Upload
m-s-sridhar
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 Social Networks and Rule of 150 with Miscellany
1/4
1
Editorial
Social Networks and the Rule of 150
In an earlier issue (Feb 2012), we have seen the democratizing power and otherbenefits of social technologies including the small world phenomenon and promised to
look into the social technology cluttercreated by this great revolution. To understand
the magnitude of clutter of social technologies, one should know how relationship
multiplies in a network. A network consists of members (nodes/vortexes) and
relationships (ties/links/connections) between members. The number of possible
connections between members increase dramatically as the number of members
increase in the network (see table and diagram). As could be
seen in the table, in a group of 5, one has to keep track of 10
relationships. A small increase in the size of the group creates a
significant additional social and intellectual burden. For example,
just a three-fold increase from a group of 5 to 15 increases
relationships by more than ten-fold from 10 to 105 (see table). In
other words, the amount of information processing required to
know other members of network increases enormously in this
way.
Let me digress and put some facts before you. Human evolution took place when men
lived in small groups on a face-to-face
basis much before agricultural era.
Naturally the adaptive mechanism of
human biology is tuned to have strong
feelings about few people, short distances
and in brief intervals of time. Thus there
exists a natural limit to social channel
capacity of human beings. The amount of space in the brain for certain kind of
information is called channel capacity. A normal human being is able to distinguish
about 6 or 7 finer categories of information like sound level, sugar level in tea and so on.
However in case of strong feelings like death or devastating events, he could
Table: Increase in
number ofrelationships assize of groupincreases
No. ofmembers
No. ofconnections
2 13 3
4 65 10
10 45
15 105
Diagram representing increase in number ofrelationships as size of group increases
Volume 4 Issue 3 March 2012
8/2/2019 Social Networks and Rule of 150 with Miscellany
2/4
2
accommodate and remember 10 to 15 people known to him. With this limitation as a
human being, one wonders how we are coping with thousands of people in social
networks, particularly on the Internet. The internet, the brain, the web of reactions in a
living cell, power grids and the economy are some examples of networks.
Humans, apart from other primates like monkeys, chimps and baboons, have biggest
brain (neocortex) to deal with complex thoughts, reasoning and the complexities of
larger social groups. Based on the neocoretex ratio developed by Anthropologists the
rule of 150 is derived for social channel capacity of human beings. That is 150 is the
maximum number of individuals with whom one can have genuinely social relationship.
Interestingly pre-historic hunter societies used to split their colony once it approached
150. If the rule of 150 is true, what happens to hundreds (even thousands) of mouse-
click friendship relations created on social networks?
M S Sridhar
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editors Post ScriptMiscellany
Recording Industry comes down heavily on Google and Wiki for stopping PIPA
and SOPA. US Congress finally set aside PIPA (Protect Intellectual Property Act) and
SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act). Enraged Chief of Recording Industry Association of
America, Cary H Sherman comes down heavily on both Google and Wikipedia saying
that these platforms preach net-neutrality to the Internet pipes, but they themselves do
not properly distinguish digital protection from net monitoring responsibilities, neutral
reporting from editorial facts and censorship from privacy. He felt Wikipedia, Google and
others manufactured controversy by unfairly equating SOPA with censorship as it is a
loaded and inflammatory word more suitable for crackdowns on pro-democracy
websites by China or Iran. They are duping their users into accepting as truth what are
merely self-serving political declarations. Eleventh hour flood of emails and phone callsto Congress stopped the legislation with misinformation. Citing that music sales is less
than half since 1999 and reduction of direct employment in the industry by more than
half, he asks what is the alternative to combat online piracy of music, movies, books
and other creative works and is it not a constitutional and economic imperative to
protect them from theft?
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]8/2/2019 Social Networks and Rule of 150 with Miscellany
3/4
3
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-02-08/computing/31037154_1_web-
sites-sopa-censorshipWikipedia: What it doesn't tell you Cary H. Sherman, New York
Times Feb 8, 2012, 04.17PM IST
Call to boycott Elsevier Journals: Cambridge Mathematician Timothy Growers call to
boycott Elsevier journals (blog post dated January 21, 2012) lead to signing online
pledge by more than 3000 authors/scientists. The reasons include high prices of
journals, mandatory bundled/ package offer and supporting Research Work Act.
Elsevier publishes more than 2000 journals with 36% profit. It is not the first time that
academicians raised their voice against commercial publishers. The editorial boards of
Topology(Elsevier) resigned in 2006 and that of K-Theory(Springer) in 2007.
http://copyfight.corante.com/archives/2012/01/31/tyler_neylon_on_what_elsevier_shoul
d_do.php
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/feb/02/academics-boycott-publisher-elsevier )
Li-Fi, the Wireless communication after Wi-Fi and Bluetooth: Tripping or flickering
visible light from screens, which is not perceptible to human eye, can be detected by
camera on phones to transmit digital data up to 10 meters in future. LEDs which are
going to replace the incandescent lights and fluorescent tubes in future are ideal to emit
the required light and become the hot spots for data exchange. Two limitations are: non-
penetration of walls by ordinary light waves and need for photo detectors on LEDs. The
advantages are: unlike Wi-Fi, there is no limitation of radio spectrum and it can be used
safely in the areas like aircrafts and operation theaters without any interference with
radio signals.
Privacy Laws to prevent commercial use of personal information: Interestingly the
netizen population of China and India put together is more than the citizen population of
America and Europe. Anonymity and privacy are almost lost on the Internet due to
crawlers, history stealing web sites and mushrooming of like buttons. Google didcapture personal data from unsecured Wi-Fi networks of houses. There is an intense
debate on the need for anonymity and privacy issues. Protecting customers personal
information from commercial exploitation is a legal obligation and the law exists in USA,
Europe, China and India. A clear privacy policy spelling out what information is
collected, how it is used, how user can change or delete it, with whom it is shared and
how customers can opt out of it are necessary. The law in Europe is so stringent
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-02-08/computing/31037154_1_web-sites-sopa-censorshiphttp://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-02-08/computing/31037154_1_web-sites-sopa-censorshiphttp://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-02-08/computing/31037154_1_web-sites-sopa-censorshiphttp://copyfight.corante.com/archives/2012/01/31/tyler_neylon_on_what_elsevier_should_do.phphttp://copyfight.corante.com/archives/2012/01/31/tyler_neylon_on_what_elsevier_should_do.phphttp://copyfight.corante.com/archives/2012/01/31/tyler_neylon_on_what_elsevier_should_do.phphttp://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/feb/02/academics-boycott-publisher-elsevierhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/feb/02/academics-boycott-publisher-elsevierhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/feb/02/academics-boycott-publisher-elsevierhttp://copyfight.corante.com/archives/2012/01/31/tyler_neylon_on_what_elsevier_should_do.phphttp://copyfight.corante.com/archives/2012/01/31/tyler_neylon_on_what_elsevier_should_do.phphttp://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-02-08/computing/31037154_1_web-sites-sopa-censorshiphttp://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-02-08/computing/31037154_1_web-sites-sopa-censorship8/2/2019 Social Networks and Rule of 150 with Miscellany
4/4
4
(equally so in China and India) that companies doing business with Europeans are also
required to comply with the laws. Further, as much as 62% of Europeans do not trust
that Internet companies protect their personal information. Even web pages are required
to provide special icons so that customers click and prevent companies to track their
activities. Business houses naturally feel that all this is leading to costly trade barriers in
global digital economy.
Face book, the social network monarch: The hot news since last issue is that Face
book (FB) has become a hundred billion dollar company over a decade beating many
century-old traditional companies like Boeing. With 845 million monthly active users
(expected to reach 1 billion shortly) is like a third most populous country on the earth.
Interestingly, it acquired such extensive data on a huge population across the world in a
short time while making large profits. The membership with FB is de facto virtual
passport or ID to enter many other online systems and services. Though the purposes
are different, compare with Unique Identification Authority of Indias AADHAR which is
spending thousands of Crores of Rupees and yet not reached half the target number
(400m)! FB has no nearest competitor in social networking and unlike MySpace which
started declining in 2005, FB is expected to reach 3 billion members by 2016. FB is a
profitable social utility hoping to add social discovery features and virtual currency
(online payment service). Though likely to be haunted by privacy laws and anti-trust
regulations, this unopposed social network monarch has immense commercial
prospects cheered by online advertisers. How 25000 turmeric farmers of a village called
Sangli in Maharashtra steered through the difficult times of price crash to communicate
through FB to collectively hold back supply and to boycott auction lead to double the
price in a matter of 10 days is a success story of not only FB, but even the network
technology for effective information exchange to eliminate middle men and organize
collective strategy. True, larger networks are strategically more beneficial for political,
business and commercial campaigns. But how this grand success of social technology
industry matters to ordinary people who made one billion memberships possible for FBdepends on how large a network you and I need (Editors desk). There are some
postings like 5 most annoying Face book habits on FB itself.
M S Sridhar
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]