Upload
osborne-watts
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Soft Markets andHard Truths in the Property/Liability Insurance Industry
Steven N. Weisbart, Ph.D., CLU, Senior Vice President and Chief EconomistInsurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038
Tel: (212) 346-5540 Cell: (917) 494-5945 [email protected] www.iii.org
Alabama I-Day 2009University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL
October 7, 2009
• Hard Truths about the U.S. Economy• Soft Markets in the Property-Liability
Insurance Industry• Hard Truths in Property-Liability
Insurance Operations• Hard Truths About Property-Liability
Investment Performance & Insuring Capacity
Q&A
Presentation Outline
Hard Truthsabout
the U.S. EconomyBeen Down So Long It Looks Like Up to Me
Length of U.S. Business Cycle Contractions, 1945-Present*
811 10
810 11
16
6
16
8 8
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
Feb.1945
Nov.1948
July 1953 Aug.1957
Apr.1960
Dec.1969
Nov.1973
Jan. 1980 Jul. 1981 Jul. 1990 Mar.2001
Dec.2007
* As of September 2009, inclusive
Sources: National Bureau of Economic Research; Insurance Information Institute.
Current recession began in Dec. 2007 and is already the longest
since the Great Depression.
Duration (Months)
Month Recession Started
Length of U.S. Business Cycles, 1945-Present*
8 11 10 8 10 1116
616
8 8
2237
45
39
24
106
36
58
12
92
120
73
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
Feb.1945
Nov.1948
July1953
Aug.1957
Apr.1960
Dec.1969
Nov.1973
Jan.1980
Jul. 1981 Jul. 1990 Mar.2001
Dec.2007
Contraction Expansion following
* As of April 2009, inclusive
Sources: National Bureau of Economic Research; Insurance Information Institute.
Duration (Months)
Month Recession Started
3.1%
2.1%
5.4%
1.4%
0.1%
3.0%
1.2%
3.2% 3.
6%
2.1%
1.5%
-5.4
%
-6.4
%
-1.0
%
3.0%
2.4%
2.5% 2.7%
2.7% 2.9%
-0.7
%
-2.7
%-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
05:3
Q
05:4
Q
06:1
Q
06:2
Q
06:3
Q
06:4
Q
07:1
Q
07:2
Q
07:3
Q
07:4
Q
08:1
Q
08:2
Q
08:3
Q
08:Q
4
09:1
Q
09:2
Q
09:3
Q
09:4
Q
10:1
Q
10:2
Q
10:3
Q
10:4
Q
Real Quarterly GDP Changes (annualized),
2005:Q3-2010:Q4F
Sources: US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis (actual) at http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm Blue Chip Economic Indicators 9/09 issue (forecasts).
Spike due almost entirely to the weak dollar (growing exports and slowing imports)
Red bars are actual; Yellowbars are forecasts/estimates
The Q1:2009 decline was the steepest since the
Q1:1982 drop of 6.4%
Employment
U.S. Nonfarm Private Employment, Monthly, Nov 2007 – August 2009
138.
0
138.
1
138.
0
137.
9
137.
8
137.
8
137.
7
137.
6
137.
6
137.
4
137.
0
136.
7
136.
2
135.
1
134.
3
133.
7
133.
0
132.
5
132.
2
131.
7
131.
4
131.
2
130.0130.5131.0131.5132.0132.5133.0133.5134.0134.5135.0135.5136.0136.5137.0137.5138.0138.5
Nov07
Dec07
Jan08
Feb08
Mar08
Apr08
May08
June08
Jul08
Aug08
Sep08
Oct08
Nov08
Dec08
Jan09
Feb09
Mar09
Apr09
May09
Jun09
Jul09
Aug09
Seasonally adjusted. Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics
Millions The U.S. economy lost about 6 million jobs in 12 months
Employment peak; recession starts
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Jan-
00
Jan-
01
Jan-
02
Jan-
03
Jan-
04
Jan-
05
Jan-
06
Jan-
07
Jan-
08
Jan-
09
Traditional Unemployment Rate U-3Unemployment + Underemployment Rate U-6
January 2000 through August 2009, seasonally adjusted
U-6 went from 9.2% in April 2008 to
16.8% in Aug. 2009
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
9.7% Aug. 2009 unemployment rate (U-3) was the highest monthly rate since 1983. Peak rate in the last 30 years: 10.8% in
Nov-Dec 1982.
Unemployment and UnderemploymentRates: Rocketing Up in 2008-9
Percent
U.S. Unemployment Rate ForecastsQuarterly, 2009:Q3 to 2010:Q4
9.8%
10.1%10.3% 10.3% 10.3%
10.2%
9.6%
9.9%10.0%
9.9%
9.7%
9.5%9.5%9.7% 9.7%
9.5%
9.1%
8.8%
8.5%
9.0%
9.5%
10.0%
10.5%
11.0%
09:Q3 09:Q4 10:Q1 10:Q2 10:Q3 10:Q4
10 most pessimistic consensus/midpoint 10 most optimistic
Sources: Blue Chip Economic Indicators (9/09); Insurance Info. Inst.
Unemployment is expected to peak in late 2009:Q4 or 2010:Q1.
Rising unemployment will erode payrolls and workers comp’s exposure base.
Has the Contraction Endedand Recovery Begun?
Source: http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/
Will the Recession End Soon?Feb-Sep 2009 Initial Jobless Claims*
620
640643
647650650
658659651648
638
625632630627
632
623617618616
607
585
567560
557
566571
567573570
540
560
580
600
620
640
660
Feb
14
Feb
21
Feb
28
Mar
7
Mar
14
Mar
21
Mar
28
Ap
r 4
Ap
r 11
Ap
r 18
Ap
r 25
May
2
May
9
May
16
May
23
May
30
Jun
6
Jun
13
Jun
20
Jun
27
Jul 4
Jul 1
1
Jul 1
8
Jul 2
5
Au
g 1
Au
g 8
Au
g 15
Au
g 22
Au
g 29
Sep
5
4-week moving avg (000)
*seasonally adjusted; state programs only Source: http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/ui/current.htm
Housing
2.8 3.
5 4.0
3.7
3.6 3.8
3.6 3.
9
3.9
3.8 4.1
7.1
6.5
5.7
4.9
4.49 4.71
4.55 4.66
4.72 4.89 5.
24
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
05 06 07 08
Jan-
09
Feb
09
Mar
09
Apr
09
May
09
Jun
09
Jul 0
9
Inventory of unsold homes number of homes sold
Source: http://www.realtor.org/research/research/ehsdata
High Ratio of Unsold-Homes Inventory to Sales Will Likely Keep Prices Falling
Millions of Homes, Annual Rate
# of house sales fell;inventory wasn’t the problem
# of house sales is rising but so is inventory
“Shadow” Inventory of Unsold Homes: It’s Worse Than You Think
• “About 1.8 million homes are currently in foreclosure and they will continue to weigh on home prices for at least the rest of the year.”
• Zillow.com’s latest Homeowner Confidence Survey (published August 18, 2009) asked homeowners how likely they would put their homes on the market if they saw signs of a turnaround in the next 12 months: Very likely, 8% (7.5 million homes)
Likely, 9% (7.5 million homes)
But Adam York, economist for Wells Fargo Securities, “contends that the amount of homes that have not yet been listed for sale could be around 4-5 million.
Sources: Julie Haviv, “’Shadow’ inventory lurks over U.S. housing recovery,” Reuters, at http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-Housing/idUSTRE56U5YZ20090731 and http://zillow.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=173
High Inventory Means Millions Fewer Private Housing Starts
2.07
1.80
1.36
0.90
0.58
0.80
1.48
1.351.
46
1.29
1.20
1.01
1.19
1.47
1.62 1.64
1.57 1.60 1.
71
1.85
1.96
0.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.92.02.1
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08F 09F 10F
Measured by number of new units started, exposure growth for HO insurers is low.
Housing start data also affects commercial insurers with construction risk exposure.
I.I.I. estimate: each 100,000 decline in housing starts “costs” home insurers $90
million in gross premium. Estimated premium loss in 2008 vs. 2005: about $1
billion.
Sources: US Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (9/09); Insurance Information Inst.
Millions of Units
Housing bubble
Recession
Recession
The “Silver Lining”?Inflation Might Be
Relatively Low
After Recent Recessions,the Annual Inflation Rate Dropped
4.9%5.1%
3.0%3.2%
2.6%
1.5%1.9%
3.3%3.4%
1.3%
2.5%2.3%
3.0%
3.8%
2.8%
3.8%
1.8%
-0.5%
2.8%2.9%2.4%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09F10F
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics (actual, blue bars); Blue Chip Economic Indicators, 9/09 issue, (forecasts, yellow bars)
Average inflation rate, 1992-2007: 2.67% Post-
Recession Post-Recession
• Continued high levels of unemployment/ underemployment
• Continued low levels consumer demand/ business investment Significant increase in the personal saving rate, but
virtually all used to pay down outstanding debt
Low- or no-growth in insured exposures
• Low levels of new borrowing Affects housing, autos, other consumer durables
Section Summary: Hard Truths About the U.S. Economy
Soft Markets in the Property/Liability Insurance Industry
Primarily Driven bythe Industry’s Underwriting Cycle,
Not the Economy
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
22%
24%
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
:Q1
Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute
40 Years ofHard and Soft Markets
1975-78 1984-87 2000-03Shaded areas denote “hard
market” periods In 2007 net written premiums fell, the first decline since
1943
Year-to-Year Change in Net Written Premium, 2000-2009*
Sources: A.M. Best (historical through 2008; ISO for 2009. *first quarter 2009 only
5.0%
8.4%
15.3%
10.0%
3.9%
0.5%
4.2%
-1.0% -1.4%-3.5%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009*
P/C insurers are experiencing their
slowest growth rates since 1943
Slow growth means retention is critical
Protracted period of
negative or slow growth is possible due to soft
markets and slow
economy
5.2%
-0.9
%-7
.4%
-6.5
%-1
.5%
1.8%
4.3%
18.6
%20
.3%
5.8%
0.3%
-1.6
%-1
.0%
-1.8
%-1
.0%
3.1%
1.1%
0.8%
0.4%
0.6%
-0.4
%-0
.3%
1.6%
5.6%
13.7
%7.
7%1.
2%-2
.9% -0
.5%
-3.8
%-4
.2%
1.7%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%7
87
98
08
18
28
38
48
58
68
78
88
99
09
19
29
39
49
59
69
79
89
90
00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
8E
09
F
Rea
l N
WP
Gro
wth
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
Rea
l G
DP
Gro
wth
Real NWP Growth Real GDP
Does National Economic Growth Affect Real P/C Premium Growth? Not Much
Sources: A.M. Best, US Bureau of Economic Analysis, Blue Chip Economic Indicators, 2/09; Insurance Information Inst.
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08*
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
$45Wage & Salary DisbursementsWC NPW
*9-month data for 2008Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis; Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis at http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/WASCUR; I.I.I. Fact Books
Even When the Payroll Base is Rising, Soft Markets Reduce Workers Comp Premiums
7/90-3/91
Shaded areas indicate recessions
3/01-11/01
Wage & Salary Disbursement (Private Employment) vs. WC NWP$ Billions $ Billions
12/07-?
Weakening wage and salary growth is
expected to cause a deceleration in workers comp
exposure growth
Hard Truths in the Property/Liability
Insurance OperationsPrimarily Driven by
the Industry’s Underwriting Cycle,Not the Economy
115.
8
107.
4
100.
1
98.3 10
0.7
92.4
102.
0105.
1
95.5
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009:Q1E
The P/C Industry’s Combined Ratio Seems Headed Up, Again
Sources: A.M. Best, ISO; III preliminary estimates.
The industry’s combined ratio appears to be on a “cyclical upturn” dating to 2006. In 2008, even excluding net CAT losses (which
added 3.4 points to the combined ratio vs. 2007) and M&FG losses (another 4.1 points vs. 2007), the 2008 ratio would have been 97.6.
Combined Ratio
09:Q1 combined ratio was 98.4 excl. M&FG vs. 96.8
in 08:Q1
Medical Cost Inflation is One of the Most Serious Long-term Challenges Facing
Casualty, WC, and Health Insurers
80
140
200
260
320
380
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09*
Ind
ex V
alu
e (1
982-
84=
100)
All Items Medical Care
Source: Department of Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics); not seasonally adjustedhttp://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cpi.pdf *through July 2009
Since 1982-84, (index =100) the cost of medical care has nearly quadupled (to 375), while the overall cost of living
merely doubled (to 215)
4.5%3.5%
2.8% 3.2% 3.5%4.1%
4.6% 4.7%4.0% 4.4% 4.2% 4.0% 4.4%
5.1%
7.4%
10.1%
8.3%
10.6%
7.3%
13.6%
7.6%
6.2%
9.2%
7.2%
8.6%
6.0%
0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Change in Medical CPIChange Med Cost per Lost Time Claim
WC Medical Severity Rising Far Faster than Medical CPI
Sources: Med CPI from I.I.I. Inflation Watch; WC med severity from NCCI based on NCCI states.
Since 2003, Tort System Cost Growth Has Moderated but Could Spike Again
-6%
-3%
0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Rate of Tort System Cost Growth CPI
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Tillinghast-Towers Perrin, 2008 Update on U.S. Tort Costs; Insurance Info. Inst.
Catastrophic Losses*: Was 2005an Outlier or a Harbinger?
$7.5$2.7$4.7
$22.9
$5.5
$16.9
$8.3$7.4$2.6
$10.1$8.3$4.6
$26.5
$5.9
$12.9
$27.5
$6.7
$26.0
$6.9
$61.9
$9.2
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09**
*Excludes $4B-$6b offshore energy losses from Hurricanes Katrina & Rita. **2009:1HNote: 2001 figure includes $20.3B for 9/11 losses reported through 12/31/01. Includes only business and personal property claims, business interruption and auto claims. Non-prop/BI losses = $12.2B.Source: Property Claims Service/ISO; Insurance Information Institute
$ Billions
30
Is $25 billion the new level of expected
yearly CAT losses?Before 2001, CAT
losses averaged about $8-10 billion per year.
5.1 5.
3 5.4 5.
5 5.6 5.
7 5.8 5.
9 6.0 6.
2 6.3 6.
5 6.6 6.
8 7.0 7.
1
7.3 7.
4 7.5
7.5 7.5
7.6 7.6 7.
7 7.9 8.
0 8.1 8.
2 8.3 8.
5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09F
10F
11F
12F
13F
14F
15F
16F
17F
18F
19F
Source: http://edr.state.fl.us/conferences/population/demographic.htm
Data are from Feb. 18, 2009 Florida Demographic Estimating conference
A Million More Florida Resident Households in the Next Decade?
Millions of Households
The State of Florida now (Feb 09) forecasts nearly 1 million more
households by 2019 (up almost 13%). There will be more businesses, too.
Hurricane Andrew
Hurricane Wilma
Source: South Alabama Regional Planning Commission, “Coastal Alabama River Basin Management Plan”, January 2004.
High Population Growth Forecast for Coastal Areas in Baldwin County, AL, 2000-2030
High population growth in coastal
Alabama puts more insured value
at risk
High Mobile County Population Growth Forecast 2000-2030 is Near but Not Directly on the Coast
Source: South Alabama Regional Planning Commission, “Coastal Alabama River Basin Management Plan”, January 2004.
Major (Category 3, 4, 5) Hurricanes Striking the US by Decade
3 10 10
76
5
4
6
88
5
8
6
9
1900s 1910s 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 2020s
*Figure for 2000s is extrapolated based on data for 2000-2008 (7 major storms: Charley, Ivan, Jeanne (2004), Katrina, Rita, Wilma (2005), Ike (2008)).Sources: Tillinghast from National Hurricane Center: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastint.shtm.; I.I.I.
Mid 1920s – mid-1960s:AMO Warm Phase
Mid-1990s – 2030s?AMO Warm Phase
Colorado State team forecasts 3
more intense hurricanes in
2009
Inflation-Adjusted U.S. Insured Catastrophe Losses By Cause of Loss,
1987-2006¹
Fire, $6.6 , 2.2%
Tornadoes, $77.3 , 26.0%
All Tropical Cyclones, $137.7 ,
46.3%
Civil Disorders, $1.1 , 0.4%
Utility Disruption, $0.2 , 0.1%
Water Damage, $0.4 , 0.1%Wind/Hail/Flood,
$9.3 , 3.1%
Earthquakes, $19.1 , 6.4%
Winter Storms, $23.1 , 7.8%
Terrorism, $22.3 , 7.5%
Source: Insurance Services Office (ISO)..
1 Catastrophes are all events causing direct insured losses to property of $25 million or more in 2006 dollars. Catastrophe threshold changed from $5 million to $25 million beginning in 1997. Adjusted for inflation by the III.2 Excludes snow. 3 Includes hurricanes and tropical storms. 4 Includes other geologic events such as volcanic eruptions and other earth movement. 5 Does not include flood damage covered by the federally administered National Flood Insurance Program. 6 Includes wildland fires.
Insured disaster losses totaled $297.3 billion from 1987-2006 (in 2006 dollars). Hurricanes and tornadoes accounted for approximately 75% of these.
Number of Tornadoes in Each Calendar Quarter, 2005–2009:Q2
209
504
235
160
244
543
193
112
360
944
305
81
157
617
118
394
571
105
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr
2005 20062007 20082009
Sources: US Dept. of Commerce, Storm Prediction Center, National Weather Service,at http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/torn/monthlytornstats.pdf 2009:Q2 is I.I.I. estimate
The first two quarters of 2009 were more
typical of prior years than 2008.
Underwriting Expense Ratios LikelyWill Rise as Premium Growth Lags
23.4%
24.3%25.0% 26.2%
24.4%
24.5%24.8%25.6%
24.6%
25.6%
24.7%
26.1%25.9%
27.7%
30.8%
28.3%
26.3%26.4%25.6%
30.0%
31.1%
29.4%
29.9%
29.1%
26.6%
25.0%
22%
24%
26%
28%
30%
32%
96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
Personal Commercial
*Ratio of expenses incurred to net premiums written.Sources: A.M. Best; ISO; Insurance Information Institute
2009:Q1 blended ratio was 29.1%
• The financial crisis/great recession didn’t directly affect P-L underwriting performance; the underwriting cycle and catastrophes were 2008’s drivers
• Premium levels will likely continue to be soft, driven by low exposure growth, low inflation
• The potential for significant catastrophe losses remains high
• Expense ratios will likely grow unless expenses can be reduced
Section Summary: Hard Truths about P-L Insurance Operations
Hard Truths about Property/Liability
Investment Performance and Insuring Capacity
Asset Allocation of P/C Insurance Industry’s Cash & Invested Assets
Cash & Short-Term Investments
7.6%
Common Stock16.3%
Other8.2%
Preferred Stock1.2%
Bonds66.7%
Portfolio Facts
•Invested assets totaled $1.26 trillion as of 9/30/08
•Allocations were virtually unchanged from 12/31/07
Source: SNL Financial LC
As of September 30, 2008
41
Bond Yields Tend to Follow Inflation, but the Relationship is a Loose One
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99 00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09F
10F
CPI-U % Change U.S. Treasury 10-Year Note Yield
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics (history); Blue Chip Economic Indicators, 8/09 (forecasts)
ForecastJuly 1990-March 1991
recession
March 2001-November 2001
recession
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09F
10F
11F
12F
13F
14F
P-C Inv Income/Inv Assets 10-Year Treasury Note
P/C Investment Income as a % of Invested Assets Follows 10-Year U.S. T-Note
Sources: history: Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System; A.M.Best; Insurance Information Institute.Forecasts: Office of Management and Budget, Mid-Session Review, Fiscal Year 2010.
Investment yield historically tracks 10-year Treasury note quite closely
OMB forecasts that T-note yields won’t exceed 5.2% for the next decade. If
recent history holds, P-C net investment yield will be somewhat lower.
P/C Industry Investment Income*, 1994-2008
$33.
7 $36.
8
$38.
0 $41.
5
$37.
1
$36.
7
$38.
7
$39.
6
$49.
5 $52.
3 $54.
6
$51.
2
$51.
4
$40.
8
$38.
6
$39.
9
$25
$30
$35
$40
$45
$50
$551994
95
96
97
98
99
2000
01
02
03
04
2005** 06
07
08
09**
*
Bill
ion
s
*Primarily interest and stock dividends. ** Investment income (excluding one-time dividend) jumped in 2005 as insurers that had accumulated cash captured rising bond interest rates. Also, 2005 figure includes special one-time dividend of $3.2B. ***2009 figure is Q1 actual, annualizedSources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
Investment income might moderate further if rates for new bond
investments stay low and/or if insurers shift to shorter-maturity bonds and
more US government notes.
Investment income CAGR 1994-2007 was just 3.8%.
P/C Industry Net Realized Capital Gains and Losses, 1990-2009:Q1
$2.88$4.81
$9.89
$1.66
$6.00
$9.24$10.81
$13.02
$16.21
$6.63
-$1.21
$6.61$8.97
-$19.80
-$0.41
$18.02
$3.52
$9.70$9.13$9.82
-$24
-$20
-$16
-$12
-$8
-$4
$0
$4
$8
$12
$16
$20
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09:Q
1
Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
Nearly $9 billion in realized capital gains in 2007, but
$-19.7 billion in 2008.
$ Billions
Policyholder Surplus by Quarter,2006:Q4 – 2009:Q1
Billions$4
87.1
$496
.6 $512
.8
$521
.8
$478
.5
$455
.6
$437
.1
$505
.0
$515
.6
$517
.9
$400
$425
$450
$475
$500
$525
06:Q4 07:Q1 07:Q2 07:Q3 07:Q4 08:Q1 08:Q2 08:Q3 08:Q4 09:Q1
Source: ISO
Decline Since 2007:Q3 Peak
2009Q1: -$84.7B (-16.2%)
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 0809:Q1
U.S. P/C Industry Premiums-to-Surplus Ratio: 1985-2009:Q1
Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
19980.85:1–the lowest
(strongest) P:S ratio in recent history.
Premiums are a rough measure of risk accepted; surplus is funds beyond reserves to pay unexpected
losses. The larger surplus is in relation to premiums—the lower the ratio of premiums to surplus—the greater
the industry’s capacity to handle the risk it has accepted.
1.03:1 as of
3/31/09
Ratio at year-end
Largest Capital Events asa Percent of Surplus, 1989-present
3.3%
9.6%
6.9%
10.9%
16.2%
13.8%
6.2%
0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
18%
6/3
0/1
989
Hu
rric
an
eH
ug
o
6/3
0/1
992
Hu
rric
an
eA
nd
rew
12/3
1/9
3N
ort
hri
dg
eE
art
hq
uake
6/3
0/0
1S
ep
t. 1
1A
ttacks
6/3
0/0
4F
lori
da
Hu
rric
an
es
6/3
0/0
5H
urr
ican
eK
atr
ina
Fin
an
cia
lC
risis
as o
f3/3
1/0
9**
Ratio is for end-of-quarter surplus immediately prior to event. Date shown is end of quarter prior to event. Sources: PCS; Insurance Information Institute.
The financial crisis now ranks as the largest “capital event”
over the past 20+ years
Premium-to-Surplus Ratios Before Major Capital Events*
$1.65
$1.42 $1.40
$1.03 $1.03$0.88
$1.05$1.15
$0.5
$0.7
$0.9
$1.1
$1.3
$1.5
$1.7
$1.9
6/3
0/1
989
Hu
rric
an
eH
ug
o
6/3
0/1
992
Hu
rric
an
eA
nd
rew
12/3
1/9
3N
ort
hri
dg
eE
art
hq
uake
6/3
0/0
1S
ep
t. 1
1A
ttacks
6/3
0/0
4F
lori
da
Hu
rric
an
es
6/3
0/0
5H
urr
ican
eK
atr
ina
6/3
0/0
7F
inan
cia
lC
risis
As o
f3/3
1/0
9**
*Ratio is for end of quarter immediately prior to event. Date shown is end of quarter prior to event. **Latest availableSource: PCS; Insurance Information Institute.
P/C insurance industry was better capitalized going into the
financial crisis than before any “capital event” in recent history
In 2008, A.M. Best Affirmed or Upgraded 88% of P/C Insurers*
Upgraded, 59 , 4.2%
Other, 59 , 4.2%
Affirm, 1,183 , 83.4%
Downgraded, 55 , 3.9%
Under Review, 63 , 4.4%
*Through December 19.Source: A.M. Best.
50
In 2008, despite financial market turmoil, high cat losses and a soft
market, A.M. Best lowered ratings on just 3.9% of P-C insurers. It placed
another 4.4% under review
Reasons for US P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969-2008
Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2008 Impairment Review, Special Report, Apr. 6, 2008
Deficient loss reserves and inadequate
pricing are the leading cause of
insurer impairments,
underscoring the importance of
discipline. Investment
catastrophe losses play a much smaller role.
Reinsurance Failure3.7%
Rapid Growth14.3%
Misc.9.1%
Affiliate Impairment
7.9%
Sig. Change in Business
4.2%
Deficient Loss
Reserves/In-adequate Pricing38.1%
Investment Problems
7.0%
Alleged Fraud8.1%
Catastrophe Losses7.6%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
1975: 2.4%
1977:19.0% 1987:17.3% 1997:11.6% 2006:12.2%
1984: 1.8% 1992: 4.5% 2001: -1.2%
10 Years10 Years
9 Years
Note: 2008 result excluding Mortgage & Financial Guarantee insurers is 4.2%.Sources: ISO; A.M. Best (2009F); Insurance Information Institute.
2008: 0.3%
P/C Insurance Industry ROEs,1975 – 2009F*
52
• Even though the industry has had its largest “capital event,” it is still well positioned to conduct business as usual
• Yields on bonds are expected to continued at low levels Nearly a decade of investing at these levels means
they’re “baked in” to investment performance for a long time
Section Summary: Hard Truths about P-L Investments & Capacity
Insurance Information Institute On-Line
If you would like a copy of this presentation, please give me your business card with e-mail address