16
Sn Deposit Microstructures Depending on the Deposition Current Density Kil-Won Moon, Soo-Kil Kim, Maureen Williams, and William Boettinger Metallurgy Division NIST Gaithersburg, MD 20899

Sn Deposit Microstructures Depending on the Deposition ...thor.inemi.org/webdownload/x1private/Presentations/... · Summary • The effect of deposition current density from 30 to

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Sn Deposit Microstructures Depending on the Deposition

    Current Density

    Kil-Won Moon, Soo-Kil Kim, Maureen Williams, and William Boettinger

    Metallurgy DivisionNIST

    Gaithersburg, MD 20899

  • Contents

    • Background• Experiments• Results & Discussion

    – Grain size – Defect (Hillock) density– Microstructure: SEM and FIB – Crystallographic: XRD

    • Summary

    2

  • Relation of Electrodeposit Microstructures to Deposition Conditions

    • Grain sizes will be finer when;– higher current density– higher polarization (voltage) – more additives– less metal ion concentration – lower temperature– slower rotating speed

    • Equiaxed grains grow to relatively larger sizes than columnar grains do.

    • Dendritic-type grains result from mass-transport-controlled growth

    3

  • Objectives

    • Investigating the effect of deposition current density on deposit structures– on the competition between nucleation

    rate and deposit growth rate– potential operating mechanism to reduce

    the deposit strain energy– finer, equiaxed, and random oriented

    grain

    4

  • 5

    Electrodeposition

    • Cu substrate• 99.999% Sn sheet anode• 200 rpm rotating cathode• Current density range: 30

    - 200 mA/cm2 @ 25 ºC• Commercial bright

    methanesulfonate (MSA) with D/I water (18.3 MΩ-cm)

  • Results

    6

  • 45

    55

    65

    75

    85

    95

    105

    0.01

    0.02

    0.03

    0.04

    0.05

    0.06

    0.07

    20 70 120 170 220

    Efficy (%)

    mg/cm^2 sec

    Effic

    y (%

    )

    mg/cm

    ^2 sec

    mA/cm^2

    Current Efficiency & Deposit Rate depending on the Current Density

    7

  • 0.25

    0.45

    0.65

    0.85

    1.05

    1.25

    1.45

    1.65

    1.85

    20 70 120 170 220

    mA/cm^2

    um

    Current Density vs. Grain Size

    8

  • Grain Shapes Depending on the Deposition Current Density

    9

    30 mA/cm2 60 mA/cm2 90 mA/cm2

    120 mA/cm2 150 mA/cm2 200 mA/cm2

  • Cross Section Microstructures: FIB

    10

    30 mA/cm2

    90 mA/cm2 200 mA/cm2

  • 0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    20 70 120 170 220

    mA/cm^2

    # /

    cm

    ^2

    Hillock Density Depending on Deposit Current Densities

    11

  • Hillocks Depending on the Deposition Current Density

    12

    30 mA/cm2 60 mA/cm2 90 mA/cm2

    120 mA/cm2 150 mA/cm2 200 mA/cm2

  • 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 001 011 021 031 041

    )ged( atehT-owT

    5k2

    0k5

    5k7

    Inte

    nsity

    (Cou

    nts)

    0

    XRD Results Depending on Deposition Current Densities

    13

  • 0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    30 60 90 120 150 180 210

    011121031112321420312013332123303323143532512

    PF

    Current Density

    Preference Factor Changed depending on the Deposition Current Density

    14

    PFhkl =Ihkl

    Ir,hkl1n

    ∑ IhklIr,hkl

  • Stereograph with Preference Factors of Sn Deposits

    15

    texture determined by EBSD

    slip plane closest packed

    plane

    twin basal plane

    • At low stress and long time, stress relief occurs by creep processes

    • At a high stress and short times, plastic deformation (slip /twinning) might be important for stress relief mechanisms

    • Changes of PF might correspond to the plastic deformation

  • Summary• The effect of deposition current density from 30 to 200

    mA /cm2 was investigated. • Below 90 mA/cm2, hillocks (a low aspect ratio variant of

    whiskers) were formed; however, above 90 mA/cm2, no surface defects were observed on the Sn electrodeposits.

    • As the current density increased;– the columnar grain diameter decreased, – above 90 mA/cm2, the plating efficiency dropped from

    99 % to 54 %, and the grain boundary shape changed from wavy to faceted.

    – the most preferred orientation was changed from Sn (332) to Sn (112)

    16