20
1 John Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering Knoxville, TN Sep 26-29, 2005 Advances in the Science, Technology, & Engineering for Laser Fusion Energy

sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

1

Jo

hn

Se

thia

n a

nd

Ste

ve

Ob

en

sc

ha

inP

las

ma

Ph

ys

ics

Div

isio

nN

av

al R

es

ea

rch

La

bo

rato

ryW

as

hin

gto

n, D

C

21

st S

ym

po

siu

m o

n F

us

ion

En

gin

ee

ring

Kn

ox

ville

, TN

Se

p 2

6-2

9, 2

00

5

Ad

van

ces in

the

Scie

nce, T

ech

no

log

y, &

En

gin

eerin

g fo

r Laser F

usio

nE

nerg

y

Page 2: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

2

Ou

r co

-au

tho

rs c

om

e fro

m 2

9 d

iffere

nt in

stitu

tion

s

HA

PL

me

etin

g #

12

, LL

NL

Ju

ne

20

05

Un

ive

rsitie

s•

UC

SD

•W

isc

on

sin

•G

eo

rgia

Tech

•U

CL

A•

U R

och

este

r, LL

E•

UC

San

ta B

arb

ara

•U

C B

erk

ele

y•

UN

C•

Pen

n S

tate

Ele

ctro

-op

tics

Go

vern

men

t Lab

s1

.N

RL

2.

LL

NL

3.

SN

L4

.L

AN

L5

.O

RN

L6

.P

PP

L

Ind

ustry

1.

Gen

era

l Ato

mic

s2

.T

itan

/PS

D3

.S

ch

afe

r Co

rp4

.S

AIC

5.

Co

mm

on

wealth

Tech

6.

Co

here

nt

7.

On

yx

8.

DE

I9

.M

issio

n R

esearc

h C

orp

10.

No

rthru

p11.

Ultra

met, In

c12.

Pla

sm

a P

rocesses, In

c13.

Op

tisw

itch

Te

ch

no

log

y14.

Researc

h S

cie

ntific

Inst

Page 3: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

3

We a

re d

evelo

pin

g th

e s

cie

nce &

tech

no

log

ies fo

rla

ser fu

sio

n e

nerg

y w

ith d

irect d

rive ta

rgets

4. T

arg

et F

ab

ricatio

n

5. T

arg

et In

jectio

n &

En

gag

em

en

t

6. C

ham

ber &

Mate

rials

3. F

inal O

ptic

s

1. T

arg

et D

esig

n

2. L

asers

DP

PS

L (L

LN

L)

KrF

(NR

L)

S, T

, an

d E

Page 4: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

4

Wh

y w

e lik

e d

irect d

rive fo

r laser fu

sio

n

Laser B

eam

s

Ph

ysic

s is

sim

ple

r --key is

su

e is

hyd

rod

yn

am

ic s

tab

ility

Hig

her e

fficie

ncy --b

ette

r co

up

ling

of la

ser to

fuel

Targ

ets

rela

tively

sim

ple

(ch

eap

) to fa

bric

ate

No

pre

ferre

d illu

min

atio

n d

irectio

n

Sim

ple

r op

era

tion

al is

su

es: n

o h

oh

lrau

m d

eb

ris to

recycle

Dire

ct d

rive

Pelle

t

Page 5: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

5

DT

Vap

or

DT

Ice (fuel)

Fo

am/D

T (ab

lator)

2.375 mm radiusC

H

33

4

?m

25

6

?m

5 ?

m

DT

Vap

or

DT

Ice (fuel)

Fo

am/D

T (ab

lator)

2.375 mm radiusC

H

33

4

?m

25

6

?m

5 ?

m

We n

eed

gain

s >

100 fo

r en

erg

y a

pp

licatio

n2 D

co

mp

ute

r sim

ula

tion

s p

red

ict ta

rget g

ain

s >

160.

"Pic

ket" P

uls

e S

hap

e

010

20

time (n

sec)

Po

wer

(TW

) 1000

100

101

t1

t2

t3

Laser =

2.5

MJ

NR

L F

AS

T C

OD

E: h

igh

pre

cis

ion

2D

calc

ula

tion

s th

at in

clu

de a

ll re

levan

t mo

des a

nd

no

n-u

nifo

rmitie

s in

the ta

rget a

nd

laser

21.8

3 n

sec

22.4

0 n

sec

GA

IN =

160

Secto

r of

Sp

heric

al

Targ

et

Page 6: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

6

Th

e b

aselin

e ta

rget re

vis

ited

…. w

ith s

pecs th

at c

an

meet re

qu

irem

en

ts fo

r gain

, fab

ricatio

n, &

inje

ctio

n

L.J

. Pe

rkin

s (L

LN

L)

1D

ca

lcu

latio

nb

as

ed

on

NR

L d

es

ign

LA

SE

R:

2.4

MJ

YIE

LD

:3

48

.6 M

JG

AIN

:144.8

(las

er h

as

pic

ke

t pu

lse

)D

T V

apo

r(.0002 g

/cc)

DT

Ice (fuel)

Fo

am/D

T (ab

lator)

2.227 mm radius

CH

seal coat

334

µm

153

µm

5 µ

m

800 _

50/5

0 A

u/P

d o

ute

r layer

dem

onstra

ted:

imprin

t reductio

n,

fast D

T fill

Hig

h IR

refle

ctiv

ity

5 µ

m C

H c

oatin

g

dem

onstra

ted s

eal,

should

get R

MS

< 5

0 n

m

100 m

g/c

c fo

am

can m

ake s

hells

Gas te

mp

17.3

°K

bala

nces p

hysic

s

and ic

e R

MS

Su

rface te

mp

18.6

°K

belo

w D

T T

riple

Poin

t,

allo

ws fo

r warm

up

Page 7: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

7

We a

re d

evelo

pin

g tw

o ty

pes o

f Lasers

for IF

E.

Bo

th h

ave th

e p

ote

ntia

l to m

eet th

e re

qu

irem

en

ts fo

rta

rget p

hysic

s, re

p-ra

te, c

ost a

nd

du

rab

ility.

KrF

Laser (E

lectra

-NR

L)

ele

ctro

n b

eam

pu

mp

ed

gas la

ser

DP

SS

L (M

erc

ury

-LL

NL

)

Dio

de p

um

ped

so

lid s

tate

laser

•N

eed

ed te

chnolo

gies are b

ein

g d

evelo

ped

and d

emonstra

ted

on larg

e (but su

bscale) sy

stems.

•T

echnolo

gies d

evelo

ped

must scale to

MJ sy

stems

Page 8: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

8

Th

e M

erc

ury

Laser T

eam

has d

evelo

ped

six

new

tech

no

log

ies

Ban

dw

idth

Fre

qu

en

cy C

on

verte

rA

dap

tive O

ptic

Dio

de p

um

p a

rrays

Cry

sta

lline a

mp

lifiers

Heliu

m g

as c

oo

ling

Page 9: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

9

05

10

15

20

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Conversion EfficienN

um

be

r of S

ho

ts

(x 1

03)

Th

e Mercu

ry laser was o

perated

at an averag

e po

wer o

f5

50

W fo

r >1

05 s

ho

ts a

t 1 µ

m an

d at 227 W

for >10

4 sho

ts at 0.5 µm

0.5

µm

Effic

ien

cy (1

4 n

s p

uls

e)

020

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1

10

100

1 Output Energy (

Nu

mb

er o

f Sh

ots

(x

103)

80%

en

erg

y in

a 6

X D

L s

po

t

1 µ

m A

vera

ge P

ow

er (F

ou

r 1 h

r run

s)

55 J

/pu

lse a

t 1 µ

m22.7

J/p

uls

e a

t 0.5

µm

Page 10: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

10

De

mo

ns

trate

d v

ery

un

iform

las

er b

ea

m:

min

imiz

es

hy

dro

dy

na

mic

ins

tab

ilities

Sh

orte

st w

av

ele

ng

th (2

48

nm

)m

ax

imiz

es

ab

so

rptio

n &

roc

ke

t effic

ien

cy

min

imiz

es

risk

from

La

se

r Pla

sm

a In

sta

bilitie

s

Arc

hite

ctu

re a

llow

s s

traig

ht-fo

rwa

rd "z

oo

min

g"

(de

cre

as

e la

se

r sp

ot to

follo

w im

plo

din

g p

elle

t)

Ro

bu

st, in

du

stria

l arc

hite

ctu

re c

an

sc

ale

to M

J e

ne

rgie

s

Ga

s m

ed

ium

is to

ug

h to

bre

ak

, ea

sy

to c

oo

l

Ele

ctra

res

ea

rch

: Ov

era

ll effic

ien

cy

of IF

E s

ize

sy

ste

m

7%

(me

ets

go

al)

KrF

: Wh

y u

se K

rF la

sers

for in

ertia

l fusio

n e

nerg

y

Nik

e L

aser

0.3

- 1.3

%

non-u

nifo

rmity

(all m

odes)

Page 11: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

11

Based

on

ou

r researc

h, a

n IF

E-s

ized

KrF

syste

m is

pro

jecte

d to

have a

wall p

lug

effic

ien

cy o

f 7

%

Befo

re A

fter

Pu

lse

d P

ow

er

60%

Ad

va

nc

ed

Sw

itch

85

%

Hib

ac

hi S

truc

ture

40%

No

An

od

e, P

atte

rn B

ea

m 7

8%

KrF

9%

Ba

se

d o

n E

lec

tra e

xp

'ts 1

2%

Op

tica

l train

to ta

rge

t9

5%

Es

tima

te 9

5%

Utilitie

s (P

um

ps

, ga

s c

oo

ling

)9

5%

Es

tima

te 9

5%

To

tal

1.9

%7.2

%

> 6

% is

ad

eq

uate

for fu

sio

n ta

rget g

ain

s >

100...

...an

d la

test d

esig

ns h

ave g

ain

s >

140

Page 12: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

12

Ele

ctra

KrF

laser is

very

co

nsis

ten

t in lo

ng

du

ratio

n,

rep

etitiv

ely

pu

lsed

, run

s

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

050

100

150

200

250

300

time

(ns

)

photodiode amplitude (V)

sh

ot 1

sh

ot 1

00

0

sh

ot 2

00

0sh

ot 3

00

0

sh

ot 4

00

0sh

ot 5

00

0

sh

ot 6

00

0sh

ot 7

00

0

sh

ot 8

00

0sh

ot 9

00

0

sh

ot 1

00

00

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8 1

1.2

05

01

00

15

02

00

Tim

e (n

s)

Intensity (arb.)

Sh

ot 1

Sh

ot 1

00

Sh

ot 2

00

Sh

ot 3

00

Sh

ot 4

00

Sh

ot 5

00

0

0.5 1

1.5 2

2.5 3

050

100

150

200

250

Tim

e (n

s)

Intensity (arb.)

Sh

ot 1

Sh

ot 5

0

Sh

ot 1

00

Sh

ot 1

50

Sh

ot 2

00

Sh

ot 2

50

Sh

ot 3

00

Sh

ot 3

50

Sh

ot 4

00

300 J

@ 1

Hz

(300 W

)10,0

00 s

ho

tsco

ntin

uo

us

(2.5

hrs

)

700 J

@ 1

Hz

(700 W

)400 s

ho

tsco

ntin

uo

us

400 J

@ 5

Hz

(2000 W

)500 s

ho

tsco

ntin

uo

us

Recen

t resu

lts:

250 J

@ 5

Hz

(1,2

50 W

)7700 s

ho

tsfo

ur b

ack to

back ru

ns

Page 13: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

13

Fin

al O

ptic

s:

Gra

zin

g In

cid

en

ce A

lum

inu

m M

irror m

eets

req

uire

men

ts fo

r1) re

flectiv

ity (>

99%

@ 8

5°)

2) la

ser d

am

ag

e th

resh

old

( > 5

J/c

m2)

Co

ncep

t

Ele

ctro

pla

ted a

lum

inum

mirro

r

stiff, lig

htw

eig

ht, c

oole

d, n

eutro

n re

sis

tant b

ase

85°

Laser

Resu

lts

UC

SD

Nu

mb

er o

f sh

ots

Laser

Dam

ag

eT

hre

sh

old

J/c

m2

30

25

20

15

10501

000 1

0k 1

00k 1

M 1

0M

100M

1G

Desire

d

Opera

ting

Range

Extra

po

late

d u

sin

g:

F2 / F

1 = (n

2 /n1 ) s

-1

s =

0.9

55

Data

Page 14: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

14

Targ

et F

ab

ricatio

n:

Th

e te

ch

no

log

ies fo

r targ

et fa

bric

atio

n a

re u

nd

ers

too

d a

nd

un

der d

evelo

pm

en

t

100 m

g/c

c fo

am

sh

ell

W2P

C

Da

ta

La

se

r A

Ph

oto

dio

de

Se

nso

rs

La

se

r B

Va

riab

le S

pe

ed

Pu

mp

Trip

le O

rifice

Ge

ne

rato

r

DA

Q

Input/O

utp

ut

Nt t

l

W2P

C

Da

ta

La

se

r A

Ph

oto

dio

de

Se

nso

rs

La

se

r B

Va

riab

le S

pe

ed

Pu

mp

Trip

le O

rifice

Ge

ne

rato

r

DA

Q

Input/O

utp

ut

Nt t

l

22 s

hells

/min

, < 1

% v

aria

tion

Targ

et p

roje

cte

d c

ost: $

0.1

6 e

a

targ

et fa

cto

ry c

oncept

L-

mo

de n

um

ber

11

01

00

10

00

1.4

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.201

10

10

01

00

0

1.4

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.20

Pre

vio

us

be

st

Ov

er fo

am

Roughness (? m)

L-

mo

de n

um

ber

11

01

00

10

00

1.4

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.201

10

10

01

00

0

1.4

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.20

Pre

vio

us

be

st

Ov

er fo

am

Ov

er fo

am

Roughness (? m)G

en

era

l Ato

mic

sL

os A

lam

os

Sch

affe

r Co

rp

Au

/Pd

Overc

oate

d s

hells

DT

Vap

or

(.0002 g/cc)

DT

Ice (fuel)

Fo

am/D

T (ab

lator)

2.227 mm radius

CH

seal coat

33

4

?m

15

3

?m

5 ?

m

DT

Vap

or

(.0002 g/cc)

DT

Ice (fuel)

Fo

am/D

T (ab

lator)

2.227 mm radius

CH

seal coat

33

4

?m

15

3

?m

5 ?

m

x-ra

y p

ictu

re"w

et" s

hells

Sm

oo

th D

-T ic

e o

ver fo

am

Cry

og

en

ic flu

idiz

ed

bed

Page 15: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

15

Targ

et in

jectio

n a

nd

trackin

g N

ew

inje

cto

r has a

ch

ieved

req

uire

d v

elo

city

Pro

of o

f prin

cip

al o

f "Po

isso

n S

po

t" trackin

g te

ch

niq

ue

Targ

et In

jecto

r (gas g

un

)50- 4

00 m

/sec

+/- 1

0 m

m a

imin

g

Gen

era

l Ato

mic

sU

CS

D

Targ

et T

rackin

g4.6

µm

accu

racy

< 0

.71 m

sec re

sp

on

se

Als

o lo

okin

g a

t ele

ctro

mag

netic

based

syste

m

Page 16: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

16

TA

RG

ET

x-ra

ys

ions

neutro

ns

Bla

nket

We a

re d

evelo

pin

g a

first w

all fo

r the c

ham

ber to

with

sta

nd

the s

tead

y p

uls

es o

f x-ra

ys, io

ns a

nd

neu

tron

s fro

m th

e ta

rget.

Firs

t Wa

ll:

Tu

ng

ste

n a

rmo

r on

Lo

w A

ctiv

atio

n F

erritic

ste

el

Page 17: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

17

Lo

ng

term

exp

osu

re e

xp

erim

en

ts a

nd

mo

delin

gsu

gg

est th

e tu

ng

ste

n F

W s

ho

uld

be k

ep

t < 2

500 °C

Ion

s:

RHEPP

(SNL)

Laser:

Dragonfire

(UCSD)

X-ra

ys:

XAPPER

(LLNL)

Mo

de

ling

:Wisconsin,

Para

mete

rs

#

sh

ots

No

thin

g

Hap

pen

s

Su

rface R

ou

gh

en

s

850 kV

N+

50 n

sec

0.0

67H

z

2000

1400 ?C

?T

=1380

1900?C

?T

=1820

satu

rate

s

2 ?

m R

MS

3100?C

?

T =

3090

satu

rate

s

4 u

m R

MS

90-1

30 e

V

50 n

sec

10 H

z

10

6

2500 ?C

?T

=1900

1 ?

m Y

AG

8 n

sec

10 H

z

10

5

1800 ?

C ( ?

T=

1700)

RM

S vs #

shots n

ot ye

t

quantifie

d

modelin

g sh

ow

s cracks (ro

ughenin

g) e

xpecte

d.

Should

stop b

efo

re th

ey g

et to

the su

bstra

te

Page 18: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

18

Reactio

n C

ham

ber M

od

elin

g:

We id

en

tified

a "c

ham

ber o

pera

ting

" win

do

w fo

r

lon

g te

rm w

all s

urv

ival, ta

rget in

jectio

n, a

nd p

lant e

fficie

ncy

1 m

m W

ove

r 3.5

mm

FS

arm

or

Coola

nt 5

80 °C

350 M

J ta

rget

Ch

am

be

r 10

.75

m ra

diu

sT

arg

et in

itial te

mpera

ture

17.5

°C

Targ

et fin

al te

mpera

ture

18.5

°C

Inje

ctio

n v

elo

city

= 1

50

m/s

ec

Tu

ng

ste

nte

mp

era

ture

(°C)

at v

ario

us

dep

ths

3400

3000

2600

2200

1800

1400

1000

600

200

0 1

0 2

0 3

0 4

0 5

0tim

e (?

sec)

Surfa

ce

1 ?

m

5 ?

m

10 ?

m

100 ?

m

1 m

m

Coola

nt

Belie

ved lo

ng te

rm lim

it = 2

500

?C

Meltin

g p

oin

t of tu

ngste

n =

3410

?C

Initia

l wall te

mpera

ture

to k

eep ta

rget b

elo

w trip

le p

oin

t = 6

00

?C

3400

3000

2600

2200

1800

1400

1000

600

200

0 1

0 2

0 3

0 4

0 5

0tim

e (?

sec)

Surfa

ce

1 ?

m

5 ?

m

10 ?

m

100 ?

m

1 m

m

Coola

nt

Surfa

ce

1 ?

m

5 ?

m

10 ?

m

100 ?

m

1 m

m

Coola

nt

Belie

ved lo

ng te

rm lim

it = 2

500

?C

Meltin

g p

oin

t of tu

ngste

n =

3410

?C

Initia

l wall te

mpera

ture

to k

eep ta

rget b

elo

w trip

le p

oin

t = 6

00

?C

UC

SD

Page 19: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

19

20

0n

s ?

30

0n

s ?

10

0n

s ?

40

0n

s ?

50

0n

s ?

526ns?

20

0n

s ?

30

0n

s ?

10

0n

s ?

40

0n

s ?

50

0n

s ?

526ns?

"Mag

netic

Inte

rven

tion

" offe

rs a

way to

keep

the

ion

s o

ff the w

all, p

ossib

ly in

cre

ase s

yste

m e

fficie

ncy

1.

Exp

an

din

g p

lasm

a c

om

pre

sses m

ag

netic

field

ag

ain

st firs

t wall

2.

Ion

s n

ever g

et to

wall!

3.

Fie

ld is

resis

tively

dis

sip

ate

d in

wall

4.

Ion

s, a

t red

uced

en

erg

y a

nd

po

wer, e

scap

e th

rou

gh

cu

sp

po

les a

nd

belt

5.

Easie

r to a

bso

rb re

du

ced

ion

po

wer in

du

mp

s

Co

ils (8

MA

each

)--fo

rm c

usp

mag

netic

field

Exp

an

sio

n o

f pla

sm

a in

cu

sp

field

:2-D

sh

ell m

od

elA

.E. R

ob

so

n

To

roid

al

Du

mp

6.5

m

13.0

m

Page 20: sofe 05 sethian - Princeton Plasma Physics LaboratoryJohn Sethian and Steve Obenschain Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 21 st Symposium on Fusion Engineering

20

Next S

tep

s to

Develo

p L

aser F

usio

n E

nerg

y

•Full s

cale

Laser B

eam

Lin

e p

lus ta

rget c

ham

ber, c

an a

ddre

ss:

–L

ase

r

–F

ina

l op

tics (la

se

r effe

cts

)

–T

arg

et fa

bric

atio

n (m

ass p

rod

uctio

n m

eth

od

s)

–T

arg

et in

jectio

n a

nd

en

ga

ge

me

nt

•Full s

cale

dem

o b

ased o

n 3

50 M

J T

arg

et a

nd 2

.5 M

J la

ser

wo

uld

be

exp

en

siv

e, a

nd

risky

–W

ou

ld lik

e to

test ta

rge

t ph

ysic

s o

n s

ma

ller s

ca

le

–N

ee

d fle

xib

le fa

cility

to d

eve

lop

an

d e

va

lua

te m

ate

rials

an

d c

om

po

ne

nts

•So

lutio

n: T

he

Fu

sio

n T

est F

acility

–S

ma

ller, le

ss e

xp

en

siv

e fa

cility

–C

ap

italiz

es o

n n

ew

ve

rsio

n o

f NR

L d

irect d

rive

targ

et

–S

ee

the

ne

xt ta

lk!!!