Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1May 2016
Social Protection and Employment
Opportunities
Dr. Bambang WidiantoExecutive Secretary of the National Team for
the Acceleration of Poverty Reduction (TNP2K)
Office of the Vice President of
The Republic of Indonesia
22
43.5%
17.8%
27.0%
12.0%
73.0%
14.4%10.8%
0.6%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Primary School & Below
Junior High Senior High & Vocational
Diploma & University
Total Population
40 % Lowest
Indonesian Workforce By EducationFebruary 2016
Source: Total Population from BPS February 2016; 40 % Lowest from Unified Data 2015
3
Monthly Consumption per Capita (IDR)
Poor and vulnerable communities make up
40%of the population
Pop
ulat
ion
Source: Susenas (2010)
14.15%below
the povertyline
200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,0000
4
Poverty & Inequality Reduction Strategy
Increase income
Reduce Burden Targeted Social Assistance Program:
• Healthcare • Education Assistance• Conditional Cash Transfer• Rice for the Poor
1
2
5
Social Protection
Social Assistance Social Insurance
• Temporary unconditional cash transfer• Conditional Cash Transfer • Rice for the poor
• Social Protection for Worker (Jaminan Sosial Tenaga Kerja)
The Social Protection Programs In Indonesia
• National Health Program (Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional)
6
Lessthan
of poor people receive BSM10%
Household Expenditure (Consumption) per Decile
Percent of 6-18-year-olds that receive BSM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5
0
7
Targeting Options• Means-testing, although this requires high-quality data that is not
available in many countries and may be expensive to put in place.
• Geographical targeting, whereby transfers are provided to everyone living in Community-based targeting, n areas where there is high incidence of poverty.
• Which uses community structures to identify the poorest members of a community or those eligible according to agreed criteria.
• Providing benefit to those recognized as belonging to a specific vulnerable category of the population; and
• Self-targeting such as in work program that offer a below-market wage, based on the logic that individuals choose to opt to the program.
8
Examples of a Specific Vulnerable Groups
Bottom Poor (Fakir Miskin)
Orphans, Street Children
Homeless Without Support
Isolated Tribal Community
Mentally Ill
Displaced Population
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
9
Government provides free small bottles (3 kg) of LPG to poor households, small restaurants, food vendors and other micro business establishments
Self Targeting: Kerosene Conversions to LPG
Bill
ion
Lit
res
59.7
39.3 36.8
1.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2005 2008 2009
Fuel Consumption
Conversion from Kerosene to LPG
(Estimation)
1010
Total Household25.771.493Total Family
27.046.374
Utilization of Unified DataFor Poverty Reduction Program
Total Population
93.026.921
Unified Data Covers 40 % lowest social economic population
Poverty Line (Sep 2015)
BENEFICIARIESKPS/KKS/KIP/Rastra
11,13 %
40%
25%
Inclusion Error
Exclusion Error
BENEFICIARIES BANTUAN IURAN (PBI) JKN
35%
PROGRAM KELUARGA HARAPAN (PKH)
8%
UNIFIED DATA*
11
Given to 25% of the poorest households or
Social Protection CardKartu Perlindungan Sosial (KPS)
15.5 million disadvantaged families.Valid until December 2014
12
FAMILY MEMBERS• Memeh (NIK: 3171066406440002) born in Tasikmalaya,
24/6/1944Wife, 70 y.o., married, never schooled, Member of BPJS PBI
• Idawati (NIK: 3171064205690003) born in Jakarta, 2/5/1969Child, 45 y.o., widowed, not in school anymore, Member of BPJS PBI
• Adam Noval (NIK: 3171061506910001) born in Jakarta ,15/6/1991Grandchild, 23 y.o., not married, not in school anymore, Member of BPJS PBI, Labour
• Dwi Fadli (NIK: 3171061809960004) born in Jakarta, 18/9/1996Grandchild, 18 y.o., not married, junior high school, Member of BPJS PBI
• Natasha Caroline (NIK: 3171066808020003) born in Jakarta, 28/8/2002Grandchild, 12 y.o., not married, elementary, Member of BPJS PBI
HOUSING CONDITIONS• House ownership • Wall type • Wall quality • Roof type • Roof quality
ASSET OWNERSHIP• Car• Motorcycle • Refrigerator• 12 kg Gas Tank• Mobile phones in HH
• Source of drinking water•Methods to obtain drinking water•Main Lighting • Source cooking fuel• Sanitation
: Self-owned: Wall: Bad: Tile: Bad
: Pumped well : Do not buy: PLN Electricity: Kerosene : Individual
: Don’t own: Don’t own: Don’t own: Don’t own: Don’t own
Welfare decile : 1
•NIK•Family Card Number•KKS Number•Regional code
Ijo•Province•District•Sub-district•Village•Address
: 3171061012320001: 3171060701091802: 373INS10310A05: 3173020001
Head of HH Name
Level of education : Not schooledOccupation: Does not workMember of BPJS PBI: Yes Fingerprints: ✔ | Iris: ✔ | Unique Identity: ✔
Unified Database
•Born in Depok, 10/12/1932
13
Out of Work Population Age 15-<60 Year
KABUPATEN KLATEN126.759
KABUPATEN KEBUMEN139.446
KABUPATEN BANYUMAS215.933
KABUPATEN CILACAP204.647
KABUPATEN BREBES297.513
KABUPATEN TEGAL198.283
KABUPATEN PEMALANG203.088
KABUPATEN DEMAK138.423
KABUPATEN JEPARA126.041
KABUPATEN PATI148.802
14
KABUPATEN WONOSOBO6.085
KABUPATEN PEKALONGAN7.146
KABUPATEN PEMALANG11.455
KABUPATEN TEGAL9.654
KABUPATEN BREBES18.904 Anak
KABUPATEN CILACAP7.027 Anak
KABUPATEN BANYUMAS7.571
KABUPATEN BANJARNEGARA6.695
Out of School Children Age 13-15 Year
KABUPATEN GROBOGAN7.119
1515
School Participation & Budget Allocation for EducationNorth Sumatera Province, 2014
Source : BPS, Ministry of Finance
Districts with poverty level higher than national and provincial level
Districts with poverty level between national and provincial level
Districts with poverty level lower than national and provincial level
School Participation Level (APM) for Junior High (%)
Bud
get
Allo
cati
on F
or E
duca
tion
(%)
16
School-based Household-based
Utilization of UDB for EducationProgram Improvement
Before 2013
20.3 million students (2016)
17
Using KPS to Improve Targeting Accuracy for BSM
Source: Susenas 2009, SPS TW IV 2013 and TW I 2014
Cove
rage
of B
enef
icia
ries
(%)
Elementary School Middle School30
25
20
15
10
5
0
School-basedHouseholds-based (March 2014)
School-basedHouseholds-based (March 2014)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Co
vera
ge o
f Ben
efic
iari
es (%
)
30
25
20
15
10
5
01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
18
100 100 100 100 100 100
71.1 70.5
55.5
40.6 40.3
20.7
0.8 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
(% A
ge
6-2
5 Y
ear
Year in school
Kuantil 1 Kuantil 2
100 100 100 100 100 100
73.3 72.7
58.2
45.0 42.6
23.2
1.1 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13%
Ag
e 6
-25
Yea
r Year in school
Kuantil 1 Kuantil 2
Source : Susenas March 2013 and March 2014
2013 2014
School Drop Out Level
Drop out level decreaseSchool participation increase
19
Impact of PKH on School Enrolment:Comparison with CCTs of some other countries
Impact evaluation for PKH program utilized RCT design, involving 180 subdistricts for treatment group and 180 subdistricts control groups,
covering 18,000 households
Junior Secondary SchoolPrimary School
PKH
Indonesia
PantawidPamilyang
Filipina
FamiliasEn AcciÓn
Colombia
Progresa
Mexico
PKH
Indonesia
PantawidPamilyang
Filipina
FamiliasEn AcciÓn
Colombia
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2.3
4.5
2 1.8
4.43.9
5
20
Terima kasih