Snap Shots - Hope of Detroit Academy...Dyned training for ELL software DIBELS training A quality education Each child at the academy received personalized instruction and the staff

At Hope of Detroit Academy, our focus is on every child’s individual needs. Every child receives the personalized attention needed to learn and grow. Learning is fun in our proven

core academic program that exposes students to a world of opportunities. Our students love the nurturing, one-on-one attention – and our parents love the results! The 2007-08 school year was the school’s ninth year in operation - a year marked by continued academic, social and behavioral growth and success. Students in grades K-8 attend the Hope of Detroit Academy’s N. Campbell Street campus; students in grades 9-12 attend the Consortium College Preparatory High School campus at 1250 Rosa Parks Blvd. 2007-08 highlights include:

•Theacademycontinuedtomeettheacademicneedsofitsstudents,withsolid gainsonMEAPproficiencyandachievingAdequateYearlyProgress(AYP).

•SkillmanfoundationrecognizedtheacademyasaGoodSchoolMakingthe Gradeandawarded$50,000intheImprovingSchoolCategory.

•TheacademyreceivedtheGreatLakesStewardshipInitiative(GLSI)award. Thefocusofthisgrantistoincreaseawarenessandunderstandingoftheecology oftheGreatLakestoencourageMichiganresidentstobecomeactivestewards.

•TheacademysubmitteditsSelf-AssessmentofReadinessforAccreditationto NorthCentralAssociationCommissiononAccreditationandSchoolImprovement (NCACASI).

•HopeofDetroitstudentsparticipatedintheStateAcademicGamescompetition inGrandRapidsandplacedthirdoutof49schoolsinthestate.

• InpartnershipwiththeLatinoPress,HopeofDetroitAcademystudents andstaffwereabletoproduceaprofessionallyformattednewspaperon amonthlybasis.

At the high school: •Atthehighschoollevel,thethirdgraduatingclassachievedagraduation rateof96%andacollege-acceptancerateof94%. •ValedictorianStephanieTinsleyandsalutatorianShaninaShepardwere amongthemanyConsortiumgraduateswhoreceivedscholarshipstoschools inOhio,Michigan,Alabama,IndianaandWashingtonD.C.Over$300,000 inadditionalfundswereawardedtotheclassof2008tosupporttheir collegeeducation. •Theboysandgirlsbasketballteamswondistrictchampionshipsforthefirsttime andmovedontotheregionaltournament. •SpringpracticeandconditioningbeganinAprilandMaytopreparefor theschool’sfirstfootballteaminacollaborativepartnershipwithOld RedfordAcademy. •TheConsortiumdanceprogramperformedattheMasonicTempleand featuredover100studentsperforminginthisspecialannualprogram.

•AsaK-12system,theschoolachievedstrongMEAPandACTstandardized testingscores,amongthehighestofpublicschoolsinsouthwestDetroit. AYPstatushadnotbeenpubliclyreleasedatthetimeofthisreport.

Enrollment process •HopeofDetroitAcademyisafree,publicschoolandadherestoallrequirements outlinedbyitscharterauthorizerandfederalandstatelawregardingenrollments.

•Currentstudentsaregiventheopportunitytore-enrollinlatewinter,with preferencegiventothemandtheirsiblings.

• Inthespring,theschoolholdsanadvertisedopenenrollmentperiod,duringwhich anyMichiganresidentmayapply.

• Intheeventthatanygradeisover-subscribed,apubliclotteryisheldtodetermine enrollmentandawaitinglist.

•Theacademydoesnotchargetuitionnordiscriminateinadmissionspolicies orpracticesonthebasisofintellectualorathleticability,measuresofachievement

Hope of Detroit Academy2007-08 Annual Education Report

School information2008-09 contact information GradesK-8 4443N.CampbellSt. Detroit,MI48210 www.leonagroup.com/hope 313.897.8720

Grades9-12 1250RosaParksBlvd. Detroit,MI48216 313.964.2339 www.leonagroup.com/consortium

Year opened 1999

Grades K-12;grades9-12attendConsortium CollegePreparatoryHighSchool

School leadership, K-8BennyCruz, school leaderAliAbdel, assistant school leader KristinJager, curriculum coach

School leadership, 9-12 RodAtkins,school leader MarkGable assistant school leader, 9-12 LydiaKovach,curriculum coach, 9-12

Current board of directors ThomasRys,president ErinIrwin, vice president JoeGappy,treasurer RosalynLove,secretary LuisCeballos DanielleJackson

CharteredbyFerrisStateUniversity Dr.LawrenceWells,director RonaldS.Rizzo - interim director, 2006-07 EdMcKeehan, field representative ManagedbyTheLeonaGroup,L.L.C.

Mission ItisthemissionofHopeofDetroit Academytopromoteamulti-cultural communityoflearnerswhostrive forexcellence,determination,and achievement.

Vision ThevisionofHopeofDetroit Academyistoeffectivelycompete inatechnologicallyglobalworld andstrivetobecomesuccessful learnersoftheircommunities

oraptitude,statusasahandicappedperson,religion,creed,race,sex,coloror nationalorigin.

•Theacademyidentifies,evaluatesandservicesallchildrenintheschoolwhomay havedisabilities.Formoreinformationregardingassistanceforstudentswith disabilitiesorifyoususpectyourchildmayhaveadisability,pleasecontactthe schoolleader.

School safety Thesafetyofstudents,families,staffandvisitorsatbothcampusesisparamount. Theschoolshaveinstitutedcomprehensiveandproactiveschoolsafetyand emergencymanagementprogramsthatwerethoroughlycommunicatedtostaff, studentsandparents/guardians.Theseprogramsinclude,butarenotlimitedto: •Studentcodesofconduct •Emergencyactionplans •Schoolbehaviorpoliciesandprocedures •Schoolsafetypoliciesandprocedures

Theschoolsadheredtoallstateandfederallawswithregardstosafetyandsafety drillsandholdcurrentcertificatesofoccupancyforschooluse.AtHopeofDetroit Academy,fivecameraswereaddedtotheexteriorandinteriorofthebuilding. Lockswereupgradedinthemultipurposeroomandindividualdooralarms wereinstalledinareasnotusedascommonentrances.Schoolsafetycrossingsigns wereaddedtothesurroundingexterior.Bullyingandgang-relatedworkshops wereconducted.AtConsortium,twosecurityguardswerehiredtofurthersupport thesafeschoolenvironmentandenhancesecurityatathleticevents.

Professional development •Allteachersarecertifiedand100%ofteachersandclassroomassistantsare highlyqualifiedaccordingtoMichiganandfederalstandards.

•Staffparticipatedinstrategicallyplannedprofessionaldevelopmentopportunities throughouttheschoolyearinallacademicareas.Inadditiontoprofessional developmentopportunitiesattheschool,highschoolstaffwererequiredto independentlyattendtwoprofessionaldevelopmentsessionsoftheirchoice.

•Theschool’smanagementcompany,TheLeonaGroup,offeredextensive professionaldevelopmenttocurriculumcoaches,schoolleadersandfaculty throughitscompany-wideQualitySchoolsInitiative.Topicsincluded:Using DataforSchoolImprovement,DebWahlstrom;unpackingthestandards;special educationlaw;trainingonthenewschoolimprovementinitiativesfromthe statetemplate;ResponsetoIntervention(RTI),brain-basedbestpracticesfor comprehension,writingworkshops;PositiveBehaviorSupport(PBS);HighSchool Summit;formativeandsummativeassessment;UniversalDesignforLearning(UDL); rigorandrelevance;improvingtherelationshipgapbetweenstaffandstudents; technology;keepingschoolssafe;andprofessionallearningcommunities.

•Atthehighschool,Dr.EllaBurtonspentthreedayswiththestaffonteaming andschoolimprovementplanning.

•Additionalinitiativesincluded: GoldenPackagedataanalysis ShelteredInstructionObservationProtocol(SIOP)training. Diversitytraining Treasures DynedtrainingforELLsoftware DIBELStraining

A quality education Eachchildattheacademyreceivedpersonalizedinstructionandthestaffeffectively adaptedthecurriculumtomeettheneedsofavarietyofindividuallearningstyles andintellectualstrengths.

Theacademy’scurriculum,whichisavailabletoallstudentsandcanbereviewed attheschool,isfullyalignedwithstatestandardsandbenchmarks.K-8instruction areasincludedcoresubjectsareasofEnglishlanguagearts,science,socialstudies andmath,complementedbyinstructioninmusic,artandphysicaleducation. Forgrades9-12,theMKJcurriculumwasusedforcoreareas.100%ofcore

SchoolSnap Shots

Local school district DetroitPublicSchools

Intermediate school district WayneRESA

Accreditation Theacademymeetsthestate’sstandards foraccreditation.

ConsortiumCollegePreparatoryHigh SchoolholdsNorthCentralAssociation (NCA)accreditation.

Mr. MaClean teaches student, Jorge Fernandez, English language arts

through music.

Ms. Vargas, grade 1 teacher and her student, Trevante Wilson, complete

an English language arts lesson using the Treasures reading program.

Ms. Snyder, kindergarten teacher, helps her student, Damya Fields, work through an English language activity using the Treasures reading program.

By the numbersEnrollment K-8........................................ 449 9-12......................................... 46Total district enrollment.......... 495

Returning students K-8: 2007-08................................ 85% 9-12: 2007-08................................ 70%

Waiting lists K-8.......................................... 65 9-12....................................... 284

Free & reduced lunch, district......................... 91%

Students with disabilities K-8......................................... 7% 9-12...................................... 12% %ofstudentpopulationserved withinaninclusiveenvironment

Student demographics K-8: Hispanic/Latino...................... 71% Black/African-American.......... 27% Caucasian................................ 2% 9-12: Black/African-American.......... 95% Hispanic/Latino........................ 3% Caucasian................................ 2%

Attendance rate, K-8............... 92%

Student-teacher ratio K-8........................................ 20:1 9-12...................................... 21:1

Hours of instruction K......................................... 1142 1-5....................................... 1239 6-7....................................... 1131 8.......................................... 1105 9-12.................................... 1121

Graduation rate...................... 96%

Students in dual enrollment ....... 5

College-equivalent courses...NoneStudents enrolled in these courses....................NoneStudents who took college equivalency exams...NoneStudents who received college credit from the exams..............................None

School administrators K-8............................................. 3 9-12........................................... 3

Teaching staff 23ingradesK-8plus24at Consortium;with100%highly qualified,whichisdefinedby NoChildLeftBehindActasbeing certifiedandteachingintheirarea

academicsubjects,elementaryandsecondaryschoolclassesweretaughtby highlyqualifiedteachers.

Afull-timecurriculumcoachateachcampusworkedcloselywithteachersand administratorstoplan,paceandassesscurriculumtoensureitsqualityand alignmentwithstatestandards.Theschoolalsoassesseditscurriculumthrough stateandstandardizedtests.Additionalmethodsofensuringcompliancewith outlinedcurriculumstandardsincludedlessonplanmonitoring,classroom observationandsubmissionofclassroomgoalstotheschool’scurriculumcoach.

Technologyisintegratedintothecurriculumviaanupdatedcomputerlab, computersineveryclassroom,SmartBoarduseandtwofullymobiletechnology labs,eachproviding25laptopcomputersforclassroomuse.Thehighschool campusfeaturesastate-of-the-arttechnologyandmedialab.Inaddition,Smart Boardtechnologyandcomputersareavailableineveryhighschoolclassroom.

Extracurricular activities Awell-roundedlearningexperiencewasprovidedtostudentsatHopeofDetroit AcademyandConsortiumCollegePreparatoryHighSchoolagainthisyear.In additiontotheacademicallychallengingandbalancedcurriculum,theacademy offeredextracurricularactivitiesandfieldtrips.Amongthem:

Grades K-8 •Basketball •Musicclub • Ballet/hiphop •Soccer •AcademicGames • Bowling •Chessclub •Artclub • Poetryclub •Mentoring •Schooldances • Fundraising •ComericaYouthSavingprogram •Saturdaycomputerschooltraining •Saturdaystudentenrichmentgrades6-8 •NationalHealthAwarenessstudentworkoutsessions •ViolinclassesthroughtheSphinxOrganization

Grades 9-12 •Cougarbotsroboticsteam •Football • Basketball •Chess •NationalHonorSociety • HonorRollclub •Studentgovernment •Conditioningclub • Danceteam •Sisterhood •Cheerleading • Yearbook •Choir

School improvement planning, grades K-8 Astaffcommitteeisinplaceforeachcurriculumarea.Thesecommitteesmeet periodicallythroughouttheyeartoassessprogressanddevelopprogramchanges toimprovestudentlearning.Technologyisintegratedintheinstructionalprogram. Theschoolimprovementteamcoordinatesallaspectsoftheacademy’splan.

School improvement team Schoolleadership Teachers Classroomassistant Speechpathologist Parent/guardian Student Schoolboardmember

Education Adequate Yearly School Phase Yes! Grade Progress Status 2007-08

Elementary/Middle C Made AYP 0

High School D-Alert Did not make AYP 0

School Report Card

School improvement planning, grades 9-12 Thedecision-makingprocessinvolvestheschoolimprovementteam,staffandthe boardofdirectors.Day-to-daydecisionsareplacedwiththefaculty,whoare empoweredtomakeprudentchoicestosolvethechallengesandproblemsof students.Otherdecision-makinggroupsincludestudentcouncilandPTA.Hope ofDetroitAcademyre-examinesitsgoalsonanongoingbasis.

School improvement teamSchooladministrators CurriculumcoachTeachers SupportstaffBoardmember ParentSpecialeducationteacher Socialworker

Goals and progressGrades K-8:

Strategicprofessionaldevelopmentopportunitiessupportedgrowthineachof thegoalareaslisted.Leadteacherswereusedtoimprovecollaboration,disseminate informationandprovidesupport.

Goal 1: Improve student’s reading and writing skills which will assist them with their comprehension, retention, process writing and mathematical abilities to effectively problem solve. Progress:Resourcesandongoingprofessionaldevelopmentwereprovided tobetterimplementtheTreasuresandPrenticeHallreadingprograms.After- schoolandsummerschoolprogramswereprovidedwithanemphasisonEnglish languagearts(ELA),Englishlanguagelearners(ELL),andmathematicstoimprove theacademicachievementofstudentsthatarenotmasteringthesecoreareas. StaffengagedindevelopmentontheScantronAchievementSeriestobeableto generateassessmentsthatidentifystudentacademicneedsbasedondisaggregating data.Pre-andpost-Scantrontestingwasconductedforgrades2-8inmath,reading, ELA,andsciencetoassistandmonitorstudentacademicgrowth.Multiplesources ofdatawerecollectedandanalyzedincludingdisaggregatingdatabyrace,gender andincomestatus,standardizedtesting(MEAP,Scantron,Gates-MacGinitie, Woodcock-Munoz,ELPA,andDIBELS)thatcanprovideaprofileofstudent achievementandtodriveinstruction.

Goal 2: Provide programs and resources for English Language Learners (ELL) that will lead to the successful transition from limited English proficiency to second language acquisition. This includes oral language development, vocabulary, and reading comprehension. Progress:Afull-timebilingualteacherwasaddedtoassistthelevel1,2,and3ELL studentsintheirtransitionintolevels4and5.TheEnglishasSecondLanguage(ESL) teacheralsoservicedELLstudentsthatweretransitioningfromlevel3English languageproficiencyintolevels4and5.Thestaffmulti-mediacenterwasenhanced withcontent-basedreferencematerials,BilingualDynedcomputersoftwareand on-linesoftware(Brainpop)toimprovestudentlearningandachievement.Three fulldaysandtwoadditionalhalfdaysofstaffprofessionaldevelopmentwere providedontheimplementationandlessonplanninginvolvedintheSIOPmodel.

Goal 3: Increase parental involvement in student academic and social development through parent, school and community partnerships. Progress:Parentalinvolvementgoalswerethoroughlycommunicatedtoparents throughverbalandwrittencommunicationduringannualparentorientations, openhouseevents,PATTmonthlymeetingsandduringtheschoolyearasneeded. Theacademymonitoredandtrackedtheprogressofallstudentbehavior,resulting inincreasedpositivestudentparticipationandfewerbehavioralreferrals.Quarterly progressreportsweredistributedthatmonitoredandtrackedtheprogressof studentacademicperformance.Studentsandstaffpublishedaschoolnewspaper forthestudentbodyandparentsthroughcollaborationwiththeLatinoPressthat communicatedschool/communityhighlights,activitiesandprograms.

Financial reportAstatementofrevenuesandexpensesforJuly1,2007throughJune30,2008islistedbelow.Additionalfinancialinformationisavailablefromtheacademy.Theauditor’sreportisbeingconductedatthistime.

RevenuesSchoolfoundation......... $3,650,020Foodservices...................... 179,341Grants-federal.................... 522,954Grants-state........................ 338,668Other................................. 172,558Total revenues .............$4,863,541

ExpensesSalariesandfringebenefits............... $2,508,168Purchasedservices........... 1,818,404Materialsandsupplies........ 296,411Other.................................. 125,256Total expenses .............$4,748,239

Retained earnings at beginning of year ...$1,275,310 Balance as of June 30, 2008 ...............$1,390,612

Classroom assistants 10ingradesK-8plus7at Consortium;with100%highly qualified,whichisdefinedby NoChildLeftBehindActas havingatleasttwoyearsof highereducationorsuccessful completionofastatetest.

Support staff 11ingradesK-8plus18at Consortiumincludingofficestaff, mentormanager,librarian,dean ofstudents,foodservice,tutor, socialworkers,coaches, maintenance,studentservices andadditionalservicescontracted asneeded.

Parentscanrequestinformationon theprofessionalqualificationsand licensingoftheirchildren’steachers fromtheschooloffice.

Parent-teacher conference attendance K-8........................................ 73% 9-12...................................... 75%

Grades 9-12:

Goal 1: Increase student performance on standardized testing for math by 14% proficiency and meet AYP. Progress:Theacademyprovidedresourcestonon-mathfacultyforcross- curriculumdevelopment.Pre-andpost-testScantrontestingallowed instructionalcoordinatorstimetomentoreachstudentbasedonindividual needsandmakedata-drivendecisionsrelativetoinstruction.Scoresimproved anaverageof6-8%ingrades7-11.Graphingcalculatorswereusedatalllevels inmathandscienceclassrooms.Smartboardandgraphingcalculatorlessons wereprovided.Studentswereengagedinscienceandmathcourseswith SmartBoardtechnology.

Goal 2: Improve writing scores by at least 10%. Progress:Studentswereexposedtoprimaryandsecondarysourcereadings. MEAPreleasedessaysanditemswereutilizedtofosterwritingrubricatall gradelevels.Essaysdemonstratinguseofopinionsandshowingstudents howtowritehistoricallywereutilized.ThroughScantrontesting,students drasticallyimprovedreadingnon-fictionby12%.

Goal 3: Promote 100% of all students grades 7-12. Progress:Studentmentoring,HonorRollClubforpositivereinforcementand creatingastrongeracademicassistanceprogrambeforeandafterschool wereamongthestrategiesimplemented.100%ofstudentsingrades7-12 werepromoted.

Goal 4: Build school relations with agencies, businesses and non-profit organizations to develop mutually beneficial relationships for civic advancement and community improvement. Progress:Communicationwithinthecommunityincludedpromotions ofpositivestudentbehaviorandneighborhoodclean-ups.

Goal 5: Maintain high graduation and college acceptance rates. Progress:Thehighschoolmaintaineda96%graduationrateand94% collegeacceptancerate.

Parent involvement HopeofDetroitAcademyandConsortiumCollegePreparatoryHighSchool valuefamilyparticipationasanintegralcomponentoftheeducationexperience. TheacademyboardadoptedandapprovedaParentalInvolvementPlanin2005 andencouragesparticipation.Thereisaparentoneachschool’simprovement teamandfamilieswereinvolvedatbothcampusesonmanylevels.

Grades K-8: •ScienceNight •TechnologyNight •Parent-teacherconferences •Grandparentstea •PoetrySlam •Reader’sTheater •Talentshow •Holidayconcert •Patrioticconcert •Volunteeropportunities •DetroitParentNetworkWorkshops •SaturdayComputerclassesforparents •English/Spanishclassesforparents •ParentActionTeacherTeam(PATT)meetings

Grades 9-12: •Classtripchaperones •ParentPowerGroup •Fund-raising •Classroomvolunteers •Graduationcommittee •Parent-teacherconferences •Orientation

Assessment Information

Frequently asked questions

Q: What does MEAP and MME stand for?A:TheyareacronymsforMichigan EducationalAssessmentProgram andMichiganMeritExam,respectively.

Q: What is the purpose of the tests?A: Thetestsmeasurestudent performancesagainststate standardsinreading,writing, mathematics,scienceand socialstudies.

Q: Who takes the tests?A: Studentsingrades3-9and11 aretested.Studentsingrades 3-8and11takeboththe mathandEnglishlanguagearts tests.Inaddition,studentsin grades5,8and11aretestedin science;grades6,9and11are testedinsocialstudies.

Q: Is the same test administered every year?A:Majorchangesaremadetothetest asthestate’sstandardschange orascontentareasareshifted fromgradetogradefortesting.

Q: Why is there no data for some of the categories?A:Resultsarecompiledand reportedforgroupsthatcontain 10ormoretestedstudents.By doingthis,theconfidentialityof individualstudentperformance ismaintained.

2007-08MEAPandsupplementaltestdataisattachedand/orthefullversionoftheannualeducationreportforthisacademyhasbeenpostedtotheschool’sWebsites: www.leonagroup.com/hope www.leonagroup.com/consortium

Parent survey results Grades K-8:

Respondents:90,representing21%oftheK-8studentbody Overall, I rate this academy as a good school.................................. 99% My child is getting a good education at this academy.................... 99% My child is safe and secure at this academy ..................................... 99%

Grades 9-12: Respondents:412,representing81.4%oftheConsortiumstudentbody Overall, I rate this academy as a good school.................................. 98% My child is getting a good education at this academy.................... 99% My child is safe and secure at this academy..................................... 95%

Parent comments “Iliketheindividualattentiontheygivetheirstudentswhentheyneedhelp. Theteachersaredoingawonderfuljobteachingmychild.”

“Theschooloffershigh-qualitylearningandexcellentsafetyforeachperson.”

“Allmychildrenhavebeenstudentshereandtheteachersaswellasotherstaff workhardtomakesurethatthechildrenhavewhattheyneedtoinordertobe asuccess.Thanksforeverything!”

Community involvement Qualitypartnershipswithlocalbusinessesandcommunityorganizations connecttheacademywiththeDetroitcommunityandbroadenexperiences foritschildren.Thecommunityplayedanintegralroleinprovidingresources forcontinuedimprovement.Communitypartnershipsandinvolvement activitiesincluded:

•Duringthesummersession,theDetroitParentNetworkPartnership providedparentworkshopsfreeofcharge. •OnOctober3,2007,HopepartneredwiththeDMCChildren’sHospital andFedExforInternationalWalktoSchoolDay. •CoatsforKids/FederalExpresspartnership •DetroitFireDepartmentpartnership •PartnershipwithComericaBankfortheCommunityYouthSavingsprogram

Atthehighschoolcampus,localbusinessessupportedschoolfunctionsthrough donationsandsponsorships.Additionalcommunitycollaborationsincluded:

•Studentsvolunteeredatalocalfoodbank •Holidaydonationoffoodbaskets •Fund-raisinginitiativesforcancerresearch •DancerecitalatWayneStateUniversity •BasketballtournamentswithlocalDetroitPoliceprecincts •CollegeFairDay,CareerDayandCougarbotssponsoredbylocalbusinesses

BennyCruz,school leader 4443N.CampbellSt.

Detroit,MI48210313.897.8720

www.leonagroup.com/hope

1250RosaParksBlvd.Detroit,MI48216

RodAtkins,schoolleaderwww.leonagroup.com/consortium

The Leona Group

HOPE OF DETROIT ACADEMY - 8722Grades 3 through 9 for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGEOf Data Analysis Reports for MEAP and MME

(Annual Report Version)

Revision AR-2.4

Copyright © Successline Inc. All Rights Reserved. Printed on June 27, 2008 • Page 1 of 89

PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL REPORT GOLDEN PACKAGE

The Golden Package™ (Annual Report Version) is a set of charts and graphs that have been designed to help meet the reporting

requirements of P.A. 25 and No Child Left Behind. The data is consistent with the reporting protocols for Michigan.

THEGOLDEN PACKAGE

THEGOLDEN PACKAGE

of Data Analysis Reports for MEAP and MME(Annual Report Version)

ORGANIZATION OF REPORTS

This package groups data by the Building of Instruction (i.e.; "feeder school") as opposed to the building that administered the tests.

According to MDE guidelines, testing data for students that did not have a Building of Instruction specified is creditied toward the testing

school.

All reports are organized by content area (Language Arts, Reading, Writing, Mathematics, Science and Social Studies). At the head of each

content area is the Percentage of Students in Each Proficiency Level, by Subgroups of Students, with AYP Targets report. This

report separates Elementary (grades 3-6), Middle (grades 7-9) and High School (Class of 2008) testing data and compares the achievement

levels to the state's AYP targets. Next is the Aggregated Assessment Data Across Grades report, displayed for all students as well as

each NCLB subgroup.

Following these reports are two reports that group by each specific grade level test: Percentage of Students in Each Proficiency

Level, by Subgroups of Students and Percentage of Students Scoring in Proficient Levels on Test, Grouped by Instructional

School, District and State.

The reports within this package are specific to PA.25 reporting and should not be used as guides for analyzing achievement and

improvement. Please refer to our standard Golden Package for reports designed for the improvement process.

Note that since the shift from testing in only particular grade levels to testing at all grade levels, the MDE uses the Proficiency Index

method for determining whether each district meets Adequate Yearly Progress targets. This determination is made at each grade level

instructed at each building, for both the entire testing population (i.e.; "All Students") as well as each reported NCLB subgroup. Refer to

the Aggregated Assessment Data Across Grades report to see if AYP targets were met. Reports within this package with combined

grade level proficiency rates are for informational puposes only and are not to be used for the determination of meeting or not meeting AYP

requirements.


EDUCATION YES! - DATA USED FOR REPORTS

All reports within this package use the "Education YES!" inclusion criteria. Reports are set to match criteria specified by the

MDE. This inclusion criteria also includes additional conditions on Language Arts and Mathematics in order to conform to

federal No Child Left Behind guidelines. Not all tests administered are included in these reports. Particular tests may be

ignored for reporting under certain conditions. These conditions are generally referred to as "exclusion factors" (listed below),

and will result in their not appearing on reports nor being averaged into aggregate numbers and percentages on reports.

LIST OF EXCLUSION FACTORS USED IN EDUCATION YES! REPORTS

• No Proficiency Level Reported

• Marked as NOT TESTED, Absent, or Not Available

• Marked as Less Than a Full Academic Year

• Marked as Parent Exempt

• Marked as Unethical

• Marked as Home School

• Marked as Post-Graduate

• EXCL marked or INCL not marked (2000-01 and 2001-02 school years)

• High School tests include the BEST score from amongst all administrations (starting in 2005-06, Math and Language Arts

include only the BEST score from amongst tests administered in the 10th and 11th grade)

Note that statewide aggregate figures within this package are not exact but an approximation within 1% of the actual numbers

and include all students tested, regardless of the aforementioned exclusion factors.

PROVISIONALLY PROFICIENT STUDENTS

Starting with results from the 2004-05 school year and the Class of 2006, the MDE began using a confidence interval for calculating Math

and Language Arts AYP proficiency rates. This confidence interval is equal to two times the standard error of measurement, which varies

depending on the test and the test form. Students that technically were scored as not proficient, but are within this confidence interval of

the proficiency cutoff are considered to be provisionally proficient for AYP calculations. This package takes this into consideration when

reporting proficiency rates and levels on most Language Arts and Math reports. Although these students technically scored Level 3 (Basic),

they are displayed as Level 2 (Proficient) within this package. Please note that any statewide aggregate figures do not take provisionally

proficient status into consideration but report on all tests administered throughout the state based on traditional proficiency levels as

reported in the released data.


ALTERNATE ASSESSMENTS

The state includes Michigan's alternate assessment tests (MI-Access) in reporting Language Arts and Mathematics proficiency levels. The

USDOE ruled recently that the MI-Access Participation and Supported Independence tests cannot count towards Adequate Yearly Progress.

Only the Functional Independence tests may count as an appropriate alternate assessment to the MEAP. In addition, the Functional

Independence test is subject to a limit of counting no more than 1% of the tested population within each district as proficient on alternate

assessments (the "AYP 1% Rule"). For districts that have exceeded the 1% limit, there is a complicated algorithm for determining exactly

which students' assessments should be counted as not proficient due to the limit. And which assessments are counted as not proficient

also have a trickle-down effect on all AYP calculations for the buildings and subgroups for which those excluded students belong.

Due to the complicated nature of applying the 1% limit, the appeals process for exempting particular students from the limit, plus the

generally small fraction of the entire testing population that take alternate assessments, we have chosen to not include any MI-Access

results within the data reported in this package. Although this can cause variance between this package and what the MDE uses in overall

rates used to measure Adequate Yearly Progress, we do not believe that it will present a significant difference.

A NOTE ABOUT ACCURACY

For the basis of these reports we have attempted to include information as intact as possible. This information has been derived from

various sources, including published MEAP and MME results from student data and research files. While we have attempted to make these

reports as accurate as possible, there are factors that can negatively affect their accuracy. One of the most important factors is the issue

of attributing longitudinal testing data to the appropriate students in the system in order to identify the BEST score from amongst multiple

administrations of high school level tests. We use special routines to consolidate student information and identify these. Successline has

developed and improved these consolidation algorithms over the decade that we have been working with standardized testing data.

However, faulty or missing student demographic information can interfere with the accuracy of this process.

Also note that any appeals for particular students that may have been made to the MDE will not be reflected in the published data, so will

not be reflected in this package.

JUST IN CASE YOU HAVE QUESTIONS

We hope you’ll call if you have questions about any of your reports or

the process of getting those reports. We want your questions and we’

re always happy to answer them. Please contact Mark Wahlstrom

through one of the following methods:

757-539-6513

757-539-6523

Telephone:

Fax:

E-mail: [email protected]


mailto:[email protected]

The Leona Group

HOPE OF DETROIT ACADEMY - 8722

Language ArtsGrades 3 through 9 for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE




Number of

Students

Meets or

Exceeds AYP

Target?

Percentage of Students in Each Proficiency Level, by Subgroups of Students, with AYP Targets

The Leona Group

Hope of Detroit Academy - 8722

Elementary (Grades 3-6) Language Arts • 2007-08

Number of Students in Each Proficiency Level

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent

Proficient

3 21 2

No4 80 82 18All Students

Males 91

Females 93

2 34 43 12

2 46 39 6

4 73 75 18

Students with Disabilities 26

White Students 3

Black Students 632 25 28 8

Hispanic Students 1182 55 51 10

Economically

Disadvantaged 170

Limited English Proficient

Less than 10 Students - Blocked for Privacy

No

No

No

No

--

No

No

Asian/Pacific Islander

Students 0Less than 10 Students - Blocked for Privacy --

No 1141 52 52 9

184

40%

46%

52%

0%

43%

48%

45%

46%

12%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% The Elementary AYP

target is 59%Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4:

QuickFinder Code:

PLSUBJ25

"Provisionally proficient" students are included in Level 2. Note that this report is for informational purposes only. Due to testing at all grade levels, you must use the

Proficiency Index method for calculating whether a school or district meets the AYP target. Refer to the Aggregated Assessment Data Across Grades report later

in this package.


Number of

Students

Meets or

Exceeds AYP

Target?


The Leona Group


Middle (Grades 7-8) Language Arts • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent

Proficient

Yes3 48 27 1All Students

Males 39

Females 40

2 20 16 1

1 28 11

2 44 25


White Students 4


Hispanic Students 431 29 13

Economically

Disadvantaged 71




Yes

Yes

Yes

--

--

No

Yes



Yes 411 28 12

79

56%

65%

73%

100%

53%

70%

65%

71%

0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% The Middle AYP target

is 54%Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4:

QuickFinder Code:

PLSUBJ25



in this package.


Number of

Students

Percentage of Students in Each Proficiency Level, by Subgroups of Students

The Leona Group


MEAP Grade 3 English Language Arts • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

1 20 20 4All Students

Males 21

Females 24

1 7 10 3

13 10 1

1 20 20 4


White Students 2

Black Students 126 5 1


Economically

Disadvantaged 45





Students 0Less than 10 Students - Blocked for Privacy

301 13 14 2

45

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4MEAP:

QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB

"Provisionally proficient" students are included in Level 2.


Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

17 26 5All Students

Males 19

Females 29

5 12 2

12 14 3

15 25 5


White Students 1



Economically

Disadvantaged 45






329 20 3

48

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB



Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 26

Females 19

10 10 6

2 8 7 2

2 17 14 8


White Students 0



Economically

Disadvantaged 41






2715 8 4

45

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB



Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 25

Females 21

1 12 11 1

13 8

1 21 16 1


White Students 0


Hispanic Students 2817 11

Economically

Disadvantaged 39






2515 10

46

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB



Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

22 18 1All Students

Males 21

Females 20

9 11 1

13 7

21 18


White Students 1



Economically

Disadvantaged 39






2314 9

41

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB



Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

3 26 9All Students

Males 18

Females 20

2 11 5

1 15 4

2 23 7


White Students 3



Economically

Disadvantaged 32






181 14 3

38

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB



The Leona GroupMEAP Grade 3 English Language Arts

Percentage of Students Scoring in Proficient Levelson MEAP Test, Grouped by Instructional School and State

# Students in Each Group 2006-07 2007-08

State of Michigan •�� Not Proficient 41,922 87,236

State of Michigan •�� Proficient 303,966 371,924

Hope of Detroit Academy - 8722 •�� Not Proficient 24 24

Hope of Detroit Academy - 8722 •�� Proficient 18 21

QuickFinder Code:PLPBSS This report includes only tests that qualify for AYP, which for elementary and middle school levels includes only first-time test takers (no retests), and for high school

level includes the best score from amongst 10th and 11th graders. AYP excludes test records with an unknown proficiency level, or those marked as Explicitly Excluded, Not Included, Home School, Not Tested, Parent Exempt, Postgraduate, Unethical, Absent, Less Than Full Academic Year, Not Available, or given a Non-Standard Testing Accommodation. Starting in Winter 2004-05 for Elementary and Middle level tests and Class of 2006 for High School level, students that are within two standard errors of measurement of the proficiency cutoff on Language Arts and Mathematics are considered "provisionally proficient" and counted as proficient for AYP calculations.

State totals and percents include all students tested, and may vary slightly from published figures due to rounding.

Copyright © Successline Inc. All Rights Reserved. Printed on August 06, 2008 • Page 145 of 345
























































The Leona Group


ReadingGrades 3 through 9 for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE




Number of

Students


The Leona Group


MEAP Grade 3 Reading • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 21

Females 24

4 6 9 2

1 18 4 1

5 24 13 3


White Students 2



Economically

Disadvantaged 45






303 18 7 2

45

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 19

Females 29

9 7 3

1 14 11 3

1 20 18 6


White Students 1



Economically

Disadvantaged 45






321 13 14 4

48

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 26

Females 19

3 9 6 8

5 5 6 3

8 12 10 11


White Students 0



Economically

Disadvantaged 41






274 13 5 5

45

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 25

Females 21

1 12 10 2

12 6 3

1 20 13 5


White Students 0



Economically

Disadvantaged 39






2514 9 2

46

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 21

Females 20

1 9 8 3

1 9 6 4

2 17 14 6


White Students 1



Economically

Disadvantaged 39






231 12 8 2

41

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 18

Females 20

3 10 4 1

1 14 5

3 20 8 1


White Students 3



Economically

Disadvantaged 32






181 13 4

38

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


The Leona Group


WritingGrades 3 through 9 for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE




Number of

Students


The Leona Group


MEAP Grade 3 Writing • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

10 28 7All Students

Males 21

Females 24

5 12 4

5 16 3

10 28 7


White Students 2



Economically

Disadvantaged 45






306 21 3

45

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

1 45 2All Students

Males 19

Females 29

18 1

1 27 1

1 42 2


White Students 1

Black Students 1616


Economically

Disadvantaged 45






321 29 2

48

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

14 22 9All Students

Males 26

Females 19

4 15 7

10 7 2

12 21 8


White Students 0



Economically

Disadvantaged 41






279 14 4

45

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

25 20 1All Students

Males 25

Females 21

12 12 1

13 8

22 16 1


White Students 0

Black Students 1811 7


Economically

Disadvantaged 39






2513 11 1

46

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

27 13 1All Students

Males 21

Females 20

13 7 1

14 6

26 13


White Students 1



Economically

Disadvantaged 39






2315 8

41

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

31 6 1All Students

Males 18

Females 20

13 4 1

18 2

27 5


White Students 3



Economically

Disadvantaged 32






1815 2 1

38

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


The Leona Group


MathematicsGrades 3 through 9 for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE




Number of

Students

Meets or

Exceeds AYP

Target?


The Leona Group


Elementary (Grades 3-6) Mathematics • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent

Proficient

1 14 9 2

No15 92 64 15All Students

Males 93

Females 93

8 42 37 6

7 50 27 9

14 89 54 13


White Students 3



Economically

Disadvantaged 170



No

No

No

No

--

No

No



No 1159 57 43 6

186

54%

58%

61%

100%

59%

56%

61%

57%

58%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% The Elementary AYP

target is 65%Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4:

QuickFinder Code:

PLSUBJ25



in this package.


Number of

Students

Meets or

Exceeds AYP

Target?


The Leona Group


Middle (Grades 7-8) Mathematics • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent

Proficient

Yes44 20 13 2All Students

Males 39

Females 40

23 9 6 1

21 11 7 1

38 19 12 2


White Students 4



Economically

Disadvantaged 71




Yes

Yes

Yes

--

--

Yes

Yes



Yes 4124 11 6

79

82%

81%

80%

100%

72%

86%

80%

85%

20%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% The Middle AYP target

is 54%Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4:

QuickFinder Code:

PLSUBJ25



in this package.


Number of

Students


The Leona Group


MEAP Grade 3 Mathematics • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 22

Females 24

3 12 7

2 18 3 1

5 30 9 1


White Students 2



Economically

Disadvantaged 45






304 21 4 1

46

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB



Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 19

Females 29

1 10 8

1 19 8 1

2 26 16 1


White Students 1



Economically

Disadvantaged 45






322 16 14

48

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB



Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 27

Females 19

2 9 13 3

4 6 7 2

6 15 16 4


White Students 0



Economically

Disadvantaged 41






282 10 15 1

46

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB



Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 25

Females 21

2 11 9 3

7 9 5

1 18 13 7


White Students 0



Economically

Disadvantaged 39






251 10 10 4

46

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB



Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

13 18 10All Students

Males 21

Females 20

7 9 5

6 9 5

13 17 9


White Students 1



Economically

Disadvantaged 39






238 11 4

41

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB



Number of

Students


The Leona Group




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 18

Females 20

16 1 1

15 2 2 1

25 2 3 2


White Students 3



Economically

Disadvantaged 32






1816 2

38

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB



The Leona GroupMEAP Grade 3 Mathematics


































































The Leona Group


ScienceGrades 3 through 9 for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE




Number of

Students


The Leona Group


MEAP Grade 5 Science • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 27

Females 19

1 10 10 6

2 8 6 3

2 18 13 8


White Students 0



Economically

Disadvantaged 41






283 13 9 3

46

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


Number of

Students


The Leona Group


MEAP Grade 8 Science • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 18

Females 20

4 10 4

5 9 4 2

8 17 6 1


White Students 3



Economically

Disadvantaged 32






185 10 3

38

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


The Leona Group


Social StudiesGrades 3 through 9 for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE




Number of

Students


The Leona Group


MEAP Grade 6 Social Studies • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Males 25

Females 21

3 6 5 11

2 6 4 9

5 10 7 17


White Students 0



Economically

Disadvantaged 39






252 7 5 11

46

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


Number of

Students


The Leona Group


MEAP Grade 9 Social Studies • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

1 4 8 3All Students

Males 9

Females 7

1 2 6 3


White Students 0


Hispanic Students 2

Economically

Disadvantaged 12









0Less than 10 Students - Blocked for Privacy

16

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


The Leona Group

HOPE OF DETROIT ACADEMY - 9155High School for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE



Revision AR-2.4


The Leona Group


Language ArtsHigh School for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE




Number of

Students

Meets or

Exceeds AYP

Target?


The Leona Group


High School Language Arts • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent

Proficient

No2 4 4All Students

Males 5

Females 5


White Students 0

Black Students 8

Hispanic Students 2

Economically

Disadvantaged 9









--

--

--

--

--

--

--



-- 0Less than 10 Students - Blocked for Privacy

10

0%

20%

40%

25%

0%

22%

0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% The High AYP target is

61%

QuickFinder Code:

PLSUBJ25



in this package.


Number of

Students


The Leona Group


MME High School English Language Arts • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2 4 4All Students

Males 5

Females 5


White Students 0

Black Students 8

Hispanic Students 2

Economically

Disadvantaged 9












10

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4MME:

QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB



The Leona GroupMME High School English Language Arts

Percentage of Students Scoring in Proficient Levelson MME Test, Grouped by School and State










The Leona Group


ReadingHigh School for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE




Number of

Students


The Leona Group


MME High School Reading • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

3 6 3All Students

Males 5

Females 7

2 5 3


White Students 0


Hispanic Students 2

Economically

Disadvantaged 10










12

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


The Leona Group


WritingHigh School for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE




Number of

Students


The Leona Group


MME High School Writing • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

10 3All Students

Males 5

Females 8

7 3


White Students 0


Hispanic Students 2

Economically

Disadvantaged 10










13

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


The Leona Group


MathematicsHigh School for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE




Number of

Students

Meets or

Exceeds AYP

Target?


The Leona Group


High School Mathematics • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent

Proficient

No1 3 6All Students

Males 5

Females 5


White Students 0

Black Students 8

Hispanic Students 2

Economically

Disadvantaged 9









--

--

--

--

--

--

--



-- 0Less than 10 Students - Blocked for Privacy

10

0%

10%

20%

13%

0%

11%

0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% The High AYP target is

55%

QuickFinder Code:

PLSUBJ25



in this package.


Number of

Students


The Leona Group


MME High School Mathematics • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

1 3 6All Students

Males 5

Females 5


White Students 0

Black Students 8

Hispanic Students 2

Economically

Disadvantaged 9












10

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB



The Leona GroupMME High School Mathematics

Percentage of Students Scoring in Proficient Levelson MME Test, Grouped by School and State









The Leona Group


ScienceHigh School for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE




Number of

Students


The Leona Group


MME High School Science • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

1 3 7All Students

Males 5

Females 6


White Students 0

Black Students 9

Hispanic Students 2

Economically

Disadvantaged 9












11

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


The Leona Group


Social StudiesHigh School for 2007-08

THE

GOLDEN PACKAGE

THE




Number of

Students


The Leona Group


MME High School Social Studies • 2007-08


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2 8 1 3All Students

Males 5

Females 9

2 4 1 3


White Students 0


Hispanic Students 2

Economically

Disadvantaged 10










14

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


QuickFinder Code:

PLSUB


Documents

Snap Shots - Hope of Detroit Academy...Dyned training for ELL software DIBELS training A quality education Each child at the academy received personalized instruction and the staff