41
SN Ia SN Ia Margutti Margutti Raffaella,2005 Raffaella,2005

SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005. 1. Observational methods. High-z SN experience. (High-z Supernova Team). 2.SN types and Progenitors. SNe II: We can find them only in spiral galaxies (extreme I population). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

SN IaSN IaMargutti Margutti Raffaella,2005Raffaella,2005

Page 2: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

1. Observational methods1. Observational methods

Page 3: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 4: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

(High-z Supernova Team)

High-z SN experience

Page 5: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 6: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 7: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

2.SN types and Progenitors2.SN types and Progenitors

SNe II:SNe II:

1. We can find them only in spiral galaxies (extreme I population).

2. Type II SNe mark the end of the nuclear energy production in massive stars (>8 solar masses), and the start of a ‘new’ life as a neutron star.

3. They are believed to originate from CORE COLLAPSE of a massive progenitor star with plenty of H. To be more precise it’s important to say that for SN IIb most (NOT all) H is removed during evolution by tidal stripping.

Page 8: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

1987A 1969L 1980K 1993J

Mej/Msun 15 17 2.2 3.26

E51 1.7 1.7 1.0 1.7

R0/1012 (cm)

3 15 22 0.7

M(56Ni)/Msun

0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075

Galaxy LMC NGC

1058

NGC

6946

M81

D(Mpc) 0.050 10.8 5.7 3.6

Type II Supernovae Parameters

From : “Supernovae and Nucleosynthesis”,Arnett,1996.

Page 9: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 10: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

SNe I:SNe I:

I aI a1. In all Hubble type galaxies (Pop II or disk).2. They are believed to originate from thermonuclear

disruptions of accreting WDs in close binary systems.3. The issue of how the WDs grow to the Chandrasekhar

mass is still an open question. We have different possibilities. Among them:

Mergers of double degenerates resulting in the formation of a M>MCH and carbon ignition.

Accretion of H from a main sequence or evolved companion.

Sub-Chandra explosions.

Page 11: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

What energies are available from What energies are available from thermonuclear events?thermonuclear events?

Fuel Ashes Erg/g 1051erg/Msun

4He 56Ni 1.57 3.0074He 28Si+32S 1.40 2.6774He 12C+16O 7.28 1.44612C 24Mg 5.60 1.11312C+16O 56Co 8.22 1.64512C+16O 56Ni 7.86 1.56112C+16O 28Si+32S 6.20 1.231

From : “Supernovae and Nucleosynthesis”,Arnett,1996.

Page 12: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

1991T 1989B 1992A 1991bg

Mej/Msun 1.33 1.1 1.1 1.1

E51 1.27 1.7 1.7 1.7

R0/1012 (cm)

0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001

M(56Ni)/Msun

0.692 0.2 0.15 0.075

Galaxy NGC

4527

NGC

3627

NGC

1380

NGC

4374

Type Ia Supernovae Parameters

From : “Supernovae and Nucleosynthesis”,Arnett,1996.

Page 13: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 14: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

I b-cI b-c

1. We can find them only in spiral galaxies (extreme pop I).

2. They are believed to be the result of an iron core collapse, and hence to be physically related to type II SNe.

From an observational point of view we are able to recognize SN types from their

Spectra. Light curve.

See next slides for more…

Page 15: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

3. Spectra3. Spectra

Page 16: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 17: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 18: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

4.Light-curves4.Light-curves

SN IISN II

(From Arnett,1996.)

Page 19: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

SN IaSN Ia The rate of the decline of the light curve correlates with the

absolute magnitude at maximum (Phillips relation,2003) The peak is proportional to the mass of 56Ni synthesized during the

explosion. The light curve is powered by a “late time “ source: that is the

radioactive decay: (56Ni 56Co 56Fe) The light curves peaks at 10-15 days after core collapse and then

declines because of the increasing transparency of the ejecta and because of the decreasing number of radioactive elements.

Galaxies having a younger stellar population appear to host the most luminous SNeI-a.

See Arnett,1996,Appendix D, for a complete derivation of supernovae light curve shapes.

Page 20: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

Cappellaro et al. 1997

Page 21: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 22: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 23: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

5.Properties of a perfect standard 5.Properties of a perfect standard candle:candle:

1. It would be extremely bright.2. It would always have exactly the same

ABSOLUTE magnitude. (in particular this means that it wouldn’t suffer of EVOLUTION).

3. If the absolute magnitude depends on the environment (e.g. Hubble type) it should be well known.

4. Small corrections should be applied (fore/back ground absorption).

5. Easy to calibrate.

Page 24: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

Standard CandlesA population of unevolving

sources, having a fixed intrinsic luminosity at

ALL redshifts

Page 25: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

6.SNe Ia as distance indicators6.SNe Ia as distance indicators1. They are exceedingly luminous , with peak MB

averaging -19 mag if H0= 72 (Kms-1Mpc-1).(Filippenko,2004)

2. “Normal” SNe Ia have small dispersion around their peak absolute magnitudes σ ≤ 0.3 mag.(Filippenko,2004).

3. Our understanding of the progenitors and explosion mechanism of SNe Ia is on a reasonably firm physical basis.

4. Little cosmic evolution is expected in the peak luminosity, and it can be modeled.

5. It’s possible to perform local tests of various possible complications and evolutionary effect by comparing nearby SNe in different environments.

Page 26: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

7.Possible evolution of SNe Ia7.Possible evolution of SNe IaEVOLUTION ( linked with changes in metallicity, mass and

C/O ratio of the progenitor,) could lead to: 1.Lower peak luminosity of SNe at high redshift; Overestimated distances2.More powerful explosions; Underestimated distancesProblem: it’s difficult to obtain an accurate, independent

measure of the peak luminosity it’s difficult to directly test for LUMINOSITY EVOLUTION.

Solution: we can easily determine if whether other observable properties of high-z and low-z SNe Ia differ. (If they are all the same is probable that the peak luminosity is constant a well !!!!)

Page 27: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

Observational results about evolution:Observational results about evolution:1. SNe Ia & host galaxy morphology: the SCP

(Supernova Cosmology Project) found no clear differences between the cosmological results obtained with SNe Ia in late-type and early-type galaxies. (Sullivan et al.,2003)

2. SNe Ia & rise time (from explosion to maximum brightness): no significant difference between high-z and low-z SNe Ia (even if at high red-shift we have usually shorter rises times). (Filippenko,2004).

3. Number of progenitors: higher in high-z SNe.Although there is NO clear signs that cosmic

evolution of SNe Ia seriously comprises our results, it is wise to remain vigilant for possible problems.

Page 28: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

8.Possible effects of extinction:8.Possible effects of extinction:Luminosity distances have to corrected for interstellar

absorption occurring in the host galaxy and in the Milky Way. From an observational point of view:

1. Extinction corrections based on the relation between SN Ia colors and luminosity improve distance precision for a sample of nearby SNe Ia which include objects with substantial extinction (Riees et al.,1996).

2. The consistency of the measured Hubble flow from SNe Ia with late-type and early-type host galaxies shows that the extinction corrections applied to dusty SNe Ia at low red-shift don’t alter the expansion rate from its value measured from SNe Ia in low dust environments

3. The scatter in the Hubble diagram is much reduced. (See next slide).

Page 29: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

Hubble diagram for SNe IaHubble diagram for SNe Ia

(The ordinate shows the distance modulus)

TOP: The objects are assumed to be standard candles and there is no correction for extinction; the result is σ=0.42 mag.

BOTTOM: the same objects after corrections for extinction and intrinsic differences in luminosity. The result is σ=0.15 mag.

(From Filippenko, 2004).

Page 30: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

Gray dust:Gray dust:THE PROBLEM:THE PROBLEM:Large dust grains ( GRAY DUST) ,would not imprint the

reddening signature of typical interstellar extinction upon which our corrections necessarily rely.

Could a evolution in dust-grain size cause us to underestimate the extinction?

THE SOLUTION:THE SOLUTION:Viewing SNe through such gray interstellar grains would

also induce a dispersion in the derived distances. With a mean gray extinction σ ≈ 0.25 mag (the value required to explain the measured distances without a cosmological constant), the expected dispersion would be σ ≈ 0.40 mag. This is significantly larger than the 0.21 mag dispersion observed.

The observational results favor the NO-Dust hypothesis (Riess et al.,2000).

Page 31: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

(1999)

9.Cosmological results9.Cosmological results

Page 32: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

• From SNe Ia • From CBR studies

Page 33: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

WMAP (2003):WMAP (2003):

ΩΩMM = 0.27±0.04 = 0.27±0.04ΩΩΛ Λ = 0.73±0.04= 0.73±0.04ΩΩtottot = 1.02 = 1.02±0. 02±0. 02

SN Ia (2004):SN Ia (2004):

ΩΩtottot = 0.94 = 0.94±0.26±0.26

Page 34: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 35: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 36: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 37: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 38: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 39: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 40: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005
Page 41: SN Ia Margutti Raffaella,2005

10.References10.References

• Arnett,1996: “Supernovae and Nucleosynthesis”, Princeton University Press.

• Filippenko,2004: The accelerating universe and dark energy: evidence from type Ia supernovae,Lect.Notes Phys,646, 191-221.

• Riees et al.,1996:Astroph. J.,473,88.• Riees et al.,2000:Astroph. J.,536,62.• Sullivan et al.,2003:astro-ph/0211444.