Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
~sohtion and Characterization of
Degradan t Impurities in Dipyridamob Formulhtion
Dipyridamole is an antithrombotic drug. In the stability study of drug
product of dipyridamole, two unknown impurities (referred as DP-I and DP-11)
were detected at levels of 0.25% and 0.54% by gradient reverse phase HPI,C
method. The drug product was subjected to stress to enhance the level of these
impurities. An elegant isocratic preparative method was employed using a
Reprosil CN column with a short run time of 14 minutes to isolate these
impurities. The DP-I and DP-I1 were isolated with purities of 99.1% and 99.8%
respectively. Structural studies of these impurities were undertaken using
spectroscopic techniques such as IR, NMR and Mass. Based on the spectral data,
the structures of DP-I and DP-I1 have been characterised to be 2.2'.2",2"'-(4-
hydroxy-%(piperidin- 1 -yl) pyri111ido [5,4-dlpyrimidine-2,6 diyl) bis(azanetriyl)
tetraethanol, 4-(2-((6-(bjs (2-hydroxyethyl) amino)-4, 8-di (piperidin-1-yl)
pyrimido [ 5 , 4 4 1 pyrimidin-2-yl) (2-hydroxyethyl) amino) ethoxy)-2. 3-
dihydroxy-4-oxobutanoic acid, respectively. A detailcd elucidation of the structure
is presented in this article.
3. Introduction
Pharmacological studies on Dipyridamole, 2, 6-bis (dictha11olarnino)-4, 8-
dipiperidinopyrimido-[5, 4-dl pyrimidine suggest that it may be used as a
coronary vasodilator in clinical medicine. The known pharmacological approach
for the prevention of thrombotic accidents is to use Dipyridamole in combination
with Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). Dipyridamole is well accepted for treatment of
angina pectoris and cerebrovascular diseases. 'The mechanism of action is to
inhibit the cellular uptake and metabolism of adenosine with resulting
vasodilatory and anti-aggregatory effects. Through the combination of its
antiplatelet and vasodilator function, Dipyridamole probably improves tissue
perfusion [I]. It has also been reported that Dipyridamole possesses antioxidant
properties and attenuates the formation of reactive oxygen species in platelets and
endothelial cells [2] . Recent studies reveal that combination of a very low dose of
Prednisolone and Dipyridamole has exhibited significant synergistic effects in
human clinical trials [3]. The same was also observed in collagen and adjuvant
arthritic animal based on inhibition of additional inflammatory chemokine [ S ] . On
the contrary, Dipyridamole did not modify the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis
C L p - I I I I m I m
in other clinical trial described by Forrest et al. [ 5 ] . In view of its wide use, the
stability indicating methods for the determination of degradation products in
Dipyridamole [6-81 have received much attention.
It is mandatory to identify and structurally characterise any impurity
formed during production and stability, exceeding the identification threshold of
0.2% in the drug product 19-1 51. For low-level impurities or degradation products,
this quite often involves H P I X method development, isolation and
characterisation techniques 116-1 91. This paper describes the separation, isolation
and characterisation of two unknown degradation impurities formed in
Dipyridamole.
OH I
14 \ 12 36
19
21 OH 22 30
12
OH 22 30
Dipyridamole DP-I DP-I1
Fig. 3a. Chemical structures of Dipyridamole and its degradant products DP-I
and DP-11
Fig. 3b. HPLC initial chromatogram of Dipyridamole sample
Fig. 3c. HPLC stability chromatogram of Dipyridamole
3.1. Experimental
3.1.1. Chemicals and reagents
Dipyridamole drug product used for investigation was obtained from the
R&D of Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd., Hyderabad, India. HPLC grade
acetonitrile and methanol were obtained from the Merck Co., Mumbai, India.
Ultra pure water was collected from TKA Millipore water purification system.
Ammonium formate, formic acid, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, sodium
Cliapter-111 IC'D1D.F
hydroxide were procured from Rankem India Ltd. Chloroform-d.3. methanol-d4 and
dimethyl sulphoxide-d6 (for NMR) were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co..
USA.
3.1.2. High performance liquid chromatography (analytical)
Samples were analysed on Agilent HPLC-DAD system equipped with
1100 series low pressure quaternary gradient pump along with pulse dampener.
AA lnertsil ODs-2 column (Agilent 150 x 4.6 mm. 5pm) was used for
chromatographic separations. Mobile phase A consists of a mixture of 0.01 M
KH2P04 buffer, with the pH adjusted to 7.0 using 5% sodium hydroxide, and
methanol in the ratio of 50:50 (viv). Mobile phase B consists of methanol and 0.01
M KI-IzPOd buffer in the ratio of 95:s (vlv). The following gradient prvgramrne is
employcd: 'r (min)/%R (v/v): 0i0, 410, 25/100, 28/100. 30/0, 35/0. The sample
detection was monitored at a wavelength of 295 nm. Chromatography was
performed at 45OC using a flow rate of 1 rnllmin.
3.1.3. Forced degradation of Dipyridarnole drug product
Forced degradation studies were performed on the Dipyridmole drug
product with the intention of determining the conditions responsible for the
formation of the degradation products. Accordingly, degradation studies were
conducted by stressing with acid, base, peroxide and thermal.
3.1.3.1. Acid stressed degradation
200 rng equivalent of Dipyridamole drug product was dissolved in 20 mL
of methanol and water in the ratio of 1 : 1. HCI solution (5 mI, of 0.1 N) was added
and refluxed for .about 4 hours and neutralised.
Fig. 3.1.3.1. Typical chromatogram of Dipyridamole acid degradation
3.1.3.2. Base stressed degradation
200 mg cquivalcnt of Dipyridamolc drug product was dissolved in 20 ml, o f
methanol and water in the ratio o r 1: 1 . NaOH solution (5 rnl, o f 0. IN) was added and
refluxed for about 4 hours and neutralised.
Fig. 3.1.3.2. Typical chromatogram of Dipyridamole base degradation
3.1.3.3. Peroxide stressed degradation
200 mg equivalent of Dipyridamole drug product was dissolved in 20 mL of
methanol and water in the ratio of 1 : l . Hydrogen peroxide (5 mL of 6 % solution)
was added and maintained at 70°C for 4 hours.
Fig. 3.1.3.3. Typical chromatogram of Dipyridamole peroxide degradation
3.1.3.4. Thermal stressed degradation
200 mg equivalent of Dipyridamole drug product was taken in a Pctri dish.
Water was sprinkled on the drug product and subjected to 105'C for 3 hours.
Fig. 3.1.3.4a. Typical chromatogram of Dipyridamole thermal degradation
Fig. 3.1.3.4b. Overlay of HPLC chromatograms of Dipyridamole forced
degradation studies.
3.1.4. HPLC analyses of forced degradation samples
The degradation samples were analysed by HYLC method as described in
section 2.2. Under acid stressed conditions, UP-I and UP-11 have formed upto
3.0% and 0.4 %, while peroxide degradation yielded 0.6% and 1.1 %,
respectively. In thermal stressed condition, only DP-I1 was formed upto 7.7%. In
base stressed condition. there was no significant degradation. Hence the thermal
and acid degradation routes were chosen to enhance the impurities.
3.1.5. Sample preparation
Dipyridamole sample was prepared at a concentration of 1 mgJm1, in
methanol for the analytical HPLC and 50 mg/ml, for the preparative HPLC
analyses.
3.1.6. High performance liquid chromatography (preparative)
Impurities were isolated from the sample using Gilson GX281 preparative
HPLC Binary system equipped with a Gilson photodiode array detector model
172 along with a Gilson analytical HPLC system. Data was collected and
processed using TRILUTION LC software (vcr 2.1). Approximately 50 mg/mL of
sample was prepared to load on to the column. A Reprosil CN column (250 x 20
Ckpttr-III I m I m
mm, 5 p ) was employed for the separation of DP-I and DP-11. The mobile phase
consists of a mixture of 0.02M ammonium acetate buffer, with the pH adjusted to
7.0 with ammonia and acetonitrile in the ratio of 70:30. The flow rate was kept at
15 mWmin. Detection was carried out at 295 nm. Desaltification procedure was
used to remove the buffering agents leading to pure fractions of the impuritics.
The impurity fractions from several injections were pooled. The pooled fraction
w& concentrated by using Rotavapnur (Heidolph Laboratory 4002 control) under
high vacuum. The aqueous solution was lyophilized to solidify the impurities.
Fig. 3.1.6a. Preparative chromatograms of DP-I & DP-I1
om m tm sm sm ~osl lm fim i sm rm am nm nm am am am nm um Yllrr
Fig. 3.1.6b. HPLC Purity Chromatogram of DP-I
Fig. 3.1.6~. HPLC Purity Chromatogram of DP-I1
3.1.7. Mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
LC-MS/MS analyses has been performed on API 4000 model Mass
Spectrometre (Applied Bio systems). Analyses was pcrformcd in positive.
ionisation mode with turbo ion spray interface. Thc parametrcs for Ion source
voltage (IS) = 5500 V, Declustering Potential (I3P) = 70 V, Entrance Potential
(EP) = 10 V were set with nebulizer gas as air at a pressure of 40 psi and curtain
gas as nitrogen at a pressure of 25 psi. An lnertsil C8 column (250 x 4.6mm, 5pm)
was used for the separation. Mobile phase A is a mixture, consisting of 0.01 M
Ammonium formate buffer with the pIl adjusted to 4.0 using formic acid and
acetonitrile in the ratio of 70:30. Mobile phase B is a mixture consisting of above
buffer and acetonitrile in the ratio of 55:45. The gradient conditions employed for
the separation with a timed gradient programme of T (min)/%B (vlv): 0 /0,
40/100,41/0,45/0. The flow rate was kept at 1 rnllrnin.
Fig. 3.1.7a. LC-MS data of Dipyridamolc
Fig. 3.1.7b. LC-MS data of DP-I
Fig. 3.1.7~. LC-MS data of DP-11
Table 3.1.7. Fragmentation pathways and infrared data of Dipyridamole, DP-
I and DP-I1
Name
3.1.8. UPLC-TOF-MS
The UPLC-TOF-MS system consisted of an ACQUITY'"' MJltra
Performance Liquid Chromatography system and a Micro mass LCT Premier XE
Mass Spectrometre (High sensitivity orthogonal time-of-flight instrument, Waters,
Millford, USA) equipped with a lock mass sprayer, operating in either the positive
or negative ion mode. All analyses were acquired using the lock spray to ensure
Fragmentation Pathways
accuracy and reproducibility; leucine-enkephalin was used as the lock mass.
Sample of concentration 0.02 mg/mL in methanol was infused in TOF-MS at a
FT-IR
(cm-I)
Cliapur-III 1rnIQ)cI:
tlow rate of 10 pL/min. High resolution (W mode. FW.HM 10500) positive
polarity scan responses were collected from rn/z 100 to 1000 at a rate of 1.0
slscan.
Singk Mur A M C I S T o l a 8 n e a = S O P P ~ I DBE m n = 0 0 r n a r = ~ ) o E b m n l pedrtm MI Nwnterdsoiopa~rmdlor lorFlT=3
Mmdsobp. kbs, E m Ek,m lrm 3B W a l e ) e n m a w mm 7 rauns wmlunb (up b 4 M oaW M a s ta ubl m1.1 E r n UICd C 0-35 H 0 35 N a9 0 0.10 I U ~ W * u o a b - w r - . w 2ahalorr
1 TWUSESt "Ml, J I 5 , " Is i ,cmg, , l . lYOl l ,
.a2451 Ilh.UO1
Im
X ' m2u1 11?W
Im!m ,$$,iW,602,, JIIW, )62Ql%.mam u o 2 x u . . - . .... 3:Y:05Y. . E . % 9 . e Y g 611 0% .r?!?!!lb'E- (ml!R!Y)!II*IUq* 1'1~*1). wz
I Y ~ z ~ w s o u ) ~ ~ ~ u o I D ~ ~ I Q D J O ~ ~ W ~ W ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~
*Llili.i.
*.Xlnur 0 0
5 0 I U 8 0 0
*as. C . I C * I " . * P V * O.. , F I T $>?mu,.
4 5 2 6 I 2 I I I rl 0 C19 1112 N I 0 ,
' i l ill3 ) 0 t d 5 7- I CJO " $ 2 H 01
Fig. 3.1.8a. HRMS data o f DP-I
Slnglo Mars Analyris Tderance*SOPPhl I DEE mn=OO max=800 Etnnent @ran on ~ d 1 s d c $ e p i * r ~ b l F I T : 3
LlnPhQOprHUt EmEeemkm n s b m ( a ) a ~ b s d m z ~ m ~ m ~ ( u p b ~ b s r ~ ~ f ~ ~ * c h - ~ E h n * Usad Cb35 Hn3 Nbe O b i 0 IM *ub rokmmr -w ~ ~ O I I
I TWUFES* W l l J2IiUIIO)Cmll)
631 311P 2 !&.on
':I I
e l o n 1 3 m m
i Gum .k-mfr- - .I ., - j ~ w , ..to ~ 3 1 ? ~ T a ' 1 ' ~ - ) a * I - - - ~ Y ? t aim?rn ysoII ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ w ~ r n s n * o s m * o ~ r m r m
Hinlsro 0 0 mi- 5 0 5 0 8 0 0
MI C ~ C m . ~ dl m DU i PIT ro-1.
631 1119 617 1110 1 9 I 0 1 5 1 S C Z l Nb5 ## W 617 1150 I 1 I 1 14 5 2 I C31 H O U6 07
Fig. 3.1.8b. HRMS data of DP-11
3.1.9. NMR spectroscopy
NMR experiments were performed on 400 MHz Mercury plus NMR
spectrornetrc (Varian) in DMSO-d6+CDC13 and Methanol-d4 at 2S0 C. Proton and
carbon chemical shifts were reported on S scale in ppm, relative to TMS (6 = 0.00
ppm), CDC13 (S = 77.00 ppm), CD30D (6 = 49.1 pprn) and DMSO (6 = 39.50
pp.m) as internal standards. Standard pulse sequences provided by Varian were
used for 'kf NMR, gradient Double Quantum - filtered Correlation Spectroscopy
(gDQCOSY), gradient Heteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence spectroscopy
(gHSQC) and gradient Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation spectroscopy
(gHMBC).
Fig. 3.1.9b. Proton decoupled I3c NMR spectrum of DP-I.
Fig. 3.1.9~. 'H NMR spectrum of DP-11
Fig. 3.1.9d. Proton decoupled 13c NMR spectrum of DP-I1
Fig. 3.1.9e. gDQCOSY spectrum of DP-I
Fig. 3.1.9f. gDQCOSY spectrum of DP-I1
Fig. 3.1.9g. gHMBC spectrum of DP-I1
- Dipyridamole DP-I DP-I1
Positiona 'H I3c 'H I3c 'H 13c
1 153.2 (C) 146.7 (C) 153.2 (C)
3 159.3 (C) 160.5 (C) 159.3 (C)
4 131.9 (C) 128.0 (C) 132.1 (C)
5 131.9 (C) 128.0 (C) 131.8 (C)
8 153.2 (C) 146.7 (C) 152.8 (C)
10 159.3 (C) 158.2 (C) 159.3 (C)
5 1.6 (CH2)
5 1.2 (CH2)
64.0 (Cl12)
59.5 (CI-12)
47.6 (CH2)
24.5 (CH2)
25.8 (CH2)
5 1.2 (C1-12)
51.2 (CHI)
59.5 (CHz)
59.5 (C'112)
47.9 (CH2)
24.5 (CH2)
25.8 (CH2)
47.9 (CH2)
172.1 (C=O)
72.4 (CH)
72.2 (CH)
173.0 (C=O)
Table 3.1.9. 'H and ''c NMR assignments for Dipyridamole, DP- I and DP-I1
a Refer structural formula (Fig. 1 (A)) for numbering: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; m, multiple; The correlations shown in the 'H and 13c NMR columns are in agreement with t1SQC and HMBC
spectra.
ctiap-111 IrnIQM:
3.1.10. FT-IR spectroscopy
IR spectra were recorded in solid state as KBr dispersion medium using
Perkin-Elmer FT-IR spectrophotometre.
Fig3.l.lOa. IR Spectrum of Dipyridamole
44.
W
48.
Y.
Y.
Y.
?Mi IU YOD f3P Y lOW U _ . I 1 1 U )1 IQ I U QO
Fig.3.l.lOb. IR Spectrum of DP-I
39.mJ - * I r I t . r t - 1- - - - POW 9f00 moo asPo 2000 moo - -7
low en* vm
Fig.3.1.10~. I R Spectrum of DP-11
3.2. Results and discussion
3.2.1. Analytical HPLC of drug product
A typical analytical HPLC chromatogram of a stability batch of
Dipyridarnole drug product recorded using the HPLC method as described in
Section 2.2 is shown in Fig. l (B). DP-I, DP-11 and Dipyridamole elute at retention
times 3.4, 10.7 and 16.8 min respectively while Imp -1, 2, 3 and 4 are known
impurities. The 'representative HPLC chromatograms of the forced degradation
study are shown in Fig. 1 (C). The structures of these impurities and Dipyridarnole
are shown in Fig.1 (A). Both DP-I and DP-I1 are more polar with respect to
Dipyridamole.
3.2.2. Isolation of impurities by preparative HPLC
isolation of these impurities by preparative HPLC was a challenging job as
the two target impurities were eluting very closely to the parent peak in
preliminary studies. This was due to limitations of preparative chromatography.
which is traditionally associated with low efficiency columns, packed with lcss
pure silica (compared with analytical columns), unstable and packed with
conventional packing technologies.
With relatively high particle size (7-10 pm) of the stationary phase used in
preparative HPLC columns, it is indccd a challenging task to resolve the peaks of
the target impurities from the main peak despite the maximum injection load and
yet leading to isolation of impurities in sufficient quantities with high purity.
Several trials were performed to achieve the required resolution. Finally an
isocratic solvent system was developed with good resolution and a short runtime
(14 min). The purity of DP-I and DP-I1 were 99.1 and 99.8% rcspcctively and
these samples were used for spectroscopic structural studies.
3.2.3. Structure elucidation of Dipyridamole DP- I
In the positive and negative mass spectra, the protonated and deprotonated,
[M+H] ' and [M-HI-, molecular ions were detected at d z 438.1 and 436.4,
respectively. The evcn m/z number of [M+II] ' and [M+kl] * ions suggest that DP-
I contains odd number of nitrogen atoms (nitrogen rule). From these results the
molecular ion of DP-I was found lo be at mlz 437. The mass difference between
Dipyridamole and DP-I was found to be 68 amu.
The positive HR-MS spectrum showed protonated molecular ion at m h
438.2453 corresponding to molecular formula C19k132N705 Whcn compared with
the molecular formula of Dipyridamole, there was a difference of Cs119N and an
addition of one oxygen atom. The differencc can bc rationalised in terms of the
loss of piperidine moiety and an addition of one hydroxyl group. The LC-MS data
of DP-I is shown in Fig.2 (A).
cliap-I11 I m I W
The proton NMR spectra of Dipyridarnole and DP-1 showed three sets of
signals. The 'H NMR and I3c NMR spectra of DP-I are shown in Fig.3 (A) and
(B), respectively. The proton signals in DP-I were observed at 4.02 (4H). 3.6-3.7
(16H) and 1.63 ppm (6H), where as Dipyridamole showed signals at 4.1 (8H), 3.7-
3.8 (16H) and 1.7 (12H) protons and the exchangeable protons were not observed.
From the gDQCOSY data, it was observed that the protons at 4.02 ppm showed
correlations with the proton at 1.63 ppm. These can be attributed to piperidine
moiety. Furthcr, the protons at 3.6 ppm showed correlations with the protons at
3.7 ppm corrcsponding to methylazanediyl dicthanol moiety. In DP-I. the protons
corresponding to piperidine were found to be ten, confirming that this is only one
piperidine moiety. The remaining protons from methylw.ancdiyl diethanol
corresponding to sixteen were found to be intact.
The absence of piperidine group shows that there are 8 4 mass units less
(CsHloN) when compared to Dipyridamole. Rut the MS data showed that there is
only a 68 mass unit difference. This shows that there is an addition of 16 mass
units after the removal of piperidine moiety. This observation indicates that the
piperidine moiety was replaced by a hydroxyl group.
The above spectral data supports the assigned structure as 2,2',2".2"'-(4-
hydroxy-8-(piperidin-1-yl)pyrimido[5,4-d]pyrimidine-2.0 diyl) bis(az.anetriy1)
tetraethanol (DP-I).
3.2.4. Structure elucidation of Dipyridarnole DP- 11
In the positive and negative mass spectra, the protonated [M+H] ' and
deprotonated . [M-HI- molecular ions were detected at m/z 637.3 and 635.7
respectively. From these results the molecular ion of DP-I1 was found to be at m/z
636. The mass difference between Dipyridamole and DP-11 was found to be 132
arnu. The ES-MS-MS spectrum displayed product ions at m/z 619.6, 591.5, 561.4,
505.2, 487.3 and 404.3 in which 505.2 is the dominant fragment. The fragment
ion at 505.2 suggests that the parent moiety is intact in DP-11.
Cliapter-111 ImIQ)F
The positive HR-MS spectrum showed protonated molecular ion at m/z
637.3329 corresponding to molecular formula CzsHjsN809. When compared with
the molecular formula of Dipyridamole, there was an addition of C4I-14o5. The
LC-MS data of DP-I1 is shown in Fig.2 (B).
The 'H NMR and I3c NMR spectra nf DP-I1 are shown in Fig.4 (A) and
(B), respectively. On comparison, DP-I1 showed two additional protons at 4.5
(1H) and 4.32 (IH) as doublets and their corresponding carbon signals were
observed at 72.4 and 72.2 ppm. respectively. From the proton and carbon
chemical shifts thcse can be attributed to oxygen attached methine groups. The 13 C NMR spectrum showed two carbonyl signals at 173.0 and 172.1 ppm. The
protons at 4.5 and 4.32 pprn showed MMBC correlations to the carbon signals at
173.0 pprn and 172.1 pprn respectively. From thcse observations the additional
moiety can be attributed to tartaric acid group, which was found to be one of the
excipients used in the formulation. Thc additional carbonyl groups wcre further
confirmed from IR spectroscopy at 1741 cm-I. Interestingly one of the carbonyls
at 172.1 pprn showed additional cross peak with one of the mcthylcne protons
(4.45 pprn as a triplet) of methylazanediyl dirthanol of Dipyridamole.
The above spectral data supports the assigned structure as 4-(2-((6-(bis (2-
hydroxyethyl) amino)-4, 8-di (piperidin-1-yl) pyrimido [5, 4-d] pyrimidin-2-yl)
(2-hydroxyethyl) ammo) ethoxy)-2,3-dihydroxy-4-oxobutanoic acid (I>P 11).
3.3. Conclusion
The drug product of Dipyridamole, subjected to stability studies, was
evaluated for degradation products. In addition to pharmacopoeia impurities, two
unknown impurities which are not reported in the literature were observed. Stress
study was performed to enhance the impurities. These degradation products were
isolated by a simple isocratic method and characterised by IR, NMR, MS and
HRMS spectroscopic techniques. The most probable structures are proposed for
these impurities based on the spectral data.
3.4. References
N.P. Stafford, A.E. Pink, A.E. White. J.R. Glenn, S. lieptinstall,
Mechanisms involved in Adenosine 'i'riphosphate-Induced platelet
aggregation in whole blood. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 23 (2003)
1928-1933.
S. Chakrabarti. 0. Vitseva, D. Iyu, S. Varghese, J.E. Freedman, The effect
of Dipyridarnole on vascular cell-derived reactive oxygen spccies. J.
Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 3 15 (2005) 494-500.
T.K. Kvien, E. Fjeld. B. Slatkowsky-Christensen, M. Nichols, Y. Zhang,
A. Proven, et al, Efficacy and safety of a novel synergistic drug candidate,
CRx-102, in hand osteoarthritis, Ann. Rheum. Dis. 67 (2008) 942-948.
G.R. Zimmermann, W. Avery, A.1,. Finelli, M. Farwell. C.C. Frascr, A.A.
Borisy, Sclectivc amplification of glucocorticoid anti-intlammatory
activity through synergistic multi-target action of a combination drug,
Arthritis. Res. Ther. 1 1 (2009) 105.
C.M. Forrest. T.W. Stone, G.M. Mackay, I,. Oxford, N. Stoy, G. Ilarman
et al, Purine metabolism and clinical status of patients with rheumatoid
arthritis treated with Dipyridamole, Nuclcosides Nuclcotides Nucleic
Acids. 25 (2006) 1287-1 290.
J. Zhang, R. B. Miller, R. Jacobus, Development and validation of a
stability-indicating HPLC method for the determination of degradation
products in Dipyridamole injection, Chromatographia. 44 (1 997) 247-252.
K. Prakash, Rama Rao Kalakuntla, Jayapal Reddy Sama, Rapid and
simultaneous determination of aspirin and Dipyridamole in pharmaceutical
formulations by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography
(RP-HPLC) method, Afr. J. Pharm. Pharacol. S(2) (201 1) 244-25 1 .
J.H. Bridle, M.T. Brimble, A stability indicating method for Dipyridamole,
Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm. 19 (3), (1993), 371 -381.
International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for
registration of pharmaceuticals for human use, ICH Q3A (R2), Impurities
in New Drug substances, 2006, pp. 1 - 15.
CIi~ptcr-I11 IWIDQ
10. International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for
registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH Q3B (R2). Impurities
in New Drug products. 2006, pp. 1-16.
11. International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for
registration of pharmaceuticals for human use, ICH Q I A (R2) Stability
testing of new drug substances and P~oducts. 2003. pp. 1-24.
12. L7.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Stability Guidelines. February
1987.
13. S. Gordg, New safe medicines faster: the role of analytical chemistry.
Trends in Anal. Chem. 22 (2003) 407.
14. J.A. Mollica, S. Ahuja, Cohen, Stability of Pharmaceuticals. J. J. Pharm.
Sci. 67, (1978) 443.
15. l h e United States Pharmacopeia. 25th Ed.. Ilipyridamole. llnited States
Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., Rockville. MD, 'IJSA. 2000. p. 7.
16. Satindcr Ahuja, Karen Mills Alsante, Handbook of isolation and
characterisation of impurities in pharmaceuticals, first ed.. USA. 2003.
17. R.J. Smith, M.I.. Webb, Analyses of Drug Impurities, Blackwell
Publishing, first ed., UK, 2007.
18. S. Ahuja, Impurities Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals, Marcel Dekker, first
ed., NY, 1998.
19. Budzikiewic7. Herbert, Djerassi. Carl, Dudley H. Williams, Mass
spectrometry of organic compounds, Holden-day, Inc., first ed., California,
1967.