Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.fugro.com
Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI)
by
Shahriar Vahdani, Ph.D., P.E.
Senior Vice President
May, 2011
www.fugro.com
Soil-Structure Interaction
Kinematic Interaction
Inertial Interaction
Free-Field
Total SSI
www.fugro.com
Traditional Approach
Free-Field
Ground Motion
K
C
www.fugro.com
Analysis Methods
Complete Method Substructuring Method
Scattered Ground Motion
Massless Structure
K
C
Scattered Ground Motion
www.fugro.com
Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) Analyses
Transbay Terminal Center (TTC)
San Francisco, CA
www.fugro.com
Project Team
Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA) - Client
Pelli Clarke Pelli - Architect
Thornton Tomasetti - Structural ARUP - Geotechnical
Fugro – Soil-Structure Interaction AMEC – Ground Motions
www.fugro.com
TTC
www.fugro.com
TTC Structure
www.fugro.com
TTC Structure
55
ft
• 3 superstructure pods
on below-grade Box
• 55 feet of basement
• Buoyant structure
• Held down by tiedowns
• Flexible basement
• Heavy roof level –
behaves like SDOF
www.fugro.com
Project Location and Challenges
www.fugro.com
TTC and Adjacent Structures
www.fugro.com
Soil Profile along TTC
Horizontal Distance (ft)
Ele
vati
on
(ft
)
East West
www.fugro.com
Key Technical Issues
Structure - Soil - Structure Interaction
Varying Soil Conditions
Variations within Structure
Buoyancy and Tiedown Modeling
Similar periods of soil column and structure 1st mode
Traveling Waves – 2.5 km/s, 0.2 s delay
Surface Waves – Effect limited by soil capacity
www.fugro.com
Approach and Assumptions
2D SSI analysis using SASSI
Explicitly model selected adjacent structures
Address soil variability in conjunction with averaging
effect of structure
Address variability of structure through 4 different 2D
structural sections
Buoyancy implies no friction along base
Tiedowns imply no (or little) rocking
www.fugro.com
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Sections 1 2 3 4 5
Variation in Soil Profiles:
Soil Sections and Zones
www.fugro.com
Dynamic Soil Properties:
Strain Compatible Shear Wave Velocity Ground Motions: GSL-2
Statistical analysis of 84 profiles (7 X 2 X 3 X 2) in each of 3 zones
www.fugro.com
Dynamic Soil Properties:
Strain Compatible Damping Ratio Ground Motions: GSL-2
Statistical analysis of 84 profiles (7 X 2 X 3 X 2) in each of 3 zones
www.fugro.com
Orientation of Motions
4 Maximum Direction and 3 Minimum Direction (Geomean) ground
motions in Longitudinal Direction
3 Maximum Direction and 4 Minimum Direction (Geomean) ground
motions in Transverse Direction
Vertical Direction – Use Bedrock Motion
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max M
in
Min
Ma
x
Min
Ma
x
Min
Ma
x
Longitudinal
Max
Min
www.fugro.com
Ground Motions:
GSL-2, Transverse Sections
Earthquake Station Name Component Velocity Pulse
1999 Duzce, Turkey Lamont 1061 161 MX N/A
1999 Kocaeli, Turkey Arcelik ARC MN 6.7 s
1979 Imperial Valley Cerro Prieto HCP MX N/A
1999 Hector Mine Hector HEC MN N/A
1995 Kobe Nishi-Akashi NIS MX N/A
1992 Erzincan Erzincan ERZ MN 2.2 s
1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan TCU076 T76 MN N/A
www.fugro.com
Ground Motions:
GSL-3, Transverse Sections
Earthquake Station Name Component Velocity Pulse
1992 Erzincan Erzincan ERZ MN 2.2 s
2002 Denali, Alaska Carlo 559 MX N/A
1999 Kocaeli, Turkey Arcelik ARC MN 6.7 s
1999 Hector Mine Hector HEC MN N/A
1999 Kocaeli, Turkey Izmit IZT MX N/A
1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan TCU076 T76 MN N/A
1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan TCU089 T89 MX N/A
www.fugro.com
Variation within Structure:
2D Structural Sections
GL - 6 GL - 15 GL - 21 GL - 31
Longitudinal
- GL - GL - GL -
www.fugro.com
Interaction with Adjacent Buildings
10
0
1s
t S
tre
et
10
1
2n
d S
tre
et
20
1
Mis
sio
n
55
5
Mis
sio
n
40
0
Ho
ward
50
0
Ho
ward
301
Mission
Lowrise
19
9
Fre
mo
nt
301
Mission
Highrise Buttress GL15
GL31
www.fugro.com
Direct Method
Time History at Ground Level
Trainbox Racking
Analysis Approach
Scattered motion
Substructuring Method
Transbay Terminal Center (with mass) Transbay Terminal Center (massless)
K
C
www.fugro.com
Soil-Structure Interaction Approach
Direct SASSI Analysis
• Full solution in SASSI
• Incorporate both inertial and kinematic effects (models with TTC mass)
• Capable of linear solution only using secant structural properties
Substructuring Analysis
• Develop springs and dashpots from SASSI
• Develop kinematic “scatter motions” (massless model)
Structural Analysis
• Structure on springs and dashpots driven by scatter motions
• Validate response of linear structure with SASSI direct analysis
• Conduct nonlinear structural evaluation for design
www.fugro.com
SASSI Models
Section GL-6
Linear, secant
stiffness
properties
Springs model
end wall effect
Soft soil at
base to model
no friction
www.fugro.com
SASSI Models
Section GL-15
www.fugro.com
100 First St
TTC
SASSI Models
Section GL-15 with Typical Adjacent Bldg.
www.fugro.com
SASSI Models
301 Mission St.
199 Fremont St.
TTC
Section GL-31
www.fugro.com
Adjacent Building Foundation Modeling
301 Mission
Pile Group Foundation
TTC
Mat Foundation
Upper Equivalent Shear Block (Gupper)
TTC
301 Mission
Mat Foundation
Lower Equivalent Shear Block (Glower)
Foundation System
920-14” square
precast Concrete
Piles
Pile spacing:
3’- 6” to 4’- 8”
Pile length:
60’ below slab
www.fugro.com
Methodology: Adjacent Building Foundations
Build PLAXIS model with foundation of adjacent buildings explicitly modeled.
Build similar model with the foundation replaced by equivalent shear blocks.
To calculate the equivalent shear modulus:
– Step 1
• Mobilize pile foundation’s lateral resistance by pushing laterally.
• Mobilize shear block’s lateral resistance by pushing laterally.
• Adjust Gupper until lateral resistances from both models are the same.
– Step 2
• Mobilize TTC laterally and record the lateral resistances from both models.
• Calibrate the lower block shear modulus (Glower) until resistances become the same.
www.fugro.com
Adjacent Building Foundation Modeling:
301 Mission St. Step 1 - Deformation
Step 2 - Deformation
www.fugro.com
Soil Buttress Modeling
Equivalent Buttress Properties
E = 2.2 X 105 ksf
g = 0.139 kcf
www.fugro.com
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Period (s)
Tra
nsfe
r F
un
ctio
n
Free-Field
Direct Method: Transfer Functions at GL-15
Rock
www.fugro.com
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Period (s)
Tra
nsfe
r F
un
ctio
n
Free-Field
Ground Level - Massless Structure
Direct Method: Transfer Functions at GL-15
Rock
www.fugro.com
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Period (s)
Tra
nsfe
r F
un
ctio
n
Free-Field
Ground Level - Massless Structure
Ground Level - Box Mass Only
Direct Method: Transfer Functions at GL-15
Rock
www.fugro.com
Direct Method: Transfer Functions at GL-15
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Period (s)
Tra
nsfe
r F
un
ctio
n
Free-Field
Ground Level - Massless Structure
Ground Level - Box Mass Only
Ground Level - With Mass
Rock
www.fugro.com
Displacement Amplification Function
GL15 Model with Mass
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Period (sec)
Dis
pla
ce
me
nt
Am
plifi
ca
tio
n F
un
cti
on
Base
Ground Surface
Top of Structure
www.fugro.com
Frequency-Dependent Stiffness and Damping
0 0.5 1 1.5 2500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Frequency (Hz)
C
(k
ips
/ft)
Cglobal
K and C
0 0.5 1 1.5 20
500
1000
1500
2000
Frequency (Hz)
K (
kip
s/f
t)
Kglobal
global global
k c i i
K global = S k i i
C global = S c i i
www.fugro.com
GL-6 Model
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
Scattered Motion
Total Motion
FF Motion
Base of Trainbox Top of Trainbox
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
Scattered Motion
Total Motion
FF Motion
www.fugro.com
GL-15 Model
Base of Trainbox Top of Trainbox
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
Scattered Motion
Total Motion
FF Motion
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
Scattered Motion
Total Motion
FF Motion
www.fugro.com
GL-31 Model TTC Only
Base of Trainbox Top of Trainbox
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
Scattered Motion
Total Motion
FF Motion
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
Scattered Motion
Total Motion
FF Motion
www.fugro.com
GL-31 Model with Adjacent Structures
Base of Trainbox Top of Trainbox
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
Scattered Motion
Total Motion
FF Motion
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
Scattered Motion
Total Motion
FF Motion
www.fugro.com
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
GL6
GL15
GL21
GL31 TTC Only
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
GL6
GL15
GL21
GL31 TTC Only
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
GL6
GL15
GL21
GL31 TTC Only
GL31 with Adjacent
Structures
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 1 2 3 4 5Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
GL6
GL15
GL21
GL31 TTC Only
GL31 with Adjacent
Structures
Summary at Ground Surface Level
Scattered Motions Total Motions
www.fugro.com
SASSI vs. Perform3D Spectra
Section GL-15
www.fugro.com
Racking: GL-15 Model with Mass
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (s)
Ra
ckin
g (
in.)
ground
concourse
www.fugro.com
Results: Racking Summary from SASSI
Section
Average Free-Field
Racking
DFF (in.)
Average Racking at
Ground Level
DBox (in.)
Average Racking
at Concourse
Level
DConc (in.)
GL-15 2.6 2.5 0.8
GL-21 2.6 2.4 0.9
GL-6 2.0 0.3 0.2
GL-31
(TTC Only) 3.4 2.3 1.1
GL-31
(Full Model) 3.4 2.0 1.0
Longitudinal 2.0 – 3.4 0.02 0.02
www.fugro.com
Parametric Studies
Considered Mean Strain Compatible Profile as well as
± 1 Std. Dev. Profiles for Each Transverse Section
Effect of Typical Highrise Building
Explicitly Modeled Varying Soil Properties along
Longitudinal Section
Evaluated Full Friction and No Friction Cases for
Longitudinal and Transverse Directions
www.fugro.com
Parametric Study: Effect of Variation in Soil Properties at GL-15
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
GSL-2 Ground Motions
Ground Surface - Mean Spectra
GL15 - Mean Profile
GL15 - High Profile
GL15 - Low Profile
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Period (sec)
Sp
ectr
al A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
GSL-2 Ground Motions
Ground Surface - Mean Spectra
GL15 - Mean Profile
GL15 - High Profile
GL15 - Low Profile
www.fugro.com
100 First St
TTC
Parametric Study: Effect of Typical Highrise
Section GL-15 with Typical Adjacent Bldg.
www.fugro.com
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Period (sec)
Sp
ec
tra
l A
cc
ele
rati
on
(g
)
GSL-2 Ground Motions
Ground Surface - Mean Spectra
GL15
GL15 + Typical Highrise
Parametric Study: Effect of Typical Highrise
www.fugro.com
Parametric Study: Effect of Variation in Soil Properties (Longitudinal)
www.fugro.com
Parametric Study: Effect of Variation in Soil Properties (Longitudinal)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Period (sec)
Sp
ec
tra
l A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
GSL-2 Ground Motions
Ground Surface - Mean Spectra
Longitudinal
Longitudinal + Soil Variations
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Period (sec)
Sp
ec
tra
l A
ccele
rati
on
(g
)
GSL-2 Ground Motions
Ground Surface - Mean Spectra
Longitudinal
Longitudinal + Soil Variations
www.fugro.com
Parametric Study: Effect of Friction at Base
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Period (sec)
Sp
ec
tra
l A
cce
lera
tio
n (
g)
GSL-2 Ground Motions
Ground Surface - Mean Spectra
GL15 - No Friction at Base
GL15 - Friction at Base
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Period (sec)
Sp
ec
tra
l A
cce
lera
tio
n (
g)
GSL-2 Ground Motions
Ground Surface - Mean Spectra
GL15 - No Friction at Base
GL15 - Friction at Base
www.fugro.com
Summary
Key SSI Issues Addressed:
– Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction
– Variations in soil and structure
Key Findings
– Adjacent structures located less than 25 ft from TTC have significant
impact
– Structural variation affects scatter motions
– “Resonance” of structure and soil response at period of 1.5 sec.
– Translational mode observed at ~ 0.7 sec. – does not govern
superstructure response
www.fugro.com
Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI)
by
Shahriar (Shah) Vahdani, Ph.D., P.E.
Senior Vice President
May, 2011
www.fugro.com
Comparison of Free-Field Ground Motions
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Period (sec)
Sp
ec
tra
l A
cce
lera
tio
n (
g)
GSL-2 Ground Motions
Ground Surface
AMEC FF - Section 2 (Mean)
AMEC FF - Section 3 (Mean)
AMEC FF - Section 4 (Mean)
Fugro FF - Zone 2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Period (sec)
Sp
ec
tra
l A
cce
lera
tio
n (
g)
GSL-2 Ground Motions
Ground Surface
AMEC FF - Section 2 (Mean)
AMEC FF - Section 3 (Mean)
AMEC FF - Section 4 (Mean)
Fugro FF - Zone 2
All Ground Motions