Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Social Security Practice: Present and Future
2:00 p.m.-3:30 p.m.
Presented By
8th Circuit Social Security Disability
Wednesday, August 19, 2015
Stacy Braverman Cloyd National Organization of Social Security
Claimants’ Representatives (NOSSCR) Deputy Director of Government Affairs
1025 Connecticut Ave, NW Suite 709
Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 202-457-7775
7/27/2015
1
Social Security Practice: Present and Future
Stacy Cloyd, National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ RepresentativesEighth Circuit Social Security Disability Conference
August 19, 2015
7/27/2015
2
Introduction
• What is NOSSCR?• Sounds great‐‐How can I join?
• Who am I?
• What am I talking about?• Policy: what’s going on in Washington• Practice: changes that affect individual cases• Pictures: graphs of national and state (AR, IA, MN, MO, ND, NE, SD) trends
7/27/2015
3
Policy
7/27/2015
4
Trust fund rebalancing
• 2 trust funds: OAS and DI (SSI does not have a trust fund)• Combined, they have sufficient funds for full benefits until 2034• DI trust fund facing shortfall in last quarter of 2016• Options:
• Clean reallocation: Change distributions of taxes (currently, 5.3% to OAS and 0.9% to DI) and/or increase total tax rate—has happened 11 times in the past
• But House rules now create point of order against legislation that “reduces the actuarial balance by at least .01 percent of the present value of future taxable payroll of” the OAS trust fund, unless it also extends the life span of the combined trust funds
• Cut DI benefits by about 20%• Other—some good and some bad (interfund borrowing, change cap on taxed income, change eligibility rules, merge trust funds, etc.)
7/27/2015
5
Trust fund rebalancingMajor causes of shortfall in DI Trust Fund:• Population growth• Baby Boomers in prime disability years• Women worked and became insured• Increased retirement age (6/15: 5.23% of disabled workers are 65)• Increased income inequality
7/27/2015
6
Legislative interest/antipathy• Nothing is moving quickly but may show up in reallocation package or as pay‐fors• Solvency: One Social Security Act (H.R. 3150), several that would raise/end the cap on taxable earnings, one that would raise full retirement age to 70. None likely to pass.
• Expansion: CPI‐E, scrap the cap with PIA increases, Huntington’s, end GPO/WEP (Brown)• The ghost of Coburn: introduced S.3003 in 2015 and some ideas may return: includes government reps; changes to EAJA, grids, adverse evidence and treating physician rules; review of “outlier” ALJs; closing the record; etc.
• Small savers: CUFF, SAIL, UI/DI, ordering SSA to revise grids• Hearings: Predominantly House Ways and Means (chair: Paul Ryan, RM: Sander Levin) and Senate Finance (Hatch/Wyden). Topics included work incentives,work‐related overpayments, and trust fund solvency.
7/27/2015
7
Fiscal Year 2015 budget
• “CRomnibus”: Continuing Resolution for Dept. of Homeland Security, omnibus for everything else.
• Total SSA administrative budget is a little higher than FY14, but much of the increase goes to research and demonstrations and OIG
• Doesn’t make up for past years• But it could have been worse
7/27/2015
8
Fiscal Year 2016 budget
• President’s budget request released February 2. Initiatives include:• Change in OAS/DI tax rates for 5 years; prolongs solvency of DI trust fund to 2033• Increase in LAE• Dedicated CDR funding• Hiring more ALJS and forming working group to study/change hiring• UI/DI offset
• SSA provided estimates and other materials to Congressional appropriators the same day
• Budgeting is often unpredictable and messy• An increase in SSA funding is unlikely
• Labor‐HHS allotment is not increasing, and commitment to more NIH $• Steady funding will lead to a decrease in services as fixed costs areexpected to increase by about $350 million next year.
7/27/2015
9
Administrative Budget FY08‐15
Fiscal Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015POTUS2016
House 2016
Senate2016
(in $ millions)Limitation on Administrative Expenses (LAE) 9,745 10,454 11,447 11,424 11,453 11,046 11,697 11,806 12,513 11,818 10,045
Research and Demonstration 27 35 49 43 8 17 47 83 101 101 101
Office of the Inspector General 92 98 103 102 102 97 102 103 110 109 106
7/27/2015
10
Program integrity• A topic of much discussion in Congress, media, and at SSA• Continuing Disability Reviews
• 1 million backlog, but more $ for CDRs in FY15—consider issues of benefits pending• Overpayments =/= fraud!
• Hearing , forthcoming GAO report about overpayments caused by delays in processing earnings reports• OIG report: 44.5% of sample overpaid at some point in decade. But largely not fraud, about 1/4 are really
benefits pending CDR appeal, about half is recovered and the rest waived or pending repayment.• October 1, 2014 – March 31, 2015 http://oig.ssa.gov/sites/default/files/SARC%20SPRING%2015%20‐‐%20FINAL.pdf
• Almost 65 million SSI/OASDI beneficiaries in May 2015 http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/quickfacts/stat_snapshot• 65,927 allegations received by OIG• 4067 investigations opened and 3892 closed• 286 arrests, 620 convictions
• Cooperative Disability Units• Currently 28 covering 24 states + PR; Kansas City and St. Louis only ones in 8th Circuit.
• Civil monetary penalties—rare but possible. 141 civil actions/CMPs in OIG report.
7/27/2015
11
Colvin nomination stalled
She is still the Acting Commissioner. Glenn Sklar just moved to OGC and Terrie Gruber is replacing him at ODAR.
7/27/2015
12
CRFB and BPC reports
• Packages of proposals for Social Security reform• CRFB: Former Reps. Jim McCrery (R‐LA) and Earl Pomeroy (D‐ND), SSDI only• BPC: Goal was to release it this summer but consensus is hard to find
• Likely topics• Cost‐cutting more than revenue‐raising• Work incentives
• May receive significant attention from members of Congress, media
7/27/2015
13
Institute of Medicine reports• Released in April 2015
• Symptom validity and psychometric testing (discussed in Coburn bill)• “psychological tests, including validity tests, are valuable and may increase the accuracy and consistency
of SSA’s disability determinations…However, validity tests should only be given in the context of broader psychological testing and should only be used to interpret information from the testing in question. The committee stresses that validity tests do not provide information about whether or not an individual is disabled.”
• Ongoing projects where consensus reports will likely be released in 2015• Two responses to 2010 GAO report about child SSI
• Speech/language disorders; mental impairments, especially autism & ADHD• Trends in diagnosis and prevalence in general and SSI populations• Current standards for diagnosis and treatment
• Project in the beginning phases• Capability determination—How can you tell who needs a payee?
• Standing Committee of Medical Experts to Assist Social Security on Disability Issues
• On retainer for issues that require quicker, shorter responses• One possibility is study of effects of trauma, beginning in March
7/27/2015
14
Practice
Photo: Flickr user slgckgc
7/27/2015
15
New Rules about Evidence• Old rule
• Disclose material facts and “provide evidence, without redaction, showing how your impairments affects your functioning during the time you say that you are disabled.” 20 CFR 404.1512 and 416.912.
• Notice of Proposed Rulemaking February 20, 2014• “Inform us about or submit all evidence known to you that relates to your disability claim…in its entirety”
• NOSSCR comments April 21, 2014• Proposal could conflict with state ethics rules on zealous representation• DDSs and ALJs could have to decide what evidence was “known” to a claimant or rep and if it’s “related”
• Longer files could burden ALJs and other decisionmakers. • How much must representative do to help claimant obtain evidence? Records are often expensive.
• New rules very similar to proposed rules. Went into effect April 20, 2015.• NOSSCR planning online survey about experience with new rules.
7/27/2015
16
Video hearings
• HA‐55• Currently no option to upload through ERE• Considerations when claimant moves or when claimant gets rep after hearing acknowledgment sent
• FY 2015 to 5/29/15 had 505,691 hearing requests and 353,866 VH opt‐outs, though many were for older requests.
• Looking at stats with 2 month lag, 30‐40% are opting out.• Blanket refusals? Conscientious claimants signing everything?
• ACUS report and recommendations on best practices• NOSSCR comments on right to opt out of video hearings
7/27/2015
17
Favorable Decision Rates at NHCs
Office FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 to 2/27/15
Not NHC 47% 44% 44%
NHC Albuquerque 44% 36% 34%
NHC Baltimore 44% 42% 45%
NHC Chicago 33% 28% 26%
NHC Falls Church 41% 37% 35%
NHC St. Louis 40% 42% 38%
Source: http://www.aalj.org/system/files/documents/aalj_newsletter__july_6__2015.pdf
7/27/2015
18
Some dismissals reversed
• 19,000 claimants who notified SSA of new address, had notice of hearing sent to an old address, and did not attend hearing
• About 90% were unrepresented, 49% SSI only, about 60% had a mental impairment
• Notices were supposed to go out in November 2014• Claimants are allowed a new hearing
• But may have won on a new claim, died, moved, aged, etc.
7/27/2015
19
Windsor and Obergefell• http://policy.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/lnx/0200210000• State of domicile vs. celebration should no longer matter• Policies are still being written• Date marriages were recognized may differ from when they were performed: see GN 00210.003.
• Example: POMS table says Iowa began recognizing out of state marriages 4/30/09 but began celebrating them 4/20/09
• SSI overpayments? Contact Justice in Aging (formerly NSCLC) or GLAD
Photo: David Goehring
7/27/2015
20
Online Dos and Don’ts• Online submission of documents via iAppeals began 3/26/15
• 1696 signatures are required, so reps must print, sign, scan, & upload • Just for medical denials at reconsideration and hearing request stages.• Not processed until Disability Report—Appeals also completed.
• Tips for Appeals Council• Don’t use your hearing office barcode! Request extension of time instead.
7/27/2015
21
Pictures
7/27/2015
22
Decreases2008‐14: 4 points decrease for initial, 3 Initial application peak: FY11 for reconsideration, and 18 for hearings
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Initial Reconsideration HearingSources: waterfall charts
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
3500000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Sources: 2014 waterfall chart, 2008‐13 http://oig.ssa.gov/sites/default/files/audit/full/pdf/A‐07‐13‐13073_0.pdf
7/27/2015
23
Initial Approval Rates: MO
Source data: http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/ssa‐state‐agency‐workload‐data
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2000
‐10
2001
‐01
2001
‐04
2001
‐07
2001
‐10
2002
‐01
2002
‐04
2002
‐07
2002
‐10
2003
‐01
2003
‐04
2003
‐07
2003
‐10
2004
‐01
2004
‐04
2004
‐07
2004
‐10
2005
‐01
2005
‐04
2005
‐07
2005
‐10
2006
‐01
2006
‐04
2006
‐07
2006
‐10
2007
‐01
2007
‐04
2007
‐07
2007
‐10
2008
‐01
2008
‐04
2008
‐07
2008
‐10
2009
‐01
2009
‐04
2009
‐07
2009
‐10
2010
‐01
2010
‐04
2010
‐07
2010
‐10
2011
‐01
2011
‐04
2011
‐07
2011
‐10
2012
‐01
2012
‐04
2012
‐07
2012
‐10
2013
‐01
2013
‐04
2013
‐07
2013
‐10
2014
‐01
2014
‐04
2014
‐07
2014
‐10
2014
‐12
2015
‐03
2015
‐06
SSDI SSI Concurrent Child SSI
7/27/2015
24
Initial Approval Rates: MN
Source data: http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/ssa‐state‐agency‐workload‐data SSDI SSI Concurrent Child SSI
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2000
‐10
2001
‐01
2001
‐04
2001
‐07
2001
‐10
2002
‐01
2002
‐04
2002
‐07
2002
‐10
2003
‐01
2003
‐04
2003
‐07
2003
‐10
2004
‐01
2004
‐04
2004
‐07
2004
‐10
2005
‐01
2005
‐04
2005
‐07
2005
‐10
2006
‐01
2006
‐04
2006
‐07
2006
‐10
2007
‐01
2007
‐04
2007
‐07
2007
‐10
2008
‐01
2008
‐04
2008
‐07
2008
‐10
2009
‐01
2009
‐04
2009
‐07
2009
‐10
2010
‐01
2010
‐04
2010
‐07
2010
‐10
2011
‐01
2011
‐04
2011
‐07
2011
‐10
2012
‐01
2012
‐04
2012
‐07
2012
‐10
2013
‐01
2013
‐04
2013
‐07
2013
‐10
2014
‐01
2014
‐04
2014
‐07
2014
‐10
2014
‐12
2015
‐03
2015
‐06
7/27/2015
25
Initial Approval Rates: IA
Source data: http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/ssa‐state‐agency‐workload‐data SSDI SSI Concurrent Child SSI
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2000
‐10
2001
‐01
2001
‐04
2001
‐07
2001
‐10
2002
‐01
2002
‐04
2002
‐07
2002
‐10
2003
‐01
2003
‐04
2003
‐07
2003
‐10
2004
‐01
2004
‐04
2004
‐07
2004
‐10
2005
‐01
2005
‐04
2005
‐07
2005
‐10
2006
‐01
2006
‐04
2006
‐07
2006
‐10
2007
‐01
2007
‐04
2007
‐07
2007
‐10
2008
‐01
2008
‐04
2008
‐07
2008
‐10
2009
‐01
2009
‐04
2009
‐07
2009
‐10
2010
‐01
2010
‐04
2010
‐07
2010
‐10
2011
‐01
2011
‐04
2011
‐07
2011
‐10
2012
‐01
2012
‐04
2012
‐07
2012
‐10
2013
‐01
2013
‐04
2013
‐07
2013
‐10
2014
‐01
2014
‐04
2014
‐07
2014
‐10
2014
‐12
2015
‐03
2015
‐06
7/27/2015
26
Initial Approval Rates: AR
Source data: http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/ssa‐state‐agency‐workload‐data SSDI SSI Concurrent Child SSI
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2000
‐10
2001
‐01
2001
‐04
2001
‐07
2001
‐10
2002
‐01
2002
‐04
2002
‐07
2002
‐10
2003
‐01
2003
‐04
2003
‐07
2003
‐10
2004
‐01
2004
‐04
2004
‐07
2004
‐10
2005
‐01
2005
‐04
2005
‐07
2005
‐10
2006
‐01
2006
‐04
2006
‐07
2006
‐10
2007
‐01
2007
‐04
2007
‐07
2007
‐10
2008
‐01
2008
‐04
2008
‐07
2008
‐10
2009
‐01
2009
‐04
2009
‐07
2009
‐10
2010
‐01
2010
‐04
2010
‐07
2010
‐10
2011
‐01
2011
‐04
2011
‐07
2011
‐10
2012
‐01
2012
‐04
2012
‐07
2012
‐10
2013
‐01
2013
‐04
2013
‐07
2013
‐10
2014
‐01
2014
‐04
2014
‐07
2014
‐10
2014
‐12
2015
‐03
2015
‐06
7/27/2015
27
Increases• Long waits for processing earnings reports, requests for waiver/recons on overpayments, etc. • Over one million hearing requests are currently pending• National average processing time (as of 6/26/15) for hearings: 498 days (up 56 days in 6 months)• National average processing times (average for year unless noted):
Sources: http://www.ssa.gov/performance/2013/FY%202013%20APP%20and%20Revised%20Final%20Performance%20Plan%20for%20FY%202012.pdf 2008; http://www.ssa.gov/budget/FY16Files/2016APP.pdf 2009‐14
Year Days
2008 509 (September only)
2009 491
2010 426
2011 360
2012 353
2013 396 (September only)
2014 422
7/27/2015
28
YTD/pending source: http://www.ssa.gov/appeals/DataSets/02_HO_Workload_Data.html (as of 6/26/15)
HearingOffice
CasesPending
Processing TimeFY15 YTD
June ‘15 Processing Time
COLUMBIA MO 2429 463 533
CREVE COEUR 7269 478 510
FARGO 2947 359 375
FORT SMITH 2956 357 388
KANSAS CITY 5800 465 477
LITTLE ROCK 7447 411 442
MINNEAPOLIS 8847 400 409
OMAHA 3769 436 470
SPRINGFIELD MO 4345 420 417
ST LOUIS 8111 422 442
WEST DES MOINES 5075 457 456
7/27/2015
29
DDS Backlogs
Source data: http://catalog.data.gov/dataset/ssa‐state‐agency‐workload‐data
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2000
‐10
2001
‐05
2001
‐12
2002
‐07
2003
‐02
2003
‐09
2004
‐04
2004
‐11
2005
‐06
2006
‐01
2006
‐08
2007
‐03
2007
‐10
2008
‐05
2008
‐12
2009
‐07
2010
‐02
2010
‐09
2011
‐04
2011
‐11
2012
‐06
2013
‐01
2013
‐08
2014
‐03
2014
‐10
2015
‐04
Nebraska
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2000
‐10
2001
‐05
2001
‐12
2002
‐07
2003
‐02
2003
‐09
2004
‐04
2004
‐11
2005
‐06
2006
‐01
2006
‐08
2007
‐03
2007
‐10
2008
‐05
2008
‐12
2009
‐07
2010
‐02
2010
‐09
2011
‐04
2011
‐11
2012
‐06
2013
‐01
2013
‐08
2014
‐03
2014
‐10
2015
‐04North Dakota
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2000
‐10
2001
‐05
2001
‐12
2002
‐07
2003
‐02
2003
‐09
2004
‐04
2004
‐11
2005
‐06
2006
‐01
2006
‐08
2007
‐03
2007
‐10
2008
‐05
2008
‐12
2009
‐07
2010
‐02
2010
‐09
2011
‐04
2011
‐11
2012
‐06
2013
‐01
2013
‐08
2014
‐03
2014
‐10
2015
‐04
South Dakota
7/27/2015
30
Questions?
Stacy Braverman CloydDeputy Director, Government Affairs
National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives1025 Connecticut Ave. NW, Ste. 709
Washington, DC 20036(202) 457‐7775
