Upload
ngokhanh
View
226
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Solar Resource Measurementsand Satellite Data
4th Sfera Summer School 2013
Hornberg Castle, Germany
Dr. Norbert Geuder CSP Services – Almería – Cologne
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 2
1) Introduction
2) Fundamentals on Solar Irradiation
3) Variability of Irradiation
4) Irradiation Sensors
5) Sensor calibration and measurement accuracy enhancement
6) Satellite Based Assessment
7) Outlook / Summary
Outline
Selection of promising sites
Long-term time series(>10 years)
Meteorological Station:Accurate irradiation data
+Irradiation map: spatial distribution Geographical data: land use, etc.
Plant design, inter-annual variability, uncertainty analysis, financing, …
GIS analysis
General Procedure at Solar Resource Assessment
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 3
Solar Resource Assessment for CSP Plants
• Direct Beam Irradiation data required for CSP Applications
• Usually not available in suitable sunny regions in the world
• Accessible via measurements or derived from satellite data
Restrictions:
– Measurements: expensive, long duration, not for the past
– Satellite data: high uncertainty (≈ 10 % or more)
• High accuracy required for DNI with long-term performance
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 4
not global irradiation – this is quite a difference!
Impact of Solar Resource Uncertaintyon CSP Plant rentability
Annual DNI
Annual expenses
(redemption, O&M, …)
Electricityproduction
DNI uncertainty(e.g. ±10 %)
Earningsexpected long-term value (100%)
Losses
Irradiation uncertainty decides over project realization !
With thoroughly performed measurements an accuracy of approximately 2 % is achievable.
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 5
Fundamentals on Solar Irradiation
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 6
Solar Constant
Mean solar irradiance (flux density in W/m²) at normal incidence outside the atmosphere at the mean sun-earth distance r.
1367 W/m²
Calculation:
Luminosity of the sun: L = 3.86 x 1026 WAstronomical unit: r = 149.60×109 m
1320
1330
1340
1350
1360
1370
1380
1390
1400
1410
1420
0 90 180 270 360Ir
radi
ance
Out
side
Atm
osph
ere
(W/m
²)
Day of Year
Annual Variation of Solar Constant
22 13674 m
Wr
L
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 7
Source: DLR
Path of Solar Radiation through the atmosphere
Rayleigh scattering and absorption (ca. 15%)
Absorption (ca. 1%)
Scatter and Absorption ( ca. 15%, max. 100%)
Reflection, Scatter, Absorption (max. 100%)
Absorption (ca. 15%)
Ozone.……….…....
Aerosol…….………..…...……
Water Vapor…….……...………
Clouds………….………..
Air molecules..……
Direct normal irradiance at ground
Radiation at the top of atmosphere
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 8
Source: DLR
Radiative Transfer in the Atmosphere
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
00:0
0
02:0
0
04:0
0
06:0
0
08:0
0
10:0
0
12:0
0
14:0
0
16:0
0
18:0
0
20:0
0
22:0
0
00:0
0
Hour of Day
Dire
ct N
orm
al Ir
radi
atio
n (W
/m²)
Extraterrestrial
O2 and CO2
Ozone
Rayleigh
Water Vapor
Aerosol
Clouds
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 9
Source: DLR
Air Mass
AM = 0 (outside of atmosphere)
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 10
Solar Spectrum and Atmospheric Influence
1 Planck curve T=5780 K at mean sun-
earth distance
2 extraterrestrial solar spectrum
3 absorption by 03
4 scattering by 02 und N2
5 scattering by aerosols
6 absorption by H2O vapor
7 absorption by aerosols
UV radiation: 0.01 - 0.39 µm, ~ 7 %
Visible Spectrum: 0.39 – 0.75 µm, ~ 46 %
Near infrared: 0.75 – 2.5 µm, ~ 47 %
www.volker-quaschning.de/articles/fundamentals1/index.php
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 11
Characteristics of solar irradiation data• Component:
– DNI (Direct-Normal Irradiation)– DHI (Diffus-Horizontal Irradiation) – GHI (Global-Horizontal Irradiation)
• Source:– ground measurements:
• precise thermal sensors (thermopiles)• Rotating Shadowband Irradiometers (RSI)
– satellite data
• Properties of irradiation:– spatial variability– inter-annual variability– long-term drifts
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 12
Direct, Diffuse and Global Irradiance
When measuring solar irradiance, the following components are of particular interest:
Direct normal irradiance (DNI)(also: beam irradiance)
Diffuse horizontal irradiance (DHI)(also: diffuse sky radiation)
Global horizontal irradiance (GHI)(also: total solar irradiance)
GHI = DHI + DNI * sin ()
Zenith angle θ,solar elevation
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 13
DNI = BHI / sin
Example:
= 50°BHI = 600W/m²
DNI = 848W/m²
DNI > BHI
Direct-Normal- Irradiation (DNI)
direct
Direct Normal Irradiation (DNI)
with: BHI = Beam Horizontal Irradiation
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 14
GHI = BHI + DIF
Example:
DIF = 150W/m²BHI = 600W/m²
GHI = 750W/m²
Global-Horizontal-Irradiation (GHI)
diffuse
direct
diffuse
Global Horizontal Irradiation (GHI)
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 15
Variability of irradiation
Long-term variability of solar irradiance
GHI from Potsdam, Germany
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 17
Source: DLR
Long-term variability of solar irradiance
7 to 10 years of measurement to get long-term mean within 5%
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 18
Source: DLR
Inter-annual variability
Strong inter-annual and regional variations
1999
2001
2000
2002
2003
deviationto mean
kWh/m²a
Average of the direct normal irradiance from 1999 to 2003
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 19
Irradiation sensors
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 20
Absolute Cavity Radiometer
Principle of Measurements:
- Possibility to measure absolute irradiancevalues. All other irradiance measurement devices need to be calibrated using an absolutecavity radiometer
- Its principle of operation is based on thesubstitution of radiative power by electrical(heating) power
- Measurement in intervals with minimal lengthof 45 s. Constant irradiation required for measurement campain
- Tracking device required
- No continuous measurement (!)
ftp.pmodwrc.ch/pub/pmo6-cc/user_guide_11.pdf
Valid for calibration purposes
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 21
Thermal sensors Semiconductor sensorRotating Shadowband Irradiometer,
RSI
(photodiode)
Suitable equipment for irradiance measurements forConcentrating Solar Power (CSP)
Pyranometer, pyrheliometer
(thermopiles)
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 22
Thermopile Sensors
CMP21 Pyranometer (GHI, DHI shaded) with ventilation unit CVF3
CHP1 Pyrheliometer (DNI)
Shading assembly with shading ball
Solys 2 sun tracker
Sun sensor
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 23
Thermopile Sensors – Pyrheliometer
Principle of Measurement:
- Pyrheliometer = radiometer suitable tomeasure direct normal irradiance
- Highly transparent window 97 – 98 % transmission of solar radiation
- Housing geomerty with 200 mm absorber tuberestricting acceptance angle to 5°
- Sensing element with black coating and built-in termopile device
- Pt-100 temperature sensor for temperaturecorrections
www.kippzonen.com/?product/18172/CHP+1.aspx
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 24
Pyrheliometer Specifications
Kipp&Zonen CHP 1 Specifications:
Spectral range: 200 to 4000 nm
Sensitivity: 7 to 14 µV/W/m² (mV/kW/m²)
Response time: < 5 s
Expected daily uncertainty: ± 1 %
Full opening view angle: 5° ± 0.2°
Required tracking accuracy: ± 0.5° from ideal
www.kippzonen.com/?product/18172/CHP+1.aspx
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 25
Thermopile Sensors – Pyranometer
Principle of Measurements:
- Pyrheliometer = radiometer suitable to measure short-wave (0.2 - 4 µm) global or diffuse radiation
- Highly transparent glass dome 97 – 98 % transmission of solar radiation
- Full view on 2π hemisphere(horizontal levelling required)
- Sensing element with black coating and built-in termopile
- Pt-100 temperature sensor for temperaturecorrections
www.kippzonen.com/?product/18172/CHP+1.aspx
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 26
Thermopile Sensors – Pyranometer
Kipp&Zonen CMP21 Specifications:
Spectral range: 285 to 2800 nm
Sensitivity: 7 to 14 µV/W/m² (mV/kW/m²)
Response time: 5 s www.kippzonen.com/?product/1491/CMP+21.aspx
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 27
Rotating Shadowband Pyranometer (RSP)
Rotating shadowband
Licor silicon photodiode
Housing of mechanics
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 28
RSI – Principle of Measurement
Source: Solar Millennium AG
Simplified sensor signal during shadow band rotation: once per minute, rotation lasts about 1.5 seconds
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 29
Licor Li-200 Pyranometer Sensor
Specifications:
Sensitivity: Typically 90 µA per 1000 W/m²
Response time: 10 µs.
Spectral range: 0.4 – 1.1 µm
Calibration: Calibrated against an Eppley Precision Spectral Pyranometer under natural daylight conditions. Typical error under these conditions is ±3% up to ±5%.
www.licor.com/env/Products/Sensors/200/li200_description.jsp
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 30
Precise thermal sensors:Pyrheliometer and Pyranometer on sun tracker
Advantages:
+ high accuracy (1 to 2%)
+ separate sensors for GHI, DNI and DHI (cross-check through redundancy)
Disadvantages:
- high acquisition costs
- high maintenance costs
- high susceptibility for soiling
- high power demand (grid connection required)
-GHI -DNI-DHI
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 31
Sensor with photo diode: Rotating Shadowband Irradiometer, RSI
Advantages:
+ fair acquisition costs
+ low maintenance
+ low susceptibility for soiling
+ low power demand (PV-Panel)
Disadvantage:
- reduced accuracy due to systematic deviations of the photodiode sensor response:
primordial DNI: ≈ 6 to 10 % (or even higher)
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 32
Measurement uncertaintyPrecise instruments (HP) versus RSI
Error source: Pyrheliometer: RSI:
Calibration < ±1.1% ±3% (... ±5%)
Temperature < ±0.5% 0% ... ±5%
Linearity < ±0.2% ±1%
Stability < ±0.5%/a < ±2%/a
Spectral dependence <±0.1% 0% ... ±8%
Sensor soiling -0.7% per day -0.07% per day
systematic errors
can be corrected!!4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 33
Choice of Measurement Equipment
High Precision sensors (thermopiles) Rotating Shadowband Irradiometer: RSI
?
Which equipment is suitable for measurements in Solar Resource Assessment?
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 34
Objectives for Irradiance Measurements
Solar Resource Assessment
• at remote site
• no qualified staff
• no electric grid
• often dusty and arid areas
Power Plant Monitoring
• always qualified staff on site
• electric power available
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 35
Pyrheliometer soiling in southern Spain
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 36
Plataforma Solar de Almería
Comparison of sensor soiling
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 37
University of Almería
Soiling characteristics of pyrheliometers and RSI‘s
RSI sensor headPyrheliometer
Solar Irradiation
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 38
direct sunlight
glass plate
tube with 200 mm length
absorber
diffusor disk over
photodiode
Choice of the adequate equipment
For Solar Resource Assessment • at remote sites and • daily maintenance not feasible
an RSI is the premium choice for DNI measurements.
However:• Proper calibration• Corrections of systematic signal response• regular maintenance inspections (2 to 4 weeks)
are indispensable for reliable measurements.
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 39
Sensor calibration and measurement accuracy enhancement
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 40
Sensor Calibration – Fundamentals I
- The World Standard Group (WSG) is an assembly of highly precise absolute cavity radiometers.
- The measured mean value (World Radiometric Reference) is the measurement standard representing the SI unit of irradiance with an estimated accuracy of 0.3 %.
- All other short wave irradiation measurement systems are calibrated against this single value.
www.pmodwrc.ch/pmod.php?topic=wrc
Precision measurement at the WorldRadiation Center (WRC)
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 41
RSI sensor calibration by DLR on PSA
2-monthly calibration of each RSI against high-precision instruments
at Plataforma Solar de Almería (PSA)(recommended every 2 years)
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 42
RSI sensor calibration durationVariations of the Calibration Constant with calibration duration
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 43
DNI
Variability of the Correction Factors (CF)
Variability ofcorrection factors
(CF):radiation componentsneed to be correctedwith separate CFs.
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 44
Recalibration of RSIsDrift of Calibration Factor within 2 to 4 years
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 45
Correction of raw RSI measurement valuesOrigin of systematic errors of RSI response
• Temperature dependence of semiconductor sensor
• Spectrally varying irradiation– different for irradiation components (direct beam / diffuse)– depending on Air Mass
• Angle of incidence
• Pre-calibration of the sensor head (from the manufacturer)
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 46
Spectral correction of diffuse irradiation
2DHIGHIDNIΠspec
corrected
raw values
variation with air mass + altitude
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 47
Dependence of response on solar elevationBH
I ref/ BH
I RSI
solar elevation angle in degree
so called „cat-ear effect“
Correction applied only on direct beam portion of the global response
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 48
Dependence of response on solar elevationBH
I ref/ BH
I RSI
solar elevation angle in degree
corrected
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 49
Reachable accuracy for DNI with RSIs
RMSD = 13 W/m²
Accuracy of RSI measurements
as derived from a comparisonof the data from 23 RSIs with precise thermopile
measurementswithin the courseof a whole year
RSP GHI DHI DNI reference
(CHP 1) unit raw cor raw cor raw cor
average MB -10.3 ± 4.0 0.3 ± 1.3 -17.3 ± 1.6 -0.4 ± 0.7 24.6 ± 10.5 1.0 ± 0.5 1.0 ± 3.9 W/m²
RMSD 14.2 7.6 18.9 4.5 33.3 13.0 5.3 W/m²
Annual sum up to -2.5 < ±1 up to -15 < ±3.5 up to +7 < ±1 up to 1.3 %
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 50
10 min time resolution
Transferability of the results?
The reachable accuracy of the measured beam irradiance data for the client at his prospected sites depends on 2 crucial points:
• Stability of the sensor sensitivity
• Transferability of the results to other sites
• Regular inspections and data controlling
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 51
Transferability to other sites and climates
Parallel measurement campaigns in UAE:
• Comparision of 6 RSIs to high-precision thermal sensors
• Measurement periods >3 weeks
• in summer and winter
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 52
Relative deviation of DNI sum within measurement campaign
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 53
only summer:DNI < 730 W/m²
summer + winter:DNI until 1000 W/m²
Satellite Based Assessment
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 54
Satellite Derived Data
Principle of Measurements:
Analyze satellite data in two steps:
1. Atmosphere: Gather satellite information of atmospheric composition (ozone, water vapor and aerosols) and apply the ‘clear sky model’ to calculate the fractions of direct and diffuse irradiance
2. Clouds: Calculate the cloud index as thedifference between actual reflectivity of theearth as it is seen by the satellite and areference image which only includes reflectance of the ground
www.solemi.de/method.html
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
00:0
0
02:0
0
04:0
0
06:0
0
08:0
0
10:0
0
12:0
0
14:0
0
16:0
0
18:0
0
20:0
0
22:0
0
00:0
0
Hour of DayD
irect
Nor
mal
Irra
diat
ion
(W/m
²)
Extraterrestrial
O2 and CO2
Ozone
Rayleigh
Water Vapor
Aerosol
Clouds
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 55
Scan
The Meteosat satellite is located in a geostationary orbit
The satellite scans the earth line by line every half hour
How to derive irradiance data from satellites
Source: DLR
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 56
How to derive irradiance data from satellites
Derivation of a cloud index
from the two channels Scan in infra-red spectrumScan in visible spectrum
Source: DLR
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 57
Different Cloud Transmission for GHI and DNI
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
clo
ud
tra
nsm
issi
on
cloud index
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Sun-satellite angle 60-80
-26 °C-16 °C-6 °C4 °C
14 °C-30°C - -20°C-20°C - -10°C
-10 °C - 0°C0°C - 10 °C
>10°C
Different exponential functions for varying viewing angles and
brightness temperatures
Global Irradiation
Direct Irradiation
Source: DLR
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 58
Clear sky Model input data
Aerosol optical thickness GACP Resolution 4°x5°, monthly data MATCH Resolution 1.9°x1.9°, daily data
Water Vapor: NCAR/NCEP ReanalysisResolution 1.125°x1.125°, daily values
Ozone: TOMS sensorResolution 1.25°x1.25°, monthly values
Source: DLR
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 59
Uncertainty in AerosolsAll graphs are for JulyScales are the same!(0 – 1.5)Large differences in Aerosol values and distribution
GADS
Toms
GOCART
NASA GISS v1 / GACP
NASA GISS v2 1990
AeroCom Linke TurbiditySource: DLR
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 60
satellite pixel( 3x4 km²)
ground measurement instrument (2x2 cm²)
solar thermal power plant (200MW 2x2 km²
Comparing ground and satellite data: “sensor size”
Source: DLR
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 61
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 6 12 18 24hour of day
W/m
²
groundsatellite
general difficulties: • point versus area• time integrated versus
area integrated
Source: DLR
Comparing ground and satellite data: accuracy
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 62
12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15
Hi-res satellite pixel in Europe
Comparing ground and satellite data: time scales
Ground measurements are typically pin point measurements which are temporally integrated
Satellite measurements are instantaneous spatial averages
Hourly values are calculated from temporal and spatial averaging (cloud movement)
Hourly average Meteosat image Measurement
Source: DLR
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 63
Source: DLR
Temporal resolution of input data: 1 hourSpatial resolution of digital map: 1 km x 1 km per PixelLong term analysis: up to 20 years of data
data produced by (DLR, 2004) for MED-CSP
The original digital maps can be navigated and zoomed with Geographical Informations Systems like ArcView or Idrisi.
Results of the satellite-based solar assessment
Digital maps: e.g. annual sum of direct normal irradiation in 2002 in the Mediterranean Region
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 64
Source: DLR
Hourly monthly mean of DNI in Wh/m², Solar Village 2000
hour
Annual sums of DNI [kWh/m²] for one site in Spain
Monthly sums of DNI [kWh/m²] for one site in SpainHourly DNI [Wh/m²] for one site in Spain
Results of the satellite-based solar assessment
Time series: for single sites, e.g. hourly, monthly or annual
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 65
Satellite data and nearest neighbour stations
Satellite derived data fit better to a selected
site than ground
measurements from a site
farther than 25 km away.
Source: DLR
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 66
Ground measurements vs. satellite derived data
Ground measurementsAdvantages+ high accuracy (depending on sensors)
+ high time resolution
Disadvantages- high costs for installation and O&M- soiling of the sensors- possible sensor failures- no possibility to gain data of the past
Satellite dataAdvantages+ spatial resolution+ long-term data (more than 20 years)
+ effectively no failures+ no soiling+ no ground site necessary+ low costs
Disadvantages- lower time resolution- low accuracy at high time resolution
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 67
Combining Ground and Satellite Assessments
• Satellite data– Long-term average– Year to year variability– Regional assessment
• Ground data– High Precision (if measurements taken thoroughly)– High temporal resolution possible
(up to 1 min to model transient effects)– Good distribution function– Site specific
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 68
Procedure for Matching Ground and Satellite Data
Satellite assessment
Groundmeasurements
ComparisonSeparation of clear sky
and cloud conditions
Recalculationwith alternative
atmospheric input
Selection of best atmospheric input
Recalculationwith alternative cloud transmission tables
Selection of best cloud
transmission table
Transfer MSG to MFGRecalculation of
long term time seriesBest fit
satellite data
clea
r sky
cor
rect
ion
clou
d co
rrec
tion
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 69
What you should care for in good Solar Resource Assessment
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 70
Procedure to Follow for Proper Solar ResourceAssessment
• Find a good location: close to site, safe, suitable for collocation of Weather Station
• Clarify the ground property conditions
• Check/define the budget for: instrumentation, maintenance and measurement related services
• Select the appropriate measurement equipment and provider(based on budget considerations, local conditions on site and maintenance possibilities)
• Find local maintenance personnel
• Prepare the measurement site according to the supplier’s specifications (foundations, fencing, etc.)
• Installation and commissioning of the measurement equipment
• Steady monitoring of the measurement data, duration minimum 1 year
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 71
Procedure to Follow for Proper Solar ResourceAssessment
• Documenting the selection of instruments
• Choosing a renowned company or institution to conduct or assist the measurement campaign
• Documenting sensor calibration with proper calibration certificates
• Meticolously documenting the instrument installation and alignment
• Performing and documenting regular sensor cleaning, maintenance and verification of alignment
• Cautiously and continuously checking data for errors and outliers
• Flagging suspect data, and applying corrections if possible, during and after the measurement campaign
• Stating and justifying the uncertainty estimate in a detailed report after the measurement campaign.
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 72
Delivery of hardware Installation & commissioning Operational supervision and
control Equipment monitoring
with inspection visits on site
Daily data retrieval via modem (GSM/GPRS)
Data collection and processing: • accuracy enhancement
(correction) • quality and functionality check• graphical visualization
Expert office
Daily, monthly, annual report withgood quality data
to client (via e-mail)
On site
Client
Usual Expert Service for Solar Resource Assessment
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 73
Quality Control of Measurement Data
Are values physically possible ?Measurement values must met physical limits
Are they reasonable?e.g. comparison to a clear sky model (Bird) or in kd-kt-space
Are they consistent?Comparison of redundant information
Visual inspection by an expert
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 74
Summary
• Knowledge of accurate irradiation data is indispensable for CSP projects(→ proper plant design, financial calculation, efficient plant operation)
• site selection, pre‐feasibility with satellite data
• colocation of a measurement station, taking care on thorough operation
• match long‐term satellite data with good quality measurement data from ground
• monitor the operating plant efficiency thoroughly with high‐precision data
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 75
Thank youvery much
for your attention!
4th Sfera Summer School, Hornberg Castle, 2013 - 76