assots, the balancerheot b pdnarily a rnasure cl accountability forcxp.nditureE, rhowing acguisit ion cosls leescodr sllocalod to past operatbns. This rneasureof accounlability may br quile diflerent from1rur velue.'
To hcreese ilg usefuhess as one elemerd injudChC eaming porver, the ircsne stalement ispicparcd with a dietinclion between operatingand nonoperaling items. For the samo roason,c.rtain iterns may be climinoled frorn the incorne
slstomenl and shown in the statemont o lnrtained eemings. However, the effec-t of nmre'
curring and nonoperaling transaclions is notentirelY eliminated.
lnfonnalion revoaled by a serios of income3tatcments b morc rignilinnt in iudghg eamingpower than informatbn revcaled by ane hcqncstatcmstl. The incqne of a bushess rnay folbwor .Yen exaggetat€ the ups and downs ol thebueinesg cyclo and, therefore, lhe inccne of anycrc year will ncl represent eaming powor.
Changes in law or local zoning ordinancesmay result in a marked change in lhe eamingpower ol a bushess. Ukewise, changes in public
taste, devebpment of new prodtrts' apPgaranceol new conrpetilion, acquisition ol subsiJiaries'changes in management and lhe like, all maychange earning power and yet not be clearlyrellecled, il reflected at all, ir one incorne stale'menl.
The accounting use of historical. rather lhancurront, dollars in measuring depreciation andcost of goods sold may resull in distoding anyview of earning power obtained frorn a singleincorne statemenl.
ln regnrd to plant ass€ls, il can be said lhattheir value to a going concetn is usually depen'dent uPon the eaming power of the business.Such s value is not necessarily the same as lQ'uidation value, cost, cost legs amortization.repbcement value, or any other kind of value'The phrase .true value'has no definile connota'tion.
O4-4. Actusl describes the way cosls are measured.i.e., at actual historical arnounts; /ull absaptiondescribos which elemenis of cost are allocaledto hvenlory accounls, i,e., all elements of rnanu-lacluring cost are fully allocated to hventories;p/ootss describes how cqsl infonnation is accu'mubted, i.e., costs are accumulated for eachprocoss or deparlment in the laclory.
O4-5. Prime costing systems albcate only lhe primecosts, direct material and direcl bbor, lo hvento-ry accounts. Direct costing syst€ms, abo calledvariable costing syslems, albcale the variablemanulacluring ccts, direcl materbl, direci labor,and variable factory overhead lo lhe inventoryaccounts. Absorpticn costing systems albcate loIlvenlories parl or all of tixed frtory overhead,in addilioo to all varlrble manufacluring costs.
04€. Actual costing m€asuros product costs at actualhislorical arnounts, while standard ceting mea-sures product costs by ueing predeterminedarnounts ol resourceg to be coosurrned and pre-determined prices o{ those resources.
62
Q,4-7. Preess costing aicumulates costs fot oachpt@olts or department in the ladory end rnah'
tains detailcd recordr and calculationr of the
cotl of *ork h preest. Job order cting accu-
mulales cotr lor oach irb, lc', balcfi' or contrasl
and mEhtains detBilsd records and calculalbngod tho cost! of tork in prceas. BacHlush €st'ing accumulal.r coltr by working backwardsthrough ihc availablc inlormatiqr afler produc-
ticn is cornpleted (i.e., at the end of the accounl'hg pori<rd) and rnahtahr no detailed records ol
lhe costs cl ttPrk ir Prcesr.O.4€. Actual cosihg il more cornmon lhan standard
coothg in defense'rebted industries, while stan'dard cosiing ic adnewhat more cornmon else'where.
O4-9. Super'full absorpfbn or suPer absorption refersto tho income lax requiremenl thal some pur'
chasing and storage costs be allocated to inven'tory ac@unts.
O4-lO. Job order costing would be colrlmon in repairshops. buiHhg cotslructicr, and prhting; and in
servicc bushesse€ guclr as medical, legal' archi-leclurat, corutrucliqr engineering, accounling'and consulling lirms, as mentioned in the lexl'Other examples include shipbuilding. bridgebuilding, tool and die manufacturing, arl andantique resloratirn, and contracl rossarch'
o4-1 1. As mentixred h tho text, Pr66!ts costing wouldbe common in thc mill ing, brewing, chemical'and textile industries; in sirnple assembly oP€ra-tions: and in seryice businesseg serving largenumbers o( cuglorners simultanrcusly, ruch asairlhes. Other erampleg include petroleum refin-ing, basic food preessing, and manufacture of
ChaPter 4
low*ost @nsumor products such as toys, dis'posable Pens, na:ronr' and lighters.
04-12. Aspecls cqrtrnon lo icb order and prccess cost-ing are:(a) They can be used by rervice organiza'
tbns.(b) They requin cqrsiderablo detail to calcu'
late tho cost ol *ork h Procells.(c) The wprk h process accotnl in the gener'
a l lcdgcr i r lupported by subsid iaryt€cordg.
O4-1 3. A blended cthg method uee irb order cctinglo accumulate soflrc clement(s) ol cost andprcces3 ccthg to accumulale ofien-
O4-14. Flcxible manufacluring 3yslems consisl of anintegrated collection ol automated productionpnocesges, autornated rnaterials rpvemonl, and
cornputerized systetn csttrob lo utilize facilitiesln etticiently rnanulacturing a highly flerible vari-
ety cl Products.Q4-15. The adnantages of a llexble nranufacturing sys'
le.n over the cther systems include shorl (near-
zero) setuP limes, lhe absence of a learning
curve, lflet lead times to chipmont' lower diresllabor cost per unil, lower direct labor cost in
total, and bwer work in prccess invenlories.O4-16. Thc hilial cost of creathg a flerible rnanufactur'
ing system is much higher than lhat of olher
rngnuf asturing systoms.O4-17. l,lanufacturing setthg suiied for bacHlush cosl'
ing are distinguished by very fasl processing
speeds, which rernoves both the incentive and
the opportunily to track the detailed costs of
work in Pr@ess'
63
l-
It
LI\-
Ib
Ib
IS
Ib
IS
I
b
I
b
Chaptor I
. EXERCISES
E4-1 Calculation of cost of goods sold (in thousands):
TOtal manUfaCtUfing COSt ........... ' ................r.r.....tAdd work in process inventory beginning """""
Less work in process inventory ending.r..........".
Cost of goods manufacturgd r.......o.r.-........ ' ....r.. ' .,Add finished goods inventory beginning ........!....
GOSI Of gOOdS ayaitablg fOf Sa|g.. . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . .oo.. . . . . .Less finished goods inventory, ending ...o...... ' ......
Cost of goods sotd ..... ' . .-,.................... ' ..
E4-2 Calculation of cost of goods sold (in thousands):
DirgCt matgrials used.....................r...,...r,... ' ........DifgCt 1abOf . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . .FaCtOfy Ovgfh gad .o.. . ' . . r . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total manufaCtUring COSt . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . . . .Add work in process inventory beginning ........ ' ..
Less work in process inventory, endingGost of goods manufactured.. . . . . .Add f in ished goods inventory beginning . . . . . . . . ' . . . .
Gos to fgoodsava i |ab te fo rsa |e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � � � � � � � � � � � � �Less finished goods inventory ending..............,..
Gost of goods sold .......o............. ..t...... ' ..
s l 1080
$1eo90
$t oo1 5 0
$25060
$.11D
$230250
$480210
$27o'340
$61027fJ
s340
$ s o6080
i
I
Clpptcrl
E44 (Goncluded)
(21 Gost of goods manufactured:
Stores, April 30....... '. '........r.,.. .....--..----.PUfChaSgS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . .
LoSS: StOrtSt May 3t ro....rr...........r.................r....o......r..o....or....
Dirgct matgr ials COnSUmgd ' . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . r r . . . . . . . . t . . r . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . . r .Dirgct tabor used (4r25O x5221..r,.....,.........o.,............r.,...o......FaCtOfy OYefhead . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . r . . . . . . . ' . . . . .
Total manufacturing costAdd work in process, beginning inventory
Loss wgrk in process, ending inventory................r.....,...........COSI Of gOOdS manUfaCtUngd .... '..... '.........r...................... '.......
Ending balance of finished goods:
Finished Cost of Finishedgoods, + goods goods, =
April 30 manufactured May 31
S 4 5 , 6 0 2 + $ 2 8 2 r O g O X =
X =
Therefore, the finished goods ending balances is $47,662.
E4€ (al *",i135";;;;;il..:::.::::::.::::::::::::::-:::::: 35,ooo
(b) Work in Process............ t...........r.... 33'OOOFactory olrgrhead Gontro| ..o............r...,........ 21000
Matgr ia ls .or . . r . . . . . ' r . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . r . . . . . .o .
(c) Payroll 4O,OOOAccrugd Payro11.....,....,.r,.r..,.....r....,...r...,
Accrugd Payroll .r................,......,...,.............. 4OTOOOCaSh . . . . r r . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . o . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . o r . . . .
Work in Procgss ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r. . . .o,.. . , . , . .r. . . . . . . . . . g2rOOOFactory Overhead control,.. S'OOO
Payroll . . . . . . . . . .
(0 Factory gverhead Control 4,OOO
65
(31
s 1O,25O105,OOO
s l15,25012r7AO
sl 02,55093,50077.390
5273r4/,O61.420
s334,86O52,80O
s282,O60
Cost ofgoodssold
s28O,OOO
$ 47,662
35 ,OOO
35,OOO
4O,OOO
4O,OOO
4O,OOO
4,OOO
(d,
(el
Cash
ffi
E4-S (Concluded)
(g) Factory Overhead Control .."""'r"""""""""Accounts Payable . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . .""""
Factory Overhead Gontrol .....-................. '."'Accumulated Depreciat ion.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' .Prepaid Expenses .. . .r , . . . . , - . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . .Accrued Property Taxes .,..,........r........"'
WOfk in PfOCeSS .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Factory Overhead Control
Finishgd GOOdS.. . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . .Work in Process.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts Rgceivabl€ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gash . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Accounts Recgivabl€. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "
Cost of Goods So1d.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! . . . . . . . . """
E4-6 (al
Work in Procgss ...................... ' ...............,..,.Factory Ovgrhead Control .r....r..,r. ' .............,.Marketing Expenses Control ........-...............Administrative Expenses Control
Payrol l . . . . . . . . . . . , . .
Factory Overhead ControlCash.. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Factory Overhead ControlAccounts PaYable
Work in Process . . . . . - . - . . - .Factory Overhead Gontrol
Finished Goods.. ' .Work in Process """"""
Chapter 4
l8 ,ooo _18,OOO
4 , 1 3 02 , 1 O O
78011254
36,1303 6 , 1 3 0
92,OOO92,OOO
8O,OOO8O,O0O
4O,OOO4O,OoO
60,000 :
1 7 , 5 O O' 1 7 , 5 O O
1 , 8 0 01,800
27,OOO
17,0OO2,0005,0003,000
27,OOO
2r5OB :2,5O8
8,5OOB,5OO
1 4 , 8 O 81 4 , B O B
6 0 , 1 O O6 0 , 1 O O
(hl
(il
o
(k)
Finished Goods . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . , . . . , . , """" 6Ot000
13,50OAccounts Payable 13'5oo
(bl
(c)
(d)Accrued Payroll .....,. ' ...... 27 |OOO
(e)
(0
(gl
(h)
Chaptor I
E4-O (poncluded)
O Accounts R9cgivab18.............o...............oo'....
Cost of Goods Sold'Finished Goods'sl5,ooo + $oo,roo -$1s,roo = $8o,ooo
67
Sa8O,OOO
6O,OOO
8O,OOO
60,o00
E4-7 WALLACE INDUSTRIESCost of Goods Manufactured Statement
For May( in thousands of dol lars)
Direct materials:Direct materials, April 30, 20A.........oPurchases ......,...,.Freight i l l . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . r . r . . . t . .
Direct materials available for use.....t.Less direct materials, May. 31r 2OA...
Dirgct materials consumed ..........DirgCt tabOr.........roo........ i ..r.......o.,Factory overhead:
Indirect factory labor ..............,...r.......Utilities ($f gs r go o/o).............,..,...o..r..Propefi t?,if, ..........r.....,.............r.........lnsuran co ($2O x gO%1..r...,...............r.Depreciation Sl2O + $3O).....
Total factory ovgrhgad,r...r..r.r.......Total manufacturing coSt..........o....r............
Add work in process, April 30, 2OA,...
Less work in process, May 31, 20A.,.Cost of goods manufactured
s5f ot 5
$ zs ,
525
sss323
$ e o1 0 8601 250
s s30260
320
$ t , t 1o150
$1,28O210
$ { . 0 5 0:
Chaptor Iffi
E+8 cll{l{ABAR 69ffiplMfStatement of Cost of Goods SoldFor Year Ended December 31
Raw materials:Purchase3 .........'."
Less dlgcounts on rawmaterials Punchagod .""
Lesg raw materials on handtDgcgmbgr 3{ e 2OA.........""t
Cost of raw materials consumodDirgct labor ...........o."""""""""""r'Factory overheads
Factory mainte na!1co"...............Factory suppllgs used ....""'t""'Powgr and hgat-factofl ......'...'lnsuranco erpense-factorY
building and equiPrllollt...."Dep reciation-factory bullding
and eqUipmgnt .."""""""""Factory superintendence ..........tndirgct factory |abor.........."""'
Total factory overhead ........
Total manufacturing costs-,....--.....-.-.Add work in Process, January 1r 2OA
Less work in Process, December 31t204
Cost of goods manufacturgd....-........Add finished goods,Jbnuary 1r2OA.
Cost of goods available for sale o....-..Less finished goodsr December 3l'
2OA' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o . . . . . t . . . . . . " t " " "
Cost of goods sold ....................o.......
$40o,ooo
4,2OO $ggs,goo
24,0O0s371'8OO
lEo,ooo
s?8,4OO22t4AO19,400
4,8OO
l7,5OO1O0,00020,OO0
222,5AO
$774,3OO. 84,OOO
$858,30O
3O,OOO
$828,3OO37,5OO
s865,80o
. 7O.OQ0
szggJsq
CGA-Canada (adaptedl. Reprint with permission'
Chaptor I
PROBLEMS
P4-1
(rl BRTDGEWELL COMPANYGost of Goods Sold Statement
For Month Ended July 31(in thousands)
Direct materials consumed,...,....... .....r......r...,.D i r g C t 1 a b O f . . . . . . . . r . r . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . r r . r . o . . . . ' r . . r . . r
FactOry ovgrhgad ................ ' ..................................... ' .....r............Total manufacturing cost (a)...............................rr..,....,............Add work in process inventory July 1.......,......,.....,............,........
s7sLgss work in process inventory, July 3'l ..........,.......................,... 25Cost of goods manufacturgd r.....,........r..,r....r...,........o..........,....... 55OAdd finished goods invgntory, July I (b) .............r....................... 20Cost of goods availablg for salg r........r............,.,..........,.....o......... S?OLgss finishgd goods inventory, July 31(G) ................_.-.-.u.r.......... 15Cost of goods sotd ........,......... ' ......r.r....................,..,.....,...r......,.. GCalculat ions:
(a) Costofgoodsmanufactured... . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . .Add work in process, ending
Less work in process, beginning.. . . . , . . . . . . . - . , . . .Equals total manufactur ing cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b)
69
s 1 62420
s601 5
$5025
s75l 5
_999
(c)
Cost of goods available for sa|e.,.,......,..r...o. $ZOLess cost of goods manufactured.. . , . , . . . . . . , . . . 50Equals f in ished goods, beginning . . . . . . , . . . . , , , . . 14
Gost of goods avai lable for safe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ZOLess cost of goods so|d. . . . . . . . 55Equals finished goods, ending gg
' 70
(b) Work In Process a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a l a
a a a a a a a t a a a a a a a a a a a a a a '
Chapter 4
25,OOO
16,OOO2,OOO
29,OOO
24rOOO5,O00
25,OOO
29'0oo
5O,OOO5O,OOO
105,O00105,0OO
55,OOO55rO0o
P4-1 (Concluded)
l2l (al Matefia1S.o..r.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o... . . . . . . .o... . . . . . . . .AccountsPayable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . | . . . . . . . . . .
Factory Ovgrhgad Gontrol ....."""""""""""'Matgrials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r ' . . . . . . . .""""""""""" '
(cl Payrolt ($ZCrOoO +$5'OOO)"""""""""""t""'Accru gd Payro11 """"""""tr"""""D"""'r '
(dl work in Procgss ..............r....r..................... ' .Factory Ovgrhgad Gontrol r""""""""""t"o"
PayrOl l t . . . . . . . " t " " " " " " " t " t " " r t " " " " " " " t "
(e) Finished Goods
18 ,OOO
29,OOO
Work in ProcesS """t"""""""""""""""
(0 Accounts Rgceivabte""""""""""""""""""Sales ($60'000 + (75o/o of $6O10O0)) """'
cost of Goods so1d............................,..o.......Finishgd Goods """"""""""""" ' r"""""
Chapten4
P4-2(11 SCOTTSBURG COMPANY
Cost of Goods Sold StatementFor Month Ended June 3O
(in thousands)Direct materials:
Materials inventory June 1 ........................Purchases........................., ..........Materials avai lable for use.. . . . . . . . . .Less: Indirect materials used.................... S 1
s ls33
s48
Materials inventory June 30... . . . . . . . . 19 ZO
Total manufacturing cost (b)........Add work in process inventory June 1.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less work in process inventory June 30...............Cost of goods manufactured ......Add f inished goods inventory June 1 (c). . . . . . . . . . . . , .Cost of goods available for sale.,Less finished goods inventory, June 30 (d)..........:.Cost of goods so|d. . . . . . .Ga lcu la t ions :
(a) indirect labor + direct labor = $4gindirect labor + (indirect labor x 6) = $49i n d i r e c t l a b o r x T = 9 4 9indirect labor = 37d i r e c t l a b o r = 6 x $ 7 = 9 4 2
(b) Costo fgoodsmanufac tured . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . $120Add work in process, ending gO
sl 50Less work in process, beginning.. . . . . . . . 40Equals total manufactur ing cost. Sl iO
(c ) Cos t o f goods ava i lab le fo r sa le S19OLess cost of goods manufactured . . . . . . . 12OEqua ls f in ished goods, beg inn ing S ?O
s ,t,
$ 17
1 72
1 3 4
s l 14
s1s3
s l27
s l 93
s l s
72
P4-2 (Concluded)
(d) Cost of goods available for sale r...... '..""""'Lgss cost of goods so1d......................,......,..Equals finished goods, ending ..............."""
Chapter 4
33 ,OOO
29,0OO
49,OOO
49,OOO
120,OOO
210,OOO
155,OOO
l2l (al
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
n
Matgf ials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . .Accounts Payable ...,......r.....,.........o..,....
Work in Procgss . . . . . . . . . t r . . . . t t 'o t r " " " " " " " " t ' r " '
Factory Ovgrhgad Gontrol ............................Matgrials . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . ' t """"""""" t"" t"" '
Pay ro l l . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " " " " t t t t " t " t " " t t " " " " " t "
Accru gd Payro11...t..r..""""""""""""""'
WOfk in PfOCgSS . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . ' . . . . . r . ,o . . r . . . . . .
Factory Ovgrhgad Control ....t..r......"""""""Payroll ...............""""""""""""""""""'
Fin ishgd GOOdS.. . . , r r , . . . . . . . r . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . .o . . r . . . . . . . . .
Work in ProcgsS.... . . ' . . . . .""r"""o"""""" '
Accounts Rgcgivabl€... . . . . .". . . . . . . ."""""tt"""Sales ($14o,ooo + (50% ot $14o'o00))...
Cost of Goods So1d...................,....,..ro..........F inishgd Goods . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . """"""""""" '
$1 90{ 5 5
s 3 5
33,O0O
28,OOOI ,OOO
49,OOO
42rOOO7,OOO
12O,OOO
21O,O0O
{55,OOO
- ChaPtar I
P4-3 ,
(11
73
MADEIRA COMPANYSchedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured
For Month Ended March 31
work in process, March I .............r.......r,.......Production costs:
Dirgct matgriats.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $lo4rooo tr
r Direct labor....r.-....." """""""" l6otooo ttt
Factory overhead ..............,......""""""" 8or999 *tt -344t009
Lgss work in procgss, March 31 ............."""'
Cost of goods manufacturgd..-.'....,............... '
r Cost of goods sold ($345,O0O) + ending finished goods inventory($tos,ooo) - beginning finished goods inventory (slo2,ooo) = s348r000.
'rpurchases of materials during March ($l tO,OOO) + beginning materialsinventory (S2O,OOO) - ending materials inventory ($26'000) = SlO4'OOO.
r.' production costs for March ($gCC,OOO) - direct materials ($t Oe 'OOO1 =direct labor and factory overhead ($24O'0Oo).
Letx = d i rect labor1.5r = S24O,OOO
x = $l60'000 direct labor.5x = $8O,OOO factory overhead
(21 Prime cost:Direct materials (requirement (1)) .........,..r.o........, SlO4r0gODirgct labor (requiremgnt (1))....:....,..................... l6OIOOO
_9261poo
(31 Conversion cost:Direct tabor (requirement (1)) ' . . . . . . r . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $160rO0OFactoryoverhead(requirement(1)1.. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . 80'0OO
_9240,999
s 4o,o0o
s384,00036,000
$ a 8 , @ '
P4-4
CompanY A:Salgs " " " " t " " " " " t " t t " " t t t " t t " " t " " " t t t " " " " " t "
Cost ol goods sold:Finished goods inventory Janualy i """Gost of goods manutactlli9d"""""""""
Gost of goods availablo lor sa|e""""""'Finished goods Inventory December 3l
. Cost of goods Sold tt""t'o""t""""t"""t"'
Gross profit l2oo/o Of Sales).o......'..............r.....
GompanY B:' ctst of goods availablg tor 3a1o.,..r.........,......Less finished goods ending inventory""""""
COSI Of gOods Sold "t t"" t""""""""""r""""" '
CompanY C:Sal eS . . . " " " t " ' r t " t " 'o t " " t " " " " " " "o" t1" " " " " " t "
Cost of goods sold:Cost ol goods manufacttlrl9d"""""""""Add bsginning finished goods inventory
Cost of goods availablo lor 8a1e""""""'Less ending finished goods inventory""
Cost of goods Sold """"'o"""""""""""'
Gross profit """"t""""'r""""""""""""""""'
P4-5
S 600,0003,80O,OOO
$4,4oO,ooolr2OO'OOO
51,5{O,OOO_ 2'l o.oooslJggJoo
$ 34O,OOO45,OOO
$ 385,OOO52,OOO
Work in Process
Chaptor 4
s4,oo0,ooo
3,20O,OOO
s Soo,ooo
S 429,ooo
333,OOO
$ 96,000
346,OOO
13 ,OOO55,OOO
2OO,OOO268,N
End.9,Ooo
Finished Goods
Beg.(41
34,0OO348r00O
38Ct,o(toEnd.3O,W
2O,OOO65,OOO
85,O@
End.7S,OOQ
35O,OO0
2O,OOO5O,OOO
70,O@
7,0oo5O,OOO
20O,OOOloo,0oo
357,WEnd.17,@
Beg.ML(2)FOH
Materials and Supplies Accnred PaYroll
(8)(11
259,OOO Beg.
75Chapter 4
P4-5 (Concluded)
Accounts Receivable
54,0005OO,OOO
554,OOOEnd.22,OOO
,Factory Overhead Gontrol
Accounts Payable
77,OOO Beg.(7) (6) 18 ,OOO65,OOO
83,OOO
End.6,00O
2O,00055,00010,00o
2,OOO13,OOOlOO,AOO
(3)
532,OOO
lOO,OOO
55,0002OO,OOO
255,OAO
Payroll Cost of Goods Sold
350,OOO55,00O20O,OOO
255,OOO
(5)
(11l2l(3)(41(51(61rtl(81
Materials issued to production' 55O'OOODirect labor, $2OO,000Total factory overhead' $1OO'0OOGost of goods manufactured, $346'OOOCost of goods sold, S35O,OOOPayment of accounts payable' 577'0OOCol lect ion of accounts receivable, 5532,OOOPayment of Payroll ' S259'0OO
GGA-Ganada (adapted).Reprint with Permission.
Sales
t
1 ,<
76
P4-6
Work in ProcessMaterial8...
Cost ol gOodg SOld ttt"tt""t"""""t""tt""
Add finished goods inventoq/ incl€ase"
Cost of goods manufactllhod..'...'...r..""'Add work in process inventory increase
Total manufagturing cost -....--.-...........o"Less : Factory overhead.t..... $35'OOO
Dirgct t:lbor.......,....o... 4OTOOO
Materials used in manufacturing .,.r,......
Mate r i a l s . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . t . . . t " " " t " " " t t t t t " t " t t " t t t t "
Accounts Payablg .....'.."""""""""""""
Materials ussd in manufacturing(from above| .........o...."r""""""'rt"""'
Add materials inventory increase ....'.....
Matgrials punchasgd ".........""""'r""""'
Payroll ..... ' . ' . ......
l a a a a t a
Chapter 4
84,OOO84,OOO
91 ,OOO9l ,ooo
40,ooo4O,OOO
4O,OOO4O,OOO
35,OOO35,OOO
35,0OO35,OOO
t57,0oot57,OOO
l40,oool4o,ooo
$14o,oool7,ooo
s157,OOO2,OOO
s159,OOO
75rOOO
l_84,OOO
$ 84,OOO7,OOO
$ er,ooo
a a t a - a a a a a a a
Accnrgd Paytoll.......'.........""""""""to"'
Work in ProcgsS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t t " " t " " " t t t r t '
Payro l l . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . " " t " " t " " " " " " " " " t '
Factory Overhgad Gontrcl ......r'.r.t,,.....""""'Va ri o u s C rgd its.'........ "' t " " "" " " "r'r t " " "'
Work in Procgs3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . t " " t 'o " t " t " t t t " r " ' t r
Factory Ovgrhgad Control o..r........ro""""
Finished Goods (12'OOO + 84'OOO + 4O'OOO +35tOOO - 1 4tOOO) ... . . . . . . . . . ."""""""""t
Work in ProcgsS .............'...r"""""r""""
Cost of Goods Sold (28'000 + 157'O0O -45tOOOl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . " t " " t " t " " t " '
Finished Goods ..............
GGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission'
n
(c) Payroll... 86,000'' Accrued Payroll .............. 86,000
Work in Process....................r............................. 6Or5OOFactory Overhgad Contro|..........,.,....,...........,..... 1215OOMarketing Expenses Control ,..............t............., IrOOOAdministrative Expenses Gontrol 5,OOO
86,OOO
92,OOO
26,530
47,33O
188,OOO
241,150
185,5OO(hl Cash !........,r.........,......,.. ZOSrGO2
Sales Discounts,........... ...,...... 4r2igAccounts Receivable........... 212rg2}
(i) Marketing Expenses Control ...,............ 18,oooAdministrative F.xpenses Control 12,OOO
Accounts Payable 3O,OOO
0 Accounts Payable 1O4,OOO
rt
Cash 1O4,OOO
78
P4-7 (Gontinued)
88,25Ol04,o0o
't92,250
212,924
2,25O86,OOO
Materials
Machinery
Chapter 4
9O,8OO
15,5OO92,OOO26,53O3O,OOO,64\030
l / l Bal'(hl
Cash
20,O0O2O8,662
2i28,66236,412
Accounts Receivable
(c)0l
t7,2OO
l /1 Bal '(gl
25,O0O241,15O
26art50
(hl 1/1 Bal . 4O'OOO
53J,3O
Finished Goods
(g) 1B5,5oO
188,O0O
Accumulated DePreciation
111 Bal. 1O,OOO
Accounts Payable
1 t7(0
Bal.
t/ l Bal.(c)(dt(e)
9r5OOl88,OOO
,97,5OO
4,50O6O,5OO82,50O47,330(q4,>e3<t
Accrued Payroll
88,25O 111 Bal.(c)
Sales
104,OOO 1/l Bal .(a)(b)(i)
Retained Earnings
111 Bal. 21,25O
Cost of Goods Sold
(g) 185,5OO I
Payroll
(c)
111 Bal. 1o'ooo I (d)(a) 92,OOO
102,OOO
Work in Process
241,15O
Sales DiscountsI
86,0O0 | (c) 86,OOO
LLLI\
79Clppterl
P4-7 (Concluded)
(b)(cl(d)
(cl(i)
(cl(il
t_I!
I!
II!
b
Administrative Expenses Gontrol
5,O0O12,OOO
17,AOO
Factory Overhead Control
26,53Ol2r5OO
8r3OO47,33tO
(e) 47,330
Marketing Expenses Controf
810oo'l8,0oo2l,ooct
(31 HOPKINS & WHITE COMPANYThial BalanceJanuary 31
Common Stock
CSSh '........AcCOuntS RgCgivabl€...tr..............r............................r......Fin ished GOOdS.. . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r .o . . . . ' . . r . . r . . . . . . r . . . r ' . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . r .
WOrk ln PrOCgSS......... ' .o,.r.,.....,..r ' .......r. ' .... ' .rr. ' .....r........t
Materfals a a a a a a a r o a a a a a a a a a a t t a a a a a a a a a a a a
$ 36 ,41253,23O12,OOO
6,8301 1 r 2 O O4O,OOO
4,258185,5OO
26,OOOl7'OOO
s 60,030l O,OOO6O,0OO21r25O
241,15O
MachineAccounts Papble a a a a a a a a a a a a o a a a a a a a a t a a a a a a t t a a a l a a
Accumulatgd Depreciation....,...,......,,.,.....,....,................Common Stock..,. a t
Retained Earnin a a r a o t a a a a a a a a a a a t a a a a
SalesSalgs Discounts,...,..
1993,430 _$3e2,499
l
Ghapter 25
DfscusstoN QuEsTtoHsezs-1, Porcontago d gral'tl lo ralo b a nrasuro of
cun.nl operating activilirs. Fevenuo produc-liwr, coal incurrcnco, Ind corl control arlrnbodied in lhir ratio. Thr capitatrmploydlumovrr ratr ir ! moa3uro of lhc anrount ofagsol investment rehtivr to tho activhy lcvel clth. cornpany. This rato highlights the succcgso{ adrievirg ealeg vc{urnr with mirimum acsot
' hvcaUnont ard measurcr lhc salesaeneraliqractivity and overafl anscl menagemont.
e2s-2. Capitsl omployed cqrsbtr ol nqrcurrent a$ets( invrstmentr in bui ld ingr , machinrry, andoquipmrnt) ar wrll !r currrnl asrctr. Somtfinnr do ttcrt ur. cuncnt aerr1ts but p6fer rork-ing c-Fital; lhat is, lho nol balsnce of curnntegrtt ard currcnl linbililicr.
Q25-3. Tr+o major objectivet that managemonl mayhavc in mind when setting up a system formeatur ing lhe rc turn on d iv ia ional capi ta lcrngbyed an:(a) lo lecuro a summary msasurc of lho
profilability of operations, products, andlacililies connecled with each divbirn;
O) to obtain hforrnation as to the success oldivision manag.rr in conducting thcir
. portirrr of thc canrpant'c rtivilies.Q25-4. Dpfuncibnal astbnr that managemenl could
lak. lo irnprovc rhorl-term relum on caoitalornpbyed at the expsrse ol bng-run prolitabili-ty hclude:(a) Defer or reduce preventive mainlenarrce,
wh ich reduce l cu r ren l cxpenae bu lt ho r l en r l hc l i l o o f a re e l s , t he rebyircreaa irg I r.rtu rr cosi.
(b) Rcducr cxponditurr on research snddrvclopmcnt, which reduces curronlexpcnr. bul makor thr cornpany lesscanpelilivt h tho luturc.
(c) Rcduco or arrc*J rrnpbycr trainhg anddcvelopment , which reduces currentcxp.nlro bul makcc lhe company lesscqryctiiivo h thr future.
(d) Sell ard then nnt nreded assets, I,ltich9e!s lhcm ofl thc balancc sheet but maycosl the cornpsny rnorc h the bng run.
(o) Deler, reduce, or arcid nrodemizaticn offacil i t ies, rspocially rubstantial inyost-rncnb h eutornaled manulacluring frili-lior, wtrich kecpr asrol cosl on thr bal_anca sheot lotr bU rnalcs thc cornganylcss carpetitivo h tht futurc.
425-5. Uac od lhc rato-o{-rolum-ori-cspilal.emptoyoc,hag the folbwing livr claimod achranlaoes:(a) l l focuses menagemont's atte-nlion on
oaming thc bcst pro{it possible on thecapital (tolal assets) avaihblo.
(b) lt lies lognther the rnany phasos ot fiAan.\-cial phnning. sales cbjrlives, c6l st-trol, and the prolit gnal.
(c) l l aids in detecting the strengthl end.weaknesses wilh respect to lho usr ornonuse of hdivijual assob.
(O h serves as a yardstbk h measurirg por-,fonnance and proviCes a basis lor evalu- aating inprovem€nl ovo, time ard arrstgdivbi:ns.
{o) }t devebps a keener eenge of resoqtsi_. bility and leam eflort in divbisrol ,nan- -
agcrr by enablirg thcm to measurc and. tvaluale their orvn astivilies in he light c/
lhe brdget and with ,Dspecl to thr resuttrachieved by other divisisrsl rnanagors. r'
025-6. The five lrequently encountered limitatbos ofusing the rate-of.retum_on-capilal-employedfollow:(a) lt may not be reasonable to expcct thr v
aame rolum on capital employed lromeach division if the divisions selt thcirrespective products in rne*ets that difler _widely with respect to product develop-menl , compel i l ion, and conrumodrmand Lack ol egreernont on thr gti-mum rale ol rclurn might discourlg. \rrnarugen who believe lhe rate is ret atan unlair level.
(b) Valuatiqrs of assets cil different vintagerin ditferent divisions might givo rito to *comparison diff icuttieg and misundcr-atandings.
(c) Proper albcation ol conrrnon c€lc andassots requi rea dsta i led in format ion Faboul tho budgeted and actual uro ofcofilmon lacilities. Thc cost of kecpingtrack ol guch detaila rnay be higrh.
(d) For the sake of making itrr curiont pcri:a -
rale of relum on capitaf empbycd -lootgood,'managers may be influenced tomEke decisions that are not h thr best _bngl,run hlerests of the firm. Thir prob-l em i s espec ia l l y l i ke l y i l managc r t -expecl lo be in pcitbns for mly a rhorltime belore behg reassignod, thur, por- rvsona l l y avo id ing r cspona ib i l i t y f o r ,lmg-run corsequoncet.
(e) A single moasure of performanco, ruchas rotum on capilal employed, rnay nrult l-in a fixation on improving thc compo.ncnts of the one moasurc to thc neglectof needed at tenl ion lo othor dcai rabbactivilies. product research and dovclop- \trnent, managerial devebpmonl, progror-
. sivc personnel polbict, grood onployoe
688
Chapter 25l 1
moralo, and good custqncr and public
relolbnr arc juol ar irnportanl in oaminga grealcr prc/it and assprhg csltinuourgrowllt
Q25-7. Multiplc pcrformanco moaauro3 aro usod lo
oycrcorno tho limitetkrnl cl r rhgh financialrnasur.. Multpll prrlorrnam tnealut$ PttFvidc central rnanagerncnl with a nprc cornpt"'hensive pictutr ol divisimal prdormancr byconsidering a widcr rangr of managomenlrespansbililie3, nsllinamial activilies ar wellas fiuncbl performancl. Muhiple perfonnancrmcalurcr cen bo der igncd to prov ido anincenlivo to divisimal tnanagon to cnlngo hactivitieo that havo long'lerm bcnlfil lo lhrcompany but which may havo r n lgal ivrimpact on rhort-run protit. Ersmpler includrbaric roaearch, now producl drvrlopmrnl,guality improvcmrnt, produclion innovalion,emp loyee dev r l opmen l , . and new marke ldovelopmcnl. ln additiqr, mulliple moasutcsmiligalr tho problem cil trying to evalualc divFsional performincc on the bagis ol a singleprofil measuro that may be cornputed on diller'enl bsser in each divisicn.
Q25-8. Cornrnan forml of managsmenl incentive csn'pensatbn phnr irclude:
, (a) Co^rh bonuror, whbh erl urually paiJ ina lurrp rum rl thc ond of lhr pcrird andan basod qt a cornbirgtion of ccrpordeporlormancr, individual porformancr,and thr managernenl levol.
(b) Stock bcnusea, wtrbh arc delermined inessentially lho same way a! cash bqtus-ca.
(c) Delrrod canpmsalion, ufibh ir paid incash andor dock ttst do€s ncl vest urdila future perird. In tryno c8ses, tht rnan-agcr io rcguircd lo invrsl annually andthc oqrany rnatchcr lhc stlrbuli<n.
(d) Steh qlinr, whi*t givo thr tnatragor aright lo purcharr rtock al a rrt pricewilhin r rct pcrird Tho hccnlivo b tohclp thr cornpany insrcalr tho marketpricc ol itr clock s! much ar possiblewithh thr oplbo porird
(e) Stek appreciot'ur rigrts, wtri*r art sini-br lo ttck optbru crcopt that thc nran-agcr is not roquired to purchasc rtock,bul ircloed rccoiver an anpunt equal toils apprcciati:n at lho cnd ol a rel perFod.
(t) Prrlormencr rharer. which arc rtockawardl paid to lho rnsnagcr only allerrorrr long*un groal har boen schioved.
Cash and stock borru.r.t ara barrd on oneprri'cd rosultr ard thoroforo provi<Je a rhorl-tcrm irccntivr, ln csdrast,.ctek cptbn!. stock
689
appreciation righls, and pcrlormancc sharlgsro valuabb only if thc cqnpany imprwee htho bng+rn. Since adbns thal resull h shorl-tcrm ?nprovements catl have a negativc lmgrterm irrpact hng-lerm incentiver probabty arcnPrc oltrlivr.
Q2s9. Ttrc basb methods used h pticing irlrcqrpa'nY Itansil96 ar.:(a) trander prbhC basod cr ccl(b) rnatkel-bas€dtranslorPricing(c) cosiflus transfer Ptiing(d) negrctiated kansler pticing(e) arbilrarY transfer Prbhg
425-1o. A markot-baced lranster prico provides anincentive for divisional managemenl lo mini'mize cosir h qder to rnaximize dMsimal prof'
ilr. In csrtrast, e ccl?luc transler pricc pro-vkJcs no incontive tor divisioosl managcmonlto bo coot etlbiont. ln last il lhe ptdit rnartupir a percentago of cosl, there is gubslanlial
incentive to bc inelficienl h order to increasetotal divisicnd PrclfiL
a2s-1 1. (a) Negol'aled lransf er pticing:('t) Advanlage: The profit'center man'agots haYe conl ro l over lho l ranslerprices and can be held responsible lorheir resufting irnpact on profils.(2) Disadvantage: lndividual manageru,in heir endeavor to msximize profits ciltheir om divbbns, may rnekc decisirudelrimental lo thc overall prolil of thelirm.
(b) ArbitrarY lransfer Pricing:(l) Acfvantage: ll'rs Po.ssible for execu'tivo management to eet transfer priceathot will guide profilcenler managors lomake decisisrs that will maximiza totalfirm Profits.(2) Dioadvanlage: The prof i t 'centermanager! do not havc aulhorily in anaree aflecting the prcfil pedonnancr lorwhich they will be evalualed.
CGA-Canada (adapled). Fteprint wilh permis-
rbn.Q25-12. Under the dual lransfer pricing approach' lhe
produchg (selllng) division hcludes a profit hcarputhg itl revenue f rorn irdracornpany caleswh i l e t he consuming (buy ing ) d i v i g i on i rassigned only variablo costs of lhe produchgdivision, plus an equitablo porlion ol f ixedcosts. Thc producing division lhu+ uses- g
t rEngler pr ice thal bel tet measures prr for 'rnanc., whitc tho ccnsuming divisbn has avaiFablc a price more uselul for decisbn'makingpurposos. The producing divisbn's prolil wor.lldbr o l iminated in prepar ing company'widetinsrcbl stalemont3.
690
EXERCISES
SalesGapital employed
Profit s200,000Sales $1,600,000
${ ,6OO,OOO
s2,ooo,ooo
= .125
Percentage ofprofit to sales
Chapter 25
= .8
= . 8 x . 125 = . 1O
E25-l
(11 Capital-emPloYedturnover rato
,^r Percentage oft z t =
profit to sales
t3l Rate ol return on E Capital-employed
xcapftal empfoyed turnover rate
E25-2
(1) Total corporate assetsTotal corporate assets
DivisionRecreational Products....Household Products ..,,,..Comm grcial Too1s.,....,,.,.
TOtal rr. . . . .o.. . .or,. . . tr . . .
DivisionRecreational Products....Household Products ...,..Gommercial Too1s...,..,..,.Ove rall Corporation .,......
(1 )
Saless15,75O,OOO
20,16O,OOO15,435,OOO51r345,OOO
at beginning of the year. . . .o. . . . . , . , . , $ 6S'000'000at the end of the year,..o..,..........o. TOTOOO,O0O
$136,OO0,O00-r- 2
Average total eorporate assets employed during the year $ gg,ooo,oooAssets used by corporate headquarters 8nd not
allocatgd to operating divisions..........r..........o......,...Average assets used by operating divisions during
the year . .o . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . . ' . . . ' . r r . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . r . . . ' . . ' . . . . .o . . . .
(11 (21Total Average Percentage
Assets Used By Used ByAll Divisions Division563,000,000 25eh
63,000,000 4063,000,000 35
j_oo%-
tzl
GapitalEmployed
sl5,75O,OOO25r2OO,OOO22,05O,OOO6g,ooo,ooo
oooo00
E_99p9s999i3)
GapitalEmployed(r) r (21
$15,75O,OOO25,2OO,OOO22r05O,O0O
_$63fOOr0OO
(31Gapital-Employed
Turnover Rate(l) +- (21l .OOO
.800
.700
.755
69ipter 25
E25-2 (Concluded)
l2l(21
(31
DlvlslonffiUonal Prodrrct8.,.,Ho usehold Produetr .......Commg rg!rl Tools........'..Overal I Corporadroll ........
DlvlelonRecreaUonSl Prodtrctl.-.H o usohold Produetr o...-.Commerclal Toob ..oo...-.Overall Co rporatlon .,...-.
or altomaUvoty
DlvislonFlecroadona I P ro.ductr-,H o usohold P roductr Do..6rCommorclal Tools..,-...-.Ovc rall Corporatlon ..,,...,
(11
Proflfs4,725,000
4,032,OO03,85817509,86O,0OO
(11Capltal-Employ.d
TlrmovcrRsta1.OOO,800.700.755
(1)
Pro,fft9f,725,OOO
4,032,0O03,858,76O9,860,O0O
Salcs315,75O,0OO
20, t 60,00015,4iNi,OO051r34lt,OOO
tr)Percontago
of Profitto Salor
,300.2002W.192
(21
CapltalEmploycd
sl5,75O,(XX)25,2OO,OOO22,O5O,OO068,OOO,OOO
(3)Percentago otPmflt to Sales
(11* (2).300-200250,192
(31Rsto of Rehrrn onCapltaf Empfoyed
(1) r (2),300.180.175.1+5
(3)Bato of Return onCapltal Employed
(rl + P),300.160.175.145
-l
(1)
692
825-3
(21 PresentSales (16,000 tons
l2O% x 8O,OOO tons) x $9.)Variable cost
(8OrO00 tons r $4.5O).......,..Fixgd cost. . . . . , . . . . . . , . r , , . , tD.. , , . . . , . r
Total . , , . . . , . . . . . . , r . r , . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . .
rSales price - marketing costs
Proposed:
Sales (8O,OOO tons x $6)Variable costs:
Production... 53.00Marketing.,.. .50
Chapter 25
t
The company must seek to mlnlmlze total @st Since there Is no othermarket for the 64,000 lons, and since the variabfe cost of S4.5O per tonls less than the outside price of $5, the coke-producing profit centerrssupply should be used at least In the short run. In the long run, the S4.SOvarlable cost may change, and the flred cost must be covered whlfe real-lzlng a reasonable roturn on capltal employed. However, the 35 outsldeprice may also change when the contract ls ronegotiated. In determinlngthe transfer prlce for profit-center proflt computatlons, the blast furnacemarulger has a sound basis lor a renegotfation of the transfer price sothat lt ls competitive wlth the $5 external price that ls available.
Revenue Costs
$ 96,000
$ 96,000
$360,OOO40,OO0
s4OO,00O= 5(304,009)
$3,50 x 80,000 tons
Fixed costs:Present.,.,..r.,....... S4Or0O0Proposed......,....,. 60,OOO
Purchase of coke for blastfumace (641000 tons x S5)..Tota| . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . r
9480,000
s19999 -
$28O,OOo
1OO,O00
32O,O00$7OO'O00 = S(220'0OO)
By making the additional investment, the company woutd be better off byS84'o0o (S304,ooo - $22o,ooo), The cost of capital committed to thisinvestment should be considered by management in making a declsionon this proposal. (See Chapter 23.)
693
(1)
Ghapter 25
Ez'5'4
Outsidg supplier CoSt (S1.25 x 1Or00O units).... ' ,,. ' . .... ' ...o...............r. ' .Variable cost to manufacture by Blade Division....... ' . ' . .. ' . .. ' . .r.......... ' .Savings to Dana if the Lawn Products Division punchases from the
Blade Div is ion. . . . . . . r . . . . . r . . . . . . . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . " . . . r . r . . . . ' . . .D. . . . . t . . . . . . t . r
Ace Division should take on the new customer because its gross protit
would be increased by $6001000. Aceb cost to manufacture would be the
same por unit and in total whether they ars sold to Duece Division or to
ttro outside customer (since the quantity is the same)' Thereforer 3rYincrease In sates nevonue would immodiately be translated intoincreased protit for Aco Division-
Sales novenug from nsw customer ($75 r 20,OOO UIlitS! ...... $l '$OOIOOOSatgS noygnuO from DugCg Dlvision D'..r..'....'..........t...........'. 9OOIOOO
InCreaSe In feVenUe and inCOme ffOm OUtSide S319S........'... -$ 6OOtOOO
Initiat amount from new negotiated transfer price
Gl75 X 2OrO00 UnitSl... '.......oo.'o..."o...'..."r.... 'o....".t..... '..
Less manufacturing costs: Variabte cost...... 99OOTOOOFixed cost '... ' ..... 3OO'OOO
l2l
200.oooGroSS prgti t from tranSfer... . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . ' . . ' . . ' . ' . . .r .o. ' . . , .o' . . . . . ' . . .r S 30OtOOO
LOSS aVOidgd On Ofiginal t fanSfef pfiCO... ' . . ' .o. ' . . . . . ' . . . . , . . ' . . . . t . . (3OOtOO0l
Additionat gross profit from proposed transfer prico........'.. l-qOO'Ogg
Initial Unit tfanSfef priCe .r..............,.. '..... '....... '... '... '......o...r. S75Less 112ot average addlUonal gross protit
1112 r (600T000 + 2OTOOO units)),. . . . . . . . . t . . . ' r . . .r.r""""""" l5
Actual transfer price after sptitting the additional grossprof i t , . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' , . ' . . r . . ' . . . ' . . . . ' . . . . . . . ." -S69
E25-5
No, becauso making blades would savo Dana Gompany $2,5OO, determined asfollorvs:
$1,5OO,OOO
sl2,5oo1O,0OO
S 2,500
694
P25-1
(rl
PROBLEMS
TOtal COSI... ' ."r. ' . ' . .............o.....r 'r..o
lncome bgforg Incomg t3r..........,.r,.r,Capftal omployod: Variable .o..t.....r....
Fixgd ............r., '.r..
Total capital employgdro,.,........,,..r
Sa l € S . . . . r . . . . . r r . . . . . r . , . . . . . . r . . . t . r r r . r . . . r .
Variable cost3325,OOO units x S.90.........o...lOO'O0O unlts r $i .95.. . . . . . . . . .
Firgd cost... . . . . . . . . , ,r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,o...TOta I COSt .......... r.t.D.........,..o..
Incomg bgfore incomg tar.........Gapital employed: Variable .......
Firg d.. . . . . . . .o. .Total capital emptoyed.,....o...
Springy Leapy Totals42O,OOO S292,5OO 37t2,5OO$252,O0O
Chapter 25
s202,5OO 3454,5O045,OOO 175,OOO
s247,5OO 3629,5O0
_L l!,opg s 8g,o0g$ 58,5OO $.t oo,5oo
91,5OO 239,5OOst5o,ooo s34O,OOO
s 45,OOO S gg,ooo$150,0oo s34O,0oo
300h 24.40h
SalesVariable cost 2gOrOOO units x $,9O.,
l5O,OOO units r $1.35Fixgd cost....., 13O,OOO
$382,OOO
s_38,o09$ 4z,ooo
148,OOO
_$leg,oog$ gg,ooo$19O,OOO
Rgturn on capltal emp|oyed.....,........ ZOoh
(21 (al lncrease springy producuon and increase Leapy price by $.r5 perunit:
Return on capital employed,.....
Springy Leapy$487,5OO $ZtO,OOO
s292,50O$135,OOO
4O,OOO$175,OOOs 35,OOOs 42,OOO
81 ,5OO
sr2g,sog$ 35,OOO$123,5OO
29.30h
t44 ,5OO$437,oooE50€gg$ 48,750
158,OOO
_S2o6,?so
$ 5O,5OO$2O6,75O
24.40h
Total$697,50O
s427,5OO184,5OO
$612,O0O$ 85,5OO
$ 9O,75O239,5OO
_$33q2sg
$ 85,5OO$33O,25O
25.9Vo
Ch-apter 25
, -5-1(Goncluded)
Springy$487,5OO
s292,5OO
_ 144,5OO$437,O0O
$ 48,750158,OOO
s206,750-
$ 5O,5OOs2o6,750
24.40h
Springys487,5O0
$292,50O
144Jtoos437,OOO
Leapysl95,0oo
$135,OOO31,OOO
$166,000g2ep99$ 39,0OO
8l ,5OO
_999€0o$ eg,ooo$12O,5OO
24.10h
Leapys2oo,ooo
$135,00032,5OO
695
Totals682,5OO
s427,5OO175,5OO
$603,OOO$ 79,5oo$ 87,750
239,5OO$n,25o
$ 79,5OOs327,25O
24.30h
TotalSoaz,soq
s427,50O177,OOO
(bl Increase Springy production and continue present Leapy price:
Return on. capital employed '.." '
(cl Increase Springy producuon and increase Leapy price by 3.o5 per
unit:
SaleVariable cost:
325rO0O units x 3'9O."--.',.....IOO'OOO units x 91 .35...'....,r.
Fixgd COSt... . . . . . .o.. . ' . .""t"t 'o"o"" '
Total COSI.............ot....".""""
lncome before incomg tax.... ' ....
Gapital employed: Variabls o......Fixgd..".. ' .....
Totat capital employed.... ' .., ' .
Sa I gS. . . . . t . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . r . . ' . . . . . ' . . ' r " " t t "
Variable cost:325rOOO units x S.90.. '....,. ' .,.lO0'OOO uni ts x $1'35., . . . . . . ' r .
Fixed cost.......Tota l CoSt ' . . . . . t . . . t . . . .o . . . . r . . t "o to t
tncorne before income tar. '... ' ..-
Capitat employed: VariableFiXed '..... ' . ' . . '
Total capital employed.... ' .....
$167,500- s6o4,5OOs 5o.5oo s 32,5OO $ 83,OOO
$ 48,750 s 4O,OOO s 88'750158,OOO 81,5OO 239'5OO
s2o6,75o s121,5OO 9328'250- - -
$ 83,ooo9sza,z:so
25.30h
Note: Ercluding nonatlocable data understates costs and capital employed, Asan alternate solution, the nonallocablo fixed cost (S28'OOO) and capitalemptoyed (S25,OOO) might bo included in the total f igures, thus highl ight-ing the nonadditive diff iculty that can arise when full allocation is notmade to segments.
$ 5O,5OO s 32,5OOs2O6,75O 9121,5OO
Return on capital employed '..... 24.4oh 26.7oh
-r
\
696
1
P25-2
(1) Contribution margin of sales increase(2,4oo r (3380 - $7o - S37 - S3o - S4s - $rB)1........,..........
Loss in contribution margin on original volume, arising fromdecrease in sales price (15'OOO x S2O).o.......r..,.
Estimated increase in contribution margin and in incomebefore incomo tar if sales price is reduced 5%
(21 Contribution margin frorn sales to WindAir(77 r4OO x ($SO - 9l O.5O - $g - $t O11 .,........,.....,....r,.......,....
Loss in contribution margin from loss of sales to outsiders:Total unit capaci 75,00oSa19stoVtlindAir.....................,..........D,.......-... iZr4OOBalance....,. 57,600
64,OOO
_9,499
Ghapter 25
s432,OOO
3OO,OOO
sl32,oog
s374,1OO
a a a a t a a a a t t a a a t a o a a t a a a a
(3)
Projected sales to outsiders...,.,.
(6,400 x ($f OO - $12 - $8 - $tO - $6)).,....,.,............,.......Estimated decrease in compressor Division contribution
margin and in income before income tax if windAirb needsarg Supp l ied . . . . r t ' . . . . . t . . r . . r . . r ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o . r . . . r . . . .o . . . ' . r . r . . . . r . . . r . . . . . .
4O9,6OO
s 35,500
The Gompressor Division would find it desirable, from its own viewpoint,to accept orders from WindAir above the 64rOoO-unit outside customerdemand level, up to its 7s,ooo-unit capacity, because there would be aposit ive contr ibut ion margin of $Zf .SO per unit .
Gost savings by using units from Compressor Division;Outside purchase price r..............................r..,.,...., S zo.ooGompressor Divisionb variable cost to produce
Gl1o.5o + $B + $10).....r.o... . r r r r a r a a a t a
Sav ings per un i t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r ' . .o . r . . . r . . . . . ' . ' , . . . . r . . . r . . . . r . . . . . . , . r . . . . . . . . r . . .Numbgr o f compressor : i . . . . . . . . . r , . . . . . . , . . . . r . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . r . . . , , , . . . . . , r . .
Total cost saviD$s' . . . . , . . r . . . . . . , r r ! . . ,D.. . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . r . .Less Compressor Divisionb lost sales to outsiders
{614OO x $64 (see requirement 2})}.....,,.......,,,,.....,,......t......Increase in income before income tax for Nationat tndustries
The decision shoutd be based on what is best for the total f irm. lt wouldbe in the best interests of National Industries for the GompnessorDivision to sell the units to the WindAir Division. The net advantage toNational Industries is $312,5oo, as shown in the above cafcutations.Since each division is evaluated based on its profits and return on divi-s ion investment, the expectat ions for the two div is ions shoutd be adjust-ed because of tho ef fect of th is decis ion on indiv idual d iv is ionat perfbr-mance.
28.50s 41 ,50r 17 ,4OO$722,1OO
4O9,60O
_$312,5O0
Cr.qpter 25 699
> -5-4
(1) Based on variable manufacturing cost to produce the cushioned seat and
the Offics Division's opportunity cost, tho transler price is 911869 for a1OO-unit lot or $18.69 per seat, computed as follorvs:
Vafiabte COSt,....,.o.... '.... '.................... ' Slr329Opportunity cost"'or""""""o"""""""' 54O
Thansfgr price........"""'o"""""'o""'o"' 91t899'
This transfer price was derived as follows:
Variable Gost:Gushioned Material:'
Padding.... .r. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . .".- '- .-. .D.r. 'r 32.40Vinyl ' t . . . . . .o... . . . .r." ' ."""" 'o""""""" ' 4'0O
Tota lcushionmater ia l . . . . . - - - r . . . . , . ' . ' . . S6.40Cost increass l lO%r. . - . - . . . r . - . . ' . , " . . . . . x l '1O
Cost of cushiongd seat.,.................,.......,. '.... '. '.. I 7.04Cushion fabrication labor cost
[$7.5O r .5 DLH].., . . . . . . .r.r. ,r. , . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . , , . , . . . . . . , . 3.75
Variable factory overhead'($5.0O per DLH x .5 DLH)............ '..........""""'
Total variable cost per cushioned seat.... '..-r...-..2.50
913.2es l ,329Total variable cost per 1O0-unit lot....
'Variable overhead for 3O0,OOO hours:SU p p l i eS . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . r ' . rD . . . ' . . . . r ' . . r . . . , .o . . . . . . r . .
lnd i rgCt labOr . . . . r . . ' . . . ' . . r . . ' . ro . . . . . . ' . . ' . ' . . . ' . r . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . .o . ' . .. P O W e f a a r a a a a . r a a a a i . a a a a . . r o a . a r r a . r a r o a r . . r a . . r a . . . . a . . t t t l . . t t . . . t . . . t t t . t t .
Employeo benefits:2Aoh of direct labor and indirect labor (excludingzooh of supemisors' salary which is a fixed cost)(S575rO0O - (2O% r $25Or000)) ........ '.... '...... '. 'r.......
Total variable overhead at 3OO'OO0 direct labor hours
42O,OOO375,OOO18O,OOO
525,OOO
slEoo,oooVariable overttead per DLH
($l15ooroo0 + 3o0rooo DLF4...,,...o.,.o,...,. '.... '..r... '. 35.oo per DLH
\1
700
P25-4 (Goncluded)
Opportunlty cost
7.504.00
s33.30 $25.76
Chapter 25
.8 hour
125 stools
EconomyOfficeStools41.60
s15.84x 125
Labor hour constraintLabor hours to make a 10O.unit lot of defuxe office
stools (1.5o DLH r 1(x) unlts)..... '. '..,........r..,.,.. 1so hoursLess labor hours to make a loo-unlt ]ot of
cushioned seats (,5 DLH x 100 unlts)......,.,,...., SO hoursLabor hours avallable for economy office stoor ,,, J66 ho,roLabor hours required to make one economy
of f icg stool . . r . r . . . r . . r . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r ' . r . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . r . . .
Use of extra labor devoted to economy office stoolproduction (100 hours + ,8 hour)....,.D...o.r.,.,,..o.
Selling price per unit......,......., ,...,.,....,...Less manufacturing costs:
ss8.50
Matgr ia ls ' . . . r . . . . " ' . . . . ' . . . . r t r . . . . . . . . . 'o. . . . . . . . . . . , . . , .o. . , . . $14.s5 S15.76Labon (S7.50x 1 '5 DLH), . ' . . . . .o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . 11.2s
($z.so x .8 DLH) .....,.,..o...,..,,. 6.oeVariable factory overhead:
DeluxeOfficeStool
s2s.20x1OO
$2,520 -Sl,ggo
(21
Opportunlty cost of shifting production to theeconomy office stool ($Z,S2O - $t,gg0),...,...... t g4O
variable manufacturing cost plus opportunity cost woutd be the besttransfer price system to use because lt woufd allow the supptying divi-sion to be indifferent between selling the product internatly io anotherdivision or selting the product in thelxternal market This transfer pricemethod assures-that the supplying division's contribution to profit woutdbe the same under either alternative. The sum of fhe variable manufac-turing cost and the opportunlty cost repnesents the effort put forth bysupplying division to the overalt weil-being of the company.
appropriate transfer price must attempt to futfitf the companyobjectives of autonomy, Incentive, and goal congruence. while no onetransfer price can necessarity satisfy each of these objectives fully in atlsituations, the variable manufacturing cost ptus opportunity cost transferprice should be the most appropriate method for meeting these obfec-tives in most situations,
ChaPter 25
j-5
701
ln order to marimizd shod-run contribution margin' the cole Division
silouro sccopt the contract from wares company. This conclusion is sup'
ported by the following calculations:
Colo Division transfer to Diamond Division
ff i 'ooounitsr$1,5oooach}.. ' . ' . ... ' . .. ' . ....... $4'5OO,OOO
(rl
Variable cost:Purchaso from BaYrside Division- -fgrooo
units x $iloO oach) ......"""""' $l t8ootOooVariabte processing cost In Cole Division--(Crooo'unlts
x$sbo each)....."""""" l '5o0'oo9
Gole Division sales to Wales 9ompanyeach)o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . - . . t$4 '375 'ooo
Variable cost:Purchase from BaYside Division
(3,5OO units x $5OO each)..,..,...."""'Variabte processing cost in Gole Division
" (3r5oO units r $400 gachl ....""""""Contribution margiJl .."""""'o""""""""r $1,225,ooo
$1,20o,ooo1.225,OOO
$ 25,OOO
Gontribution margifl . ' ...............
3,3OOr0OOsl,20o,ooo
sl,75O,OOO
l,4oo,o0o 3r15O'OOO
Conclusion:contribution margin from transfer to Diamond DivisionContribution margin from sales to Wales Company """"Difference in favor of Wales Company contract"""""""
*{- \
t !i
702 Chapter 25
P25-S (Goncluded)
l2l Cole Divisionb decision to accopt the contract from Wales Company is inthe best Interest of Robert Products Inc. because the decision increasesthe overall corporationb contribution margin. This conclusion is support-od by the following cafculations:
RevenuEs and cost savings to Robert Products Inc.:Sales by Cole Division to Wales Gompany
(3r50O unlts r $1r25O 9ach1................o. 34r375rOOOSales by Bayslde Division to london
Company (3r0OO units r $COO oach)..... t ',2oO,OoOCost savings (variable costs avoided by not
accepting the Diamond Division order):Bayside Division's savings
(3r00O units r $30O each) .D.,..,.r... 9OOTOOOCole Divisionb savings
(3rO0O units r $50O each) .. .ro.,. .o,. i TSOO,OOO $7rg75,OOOErpenditures incurred by Roberts products Inc.:
Variable cost incured for the WafesCompany ordenCola Divislon (3r5OO units r $400 each) $i,4oo,oo0Bayside Division (3,500 units r $25O
OaCh) . . . t . . . . r r .o r . . . . . . r . . . . . . . .o . r . . . . . . r . . .D . . . . . ; 875rOOOVariable cost incurred for Diamond Division
purchase from London Company(3,OOO units r $ir5OO each).. . . . , . , . . . . . , . . . . 4,SOO,OOO
Variable cost incurred for London Companyorder from the Bayside Division(3'OOO units x $ZOO each)... . . . .o... .o. 'r jooo 600,000 7,375 ooo
PosiUve overall contribution margin for RobertProdugts 111G... . . . . . . ' . . . . r . . . . . ' . . . r . . . . r . rr , . . . . . . r . , . . r rr . . , . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6oOrOOO
703. ChaPter 25
CASES
c25,-1
(rl The return on capital employed has definite limitations for evaluating tho
performanco ol ths Dexter PlanL Too many fastors used to compute the
return are not within the control of plant managemenl A significant pon
Uon of the "return''gide of the measuno ls determined by the action of
higher tevel managament-+ales and allocated costs. The plant manage-
ment appsars to have effestive control ovor only a part of the costsincurred at the ptant levet, and the same Is true for tho asset baso.Corporate and dirislon assets are altocated to tho plant' In additionr it
appears that specific assets rnay be charged to the ptant qven though
tho decision was made at a higher level'
l2l The case states that recommendations lor promotions and salaryincreases for plant manageni are influenced by the cornparison of the
budgeted return on capital emptoyed to tho actuai return. lt appears that
this ptant manager is reacting in direct response to this measunementsyrstem. T\ro evJnts have occurred outside his control (the sales declineand extra tand charges|, which will reduce his return on capital employedmeasure. He has responded by influencing those components of themeasure that he controts and that will improve this measure. Thered uced costs-traini n g, maintenance, ne pair, and certain labsr-wo uldnot affect sales volume in the short run. lt is also likely that reduction of
inventory tevets will not inftuence the sales in the short run. Throughthese actions hs has improved his return for 2oA, but it may well be atthe erpense of 2oB, or later Yea|:i.
c25-2
(11 Tho shortcomings, or possible inconsistencies, of using rate of return oncapital employed as the sole criterion to evatuate divisional managementperformance include the following:i") Rate of return on capitat employed tends to emphasize short-run
performance at the expense of long-run profitability. In order toimprove short-run profits, managers may make decisions that arenot in the best interest of tho company over the long run.
(bl Rate of return on capital emptoyed is not consistent with cash llowmodels used lor capital oxpenditure analysis and, therefore, ffiaYnot be comparabto for divisions that uso different accounting meth-ods or that havo assets purchased in different periods.
(c) Rato of return on capital employed may not be controllable to thssame ertent by al l division managers, i ,e., the divisions may sel l indifferent markets with different degrees ol product development'compeUtion, and consumer demand.
t \
: Va
* - \
:
704 Chapter 25
C25-2 (Concluded)
(d) The use of a single measuro of performance, such as rate of returnon capital employed, may result in a firation on improving the com-ponents of the ono measure to the neglect of needed attention toother desirable acUviUes-research and development, employeedevelopment, and improvement ol market position.
l2l The advantages of using mulUple measures ii evaluating divisional man-sgement performance include the following:(al Multiple performanco measunes provide a mone comprehensive pic-
ture of performance by considering a wider range of managementresponsibilit ies.
(b) Multiple performance moasunes emphasize nonquantitative as wellas quantitative aspects of performance, thereby providing an incen-tive for divisional managers to engage in desirable activities, suchas, research and development, employee development, andimprovement of market position, as well as to seek profitability.
(c) Multiple performance measunes will mitigate the problem of tryingto compare divisional perforrnance with a single measune that maybe computed on different bases in each division.
(d) Multiple performancs measunes include long-term as welt as short-term incentives, thereby emphasizing total performance rather thanjust short-term profit maximization,
(3) The problems or disadvantages of impfementing a system of multipleperformance measures include the following:(al The measurement criteria are not all equally quantifiable and, there-
fore, it may be difficult to compare the overalt performance of onedivision with another.
(b) Central managernent may have difficutty applying the criteria on aconsistent basis. Some criteria may be subjectively more heavilyweighted than other criteria at different points in time, and somecriteria may be in conflict with other criteria.
[c] A multiple performance measurement system may be confusing todivision managen;, thereby resulting in diffusion of effort and insta-bility in performance.
705i cnapter zs
,3
(r) (al Avorage oporating assets omploved:Batance at 12131120F"""" """r"
Balance' at 12131 l2OE (512'600'000 / 1'05)" " """ 'r
Beginning Plus ending balances
Average batanco ($24'600'000 * 2l'
Rate ol return oncapital emPloYed
Ineome trom operations before taxes
@issetsemPloYed
$2,460,0OO
$12,goo,oooI2TOOO'OOO
$24r600,OOO
$t 2,3OO,OOO
$lZrgOo,ooo= 2ooh
(bl Income from operations bgfore taxgs o,..il.'D.."'r.rt'..'.
Minimum return:$12,30O,ooox 15oh
s 2,460,000
1r845,OOOAverage operating assets employodGharge for invested capital '..--...'...'..
(31
ReSidUal inCOme. . . r r r . .o r . . . r r . . . . r r . .o . . . . . . . . . . r .o . . . . . . . . ' . r . ' . . . . . $ 615,ooo#=:
Yes. Presserb management probably wOuld have accepted the invest'
ment lf residual income wenB used. The investment opportunity wouldhave lowered presser's 2OF rate of return on capital employed becausethe expected return (16%) was lower than the divisionls_ historical returns(f 9.3% to 22.1o/") as well as its actual2OF rale (2Ooh). Managementreiected the investment because bonuses ane based in part on the rate
of return performanso measure. lf residual incomo weno used as a per-
formance measuno (and as a basis for bonusesl' managemont wouldaccept any and all investments that wsuld incroase rssidual income (i.e.'
a doliar amount rather than a pencentagel, including the investmentopportunity i t had in 2OF'
presser must controt atl ltems related to protit (revenues and expenses)and investment if it is to be evatuated fairty as an investment center byeither the rate of return on capitat employed or the residual income per'formanco measunes. Presser must controt all elements of the businessexcept the cost of invested capital, which is controlled by LavvtonIndustries.
706
c25-4.
(r)
1
Chapter 25 i
: - \; f
Divisional plofi t . . . . . .-. . .r. . . . . . . . . . . . .orr.. . . .o... . . . . . . .
Add corporate headquarters allocatiolt ......
Residual incomo
($oOo omitted)Marine Airline Plastics
$ 5,1OO S1,O5O $ 9,3603,4sO lfsq s70
j_gg gr,r* $ r,roAdiusted divisional profit
Divisional capltal employed. s2O,4OO s5,0OO S36,OOODeduct corporate headquarteni allocaUon 970 252 941Adjusted divisional capltal employed .......,. _9!9,430 g!,?49 J35,999Adiusted dlvlslonal rate of return on capltal
employed _!:q"n_ _ 47% ____Ze%
_$ 8,550 $2,235 S 9,930Adjusted divisional proLess 20oh of adiusted divisional capital
employed (minimum level of income).. 9503,886
-gl'664
7,O12
t2l
(31
s l ,285 S 2 ,918
All three divisions have a reported rate of return on capital emptoyed inoxcess of the 2Oo/o target rate. However, Marine Division managementapparently turned down its Investment opportunity because tho invest-ment had a lower rate of return than the division (24oh for the investmentyersus 25oh for t:lls division|, which if accepted would havE lowered thedivisionb rate lor the year, thereby lowering the annual bonus. Similarly,Airline Division management appears to have avoided fleet replacementtor the samo neason (i.e., fleet replacement rEturn is 16% versus 21oh lorthe division for the year). Plastic Divisionb management has achievedthe marimum bonus allowable under the current bonus system andtherefore had no incentive to increase profit (which may have beenviewed as something that could simply increase next yearb budget). Thelevised liguras indicate that all three divisions are performlng welt; how-ever' Marine Division's residual income is greater than the other two divi-sions combined.
Airline Division ls making an adjusted profit of $2,235,OOO and residualincome ol $1'285'OOO. The adjusted rate of return on capital employed is47oh, which suggests that the target rate should be rovised in order toproperly evaluate it. Nevertheless, since the division is achieving monothan double the present target rate of 2Ooh and more than either of theother two divisions, it appears to be a very good investment. Howover,fleet replacement should be examined along with the computation ol anew adjusted rate of return on capital employed and residual incomg,Assuming that the $25,OOO,OOO capitat investment does not inctude anycorporate headquarters allocation and that the otd fixed assets have abook value equal to market value, tho recomputat ion fol lows:
n*^
707Chapter 25
(41
l
-4 (Concluded)
lnCfgm gntal diViSiOn pf0fit o........'........r......r..'...r'...."o""'
Add COfPOfato he adqUafte fS all OCaUO Jl'....',"""""""oo""
AdiU5tgd InCfgmental diViSiOn pnOfit r.'...r..............'......."
Ad-d adiustod divislonal profit without fleet replacemsnt
Adjusted divisional profit with fleet replacefllsllt'..i.....'..
DiViSiOn CUfnont aSSOt3...r '..-o.....r. ' ..t............t...t.......tttt"t
DiViSiOn llXed aSSOtS (tleet feplagemgnt COSI}""""""""'
Adtusted divislonal capital employed with fleetnOplaCOm€J1t..r. . . . . .- . . . . . . . .D... . .r .ro.oo..r. . . . . . . . . . . . . t t . . . . . . . . t . . . . .
Adiusted rato of noturn on capital employ€d"""""""'ro"
AdjUSted diVisiOnal pfOtit ' . . . . . . .r"..r.o'. . . . . ' . , ' .ro... .D.' . . . . . . . . . .dt
Less zlohof incrgmgntal capital gmploygd'.'.................
AdiUStgd InCfgmgntal fgsidUal inCOme.. ' . . ' . . . . . . ' . . . . . . .r.o..o..
$ 4,ooo,ooo135,OOO
$ 4r135,ooo2,235|OOO
$ 6,370,000$ 2r748,ooo
25,OOO,OOO
E?ulgfoo230h
$ 6,370,0005r549,600
s__82o49
(5)
Even when adjusted, the rate of return on capital omployed is abovethe corporate target level and the incremental residual income is posi-
tive. Furthermore, assuming that profits do not fall in the future' theroturn on assots employed should rise in the future because the amountof assets employed witi Oeclino due to depreciaUon. As a result' itappoans that from a quantitative perspective tho airline should not besoid. Nevertheless, the investment required to replace the fleet shouldbe evaluated using ono of the capital expenditure evaluation techniquesthat considers the time valuo of money (e.9., the net present valuemethod or the discounted cash flow rate of return method).
Frorn a qualitative perspective, factors such as spill-over businesstoffering a futl line to customers, ulUmato profitability vvhen the economyimprovls, possiblo advantags to a competitor from tho sate of the divi-sion, €tc,, may override quantitative analysis.
Tho bonus schemo should bo basod on nesidual incomo rather than rateof return on capital employed in order to avoid the problem of manageF;making suboptimal decisions from the corporationb overall perspective.
The divisional performance measures should be computed without allo'cations of corporate headquarters costs or assets, because such alloca-tions are arbitrary and divisional managers cannot control such costs orthe uss of such assets. Also, capital investments (such as the ones facedby the Marine Division and the Airtine Division) should be evaluated byusing the capital budgeting evaluation methods (such as the net presentvalue method or tho internal rate of return method)'
CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with pei-mission'
7
708 Chapter 25 i
c25-5, .
(l) Generaf crfteria that should be used in selecUng psrformance measunesto evaluate operatlng managors Includo tho following:(al The measunes should be controllable by the manager and reflect the
scfions and docisions made by the managor in the current period.(bl The measunes should be mutually agreed upon, clearly understood,
and accepted by all the parties Involved.(c) The measunos should (ll reward long-term performance; (2) tie
incentive compensation to achieving strateglc (nonfinancial) goals,such as target market share, productivity levels, improvement inproduct quallty, product development, and personnel developmengand (3) evaluate opsraUng profits before gains from financiaf trans-actions; before deductions for approved erpenditures on researchand development, quality fmprovements, and preventive mainte-nance; and before deductions for the ifcremental amount of accel-erated depreciation,
(21 A major expansion of Star Paperb plant was compfeted in April, 2oA.Thls erpansion included addiUons to the production-line machinery andthe replacement of obsolete and fully depreciated equipmenl As aresult, the value of the divisionb asset base increased considerably.Whlfe productivity undoubtedly increased during the first year in theerpanded plant, the increaso was not immediate nor sufficient to offsetthe Increase In the value of the capital employed,
(3) .Apparent weaknesses in the performance evaluation pnocess at Royal
Industries include the following:(al There was no mutual agreement on the use of return on capital
employed as the only measurement of perforrnance.(bl The feedback from Fortner was insufficient Fortner indicated that
Harris would receive feedback about the questions raised concern-ing the appropriateness of using the return on capital employed toevaluate performance, but feedback was not prtrvided.
(c) There is only one single measure of performance that may give adistorted picture of actual performance at Star Paper. A single rtoa-suro could oncourage division management to make decisions thatcould lmprove short-run return at the expense of long-nrn profits.Examples include deferring maintenance, avoiding plant moderniza-tion, eliminating employee training, discontinuing research anddevelopment, etc.
(4) Multiple performance evaluation criteria woutd be appropriate for theevaluation of the Star Paper Division. The criteria suggested by Harristake into account more of the results of the key decision being made bythe manager' ang not in conflict with each other, and emphasize the bat-anco of profits with the control of current assets. These thrse measunesare controllable by division managers and, in conjunction with return oncapital omployed, provido a mono complete picture of business success.
\*
.Chapter 25
,-('
(1)
709
The 2oB bonus pool available for the management teams of each divisionfollow:Meyera Service Company
Bonus Pool = l0oh r income belore income tar and bonuses= .1O I S417,OOO= S41r7OO
Wellington Products lnc.Bonus Pool = loh r (Revenue - Cost of Product|
= .01 I ($10,0001000 - $4,95010001= .Ol I $5r05Or0OO= S50'5OO
TVyo of the advantages and two of tho disadvantages to Renslen Inc. ofthe bonus pool incentive plan at Meyers Seruice Companl follow:Advantaoes(al The management team will bs moUvated by tho bonus plan because
they have the opportunity to earn addiUonal compensation lf theywork hard as a team and take some risks for the company.
(bl Because management sharos in the benefits of efficient operations,there is an incenUve to control all costs (product costs as well asoverhead costs) and to promote sales.
Disadvantaqes(al The plan may rnotivate management to increase tho rbottom line"
only and concentrate on the short run. The pfan may encouragemanagers to sacrifice quality or avoid new product development forthe sake of curent profits.
(b) Management may postpone necessary expenditunos such as main-tenance or nessarch and development in order to increase currsntnet Incomo.
TVvo of the advantages and two of the disadvantages to Renslon Inc. oftho bonus pool incentivo ptan at Wellingrton Products Inc. follovnAdvantages(al Tho management team will be motivated by the bonus plan because
each manager has the opportunity to earn additional compensationby working hard and taking some risks for the company.
(bl The managers wifl be encouraged to sell the most profitable mix ofproducts.
Disadvantages(al The plan omits accountability for all costs except lor production
costs. Therefore, manager:i may leel no obligation to control thecosts that aro shown below tho gross profit line.
(bl The ptan may cause managers to focus all energies to maximizingcurrsnt sales and production regardless of the impact this couldhave on the manufacturing planL There is a strong motivation todefer maintenance, employee training, quality improvement, etc.,because the incentive is to produco and sel l high volume.
(21
7lo
C25-G (Goncluded)
Chapter 25 :
(3) (a) Having two differont incontive plans lor the two operating divisionscoutd result In behavioral problems and may reduce teamwork/syn-
'
ergy between the two divisions if the managers of either divisionbelieve they are belng trsated untairly. '
Themanagement teamatMeyersServ icomaybe| ievethat theyhavo to work harder to achieve their bonusos because they areresponslble for all costs and must achieve overall efficient opera-tions to earn substantial bonuses.
The management team at Wellington Products may believe thatthey have less of an opportunlty to affect the size of the bonusesthey receive because onty changes in sales and/or product costswill increaso the gross ProfiL
These perceptions of Ineguity coul4lead to decreased motivationthat could'result in decreased divisional performanco,
(b) In order to justlfy having dlfferent IncenUve plans for the two divi-sions, Renslen management could argue the foflowing:(f l The goals and products of the two buslnesses are different(one is a servlce organization while the other is a manufacturingorganizationl and, therefore, should be measured on different crite'ria. For example, the control of manufacturing costs and improvedproductivity may be the most important factor in maintainingWellington Prcducts'competitiveness, while lt may be critical forMeyers Service to control all costs to maintain profitability.(21 The plans weno In place when the businesses were acquiredand had proved satisfactory previously.
\
Chapter 25
'>-7
(rl
7 f l
ln termg ol what is best for the total company in the long run, omar prob'
aUty gt,ould not supply Defco with Electrical Fitting X1726 for ths 55 Per
unii pri"". In this ;s;, I appears that Omar and Defco 6erve different
miriets and do not represent closely related operating units. Omar oper-
ates at capacity; Defco does not. No mention is made of any other inter-
divisionat business, In the long run, Gunnco Gorporation is probably bet-
ter served lf omar is permitted to continue dealing with its regular cus'
tomers at the market price. lf Delco is having difficulties, the solutionp-uiury doeg not lie with temporary help
"! !f" sxpenso of another divi'
iion, *ttos" gales to regular custorners could be lost' The purposed
courso of acuon should not be toltowed unless it will yield a greater long-
run pront for the total company (Gunnco) T"n will any o-ther alternative.
Gunnco would be $5.5o better oif, in the short run, if Omar supptied '
Defco Electrical Fitting 11726 tor $5 and sold the brake unit for 949'5O'Assuming that the $s ier unit for fixed factory overhead and administra-
Uve erpensos r"pr"r"nts an allocation of tho costs Delco incurs, regard-
less of the brake unit order, Gunnco would lose $2.50 in cash flow for
oach fitting sotd to Defco, but would gain $B from each brake unit sold
by Defco.ln tha short nrn, there ls an advantago to Gunnco of transferringEfectrical Fitting 11726 at the SS price and, thus, selling the brake unit
for $49.50. To ilafe this happen, Gunnco witt have to overrule the deci-
sion ol Omarb managomenl This action would be counter to the purpos-
es of decentralized decision making. lf such action wens necessary on a
regular basis, the decentralized decision making inherent in the division-aliied organization would be a sham. Then the organizational structure is
inappropriate for the situation.On the other hand, if this is an occurnence of relative infrequency' tha
intervention of corporate management will not indicate inadequate orga-nizational structuro. lt may, however, create problems with division man'agements, tn the case at hand, if Gunnco management requires thatElectrical Fitting 11726 be transferred at $5r the result will be toenhance Defcob operating resutts at the sxpense of Omar. This certainlyis not in keeping with the concept that a managerb performance shouldbe measured on tho results achieved by the decision he or she controls.Omar is operating at capacity and wouid lose S2.5O (S7'5O - 35) for each -titting sold to Defco. The management performance of Omar is measuredby reiurn on investment and doitar profits. Selling to Defco at 35 per unitwould adversely affect thoso performanco measures'
f
l2l
( l
7
r t a t t a a a a a a
=.,h
I
b
712
c25-8
(1)
Chapter 25
Thc Lorar Elegtric Company wlll earn higher profits lf the necessary int.gratod circutts $Cs) aro sold to the Systoms Division rather than to regu-lgr customors. Ttrel improved proftt will be $l.OO per clock system asrhown belor*
Contrlbutlon margln from clock gystem:Propoged galea prlcc $7.50
i
5.2s
Less varlablo ProducUon costs:Intcgrated clrcutts 1C378 (5 O S-f q ..-.-.-..-'Outsldc oompono11t8 "...."........."'o"""""""Clrcuh bOard otchlng.'...D.....D...'.......oD."'.."'Argemb$ tesUng, iackgglnlf "'.'.-..'F......--
ContrfbutJon margin por'unlt on clock systemContrlbution margin forgone In Devices Division:
Salgg price of lC 378..........',..r.',....o..'.......'D.D..Variabl g production costs..'.'r....D..'......-.'.'.,.....CorrtrlbuUon margin per clrcult...Dr.D.'..o..'...'.'..Unlts tor clOck Eystem....r.'F"...'.'......".o.'D.......Co ntrl b utl o n m a rg | !l I o9t..'. -....... r.. r....... o o.. r.'....
Net advantagc to Lorax Company lf clock systemle producgd by Sytstems Dlvlsion..r""..D,...r'....r
$ '752.75
,401,35
s2.25
$ .ao, 15 ' r - .
$ ,25r5
1,25
$l.OO/unit:
f2) lnteruention by cxccutivo msnagsment generally ls not advisable' oxceptIn unugual clrcumstances, becausc h takes ayt ay the delegated decisionpowor glven to dlvision management and influences the measunes usedto ludgc the pcrfornancc of dlvlsion managemenl h conflicts withI m portant objectivce of decentralizaUo n-division auton o my ovor o p erat-Ing declalons and doclslons made by those closest to the operatingrccnc. Such lnterfercncc cgn rcsult in lower moralc and poorer perfor-mancc by dlvlslon mansgement because they will be evaluated uslngmoaauncs that arc not substantlally within their control. However, a divi'clon should ns,t bo allowed to make a decislon that ls not in the bestInterest ol thc total compsny oyor tre long nrn.
Thc descrlbed policy would avoid the need lor lntervention by erecutivemsnsgsmont or an arbiffiion committee, Howeyer, the polisy is undesir'abfe becauac other unfavorable consequsnces outweigh this benelit.With thc described policy, there would be no analysis to determine themost profitable use of an ltem raquired to be transferred at variable cosLIn sddltion, e division manager would have less control over the divisionboperaUons, and there would be an "uncontrol lable' inf luenco on themanagerb porformanco moasure; this could result In lower moral tormsnagora.
a
; f3)i