Upload
paula-green
View
222
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Social Theory: SOCL/ANTH 302
Georg Simmel
1
Georg Simmel 1858-1918
Born: Berlin, Germany
Family:Business-orientedProsperousJewish
2
How is society possible?
Sociologists should focus on people in relationships.
Society--Patterned interactions
among members of a group
3
Everyday Life
Began with the elements of
everyday life—playing games keeping secrets being a stranger forming friendships
4
Macro or Micro
Resisted reducing social behavior to individual personality
Social relationships not fully explained by larger collective patterns such as “the economy.”
5
Interaction orderEveryday interaction creates levels
of reality “Interaction order”
Never totally fixedAlways problematicCapable of change
6
Task of Sociology
Society = A web of patterned Interactions
Sociology’s TaskStudy formsforms of interactions
7
SociationSociety= Name for individuals
connected by interactions
Major field of study: Sociationociation
Patterns & Forms in which people associate and interact
8
Formal Sociology (Social Forms)
Forms of InteractionFor example:Study of warfare and Study of marriage
Qualitatively different subjects
Essentially similar interactive forms in martial conflict and in marital conflict
9
Formal Sociology (Social Forms)
Behavior displayed at the Court of Louis XIV
AndAt Offices of American corporations
Study forms of subordination and superordination Common patterns
10
Forms of Social Interaction
Social Processes
Conflict and Cooperation
Subordination and Superordination
Centralization and Decentralization
11
Georg Simmel: Social Types
Simmel constructed a gallery of social typessocial types to
complement his inventory of social formssocial forms:The StrangerThe MediatorThe PoorThe AdventurerThe Man in the MiddleThe Renegade
12
Georg Simmel: Social Types
The typetype is created through
relations with others who:Assign him a particular position Expect him to behave in specific
ways.
13
Social Types: “The stranger” Is not just a wanderer “who comes today and goes tomorrow,” having no specific structural position.
He is a “person who comes today & stays tomorrow… He is fixed within a particular spatial group… but his position…is determined…by the fact that he does not belong to it from the beginning,” and that he may leave again.
The stranger is “an element of the group itself” While not being fully part of it. “
14
“The stranger” He therefore is assigned a role that no other
members of the group can play. By virtue of his partial involvement in group
affairs he can attain an objectivity that other members cannot reach…
Moreover, being distant and near at the same time, the stranger will often be called upon as a confidant…
the stranger may be a better judge between conflicting parties than full members of the group since he is not tied to either of the contenders…
15
Social Types: The Poor
Once the poor accept assistance, they are removed from the preconditions of their previous status, they are declassified, and their private trouble now becomes a public issue.
16
The PoorThe poor come to be viewed not by
what they dobut by virtue of what is done to them.Society creates the social type of the
poor and assigns them a peculiar status that is
marked only by negative attributes, by what the status-holders do not have.
17
Georg Simmel: Social Types
The stranger and the poor, and Simmel’s other types,
Assigned their positions by specific interactive relations
They are societal creations and Must act out their assigned roles.
18
Georg Simmel: The Dialectical Method
Sociationociation always involves: Harmony and conflict, Attraction and repulsion, Love and hatred. Human relations are characterized by ambivalence Those in intimate relations likely to harbor not only
positive but also negative sentiments.
Tuesday, April 18, 202319
Georg Simmel: The Dialectical Method
What the observer or the participant divides into two intermingling trends may in reality be only one.
Because conflict can strengthen existing bonds or establish new ones, it can be considered a creative rather than a destructive force.
Tuesday, April 18, 2023
© 2000-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
20
Georg Simmel: The Significance of Numbers for Social Life
Simmel’s emphasis on the structural determinants of
social action is best exemplified in his essay,
“Quantitative Aspects of the Group.”
Here he comes close to his goal of writing a grammar of social life by considering one of the most abstract characteristics of a group:
The mere number of its participantsThe mere number of its participants.
Tuesday, April 18, 2023
© 2000-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
21
Georg Simmel: The Significance of Numbers for Social Life
Dyad versus Triad
A dyaddyadic relationship differs qualitatively from all other types of groups
Each of the two participants is confronted by only one other and not by a collectivity.
“A dyad depends on each of its two elements
Tuesday, April 18, 2023
© 2000-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
22
Georg Simmel: The Significance of Numbers for Social Life
When a dyad is transformed into a triadtriad, The fact that one member has been added
actually brings about a major qualitative change.
In the triadtriad, as in all associations involving more than two persons,
The individual participant is confronted with the possibility of being outvoted by a majority.
Tuesday, April 18, 2023
© 2000-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
23
001 4/11 Georg Simmel: The Significance of Numbers for Social Life
The triad is the simplest structure in which the group as a whole can achieve domination over its component members;
Social framework for constraining individual participants for collective purposes…
The triad exhibits in its simplest form the sociological characteristic of all social life:
The dialectic of freedom and constraint,
Of autonomy and heteronomy.
Tuesday, April 18, 2023
© 2000-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
24
Georg Simmel: The Significance of Numbers for Social Life
When a third member enters a dyadic group, various processes become possible where previously they could not take place.
A third member may: Mediate Rejoice Divide and Rule
Tuesday, April 18, 2023
© 2000-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
25
The Philosophy of Money
Economic exchange is a formform of social interaction.
When monetary transactions replace barter,
Significant changes occur in the forms of interactions between social actors.
Tuesday, April 18, 2023
© 2000-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
26
The Philosophy of Money
Money is subject to: Precise division and manipulation Permits exact measurement of equivalents
It is impersonal in ways that objects of barter, like crafts
and collected shells, can never be.
Tuesday, April 18, 2023
© 2000-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
27
The Philosophy of Money
It helps promote rational calculation in human affairs
And furthers the rationalization that is characteristic of modern society.
When money becomes the prevalent link between people,
It replaces personal ties by impersonal relations that are limited to a specific purpose.
Tuesday, April 18, 2023
© 2000-2006 by Ronald Keith Bolender
28
The Philosophy of Money
Consequently, abstract calculation invades areas of social life such as: Kinship relations Esthetic (artistic) appreciation
Which were previously the domain of qualitative rather than quantitative appraisals.
Tuesday, April 18, 202329