14
Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

Social and Ethical Considerations of

Agro-biotechnology

Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D.

Department of Sociology/Anthropology

North Dakota State University

Page 2: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

Biotechnology, in general, and genetically modified organisms (GMOs), in particular, pose many social and ethical questions.

Our discussion today will explore some of these questions.

Page 3: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

The Sociology of Genetically Modified Organisms

The Social Psychology of GMOs

Macro-Structural Issues: Government, Private Industry,

and International Relations

Micro-Structural Issues: Small Groups and Communities

Page 4: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

The Social Psychology of GMOs

What is the social psychology and cosmology regarding human’s place in/connection to nature as a result of the “genetic revolution?”

How are public perceptions of GMOs affected by the larger questions of biotechnology and human cloning?

What are environmentalists’, faith community’s, etc. attitudes toward GMOs?

How do social movement organizations shape attitudes toward GMOs?

What are producers attitudes toward/adoption of GMOs?

What are consumer awareness of/attitudes toward GMOs?

Page 5: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

Micro-Structural Issues:Small Groups and Communities

What are the characteristics of those who can and can’t afford GMOs technology?

What are the consequences for producers for adopting or not adopting GMOs?

What are the employment, social capital, conflict, and development implications for rural communities?

How have the relationships among residents in rural neighborhoods been affected by GMOs?

Page 6: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

Macro-Structural Issues: Government, Private Industry, & International Relations

Who are the beneficiaries of GMOs: producers, consumers, agribusiness, general public?

What about the monopoly of the agro-food system by transnational corporations?

Page 7: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

Market Share Controlled by Largest Food Firms

FoodSector

Four LargestFood Firms

MarketShare (%)

Broilers Tyson, Gold Kist, Perdue Farms, ConAgra 45

Beef IBP, ConAgra (Monfort), Cargill (Excell),Farmland Industries (National Farms)

87

Flour Milling Flour Milling ConAgra, ADM, Cargill, GeneralMills

71

PorkSlaughter

IBP, Smithfield, ConAgra, Cargill (Excell) 46

SheepSlaughter

ConAgra, Superior Packing, High Country,Denver Lamb

73

SoybeanCrushing

ADM, Cargill, Bunge, Ag Processsors 76

Turkey ConAgra, Rocco Turkeys, Hormel (Jennie-O),Carolina Turkeys

35

Wet CornMilling

ADM, Cargill, Tate and Lyle, CPC 74

Dry CornMilling

Bunge, Illinois Cereal, ADM, ConAgra(Lincoln Grain)

57

Heffernan, et al., 1996.

Page 8: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

Who are the beneficiaries of GMOs: producers, consumers, agribusiness, general public?

What about the monopoly of the agro-food system by transnational corporations?

What are the connections among government-subsidized GMO research, private industry, and government regulation?

How about patent and intellectual property rights?

Whose responsibility is it to clean-up genetic contamination?

What is the Impact on the structure of agriculture in Developing Nations?

How about GMOs as military, economic weapons; genetic terrorism?

Macro-Structural Issues: Government, Private Industry, & International Relations

Page 9: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

The Ethics of Genetically Modified Organisms

Beneficence Non-maleficence

AutonomyJustice

Ethical Principles

Page 10: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

Beneficence

Beneficence = to do good; unconditional goodwill and compassion.

Can GMOs feed a hungry world?

Is GMO engineering, technology, and agriculture sustainable? Profitable? Healthy?

Page 11: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

Autonomy

Autonomy = self-determination; respect for persons.

What limits human action: God’s or Nature’s design? Human knowledge (science) or ability (technology)?

To what degree should GMO engineering, technology, and agriculture be regulated?

Labeling: Do individuals have a right to know in order to make informed decisions?

Page 12: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

Non-maleficence Non-maleficence = do no evil or harm; risk-

benefit analysis.

What are the biological, environmental, health, and economic risks of GMOs? Are they safe?

What could happen? What should happen?

Who will decide?

Are the risks acceptable? And do the benefits outweigh the risks?

Page 13: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

Justice

Justice = equity; fair treatment for all people.

Should private individuals or corporations have the right to patent genes or life forms?

How equitably will the benefits and risks be distributed?

Page 14: Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology Gary A. Goreham, Ph.D. Department of Sociology/Anthropology North Dakota State University

The current state of affairs regarding the social and ethical

implications of genetically modified organisms?

We have far more questions than answers!