28
Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

  • View
    227

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Social constructivismDewey & Vygotsky

Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Page 2: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

John Dewey (1859 – 1952)

• American psychologist, philosopher, educator, social critic and political activist. In 1894 he became the chairman of the department of philosophy, psychology, and pedagogy at the University of Chicago.

• Dewey taught at Columbia University from 1905 until he retired in 1929. During his years at Columbia he traveled the world as a philosopher, social and political theorist, and educational consultant. Among his major journeys are his lectures in Japan and China from 1919 to 1921, his visit to Turkey in 1924 to recommend educational policy, and a tour of schools in the USSR in 1928.

Page 3: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Dewey

• Of course, Dewey never ignored American social issues. He was outspoken on education, domestic and international politics, and numerous social movements. Among the many concerns that attracted Dewey's support were women's suffrage, progressive education, educator's rights, the Humanistic movement, and world peace.

Page 4: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Behaviour vs experience

Dewey laid the foundation for his concept of experience in 1896 with a groundbreaking article in which he criticized how the concept of the reflex arc concept in psychology(behaviorism) is used to interpret the relation between action and thinking. In this article Dewey argued against the notion that it is possible to analyse human action as a mechanical sequence.

Page 5: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Dewey interpreted in the light of a need for innovation(Elkjaer 2009)

• Pragmatism views subjects as future-oriented.

• The consequence of this orientation towards the future is that knowledge is provisional because future experience may act as a corrective.

• Dewey may be helpful for the creation of a learning theory that answers the cry for creativity and innovation that is in demand in contemporary knowledge societies.

Page 6: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Problem and inquiry based learningas source of creativity and innovation

(model: Knud Illeris 2009)

University studies

Project work

Task based

Classroom teaching and instruction

accomodative

assimilative

Convergent thinking Divergent

thinkingProblembased

Curriculum based

Learner centred

Teacher centred

Page 7: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Pragmatism

• In everyday language a pragmatist is a person focused on results and solutions to problems despite ideological and political differences.

• It is future- oriented :What – if”• American pragmatism is situated in the

optimisms of the promise of new life surrounding waves of immigration to the US at the end of the 19th century.

Page 8: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Dewey and pragmatism

• Inquiry is a method in which working hypotheses are generated through anticipatory (creative)imagination of consequences ( thus much more than trial and error)

• Thinking (critical anticipation) is to use concepts and theories to solve a problem. The situation determines the choice of theories and concepts.

Page 9: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Pragmatism a learning theory for the future ?

• At the heart of Dewey´s thinking is the term ”experience”

• Experience is according to Dewey associated with human beings´lives and living.

• In Dewey´s terms , living is the continuous interaction between individuals and their environment.

• Includes emotion, aesthetics and ethics as well as knowledge.

Page 10: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

School and society(Dewey)

Page 11: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Experience and inquiry

• The subject-worlds relation makes experience possible.

• Experience is both the process of experiencing and the result of the process.

• Inquiry ( or critical and reflective thinking) is an experimental method by which new experience may be had not only through action but also by using ideas and concepts, hypotheses and theories as tools to think with.

Page 12: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Learning by experience Dewey !

Page 13: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Experience

Traditional• Experience as knowledge

• Experience as subjective

• Experience as oriented to the past

• Experience as isolated experiences

• Experience as action

Dewey• Knowledge as a subset of

experience• Experience as both subjective

and objective(weaving)• Experience as future oriented

(what-if)• Experience as united

experiences(organic circles)

• Experience as encompassing theories and concepts and as such a foundation for knowledge.

Page 14: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Experience as culture

• Dewey was aware that his use of experience was similar to the concept of culture (also a term with many definitions).

• The term practice might be preferred today.• (cf Lave, Bourdieu)

Page 15: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

What is missing ?

• Deweyan philosophy is insufficient today to describe how power is a key to understanding how learning is also a matter of access to participation in educational activities and to being able to respond to challenges ( Biesta 2006)

Page 16: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Vygotsky biography

• Although Vygotsky was never popular within the Sovjet system his teory, however, is firmly embedded in its ideals.

• Vygotsky was Jewish-Russian(limited acces to university etc).

• Vygotsky´s interests belonged to the humanities and social sciences, e.g. philosophy, literature & art ( contrast to Piaget, but similar to Dewey)

Page 17: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Vygotsky biography

• Contrary to expectations he was admitted to Moscow University (enrolled by draw)

• Admitted to medical school – changed to law and graduated in history & philosophy from private university as well as M.U.

• In philosophy Vygotsky looked for an alternative to Cartesian dualism

• Position at teachers´college and delivered first lectures in psychology

Page 18: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Vygotsky biogaphy

• Psychcology of Art (Ph.d)(1925)• The title shows that for Vygotsky psychology

was a method of uncovering the origins of higher forms of human consciousness and emotional life rather than of elementary behavioral acts.

• Psychology cannot limit itself to direct evidence. Psychology must take into account indirect evidence and circumstantial clues.

Page 19: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Vygotsky

• 1924 Vygotsky challenged the Russian behaviorists (Pavlov) (cf Dewey)

• Vygotsky ( with Luria) started a programme for nonreflexological scientific psychology. It had to solve the problem of interrelation of higher and lower elementary functions. He wanted to over the split between naturalist and idealist worldviews.

Page 20: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Vygotsky´s main concepts

• Socially meaningful activity became the main explanatory principle.

• Individual consciousness is built from the outside through relations with others.

• Human higher mental functions are products of mediated activity.(tools)and interpersonal relations.

Page 21: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Vygotsky´s idea of ”development”

• Development & cultural history• Vygotsky uses the concept of development with

reference to Marx & Hegel according to which the essence could only be understood through a study of its origin and history

• Development both applies to the individual and the cultural-historical evolution.( contrary to ideas of maturation).

• Psychological development is a dynamic process full of upheavals , sudden changes and reversals.

Page 22: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

The human condition is based in social interactions.

• Vygotsky suggests that it is the ability to develop cooperative activity through complex social relationships that separate mature humans from all other animals.

• Dewey also thinks that human beings are born social creatures and develop their sense of self through relationships.

• The main difference lies in how much power the individual has over future social activities.

Page 23: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Conceptualization of experience/culture

Dewey• Experience is helping to

form thinking

• Social history creates tools that are of use in present circumstances

Vygotsky• Culture is the raw material

of thinking

• Tools developed through history have a lasting impact on the social community

Page 24: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Dewey, tools and long term projects

• Dewey posits diversity as an important aspect of educational experience ( diversity as a tool)

• He thinks that environments with a high level of agreement between subjects are not beneficial, because they do not engage in free inquiry and this leads to narrow-mindedness.

• He ( like Vygotsky)sees progress in a equilibration/disequilibration process. The state of disequilibration represents a need. Disturbed equilibration drives exploration of new ideas.

Page 25: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Bottom – up or top-down

• The social is of primary influence in the life of the individual. Society has a vested interest in the development and maintenance of tools.

• Dewey wants to educate the individual and diversify the social milieu (bottom-up)

• Vygotsky wants to use the educational process to teach new members of the social community how to use culturally developed tools (top-down)

Page 26: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Two educational modelslong-term projects and Zone of proximal Development

Dewey• ”Long-term projects”• Children are immersed in everyday

activity. children will work on a topic that is of interest to them. The topic need not be of any relevance to the demands of the larger social community. The teachers should act as facilitators. The free inquiry must be based on the Children´s own goals. The children learn that they are responsible for inquiry in their lives and they determine what goals are important.

Vygotsky• ”Zone of proximal

development”• Adults as representatives of

society mentor children in specific culturally appropriate activity. The role of the educational process is to prepare children for more complex activity in the larger social community

Page 27: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

The role of teachers

Dewey• Are teachers supposed to

have the role as facilitators who step back from children´s activity and let it run its own course ?

Vygotsky• Are teachers supposed to

approach students as mentors who guide or direct activity ?

Page 28: Social constructivism Dewey & Vygotsky Pragmatism, Experience, school and society

Collaborative learning

• Dewey & Vygotsky

• What principles could be deduced from social constructivism and social learning ?