Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Soil biology and system
managementLisa M. Fultz
Assistant Professor Soil Microbiology of Cropping Systems
LSU AgCenter
Baton Rouge, LA
Award #: 2012-67019-30183
1
Ecosystem Functions from the Soil Perspective
Soil texture, compaction, PAW, aggregate stability
pH, SOM, CEC, nutrients
Microbial biomass and activity, SOC, nutrient cycling, diseases
Physical
Chemical
Biological
2
To Understand Soil Health We MustUnderstand Soil Biology
Soil Biota
Plant growth enhancement
Photo credit: Lisa M Fultz, LSU AgCenterSlide design: Jennifer Moore-Kucera, NRCS-SHD
Nutrient cycling
N fixation
Plant protection
Pathogen supression Detoxify
pollutants
Influence atmosphere composition
Decompose residues
Water filtration
Water storage
Water flow
Aggregate formation
3
Resist erosion
Soil Health Identifies the Importance of Soil Biology To Enhance Ecosystem Services
Increase H2O infiltration and storage
Enhance water/air quality
• Increase amount, types and availability of plant residues.
• Minimize disturbance
C sequestrationClimate mitigation Release plant
available nutrients
Plant Growth, Productivity
Aggregate Stability
Increase #s and types of soil organisms
OM TransformationsHumus Formation
Biogeochemical Cycling
4
Ecological Challenges to Soil Resilience
Abiotic Variables:• Depleted water sources• Changes in precipitation
patterns• Extreme weather• Erodibility indexes
(>200 tons ha-1 y-1)
Cultural Practices:• High disturbance
agronomic systems• Intensive/ frequent tillage• Low diversity• Fallow periods• Low residue return
5
Management Practices to Enhance Soil Health and Combat Soil Degradation
• Increase plant residues returned to the soil• Perennial grasslands/forage lands• Use crop rotations or cover crops• Integrate cattle into cropping system
• Convert to conservation or no-till • Enroll in conservation management
programs
6
Integrated Crop-Livestock Agroecosystems
• Great flexibility
• Divide fields to suit needs/skill/resources
CottonMonocultures
Grass-cattle
Grain - Cotton
Pullman clay loam soilspH = 7.4SOM = 1.5 – 3.3%34% clay
7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1997 CTN_1 ICL_1 CTN_2 CTN_3 ICL_2 ICL_3 ICL_4
Soil
orga
nic
C (g
kg-1
)
System
Gra
ssla
nd
Def
icit
irrig
ated
co
ntin
uous
cot
ton
Def
icit
irrig
ated
bl
uest
em &
cro
p ro
tatio
n
Dry
land
fora
ges &
co
tton
Def
icit
irrig
ated
per
enni
al
gras
ses
Blu
este
m a
nd fu
lly ir
rigat
ed
row
cro
ps
Def
icit
irrig
ated
co
ntin
uous
cot
ton
Def
icit
irrig
ated
co
ntin
uous
cot
ton
Fultz, L.M., Moore-Kucera, J., Zobeck, T.M., Acosta-Martinez, V, & Allen, V.G. (2013) 77:1659-1666.
• 31% increase in SOC following 13 years under ICL management
8
Water use and productivity-Allen et al. 2012. Agronomy Journal
Integrated system compared to continuous cotton
Per hectare 25% less irrigation 36% less N fertilizer Decreased chemical inputs (pesticides and plant growth
regulators) Avg. over 10 years profitability was similar when
comparing the two systems
9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1997 CTN_1 ICL_1 CTN_2 CTN_3 ICL_2 ICL_3 ICL_4
Soil
orga
nic
C (g
kg-1
)
System
Gra
ssla
nd
Def
icit
irrig
ated
co
ntin
uous
cot
ton
Def
icit
irrig
ated
bl
uest
em &
cro
p ro
tatio
n
Dry
land
fora
ges &
co
tton
Def
icit
irrig
ated
per
enni
al
gras
ses
Blu
este
m a
nd fu
lly ir
rigat
ed
row
cro
ps
Def
icit
irrig
ated
co
ntin
uous
cot
ton
Def
icit
irrig
ated
co
ntin
uous
cot
ton
• ICL’s increased aggregate stability 2-3x’s that in continuous cotton
10
SOM and Aggregate Stability
y = 0.04e0.09x
r² = 0.73***
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0 10 20 30 40
Mea
n w
eigh
t dia
met
er (m
m)
Soil organic matter (g kg-1)
Relationship between increasing SOM and MWD (proxy for stability)
0.000.200.400.600.80
Annualcrops
PerennialMea
n w
eigh
t di
amet
er
(mm
)
Critical SOM value for enhanced aggregate stability
Annual crops
Perennials
11
Relative abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (mol%)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Mea
n w
eigh
t dia
met
er (m
m)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.50-5 cmY= 0.05x + 0.24
r ² 0.357r = 0.597p < 0.0001
5-20 cmY= 0.02x + 0.30
r ² 0.370r = 0.608p < 0.0001
12
What are the ecological impacts of increased fungal richness?
Fungal Diversity
CTN_1CTN_2
FRG_CTN
OWB_BERFRG_RC
Fung
al o
pera
tiona
l tax
onom
ic u
nits
(p
ropo
rtion
al to
syst
em a
rea)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Davinic, M. 2014, Ph.D. DissertationMonoculture
Cotton
Increased Fungal Richness
Rotations/Perennial Systems
Fungal richness (diversity)
Converting part or all of the field to rotation or perennial-based agroecosystems
Rotations/PerennialSystems
Monoculture Cotton
Fungal richness (diversity)
Increased SOM
13
Do these shifts in microbial groups influence nutrient cycling?
Bacterial Phylum Acidobacteriay = 16.852x + 2.4869
R² = 0.213
Fungal Class Onygenalesy = 27.467x + 38.791
R² = 0.248
0
50
100
150
200
250
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00
Avai
labl
e So
il P
(ppm
; Meh
lich3
)
Relative abundance (%) Onygenales or Acidobacteria
Microbial composition influences the release of plant-available nutrients
14
Field Design
Cereal radish + rye mix
Radish (Raphanus sativus var. longipinnatus)
Fallow
Hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth)
Crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatumL)
Cereal rye (Secale cereale)
Winter pea (Pisium sativum L)
Berseem clover (Trifoliumalexandrinum)
• Split plot design: Cover crop (CC) as main plot and N rates as sub plots• 32 treatments: 8 cover crops and 4 N rates, with 4 reps for each CC*N
treatment within a cover crop main plot
N rates: 0, 235, 268, 302 kg Urea ha-1
15
Cover crop dry weight biomass
[CELLRANGE]
[CELLRANGE]
[CELLRANGE]
[CELLRANGE][CELLRANGE]
[CELLRANGE]
[CELLRANGE]
[CELLRANGE]
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Fallow BerseemClover
CrimsonClover
Hairy Vetch Winter Pea Cereal Rye Radish Rye+Radish
Biom
ass
wei
ght
(g)
16
Soil organic matter – 14.6% increase Fall 2014 to Fall 2015
17
[CELLRANGE]
[CELLRANGE]
[CELLRANGE]
[CELLRANGE][CELLRANGE]
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
Fallow Legume Grass Brassica Rye/Radish
Soil
Org
anic
Mat
ter
(% L
OI)
C cycling enzyme greater in spring, fallowing cover crops
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Fallow Legumes Grass Brassica Rye/Radish
B-gl
ucos
idas
e (m
g p-
nitr
ophe
nol
g-1
hr-1
)
Fall 2014 Spring 2015 Fall 2015 Spring 2016
18
N cycling enzymes increasing over time
0
5
10
15
20
25
Fallow Legumes Grass Brassica Rye/Radish
B-gl
ucos
amin
idas
e (m
g p-
nitr
ophe
nol g
-1 h
r-1)
Fall 2014 Spring 2015 Fall 2015 Spring 2016
19
y = 52.938x + 7.3273R² = 0.2542
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 1 2 3 4
Tota
l Mic
robi
al B
iom
ass
(nm
ol g
-1)
Soil Organic Matter (% LOI)
y = 0.1413x - 5.789R² = 0.3082
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Nit
rate
-N (
mg
kg-1)
Total Microbial Biomass (nmol g-1)
y = 0.2147x + 6.0442R² = 0.1687
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Soil
P (m
g kg
-1)
Total Microbial Biomass (nmol g-1)
Total microbial biomass increased with SOM
20
Fallow Berseem Crimson Hairy vetch Winter pea Cereal rye Radish Rye+Radish
Fallow Berseemclover
Crimsonclover
Hairy vetch Winter pea Cereal rye Radish Rye+Radish
76%
85%77% 85% 82%
81%
75% 74%
64%
93% 123%70%
132% 128%
67% 69%
21
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Corn
gra
in y
ield
(bu
/A)
ABC
ar 3 – Corn yields increased following asses and legumes
F
DECD
AAB
BCD
E
22
nter annuals overseeded on a perennial stureouthern Mississippi
eef cattle operation
Winter annual mixture
Oats
Triticale
Annual ryegrass
Hairy vetch
Red clover
Crimson clover
White clover
Turnip
Radish
23
y = 57.9x - 23.55R² = 0.4532
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 2 4 6 8 10
Tota
l Mic
robi
al B
iom
ass
(nm
ol g
-1)
Soil Organic Matter (% LOI)
y = 0.0839x + 7.4626R² = 0.2816
y = 0.0552x + 7.8822R² = 0.2939
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Soil
P (m
g kg
-1)
ial pastureeded wither annuals
24
MF, P, and O3
25
26
Large macroaggregate roots
Fibers
28
What is the impact of ICLs on the ratio of ungi to bacteria (F:B)?
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
• Highest F:B (18:2/Bac) ratio in continuous cotton
• Marker common for saprophytic fungi• No change between ICLs
Type of ratio impacts interpretation!
g(
,)
29
What is the impact of ICLs on the ratio of fungi to bacteria (F:B)?
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
AMF/Bac ratio:cotton < rotation < perennial-
based systems
Type of ratio impacts interpretation!
30
CRP
ctive: Evaluate short-term soil health changes ng conversion of CRP back to cropland
tems (CRP vs. Converted CRP)ths (0-10, 10-30, 30-50cm)rs (2012, 2013, 2014)
histories:P ages 23-25 years enrolledverted CRP were 22-25 s enrolled and converted 011 2012
Semi-arid climate:• Avg. annual temperature :16°C• Avg. annual PPT : 475mmSoil: Amarillo fine sandy loam • pH: 7.6 (0-30cm)• SOM: 1.4%• Sand: 71%
WEI 200 t /h /
Converted to annual crops
-3.8
22.7
-56.8
-26.8 -22.4
23.2
M-C POM-N MBC α-galac/MBC
β-gluc/MBC
β-glm/ MBC
qCO2
10cm Converted CRP change percent (%) Reference line is CRPLabile OM Specific Metabolic ActivitiesMBC
36.1 -53.9 -38.5
5.9
-9.1
31.0
111.7
46.614.2 27.5
125.6
Actinomycetes
Gram+
Totalbacteria
Totalfungi
Fungi:Bacteria
Gram‐AMF
Gram‐
TotalbacteriaGram
+
Actinomycetes
Totalfungi
Fungi:Bacteria
AMF
33
Increased soil organic matter increased total microbial biomass
y = 74.9x - 44.232R² = 0.73
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
Annual corn w/cover crops
Perennial grasses over seeded w/winter annuals
34
35