Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Tab
le C
8.4.
9 D
ESC
RIP
TIO
N O
F IM
PAC
TS
ON
SO
CIA
L E
NV
IRO
NM
EN
TA
L C
OM
PON
EN
TS
(1/3
)
Envi
ronm
enta
l co
mpo
nent
to b
e af
fect
ed
Phas
e*
Des
crip
tion
of d
irect
impa
ct
Neg
ativ
e/
Posi
tive
Spat
ial e
xten
t/ Ar
ea to
be
affe
cted
Co
nditi
ons o
f im
pact
s to
occ
ur
Qua
ntita
tive
mag
nitu
de
Poss
ible
seco
ndar
y im
pact
s**
1. R
eset
tlem
ent
PC
Cha
nge
of r
esid
ence
and
sta
rt of
new
life
is n
eces
sary
for
the
conc
erne
d re
side
nts
as a
res
ult
of la
nd a
cqui
sitio
n.
Neg
ativ
e A
long
Tam
alat
e Fl
oodw
ay si
te,
do
wns
tream
of T
apod
u,
Bol
ango
, Biy
onga
and
A
lo-P
ohu
river
s
Not
avo
idab
le.
The
mag
nitu
de o
f im
pact
dep
ends
on
the
mag
nitu
de a
nd lo
catio
n of
the
proj
ects
In to
tal
13
0 ho
uses
and
69
ha
of la
nds
Adj
ustm
ent o
nese
lf to
a
new
loca
tion
Neg
ativ
e In
suff
icie
nt
com
pens
atio
n an
d no
ap
prop
riate
alte
rnat
ive
land
s pro
vide
d
Impo
veris
hmen
t of t
he
affe
cted
hou
seho
lds
PC
Res
ettle
men
t m
easu
res
may
fo
rce
the
conc
erne
d ho
useh
olds
to
cha
nge
occu
patio
n or
los
e as
set s
uch
as ri
ce fi
eld.
Po
sitiv
e
Alo
ng T
amal
ate
Floo
dway
con
stru
ctio
n si
te,
dow
nstre
am o
f Ta
podu
, Bol
ango
, B
iyon
ga a
nd A
lo-P
ohu
river
s Su
ffic
ient
com
pens
atio
n an
d ap
prop
riate
al
tern
ativ
e la
nds
prov
ided
.
130
hous
es
(est
imat
ed m
ore
than
500
per
sons
), 69
ha
Not
Cle
ar
C
Rec
ruitm
ent o
f w
orke
rs f
or t
he
proj
ect
impl
emen
tatio
n pr
ovid
es a
job
opp
ortu
nity
in
the
regi
on
whi
ch
can
be
an
alte
rnat
ive
sour
ce o
f inc
ome
for
the
relo
cate
d ho
useh
olds
Posi
tive
All
the
proj
ect
site
s. A
rea
may
go
be
yond
bo
unda
ries
of c
once
rned
vi
llage
, tho
ugh.
Loca
l res
iden
ts is
re
crui
ted
favo
rabl
y to
th
e pe
ople
from
out
side
.
230-
400
wor
ker
recr
uitm
ent (
est.
mor
e th
an 9
00
pers
ons i
nflu
ence
d)
Influ
x of
wor
kers
ou
tsid
e th
e lo
cal
villa
ges
2. L
ivel
ihoo
d
M/O
St
able
w
ater
le
vel
prov
ides
fa
vora
ble
envi
ronm
ent
for
fish
cultu
re in
the
lake
Lim
boto
.
Posi
tive
Lake
Li
mbo
to
surr
ound
ing
area
(1
9 fis
hery
vi
llage
s at
ka
bupa
ten
leve
l)
Tapo
du g
ate
prop
erly
co
ntro
lled
and
man
aged
, w
ith th
e pr
omot
ion
of
fishe
ry in
the
lake
With
4 m
of w
ater
le
vel,
max
imum
po
tent
ial o
f fis
h pr
oduc
tion
can
be
1,55
2 to
n/ye
ar
Labo
r shi
ft in
to fi
sher
y in
dust
ry fr
om o
ther
se
ctor
s
PC
Land
acq
uisi
tion
wou
ld c
ause
pe
ople
’s
frus
tratio
n or
re
sist
ance
to re
leas
e of
land
and
pr
ojec
t im
plem
enta
tion
Neg
ativ
e A
long
Ta
mal
ate
Floo
dway
si
te,
do
wns
tream
of
Tapo
du,
Bol
ango
, B
iyon
ga
and
Alo
-Poh
u riv
ers
14 d
esa/
kelu
raha
n at
pro
ject
site
s, an
d su
rrou
ndin
g de
sa
of th
e la
ke
Lim
boto
In th
e m
ost s
erio
us c
ase,
pr
ojec
t com
men
cem
ent
is h
inde
red.
3.Lo
cal
Po
pula
tion’
s
O
ppos
ition
C
Con
stru
ctio
n w
ork
wou
ld
prod
uce
nois
e an
d w
aste
, an
d ca
use
traff
ic j
am,
esp.
aro
und
Pilo
loda
a m
arke
t
Neg
ativ
e A
ll th
e si
tes
of
cons
truct
ion
wor
k
Insu
ffic
ient
so
cial
izat
ion
of th
e pr
ojec
ts, l
ack
of
dial
ogue
bet
wee
n th
e re
side
nts a
nd th
e go
vern
men
t, in
appr
opria
te la
nd
acqu
isiti
on m
easu
res
14 d
esa/
kelu
raha
n at
pro
ject
site
s, an
d Pi
lolo
daa
mar
ket
In th
e m
ost s
erio
us c
ase,
pr
ojec
t im
plem
enta
tion
is re
tard
ed o
r rej
ecte
d.
C8-63
Tab
le C
8.4.
9 D
ESC
RIP
TIO
N O
F IM
PAC
TS
ON
SO
CIA
L E
NV
IRO
NM
EN
TA
L C
OM
PON
EN
TS
(2/3
)
Envi
ronm
ent
al c
ompo
nent
to
be
affe
cted
Phas
e*
Des
crip
tion
of d
irect
impa
ct
Neg
ativ
e/Po
sitiv
eSp
atia
l ext
ent/
Area
to b
e af
fect
ed
Cond
ition
s of i
mpa
cts t
o oc
cur
Qua
ntita
tive
mag
nitu
de
Poss
ible
se
cond
ary
impa
cts*
* 3.
Loca
l Po
pula
tion’
s O
ppos
ition
(c
ont.)
M/O
C
onst
ruct
ion
of f
acili
ties
may
cau
se
com
mun
ity sp
lit
Neg
ativ
eA
long
Tam
alat
e Fl
oodw
ay
and
Tapo
du ri
ver
impr
ovem
ent s
ites
Insu
ffic
ient
soci
aliz
atio
n of
th
e pr
ojec
ts, l
ack
of d
ialo
gue
betw
een
the
resi
dent
s and
the
gove
rnm
ent,
inap
prop
riate
la
nd a
cqui
sitio
n m
easu
res
Popu
latio
n of
de
sa/k
elur
ahan
alo
ng
Tam
alat
e Fl
oodw
ay
and
Tapo
du ri
ver
Not
Cle
ar
PC
Non
e -
- -
- -
C
Tran
spor
tatio
n ve
hicl
e co
uld
caus
e cr
owde
d tra
ffic
and
dis
turb
ance
to
activ
ities
at P
ilolo
daa
mar
ket
Neg
ativ
eA
t the
Tap
odu
gate
co
nstru
ctio
n si
te, K
el.
Pilo
loda
a an
d its
ne
ighb
orho
od
Inap
prop
riate
sche
dule
of
utili
zatio
n of
exi
stin
g ro
ads
Aff
ecte
d pe
ople
’s
num
ber i
s not
cle
ar
(Kel
. Pilo
loda
a an
d its
mar
ket u
sers
)
Peop
le’s
op
posi
tion
to
the
proj
ect
activ
ities
4.Pe
ople
’s
mob
ility
M/O
Th
e co
nstru
ctio
n of
new
brid
ges
and
acce
ss r
oad
alon
g th
e di
ke t
oget
her
with
hei
ghte
ning
of
som
e ex
istin
g br
idge
s co
uld
incr
ease
mob
ility
of
loca
l pop
ulat
ion
Posi
tive
Aro
und
the
proj
ect s
ites
whe
re c
once
rned
brid
ges a
nd
road
s are
pro
vide
d
The
brid
ges a
nd ro
ads a
re
prop
erly
use
d an
d m
aint
aine
d.
Not
Cle
ar.
(pop
ulat
ion
of K
ota
Bar
at/ S
elat
an/
Uta
ra, K
ec. K
abila
/ Te
laga
, mai
nly
)
Not
Cle
ar
Neg
ativ
eIt
is d
iffic
ult t
o av
oid,
i.e.
to
chan
ge p
eopl
e’s a
ttitu
de in
a
shor
t ter
m
PC
As
the
land
s al
ong
conc
erne
d riv
ers
are
to b
e ac
quire
d, p
eopl
e’s
acce
ss
to w
ater
s be
com
es l
imite
d. I
n ot
her
wor
ds,
peop
le’s
dai
ly l
ife a
ctiv
ity
(bat
hing
, la
undr
y, w
aste
dum
ping
, pr
ivy,
et
c.)
and
thei
r vi
sual
ac
cess
ibili
ty to
wat
ers a
re d
istu
rbed
.
Posi
tive
Alo
ng T
amal
ate
Floo
dway
an
d Ta
podu
rive
r im
prov
emen
t site
s, in
ad
ditio
n to
som
e co
asta
l are
a of
lake
Lim
boto
Pr
actic
e of
was
te-d
umpi
ng is
co
ntro
lled.
C
Acc
ess
to w
ater
s is
lim
ited
by l
and
occu
patio
n fo
r co
nstru
ctio
n w
orks
an
d da
ily li
fe is
dis
turb
ed.
Neg
ativ
eA
ll th
e pr
ojec
t site
s N
ot a
void
able
.
5. A
cces
s to
wat
ers
M/O
W
ith c
onst
ruct
ed s
truct
ures
(di
kes,
gate
, etc
.), it
bec
omes
mor
e di
ffic
ult
to a
cces
s to
river
and
lake
wat
ers.
Neg
ativ
eA
long
Tam
alat
e Fl
oodw
ay,
Tapo
du ri
ver i
mpr
ovem
ent
site
s, in
add
ition
to so
me
coas
tal a
rea
of la
ke L
imbo
to.
Alte
rnat
ive
path
to
wat
ers/
plac
e ar
e no
t pro
vide
d in
the
desi
gn o
f stru
ctur
al
inte
rven
tions
.
130
hous
ehol
ds
relo
cate
d +
α.
Not
Cle
ar (R
esid
ents
al
ong
the
treat
ed
river
s and
Tam
alat
e Fl
oodw
ay)
Inte
nsiv
e ut
iliza
tion
of
alte
rnat
ive
wat
er p
lace
. D
omes
tic
was
te m
ay b
e du
mpe
d so
mew
here
el
se a
nd th
e pl
ace
will
be
pollu
ted.
C8-64
Tab
le C
8.4.
9 D
ESC
RIP
TIO
N O
F IM
PAC
TS
ON
SO
CIA
L E
NV
IRO
NM
EN
TA
L C
OM
PON
EN
TS
(3/3
)
Envi
ronm
enta
l co
mpo
nent
to
be a
ffect
ed
Phas
e*
Des
crip
tion
of d
irect
impa
ct
Neg
ativ
e/Po
sitiv
eSp
atia
l ext
ent/
Area
to b
e af
fect
ed
Cond
ition
s of i
mpa
cts t
o oc
cur
Qua
ntita
tive
mag
nitu
de
Poss
ible
seco
ndar
y im
pact
s**
PC
Hea
lth
faci
litie
s/pe
rson
nel
loca
ted/
liv
ed in
the
proj
ect s
ites
may
nee
d to
mov
e as
a c
onse
quen
ce o
f la
nd
acqu
isiti
on a
nd p
eopl
e’s
acce
ss to
pu
blic
hea
lth b
ecom
es d
iffic
ult.
Neg
ativ
eA
long
Tam
alat
e Fl
oodw
ay
and
Bol
ango
rive
r im
prov
emen
t site
s.
Exis
ting
heal
th fa
cilit
ies
and/
or p
erso
nnel
nee
d to
be
relo
cate
d
Not
Cle
ar.
Not
Cle
ar.
C
Non
e -
- -
- -
6.Pu
blic
Hea
lth
an
d sa
nita
tion
M/O
W
hen
the
prop
osed
pro
ject
s ar
e al
l pr
oper
ly i
mpl
emen
ted,
Flo
od
risks
in
th
e re
gion
w
ill
be
miti
gate
d.
Posi
tive
All
the
flood
pro
ne a
reas
in
Kot
a an
d K
ab.
Gor
onta
lo
All
the
com
plet
ed fa
cilit
ies
are
prop
erly
use
d an
d m
aint
aine
d (n
o st
agna
nt
wat
er w
ithin
slui
ces)
.
Not
Cle
ar. (
all t
he
popu
latio
n of
floo
d pr
one
area
)
Not
Cle
ar.
PC
Peop
le’s
hab
it of
was
te d
umpi
ng
into
rive
rs m
ay b
e di
stur
bed.
N
egat
ive
/Pos
itive
Alo
ng a
ll th
e pr
ojec
t site
s ex
cept
for S
edim
ent t
rap
inst
alla
tion.
Acc
ess t
o ac
quire
d la
nds i
s st
rictly
pro
hibi
ted.
N
ot C
lear
. Th
e vo
lum
e of
was
te
is n
ot q
uant
ified
yet
.
Dom
estic
was
te m
ay
be d
umpe
d so
mew
here
els
e an
d th
e pl
ace
will
be
pollu
ted.
C
V
ario
us c
onst
ruct
ion
wor
ks w
ill
prod
uce
cons
truct
ion
was
te.
Neg
ativ
eA
t all
the
proj
ect s
ites
Con
stru
ctio
n w
aste
is n
ot
prop
erly
dis
pose
d N
ot C
lear
. N
ot C
lear
.
7. W
aste
M/O
Pe
ople
cho
ose
impr
oved
riv
ers
as
a ne
w w
aste
dum
ping
spot
. N
egat
ive
Alo
ng a
ll th
e pr
ojec
t site
s in
clud
ing
Sedi
men
t tra
p in
stal
latio
n.
Acc
ess t
o riv
ers a
nd la
ke
is n
ot p
rohi
bite
d.
Not
Cle
ar.
Mal
func
tion
of
Tapo
du G
ate
and
slui
ce g
ates
.
* PC
: Pre
-con
stru
ctio
n ph
ase,
C: C
onst
ruct
ion
phas
e, O
/M: O
pera
tion
and
Mai
nten
ance
pha
se.
** “
Poss
ible
seco
ndar
y im
pact
s” a
re th
e im
pact
whi
ch m
ay o
ccur
as a
resu
lt of
dire
ct im
pact
s men
tione
d an
d ne
ed to
be
take
n in
to c
onsi
dera
tion
for p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion.
C8-65
Table C8.4.10 RESULT OF IMPACT EVALUATION ON SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS
Conceivable impacts Nature of impacts Evaluation result
(1) Negative impacts
Change of residence
1. Affected population limited compared to past victims/damage2. Affected area is limited to project sites. 3. Impact lasts forever and irreversible 4. Possible interaction with other components such as livelihood5. Can be compensated
Not Significant, Proper land acquisition is the key
Loss of productive lands, change of occupation
1. Number of affected people seems limited 2. Affected area is limited to project sites’ neighborhood 3. Intensity/duration seems possibly high 4. Impact is reversible (with compensation)
Not Significant, Proper land acquisition is the key
Local population’s resistance
1. Community perception is positive as a whole 2. Affected area is limited to project sites 3. Impact may last only for a short time of period 4. Possible interrelation with land acquisition procedure 5. Impact is reversible
Not Significant, Proper land acquisition and socialization are the key
Disturbance of local traffic circulation
1. Affected population is large considering nature of existing local market
2. Affected area is limited (Pilolodaa market only) 3. Impact lasts only during construction stage 4. Other components not affected
Not Significant, need socialization to avoid secondary impact (opposition)
Limited access to river and lake waters
1. Affected population limited compared to past victims/damage2. Affected area is limited to project sites 3. Impact lasts forever and irreversible 4. Possible interaction with other components like waste 5. Habitat change needs a fundamental change
Not Significant
Disturbance of waste dumping into rivers
1. Number of affected people seems limited 2. Affected area is limited to project sites 3. Impact may last beyond project implementation period 4. Possible interaction with public health 5. Impact is reversible with human intervention
Not Significant,
(2) Positive impacts Job creation and better livelihood (enhanced potential of fish culture)
1. 230-400 jobs estimated, benefiting more than 900 persons 2. Benefiting area can be wide including outside Gorontalo 3. Impact lasts for one phase only, fish culture long-term impact4. Possible interaction with other components like public health
Significant, both immediate and short-term impact and possibly long-term impact
Better people’s mobility
1. Benefiting population is relatively large 2. Benefiting area can go beyond project sites 3. Impact lasts for a long time 4. Possible interaction with other components, livelihood 5. Impact is cumulative (bridges/roads are basic infrastructure)
Significant
Reduction of flood risks
1. Benefiting population is quite large 2. Benefiting area extends to all kecamatan around Lake 3. Impact lasts for a long time with proper O/M 4. Interaction with all the other components
Significant
Improvement of sanitary condition
1. Benefiting population is large, those of flood prone area 2. Affected area can extend to all flood prone areas 3. Impact lasts until the facilities collapse 4. Benefit is evident only when flooding
Significant
Limited access to rives and lake waters (less waste dumping)
1. Number of benefiting people seems limited 2. Benefiting area is limited to project sites 3. Impact may last beyond project implementation period 4. Possible interaction with public health 5. Impact could be assimilated by affected communities
Not Significant
C8-66
Envi
ronm
enta
l com
pone
ntM
anag
emen
t obj
ectiv
eM
anag
emen
t goa
lM
easu
re/A
ctio
n fo
rm
itiga
tion/
enha
ncem
ent
Eval
uatio
n cr
iteria
1.G
eolo
gy (e
rosi
on a
ndse
dim
enta
tion)
Eros
ion
of ri
ver b
anks
.K
eepi
ng ri
ver b
anks
bei
ng n
on-e
rode
dco
nditi
on.
Reg
ular
insp
ectio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce o
friv
er b
ank
and
river
cha
nnel
.Sa
me
as M
anag
emen
t goa
l.
Wel
l wat
erPr
even
tion
of in
conv
enie
nce
on d
rinki
ngw
ater
supp
ly.
Supp
ly o
f drin
king
wat
er fo
r aff
ecte
dho
useh
olds
.D
itto
Land
subs
iden
ceA
ssur
ance
of r
emed
ial m
easu
re fo
r dam
age
caus
ed b
y la
nd su
bsid
ence
Det
ectio
n of
occ
urre
nce
of la
nd su
bsid
ence
phen
omen
on.
Ditt
o
Wat
er le
vel o
f riv
ers a
ndflo
od ri
sks
Floo
d co
ntro
l for
floo
ds u
p to
20
year
recu
rren
ce p
erio
d.A
ppro
pria
te g
ate
cont
rol a
t Tap
odu
gate
.D
itto
Wat
er le
vel i
n La
keLi
mbo
toK
eepi
ng th
e pl
anne
d w
ater
leve
l mor
e th
an4.
0 m
.A
ppro
pria
te g
ate
cont
rol a
t Tap
odu
gate
.D
itto
4.T
erre
stri
al fl
ora
and
faun
aW
ild p
lant
s and
ani
mal
sN
o im
pact
s on
prot
ecte
d sp
ecie
s.Tr
ansp
lant
atio
n of
pro
tect
ed sp
ecie
s, if
any.
Ditt
o
Aqu
atic
wee
ds(M
acro
phyt
es)
Prev
entio
n of
ove
rgro
win
g.K
eepi
ng la
ke w
ater
leve
l at c
onst
antly
hig
h(h
ighe
r tha
n 4.
0 m
).D
itto
Eels
and
oth
er m
igra
tory
fish,
if a
ny.
Kee
ping
fish
ing
outp
ut a
s cur
rent
stat
us.
/Ass
uran
ce o
f com
pens
atio
n fo
r dam
aged
fishe
rmen
.
Kee
ping
dis
char
ge p
ossi
ble
enou
gh fo
r eel
'sm
igra
tion
and
wat
er q
ualit
y in
goo
dco
nditi
on in
dra
inag
e ch
anne
ls.
Cur
rent
fish
ing
outp
ut o
f eel
s.
Oth
er fi
shK
eepi
ng fi
shin
g ou
tput
mor
e th
an c
urre
ntst
atus
.A
ppro
pria
te g
ate
cont
rol a
t Tap
odu
gate
.C
urre
nt fi
shin
g ou
tput
./ C
urre
ntaq
uacu
lture
pro
duct
ion.
Air
pollu
tion
caus
ed b
yem
issi
on g
asPr
even
ting
heal
th d
amag
e of
nea
rby
resi
dent
s.
Kee
ping
con
stru
ctio
n m
achi
nery
and
trans
porta
tion
vehi
cles
in g
ood
cond
ition
by
mea
ns o
f reg
ular
tune
-up.
Am
bien
t air
qual
ity st
anda
rds o
f NO
x,SO
x an
d C
O, p
rovi
ded
by G
over
nmen
tR
egul
atio
n N
o. 8
2, 2
001.
Dus
tK
eepi
ng a
ir du
st in
tole
rabl
e co
nditi
on.
Kee
ping
traf
fic ru
les a
ndre
gula
tions
./Kee
ping
goo
d dr
ivin
g m
anne
r.
Allo
wed
dus
t con
cent
ratio
n of
230
µg/
m3 ,
prov
ided
by
Gov
ernm
ent R
egul
atio
nN
o.41
/199
9.
Noi
seK
eepi
ng a
mbi
ent n
oise
leve
l in
tole
rabl
eco
nditi
on.
Con
side
ratio
n of
tran
spor
tatio
n ro
utes
, e.g
.co
nstru
ctio
n of
Tem
pora
ry e
xclu
sive
road
.A
llow
ed n
oise
leve
l pro
vide
d by
Dec
ree
ofEn
viro
nmen
tal M
inis
try N
o. 4
8, 1
996.
Turb
idity
and
alk
alin
ity in
river
s and
in L
ake
Lim
boto
Kee
ping
turb
idity
in to
lera
ble
cond
ition
for
daily
wat
er u
se.
Encl
osur
e of
con
stru
ctio
n si
te b
y sa
ndba
gsfo
r pre
vent
ion
of tu
rbid
wat
er d
isch
arge
.W
ater
qua
lity
stan
dard
s pro
vide
d by
Gov
ernm
ent R
egul
atio
n N
o. 8
2, 2
001.
Alk
alin
ity in
rive
rs a
nd in
Lake
Lim
boto
Kee
ping
pH
in to
lera
ble
cond
ition
for f
ish
habi
tat.
Inst
alla
tion
of o
n-si
te tr
eatm
ent p
ond
ofhi
gh a
lkal
i wat
er.
Ditt
o
Wat
er q
ualit
y of
Lak
eLi
mbo
toK
eepi
ng w
ater
qua
lity
in su
itabl
e fo
raq
uacu
lture
.
App
ropr
iate
gat
e co
ntro
l at T
apod
u ga
te./
Prop
er in
spec
tion
and
mai
nten
ance
of
sedi
men
t tra
p.D
itto
Tab
le C
8.4.
11 E
NV
IRO
NM
EN
TA
L M
AN
AG
EM
EN
T P
LA
N O
N N
AT
UR
AL
EN
VIR
ON
ME
NT
AL
CO
MPO
NE
NT
2. 3. 5.
Gro
undw
ater
and
land
subs
iden
ce
Wat
er r
egim
e
Aqu
atic
flor
a an
d fa
una
7.6.A
ir Q
ualit
y
Wat
er Q
ualit
y
C8-67
Tab
le C
8.4.
12 E
NV
IRO
NM
EN
TA
L M
AN
AG
EM
EN
T P
LA
N O
N S
OC
IAL
EN
VIR
ON
ME
NT
AL
CO
MPO
NE
NT
S
Env
iron
men
tal
com
pone
ntM
anag
emen
t Ele
men
tM
anag
emen
t goa
lM
easu
re/A
ctio
n fo
rMiti
gatio
n/E
nhan
cem
ent
Eva
luat
ion
crite
ria
1. R
eset
tlem
ent
Land
Acq
uisi
tion
To m
inim
ize
nega
tive
impa
ct b
yre
settl
emen
t on
the
affe
cted
resi
dent
s
Res
pect
the
exis
ting
regu
latio
ns re
gard
ing
land
acq
uisi
tion,
in o
rder
tode
term
ine
fair
and
prop
er c
ompe
nsat
ion
cond
ition
s to
all t
he a
ffec
ted
resi
dent
s.A
com
bina
tion
of in
form
al a
nd fo
rmal
app
roac
hes s
houl
d be
car
eful
lyde
sign
ed a
nd im
plem
ente
d.
(1) K
eppr
ess*
No.
55 /1
993
and
Pera
tura
n M
ente
riN
egar
a A
grar
ia/ K
epal
a B
PN N
o.1
/199
4 (2
) Kep
pres
s No.
2 /1
993
and
Pera
tura
n M
ente
riN
egar
a A
grar
ia/ K
epal
a B
PN N
o.3
/199
4.
- A
ccep
tanc
e of
com
pens
atio
n an
d co
nditi
ons
2. L
ivel
ihoo
d
Land
Acq
uisi
tion
To m
inim
ize
inco
me
loss
cau
sed
by th
epr
ojec
t, of
the
affe
cted
resi
dent
sTo
satis
fy th
e pe
ople
who
se la
nd is
acqu
ired
by th
e pr
ojec
t
Any
loss
of a
gric
ultu
ral a
nd fi
sher
y pr
oduc
tion
shou
ld b
e ta
ken
into
aco
unt t
ode
term
ine
the
amou
nt a
nd c
ondi
tions
of c
ompe
nsat
ion,
in d
irect
con
sulta
tion
with
the
affe
cted
resi
dent
sPr
ovid
e al
tern
ativ
e la
nds f
or c
ontin
uing
pre
sent
act
iviti
es
- Th
e am
ount
of c
ompe
nsat
ion
fairl
y de
term
ined
by u
sing
NJO
P**
To c
ontro
l ten
sion
am
ong
peop
leco
ncer
ned
Soci
aliz
atio
n to
the
affe
cted
peo
ple
so a
s to
avoi
d un
rest
- In
cide
nt o
f peo
ple's
unr
est
Rec
ruitm
ent o
f wor
kers
To a
llevi
ate
nega
tive
impa
ct o
n in
com
e of
the
affe
cted
resi
dent
sG
ive
prio
rity
of re
crui
tmen
t as w
orke
r in
the
proj
ect t
o th
e af
fect
ed re
side
nts
- R
ecru
itmen
t of l
ocal
aff
ecte
d re
side
nts
Fish
ery
prom
otio
nTo
enc
oura
ge g
row
th a
nd d
evel
opm
ent o
fec
onom
ic a
ctiv
ity su
rrou
ndin
g La
keLi
mbo
to
In c
olla
bora
tion
with
Din
as P
erik
anan
:Es
tabl
ish
Lim
boto
Lak
e Sp
atia
l Pla
n al
lotti
ng a
rea
for f
ish
cultu
reTr
aini
ng o
n fis
h cu
lture
Enco
urag
e th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f fis
herm
an g
roup
- D
evel
opm
ent o
f fis
h cu
lture
in L
ake
Lim
boto
- C
ontri
butio
n of
fish
ery
to re
gion
al e
cono
my
3. Loc
al P
opul
atio
n's
Dis
sem
inat
ion
activ
ity(s
ocia
lizat
ion)
To a
void
peo
ple's
unr
est a
nd re
sist
ance
toth
e pr
ojec
tSo
cial
izat
ion
of th
e pr
ojec
ts to
war
d th
e pe
ople
aff
ecte
d by
the
Tam
alat
eFl
oodw
ay, T
apod
u G
ate
and
Sedi
men
t tra
p co
nstru
ctio
n, in
ord
er to
impr
ove
the
popu
latio
n's p
erce
ptio
n (le
vel o
f acc
epta
nce)
on
the
men
tione
d pr
ojec
ts
- Pe
ople
's pe
rcep
tion
on th
e pr
ojec
t(r
ef: A
gree
=68%
, Not
agr
ee=2
3.1%
as o
f Jun
e20
02)
Opp
ositi
onLa
nd A
cqui
sitio
nTo
eas
e pe
ople
's fr
ustra
tion
The
amou
nt a
nd c
ondi
tions
of c
ompe
nsat
ion
shou
ld b
e fa
irly
dete
rmin
edac
cord
ing
to th
e ag
reem
ent w
ith la
nd/h
ouse
ow
ners
- A
ccep
tanc
e of
aff
ecte
d pe
ople
on
amou
nt a
ndco
nditi
ons o
f com
pens
atio
n co
nclu
ded
4. P
eopl
e's m
obili
tyTr
affic
con
ditio
nsTo
alle
viat
e di
stur
banc
e of
peo
ple
and
vehi
cle's
mob
ility
and
of u
sual
func
tion
ofm
arke
t whi
ch is
cau
sed
by p
roje
ct
Tran
spor
tatio
n sc
hedu
le is
to b
e ca
refu
lly p
repa
red
take
n in
to a
ccou
nt th
eex
istin
g m
arke
t at P
ilolo
daa,
esp
ecia
lly it
s pea
k pe
riods
and
day
s of t
he m
arke
tan
d su
rrou
ndin
g tra
ffic
- In
cide
nce
of tr
affic
jam
dur
ing
cons
truct
ion
stag
e
5. A
cces
s to
wat
ers
Acc
essi
bilit
y to
rive
r and
lake
wat
ers
To m
inim
ize
dist
urba
nce
of d
aily
act
iviti
essu
ch a
s was
hing
and
bat
hing
Des
ign
dike
s with
pat
h or
stai
rsIn
divi
dual
con
sulta
ion
for t
hose
who
suff
er fr
om d
iffic
ult a
cces
s to
wat
ers
- C
onst
ruct
ed d
ikes
- C
ase
of in
divi
dual
con
sulta
tion
6. P
ublic
hea
lthan
d Sa
nita
tion
Acc
essi
bilit
y to
hea
lthse
rvic
esN
ot to
wor
sen
peop
le's
acce
ss to
hea
lthse
rvic
es, b
ecau
se o
f eve
ntua
l rel
ocat
ion
ofhe
alth
faci
litie
s/ p
erso
nnel
Car
eful
cho
ice
of p
roje
ct si
te in
ord
re to
mai
ntai
n ex
istin
g he
alth
serv
ice
If n
ot a
void
able
, ind
ivid
ual c
onsu
ltaio
n fo
r tho
se w
ho su
ffer
from
diff
icul
tac
cess
to h
ealth
serv
ices
- R
eloc
atio
n of
hea
lth fa
cilit
ies a
nd p
erso
nnel
'sre
side
nce
- C
ase
of in
divi
dual
con
sulta
tion
7. W
aste
Prac
tice
of w
aste
dum
ping
To k
eep
impr
oved
rive
r stre
ams a
ndco
nstru
cted
Flo
odw
ay c
lean
Reg
ular
inve
stig
atio
n an
d cl
eani
ng o
f the
Flo
odw
ay b
y ei
ther
loca
l peo
ple
orpu
blic
serv
ice
- Si
tuat
ion
arou
nd c
onst
ruct
ed st
ruct
ures
(Tam
alat
e Fl
oodw
ay, T
apod
u ga
te, d
ikes
, etc
.)
Con
stru
ctio
n w
aste
To a
void
uno
rgan
ized
dep
osit
ofco
nstru
ctio
n w
aste
Det
erm
ine
depo
sit p
lace
s for
eac
h of
con
stru
ctio
n si
tes a
nd o
rgan
ize
prop
erly
disp
osal
of w
aste
- Si
tuat
ion
of c
onst
ruct
ion
was
te a
t pro
ject
site
s
* K
eppr
ess (
Pres
iden
tial D
ecre
e); *
* N
JOP:
(Nila
i Jua
l Obj
ek P
ajak
: Sol
d Va
lue
of T
ax O
bjec
t)
C8-68
Phas
eM
onito
ring
Para
met
erM
onito
ring
Site
sFr
eque
ncy/
Perio
dM
etho
dolo
gy
1.G
eolo
gy (e
rosi
on &
sedi
men
tatio
n)Er
osio
n of
rive
r ban
ksO
/MEr
osio
n po
int a
ndm
a gni
tude
.Ta
podu
R.,
Bol
ango
R.,
Bon
e R
. and
Tam
alat
e R
.A
fter m
ajor
floo
ds w
hen
nece
ssar
y.O
n-si
te v
isua
l obs
erva
tion
Wel
l wat
erC
&O
/MW
ell w
ater
leve
lA
long
Tam
alat
e flo
odw
ayan
d Ta
podu
rive
r, an
dSi
ende
ng C
utof
f cha
nnel
.
Onc
e a
mon
th d
urin
g an
d af
ter t
he c
onst
ruct
ion
of T
amal
ate
flood
way
, exc
avat
ion
of T
apod
uriv
er a
nd S
iend
eng
Cut
off c
hann
el. /
Per
iod
ofm
onito
ring
is to
dep
end
on m
onito
ring
resu
lt of
early
stag
e.
Man
ual m
easu
rem
ent o
f wel
lw
ater
leve
l of l
ocal
resi
dent
s.
Land
subs
iden
ceC
&O
/MG
roun
d el
evat
ion
(Alti
tude
)D
itto
Ditt
oSu
rvey
of g
roun
d le
vel e
leva
tion
Wat
er le
vel o
f riv
ers a
nd fl
ood
risks
O/M
Ove
rflo
w p
oint
and
Inun
datio
n ar
eaLB
B b
asin
(Low
er b
asin
area
)A
fter m
ajor
floo
d w
hen
nece
ssar
y.O
n-si
te v
isua
l obs
erva
tion
Wat
er le
vel i
n La
ke L
imbo
toO
/MW
ater
leve
lLa
ke L
imbo
to a
nd T
apod
uga
teD
aily
for 5
yea
rs a
fter c
ompl
etio
n of
Tap
odu
gate
.M
easu
rem
ent o
n w
ater
gau
ge
4.T
erre
stri
al fl
ora
and
faun
aW
ild p
lant
s and
ani
mal
sC
&O
/MSp
ecie
s des
igna
ted
as p
rote
cted
spec
ies.
Tam
alat
e flo
odw
ay a
n driv
er w
iden
ing
site
s.B
efor
e ve
geta
tion
clea
ranc
e.O
n-si
te v
isua
l obs
erva
tion
Aqu
atic
wee
ds (M
acro
phyt
es)
O/M
Subm
erge
d an
dem
erge
nt p
lant
s.B
ente
ng O
tana
ha a
nd o
ther
view
poin
ts.
Seve
ral t
imes
a y
ear.
/ Up
to 5
yea
rs a
fter t
h eco
nstru
ctio
n of
Tap
odu
gate
.Ph
otog
raph
taki
ng a
nd v
isua
lob
serv
atio
n.Fi
shin
g ou
tput
of
eels
Mar
ket a
nd e
ach
fishe
rmen
Ever
y da
y.R
epor
t fro
m e
ach
fishe
rmen
Eels
' mig
ratio
nTa
podu
rive
r and
dra
inag
ech
anne
ls.
Twic
e a
mon
th fo
r 1 y
ear b
efor
e a
nd a
fter t
heco
mpl
etio
n of
Tap
odu
gate
.Se
tup
of e
el tr
ap o
n Ta
podu
rive
ran
d dr
aina
ge c
hann
els.
Oth
er fi
shO
/Mfis
hing
out
put f
rom
Lim
boto
Mar
ket a
nd e
ach
fishe
rmen
Reg
ular
ly, e
.g.,
once
a w
eek.
Rep
ort f
rom
eac
h fis
herm
enA
ir po
llutio
n ca
used
by
emis
sion
gas
CN
Ox,
SO
x, C
O
Dus
tC
Dus
t Con
cent
ratio
n
Noi
seC
Noi
se L
evel
On-
site
surv
ey u
sing
noi
se le
vel
met
er.
Turb
idity
and
alk
alin
ity in
river
s and
in L
ake
Lim
boto
CTS
S, T
urbi
dity
Sam
plin
g an
d la
bora
tory
test
Alk
alin
ity in
rive
rs a
nd in
Lak
eLi
mbo
toC
pHO
n-si
te su
rvey
usi
ng p
H m
eter
.
Wat
er q
ualit
y of
Lak
e Li
mbo
toO
/MpH
, DO
, BO
D5,
CO
D, T
SS, C
olifo
rmLa
ke L
imbo
toA
t 3 p
oint
s and
2 ti
mes
a y
ear,
i.e. i
n ra
iny
seas
on a
nd d
ry se
ason
, 5 y
ears
afte
r com
plet
ion
of T
apod
u ga
te./
6 po
ints・
times
x 5
yea
r = 3
0
On-
site
surv
ey a
nd S
ampl
ing
and
labo
rato
ry te
st.
* C
: Con
stru
ctio
n ph
ase,
O/M
: Ope
ratio
n an
d M
aint
enan
ce p
hase
7.2. 3. 5. 6.
Tab
le C
8.4.
13 E
NV
IRO
NM
EN
TA
L M
ON
ITO
RIN
G P
LA
N O
N N
AT
UR
AL
EN
VIR
ON
ME
NT
AL
CO
MPO
NE
NT
O/M
Man
agem
ent o
bjec
tive
Envi
ronm
enta
lCo
mpo
nent
Mon
itorin
g pl
an
Aqu
atic
flor
a an
dfa
una
Gro
undw
ater
and
land
subs
iden
ce
Eels
and
oth
er m
igra
tory
fish
, if
any
Wat
er Q
ualit
y
Onc
e at
pea
k pe
riod
of e
ach
cons
truct
ion
wor
kon
Alo
R.,
Pohu
R.,
Biy
onga
R.,
Tapo
du R
.,B
olan
go R
, Bon
e R
., Ta
mal
ate
R.,
Tam
alat
eflo
odw
ay, T
amal
ate
wei
r, Ta
podu
gat
e an
dSe
dim
ent t
rap.
/ 10
tim
es in
tota
l.
Lake
Lim
boto
, Alo
-Poh
u R
.,B
iyon
ga R
., Ta
podu
R.,
Bol
ango
R, B
one
R.,
Tam
alat
e R
.
Wat
er r
egim
e
Sam
plin
g an
d la
bora
tory
test
Air
Qua
lity
Onc
e at
pea
k pe
riod
of e
ach
cons
truct
ion
wor
kon
Alo
R.,
Pohu
R.,
Biy
onga
R.,
Tapo
du R
.,B
olan
go R
, Bon
e R
., Ta
mal
ate
flood
way
,Ta
mal
ate
wei
r and
Tap
odu
gate
./ 9
poi
nts・
times
in to
tal.
Kec
. Lim
boto
, Tel
aga
and
Kab
ila. K
ota
Bar
at, S
elat
anan
d U
tara
C8-69
Tab
le C
8.4.
14 E
NV
IRO
NM
EN
TA
L M
ON
ITO
RIN
G P
LA
N O
N S
OC
IAL
EN
VIR
ON
ME
NT
AL
CO
MPO
NE
NT
SE
nvir
onm
enta
lM
anag
emen
t Ele
men
tM
onito
ring
pla
nC
ompo
nen t
Phas
eM
onito
ring
par
amet
erM
onito
ring
Site
sFr
eque
ncy/
Per
iod
met
hodo
logy
*
At e
very
mee
ting
of L
and
acqu
isiti
on c
omm
ittee
- Pr
ogre
ss o
f lan
d ac
quis
ition
proc
esse
s1.
Res
ettle
men
tLa
nd a
cqui
sitio
nPC
Com
pens
atio
n (e
sp. i
tsco
nditi
ons)
Each
pro
ject
site
and
BPN
At t
he c
oncl
usio
n of
land
acq
uisi
tion
proc
ess
- Pr
ogre
ss o
f lan
d ac
quis
ition
proc
esse
s -
I (La
nd a
cqui
sitio
n co
mm
ittee
) -
I (af
fect
ed re
side
nts)
Land
acq
uisi
tion
PCC
ompe
nsat
ion
(its
amou
nt &
con
ditio
ns)
Each
pro
ject
site
and
BPN
At t
he c
oncl
usio
n of
land
acq
uisi
tion
proc
ess
- sa
me
as m
entio
ned
in "
1."
abov
e
2. L
ivel
ihoo
dR
ecru
itmen
t of
wor
kers
CR
ecru
ited
rese
ttled
resi
dent
sEa
ch p
roje
ct si
te a
nd c
ontra
ctor
's of
fice*
*A
t the
end
of w
orke
r rec
ruitm
ent
- I+
Q (r
ecru
ited
rese
ttled
resi
dent
s)
Fish
ery
prom
otio
nO
/MLa
ke L
imbo
to, D
inas
Per
ikan
anA
nnua
lly -
Stat
istic
s Din
as P
erik
anan
3. L
ocal
Pop
ulat
ion'
sD
isse
min
atio
nac
tivity
PCIn
cide
nt o
f res
ista
nce
Vill
age
of in
cide
ntW
hen
peop
le's
unre
st is
obs
erve
d an
d pe
ople
'sfr
ustra
tion
expr
esse
d -
I+Q
(vill
ages
at p
roje
ct si
tes)
Opp
ositi
onLa
nd a
cqui
sitio
nPC
Com
pens
atio
n (a
mou
ntan
d co
nditi
ons )
Each
pro
ject
site
and
BPN
At t
he c
oncl
usio
n of
land
acq
uisi
tion
proc
ess
- sa
me
as m
entio
ned
in "
1."
abov
e
4. T
raff
ic fa
cilit
ies
Traf
fic c
ondi
tions
CC
row
dedn
ess o
f tra
ffic
Aro
und
Pilo
loda
a m
arke
t and
con
tract
or's
offic
e
Bef
ore
star
ting
any
cons
truct
ion
wor
kO
nce
a m
onth
dur
ing
cons
truct
ion
stag
e, in
clud
ing
the
peak
per
iod
of c
onst
ruct
ion
wor
k -
FO -
Num
ber o
f com
plai
nts r
ecei
ved
PCEa
ch p
roje
ct si
teA
t the
con
clus
ion
of la
nd a
cqui
sitio
n pr
oces
s -
FO, I
5. A
cces
s to
wat
ers
Acc
essi
bilit
y to
rivr
ean
d la
ke w
ater
sC
Util
izat
ion
of ri
ver a
ndla
ke w
ater
s by
resi
dent
sEa
ch p
roje
ct si
te a
nd c
ontra
ctor
's of
fice
Whe
n co
mpl
aint
s are
exp
ress
ed
- FO
, I (r
esid
ents
nea
rby)
- N
umbe
r of c
once
rned
com
plai
nts
durin
g co
nstru
ctio
n st
age
- R
ecor
d of
con
sulta
tion
O/M
Each
pro
ject
site
One
mon
th a
fter t
he c
ompl
etio
n of
con
stru
ctio
n w
ork
- I+
Q (r
esid
ents
alo
ng ri
vers
)
6. P
ublic
hea
lth a
nd sa
nita
tion
Acc
essi
bilit
y to
heal
th se
rvic
esO
/MU
se o
f hea
lth se
rvic
e by
affe
cted
peo
ple
Each
pro
ject
site
and
nea
rby
heal
thfa
cilit
ies
At t
he c
ompl
etio
n of
con
stru
ctio
n w
orks
- St
atis
tics D
inas
Kes
ehat
an -
I (he
alth
faci
lity)
- I+
Q (p
eopl
e di
rect
ly a
ffec
ted)
- R
ecor
d of
con
sulta
tion
7. W
aste
Prac
tice
of w
aste
dum
ping
PCSt
atus
of w
aste
dum
ping
by
resi
dent
sA
long
Tam
alat
e FW
& c
once
rned
rive
rsA
t the
com
plet
ion
of la
nd a
cqui
sitio
n -
FO, I
+Q (r
esid
nets
alo
ngco
ncer
ned
river
s)
Con
stru
ctio
n w
aste
CO
rgan
izat
ion
of w
aste
depo
sit
Was
te d
epos
it fo
r eac
h pr
ojec
t site
&co
ntra
ctor
's of
fice
At t
he b
egin
ning
, pea
k an
d en
d of
con
stru
ctio
n w
ork
- FO
, I (C
ontra
ctor
)
Prac
tice
of w
aste
dum
ping
O/M
Stat
us o
f was
tedu
mpi
ng b
y re
side
nts
Alo
ng T
amal
ate
FW &
con
cern
ed ri
vers
One
mon
th a
fter t
he c
ompl
etio
n of
con
stru
ctio
n w
ork
- FO
, I+Q
(res
iden
ts a
long
conc
erne
d riv
ers a
nd T
amal
ate
FW)
note
: * I
: Int
ervi
ew; Q
: Que
stio
nnai
re; I
+Q (.
..): I
nter
view
and
que
stio
nnai
re (t
arge
t gro
ups)
; FO
: Fie
ld o
bser
vatio
n; F
W: F
lood
way
, **
cont
ract
ed c
ompa
ny fo
r pro
jec t
C8-70
Table C8.4.15 APPROVAL LETTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS (1/3)
GOVERNMENT OF GORONTALO PROVINCE
EVALUATION COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS (EIA)
General Sudirman Street No. 57 Gorontalo, Phone 0435-821277 Fax 0435-828281
CHAIR OF EVALUATION COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS, GORONTALO PROVINCE DECREE
NO. 02, 2002
ON ENVIRONMENTAL SUITABILITY OF FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITY
IN LIMBOTO-BOLANGO-BONE (LBB) BASIN, GORONTALO PROVINCE BY JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) AND
DINAS PU/KIMPRASWIL, GORONTALO PROVINCE
THE CHAIR OF EVALUATION COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS (EIA), GORONTALO PROVINCE,
Considering : a. that based on the evaluation made by AMDAL Evaluation Committee,
Gorontalo Province, the Environmental Impact Analysis (ANDAL), Environmental Management Plan (RKL), and Environmental Monitoring Plan (RPL) on flood control in LBB Basin conducted by Japan International Cooperation Agency and Dinas PU/KIMPRASWIL, Gorontalo Province, can be approved according to the committee meeting result on 29 August 2002;
b. that the results of Environmental Impact Analysis, Environmental Management Plan, and Environmental Monitoring Plan need to be established by a decree from the Chair of AMDAL Evaluation Committee, Gorontalo Province;
c. that based on consideration stated in points a. and b., decree from the Chair of AMDAL Evaluation Committee, Gorontalo Province on Environmental Suitability of Flood Control in Limboto-Bolango-Bone Basin, Gorontalo Province conducted by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Dinas PU/KIMPRASWIL, Gorontalo Province need to be established;
Considering further : 1. The Law No. 5 (1990) on Biological natural Resource Conservation and its Ecosystem (State Document No. 49, 1990, addition to State Document No. 3419),
2. The Law No. 24 (1992) on Spatial Planning (State Document No. 115, 1992, addition to State Document No. 3501),
3. The Law No. 23 (1997) on Environmental Management (State Document No. 68, 1997, addition to State Document No. 3699),
4. The Law No. 22 (1999) on Regional Government (State Document No. 60, 1999, addition to State Document No. 3839),
5. Government Regulation No. 27 (1999) on Environmental Impact Analysis (State Document No. 59, 1999, addition to State Document No. 3838),
(Cont’d)
C8-71
Table C8.4.15 APPROVAL LETTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS (2/3)
6. Government Regulation No. 10 (2000) on Environmental Impact Management Board.
Considering further : a. Decree of Environmental Ministry No. 17/Men-LH/02/2001 on Types of Activities that Required Environmental Impact Analysis,
b. Decree of Board of Environmental Impact Control Chair No. 9 (2000) on Community Involvement and Information Transparency during the EIA Process,
c. Decree of Board of Environmental Impact Control Chair No. 231 (2002) on Environmental Impact Analysis Arrangement Guideline,
d. Decree of Governor No. 231 (2002) on Establishment on Evaluation Committee and EIA Technical Team in Gorontalo Province,
e. Minutes of Gorontalo Province EIA Evaluation Committee Meeting, 29 August 2002 on Environmental Impact Analysis, Environmental Management Plan, and Environmental Monitoring Plan of Flood Control Project in Limboto-Bolango-Bone Basin conducted by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Dinas PU/KIMPRASWIL, Gorontalo Province,
f. Minutes of evaluation on Environmental Impact Analysis of Flood Control Project in Limboto-Bolango-Bone Basin carried out by Gorontalo Province Environmental Impact Analysis Technical Team, 22 September 2002.
TO DECREE
FIRST : Environmental suitability of Flood Control Activity in Limboto-Bolango-Bone Basin, Gorontalo Province conducted by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Dinas PU/KIMPRASWIL, Gorontalo Province.
SECOND : Environmental suitability of Flood Control Activity in Limboto-Bolango-Bone Basin, Gorontalo Province conducted by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Dinas PU/KIMPRASWIL, Gorontalo Province stated in the FIRST dictum means that the Flood Control Project Activities in Limboto-Bolango-Bone Basin, Gorontalo Province conducted by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Dinas PU/KIMPRASWIL, Gorontalo Province is suitable according to environmental viewpoint.
THIRD : Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Dinas PU/KIMPRASWIL, Gorontalo Province are required to accomplish and to obey the following procedures during their activities:
To perform environmental management and monitoring measures as written in the approved Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan Documents,
To report the results of perform environmental management and monitoring measures to Environmental Impact Management Board (BAPEDAL), Home Affair Minister of Republic Indonesia, Governor of
(Cont’d)
C8-72
Gorontalo, Walikota Gorontalo, and Bupati Kabupaten Gorontalo every six (6) months from the time this decree is signed.
FOURTH : The approving authorities are required to include all requirements and obligations, which are not only written in this decree but in Environmental Management and Monitoring Plans, as well as regulations in permitting the flood control activities in LBB basin, Gorontalo Province.
FIFTH : If in the future case there will be any unpredicted and uncontrolled environmental impacts, which are not described in the approved environmental management and monitoring documents, taking place; the project operator must immediately report the impacts to the institutions mentioned in the THIRD dictum points two (2), to determine any further necessary steps.
SIXTH : If the flood control project activities require any extension, relocation, or change, whose impacts are not assessed and described in the approved environmental management and monitoring documents, then a new Environmental Impact Analysis (EIA) must be accomplished,
SEVENTH : Any failure or violation acted by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Dinas PU/KIMPRASWIL, Gorontalo Province upon this endorsement may be penalized according to the law.
EIGHT : Any expense for issuing this decree is charged to The Environmental Impact Plan and Control Project, Regional Planning and Developing Board (Bappeda), Gorontalo Province, namely fund from additional budget (ABT).
NINETH : Any mistakes written in this decree must be in the future corrected accordingly.
Decreed in Gorontalo On September the 23rd 2002 AMDAL EVALUATION COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN Already signed and stamped by G U S N A R I S M A I L
Copy to: 1. Home Affair Minister in Jakarta 2. State Minister of Environment in Jakarta 3. Public Work/Settlement and Regional Infrastructure Minister in Jakarta 4. Gorontalo Governor in Gorontalo 5. Walikota Gorontalo in Gorontalo 6. Bupati Gorontalo in Limboto 7. The Chair of Environmental Impact Management Board in Jakarta 8. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Team 9. Achieve (Remarks) Temporally English translation from original letter written in Indonesian.
Table C8.4.15 APPROVAL LETTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS (3/3)
C8-73
The Study on Flood Control and Water Management
in Limboto-Bolango-Bone Basin in the Republic of Indonesia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Figure C8.4.1 PROCEDURAL FLOW OF ENVIRONMENTALMANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT
Local Residents and Agencies to be affected, and NGOs
Supervisory Governmental Agency (BAPEDAL, Gorontalo)
Project Implementer (PU/Kimpraswill, Gorontalo)
Dissemination of commencement of monitoring
Commencement of Construction Works
End of Monitoring Activities.
Completion of construction works
Env
ironm
enta
l Mon
itori
ng
Dur
ing
Con
stru
ctio
n Ph
ase
Env
ironm
enta
l Mon
itori
ng
Dur
ing
Ope
ratio
n an
d M
aint
enan
ce P
hase
Several times up to 5 years after construction works
Questions, Opinions and/or Requests
Report of Monitoring Results
Instruction of Necessary Action
Monitoring Results
Dissemination of monitoring results
Report in case of Emergency
Several times during construction phase
Report in case of Emergency
Questions, Opinions and/or Requests
Dissemination of monitoring results
Instruction of Necessary Action
Monitoring Results
Report of Monitoring Results
C8-74
The Study on Flood Control and Water Management
in Limboto-Bolango-Bone Basin in the Republic of Indonesia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Figure C8.4.2 PROPOSED PRACTICAL STEPS FOR LAND ACQUISITION
1. Unofficial Steps (to be taken by non official or the third party (e.g. NGO))measures to be taken objective
Identification of key persons(Public figures, religious leaders, youth
leaders, LSM, community organizations, etc.)Preparation before concrete discussions
Personnal contacts and Small Meetings(informal meetings) Pre approach for "socsializasi"
Dissemination ("Sosializasi") Pre approach before starting(about importance of flood control for the
region, formal procedure of land acquisition,official administrative procedure
2. Official Steps (to be taken charge of by Kimpraswil Officials)
Contact with the community by officials
Follow Administrative procedure in collaboration with BPN and others(See. "Table A5.2.1 PROCEDURE FOR LAND ACQUISITION" of the Supporting Report A)
Steps should be carefully designed and implemented in a correct order and in a proper manner, according to the reality of the approaching community.
<Explicative note>1. Unofficial steps1.1 Identification of key persons: 1.3 Dissemination:- Each affected community group has its ownkey persons that need to be identified. Some ofthem may have already participated in PCMconducted by JICA or AMDAL Team.
- Dissemination would be performed when thecontact persons and NGO have completed theirassignment mentioned in 1.2.- Follow-up of dissemination activities are
d d- Although some of the key persons have beenidentified via PCM, a site visit need to be doneso as to check any additional key person.
- All detailed dissemination result should besupplied to the relevant and competent officialin charge of land acquisition procedures, suchas BPN.2. Official steps
1.2 Personal contacts and small meetings: 2.1 Contact with the community by officials:
- This medium should be utilized by theproject operator to transfer all necessary dataand information regarding the project schemes,impacts, and land acquisition measures to the
- It is necessary to firstly define which officialsamong Dinas at province, kabupaten, and kotaGorontalo levels are in competence to handlethe land acquisition processes.
- Any voices and aspiration from the contactedpersons should be examinined.- Contact persons and NGO involved in suchmeetings are expected to firstly disseminatethe result of small meetings within theircommunity.
C8-75
Part-C: Feasibility Study for Priority Projects
C9-1
C9. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN C9.1 Overall Implementation Plan Implementation of Master Plan: The Flood Mitigation Master Plan (FM-MP) is proposed for implementation by the target year of 2019. Considering the effective and orderly implementation, early realization of project effects, and capacity building through the project implementation, the FM-MP was proposed for stage-wise implementation as follows (Figure C9.1.1):
1) Preparatory stage : Until end of 2004 2) Intensive implementation stage : From beginning of 2005 to end of 2009 3) Sustainable implementation stage : From beginning of 2010 to end of 2019
Intensive Implementation: During the period of the Eighth National Five-Year Plan from 2005 to2009, actual construction works at site and activities for watershed management and flood plain management will be implemented intensively. Through the intensive implementation, it is expected the flood mitigation activities in the basin will be stimulated and related personnel and administration will be trained and adjusted toward effective implementation of the project. The projects to be implemented in this stage must be the basic facilities and activities for flood mitigation and the priority ones expected to yield higher outcome. Priority Projects Selected for Intensive Implementation: The Priority Projects include structural and non-structural measures. The structural measures selected for the intensive implementation are:
1) Lower Bone River Improvement 2) Lower Bolango River Improvement 3) Tapodu River Improvement with Tapodu Gate 4) Tamalate Floodway 5) Sediment Trap Works in Lake Limboto
In parallel with the structural measures, non-structural measures such as watershed management and flood plain management will also be implemented within a framework of the intensive implementation.
Part-C: Feasibility Study for Priority Projects
C9-2
Structural Sub-Projects: The structural measures selected for the priority projects can be divided into following sub-projects which are expected to realize respectively the effects corresponding to the works implemented.
Work I: Bone-Bolango-Tapodu (BBT) River Improvement Work I-1: Lower Bone River Work I-2: Bolango Stretch-I Work I-3: Tenda COC Work I-4: Bolango Stretch-IIR Work I-5: Bolango Stretch-IIL Work I-6: Bolango Stretch-III Work I-7: Tapodu River with Tapodu Gate
Work II: Tamalate Floodway Work III: Sediment Trap Works in Lake Limboto
Non-structural Measures: The non-structural flood mitigation measures are the activities to be carried out in collaboration with relevant government agencies, local communities and individuals. Rolls of the agency in charge of flood mitigation would not be project-type works but rather administrative works to be performed as routine works as described below.
1) Watershed management by encouraging activities to be undertaken by relevant agencies and local community organizations, so as to conserve flood-water and sediment retention function by means of construction of erosion control facilities, afforestation and land use control, and dissemination activities in the watershed areas; and
2) Flood plain management by guiding and promoting the activities to prevent occurrence of damages by such means of flood-proofing, flood forecasting- warning and evacuation, flood fighting, and community-based flood mitigation measures, by mobilizing local community organizations and individuals in the flood prone areas.
C9.2 Preparatory Stage During the preparatory stage until the end of the 7th National Five-Year Plan in 2004, various works and activities have to be performed for the forthcoming full-scale project. Main works and activities are presented below. Some activities below are to be
Part-C: Feasibility Study for Priority Projects
C9-3
continued after in the remaining stages. (1) Institutional and Organizational Arrangements The preparatory works for the implementation of the FM-MP should be initiated from the establishment or reinforcement of the implementation body of the project. This works would include institutional and organizational arrangements as follows:
1) Institutional Arrangements: The priority project will be implemented under the management of Gorontalo Province in cooperation with Kabupaten Gorontalo and Kota Gorantalo, since the LBB basin extends across the border of Kabupaten and Kota. Gorontalo Province should make administrative decision toward the project implementation in association with Kabupaten and Kota.
2) Organizational Arrangements: Organizational setup should be established for the full scale implementation of the project. In the organization, staffing, roles and budgeting shall be clarified based on the coordination with relevant agencies of Province, Kabupaten and Kota. Capacity building is an important aspect to materialize the organization. For the successful implementation of the project, recruit of capable staff and training for them should be started.
(2) Fund Arrangement The project cost estimated in the feasibility study is allocated among the stakeholders such as central/local governments and communities, taking into consideration the nature of work and the capability of funding. (3) Definite Plan/Detail Design A definite plan of the flood mitigation works will be drawn up after getting consent of the central/local government agencies and communities concerned. A detailed design will be prepared of the project facilities. (4) Preservation of Lands One of the crucial issues of the works in urban area like Gorontalo is the land acquisition. Therefore, it is essential to preserve the lands for flood mitigation
Part-C: Feasibility Study for Priority Projects
C9-4
facilities. This should start immediately after the preparation of definite flood mitigation plan. (5) Research and Investigation: Throughout the implementation period of the FM-MP, research and investigation activities should also be conducted in parallel for development of engineering tools to support the project. The following may be included among these activities, but not limited to:
1) Sediment Runoff: Study and analysis on sediment yield and transport are necessary especially in relation to the Lake Limboto.
2) Development of Erosion Control Works: For developing erosion control works effective and practical to the basin, various types of erosion control works should be introduced and tested. The work should include measures against sheet erosion and riverbank erosion. The works should be monitored for their sediment control effects and evaluated taking the materials available and cost-performance into consideration.
3) Research on Application of Bioengineering Technology: In order to introduce bioengineering technology as a component of flood mitigation, research works and accumulation of experience are necessary, in particular, on the selection of plant species, type and function of works applicable, raising techniques, and possibility of income generation for the community.
(6) Training and Workshops on Watershed and Flood Plain Management
1) For government officials and staff: Training and workshop of the government officials and staff in charge regarding watershed management, flood plain management and their application procedures to communities, so that they can coordinate, guide and support activities undertaken by relevant agencies, communities and individuals.
2) For community leaders: Training and workshop of the community leaders regarding flood plain management are also necessary to be undertaken by the government officer in charge.
Part-C: Feasibility Study for Priority Projects
C9-5
(7) Coordination with Relevant Agencies and Communities Implementation of flood mitigation requires coordination with various agencies and organization, among others:
1) For structural measures: Coordination to allocate works and required cost among the relevant agencies and organizations;
2) For watershed management: Coordination mainly with the Department of Forest and Plantation to promote Land Rehabilitation and Soil Conservation (LRSC) project
3) For flood plain management: Coordination and promotion for community mobilization to establish organizational basis for the flood mitigation activities in the communities.
C9.3 Intensive Implementation Stage (1) Work I: Bone-Bolango-Tapodu (BBT) River Improvement The implementation of Work I (BBT River Improvement), especially Works I-2 through I-5 and I-7 should be given the highest priority, because the suffering area is the center of the Gorontalo City, and that the areas related with these works are not protected by dikes in spite of inherently low ground elevations. The Work I was scheduled for its construction at site from 2005 to 2007. (2) Work II: Tamalate Floodway Although Work II (Construction of Tamalate Floodway) plays vital role on the flood mitigation for the city of Gorontalo, flood wall of the Tamalate River progresses almost entire stretches in the city. In view of this, priority was given lower than the Work I. The Work II was scheduled for its construction at site from 2007 to 2009. (3) Work III: Sediment Trap Works in Lake Limboto Considering the urgency for the establishment of countermeasures of Lake Limboto, it is advisable to start research and test work as early as possible. Therefore the Work III (Sediment Trap Works in Lake Limboto) was scheduled for its construction at site from 2005 to 2006.
Part-C: Feasibility Study for Priority Projects
C9-6
(4) Non-structural Measures Training/workshop and coordination activities initiated in the preparatory stage should be continued in this stage too. The dissemination activities of watershed management activities and flood plain management as well, community mobilization to establish the local community organizations, and other watershed and flood plain management activities should be put into practice in the selected pilot villages. All of these activities should be kept in record for future lessons and improvement including both succeeded and failed ones. C9.4 Sequence of Implementation It is ideal the work should be implemented on the schedule mentioned above, getting enough funds for their implementation. Even if the enough funds are not in hand, it is advisable to implement the works using the fund as available and realize the flood mitigation effects. For the selection of works in such cases, priority or sequence of works are proposed as follows:
1) First Group: Implementation at anytime as soon as possible: Work I-7: Tapodu River with Tapodu Gate Work I-3: Tenda COC Work I-2: Bolango Stretch-I Work III: Sediment Trap Works in Lake Limboto
2) Second Group: Implementation at anytime after Work I-2: Work I-4: Bolango Stretch-IIR Work I-5: Bolango Stretch-IIL
3) Third Group: Implementation at anytime during intensive implementation:
Work II: Tamalate Floodway Work I-1: Lower Bone River Work I-6: Bolango Stretch-III
Works can be selected for implemented from any of the first group works, then the second and third group works, considering the fund and lands available.
Part-C: Feasibility Study for Priority Projects
C9-7
The non-structural measures such as watershed management and flood plain management should be performed continuously as routine works starting from the preparatory stage
The Study on Flood Control and Water Management
in Limboto-Bolango-Bone Basin in the Republic of Indonesia
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Figure C9.1.1 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF FM-MP
0304
0506
0708
0910
1112
1314
1516
1718
19N
atio
nal F
ive-
Yea
r Pla
n7T
H8T
H9T
H10
TH
Alo
-Poh
u R
iver
Impr
ovem
ent
Rin
teng
a R
iver
Impr
ovem
ent
East
and
Wes
t Dik
es o
f Lak
e Li
mbo
toW
ater
shed
Man
agem
ent
Mid
dle
Bol
ango
Riv
er Im
prov
emen
tB
iyon
ga R
iver
Impr
ovem
ent
Mel
uopo
Riv
er Im
prov
emen
tM
aris
a R
iver
Impr
ovem
ent
Topo
du R
iver
Impr
ovem
ent w
ith T
opod
u G
ate
Sedi
men
t Tra
p W
orks
Tam
alat
e Fl
oodw
aySu
stai
nabl
e Im
plem
enta
tion
Stag
e
Feas
ibili
ty S
tudy
Fund
Arr
ange
men
tD
efin
ite P
lan/
Det
ail D
esig
nPr
eser
vatio
n of
Lan
ds1.
4
1.5
1.3
Res
earc
h an
d In
vest
igat
ion
Yea
r (20
03 -
2019
)
1 1.1
1.2
Sub-
Proj
ect/A
ctiv
ities
Prep
arat
ory
Stag
e
Mid
dle
Bon
e R
iver
Impr
ovem
ent
Low
er T
amal
ate
Riv
er Im
opro
vem
ent
Inte
nsiv
e Im
plem
enta
tion
Stag
eLo
wer
Bon
e R
iver
Impr
ovem
ent
Low
er B
olan
go R
iver
Impr
ovem
ent
21.6
Coo
rdin
atio
n
3 4 5Fl
ood
Plai
n M
anag
emen
t
